Archive for category: Writing Guides

NUR 350 Module Five Health Education Activity

The activity involves choosing a vulnerable population, assessing their needs, and planning, implementing, and evaluating a health education activity to address those needs.

You will need to review available data and demographics for your local area to choose a population to assess and diagnose their need. Then, you will plan, implement, and evaluate a health education activity that addresses their need.

Here is some general guidance on how to approach this health education activity based on the instructions and guidelines you have been provided by your instructor.

Health Education Activity Process Step: Assessment

In this section, you should summarize your assessment of the vulnerable elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh related to pressure ulcers. Consider factors such as demographics, health status, access to healthcare, and social support. Gather data from reliable sources such as government health reports, local health departments, and healthcare providers.

Health Education Activity Process Step: Diagnosis

Based on your assessment, identify the health needs of the chosen vulnerable population. A NANDA community nursing diagnosis related to pressure ulcers in the elderly population could be a “Risk for impaired skin integrity related to immobility, sensory deficit, and/or incontinence.” Support your diagnosis with evidence from your assessment.

Health Education Activity Process Step: Plan

Outline your plan for implementing a health education activity that will meet the needs of your chosen vulnerable population. Identify two SMART goals that your activity will achieve. For example, a SMART goal could be to increase knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention by 50% among elderly residents of Mary Manning Walsh within three months. Describe your plans to evaluate the achievement of these goals.

Health Education Activity Process Step: Implementation

Explain the process for implementing your health education activity. Describe what you did and how you did it. Provide details such as the type of activity, location, materials, and audience. Consider how you adapted your approach to meet the specific needs of the vulnerable elderly population.

Health Education Activity Process Step: Evaluation

Evaluate the success of your health education activity based on feedback from the audience. Describe how you collected feedback and what it revealed about the effectiveness of your activity. Did you achieve your SMART goals? Support your evaluation with evidence from your assessment and feedback.

Health Education Activity Process Step: Reflection

Reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of your approach to the health education activity. Consider what you would do differently in the future to improve health education opportunities for vulnerable populations. Identify areas where you excelled and areas where you could improve.

Health Education Activity Process Step: Log of Hours

Ensure that you have completed eight hours of clinical practice experience related to your health education activity. Fill out the log accurately and include all activities related to preparing for, implementing, and evaluating your health education activity.

Remember to follow the provided guidelines and rubric for this health education activity and complete all sections of the Health Education Activity Planner and Log worksheet. Good luck with your project!

We have also provided some written examples to guide you in writing your NUR 350 module five health education activity.

Check out another post by our paper writing experts aimed at assisting students on NUR 319 Nursing Assignment

NUR 350 Module Five Health Education Activity Example One

Process Step: Assessment

The vulnerable population chosen for this health education activity is the elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh. According to the demographic data available, the elderly population is increasing in this area, with an estimated 15% of the population being over the age of 65. Furthermore, a review of patient records revealed that pressure ulcers are a significant problem among this population. It was noted that most of these patients had limited mobility and required assistance with their daily activities. The majority of these patients also had chronic conditions, such as diabetes and heart disease, which increases the risk of developing pressure ulcers.

Process Step: Diagnosis

The NANDA community nursing diagnosis identified for this population is “Risk for impaired skin integrity related to immobility and chronic illness.” Evidence from patient records indicates that this population is at high risk for developing pressure ulcers due to their limited mobility and chronic conditions.

Process Step: Plan

The plan for implementing a health education activity for this vulnerable population includes two SMART goals:

• Increase knowledge and awareness of pressure ulcers and their prevention among the elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh by 50% within six months.
• Decrease the incidence of pressure ulcers among the elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh by 25% within six months.

To achieve these goals, the health education activity will include a presentation on the causes, prevention, and treatment of pressure ulcers. The presentation will be tailored to the elderly population and will include practical tips for preventing pressure ulcers, such as repositioning frequently and maintaining good nutrition. The effectiveness of the presentation will be evaluated through pre and post-surveys, and the incidence of pressure ulcers will be tracked through patient records.

Process Step: Implementation

The health education activity was implemented through a 30-minute presentation to the elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh. The presentation covered the causes and prevention of pressure ulcers, as well as practical tips for preventing them. Attendees were engaged through the use of visual aids and were encouraged to ask questions. The presentation was well-received, and attendees reported feeling more knowledgeable about pressure ulcers and their prevention.

Process Step: Evaluation

The success of the health education activity was evaluated based on feedback from the audience and the incidence of pressure ulcers among the population. Pre and post-surveys revealed a 60% increase in knowledge and awareness of pressure ulcers and their prevention. The incidence of pressure ulcers decreased by 30% within six months of the presentation. These results indicate that the SMART goals were achieved, and the health education activity was successful in reducing the incidence of pressure ulcers among the vulnerable population.

Process Step: Reflection

Looking back on the steps completed so far, it is evident that the approach taken was effective in achieving the goals of the health education activity. However, it is also clear that more time could have been spent tailoring the presentation to the specific needs of the audience. In future health education opportunities, more emphasis will be placed on customizing the presentation to meet the unique needs of the population. Additionally, more attention will be given to tracking the long-term impact of the presentation on the incidence of pressure ulcers among the population.

Process Step: Log of Hours

Preparing for the health education activity took approximately 4 hours, which included reviewing patient records and demographic data and developing the presentation. Implementing the health education activity took approximately 2 hours, which included delivering the presentation and collecting feedback from the audience. Evaluating the success of the health education activity took approximately 2 hours, which included analyzing survey results and tracking the incidence of pressure ulcers among the population. Overall, 8 hours were spent on this health education activity.

NUR 350 Module Five Health Education Activity Example Two

Process Step: Assessment

For this health education activity, the vulnerable population chosen is elderly individuals who reside at Mary Manning Walsh nursing home. A review of available data and demographics in the local area indicates that the elderly population is at risk of developing pressure ulcers due to their age, reduced mobility, and decreased skin integrity. Pressure ulcers are a common problem among the elderly population in nursing homes, and this can result in significant pain, discomfort, and increased healthcare costs. A review of the medical records of the patients at Mary Manning Walsh nursing home indicated that pressure ulcers are a significant health problem that requires urgent attention.

Process Step: Diagnosis

The health needs of the vulnerable elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh nursing home are pressure ulcer prevention and management. The NANDA community nursing diagnosis that will guide the health education activity is “Risk for impaired skin integrity related to immobility and reduced tissue perfusion as evidenced by the presence of pressure ulcers.” The evidence supporting this diagnosis is the high prevalence of pressure ulcers among the elderly population in nursing homes, as well as the risk factors associated with this condition.

Process Step: Plan

The plan for implementing a health education activity that will meet the needs of the vulnerable elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh nursing home includes the following SMART goals:

• By the end of the health education activity, 80% of the elderly residents at Mary Manning Walsh nursing home will be able to identify at least three risk factors associated with pressure ulcers.
• By the end of the health education activity, 70% of the elderly residents at Mary Manning Walsh nursing home will be able to demonstrate at least one self-care technique to prevent pressure ulcers.

To evaluate the achievement of these goals, a pre-and post-education survey will be conducted. The survey will assess the residents’ knowledge of pressure ulcers and their risk factors and self-care techniques before and after the health education activity.

Process Step: Implementation

The implementation process for the health education activity involved collaboration with the nursing staff at Mary Manning Walsh nursing home to identify the residents who would benefit from the education. The education session was conducted in the residents’ common area, and a PowerPoint presentation was used to educate them on the risk factors associated with pressure ulcers and self-care techniques to prevent them. The residents were also provided with handouts summarizing the key points of the education session.

Process Step: Evaluation

The success of the health education activity was evaluated based on feedback from the residents and the results of the pre-and post-education survey. The residents reported that the education session was informative, and they appreciated the opportunity to learn about pressure ulcer prevention. The pre-and post-education survey results showed a significant increase in the residents’ knowledge of pressure ulcer risk factors and self-care techniques, with 85% of residents being able to identify at least three risk factors and 75% being able to demonstrate at least one self-care technique. Therefore, the SMART goals were achieved.

Process Step: Reflection

Looking back at all the steps completed so far, I think the strengths of my approach were a collaboration with the nursing staff, the use of a PowerPoint presentation, and the pre-and post-education survey to evaluate the success of the activity. However, the weakness was that the education session was conducted in the residents’ common area, which may have led to distractions and reduced engagement. In future health education opportunities, I will ensure that the education sessions are conducted in a quieter environment to maximize resident engagement.

Process Step: Log of Hours

I spent eight hours preparing for, implementing, and evaluating the health education activity. The time was spent on research, collaboration with the nursing staff, development of the PowerPoint presentation and handouts, conducting the education session, and data collection for the pre-and post-education survey.

NUR 350 Module Five Health Education Activity Example Three

Process Step: Assessment

The vulnerable elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh is at risk for pressure ulcers due to factors such as immobility, sensory deficits, and incontinence. The majority of residents are over the age of 65 and have multiple chronic health conditions, including diabetes, heart disease, and dementia. Access to healthcare is limited, as many residents have mobility issues and rely on staff for transportation to appointments. Social support is also limited, as many residents do not have family or friends nearby and may feel isolated. Data from local health departments and healthcare providers indicate that pressure ulcers are a common issue among this population.

Process Step: Diagnosis

The health needs of the vulnerable elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh include preventing pressure ulcers and improving skin integrity. A NANDA community nursing diagnosis related to pressure ulcers in the elderly population could be a “Risk for impaired skin integrity related to immobility, sensory deficit, and/or incontinence.” This diagnosis is supported by evidence from the assessment, which identified the risk factors for pressure ulcers among this population.

Process Step: Plan

The plan for implementing a health education activity for the vulnerable elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh includes developing a presentation on pressure ulcer prevention and skin integrity. The two SMART goals for this activity are:

• Increase knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention by 50% among elderly residents of Mary Manning Walsh within three months
• Improve skin integrity by reducing the incidence of pressure ulcers by 20% within six months

Plans to evaluate the achievement of these goals include administering pre- and post-education surveys to assess knowledge and track the incidence of pressure ulcers over time.

Process Step: Implementation

The health education activity was implemented by developing a PowerPoint presentation on pressure ulcer prevention and skin integrity. The presentation was given to groups of residents at Mary Manning Walsh, as well as staff members who work closely with the vulnerable elderly population. The presentation included information on the causes of pressure ulcers, risk factors, prevention strategies, and how to maintain skin integrity. Handouts and posters were provided to reinforce the information presented. The presentation was adapted to meet the specific needs of the vulnerable elderly population, with larger font sizes and simplified language.

Process Step: Evaluation

The success of the health education activity was evaluated based on feedback from the audience. The pre-and post-education surveys showed a 60% increase in knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention among residents and staff members who attended the presentation. The incidence of pressure ulcers decreased by 15% within six months, which was close to the target goal of 20%. Overall, the SMART goals were achieved, indicating that the health education activity was successful in meeting the needs of the vulnerable elderly population.

Process Step: Reflection

The strengths of this approach to the health education activity include tailoring the presentation to meet the specific needs of the vulnerable elderly population, providing handouts and posters to reinforce the information presented, and tracking the incidence of pressure ulcers over time to evaluate the effectiveness of the activity. The weaknesses include limited access to healthcare and social support, which may have impacted the success of the activity. In the future, more emphasis could be placed on engaging family members and volunteers to provide social support and help with healthcare needs. The activity could also be expanded to include other health topics relevant to the vulnerable elderly population.

Process Step: Log of Hours

Date | Activity | Hours

• 02/10/2023 | Research and planning for health education activity | 2 hours
• 02/15/2023 | Developing PowerPoint presentation and handouts | 3 hours
• 02/18/2023 | Giving presentation to residents and staff members | 2 hours
• 02/20/2023 | Evaluating pre- and post-education surveys | 1 hour
• 02/25/2023 | Tracking incidence of pressure ulcers | 1 hour

Get Expert Writers to Work on Your NUR 350 Module Five Health Education Activity

ReliablePapers.com has hired nursing paper writers with a wealth of experience to write high-quality papers. These papers are written by nursing assignment help writers who are experts in nursing education.

Getting help from professional writers to write your health education activity can be beneficial in many ways.

Professional writers have more knowledge and experience, so they can give you high-quality content that is well-researched and written in a clear and concise way.

Nursing students can be sure that ReliablePapers.com will help them with their essays in the best way possible, on time, and at a price, they can afford.

You can get nursing term paper writing assistance with writing your papers from scratch or rewriting an existing paper.

If you require a reliable writing service, our experienced nursing paper writers are always available to assist you with any nursing coursework help.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

NURS 6053 IO004 Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment Example

NURS 6053 IO004 Module 4 Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment

NURS 6053 IO004 Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment Brief

Assignment Overview

This assignment guides you through a structured analysis of the work environment, with an emphasis on understanding the dynamics of workplace civility. By using the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory as a diagnostic tool, students will evaluate and interpret their workplace environment, focusing on areas that contribute to—or detract from—organizational health. The assignment further calls for a literature review to identify evidence-based strategies that can foster a more supportive, high-performing interprofessional team environment.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Understanding Assignment Objectives

The assignment has three core objectives:

• To assess workplace civility and its impact on organizational health.
• To review relevant literature to understand theories and concepts that address workplace civility and team cohesion.
• To apply evidence-based strategies for enhancing workplace culture and interprofessional teamwork.

The Student’s Role

Students will take on a reflective and analytical role, assessing the current environment of their workplace and identifying specific areas needing improvement. The assignment requires the application of both introspection and critical thinking to explore and understand workplace dynamics. Additionally, students must engage with relevant research to support their observations and recommended strategies.

Competencies Measured

The competencies measured in this assignment include:

• Assessment and Evaluation: Applying tools like the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to evaluate workplace civility and health.
• Literature Integration: Identifying theories and concepts from the literature that are relevant to workplace assessment findings.
• Strategic Recommendation: Using evidence-based strategies to recommend actionable steps to improve workplace dynamics and foster a more positive work environment.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS 6053 – Interprofessional Organizational and Systems Leadership Course:

NURS 6053 IO001 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Example

NURS 6053 IO001 Healthcare Environment Review of Current Healthcare Issues Discussion Assignment Example

NURS 6053 IO002 Professionalism Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Assignment Example

NURS 6053 IO002 Developing Organizational Policies and Practices Example

NURS 6053 IO003 Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies Example

NURS 6053 IO005 Change Implementation and Management Plan Assignment Example

NURS 6053 IO004 Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment Example

Introduction

The presence of a healthy workplace environment is pivotal in delivering safe, effective patient care. However, nursing environments often face challenges, such as workplace incivility, that affect team cohesion and patient outcomes. Workplace incivility, defined as repeated low-intensity adverse social behaviors, detracts from teamwork, respect, and communication. This assessment evaluates the health and civility of a workplace using the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory and explores interventions to address uncivil behaviors. It consists of three parts: a summary of the Work Environment Assessment, an analysis of relevant theories or concepts, and evidence-based strategies to build interprofessional teams.

Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)

Summary of Results – Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory

The Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory revealed a score of 83, indicating a moderately healthy workplace. This score reflects a shared vision and mission among team members grounded in respect, trust, and collaboration. Nurse leaders emphasize teamwork and patient-centered care, establishing a culture that supports evidence-based practice and safe patient outcomes.

Surprising Findings and Confirmation of Prior Beliefs

Two unexpected findings emerged from the assessment. First, while there is a moderate level of civility, covert incivility exists, especially among peers, manifesting as nonverbal cues and subtle disrespect during clinical rounds. Second, the lack of documentation for incivility incidents implies that many cases remain unaddressed. A belief that was confirmed is that the hospital leadership is committed to fostering a healthy workplace, as seen through efforts to involve team members in decision-making and provide competitive compensation.

Implications of Assessment Results

The results suggest that the workplace is moderately healthy but requires interventions to address unspoken tensions and maintain civility. Team dynamics and leadership practices are strong, yet the covert behaviors among colleagues necessitate improvements to foster transparency and mutual respect.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)

Selected Theory or Concept

The concept of cognitive rehearsal, as discussed in Clark (2015) and Clark (2019), forms the foundation for addressing incivility in nursing. Cognitive rehearsal, rooted in Bandura’s social learning theory, involves mentally practicing responses to difficult situations to develop composure and enhance communication. This technique empowers nurses to confront incivility with prepared responses, improving their ability to handle tense situations effectively.

Relevance to the Work Environment Assessment Results

Cognitive rehearsal is directly applicable to the observed workplace challenges, particularly the subtle peer-to-peer incivility that remains unreported. By incorporating cognitive rehearsal, nurses could practice handling incivility in constructive ways, which would mitigate anxiety and build confidence. This process can enable a shift toward open, respectful communication and foster a healthier environment.

Application of Cognitive Rehearsal to Improve Organizational Health

To implement cognitive rehearsal, nurse leaders could conduct role-playing exercises where staff practice responding to incivility. For example, during team meetings, leaders can demonstrate and model respectful responses to common challenges, promoting a culture where respectful discourse is the norm. By establishing structured cognitive rehearsal sessions, the organization can foster a proactive approach to managing incivility.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1-2 pages)

Recommended Strategies to Address Shortcomings

1. TeamSTEPPS Training: Implementing the Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) program provides structured communication and teamwork training, improving team cohesion and civility. TeamSTEPPS emphasizes clarity, empathy, and respect, which can help reduce miscommunication and interpersonal conflicts in high-stress scenarios.
2. Transformational Leadership Development: Leaders should adopt transformational leadership practices, which inspire teamwork, encourage shared governance, and motivate team members to exceed personal and professional expectations. Training nurse leaders in transformational leadership will empower them to foster an environment that discourages incivility, sets a standard for behavior, and supports team members in managing stress.

Strategies to Bolster Successful Practices

1. Ongoing Cognitive Rehearsal Training: Continuing cognitive rehearsal sessions, as well as refresher courses, could reinforce respectful communication. By practicing responses to incivility regularly, nurses can build resilience and reinforce the desired behaviors within the workplace culture.
2. Implementing the DESC Model: The DESC model (Describe, Express, Specify, and Consequences) could be introduced as a communication tool. This model teaches staff to express concerns without disrespecting others, promoting honest dialogue while preventing conflicts from escalating. Regular training sessions on DESC can solidify effective communication techniques and foster a more civil environment.

Conclusion

The Work Environment Assessment highlighted the importance of addressing covert incivility to strengthen the workplace. Drawing on cognitive rehearsal and evidence-based communication strategies, this assignment proposed solutions for a healthier workplace culture. By implementing TeamSTEPPS, transformational leadership, and DESC communication practices, the organization can reduce incivility, promote teamwork, and ultimately improve patient care quality.

References

Abdollahzadeh, F., Asghari, E., Ebrahimi, H., Rahmani, A., & Vahidi, M. (2017). How to prevent workplace incivility? Nurses’ perspective. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 22(2), 157–163.

AHRQ. (n.d.). About TeamSTEPPS®. https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/index.html

Armstrong, N. (2018). Management of nursing workplace incivility in healthcare settings: A systematic review. Workplace Health and Safety, 66(8), 403–410.

Bambi, S., Foà, C., De Felippis, C., Lucchini, A., Guazzini, A., & Rasero, L. (2018). Workplace incivility, lateral violence, and bullying among nurses: A review of their prevalence and related factors. Acta Biomedica, 89(6), 51–79.

Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18–23.

Clark, C. M. (2019). Combining cognitive rehearsal, simulation, and evidence-based scripting to address incivility. Nurse Educator, 44(2), 64–68.

Eggenberger, B. T., Sherman, R. O., & Keller, K. (2019). Creating high-performance interprofessional teams leading the way. American Nurse Today, 9(11), 12–14.

Kousha, S., Shahrami, A., Forouzanfar, M. M., Sanaie, N., Atashzadeh-Shoorideh, F., & Skerrett, V. (2022). Effectiveness of educational intervention and cognitive rehearsal on perceived incivility among emergency nurses: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Nursing, 21(1), 1–9.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS 6053 IO004 Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment

Description

Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.

In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.

To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
• Review the Work Environment Assessment Template.
• Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
• Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
  • Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
  • Clark (2018)
  • Clark (2015)
  • Griffin and Clark (2014)

The Assignment (3-6 pages total):

Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)

• Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
• Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
• Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
• Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)

• Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
• Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
• Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)

• Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
• Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

By Day 7 of Week 9

Submit your Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

• Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
• Click the Week 9 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
• Click the Week 9 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
• Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
• If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.

Required Readings

Marshall, E., & Broome, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

• Chapter 5, “Collaborative Leadership Contexts: Networks, Communication, Decision Making, and Motivation” (pp. 121–144)
• Chapter 9, “Creating and Shaping the Organizational Environment and Culture to Support Practice Excellence” (pp. 247–278)
• Chapter 10, “Building Cohesive and Effective Teams” (pp. 279–298)

Select at least ONE of the following:

Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., & Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practice: Nurse leader perspectives. Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324–330. doi:10.1097/NNA.0b013e31822509c4

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Clark, C. M. (2018). Combining cognitive rehearsal, simulation, and evidence-based scripting to address incivility. Nurse Educator. doi:10.1097/NNE.0000000000000563

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18–23. Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdf

Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years later. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535–542. doi:10.3928/00220124-20141122-02

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Document: Work Environment Assessment Template (Word document)

Work Environment Assessment  Template

Use this document to complete the Module 4 Workplace Environment Assessment.

Summary of Results – Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory 

Identify two things that surprised   you about the results. Also identify one idea that you believed prior to   conducting the Assessment that was confirmed. 

What do the results of the Assessment   suggest about the health and civility of your workplace?

Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the   article(s) you selected. 

Explain how the theory or concept   presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment   Assessment.

Explain how your organization   could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve   organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide   examples.

General Notes/Comments

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.

How We Can Assist You

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

• Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
• Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
• Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
• Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at ReliablePapers.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust ReliablePapers.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

NURS 6053 IO002 Developing Organizational Policies and Practices Example

Assignment: Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

NURS 6053 IO002: Developing Organizational Policies and Practices Assignment Brief

Assignment Instructions Overview:

This assignment centers on examining and addressing organizational policies and practices that influence the handling of healthcare issues and stressors. Within healthcare, competing needs arise as organizations work to meet patient care standards, support workforce demands, and manage resources effectively. Through this assignment, students will explore these needs, focusing on how leaders can create balanced policies that promote ethical practices while addressing various organizational and patient care challenges.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

The key objectives are to:

• Identify and describe two or more competing needs that impact a chosen healthcare issue or stressor.
• Critique an existing organizational policy or practice for its influence on the selected issue, including its ethical strengths and limitations.
• Recommend improvements or alternatives in policy or practice that better balance competing needs, ensuring ethical considerations are fully integrated into proposed solutions.
• Reference and incorporate evidence-based resources that support proposed policy changes, demonstrating an understanding of current practices and challenges in healthcare.

The Student’s Role:

Students will act as policy advocates and analysts, critically evaluating their chosen healthcare issue and identifying how organizational policies address or overlook ethical and operational challenges. In developing their white paper, students are expected to propose policies or practices that balance patient care demands, workforce well-being, and resource constraints. This role requires a thorough understanding of both ethical practices and practical solutions that can be applied to mitigate healthcare stressors.

Competencies Measured:

This assignment measures competencies in the following areas:

• Professionalism (IO002): The ability to assess and promote ethical practices within healthcare organizations.
• Policy Analysis and Development: Skill in analyzing current policies, identifying gaps, and creating recommendations that address multiple competing needs effectively.
• Ethical Reasoning: Competence in critiquing organizational practices through an ethical lens and providing balanced solutions that prioritize patient care and workforce support.
• Evidence-Based Practice: Using scholarly research to back policy recommendations, demonstrating familiarity with current evidence-based healthcare management practices.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS 6053 – Interprofessional Organizational and Systems Leadership Course:

NURS 6053 IO001 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Example

NURS 6053 IO001 Healthcare Environment Review of Current Healthcare Issues Discussion Assignment Example

NURS 6053 IO002 Professionalism Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Assignment Example

NURS 6053 IO003 Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies Example

NURS 6053 IO004 Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment Example

NURS 6053 IO005 Change Implementation and Management Plan Assignment Example

NURS 6053 IO002 Developing Organizational Policies and Practices Assignment Example

Introduction

Competing needs in healthcare organizations often create challenges that impact patient care, workforce satisfaction, and organizational efficiency. This paper addresses the organizational policies and practices surrounding a primary healthcare stressor, focusing on inadequate risk assessment and health promotion. These issues underscore the need for effective policies that align patient safety with resource management while promoting ethical standards in healthcare. By identifying specific competing needs, analyzing existing policies, and recommending changes to balance these competing needs, healthcare organizations can improve outcomes and foster an ethical work environment.

Identifying and Describing Competing Needs

The healthcare stressor examined in this paper is the strain on primary care, often due to high patient demand, insufficient workforce, and limitations in health promotion activities. Two major competing needs impacting this stressor are poor risk assessment procedures and inadequate health promotion. Risk assessment procedures are crucial for identifying potential health risks among patients and establishing preventive measures. However, without efficient risk assessment tools, healthcare providers may miss critical warning signs, leading to adverse outcomes. Likewise, health promotion efforts are essential for educating patients about preventive care, yet limited resources and competing priorities often restrict the focus on health promotion, thereby impeding preventive care strategies.

According to Kilbourne et al. (2018), risk assessments and screening procedures significantly affect patient outcomes by identifying at-risk individuals and suggesting preventive measures. When these practices are inadequate, patients may face increased risks for preventable illnesses. Additionally, health promotion efforts aim to reduce health inequities and empower patients to make informed health choices. Shahid et al. (2019) highlight that effective health promotion can enhance quality of life and support long-term wellness goals. However, when organizational resources are restricted, health promotion initiatives may be deprioritized, limiting patients’ access to essential information.

Relevant Policy and Ethical Critique

One existing policy within the organization is focused on reducing healthcare expenditures to manage operational costs. While this policy supports organizational financial health, it poses ethical concerns related to patient safety and workforce stability. For instance, budget cuts often translate into staffing reductions, which can directly impact patient care quality. Kilbourne et al. (2018) argue that prioritizing cost reduction over essential resources can exacerbate healthcare stressors by placing additional burdens on existing staff and reducing patient services.

The policy’s strength lies in its potential to provide a financial cushion during emergencies, such as public health crises. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, organizations with flexible budgets could better allocate resources to manage patient surges (Adams et al., 2019). However, the ethical challenge here is balancing cost-cutting with the organization’s duty to provide safe and adequate patient care. Reductions in the nursing workforce, for instance, may lead to burnout, higher turnover rates, and lower quality of patient care, all of which compromise ethical standards in healthcare delivery.

Policy Recommendations for Balancing Competing Needs

To address these ethical shortcomings and balance competing needs, the organization should consider implementing the following policy and practice changes:

Adoption of Advanced Health Technology for Risk Assessment

Introducing digital health technologies, such as AI-driven risk assessment tools, can enhance the accuracy and efficiency of screening procedures. This approach would allow healthcare providers to better identify high-risk patients and intervene early, thereby improving patient outcomes and supporting health promotion. Partnering with software developers and pharmaceutical companies could further facilitate the integration of advanced risk assessment systems, as recommended by Shahid et al. (2019). For example, AI-enabled predictive tools can reduce diagnostic errors, enabling clinicians to make more informed decisions and minimize medical negligence.

Establishing a Dedicated Health Promotion Program

Creating a dedicated health promotion initiative within the organization could support patients in adopting preventive health measures, addressing one of the primary competing needs. This program would focus on educating patients about lifestyle modifications, disease prevention, and self-management strategies. Evidence from Adams et al. (2019) suggests that effective health promotion programs not only improve individual health outcomes but also reduce overall healthcare costs by preventing chronic illnesses. To balance resource allocation, the organization could reallocate funds from non-essential areas to support this initiative, thereby reinforcing its commitment to patient-centered care.

Implementing Workforce Retention and Support Policies

To mitigate the ethical and operational impacts of workforce reductions, the organization should establish workforce retention policies, such as offering flexible schedules, professional development opportunities, and mental health resources. Investing in workforce well-being is critical, as staff turnover can adversely affect patient care and exacerbate workforce shortages. Evidence suggests that retention policies improve employee satisfaction and reduce turnover rates, ultimately benefiting both patients and the organization (Kilbourne et al., 2018). Providing adequate support for healthcare workers aligns with ethical standards by prioritizing the well-being of employees and patients alike.

Developing Ethical Guidelines for Cost-Reduction Measures

Finally, the organization should establish ethical guidelines to ensure that cost-reduction strategies do not compromise patient care or workforce satisfaction. These guidelines could include criteria for determining which areas are appropriate for cost-cutting and require that essential services and staffing levels remain protected. Ethical guidelines would support transparency in decision-making and reinforce the organization’s commitment to ethical healthcare practices, even in financially challenging situations.

Conclusion

Healthcare organizations face numerous challenges as they attempt to balance the competing needs of patients, staff, and resources. The adoption of advanced technology, the development of targeted health promotion programs, workforce support policies, and ethical cost-reduction guidelines can help address these challenges effectively. By implementing these policy recommendations, the organization can better align its practices with ethical standards, enhance patient care quality, and create a more sustainable work environment for healthcare providers. This approach not only addresses the immediate strain on primary care but also establishes a foundation for long-term organizational resilience and ethical healthcare delivery.

References

Adams, A., Hollingsworth, A., & Osman, A. (2019). The implementation of a cultural change toolkit to reduce nursing burnout and mitigate nurse turnover in the emergency department. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 45(4), 452-456.

Kilbourne, A. M., Beck, K., Spaeth-Rublee, B., Ramanuj, P., O’Brien, R. W., Tomoyasu, N., & Pincus, H. A. (2018). Measuring and improving the quality of mental health care: A global perspective. World Psychiatry, 17(1), 30-38.

Shahid, N., Rappon, T., & Berta, W. (2019). Applications of artificial neural networks in healthcare organizational decision-making: A scoping review. PLoS ONE, 14(2), 125-132.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS 6053 IO002 Developing Organizational Policies and Practices Assignment

Description

• IO002 Professionalism
  • Assess organizational policies and the promotion of ethical practice in addressing healthcare issues/stressors.

Assignment: Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

Competing needs arise within any organization as employees seek to meet their targets and leaders seek to meet company goals. As a leader, successful management of these goals requires establishing priorities and allocating resources accordingly.

Within a healthcare setting, the needs of the workforce, resources, and patients are often in conflict. Mandatory overtime, implementation of staffing ratios, use of unlicensed assisting personnel, and employer reductions of education benefits are examples of practices that might lead to conflicting needs in practice.

Leaders can contribute to both the problem and the solution through policies, action, and inaction. In this Assignment, you will further develop the white paper you began work on in Module 1 by addressing competing needs within your organization.

To Prepare:

• Review the national healthcare issue/stressor you examined in your Assignment for Module 1, and review the analysis of the healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
• Identify and review two evidence-based scholarly resources that focus on proposed policies/practices to apply to your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
• Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post regarding competing needs.

The Assignment (4-5 pages):

Developing Organizational Policies and Practices

Add a section to the paper you submitted in Module 1. The new section should address the following:

• Identify and describe at least two competing needs impacting your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
• Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization that may influence your selected healthcare issue/stressor.
• Critique the policy for ethical considerations, and explain the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.
• Recommend one or more policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients, while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. Be specific and provide examples.
• Cite evidence that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and/or the policies, and provide two scholarly resources in support of your policy or practice recommendations.

 By Day 7 of Week 3

Submit your revised paper.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

• Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
• Click the Week 3 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
• Click the Week 3 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
• Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
• If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
• Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:

Week 3 Assignment Rubric

 Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity

To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:

Submit your Week 3 Assignment draft and review the originality report.

 Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3

To submit your Assignment:

Week 3 Assignment

NURS_6053_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric

Add a section to the paper you submitted in Module 1. In 4–5 pages, address the following:

·   Identify and describe at least two competing needs impacting your selected healthcare issue/stressor.–

Excellent 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

Good 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

Fair 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

Poor 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

• Describe a relevant policy or practice in your organization that may influence your selected healthcare issue/stressor.·   Critique the policy for ethical considerations and explain the policy’s strengths and challenges in promoting ethics.–

Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

• Recommend one or more policy or practice changes designed to balance the competing needs of resources, workers, and patients while addressing any ethical shortcomings of the existing policies. Be specific and provide examples.·   Cite evidence that informs the healthcare issue/stressor and/or the policies and provide two scholarly resources in support of your policy or practice recommendations.–

Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.

How We Can Assist You

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

• Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
• Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
• Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
• Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at ReliablePapers.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust ReliablePapers.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

NURS 6052/5052 EB006 Disseminating Evidenced Based Practice Changes Example

EB006 Disseminating Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Changes Assignment

NURS 6052/5052 EB006 Disseminating Evidence Based Practice Changes Assignment Brief

Assignment Instructions Overview:

In this assignment, students will create a 10- to 13-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation to analyze effective strategies for disseminating evidence-based practice (EBP) changes within their healthcare organization. This task emphasizes clear communication of EBP changes, tailored dissemination strategies, and addresses potential challenges to ensure successful adoption. The submission must be named following the format “EB006_presentation_firstinitial_lastname” and should meet all criteria provided in the rubric. The completed presentation will be uploaded through the Assessment tab, with an option to use Turnitin Draft Check to confirm originality.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

This assignment aims to develop students’ skills in identifying and communicating effective dissemination strategies for EBP changes. Students will analyze various strategies to share EBP changes with healthcare colleagues and stakeholders, enhancing their understanding of how to advocate for and implement best practices. The task focuses on not only selecting appropriate dissemination strategies but also critically evaluating their effectiveness and feasibility in a real-world organizational context.

The Student’s Role:

Students will take on the role of a clinical professional aiming to implement an EBP change within their healthcare organization. They will select a clinical issue of interest relevant to their setting, propose an evidence-based practice change, and design a strategic plan to communicate this change effectively to their team. As part of this role, students will identify barriers to dissemination, critically analyze dissemination strategies, and develop solutions to overcome these obstacles.

Competencies Measured:

This assessment evaluates key competencies in disseminating EBP changes within healthcare settings. These include the ability to:

• Identify and communicate clinical issues that are conducive to evidence-based improvements.
• Design strategic dissemination plans to promote EBP adoption.
• Critically evaluate and select effective communication strategies for sharing EBP changes.
• Identify and propose solutions to barriers to EBP dissemination.
• Engage in reflective practices that support ongoing professional development, making this task an essential component of the course’s Portfolio Assessment and the Capstone course.

You can also read other assignment examples for the NURS 5052 – Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice Course below:

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice Discussion Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB002 Identifying Research Methodologies Evidence-Based Project Assignment Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB003 Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Evidence-Based Project Assignment Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB004 Critical Appraisal Evaluation Summary and Synthesis of Evidence Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB005 Evidence Based Decision Making Presentation Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB006 Disseminating Evidenced Based Practice Changes Example

Slide 1: Title Slide

Title: Disseminating Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Changes: Reducing Hospital Readmissions for Heart Failure Patients

Subtitle: [Your Course Name and Code]

Your Name:

Date:

Narration:

“Hello, everyone. Today, I will be presenting a dissemination strategy to implement an evidence-based practice change to address the high rate of hospital readmissions for heart failure patients. This EBP change focuses on improving discharge education to support self-management and reduce preventable readmissions.”

Slide 2: Introduction to EBP and Its Importance in Healthcare

Content:

• Overview of EBP as a cornerstone in improving healthcare quality and patient outcomes (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).
• Importance of EBP dissemination in translating research into practice effectively (Dang & Dearholt, 2017).

Narration:

“Evidence-based practice is essential in healthcare because it combines clinical expertise, research evidence, and patient preferences to enhance patient care outcomes. Effective dissemination ensures that research-backed interventions, like improved discharge education, are adopted widely, leading to high-quality, standardized care.”

Slide 3: Clinical Issue of Interest

Title: Clinical Issue: High Readmission Rates for Heart Failure Patients

Content:

• Heart failure is a leading cause of hospital readmissions, with nearly 25% of patients readmitted within 30 days (Benjamin et al., 2019).
• Impact of high readmissions on healthcare costs and patient quality of life (CDC, 2022).

Narration:

“The clinical issue of interest is the high readmission rate among heart failure patients. Studies show that nearly 25% of these patients are readmitted within 30 days. Readmissions significantly burden healthcare costs and expose patients to additional health risks. This issue is highly conducive to evidence-based change, as effective discharge education can empower patients to manage their conditions better.”

Slide 4: Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

Title: Recommended EBP Change: Discharge Education Program

Content:

• Discharge education program covering medication management, diet, symptom monitoring, and follow-up care (Naylor et al., 2017).
• Evidence showing a 30% reduction in readmissions with improved discharge education (Koelling et al., 2017).

Narration:

“I recommend implementing a structured discharge education program for heart failure patients, addressing key areas such as medication management, diet and fluid restrictions, symptom monitoring, and the importance of follow-up care. Studies indicate that well-structured discharge education can reduce readmission rates by up to 30%, as patients gain the knowledge and skills needed to manage their health effectively.”

Slide 5: Strategy 1 – Organizational Meetings

Title: Dissemination Strategy 1: Organizational Meetings

Content:

• Led by senior leaders, these meetings emphasize the importance of the EBP change (Melnyk et al., 2017).
• Allows for open dialogue, enabling staff to ask questions and voice concerns.

Narration:

“The first recommended dissemination strategy is conducting organizational meetings led by senior leaders. These meetings serve as a platform to communicate the importance of the EBP change. They also provide an opportunity for staff to ask questions, ensuring everyone understands the change and feels involved in the implementation process.”

Slide 6: Strategy 2 – Peer-to-Peer Training Workshops

Title: Dissemination Strategy 2: Peer-to-Peer Training Workshops

Content:

• Interactive workshops led by experienced nurses to train colleagues on discharge education methods.
• Encourages collaboration, enhancing the retention of new practices (Dang & Dearholt, 2017).

Narration:

“Peer-to-peer training workshops are the second recommended strategy. These workshops are interactive sessions where experienced nurses train their colleagues on delivering effective discharge education. This method promotes collaboration and improves retention of the new practices, as staff feel more engaged and confident in applying the changes.”

Slide 7: Less Preferred Strategy – Email Communication

Title: Less Preferred Strategy: Email Communication

Content:

• Often ignored or skimmed, leading to low engagement (Shah et al., 2020).
• Does not provide an interactive platform for discussion.

Narration:

“One of the less recommended strategies is disseminating the information through email communication. Although it is quick and easy, emails are often ignored or only briefly read, which can lead to a lack of understanding and engagement. Additionally, emails do not allow for the interactive discussion needed for complex EBP changes.”

Slide 8: Less Preferred Strategy – Intranet Posts

Title: Less Preferred Strategy: Intranet Posts

Content:

• Limited reach, as many staff members do not regularly check the intranet (AHA, 2021).
• Does not foster engagement or discussion.

Narration:

“Posting information on the intranet is another less effective dissemination strategy, as many staff members do not consistently check the intranet for updates. Without interactive engagement, this method may fail to communicate the change’s significance and the practical steps needed for successful implementation.”

Slide 9: Potential Barriers to Preferred Strategies

Title: Barriers to Dissemination

Content:

• Time Constraints: Staff may not have time to attend meetings or workshops (Naylor et al., 2017).
• Resource Limitations: Limited funding for additional training resources (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).

Narration:

“While organizational meetings and peer-to-peer workshops are effective, they come with challenges. Time constraints prevent staff from attending due to their workload, and resource limitations might hinder access to necessary training materials and facilitators.”

Slide 10: Overcoming Time Constraints

Title: Overcoming Barrier 1: Time Constraints

Content:

• Offer flexible scheduling or recorded sessions for staff on different shifts.
• Encourage cross-departmental collaboration to streamline meeting times.

Narration:

“To overcome time constraints, meetings and workshops could be offered at multiple times to accommodate various shifts. Additionally, recording sessions allows staff to access training on their own schedule, making it more feasible for everyone to participate.”

Slide 11: Overcoming Resource Limitations

Title: Overcoming Barrier 2: Resource Limitations

Content:

• Secure leadership support by presenting data on the cost-effectiveness of the program.
• Seek grants or budget reallocations to support the training program.

Narration:

“Resource limitations can be addressed by presenting the financial benefits of reducing readmissions to hospital leadership. Additionally, grants and budget reallocation options can provide funding for necessary resources, ensuring effective dissemination and training.”

Slide 12: Expected Outcomes and Impact

Title: Anticipated Outcomes of EBP Change

Content:

• Reduced readmissions for heart failure patients by 20-30% (Koelling et al., 2017).
• Improved patient satisfaction and empowerment through education (Shah et al., 2020).

Narration:

“The anticipated outcomes of implementing this discharge education program include a 20-30% reduction in heart failure readmissions, as shown in multiple studies. Additionally, patients will feel more empowered and satisfied with their care as they gain a better understanding of managing their condition.”

Slide 13: Conclusion

Title: Conclusion

Content:

• Recap of the importance of EBP dissemination in improving patient outcomes.
• Call to action for organization-wide support in adopting the discharge education program.

Narration:

“In conclusion, effective dissemination of this EBP change is essential for reducing readmission rates and enhancing patient outcomes. By using targeted strategies, we can ensure that all staff are well-prepared to implement these changes, ultimately leading to better care for our patients. Thank you for your attention, and I encourage everyone to support this program’s adoption.”

Slide 14: References

Title: References

American Heart Association. (2021). Managing heart failure. Retrieved from https://www.heart.org/

Benjamin, E. J., Muntner, P., et al. (2019). Heart disease and stroke statistics—2019 update. Circulation, 139(10), e56-e528.

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS 6052/5052 EB006 Disseminating Evidenced Based Practice Changes Assignment

Description

Overview

For this Performance Task Assessment, you will create a narrated PowerPoint presentation in which you analyze dissemination strategies to best communicate evidence-based practice changes to your organization.

Submission Length: A 10- to 13-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation.

Your response to this Assessment should:

• Reflect the criteria provided in the rubric.
• Adhere to the required assignment length.

This Assessment requires submission of one (1) file, a narrated PowerPoint presentation. Save your file as EB006_presentation_firstinitial_lastname (for example, EB006_presentation_J_Smith).

You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu.

Note: For students in Nursing Education, Executive Nursing, or Nursing Informatics, this Assessment is a Portfolio Assessment in your program. You will have one Portfolio Assessment in each of your courses. You will need to save these Assessments for inclusion in your portfolio that you will submit in your Capstone course.

Instructions

Access the following to complete this Assessment:

To complete this Assessment:

• Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change.
  Identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of an evidence-based change. (Note: You are required to focus on the same clinical issue of interest in the competencies EB002–EB006.)
• Create a 10- to 13-slide (total for all topics) narrated PowerPoint presentation in which you address the following:
• Explain the clinical issue of interest that is most conducive to an evidence-based practice change in your healthcare organization. (1–2 slides)
• Describe the evidence-based practice change that you would recommend implementing to address the clinical issue of interest that you selected. Be specific and provide examples. (2–3 slides)
• Compare at least two dissemination strategies that you might recommend to communicate evidence-based practice changes to your organization, and explain why. (2 slides)
• Compare at least two dissemination strategies that you would be least inclined to recommend to communicate evidence-based practice changes to your organization, and explain why. (2 slides)
• Identify at least two barriers that you might encounter when using the dissemination strategies that you are most inclined to use. (1 slide)
• Explain how you might overcome the barriers that you identified. Be specific and provide examples. (2–3 slides

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

• Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
• Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
• Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
• Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
• Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
• Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!