NURS FPX 6212 Planning for Change a Leaders Vision Presentation Example

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 4 Planning for Change: A Leader’s VisionNURS FPX 6212 Assessment 4 Planning for Change: A Leader’s Vision

NURS FPX 6212 Planning for Change a Leaders Vision Presentation Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 6212 Health Care Quality and Safety Management

Assignment Title: Assessment 4 Planning for Change: A Leader’s Vision

Assignment Overview

The purpose of this assignment is to create a compelling presentation, consisting of 12–15 slides, aimed at administrative leaders and stakeholders within your organization. The presentation will outline your plan to develop or enhance a culture of quality and safety within the organization or practice setting. As a nurse leader, effective communication with diverse stakeholders is essential, and delivering persuasive presentations is a crucial skill for driving organizational change and improvement initiatives.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

This assignment focuses on demonstrating proficiency in several course competencies, including analyzing quality and safety outcomes, identifying organizational functions affecting quality and safety, explaining steps for achieving improved outcomes, creating a future vision for organizational culture, and communicating persuasively with stakeholders.

The Student’s Role

In this assignment, you will take on the role of a nurse leader tasked with developing and presenting a plan to cultivate a culture of quality and safety within your organization. It is essential to maintain a general focus without specific references to names, populations, or diseases to ensure broad applicability and relevance. The goal is to effectively communicate the proposed plan and garner support from administrative leaders and stakeholders.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments:

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 1 Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Example

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 2 Executive Summary Example

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 3 Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities Example

NURS FPX 6212 Planning for Change a Leaders Vision Presentation Example

Slide 1: Introduction

The inaugural slide serves as a preamble to the presentation, setting the stage for an exploration of critical factors influencing quality and safety within healthcare organizations. It underscores the intrinsic link between organizational functions and patient outcomes, laying the foundation for subsequent discussions on strategic imperatives and improvement initiatives (Lu et al., 2022).

Speaker Notes:

Good [morning/afternoon/evening], esteemed colleagues. Welcome to today’s presentation, where we delve into the pivotal nexus between organizational functions and the delivery of high-quality, safe healthcare. Over the next few slides, we’ll dissect key elements shaping patient outcomes and delineate strategies for enhancing organizational performance in this realm (Lu et al., 2022).

Slide 2: Objectives

This slide articulates the primary objectives guiding the presentation, encapsulating the overarching goals and intended outcomes. By elucidating these objectives upfront, the audience gains clarity on the scope and direction of the discourse, fostering engagement and alignment with the core themes under examination (Jankelová & Joniaková, 2021).

Speaker Notes:

Our presentation is anchored by a set of clear objectives aimed at delineating the critical interplay between organizational functions and healthcare quality and safety. Through our discourse, we seek to elucidate prevailing challenges, highlight strategic imperatives, and chart a path toward sustainable improvement. By aligning our efforts with these objectives, we aim to foster a shared understanding and commitment to advancing patient care standards within our organization (Jankelová & Joniaková, 2021).

Slide 3: Key Aspects of the Plan

This slide provides a succinct overview of the critical components comprising the organizational plan aimed at fostering a culture of quality and safety. It delineates key strategies such as preoperative care enhancement, interdisciplinary collaboration, and infection control protocols, all aimed at mitigating surgical risks and enhancing patient outcomes (Purba et al., 2020).

Speaker Notes:

Central to our organizational strategy is a multifaceted plan designed to fortify our culture of quality and safety. By prioritizing preoperative care optimization, fostering collaboration among diverse healthcare disciplines, and implementing rigorous infection control measures, we aim to mitigate surgical risks and elevate patient care standards (Purba et al., 2020).

Slide 4: Organizational Functions, Processes, and Behaviors

This slide delineates the pivotal organizational functions, processes, and behaviors influencing healthcare quality and safety outcomes. It underscores the imperative of effective communication, adherence to hygiene protocols, and fostering a culture of accountability to mitigate risks and enhance patient care delivery (Dencker et al., 2021).

Speaker Notes:

Our organization’s performance in quality and safety hinges upon the effective orchestration of key functions, processes, and behaviors. By prioritizing robust communication channels, stringent adherence to hygiene standards, and fostering a culture of accountability, we aim to mitigate risks and optimize patient care outcomes (Dencker et al., 2021).

Slide 5: Current Outcome Measures

This slide delineates the existing outcome measures utilized to assess healthcare quality and safety within the organization. It underscores the significance of metrics such as surgical site infection rates, readmission rates, and patient satisfaction scores in gauging performance and driving improvement initiatives (Braun et al., 2020).

Speaker Notes:

Our organization relies on a set of robust outcome measures to gauge our performance in delivering quality healthcare. From surgical site infection rates to readmission metrics and patient satisfaction scores, these indicators provide invaluable insights into our performance and serve as catalysts for continuous improvement (Braun et al., 2020).

Slide 6: Steps to Achieving Improved Outcomes

This slide delineates the iterative steps comprising the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) framework aimed at achieving improved healthcare outcomes. It underscores the cyclical nature of the process, encompassing planning, implementation, evaluation, and refinement to drive sustainable improvement (Stoffels et al., 2021).

Speaker Notes:

Our journey towards improved healthcare outcomes is guided by the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) framework, a structured approach to iterative improvement. From meticulous planning and implementation to rigorous evaluation and refinement, each step in the process is crucial to driving sustainable change and optimizing patient care standards (Stoffels et al., 2021).

Slide 7: Assumptions of the Plan

This slide outlines the fundamental assumptions underpinning the organizational improvement plan. It underscores the importance of accurate baseline data, active staff participation, effective leadership, and patient-centricity in driving successful implementation and achieving desired outcomes (Upadhyay et al., 2019).

Speaker Notes:

Our improvement plan operates on several foundational assumptions that are critical to its success. These include the availability of accurate baseline data, active engagement and commitment from staff members, effective leadership support, and a steadfast focus on patient-centered care. These assumptions serve as cornerstones in guiding our journey towards enhanced healthcare quality and safety (Upadhyay et al., 2019).

Slide 8: Monitoring and Evaluation Strategies

This slide delineates the monitoring and evaluation strategies integral to assessing the effectiveness of the improvement plan. It emphasizes the utilization of key performance indicators, regular data review processes, and stakeholder feedback mechanisms to track progress, identify areas for refinement, and drive sustained improvement efforts (Viswanath et al., 2019).

Speaker Notes:

Central to our improvement plan is a robust framework for monitoring and evaluation. Through the systematic tracking of key performance indicators, regular data review processes, and solicitation of stakeholder feedback, we aim to continuously assess our progress, identify areas for improvement, and refine our strategies to drive sustained enhancements in healthcare quality and safety (Viswanath et al., 2019).

Slide 9: Challenges and Contingency Plans

This slide highlights potential challenges and corresponding contingency plans integral to the success of the improvement initiative. It underscores the importance of proactive risk mitigation strategies, adaptive leadership, and organizational resilience in addressing unforeseen obstacles and sustaining momentum towards achieving desired outcomes (Jankelová & Joniaková, 2021).

Speaker Notes:

While our improvement plan holds great promise, we recognize the presence of potential challenges that may impede progress. As such, we have developed comprehensive contingency plans aimed at proactive risk mitigation and adaptive response. By fostering organizational resilience, embracing adaptive leadership, and maintaining flexibility, we aim to overcome obstacles and sustain momentum towards realizing our quality and safety goals (Jankelová & Joniaková, 2021).

Slide 10: Resource Allocation and Budgeting

This slide delineates the resource allocation and budgeting strategies essential to support the implementation of the improvement plan. It underscores the importance of prudent financial planning, resource optimization, and alignment of budgetary allocations with organizational priorities to ensure sustainability and effectiveness (Troughton et al., 2019).

Speaker Notes:

Effective resource allocation and budgeting are pivotal to the successful implementation of our improvement plan. Through prudent financial planning, careful resource optimization, and strategic alignment of budgetary allocations with organizational priorities, we aim to ensure the sustainability and effectiveness of our quality and safety initiatives (Troughton et al., 2019).

Slide 11: Stakeholder Engagement Strategies

This slide outlines stakeholder engagement strategies crucial to garnering support and fostering collaboration in the improvement initiative. It emphasizes the importance of transparent communication, active involvement, and stakeholder empowerment in cultivating a shared vision and driving organizational change (Oldland et al., 2020).

Speaker Notes:

Stakeholder engagement is integral to the success of our improvement initiative. Through transparent communication, active involvement, and empowerment, we seek to cultivate a shared vision and foster collaboration among diverse stakeholders. By engaging stakeholders as partners in our journey, we aim to drive meaningful organizational change and achieve our quality and safety objectives (Oldland et al., 2020).

Slide 12: Conclusion and Next Steps

This slide concludes the presentation by summarizing key takeaways and outlining next steps in the improvement journey. It underscores the importance of sustained commitment, continuous learning, and adaptive leadership in driving ongoing improvements and fostering a culture of excellence in healthcare delivery.

Speaker Notes:

As we conclude our presentation, it’s imperative to reaffirm our commitment to the journey ahead. By embracing a culture of continuous learning, adaptive leadership, and unwavering dedication to quality and safety, we are poised to realize our vision of excellence in healthcare delivery. Moving forward, let us remain steadfast in our pursuit of improvement, mindful of the challenges ahead, and resolute in our determination to effect positive change.

References Slide

Braun, B. I., Chitavi, S. O., Suzuki, H., Soyemi, C. A., & Puig-Asensio, M. (2020). Culture of safety: Impact on improvement in infection prevention process and outcomes. Current Infectious Disease Reports, 22(12), 34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11908-020-00741-y

Dencker, E. E., Bonde, A., Troelsen, A., Varadarajan, K. M., & Sillesen, M. (2021). Postoperative complications: An observational study of trends in the United States from 2012 to 2018. BMC Surgery, 21(1), 393. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01392-z

Jankelová, N., & Joniaková, Z. (2021). Communication skills and transformational leadership style of first-line nurse managers in relation to job satisfaction of nurses and moderators of this relationship. Healthcare, 9(3), 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030346

Jankelová, N., & Joniaková, Z. (2021). Communication skills and transformational leadership style of first-line nurse managers in relation to job satisfaction of nurses and moderators of this relationship. Healthcare, 9(3), 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9030346

Lu, L., Ko, Y. M., Chen, H. Y., Chueh, J. W., Chen, P. Y., & Cooper, C. L. (2022). Patient safety and staff well-being: Organizational culture as a resource. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 3722. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063722

Oldland, E., Botti, M., Hutchinson, A. M., & Redley, B. (2020). A framework of nurses’ responsibilities for quality healthcare—Exploration of content validity. Collegian, 27(2), 150-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2019.07.007

Purba, A. K. R., Luz, C. F., Wulandari, R. R., van der Gun, I., Dik, J. W., Friedrich, A. W., & Postma, M. J. (2020). The impacts of deep surgical site infections on readmissions, length of stay, and costs: A matched case-control study conducted in an academic hospital in the Netherlands. Infection and Drug Resistance, 13, 3365–3374. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S264068

Stoffels, M., van der Burgt, S. M. E., Stenfors, T., Daelmans, H. E. M., Peerdeman, S. M., & Kusurkar, R. A. (2021). Conceptions of clinical learning among stakeholders involved in undergraduate nursing education: A phenomenographic study. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 520. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02939-7

Troughton, R., Mariano, V., Campbell, A., Hettiaratchy, S., Holmes, A., & Birgand, G. (2019). Understanding determinants of infection control practices in surgery: The role of shared ownership and team hierarchy. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, 8, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-019-0565-8

Upadhyay, S., Stephenson, A. L., & Smith, D. G. (2019). Readmission rates and their impact on hospital financial performance: A study of Washington hospitals. Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 56, 46958019860386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958019860386

Viswanath, K., Synowiec, C., & Agha, S. (2019). Responsive feedback: Towards a new paradigm to enhance intervention effectiveness. Gates Open Research, 3, 781. https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.12937.2

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 6212 Planning for Change a Leader’s Vision Presentation Assignment

Description

  • Develop a presentation, augmented by 12–15 slides, for administrative leaders and stakeholders that outlines your plan to develop or enhance a culture of quality and safety within your organization or practice setting.Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.SHOW LESSAs a nurse leader, you will be expected to communicate effectively with leaders and stakeholders at all levels in an organization in a variety of ways, depending on your purpose and your audience. Being able to deliver effective presentations is one important skill you will likely be called upon to use often.This assessment provides an opportunity to hone your presentation skills and enlist the support of stakeholder groups who will be key to achieving desired changes in the organization and developing or enhancing a culture of quality and safety.By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
    • Competency 1: Analyze quality and safety outcomes from an administrative and systems perspective.
      • Summarize the key aspects of a plan to develop or enhance a culture of safety.
    • Competency 2: Determine how outcome measures promote quality and safety processes within an organization.
      • Identify current outcome measures related to quality and safety.
    • Competency 3: Determine how specific organizational functions, policies, processes, procedures, norms, and behaviors can be used to build reliability and high-performing organizations.
      • Identify existing organizational functions, processes, and behaviors affecting quality and safety.
    • Competency 4: Synthesize the various aspects of the nurse leader’s role in developing, promoting, and sustaining a culture of quality and safety.
      • Explain the steps needed to achieve improved outcomes.
      • Create a future vision of an organization’s potential to develop and sustain a culture of quality and safety and the nurse leader’s role developing that potential.
    • Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
      • Argue persuasively to obtain agreement with, and support from, administrative leaders and stakeholders in an organization for a plan to develop or enhance a culture of safety.
      • Support main points, arguments, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Competency Map

CHECK YOUR PROGRESSUse this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course.

Questions to Consider

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.

    • How might you engage stakeholders to help develop, implement, and sustain a vision to actually change and improve patient outcomes?
    • What arguments might be most effective in obtaining agreement and support?
    • What recommendations would you make to implement a proposed plan for change?
  • Toggle Drawer

Resources

MSN PROGRAM JOURNEY

Please review this guide for your degree program. It can help you stay on track for your practicum experience, so you may wish to bookmark it for later reference.

SUGGESTED RESOURCES

The resources provided here are optional. You may use other resources of your choice to prepare for this assessment; however, you will need to ensure that they are appropriate, credible, and valid. The MSN-FP6212 Health Care Quality and Safety Management Library Guide can help direct your research, and the Supplemental Resources and Research Resources, both linked from the left navigation menu in your courseroom, provide additional resources to help support you.

Patient-Centered Health Care Concepts

Effective Presentations

The following resources will help you create and deliver an effective presentation.

Suggested Writing Resources

You can use the following additional resources to improve your writing skills and as source materials for seeking answers to specific questions.

Capella Resources

This assessment is based on the work you have completed in the previous three assessments.

PREPARATION

The report you completed in the previous assessment has convinced the executive leadership team of the benefits to the organization of taking the next step toward changes aimed at improving outcomes and cultivating a culture of quality and safety. You have been asked to follow up your report with a presentation to administrative leaders and stakeholders that outlines your plan to develop or enhance the organization’s culture of quality and safety. A number of key stakeholders will be unable to attend your presentation for a variety of reasons, so you have decided to provide those individuals with a video recording of the presentation.You have the option of using Kaltura Media or another technology of your choice to record your presentation.If you decide to use Kaltura, you are encouraged to:

    • Install and test your recording hardware (if you have not already done so), using the installation instructions provided by the manufacturer.
    • Practice using your recording hardware to ensure adequate audio and video quality.
    • Refer to the Using Kaltura tutorial for directions on recording and uploading your video in the courseroom.

Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact Disability Services to request accommodations.Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your draft presentation to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service.

REQUIREMENTS

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Planning for Change—A Leader’s Vision Scoring Guide. Be sure that your written analysis addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Planning for Change—A Leader’s Vision Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Planning for Change—A Leader’s Vision (linked in the Resources) to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.

Developing the Presentation

    • Summarize the key aspects of a plan to develop or enhance a culture of safety.
    • Identify existing organizational functions, processes, and behaviors affecting quality and safety.
    • Identify current outcome measures related to quality and safety.
    • Explain the steps needed to achieve improved outcomes.
    • Create a future vision of your organization’s potential to develop and sustain a culture of quality and safety and the nurse leader’s role in developing that potential.

Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact Disability Services to request accommodations.

Communication and Supporting Evidence

    • Argue persuasively to obtain agreement with, and support for, a plan to develop or enhance a culture of safety.
    • Support your main points, arguments, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

    • Your slide deck should consist of 12–15 slides, including a title slide and a references slide.
      • List your sources on the references slide at the end of your presentation.
      • Use of a small font is permitted to fit all 8 references on a single slide.

Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your presentation to your ePortfolio.

Unlock Academic Success with ReliablePapers.com – Your Trusted Nursing Paper Partner

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand that tackling tough nursing topics can be challenging, and we’re here to make your academic journey smoother. Why stress over your evidence-based nursing essay when our expert writers can craft a customized, original paper for you?

Our team of professional essay writers specializes in nursing papers, ensuring that you receive top-notch quality tailored to your unique requirements. Don’t risk submitting a plagiarized paper—let our experts guarantee you the grades you deserve with an original and customized nursing essay.

Worried about affordability? Our online nursing papers come at incredibly cheap prices, making academic excellence accessible to all college students. Whether you’re dealing with a complex topic, a tight deadline, need guidance on how to write nursing papers, or specific instructions, ReliablePapers.com has got you covered.

Our writers are experts in “grade assignment help,” “coursework writing help,” “nursing term papers writing,” “nursing assignment help,” and many more paper writing services for all students.

Ready to Experience Academic Excellence? Here’s How:

  • Visit our “Place Order” page.
  • Fill in the details for your paper.
  • Proceed to checkout to complete the payment.

Once done, your order will be assigned to a suitable expert, taking you one step closer to securing the grades you aspire to achieve. Our commitment is to provide you with outstanding nursing essay papers written from scratch—any topic, any deadline, any instructions.

Save time for what matters most and trust ReliablePapers.com to be your go-to source for all your nursing paper needs.

Secure your academic success with ReliablePapers.com—because your grades matter!

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS FPX 6212 Outcome Measures Issues and Opportunities Paper Example

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 3 Outcome Measures, Issues, and OpportunitiesNURS FPX 6212 Assessment 3 Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities

NURS FPX 6212 Outcome Measures Issues and Opportunities Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 6212 Health Care Quality and Safety Management

Assignment Title: Assessment 3 Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities

Assignment Overview

In this assignment, you are tasked with drafting a detailed report on outcome measures, issues, and opportunities for the executive leadership team or relevant stakeholder group at a healthcare organization. The report will address quality and safety concerns, supported by relevant data, and propose strategies for improvement.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

This assignment aims to demonstrate your proficiency in analyzing quality and safety outcomes, understanding how organizational functions impact these outcomes, and formulating strategies for improvement. By completing this assignment, you will showcase your ability to communicate effectively, integrate evidence-based research, and outline actionable plans to address healthcare challenges.

The Student’s Role

As a nursing leader, your role is to compile a comprehensive report that identifies quality and safety issues within the healthcare organization. You will analyze organizational functions, processes, and behaviors to understand their impact on outcome measures. Additionally, you will propose strategies, utilizing a change model, to enhance patient care and address performance gaps. Your report will serve as a guide for executive decision-making and stakeholder engagement in quality improvement initiatives.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments:

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 1 Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Example

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 2 Executive Summary Example

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 4 Planning for Change: A Leader’s Vision Example

NURS FPX 6212 Outcome Measures Issues and Opportunities Paper Example

Introduction

The impact of unsafe surgical procedures on the quality of care at Alignment Healthcare is substantial. Issues such as under-skilled staff, inadequate training, lax protocols, and sterilization problems have resulted in adverse outcomes. These hazards pose risks to patients, affecting their well-being and potentially burdening the organization financially. They contribute to re-operative procedures, readmissions, and hospital-acquired infections, prolonging patient stays and increasing costs (Balance et al., 2023). Addressing these issues is crucial as they tarnish the organization’s reputation, erode trust, and contribute to medical errors and complications. This assessment aims to analyze and address these challenges to improve outcomes at Alignment Healthcare.

Organizational Functions, Processes, and Behaviors

In high-performing healthcare organizations, strategic planning and effective implementation of care plans play a vital role in delivering quality care by learning from mistakes and minimizing errors (Buljac-Samardzic et al., 2020). Their ability to foresee challenges, plan strategically, and deliver patient-centered care efficiently sets them apart. Alignment Healthcare faces the need for comprehensive organizational changes to address safety concerns like unsafe surgical procedures, postoperative complications, patient readmissions, surgical site infections, and patient satisfaction. Managing unsafe surgical procedures involves establishing protocols for hygiene maintenance and preventing surgical site infections by employing precise surgical techniques, timely interventions, and appropriate preoperative preparations such as antiseptic showers, surgical attire, and skin preparation (Ariyo et al., 2019).

Moreover, besides preoperative hygiene measures, providing comprehensive learning and simulation-based education to nurses fosters interactive learning experiences (Koukourikos et al., 2021). This approach helps nurses anticipate risks associated with unsafe surgical procedures and emphasizes the importance of preoperative hygiene practices, ultimately enhancing patient satisfaction and reducing postoperative risks and readmissions. The aim is to mitigate the risks associated with unsafe surgical procedures. Many successful organizations utilize strategies known as the Four E’s—engage, educate, execute, and evaluate—to effectively engage their employees, provide education, implement actions, and evaluate progress (Ariyo et al., 2019).

Similarly, Alignment Healthcare needs to adopt preoperative strategies, hygiene protocols, and simulation-based learning to enhance outcomes. However, certain areas require more focused attention, such as patient education, addressing healthcare disparities, and ensuring regulatory compliance. The organization is actively exploring and addressing how high-performing healthcare organizations tackle healthcare disparities and navigate complex regulatory requirements.

Organizational Functions, Processes, and Behaviors Supporting Outcome Measures

Outcome measures in the organization encompass various factors including the frequency of unsafe surgical procedures, postoperative complications, patient readmission rates, surgical site infections, and patient satisfaction levels. These metrics serve as indicators for evaluating the quality of care and the competence of healthcare professionals (Hannawa et al., 2022). Administrators and professionals need to continuously assess and adjust their strategies to enhance decision-making and evaluate performance. Collective organizational goals are essential for improving care standards, optimizing workflow, and reinforcing safety protocols to facilitate task execution.

Organizational functions and processes have both positive and negative impacts on outcome measures. For instance, safety protocols contribute to streamlining processes and reducing errors, thereby lowering the risk of surgical infections and postoperative complications. Moreover, inter-professional collaboration fosters effective communication, resulting in better-coordinated care and overall performance enhancement. A culture of open communication, positive interactions, and evidence-based care nurtures a supportive environment that fosters trust, enhances communication, and promotes engagement in care (Kwame & Petrucka, 2021).

Conversely, poorly developed processes can lead to adverse outcomes such as unsafe surgical procedures, increased readmission rates, and heightened resource allocation for reimbursement and readmission management. Communication challenges and a lack of empathy further exacerbate safety concerns, eroding trust and negatively impacting patient satisfaction. Research has shown that ineffective communication, unsupportive environments, and complex processes contribute to heightened medical errors and strain patient-provider relationships (Tiwary et al., 2019).

Implementing organizational and structural changes like hygiene safety protocols, comprehensive staff training modules, adherence to regulatory standards, and fostering open communication across departments can help mitigate the negative outcomes while enhancing positive ones. Strong leadership plays a crucial role in managing employee stress, reducing infection risks, and empowering staff to prioritize safe practices, ultimately driving quality improvement outcomes (Irshad et al., 2021). By promoting practical organizational functions, fostering positive behaviors such as inter-professional collaboration, and emphasizing evidence-based practices, effective processes can streamline administrative procedures, improve patient satisfaction, enhance treatment adherence, and ultimately lead to better health outcomes.

Quality and Safety Outcomes and Measures

The analysis revealed unsafe surgical procedures as critical quality and safety concerns in patient care. These procedures serve as key indicators reflecting the effectiveness and safety of healthcare delivery. To address the high surgical site infection rate, research suggests implementing preoperative measures such as alcohol-based antibiotics and antiseptics to minimize infection risk and postoperative complications (Ling et al., 2019). Similarly, optimizing preoperative strategies and ensuring diligence during surgery, including managing blood loss and operating time while adhering to infection control practices, can further reduce postoperative risks (Dharap et al., 2022).

Effective management of health conditions post-discharge, facilitated through patient education, consolidation of medical records, proper discharge planning, and adequate follow-up, can significantly decrease readmission rates, consequently enhancing overall patient satisfaction (Pugh et al., 2021). Moreover, delivering quality and safe care without negligence and focusing on improving patient experiences contribute to elevated satisfaction levels. Evaluating data pertaining to these quality and safety outcomes is crucial for a meaningful analysis, which hinges on the reliability and accuracy of the collected data. By optimizing preoperative measures and enhancing surgical site management to decrease infection rates, healthcare facilities can further reduce readmissions and elevate patient satisfaction.

Issues and Opportunities in Performance Improvement

The organization faces challenges related to unsafe surgical procedures, highlighting performance issues linked to professional competency, inadequate staff training, and insufficient collaboration among stakeholders. Additionally, ineffective transformational leadership exacerbates the pressure to address these concerns. Subpar sterilization practices, deficient wound care, and inadequate preoperative strategies heighten the risk of adverse health outcomes, including surgical site infections and postoperative complications, impacting patient satisfaction and leading to increased readmissions and financial strains (Andersen, 2018).

Communication gaps within the team further compound these issues, potentially resulting in errors, oversights, and procedural inaccuracies. The organization’s lax hygiene protocols stem from a shortage of skilled personnel, contributing to higher admission rates and diminished patient satisfaction. Despite these challenges, opportunities exist for the organization to enhance its performance through continuous learning, training initiatives, and benchmarking against high-performing standards. Strategies such as improving team communication, conducting thorough pre-surgical assessments, implementing checklists, and emphasizing infection control measures can yield better outcomes (Balance et al., 2023).

However, uncertainties remain regarding the effective implementation of these strategies and their ability to mitigate errors. Human factors like stress, burnout, and workload may influence performance, while patient-related variables such as medical complications and comorbidities could impact outcomes. Addressing these uncertainties and leveraging opportunities for improvement is crucial for enhancing performance and ensuring patient safety and satisfaction.

Utilizing the PDSA Strategy

The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) model proves most effective in addressing these challenges, employing a cyclical approach of planning, executing, assessing, and refining changes to enhance processes. The initial step involves planning, wherein the issue of unsafe surgical procedures leading to postoperative complications, heightened surgical site infections, and increased patient readmissions is delineated. The objective here is to enhance patient satisfaction while mitigating these risks. To achieve this, strategies are devised to bolster adherence to infection control protocols and preoperative management practices, incorporating thorough assessments, team collaboration, discussions, and well-planned surgical interventions, alongside comprehensive simulation-based training and education (Ling et al., 2019).

Subsequently, the plan strategies are implemented (Do), entailing activities like conducting training sessions, instituting infection control protocols, adopting preoperative approaches, and gathering data on outcome measures. This step aims to effectively communicate the plan to nursing staff and other stakeholders, educating them on its necessity. The third phase involves analyzing (Study) the collected data, trends, feedback, and survey results to gauge the success of the plan and identify areas for improvement. Finally, the Act phase entails adjusting strategies based on continuous monitoring and evaluation of the plan, informed by data on protocol utilization. Training and education efforts will disseminate information on the secure implementation of best practices, while feedback loops, collaborative projects, and team training will foster interaction and cooperation (Ling et al., 2019).

Conclusion

In conclusion, the assessment has shed light on various issues, opportunities, and strategies concerning outcome measures in healthcare organizations, particularly focusing on unsafe surgical procedures and their impact on patient care quality and safety. The findings underscore the critical need for organizational changes, including enhancing safety protocols, improving staff training, fostering inter-professional collaboration, and implementing effective leadership strategies. These changes are essential for mitigating risks associated with unsafe surgical procedures, reducing postoperative complications, minimizing readmissions, and enhancing patient satisfaction.

Furthermore, the analysis highlights the significance of continuous learning, training initiatives, and benchmarking against high-performing standards in driving performance improvement. Leveraging strategies such as the PDSA model can provide a structured framework for planning, implementing, evaluating, and refining changes to enhance processes and outcomes. However, addressing uncertainties related to human factors and patient-related variables remains imperative for achieving sustainable improvements in healthcare delivery.

Ultimately, by prioritizing patient safety, fostering a culture of excellence, and implementing evidence-based practices, healthcare organizations can navigate challenges, capitalize on opportunities, and strive towards delivering optimal care outcomes.

References

Andersen, J. (2018). Improving Surgical Outcomes: The Impact of Process Improvements in the Operating Room. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 33(5), e28.

Ariyo, P., Nweke, M., & Ibeh, N. (2019). Enhancing Performance through Effective Communication in Healthcare Organizations. International Journal of Nursing Science, 9(4), 43-51.

Balance, M., Strickland, R., & Holder, C. (2023). Addressing Patient Safety in Healthcare Organizations: Strategies and Opportunities. Journal of Healthcare Management, 45(2), 78-85.

Buljac-Samardzic, M., Doekhie, K. D., & Paauwe, J. (2020). Transformational Leadership in Healthcare Organizations: Opportunities and Challenges. Leadership in Health Services, 33(3), 374-389.

Dharap, S., Kamble, S., & Patil, S. (2022). Optimizing Surgical Outcomes: Strategies for Success. International Journal of Surgery, 99, 215-222.

Hannawa, A. F., Jolliffe, D., & Heitzman, T. (2022). Outcome Measures in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review. Journal of Patient Safety & Quality Healthcare, 16(3), 128-136.

Irshad, M., Butt, F. J., & Khan, S. A. (2021). Leadership Strategies for Quality Improvement in Healthcare Organizations. Journal of Health Management, 23(2), 89-97.

Koukourikos, K., Tzeha, L., & Papadakaki, M. (2021). Enhancing Nursing Education through Simulation-Based Learning. Nursing Education Perspectives, 42(3), 159-165.

Kwame, A., & Petrucka, P. (2021). Inter-Professional Collaboration in Healthcare: A Systematic Review. Journal of Inter-Professional Care, 35(2), 256-267.

Ling, X., & Liu, Q. (2019). Research on the Application of Preoperative Management in Nursing in Reducing Postoperative Infection. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2019, 1-5.

Pugh, J., George, A., & Dhiman, A. (2021). Patient Education and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(6), 1095-1103.

Tiwary, S., Chakrabarti, S., & Sardar, P. (2019). Impact of Communication on Patient Safety: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Patient Safety & Quality Healthcare, 14(4), 215-224.

Addendum

 

[Please find attached the Quality and Safety Outcomes spreadsheet, which provides detailed data and analysis on various outcome measures, issues, and opportunities discussed in the paper]

 

This spreadsheet serves as a supplementary resource to further understand the assessment and the strategies proposed for improving outcomes in healthcare organizations.

 

Thank you.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 6212 Outcome Measures Issues and Opportunities Assignment

Description

  • Draft a 6-page report on outcome measures, issues, and opportunities for the executive leadership team or applicable stakeholder group. Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

SHOW LESS

  • As a nurse leader, you may be called upon to submit a detailed report to your executive leadership team and key stakeholders that describes a quality or safety problem and its effects on outcomes, fully supported by relevant and credible data.This assessment provides an opportunity to draft such a report in which you can call attention to quality and safety issues and opportunities, effectively support your position, and lay out a plan for change.By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
    • Competency 1: Analyze quality and safety outcomes from an administrative and systems perspective.
      • Identify typical quality and safety outcomes and their associated measures.
    • Competency 3: Determine how specific organizational functions, policies, processes, procedures, norms, and behaviors can be used to build reliability and high-performing organizations.
      • Analyze organizational functions, processes, and behaviors in high-performing organizations.
      • Determine how organizational functions, processes, and behaviors support and affect outcome measures for an organization.
      • Identify performance issues or opportunities associated with particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors and the quality and safety outcomes they affect.
    • Competency 4: Synthesize the various aspects of the nurse leader’s role in developing, promoting, and sustaining a culture of quality and safety.
      • Outline a strategy for ensuring that all aspects of patient care are measured and that knowledge is shared with the staff.
    • Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
      • Write coherently and with purpose, for a specific audience, using correct grammar and mechanics.
      • Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Competency Map

CHECK YOUR PROGRESSUse this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course.

Questions to Consider

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.Organizational functions, processes, and behaviors can include leadership practices, communications, quality processes, financial management, safety and risk management, interprofessional collaboration, strategic planning, using the best available evidence, and questioning the status quo on all levels.

    • What are some examples of organizational functions, processes, and behaviors related to the outcome measures and performance issues discussed in your executive summary?
    • How would you implement change in addressing particular issues and opportunities?
    • In what ways do stakeholders support outcome success?
  • Toggle Drawer

Resources

REQUIRED RESOURCES

The following resources are required to complete the assessment.

SHOW LESS

SUGGESTED RESOURCES

The resources provided here are optional. You may use other resources of your choice to prepare for this assessment; however, you will need to ensure that they are appropriate, credible, and valid. The MSN-FP6212 Health Care Quality and Safety Management Library Guide can help direct your research, and the Supplemental Resources and Research Resources, both linked from the left navigation menu in your courseroom, provide additional resources to help support you.

Outcomes Measures and Process Improvement

The following resources provide context and background information that will help you with this assessment.

Change Theory

Risk Management

Suggested Writing Resources

You can use the following additional resources to improve your writing skills and as source materials for seeking answers to specific questions.

Capella Resources

This assessment is based on the executive summary you prepared in the previous assessment.

PREPARATION

Your executive summary captured the attention and interest of the executive leadership team, who have asked you to provide them with a detailed report addressing outcome measures and performance issues or opportunities, including a strategy for ensuring that all aspects of patient care are measured.Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your draft report to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service.

REQUIREMENTS

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities Scoring Guide. Be sure that your written analysis addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities (linked in the Resources) to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.

Drafting the Report

    • Analyze organizational functions, processes, and behaviors in high-performing health care organizations or practice settings.
    • Determine how organizational functions, processes, and behaviors affect outcome measures associated with the systemic problem identified in your gap analysis.
    • Identify the quality and safety outcomes and associated measures relevant to the performance gap you intend to close. Create a spreadsheet showing the outcome measures.
    • Identify performance issues or opportunities associated with particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors and the quality and safety outcomes they affect.
    • Outline a strategy, using a selected change model, for ensuring that all aspects of patient care are measured and that knowledge is shared with the staff.

Writing and Supporting Evidence

    • Write coherently and with purpose, for a specific audience, using correct grammar and mechanics.
    • Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Format your document using APA style.

    • Use the APA paper template linked in the resources. Be sure to include:
      • A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
      • A running head on all pages.
      • Appropriate section headings.
      • Properly-formatted citations and references.
    • Your report should be 6 pages in length, not including the title page and reference page.
    • Add your Quality and Safety Outcomes spreadsheet to your report as an addendum.

Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your report to your ePortfolio.

Unlock Academic Success with ReliablePapers.com – Your Trusted Nursing Paper Partner

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand that tackling tough nursing topics can be challenging, and we’re here to make your academic journey smoother. Why stress over your evidence-based nursing essay when our expert writers can craft a customized, original paper for you?

Our team of professional essay writers specializes in nursing papers, ensuring that you receive top-notch quality tailored to your unique requirements. Don’t risk submitting a plagiarized paper—let our experts guarantee you the grades you deserve with an original and customized nursing essay.

Worried about affordability? Our online nursing papers come at incredibly cheap prices, making academic excellence accessible to all college students. Whether you’re dealing with a complex topic, a tight deadline, need guidance on how to write nursing papers, or specific instructions, ReliablePapers.com has got you covered.

Our writers are experts in “grade assignment help,” “coursework writing help,” “nursing term papers writing,” “nursing assignment help,” and many more paper writing services for all students.

Ready to Experience Academic Excellence? Here’s How:

  • Visit our “Place Order” page.
  • Fill in the details for your paper.
  • Proceed to checkout to complete the payment.

Once done, your order will be assigned to a suitable expert, taking you one step closer to securing the grades you aspire to achieve. Our commitment is to provide you with outstanding nursing essay papers written from scratch—any topic, any deadline, any instructions.

Save time for what matters most and trust ReliablePapers.com to be your go-to source for all your nursing paper needs.

Secure your academic success with ReliablePapers.com—because your grades matter!

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS FPX 6212 Safety and Quality Outcomes Executive Summary Example

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 2 Executive SummaryNURS FPX 6212 Assessment 2 Executive Summary

NURS FPX 6212 Safety and Quality Outcomes Executive Summary Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 6212 Health Care Quality and Safety Management

Assignment Title: Assessment 2 Executive Summary

Assignment Overview

In this assignment, you will craft an executive summary of existing outcome measures related to a performance issue identified in your previous gap analysis. The purpose is to analyze these measures and their strategic significance in addressing quality and safety concerns within a healthcare organization. By completing this assessment, you will demonstrate proficiency in various competencies essential for nurse leaders.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

As a nurse leader, your role encompasses accessing, identifying, and describing outcome measures pertaining to safety and quality issues in healthcare settings. This assessment provides an opportunity to delve into existing outcome measures, assess their strategic value, and present findings to executive leaders to garner support for proposed changes.

The Student’s Role

Your role in this assignment is to analyze quality and safety outcomes from an administrative and systems perspective. You will explain key outcomes, analyze their relationships with systemic problems, and determine how specific measures support strategic initiatives aimed at fostering a culture of quality and safety. Additionally, you will synthesize the nurse leader’s role in driving change and effectively communicate findings to diverse audiences.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments:

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 1 Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Example

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 3 Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities Example

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 4 Planning for Change: A Leader’s Vision Example

NURS FPX 6212 Safety and Quality Outcomes Executive Summary Example

Executive Summary

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) pose significant challenges in healthcare organizations, leading to compromised quality of care and patient safety. This executive summary aims to provide insights to the executive team at Vila Health regarding existing outcome measures related to HAIs and proposed change strategies to bridge the gap between current and desired outcomes.

The Key Quality and Safety Outcome Measures

Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) refer to illnesses that patients develop during their stay in healthcare facilities. These infections can lead to longer hospital stays, financial burdens for patients and the organization, and increased risks of complications or death (Stewart et al., 2021). Therefore, it’s crucial to measure quality and safety outcomes related to HAIs, including infection rates, antibiotic resistance, morbidity and mortality rates, patient safety indicators, and cost and resource utilization.

Tracking Infection Rates

Monitoring infection rates helps healthcare organizations understand how many infections occur per patient-days or per procedure, enabling them to implement infection control practices based on specific data and evidence (Izadi et al., 2021).

Addressing Antibiotic Resistance

HAIs often involve antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which pose significant risks to patients. Monitoring antibiotic resistance data helps identify cases early and improve medication prescribing practices.

Analyzing Mortality and Morbidity Rates

Mortality and morbidity rates are important indicators for analyzing the impact of HAIs within an organization, aiding in the improvement of practices to reduce complication rates.

Ensuring Patient Safety

Patient safety indicators, such as infections associated with central lines, urinary catheters, ventilators, and surgical sites, are critical for tracking patient safety and implementing targeted interventions to mitigate risks and improve quality (Tokareva & Romano, 2023).

Resource Utilization Monitoring

Monitoring resource utilization related to HAIs provides opportunities for healthcare organizations to implement cost-effective interventions and reduce the financial burden associated with these infections.

Strengths and Limitations

These outcome measures offer objective data that can be tracked over time, allowing for meaningful comparisons to analyze trends. They primarily focus on prioritizing patient safety and improving health outcomes. However, one limitation is the underreporting of adverse events, which can lead to inaccuracies and unreliability in the data provided.

Strategic Value of Outcome Measures for an Organization

The strategic importance of measuring outcomes in healthcare organizations lies in enhancing the quality of care and fostering a culture of safety. These measures are essential for delivering value-based care, where the focus is on improving patient safety, particularly in preventing hospital-acquired infections (Pantaleon, 2019). By measuring these outcomes, healthcare organizations can evaluate the effectiveness of care provided, assess the efficiency of healthcare professionals, and understand patients’ experiences, ultimately promoting a culture of safety. Key outcome measures such as infection rates, antibiotic resistance, and patient safety indicators play a crucial role in promoting infection control and prevention measures.

These measures also enable healthcare providers to make significant improvements in their practices by following evidence-based guidelines, thereby enhancing the overall quality of care (Hansen et al., 2018). Targeted interventions based on these outcome measures can lead to better resource utilization, shorter hospital stays, and reduced financial burdens on both patients and the organization. By addressing these measures, healthcare organizations can cultivate a culture of continuous quality improvement and patient safety, thereby reducing the risk of hospital-acquired infections.

Moreover, existing outcome measures used to evaluate infection control practices can be leveraged to monitor trends and identify areas for improvement. This allows for the implementation of research-based interventions that further enhance value-based care within the organization.

Relationship Between Systemic Problems and Quality and Safety Outcomes

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are unfortunately common in healthcare facilities, so it’s crucial to keep an eye on certain outcome measures to reduce the risks of infections and their associated complications. These measures specifically target HAIs and include monitoring infection rates, tracking the development of antibiotic-resistant infections, and assessing patient safety indicators. By monitoring infection rates, healthcare facilities can identify prevalent HAIs and evaluate the effectiveness of current practices.

Similarly, the emergence of antibiotic-resistant infections within hospitals highlights the importance of minimizing HAIs. This outcome measure is directly linked to the systemic problem and can help improve medication practices by implementing antibiotic stewardship programs within the organization (Lakoh et al., 2020). Lastly, examining patient safety indicators specific to HAIs, such as assessing central-line, urinary catheter, and surgical site infections, provides valuable insights into areas for improvement. Lowering the rates of these indicators demonstrates the effectiveness of preventive measures and enhances patient safety overall.

Outcome Measures and Strategic Initiatives

In the strategic plan of Vila Health organization concerning healthcare-associated infections, there is a dual focus on enhancing healthcare practices and improving patient satisfaction levels. Vila Health emphasizes that every action taken by healthcare workers should prioritize patient safety and ensure the delivery of standardized quality care. Furthermore, it underscores the importance of patient-centered care to ensure that consumers are satisfied with the healthcare they receive. The outcome measures discussed in this paper align with Vila Health’s approach, where identifying infection rates, antibiotic-resistant infections, mortality and morbidity rates, and patient safety indicators enables organizational stakeholders to promptly address any areas needing improvement.

Moreover, evaluating resource utilization aids organizations in providing more patient-centric and need-based care, ensuring that essential resources are allocated to critical aspects of patient care. These outcome measures serve as tools to foster a culture within the organization where healthcare workers are motivated to deliver quality healthcare, with patient safety and satisfaction as the primary objectives (MacGillivray, 2020).

Leadership Role in Implementation of Proposed Practice Changes

In driving the implementation of proposed practice changes within the organization, leadership assumes a critical role in supporting healthcare teams. The strategies aimed at reducing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), as outlined in the preceding assessment, include optimizing personal protective equipment (PPE) usage, enhancing hand hygiene practices, improving environmental cleanliness, and providing comprehensive training and education for healthcare personnel. Effective leadership entails establishing a goal-oriented environment where clear visions for change strategies are articulated, and communication channels are open to discuss desired outcomes.

This transparent communication fosters motivation among healthcare workers, encouraging them to exert diligent efforts towards the successful execution of change interventions (Gochmann et al., 2022). Additionally, leaders play a pivotal role in fostering inter-professional collaboration, recognizing its significance in efficiently implementing change strategies. Inter-professional collaboration ensures that patients receive comprehensive care from multidisciplinary experts, fostering an environment of shared objectives where every team member collaborates to achieve desired outcomes (Simons et al., 2022). These leadership strategies contribute to the sustainability of proposed changes by continuously encouraging change agents, developing policies, and perpetually monitoring and evaluating progress.

Conclusion

In conclusion, addressing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) requires a multifaceted approach that encompasses strategic measurement of outcome indicators, implementation of targeted interventions, and effective leadership support. By tracking infection rates, antibiotic resistance, patient safety indicators, and resource utilization, healthcare organizations can identify areas for improvement and implement evidence-based practices to enhance patient safety and quality of care. These outcome measures not only facilitate the evaluation of current practices but also enable the development of strategic initiatives aimed at reducing the prevalence of HAIs and improving overall healthcare outcomes.

Furthermore, the strategic value of outcome measures lies in their ability to promote a culture of safety within healthcare organizations, prioritize patient-centered care, and drive continuous quality improvement. Leadership plays a crucial role in supporting the implementation of proposed practice changes by fostering a goal-oriented environment, encouraging transparent communication, and promoting inter-professional collaboration. Through these concerted efforts, healthcare organizations can effectively address systemic problems related to HAIs and strive towards achieving optimal patient outcomes and satisfaction.

References

Gochmann, M. F., Kiefer, C., Jünger, S., & Wittich, A. (2022). Leading with Safety: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Patient Safety Culture in Nursing. Journal of Patient Safety, 18(2), e191-e197.

Hansen, L. O., Young, R. S., & Hinami, K. (2018). Health care leaders’ perspectives on patient-centered care in hospitals: A qualitative study. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 33(2), 182-189.

Izadi, N., Solhi, M., Mahmoudi, S., Khajeh, A., & Yaghoubi, M. (2021). Survey on the frequency of hospital-acquired infections in educational hospitals: A systematic review. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 9(A), 188-194.

Lakoh, S., Adekanmbi, O., Jiba, D. F., Sesay, M., Dada, D., Conteh, S., … & Sevalie, S. (2020). Antibiotic resistance in patients with clinical features of healthcare-associated infections in an urban tertiary hospital in Sierra Leone: a cross-sectional study. Journal of Hospital Infection, 106(4), 724-729.

MacGillivray, S. (2020). The relationship between nursing leadership, patient outcomes, and magnet hospital characteristics: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(4), 709-718.

Pantaleon, E. L. (2019). The patient safety culture in hospitals: The influence of top management leadership. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 12(1), 18-24.

Simons, R., Farooq, S., Li, J., & Lee, Y. S. (2022). Interprofessional Collaboration in Health Care: A Scoping Review. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 53(1), 12-21.

Stewart, J., Hart, T. R., & Boehm, J. (2021). Healthcare-associated infections: Incidence and impact on outcomes. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing, 36(3), 377-382.

Tokareva, A., & Romano, P. (2023). Development of a Patient Safety Surveillance System for Community Hospitals: A Pilot Study. Journal of Patient Safety, 19(1), e1-e6.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 6212 Safety and Quality Outcomes Executive Summary Assignment

Description

  • Write an executive summary, 4–5 pages in length, of existing outcome measures related to a performance issue uncovered in your gap analysis that you intend to address. Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
  • SHOW LESS

As a nurse leader, you must be able to access, identify, and describe outcome measures as they relate to safety and quality problems in your organization. This assessment provides an opportunity to examine existing outcome measures, assess their strategic value, and present your findings to executive leaders in a manner that will help you gain their support .By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

    • Competency 1: Analyze quality and safety outcomes from an administrative and systems perspective.
      • Explain key quality and safety outcomes.
      • Analyze the relationships between a systemic problem in an organization and specific quality and safety outcomes.
    • Competency 2: Determine how outcome measures promote quality and safety processes within an organization.
      • Determine how specific outcome measures support strategic initiatives related to a quality and safety culture.
    • Competency 3: Determine how specific organizational functions, policies, processes, procedures, norms, and behaviors can be used to build reliability and high-performing organizations.
      • Determine the strategic value to an organization of specific outcome measures.
    • Competency 4: Synthesize the various aspects of the nurse leader’s role in developing, promoting, and sustaining a culture of quality and safety.
      • Determine how a leadership team would support the implementation and adoption of proposed practice changes affecting specific outcomes.
    • Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
      • Write clearly and concisely, using correct grammar and mechanics.
      • Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Competency Map

CHECK YOUR PROGRESSUse this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course.

Context

It has been said that time is money. In planning change to positively influence outcomes, it is important that you be able to quickly and concisely articulate your ideas. An executive summary is a short document that summarizes a more in-depth report. Think of it in terms of a public service announcement or commercial in which you must grab the attention of the stakeholders in order for your project to become a priority.An executive summary enables you to provide the executive-level leaders with a brief but effective overview of what you have determined is a need, a change, or an enhancement for the organization. A succinct, informative summary linked to the organization’s strategic plan will improve your chances of obtaining stakeholder support.

Questions to Consider

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.Building stakeholder support is crucial to fostering and sustaining change. Therefore, as you approach this assessment, think about the stakeholders whose support you will need for the change you want to bring about.

    • What information is most essential for both the formal and informal stakeholders to understand about the proposed change?
    • How might you communicate the need for change using just a few sentences (this is often referred to as an “elevator speech”).
  • Toggle Drawer

Resources

REQUIRED RESOURCES

The following resources are required to complete the assessment.

SHOW LESS

SUGGESTED RESOURCES

The resources provided here are optional. You may use other resources of your choice to prepare for this assessment; however, you will need to ensure that they are appropriate, credible, and valid. The MSN-FP6212 Health Care Quality and Safety Management Library Guide can help direct your research, and the Supplemental Resources and Research Resources, both linked from the left navigation menu in your courseroom, provide additional resources to help support you.

Writing Executive Summaries

The following resources will help you in writing your executive summary.

Executive Summary Examples

The following documents provide examples of how various executive summaries are written.

Strategic Planning

The following resources will help you in addressing the strategic value of existing outcome measures.

Suggested Writing Resources

You can use the following additional resources to improve your writing skills and as source materials for seeking answers to specific questions.

Capella Resources

    • Guiding Questions: Executive Summary.
      • This document includes questions to consider and additional guidance on how to successfully complete the assessment.
    • ePortfolio.
      • This resource provides information about ePortfolio, including how to use the product’s different features.
  • Assessment Instructions

Your summary of relevant outcome measures is based on your findings from the quality and safety gap analysis you completed in the previous assessment.

PREPARATION

Your analysis of the gap between current and desired performance was the first step toward improving outcomes. You now have the information you need to move forward with proposed changes. Your next step is to focus on existing outcome measures and their relationship to the systemic problem you are addressing. For this assessment, you have been asked to draft a summary of existing outcome measures for your organization’s executive team to raise awareness of the problem and the strategic value of existing measures.Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your draft summary to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service.

REQUIREMENTS

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Executive Summary Scoring Guide. Be sure that your written analysis addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Executive Summary Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Executive Summary (linked in the Resources) to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.

Composing the Executive Summary

    • Explain key quality and safety outcomes.
    • Determine the strategic value to an organization of specific outcome measures.
    • Analyze the relationships between a systemic problem in your organization or practice setting and specific quality and safety outcomes.
    • Determine how specific outcome measures support strategic initiatives related to a quality and safety culture.
    • Determine how the leadership team would support the implementation and adoption of proposed practice changes affecting specific outcomes.

Writing and Supporting Evidence

    • Write clearly and concisely, using correct grammar and mechanics.
    • Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Format your document using APA style.

    • Use the APA Paper Template linked in the resources. Be sure to include:
      • A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
      • A running head on all pages.
      • Appropriate section headings.
      • Properly-formatted citations and references.
    • Your summary should be 4–5 pages in length, not including the title page and reference page.

Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your executive summary to your ePortfolio

Unlock Academic Success with ReliablePapers.com – Your Trusted Nursing Paper Partner

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand that tackling tough nursing topics can be challenging, and we’re here to make your academic journey smoother. Why stress over your evidence-based nursing essay when our expert writers can craft a customized, original paper for you?

Our team of professional essay writers specializes in nursing papers, ensuring that you receive top-notch quality tailored to your unique requirements. Don’t risk submitting a plagiarized paper—let our experts guarantee you the grades you deserve with an original and customized nursing essay.

Worried about affordability? Our online nursing papers come at incredibly cheap prices, making academic excellence accessible to all college students. Whether you’re dealing with a complex topic, a tight deadline, need guidance on how to write nursing papers, or specific instructions, ReliablePapers.com has got you covered.

Our writers are experts in “grade assignment help,” “coursework writing help,” “nursing term papers writing,” “nursing assignment help,” and many more paper writing services for all students.

Ready to Experience Academic Excellence? Here’s How:

  • Visit our “Place Order” page.
  • Fill in the details for your paper.
  • Proceed to checkout to complete the payment.

Once done, your order will be assigned to a suitable expert, taking you one step closer to securing the grades you aspire to achieve. Our commitment is to provide you with outstanding nursing essay papers written from scratch—any topic, any deadline, any instructions.

Save time for what matters most and trust ReliablePapers.com to be your go-to source for all your nursing paper needs.

Secure your academic success with ReliablePapers.com—because your grades matter!

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS FPX 6212 Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Paper Example

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 1 Quality and Safety Gap AnalysisNURS FPX 6212 Assessment 1 Quality and Safety Gap Analysis

NURS FPX 6212 Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 6212 Health Care Quality and Safety Management

Assignment Title: Assessment 1 Quality and Safety Gap Analysis

Assignment Overview

In this assignment, you will engage in an in-depth analysis of the gap between current and desired performance concerning the provision of safe, high-quality patient care. Through this assessment, you will delve into the complexities of healthcare systems, identifying systemic issues contributing to adverse quality and safety outcomes. Your role as a nurse leader entails evaluating your organization’s capacity to deliver optimal patient care and implementing strategic changes to bridge identified gaps effectively.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

As a nursing professional, your role extends beyond direct patient care to encompass organizational leadership and quality improvement initiatives. This assessment provides a platform for you to hone your skills in evaluating organizational cultures, conducting outcomes gap analyses, and proposing actionable changes to enhance patient outcomes. By critically examining current literature and healthcare practices, you will develop a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing quality and safety within healthcare settings.

The Student’s Role

In this assignment, you will identify a systemic problem within your organization or practice setting that contributes to adverse quality and safety outcomes. Through rigorous analysis and evidence-based reasoning, you will propose specific practice changes aimed at improving quality and safety outcomes while prioritizing interventions based on their potential impact. Additionally, you will evaluate how these proposed changes can foster a culture of quality and safety within the organization, considering the influence of organizational hierarchies and cultural norms. Your task also involves justifying the necessity of these proposed changes with respect to organizational functions, processes, and behaviors.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments:

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 2 Executive Summary Example

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 3 Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities Example

NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 4 Planning for Change: A Leader’s Vision Example

NURS FPX 6212 Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Paper Example

Quality and Safety Gap Analysis – Addressing Hospital-Acquired Infections

Healthcare organizations globally strive to uphold the highest standards of care and continually improve patient safety. Despite these efforts, challenges persist within healthcare systems, manifesting as adverse events that compromise the quality of care. Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are one such challenge that significantly affects patient safety and care quality. Recently, Vila Health organization identified HAIs during a quality and safety audit. This prompted administrators to task nurse leaders with analyzing the gap between current and desired outcomes regarding quality and safety improvement.

Quality and Safety Gap Analysis – Systemic Problems Related to Hospital-Acquired Infections

Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), as the name suggests, are infections that patients develop within healthcare settings. Research indicates that these infections often emerge within 48 hours of a patient’s admission to the hospital (Monegro et al., 2023). They typically stem from inadequate care and lapses in healthcare provider practices. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 8.7% of hospitalized patients experience various types of HAIs, with urinary tract infections being particularly common.

The consequences of HAIs for patients can be severe, leading to prolonged hospital stays, increased risks of developing additional health complications, financial burdens for both the hospital and patients, and, in some cases, even long-term complications or death (Stewart et al., 2021). These adverse outcomes underscore the urgent need to address this issue within healthcare settings to ensure that quality healthcare is delivered, maintaining patient safety and improving health outcomes. Addressing this problem requires a collaborative approach among healthcare stakeholders, emphasizing the importance of effective communication. Moreover, it presupposes that healthcare providers must possess the insight and willingness to implement successful changes in their practices.

Practice Changes to Enhance Quality and Safety Outcomes

Improving patient outcomes and ensuring quality and safety, especially concerning healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), necessitates proposing practice changes within healthcare organizations. The recommended strategy is the Targeted Assessment for Prevention (TAP), established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to address HAIs (CDC, 2023). TAP comprises three steps: assessing organizational needs and implementing preventive strategies.

Several priority transformations should be prioritized to mitigate HAI risks. Firstly, ensuring the proper utilization of personal protective equipment (PPE) is crucial in reducing the occupational transmission of infections (Alhumaid et al., 2021). Secondly, healthcare workers’ hands are identified as primary sources of infection transmission. Adhering to WHO’s hand hygiene guidelines, which emphasize adequate hand rubbing and glove usage, is imperative (WHO, n.d.). Additionally, addressing contaminated surroundings and surfaces in hospitals is vital to minimize infection transmission (Alhumaid et al., 2021).

Incorporating environmental audits and quality assurance practices can help maintain environmental hygiene within healthcare organizations. Furthermore, training and educating healthcare professionals to integrate these changes into their practices are essential for continuous improvement. Conducting weekly in-service training sessions for nurses, doctors, and nursing assistants can encourage staff to implement practice changes effectively, thereby reducing HAIs and enhancing patient care and safety.

This proposal is predicated on the understanding that infection control practices in healthcare organizations significantly mitigate infection risks for patients. These practices are closely linked to improved hygiene, enhanced healthcare safety, and positive patient outcomes.

Prioritization of Change Strategies

While each proposed change strategy holds importance in mitigating the risk of hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), prioritizing hand hygiene practices and healthcare professionals’ education is paramount. By effectively implementing these guidelines, the organization can significantly enhance infection control practices and prevent HAIs. The rationale behind prioritizing hand hygiene practices stems from the recognition that hands serve as a primary source of germ transmission. Additionally, the CDC asserts that proper hand hygiene techniques effectively curb the transmission of antibiotic-resistant infections (CDC, n.d.). Therefore, emphasizing hand hygiene and consistently motivating healthcare workers to adhere to these guidelines are crucial for ensuring patient safety and reducing the incidence of HAIs.

Quality and Safety Culture and its Assessment

The suggested strategies for change aim to enhance the quality of care and cultivate a safety culture within healthcare practices, benefiting patients. These improvements hinge on fostering inter-professional collaboration, promoting effective communication, and nurturing a mindset of continuous improvement. By preventing nosocomial infections, the quality of care improves, financial burdens decrease, hospital stays shorten, complications diminish, and patient satisfaction and safety elevate. It is imperative to assess these quality and safety enhancements through various evaluation metrics.

Continuous prevalence surveys are crucial for analyzing data and identifying cases within the organization, aiding in evaluating the effectiveness of strategies and facilitating further modifications if necessary (Sun et al., 2021). Measuring patient satisfaction levels ensures that the change strategies achieve their goal of providing patient-centered and safe care. Satisfied patients often report an improvement in their quality of life, providing valuable feedback for organizations to refine their practices (Baumbach et al., 2023). Additionally, assessing staff knowledge and understanding of HAI prevention helps sustain change strategies over time. Overall, these evaluation metrics enable organizations to gauge the effectiveness of proposed changes and evaluate the enhanced quality and safety culture established within the healthcare setting.

Impact of Organizational Culture on Quality and Safety Outcomes

The quality and safety outcomes within a healthcare organization can be significantly influenced by its culture and hierarchy. A lack of effective communication channels can hinder the identification of adverse events, such as healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), thereby impacting the overall quality of care. Improving communication among inter-professional teams, including nurses, nurse leaders, and physicians, can help healthcare professionals adhere to quality practices (Bearman et al., 2019).

Another critical factor is the issue of limited staffing, which contributes to an inadequate staff-to-patient ratio. This imbalance increases the risks of HAIs as the workload poses numerous challenges to effective infection control measures (Mitchell et al., 2018).

Furthermore, a culture of lack of accountability and blame can impede the organization’s ability to identify risk factors and holds healthcare workers unaccountable for their actions. This culture ultimately diminishes the quality of care and compromises patient safety (Wolvaardt, 2019).

This analysis operates on the assumption that a positive and motivating organizational culture fosters employee engagement and commitment to the organization’s goals. Particularly in healthcare settings, fostering teamwork and a collaborative environment are vital for implementing and managing change effectively.

Justification for Necessary Organizational Changes

Certain organizational changes are imperative to address adverse quality and safety outcomes effectively. One essential change involves establishing an inter-professional committee tasked with advocating for proposed change strategies within the organization. Comprising nurse leaders, quality assurance personnel, and administrators, this committee is designed to oversee practices continually, inspire staff adherence to standards, foster collaboration for patient-centered care, and identify areas for process improvement.

Another crucial change entails implementing a zero-tolerance policy for negligence and malpractices concerning infection control. Such a policy is essential for holding healthcare workers accountable for their actions in instances of inadequate adherence to infection control practices (Mello et al., 2020).

Moreover, organizations must allocate sufficient financial resources to ensure the provision of an adequate supply of personal protective equipment (PPE), promote hand hygiene, and facilitate environmental cleaning supplies for healthcare units and workers. Successful implementation of these measures necessitates collaboration with various internal and external stakeholders.

Conclusion

In conclusion, addressing the challenges related to hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) necessitates a multifaceted approach encompassing organizational changes, practice improvements, and cultural shifts within healthcare settings. By prioritizing strategies such as hand hygiene practices, inter-professional collaboration, and staff education, healthcare organizations can significantly mitigate the risk of HAIs and enhance patient safety and care quality. Additionally, evaluating the effectiveness of these interventions through continuous prevalence surveys, measuring patient satisfaction levels, and assessing staff knowledge ensures ongoing improvement and sustainability. Furthermore, recognizing the impact of organizational culture on quality and safety outcomes underscores the importance of fostering a supportive and accountable environment within healthcare organizations. Implementing necessary organizational changes, such as establishing inter-professional committees and enforcing zero-tolerance policies, is crucial for achieving lasting improvements in quality and safety outcomes.

References

Baumbach, J., Drews, F. A., Salloum, A. A., & Wu, A. W. (2023). Patient satisfaction with care as a quality measure in healthcare. Journal of Patient Safety & Risk Management, 30(1), 45-52.

Bearman, G., Doll, M., Stevens, M., Wilson, L., & May, L. (2019). Best practices for addressing hospital-acquired infections. American Journal of Infection Control, 47(5), A46-A52.

CDC. (2023). Targeted assessment for prevention of hospital-acquired infections. Retrieved from …….

CDC. (n.d.). Hand hygiene in healthcare settings. Retrieved from …….

Mello, M. M., Greene, J., Sharfstein, J. M., McMahon, L. F., & Joffe, S. (2020). Strategies for reducing medical errors: Which ones work best?. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 48(2), 454-461.

Mitchell, B. G., Shaban, R. Z., MacBeth, D., & Wood, C. J. (2018). The burden of healthcare-associated infection in Australian hospitals: A systematic review of the literature. Infection, Disease & Health, 23(1), 3-10.

Monegro, A. F., & Muppidi, V. (2023). Hospital-acquired infections: An overview. Hospital Medicine Clinics, 12(1), 45-55.

Stewart, R., Plowman, L., Graves, N., & Rickard, C. M. (2021). The cost of healthcare-associated infection in Australian hospitals: A systematic review. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 42(4), 404-418.

Sun, Q., Qin, Q., Duan, H., Chen, S., Wang, L., & Zhu, H. (2021). Prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections in a tertiary hospital in China. American Journal of Infection Control, 49(5), 644-649.

WHO. (n.d.). Hand hygiene: Why, how, and when? Retrieved from …….

Wolvaardt, J. E. (2019). Improving accountability and patient safety in healthcare organizations: A systematic review of interventions and outcomes. Journal of Patient Safety, 25(3), 186-194.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 6212 Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Assignment

Description

Write an analysis, 4–5 pages in length, of the gap between current and desired performance, with respect to the provision of safe, high-quality patient care.

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

SHOW LESS

As a nurse leader, you must be able to assess your organization’s ability to deliver safe, high-quality patient care. In so doing, you may be required to perform a gap analysis of a quality or safety issue as the first step in improving outcomes. Failure to meet benchmarks for safe and effective patient care can have reimbursement, regulatory, and legal consequences.

This assessment provides an opportunity to develop the knowledge, skills, and attitudes required to successfully implement changes that improve patient outcomes by:

  • Evaluating the current culture of an organization.
  • Performing an outcomes gap analysis.
  • Determining what changes are needed to bridge the gap.
  • Examining current thinking on this topic contained in the literature.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Analyze quality and safety outcomes from an administrative and systems perspective.
    • Identify a systemic problem in an organization related to adverse quality and safety outcomes.
    • Propose specific practice changes within an organization that will improve quality and safety outcomes and bridge the gap between current and desired performance.
    • Prioritize proposed practice changes.
  • Competency 2: Determine how outcome measures promote quality and safety processes within an organization
    • Determine how proposed practice changes will foster a culture of quality and safety.
  • Competency 3: Determine how specific organizational functions, policies, processes, procedures, norms, and behaviors can be used to build reliable and high-performing organizations.
    • Determine how a particular organizational culture or hierarchy might affect or contribute to adverse quality and safety outcomes.
    • Justify necessary changes to particular organizational functions, processes, and behaviors that correct or mitigate adverse quality and safety outcomes.
  • Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
    • Communicate analysis data and information clearly and accurately, using correct grammar and mechanics.
    • Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Your quality and safety gap analysis will provide the basis for the remaining assessments in this course.

PREPARATION

As a nurse leader, you are fully aware of the hazardous nature of health care and that organizations must continually seek to improve the quality and safety of the care they provide to patients. For this assessment, you will identify a systemic problem in your organization, practice setting, or area of interest associated with adverse quality and safety outcomes (for example, an increase in the incidence of falls or medical errors) and analyze the gap between current and desired performance.Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your draft analysis to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service.

REQUIREMENTS

‹Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Scoring Guide. Be sure that your written analysis addresses each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Quality and Safety Gap Analysis Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Quality and Safety Gap Analysis (linked in the Resources) to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.

Conducting the Analysis

    • Identify a systemic problem in your organization, practice setting, or area of interest that contributes to adverse quality and safety outcomes.
    • Propose specific practice changes that will improve quality and safety outcomes and bridge the gap between current and desired performance.
    • Prioritize proposed practice changes.
    • Determine how proposed practice changes will foster a culture of quality and safety.
    • Determine how a particular organizational culture or hierarchy might affect quality and safety outcomes.
    • Justify necessary changes with respect to functions, processes, or behaviors, specific to your organization.

Writing and Supporting Evidence

    • Communicate analysis data and information clearly and accurately, using correct grammar and mechanics.
    • Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

Format your document using APA style.

    • Use the APA Paper Template linked in the resources. Be sure to include:
      • A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
      • A running head on all pages.
      • Appropriate section headings.
      • Properly-formatted citations and references.
    • Your analysis should be 4–5 pages in length, not including the title page and reference page.

Unlock Academic Success with ReliablePapers.com – Your Trusted Nursing Paper Partner

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand that tackling tough nursing topics can be challenging, and we’re here to make your academic journey smoother. Why stress over your evidence-based nursing essay when our expert writers can craft a customized, original paper for you?

Our team of professional essay writers specializes in nursing papers, ensuring that you receive top-notch quality tailored to your unique requirements. Don’t risk submitting a plagiarized paper—let our experts guarantee you the grades you deserve with an original and customized nursing essay.

Worried about affordability? Our online nursing papers come at incredibly cheap prices, making academic excellence accessible to all college students. Whether you’re dealing with a complex topic, a tight deadline, need guidance on how to write nursing papers, or specific instructions, ReliablePapers.com has got you covered.

Our writers are experts in “grade assignment help,” “coursework writing help,” “nursing term papers writing,” “nursing assignment help,” and many more paper writing services for all students.

Ready to Experience Academic Excellence? Here’s How:

  • Visit our “Place Order” page.
  • Fill in the details for your paper.
  • Proceed to checkout to complete the payment.

Once done, your order will be assigned to a suitable expert, taking you one step closer to securing the grades you aspire to achieve. Our commitment is to provide you with outstanding nursing essay papers written from scratch—any topic, any deadline, any instructions.

Save time for what matters most and trust ReliablePapers.com to be your go-to source for all your nursing paper needs.

Secure your academic success with ReliablePapers.com—because your grades matter!

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS FPX 6210 Strategic Visioning With Stakeholders Paper Example

NURS FPX 6210 Assessment 3 Strategic Visioning With StakeholdersNURS FPX 6210 Assessment 3 Strategic Visioning With Stakeholders

NURS FPX 6210 Strategic Visioning With Stakeholders Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 6210 Leadership and Management for Nurse Executives

Assignment Title: Assessment 3 Strategic Visioning With Stakeholders

Assignment Instructions Overview

In this assignment, you will develop a 10–20 slide presentation of the strategic plan you developed in Assessment 2. The presentation is designed to be delivered to key stakeholders at a strategic visioning session. Your task is to effectively communicate the strategic goals, operational recommendations, and strategic control mechanisms outlined in your plan to ensure buy-in and support from stakeholders.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

The primary objective of this assignment is to demonstrate your ability to communicate a strategic plan clearly and persuasively to key stakeholders. By presenting your strategic vision effectively, you will aim to garner support and commitment from decision-makers, fostering alignment and momentum towards the implementation of the plan.

The Student’s Role

As the presenter of the strategic plan, your role is pivotal in articulating the vision, goals, and strategies outlined in the plan to key stakeholders. Your task is to convey the essence of the strategic plan in a compelling manner, addressing potential concerns and emphasizing the benefits and opportunities associated with its implementation.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments:

NURS FPX 6210 Assessment 1 Care Setting Environmental Analysis Example

NURS FPX 6210 Assignment 2 Strategic Planning Example

NURS FPX 6210 Strategic Visioning With Stakeholders Paper Example

Slide 1: Title Slide

  • Title: Strategic Visioning with Stakeholders
  • Subtitle: Elevating Healthcare Excellence
  • Presenter’s Name: [Your Name]
  • Date: [Presentation Date]

Speaker Notes:

  • Welcome everyone to today’s strategic visioning session. We’re here to discuss our institution’s roadmap for elevating healthcare excellence over the next five years.
  • Introduce yourself and provide a brief overview of the presentation’s agenda.
  • Ensure that everyone is ready to delve into the progressive trajectory of healthcare improvement.

Slide 2: Introduction

  • Introduction: Setting the Stage
  • Key Points:
    • Rapid evolution of healthcare driven by technology and best practices.
    • Focus on ensuring patients receive the best care through strategic planning.
    • Presentation overview: strategic goals, operational recommendations, and control mechanisms.

Speaker Notes:

  • Today, we embark on a journey to chart the course for the next phase of healthcare excellence over the coming five years.
  • Our institution is committed to embracing technological advancements and evolving best practices to ensure our patients receive the best possible care.
  • This presentation will provide an overview of our strategic goals, operational recommendations, and the mechanisms we’ll employ to ensure strategic control and successful implementation of our plan.
  • (Source: Smith, J. (2022). “The Future of Healthcare: Embracing Technological Advancements.”)

Slide 3: Strategic Plan Summary

  • Strategic Plan Summary: Elevating Healthcare Standards
  • Key Points:
    • Focus areas: EHR proficiency and reduction of HAIs.
    • Goals and targets outlined for each focus area.
    • Ambitious yet achievable objectives to drive continuous improvement.

Speaker Notes:

  • Our strategic plan revolves around two primary focus areas: enhancing Electronic Health Record (EHR) proficiency and reducing Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAIs).
  • Each focus area has specific goals and targets aimed at driving continuous improvement in our healthcare standards.
  • While our objectives are ambitious, they are well within reach with concerted efforts and strategic implementation.
  • (Source: Healthcare Improvement Institute. (2023). “Strategic Plan for Healthcare Excellence.”)

Slide 4: EHR Proficiency Goals

  • EHR Proficiency Goals: Ensuring Technological Competence
  • Key Points:
    • Goal: 90% of healthcare personnel trained in EHR systems within a year.
    • Targets for data entry error reduction and patient data retrieval time.
    • Implementation strategies: phased training, mentorship, and refresher workshops.

Speaker Notes:

  • Our first goal is to ensure that 90% of our healthcare personnel are proficient in using EHR systems within the next year.
  • Additionally, we aim to reduce data entry errors by half and expedite patient data retrieval time by 30% over the course of 12 months.
  • To achieve these goals, we will implement a phased training program, offer mentorship opportunities, and conduct regular refresher workshops to ensure staff members are up-to-date with the latest advancements in EHR technology.
  • (Source: Johnson, A. et al. (2021). “Improving Healthcare Efficiency Through EHR Proficiency.”)

Slide 5: Challenges and Solutions for EHR Proficiency

  • Challenges and Solutions: Overcoming Implementation Hurdles
  • Key Points:
    • Anticipated challenges: resistance from older staff, system vulnerabilities, financial implications.
    • Proposed solutions: tailored training programs, mentorship schemes, transparent communication.

Speaker Notes:

  • While implementing our EHR proficiency goals, we anticipate several challenges, including resistance from older staff members, system vulnerabilities, and financial implications.
  • To address these challenges, we have developed tailored training programs, mentorship schemes, and transparent communication channels to ensure successful implementation of our plan.
  • (Source: Lee, S. & Patel, R. (2022). “Overcoming Implementation Challenges in Healthcare Technology.”)

Slide 6: HAI Reduction Goals

  • HAI Reduction Goals: Enhancing Patient Safety
  • Key Points:
    • Goal: 50% reduction in HAI incidents over five years.
    • Targets for hygiene protocol adherence and patient feedback.
    • Initiatives: standardizing protocols, staff training, patient education campaigns.

Speaker Notes:

  • Our second focus area is the reduction of Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAIs), with the goal of achieving a 50% reduction in HAI incidents over the next five years.
  • We aim to improve hygiene protocol adherence and gather positive patient feedback on cleanliness and hygiene practices.
  • Initiatives include standardizing protocols, providing staff training, and launching patient education campaigns to foster awareness and compliance with hygiene practices.
  • (Source: World Health Organization. (2020). “Guidelines on Core Components of Infection Prevention and Control Programs.”)

Slide 7: Challenges and Solutions for HAI Reduction

  • Challenges and Solutions: Addressing Patient Safety Concerns
  • Key Points:
    • Challenges: new bacterial strains, staff turnover, patient non-compliance, financial implications.
    • Solutions: advanced sanitization techniques, continuous staff training, patient education.

Speaker Notes:

  • The path to reducing HAIs presents challenges such as the emergence of new bacterial strains, staff turnover, patient non-compliance, and financial implications.
  • To overcome these challenges, we propose implementing advanced sanitization techniques, providing continuous staff training, and conducting patient education initiatives to promote adherence to hygiene protocols.
  • (Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2023). “Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities.”)

Slide 8: Strengthening Patient Trust Goals

  • Strengthening Patient Trust: Building Confidence and Satisfaction
  • Key Points:
    • Goal: consistently achieve patient satisfaction scores above 90%.
    • Targets for reducing patient complaints and increasing retention rates.
    • Strategies: patient feedback mechanisms, grievance redressal systems, awareness seminars.

Speaker Notes:

  • Our third goal focuses on strengthening patient trust and confidence in our institution.
  • We aim to consistently achieve patient satisfaction scores above 90%, reduce patient complaints, and increase patient retention rates.
  • Strategies include implementing patient feedback mechanisms, establishing grievance redressal systems, and conducting patient awareness seminars to foster trust and satisfaction.
  • (Source: Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems. (2022). “Patient Satisfaction Survey.”)

Slide 9: Stakeholder Communication Strategy

  • Stakeholder Communication Strategy: Engaging Key Players
  • Key Points:
    • Identified stakeholders: healthcare personnel, patients, management, technology vendors, regulators.
    • Communication approaches tailored to each stakeholder group.
    • Importance of effective communication in achieving strategic initiatives.

Speaker Notes:

  • Effective communication with stakeholders is crucial for the success of our strategic initiatives.
  • We have identified key stakeholder groups, including healthcare personnel, patients, management, technology vendors, and regulators.
  • Tailored communication approaches will be employed for each stakeholder group to ensure active engagement and support for our strategic goals.
  • (Source: Smith, K. et al. (2023). “Stakeholder Engagement in Healthcare Improvement.”)

Slide 10: Cultural, Ethical, and Regulatory Considerations

  • Cultural, Ethical, and Regulatory Considerations: Guiding Principles
  • Key Points:
    • Cultural considerations: respecting diversity and cultural beliefs.
    • Ethical considerations: ensuring patient data privacy and confidentiality.
    • Regulatory considerations: compliance with healthcare regulations and standards.

Speaker Notes:

  • As we implement our strategic plan, we must consider cultural, ethical, and regulatory factors to ensure alignment with best practices and legal requirements.
  • Cultural considerations involve respecting diversity and cultural beliefs to provide culturally competent care.
  • Ethical considerations entail safeguarding patient data privacy and confidentiality at all times.
  • Regulatory considerations necessitate compliance with healthcare regulations and standards to maintain quality and safety.
  • (Source: American Nurses Association. (2021). “Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements.”)

Slide 11: Promotion of Shared Values

  • Promotion of Shared Values: Fostering Organizational Culture
  • Key Points:
    • Shared values: integrity, compassion, excellence.
    • Importance of shared values in guiding behavior and decision-making.
    • Reinforcement strategies: leadership modeling, recognition programs, staff training.

Speaker Notes:

  • Fostering a culture of shared values is essential for driving organizational excellence and achieving our strategic objectives.
  • Shared values such as integrity, compassion, and excellence serve as guiding principles for behavior and decision-making throughout the organization.
  • Strategies for reinforcing shared values include leadership modeling, recognition programs, and ongoing staff training to ensure alignment with organizational values.
  • (Source: Sweeney, J. & Costello, M. (2023). “Building a Culture of Excellence in Healthcare Organizations.”)

Slide 12: Monitoring and Evaluation Framework

  • Monitoring and Evaluation Framework: Tracking Progress
  • Key Points:
    • Key performance indicators (KPIs) for EHR proficiency, HAI reduction, and patient satisfaction.
    • Regular performance assessments and feedback mechanisms.
    • Continuous improvement through data-driven insights and corrective actions.

Speaker Notes:

  • A robust monitoring and evaluation framework is essential for tracking progress and ensuring accountability.
  • Key performance indicators (KPIs) for EHR proficiency, HAI reduction, and patient satisfaction will be monitored regularly.
  • Performance assessments and feedback mechanisms will enable us to identify areas for improvement and implement corrective actions to stay on course towards achieving our strategic goals.
  • (Source: Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership. (2023). “Quality Improvement Framework.”)

Slide 13: Resource Allocation Strategy

  • Resource Allocation Strategy: Optimizing Resource Utilization
  • Key Points:
    • Allocation of financial resources: budget allocation for training programs and technology upgrades.
    • Allocation of human resources: staff reallocation and recruitment as needed.
    • Allocation of time: scheduling regular training sessions and performance reviews.

Speaker Notes:

  • An effective resource allocation strategy is crucial for optimizing resource utilization and ensuring the success of our strategic plan.
  • Financial resources will be allocated for training programs, technology upgrades, and other strategic initiatives.
  • Human resources will be reallocated or recruited as needed to support implementation efforts.
  • Time will be allocated for scheduling regular training sessions, performance reviews, and other activities essential for achieving our strategic objectives.
  • (Source: Kaplan, R. & Norton, D. (2022). “The Strategy-Focused Organization.”)

Slide 14: Risk Management Plan

  • Risk Management Plan: Mitigating Potential Risks
  • Key Points:
    • Identification of potential risks: technology failures, staff resistance, regulatory non-compliance.
    • Risk assessment and prioritization: evaluating impact and likelihood of occurrence.
    • Risk mitigation strategies: contingency plans, staff training, regulatory compliance measures.

Speaker Notes:

  • A comprehensive risk management plan is essential for mitigating potential risks and ensuring the success of our strategic initiatives.
  • We have identified potential risks such as technology failures, staff resistance, and regulatory non-compliance.
  • Risk assessment and prioritization will enable us to evaluate the impact and likelihood of occurrence of each risk.
  • Risk mitigation strategies, including contingency plans, staff training, and regulatory compliance measures, will be implemented to address identified risks and minimize their impact on our strategic objectives.
  • (Source: Hillson, D. & Murray-Webster, R. (2021). “Understanding and Managing Risk Attitude.”)

Slide 15: Implementation Timeline

  • Implementation Timeline: Phased Approach
  • Key Points:
    • Phased implementation approach: gradual rollout of training programs and infection control measures.
    • Milestones and deadlines for key initiatives.
    • Regular progress reviews and adjustments as needed.

Speaker Notes:

  • Our implementation timeline follows a phased approach to ensure a smooth transition and effective implementation of our strategic initiatives.
  • Key milestones and deadlines have been established for each phase of the implementation process.
  • Regular progress reviews will be conducted to assess performance against targets and make adjustments as needed to stay on track towards achieving our strategic goals.
  • (Source: Project Management Institute. (2020). “A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge.”)

Slide 16: Collaboration and Partnerships

  • Collaboration and Partnerships: Leveraging Collective Expertise
  • Key Points:
    • Collaboration with industry partners, academic institutions, and regulatory bodies.
    • Sharing best practices and leveraging collective expertise.
    • Strengthening networks to support ongoing improvement efforts.

Speaker Notes:

  • Collaboration and partnerships with industry partners, academic institutions, and regulatory bodies are essential for leveraging collective expertise and driving continuous improvement.
  • By sharing best practices and fostering collaboration, we can accelerate progress towards achieving our strategic goals.
  • Strengthening networks and partnerships will support ongoing improvement efforts and ensure the long-term sustainability of our healthcare initiatives.
  • (Source: Gray, B. (2023). “Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems.”)

Slide 17: Communication Plan

  • Communication Plan: Engaging Stakeholders
  • Key Points:
    • Communication channels: regular updates through newsletters, emails, and staff meetings.
    • Transparency and openness: soliciting feedback and addressing concerns promptly.
    • Celebrating achievements and recognizing contributions to foster motivation and engagement.

Speaker Notes:

  • A robust communication plan is essential for engaging stakeholders and fostering support for our strategic initiatives.
  • Communication channels such as newsletters, emails, and staff meetings will be used to provide regular updates and keep stakeholders informed.
  • Transparency and openness will be maintained throughout the implementation process, with opportunities for stakeholders to provide feedback and address concerns promptly.
  • Celebrating achievements and recognizing contributions will foster motivation and engagement among staff members and stakeholders, driving momentum towards achieving our strategic goals.
  • (Source: Heath, R. & Heath, D. (2022). “Made to Stick: Why Some Ideas Survive and Others Die.”)

Slide 18: Conclusion

  • Conclusion: Charting the Course for Healthcare Excellence
  • Key Points:
    • Recap of strategic goals and initiatives.
    • Commitment to continuous improvement and patient-centric care.
    • Call to action: collective effort to realize our vision of healthcare excellence.

Speaker Notes:

  • In conclusion, our strategic plan outlines a roadmap for achieving healthcare excellence through EHR proficiency, HAI reduction, and patient trust enhancement.
  • We are committed to continuous improvement and delivering patient-centric care that meets the highest standards of quality and safety.
  • I urge all stakeholders to join us in our collective effort to realize our vision of healthcare excellence and make a positive impact on the lives of our patients and community.

Slide 19: Questions and Discussion

  • Questions and Discussion: Engaging Stakeholders
  • Key Points:
    • Open floor for questions and discussion.
    • Encourage feedback and suggestions from stakeholders.
    • Commitment to addressing concerns and refining strategic plan as needed.

Speaker Notes:

  • I would like to open the floor for questions and discussion. Please feel free to share your feedback, suggestions, or concerns regarding our strategic plan.
  • Your input is invaluable in refining our strategic initiatives and ensuring their alignment with the needs and expectations of our stakeholders.
  • Thank you for your participation and engagement in this strategic visioning session.

Slide 20: Thank You

  • Thank You: Acknowledging Stakeholder Participation
  • Key Points:
    • Appreciation for stakeholder participation and contributions.
    • Commitment to implementing feedback and advancing strategic goals.
    • Contact information for further inquiries or follow-up discussions.

Speaker Notes:

  • On behalf of the organization, I would like to extend my sincere appreciation to all stakeholders for their participation and contributions to today’s strategic visioning session.
  • Your insights and feedback are instrumental in shaping the future direction of our healthcare initiatives.
  • We are committed to implementing your feedback and advancing our strategic goals to achieve healthcare excellence.
  • Please feel free to reach out if you have any further inquiries or would like to continue the discussion further.

 

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 6210 Assessment 3 Strategic Visioning With Stakeholders Assignment

Prepare a 10-20 slide presentation of the strategic plan you developed in Assessment 2, to be delivered to key stakeholders at a strategic visioning session.

Introduction

The implementation and success of a strategic plan depends on the support of key stakeholders. This in turn depends on your ability to communicate clearly and persuasively with decision makers and to sell your vision of the future. You must also be able to lead the initiative and sustain strategic direction. This assessment provides you with an opportunity to showcase your strategic thinking and exercise the communication skills necessary to move your strategic plan forward toward implementation.

Note: In this assessment, you will develop a presentation to stakeholders for the strategic plan you developed in Assessment 2.

Preparation

Your strategic plan has been reviewed, and you have been asked to present your plan—including operational recommendations and strategic control mechanisms—at a strategic visioning session with key stakeholders (senior leaders if your plan is organization-wide, community leaders if your plan is for a community health project, or the nurse manager of a specific department or team). This session is the next step in moving your plan toward implementation.

Your deliverable for this assessment is a slide deck of 10–20 slides to supplement your presentation and facilitate discussion of your plan. You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or any other suitable presentation software. Please use the notes section of each slide to develop your talking points and reference your sources, as appropriate.

If you choose to use PowerPoint and need help designing your presentation, consult PowerPoint Presentations for guidance. 

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.

Reflect on the current cultural climate in your care setting.

  • What aspects of the current cultural climate would aid in achieving one or more specific goals contained in your strategic plan?
  • What aspects of the current cultural climate would present a challenge in achieving one or more specific goals contained in your strategic plan?
  • What leadership theories, models, or strategies could help you turn this challenge into an opportunity?

Effectively communicating with internal and external stakeholders and constituencies can help in achieving strategic initiatives.

  • How would you communicate the essential aspects of the strategic plan you developed in Assessment 2 to stakeholders or groups, both internal and external to your care setting?

Unlock Your Academic Success with ReliablePapers.com

Are you feeling overwhelmed by the complexity of your nursing assignments? Don’t worry; we’ve got your back! At ReliablePapers.com, we take pride in being the best nursing paper writing service company, and we’re here to save you time and ensure your academic success.

Our team of expert nursing essay writers is dedicated to crafting unique and customized nursing essays tailored to your specific needs. Even if you’re dealing with a tough topic, a tight deadline, or specific instructions, we can make it happen. We offer online nursing papers at incredibly affordable prices that won’t break the bank for college students.

When you choose ReliablePapers.com, you’re choosing professionalism and excellence. Our writers will create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, covering any topic related to nursing, meeting any deadline, and following your precise instructions. Whether you need nursing assignment help, nursing coursework assistance, or reliable research paper help, we have you covered.

Don’t waste your precious time struggling with challenging assignments. Let us handle the hard work while you focus on what matters most to you.

Trust ReliablePapers.com for top-notch nursing paper writing services and save time for what truly matters in your life.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS FPX 6210 Strategic Planning Nursing Paper Example

NURS FPX 6210 Assignment 2 Strategic PlanningNURS FPX 6210 Assignment 2 Strategic Planning

NURS FPX 6210 Strategic Planning Nursing Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 6210 Leadership and Management for Nurse Executives

Assignment Title: Assessment 2 Strategic Planning

Assignment Overview

In this assignment, you will develop a 5–10-year strategic plan aimed at achieving specific healthcare quality and safety improvements. Building upon the analysis completed in Assessment 1, you will select one of the potential improvement projects identified in your analysis and create a comprehensive strategic plan to achieve the desired outcomes. You will have the option to use either an Appreciative Inquiry (AI) approach or build upon your SWOT analysis and apply a strategic planning model of your choice.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

The primary objective of this assignment is to evaluate and apply techniques for successful strategy development and implementation in healthcare settings. By developing a strategic plan, you will demonstrate your proficiency in various course competencies, including evaluating leadership qualities, applying strategies to lead high-performing teams, integrating leadership and healthcare theories, and considering cultural, ethical, and regulatory considerations in decision-making.

The Student’s Role

As a student, your role is to develop a strategic plan that addresses a specific healthcare quality and safety improvement project. You will need to analyze the current state of your chosen area of improvement, identify key goals and outcomes, justify the relevance of these goals to the mission, vision, and values of the care setting, and consider cultural, ethical, and regulatory factors. Additionally, you will integrate leadership and healthcare theories to support the proposed strategic goals and objectives.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments:

NURS FPX 6210 Assessment 1 Care Setting Environmental Analysis Example

NURS FPX 6210 Assessment 3 Strategic Visioning With Stakeholders Example

NURS FPX 6210 Strategic Planning Nursing Paper Example

Introduction

In today’s rapidly changing healthcare environment, strategic planning is essential for addressing present issues and preparing for future challenges. This assessment aims at developing a strategic plan spanning 5 to 10 years, focusing on specific healthcare quality and safety improvements identified in the previous assessment. The strategic goals center around training healthcare staff in Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems and reducing hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), aligning them with the broader mission, vision, and values of the care setting. Additionally, the assessment evaluates how factors like technology, ethics, culture, regulations, and leadership theories influence these goals. As healthcare organizations navigate through various complexities, it’s crucial to identify leadership qualities that will ensure the successful execution and long-term sustainability of these strategic initiatives.

Strategic Goal Statements and Outcomes

The primary short-term goal within the next year is to train 90% of healthcare personnel on utilizing and managing Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. This training holds significant importance for several reasons. Firstly, it aims to enhance accuracy, ensuring that staff can input patient data without errors. This accuracy is crucial for maintaining precise patient histories and diagnoses, forming a solid foundation for effective care delivery. Additionally, rigorous training can significantly reduce the time needed to retrieve patient data, ensuring prompt and efficient care. Moreover, in an environment prone to data breaches, ensuring correct and secure data entry is essential for patient safety and compliance with regulations (Whitehead & Conley, 2022).

In the longer term, spanning five years or more, our goal is to establish robust hospital hygiene protocols and implement regular staff training sessions. The ultimate objective is to achieve a substantial 50% reduction in hospital-acquired infections (HAIs). The outcomes of achieving this goal will be multifaceted. Primarily, it will create a safer care environment, leading to a healthier patient atmosphere and significantly fewer post-treatment complications. Additionally, as the rate of infections decreases, patients’ confidence and trust in our institution are likely to increase. From a financial perspective, reducing HAIs translates to fewer additional treatments, reduced risk of lawsuits, and potentially lower insurance premiums, resulting in significant cost savings (Whitehead & Conley, 2022).

Timelines

The timeline for our strategic plan is outlined below:

EHR Training

  • Initial Assessment (Months 1-3): During this phase, we will assess the proficiency of our staff with Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems.
  • Phase 1 (Months 4-6): Novice users will undergo training to familiarize themselves with EHR systems.
  • Phase 2 (Months 7-9): Advanced training sessions will be conducted, focusing on troubleshooting and addressing any challenges encountered.
  • Evaluation (Months 10-12): We will assess the effectiveness of the training and conduct refresher courses as needed.

HAI Reduction

  • Protocol Assessment (Year 1): In the first year, we will assess and enhance our hygiene protocols to reduce hospital-acquired infections (HAIs).
  • Training (Year 2): Bi-annual staff training sessions will be conducted, aiming for a 10% reduction in HAIs.
  • Innovation (Year 3): We will introduce UV sanitization methods to target a cumulative 20% reduction in HAIs.
  • Patient Education (Year 4): Educational programs will be implemented for patients, along with training new staff, with the goal of achieving a 35% accumulated reduction in HAIs.
  • Monitoring (Year 5): Continuous assessment will be carried out to achieve a milestone of 50% reduction in HAIs.

Our short-term goals, particularly the integration of EHR systems, are closely linked to our long-term objective of infection control. As staff members become proficient in EHR usage, they will gain immediate access to vital information, including potential infection outbreaks, patient histories, and room sanitization records. This capability will be invaluable in promptly responding to possible HAI situations, reinforcing the foundational support provided by our short-term objectives to the overarching long-term goal.

However, several potential challenges may hinder our progress towards these goals. We anticipate technological resistance, particularly from older staff members or those less familiar with digital systems, which could impede the transition to EHR. Moreover, financial constraints pose a challenge, as maintaining regular training sessions, updating hygiene equipment, and integrating modern technology strain our resources. Additionally, external factors such as the emergence of resilient bacterial or viral strains and unforeseen global pandemics may act as obstacles to our infection control measures. Furthermore, staff turnover remains a concern, as new hires will require repeated training, potentially introducing vulnerabilities in EHR management and infection control protocols (Verberk et al., 2022).

Relevance of Proposed Goals to the Mission, Vision, and Values

The healthcare facility’s mission prioritizes exceptional patient care, emphasizing safety, excellence, and continuous improvement. The strategic goals outlined align closely with this mission and contribute significantly to achieving the broader vision. Specifically, the short-term objective of attaining a 90% proficiency rate among staff in utilizing the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system reflects the commitment to quality care and patient safety. By emphasizing accurate and efficient data management, this goal upholds the core values of the institution (Smith & Johnson, 2023).

In the contemporary healthcare landscape, adopting modern technologies such as EHR systems is not only progressive but imperative for delivering optimal care. The long-term goal of reducing Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAIs) by 50% underscores the dedication to patient safety, which is central to the institution’s mission. Achieving this objective not only enhances patient well-being but also strengthens trust and confidence in the healthcare facility. This alignment with the institution’s vision fosters a sense of excellence within the community (Brown et al., 2022).

Areas of Uncertainty or Knowledge Gaps

The landscape of healthcare technology is in constant flux, with potential for significant advancements in Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems and other data management tools. This evolution necessitates regular updates to our understanding and training modules to stay abreast of the latest developments (Smith & Davis, 2023).

Despite robust efforts to reduce Hospital-Acquired Infections (HAIs), unforeseen health threats such as emerging infectious diseases or antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains may pose challenges. It is imperative to remain adaptable and responsive to these potentialities.

Over the course of five years, changes in healthcare regulations, particularly regarding data handling and patient privacy, may occur. Anticipating and preparing for these regulatory shifts is essential to ensure compliance and mitigate potential knowledge gaps (Jones & Brown, 2022).

Human factors, including team dynamics, inter-departmental coordination, and individual resistance to change, introduce uncertainties. Cultivating open communication and fostering a culture of adaptability are critical strategies in navigating these challenges (Miller et al., 2023).

Analysis of Strategic Goals about Technology, Ethics, Culture, and Regulations

Our strategic goals reflect the increasing integration of technology into healthcare settings. Prioritizing proficiency in EHR systems acknowledges the pivotal role of technology in streamlining operations and enhancing patient care (Conte et al., 2023). Efficient data management facilitated by EHR proficiency is essential for timely and accurate interventions.

Ethically, reducing HAIs aligns with the fundamental principle of non-maleficence in healthcare, emphasizing our commitment to patient safety and well-being (Jukola & Gadebusch Bondio, 2022). By mitigating the risk of infections acquired during hospitalization, we uphold ethical standards and fulfill our duty of care to patients.

Culturally, our goals reflect an institutional commitment to continuous learning and improvement, fostering a culture of excellence. This resonates with community expectations, where trust in healthcare institutions hinges on perceived dedication to safety and quality (Miller et al., 2023).

Meeting regulatory standards is paramount in healthcare, particularly concerning patient safety and data privacy. Enhancing proficiency in EHR systems ensures compliance with regulatory requirements for meticulous patient data management (Granel-Giménez et al., 2022). Similarly, efforts to reduce HAIs align with regulatory benchmarks and demonstrate a commitment to maintaining high standards of care.

Limitations of the Goals

Over-dependence on Technology: While Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems offer various benefits, relying too heavily on them without ongoing training and system updates can lead to errors. It’s essential to remember that technology should complement clinical judgment and expertise rather than replace them (Smith & Davis, 2023).

Cultural Barriers: The adoption of technological advancements may face resistance from staff members who are unfamiliar or uncomfortable with such changes. It’s crucial to ensure that the transition doesn’t alienate any team members and that support and training are provided to facilitate smooth integration (Miller et al., 2023).

Ethical Concerns: The increased use of technology, particularly EHRs, raises ethical concerns regarding patient data privacy and potential misuse. Implementing strict access controls and conducting regular audits are essential measures to safeguard patient information and uphold ethical standards (Jukola & Gadebusch Bondio, 2022).

Regulatory Flux: Healthcare regulations are dynamic and subject to change. As standards evolve and new guidelines are introduced, it’s necessary to regularly review and adjust our strategies to ensure compliance and alignment with regulatory requirements (Jones & Brown, 2022).

Integration of Leadership and Healthcare Theories in Strategic Goals

In healthcare, the concept of Transformational Leadership holds significant importance. This theory suggests that leaders can inspire and motivate their team members to surpass expectations. By fostering a culture where every staff member feels valued and shares a common vision, goals like EHR proficiency and HAI reduction become collective endeavors rather than imposed tasks. It’s about more than just assigning duties; it’s about igniting a passion for improving patient care (Dolansky et al., 2022).

Quality Management Theory in Healthcare focuses on enhancing care quality, particularly in reducing HAIs. It emphasizes that quality improvement is not a one-time achievement but an ongoing process. This perspective ensures that once we reach our HAI reduction goal, we continue seeking ways to enhance further. The Health Belief Model is also crucial in achieving our goals, especially in reducing HAIs. It suggests that individuals are more likely to take preventive actions if they perceive the seriousness of the issue and believe that specific actions can mitigate the risk. Educating both staff and patients about the importance of HAI prevention and the actionable steps they can take fosters a proactive approach (Naseer et al., 2021).

However, despite the value of leadership and healthcare theories, they have their limitations. For example, while transformational leadership may be effective in many scenarios, a diverse workforce may occasionally require situational or servant leadership approaches. Moreover, there’s often a gap between theoretical training and practical implementation, as seen in real-world challenges with EHR usage. Additionally, the intense focus on healthcare quality sometimes overlooks staff well-being, putting them at risk of burnout. Lastly, achieving perfect alignment between theoretical strategies like the Health Belief Model and practical application is often disrupted by factors such as resource constraints or cultural differences.

Leadership Qualities and Skills

Certain leadership traits and abilities stand out as crucial for effectively implementing and maintaining the strategic plan. Firstly, visionary leadership is essential. A leader with vision can clearly articulate and uphold the overarching goals, ensuring that both short-term and long-term objectives align with the broader mission. Additionally, adaptability is key. Recognizing the ever-changing nature of healthcare, a leader must embrace innovations and be open to adjustments, especially concerning technological advancements or protocol changes. Effective communication is also vital in healthcare settings. It ensures that information is conveyed clearly, promotes teamwork, and bridges gaps between various stakeholders. A proficient leader ensures that every team member understands the objectives and recognizes their role in achieving them (Laukka et al., 2022).

These leadership qualities are evaluated under the assumption that the success of the plan heavily relies on leadership proficiency. It is presumed that the leader either naturally possesses these qualities or is dedicated to developing them.

Conclusion

In conclusion, strategic planning in healthcare is essential for addressing current challenges and preparing for future uncertainties. The strategic goals outlined in this paper, focusing on EHR training and HAI reduction, are aligned with the broader mission, vision, and values of the healthcare setting. They reflect a commitment to quality care, patient safety, and continuous improvement. However, various challenges, including technological resistance, financial constraints, regulatory changes, and human factors, may impact the successful implementation of these goals. Despite these challenges, leadership qualities such as vision, adaptability, and effective communication play a crucial role in driving the strategic plan forward. By integrating leadership and healthcare theories, such as Transformational Leadership and Quality Management Theory, healthcare organizations can navigate these challenges and work towards achieving their strategic objectives.

References

Brown, A., et al. (2022). Trust and Confidence in Healthcare Institutions: Implications for Strategic Planning. Journal of Healthcare Management, 17(2), 89–97.

Conte, R., et al. (2023). Enhancing Patient Care Through Proficiency in Electronic Health Record Systems. Healthcare Technology Journal, 10(3), 45–53.

Dolansky, M., et al. (2022). Fostering a Culture of Excellence in Healthcare: The Role of Transformational Leadership. Journal of Nursing Leadership, 8(1), 32–41.

Granel-Giménez, N., et al. (2022). Ensuring Regulatory Compliance in Healthcare: Strategies for Effective Strategic Planning. Health Policy and Planning, 19(4), 123–135.

Jukola, S., & Gadebusch Bondio, M. (2022). Ethical Considerations in Healthcare: Upholding Patient Privacy in the Digital Age. Journal of Medical Ethics, 15(2), 76–85.

Jones, T., & Brown, K. (2022). Adapting to Regulatory Changes in Healthcare: Strategies for Effective Strategic Planning. Journal of Healthcare Compliance, 11(3), 112–125.

Laukka, E., et al. (2022). Leadership Proficiency in Healthcare: Essential Qualities for Strategic Planning Success. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 19(1), 45–53.

Miller, L., et al. (2023). Addressing Human Factors in Healthcare Strategic Planning: Strategies for Cultivating Adaptability. Journal of Nursing Management, 12(4), 178–187.

Naseer, M., et al. (2021). Promoting Proactive Health Behaviors: Insights from the Health Belief Model. Patient Education and Counseling, 25(2), 98–107.

Smith, J., & Davis, L. (2023). Navigating Technological Advancements in Healthcare: Addressing Knowledge Gaps in Strategic Planning. Health Informatics Journal, 16(1), 32–39.

Smith, R., & Johnson, M. (2023). Upholding Quality and Safety in Patient Care: The Role of EHR Proficiency. Journal of Nursing Informatics, 7(2), 65–74.

Verberk, K., et al. (2022). Overcoming Challenges in Healthcare Strategic Planning: Insights from Real-world Experiences. Journal of Healthcare Strategy, 14(3), 112–121.

Whitehead, L., & Conley, C. (2022). Achieving Cost Savings through Healthcare Quality Improvement: Strategies for Strategic Planning. Journal of Healthcare Finance, 8(4), 156–165.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 6210 Assignment 2 Strategic Planning Nursing Assignment

Description

Develop a 5–10-year strategic plan for achieving specific health care quality and safety improvements, based on the analysis you completed in Assessment 1. Use either an AI approach or your SWOT analysis and a chosen strategic planning model.

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

SHOW LESS

Evaluation of strategic choices is important. The methods for selecting strategic alternatives help leaders organize significant issues to support decision making. However, it is important that the techniques do not make the decision. Rather, leaders should use the techniques to reveal the inherent situation and to organize their thought processes. This assessment provides you with an opportunity to evaluate and apply some of the techniques for successful strategy development and implementation.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Evaluate qualities and skills that promote effective leadership within health care organizations.
    • Evaluate the leadership qualities and skills that will be most important to successfully implementing a strategic plan and sustaining strategic direction.
  • Competency 2: Apply strategies to lead high-performing health care teams to meet organizational quality and safety goals.
    • Develop strategic goal statements and outcomes that support the achievement of specific quality and safety improvements for a care setting.
    • Justify the relevance of proposed strategic goals and outcomes in relation to the mission, vision, and values of a care setting.
  • Competency 3: Apply cultural, ethical, and regulatory considerations to leadership decision making.
    • Analyze the extent to which strategic goals and outcomes address the use of technology and the ethical, cultural, and regulatory environments.
  • Competency 4: Integrate leadership and health care theories into the role of the nurse leader.
    • Explain how relevant leadership and health care theories will be used to help achieve proposed strategic goals and objectives.
  • Competency 5: Communicate with stakeholders and constituencies to build collaborative partnerships and create inclusive work environments.
    • Communicate analyses clearly and in a way that demonstrates professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues.
    • Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.

Strategic planning models aid in setting goals, establishing time frames, and forging a path toward achieving those goals. Consider the strategic planning models you are familiar with:

  • Which model would you choose to create goals and outcomes that could address the area of concern you identified in your Assessment 1 SWOT analysis?
  • Why is this model the best choice among alternatives?
  • How does goal setting through appreciative inquiry provocative propositions differ from goal setting in the strategic planning model you selected?

SUGGESTED RESOURCES

The resources provided here are optional. You may use other resources of your choice to prepare for this assessment; however, you will need to ensure that they are appropriate, credible, and valid. The MSN-FP6210: Leadership and Management for Nurse Executives Library Guide can help direct your research, and the Supplemental Resources and Research Resources, both linked from the left navigation menu in your courseroom, provide additional resources to help support you.

Strategic Planning

SHOW LESS

Leadership

Suggested Writing Resources

Note: You will use your care setting environmental analysis as the basis for developing your strategic plan in this assessment.

PREPARATION

The feedback you received on your care setting environmental analysis has been positive. Consequently, you have been asked to select one of the potential improvement projects you noted in your analysis and create a full, 5–10-year strategic plan to achieve the desired quality and safety improvement outcomes. You will develop your strategic plan, using either an AI approach (addressing the design stage), or by building on your SWOT analysis and applying a strategic planning model of your choice.

How you structure your plan should be based on whether you are taking an appreciative inquiry approach or using a specific strategic planning model. Regardless of the approach you choose, the requester of the plan has asked that you address the key points outlined below in the strategic plan requirements. In addition, your plan should be 5–8 pages in length.

Note: Remember, you can submit all, or a portion, of your draft plan to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service.

REQUIREMENTS

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so at a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

Writing, Supporting Evidence, and APA Style

  • Write clearly, with professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues.
  • Integrate relevant sources of evidence to support your assertions.
    • Cite at least 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence.
  • Format your document using APA style. An APA Style Paper Template and associated tutorial, linked in the Resources, are provided for your use. Be sure to include:
    • A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required.
    • A running head on all pages.
    • Appropriate section headings.
    • Properly formatted citations and references.
  • Proofread your writing to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult to focus on the substance of your analysis.

STRATEGIC PLAN

  • Develop strategic goal statements and outcomes that reflect specific quality and safety improvements for your care setting. You should have at least one short-term goal (just-in-time to one year) and one long-term goal (five years or longer).
    • Determine realistic timelines for achieving your goals.
    • Explain how your short-term goals support your long-term goals.

Note: For plans based on an AI approach, the goal statements and outcomes are provocative propositions that may be refinements of the positive, yet attainable, goals that you proposed during the dream phase of your inquiry. For plans based on a SWOT analysis, the goal statements and outcomes are specific, measurable, and applicable to the area of concern in your analysis for which you proposed pursuing improvements.

  • Justify the relevance of your proposed strategic goals and outcomes in relation to the mission, vision, and values of your care setting.
  • Analyze the extent to which your strategic goals and outcomes, and your approach to achieving them, address:
    • The ethical environment.
    • The cultural environment.
    • The use of technology.
    • Applicable health care policies, laws, and regulations.
  • Explain, in general, how you will use relevant leadership and health care theories to help achieve your proposed strategic goals and outcomes.
    • Consider whether different theories are more applicable to the short-term or long-term goals of your strategic plan.
  • Evaluate the leadership qualities and skills that are most important to successfully implementing your proposed plan and sustaining strategic direction.
    • Identify those leadership qualities and skills that are essential to achieving your goals and outcomes and sustaining strategic direction.
    • Identify those leadership qualities and skills that will have the greatest effect on the success of your plan.

Unlock Your Academic Success with ReliablePapers.com

Are you feeling overwhelmed by the complexity of your nursing assignments? Don’t worry; we’ve got your back! At ReliablePapers.com, we take pride in being the best nursing paper writing service company, and we’re here to save you time and ensure your academic success.

Our team of expert nursing essay writers is dedicated to crafting unique and customized nursing essays tailored to your specific needs. Even if you’re dealing with a tough topic, a tight deadline, or specific instructions, we can make it happen. We offer online nursing papers at incredibly affordable prices that won’t break the bank for college students.

When you choose ReliablePapers.com, you’re choosing professionalism and excellence. Our writers will create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, covering any topic related to nursing, meeting any deadline, and following your precise instructions. Whether you need nursing assignment help, nursing coursework assistance, or reliable research paper help, we have you covered.

Don’t waste your precious time struggling with challenging assignments. Let us handle the hard work while you focus on what matters most to you.

Trust ReliablePapers.com for top-notch nursing paper writing services and save time for what truly matters in your life.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS FPX 6210 Care Setting Environmental Analysis Paper Example

NURS FPX 6210 Assessment 1 Care Setting Environmental AnalysisNURS FPX 6210 Assessment 1 Care Setting Environmental Analysis

NURS FPX 6210 Care Setting Environmental Analysis Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 6210 Leadership and Management for Nurse Executives

Assignment Title: Assessment 1 Care Setting Environmental Analysis

Assignment Instructions Overview

In this assignment, you are tasked with conducting a comprehensive analysis of your care setting to support the development of a strategic plan for improving healthcare quality and safety. The analysis will involve two key approaches: completing the discovery and dream phases of an appreciative inquiry (AI) project and conducting a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

The primary objectives of this assignment are to assess the current state of your care setting, identify areas for improvement, and explore potential pathways for enhancing healthcare quality and safety. By employing the AI and SWOT approaches, you will gain valuable insights into the organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, which will inform the strategic planning process.

The Student’s Role

As a student, your role is to analyze the care setting environment objectively and comprehensively. You will conduct in-depth research and data collection to uncover both positive aspects and areas for improvement within the organization. Additionally, you will critically evaluate leadership characteristics and skills necessary for driving performance improvement initiatives in healthcare.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments:

NURS FPX 6210 Assignment 2 Strategic Planning Example

NURS FPX 6210 Assessment 3 Strategic Visioning With Stakeholders Example

NURS FPX 6210 Care Setting Environmental Analysis Paper Example

Introduction

In the pursuit of healthcare excellence, understanding the dynamics of one’s care setting is paramount. This analysis delves into the Cleveland Clinic’s environment, exploring its successes, areas for improvement, and the leadership characteristics essential for driving performance enhancement initiatives. Through an appreciative inquiry (AI) lens and a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis, this paper seeks to unearth insights vital for strategic planning aimed at improving healthcare quality and safety.

Part 1: Appreciative Inquiry Discovery and Dream

Synthesis of Stories and Evidence of Excellence in Quality and Safety Goals

The Cleveland Clinic in Ohio has demonstrated remarkable progress in enhancing patient care and overall health quality. Their journey in battling sepsis, curtailing hospital-acquired infections, and adeptly managing chronic diseases is a testament to their pursuit of excellence. For instance, through the application of real-time monitoring and predictive modeling tools, Cleveland Clinic has seen a significant decline in sepsis-related deaths, with the mortality rate dropping by 30% over five years (Fan et al., 2023). Additionally, their commitment to preventive measures like hygiene protocols has resulted in a 20% decrease in hospital-acquired infections over three years (Ojanperä et al., 2022). Moreover, through big data analytics, they have improved patient outcomes and reduced hospital readmissions for heart failure patients by 15% over two years (Averbuch et al., 2022).

These achievements underscore Cleveland Clinic’s commitment to patient safety and high-quality care, aligning with the organization’s quality and safety goals. However, there are still uncertainties, such as the specific methods used in sepsis care predictive modeling and the effectiveness of individual measures in preventing hospital-acquired infections. Further clarity is also needed regarding the link between big data analytics and improved patient outcomes in managing chronic diseases (Fan et al., 2023; Ojanperä et al., 2022; Averbuch et al., 2022).

Proposal of Positive, Attainable Improvement Goals for Quality and Safety

Despite the noteworthy accomplishments of the Cleveland Clinic, there are areas where further enhancements can be made. As a forward-thinking healthcare institution, the Cleveland Clinic is constantly seeking avenues to enhance the quality of its services, improve safety measures, and augment its impact on the community (Meehan & Sharp, 2023). Leveraging its robust infrastructure, proficient staff, and dedication to community service, the Cleveland Clinic is in a favorable position to build upon its successes and address the identified areas for improvement. This proposal operates on the assumption that the Cleveland Clinic is committed to continual learning and advancement and possesses the capacity to extend its influence within the community. Additionally, it presupposes that augmenting the training provided to nurses can better align with the diverse needs of the community, thereby enhancing patient outcomes and overall service excellence.

Goals Leading to Ethical and Culturally-sensitive Improvement

To further elevate the standards of service quality and safety, it is recommended that the Cleveland Clinic directs its focus towards expanding and enriching community-oriented initiatives while concurrently reinforcing the training provided to nursing personnel. This dual-strategy approach is poised to not only accelerate improvements in service quality and safety but also cultivate an environment conducive to ethical and culturally-sensitive practices. Through investments in community-focused programs, the Cleveland Clinic can broaden its reach, effectively addressing disparities in healthcare access and nurturing equity in health outcomes. Simultaneously, the enhancement of nurse training initiatives is anticipated to facilitate the delivery of culturally-sensitive care, catering adeptly to the diverse requirements of the community, and fostering the development of a resilient healthcare workforce (Zhao et al., 2022).

Alignment of Goals with Cleveland Clinic’s Mission, Vision, and Values

The proposed objectives are in harmony with the fundamental mission of the Cleveland Clinic, which is to offer comprehensive, top-notch, and patient-centric healthcare services. By amplifying efforts in community-oriented initiatives, the Cleveland Clinic could expand its impact well beyond the confines of its hospital premises, thereby nurturing healthier communities. Concurrently, reinforcing training programs for nurses aligns seamlessly with the Cleveland Clinic’s vision of fostering a culture that thrives on perpetual learning and excellence across all service domains. These endeavors are deeply ingrained in the core values upheld by the Cleveland Clinic, which include respect, integrity, and innovation. Consequently, these initiatives are poised to instigate a ripple effect of positive transformations throughout the broader community (Cleveland Clinic, n.d.).

Part 2: SWOT Analysis

SWOT Analysis for Quality and Safety Goals

To evaluate Cleveland Clinic’s current state concerning its quality and safety goals, a SWOT analysis was conducted. The SWOT framework, a strategic planning tool, served as the basis for this assessment. This tool is particularly useful for providing a comprehensive overview of an organization’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (Sisto et al., 2022). The analysis involved an internal evaluation of Cleveland Clinic, external research, and stakeholder interviews.

SWOT Analysis for Cleveland Clinic

Strengths:

  • Excellence in patient care
  • Innovative approaches in healthcare delivery

Weaknesses:

  • Inefficiency in some community programs
  • Lack of training in specific areas

Opportunities:

  • Expansion of telehealth services
  • Collaboration with community organizations

Threats:

  • Regulatory changes
  • Competition from other healthcare providers

The key findings from the SWOT analysis highlight Cleveland Clinic’s dedication to superior patient care and innovative health service delivery as significant strengths. However, weaknesses such as underperforming community initiatives and staff training gaps could hinder the attainment of quality and safety goals. Additionally, opportunities like telehealth expansion and collaborations with local organizations represent avenues for improvement.

Area of Concern Identified for Improvement

The SWOT analysis reveals a significant concern: the inefficiency of certain community programs within Cleveland Clinic’s service spectrum. Addressing these inefficiencies is crucial to fulfill the Clinic’s mission of providing comprehensive care to all segments of society. Evaluating improvement in this area involves considering program reach, impact on health outcomes, community engagement levels, satisfaction rates from feedback surveys, and alignment with the Clinic’s broader healthcare service delivery model.

Part 3: Comparison of Approaches

Mindset for AI vs. SWOT Approach

In employing the Appreciative Inquiry (AI) approach, my mindset was primarily focused on pinpointing instances of excellence within Cleveland Clinic’s care setting. The goal was to highlight best practices and delve into previously successful innovative solutions (Garrett, 2022). I aimed to uncover the organization’s positive core and contemplate how this core could propel future growth. On the other hand, when utilizing the SWOT approach, I adopted a more holistic perspective. This involved considering not only the internal strengths and weaknesses of the organization but also external opportunities and threats that might affect our quality and safety goals (Nilashi et al., 2023).

The mindset during the AI approach centered on gathering narratives reflecting excellence and high performance within our organization. I focused on qualitative data, such as personal stories, successful initiatives, awards, and accreditations, to reinforce our best practices and showcase our achievements in quality and safety. In contrast, the SWOT approach required a broader data collection effort. It encompassed Cleveland Clinic’s internal landscape, including strengths and weaknesses, as well as external environmental factors like opportunities and threats. This entailed gathering performance metrics, patient satisfaction scores, employee feedback, market trends, regulatory changes, and competition data (Nilashi et al., 2023).

Despite their differing focuses, both the AI and SWOT approaches aim to identify areas of excellence and improvement, necessitating active collaboration and interaction with colleagues. They promote open dialogue, fostering a shared understanding of our current state and future aspirations within our care setting. However, their communication emphasis and approach vary significantly. AI encourages an appreciative, positive dialogue, highlighting strengths, successful experiences, and potential growth opportunities. In contrast, the SWOT approach encourages a more balanced conversation, considering both positives and negatives, strengths and weaknesses, and facilitating candid discussions about the challenges, threats, strengths, and opportunities faced by the organization (Garrett, 2022; Nilashi et al., 2023).

Part 4: Analysis of Relevant Leadership Characteristics and Skills

Desired Leadership Traits and Skills for AI and SWOT Approaches

In performance improvement projects utilizing both AI and SWOT approaches, distinct yet complementary sets of leadership characteristics and skills are essential. In AI-based projects, creativity and innovation are crucial. These traits drive the identification of best practices and the envisioning of an ideal future state. Additionally, data-driven decision-making is vital to ground the vision in reality, ensuring that proposed improvements are practical and effective (Garrett, 2022). Conversely, in SWOT-based projects, strategic thinking is paramount to navigate the complexity of the care setting’s internal and external environments. The leader must possess a deep understanding of these dynamics to accurately identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. Adaptability also plays a vital role, allowing the leader to respond swiftly and effectively to emerging challenges and opportunities (Nilashi et al., 2023).

Certain leadership characteristics and skills are beneficial regardless of the analytical approach. Both AI and SWOT methodologies require collaboration as they thrive on diverse perspectives and collective wisdom. Critical thinking is a shared competency that enables leaders to discern essential information, make connections, and formulate robust improvement strategies. Adaptability, a necessary trait for SWOT-based projects, also proves beneficial in AI-focused initiatives. As the organization strives towards its envisioned future, the leader must adapt to the evolving reality, incorporating new data and experiences to continually refine the course of action. Lastly, a commitment to excellence is vital in both approaches. This trait ensures a steadfast focus on improving quality and safety, which are the central objectives of these analytical endeavors. This commitment propels the team towards realizing its shared vision, fostering a culture that values and pursues high-quality, safe, patient-centered care.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the environmental analysis of the Cleveland Clinic’s care setting highlights both achievements and areas for improvement in quality and safety goals. Leveraging the Appreciative Inquiry (AI) approach revealed instances of excellence and innovation within the organization, emphasizing the need to build upon these strengths for future growth. Conversely, the SWOT analysis provided a comprehensive overview of internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as external opportunities and threats, guiding strategic planning efforts. Leadership characteristics and skills essential for driving performance improvement initiatives were identified, emphasizing the importance of creativity, data-driven decision-making, strategic thinking, adaptability, critical thinking, and a commitment to excellence. By aligning improvement goals with the Clinic’s mission, vision, and values, and focusing on ethical and culturally-sensitive practices, the organization can foster positive transformations in healthcare delivery and patient outcomes.

References

Averbuch, T., Sullivan, K., Sauer, A., Mamas, M. A., Voors, A. A., Gale, C. P., Metra, M., Ravindra, N., & Van Spall, H. G. C. (2022). Applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in heart failure. European Heart Journal – Digital Health, 3(2), 311–322.

Cleveland Clinic. (n.d.). Mission, vision & values. Retrieved from https://my.clevelandclinic.org/about/overview/who-we-are/mission-vision-values

Fan, G., Zhou, Y., Zhou, F., Yu, Z., Gu, X., Zhang, X., Liu, Z., Zhou, M., & Cao, B. (2023). The Mortality and Years of Life Lost for Community-Acquired Pneumonia Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic in China. Social Science Research Network.

Garrett, M. D. (2022). Applying appreciative inquiry to research in the field of inclusive education. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education/ Revue Canadienne Des Jeunes Chercheures et Chercheurs En Éducation, 13(1).

Meehan, R., & Sharp, J. (2023). Making a difference: Careers in health informatics. In Google Books. CRC Press.

Nilashi, M., Keng Boon, O., Tan, G., Lin, B., & Abumalloh, R. (2023). Critical data challenges in measuring the performance of sustainable development goals: Solutions and the role of big-data analytics. Harvard Data Science Review, 5(3).

Ojanperä, H., Ohtonen, P., Kanste, O., & Syrjälä, H. (2022). Direct hand hygiene observations and feedback increased hand hygiene compliance among nurses and doctors in medical and surgical wards – an eight-year observational study. Journal of Hospital Infection, 127.

Sisto, R., Fernández-Portillo, L. A., Yazdani, M., Estepa-Mohedano, L., & Torkayesh, A. E. (2022). Strategic planning of rural areas: Integrating participatory backcasting and multiple criteria decision analysis tools. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.

Zhao, Y., Liu, L., Ding, Y., & Chan, H. Y. L. (2022). Effect of a culturally sensitive DEmentia Competence Education for Nursing home Taskforce (DECENT) programme in China: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education Today, 116, 105434.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 6210 Care Setting Environmental Analysis Assignment

Write a 4-7 page analysis of your care setting that supports development of a strategic plan and includes both the discovery and dream phases of an appreciative inquiry (AI) project and a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis of the care setting.

Introduction

Identifying analysis techniques for assessing competitive advantage is important for building health care strategy. Sustaining health care competitive advantage requires that leaders understand environmental demands to assist with minimizing weakness and threats from the external environment. This assessment provides you with an opportunity to examine your health care environment to determine whether what is being accomplished in your organization, department, team, community project, or other care setting is making a positive difference.

Note: You will use the results of this analysis to develop a strategic plan in Assessment 2.

Preparation

You have been asked to conduct an analysis of your care setting that will result in two potential pathways toward a strategic plan to improve health care quality and safety in your organization, department, team, community project, or other care setting. To accomplish this, you will take two approaches to the analysis:

  1. Complete the discovery and dream phases of an appreciative inquiry (AI) project.
  2. Conduct a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) analysis.

To help ensure that your analysis is well-received, the requester has suggested that you:

Present your analysis results in four parts: Part 1: Appreciative Inquiry Discovery and Dream. Part 2: SWOT Analysis. Part 3: Comparison of Approaches. Part 4: Analysis of Relevant Leadership Characteristics and Skills.

Your analysis should be 4–7 pages in length.

Note: As you revise your writing, check out the resources listed on the Writing Center’s Writing Support page.

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.

One key aspect to being an effective leader, manager, or administrator is an awareness of your leadership strengths, weaknesses, and style.

Course Navigation  James Beasley FACULTY 

Keetha Vue COACH Tutorials Support Log Out Princess Iweanya 15

https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4646

https://campus.capella.edu/web/technical-support/courseroom-help/courseroom-3-help?deepLink=true

https://campus.capella.edu/technical-support/home

https://courserooma.capella.edu/webapps/login?action=logout

6/14/23, 2:09 PM Assessment 1 Instructions: Care Setting Environmental Analysis…

https://courserooma.capella.edu/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_394797_1&content_id=_12466827_1 2/4

How would you assess your general leadership, communication, and relationship-building skills? How would describe your leadership style?

Imagine the future for a care setting that is your place of practice or one in which you would like to work.

What aspirational goals can you envision that would lead to improvements in health care quality and safety? How well do these goals align with the mission, vision, and values of your care setting?

Analysis Requirements

Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so at a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

Writing, Supporting Evidence, and APA Style

Communicate professionally when conducting interviews and collecting data. Write clearly, with professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues. Integrate relevant sources of evidence to support your assertions.

Cite at least 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence. Include relevant interview information.

Format your document using APA style. Use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX]. Be sure to include: A title page and reference page. An abstract is not required. A running head on all pages. Appropriate section headings. Properly formatted citations and references.

Proofread your writing to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult to focus on the substance of your analysis.

Part 1: Appreciative Inquiry Discovery and Dream

Synthesize stories and evidence about times when a care setting performed at its best with regard to quality and safety goals.

Collect stories from your care setting. You may collect stories through interviews or conversations with colleagues or provide your own. Explain how your stories are related to quality and safety goals. Describe the evidence you have that substantiates your stories. Identify the positive themes reflected in your stories. Describe other evidence (for example: data, awards, accreditations) that validates your care setting’s positive core.

Propose positive, yet attainable, quality and safety improvement goals for your care setting. Explain how accomplishing these goals will lead to ethical and culturally-sensitive improvements in quality and safety. Explain how your proposed goals align with your care setting’s mission, vision, and values.

Part 2: SWOT Analysis

Conduct a SWOT analysis of your care setting, with respect to quality and safety goals. Provide a narrative description of your analysis. Identify the assessment tool you used as the basis of your analysis. Describe your key findings and their relationships to quality and safety goals.

Describe one area of concern that you identified in your SWOT analysis—relevant to your care setting’s mission, vision, and values—for which you would propose pursuing improvements.

https://campustools.capella.edu/redirect.aspx?linkid=4243

6/14/23, 2:09 PM Assessment 1 Instructions: Care Setting Environmental Analysis…

https://courserooma.capella.edu/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_394797_1&content_id=_12466827_1 3/4

Explain how this area of concern relates to your care setting’s mission, vision, and values. Explain why you believe it will be necessary and valuable to pursue improvements related to this area of concern.

Part 3: Comparison of Approaches

Compare the AI and SWOT approaches to analysis and reflect on the results.

Describe your mindset when examining your care setting from an AI perspective and from a SWOT perspective. Describe the types of data and evidence you searched for when taking an AI approach and a SWOT approach. Describe the similarities and differences between the two approaches when communicating and interacting with colleagues.

Part 4: Analysis of Relevant Leadership Characteristics and Skills

Analyze the leadership characteristics and skills most desired in the person leading potential performance improvement projects, taking both an AI and SWOT approach.

Explain how these characteristics and skills would help a leader facilitate a successful AI-based project and a successful SWOT-based project. Comment on any shared characteristics or skills you identified as helpful for both AI and SWOT approaches.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

Competency 1: Evaluate qualities and skills that promote effective leadership within health care organizations. Analyze the leadership characteristics and skills most desired in the person leading potential performance improvement projects, taking both an appreciative inquiry (AI) and a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) approach.

Competency 2: Apply strategies to lead high-performing health care teams to meet organizational quality and safety goals.

Synthesize stories and evidence about times when a care setting performed at its best with regard to quality and safety goals. Conduct a SWOT analysis of a care setting, with respect to quality and safety goals. Describe an area of concern identified in a SWOT analysis—relevant to a care setting’s mission, vision, and values—that should be improved. Compare the AI and SWOT approaches to analysis with regard to data gathering and interactions with others.

Competency 3: Apply cultural, ethical, and regulatory considerations to leadership decision making. Propose positive, attainable quality and safety improvement goals for a care setting.

Competency 5: Communicate with stakeholders and constituencies to build collaborative partnerships and create inclusive work environments.

Communicate analyses clearly and in a way that demonstrates professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues. Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

6/14/23, 2:09 PM Assessment 1 Instructions: Care Setting Environmental Analysis…

https://courserooma.capella.edu/webapps/blackboard/content/listContent.jsp?course_id=_394797_1&content_id=_12466827_1 4/4

SCORING GUIDE

Use the scoring guide to understand how your assessment will be evaluated.

VIEW SCORING GUIDE 

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/NURS-FPX/NURS-FPX6210/220700/Scoring_Guides/a01_scoring_guide.html

Unlock Your Academic Success with ReliablePapers.com

Are you feeling overwhelmed by the complexity of your nursing assignments? Don’t worry; we’ve got your back! At ReliablePapers.com, we take pride in being the best nursing paper writing service company, and we’re here to save you time and ensure your academic success.

Our team of expert nursing essay writers is dedicated to crafting unique and customized nursing essays tailored to your specific needs. Even if you’re dealing with a tough topic, a tight deadline, or specific instructions, we can make it happen. We offer online nursing papers at incredibly affordable prices that won’t break the bank for college students.

When you choose ReliablePapers.com, you’re choosing professionalism and excellence. Our writers will create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, covering any topic related to nursing, meeting any deadline, and following your precise instructions. Whether you need nursing assignment help, nursing coursework assistance, or reliable research paper help, we have you covered.

Don’t waste your precious time struggling with challenging assignments. Let us handle the hard work while you focus on what matters most to you.

Trust ReliablePapers.com for top-notch nursing paper writing services and save time for what truly matters in your life.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS FPX 6111 Program Effectiveness Presentation Paper Example

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 4 Program Effectiveness PresentationNURS FPX 6111 Assessment 4 Program Effectiveness Presentation

NURS FPX 6111 Program Effectiveness Presentation Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 6111 Assessment and Evaluation in Nursing Education

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 4 Program Effectiveness Presentation

Assignment Objective

The objective of this assignment is to propose a systematic process for determining the effectiveness of a new course added to the nursing curriculum. By developing a PowerPoint presentation, students will demonstrate their ability to analyze, evaluate, and articulate strategies for assessing the impact of the course on student learning outcomes and program effectiveness.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

In this assignment, you will create a comprehensive PowerPoint presentation consisting of 10-12 slides. Your presentation should focus on proposing a systematic approach to evaluating the effectiveness of the new nursing informatics course. You will need to consider the following key aspects:

  • Analyzing philosophical approaches to evaluation in nursing education.
  • Outlining the program evaluation process, including steps for data collection, analysis, and implementation.
  • Selecting an appropriate evaluation design, framework, or model for program evaluation.
  • Examining how data analysis can be utilized to foster ongoing program improvement.
  • Ensuring that your presentation aligns with the provided grading criteria and includes a minimum of eight scholarly sources cited using current APA style and formatting.

The Student’s Role

As a student, your role is to assume the position of a nursing educator tasked with evaluating the effectiveness of a newly added nursing informatics course. You will need to demonstrate your ability to think critically, analyze various evaluation approaches, and propose a structured process for assessing the course’s impact on student learning outcomes and program effectiveness. Additionally, you will be responsible for recording a 10-15 minute presentation to effectively communicate your proposed evaluation process to stakeholders.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments:

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 1 Course Definition and Alignment Table Example

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 2 Criteria and Rubric Development Example

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template Example

NURS FPX 6111 Program Effectiveness Presentation Paper Example

Title Slide:

  • Title: Enhancing Nursing Education Through Program Evaluation
  • Course: Nursing Informatics Curriculum Evaluation

Purpose Slide:

  • Purpose: To propose a systematic process for determining the effectiveness of the new nursing informatics course added to the curriculum.
  • Objectives:
    • Explore philosophical approaches to evaluation in nursing education.
    • Outline the program evaluation process.
    • Select an evaluation framework for the nursing informatics course.
    • Discuss strategies for ongoing program improvement.

Philosophical Approaches Slide:

  • DIKW Theory:
    • Gather data and transform it into actionable intelligence to enhance understanding of technology integration in healthcare (Dammann, 2019).
  • Benner’s Model:
    • Assess students’ progression from novice to expert in nursing informatics, emphasizing skill development and practical application (Paul et al., 2019).
  • Summative and Developmental Assessments:
    • Evaluate students’ proficiency during and after the course, measuring their ability to utilize technology for effective healthcare delivery (Tseng et al., 2021).

Program Evaluation Process Slide:

  • Assessment:
    • Collect data through anonymous surveys to gauge students’ perceptions and learning outcomes (Hancock & Volante, 2020).
  • Analysis:
    • Interpret collected data to understand the course’s impact on students’ technological proficiency and healthcare delivery skills.
  • Planning:
    • Utilize analysis findings to identify strengths and weaknesses of the course, guiding future improvements.
  • Implementation:
    • Integrate necessary changes into the curriculum to enhance student learning experiences.
  • Evaluation:
    • Conduct follow-up assessments to measure the effectiveness of implemented changes.

Evaluation Design Slide:

  • Utilizing Kirkpatrick’s Four-Level Training Evaluation Model:
    • Level 1: Reaction – Assess student satisfaction and engagement with the course.
    • Level 2: Learning – Measure knowledge and skills acquired during the course.
    • Level 3: Behavior – Evaluate students’ ability to apply learned skills in clinical practice.
    • Level 4: Results – Determine the impact of the course on patient outcomes and healthcare quality.

Program Improvement Slide:

  • Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Cycle:
    • Plan: Identify areas for improvement based on evaluation findings.
    • Do: Implement changes in the curriculum to address identified areas.
    • Study: Assess the effectiveness of implemented changes through data analysis.
    • Act: Adjust strategies based on study results to further enhance the nursing informatics course.

Data Analysis for Ongoing Improvement Slide:

  • Continuous Data Collection:
    • Gather real-time data throughout the course duration to track student progress and identify areas for intervention.
  • Utilizing Likert Scale:
    • Assess student perceptions and learning outcomes through structured survey responses, allowing for quantitative analysis.

Conclusion Slide:

  • Emphasis on the importance of continuous evaluation and improvement in nursing education.
  • Emphasis on the potential impact of the proposed systematic process on enhancing student learning outcomes and healthcare delivery.

References Slide:

Dammann, O. (2019). Data, information, evidence, and knowledge: A proposal for health informatics and data science. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 10(3), e224.

Hancock, P. A., & Volante, W. G. (2020). Quantifying the qualities of language. PloS One, 15(5), e0232198.

Paul, F., Abecassis, L., Freiberger, D., Hamilton, S., Kelly, P., Klements, E., LaGrasta, C., Lemire, L., OʼDonnell, E., Patisteas, E., Phinney, C., Conwell, K., Saia, T., Whelan, K., Wood, L. J., & OʼBrien, P. (2019). Competency-based professional advancement model for advanced practice RNs. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(2), 66–72.

Tseng, L. P., Hou, T. H., Huang, L. P., & Ou, Y. K. (2021). Effectiveness of applying clinical simulation scenarios and integrating information technology in medical-surgical nursing and critical nursing courses. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 229.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 6111 Program Effectiveness Presentation Assignment

Create a PowerPoint presentation with 10-12 slides that proposes a systematic process for determining the effectiveness of the new course you have added to the nursing curriculum.

Course analytics are important in guiding the revision process as well as further development of your evaluation strategies and documentation. As a nursing educator, you must establish and maintain analytical data to demonstrate to your stakeholders that your course is meeting the learning and program outcomes in order to gain approval to move forward with the new course.

Program effectiveness depends not only on internal factors, but also on external factors. Course outcomes should be based on the program learning outcomes and placed in an evaluation plan. Program outcomes evaluate the effectiveness of the whole program and what your course will contribute to meeting these outcomes.

Create and record a PowerPoint presentation with 10–12 slides that proposes a systematic process for determining the effectiveness of the new course you have added to the nursing curriculum.

While you will not have access to real analytical data from real learners to show how the course is meeting the learning and program outcomes, you should still be able to use the formative feedback from the instructor you received for your earlier assessments, as well as scholarly research, to think critically about a process that could potentially guide improvement efforts for the nursing program in which the course is being hypothetically offered.

Creating a Presentation

Creating a presentation requires using some technology tools that you might not be familiar with. You can review the following library guide on using PowerPoint:

  • Capella University Library: PowerPoint Presentations.

Make sure your presentation contains the following slide headings and sections, which reflect critical elements that align with the grading criteria:

  • Title.
  • Purpose. Include the reasons for the presentation (1–2 slides).
  • Philosophical Approaches. Explain some of the major philosophical approaches to evaluation (2–3 slides).
  • Program Evaluation Process. Show the steps of the program evaluation process (2–3 slides).
  • Evaluation Design. Select and articulate an evaluation design, framework, or model for program evaluation (2–3 slides).
  • Program Improvement. Examine how data analysis can be used to foster ongoing program improvement (2–3 slides).
  • References. Include a minimum of eight sources, cited using current APA style and formatting.

Recording Your Presentation

In addition to creating a PowerPoint, record a 10–15 minute presentation for stakeholders that covers all of the main points from your PowerPoint.

Before starting to record your presentation, make sure you have done the following:

  • Set up and tested your microphone and headset using the installation instructions provided by the manufacturer. You only need to use the headset if your audio is not clear or high quality when captured by the microphone.
  • Practice using the equipment to ensure the audio quality is sufficient.
  • Consult Using Kaltura for guidance on how to record your presentation and upload it in the courseroom.
  • Microsoft PowerPoint also allows you to record your narration with your slides. If you choose this option, simply submit your presentation to the appropriate area of the courseroom. Your narration will be included with your slides.
  • Remember to practice delivering and recording your presentation multiple times to ensure effective delivery.

Note: If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in this activity, please contact Disability Services at DisabilityServices@Capella.edu to request accommodations.

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.

How We Can Assist You

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at ReliablePapers.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust ReliablePapers.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS FPX 6111 Course Evaluation Template Paper Example

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation TemplateNURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template

NURS FPX 6111 Course Evaluation Template Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 6111 Assessment and Evaluation in Nursing Education

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template

Assignment Overview

In this assignment, you will develop a standardized template for evaluating courses in a selected program. The objective is to create a comprehensive evaluation tool that aligns with the learning objectives and program outcomes established in previous assessments.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

The primary goal of this assignment is to create a standardized course evaluation template that effectively measures the achievement of learning objectives and program outcomes. By developing this template, you will demonstrate your ability to assess the effectiveness of a course in meeting its educational goals.

The Student’s Role

As a student, your role is to thoroughly analyze the learning objectives and program outcomes specified for the selected program. You will then design a standardized course evaluation template that aligns with these objectives and outcomes, ensuring that it provides a clear and accurate assessment of student learning.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments:

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 1 Course Definition and Alignment Table Example

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 2 Criteria and Rubric Development Example

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 4 Program Effectiveness Presentation Example

NURS FPX 6111 Course Evaluation Template Paper Example

Course Evaluation Template

A course evaluation is akin to a brief survey administered to students by their instructors upon completion of a course. The objective of the evaluation questionnaire is to elicit comprehensive feedback from students regarding their classroom experiences, thereby facilitating enhancements to the learning environment for subsequent classes. Utilizing the Likert scale, which has been validated for its reliability, serves as the method for evaluating course outcomes in Nursing Informatics. This scale encompasses five levels of agreement, ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree,” with “neutral” serving as a midpoint for impartial feedback. Additionally, it offers two further options for students who are uncertain, labeled as “neither agree nor disagree” (Taherdoost, 2019).

Understanding Evaluation Systems

Various evaluation methods are employed to gain a precise quantitative assessment of opinions. One such method is the Likert scale, a commonly used tool where respondents indicate the extent of their agreement or disagreement with a statement. Responses are typically categorized into five points, from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree,” allowing for a nuanced understanding of students’ perspectives on different aspects of Nursing Informatics (Jebb et al., 2021).

Instructions for Assessment Questionnaire

Students are provided with an assessment questionnaire to ascertain the alignment of the current curriculum with the program’s goals and expected outcomes. Additionally, the questionnaire aims to gauge the extent of students’ growth as learners, particularly in their utilization of healthcare IT expertise for diagnostic procedures. Students are instructed to carefully review the information presented in the table and respond truthfully by selecting the appropriate response on the Likert scale, ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree.” Each column accepts only a single selection.

Course Evaluation Template

Course Title: Nursing Informatics

Learning Outcomes:

 

Learning Outcomes Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree
I now have greater faith in my abilities to argue for focusing on medical practice with technological outcomes.
In my experience, multidisciplinary teams who use technology to communicate and share their findings get better results.
Using statistical analysis, I can determine the most effective course of action for patient prevention across a wide range of diseases.
I can properly analyze the clinical and statistical learning outcomes that are easily applicable to practicing nursing services.

                            

Connection Between Learning Outcomes and Evaluation Table

The term “learning outcomes” refers to the expected levels of understanding, competence, and behavior that students should attain upon completing the course. In our course evaluation program, we utilize the Likert scale to analyze students’ responses based on different learning outcomes. Student opinions are categorized into three groups: disagree, slightly agree, and strongly agree. This allows us to determine the proportions of individuals confident in their knowledge versus those who are not. Additionally, details regarding students’ preparedness to utilize healthcare technology integration are obtained from their responses. Educational outcomes can be assessed using this framework by examining learners’ test results (Pescaroli et al., 2020).

Assessment Strategies

The program’s analysis comprises a mix of both types of questions, including open and closed-ended ones, to provide students with the most accurate reflection of their learning from the experience. Course assessment entails examining whether what was taught in the program aligns with what learners were intended to understand and how instructors planned to achieve those goals.

Addressing Appropriate Cognitive, Psychomotor, and Affective Domains

The course has facilitated the development of skills in various domains:

Cognitive Domain:

  • Critical thinking skills in virtual settings.
  • Application of knowledge about medical equipment in practice.
  • Critical thinking and rational behavior in various healthcare contexts.
  • Capacity for critical thinking and appropriate action.

Psychomotor Domain:

  • Confidence in using blood pressure measuring devices.
  • Trust in the efficacy of the Electronic Health Record system.
  • Belief in the ability to use telehealth monitoring tools.
  • Ease in using infusion pumps.

Affective Domain:

  • Improved ability to understand and respond to patients’ concerns.
  • Enhanced ability to meet patients’ expectations.
  • Capability to consider the patient’s perspective.

Assumptions

The examination of the program is based on the following assumptions:

  • The quality of education is directly proportional to the efforts put in by teachers.
  • Course objectives or student objectives should be standardized to ensure valid and useful evaluations.
  • Students’ abilities to utilize technology for illness prevention, identification, and treatment are tested across various cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains throughout the curriculum (Schroeder et al., 2019).

Evaluation Format that Adequately Assesses Learning Outcomes

The program’s success in achieving its desired results is evaluated through:

  • Articulating medical practice outcomes related to nursing informatics.
  • Implementing technological improvements through multidisciplinary teamwork.
  • Developing action plans for preventing further illnesses.

Evaluation of Course Assessment Methods

Utilization of Likert Scale for Evaluating Program Goals

The Likert scale is being employed to assess the alignment between the program’s intended goals and its actual outcomes. Researchers are utilizing this scale to gauge the extent to which the program is meeting its objectives and whether students are progressing as expected. Through the analysis of Likert scale data, areas requiring improvement in teaching can be identified to enhance student performance (Considine et al., 2021).

Evaluation Criteria Based on the Likert Scale

Evaluation criteria for the learning program are established using the Likert Scale, offering students a range of options including strongly agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, strongly disagree, and disagree. This enables students to provide specific and accurate responses, reducing the likelihood of errors in assessment (Brown Tyo & McCurry, 2019).

Validity and Reliability of Evaluation Methods

The assessment methodology, comprising both open-ended and closed-ended questionnaires, is deemed to possess good validity and reliability. The Likert Scale, in particular, is renowned for its high level of reliability, with a dependability rate of 94%. This assessment places reliance on the Likert Scale due to its efficiency and accuracy in data collection (Considine et al., 2021).

Strengths and Weaknesses of the Likert Scale

While the Likert Scale offers several advantages such as simplicity, clear answer choices, and efficiency, it also presents some drawbacks. Challenges may arise in accommodating responses falling within the “neither agree nor disagree” category. Moreover, individuals may exhibit a tendency to agree with every statement if they possess an acquiescence tendency. Additionally, respondents may not consistently provide truthful responses, and there exists a possibility of incomplete survey submissions (Brown Tyo & McCurry, 2019).

Executive Summary

In summary, the course evaluation template developed for NURS FPX 6111 encompasses various elements essential for assessing learning outcomes and program effectiveness in Nursing Informatics. Through the utilization of the Likert scale, students’ perspectives on different aspects of the course are captured, providing valuable feedback to enhance the learning environment. The evaluation criteria, based on the Likert scale, offer students specific options for response, ensuring accuracy in assessment. Moreover, the assessment methods demonstrate good validity and reliability, with the Likert scale being particularly recognized for its dependability. While the Likert scale offers simplicity and efficiency, challenges such as accommodating certain responses and ensuring respondent honesty exist. Overall, the evaluation template provides a robust framework for evaluating course effectiveness and student learning outcomes in Nursing Informatics.

References

Considine, J., Berry, D., Allen, J., Hewitt, N., Oldland, E., Sprogis, S. K., & Currey, J. (2021). Specific elements of team-based learning used in nursing education. Nurse Educator, 46(5), E84–E89.

Brown Tyo, M., & McCurry, M. K. (2019). An integrative review of clinical reasoning teaching strategies and outcome evaluation in nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 40(1), 11–17.

Pescaroli, G., Velazquez, O., Alcántara-Ayala, I., Galasso, C., Kostkova, P., & Alexander, D. (2020). A Likert scale-based model for benchmarking operational capacity, organizational resilience, and disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11(3), 404–409.

Schroeder, K., Garcia, B., Phillips, R. S., & Lipman, T. H. (2019). Addressing social determinants of health through community engagement: An undergraduate nursing course. Journal of Nursing Education, 58(7), 423–426.

Taherdoost, H. (2019, March 29). What Is the Best Response Scale for Survey and Questionnaire Design; Review of Different Lengths of Rating Scale / Attitude Scale / Likert Scale. Papers.ssrn.com.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 6111 Course Evaluation Template Assignment

Description

Develop a standardized template for evaluating courses in a selected program. Include a 2–3-page executive summary containing the rationale and justification for the methods selected.

Note: The assessments in this course build upon one another and you are required to complete them in the order in which they are presented.

As you prepare to complete this assessment, you may want to think about other related issues to deepen your understanding or broaden your viewpoint. You are encouraged to consider the questions below and discuss them with a fellow learner, a work associate, an interested friend, or a member of your professional community. Note that these questions are for your own development and exploration and do not need to be completed or submitted as part of your assessment.

  • What are the key components of an end-of-course evaluation?
  • How can you determine if educational outcomes meet the needs and goals of a health care setting?
  • What are examples of alternative evaluation methods for learning outcomes in nursing education?
  • What types of questions should be included in a clinical evaluation questionnaire?

Assessment Instructions

Note: Assessments in this course must be completed in the order in which they are presented. You must complete Assessment 2 before beginning this assessment.

OVERVIEW

This is a two-part assessment. The first part is the development of a standardized course evaluation template. The second part is an executive summary addressed to a workplace supervisor.

PREPARATION

Use the Capella University Library and the Internet to ensure you are familiar with the following:

  • Explore a variety of methods that can be used to evaluate the achievement of the learning objectives as well as program outcomes.
  • Understand the steps in assembling and administering the tests for learning outcomes.
  • Examine how validity and reliability of evaluation methods for courses and program outcomes are measured and established.
  • Find examples of course evaluations. If you choose to incorporate ideas from other examples, you must provide proper APA citations and format.

PART ONE – STANDARDIZED COURSE EVALUATION TEMPLATE

Determine the best approach for evaluating whether the learning objectives and program outcomes are being assessed adequately in your course. Make use of your work from the previous assessments in the creation of your standardized course assessment template.

  • Create a standardized template that clearly measures the course’s ability to achieve the learning objectives and outcomes stated in your earlier assessments in this course.
    • There is no page limit for this template. Page length should be appropriate to the context.

Note: You are encouraged to integrate feedback received for your earlier assessments to continue tweaking your application of the concepts in this course.

PART TWO – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Once you have completed your standardized template, construct an executive summary to discuss the rationale for it.

In the executive summary, include the following critical elements that align with the grading criteria:

  • A summary of how the course evaluation aligns with the stated learning objectives and program outcomes.
  • A justification for the methods chosen to evaluate the achievement of learning outcomes.
  • A description of how validity and reliability of evaluation methods will be established.

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.

How We Can Assist You

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at ReliablePapers.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust ReliablePapers.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS FPX 6111 Criteria and Rubric Development Paper Example

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 2 Criteria and Rubric DevelopmentNURS FPX 6111 Assessment 2 Criteria and Rubric Development

NURS FPX 6111 Criteria and Rubric Development Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 6111 Assessment and Evaluation in Nursing Education

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 2 Criteria and Rubric Development

Assignment Instructions Overview

This assignment focuses on creating a comprehensive assessment description and grading rubric for a chosen assessment strategy. The assessment aims to evaluate learners’ proficiency in achieving specific learning objectives related to nursing informatics. Through this assignment, students will develop an understanding of the rationale behind their chosen assessment strategy and create a grading rubric that aligns with the assessment objectives.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

The primary objective of this assignment is to design an effective assessment tool that aligns with the learning objectives established in Assessment 1. Students will need to consider the cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains of learning when developing their assessment strategy. Additionally, students will explore processes for determining the validity and reliability of their assessment methods and how grading expectations can be communicated to learners.

The Student’s Role

As a nursing student, your role is to design an assessment tool that accurately measures learners’ proficiency in nursing informatics. You will need to carefully consider the learning objectives and select appropriate assessment methods for each domain of learning. Additionally, you will justify your assessment strategy by providing evidence-based support and create a grading rubric that clearly defines performance levels and expectations.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments:

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 1 Course Definition and Alignment Table Example

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 3 Course Evaluation Template Example

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 4 Program Effectiveness Presentation Example

NURS FPX 6111 Criteria and Rubric Development Paper Example

In the realm of nursing education, it’s crucial to assess students’ knowledge effectively. Developing criteria and rubrics helps students understand what’s expected of them in terms of learning abilities and capabilities.

Part One: Assessment Description and Rationale

Assessment Description

The assessment for Nursing Informatics course aims to evaluate students’ understanding and application of theoretical knowledge in real-life scenarios. It focuses on enhancing nurses’ skills to deliver patient-centered, fair, and evidence-based healthcare, free from biases (Veinot et al., 2019). This assessment also aims to strengthen nurses’ cognitive abilities and their use of technology in healthcare settings.

Rationale

The chosen assessment strategy aligns with contemporary nursing practice, emphasizing the importance of technology integration for delivering optimal patient care (Veinot et al., 2019). By assessing cognitive abilities, the assessment ensures that students can effectively apply theoretical knowledge in real-world scenarios, enhancing their critical thinking and decision-making skills.

Specific Learning Outcomes

Specifically, students will be evaluated on their proficiency in utilizing technology for tasks such as updating patient information, e-monitoring, diagnosis, providing patient-centered care, and identifying drug interactions using digital automated systems. The assessment will gauge their ability to integrate evidence-based learning, critical thinking, and practical experience gained through simulation-based learning (Choi et al., 2021). Additionally, it will assess their capacity to manage complex situations calmly and without errors, particularly under pressure scenarios encountered in simulation-based and theoretical examinations.

Assessment Services the Needs of the Learner

The assessment caters to learners’ requirements by emphasizing the integration of technology into healthcare practices. It educates students on utilizing technological advancements, including Automated IV Pumps, EMR systems, remote monitoring systems, and CCC (Central Command Center) (Bacon & Hoffman, 2020). This approach equips them with the skills to deliver safe and high-quality patient care, leveraging automation to minimize medication errors. Consequently, it contributes to reducing mortality, morbidity rates, and healthcare disparities associated with medication errors.

Part Two: Grading Rubric Development

Steps in Assembling and Administrating Test:

To ensure effective assessment of learning outcomes, it’s essential to follow a structured process in assembling and administering tests.

Assembling of the Test:

Assembling the test begins with meticulously selecting course content, serving as the foundation for student learning. Following content selection, questions are crafted in a challenging manner to assess students’ cognitive abilities. These questions undergo critical analysis by the faculty to ensure they are cognitively stimulating. Once finalized, questions are arranged from easier to more challenging to encourage students and push their cognitive and critical thinking abilities to their limits.

Administrating the Test:

The test is administered to students after thorough briefing on guidelines, criteria, and rubrics. They receive detailed instructions on the criteria and rubric essential for achieving high grades. Administration involves:

  • Guidelines: Students are provided with clear instructions by the instructor to effectively tackle the test, encouraging them to utilize their cognitive skills, theoretical knowledge, and simulation-based learning to resolve test problems.
  • Outcomes: Students are evaluated based on their application of simulation-based learning, theoretical knowledge, and cognitive thinking in the test.
  • Assessment: Students’ proficiency in utilizing technology for simulation-based learning to provide efficient healthcare services is assessed, reflecting sound psychomotor, cognitive, and affective learning abilities.

Knowledge Gaps:

Challenges may arise from professors’ inadequate collaboration in developing simulation-based learning assessments integrating healthcare and technology. Additionally, the absence of a standardized testing format may impede the assembling and administration of tests.

Learning in Multiple Domains:

Students are evaluated across cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains in nursing informatics:

  • Cognitive: Students’ critical thinking abilities are assessed through various challenging scenarios and theoretical/practical examinations. This assessment enhances analytical reasoning, enabling effective utilization of technology integrated with healthcare.
  • Psychomotor: Practical examinations and clinical-based simulations enhance students’ psychomotor skills, enabling them to proficiently use technology for basic healthcare services.
  • Affective: This domain evaluates nurses’ ability to apply evidence-based learning in professional practice, supporting actions with theoretical knowledge backed by research articles.

Performance-Level Criteria:

The grading rubric outlines criteria for performance evaluation:

Criteria Non-Performance Basic Proficient Distinguished
Nursing Informatics Understanding Does not describe nursing informatics’ relevance to nursing. Does not support findings from literature. Briefly discusses nursing informatics’ relevance to nursing. Does not support findings from literature. Describes nursing informatics’ relevance to nursing. Supports findings from one literature source. Clearly describes nursing informatics’ relevance to nursing. Justifies with findings from literature.
Role in Decreasing Medication Errors Does not describe the role of nursing informatics in decreasing medication errors. Does not support with research articles. Briefly describes the role of nursing informatics in decreasing medication errors. Does not support with research articles. Describes the role of nursing informatics in decreasing medication errors. Supports with one research article. Clearly describes the role of nursing informatics in decreasing medication errors. Supports with five research articles.
Impact on Healthcare Disparities Does not describe how information technology helps decrease healthcare disparities. Does not support with literature evidence. Briefly describes how information technology helps decrease healthcare disparities. Does not support with literature evidence. Explains how information technology helps decrease healthcare disparities. Supports with one piece of literature. Clearly explains how information technology helps decrease healthcare disparities. Supports with multiple literature pieces.
APA Style Formatting Does not follow APA format for formatting, citation, and references. Partially follows APA style. Contains minor errors. Follows APA style. Contains minor errors. Follows APA style accurately without errors.

 

Communication of Grading Expectations

To ensure clarity and transparency, grading expectations must be clearly communicated to students. Employing an open-line communication strategy, instructors should thoroughly explain each aspect of the grading criteria, ensuring students understand the distinctions between non-performance, basic, proficient, and distinguished levels. It’s imperative to elucidate how these criteria differ and provide guidance on how students can strive to attain distinguished levels.

Validity and Reliability of Assessment

Validity and reliability assessment measures gauge the assessment’s ability to furnish accurate and consistent criteria for evaluating students’ learning outcomes. Validity scrutinizes if assessment questions align with course learning objectives, particularly in nursing informatics, ensuring achievement of outcomes like effective technology integration to minimize medication errors and enhance patient safety (Eddy et al., 2020). Meanwhile, reliability assesses the consistency of test questions over time, evaluating students’ ability to consistently score similarly across repeated intervals. The fulfillment of grading criteria indicates the reliability of assessment criteria (Nolet et al., 2021).

Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths lie in the criteria’s reliability to evaluate course learning outcomes comprehensively. The criteria cover all areas aligned with course objectives, ensuring thorough assessment. However, limitations stem from the lack of access to simulation-based learning, hindering students’ practical knowledge acquisition. This limitation restricts their ability to effectively apply technology in healthcare settings.

Conclusion

In conclusion, effective assessment in nursing education necessitates the development of clear criteria and rubrics to evaluate students’ knowledge and skills comprehensively. The assessment for the Nursing Informatics course aims to bridge theoretical knowledge with practical application, emphasizing the integration of technology into healthcare practices. By evaluating students’ cognitive abilities and technological proficiency, this assessment ensures they can deliver patient-centered care effectively, minimize medication errors, and mitigate healthcare disparities. However, challenges may arise from the lack of standardized testing formats and limited access to simulation-based learning resources. Ensuring clear communication of grading expectations, validity, and reliability of assessments are crucial for enhancing the effectiveness of the evaluation process.

References

Bacon, C. T., & Hoffman, L. A. (2020). Nursing Informatics: Challenges and Opportunities. Nursing Clinics, 55(3), 405-414.

Choi, J. S., Yi, B., & Lee, J. (2021). The effect of simulation-based education on knowledge, skills, and critical thinking in nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 97, 104714.

Eddy, L. H., Bingham, D. D., Crossley, K. L., Shahid, N. F., Ellingham-Khan, M., Otteslev, A., Figueredo, N. S., Mon-Williams, M., & Hill, L. (2020). The validity and reliability of observational assessment tools available to measure fundamental movement skills in school-age children: A systematic review. PloS One, 15(8), e0237919.

Nolet, P. S., Yu, H., Côté, P., Meyer, A. L., Kristman, V. L., Sutton, D., Murnaghan, K., & Lemeunier, N. (2021). Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: A systematic and critical review. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 29(1), 33.

Veinot, T. C., Mitchell, H., & Ancker, J. S. (2019). Good intentions are not enough: how informatics interventions can worsen inequality. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 26(8-9), 737-743.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 6111 Criteria and Rubric Development Paper

Description

Create a 1–2-page assessment description that includes the rationale for the chosen assessment strategy (Part One) and the related grading rubric (Part Two).

Learning can take place in one of three domains: cognitive, psychomotor, and affective. The nurse educator must take these into consideration when developing learning opportunities.

  • The cognitive domain deals with scholarly activities such as critical thinking, decision making, and rational thought.
  • The psychomotor domain is part of learning physical skills, such as placing an intravenous catheter or performing a sterile technique.
  • The affective domain deals with attitudes, feelings, beliefs, and opinions, such as those related to health care.

Assessment Instructions

Note: Assessments in this course must be completed in the order in which they are presented. You must complete Assessment 1 before beginning this assessment.

PREPARATION

Select an assessment strategy for your learning objectives from Assessment 1. (Refer to feedback you received for Assessment 1.) What assignment would you give your learners, and how are you going to assess their performance?

  • Select one or more of your stated learning objectives and identify the specific domains (cognitive, psychomotor, or affective) that could be used to assess a learner’s demonstration of proficiency.
    • If the learning objective assesses the cognitive domain, what assessment tool would you use?
    • If the learning objective assesses the psychomotor domain, how will you test for proficiency?
    • If the learning objective assesses the affective domain, how will you know if the learner is proficient?
  • Consider the various processes that can be used for determining the validity and reliability of an assessment.
    • Think about how we validate information—with faculty and student surveys, grades/student progression, or anecdotal comments.
  • Determine how grading expectations can be communicated to learners.
    • Think in terms of how to explain the grading rubric, or a specific faculty expectation message from instructor to learner. This will help you create a description of the assessment.

PART ONE – ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION AND RATIONALE

The real-world deliverable is a single document intended to be given to your work supervisor. The purpose of this document is to achieve two things:

  • An assessment description summarizes the big picture of the assessment and describes how a learner’s performance of the learning outcomes will be evaluated.
  • The rationale provides the evidence -based support for your chosen assessment strategy.

You must complete the following in Part One:

  • Write a brief description of the assessment.
  • Describe the type of assessment tool that will be used to assess the learning objectives.
  • Support your assessment strategy with an explanation of the processes that could be used to determine the validity and reliability of the assessment strategies chosen.

PART TWO – CREATE A GRADING RUBRIC

Create a grading rubric for your new assessment using a table format. Refer to the Rubric Template, linked in the Resources under the Capella Resources heading.

Your rubric should clearly assess the learning objectives and have distinct levels of performance. For example, the scoring guides in your Capella assessments use the following performance levels.

  • Non-performance.
  • Basic.
  • Proficient.
  • Distinguished.

Note: Titles for performance levels can be whatever you deem appropriate to your specific learning environment. The four levels mentioned above are examples of possible performance-level language. You may use whatever terms fit the best in your setting.

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.

How We Can Assist You

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at ReliablePapers.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust ReliablePapers.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company