A collection of students’ favorite writing guides, how-tos, and hacks that will help them improve their writing skills and knowledge and make sure they excel in school

NURS FPX 4020 Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation Example

NURS FPX 4020 Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation ExampleNURS FPX 4020 Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation Example Assignment Brief

Course: NURS FPX 4020 Improving Quality of Care and Patient Safety

Assignment Title: Assessment 3: Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation

Assignment Instructions Overview:

This assignment is designed to assess your ability to develop and deliver an engaging and informative in-service presentation related to a Medication Safety Improvement Plan. The primary goal is to showcase your proficiency in key competencies such as analyzing successful quality improvement initiatives, explaining the nurse’s role in coordinating care, and applying professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate effectively.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

In this assignment, you will build on the Medication Safety Improvement Plan developed in Assessment 2 and create an 8–14 slide PowerPoint presentation. The presentation, accompanied by detailed speaker’s notes, will be designed for a hypothetical in-service session targeting nursing staff. The focus is on promoting knowledge acquisition and skill application related to the safety improvement initiative.

The assignment will assess your ability to:

Analyze the Elements of a Successful Quality Improvement Initiative:

Explain the Nurse’s Role in Coordinating Care:

  • List clearly the purpose and goals of an in-service session focusing on safe medication administration for nurses.
  • Explain the audience’s role in and importance of making the improvement plan focusing on medication administration successful.

Apply Professional, Scholarly, Evidence-Based Strategies to Communicate Effectively:

  • Ensure slides are easy to read, error-free, and organized with a clear purpose or goals.
  • Provide detailed speaker notes that are clear, organized, and professionally presented.
  • Communicate with nurses in a respectful and informative way, presenting expectations and soliciting feedback on communication strategies for future improvement.

The Student’s Role:

As a student undertaking this assignment, your role is to:

  • Utilize the knowledge gained throughout the course to develop a comprehensive Medication Safety Improvement Plan.
  • Design an in-service presentation agenda and outcomes that clearly articulate the purpose and goals of the session, addressing the importance of safe medication administration for nurses.
  • Present a thorough overview of the Safety Improvement Plan, emphasizing its significance in reducing medication errors, improving patient outcomes, and enhancing the overall work environment.
  • Engage the audience by explaining their critical role in implementing and driving the improvement plan, highlighting the direct impact on patient safety and the overall success of the initiative.
  • Create resources and activities within the presentation that encourage skill development and process understanding related to safe medication administration.
  • Communicate effectively through well-organized slides and detailed speaker notes, ensuring clarity, professionalism, and alignment with evidence-based strategies.
  • Demonstrate a commitment to ongoing improvement by soliciting feedback from the audience and outlining how this feedback will be integrated into future sessions.

Remember to refer to the provided literature and best practices, and leverage the AONE Nurse Executive Competencies as you design and deliver the in-service presentation. Your ability to lead and educate other nurses, demonstrating leadership and valuable resourcefulness, will be key in this assignment.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation Assignment

For this assessment, you will develop an 8–14 slide PowerPoint presentation with thorough speaker’s notes designed for a hypothetical in-service session related to the safe medication administration improvement plan you developed in Assessment 2.

As a practicing professional, you are likely to present educational in-services or training to staff pertaining to quality improvement (QI) measures of safety improvement interventions. Such in-services and training sessions should be presented in a creative and innovative manner to hold the audience’s attention and promote knowledge acquisition and skill application that changes practice for the better. The teaching sessions may include a presentation, audience participation via simulation or other interactive strategy, audiovisual media, and participant learning evaluation.

The use of in-services and/or training sessions has positive implications for nursing practice by increasing staff confidence when providing care to specific patient populations. It also allows for a safe and nonthreatening environment where staff nurses can practice their skills prior to a real patient event. Participation in learning sessions fosters a team approach, collaboration, patient safety, and greater patient satisfaction rates in the health care environment (Patel & Wright, 2018).

As you prepare to complete the assessment, consider the impact of in-service training on patient outcomes as well as practice outcomes for staff nurses. Be sure to support your thoughts on the effectiveness of educating and training staff to increase the quality of care provided to patients by examining the literature and established best practices.

You are encouraged to explore the AONE Nurse Executive Competencies Review activity before you develop the Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation. This activity will help you review your understanding of the AONE Nurse Executive Competencies — especially those related to competencies relevant to developing an effective training session and presentation. This is for your own practice and self-assessment, and demonstrates your engagement in the course.

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative. Explain the need and process to improve safety outcomes related to medication administration. Create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative on medication administration.

Competency 4: Explain the nurse’s role in coordinating care to enhance quality and reduce costs. List clearly the purpose and goals of an in-service session focusing on safe medication administration for nurses. Explain audience’s role in and importance of making the improvement plan focusing on medication administration successful.

Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care. Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. Speaker notes are clear, organized, and professionally presented. Organize content with clear purpose or goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years).

Communicate with nurses in a respectful and informative way that clearly presents expectations and solicits feedback on communication strategies for future improvement.

Reference for NURSFPX4020 Capella Assessment 3: Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation.

Patel, S., & Wright, M. (2018). Development of interprofessional simulation in nursing education to improve teamwork and collaboration in maternal child nursing. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 47(3), s16–s17.

Professional Context

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will often find yourself in a position to lead and educate other nurses. This colleague-to-colleague education can take many forms, from mentoring to informal explanations on best practices to formal in-service training. In-services are an effective way to train a large group. Preparing to run an in-service may be daunting, as the facilitator must develop his or her message around the topic while designing activities to help the target audience learn and practice. By improving understanding and competence around designing and delivering in-service training, a BSN practitioner can demonstrate leadership and prove him- or herself a valuable resource to others.

Scenario

For this assessment it is suggested you take one of two approaches:

Build on the work that you have done in your first two assessments and create an agenda and PowerPoint of an educational in-service session that would help a specific staff audience learn, provide feedback, and understand their roles and practice new skills related to your safety improvement plan pertaining to medication administration, or

Locate a safety improvement plan through an external resource and create an agenda and PowerPoint of an educational in-service session that would help a specific staff audience learn, provide feedback, and understand their roles and practice new skills related to the issues and improvement goals pertaining to medication administration safety.

Instructions

The final deliverable for this assessment will be a PowerPoint presentation with detailed presenter’s notes representing the material you would deliver at an in-service session to raise awareness of your chosen safety improvement initiative focusing on medication administration and to explain the need for it. Additionally, you must educate the audience as to their role and importance to the success of the initiative. This includes providing examples and practice opportunities to test out new ideas or practices related to the safety improvement initiative.

Be sure that your presentation addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

List the purpose and goals of an in-service session focusing on safe medication administration for nurses.

Explain the need for and process to improve safety outcomes related to medication administration.

Explain to the audience their role and importance of making the improvement plan focusing on medication administration successful.

Create resources or activities to encourage skill development and process understanding related to a safety improvement initiative on medication administration.

Communicate with nurses in a respectful and informative way that clearly presents expectations and solicits feedback on communication strategies for future improvement.

There are various ways to structure an in-service session; below is just one example:

Part 1: Agenda and Outcomes. Explain to your audience what they are going to learn or do, and what they are expected to take away.

Part 2: Safety Improvement Plan. Give an overview of the current problem focusing on medication administration, the proposed plan, and what the improvement plan is trying to address. Explain why it is important for the organization to address the current situation.

Part 3: Audience’s Role and Importance. Discuss how the staff audience will be expected to help implement and drive the improvement plan. Explain why they are critical to the success of the improvement plan focusing on medication administration. Describe how their work could benefit from embracing their role in the plan.

Part 4: New Process and Skills Practice. Explain new processes or skills. Develop an activity that allows the staff audience to practice and ask questions about these new processes and skills. In the notes section of your PowerPoint, brainstorm potential responses to likely questions or concerns.

Part 5: Soliciting Feedback. Describe how you would solicit feedback from the audience on the improvement plan and the in-service. Explain how you might integrate this feedback for future improvements.

Remember to account for activity and discussion time.

Additional Requirements :

Presentation length: There is no required length; use just enough slides to address all the necessary elements. Remember to use short, concise bullet points on the slides and expand on your points in the presenter’s notes. If you use 2 or 3 slides to address each of the parts in the above example, your presentation would be at least 10 slides and no more than 15 slides (not including the title, conclusion, or references slides).

Speaker notes: Speaker notes (located under each slide) should reflect what you would actually say if you were delivering the presentation to an audience. This presentation does NOT require audio or a transcript. Another presenter would be able to use the presentation by following the speaker’s notes.

APA format: Use APA formatting for in-text citations. Include an APA-formatted reference slide at the end of your presentation.

Number of references: Cite a minimum of 5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence to support your assertions. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information. Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.

PLEASE READ THE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY AND TAKE YOUR TIME TO MEET EVERY REQUIREMENT!

Resources:

Leadership Competencies

  • American Organization of Nurse Executives. (2015). Nurse executive competencies [PDF]. Retrieved from https://www.aonl.org/nurse-executive-competencies
  • The AONE nurse executive competencies may be a helpful resource as you design your presentation, especially with regard to communication and collaboration.

Evidence and Value-Based Decision Making

Zadeh, R., Sadatsafavi, H., & Xue, R. (2015). Evidence-based and value-based decision making about healthcare design: An economic evaluation of the safety and quality outcomes. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 8(4), 58–76.

  • This article presents a model for taking different decision-making approaches to improve outcomes.

Facilitating Learning

Fewster-Thuente, L. (2014). A contemporary method to teach collaboration to students. Journal of Nursing Education, 53(11), 641–645.

This article may give you some ideas for a skills practice activity to include in your Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation.

  • Green, J. K., & Huntington, A. D. (2017). Online professional development for digitally differentiated nurses: An action research perspective. Nurse Education in Practice, 22, 55–62.

Green and Huntington highlight five elements that are key to effective online professional development in this article describing an action-research project involving RNs in clinical settings.

  • Moradi, K., Najarkolai, A. R., & Keshmiri, F. (2016). Interprofessional teamwork education: Moving toward the patient-centered approach. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(10), 449–460.

The study discussed in this article involved the development of a framework of interprofessional framework competencies on which curricula and assessment tools could be based. Such an approach may be useful for you to consider as you develop your presentation.

  • Rakhudu, M. A., Davhana-Maselesele, M., & Useh, U. (2016). Concept analysis of collaboration in implementing problem-based learning in nursing education. Curationis, 39(1), 1–13.

In their effort to better understand and define collaboration in terms of problem-based learning, the authors observed the increasing importance of interprofessional collaboration to nursing education and other aspects of the health care profession.

  • Capella Writing Center
  • Introduction to the Writing Center.
  • Access the various resources in the Capella Writing Center to help you better understand and improve your writing.

Assessment 3: Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation APA Style and Format

  • Capella University follows the style and formatting guidelines in the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, known informally as the APA manual. Refer to the Writing Center’s APA Module for tips on proper use of APA style and format.

Capella University Library

  • BSN Program Library Research Guide.
  • The library research guide will be useful in guiding you through the Capella University Library, offering tips for searching the literature and other references for your assessments.

PowerPoint

Refer to these helpful Campus resources for PowerPoint tips:

  • Capella University Library: PowerPoint Presentations.
  • Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX].

NURS FPX 4020 Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation Example Assignment

Slide 1: Title

  • Title: Medication Safety Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation

Speaker Notes:

    • Good [morning/afternoon/evening], everyone. Today, we’re here to discuss a crucial aspect of patient care – Medication Safety Improvement Plan.
    • Medication errors can have serious consequences, and our goal is to address this issue through a comprehensive in-service presentation.

Slide 2: Introduction

Introduction:

  • Medication errors are preventable adverse events occurring during prescribing, transcribing, or dispensing.
  • Escalation at our medical facility due to factors like workload, inadequate training, and distractions (Farzi et al., 2017).
  • Consequences include patient harm, prolonged hospital stay, increased costs, and potential lawsuits.

Speaker Notes:

  • Let’s now look at the core of the issue. Medication errors are avoidable but have been on the rise at our facility due to various factors.
  • We’ve noticed adverse effects on patients, increased hospital stays, and elevated costs. Today, we’ll explore how a Safety Improvement Plan can mitigate these issues.

Slide 3: Agenda and Outcomes

Agenda and Outcomes:

  • 3-4 days of sessions focusing on safety improvement.
  • Key Topics: Safety improvement, Audience role, New skills.
  • Outcomes: Understanding strategies, Evidence-based practice, Teamwork importance, New skills acquisition.

Speaker Notes:

  • Over the next 3-4 days, we’ll cover key topics critical to our safety improvement initiative.
  • By the end of this in-service, our goal is for you to understand strategies, implement evidence-based practices, appreciate teamwork, and acquire new skills related to medication safety.

Slide 4: Safety Improvement Plan Overview

Safety Improvement Plan:

  • Significant medication errors over the past 8 years.
  • Addressing the issue vital for reducing morbidity and mortality, minimizing costs, and improving work environment.
  • Proposed plan: Health information technology, effective communication, increased staff, and minimized interruptions (Hughes & Ortiz, 2015).

Speaker Notes:

  • Now, let’s take a closer look at the Safety Improvement Plan. We’ve observed a significant increase in medication errors over the past 8 years.
  • It’s crucial to address this issue not just for patient safety but also to reduce costs, improve work environment, and prevent potential legal challenges.

Slide 5: Audience’s Role and Importance

Audience’s Role and Importance:

  • Staff will implement and drive the plan.
  • Commenting, sharing experiences, taking responsibility, and embracing the plan.
  • Critical for success as they are directly affected, integral to the process, and their response influences success.
  • Benefits include minimal errors, trust from patients, and improved overall performance.

Speaker Notes:

  • You, the staff, play a pivotal role in implementing and driving this plan. Your input, experiences, and commitment are invaluable.
  • Your active participation is not just essential; it’s integral to the success of the plan. By embracing your roles, you contribute to minimal errors, gain trust, and enhance overall performance.

Slide 6: New Processes and Skills Practice

New Processes and Skills Practice:

  • Emphasis on the “Five Rights” of medication administration.
  • Right patient, drug, dose, route, and time (Martyn et al., 2019).
  • Role play for effective practice, activities related to medication labels and orders for critical thinking, and question worksheets.
  • Ensuring rigorous activities for skill development and understanding.

Speaker Notes:

  • Let’s talk about the practical side. We’ll focus on the “Five Rights” of medication administration – ensuring the right patient, drug, dose, route, and time.
  • We’ve designed role-playing activities, critical-thinking exercises, and question worksheets to enhance your skills and understanding.

Slide 7: Soliciting Feedback

Soliciting Feedback:

  • Methods: Asking questions, surveys, exploratory discussions.
  • Importance of feedback in shaping future improvements.
  • Responding to feedback, making necessary changes, and compiling results.

Speaker Notes:

  • Your feedback is crucial in shaping the success of this plan. We’ll employ various methods, from direct questions to surveys and exploratory discussions.
  • We want to hear from you – your concerns, suggestions, and experiences. Your input will guide us in making necessary improvements for the future.

Slide 8: Conclusion

Conclusion:

  • The improvement plan is tailored for patient safety.
  • Audience’s roles are pivotal for success.
  • Strategic processes and skills practice are essential.
  • Soliciting feedback is integral for ongoing improvement.

Speaker Notes:

  • In conclusion, our improvement plan is tailored to ensure patient safety, and your roles are central to its success.
  • As we focus on the strategic processes and skills practice, keep in mind that your ongoing feedback is integral for continuous improvement.

Slide 9: References

References:

CDC. (2017). Medication Safety. [Link]

Farzi, S., Irajpour, A., Saghaei, M., & Ravaghi, H. (2017). Causes of medication errors in intensive care units. Journal of research in pharmacy practice, 6(3), 158.

Hughes, R. G., & Ortiz, E. (2015). Medication errors: why they happen, and how they can be prevented. Journal of infusion nursing, 28, 14-24.

Kasemsap, (2017). The perspectives of medical errors in the health care industry. In Impact of medical errors and malpractice on health economics, quality, and patient safety (pp. 113-143). IGI Global.

Martyn, -A., Paliadelis, P., & Perry, C. (2019). The safe administration of medication: Nursing behaviours beyond the five-rights. Nurse Education in Practice, 37, 109–114. [DOI Link]

Unlock Your Academic Success with ReliablePapers – Your Trusted Nursing Writing Partner!

Are nursing assignments stressing you out? Don’t worry, we’ve got you covered at ReliablePapers.com! As the best nursing paper writing service, we understand that some topics are tougher than others. If the provided sample on the [Improvement Plan In-Service Presentation Assignment] isn’t enough, why not let our expert nursing essay writers create a unique, customized nursing presentation just for you?

Why Choose Us?

We’re not just another nursing writing service – we’re your pathway to academic excellence. Our online nursing papers are not just cheap; they are a guarantee for academic success. Whether you need nursing writing help, want to buy nursing papers online, or seek nursing assignment help, we’ve got you covered.

No need to submit a plagiarized paper when our experts can craft an original and tailored nursing presentation, guaranteeing you the grades you deserve.

Our pro writers are ready to make your presentation paper perfect, whether it’s a complex topic, a tight deadline, or specific instructions you’re dealing with.

Ready to take the first step toward academic success?

Here is How to Begin Your Journey to Academic Excellence:

Click on our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, and proceed to checkout. Your order will be assigned to a suitable expert, marking the first step toward securing the grades you deserve. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements, and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

Our professional nursing essay writers are here to guide you, ensuring you get original papers written according to your instructions.

Save time for what matters most and let ReliablePapers.com be your go-to for all your nursing paper needs.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

Nursing HTN SOAP Note for Hypertension Example [Solved]

Nursing HTN SOAP Note for Hypertension ExampleAssignment Brief: HTN SOAP Note for Hypertension

Overview:

This assignment focuses on creating a comprehensive SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan) note for a hypothetical patient with hypertension. The objective is to improve your skills in documenting and communicating vital information related to hypertension care. By engaging in this assignment, you will strengthen your abilities in considering both subjective and objective elements, conducting assessments, and formulating appropriate plans for managing hypertension.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

SOAP Note Structure:

  • Understand the SOAP note structure.
  • Identify and define each section’s purpose, including Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan.

Patient Encounter Documentation:

  • Learn to document a patient encounter systematically.
  • Understand the importance of including subjective information, objective measurements, professional assessments, and tailored plans.

Hypertension Management:

  • Explore the details of documenting hypertension-related information.
  • Develop skills in assessing blood pressure readings, interpreting lab results, and creating effective plans for hypertension management.

The Student’s Role:

Your role as a student is to assume the position of a healthcare professional responsible for documenting a patient encounter related to hypertension. Imagine yourself as a nurse, nurse practitioner, or physician’s assistant in a clinical setting. Your task is to create a SOAP note that encapsulates crucial details regarding the patient’s hypertension, incorporating both the patient’s self-reported information and objectively measurable data.

Assignment Guidelines:

SOAP Note Creation:

  • Create a detailed SOAP note for a hypothetical patient with hypertension.
  • Ensure each section (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan) is clearly defined and filled with relevant information.

Subjective Section:

  • Include the patient’s self-reported information such as symptoms, concerns, lifestyle habits, medication adherence, and relevant medical history related to hypertension.

Objective Section:

  • Document measurable and observable data, including blood pressure readings, physical examinations, and any relevant lab or diagnostic test results.

Assessment Section:

  • Offer your professional assessment and interpretation of the patient’s hypertension status based on both subjective and objective information.

Plan Section:

Outline a comprehensive treatment plan, interventions, and recommendations for managing the patient’s hypertension. This should include lifestyle modifications, medication recommendations, follow-up plans, and educational aspects.

 HTN SOAP Note for Hypertension Example

Patient Information:

  • Name: Mr. W.S.
  • Age: 65-year-old
  • Sex: Male
  • Source: Patient
  • Allergies: None
  • Current Medications: Atorvastatin tab 20 mg, 1-tab PO at bedtime
  • PMH: Hypercholesterolemia
  • Immunizations: Influenza last 2018-year, tetanus, and hepatitis A and B 4 years ago.
  • Surgical History: Appendectomy 47 years ago.
  • Family History:
    • Father-died at 81; no reported information
    • Mother-alive, 88 years old, Diabetes Mellitus, HTN
    • Daughter-alive, 34 years old, healthy
  • Social History: No smoking or illicit drug use, occasional alcoholic beverage consumption, retired, widow, lives alone.

SUBJECTIVE:

Chief Complaint: Headaches that started two weeks ago.

Symptom Analysis/HPI:

Mr. W.S., a 65-year-old male, complains of recurring headaches over the past two weeks. Blood pressure readings on three occasions were elevated (159/100, 158/98, and 160/100). He occasionally experiences dizziness. Stress in the workplace has been reported for the last month.

Denies chest pain, palpitation, shortness of breath, nausea, or vomiting.

Review of Systems (ROS):

  • CONSTITUTIONAL: Denies fever or chills, weakness, or weight loss.
  • NEUROLOGIC: Reports headaches and dizziness, denies changes in LOC, tremors, or seizures.
  • HEENT: Denies head injury, changes in vision, diplopia, blurred vision, ear pain, hearing loss, or nasal issues.
  • RESPIRATORY: Denies shortness of breath, cough, or hemoptysis.
  • CARDIOVASCULAR: No chest pain, tachycardia, orthopnea, or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea.
  • GASTROINTESTINAL: Denies abdominal pain, flatulence, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea.
  • GENITOURINARY: Denies hematuria, dysuria, or changes in urinary frequency.
  • MUSCULOSKELETAL: Denies falls, pain, or abnormal sounds.
  • SKIN: No changes in coloration, rashes, or pruritus.

Objective Data:

  • CONSTITUTIONAL: Vital signs: Temperature: 98.5 °F, Pulse: 87, BP: 159/92 mmHg, RR: 20, PO2: 98% on room air, Ht: 6’4”, Wt: 200 lb, BMI: 25. Reports pain 0/10.
  • General Appearance: Alert and oriented x 3, no acute distress.
  • NEUROLOGIC: Alert, CN II-XII grossly intact, oriented, sensation intact, bilateral UE/LE strength 5/5.
  • HEENT: Normocephalic, atraumatic, symmetric, non-tender. No abnormalities in eyes, ears, nose, or throat.
  • CARDIOVASCULAR: S1S2, regular rate and rhythm, no murmur or gallop noted. Capillary refill < 2 sec.
  • RESPIRATORY: No dyspnea, use of accessory muscles. Clear breath sounds bilaterally.
  • GASTROINTESTINAL: No mass or hernia. Bowel sounds present, no bruits. Abdomen soft, non-tender.
  • MUSCULOSKELETAL: No pain, normal ROM.
  • INTEGUMENTARY: Intact, no lesions, rashes, cyanosis, or jaundice.

Assessment:

Essential (Primary) Hypertension (ICD10 I10): Given symptoms and high blood pressure (156/92 mmHg), classified as stage 2. Once organic causes ruled out (renal, adrenal, thyroid), this diagnosis is confirmed.

Differential Diagnosis:

  • Renal artery stenosis (ICD10 I70.1)
  • Chronic kidney disease (ICD10 I12.9)
  • Hyperthyroidism (ICD10 E05.90)

Plan:

Diagnosis: Clinical evaluation, history, physical examination, and routine laboratory tests. Basic tests include CMP, CBC, Lipid profile, TSH, Urinalysis, and ECG.

Pharmacological Treatment:

  • Thiazide-like diuretic and/or CCB.
  • Hydrochlorothiazide tab 25 mg, Initial dose: 25 mg orally once daily.

Non-Pharmacologic Treatment:

  • Weight loss
  • Healthy diet (DASH)
  • Reduced sodium intake
  • Increased potassium intake
  • Regular physical activity
  • Tobacco cessation
  • Stress management

Education:

  • Provide nutrition/dietary information.
  • Daily blood pressure monitoring at home for 7 days, record, and bring to next visit.
  • Medication intake compliance.
  • Education on possible complications: stroke, heart attack, etc.

Follow-ups/Referrals:

  • Evaluation with PCP in 1 week for managing blood pressure.
  • Urgent Care visit prn.
  • No referrals needed currently.

References:

Domino, F., Baldor, R., Golding, J., Stephens, M. (2017). The 5-Minute Clinical Consult 2017 (25th ed.). Print (The 5-Minute Consult Series).

Codina Leik, M. T. (2014). Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review (2nd ed.). ISBN 978-0-8261-3424-0

HTN SOAP Note for Hypertension Example Two

Patient Information:

  • Name: Mr. U
  • Age: 48 years old
  • Blood Pressure (BP): 165/90 mm Hg

Background:

Mr. U’s BP is elevated, and he is reluctant to take medication. He has been trying to manage it through diet and weight loss. His family history is significant for hypertension, with both parents and several siblings affected. Mr. U has a history of smoking one pack per day for 30 years, and he does not consume alcohol. He currently takes no medications.

Review of Symptoms:

Denies chest pain, shortness of breath, claudication, headache, dizziness, palpitations, weight change, constipation, daytime sleepiness, and snoring.

Physical Examination:

  • BP: 165/90 mm Hg in both arms
  • Pulse: 84 bpm
  • Respiratory Rate: 16 breaths per minute
  • Weight: 220 pounds
  • BMI: 30 kg/m²

Additional Findings:

  • Fundoscopic exam: Arteriolar narrowing with no hemorrhages or exudates
  • Cardiovascular exam: S4 present, no S3 or murmurs
  • No abdominal bruits, normal pulses, and no peripheral edema
  • Neurologic exam: Normal

Initial Test Results:

  • ECG: Left ventricular hypertrophy by voltage, otherwise normal
  • TSH: 1.0 microunit/mL
  • Urine albumin–creatinine ratio: Normal
  • Electrolytes: Na 145 mEq/L, K 4.2 mEq/L, Cl 100 mEq/L, BUN 11 mg/dL, creatinine 0.5 mg/dL
  • Fasting glucose: 90 mg/dL
  • Fasting lipid panel: Total cholesterol 240 mg/dL, HDL 40 mg/dL, triglycerides 100 mg/dL, LDL 180 mg/dL

Assessment:

  • Hypertension
  • Early Retinopathy
  • Hypercholesterolemia
  • Left ventricular hypertrophy
  • Obesity

Rule out secondary hypertension.

Plan:

  • Smoking cessation counseling
  • Referral to a nutritionist for diet and exercise guidance
  • Medications:
    • Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg daily for hypertension
    • Atorvastatin 40 mg daily for hypercholesterolemia

Follow-up:

One month later, BP is 145/85 mm Hg. Despite no initiation of exercise and continued smoking, counseling on lifestyle modifications is reinforced. Six months later, with diet changes and regular exercise, Mr. U has lost 5 pounds, and his BP is 135/82 mm Hg. He continues to smoke.

SOAP NOTE:

S:

A 48-year-old man presents with a BP of 165/90 mmHg. He has been attempting lifestyle modifications, including diet and weight management, to avoid medication. No alcohol use, and a significant family history of hypertension is noted. Past medical history includes smoking 1 pack/day for 30 years. Denies several symptoms, including chest pain, shortness of breath, headache, and more.

O:

BP: 165/90 mmHg in both arms, Pulse: 84 bpm, RR: 16 breaths per minute, Weight: 220 lbs, BMI: 30. Lungs clear, cardiac exam shows S4, no S3 or murmurs. Fundoscopic exam reveals arteriolar narrowing. Abdominal bruits, pulses, and peripheral edema are normal. Neurologic exam is unremarkable.

Initial test results include ECG findings of left ventricular hypertrophy, normal TSH, and urine albumin–creatinine ratio. Electrolytes, glucose, and lipid panel values are within normal limits.

A:

Hypertension, Early Retinopathy, Hypercholesterolemia, Left ventricular hypertrophy, Obesity. Rule out secondary hypertension.

P:

Counseling for smoking cessation, referral to a nutritionist. Medications initiated: Hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg and Atorvastatin 40 mg daily.

Summary:

Hypertension can be either primary or secondary. Mr. U, with a family history of hypertension, is managing his elevated BP through lifestyle changes and medications. Regular follow-ups and reinforcement of lifestyle modifications are essential in controlling hypertension and preventing complications.

HTN SOAP Note for Hypertension Example Three

SUBJECTIVE:

Chief Complaint (C/C): “I’ve had a couple high blood pressure readings at home and bloody nose x 3 days”

History of Present Illness (HPI):

A 35-year-old male landscape worker reports elevated home blood pressure readings, reaching over 200 and 235 mm Hg on two occasions this month. Additionally, he experienced three episodes of nosebleeds during the past week, unrelated to any specific triggers, which were self-managed by applying pressure and leaning forward. The patient works outdoors and is exposed to environmental factors and heat. He denies nasal congestion, vigorous nose blowing, but reports itchy eyes, alleviated by washing his face multiple times daily. No other health complaints. Reports a recent decrease in alcohol consumption, a shift to healthier meals, and stable weight. Review of systems is negative for other symptoms.

Objective:

Vital Signs:

  • T: 98.0°F
  • P: 54 bpm
  • RR: 16 breaths per minute
  • 1st BP: 150/84 mm Hg
  • 2nd BP: 131/86 mm Hg
  • Ht: 61 in
  • Wt: 199.3 lbs
  • BMI: 37.62

Laboratory Results:

  • 1/2019: A1c: 5.5, LDL: 99, HDL: 49, Triglycerides: 180, Cholesterol: 189, GFR: 113, TSH: 3.65
  • Labs drawn today (9/10/2020): CBC, CMP, lipid panel, TSH, HbA1c, microalbumin

Physical Examination:

  • General: Well-appearing, groomed, cooperative
  • Skin: Normal, no rashes or lesions
  • HEENT: Normocephalic, atraumatic, normal bilateral tympanic membranes, clear nasal passages
  • Neck: Supple, no lymphadenopathy
  • Respiratory: Clear lung sounds, non-labored respirations
  • Cardiovascular: Regular rate and rhythm, no murmurs or edema
  • Musculoskeletal: No joint deformities or abnormalities
  • Neurologic: Alert and oriented, normal speech, no motor or sensory deficits

Assessment:

Epistaxis (R04.0):

  • Treatment: Saline nasal irrigation to reduce irritation.
  • Diagnostics: None today.
  • Education: Nasal precautions, use of saline nasal irrigation.
  • Follow-up: In 4 weeks or as needed if symptoms worsen.

Essential Hypertension (I10):

  • Treatment: Edarbi 40mg PO, lifestyle modifications.
  • Diagnostics: Blood pressure re-check at end of visit (131/86 mm Hg).
  • Education: BP control, lifestyle changes, medication adherence.
  • Follow-up: In 4 weeks with home blood pressure logs for review.

Clinical Decision Making:

  • Labs drawn today: To assess for possible chronic kidney disease, anemia, or hypothyroidism, potential causes of elevated blood pressure.
  • Home blood pressure log: Monitors baseline and aids in effective medication titration.
  • Language barrier: Addressed by involving a Spanish-speaking nurse and providing printed education materials in Spanish.
  • Learning Experience: Utilized an otoscope for the first time, gaining valuable hands-on experience.
  • Future Improvement: Consider taking a medical Spanish course to enhance communication skills.
  • Insightful Takeaway: Effective communication and patient education are crucial, and language-appropriate materials enhance understanding.

References:

American Diabetes Association. (2019). Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes.

James, P. A., Oparil, S., Carter, B. L., Cushman, W. C., Dennison-Himmelfarb, C., Handler, J., … & Smith Jr, S. C. (2014). Evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA, 311(5), 507-520.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (2014). The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure.

HTN SOAP Note for Hypertension Example Four

Medical Specialty:

SOAP / Chart / Progress Notes

Sample Name: Hypertension – Progress Note

Description: Patient with hypertension, syncope, and spinal stenosis – for recheck.

SUBJECTIVE:

The patient, a 78-year-old female, presents for a recheck. She reports having hypertension but denies chest pain, palpitations, orthopnea, nocturnal dyspnea, or edema.

PAST MEDICAL HISTORY / SURGERY / HOSPITALIZATIONS:

Reviewed and unchanged from the dictation on 12/03/2023.

MEDICATIONS:

  • Atenolol 50 mg daily
  • Premarin 0.625 mg daily
  • Calcium with vitamin D (two to three pills daily)
  • Multivitamin daily
  • Aspirin as needed
  • TriViFlor 25 mg (two pills daily)
  • Elocon cream 0.1% and Synalar cream 0.01% used as needed for rash.

ALLERGIES:

  • Benadryl, phenobarbitone, morphine, Lasix, and latex.

FAMILY HISTORY / PERSONAL HISTORY:

Reviewed. Positive family history of congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, and ischemic cardiac disease. Brother deceased from lymphoma, and one living brother has had angioplasties x 2. Another brother has asthma. Mother died from congestive heart failure, and father died from myocardial infarction at 56. Personal history negative for alcohol or tobacco use.

REVIEW OF SYSTEMS:

  • Bones and Joints: Lower back pain radiating down the right leg. Under evaluation by Dr. XYZ for spinal stenosis.
  • Genitourinary: Occasional nocturia.

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION:

  • Vital Signs: Weight: 227.2 pounds, Blood pressure: 144/72, Pulse: 80, Temperature: 97.5 degrees.
  • General Appearance: Elderly female not in acute distress.
  • Mouth: Posterior pharynx clear.
  • Neck: Without adenopathy or thyromegaly.
  • Chest: Lungs resonant to percussion. Normal breath sounds.
  • Heart: Normal S1 and S2 without gallops or rubs.
  • Abdomen: Without masses or tenderness.
  • Extremities: Without edema.

IMPRESSION/PLAN:

Hypertension: Continue with current medication.

Syncope: No recurrence since the episode around Thanksgiving. No arrhythmias found in prior cardiac studies.

Spinal Stenosis: Under evaluation. Potential surgery in the near future.

References:

James, P. A., Oparil, S., Carter, B. L., Cushman, W. C., Dennison-Himmelfarb, C., Handler, J., … & Smith Jr, S. C. (2014). Evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA, 311(5), 507-520.

American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. (2017). ACC/AHA hypertension guideline 2017. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 71(19), e127-e248.

HTN SOAP Note for Hypertension Example Five

Patient Information:

  • Name: Sanjay War
  • Age: 64 Years
  • Height: 6 Feet 2 Inches
  • Weight: 95 Kg

S: Subjective:

Sanjay reports living alone and being an occasional drinker, but he does not smoke. Family history reveals both parents had hypertension. Current medications include Hydrochlorothiazide 25mg, Doxazosin 2mg, Carvedilol 12.5mg, Mucinex D 2 tablets, Naproxen 220 mg, and Metformin 500mg.

O: Objective Findings:

  • Blood Pressure: 160/85 mm Hg (3 months ago)
  • Heart Rate: 76 bpm
  • Weight: 95 kg
  • Height: 6’2
  • BMI: 26.8 (overweight)
  • Total Cholesterol: 171mg/dl, LDL: 99mg/dl, HDL: 40mg/dl
  • Triglycerides: 158mg/dl
  • Serum creatinine: 2.2 mg/dl
  • Blood Glucose: 110mg/dl
  • Uric Acid: 6.7 mg/dl

A: Assessment:

Sanjay’s blood pressure is above the goal, considering his diabetes. Factors contributing to suboptimal blood pressure control include medication side effects (Mucinex D, Naproxen), and non-compliance with a low sodium diet. ACEIs or ARBs are recommended for diabetes. Carvedilol, a non-selective beta-blocker, may not be the best choice for COPD.

P: Plan:

  1. Discontinue guaifenesin/pseudoephedrine preparation.
  2. Discontinue Naproxen. Replace with an alternative (e.g., acetaminophen) for headaches and gout.
  3. Gradually discontinue Carvedilol.
  4. Add Lisinopril 5mg once daily, considering dry cough or angioedema.
  5. Monitor B.P, K, renal function, glucose, and lipid profile.
  6. Continue HCLTZ 25mg po qam.
  7. Continue Doxazosin 2mg. Change dosing schedule to reduce possible Doxazosin-induced dizziness.
  8. Continue Metformin 500mg.

References:

James, P. A., Oparil, S., Carter, B. L., Cushman, W. C., Dennison-Himmelfarb, C., Handler, J., … & Smith Jr, S. C. (2014). Evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA, 311(5), 507-520.

American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. (2017). ACC/AHA hypertension guideline 2017. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 71(19), e127-e248.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on HTN SOAP Notes for Hypertension

What is a SOAP note for hypertension?

A SOAP note for hypertension is a structured method of documenting a patient’s encounter related to high blood pressure. It consists of four sections: Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan, and is commonly used by healthcare professionals to record and communicate information about a patient’s hypertension.

What does the “S” in the SOAP note for hypertension stand for?

The “S” stands for “Subjective.” This section includes the patient’s self-reported information, such as their symptoms, concerns, lifestyle habits, medication adherence, and any relevant medical history related to hypertension.

What does the “O” in the SOAP note for hypertension stand for?

The “O” stands for “Objective.” Here, the healthcare provider documents measurable and observable data, including vital signs (such as blood pressure readings), physical examinations, and any relevant lab or diagnostic test results.

What does the “A” in the SOAP note for hypertension stand for?

The “A” stands for “Assessment.” In this section, the healthcare provider offers their professional assessment and interpretation of the patient’s hypertension status based on both subjective and objective information.

What does the “P” in the SOAP note for hypertension stand for?

The “P” stands for “Plan.” In this section, the healthcare provider outlines the treatment plan, interventions, and recommendations for managing the patient’s hypertension.

What information is included in the “Subjective” section for hypertension?

The “Subjective” section may include the patient’s reported symptoms (such as headaches, dizziness), medication history, lifestyle factors (diet, exercise), family history of hypertension, and any concerns or questions the patient may have.

What information is included in the “Objective” section for hypertension?

The “Objective” section includes the patient’s blood pressure readings (systolic and diastolic), heart rate, physical examination findings (like the presence of edema), and any relevant laboratory results (such as renal function tests).

What does the “Assessment” section involve for hypertension?

The “Assessment” section involves the healthcare provider’s clinical judgment of the patient’s hypertension condition. It may include the classification of the hypertension stage, risk assessment for complications, and evaluation of any related health issues.

What does the “Plan” section entail for hypertension?

The “Plan” section outlines the proposed management and treatment strategies for the patient’s hypertension. This can include lifestyle modifications, medication recommendations, follow-up appointments, and education on hypertension management.

How often should SOAP notes for hypertension be updated?

The frequency of updating SOAP notes for hypertension depends on the patient’s condition and treatment plan. They can be updated after each visit or as significant changes occur in the patient’s blood pressure or overall health.

Can patients access their own SOAP notes for hypertension?

In some cases, patients may have access to their medical records, including SOAP notes, as part of their right to access their health information. However, this can vary based on healthcare facility policies and regulations.

Are SOAP notes only used by doctors for hypertension?

No, SOAP notes are used by a variety of healthcare professionals, including doctors, nurses, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants, to document and communicate information about a patient’s hypertension care and management.

Achieve Academic Excellence with ReliablePapers.com – Your Trusted Partner in Nursing Paper Writing

Are you feeling overwhelmed by the complexities of nursing assignments, especially when it comes to topics like [HTN SOAP Notes for Hypertension Assignment]? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we take pride in being the best nursing paper writing service company, offering you a lifeline to academic success – we ensure every paper is original, meeting the highest academic standards for top grades.

Our expert nursing essay writers understand that some topics are tougher than others. If the samples provided on [HTN SOAP Notes for Hypertension Assignment] are not sufficient for your paper, entrust us with your assignment. We guarantee unique, customized nursing essays that will elevate your grades.

Worried about plagiarism? With our team of professionals, you can rest assured that your paper will be original and tailored to your specific instructions. We believe in delivering excellence, and our online nursing papers come at very affordable prices, catering to the budget constraints of college students.

Our user-friendly “Place Order” page makes the ordering process easy. Fill in the details for your paper, proceed to checkout, and let our pro writers perfect your nursing papers. Whether you’re tackling a complex topic, facing tight deadlines, or seeking guidance on nursing assignments, we’ve got you covered.

Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements now and let our experts deliver your work promptly. By working with us, you get to enjoy the result of outstanding nursing essay papers written from scratch, covering any topic, meeting any deadline, and following any instructions.

Seek the help of professional essay writers from ReliablePapers.com. Save time for what matters most – your academic success. Place your order today!

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NRS 434NV Health Illness Continuum Nursing Essay Example

NRS 434NV Health Illness Continuum Nursing Essay ExampleAssignment Brief: NRS 434NV Health Illness Continuum Nursing Essay

Assignment Overview:

The objective of this assignment is to explore and analyze the concept of the health-illness continuum in the context of nursing and patient care. Students are expected to focus on the importance of the health-illness continuum, its relevance to patient care, and its connection to human value, dignity, and flourishing. The assignment encourages personal reflection on the student’s state of health in alignment with the continuum and proposes strategies for moving towards wellness.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

This assignment aims to enhance students’ comprehension of the health-illness continuum and its practical implications in nursing. It encourages critical thinking by exploring the continuum’s comprehensive role in patient care and its connection to fundamental aspects such as value, dignity, and human flourishing. Through personal reflection, students will gain insight into their own health status and develop strategies for achieving optimal well-being. The assignment emphasizes the integration of resources and practices that support wellness on both personal and patient care levels.

The Student’s Role:

As a student undertaking this assignment, your role is to:

  • Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the health-illness continuum, its historical context, and its contemporary relevance in nursing.
  • Analyze and articulate the continuum’s impact on patient care, considering its application in assessing diverse dimensions of well-being.
  • Explore the ethical and holistic dimensions of the continuum, focusing on its role in promoting human value, dignity, and flourishing in healthcare.
  • Engage in reflective practice by assessing your personal state of health in alignment with the continuum and proposing actionable strategies for improvement.
  • Investigate and present various resources supporting wellness, highlighting their significance in fostering positive transitions along the health-illness spectrum.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NRS 434NV Health Illness Continuum Nursing Essay

Benchmark – Human Experience Across the Health-Illness Continuum

Research the health-illness continuum and its relevance to patient care. In a 750-1,000 word paper, discuss the relevance of the continuum to patient care and present a perspective of your current state of health in relation to the wellness spectrum. Include the following:

Examine the health-illness continuum and discuss why this perspective is important to consider in relation to health and the human experience when caring for patients.

Explain how understanding the health-illness continuum enables you, as a health care provider, to better promote the value and dignity of individuals or groups and to serve others in ways that promote human flourishing.

Reflect on your overall state of health. Discuss what behaviors support or detract from your health and well-being. Explain where you currently fall on the health-illness continuum.

NRS 434NV Human Experience Across the Health-Illness Continuum Essay

Discuss the options and resources available to you to help you move toward wellness on the health-illness spectrum. Describe how these would assist in moving you toward wellness (managing a chronic disease, recovering from an illness, self-actualization, etc.).

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. NRS 434NV Human Experience Across the Health-Illness Continuum Essay

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assesses the following competency:

RN-BSN

5.1. Understand the human experience across the health-illness continuum.

NRS 434NV Health Illness Continuum Nursing Essay Example

Introduction

The health-illness continuum serves as a dynamic framework illustrating the ever-changing nature of an individual’s health status, ranging from optimal wellness to illness and, ultimately, death. This model holds significant relevance in healthcare, as it provides a comprehensive view of a person’s physical, emotional, and psychological well-being. This paper explores the importance of the health-illness continuum in patient care, emphasizing its impact on the human experience. Furthermore, it reflects on the author’s current state of health, identifying behaviors that contribute to or detract from overall well-being, and outlines options and resources to progress towards wellness.

Understanding the Health-Illness Continuum in Patient Care

The health-illness continuum is a crucial concept in healthcare, offering a holistic perspective on an individual’s health status. It considers not only physical health but also emotional and psychological well-being. Recognizing the continuum’s significance allows healthcare providers to tailor patient care effectively. For instance, a positive outlook can influence a patient’s response to illness positively. Conversely, a negative perspective may impede recovery and exacerbate the condition.

The nurse-patient relationship plays a pivotal role in shaping a patient’s perspective. Through empathy and understanding, healthcare providers can establish a connection that fosters trust and encourages patients to adopt positive attitudes towards their health. Nurses and healthcare workers have the power to influence patients’ perspectives, promoting human flourishing and upholding the dignity of individuals or groups.

Reflection on Personal State of Health

In evaluating my overall state of health, I place myself on the health-illness continuum at the point labeled “normal health.” While I do not suffer from grave illnesses, I acknowledge certain behaviors that may impact my well-being. Reflecting on my mental health, I recognize moments of negativity and overthinking, which I actively work on improving for my benefit and the benefit of those under my care.

Detracting behaviors include inadequate sleep, insufficient exercise, and frequent consumption of unhealthy foods. On the positive side, I am cultivating habits such as staying hydrated, maintaining a mental health journal, and consistently using sunscreen. These small changes contribute to the development of healthier habits, aligning with my commitment to continuous self-improvement.

Options and Resources Towards Wellness

To progress towards higher-level wellness, I have identified key areas for improvement, including sleep patterns, exercise routines, and meal planning. Developing a comprehensive plan and adhering to it consistently are essential steps in achieving this goal. As a healthcare worker, investing in personal growth is crucial, as it enhances communication skills and fosters deeper connections with patients and colleagues.

Numerous resources are available to support this journey towards wellness. Peer support, mentorship, and professional development opportunities within the healthcare community offer valuable insights and encouragement. Additionally, utilizing available tools and technologies for self-assessment and goal tracking can enhance accountability and facilitate progress.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the health-illness continuum is a vital concept in healthcare, providing a holistic view of an individual’s well-being. Understanding and applying this continuum in patient care can positively influence outcomes and contribute to human flourishing. Reflecting on personal health and identifying behaviors that contribute to or detract from wellness is a crucial step in the journey towards higher-level wellness. Utilizing available options and resources empowers individuals to make positive changes, promoting a healthier and more fulfilling life. As healthcare providers, embracing the principles of the health-illness continuum enhances our ability to care for others and contribute to the well-being of the communities we serve.

NRS 434NV Health Illness Continuum Nursing Essay Example Two

Health is a dynamic condition that reflects an individual’s capacity to adapt to both internal and external environmental changes. In the realm of healthcare, assessing patients’ health status is crucial for delivering effective medical care. The health-illness continuum serves as a scale to depict an individual’s health status, and this paper seeks to explore its relevance to healthcare practices and delineate strategies for moving towards wellness.

Health and illness, existing at opposite extremes on a single scale, are conceptualized through the health-illness continuum, a visual representation of an individual’s health developed by Travis in 1972 and still widely utilized today (Hinkle & Cheever, 2018). This model is integral to patient care as it enables the evaluation of an individual’s health position on the continuum, reflecting the effectiveness of treatment or the deterioration of health (“Health promotion and disease prevention: NCLEX-RN,” 2020). Therefore, the health-illness continuum facilitates the assessment of patients’ well-being and the identification of necessary medical interventions.

An individual’s position on the health-illness continuum is influenced by diverse factors, encompassing both internal and external environments. Balancing these aspects is vital for ensuring and preserving patients’ well-being, necessitating nurses to recognize the intricate interconnections between them (Cooper & Gosnell, 2018). Beyond physical symptoms, family relationships and emotional stressors can significantly impact a patient’s state. Upholding individuals’ values involves creating comfortable physical and emotional conditions, considering ethnic, cultural, and economic influences as integral to dignity. A holistic healthcare approach, addressing physical, emotional, spiritual, and other needs, promotes overall patient flourishing (Cooper & Gosnell, 2018). Thus, the health-illness continuum serves as a tool to identify measures for enhancing patients’ value, dignity, and flourishing, guiding them towards wellness.

Illustrating the significance of the health-illness continuum through a personal example, as a college student, my health is generally good due to my young age and the absence of chronic diseases. However, my sedentary lifestyle and lack of physical exercise compromise my immune system, making me susceptible to seasonal diseases. Occasional unhealthy eating and insufficient vitamin intake further impact my health negatively. To progress towards wellness, I need to assess my physical and emotional state, focusing on general well-being and immunity. Incorporating regular exercise and a nutritious diet, along with stress management and ample rest, is key to moving towards optimal well-being (“Health promotion and disease prevention: NCLEX-RN,” 2020).

In conclusion, the health-illness continuum serves as a concise visual representation of health’s dynamic nature. Its significance in patient care lies in its ability to assess individuals’ health status and guide interventions to promote their value, dignity, and flourishing. For every individual, the health-illness continuum serves as a valuable tool for self-assessment, aiding in the identification of areas requiring improvement to attain overall well-being.

References

Cooper, K., & Gosnell, K. (2018). Foundations of nursing (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Health Sciences. Web.

Health promotion and disease prevention: NCLEX-RN. (2020). Web.

Hinkle, J.L., & Cheever, K.H. (Eds.). (2018). Brunner and Suddarth’s textbook of medical-surgical nursing. New Delhi, India: Wolters Kluwer. Web.

NRS 434NV Health Illness Continuum Nursing Essay Example Three

The concept of health is a dynamic process, depicting an individual’s ability to adapt to changing internal and external environments in order to maintain overall well-being. Successful adaptation, even in the face of stress or chronic illness, leads to a state of wellness, considered a higher level on the health-illness continuum. This continuum serves as a graphical representation of individual wellness, evaluating emotional, social, and psychological well-being. It acknowledges the fluctuating nature of well-being, recognizing that individuals undergo various stages of health and illness throughout their lives (Lundqvist & Andersson, 2021).

The health-illness continuum positions optimum health and wellness to the right and illness and premature death to the left. Individuals slide along this scale throughout life, aspiring to move towards the positive end of the spectrum. This paper delves into perspectives on the health-illness continuum and its significance in patient care.

According to the National Wellness Institute, the health-illness continuum comprises six elements: physical, social, emotional, intellectual, spiritual, and occupational wellness (Lundqvist & Andersson, 2021). Physical wellness pertains to self-care through exercise, sleep, and diet, while social wellness involves interactions and contributions to communities. Emotional wellness encompasses awareness, acceptance, and coping with emotions, while intellectual wellness focuses on engaging in activities that stimulate the brain. Occupational wellness is achieved through fulfilling work aligning with personal values, and spiritual wellness involves finding meaning in life based on beliefs and values (Gazaway et al., 2019).

When caring for a patient, a comprehensive examination of these elements is crucial, as well-being extends beyond the absence of disease or injuries. Assessing these facets acknowledges their impact on the recovery process. The health-illness continuum promotes a holistic approach to treatment, shifting from intermittent goals focusing solely on physical symptoms to broader, lasting goals that enhance overall life quality. This perspective addresses gaps in a patient’s treatment plan by connecting key elements and emphasizes conscious awareness of individual health (Swan et al., 2019).

For healthcare providers, the health-illness continuum offers an opportunity to address issues beyond direct treatment, reassures patients about the decisions they make for their well-being, and acknowledges emotional and spiritual aspects. This is particularly essential when dealing with chronic illnesses where medical interventions may be limited. For instance, a cancer patient may need emotional and spiritual support alongside medical interventions to improve overall well-being (Gazaway et al., 2019).

In alignment with Christian teachings, the health-illness continuum upholds human dignity by treating the patient rather than the disease, involving the patient in the wellness process. Patients are empowered to play a valuable role in enhancing their well-being, living according to their principles and values.

On a personal note, I find myself below the average mark on the health-illness continuum. During stressful moments, my habits such as opting for fast food and disrupted sleeping patterns contribute to a lower level of well-being. To move towards a higher level on the health-illness spectrum, I plan to seek the assistance of the school counselor to develop healthier stress management strategies. Additionally, engaging with a life coach will enhance self-awareness and help me utilize my resources more effectively in the pursuit of self-actualization.

References

Gazaway, S., Stewart, M., & Schumacher, A. (2019). Integrating palliative care into the chronic illness continuum: a conceptual model for minority populations. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 6, 1078-1086.

Lundqvist, C., & Andersson, G. (2021). Let’s talk about mental health and mental disorders in elite sports: a narrative review of theoretical perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 700829.

Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Vansteenkiste, M., & Soenens, B. (2021). Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior. Motivation Science, 7(2), 97.

Swanson, C., Thompson, A., Valentz, R., Doerner, L., & Jezek, K. (2019). Theory of Nursing for the Whole Person: A distinctly scriptural framework. Journal of Christian Nursing, 36(4), 222-227.

NRS 434NV Health Illness Continuum Nursing Essay Example Four

The health-illness continuum, initially proposed by John W. Travis and Regina S. Ryan (LeMone, 2017), serves as a visual representation of well-being that extends beyond the mere absence of illness. This paper aims to explore the relevance of the health-illness continuum in patient care and provide insights into the author’s current health status.

Health-Illness Continuum’s Importance to Patient Care

The Health-Illness continuum is a crucial framework that enhances patients’ health and enriches the human experience in healthcare. It categorizes health and illness on a continuum, with high-level wellness at one end and severe sickness or poor health at the other. This perspective emphasizes achieving high-level wellness, which includes a contented mental state and flourishing, over mere symptom alleviation (LeMone, 2017).

This approach is particularly vital in healthcare and nursing, allowing a comprehensive assessment of patients beyond the treatment of specific illnesses. It promotes a holistic approach, focusing on mental and emotional well-being, providing support for a better quality of life.

Relation of the Continuum to Value, Dignity, and Promotion of Human Flourishing

The health-illness continuum aligns with factors contributing to individual and societal prosperity, including value, dignity, and human flourishing. Human flourishing encompasses various elements, such as mental and physical health, happiness, life satisfaction, meaning, purpose, character, virtue, and close social relationships (VanderWeele, 2017). Dignity, closely connected to esteem and status, allows patients to live in accordance with their standards and values (Xiao et al., 2019). The continuum’s focus on mental and physical well-being positions healthcare providers to significantly contribute to individual and societal well-being.

Reflection on Personal State of Health and the Health-Illness Continuum

Reflecting on my health state, I find myself below the average mark on the health-illness continuum. Despite being young and free from chronic or acute diseases, I experience fatigue, mood swings, and low energy. Unhealthy lifestyle choices, including poor eating habits and irregular sleep patterns, contribute to a false sense of wellness.

To improve my well-being, I plan to focus on regular exercise, healthier eating, and behavior changes. Seeking professional support and engaging with a study counselor for self-actualization will complement these efforts, aiming for optimal well-being.

Resources Supporting Wellness

To progress toward optimal health, I plan to:

  • Ensure at least 8 hours of sleep per night.
  • Limit caffeine intake.
  • Plan my days to allocate time for studies, workouts, and rest.

Additionally, seeking support from a study counselor aligns with my goal of achieving optimal well-being.

Conclusion

The health-illness continuum, emphasizing well-being over symptom alleviation, provides a valuable framework for effective healthcare. By evaluating patients holistically, healthcare practitioners can contribute to not only disease-free states but also flourishing individuals. The continuum’s relevance extends to personal well-being, encouraging individuals to focus on a comprehensive approach to a fulfilling life.

References

LeMone, P. (2017). Medical-surgical nursing. Volumes 1-3: Critical thinking for person-centered care. Melbourne: Pearson Australia.

VanderWeele, T. J. (2017). On the promotion of human flourishing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(31), 8148-8156.

Xiao, J., Chow, K.M., Liu, Y., & Chan, C.W.H. (2019). Effects of dignity therapy on dignity, psychological well-being, and quality of life among palliative care cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psycho-Oncology, 28, 1791-1802.

NRS 434NV Health Illness Continuum Nursing Essay Example Five

The health-illness continuum suggests that individuals can actively progress towards enhanced health and well-being through various stages. Olde Rikkert et al. (2022) assert that phases like awareness, education, and self-management development initiate from sickness problems involving clinical signs, symptoms, and limitations. Public health physician Travis introduced this dynamic continuum, emphasizing the crucial understanding of connections between disease and well-being (Olde Rikkert et al., 2022). Moving from illness, marked by symptoms and impairment, towards a neutral point and then well-being through awareness, education, and growth is achievable. Health care providers, acknowledging health as highly personalized, play a vital role in guiding patients on their unique paths toward completeness (Swanson et al., 2019).

There are diverse levels of well-being, mirroring various sickness levels. Stohecker (2019) posits that the health-illness continuum illustrates the relationship between treatment and well-being paradigms. Wickramarathne et al. (2020) note that therapeutic perspectives, including medications and medical procedures, can bring patients to a neutral stage where disease effects are alleviated. The well-being perspective encourages individuals to strive for higher health levels. The continuum accommodates side effects, like fatigue and dissatisfaction, emphasizing the importance of prioritizing physical and mental well-being. Nursing professionals should guide patients towards health rather than just addressing illness.

Relation of Human-Illness Continuum to Value, Dignity, and Promotion of Human Flourishing

Understanding the health-illness continuum aids health care professionals in promoting the worth and dignity of individuals, fostering human flourishing. Stohecker (2019) indicates that excessive stress damaging the immune system can result in illness, and negative emotions may lead to unhealthy behaviors. Health is a lifestyle encompassing physical, psychological, and social dimensions, necessitating constant exploration and awareness (Wickramarathne et al., 2020). Balancing patients’ well-being is an ongoing process, teaching them to care for their physical and emotional selves.

Reflection on Personal State of Health and the Health Illness Continuum

Exploring the causes of my health condition is crucial for life balance and well-being. Farina et al. (2018) suggest that maintaining balance across physical, cognitive, social, spiritual, interpersonal, and professional well-being is vital. Nurses play a significant role in embracing life throughout the wellness-illness continuum, serving as role models for patients. Lifestyle choices, including exercise and stress management, are critical in moving towards wellness. Recognizing my position on the continuum between education and growth highlights the need for self-care.

Resources Supporting Wellness

Transitions between illness and wellness occur throughout life, requiring new skills and abilities (Polacsek et al., 2019). Resources, such as self-care practices, weight control, fitness, and stress management, assist in chronic disease management and self-actualization (Farina et al., 2018). Mindfulness activities reduce anxiety, promote inner tranquility, and enhance communication.

Conclusion

Embracing the health-illness continuum empowers nursing professionals to enhance human well-being by promoting value and dignity. Stress and negative emotions can impact health, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach across physical, psychological, and social dimensions. Wellness practices, including mindfulness and healthy habits, contribute to patients’ overall well-being.

References

Farina, S. M., Minerva, E., Glunt, J., & Bernardo, L. M. (2018). Introducing mindfulness practices for self-care. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 34(4), 194–198.

Fawcett, J., Derboghossian, G., Flike, K., Gómez, E., Han, H. P., Kalandjian, N., Tapayan, S., & Pletcher, J. E. (2019). Thoughts about real nursing. Nursing Science Quarterly, 32(4), 331–332.

Olde Rikkert, M. G., Melis, R. J., Cohen, A. A., & Peeters, G. M. E. E. (2022). Why illness is more important than disease in old age. Age and Ageing, 51(1).

Polacsek, M., Boardman, G. H., & McCann, T. V. (2019). The influence of a successful wellness-illness transition on the experience of depression in older adults. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 41(1), 31-37.

Stohecker, J. (2019). A new vision of wellness. Healthy.net.

Boost Your Nursing Essays with ReliablePapers.com – Your Gateway to Academic Excellence!

Are you feeling overwhelmed by challenging nursing essay topics? Are tight deadlines causing you stress? Look no further – ReliablePapers.com is your trusted partner in achieving academic success! Our nursing paper writing service stands out as the best in the industry, ensuring that you not only meet your assignment requirements but exceed them.

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand that some topics can be tougher than others. If the provided essay examples for [NRS 434NV Health Illness Continuum Nursing Essay Assignment] are not sufficient for your needs, our expert nursing essay writers are ready to craft a unique, customized essay just for you. Say goodbye to the worry of submitting a plagiarized paper. Let our professionals guarantee you originality and the best possible grades.

What sets us apart is our commitment to affordability. Our online nursing papers come at very reasonable prices, ensuring accessibility for all college students. Our pro writers specialize in handling complex topics, tight deadlines, and specific instructions, providing comprehensive guidance for your nursing assignments.

Ready to boost your academic performance? Placing an order is simple! Click on our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert. Take the first step towards securing the grades you deserve with ReliablePapers.com.

Don’t wait until the last minute. Fill in your requirements now, and let our experts deliver your exceptional nursing essay ASAP.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

DNP 835 Topic 1 DQ 1 PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety Reflection Example

DNP 835 Topic 1 DQ 1 PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety Reflection ExampleAssignment Brief: DNP 835 Topic 1 DQ 1 PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety Reflection Assignment

Assignment Overview:

In this assignment, you will engage in a reflective analysis of the discussions in DNP 835 Topic 1, specifically focusing on Patient Safety (PS) 101: Introduction to Patient Safety. The objective is to critically evaluate and respond to key concepts and insights shared by peers in the context of patient safety practices and initiatives.

Assignment Objectives:

  • Reflect on Patient Safety Discussions: Your main task is to think about the discussions that happened in DNP 835 Topic 1, particularly those related to patient safety. Consider various perspectives, insights, and experiences shared by your peers and evaluate their implications for healthcare practices.
  • Incorporate Assigned Readings: Include relevant information from the assigned readings, including references to the Joint Commission’s key elements, Lawati et al.’s systematic review, and the study by Storesund et al. on the impact of checklists in surgery.
  • Analyze Leadership Commitment: Evaluate the commitment of healthcare leadership to patient safety, as discussed in the posts. Assess the outlined strategies and principles for fostering a culture of safety within healthcare organizations.
  • Explore Surgical Safety Checklists: Look into the effectiveness of surgical safety checklists, drawing insights from the discussions on the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist and the Surgical Patient Safety System (SURPASS) checklists. Consider how these tools contribute to preventing complications and improving patient outcomes.
  • Evaluate Nursing Errors: Think about the challenges and factors contributing to nursing errors, as highlighted in the posts. Analyze the implications of these errors for patient safety and explore potential strategies to address them.
  • Apply Patient Safety Concepts: Consider real-life examples shared by peers, such as the case of a doctor administering the wrong blood due to onboarding processes. Discuss how the principles of patient safety can be applied to mitigate such errors and improve overall healthcare processes.

The Student’s Role:

As a student, your role is to actively engage with the content discussed in DNP 835 Topic 1. Participate in the reflective process, bringing in your insights and experiences related to patient safety. Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the assigned readings and apply the concepts to the context of patient safety in healthcare settings. Your reflections should go beyond summarization and aim to provide thoughtful analyses, considering the broader implications for healthcare delivery and patient outcomes.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the DNP 835 Topic 1 DQ 1 PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety Reflection Assignment

DNP 835 Topic 1 DQ 1 Reflecting on the “IHI Module PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety,” summarize why it is essential to improve patient safety

Topic 1 DQ 1

Reflecting on the “IHI Module PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety,” summarize why it is essential to improve patient safety. Use one of the articles from this week’s topic Resources and describe the framework or theory that was used to improve the patient outcome. What outcome measures were identified and how did they align with the improvement project? Explain how the authors learned from the error or unintended events to ensure patient safety. Provide supporting evidence.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.

As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.

It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

 

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

DNP 835 Topic 1 DQ 1 PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety Reflection Example

Reflection on IHI Module PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety:

Improving patient safety is a critical aspect of healthcare, and the IHI Module PS 101 sheds light on the key elements, including leadership, policies, transparency, validation, and just culture, necessary for fostering a safety culture. The relevance of patient safety is emphasized through its impact on the quality of care. Safety culture, as defined by Lee et al. (2019), is shaped by individual and group values, attitudes, perceptions, competencies, and behavior patterns, determining an organization’s commitment to health and safety management.

Nurses, as frontline healthcare workers, play a pivotal role in promoting patient safety. Nursing knowledge, derived from nursing theories, is a valuable asset for delivering patient-centered care and improving outcomes (Ortiz, 2021). The importance of proper assessment and adherence to guidelines is highlighted by Haley and Fritz (2019), emphasizing the need to treat the resident and not the urine in long-term care settings.

Leadership commitment to a safety culture is crucial, as highlighted in the Joint Commission’s key elements. This commitment involves communication of support, modeling expected behavior, creating a code of conduct, fostering an environment for reporting errors without fear of punishment, and promoting collaboration across disciplines (Joint Commission, 2019).

The focus on patient safety extends to perioperative care, where the use of checklists, such as the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist and the Surgical Patient Safety System checklists, has a significant impact. The study by Storesund et al. (2020) demonstrates the effectiveness of these checklists in reducing adverse events, unplanned repeat surgeries, and rehospitalization rates.

The implementation of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist globally resulted in a noteworthy reduction in complications and mortality rates (Haugen et al., 2019). The emphasis on protocol adherence and the checklist’s comprehensive nature contribute to improved patient safety outcomes.

Patient safety is not without challenges, and errors, particularly in nursing, are prevalent. Factors contributing to nursing errors include heavy workload, inadequate knowledge, and suboptimal working environments (Mohsenpour et al., 2017). It is crucial to address these challenges systematically and collaboratively to enhance patient safety.

Reflecting on personal experiences, the need for effective onboarding processes and systematic approaches to addressing errors is evident. Ordering unnecessary labs, as discussed by Haley and Fritz (2019), highlights the importance of empowering nurses with clinical judgment skills to avoid overuse of medical resources.

References:

Haley, T., & Fritz, S. (2019). Treat the resident, not the urine: Using patient safety to reduce urinary tract infections and overuse of urine culture in long term care. American Journal of Infection Control, 47(6), S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.04.148

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). Improving Health and Health Care Worldwide | IHI – Institute for Healthcare Improvement. https://my.ihi.org/

Joint Commission. Comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals (CAMH). Oakbrook Terrace (IL): Joint Commission Resources; 2019.

Lee, S. E., Scott, L. D., Dahinten, V. S., Vincent, C., Lopez, K. D., & Park, C. G. (2019). Safety culture, patient safety, and quality of care outcomes: a literature review. Western journal of nursing research, 41(2), 279-304.

Mohsenpour M, Hosseini M, Abbaszadeh A, et al. Iranian paediatric nurses experience of nursing error: a content analysis. HK J Paediatr (New Series) 2017; 22: 97–102.

Ortiz, M. R. (2021). Best practices in patient-centered care: Nursing theory reflections. Nursing Science Quarterly, 34(3). https://doi-org/10.1177/08943184211010432

Storesund, A., Haugen, A. S., Flaatten, H., Nortvedt, M. W., Eide, G. E., Boermeester, M. A., Sevdalis, N., Tveiten, Ø., Mahesparan, R., Hjallen, B. M., Fevang, J. M., Størksen, C. H., Thornhill, H. F., Sjøen, G. H., Kolseth, S. M., Haaverstad, R., Sandli, O. K., & Søfteland, E. (2020). Clinical efficacy of Combined Surgical Patient Safety System and the World Health Organization’s checklists in surgery. JAMA Surgery, 155(7), 562. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0989

Haugen, A. S., Sevdalis, N., & Søfteland, E. (2019). Impact of the world health organization surgical safety checklist on patient safety. Anesthesiology, 131(2), 420-425.

Unread

Thank you for your insightful post. I concur with your statements regarding the critical importance of prioritizing patient safety. Particularly noteworthy is the assertion, “Due to the complexity of the healthcare system about patient care, practicing patient safety is vital to preventing errors and harm when caring for the patient. Nurses contribute to and promote patient safety practices.” In alignment with the Joint Commission’s key elements, the leadership of my organization has dedicated itself to fostering a safety culture. This commitment involves holding themselves and others accountable for the following:

  • Communicating leadership support for a culture of safety.
  • Modeling expected behavior within a safety culture.
  • Developing and enforcing a code of conduct that defines appropriate behavior supporting a safety culture and unacceptable behavior that can undermine it.
  • Creating an environment where people can speak up about errors without fear of punishment; utilizing this information to identify system flaws contributing to mistakes.
  • Applying a fair and consistent approach to evaluate the actions of staff involved in patient safety incidents.
  • Supporting event reporting of near misses, unsafe conditions, and adverse events.
  • Identifying and addressing organizational barriers to event reporting.
  • Cultivating an organization-wide willingness to examine system weaknesses and using findings to improve care delivery.
  • Promoting collaboration across ranks and disciplines to seek solutions to identified safety problems.
  • Periodically assessing an organization’s safety culture to track changes and improvements.

(Joint Commission, 2019)

Jan 9, 2023, 6:30 PM

Unread

Patient safety is the practice of preventing mistakes in medical care. It is essential to the quality of treatment that patients receive because even minor errors can negatively affect their general well-being. Patient safety requires a dedication to ongoing development and an emphasis on reducing risks and averting potential harm (Lawati et al., 2018). Patient safety is crucial because it protects patients from injury and raises the standard of care in general. Patients are more likely to experience better health outcomes when they receive safe care. As a result, it is crucial for healthcare professionals to put patient safety first and strive tirelessly to increase the security of the treatment they deliver. This essay describes the use of checklists in the perioperative care pathway to improve surgery patients’ safety and outcomes.

According to Storesund et al. (2020), the study aimed to determine the impact of the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist (WHO SSC) and the Surgical Patient Safety System (SURPASS) checklists on patient treatment results such as illness, death, and hospitalization length. The research design involved introducing the pre- and post-operative SURPASS checklists to the intraoperative surgical safety checklist in surgery departments at a tertiary hospital in Norway using a nonrandomized clinical trial approach. The primary purpose of these checklists was to improve patient outcomes by consistently following key safety steps throughout the perioperative care pathway.

My focus is to assess the incidence of complications during hospitalization, unplanned repeat surgeries, unplanned return visits within thirty days of being discharged, and death within thirty days. These outcomes were chosen because they are all indicators of patient safety and have the potential to have a significant impact on patient outcomes. The study aimed to improve patient outcomes overall by lowering the occurrence of complications, reoperations, and readmissions, as well as improving survival rates.

This study used the length of hospital stay (LOS) as a secondary outcome measure. While LOS is not directly related to patient safety, it can be an important indicator of the perioperative care pathway’s efficiency and effectiveness. The study aimed to improve the overall efficiency of the perioperative care pathway by lowering the LOS, which could lead to cost savings and improved patient satisfaction (Storesund et al., 2020). The identified outcome measures were generally aligned with the improvement project, as they were chosen to assess the impact of the checklists on key indicators of patient safety and efficiency in the perioperative care pathway.

The joint application of the two checklists was linked to decreased adverse events while in the hospital, unplanned repeat surgeries, and rehospitalization rates. According to Storesund et al. (2020), this finding raises the possibility that using these checklists could help identify and prevent mistakes or unintended events in the perioperative care pathway, improving patient outcomes.

References

Lawati, M. H., Dennis, S., Short, S. D., & Abdulhadi, N. N. (2018). Patient safety and safety culture in primary health care: A systematic review. BMC Family Practice, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0793-7

Storesund, A., Haugen, A. S., Flaatten, H., Nortvedt, M. W., Eide, G. E., Boermeester, M. A., Sevdalis, N., Tveiten, Ø., Mahesparan, R., Hjallen, B. M., Fevang, J. M., Størksen, C. H., Thornhill, H. F., Sjøen, G. H., Kolseth, S. M., Haaverstad, R., Sandli, O. K., & Søfteland, E. (2020). Clinical efficacy of Combined Surgical Patient Safety System and the World Health Organization’s checklists in surgery. JAMA Surgery, 155(7), 562. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0989

Jan 10, 2023, 7:12 PM

Unread

Hi Lydia, thanks for your post and for discussing the surgical checklist for patient safety. Serious complications and sometimes loss of life have resulted from surgical errors. The introduction of a surgical checklist helped alleviate the complications previously experienced. The most common surgical complications are related to surgical techniques, infections, and postoperative bleeding. A record of 48.6 to 60.7% reduction in equipment errors was achieved with the use of a preoperative checklist. Implementation and practice of good teamwork, communication, and consistency of care are essential in achieving improved patient safety.

The use of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist was noted to reduce complications from 11.0 to 7.0%, with a mortality drop from 1.5 to 0.8% in a global setting of eight hospitals in eight countries (Haugen et al., 2019). In another scenario, the WHO checklist was reported to have resulted in a reduction of surgical complications from 19.9 to 12.4% in the intervention group, and the concurrent length of stay was reduced by 0.8 days. As with any procedure, it is essential to implement and adhere to the protocol in its entirety to achieve the desired outcomes.

Reference

Haugen, A. S., Sevdalis, N., & Søfteland, E. (2019). Impact of the world health organization surgical safety checklist on patient safety. Anesthesiology, 131(2), 420-425.

Jan 11, 2023, 11:28 PM

Unread

Patient safety is a major concern in the healthcare system, and medical errors are the most significant threats in this regard. Generally, mistakes occur when one’s choice leads to negative or less desirable outcomes and in fact, the term “error” means to astray. The most frequent nursing students’ errors are related to hand hygiene and personal protection. In addition, the lack of enough skills and appropriate equipment are prevalent causes of nursing students’ errors.

Authorities in this field should attend to these errors in nursing education, clinical practice, and nursing studies in order to promote this profession in all of these three dimensions. Nurses play a crucial role in providing health care; however, the results of a study showed that 20% of nurses make at least one mistake during their working time. The factors leading to committing errors include heavy workload, a large number of patients, unstable patient status, nurses’ lack of adequate knowledge, improper working environment, and lack of support from and cooperation with experienced staff.

References

Mohsenpour M, Hosseini M, Abbaszadeh A, et al. Iranian paediatric nurses experience of nursing error: a content analysis. HK J Paediatr (New Series) 2017; 22: 97–102.

Jan 9, 2023, 4:45 PM

Unread

I am unsure which stories touched me more, as I can see myself in every situation. For example, the doctor that accidentally administered the wrong blood due to inadequate onboarding processes could have easily avoided the mistake had he been familiar with the hospital’s procedures (Institute for Healthcare Improvement, n.d.). As many patients, including myself, have fallen victim to medical errors, we must begin to review the process (Institute for Healthcare Improvement, n.d.). Unfortunately, I am not optimistic when it comes to the nursing population, as it is likely that some will find it better to gloat about a colleague’s errors rather than focus on fixing the situation. However, the IHI curriculum pilot example shows that this process is ineffective in increasing patient safety but adds to the takeaways from the IHI lesson. The lesson examples that addressing errors systematically is the best approach (Institute for Healthcare Improvement, n.d.).

However, the assignment asks us to review the posted articles and provide a synopsis relevant to the topic; in this aspect, we know that ordering unnecessary labs increases costs (Haley & Fritz, 2019). In this case, simply empowering the nurses to assess and clinical judgment skills to assess residents for Urinary Tract Infections showed promise in reducing the orders for urine cultures (Haley & Fritz, 2019).

References

Haley, T., & Fritz, S. (2019). Treat the resident, not the urine: Using patient safety to reduce urinary tract infections and overuse of urine culture in long term care. American Journal of Infection Control, 47(6), S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.04.148

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). Improving Health and Health Care Worldwide | IHI – Institute for Healthcare Improvement. https://my.ihi.org/

Achieve Academic Success with ReliablePapers.com: Your Trusted Nursing Paper Partner

Are you facing the challenge of crafting a top-notch nursing essay? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we pride ourselves on being the premier nursing paper writing service, dedicated to ensuring your academic success. Our expert nursing essay writers are ready to assist you in creating a unique, customized nursing essay that guarantees top-notch grades.

Why choose us?

  1. Originality Guaranteed: Tired of generic papers? Our professionals can help you compose an entirely original and custom nursing paper, steering clear of plagiarism pitfalls.
  2. Affordability for All: We understand the budget constraints of college students. Our online nursing papers come at exceptionally low prices, ensuring accessibility without compromising quality.
  3. Expert Nursing Writers at Your Service: Let our seasoned writers perfect your paper, irrespective of the complexity, tight deadlines, or specific instructions. We’re your one-stop solution for all nursing assignment needs.

How to Order:

Placing your order is a breeze. Just visit our “Place Order” page, fill in the details for your paper, and proceed to checkout. Once done, your order will be promptly assigned to a suitable expert, setting you on the path to academic excellence.

Don’t wait until the last minute! Fill in your requirements now and let our experts deliver your work promptly.

Trust ReliablePapers.com – Your Partner in Nursing Academic Excellence! Save time for what matters most.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example AssignmentAssignment Brief: NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment

Course: NURS FPX 4020 Improving Quality of Care and Patient Safety

Assignment Title: Assessment 1: Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety

Overview:

This assignment focuses on improving quality and safety in healthcare, specifically addressing patient falls as a significant safety concern. Students will explore the risk factors associated with patient falls, look into practical solutions to mitigate this issue, understand the vital role of nurses in fall prevention, and identify key stakeholders for effective collaboration.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

The primary goals of this assignment are to:

  1. Analyze Patient Fall Risk Factors: Investigate and understand both internal and external factors contributing to the safety risk of patient falls. Utilize relevant literature and resources to gain insights into these risk elements.
  2. Explore Evidence-Based Solutions: Examine practical practices and solutions aimed at preventing patient falls. This includes assessing the effectiveness of interventions, such as minimizing psychoactive drug use, conducting gait and balance training, and providing vitamin D supplementation.
  3. Understand the Role of Nurses in Fall Prevention: Recognize and articulate the essential role of nurses in addressing patient falls. This involves assessing their involvement in fall risk assessment, patient education, and effective communication within the healthcare team.
  4. Identify Stakeholders for Collaboration: Identify and discuss stakeholders essential for collaborative efforts in fall prevention. Understand the importance of working together involving patients, doctors, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals.

The Student’s Role:

As a student undertaking this assignment, your role involves:

  • Research and Analysis: Conduct in-depth research to understand the complexities of patient fall risk factors and evidence-based solutions. Utilize academic journals, textbooks, and reputable sources to gather information.
  • Critical Thinking: Apply critical thinking skills to evaluate the effectiveness of evidence-based solutions. Consider the practicality of each intervention in real-world healthcare settings.
  • Nursing Perspective: Embrace the role of a nurse by exploring how they contribute to fall prevention. Analyze their responsibilities, including fall risk assessment, patient education, and communication, to comprehend the comprehensive nature of nursing involvement.
  • Stakeholder Identification: Identify and discuss key stakeholders involved in collaborative efforts for fall prevention. Emphasize the importance of effective communication and teamwork among healthcare professionals.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Assignment

For This Assessment, You Will Develop A 3-5 Page Paper That Examines A Safety Quality Issue In A Health Care Setting. You Will Analyze The Issue And Examine Potential Evidence-Based And Best-Practice Solutions From The Literature As Well As The Role

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.    

Explain evidence-based and best-practice solutions to improve patient safety related to a specific patient safety risk and reduce costs.

Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.    

Explain factors leading to a specific patient safety risk.

Competency 4: Explain the nurse’s role in coordinating care to enhance quality and reduce costs.    

Explain how nurses can help coordinate care to increase patient safety and reduce costs.

Identify stakeholders with whom nurses would need to coordinate to drive quality and safety enhancements.

Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.    

Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.

References

Allen, M. (2013). How many die from medical mistakes in U.S. hospitals? Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/09/20/224507654/how-many-die-from-medical-mistakes-in-u-s-hospitals.

Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J., & Donaldson, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Professional Context

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for implementing quality improvement (QI) and patient safety measures in health care settings. Effective quality improvement measures result in systemic and organizational changes, ultimately leading to the development of a patient safety culture.

Scenario

Consider the hospital-acquired conditions that are not reimbursed under Medicare/Medicaid, some of which are specific safety issues such as infections, falls, medication errors, and other concerns that could have been prevented or alleviated with the use of evidence-based guidelines.

Choose a specific condition of interest and incorporate evidence-based strategies to support communication and ensure safe and effective care.

For this assessment, consider using one of the following approaches:

Expand on the scenario presented in Vila Health: Identifying Patient Safety Concerns and analyze a quality improvement (QI) initiative.

Analyze a current issue in clinical practice and identify a quality improvement (QI) initiative in the health care setting.

Instructions

The purpose of this assessment is to better understand the role of the baccalaureate-prepared nurse in enhancing quality improvement (QI) measures that address safety risk. This will be within the specific context of patient safety risks at a health care setting of your choice. You will do this by exploring the professional guidelines and best practices for improving and maintaining patient safety in health care settings from organizations such as QSEN and the IOM. Looking through the lens of these professional best practices to examine the current policies and procedures currently in place at your chosen organization and the impact on safety measures for patients, you will consider the role of the nurse in driving quality and safety improvements. You will identify stakeholders in QI improvement and safety measures as well as consider evidence-based strategies to enhance quality of care and promote safety in the context of your chosen health care setting.

Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so that you know what is needed for a distinguished score.

Explain factors leading to a specific patient-safety risk.

Explain evidence-based and best-practice solutions to improve patient safety related to a specific patient-safety risk and reduce costs.

Explain how nurses can help coordinate care to increase patient safety and reduce costs.

Identify stakeholders with whom nurses would coordinate to drive safety enhancements.

Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

Length of submission: 3–5 pages, plus title and reference pages.

Number of references: Cite a minimum of 4 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment

Administration-related errors

Patient safety and the quality of care are paramount goals in healthcare, directly impacting treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction. Continuous quality improvement is integral to enhancing the overall efficiency of healthcare services. However, challenges persist in achieving quality enhancement, with a notable concern being medication errors, defined by the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCCMERP, n.d) as “any preventable event that may cause or lead to inappropriate medication use or patient harm.” Medication errors (M.E.s) occurring during drug administration are often attributed to nurses. Although these errors can happen throughout the healthcare system, this paper specifically addresses the gravity of the issue within acute care settings.

Acute hospitals, providing short-term yet critical treatment services, such as emergency or intensive care, are prone to distractions and require quick decision-making. This setting increases the likelihood of medication administration errors (MAEs), posing a threat to patient safety. To address this, nurses need to implement effective strategies and solutions to minimize administration-related errors and improve care quality.

Overview of Medication Errors

Medication errors (M.E.s) constitute a significant healthcare issue, resulting in both minor and severe harm to patients. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA, 2019), there are over 100,000 reported presumed cases of M.E.s annually. Additionally, up to 9,000 people in the U.S. die each year due to these errors (Tariq et al., 2021). The associated costs are substantial, exceeding $40 billion per year in total care costs for patients affected by M.E.s (Tariq et al., 2021). Beyond financial implications, M.E.s contribute to perceptions of negligence, carelessness, or inexperience among healthcare staff, eroding trust in healthcare services.

Factors Leading to Medication Administration Errors

While medication errors (M.E.s) can occur at any stage of medication use, they are particularly prevalent during administration, accounting for up to 25% of drug administration instances (Koyama et al., 2020). Inattention and distraction are leading causes of MAEs, often resulting in errors such as administering the wrong drug, dose, or to the wrong patient. Nursing inattentiveness is linked to factors like high workload, multitasking, and increased patient flow (Bucknall et al., 2019). Distractions, common in healthcare facilities, especially in acute care settings, contribute to the most frequent administration-related M.E.s.

Competence or skill flaws, insufficient drug knowledge, misunderstandings related to abbreviations or poor handwriting, similar drug names, packaging, incorrect routes of administration, and non-compliance with recommendations and protocols further contribute to MAEs (Tariq et al., 2021). These factors elevate the risk of patient harm. However, the majority of these factors are preventable human errors that can be mitigated through the implementation of appropriate strategies.

Strategies to Improve Patient Safety

Improving patient safety and care quality necessitates a reduction in M.E. rates. Adherence to the “five-rights” rule, ensuring the right patient receives the right drug at the right time, dose, and route, is a fundamental strategy (Martyn et al., 2019). However, recent studies suggest the need for new frameworks, emphasizing the importance of managing workflow, avoiding interruptions, and implementing patient-centered strategies to contribute to safe and prompt medication administration (Martyn et al., 2019). The introduction of new teaching strategies, such as reflection and remediation educational models, can raise awareness of proper drug administration and reduce MAEs (McCabe & Ea, 2016). Computerizing and automating the medication preparation and administration process is another strategy endorsed by research, as it significantly reduces the occurrence of medication errors (Risør et al., 2018).

Nurse Roles

Nurses play a pivotal role in healthcare, particularly in acute care settings, where they are involved in various aspects, including medication prescribing, preparation, dispensing, and administration. Educated, experienced, and attentive nurses contribute to the prevention of medication errors through their high level of competence. Nurses are crucial in the medication use process, serving as the last line of defense to prevent MAEs by double-checking the correctness of medication, dose, patient, time, and route before administration.

Nurse Coordination with Stakeholders

Interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial to preventing medication administration errors. Nurses often require additional information from clinicians, physicians, pharmacists, or other nurses to ensure safe drug administration. Effective communication with patients is also essential, as missing patient information, failure to obtain medical and allergy histories, or not being aware of side effects can lead to MAEs. Nurses act as intermediaries, connecting healthcare professionals with patients, coordinating communication, and ensuring safe medication use.

Conclusion

Medication errors related to drug administration pose significant risks to patient safety, ranging from minor harm to potential fatality. While various factors contribute to these errors, they are preventable incidents requiring diligent efforts to explore and implement effective strategies. Reducing the rate of MAEs is crucial to providing patients with safe and quality care. The skills, knowledge, and attitudes of nursing staff are instrumental and should be maintained at a high level to ensure the prevention of medication errors.

References

Bucknall, T., Fossum, M., Hutchinson, A. M., Botti, M., Considine, J., Dunning, T., Hughes, L., Weir-Phyland, J., Digby, R. & Manias, E. (2019). Nurses’ decision‐making, practices and perceptions of patient involvement in medication administration in an acute hospital setting. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(6), 1316-1327. Web.

Food and Drug Administration (2019). Working to reduce medication errors. Web.

Koyama, A. K., Maddox, C. S., Li, L., Bucknall, T., & Westbrook, J. I. (2020). Effectiveness of double checking to reduce medication administration errors: a systematic review. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29(7), 595–603. Web.

Martyn, J., & Paliadelis, P. (2019). Nurses’ decision-making and the Five Rights of medication administration. Contemporary Nurse, 55(1), 116–126. Web.

McCabe, B., & Ea, E. (2016). Medication administration error reduction efforts in nursing homes: A systematic review and synthesis of quantitative evidence. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 62, 92-103. Web.

Risør, B. W., Lisby, M., Sørensen, J., & Bro, L. (2018). Two strategies for introducing barcoding of drug administration to an electronic medication administration record. Journal of Patient Safety, 14(4), 459-465. Web.

Tariq, R. A., Rai, A. B., Tai, Y. H., & Raouf, M. (2021). Medication administration errors in pediatrics: A systematic review. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 59, 25–33. Web.

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment Two

Introduction

Patient safety is a critical aspect of healthcare delivery, and medication administration errors (MAEs) pose a significant threat to patient well-being. This paper aims to explore the factors contributing to MAEs and present evidence-based strategies to enhance the quality of patient care while minimizing costs. By analyzing a specific incident involving a medication error and employing professional guidelines, this paper elucidates the role of baccalaureate-prepared nurses in coordinating care to drive safety enhancements.

Factors Leading to Patient Safety Risks

One illustrative incident involves Nurse Ella, who inadvertently administered rapid-acting insulin instead of long-acting insulin to a diabetic patient, Mr. Wallace. Several factors contribute to such medication errors:

Lack of Knowledge and Training: Inadequate knowledge about drug doses, interactions, and contraindications is a leading factor of medication administration errors. Research indicates that 78.7% of medication errors result from poor training of nurses (Hassen et al., 2022). Nurses possessing advanced pharmaceutical knowledge and subsequent training are less likely to make medication administration errors.

Communication Gap Between Healthcare Professionals: Insufficient communication and collaboration among healthcare staff contribute to medication errors. A study suggests a higher incidence of medication administration errors in settings with communication gaps (Ghasemi et al., 2022).

Prescribing Errors: Inaccurate prescriptions leading to incorrect dosages and inappropriate instructions are another significant factor. Incompletely written prescriptions contribute to 71% of prescription-related errors (White et al., 2019).

Stress, Burnout, and Mental Health Challenges: Elevated stress levels among nurses due to excessive workloads and long shifts contribute to psychological distress, burnout, and ultimately, medication errors. Burnout is linked to a fivefold increase in patient care and medication errors (White et al., 2019).

Evidence-Based Best Practices Solutions

To address these challenges, evidence-based and best practice solutions are crucial. Some effective strategies include:

QSEN Competencies: Implementation of Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) competencies in nursing education has been shown to improve nurses’ quality and safety education by up to 75% (Watanabe et al., 2021).

Medication Reconciliation: Implementing medication reconciliation procedures during care transitions, contrasting a patient’s present pharmaceutical regimen with prescribed medications, improves patient safety (Koprivnik et al., 2020).

Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE): Electronically submitting medicine orders through CPOE systems reduces the chance of adverse drug events and improves patient safety (Skalafouris et al., 2022).

Barcode Medication Administration (BCMA) Systems: Using BCMA systems for correct medication delivery enhances patient safety by preventing drug errors through patient identification and barcoded labels (Ye, 2023).

Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS): Offering suggestions based on research to healthcare practitioners at the point of care, CDSS can notify healthcare professionals about possible medication combinations, dosage mistakes, or allergies (Manias et al., 2020).

Value-Based Formulary Management: Choosing medicines based on clinical potency, cost-effectiveness, and safety helps maintain high healthcare quality while cutting expenditures related to pharmaceuticals (Weinmeyer et al., 2021).

Nurse-Led Coordination to Optimize Patient Safety

Effective coordination among healthcare professionals, especially nurses, plays a pivotal role in optimizing patient safety. In the case of medication administration errors, nurses can collaborate with various stakeholders:

Coordination with Physicians and Pharmacists: Clear communication between nurses and physicians regarding treatment regimens, along with collaborative efforts with pharmacists, can reduce prescription transcribing and filling errors (Koprivnik et al., 2020).

Collaboration with IT Personnel: Mutual collaboration with IT personnel for the effective utilization of technology tools ensures the proper functioning of systems like CPOE, BCMA, and CDSS to prevent MAEs (Ye, 2023).

Interdisciplinary Collaboration: A holistic care approach by working with interdisciplinary teams and adherence to regulatory requirements reduces the risk of errors, ensuring patient safety and cost-effectiveness (Alrabadi et al., 2021).

Nurses’ Coordination with Other Stakeholders

Nurses play a crucial role in collaborating with various stakeholders to improve medicine delivery and enhance patient safety:

Collaboration with Physicians and Pharmacists: Nurses collaborate with physicians and pharmacists to ensure accurate medication administration. Quality improvement teams and nursing staff can work together to evaluate challenges and implement suitable strategies (Manias et al., 2020).

Involvement of Patients and Families: Better adherence and patient satisfaction can be achieved by involving patients and their families actively in the medication administration process.

Involvement of Medication Safety Officers and Administrators: Organizational prioritization of patient safety through the involvement of medication safety officers and administrators is crucial. Professional associations offer tools for the continuous advancement of medical practices (Manias et al., 2020).

Conclusion

Medication administration errors pose a significant threat to patient safety and contribute to increased treatment costs. However, employing evidence-based best practices and fostering effective coordination among healthcare professionals, especially nurses, can significantly reduce the occurrence of MAEs. The integration of QSEN competencies, medication reconciliation, and advanced technological tools, along with interdisciplinary collaboration, creates a holistic approach to patient care, ensuring safety and cost-effectiveness.

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment Three

Quality improvement initiatives are widespread across health organizations, emphasizing patient safety and quality care. Patient safety remains a top priority for interdisciplinary teams, particularly as medication errors pose common and recurring threats to healthcare, contributing to increased patient harm and mortality (Alotaibi & Federico, 2017). Medication errors are preventable and can result from various factors such as communication gaps, disturbances during medication retrieval and administration, missing patient information, poor labeling, inadequate medication reconciliation, and lack of knowledge.

Factors Leading to Patient Safety Risks

Medication errors can occur at any time and place, often during prescription and drug monitoring. Resolving this issue necessitates collective responsibility, involving interdisciplinary collaboration. Evidence-based practices play a crucial role in raising awareness among healthcare professionals. While medication errors can happen in diverse settings, home environments pose risks, especially for children due to negligent drug storage. Adherence to the five rights of medication administration — ensuring the right drug, patient, dosage, time, and route — is critical in preventing errors. Factors contributing to negligence include increased workloads, fatigue, and insufficient pharmacologic knowledge.

Evidence-based Practices

High-quality care aligns with evidence-based research, emphasizing patient-centered care and proper communication among staff. Involving patients and caregivers in medication education and ensuring clear instructions can enhance care quality. Best practices to enhance patient safety encompass double-checking procedures, using name alerts, planning medication administration to avoid disruptions, and leveraging available technologies.

The Nurse’s Role in Coordinating Care

Nurses, integral to hospital quality improvement, engage in various roles, including patient care, data collection, and medication management. Medication errors pose financial burdens, and nurses play a vital role in coordinating care to alleviate these challenges. Coordination involves assessing the work environment, implementing safety technologies, educating patients, and exercising caution with high-alert medications. Nurses share knowledge, ensure seamless care transitions, and collaborate with interdisciplinary teams to develop personalized care plans, contributing to cost efficiency.

Stakeholder Coordination for Quality and Safety Enhancements

Effective coordination involves collaboration with stakeholders such as society, administrators, patients, families, researchers, technicians, nursing educators, and physicians. Patients and families actively contribute to quality patient safety by providing essential information and seeking clarification on medications.

Conclusion

Patient safety remains paramount, necessitating a focus on preventing medication errors. Factors contributing to these errors are diverse, emphasizing the need for strict adherence to the five rights of medication administration. Coordination by nurses, evidence-based practices, and stakeholder collaboration are essential elements in enhancing quality and safety in healthcare.

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment Four

Introduction

Ensuring patient safety and delivering quality care stand out as paramount challenges in healthcare, involving healthcare facilities, nurses, physicians, and various professionals. Suboptimal quality and compromised patient safety result in adverse outcomes such as morbidity, mortality, increased care costs, prolonged hospital stays, diminished patient and job satisfaction, among other issues. This paper aims to examine the patient safety issue of medication administration, analyze evidence-based practices, and scrutinize the coordination among nurses and stakeholders.

Patient-safety risk focusing on medication administration

Medication administration, a pivotal process predominantly managed by nurses, involves multiple stakeholders, including physicians, pharmacists, and informatics nurses. Errors at any stage of this process can lead to medication administration errors (MAEs) and subsequent adverse events. Research indicates varying rates of prescription, dispensing, and dosage errors, emphasizing the substantial contribution of human errors, particularly by nurses. Interferences during medication administration, whether from patients, families, or distractions, further elevate the risk of errors. Factors like nurse-to-patient ratio, poor communication, and inadequate training are additional contributors, with the potential consequences ranging from mortality and morbidity to adverse effects.

Evidence-based and best practice solutions

Implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs) is crucial to address medication administration challenges. Training and educating healthcare staff based on guidelines from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) is a primary EBP. This includes vigilant verification of medication with electronic health records (EHRs), allergy checks, pre-administration assessment, accurate dosage calculation, and the avoidance of workarounds and abbreviations. Another EBP involves the implementation of a physician order entry system with error reporting and communication capabilities, aiming to reduce prescription, dispensing, and administration errors. Technological interventions, such as bar-code-based medication administration and voice-tagged dosage calculation, prove effective in preventing errors. Strategies like using color-coded tabards and checklists, along with interprofessional collaboration, contribute to reducing interruptions and enhancing communication during medication administration.

Coordinated care among nurses to improve quality and patient safety

Nurses play a crucial role in coordinating care to address burnout and create supportive work environments. Collaborative efforts during medication administration, such as sharing responsibilities and supporting each other during interruptions, contribute to error reduction. Effective communication among nurses to identify patient allergies and educate colleagues about EHRs and technology usage enhances skills and knowledge. Nurse leaders manage resources and conflicts, ensuring a coordinated approach to resolve practice issues. Shared decision-making and coordinated care further contribute to efficient workflow and decreased medication errors.

Stakeholders and safety enhancement

Coordination among various stakeholders, including informatics nurses, pharmacists, physicians, therapists, nurse leaders, and patients, is essential for safety enhancement. Patients’ active involvement in treatment decisions and their contribution to health history and allergy information are critical. Informatics nurses play a vital role in data management, error reporting, and correction processes within EHRs. Physicians, pharmacists, and nurse leaders collaborate to prevent and correct medication errors, while therapists and specialists provide valuable insights into patient conditions. Effective communication and coordination among stakeholders help in resolving conflicts and ensuring patient safety.

References

Abukhader, I., & Abukhader, K. (2020). Effect of medication safety education program on intensive care nurses’ knowledge regarding medication errors. Journal Of Biosciences And Medicines, 08(06), 135-147.

Armstrong, G. (2019). QSEN safety competency: the key ingredient is just culture. The Journal Of Continuing Education In Nursing, 50(10), 444-447.

Bradley, C., Luder, H., Beck, A., Bowen, R., Heaton, P., & Kahn, R. et al. (2016). Pediatric asthma medication therapy management through community pharmacy and primary care collaboration. Journal Of The American Pharmacists Association, 56(4), 455-460.

Hammoudi, B., Ismaile, S., & Abu Yahya, O. (2017). Factors associated with medication administration errors and why nurses fail to report them. Scandinavian Journal Of Caring Sciences, 32(3), 1038-1046.

Huckels-Baumgart, S., Niederberger, M., Manser, T., Meier, C., & Meyer-Massetti, C. (2017). A combined intervention to reduce interruptions during medication preparation and double-checking: a pilot-study evaluating the impact of staff training and safety vests. Journal Of Nursing Management, 25(7), 539-548.

Korb-Savoldelli, V., Boussadi, A., Durieux, P., & Sabatier, B. (2018). Prevalence of computerized physician order entry systems–related medication prescription errors: A systematic review. International Journal Of Medical Informatics, 111, 112-122.

Manias, E. (2018). Effects of interdisciplinary collaboration in hospitals on medication errors: an integrative review. Expert Opinion On Drug Safety, 17(3), 259-275.

Montgomery, A., Azuero, A., Baernholdt, M., Loan, L., Miltner, R., & Qu, H. et al. (2020). Nurse burnout predicts self-reported medication administration errors in acute care hospitals. Journal For Healthcare Quality, Publish Ahead of Print.

Palese, A., Ferro, M., Pascolo, M., Dante, A., & Vecchiato, S. (2019). “I am administering medication—please do not interrupt me”: red tabards preventing interruptions as perceived by surgical patients. Journal Of Patient Safety, 15(1), 30-36.

Pop, M., & Finocchi, M. (2016). Medication errors: a case-based review. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 27(1), 5-11.

Tariq, R., Vashisht, V., Sinha, A., & Scherbak, y. (2021). Medication dispensing errors and prevention. Retrieved 17 March 2021, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519065/.

Thomas, L., Donohue-Porter, P., & Stein Fishbein, J. (2017). Impact of interruptions, distractions, and cognitive load on procedure failures and medication administration errors. Journal Of Nursing Care Quality, 32(4), 309-317.

Thompson, K., Swanson, K., Cox, D., Kirchner, R., Russell, J., & Wermers, R. et al. (2018). Implementation of bar-code medication administration to reduce patient harm. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes, 2(4), 342-351.

Tsegaye, D., Alem, G., Tessema, Z., & Alebachew, W. (2020). Medication administration errors and associated factors among nurses. International Journal Of General Medicine, Volume 13, 1621-1632.

Verweij, L., Smeulers, M., Maaskant, J., & Vermeulen, H. (2016). Quiet please! drug round tabards: are they effective and accepted? A Mixed-Method Study. Journal Of Nursing Scholarship, 46(5), 340-348.

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment Five

Introduction

Patient safety is a major concern in healthcare, with patient falls being a significant safety issue. A fall is described as “an unplanned descent to the floor (or extension of the floor [e.g., trash can or other equipment]) with or without injury to the patient and with or without assistance” (Tucker et al., 2019, p. 113). Falls can lead to various injuries, including fractures, functional decline, traumatic brain injury, and nursing home placement, making them the “leading cause of accidental death in people over 65 years old” (Lasater et al., 2016, p. 545). In addition to the human cost, falls increase healthcare expenses due to the need to treat preventable injuries. Healthcare organizations are thus focused on falls prevention to enhance patient safety and reduce healthcare costs. This paper examines the risk factors of patient falls and evidence-based solutions. It also explores the role of nurses in falls prevention and identifies stakeholders with whom nurses should collaborate to address this safety concern.

Factors Leading to Patient-Safety Risk

Patient fall risk factors can be categorized as intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic factors include patient characteristics such as age, sex, previous falls, balance impairment, gait, activities of daily living (ADL) disabilities, stroke, cognitive impairments, Parkinson’s disease, and incontinence (Kwan et al., 2016). The risk of falls increases with age, with those aged 65-74 years having a 32% probability and those over 80 years having a 37% probability (Kwan et al., 2016). Extrinsic factors related to the environment include home hazards, use of assistive devices, and inappropriate footwear (Morone et al., 2018; Kwan et al., 2016). The Morse scale assesses risk factors such as history of falls, secondary diagnosis, walk assistance, parenteral therapy, mental status, and gait to determine an individual’s risk of falls (Nadia & Permanasari, 2018).

Evidence-Based Solutions

Addressing patient falls begins with identifying at-risk patients and conducting a multifactorial fall risk assessment for older patients (Morone et al., 2018). Assessment should include factors like gait, balance, mental status, reflexes, and various functions (Morone et al., 2018). Analyzing the type of fall is crucial for selecting preventive strategies, categorizing falls as accidental, unanticipated physiological, anticipated physiological, or intentional (Morone et al., 2018). Evidence-based practices include minimizing psychoactive drug use, engaging in gait and balance training, and providing vitamin D supplementation (Morone et al., 2018). Managing conditions identified during risk assessment, such as visual impairment or a hazardous home environment, is also critical. Effective fall prevention involves interventions addressing both clinical assessment findings and individual risk assessment outcomes (Morone et al., 2018).

The Role of Nurses in Addressing Patient-Safety Risk

Nurses play a central role in addressing the safety issue of patient falls due to their extensive patient interaction and involvement in the care team (Nadia & Permanasari, 2018). Nurses contribute to fall risk assessment using tools like the Morse scale, inform patients about fall risks, and provide necessary assistance. Effective communication among nurses is vital for ensuring patient safety, as poor communication can jeopardize care coordination (Tucker et al., 2019).

Stakeholders

Collaboration with various stakeholders is essential for implementing evidence-based solutions for patient falls. Nurses should educate patients and families on fall risks and prevention strategies. Cooperation with doctors and pharmacists is crucial for adjusting medications and administering vitamin D. Nurses should also work with social workers and doctors to implement strategies like exercise programs, motivational interviewing, and environmental assessment. Effective communication among nurses is necessary for sharing information about safety issues and addressing them (Lasater et al., 2016; Tucker et al., 2019).

References

Kwan, E., Straus, S., & Holroyd-Leduc, J. (2016). Risk factors for falls in the elderly. In A. Huang & L. Mallet (Eds.), Medication-related falls in older people (pp. 91-101). Adis.

Lasater, K., Cotrell, V., McKenzie, G., Simonson, W., Morgove, M. W., Long, E. E., & Eckstrom, E. (2016). Collaborative falls prevention: Interprofessional team formation, implementation, and evaluation. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(12), 545-550.

Morone, G., Federici, A., Tramontano, M., Annicchiarico, R., & Salvia, A. (2018). Strategies to prevent falls. In G. Sandrini, V. Homberg, L. Saltuari, N. Smania, & A. Pedrocchi (Eds.), Advanced technologies for the rehabilitation of gait and balance disorders (pp. 149-158). Springer.

Nadia, P., & Permanasari, V. Y. (2018). Compliance of the nurse for fall risk assessment as a procedure of patient safety: A systematic review. KnE Life Sciences, 4(9), 207-219.

Tucker, S., Sheikholeslami, D., Farrington, M., Picone, D., Johnson, J., Matthews, G., Evans, R., Gould, R., Bohlken, D., Comried, L., Petrulevich, K., Perkhounkova, E., & Cullen, L. (2019). Patient, nurse, and organizational factors that influence evidence‐based fall prevention for hospitalized oncology patients: An exploratory study. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(2), 111-120.

Receive Academic Excellence with Our Professional Nursing Essay Writing Service

Are you struggling with challenging nursing assignments? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we take pride in being the best nursing paper writing service that can save you time and elevate your academic performance. Our dedicated team of expert nursing essay writers is here to provide you with personalized and original nursing papers tailored to your unique requirements.

Why Choose Our Nursing Paper Writing Service?

  • Expertise Matters: Our pro writers specialize in nursing papers, ensuring that your essay is crafted with in-depth knowledge and understanding of nursing concepts.
  • Affordable Excellence: Worried about your budget? Our online nursing papers come at very affordable prices, making top-notch academic assistance accessible to all college students.
  • Customization Guaranteed: Tired of generic papers? Order a nursing custom paper from us, and our experts will write an original, customized essay to secure the best possible grades for you.

How to Order: Simple and Secure

Ready to experience academic success? Follow these easy steps:

  1. Click on our “Place Order” page.
  2. Fill in all the details for your paper.
  3. Proceed to checkout to complete the payment.

Once done, your order will be assigned to a suitable expert, taking the first step toward academic excellence.

Choose ReliablePapers.com – where excellence meets affordability! Save time for what matters most and let our professional essay writers elevate your academic journey.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient's Spiritual Needs Case Analysis ExampleAssignment Brief: PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

Overview:

The purpose of this assignment is to analyze a case study involving the postponement of medical intervention based on religious beliefs and to explore the ethical implications of such decisions. The case study revolves around the decisions made by a parent, Mike, for his son, James, considering spiritual beliefs and their impact on healthcare choices.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

Decision-Making and Autonomy:
  • Analyze the crucial ethical principles of patient autonomy and decision-making.
  • Examine the challenges presented when dealing with minors and parental decisions.
  • Assess the ethical and legal responsibilities of healthcare professionals in cases where parental decisions may pose harm to the patient.
  • Evaluate the application of the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence in pediatric healthcare.
Christian View Regarding Health and Sickness:
  • Explore the influence of religious beliefs on healthcare practices and perceptions of sickness, health, and healing.
  • Examine the Christian perspective on illness, specifically viewing sickness as a test or punishment from God.
  • Analyze relevant biblical references that guide Christians on seeking medical treatment and the responsibility to care for the body as a temple.
  • Discuss the balance between faith, prayer, and medical interventions from a Christian standpoint.
Spiritual Assessment:
  • Understand the significance of conducting a spiritual needs assessment in the context of healthcare decisions.
  • Explore tools used for spiritual assessments, focusing on dimensions such as purpose, values, and self-identity.
  • Examine the role of healthcare professionals in addressing spiritual needs and directing patients to appropriate pastoral care.
  • Discuss the potential impact of a spiritual assessment on the alignment of medical decisions with religious beliefs.

The Student’s Role:

As a student, your role is to critically engage with the case study and address the outlined objectives. Provide in-depth analyses of the ethical considerations surrounding parental decisions, the Christian perspective on health and sickness, and the relevance of spiritual assessments in healthcare. Support your insights with references to ethical principles, biblical references, and scholarly literature.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Assignment

Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

Spirituality and religion are crucial factors in most people seeking medical care. Unfortunately, health care professionals might not consider religious beliefs and spiritual needs when they are dealing with complex medical decisions for their patients or their families. This paper analyzes a case involving parental postponement of a medically needed intervention based on religious beliefs in prayers and miracles…

In addition to the topic study materials, use the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about \”Case Study: Healing and Autonomy\” as the basis for your responses in this assignment.

Answer the following questions about a patient\’s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview.

In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient\’s autonomy? Explain your rationale.
In 400-500 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James\’s care?
In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care?
Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials. Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

BS in Health Sciences 1.2; BS Nursing (RN to BSN ) 5.2 Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.

Case Study: Healing and Autonomy

Mike and Joanne are the parents of James and Samuel, identical

twins born 8 years ago. James is currently suffering from acute glomerulonephritis, kidney failure. James was originally brought

into the hospital for complications associated with a strep throat infection. The spread of the A streptococcus infection led to the subsequent kidney failure. James’s condition was acute enough

to warrant immediate treatment. Usually cases of acute glomerulonephritis caused by strep infection tend to improve on their own or with an antibiotic. However,James also had elevated

blood pressure and enough fluid buildup that required temporary dialysis to relieve.The attending physician suggested immediate dialysis.After some time of discussion with Joanne, Mike informs the physician that they are going to forego the dialysis and place their faith in God. Mike and Joanne had been moved by a sermon their pastor had given a week ago, and also had witnessed a close

friend regain mobility when she was prayed over at a healing service after a serious stroke. They thought it more prudent to take James immediately to a faith healing service instead of putting James through multiple rounds of dialysis. Yet, Mike and Joanne

agreed to return to the hospital after the faith healing services later in the week, and in hopes that James would be healed by then.

Two days later the family returned and was forced to place James Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

on dialysis, as his condition had deteriorated. Mike felt perplexed and tormented by his decision to not treat James earlier.Had he not enough faith? Was God punishing him or James? To make matters

worse, James’s kidneys had deteriorated such that his dialysis was now not a temporary matter and was in need of a kidney transplant. Crushed and desperate, Mike and Joanne immediately offered to donate one of their own kidneys to James, but they were not compatible donors. Over the next few weeks, amidst daily rounds of dialysis, some of their close friends and church members also offered to donate a kidney to James.However, none of them were tissue matches James’s nephrologist called to schedule a private appointment with Mike and Joanne.James was stable, given the regular dialysis, but would require a kidney transplant within the year. Given the desperate situation, the nephrologist informed Mike and Joanne of a donor that was an ideal tissue match, but as of yet had not been considered—James’s brother Samuel. Mike vacillates and struggles to decide whether he should have his other son Samuel lose a kidney or perhaps wait for God to do a miracle this time around. Perhaps this is where the real testing of his faith will come in? Mike reasons, “This time around it is a matter of life and death. What could require greater faith than that?”

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example

Introduction

Spirituality and religion play pivotal roles in the healthcare decisions of individuals. However, healthcare professionals often overlook religious beliefs and spiritual needs when navigating complex medical scenarios. This paper delves into a case involving the deferment of a medically necessary intervention due to religious convictions about prayers and miracles.

Physician’s Role in Decision-Making

In the case of James, the physician should not have permitted Mike, the father, to persist in making decisions that seemed irrational and detrimental to James. While respecting parental autonomy is crucial, healthcare professionals bear a legal and ethical responsibility to intervene when a child’s well-being is jeopardized (Katz & Webb, 2016). In instances where a child faces the risk of disability or death due to parental decisions, professionals must report the situation to appropriate authorities and, if necessary, proceed with life-saving interventions.

Christian Perspective on Health and Sickness

From a Christian standpoint, perceptions of health and sickness are intertwined with faith. Some Christians may view good health as a reward for righteous living and illness as a consequence of sin or a test of faith. In the case of James, his father, Mike, grapples with feelings of inadequacy and questions whether the illness is a result of insufficient faith.

It is imperative for Christians to understand that seeking medical intervention aligns with biblical principles. In Matthew 9:12, Jesus emphasized the role of physicians, indicating that those who are sick need a physician. Medical care is not a lack of faith but a means through which God’s healing can manifest. Christians are encouraged to honor their bodies as temples of God and seek medical care responsibly (1 Corinthians 6:19-20).

Mike’s Dilemma and Christian Ethics

As a Christian, Mike should recognize that medical intervention is not a contradiction to trusting God. Allowing James to undergo necessary medical procedures does not negate the power of prayer but acknowledges that God may work through healthcare professionals. Honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, Mike should consider the potential benefits of a kidney transplant for James. Beneficence entails promoting well-being, and in this case, a transplant can save James’s life without necessarily conflicting with spiritual beliefs.

Spiritual Needs Assessment

A spiritual needs assessment is instrumental in guiding the physician to assist Mike in determining suitable interventions for James and the family. Identifying spiritual and religious needs ensures that medical decisions are respectful and responsive to these beliefs. A comprehensive assessment involves supporting spiritual beliefs, organizing resources, and facilitating spiritual activities (Isaac et al., 2016).

Upon identifying the spiritual needs of James’s family, the physician can then decide whether to address these needs or involve spiritual and religious leaders in the care process. Referring individuals to appropriate pastoral care acknowledges the importance of spirituality in healthcare decision-making without placing the burden solely on medical professionals.

Conclusion

In conclusion, addressing a patient’s spiritual needs, especially within the context of religious beliefs, is essential for providing holistic and patient-centered care. While respecting autonomy is crucial, healthcare professionals must navigate complex situations, especially when a child’s well-being is at stake. Integrating spirituality into the care process through assessments and collaboration with spiritual leaders ensures a more comprehensive and respectful approach to healthcare decision-making.

References:

Isaac, K., Hay, J., & Lubetkin, E. (2016). Incorporating Spirituality in Primary Care. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(3), 1065-1077.

Katz, A., & Webb, S. (2016). Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics, 138(2), e20161485.

Part Two:

In 200-250 words, respond to the following:

In the context of the Christian worldview, the principles in this case are specified and weighted based on the core tenets of Christian ethics. Christians, when grappling with healthcare dilemmas, consider four key principles, recognizing the need for nuanced evaluation in each unique medical situation. In the presented case, the principle of beneficence carries significant weight. Despite James’s stable condition, the imminent threat to his life within a year without an organ transplant elevates the importance of saving his life. The Christian teaching underscores the sacredness of human life, imposing an obligation on Christians to preserve life. Both the parents and the healthcare practitioners share the responsibility of ensuring James’s survival, aligning with the principle of beneficence. Beyond mere survival, there exists a duty to enhance James’s life, a task guided by the same principle.

In 200-250 words, respond to the following:

Within the Christian worldview, achieving a balance among the four principles—Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice—is a matter of discerning priorities aligned with Christian values. The sanctity of life, considered sacred in Christianity, forms the basis for balancing these principles. Christians navigate this delicate equilibrium by prioritizing the principle most aligned with preserving life. For instance, while autonomy allows freedom of choice, the paramount importance of beneficence may supersede in critical situations. In the case, parents exercised autonomy by seeking faith healing, potentially neglecting the beneficence owed to their son. The healthcare professional, guided by Christian ethics, might intervene, placing James on dialysis to avert harm.

Additionally, the Christian perspective emphasizes the role of justice and nonmaleficence. Clear communication with the parents, explaining that delaying treatment could exacerbate James’s condition and lead to dire consequences, incorporates these principles into the decision-making process. Ultimately, a Christian balance among the principles ensures a comprehensive approach, respecting autonomy but prioritizing beneficence, justice, and nonmaleficence in alignment with Christian teachings.

References:

Fried, A. L., & Fisher, C. B. (2018). Emerging ethical and legal issues in clinical child and adolescent psychology. In The Oxford Handbook of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology.

Hoehner, P. J. (2018). Practicing dignity: An introduction to Christian values and decision-making in health care. Biomedical ethics in the Christian narrative. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/phi413v/practicing-dignity-an-introduction-to-christianvalues-and-decision-making-in-health-care/v1.1/#/chapter/3

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example Two

Spiritual Needs Assessment

As healthcare professionals, engaging in conversations with patients about their spirituality becomes imperative. The beliefs, values, and morals of individuals shape their identity, influencing the approach of healthcare workers in providing care. Respecting patients’ beliefs, faith, and cultural backgrounds establishes trust and rapport, essential components of patient care. To deliver optimal care, healthcare professionals must understand the intricate connection between a patient’s belief system and the care plan. Confidence and openness to discussing various aspects of spirituality are crucial for effective patient care.

The author conducted an interview with a family member, D.K., who underwent treatment for an extended period, eventually diagnosed with Celiac Disease. This paper aims to create a spiritual assessment based on the interview, presenting a transcript and analyzing the interaction. Evaluation of the interview’s successes, areas for improvement, and identification of potential barriers between the interviewer and interviewee will be addressed. The focus of the interview is on D.K.’s experiences as a patient in a hospital setting.

Part I: The Interview

Inquiring about D.K.’s religious and spiritual beliefs, the interview revealed her 30-year commitment to Christianity and her reliance on faith during the hospitalization. The discussion highlighted the role of prayer and communion in supporting her spiritual well-being. When questioned about the influence of her beliefs on self-care decisions, D.K. expressed a heightened prayer focus and shared the significance of others praying for her. Additionally, privacy and respect for personal spiritual time emerged as crucial needs that healthcare professionals could address.

Part II: Analysis

The interviewee, an older Caucasian female and a devout Christian, faced a challenging diagnosis of Celiac Disease, impacting her culinary profession centered around gluten. The interview underscored the importance of spiritual care during hospitalization, emphasizing the need for healthcare professionals to respect and encourage moments of prayer and reflection. The author identified the potential value of conducting the interview while D.K. was still an inpatient.

No significant barriers were identified during the spiritual assessment, and the author stressed the importance of maintaining a commitment to spiritual care even amid busy schedules. Acknowledging the interconnectedness of spiritual and physical healing, the author emphasized the equal significance of addressing patients’ spiritual needs without delay.

References:

D.K. Personal Communication. November 2016.

Joint Commission. 2016. Medical Record – Spiritual Assessment. Retrieved from Joint Commission Spiritual Assessment. Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis.

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example Three

The principle of autonomy upholds a patient’s right to make informed medical decisions. However, in the context of this case within a Confucian society, where familial authority plays a significant role, the head of the family, Mike, is expected to make decisions for those under his care (Tai & Tsai, 2003). Despite the physician’s obligation to present all possible measures, the decision ultimately rests with James’s parents, even if it appears irrational from a medical standpoint. Mike, as a Christian family head, is entrusted with ensuring the well-being, both physical and spiritual, of his children. Thus, respecting patient autonomy is vital, trusting that Mike will act in his son’s best interest. James’s parents, albeit belatedly, opted for dialysis, a crucial step in stabilizing the child, allowing time for thoughtful consideration and consultation to determine the best course that benefits James without jeopardizing Samuel.

The physician may intervene in decision-making only if Mike is deemed incompetent or uncertain about the child’s best interests. In such cases, the physician should thoroughly explain all options and the chosen course of action, detailing the potential implications associated with the selected treatment method (Tai & Tsai, 2003).

Christians Views on Sickness and Health

Christianity acknowledges suffering, including sickness, pain, and disability, as integral to religious life (Porterfield, 2005). Viewing suffering as a path to redemption, Christians believe that healing is facilitated through unwavering faith in a higher power. Perspectives on sickness and healing vary among Christians, with some perceiving it as a consequence of sins, while others see it as a test of faith (Porterfield, 2005). In this case, Mike interpreted James’s illness as divine punishment, reflecting the diverse Christian perspectives. Seeking religious meaning and redemption during suffering is common among Christians, often manifesting through caregiving mirroring Jesus’ healing ministry.

Medical interventions, essential for Christians, do not signify a loss of faith; instead, they complement spirituality. Combining medicine with spirituality fosters positive expectations, alleviates stress, and enhances natural recovery processes, akin to the placebo effect (Porterfield, 2005). Various forms of medical interventions, including nutrition, exercise, and mental well-being, intertwine with Christian practices, promoting a holistic approach to health.

Mike, driven by the principles of nonmaleficence and benevolence, should act in James’s best interest. While prayer was attempted, the subsequent dialysis stabilized James, underscoring the importance of medical interventions. Embracing medical assistance aligns with Christian beliefs, acknowledging that God works through individuals, including healthcare professionals. To uphold his faith, Mike can prayerfully support the organ transplant, trusting in divine guidance.

Spiritual Assessment

Spiritual assessment in healthcare aids practitioners in addressing patients’ spiritual and emotional needs during challenging times. Utilizing Draper’s (2012) generic approach to spiritual assessment would be beneficial for Mike. This approach helps recognize and acknowledge spiritually based issues, identifying coping resources and facilitating informed decision-making. Questions should explore Mike’s spiritual beliefs, meaningful aspects of James’s life, and how these beliefs influence healthcare decisions.

Furthermore, the assessment tool can probe into Mike’s spiritual community, assessing its potential to provide emotional and spiritual support. Understanding these aspects enables the physician to tailor interventions that enhance spiritual well-being. Spiritual engagement contributes to improved quality of life, reduced stress symptoms, increased mindfulness, and enhanced coping mechanisms.

Conclusion

Christianity profoundly shapes perceptions of sickness, health, and seeking help from healthcare professionals. Both Christians and physicians play vital roles in maintaining patient autonomy, ensuring informed decision-making while respecting religious beliefs. Integrating medicine with spirituality provides a comprehensive approach to healthcare, acknowledging the interconnectedness of physical and spiritual well-being. The case emphasizes the importance of Christians accepting medical assistance when necessary, promoting a harmonious balance between faith and professional healthcare.

References

Craigie, F. C. (2010). Positive spirituality in health care: Nine practical approaches to pursuing wholeness for clinicians, patients, and health care organizations. Hillcrest Publishing Group.

Draper, P. (2012). An integrative review of spiritual assessment: implications for nursing management. Journal of Nursing Management, 20(8), 970-980.

Porterfield, A. (2005). Healing in the History of Christianity. Oxford University Press.

Tai, M. C. T., & Tsai, T. P. (2003). Who makes the decision? Patient’s autonomy vs. paternalism in a Confucian society. Croatian medical journal, 44(5), 558-561.

Zollfrank, A. A., Trevino, K. M., Cadge, W., Balboni, M. J., Thiel, M. M., Fitchett, G.… & Balboni, T. A. (2015). Teaching health care providers to provide spiritual care: a pilot study. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 18(5), 408-414.

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example Four

Introduction

Healthcare professionals strive to adhere to ethical principles, encompassing a patient’s beneficence, autonomy, nonmaleficence, and justice. However, the intricate nature of human body systems and diverse values often complicates strict adherence to these principles (Johnstone, 2019). Spiritual and religious beliefs, in particular, can significantly influence patients’ willingness to follow healthcare recommendations, potentially leading to adverse health outcomes. This case study highlights the imperative of addressing patients’ spiritual needs to ensure compliance with beneficence and nonmaleficence principles.

Patient Autonomy

The presented case underscores challenges related to patient autonomy. Decisions made by the parents, Mike and Joanne, create a dilemma for the physician in upholding beneficence and nonmaleficence principles. The parents’ choices result in a severe deterioration of their son’s health, prompting consideration of the child’s best interest over parental preferences. While tempting to override parental autonomy for the child’s benefit, disrespecting autonomy can lead to unintended consequences, including distrust in healthcare professionals and potential endangerment of the child (Ubel, Scherr, & Fagerlin, 2017).

Rather than infringing on parental autonomy, the physician should establish effective communication and rapport with the parents. Informing them about all options and consequences, the healthcare practitioner must act in the child’s best interest, emphasizing the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence as priorities (Lawrence, 2007). While being compassionate, the physician should be clear and sincere in presenting the preferred treatment, fostering collaboration with the parents.

Christian Perspective Regarding Sickness and Health

The Christian view on health and illness is nuanced, encompassing perspectives of punishment or trial. In this case, Mike perceives his son’s illness as a trial imposed by God, necessitating an active response. Viewing medical advances as gifts from God, Christians are encouraged to accept these instruments rather than reject divine wisdom (Johnstone, 2019). To align with beneficence and nonmaleficence principles, Mike should seek medical assistance, integrating faith with medical interventions. Trusting God and utilizing medical tools ensures the child’s well-being, demonstrating responsibility in cherishing God’s gifts.

Spiritual Assessment Benefits

Recognizing diverse patient needs, contemporary healthcare professionals advocate for spiritual assessments to facilitate holistic care. Various assessment instruments, including open-ended interviews, prove effective in identifying patients’ values and beliefs (Timmins & Caldeira, 2017). In this case, a spiritual assessment would provide insight into Mike’s values, enabling the physician to craft arguments supportive of recommended treatments. The assessment could involve consultation with other professionals and the hospital’s chaplain to guide the family effectively. By addressing spiritual needs, the physician could enhance relationships, fostering greater patient compliance and cooperation.

Conclusion

Mike faces challenging decisions that can impact his son’s life profoundly. Rooted in Christian faith, Mike can find strength by perceiving the trial as a call to action and appreciating divine wisdom. The physician, through a spiritual assessment, could tailor communication to align with Mike’s values, promoting collaboration. In navigating this delicate situation, Mike’s faith, integrated with medical interventions, can guide decisions that prioritize the child’s well-being.

References

Hubbard, R., & Greenblum, J. (2019). Parental decision making: The best interest principle, child autonomy, and reasonableness. HEC Forum, 31(3), 233-240.

Johnstone, M. J. (2019). Bioethics: A nursing perspective (7th ed.). Chatswood, NSW: Elsevier Health Sciences.

Lawrence, D. J. (2007). The four principles of biomedical ethics: A foundation for current bioethical debate. Journal of Chiropractic Humanities, 14, 34-40.

Timmins, F., & Caldeira, S. (2017). Assessing the spiritual needs of patients. Nursing Standard, 31(29), 47-53.

Ubel, P. A., Scherr, K. A., & Fagerlin, A. (2017). Empowerment failure: How shortcomings in physician communication unwittingly undermine patient autonomy. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(11), 31-39.

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example Five

Introduction

Considering religion and spirituality is crucial in healthcare, acknowledging individual variations in religious, spiritual, and philosophical inclinations. Healthcare professionals, despite personal beliefs, must prioritize ethical decision-making for prompt medical attention (Lawrence, 2007). This case, exemplified by James, emphasizes the central role of healing in nursing, treating human life as invaluable and created in God’s image. The case delves into how a parent’s choices impact family dynamics in the context of a child’s health.

Question 1

Adhering to the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, which prioritize patient well-being, the doctor asserts that Mike’s judgments, deemed detrimental to James, must be addressed. Balancing therapy advantages with costs and risks aligns with beneficence, while non-maleficence prioritizes the patient’s welfare (Bavinck & Sutanto, 2019). Despite respecting patient autonomy, the physician may need to proceed with necessary treatments to avert harm, ensuring the patient’s access to medical care (Kabbur, 2013).

Sickness and Health

The Christian perspective views illness as an inevitable part of life, fostering fortitude, character, and hope through trials (Romans 5:3-4). Despite environmental sources of sickness, faith remains pivotal for healing, emphasizing trust in God’s promises (Hebrews 11:6). While illness is not desired, God’s presence brings comfort and hope to the afflicted (Mariottini, 2018).

Medical Intervention

Christians perceive medical assistance as a divine gift, emphasizing faith in the synergy of medical intervention and religious belief. Seeking timely medical attention is endorsed, acknowledging God’s provision of knowledge to physicians (Sirach, Chapter 38). Faith in medical intervention aligns with the belief in God’s healing gifts.

Recommendation Action for Mike

Mike’s decisions, influenced by a misunderstanding of Biblical narratives, may conflict with universal principles of good and evil. Advocating for a kidney transplant aligns with Christian values, considering it an act of love akin to Jesus’ example. Despite the difficulty, choosing a transplant for James, supported by Samuel, aligns with preserving life, emphasizing the potential for a healthy and normal life with one kidney.

Spiritual Needs Assessment

James’ physical pain and Mike’s spiritual distress necessitate a spiritual assessment. Recognizing the interplay of religious beliefs and health, a spiritual examination aids in understanding perspectives, fostering tailored solutions. The HOPE questions and Joint Commission’s Spiritual Assessment provide valuable insights, enhancing patient-doctor relationships and promoting better outcomes.

Conclusion

Religious beliefs significantly influence medical decisions, necessitating healthcare professionals’ training in spiritual needs assessment. Understanding and respecting patients’ religious views ensure compassionate and high-quality treatment. A proper spiritual examination fosters comprehension between healthcare providers and patients, contributing to improved outcomes.

References

Anandarajah, G. (2005). Doing a Culturally Sensitive Spiritual Assessment: Recognizing Spiritual Themes and Using the HOPE Questions. Virtual Mentor,7(5). doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.cprl1-0505

Bavinck, H., & Sutanto, N. G. (2019). Christian worldview. Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway.

Biblica Inc. (2011). Romans 5:3-4 New International Version. Retrieved from Bible Gateway

Kabbur, G. (2013). American Medical Association Journal of Ethics.

Lawrence DJ. (2007). The four principles of biomedical ethics: a foundation for current bioethical debate. Journal of Chiropractic Humanities, (14), 34–40. Retrieved from EBSCOhost

Mariottini, C. (2018, July 13). A Christian Perspective on Illness. Retrieved from Claude Mariottini

Shelly, J. A., & Miller, A. B. (2006). Called to care: A Christian worldview for nursing (2nd ed.).

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example Six

In today’s era, remarkable strides have been achieved in medical science. Despite these progressions, a considerable number still lean towards relying on spirituality and religion instead of conventional medical approaches. Conversely, medical professionals often overlook the spiritual requirements of patients, neglecting to guide them through intricate medical decisions. This paper seeks to scrutinize a case involving a paternal postponement of medical intervention rooted in a belief in miracles and prayers.

Decision-Making and Autonomy

An imperative facet of medical ethics is patient autonomy and the prerogative of decision-making. When dealing with minors, the principles of autonomy and decision-making frequently present a quandary. In the specified case, Mike’s decision, grounded in religious belief, was detrimental to James’s health, warranting intervention by the physician. While parental decisions hold significance in childcare, physicians working with minors are duty-bound to discuss all options, balancing “respecting children’s rights and liberties while protecting them from harm” (Strom-Gottfried, 2008). The ethical and legal responsibility of the physician was to intervene in the decision, preventing potential harm to James (Katz et al., 2016). The delayed intervention resulted in increased deterioration, necessitating permanent dialysis and a kidney transplant.

Medical health practitioners bear the responsibility of safeguarding minors at risk of medical neglect (Katz et al., 2016). Upon identifying potential harm due to parental decisions, the physician is legally and professionally obligated to report parents to relevant authorities. Continuing life-saving intervention, even against parental objections, aligns with the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence.

Christian View Regarding Health and Sickness

Long-standing religious beliefs have significantly influenced individual healthcare practices and perspectives on sickness, health, and healing. The notion that good health is a reward for virtuous deeds while sickness may be a form of divine punishment or a test of faith has persisted. In James’s case, Mike initially viewed the illness as a test from God, resorting to prayer for recovery. However, as uncertainties arose, questioning his faith, Mike pondered if this was divine punishment. Such reflections are common among the religious, attributing illness to a lack of devotion. This perspective on health and sickness can adversely influence healthcare choices, as evident in Mike’s inclination towards prayer over medical interventions.

Christianity, while acknowledging the importance of faith, encourages followers to seek medical treatment in times of illness. The scripture in Matthew 9:12 emphasizes the need for medical attention when one is unwell. This underlines the freedom of Christians to seek professional medical consultation, recognizing medical science as a divine gift for their well-being. Viewing the human body as a temple, Christians are obliged “to honor God with your bodies” (1 Corinthians 6:19-20). Hence, caring for the body through medical means aligns with Christian values.

As a Christian, Mike needs to ensure that his decisions uphold the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence. Trusting healthcare professionals as agents of God for treatment aligns with preserving life, combining prayer and medical intervention for the best outcome.

Spiritual Assessment

Conducting a spiritual needs assessment is instrumental in identifying the spiritual needs of patients and their families. It aids physicians in providing support aligned with religious beliefs, offering insights into conflicting beliefs affecting medical decisions (Isaac et al., 2016).

The spiritual assessment aims to address religious beliefs through tools exploring dimensions such as purpose, values, transcendental experiences, and self-identity (Monod et al., 2010). Physicians, while not providing spiritual guidance, can direct patients to appropriate pastoral care. Chaplains are better suited to inform patients about the risks of forgoing treatment and may effectively persuade patients on the importance of medical intervention.

References

Isaac, K., Hay, J., & Lubetkin, E. (2016). Incorporating Spirituality in Primary Care. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(3), 1065–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0190-2

Katz, A. L., Webb, S. A., & COMMITTEE ON BIOETHICS. (2016). Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics, 138(2), e20161485. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1485

Monod, S. M., Rochat, E., Büla, C. J., Jobin, G., Martin, E., & Spencer, B. (2010). The spiritual distress assessment tool: An instrument to assess spiritual distress in hospitalized elderly persons. BMC Geriatrics, 10(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-10-88

New International Version. (2011). Bible Gateway passage: Matthew 9 – New International Version. Bible Gateway. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%209&version=NIV

Rumun, A. J. (2014). INFLUENCE OF RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON HEALTHCARE PRACTICE. 2(4), 12.

Strom-Gottfried, K. (2008). The Ethics of Practice with Minors: High Stakes, Hard Choices. Lyceum Books.

Boost Your Grades with Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services at ReliablePapers.com

Are you feeling overwhelmed by tough nursing paper topics? Look no further – at ReliablePapers.com, we take pride in being the best nursing paper writing service. If the examples provided on [PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Examples] don’t suffice for your paper, entrust our expert nursing essay writers to craft a unique, customized nursing essay tailored to your requirements.

Worried about plagiarism? Our skilled professionals guarantee originality, ensuring you submit a paper that stands out and secures you the best grades. What’s more, our online nursing papers come at exceptionally affordable prices, making top-notch academic assistance accessible to every college student.

Why struggle with a complex topic, tight deadlines, or specific instructions when we’ve got your back? From writing your nursing assignments to providing valuable guides, ReliablePapers.com is your go-to destination. Ready to place an order? It’s a breeze! Click on our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Invest in your academic success by letting us perfect your nursing papers. Our experts deliver top-quality nursing essays tailored to your instructions, providing unparalleled assistance for every topic, deadline, and set of instructions. Seek the help of professional essay writers at ReliablePapers.com and save time for what truly matters.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NGR 5700 Decision Making Process Paper Example

NGR 5700 Decision Making Process Paper ExampleNGR 5700 Decision-Making Process Paper – Assignment

NGR 5700 DBX-DL01: Decision Making Course

Florida National University

Course Information

Course Number: NGR 5700

Course Title: Decision Making

Course Credits: 3.0000

NGR 5700 Decision Making Process Paper Assignment Brief

Assignment Instructions Overview

This assignment requires students to craft a 6–8-page scholarly paper exploring a significant and relevant issue in nursing practice. The paper must compare and contrast three different decision-making approaches from a multidisciplinary perspective. Students must examine how various levels of nursing professionals—staff nurses, nurse leaders/managers, and nurse practitioners—would address the chosen issue using these decision-making frameworks. The topic selected should have an impact across all levels of nursing practice and must be approved by the course instructor prior to writing.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

The assignment must follow APA 7th edition formatting, with at least 10 scholarly references (excluding the textbook). The page count does not include the title page or reference list. Students should critically analyze and reflect on their personal decision-making style and identify a funding source applicable to the selected nursing issue.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

The primary objective of this paper is to develop and demonstrate an in-depth understanding of how different decision-making models influence nursing practice across all levels. Students are expected to:

Identify and describe a current, complex issue in nursing that has wide-reaching implications.

Compare and contrast decision-making approaches and analyze how they are applied by various nursing roles.

Evaluate the effectiveness, limitations, and real-world applicability of these approaches.

Reflect on personal decision-making philosophies and how these align with professional practice.

Identify potential funding sources that support initiatives related to the selected issue.

This assignment promotes critical thinking, multidisciplinary awareness, and scholarly writing, preparing students to engage in evidence-based decision-making in complex healthcare environments.

The Student’s Role

Students are expected to take a leadership-oriented, scholarly approach in the development of this paper. This includes:

  • Conducting a comprehensive literature review on the selected issue.
  • Applying critical reasoning to evaluate and synthesize decision-making frameworks.
  • Understanding the nuanced differences in practice scope and authority among nurse leaders, staff nurses, and nurse practitioners.
  • Demonstrating advanced communication through clear, coherent, and organized academic writing.
  • Ensuring academic integrity by properly citing all sources using APA 7th edition guidelines.
  • Engaging in self-reflection to articulate how decision-making models align with their professional values and practice style.

Competencies Measured

This assignment evaluates several graduate-level competencies essential for advanced nursing practice, including:

  • Critical Thinking and Clinical Reasoning: Ability to analyze, interpret, and apply complex decision-making models to real-world nursing problems.
  • Multidisciplinary Collaboration: Understanding how different nursing roles contribute uniquely to issue resolution using varied decision-making strategies.
  • Leadership and Policy Awareness: Evaluation of leadership responsibilities and strategies in addressing systemic nursing issues.
  • Professional Identity and Advocacy: Reflection on personal decision-making style and how it integrates with nursing ethics and leadership.
  • Scholarly Communication: Proficiency in academic writing, organization, APA formatting, and use of scholarly references.
  • Resource Utilization and Financial Literacy: Ability to identify and explain potential funding mechanisms to support practice change or innovation.

NGR 5700 Decision Making Process Paper Example

Introduction

The nursing shortage and high nurse turnover rates are pressing challenges that affect the entire healthcare system. These issues compromise patient safety, overburden existing staff, and reduce overall job satisfaction across all nursing roles. From bedside nurses to nurse managers and advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), all levels of the profession are impacted. According to the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), the demand for registered nurses continues to exceed supply, a situation projected to intensify with an aging population and workforce (AACN, 2022). This paper explores various decision-making approaches used to tackle the nursing shortage and turnover, comparing how these strategies differ among staff nurses, nurse leaders, and nurse practitioners. It also includes a reflection on the decision-making model most aligned with personal and professional nursing philosophies, and identifies a potential funding source to support intervention.

Background and Significance

Nurse turnover and workforce shortages are global health issues with profound implications on care quality, healthcare costs, and staff morale. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2023) projects over 203,000 openings for registered nurses each year through 2031, mainly due to retirements and the ongoing pandemic aftermath. High turnover is particularly prominent among early-career nurses, with studies reporting rates as high as 27% in the first year of employment (Kelly et al., 2021). The effects are widespread—bedside nurses face increased workloads, nurse leaders struggle to maintain safe staffing ratios, and nurse practitioners experience care delays due to insufficient support staff.

The significance of this issue spans all nursing levels. At the bedside, turnover causes burnout and moral distress, often leading to further resignations (Moss et al., 2022). For nurse managers, frequent departures disrupt team cohesion and continuity of care. APRNs are indirectly affected as they rely on support staff to execute comprehensive care plans efficiently. Addressing this issue requires collaborative and informed decision-making approaches tailored to each role within the healthcare system.

Decision-Making Models: Comparison and Contrast

Several decision-making models can be applied to tackle nurse turnover and shortages, including the Rational Decision-Making Model, Shared Decision-Making Model, and Transformational Leadership Model. Each offers unique benefits and limitations depending on the nursing role involved.

Rational Decision-Making Model

This model involves identifying a problem, gathering data, generating alternatives, evaluating options, choosing the best alternative, implementing it, and monitoring results (Bazerman & Moore, 2019). For nurse managers, this structured approach is ideal for evaluating staffing needs and budget constraints.

  • Benefits: It provides a logical, evidence-based framework ideal for administrative decisions involving staffing projections and scheduling algorithms.
  • Limitations: The model may not account for emotional or contextual variables such as morale or interprofessional dynamics, making it less useful for bedside nurses under acute stress.

Shared Decision-Making Model (SDM)

The SDM model emphasizes collaboration among stakeholders, incorporating diverse perspectives to reach consensus (Elwyn et al., 2017). Bedside nurses often engage in this model informally, using unit-based councils or staff committees.

  • Benefits: It promotes engagement, empowerment, and job satisfaction—key factors in reducing turnover.
  • Limitations: The process can be time-consuming and less efficient in urgent staffing crises.

Transformational Leadership Model

Transformational leaders inspire and motivate through vision, individualized consideration, intellectual stimulation, and role modeling (Avolio & Bass, 2004). Nurse practitioners and nurse leaders often adopt this model to foster a positive work culture.

  • Benefits: Encourages innovation and morale, aligning with long-term retention goals.
  • Limitations: Relies heavily on the leader’s charisma and may not yield immediate, measurable results.

Role-Specific Application of Decision-Making Approaches

Staff Nurse (Bedside)

Bedside nurses deal with the immediate impact of shortages. Their decision-making is often reactive, focused on prioritizing care under pressure. The Shared Decision-Making Model is particularly suitable here, as it involves nurses in discussions about staffing policies, workload balance, and care delivery.

For instance, a hospital with a nurse-led staffing committee that meets monthly to propose solutions can increase retention by allowing bedside nurses to voice concerns and implement changes (Sharma & Rani, 2021).

Nurse Leader/Manager

Nurse managers often rely on the Rational Decision-Making Model. They assess turnover metrics, absenteeism, overtime rates, and productivity data to plan recruitment and retention interventions. For example, they may implement flexible scheduling software after conducting a cost-benefit analysis, balancing staff needs with organizational limitations (Lasater et al., 2021).

Nurse Practitioner (NP)

NPs operate between direct care and leadership, often using a Transformational Leadership Model. As clinical leaders and mentors, they are in a unique position to inspire staff. For example, they may introduce evidence-based practices such as mindfulness sessions or peer-support programs to combat burnout (Wei et al., 2020). Their decisions often blend clinical insight with system-level awareness.

Personal Philosophy and Preferred Decision-Making Approach

As a nursing professional, the Shared Decision-Making Model best aligns with my personal and professional philosophy, which centers on collaboration, mutual respect, and empowerment. I believe effective decisions emerge when all stakeholders are included, especially those directly impacted. Nurses at all levels bring valuable experiential knowledge that can guide practical and sustainable interventions.

In addressing the nursing shortage, this model allows for transparent communication, decentralized leadership, and greater accountability. For instance, involving frontline nurses in discussions about staffing ratios or mental health initiatives ensures that implemented changes are both feasible and well-received. This participatory approach not only improves decision quality but also promotes a culture of trust and shared ownership.

Potential Funding Source

Addressing the nursing shortage requires financial resources for recruitment campaigns, mental health support, retention bonuses, and leadership development programs. One suitable funding source is the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), specifically its Nurse Corps Scholarship Program and Nursing Workforce Diversity (NWD) Grants.

The NWD grant supports educational institutions and healthcare facilities aiming to diversify and expand the nursing workforce. It funds initiatives that promote recruitment and retention of nurses from underserved areas, including mentorship and wellness programs (HRSA, 2024). Facilities could apply for HRSA grants to support resilience training, peer mentoring, and flexible staffing initiatives—all of which reduce turnover.

Another relevant source is the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Innovation Center, which funds pilot programs that improve care delivery and workforce outcomes. For example, a nurse-led staffing model aimed at reducing burnout could be submitted as an innovation proposal.

These funding sources align with the national agenda to stabilize and strengthen the nursing workforce, offering financial backing for programs that directly address the chosen topic.

Conclusion

The nursing shortage and high turnover rates are complex issues requiring strategic, evidence-based, and inclusive decision-making. By comparing and applying decision-making models across bedside nurses, nurse leaders, and nurse practitioners, we can appreciate the importance of context, role, and philosophy in shaping decisions. The Shared Decision-Making Model emerges as the most suitable for fostering collaboration and sustainable change. With support from funding bodies like HRSA and CMS, these efforts can be amplified to retain and empower a resilient nursing workforce.

References

American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2022). Nursing shortage factsheet. https://www.aacnnursing.org/news-information/fact-sheets/nursing-shortage

Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Manual and sampler set (3rd ed.). Mind Garden, Inc.

Bazerman, M. H., & Moore, D. A. (2019). Judgment in managerial decision making (8th ed.). Wiley.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023). Occupational outlook handbook: Registered nurses. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/registered-nurses.htm

Elwyn, G., Frosch, D., Thomson, R., Joseph-Williams, N., Lloyd, A., Kinnersley, P., … & Barry, M. (2017). Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 32(6), 675–682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4030-6

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). (2024). Nursing workforce diversity program. https://bhw.hrsa.gov/funding/nursing-workforce-diversity

Kelly, L. A., Gee, P. M., & Butler, R. J. (2021). Impact of nurse burnout on organizational and position turnover. Nursing Outlook, 69(1), 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2020.06.008

Lasater, K. B., Aiken, L. H., Sloane, D. M., French, R., Martin, B., Reneau, K., … & McHugh, M. D. (2021). Chronic hospital nurse understaffing meets COVID-19: An observational study. BMJ Quality & Safety, 30(8), 639-647. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2020-011512

Moss, M., Good, V. S., Gozal, D., Kleinpell, R., & Sessler, C. N. (2022). A critical care societies collaborative statement: Burnout syndrome in critical care health-care professionals. Chest, 161(2), 513-525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.08.054

Sharma, P., & Rani, R. (2021). Shared decision making and job satisfaction among nurses. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 117, 103882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103882

Wei, H., Roberts, P., Strickler, J., & Corbett, R. W. (2020). Nurse leaders’ strategies to foster nurse resilience. Nursing Management, 51(1), 42-49. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000610614.58068.93

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NGR 5700 Decision Making Process Paper Assignment

Decision-Making Process Paper

Instructions

In this assignment, you will be writing a 6–8-page paper identifying, comparing and contrasting at least 3 different decision-making approaches of care from a multidisciplinary perspective using a pertinent and significant topic in nursing (examples might include nursing shortage and nurse turn- over, nurse staffing ratios, unit closures and restructuring, use of contract employees (i.e., registry and travel nurses), continuous quality improvement and patient satisfaction, and magnet designation or another current and relevant nursing issue) the topic MUST BE APPROVED by your nursing instructor before writing the paper. . You are required to use APA 7th edition format and the page count does not include title page or reference page. Reflect on your own decision-making practices and the implications this will have regarding differing approaches taken of nursing leaders and staff nurses/clinical practitioners in decision making within to issues in practice. To complete this assignment, do the following:

  1. Select and describe an issue in nursing that impacts nurses at all levels from bedside to advanced practice. Make sure to provide an adequate background and its significance to all levels of nursing using a strong review of the literature.
  2. Compares and contrast how you would expect a nurse leader/manager, a bedside/staff nurse and a nurse practitioner to address your selected issue using various decision-making approaches. There must be a detailed analysis of the benefits and limitations of various decision-making approaches that are applied appropriately to the level of nursing practice to address the selected issue/problem. This is informed from course readings, literature, clinical scenarios and other evidence-based and scholarly sources.
  3. Identify the decision-making approach or approaches that best fits your personal and professional philosophy of nursing and explain why the approach is suited to your personal inquiry style. How would it help to address your chosen topic if not mentioned or applied in the above description.
  4. Identify a possible funding source that addresses your topic. Consider looking at federal, state, and local organizations. For example: There are many grants available through the CDC, HRSA, etc. Again, this need to be specifically applied with sufficient details
  5. Use at least 10 references other than your main text. Uses APA 7th edition formatting
CRITERION STRONG AVERAGE WEAK
Identification and description of an issue in nursing that impacts all levels of nursing practice from bedside to advanced practice with a good background and significance (21 pts) 15-21 pts

 

Identifies, describes and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the nursing issue as it relates to all levels of nursing practice with a specific and strong background and significance to nursing

8-14 pts

 

Identifies, describes and demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the nursing issue as it relates to all levels of nursing practice illustrating some but not explicit background and significance of the topic to nursing

0-7 pts

 

Identifies, describes and demonstrates an incomplete and vague understanding of the nursing issue as it relates to all levels of nursing practice with a vague and unclear background and significance

Compare and contrast various types of decision-making models that could be utilized to enhance knowledge about your topic (21 pts) 15-21 pts

 

Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of various decision- making approaches with good comparing and contrasting of the various limitations and benefits of each of the decision-making approaches that specifically addresses the identified problem/topic.

8-14 pts

 

Presents a somewhat thorough analysis of various decision-making approaches with a somewhat good comparing and contrasting of the various limitations and benefits of each of the decision-making approaches that somewhat but not specific in addressing the identified problem/topic

0-7 pts

 

Little to no analysis of. various decision- making approaches with a limited and vague comparing and contrasting of the various limitations and benefits of each of the decision-making approaches that is vague and limited in addressing the identified problem/topic

Appropriate and clear application of the selected decision- making approaches from the perspective of a bedside/staff 15-21 pts

 

Presents an insightful and thorough application of selected decision-making

8-14 pts

 

Presents a somewhat insightful but not thorough application of selected decision-

0-7 pts

 

Limited and vague application of selected decision-making approaches from the

 

nurse, nurse leader/manager and nurse practitioner that is realistic and appropriate to the level of nursing practice, the problem and the decision- making approach (21 pts) approaches from the perspective of 3 levels of nursing practice that is realistic and specific to the level of nursing practice, the decision- making model and the identified problem. making approaches from the perspective of 2-3 levels of nursing practice that is somewhat realistic but not all together specific to the level of nursing practice, the decision- making model and/or the identified problem. perspective of less than 2 levels of nursing practice that is unrealistic and vague to the level of nursing practice, the decision making model and/or the identified problem
Identify the decision- making approach or approaches that best fits your personal and professional philosophy of nursing and how would it help to address your chosen topic. (21pts) 15-21 pts

 

Sophisticated explanation of personal decision-making approach that fits with professional philosophy of nursing. Excellent description of how this decision-making model/theory will address your chosen topic.

8-14 pts

 

Appropriate explanation of personal decision- making approach that fits with professional philosophy of nursing. Excellent description of how this decision- making model/theory will address your chosen topic.

0-7 pts

 

Limited explanation of personal decision- making approach that fits with professional philosophy of nursing. Excellent description of how this decision- making model/theory will address your chosen topic.

Identify a possible funding source that addresses your topic (18 pts) 13-18- pts

 

Integrated and full descriptions of an appropriate funding source that addresses your chosen topic. The description includes real-world examples of fundings sources that include federal, state, and local organizations

7-12 pts

 

Somewhat integrated but not full description of an appropriate funding source that addresses your chosen topic. The description includes

real-world examples of fundings sources but limited with either federal and state or local organizations

0-6 pts

 

Limited to no description of an appropriate funding source that addresses your chosen topic. The description includes a less than real-world example of only a limited scope of funding and only includes one type of funding either state or federal or local organization.

Writing Mechanics: 13-18- pts 7-12 pts 0-6 pts

 

Language and direction of the paper follows the assignment outline and is clear and easy to follow. (18 pts) Demonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness;

writing is free of grammar and spelling

errors. The assignment outline was followed and guides the paper

content appropriately

Somewhat concise and clear grammar and spelling used.

Guidelines was mostly used to guide the paper content. Some spelling and grammar issues (less than 3-4 errors within paper)

Many deficiencies in

 

grammar, spelling, or failure to follow the assignment guidelines. Writing has frequent spelling and grammar errors

APA formatting (paper is formatted per APA 7th edition guidelines including font, level of headings, appropriate number of references, in-text and reference list citations) (18 pts) 13-18- pts

 

APA formatting is followed throughout the paper with correct citations and includes at least 10 scholarly references that are correctly APA 7th ed. citations.

7-12 pts

 

APA formatting is mostly followed throughout the paper with mostly correct citations with at least 8 to 9 scholarly references but not required 10 and/or 2-3 incorrect APA 7th ed. referencing or formatting

0-6 pts

 

Multiple errors in APA formatting throughout the paper identified. Fewer than 8 scholarly references provided in the paper and/or > 3 to 4 errors in APA 7th ed referencing and formatting.

Total: 138 pts

Boost Your Grades with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you grappling with challenging nursing topics? Look no further! ReliablePapers.com is your trusted partner for top-notch nursing writing services. Our dedicated team of skilled nursing essay writers is committed to crafting customized and original human-written nursing papers, ensuring academic success.

Making Nursing Assignments a Breeze

Whether you’re tackling complex topics, facing tight deadlines, or dealing with specific instructions, we’ve got you covered. From creating custom nursing research papers to assisting with nursing assignments, our professionals are here to support you.

How We Can Help

Our pro nursing writers excel at crafting outstanding human-written nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At ReliablePapers.com, we recognize the significance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are affordably priced, making them accessible to all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers perfect your paper, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Bid farewell to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts create original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Our experts at ReliablePapers.com stay updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Trust us for the best nursing writing services that meet your desires and ensure timely submissions.

Save Time and Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NGR 5700 Moral Distress in Nursing Presentation PPT Example

NGR 5700 Moral Distress in Nursing Presentation PPT ExampleNGR 5700 – Moral Distress in Nursing Presentation PPT Assignment

NGR 5700 DBX-DL01: Decision Making Course

Florida National University

Course Information

Course Number: NGR 5700

Course Title: Decision Making

Course Credits: 3.0000

NGR 5700 Moral Distress in Nursing Presentation PPT Assignment Brief

Assignment Instructions Overview:

This assignment requires students to design a PowerPoint presentation (10–15 slides) centered around a unique and original nursing situation that reflects the concept of moral distress as experienced by an advanced practice nurse (APN). The scenario should highlight a real-world ethical dilemma encountered in advanced nursing practice, thoroughly demonstrating how it qualifies as moral distress based on definitions from scholarly literature.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Students will explore how personal, professional, and organizational factors contribute to the experience of moral distress and will analyze how this distress differs from other related ethical responses such as moral uncertainty, moral dilemma, moral conflict, and moral residue. Additionally, the presentation must propose and evaluate evidence-based strategies to address moral distress at all three levels—personal, professional, and organizational—while also integrating insights from current research and course readings.

Presentations must be visually engaging, utilize speaker notes to explain content (no large blocks of text on slides), and follow APA 7th edition formatting for all references.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

The purpose of this assignment is to deepen students’ understanding of how moral distress manifests in advanced practice settings and how it can impact clinical decision-making, personal integrity, and patient outcomes. By developing an original case scenario and evaluating it through a research-informed lens, students will learn to:

  • Recognize the ethical and emotional dimensions of advanced nursing practice.
  • Differentiate types of ethical conflict.
  • Critically examine sources of moral distress.
  • Develop targeted interventions that align with professional values and institutional structures.
  • Communicate complex ethical concepts clearly and concisely using multimedia tools.

The Student’s Role:

As an advanced nursing student, your role is to adopt the perspective of an APN navigating a morally distressing clinical scenario. You will act as a reflective practitioner, ethical analyst, and systems thinker—exploring how internal values and external constraints intersect to produce moral distress.

You will also assume responsibility for identifying realistic, evidence-based solutions that support the well-being of both the provider and the patient while aligning with legal, institutional, and ethical standards of care. This includes evaluating current best practices, identifying systemic barriers, and recommending interventions tailored to your scenario.

Competencies Measured:

This assignment is designed to assess and strengthen the following graduate-level nursing competencies:

  • Ethical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment: Analyze ethical challenges and apply moral reasoning to resolve practice-based dilemmas.
  • Leadership and Advocacy: Demonstrate leadership in addressing complex moral issues at the bedside, team, and system levels.
  • Scholarly Communication: Use clear, structured, and scholarly communication to convey ethical concepts and support arguments with academic evidence.
  • Reflective Practice: Identify personal and professional values, experiences, and biases influencing moral decisions and responses.
  • Systems-Based Practice: Evaluate how institutional policies, interdisciplinary dynamics, and workplace culture contribute to or alleviate moral distress.
  • Application of Evidence-Based Practice: Integrate scholarly research to frame the issue, support analysis, and inform practical recommendations.

Check out another task that our nursing essay writing services have assisted another student on NGR 5700 Decision Making Process Paper Example.

NGR 5700 Moral Distress in Nursing Presentation PPT Example

Slide 1: Title Slide

Title: Moral Distress in Nursing: An Advanced Practice Nurse’s Perspective

Subtitle: Exploring Ethical Challenges and Solutions in Clinical Practice

Presented by: [Your Name]

Course: NGR 5700 – Ethical Decision-Making in Nursing Practice

Date: [Insert Date]

Slide 2: Introduction to Moral Distress

  • Moral distress occurs when one knows the right action but is constrained from acting on it.
  • Common in nursing when external barriers impede ethical actions.
  • Particularly relevant to the role of the Advanced Practice Nurse (APN).

Speaker Notes:

Moral distress is not just frustration; it’s a deep psychological and emotional response to being unable to take ethically appropriate action. As advanced practice nurses, we often face systemic, hierarchical, or organizational obstacles that prevent us from acting on our ethical knowledge. According to Jameton (1984), moral distress arises in situations where the nurse knows the ethically appropriate action to take but feels powerless to act due to institutional constraints.

*Citation: Jameton, A. (1984). Nursing Practice: The Ethical Issues. Prentice-Hall.

Slide 3: Case Scenario – APN and Palliative Sedation Refusal

  • Patient: Mr. L, 74, terminal pancreatic cancer, high suffering.
  • Family refuses palliative sedation due to religious beliefs.
  • APN believes it’s ethically necessary to relieve intractable suffering.

Speaker Notes:

Mr. L is suffering significantly from terminal cancer-related pain and anxiety. As the APN managing his palliative care, I recommended continuous palliative sedation, which is medically and ethically justified under the principle of double effect. However, the patient’s family refuses sedation, insisting that suffering is part of their religious values. The APN experiences moral distress from knowing what should be done, but being unable to proceed due to external constraints.

*Citation: McCarthy, J., & Gastmans, C. (2015). Moral distress: A review of the argument-based nursing ethics literature. Nursing Ethics, 22(1), 131-152.

Slide 4: How the Scenario Illustrates Moral Distress

  • APN knows the ethically appropriate course (palliative sedation).
  • Institutional policy and family beliefs restrict action.
  • Meets core definition: constraint + ethical knowledge.

Speaker Notes:

This case fits the definition of moral distress as it involves ethical clarity coupled with action constraints. Despite clinical guidelines supporting palliative sedation for intractable suffering (Cherny & Radbruch, 2009), the APN cannot implement it due to family objection and legal hesitancy by the institution, causing emotional and ethical distress.

*Citation: Cherny, N., & Radbruch, L. (2009). European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) framework for palliative sedation. Palliative Medicine, 23(7), 581–593.

Slide 5: Personal Factors Contributing to Moral Distress

  • Empathy for patient’s pain.
  • Fear of legal consequences.
  • Conflict between personal ethics and professional limitations.

Speaker Notes:

On a personal level, the APN is deeply troubled by the patient’s suffering. They feel a moral obligation to reduce harm. However, fear of institutional reprisal or legal action restrains them. The emotional burden increases with each shift, leading to emotional exhaustion and a feeling of betrayal of professional values (Rushton, 2018).

*Citation: Rushton, C. H. (2018). Moral Resilience: Transforming Moral Suffering in Healthcare. Oxford University Press.

Slide 6: Professional Factors Contributing to Moral Distress

  • Role conflict: advocate vs. policy follower.
  • Ethical obligation vs. hierarchical limitations.
  • Fear of professional isolation.

Speaker Notes:

As an APN, there is an ethical expectation to advocate for optimal patient care. However, the hierarchical structure in the hospital limits autonomy. Physicians and legal advisors influence final decisions. This tension can diminish the APN’s sense of professional agency, reinforcing moral distress (Epstein & Delgado, 2010).

*Citation: Epstein, E. G., & Delgado, S. (2010). Understanding and addressing moral distress. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 15(3), Manuscript 1.

Slide 7: Organizational Factors Contributing to Moral Distress

  • Risk-averse policies.
  • Lack of ethics consultation services.
  • Inadequate support systems.

Speaker Notes:

Institutional policies often prioritize legal protection over patient-centered care. In this case, the hospital’s risk management team advised against sedation without explicit consent. Furthermore, the absence of a rapid-response ethics consultation service compounded the issue. These systemic barriers heighten APNs’ moral distress (Hamric et al., 2012).

*Citation: Hamric, A. B., et al. (2012). Moral distress in health care professionals. Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc, 75(1), 20-26.

Slide 8: Personal-Level Strategies for Resolution

  • Reflective practice.
  • Moral resilience training.
  • Peer debriefing.

Speaker Notes:

Developing moral resilience helps APNs navigate these ethical challenges. Techniques like journaling, mindfulness, and regular ethical reflection can help prevent burnout and preserve integrity. Peer support groups allow for shared experiences and validation (Rushton, 2016).

*Citation: Rushton, C. H. (2016). Moral resilience: A capacity for navigating moral distress in critical care. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 27(1), 111–119.

Slide 9: Professional-Level Strategies for Resolution

  • Ethical education and simulation.
  • Professional advocacy.
  • Interdisciplinary ethics rounds.

Speaker Notes:

Advanced practice nurses benefit from continuous ethics education. Case-based simulations enhance ethical decision-making skills. Furthermore, engaging in interdisciplinary ethics rounds ensures that APNs can voice concerns and propose alternatives within their professional role (Dodek et al., 2016).

*Citation: Dodek, P. M., et al. (2016). Moral distress in intensive care unit professionals is associated with profession, age, and years of experience. Journal of Critical Care, 31(1), 178-183.

Slide 10: Organizational-Level Strategies for Resolution

  • Institutional ethics committees.
  • Anonymous reporting systems.
  • Policies supporting APN autonomy.

Speaker Notes:

Hospitals must implement structures that support ethical practice. This includes robust ethics committees accessible in urgent cases, safe whistleblowing channels, and policies that recognize and protect APN decision-making authority (Morley et al., 2019).

*Citation: Morley, G., et al. (2019). Addressing moral distress in clinical practice: Ethics consultation and support. Nursing Ethics, 26(8), 1177–1186.

Slide 11: Distinguishing Moral Distress from Other Ethical Responses

Term Definition
Moral Distress Knowing the right thing but unable to act
Moral Uncertainty Unsure what the right thing is
Moral Dilemma Two or more conflicting ethical principles apply
Moral Conflict Disagreement between stakeholders over what is ethical
Moral Residue Lingering feelings after moral distress or compromise

Speaker Notes:

It’s important to differentiate moral distress from other responses. In our case, the APN experiences moral distress—not uncertainty or dilemma—because the ethically correct action is clear. Over time, unresolved distress may lead to moral residue, resulting in burnout or disengagement.

*Citation: Fourie, C. (2015). Moral distress and moral conflict in clinical ethics. Bioethics, 29(2), 91–97.

Slide 12: Ethical Frameworks Supporting APN Action

  • Principle of Beneficence.
  • Principle of Autonomy.
  • Principle of Nonmaleficence.

Speaker Notes:

Ethical principles support the APN’s intentions. Beneficence drives the desire to relieve suffering. Autonomy applies to the patient’s right to receive comfort measures. Nonmaleficence warns against prolonging unnecessary pain. These principles validate the APN’s moral reasoning.

*Citation: Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Slide 13: Summary

  • Moral distress is a serious ethical concern in APN practice.
  • Rooted in personal, professional, and institutional barriers.
  • Addressed through resilience, education, and system change.
  • Clear distinction from other ethical responses.

Speaker Notes:

In conclusion, moral distress in APN roles requires layered understanding and response. Through ethical advocacy, education, and resilience, nurses can navigate these challenges while protecting their professional integrity and patient welfare.

Slide 14: References

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2013). Principles of Biomedical Ethics.
  • Cherny, N., & Radbruch, L. (2009). Palliative Medicine.
  • Dodek, P. M., et al. (2016). Journal of Critical Care.
  • Epstein, E. G., & Delgado, S. (2010). OJIN.
  • Fourie, C. (2015). Bioethics.
  • Hamric, A. B., et al. (2012). Pharos.
  • Jameton, A. (1984). Nursing Practice.
  • McCarthy, J., & Gastmans, C. (2015). Nursing Ethics.
  • Morley, G., et al. (2019). Nursing Ethics.
  • Rushton, C. H. (2016; 2018). AACN Advanced Critical Care; Oxford University Press.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NGR 5700 Moral Distress in Nursing Presentation PPT Assignment

Moral Distress in Nursing Presentation PPT

General Guidelines:

Create a nursing situation (must be original; meaning there should not be any two presented in class that are the same as any other student) which illustrates moral distress related to a clinical problem that an advanced practice nurse is likely to encounter in practice. Ensure to define and explain how the scenario meets the definition of moral distress and that the problem as identified in the nursing situation is supported by evidence-based literature. Describe the personal, professional and organizational factors that are the causes of moral distress within the case scenario from the perspective of the APN. Analyze current interventions and strategies to address the identified issue of moral distress in the created nursing situation at the personal, professional and organizational level. Differentiate moral distress from other common responses to ethical situations encountered in practice (moral uncertainty, dilemma, conflict and residue).

  1. Presentation should be between 10-15 slides.
  2. Each content slide should be succinct and have no long paragraphs to read.
  3. Utilize notes pages may be utilized for explanation if needed and to expand on subject area to cover all criteria on rubric.
  4. Use pictures to enhance presentation.

Content Criteria: (see below)

  1. Nursing situation clearly describes and explores moral distress related to an ethical practice issue from the perspective of an advanced practice nurse which is linked to current best practice, research and literature.
  2. Analysis & Evaluation of Moral Distress is clearly demonstrated as an ethical issue from the perspective of the advanced practice nurse within the nursing situation
  3. Personal, professional, and organizational causes of moral distress are explained and clearly illustrated using the nursing situation.
  4. Recommendations on Effective Interventions and Strategies from a personal, professional and organizational perspective are demonstrated and explained using the nursing situation.:
  5. Explores the differences between moral distress and moral uncertainty, dilemma, conflict and residue from the perspective of the advanced practice nurse.
  6. Writing Mechanics and Formatting Guidelines are clear and the concept of moral distress from the perspective of an advanced practice nurse is well supported using evidence-based research and literature throughout the presentation.

PowerPoint Presentation Rubric

CRITERION STRONG AVERAGE WEAK
Nursing situation clearly describes and explores moral distress related to an ethical practice issue from the perspective of an advanced practice nurse (15%) 10-15 pts

 

Nursing situation identifies, describes and demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of moral distress as an ethical practice issue and dilemma from the perspective of an advanced practice nurse (APN).

5-9 pts

 

Nursing situation identifies, describes, and demonstrates a somewhat accomplished understanding of moral distress as an ethical practice issue and dilemma from the perspective of an advanced practice nurse (APN).

0-4 pts

 

Nursing situation identifies, describes, and demonstrates an unclear understanding of moral distress as an ethical practice issue and dilemma from the perspective of an advanced practice nurse (APN).

Analysis and Evaluation of Ethical Dilemma

 

15%

10-15 pts

 

Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of moral distress using a clinical practice issue that is well supported with best practice and current research which relates specifically to

5-9 pts

 

Presents a somewhat thorough analysis of moral distress using a clinical practice issue that is somewhat but not clearly supported with best practice and current research and

0-4 pts

 

Little to no analysis of moral distress using a clinical practice issue that is not well supported with best practice and current research and fails to show a specific link to

 

the role of APN versus a bedside nurse is illustrated using the

nursing situation.

somewhat relates to the role of APN versus a bedside nurse. the role of APN versus a bedside nurse.
Personal, professional, and organizational causes of moral distress are explained and clearly illustrated using the nursing situation (15%) 10-15 pts

 

Exceptional exploration of personal, professional and organizational causes of moral distress is presented and illustrated using the identified nursing situation.

5-9 pts

 

Appropriate but somewhat vague exploration of personal, professional and organizational causes of moral distress is presented and illustrated using the identified nursing situation.

0-4 pts

 

Little to no exploration of personal, professional and organizational causes of moral distress is presented and illustrated using the identified nursing situation.

Recommendations on effective interventions

 

Solutions/Strategies from a personal, professional and organizational perspective are demonstrated and explained using the nursing situation

 

(15%)

10-15 pts

 

Sophisticated explanation of effective interventions and strategies from a personal, professional and organizational perspective are provided to address moral distress as illustrated in the nursing situation which are clearly linked and supported by evidence based best practice and literature.

5-9 pts

 

Appropriate explanation of effective interventions and strategies from a personal, professional and organizational perspective are provided to address moral distress as illustrated in the nursing situation which are somewhat linked and supported by evidence based best practice and literature.

0-4 pts

 

Limited explanation of effective interventions and strategies from a personal, professional and organizational perspective are provided to address moral distress as illustrated in the nursing situation which are not clearly linked and/or supported by evidence based best practice and literature

Explores the differences between moral distress and moral uncertainty, dilemma, conflict and residue from the perspective of the 10-15 pts

 

Integrated and full descriptions of how moral distress differs from the other ethical responses of moral uncertainty, moral

5-9 pts

 

Somewhat integrated but not full description of how moral distress differs from the other ethical responses of moral uncertainty, moral

0-4 pts

 

Limited to no description of how moral distress differs from the other ethical responses of moral uncertainty, moral

 

advanced practice nurse.

 

(15%)

dilemma, moral conflict and moral residue from the perspective of the advanced practice

nurse.

dilemma, moral conflict and moral residue from the perspective of the advanced practice nurse dilemma, moral conflict and moral residue from the perspective of the advanced practice

nurse

Links ethical dilemma of moral distress to Course Readings and Additional Literature &

Research (15%)

10-15 pts

Makes appropriate connections between

5-9 pts

 

Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between identified ethical and moral issues from both sides; supplements presentation with some relevant and thoughtful research and documents all sources of information.

0-4 pts

 

Makes inappropriate or little connections between identified ethical and moral issues from both sides; supplements presentation with some relevant and thoughtful research and documents all sources of information.

identified ethical and moral issues from both
sides; supplements
presentation with
relevant and
thoughtful research
and documents all
sources of information.
Writing Mechanics and Formatting Guidelines including correct references and APA

formatting

8-10 pts Demonstrates clarity,

conciseness and

4-7 pts

Occasional grammar or spelling errors, but still

0-3 pts

Many deficiencies on grammar, spelling, or

 

(10%)

correctness; no a clear presentation of APA formatting. Slides
paragraphs to read on ideas; lacks have paragraphs to
slides; utilizes notes on organization. Slides read and are not
each slide to expand; contain too much text concise or notes on
APA formatting is to read each slide are not
appropriate and utilized.
writing is free of
grammar and spelling

 

errors
Total 100 pts

Boost Your Grades with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you grappling with challenging nursing topics? Look no further! ReliablePapers.com is your trusted partner for top-notch nursing writing services. Our dedicated team of skilled nursing essay writers is committed to crafting customized and original human-written nursing papers, ensuring academic success.

Making Nursing Assignments a Breeze

Whether you’re tackling complex topics, facing tight deadlines, or dealing with specific instructions, we’ve got you covered. From creating custom nursing research papers to assisting with nursing assignments, our professionals are here to support you.

How We Can Help

Our pro nursing writers excel at crafting outstanding human-written nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At ReliablePapers.com, we recognize the significance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are affordably priced, making them accessible to all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers perfect your paper, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Bid farewell to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts create original and customized human-written nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Our experts at ReliablePapers.com stay updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Trust us for the best nursing writing services that meet your desires and ensure timely submissions.

Save Time and Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NGR 5700 Shared Decision Making Paper Assignment Example

NGR 5700 Shared Decision Making Paper Assignment ExampleNGR 5700 – Shared Decision-Making Paper Assignment

NGR 5700 DBX-DL01: Decision Making Course

Florida National University

Course Information

Course Number: NGR 5700

Course Title: Decision Making

Course Credits: 3.0000

NGR 5700 Shared Decision Making Paper Assignment Brief

Assignment Instructions Overview

This written assignment requires students to explore the implementation of Shared Decision-Making (SDM) as a routine practice in a chosen healthcare setting, such as a clinic or hospital. The paper must be 6–8 pages in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and follow APA 7th edition formatting. A minimum of 8–10 scholarly references (outside of course readings) is required. Students will compare and contrast at least two SDM models, identify a preferred model for implementation, and detail strategies for integration at organizational, professional, and personal levels. The submission must be in Word format only and must comply with SafeAssign similarity index guidelines (<20%).

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Understanding Assignment Objectives

This assignment aims to deepen your understanding of SDM and its essential role in enhancing patient-provider collaboration. The paper will assess your ability to:

  • Describe the significance of SDM in clinical decision-making.
  • Evaluate and compare two SDM models.
  • Propose implementation strategies specific to your healthcare setting.
  • Identify the resources, tools, and staff training needs.
  • Address potential challenges and benefits of SDM integration.
  • Demonstrate scholarly writing, organization, and APA proficiency.

The Student’s Role

As a graduate nursing student and emerging advanced practice nurse (APN), you are expected to critically appraise SDM theory and apply it to a real-world clinical context. Your role includes:

  • Independently researching evidence-based SDM frameworks.
  • Using your clinical judgment to tailor SDM models to a practice setting.
  • Designing strategic approaches for implementation and training.
  • Engaging in reflective analysis of barriers and enablers to SDM adoption.
  • Writing a unique, plagiarism-free paper that clearly communicates your ideas.

Competencies Measured

This assignment assesses the following advanced nursing competencies:

  • Leadership in systems-based practice through proposing organizational-level changes.
  • Evidence-based practice by integrating the latest literature on SDM.
  • Collaboration and communication in multidisciplinary care planning.
  • Clinical decision-making supported by patient-centered models.
  • Professional accountability and advocacy through ethical patient engagement.

Check out another task that our nursing essay writing services have assisted another student on NGR 5700 Moral Distress in Nursing Presentation PPT Example.

NGR 5700 Shared Decision Making Paper Assignment Example

Introduction

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a collaborative process that allows healthcare providers and patients to make health-related decisions together, integrating clinical evidence and patient preferences. In the context of a hospital surgical unit, where patients often face complex choices regarding surgical interventions, the use of SDM is crucial for promoting informed consent, enhancing patient satisfaction, and improving outcomes. Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) play a vital role in implementing SDM, acting as patient advocates and clinical leaders. This paper explores the significance of SDM in surgical care, compares two leading SDM models, and outlines a comprehensive strategy to integrate SDM at organizational, professional, and personal levels. It also highlights tools, training resources, challenges, and benefits, offering an evidence-based roadmap to strengthen patient-centered care within surgical settings.

Background and Significance of Shared Decision-Making in Healthcare

SDM represents a paradigm shift from the traditional, paternalistic model of care to one that values and incorporates the patient’s voice in clinical decisions. This approach is especially pertinent in surgical units, where patients may be presented with multiple treatment options, each carrying different risks and benefits. Research shows that SDM leads to better alignment between chosen treatments and patients’ values, which subsequently enhances trust, adherence to treatment, and overall satisfaction with care (Stacey et al., 2017).

From the provider’s perspective, SDM fosters meaningful engagement, reduces decisional conflict, and strengthens the therapeutic alliance (Elwyn et al., 2012). For APNs, SDM is a practice-aligned responsibility that intersects with core competencies such as patient education, advocacy, evidence-based practice, and ethical decision-making (American Association of Nurse Practitioners [AANP], 2020).

The importance of SDM is further emphasized in national healthcare policies and standards. The Institute of Medicine advocates for SDM as a critical element of high-quality care (IOM, 2011), while the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) promotes its integration across clinical settings. In surgical environments, where high-stakes decisions are common, SDM ensures that patients are not only informed but also actively involved in choosing interventions that align with their values and goals.

Overview and Comparison of Two Shared Decision-Making Models

The Three-Talk Model

The Three-Talk Model, developed by Elwyn et al. (2017), structures the SDM conversation into three phases: team talk, option talk, and decision talk. This model begins with “team talk,” where clinicians invite the patient to be part of the decision-making process. “Option talk” involves the clinician presenting treatment options using clear, balanced information. Lastly, “decision talk” is the collaborative stage where the provider supports the patient in exploring preferences and making a decision.

This model is particularly useful in time-sensitive environments like surgical units because it is concise, adaptable, and easy to implement during pre-operative consultations. It supports active listening and transparency while maintaining the clinical efficiency often required in hospitals.

The SHARE Approach

Developed by the AHRQ, the SHARE Approach is a five-step process: Seek your patient’s participation, Help your patient explore and compare treatment options, Assess your patient’s values and preferences, Reach a decision with your patient, and Evaluate the decision (AHRQ, 2014). Unlike the Three-Talk Model, the SHARE Approach offers a more detailed and structured framework, including tools for documentation, patient education, and decision aids.

This model is best suited for comprehensive, multidisciplinary discussions involving complex or chronic surgical cases. It allows for greater depth in value clarification and can be extended across multiple encounters. However, it may be time-consuming and less suitable for fast-paced surgical assessments.

Comparison and Suitability for Surgical Units

Both models support the principles of patient-centered care, but their structure and focus differ. The Three-Talk Model is streamlined and pragmatic, aligning well with the high-pressure environment of surgical units. It ensures patients are heard without overwhelming the provider with additional procedural steps. In contrast, the SHARE Approach is ideal for elective or non-urgent surgeries, where time permits deeper value exploration.

Given the urgent and procedural nature of hospital surgical units, the Three-Talk Model emerges as the most practical and effective approach for implementation. It aligns with the workflow, accommodates provider constraints, and fosters meaningful patient engagement without disrupting clinical operations.

Implementation of SDM in the Hospital Surgical Unit

Organizational Level

At the organizational level, implementing SDM requires leadership commitment, policy development, and integration into clinical pathways. Hospital administration must prioritize SDM in strategic goals and allocate resources for training, tools, and staffing. Policies should mandate SDM discussions before all surgical procedures, embedded within electronic health records (EHRs) for documentation and quality tracking (Barry & Edgman-Levitan, 2012).

Standardized protocols for informed consent should be updated to include SDM principles, ensuring patients are presented with multiple treatment options and associated outcomes. Multidisciplinary teams—including surgeons, APNs, anesthetists, and patient educators—should collaborate to implement SDM as part of routine preoperative care.

Professional Level

On the professional level, surgeons and APNs need skill development in communication, cultural competency, and evidence presentation. Training programs should include role-playing, workshops, and use of validated decision aids. Continuing education credits can incentivize participation. Interprofessional collaboration must be encouraged to ensure that SDM is not seen as a sole responsibility of the nurse or surgeon but as a shared task across the care team.

APNs, in particular, should take the lead in coordinating SDM conversations, providing patients with reliable information, and clarifying any doubts prior to surgery. Their holistic approach and longer interaction time with patients make them ideal SDM facilitators.

Personal Level

At a personal level, healthcare providers must embrace a mindset shift from being authoritative decision-makers to facilitators of patient choices. Reflective practice, feedback sessions, and peer review can help clinicians evaluate and improve their SDM conversations. Providers must also remain aware of their biases, ensuring that their recommendations are balanced and not coercive.

Personal accountability includes ensuring that every surgical consultation respects patient autonomy and actively seeks their input. For APNs, personal strategies such as using SDM checklists, attending reflective practice groups, and engaging in peer mentoring can reinforce these behaviors.

Tools, Resources, and Patient Engagement Strategies

To ensure successful SDM integration, both staff and patients require appropriate tools and resources. Decision aids are essential, especially in surgical contexts. These include brochures, videos, online platforms, and printed option grids that outline surgical choices, risks, recovery timelines, and alternative therapies (O’Connor et al., 2009).

EHR templates should prompt providers to record SDM discussions and patient preferences. Visual aids and risk communication tools, such as pictographs or risk calculators, can help patients understand statistical information.

Patient engagement is enhanced through structured pre-operative education sessions led by APNs. These sessions can be group-based or individual and should be culturally sensitive and linguistically appropriate. Offering patients printed questions to bring to consultations encourages active participation.

Training for providers must cover the use of these tools, supported by simulation-based learning, e-learning modules, and mentorship programs. These ensure consistent practice and confidence in facilitating SDM.

Strategies to Build Competency Among APNs and Providers

Competency development should begin with formal SDM training included in APN orientation and ongoing professional development. Key strategies include:

  • Simulation-based learning: Role-play scenarios with standardized patients improve communication skills.
  • Workshops and seminars: Regular educational sessions provide evidence-based updates and practical guidance.
  • Peer mentoring: Pairing experienced APNs with novices helps reinforce SDM in real-time settings.
  • Audit and feedback: Reviewing SDM documentation in EHRs and providing feedback helps refine practice.
  • Online modules: Self-paced programs accommodate busy schedules and ensure theoretical understanding.

APNs should also be involved in research and quality improvement initiatives related to SDM, promoting a culture of inquiry and evidence-based practice. Certification programs and credentialing that recognize SDM competency can further validate these skills.

Challenges and Benefits of Implementing SDM

Challenges

Despite its benefits, implementing SDM in surgical units presents several challenges. These include:

  • Time constraints: Surgical consultations are often brief, making it difficult to engage in extended discussions.
  • Provider resistance: Some clinicians may be skeptical of SDM, perceiving it as undermining clinical authority.
  • Lack of training: Many providers lack formal education in SDM techniques.
  • Documentation issues: Integrating SDM into EHRs without adding to administrative burden is challenging.
  • Patient variability: Patients differ in their desire and ability to participate, requiring personalized approaches.

Benefits

Conversely, the benefits are significant:

  • Enhanced patient satisfaction: Patients feel heard and respected, increasing trust.
  • Improved outcomes: Engaged patients are more likely to adhere to postoperative instructions and report better recovery experiences.
  • Reduced decisional regret: Patients who participate in decisions are less likely to experience regret or dissatisfaction.
  • Professional growth: APNs develop advanced communication and leadership skills.
  • Compliance with standards: SDM supports ethical practice, accreditation requirements, and legal standards for informed consent.

Conclusion

Shared decision-making is a vital practice innovation that enhances surgical care delivery by aligning treatments with patient values and preferences. This paper has explored the importance of SDM, compared two leading models, and proposed a comprehensive strategy to implement the Three-Talk Model within a hospital surgical unit. Implementation at the organizational, professional, and personal levels, supported by tools, training, and ongoing reflection, ensures the sustainability of this patient-centered approach. Though challenges exist, the benefits to both patients and providers make SDM an essential standard of care in modern surgical practice.

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2014). The SHARE approach: A model for shared decisionmaking. https://www.ahrq.gov/health-literacy/professional-training/shared-decision/index.html

American Association of Nurse Practitioners. (2020). Standards of practice for nurse practitioners. https://www.aanp.org/practice/clinical-resources/standards-of-practice

Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012). Shared decision making—the pinnacle of patient-centered care. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(9), 780–781. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1109283

Elwyn, G., Frosch, D., Thomson, R., Joseph-Williams, N., Lloyd, A., Kinnersley, P., … & Barry, M. (2012). Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(10), 1361–1367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6

Elwyn, G., Durand, M. A., Song, J., Aarts, J., Barr, P. J., Berger, Z., … & Frosch, D. L. (2017). A three-talk model for shared decision making: Multistage consultation process. BMJ, 359, j4891. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4891

Institute of Medicine (US). (2011). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press.

O’Connor, A. M., Bennett, C. L., Stacey, D., Barry, M., Col, N. F., Eden, K. B., … & Thomson, R. (2009). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3(3), CD001431. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub2

Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Lewis, K., Barry, M. J., Bennett, C. L., Eden, K. B., … & Trevena, L. (2017). Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, CD001431. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NGR 5700   Shared Decision Making Paper Assignment

Shared Decision-Making Paper Assignment

The assignment will require you to write a 6-8 page paper formatted using APA 7th edition (this does not include the title or references page). Be sure to review the grading rubric and criteria for the assignment carefully and to include all aspects that are required as part of the assignment grade. It should go without saying that NO two papers should look the same, meaning that the choice of implementation strategies, selection of SDM , the patient and population and specific strategies are unique in every paper AND those papers submitted with numerous similarities will be looked at closely and closely reviewed for any evidence of academic. Students these and all paper assignments need to be original with your own ideas and your individual search of sources and literature to support the paper proposal. Remember the paper must be submitted in a Word formatted APA 7th edition format failure to submit or to submit as a PDF will be returned ungraded. Pay attention when submitting the assignment to SafeAssign that the similarity index is not higher or close to 20% per the Syllabus guidelines.

As an APN working as part of a team, you have been asked by your director to adopt a shared decision-making approach to be used as part of routine practice in your healthcare organization (you may choose if this is a hospital or a clinic setting). This involves describing how shared decision making is implemented from an organizational, professional and personal level to improve the care of patients. What processes are required to implement a successful shared decision-making approach to the current practice environment? Part of this involves determining which SDM of care would be best suited to the selected practice environment and patient population (you are required to describe in- depth at least two different models of SDM comparing and contrasting the two and linking the choice of which model would be best for your practice setting; make sure the description of the practice setting and patients in included in the paper). What is the purpose of SDM, how does it impact patient and provider care? How does SDM help the APN to make decisions in patient care? How does the adoption of the SDM model of care meet the standards of practice for APN/NP?

What resources and training needs would be required both by staff and patients to ensure comprehensive integration of this type of decision making into practice (this needs to be a detailed discussion about specific patient tools and approaches). Additionally, describe specific and detailed strategies that would be implemented to build competency among the APN and provider staff that facilitates adoption of this method. Identify key challenges that you may face in implementing this into the care setting and key benefits to integrating a SDM into care.

Must contain a minimum of 8-10 references not found in your course readings, introduction, summary and be APA formatted.

CRITERION STRONG AVERAGE WEAK
Introduce the overall concepts that will be described in the paper (10 pts) 7-10 pts

 

Clear and concise introduction of the concepts to be presented in the paper

4-6 pts

 

Mostly clear but somewhat generic introduction of the concepts to presented in the paper

0-3 pts

 

Vague, unclear or no introduction of concepts to be presented in the paper

A detailed description of the background and significance of SDM in healthcare and ways it impacts patient and provider care (APN in particular but all levels of care).

Description of how

15-21 pts

 

Detailed and specific background and significance of SDM in healthcare and how it impacts patient and provider clear is thorough and evident. Clear link and description of how the

8-14 pts

 

Mostly clear but somewhat vague background and significance of SDM in healthcare provided and how it impacts patient and provider is somewhat clear but not specifically evident.

0-7 pts

 

Vague, unclear, or failure to provide background and significance of SDM in healthcare and how it impacts patient and provider is not clearly evident. Vague or unclear description of

 

SDM meets APN/NP practice standards is described. (21 pts) SDM meets APN/NP practice standards is described. Somewhat clear description of how the SDM meets APN/NP practice standards is

somewhat described.

how the SDM meets APN/NP practice standards is vaguely or not described.
Detailed description of the processes involved in implementing a shared decision making (SDM) at the organizational, professional and personal level as a way to improve the care of patients. (21 pts) 15-21 pts

 

Detailed and specific description of how a SDM approach to practice is implemented at the organizational, professional, and personal level of care to improve the care of patients is evident.

8-14 pts

 

Mostly clear but somewhat vague description of how a SDM approach to practice is implemented at the organizational, professional, and personal level of care to improve the care of patients is somewhat evident.

0-7 pts

 

Vague and unclear description of how a SDM approach to practice is implemented at the organizational, professional, and personal level of care to improve the care of patients is vague and not clearly evident.

Compare and contrast at least 2 different SDM models of care with the identification of the SDM that would work best in the current practice environment. (21 pts) 15-21 pts

 

Excellent, specific and detailed comparison and contrast of at least 2 different SDM models with details of how it is used in various practice settings. One of the two described models is prioritized for the selected practice setting and population that serves to clearly link the model with the population.

8-14 pts

 

Mostly clear but somewhat vague comparison and contrast of at least 2 different SDM models with details of how it is used in various practice settings. One of the two described models is prioritized for the selected practice setting and population that serves to clearly link the model with the population.

0-7 pts

 

Vague and unclear comparison and contrast of 2 or less SDM models with details of how it is used in various practice settings. One of the two described models may be or is not prioritized for the selected practice setting and population that serves to vaguely or fails to link the model with the population.

Describe and apply resources and tools that will be used to implement SDM models for the selected patient and 15-21 pts

 

Excellent, detailed and specific description of tools and resources needed to implement the selected SDM model

8-14 pts

 

Mostly clear but somewhat vague description of tools and resources needed to implement the selected

0-7 pts

 

Vague and unclear description of tools and resources needed to implement the selected SDM model for the

 

population. Provide for the select patient SDM model for the select patient
sufficient link population. Strong and select patient population. population. Vague
between the tools clear link is provided Somewhat strong and and/or unclear link is
and resources, the between the tools & mostly clear link is provided between the
SDM model chosen resources, the SDM provided between the tools & resources, the
and the patient model and the patient tools & resources, the SDM model and the
population. What will population. The process SDM model and the patient population. The
this process look is well outlined with patient population. The process is either not or
like; justify and excellent rationale for process is outlined with vaguely outlined with
provide the rationale choice of identified some rationale for choice little rationale for choice
for choice of resources. of identified resources. of identified resources.
identified resources.
(21 pts)
Describe strategies that would be implemented to build competency among the APN/providers that facilitates adoption and usage SDM method (21 pts) 15-21 pts

 

Describe specific and detailed strategies that would be implemented to build competency among the APN/providers that facilitates adoption and usage SDM method.

This section is well informed and realistic to the population and care

setting.

8-14 pts

 

Mostly clear but somewhat vague strategies that would be implemented to build competency among the APN/providers that facilitates adoption and usage SDM method.

This section is somewhat clear but not exactly realistic to the population

and care setting.

0-7 pts

 

Vague and unclear strategies that would be implemented to build competency among the APN/providers that facilitates adoption and usage SDM method.

This section is missing, unclear or extremely vague and not realistic to the population and

care setting.

Identify key challenges and benefits that might be encountered when implementing a SDM into the practice setting at the organization, professional and personal levels of care. (21 pts) 15-21 pts

 

Identifies and specifically outlines the challenges and benefits that might been countered when implementing the selected SDM model in the practice setting at the organizational, professional and personal levels of care.

8-14 pts

 

Identifies and somewhat specifically outlines the challenges and benefits that might be encountered when implementing the selected SDM model in the practice setting at the organizational, professional and personal levels of care.

0-7 pts

 

Vague and unclear outlines the challenges and benefits that might be encountered when implementing the selected SDM model in practice setting at the organizational, professional and personal levels of care.

 

Summary – summarize the key points made throughout the paper is a comprehensive manner (10 pts) 7-10 pts

 

Summarizes the key points made throughout the paper in a succinct but comprehensive manner

4-6 pts

 

Somewhat summarizes the key points made throughout the paper in a mostly clear but not entirely comprehensive manner

0-3 pts

 

Vague and unclear summary of the key points made throughout the paper that is not succinct or comprehensive.

Writing Mechanics: Language and direction of the paper follows the assignment outline and is clear and easy to follow. (18 pts) 13-18- pts Demonstrates clarity, conciseness and correctness;

writing is free of grammar and spelling

errors. The assignment outline was followed and guides the paper

content appropriately

7-12 pts

 

Somewhat concise and clear grammar and spelling used. Guidelines was mostly used to guide the paper content. Some spelling and grammar issues (less than 3-4 errors within paper)

0-6 pts

 

Many deficiencies in

 

grammar, spelling, or failure to follow the assignment guidelines. Writing has frequent spelling and grammar errors

APA formatting (paper is formatted per APA 7th edition guidelines including font, level of headings, appropriate number of references, in-text and reference list citations) (18 pts) 13-18- pts

 

APA formatting is followed throughout the paper with correct citations and includes at least 10 scholarly references that are correctly APA 7th ed. citations.

7-12 pts

 

APA formatting is mostly followed throughout the paper with mostly correct citations with at least 8 to 9 scholarly references but not required 10 and/or 2-3 incorrect APA 7th ed. referencing or formatting

0-6 pts

 

Multiple errors in APA formatting throughout the paper identified. Fewer than 8 scholarly references provided in the paper and/or > 3 to 4 errors in APA 7th ed referencing and formatting.

Total: 182 pts

Boost Your Grades with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you grappling with challenging nursing topics? Look no further! ReliablePapers.com is your trusted partner for top-notch nursing writing services. Our dedicated team of skilled nursing essay writers is committed to crafting customized and original nursing papers, ensuring academic success.

Making Nursing Assignments a Breeze

Whether you’re tackling complex topics, facing tight deadlines, or dealing with specific instructions, we’ve got you covered. From creating custom nursing research papers to assisting with nursing assignments, our professionals are here to support you.

How We Can Help

Our pro nursing writers excel at crafting outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At ReliablePapers.com, we recognize the significance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are affordably priced, making them accessible to all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers perfect your paper, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Bid farewell to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts create original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Our experts at ReliablePapers.com stay updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Trust us for the best nursing writing services that meet your desires and ensure timely submissions.

Save Time and Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Assignment Example

NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Assignment Example

NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 2: Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Assignment Brief: NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Course: NURS FPX 4010 Leading People, Processes, and Organizations in Interprofessional Practice

Assignment Title: Assessment 2: Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Assignment Overview:

This assignment aims to enhance students’ understanding of healthcare challenges, particularly understaffing, through an interview with a nurse manager, and to explore interdisciplinary solutions using change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches. By looking into real-world scenarios and theoretical frameworks, students will gain insights into the complexities of healthcare management and develop critical thinking skills.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

This assignment is designed to:

  1. Enhance your interviewing skills and ability to extract relevant information from a healthcare professional.
  2. Develop critical thinking regarding the identified healthcare challenge (understaffing) and its multifaceted impact.
  3. Apply theoretical frameworks, specifically Kurt Lewin’s change model and democratic leadership, to propose interdisciplinary solutions.
  4. Explore collaboration approaches that contribute to effective interdisciplinary teams in healthcare settings.

The Student’s Role:

As a student, your role involves:

  • Planning and executing a semi-structured interview with a nurse manager, ensuring thoughtful and relevant questions.
  • Analyzing the identified healthcare challenge, emphasizing interdisciplinary aspects.
  • Applying change theories and leadership concepts to propose viable solutions.
  • Engaging in critical thinking to explore collaboration approaches that contribute to the overall effectiveness of interdisciplinary healthcare teams.

NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Assignment Example

Interview Summary

I conducted an interview with a registered nurse working in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a local hospital. The nurse, a female in her late twenties, has accumulated five years of experience in the mentioned hospital. Her responsibilities include administering medications, evaluating vital signs, performing diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and monitoring medical equipment.

The nurse highlighted a critical issue in the hospital’s safety culture, emphasizing its inadequacies. Despite existing safety protocols, medical errors are prevalent, and there is a pervasive culture of concealing mistakes rather than reporting them. Recent management changes triggered an investigation into medical errors, but the results are pending.

The nurse attributed the prevalence of medical errors to a lack of collaboration. While interdisciplinary teams exist, there is a tendency for blame-shifting between physicians and nurses. The nurse acknowledges the potential benefits of interdisciplinary teamwork but notes issues such as a lack of trust, physicians’ dominance, and inadequate nurse participation in decision-making.

Issue Identification

The identified issue is the deficient safety culture in the hospital, leading to a high incidence of medical errors. The lack of a collaborative environment exacerbates the problem, hindering effective communication and cooperation among healthcare professionals. An interdisciplinary approach is essential to address these challenges, fostering a culture of safety and improving collaboration.

Change Theories for an Interdisciplinary Solution

To address the issue, the Five As Behavior Change Model can be applied. This model involves assessing the situation, advising on the benefits of change, agreeing on specific goals, assisting in overcoming barriers, and arranging a comprehensive plan. The interdisciplinary team, following this model, would assess current behaviors and beliefs related to safety, advise on the benefits of a safety culture, agree on specific safety goals, assist in overcoming barriers, and arrange a comprehensive plan for implementation.

This model has demonstrated effectiveness in various settings and is supported by the study conducted by Lopez-Jeng and Eberth (2019). Their research, published in a peer-reviewed journal, provides a current and credible foundation for implementing the Five As Behavior Change Model.

Leadership Strategies for an Interdisciplinary Solution

Transformational leadership is identified as the most suitable strategy to address the safety culture issue. Healthcare professionals need support, encouragement, and guidance rather than a punitive approach. Transformational leaders inspire and motivate teams toward a shared vision, promoting collaboration and fostering a positive work environment.

Research by Kagan, Porat, and Barnoy (2019) supports the effectiveness of transformational leadership in shaping the quality and safety culture in hospitals. Published in a peer-reviewed journal, this study provides credible insights into the impact of leadership strategies on patient satisfaction and safety culture.

Collaboration Approaches for Interdisciplinary Teams

For effective collaboration within interdisciplinary teams, a transformational leadership approach is recommended. Each team should have a leader who acknowledges the need for change and values input from all members. Additionally, involving patients in the creation of a safety culture, as suggested by Kagan et al. (2019), can enhance the interdisciplinary approach.

The hospital’s prior research on medical errors provides an opportunity to evaluate the current safety culture based on the perspectives of healthcare professionals, administrators, and patients. This approach helps identify weaknesses and barriers to establishing a robust safety culture.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the interview with the ICU nurse highlighted a critical issue in the hospital’s safety culture, leading to a high incidence of medical errors. An interdisciplinary approach, guided by the Five As Behavior Change Model and supported by transformational leadership, is recommended to address the identified issue. Collaboration within interdisciplinary teams, incorporating the perspectives of healthcare professionals and patients, is crucial for the successful implementation of a safety culture. This foundation will inform the development of a comprehensive plan in the subsequent phases of the project.

References

Kagan, I., Porat, N., & Barnoy, S. (2019). The quality and safety culture in general hospitals: Patients’, physicians’, and nurses’ evaluation of its effect on patient satisfaction. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 31(4), 261-268.

Lopez-Jeng, C., & Eberth, S. D. (2019). Improving hospital safety culture for falls prevention through interdisciplinary health education. Health Promotion Practice.

Tetuan, T., Ohm, R., Kinzie, L., McMaster, S., Moffitt, B., & Mosier, M. (2017). Does systems thinking improve the perception of safety culture and patient safety? Journal of Nursing Regulation, 8(2), 31-39.

NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Assignment Example Two

Summary

The interviewee for Assessment Two is an Advanced Certified Oncology Nurse Practitioner at a major cancer center. Due to the prevailing COVID-19 situation, the interview was conducted telephonically, utilizing a set of questions provided for the assessment as a basic guide. The interview, conducted in a semi-structured manner, was recorded. The cancer center comprises various disciplines, including surgical, radiation, and medical oncologists, pain management specialists, social workers, psychologists, nurse practitioners, and discipline-specific nursing staff. Notably, the cancer center recently transitioned from an independent medical oncology practice to becoming part of the Christian Care Health System, signifying a significant cultural shift. The nurse practitioner’s primary responsibilities include coordinating between disciplines, writing referrals and orders, managing chemotherapy, pain management, education, and follow-up calls.

A pertinent issue highlighted by the nurse practitioner is the encroachment of disciplines beyond their defined scope of practice, leading to interference in the responsibilities of other disciplines. This issue is exacerbated by a perceived lack of strong motivational leadership to aid the oncology practice in adapting to its new role within the larger corporation. Additionally, while the organization emphasizes teamwork, true interprofessional collaboration is limited, and a silo mentality prevails. The interviewee’s attempt to contribute to a collaborative team was met with resistance, reflecting a need for effective leadership and a shift in organizational culture.

Issue Identification

The primary issue identified during the interview is the infringement of one discipline into the scope of practice of another, resulting in a disruption of patient care. Examples include the medical oncology group managing a patient’s pain until it is deemed uncontrolled, at which point the patient is referred to the pain management group. Challenges arise when patients experience uncontrolled pain and communicate this to their medical oncologist, raising questions about the appropriate course of action. The multidisciplinary approach is deemed suitable for addressing this issue, with evidence supporting interprofessional practice for improved patient care, safety, and prevention of medical errors (Bosch & Mansel, 2015).

Change Theory

Change theory, as applied to the organization, involves understanding the existing culture, beliefs, and values that influence the organization’s openness to change. Kurt Lewin’s Field Theory is considered relevant in this context, offering a framework for analyzing group behavior and environmental factors. The goal is to identify and modify forces that hinder or promote change. The application of Lewin’s theory is crucial for targeting the cultural shift needed within the organization, encouraging collaboration as the norm.

Leadership Strategy

Effective leadership is identified as a crucial component for driving organizational change and fostering interprofessional collaboration. The transformational leadership style, characterized by charisma, inspiration, effective communication, and empowerment, is deemed suitable for the current situation. The existing leadership is perceived as weak, lacking communication and transparency. A transformational leader is seen as instrumental in guiding the cancer center toward an interdisciplinary approach.

Collaborative Approach

The literature emphasizes a collaborative approach centered on putting the patient first. This patient-centric focus serves as an equalizer, aligning individual team members’ interests with patient interests. Active and respectful communication is highlighted as a tool for building interprofessional collaboration, emphasizing the importance of a common language and standardized communication methods. Interprofessional rounding is suggested as a beneficial practice to prevent disciplines from infringing on each other’s practices and gain insights into preventing future issues.

Conclusion

In conclusion, change theory, leadership, and collaborative practice are identified as essential tools for improving healthcare. Change theory provides a mechanism for understanding and altering organizational culture, but effective leadership is required to drive and motivate the workforce toward interdisciplinary practice. Patient-centric collaboration and open communication are proposed as fundamental principles for fostering a collaborative approach. The integration of these tools can lead to a positive shift in organizational culture, promoting true interprofessional collaboration for enhanced patient care and safety.

References

Batras, D., Duff, C., & Smith, B. J. (2015). Organizational change theory: Implications for health promotion practice. Health Promotion International, 31(2), 231-241.

Bergstedt, K., & Wei, H. (2020). Leadership strategies to promote frontline nursing staff engagement. Nursing Management, 48-53.

Bosch, B., & Mansel, H. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration in healthcare: Lessons to be learned from competitive sports. CPJRPC, 176-179.

Hussain, S. T., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. H. (2016). Kurt Lewin’s change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3, 125-127.

Tomasik, J., & Flemming, C. (2015). Lessons from the field: Promising interprofessional collaboration practices. Retrieved from www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2015/03/lessons-from-the-field.html

NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Assignment Example Three

Summary of the Interview

The interview followed a semi-structured approach to gain insights from a nursing colleague regarding her organization, its past and current challenges, her role and responsibilities, the effectiveness of interventions, impacts on diverse populations, the role of nurse leaders, leadership strategies, and interdisciplinary collaboration within the organization (McIntosh & Morse, 2015). The colleague works in a profit-based acute healthcare facility with 75 beds, utilizing advanced technologies such as automated EHRs, patient monitoring systems, telemedicine, error reporting software, and data analytics for nursing informatics to enhance care quality. As an ICU nurse, her duties encompass monitoring, recording patient data, ordering diagnostics tests, coordinating with healthcare professionals, administering medication, treating wounds, and educating patients and families.

The interview, conducted in a flexible style, allowed the interviewee ample opportunity to express perspectives. Open-ended questions were utilized to delve deeper into healthcare issues, with a focus on statistics and benchmarks to gauge issue severity. Past challenges such as resistance to implementing technology were addressed through nurse training, transformational leadership, and the hiring of specialized nurses.

Identified Issue from the Interview

While various issues require interdisciplinary collaboration, the significant concern is medication errors, demanding a collaborative approach involving nurses, physicians, lab technicians, pharmacists, informatics nurses, and pain management nurses (Srinivasamurthy et al., 2021). Collaboration is essential due to the involvement of multiple healthcare professionals, making it challenging to detect errors and identify root causes. Delays in patient care due to communication gaps can threaten patient safety. A blame culture further complicates the issue, involving different stakeholders and potentially compromising patient care (Tena et al., 2018).

Analysis of Potential Change Theories

Lewin’s change theory, with stages of unfreezing, moving, and refreezing, is deemed suitable for addressing the issue. While driving forces include quality of care and patient safety, resistance forces center around a blame culture. This theory facilitates unfreezing the current process, implementing change, and refreezing to establish the change, fostering collaboration and shared decision-making (Smith & Gullett, 2019). Rogers’ theory, with stages of awareness, interest, evaluation, implementation, and adoption, complements Lewin’s model, focusing on motivating professionals to adopt change and evaluating outcomes (Smith & Gullett, 2019). Spradley’s eight-step change theory emphasizes evaluation and stabilization, supporting change implementation through collaborative efforts.

Leadership Strategies

To address potential resistance, transformational and servant leadership styles are recommended, involving strategies like group discussions, understanding stakeholders’ perspectives, motivation, action plans for collaboration, support provision, fostering an inclusive work environment, root-cause analysis to reduce blame culture, and establishing direct communication channels. Sharing the workload during medication administration through effective staffing and scheduling can further enhance collaboration (Jember et al., 2018).

Collaborative Approaches from the Literature

Various collaborative models have been proposed in the literature. Manias (2018) suggests a multimodal interdisciplinary collaboration model, encompassing communication tools, logs, collaborative medication review, adherence to protocols, direct involvement of pharmacists, and collaborative conferences and workshops. Tena et al. (2018) propose root-cause analysis with a safety checklist to identify discrepancies in patient information. Jember et al. (2018) and Srinivasamurthy et al. (2021) highlight the positive impact of a medication error system integrated with computerized physician entry, involving all stakeholders to reduce medication errors.

References

Ahrq.gov. (2020). How do you measure fall rates and fall prevention practices? [URL].

Hunitie, M. (2016). A cross-sectional study of the impact of transformational leadership on integrative conflict management. Asian Social Science, 12(5), 47. [DOI]

Jember, A., Hailu, M., Messele, A., Demeke, T., & Hassen, M. (2018). Proportion of medication error reporting and associated factors among nurses: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nursing, 17(1). [DOI]

Manias, E. (2018). Effects of interdisciplinary collaboration in hospitals on medication errors: an integrative review. Expert Opinion On Drug Safety, 17(3), 259-275. [DOI]

McIntosh, M., & Morse, J. (2015). Situating and constructing diversity in semi-structured interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2, 233339361559767. [DOI]

Smith, M., & Gullett, D. (2019). Nursing theories and nursing practice (5th ed.). F A Davis.

Srinivasamurthy, S., Ashokkumar, R., Kodidela, S., Howard, S., Samer, C., & Chakradhara Rao, U. (2021). Impact of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) on the incidence of chemotherapy-related medication errors: a systematic review. European Journal Of Clinical Pharmacology. [DOI]

Tena, R., League, S., & Brennan, J. (2018). Preventing wrong site, wrong procedure, wrong patient errors. Nursing Made Incredibly Easy!, 16(3), 10-13. [DOI]

Weller, S., Vickers, B., Bernard, H., Blackburn, A., Borgatti, S., Gravlee, C., & Johnson, J. (2018). Open-ended interview questions and saturation. PLOS ONE, 13(6), e0198606. [DOI]

NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Assignment Example Four

Interview Summary

I conducted a telephonic interview with Mr. Kelly (pseudonym), the nurse manager at Sanford Medical Center, Bismarck. The facility, comprising a team of specialists, emphasizes healthcare excellence through a combination of compassionate patient care, expertise, and advanced technology. Mr. Kelly oversees financial and human resources, maintains care standards and quality, ensures staff and patient satisfaction, and fosters a safe environment. In the interview, I posed the following questions:

  1. What is the main challenge facing your organization?
  2. How does this problem affect the ability to complete your duties?
  3. How have you or your organization tried to address this problem?
  4. Does your organization have a culture of collaboration?

Mr. Kelly acknowledged understaffing, particularly in the nursing department, as the primary challenge. Shortages in the emergency department compromise patient care quality, leading to nurses working extended hours. The resultant stress contributes to physical, mental, and emotional health issues among nurses, affecting patient satisfaction. Sanford Medical Center addresses understaffing by retaining nurses through a supportive work environment, flexible staffing schedules, and initiatives to prevent burnout. The organization also emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration, exemplified by a situation where teamwork proved effective during a patient influx.

Issue Identification

The issue of understaffing necessitates discussions on teamwork and interdisciplinary communication to enhance nursing unit efficiency, patient safety, and care quality (Hensel et al., 2017). Teamwork skills improvement and interdisciplinary communication integration from psychology, management, and social studies can address this challenge (Tuaminen et al., 2016).

Change Theories for Interdisciplinary Solution

Kurt Lewin’s three-step model offers an interdisciplinary solution to understaffing. The model involves unfreezing, moving, and refreezing. Nursing education serves as a solution, with awareness creation, sustained efforts for change, and post-implementation evaluations (Sutherland, 2013).

Leadership Strategies for Interdisciplinary Solution

Democratic leadership, involving participative decision-making, fosters collaboration in addressing understaffing. This approach encourages engagement, values collaboration, and leverages individual strengths and talents (Smith et al., 2018).

Collaboration Approaches for Interdisciplinary Teams

Creating trusting communication, implementing team-building activities, and recognizing achievements contribute to efficient interdisciplinary teams (Tappen, 2016). Open-plan offices, team-building workshops, and recognition initiatives foster collaboration and positive interaction among nursing staff.

References

Hensel, K. O., van den Bruck, R., Klare, I., Heldmann, M., Ghebremedhin, B., & Jenke, A. C. (2017). Nursing staff fluctuation and pathogenic burden in the NICU-effective outbreak management and the underestimated relevance of non-resistant strains. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1-7.

Tuominen, O. A., Lundgren-Laine, H., Kauppila, W., Hupli, M., & Salanterä, S. (2016). A real-time Excel-based scheduling solution for nursing staff reallocation. Nursing Management, 23(6).

Morley, L., & Cashell, A. (2017). Collaboration in health care. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 48(2), 207-216.

Tappen, R. M. (2016). They know me here: Patients’ perspectives on their nursing home experiences. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 21(1).

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Assignment

Assessment 2 Instructions: Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

  • PRINT
  • For this assessment, you will create a 2-4 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach, and review best practices and evidence to address the issue.

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, your participation and leadership in interdisciplinary teams will be vital to the health outcomes for your patients and organization. One way to approach designing an improvement project is to use the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement describes it thus:

The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is shorthand for testing a change in the real work setting—by planning it, trying it, observing the results, and acting on what is learned. This is the scientific method adapted for action-oriented learning…Essentially, the PDSA cycle helps you test out change ideas on a smaller scale before evaluating the results and making adjustments before potentially launching into a somewhat larger scale project (n.d.).   

You might also recognize that the PDSA cycle resembles the nursing process. The benefit of gaining experience with this model of project design is that it provides nurses with an opportunity to ideate and lead improvements. For this assessment, you will not be implementing all of the PDSA cycle. Instead, you are being asked to interview a health care professional of your choice to determine what kind of interdisciplinary problem he or she is experiencing or has experienced in the workplace. This interview, in Assessment 2, will inform the research that you will conduct to propose a plan for interdisciplinary collaboration in Assessment 3.

It would be an excellent choice to complete the PDSA Cycle activity prior to developing the report. The activity consists of four questions that create the opportunity to check your understanding of best-practices related to each stage of the PDSA cycle. The information gained from completing this formative will promote your success with the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification report. This will take just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.

Reference

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). How to improve. Retrieved from https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx

Demonstration of Proficiency

    • Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
  • Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
  • Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
  • Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
    • Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
  • Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
    • Describe change theories and a leadership strategy that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
    • Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Professional Context

This assessment will introduce the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model to create change in an organization. By interviewing a colleague of your choice, you will begin gathering information about an interprofessional collaboration problem that your colleague is experiencing or has experienced. You will identify a change theory and leadership strategies to help solve this problem.

Scenario

This assessment is the first of three related assessments in which you will gather interview information (Assessment 2);  design a proposal for interdisciplinary problem-solving, (Assessment 3); and report on how an interdisciplinary improvement plan could be implemented in a place of practice (Assessment 4). At the end of the course, your interviewee will have a proposal plan based on the PDSA cycle that he or she could present to stakeholders to address an interdisciplinary problem in the workplace.

For this assessment, you will need to interview a health care professional such as a fellow learner, nursing colleague, administrator, business partner, or another appropriate person who could provide you with sufficient information regarding an organizational problem that he or she is experiencing or has experienced, or an area where they are seeking improvements. Consult the Interview Guide [DOCX] for an outline of how to prepare and the types of information you will need to complete this project successfully.

Remember: this is just the first in a series of three assessments.

Instructions

For this assessment, you will report on the information that you collected in your interview, analyzing the interview data and identifying a past or current issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary approach. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently being used. You will discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information. Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from the literature. Additionally, you will start laying the foundation for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal (Assessment 3) by researching potential change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to issue you have identified. Please be certain to review the scoring guide to confirm specific required elements of this assessment. Note that there are differences between basic, proficient and distinguished scores.

When submitting your plan, use the Interview and Issue Identification Template [DOCX], which will help you to stay organized and concise. As you complete the template, make sure you use APA format for in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that are informing your plan, as well as for the reference list at the end.

Additionally, be sure to address the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

  • Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
  • Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
  • Describe potential change theories and a leadership strategies that could inform an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
  • Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could facilitate establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
  • Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, and using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

  • Length of submission: Use the provided template. Most submissions will be 2 to 4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. 
  • APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.

 

Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization. Does not summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization. Discusses an interview, but the focus of the interview, the issues addressed, or the specifics of health care organizational context are unclear or missing. Summarizes an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization. Summarizes an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization. Notes strategies employed in the interview to ensure that sufficient information was gathered.
Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate. Does not identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate. Identifies an issue with an unclear connection to the interview or for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach seems inappropriate. Identifies an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate. Identifies an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate, providing one or more specific reasons to justify this approach.
Describe potential change theories and a leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Does not describe potential change theories and a leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Identifies change theories and leadership strategies that are unclear, incomplete, or irrelevant to developing an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Describes potential change theories and leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Describes potential change theories and a leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Notes which sources seem most credible or relevant to the specific organizational issue.
Describe collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue. Does not describe collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue. Identifies collaborative approaches from the literature but the relevance to establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue is unclear or insufficiently explained. Describes collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue. Describes collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue. Notes which sources seem most credible or relevant to the specific organizational issue.
Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style. Does not communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style. Communicates inconsistently, using writing that is unclear, illogically organized, and/or containing numerous errors in grammar or APA style. Communicates with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style. Communicates with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style with no errors.

Achieve Academic Success with Our Expert Nursing Essay Writers at ReliablePapers.com!

Are you feeling overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Do tight deadlines and specific instructions make the essay writing process seem impossible? Look no further – ReliablePapers.com is here to save you time and secure the grades you deserve! As the best nursing paper writing service company, we offer unparalleled expertise and professionalism.

Our expert nursing essay writers specialize in writing custom nursing papers for students, ensuring that your assignment is not just good but exceptional. If the provided samples are insufficient for your paper or you wish for a unique and customized nursing essay, our professionals are ready to assist. Say goodbye to plagiarized papers, as our writers guarantee original content tailored to your instructions.

Worried about the cost? Our online nursing papers are available at incredibly affordable prices, catering to all college students. Whether you need assistance with a complex topic, have a tight deadline, or seek a guide for your nursing assignments, ReliablePapers.com has got you covered.

Ready to take the first step toward academic success? Click on our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Seek the help of professional essay writers from ReliablePapers.com, and save time for what matters most. Your journey to outstanding academic achievements begins with us!

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company