Archive for category: Sample Papers

NURS FPX 6612 Quality Improvement Proposal Paper Example

NURS FPX 6612 Assessment 2 Quality Improvement Proposal

NURS FPX 6612 Quality Improvement Proposal Paper Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX6612 Health Care Models Used in Care Coordination

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 6612 Assessment 2 Quality Improvement Proposal

Understanding Assignment Objectives

This assignment aims to develop your skills in identifying healthcare quality improvement opportunities, conducting evidence-based research, and proposing feasible solutions to address identified issues. Through critical analysis and synthesis of relevant literature, you will demonstrate your ability to apply theoretical concepts to real-world healthcare settings and develop practical, evidence-based interventions to enhance patient outcomes and organizational performance.

The Student’s Role

As a student, your role is to act as a healthcare professional or administrator tasked with identifying and addressing a quality improvement opportunity within your organization or practice setting. You will conduct a thorough assessment of the identified problem, explore existing literature to support your proposed solution, and develop a comprehensive quality improvement proposal that addresses the identified issue and aligns with evidence-based practice principles.

Competencies Measured

This assignment assesses the following competencies:

• Ability to identify healthcare quality improvement opportunities.
• Skill in conducting evidence-based research and synthesizing findings.
• Capacity to propose feasible and evidence-based solutions to healthcare challenges.
• Proficiency in articulating expected outcomes and evaluating the effectiveness of proposed interventions.
• Capability to communicate complex ideas and proposals effectively in a written format.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS-FPX6612 Health Care Models Used in Care Coordination Course:

NURS FPX 6612 Assessment 1 Triple Aim Outcome Measures Presentation Example

NURS FPX 6612 Assessment 3 Patient Discharge Care Planning Example

NURS FPX 6612 Assessment 4 Cost Savings Analysis Example

NURS FPX 6612 Quality Improvement Proposal Paper Example

Introduction

In the pursuit of providing high-quality healthcare services while managing costs effectively, healthcare organizations increasingly turn to innovative solutions. One such solution is the implementation and expansion of Health Information Technology (HIT), which has shown promising results in improving patient outcomes and operational efficiency. This proposal aims to address the need for quality improvement within healthcare settings through the expansion of HIT infrastructure, guided by evidence-based practices and the principles of accountable care organizations (ACOs).

Overview of the Problem and Setting

Within the healthcare landscape, the challenge persists in delivering quality care while containing costs and ensuring patient safety. This issue is particularly pronounced in settings where patients present with complex health needs, requiring coordinated and comprehensive care. Unfortunately, the current landscape often grapples with insufficient information management systems and disjointed delivery of care, compounding these difficulties. Consequently, there arises an urgent call for interventions that not only streamline operational processes but also optimize the utilization of data, ultimately aiming to elevate the quality of care across the board.

Importance of Quality Improvement Initiative

A quality improvement initiative focusing on the expansion of Health Information Technology (HIT) infrastructure holds profound significance for numerous reasons. Firstly, it serves as a gateway to enhanced access to patient data, empowering healthcare providers with comprehensive information to guide their decision-making processes and customize interventions according to the unique needs of each individual (Alaei et al., 2019). Secondly, it fosters the seamless coordination of care and ensures continuity throughout the patient journey, thereby minimizing the occurrence of errors and eliminating unnecessary redundancies in treatment protocols (Barath et al., 2020). Lastly, through the strategic utilization of technology, healthcare organizations can achieve heightened levels of operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness, all while steadfastly upholding the highest standards of care delivery (Fraze et al., 2020).

Expected Outcome

The anticipated outcomes of implementing an expanded Health Information Technology (HIT) infrastructure are multifaceted and hold significant promise for improving healthcare delivery. Firstly, it is expected to lead to enhanced patient outcomes, characterized by reduced hospitalizations, more effective management of chronic conditions, and the implementation of advanced preventive care measures (Barath et al., 2020). By providing healthcare providers with comprehensive access to patient data and analytical tools, HIT facilitates more informed decision-making and personalized treatment plans, ultimately resulting in better health outcomes for patients.

Secondly, the expansion of HIT infrastructure aims to streamline administrative processes within healthcare organizations, thereby generating substantial time and cost savings for both patients and providers (Fraze et al., 2020). Through the automation of routine tasks, optimization of resource allocation, and reduction of paperwork, HIT enables more efficient operations and resource utilization. This, in turn, frees up valuable time for healthcare professionals to focus on delivering high-quality care and fosters a more seamless and patient-centered care experience.

Overall, the initiative seeks to transform healthcare delivery by harnessing the power of technology to optimize outcomes and experiences for all stakeholders (Alaei et al., 2019). By integrating HIT into various aspects of care delivery, healthcare organizations can achieve greater efficiency, effectiveness, and patient satisfaction. This transformative approach not only enhances the quality of care but also ensures that healthcare remains accessible, affordable, and sustainable in the long term.

Supporting Evidence from Previous Research

The body of research surrounding Health Information Technology (HIT) consistently highlights its efficacy in enhancing healthcare quality and outcomes. For example, a study by Fraze et al. (2020) elucidated the significant impact of HIT within accountable care organizations (ACOs), where the strategic utilization of care plans effectively addresses the multifaceted needs of patients, resulting in tangible improvements in health outcomes. By leveraging HIT tools to facilitate care coordination and personalized interventions, ACOs demonstrate superior performance in managing complex patient populations, ultimately leading to better overall outcomes.

Furthermore, research conducted by Barath et al. (2020) shed light on the compelling association between HIT implementation and reduced rates of preventable hospitalizations within ACO-affiliated healthcare settings. Through the seamless integration of HIT systems into clinical workflows, ACOs are better equipped to identify and address potential health issues proactively, thereby mitigating the need for unnecessary hospital admissions. These findings underscore the critical role of HIT solutions in driving meaningful improvements in care delivery by optimizing resource utilization and promoting proactive, patient-centered approaches to healthcare management.

By synthesizing evidence from these and other studies, it becomes evident that HIT holds immense potential for revolutionizing healthcare delivery by empowering providers with timely access to comprehensive patient data and analytical tools (Alaei et al., 2019). Through the strategic implementation of HIT solutions, healthcare organizations can capitalize on opportunities to enhance care coordination, improve clinical decision-making, and ultimately, optimize patient outcomes. As such, the integration of HIT into healthcare practice emerges as a pivotal strategy for driving continuous quality improvement and advancing the delivery of patient-centered care.

Steps for Implementation

The successful implementation of an expanded Health Information Technology (HIT) infrastructure demands meticulous planning and execution to ensure its effectiveness and seamless integration into healthcare workflows. A structured approach encompassing several key steps is essential to navigate the complexities associated with HIT deployment and maximize its potential benefits.

First and foremost, healthcare organizations must undertake a comprehensive assessment of their current technological capabilities to gauge existing infrastructure, software systems, and data management protocols (Gardner et al., 2018). This evaluation serves as a foundational step in identifying areas for enhancement and determining the specific HIT solutions that align with organizational goals and objectives.

Following the assessment phase, the next critical step involves identifying and securing the necessary resources and support required for HIT implementation. This includes allocating adequate financial resources, procuring technological infrastructure and software licenses, and engaging key stakeholders such as executive leadership, IT personnel, and frontline healthcare staff (Robert, 2019). Establishing clear lines of communication and fostering collaboration among multidisciplinary teams are essential to garnering buy-in and ensuring a smooth transition throughout the implementation process.

Moreover, the design of user-friendly interfaces and intuitive workflows is paramount to facilitate seamless adoption and utilization of HIT systems by healthcare providers (Fraze et al., 2020). Customized interfaces tailored to the specific needs and preferences of end-users can enhance usability, minimize training requirements, and promote efficient navigation within HIT platforms. Human-centered design principles should inform interface design, prioritizing simplicity, clarity, and accessibility to accommodate diverse user populations.

In parallel, comprehensive training programs must be developed and implemented to equip healthcare staff with the necessary skills and competencies to effectively utilize HIT tools in their daily practice (Gardner et al., 2018). Training sessions should be tailored to the roles and responsibilities of different staff members, covering topics such as system navigation, data entry protocols, and troubleshooting procedures. Ongoing support and refresher training sessions should also be provided to ensure sustained proficiency and confidence among users.

Finally, robust data security measures must be implemented to safeguard patient information and comply with regulatory requirements governing healthcare data privacy and security (Alaei et al., 2019). This entails implementing encryption protocols, access controls, audit trails, and regular security audits to mitigate the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access. Additionally, organizational policies and procedures should be established to govern data sharing practices and ensure compliance with relevant legal and ethical standards.

Evaluation Plan

To assess the effectiveness of the quality improvement initiative centered around the expansion of Health Information Technology (HIT) infrastructure, a comprehensive evaluation plan must be implemented. This plan encompasses the utilization of various metrics and indicators to gauge the impact of HIT expansion on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes.

One key aspect of the evaluation involves the examination of patient satisfaction scores, which serve as a crucial indicator of the overall patient experience and perceived quality of care (Barath et al., 2020). By soliciting feedback from patients through surveys or interviews, healthcare organizations can gain valuable insights into areas of strength and areas for improvement in their HIT-enabled care delivery processes.

Furthermore, evaluating the rates of preventable hospitalizations provides a quantitative measure of the effectiveness of HIT in improving care coordination and reducing unnecessary healthcare utilization (Fraze et al., 2020). A decrease in preventable hospitalizations suggests that HIT expansion has contributed to better management of chronic conditions, enhanced preventive care measures, and overall improvements in patient health outcomes.

Adherence to clinical guidelines serves as another essential metric for evaluating the impact of HIT expansion on care quality and patient safety (Robert, 2019). By tracking healthcare providers’ compliance with evidence-based practices and treatment protocols embedded within HIT systems, organizations can ensure consistency and standardization in care delivery, ultimately leading to better clinical outcomes.

Moreover, efficiency metrics related to resource utilization provide valuable insights into the cost-effectiveness of HIT-enabled care delivery models (Alaei et al., 2019). By analyzing factors such as patient flow, length of stay, and utilization of healthcare resources, organizations can identify opportunities for optimization and resource allocation, thereby improving operational efficiency and reducing healthcare costs.

In addition to quantitative metrics, qualitative feedback from healthcare providers and patients offers valuable insights into the perceived impact of HIT expansion on care delivery processes and outcomes (Gardner et al., 2018). Through interviews, focus groups, or open-ended surveys, organizations can capture firsthand perspectives on the usability, effectiveness, and overall value of HIT-enabled interventions, informing ongoing improvement efforts and enhancing the user experience.

By integrating both quantitative and qualitative evaluation methods, healthcare organizations can gain a comprehensive understanding of the impact of HIT expansion on care delivery and patient outcomes. This iterative approach to evaluation enables organizations to identify successes, address challenges, and continuously improve HIT-enabled care delivery models to ensure the highest standards of quality and patient-centered care.

Variables, Hypothesis, and Statistical Tests

To gauge the success of the quality improvement initiative centered around the expansion of Health Information Technology (HIT) infrastructure, various variables must be considered, each offering unique insights into the initiative’s impact on healthcare delivery and outcomes. Firstly, the adoption rate of HIT tools among healthcare providers serves as a critical variable, indicating the extent to which these technological solutions are integrated into clinical workflows and embraced by frontline staff (Fraze et al., 2020). A higher adoption rate suggests greater acceptance and utilization of HIT systems, potentially leading to more significant improvements in care quality and efficiency.

Secondly, changes in clinical outcomes represent another essential variable for assessment, encompassing factors such as patient health outcomes, disease management, and adherence to clinical guidelines (Barath et al., 2020). By tracking indicators such as hospital readmission rates, patient mortality rates, and disease-specific clinical metrics, organizations can ascertain whether the expansion of HIT infrastructure has resulted in tangible improvements in patient care and overall health outcomes.

Additionally, the realization of cost savings represents a key variable for evaluation, reflecting the financial impact of HIT expansion on healthcare organizations and the broader healthcare system (Robert, 2019). Cost savings may manifest in various forms, including reductions in healthcare expenditures, operational costs, and resource utilization. By quantifying these cost savings, organizations can demonstrate the economic value and return on investment associated with HIT-enabled care delivery models.

The underlying hypothesis guiding the evaluation posits that the expansion of HIT infrastructure will lead to improvements in care quality and efficiency (Alaei et al., 2019). This hypothesis is grounded in the premise that HIT solutions, by facilitating better access to patient data, streamlining care processes, and promoting evidence-based practices, have the potential to optimize care delivery and enhance patient outcomes.

To test this hypothesis and assess the significance of observed changes, statistical tests such as t-tests or chi-square analyses can be employed to analyze pre- and post-intervention data (Gardner et al., 2018). These tests enable organizations to determine whether any observed differences in variables such as adoption rates, clinical outcomes, and cost savings are statistically significant and not merely attributable to chance. By applying rigorous statistical analyses, organizations can confidently ascertain the effectiveness of HIT expansion initiatives and make data-driven decisions to inform future quality improvement efforts.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the expansion of Health Information Technology represents a promising avenue for enhancing healthcare quality and patient outcomes. By leveraging evidence-based practices and drawing on the principles of accountable care organizations, healthcare organizations can implement HIT solutions that drive meaningful improvements in care delivery. Through careful planning, implementation, and evaluation, the proposed quality improvement initiative holds the potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery and improve outcomes for patients.

References

Alaei, S., Valinejadi, A., Deimazar, G., Zarein, S., Abbasy, Z., & Alirezaei, F. (2019). Use of health information technology in patients care management: A mixed methods study in Iran. Acta Informatica Medica, 27(5), 311. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2019.27.311-317

Barath, D., Amaize, A., & Chen, J. (2020). Accountable care organizations and preventable hospitalizations among patients with depression. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 59(1), e1–e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.01.028

Fraze, T. K., Beidler, L. B., Briggs, A. D. M., & Colla, C. H. (2020). Translating evidence into practice: ACOs’ use of care plans for patients with complex health needs. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 36(1), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06122-4

Gardner, R. L., Cooper, E., Haskell, J., Harris, D. A., Poplau, S., Kroth, P. J., & Linzer, M. (2018). Physician stress and burnout: The impact of health information technology. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 26(2), 106–114. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy145

Moy, H., Giardino, A., & Varacallo, M. (2020). Accountable Care Organization. PubMed; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448136/

Robert, N. (2019). How Artificial Intelligence is changing nursing. Nursing Management (Springhouse), 50(9), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.numa.0000578988.56622.21

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 6612 Quality Improvement Proposal Paper Assignment

Description

Assessment 1 Instructions: Quality Improvement Proposal Paper Assignment

Details:

Identify a quality improvement opportunity in your organization or practice. In a 1,250-1,500 word paper, describe the problem or issue and propose a quality improvement initiative based on evidence-based practice. Apply “The Road to Evidence-Based Practice” process, illustrated in Chapter 4 of your textbook, to create your proposal.

Include the following:

1. Provide an overview the problem and the setting in which the problem or issue occurs.
2. Explain why a quality improvement initiative is needed in this area and the expected outcome.
3. Discuss how the results of previous research demonstrate support for the quality improvement initiative and its projected outcomes. Include a minimum of three peer-reviewed sources published within the last 5 years, not included in the course materials or textbook, that establish evidence in support of the quality improvement proposed.
4. Discuss steps necessary to implement the quality improvement initiative. Provide evidence and rationale to support your answer.
5. Explain how the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated to determine whether there was improvement.
6. Support your explanation by identifying the variables, hypothesis test, and statistical test that you would need to prove that the quality improvement initiative succeeded.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, , which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Rubric:

Overview of the problem and the setting in which the problem or issue occurs is described in detail.

Explanation of why the quality improvement initiative is need is clearly discussed.

The quality improvement initiative would help address the problem within the described setting presented.

The expected outcome is thoroughly described.

Overall, the explanation is clear and well supported.

The use of research to demonstrate support for the quality improvement initiative and its projected outcomes is clearly presented.

The research results strongly demonstrate support for the initiative and projected outcomes.

The three peer-reviewed sources meet all assignment criteria and provide critical support for the initiative.

The steps necessary to implement the quality improvement initiative are thoroughly discussed.

The implantation steps are well supported with evidence and rationale.

An explanation for how the quality improvement initiative will be measured is presented in detail.

The evaluation is appropriate to the quality improvement initiative.

Evaluation proposed is well supported.

The variables, hypothesis, and statistical tests needed to prove the quality improvement succeeded are presented and accurate.

The proposed elements will prove whether the quality improvement succeeded.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper.

Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.

All sources are authoritative.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

All format elements are correct.

Boost Your Grades with ReliablePapers.com: Your Trusted Nursing Paper Writing Service!

Are you struggling with intricate nursing topics? Fear not! ReliablePapers.com proudly presents itself as your ultimate destination for top-notch nursing writing services. Our team of experienced nursing essay writers is committed to delivering custom-made and plagiarism-free nursing papers that guarantee outstanding grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Navigating through complex nursing research topics, meeting tight deadlines, or adhering to specific instructions – we’ve got your back. From writing custom nursing research papers to assisting with nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand. Our vast experience has honed our skills in providing swift and effective support. We’ve developed efficient plans of action to tackle orders with tight deadlines, ensuring we save your academic life and successes.

How We Can Assist You

Our seasoned nursing writers create exceptional nursing essay papers from scratch, covering any topic, meeting any deadline, and adhering to your specific instructions. At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the pivotal role your academic success plays.

Why Choose Our Nursing Paper Writing Services?

• Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
• Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers perfect your paper, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
• Originality Guaranteed: Bid farewell to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
• Timely Support for Your Coursework: Worried about deadlines? We’ve mastered the art of helping nursing students with coursework, even with tight deadlines, saving your academic life.
• Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at ReliablePapers.com stay updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, juggling assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust ReliablePapers.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Grades: Order Your Nursing Essays Today

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. At ReliablePapers.com, we always endeavor to provide the best quality and attain high levels of customer satisfaction.

Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP. Order Now!

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

NURS FPX 6610 Case Presentation of a Patient Paper Example

NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 4 Case Presentation

NURS FPX 6610 Case Presentation of a Patient Paper Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX6610 Introduction to Care Coordination

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 4 Case Presentation

Assignment Overview

In this assessment, you will develop a presentation of a patient’s case for stakeholders, supplemented by 10–15 slides with notes. The ability to deliver effective presentations is crucial for care coordinators, particularly when addressing diverse groups of stakeholders, including patients, family members, and multiple providers in various settings. This assessment provides an opportunity for you to present a patient’s case to stakeholders, demonstrating your proficiency in key course competencies.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

This assignment aims to evaluate your ability to:

• Explain the effect of societal, economic, and interprofessional factors on patient outcomes and the care coordinator’s role.
• Evaluate care coordination plans and outcomes according to performance measures and professional standards.
• Develop collaborative interventions that address the needs of diverse populations and varied settings.
• Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, presenting patient case information to stakeholders clearly and accurately, and supporting main points with relevant evidence.

The Student’s Role

As a student in this assignment, your role is to prepare and deliver a comprehensive presentation of a patient’s case to stakeholders. You will analyze the patient’s background, care plan, and transitional care plan, identifying key goals, elements, and factors influencing outcomes. Additionally, you will explain how an interprofessional care team contributes to high-quality patient outcomes and determine the resources needed for continuing care.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS-FPX6610 Introduction to Care Coordination Course:

NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 1 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Example

NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 2 Patient Care Plan Example

NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 3 Transitional Care Plan Example

NURS FPX 6610 Case Presentation of a Patient Paper Example

Slide 1: Title Slide

Title: Comprehensive Case Presentation for Mrs. Snyder’s Continuing Care

Course Code: NURS FPX 6610

Presenter’s Name: [Student’s Name]

Date: [Date of Presentation]

Speaker Notes:

• Good morning/afternoon, everyone. Today, I’m excited to present a comprehensive case study focusing on Mrs. Snyder’s continuing care.
• We’ll look at the details of transitional care, stakeholder engagement, and the multidisciplinary approach to ensure optimal patient outcomes for Mrs. Snyder.
• Let’s dive into the details of Mrs. Snyder’s case and explore the collaborative efforts of healthcare professionals in providing patient-centered care.

Slide 2: Introduction

Importance of Case Studies in Healthcare

• Case studies play a crucial role in providing insights into patient care (Hinchliffe et al., 2020).
• They offer comprehensive patient information, aiding healthcare providers in understanding diagnoses, treatment options, and potential health issues.

Speaker Notes:

• Case studies serve as invaluable tools for healthcare professionals, offering a detailed overview of patient cases.
• In today’s presentation, we’ll explore how case studies, particularly Mrs. Snyder’s, contribute to our understanding of transitional care and collaborative patient management.

Slide 3: Transitional Care Plan and Goals

Definition of Transitional Care

• Transitional care focuses on ensuring the smooth transition of patients between healthcare settings (Daliri et al., 2019).
• Its primary goal is to uphold the quality of care while respecting patients’ preferences and needs during transitions.

Goals of Continuing Care for Mrs. Snyder

• Ensure seamless transfer between healthcare settings.
• Uphold the quality of care and treatment.
• Respect religious and cultural beliefs, particularly in Mrs. Snyder’s case (Lianov et al., 2020).

Speaker Notes:

• Transitional care is essential for patients like Mrs. Snyder who require transfer between medical centers.
• The goal is to facilitate a stress-free transition for Mrs. Snyder while maintaining the quality of care and respecting her religious and cultural preferences.

Slide 4: Stakeholder Engagement

Role of Stakeholders in Patient Health and Safety

• Stakeholders play a crucial role in shaping patient care and well-being (Lianov et al., 2020).
• Their involvement ensures that patients receive optimal care and support throughout their healthcare journey.

Importance of Stakeholder Collaboration in Mrs. Snyder’s Case

• Collaborative efforts are essential in ensuring a smooth transfer process for Mrs. Snyder.
• Healthcare professionals must prioritize her needs and preferences, including cultural considerations like providing kosher food (Lianov et al., 2020).

Speaker Notes:

• Stakeholders, including healthcare professionals and family members, play a pivotal role in Mrs. Snyder’s care.
• Collaboration ensures that Mrs. Snyder’s transfer is seamless and that her cultural and religious beliefs are respected throughout the process.

Slide 5: Elements of Continuous Care

Components of Continuous Care

• Medical record analysis: Understanding Mrs. Snyder’s medical history and current health status (Asmirajanti et al., 2019).
• Patient evaluation: Assessing Mrs. Snyder’s physical, emotional, and cultural needs.
• Emotional support: Providing Mrs. Snyder with the necessary support to navigate her healthcare journey effectively.

Importance of Understanding Mrs. Snyder’s Medical History

• Mrs. Snyder’s medical history, including her battle with ovarian cancer and diabetes, informs her ongoing treatment and care plan (Khanlarkhani et al., 2021).

Speaker Notes:

• Continuous care involves a comprehensive approach to Mrs. Snyder’s health and well-being.
• Understanding her medical history and current health status is crucial for tailoring effective treatment plans and ensuring optimal outcomes.

Slide 6: Mrs. Snyder’s Health Assessment

Overview of Mrs. Snyder’s Health Issues

• Mrs. Snyder faces multiple health challenges, including ovarian cancer, diabetes, and stress-related issues (Khanlarkhani et al., 2021; Demir et al., 2021).
• These conditions significantly impact her overall well-being and require specialized care and attention.

Impact on Mrs. Snyder’s Well-being

• Mrs. Snyder’s health issues pose significant challenges, affecting her physical and emotional health (Khanlarkhani et al., 2021; Demir et al., 2021).
• Understanding the extent of these challenges is essential for developing a comprehensive care plan tailored to her needs.

Speaker Notes:

• Mrs. Snyder’s health assessment reveals the complexity of her medical condition.
• Her health issues, including ovarian cancer and diabetes, require a holistic approach to address both physical and emotional well-being.

Slide 7: Interprofessional Care Team

Composition of Mrs. Snyder’s Care Team

• Mrs. Snyder’s care team comprises various specialists, including oncologists, endocrinologists, and nurses (Ansa et al., 2020).
• Each team member plays a unique role in managing her complex health issues and ensuring coordinated care.

Speaker Notes:

• Mrs. Snyder’s care team consists of a diverse group of healthcare professionals, each bringing their expertise to her treatment.
• Collaboration among team members is essential for ensuring comprehensive care and optimal patient outcomes.

Slide 8: Factors Affecting Patient Outcomes

Determinants of Patient Outcomes

• Patient outcomes can be influenced by various factors, including economic status, lifestyle choices, and social support systems (Chung et al., 2020).
• Understanding these determinants is crucial for developing a tailored care plan that addresses Mrs. Snyder’s unique circumstances.

Speaker Notes:

• Several factors, including economic status and social support, can impact patient outcomes.
• Recognizing these determinants allows us to develop a care plan that addresses Mrs. Snyder’s individual needs and challenges.

Slide 9: Assumptions and Areas of Uncertainty

Acknowledging Assumptions in Mrs. Snyder’s Case

• Cultural and religious considerations: Assumptions about Mrs. Snyder’s dietary preferences and religious beliefs must be taken into account.
• Family dynamics: Understanding Mrs. Snyder’s family situation and support network is essential for providing comprehensive care.

Addressing Areas of Uncertainty

• Uncertainties may arise throughout Mrs. Snyder’s care journey, requiring flexibility and adaptability from healthcare providers.
• Ongoing training and communication among the care team are essential for addressing uncertainties effectively.

Speaker Notes:

• Assumptions about Mrs. Snyder’s cultural and religious preferences guide our approach to her care.
• However, uncertainties may arise, necessitating ongoing communication and flexibility among the care team.

Slide 10: Determination of Required Resources

Essential Resources for Mrs. Snyder’s Care

• Monitoring vital signs: Regular assessment of Mrs. Snyder’s health indicators, including blood pressure and blood sugar levels (Howell et al., 2020).
• Dietary modifications: Providing Mrs. Snyder with appropriate dietary options, including kosher food, to meet her cultural and religious needs (Lianov et al., 2020).

Speaker Notes:

• Adequate resources, including monitoring equipment and dietary options, are essential for Mrs. Snyder’s care.
• Ensuring access to these resources is crucial for maintaining her health and well-being throughout her healthcare journey.

Slide 11: Conclusion

Key Takeaways

• Comprehensive transitional care is essential for patients like Mrs. Snyder, who require transfer between healthcare settings.
• Interprofessional collaboration and patient-centered care are vital for ensuring optimal outcomes and addressing patients’ individual needs.

Speaker Notes:

• Mrs. Snyder’s case highlights the importance of collaborative, patient-centered care in achieving optimal outcomes.
• By prioritizing her needs and preferences, we can ensure that Mrs. Snyder receives the support and resources necessary for a smooth transition and recovery journey.

Slide 12: References

Ansa, B. E., Zechariah, S., Gates, A. M., Johnson, S. W., Heboyan, V., & De Leo, G. (2020). Attitudes and behavior towards interprofessional collaboration among healthcare professionals in a large academic medical center. Healthcare, 8(3), 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030323

Asmirajanti, M., Hamid, A. Y. S., & Hariyati, Rr. T. S. (2019). Nursing Care Activities Based on Documentation. BMC Nursing, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0352-0

Chung, G. K.-K., Dong, D., Wong, S. Y.-S., Wong, H., & Chung, R. Y.-N. (2020). Perceived poverty and health, and their roles in the poverty-health vicious cycle: A qualitative study of major stakeholders in the healthcare setting in Hong Kong. International Journal for Equity in Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-1127-7

Daliri, S., Hugtenburg, J. G., ter Riet, G., van den Bemt, B. J. F., Buurman, B. M., Scholte op Reimer, W. J. M., van Buul-Gast, M.-C., & Karapinar-Çarkit, F. (2019). The effect of a pharmacy-led transitional care program on medication-related problems post-discharge A before—After prospective study. Plos One, 14(3), 0213593. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213593

Demir, S., Nawroth, P. P., Herzig, S., & Ekim Üstünel, B. (2021). Emerging targets in type 2 diabetes and diabetic complications. Advanced Science, 8(18), 2100275. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202100275

Hinchliffe, R. J., Forsythe, R. O., Apelqvist, J., Boyko, E. J., Fitridge, R., Hong, J. P., Katsanos, K., Mills, J. L., Nikol, S., Reekers, J., Venermo, M., Zierler, R. E., & Schaper, N. C. (2020). Guidelines on diagnosis, prognosis, and management of peripheral artery disease in patients with foot ulcers and diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, 36(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3276

Slide 13: Q&A

• Inviting Questions from Stakeholders

Speaker Notes:

• Thank you for your attention. I’m happy to address any questions or concerns you may have about Mrs. Snyder’s case or our approach to her care.
• Please feel free to ask any questions, and I’ll do my best to provide comprehensive answers based on the information presented today.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 6610 Case Presentation of a Patient Paper Assignment

Description

Assessment 3 Instructions: Case Presentation of a Patient Paper

• Develop a presentation of the patient’s case for stakeholders, supplemented by 10–15 slides with notes.
  Note: Each assessment in this course builds on your work from the preceding assessment; therefore, complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.
• The ability of care coordinators to deliver effective presentations can have a significant impact on the quality of patient care, particularly when addressing a diverse group of stakeholders, including the patient, family members, and multiple providers in a range of different settings. This assessment provides an opportunity for you to present Mrs. Snyder’s case to stakeholders.
  Communication and interdisciplinary collaboration include the patients and their families or significant others. Care coordinators understand that patients may need help navigating the complex health care system and that partnering with patients and their families improves education, safety, and patient outcomes.
  By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
  • Competency 2: Explain the effect of societal, economic, and interprofessional factors on patient outcomes and the care coordinator’s role.
    • Identify the factors that could affect outcomes for a patient.
  • Competency 3: Evaluate care coordination plans and outcomes according to performance measures and professional standards.
    • Determine the resources needed to implement continuing care.
  • Competency 4: Develop collaborative interventions that address the needs of diverse populations and varied settings.
    • Identify the goals, elements, and overall scope of a plan for continuing care.
    • Explain how an interprofessional care team delivers high-quality patient outcomes.
  • Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
    • Present patient case information to stakeholders clearly and accurately.
    • Support main points, arguments, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
  • Competency Map
    CHECK YOUR PROGRESSUse this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course.
• Toggle DrawerResources
• Asssessment InstructionsNote: Complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
  Preparation
  For your final assessment, you will present Mrs. Snyder’s case to the health care team, including all internal and external stakeholders and key family members. The purpose of the presentation is to ensure that everyone connected with Mrs. Snyder’s case is well informed and that they have a common understanding of her care to date and of plans for providing the best possible patient-centered care.
  To prepare for the presentation, you are encouraged to review the care plan and the transitional care plan that you developed for Mrs. Snyder in Assessments 2 and 3.
  Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your presentation draft to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.
  Presentation Software
  You may use Microsoft PowerPoint or any other suitable presentation software to create your slides. Use the speaker’s notes section of each slide to develop your talking points and cite your sources, as appropriate. If you need help designing your presentation, you are encouraged to review the various presentation resources provided.
  Inclusion of audio voiceover or video is optional. Required information should be included in the slides and speaker notes.
  You may use Kaltura or another technology of your choice to record your presentation. If using Kaltura, refer to the Using Kaltura page for directions on recording and uploading your video in the courseroom.
  Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
  • Assessment 4 Example [PPTX].
  • Requirements
    Develop a presentation of your patient’s case for stakeholders.
    Presentation Format and Length
    Your slide deck should consist of 10–15 slides, not including the title slide, objectives slide, and references slide.
    Supporting Evidence
  • Cite 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence to support your presentation.
  • List your sources on the references slide at the end of your presentation.
  • Developing the Presentation
    The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your case presentation addresses each point, at a minimum. Read the Case Presentation Scoring Guide to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.
  • Identify the goals, elements, and overall scope of a plan for continuing care.
    • Include a high-level overview of the care plan and the transitional care plan, with relevant background on the patient.
  • Explain how an interprofessional care team delivers high-quality patient outcomes.
    • Include and address the various roles associated with particular care coordination functions.
    • Cite credible evidence to support your conclusions.
    • Consider the informational needs of various stakeholders and their familiarity with care coordination.
  • Identify the factors that could affect outcomes for a patient.
    • Specify the information on which are you basing your conclusions.
    • Note any assumptions you are making about the specific patient, her needs, and the nature of ongoing care.
  • Determine the resources needed to implement continuing care.
    • Identify the factors that influence your determination.
    • Justify your assertions, specific to Mrs. Snyder’s case.
  • Present patient case information to stakeholders clearly and accurately.
    • Express your main points and conclusions coherently.
    • Proofread your slides to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult to focus on the substance of your presentation.
  • Support main points, arguments, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
    • Ensure that the evidence you provide is clear, explicit, and understood by all stakeholders.
  • Additional Requirements
    Submit your slide deck and, if you included audio voiceover or video, a link to your recording. If you used technology other than PowerPoint or Kaltura to create your slides or recording, make sure to submit any other relevant documentation or links for this assessment.
    Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your presentation to your ePortfolio.

Boost Your Grades with ReliablePapers.com – Your Expert Nursing Paper Writing Service!

Are you struggling with nursing research papers or assignments? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we’re your trusted nursing writing service, committed to delivering customized and original nursing papers for top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions? Our skilled nursing essay writers are here to help. From crafting custom nursing research papers to assisting with nursing assignments, we ensure top grades for your academic success.

Timely Support for Your Coursework, Top Grade Assured

With years of experience helping nursing students with coursework, we efficiently handle orders even with tight deadlines. Our expert nursing writers create outstanding papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions.

Why Choose Nursing Paper Writing Services at ReliablePapers.com?

• Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
• Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
• Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized essays for your academic success.
• Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Our skilled writers at ReliablePapers.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your research paper stands out. Trust us for your academic success – our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seek help to submit research on time and ensure exceptional performance in your nursing papers. Trust ReliablePapers.com for your academic success! Order your nursing essays today, save time, and secure the grades you deserve.

 Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements, and let our experts deliver your work ASAP. Place Your Order Now.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

NURS FPX 6610 Patient Care Plan Paper Example

NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 2 Patient Care Plan

NURS FPX 6610 Patient Care Plan Paper Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX6610 Introduction to Care Coordination

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 2 Patient Care Plan

Assignment Overview

In this assessment, you will engage in an interactive simulation involving interviews with a patient, family members, and experienced healthcare workers. From the insights gained, you will craft a proactive and patient-centered care plan for the individual, focusing on care coordination and aligning with national care coordination initiatives.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

Your primary objective is to develop a comprehensive care plan that addresses the patient’s holistic needs while incorporating principles of care coordination. You will apply nursing assessments to identify patient needs, formulate nursing diagnoses aligned with assessment data, and devise appropriate interventions in collaboration with other healthcare professionals. Moreover, you will evaluate the outcomes of care coordination efforts and revise the care plan as necessary, ensuring adherence to professional standards and guidelines.

The Student’s Role

As a nursing student, your role in this assignment is that of a care coordinator responsible for developing and implementing a patient-centered care plan. You will leverage your understanding of patient assessments, nursing diagnoses, and evidence-based interventions to promote optimal health outcomes for the individual.

Competencies Measured

This assessment aims to evaluate your proficiency in the following course competencies:

• Competency 1: Develop patient assessments: Assess a patient’s condition from a coordinated-care perspective and develop nursing diagnoses aligned with assessment data.
• Competency 3: Evaluate care coordination plans and outcomes: Evaluate care coordination outcomes according to measures and standards.
• Competency 4: Develop collaborative interventions: Determine appropriate nursing or collaborative interventions and explain the rationale for each intervention.
• Competency 5: Communicate effectively: Write clearly and concisely, supporting main points with credible evidence and correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS-FPX6610 Introduction to Care Coordination Course:

NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 1 Comprehensive Needs Assessment Example

NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 3 Transitional Care Plan Example

NURS FPX 6610 Assessment 4 Case Presentation Example

NURS FPX 6610 Patient Care Plan Paper Example

Patient Medical Diagnosis: Diabetes

Nursing Diagnosis: Hyperglycemia

Assessment Data:

• Patient has a past medical history (PMH) of uncontrolled diabetes.
• Overweight due to poor management of the disease condition.
• Experiences frequent urination secondary to the disease process.

Goals and Outcome:

• Lower the patient’s BMP blood sugar to 110 mg/dL or less over the next few weeks.
• Reduce chances of additional health complications and emphasize self-care needs.

Nursing Interventions:

• Monitor and control blood sugar.
• Identify factors causing glucose instability.
• Collaborate with a dietitian to create a diabetic diet.

Rationale:

• Frequent monitoring and controlling blood sugar facilitate better control of diabetes.
• A diabetic diet with the help of a dietitian maximizes nutritional intake, manages diabetes, and reduces the risk for cardiovascular illnesses (Sami et al., 2017).
• Identifying and addressing factors contributing to glucose instability aids in controlling blood sugar levels.

Outcome Evaluation and Re-planning:

The goals and outcomes were partially met. Incorporating additional nutritional needs due to the patient’s cancer diagnosis is essential for a more comprehensive care plan.

Nursing Diagnosis: Obesity

Assessment Data:

• Patient presents with hypercholesterolemia.
• Experiences pain and shortness of breath on inspiration due to strain on the body secondary to weight.
• Ineffective management of blood pressure secondary to the disease process.

Goals and Outcome:

• Get the patient to lose some weight (at least 2 pounds per week) through healthy eating and exercising.
• Maintain the patient’s blood pressure below 120/80 mmHg.
• Reduce shortness of breath and fatigue.
• Increase oxygen saturation to 95%.

Nursing Interventions:

• Educate and engage family members in the patient’s diet formulation.
• Monitor body weight for weight loss every other week.
• Consult with a dietitian on the patient’s caloric and nutritional needs.
• Encourage light exercise to promote good cardiovascular health.
• Educate patient and family on the need for a low salt diet for blood pressure management.

Rationale:

• The patient’s diet should contain the right nutrients to manage her health condition and meet her nutritional needs (Ridder et al., 2017).
• Periodic weight monitoring allows for tracking of the patient’s condition and facilitates necessary adjustments.
• Consulting with a dietitian helps achieve more effective results in weight management (Bleich et al., 2015).

Outcome Evaluation and Re-planning:

While the interventions helped the patient lose weight and feel better, considering her cancer diagnosis and need for a high-protein diet, increasing physical exercises may aid in weight management in the future.

Nursing Diagnosis: Pain-related Anxiety

Assessment Data:

• Patient exhibits low pain tolerance.
• Verbalizes anxiety and fear.
• PMH of being on and off anti-anxiety medication.

Goals and Outcome:

• Demonstrate minimal to no psychological symptoms of anxiety.
• Identify and overcome distinct stressors that cause or heighten anxiety levels.

Nursing Interventions:

• Discuss pain management options with the patient.
• Explore alternative anxiety management and coping strategies such as aromatherapy.
• Identify and encourage positive reinforcement, including positive self-talk.

Rationale:

• Patient education helps comprehend the situation and increases confidence (Paterick et al., 2017).
• Alternative anxiety management strategies help reduce anxiety without medication-associated side effects (Curtiss et al., 2021).
• Positive reinforcement and self-talk aid in reducing anxiety by focusing on changing thoughts (Curtiss et al., 2021).

Outcome Evaluation and Re-planning:

The interventions significantly reduced the patient’s anxiety. In future care plans, involving family members and addressing additional factors contributing to anxiety in the clinical and home environment may enhance effectiveness.

Nursing Diagnosis: Compromised Family Coping

Assessment Data:

• Ineffective family coping due to avoidance of the needs of a sick family member.
• Caregiver role strain due to poor understanding of the role and lack of effective communication.
• Denial of the severity of disease-related complications and risk of death.

Goals and Outcome:

• Obtain as much support as possible from family members.
• Encourage family members to express their feelings and assist the patient in managing her diabetes.
• Ensure family members can identify signs and symptoms of diabetes and intervene accordingly.

Nursing Interventions:

• Offer valuable feedback and constantly engage family members.
• Identify available resources and support systems.
• Educate and involve family members in the treatment plan.

Rationale:

• Offering valuable feedback motivates family members to care for the patient.
• Community resources and support systems help families interact with others for emotional support (Whitehead et al., 2017).
• Family members understanding the condition aids in effective support and medication administration (Jazieh et al., 2018).

Outcome Evaluation and Re-planning:

While these interventions increased family involvement, further focus on specific disease-related measures and addressing the lack of support from family members, especially Mr. Snyder, would enhance the effectiveness of the care plan.

References

Bleich, S. N., Bandara, S., Bennett, W. L., A., C. L., & Gudzune, K. A. (2015). Enhancing the role of nutrition professionals in weight management: A cross-sectional survey. Obesity, 23(2), 454-460.

Curtiss, J. E., Levine, D. S., Ander, I., & Baker, A. W. (2021). Cognitive-Behavioral Treatments for Anxiety and Stress-Related Disorders. Focus, 19(2), 184-189.

Jazieh, A. R., Volker, S., & Taher, S. (2018). Involving the Family in Patient Care: A Culturally Tailored Communication Model. Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare, 1(2), 33–37.

Paterick, T. E., Patel, N., Tajik, A., & Chandrasekaran, K. (2017). Improving health outcomes through patient education and partnerships with patients. Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 30(1), 112–113.

Ridder, D. d., Kroese, F., Evers, C., Adriaanse, M., & Gillebaart, M. (2017). Healthy diet: Health impact, prevalence, correlates, and interventions. Psychology & Health, 32(8), 907-941.

Sami, W., Ansari, T., Butt, N., & Hamid, M. (2017). Effect of diet on type 2 diabetes mellitus: A review. International Journal of Health Sciences, 65-71.

Whitehead, L., Jacob, E., Towell, A., Abu-Qamar, M., & Cole-Heath, A. (2017). The role of the family in supporting the self-management of chronic conditions: A qualitative systematic review. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(1-2), 22-30.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 6610 Patient Care Plan Paper Assignment

Description

Assessment 2 Instructions: Patient Care Plan Paper Assignment

• Complete an interactive simulation that includes interviews of a patient, family members, and experienced health care workers. Then, develop a care coordination strategy and a care plan for the patient based on the information gathered from the interviews.
  Note: Each assessment in this course builds on your work from the preceding assessment; therefore, complete the assessments in the order in which they are presented.
  Whether designing care plans directed by patients’ needs and preferences, educating patients and their families at discharge, or doing their best to facilitate continuity of care for patients across settings and among providers, registered nurses use accredited health care standards to realize coordinated care. This assessment provides an opportunity for you to explore health care standards with respect to the quality of care, investigate opportunities and challenges in care coordination, and develop a proactive, patient-centered care plan.
  The National Strategy for Quality Improvement in Health Care (2011) focuses on improving patient care, maximizing health resources, and reducing preventable hospital readmissions. Care coordinators reduce readmissions of those suffering from chronic conditions (such as congestive heart failure, pneumonia, asthma, and diabetes) and are responsible for providing quality care in a fiscally responsible manner. While this may seem a reasonable task, shifting the way we use health care resources can be a challenge. Consequently, you must be cognizant of effective strategies for reducing preventable readmissions and understand the barriers that nurses face when coordinating care for patients with chronic illnesses.
  By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:
  • Competency 1: Develop patient assessments.
    • Assess a patient’s condition from a coordinated-care perspective.
    • Develop nursing diagnoses that align with patient assessment data.
  • Competency 3: Evaluate care coordination plans and outcomes according to performance measures and professional standards.
    • Evaluate care coordination outcomes according to measures and standards.
  • Competency 4: Develop collaborative interventions that address the needs of diverse populations and varied settings.
    • Determine appropriate nursing or collaborative interventions.
    • Explain why each intervention is indicated or therapeutic.
  • Competency 5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style, consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.
    • Write clearly and concisely, using correct grammar and mechanics.    
    • Support main points, claims, and conclusions with credible evidence, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
  • Reference
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2011). 2011 report to Congress: National strategy for quality improvement in health care. Retrieved from https://www.ahrq.gov/workingforquality/reports/2011-annual-report.html
    Competency Map
    CHECK YOUR PROGRESSUse this online tool to track your performance and progress through your course.
• Toggle DrawerResources
• Asssessment InstructionsNote: Complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.
  Preparation
  To prepare for this assessment, complete the following simulation:
  • Vila Health: Care Coordination Scenario I.
  • In this simulation, you will obtain the information needed to develop a care coordination strategy for Mrs. Snyder and her family. You may use an intervention developed as part of your first assessment. Locate applicable current standards and benchmarks as you determine the best way to develop this strategy.
    Note: Remember that you can submit all or a portion of your draft to Smarthinking for feedback before you submit the final version of this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback.
    Requirements
    Develop a proactive, patient-centered care plan for the patient, using the information gained from your simulated interviews. Focus on care coordination and national care coordination initiatives.
    Care Plan Format
    Use the Patient Care Plan Template [DOCX] provided.
    Supporting Evidence
    Cite 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence to support your plan.
    Developing the Care Plan
    The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your care plan addresses each point, at a minimum. Read the Patient Care Plan Scoring Guide to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.
  • Assess a patient’s condition from a coordinated-care perspective.
    • Consider the full scope of the patient’s needs.
    • Include 3–5 pieces of data (subjective, objective, or a combination) that led to a nursing diagnosis.
  • Develop nursing diagnoses that align with patient assessment data.
    • Write two goal statements for each diagnosis.
    • Ensure goals are patient- and family-focused, measurable, attainable, reasonable, and time-specific.
    • Consider the psychosociocultural aspect of care.
  • Determine appropriate nursing or collaborative interventions.
    • List at least three nursing or collaborative interventions.
    • Provide the rationale for each goal or outcome.
  • Explain why each intervention is indicated or therapeutic.
    • Cite applicable references that support each intervention.
  • Evaluate care coordination outcomes according to measures and standards.
    • Indicate if the goals were met. If they were not met, explain why.
    • Describe how you would revise the plan of care based on the patient’s response to the current plan.
    • Support conclusions with outcome measures and professional standards.
  • Write clearly and concisely, using correct grammar and mechanics.
    • Express your main points and conclusions coherently.
    • Proofread your writing to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it difficult to focus on the substance of your plan.
  • Support main points, claims, and conclusions with credible evidence, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Boost Your Grades with ReliablePapers.com – Your Expert Nursing Paper Writing Service!

Are you struggling with nursing research papers or assignments? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we’re your trusted nursing writing service, committed to delivering customized and original nursing papers for top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions? Our skilled nursing essay writers are here to help. From crafting custom nursing research papers to assisting with nursing assignments, we ensure top grades for your academic success.

Timely Support for Your Coursework, Top Grade Assured

With years of experience helping nursing students with coursework, we efficiently handle orders even with tight deadlines. Our expert nursing writers create outstanding papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions.

Why Choose Nursing Paper Writing Services at ReliablePapers.com?

• Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
• Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
• Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized essays for your academic success.
• Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Our skilled writers at ReliablePapers.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your research paper stands out. Trust us for your academic success – our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seek help to submit research on time and ensure exceptional performance in your nursing papers. Trust ReliablePapers.com for your academic success! Order your nursing essays today, save time, and secure the grades you deserve.

 Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements, and let our experts deliver your work ASAP. Place Your Order Now.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

NURS FPX 6416 Evaluation of an Information System Change Paper Example

NURS FPX 6416 Assessment 3 Evaluation of an Information System Change

NURS FPX 6416 Evaluation of an Information System Change Paper Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 6416 Managing the Nursing Informatics Life Cycle

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 6416 Assessment 3 Evaluation of an Information System Change

Assignment Overview

In this assignment, you will analyze and evaluate the impact of an information system change within a healthcare organization. Specifically, you will assess the effectiveness of the system change in improving patient care, organizational efficiency, and technology integration.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

The primary objectives of this assignment are to:

• Analyze frameworks for evaluating the impact of an information system and system change.
• Design a comprehensive evaluation plan for monitoring the system changes.
• Communicate key findings and evaluation strategies to stakeholders effectively.

The Student’s Role

As a nursing informatics specialist, your role is to assess the impact of the information system change on patient care outcomes and organizational performance. You will utilize your expertise in information systems and healthcare management to analyze the effectiveness of the system change and propose strategies for ongoing evaluation and improvement.

Competencies Measured

This assignment measures the following course competencies:

• Evaluate strengths and liabilities of health information systems: Define relevant evaluation framework components and create a comprehensive evaluation plan aligned with project goals.
• Incorporate project management principles into nursing informatics: Summarize evidence-based rationale and actions for evaluating an organizational information system change project.
• Communicate as a practitioner-scholar: Appropriately address all components of the assignment prompt, support main points with relevant evidence, and communicate findings effectively to stakeholders.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS-FPX 6416 Managing the Nursing Informatics Life Cycle Course:

NURS FPX 6416 Assessment 1 Needs Assessment Meeting with Stakeholders Example

NURS FPX 6416 Assessment 2 Technology Needs Assessment Summary and Implementation Plan Example

NURS FPX 6416 Evaluation of an Information System Change Paper Example

Introduction

Implementing changes to information systems in healthcare organizations, exemplified by Villa Hospital, is essential for overcoming barriers, reducing financial burdens, and ensuring comprehensive support and access to healthcare services for patients. The integration of Information System Changes, including remote patient monitoring and a patient portal, is anticipated to enhance both organizational performance and patients’ well-being. In modern healthcare, such initiatives are crucial for improving patient care, organizational efficiency, and technology integration. As a nursing informatics specialist, evaluating the impact of such changes is paramount. This report provides an analysis of frameworks for evaluating the impact of an information system and system change, along with a comprehensive evaluation plan tailored for Villa Hospital.

Part 1: Evaluation Report: Framework Components

The evaluation of an information system change requires a comprehensive understanding of the framework components that underpin its impact. In this section, we will analyze three key components: the quality of information, outcomes of quality care, and the structural quality of the system change (Garcia-Dia, 2019).

Quality of Information Framework Component

The quality of information generated by the information system change is fundamental to its success. It encompasses various aspects such as the correctness and completeness of data, user satisfaction with the system, incorporation of patient privacy into the system’s information, and patient satisfaction with the system (Garcia-Dia, 2019). Ensuring the accuracy and completeness of data through methods like the CRAAP test (Currency, Relevancy, Authority, Accuracy, Purpose) is crucial. Additionally, user satisfaction and patient privacy must be evaluated through surveys and adherence to guidelines such as Protected Health Information (PHI) standards (Abrams et al., 2022; Griggs et al., 2018).

Outcomes of Quality Care Framework Component

The outcomes of quality care resulting from the system change are indicative of its effectiveness in improving patient care and organizational efficiency. Key aspects include the efficiency and appropriateness of care delivered through the system. Monitoring these outcomes during the implementation phase is vital to assess the system’s impact. Efficiency can be measured through productivity and cost-effectiveness, while appropriateness of care can be evaluated based on patient feedback and health outcomes (Mohammed et al., 2019; Hathaliya et al., 2019).

Structural Quality Framework Component

The structural quality of the system change pertains to the organizational support, hardware and software effectiveness, and overall functionality of the system. Organizational support is crucial for successful implementation, while the effectiveness of hardware and software directly impacts system performance. Assessing the functionality of the system involves gathering feedback from stakeholders, monitoring system performance metrics, and ensuring alignment with organizational goals (Agarwal et al., 2019; Edwards et al., 2020).

Part 2: Evaluation Plan Table

The evaluation plan outlines a structured evaluation plan to monitor the system changes at Villa Hospital. The evaluation plan aligns with the goals defined in the implementation plan and focuses on assessing the impact of the information system change across the identified framework components: quality of information, outcomes of quality care, and structural quality (Garcia-Dia, 2019).

Goals from Implementation Plan	Framework Component(s)	Measurements	Frequency	Rationale
Enhance data accuracy and completeness	Quality of Information	Conduct CRAAP test	Monthly	Ensures data reliability and relevance, aligns with PHI guidelines
Improve user satisfaction with the system	Quality of Information	Administer user satisfaction surveys	Quarterly	Provides feedback on system usability and user experience
Ensure patient privacy compliance	Quality of Information	Audit system for PHI compliance	Bi-annually	Ensures adherence to regulatory standards and protects patient confidentiality
Increase system efficiency	Outcomes of Quality Care	Measure system productivity	Quarterly	Indicates system effectiveness in delivering care and optimizing resource utilization
Enhance appropriateness of care	Outcomes of Quality Care	Analyze patient feedback on care appropriateness	Monthly	Ensures alignment of care delivery with patient needs and expectations
Assess organizational support	Structural Quality	Conduct stakeholder surveys on system support	Annually	Evaluates organizational readiness and commitment to system implementation
Evaluate hardware effectiveness	Structural Quality	Monitor system performance metrics	Quarterly	Ensures hardware reliability and functionality in supporting system operations
Assess software effectiveness	Structural Quality	Collect feedback on software usability	Bi-monthly	Indicates user satisfaction with system software and identifies areas for improvement
Measure overall system functionality	Structural Quality	Review system functionality against objectives	Bi-annually	Assesses system’s ability to meet organizational goals and fulfill user requirements

 

The chosen measurements and their frequencies are designed to provide ongoing insights into the effectiveness of the information system change. By regularly assessing these metrics, we can track progress, identify areas for improvement, and ensure alignment with organizational objectives and patient care goals. This structured approach to evaluation will facilitate evidence-based decision-making and continuous improvement in the information system at Villa Hospital.

Part 3: Overview Discussion with Stakeholders

The discussion aims to highlight key findings, strategies for ongoing monitoring, and the rationale behind the chosen evaluation measures (Garcia-Dia, 2019). Stakeholders, including the IT team, administrators, project managers, nurse informaticists, and Clinical Informatics, are integral to the change implementation process. The evaluation report and plan address concerns such as patient dissatisfaction and nurse burden. By implementing remote patient monitoring and patient portals, we aim to enhance patient care, reduce mortality rates, and alleviate nurse burden, ultimately improving overall healthcare outcomes.

Introduction to the Project

At Villa Hospital, we are committed to enhancing patient care and organizational efficiency through the implementation of information system changes. Our project focuses on integrating remote patient monitoring and patient portals to improve access to healthcare services and streamline communication between patients and healthcare providers.

Discussion of the Evaluation Report

The evaluation report provides insights into the impact of the information system change across three key framework components: quality of information, outcomes of quality care, and structural quality. We have assessed data accuracy, user satisfaction, patient privacy compliance, system efficiency, appropriateness of care, organizational support, hardware and software effectiveness, and overall system functionality.

Discussion of the Evaluation Plan

Our evaluation plan outlines a structured approach to monitor the system changes and assess their effectiveness over time. We will regularly conduct measurements aligned with the goals of the implementation plan, including CRAAP tests for data accuracy, user satisfaction surveys, audits for PHI compliance, productivity assessments, patient feedback analysis, stakeholder surveys, system performance monitoring, and feedback collection on software usability.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the evaluation of an information system change is essential for assessing its impact on healthcare organizations like Villa Hospital. By analyzing the framework components of quality of information, outcomes of quality care, and structural quality, we gain insights into the effectiveness of the system change in enhancing patient care and organizational efficiency. The evaluation plan provides a structured approach to monitor the system changes and ensure alignment with organizational goals and patient care objectives. Through ongoing assessment and stakeholder engagement, we can drive continuous improvement and optimize the benefits of the information system change at Villa Hospital.

References

Abrams, S., Delf, L., Drummond, R., & Kelly, K. (2022). The CRAAP Test. Open. Oregon state.education. https://open.oregonstate.education/goodargument/chapter/craap-test/

Agarwal, S., Sripad, P., Johnson, C., Kirk, K., Bellows, B., Ana, J., Blaser, V., Kumar, M. B., Buchholz, K., Casseus, A., Chen, N., Dini, H. S. F., Deussom, R. H., Jacobstein, D., Kintu, R., Kureshy, N., Meoli, L., Otiso, L., Pakenham-Walsh, N., & Zambruni, J. P. (2019). A conceptual framework for measuring community health workforce performance within primary health care systems. Human Resources for Health, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-019-0422-0

Al-khafajiy, M., Baker, T., Chalmers, C., Asim, M., Kolivand, H., Fahim, M., & Waraich, A. (2019). Remote health monitoring of the elderly through wearable sensors. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78(17), 24681–24706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-7134-7

Edwards, K., Prætorius, T., & Nielsen, A. P. (2020). A model of cascading change: orchestrating planned and emergent change to ensure employee participation. Journal of Change Management, 20(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2020.1755341

Griggs, K. N., Ossipova, O., Kohlios, C. P., Baccarini, A. N., Howson, E. A., & Hayajneh, T. (2018). Healthcare blockchain system using smart contracts for secure automated remote patient monitoring. Journal of Medical Systems, 42(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-0982-x

Hathaliya, J., Sharma, P., Tanwar, S., & Gupta, R. (2019). Blockchain-based remote patient monitoring in healthcare 4.0. 2019 IEEE 9th International Conference on Advanced Computing (IACC). https://doi.org/10.1109/iacc48062.2019.8971593

Menear, M., Blanchette, M.-A., Demers-Payette, O., & Roy, D. (2019). A framework for value-creating learning health systems. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0477-3

Mohammed, K. I., Zaidan, A. A., Zaidan, B. B., Albahri, O. S., Alsalem, M. A., Albahri, A. S., Hadi, A., & Hashim, M. (2019). Real-time remote-health monitoring systems: a review on patients prioritisation for multiple-chronic diseases, taxonomy analysis, concerns and solution procedure. Journal of Medical Systems, 43(7), 223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-019-1362-x

Wang, Y., Kung, L., & Byrd, T. A. (2018). Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 126(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.019

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 6416 Evaluation of an Information System Change Paper Assignment

Description

Assessment 3 Instructions: Evaluation of an Information System Change

Write a 3-4 page evaluation report analyzing the frameworks for evaluating the impact of an information system and system change.

Create an Excel or Word table evaluation plan for the project. Record an audio memo of three minutes or fewer to explain your plan to stakeholders. Introduction

Note:

Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented. With any new or changed system, you should be working to ensure that the information system has functionality in the form of interoperability and integration of information. As part of the evaluation process, you should assess the interoperability and integration of system information. You will present these findings for the stakeholders to acknowledge and confirm. As part of your work as the nursing informatics specialist, you have developed and implemented an information system change in your organization. Now it is time to design an evaluation report about the change and to put into place a consistent method for a system evaluation plan.

Note:

Complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented. Instructions Your submission will include three parts.

The first part will be a written 3–4 page evaluation report, in which you will analyze the frameworks for evaluating the impact of an information system and system change.

The second part will be a single page evaluation plan table.

The third part will be a recorded audio or video overview discussion for stakeholders.

The recording must be 3 minutes in duration or fewer.

You can submit Parts 1 and 2 together as one document with the table listed as an appendix.

Part 1:

Evaluation Report For this part of your submission, you will define the three types of framework components.

One is related to quality of information that is generated by the information system change, the second relates to the effects on outcomes of quality care due to the system change, and the third is the structural quality of the system with the change (Garcia-Dia, 2019, p. 376).

One way to organize this report is as follows:

When defining the quality of information framework include:

• The development of completeness or correctness of data.
• User satisfaction with the system.
• Patient privacy that is incorporated into the system’s information.
• Patient satisfaction with the system.

When defining outcomes of quality care framework include:

• Efficiency with the use of the system.
• Appropriateness of care with the use of the system.

When defining the structural quality framework include:

• Organizational support given to the system.
• Effectiveness of hardware for the use of the system.
• Effectiveness of software when using the system.
• Overall functionality of the system.

Part 2:

Evaluation Plan Table For this part of your submission, you will design an evaluation plan to monitor the system changes (Garcia-Dia, 2019, p. 379).

You will use the goals that you defined as part of your implementation plan as a starting point for constructing your table.

One way to organize your table is as follows:

First Column:

• Goals from the implementation plan.

Second Column:

• Framework component or components (defined in Part 1) that best fit each goal.

Third Column:

• Define at least two measurements for each goal.

Fourth Column:

• Define the frequency of measurement.

Fifth Column:

• Briefly explain why you are using the chosen measures related to the outcomes that you want to achieve with the new system change.

Part 3:

Overview Discussion with Stakeholders

For this part of your submission, you will record an audio and video discussion of highlights from your evaluation report and evaluation plan for stakeholders (including the implementation team).

Your recording must be 3 minutes in duration or fewer. Include the following in your recording:

• Brief introduction to the project.
• Discussion of the evaluation report that provides a brief overview of how the system is currently functioning from several perspectives related to the framework components.
• Discussion of the evaluation plan that provides the stakeholders information about:
  • What will you monitor ongoing with the system?
  • How will you accomplish the monitoring?
  • When will you monitor?
  • Why are you monitoring these specific data points?
• Brief conclusion to provide stakeholders with the one or two most cogent talking points.

Requirements

Evaluation Report Length:

• 3–4 pages in length, not including the title and reference page.

APA Style and Format:

• Use APA formatting with a title page, running head, title on the first page of text, level 1 headings, and a reference list.

Number of References:

• Include 3–5 scholarly sources used as parenthetical citations and in a reference list.

Evaluation Plan:

• Create a 1-page Excel or Word table to illustrate your evaluation plan.
• If you use a Word table, include it at the end of your evaluation report and designate the evaluation plan table using the appropriate APA style headings.

Overview with Stakeholders Recording:

• Upload your Kaltura video to the assessment area.

Recording Length:

• No longer than 3 minutes.
• Refer to Using Kaltura for directions on recording and/or uploading your video in the courseroom.

Note:

If you require the use of assistive technology or alternative communication methods to participate in these activities, please contact DisabilityServices@Capella.edu to request accommodations.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

• Competency 1: Evaluate strengths and liabilities of health information systems. Define three evaluation framework components that are relevant and appropriate for an organizational information system change project. Create a comprehensive evaluation plan for an organizational information system change project that lays out framework components, measurements, frequency of measurements, and rationale for measurements as aligned to specific project goals.
• Competency 2: Incorporate project management principles into nursing informatics. Summarize the evidence-based rationale and specific actions that will be undertaken as part of the evaluation of an organizational information system change project for stakeholders.
• Competency 4: Communicate as a practitioner-scholar, consistent with the expectations of a nursing professional. Appropriately address all components of the assignment prompt, using the assignment description to structure text. Support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and credible evidence. Communicate orally in a clear and concise manner, which helps to clarify key information and expectations for stakeholders in a presentation of 3 or fewer minutes.

Boost Your Grades with ReliablePapers.com – Your Expert Nursing Paper Writing Service!

Are you struggling with nursing research papers or assignments? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we’re your trusted nursing writing service, committed to delivering customized and original nursing papers for top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions? Our skilled nursing essay writers are here to help. From crafting custom nursing research papers to assisting with nursing assignments, we ensure top grades for your academic success.

Timely Support for Your Coursework, Top Grade Assured

With years of experience helping nursing students with coursework, we efficiently handle orders even with tight deadlines. Our expert nursing writers create outstanding papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions.

Why Choose Nursing Paper Writing Services at ReliablePapers.com?

• Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
• Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
• Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized essays for your academic success.
• Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Our skilled writers at ReliablePapers.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your research paper stands out. Trust us for your academic success – our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seek help to submit research on time and ensure exceptional performance in your nursing papers. Trust ReliablePapers.com for your academic success! Order your nursing essays today, save time, and secure the grades you deserve.

 Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements, and let our experts deliver your work ASAP. Place Your Order Now.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

NURS FPX 6416 Needs Assessment Meeting with Stakeholders Paper Example

NURS FPX 6416 Assessment 1 Needs Assessment Meeting with Stakeholders

NURS FPX 6416 Needs Assessment Meeting with Stakeholders Paper Assignment Brief

Course: NURS-FPX 6416 Managing the Nursing Informatics Life Cycle

Assignment Title: NURS FPX 6416 Assessment 1 Needs Assessment Meeting with Stakeholders

Assignment Overview

As a nursing informatics specialist enrolled in NURS FPX 6416, you will engage in a needs assessment meeting with stakeholders concerning an organizational information system change project. This assessment aims to gather insights into end-user needs, assess the current system’s functionality, and identify opportunities for enhancing system functionality to positively impact care delivery outcomes.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

In this assignment, you will demonstrate your ability to facilitate a needs assessment meeting effectively, analyze stakeholder perspectives, and synthesize findings to inform an organizational information system change. Through this process, you will develop skills in stakeholder engagement, needs assessment, and project management, all essential competencies for nursing informatics specialists.

The Student’s Role

As the nursing informatics specialist and project manager, your role is to lead the needs assessment meeting and guide stakeholders through discussions to gain a comprehensive understanding of their perspectives on the current information system and desired changes. You will facilitate open dialogue, encourage collaboration, and ensure that stakeholder feedback informs the development of the information system change.

Competencies Measured

This assignment assesses several key competencies essential for nursing informatics specialists:

• Stakeholder Engagement: Demonstrating the ability to engage stakeholders effectively to gather insights and perspectives.
• Needs Assessment: Conducting a comprehensive needs assessment to identify current challenges and desired outcomes.
• Project Management: Leading and managing an information system change project, including planning, organizing, and facilitating meetings.
• Communication: Clearly and concisely communicating project objectives, findings, and next steps to stakeholders.
• Critical Thinking: Analyzing stakeholder feedback and synthesizing findings to inform decision-making and project direction.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS-FPX 6416 Managing the Nursing Informatics Life Cycle Course:

NURS FPX 6416 Assessment 2 Technology Needs Assessment Summary and Implementation Plan Example

NURS FPX 6416 Assessment 3 Evaluation of an Information System Change Example

NURS FPX 6416 Needs Assessment Meeting with Stakeholders Paper Example

Introduction and Project Overview

Greetings, stakeholders. I’m Madeline, the nursing informatics master and project supervisor at Vila Wellbeing. Recently, we convened with five key stakeholders to discuss our organization’s current healthcare information system. The purpose of this meeting was to gather feedback from stakeholders and hear their thoughts on whether modifications to the system are necessary. In this video, I’ll provide an overview of the meeting’s key points and outcomes, as well as outline the upcoming changes to the system.

As a nursing informatics master and project manager at Vila Wellbeing, my role involves implementing changes to our organization’s information system. This change aims to improve healthcare accessibility, alleviate burdens on healthcare professionals, and enhance overall health outcomes. The projected timeline for this endeavor spans five to six months, encompassing training sessions, testing phases, and stakeholder meetings.

External Factors Driving Change

Factors such as an aging population, the prevalence of chronic diseases, and the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic have necessitated changes at Vila Wellbeing (Milella et al., 2021). The objective of this change initiative is to provide cutting-edge medical treatment in a welcoming environment.

Questions and Explanation

Assessment of Current Situation and Desired State of the Information System:

In discussions with stakeholders, concerns have been raised regarding the current healthcare information system’s impact on nurses and healthcare professionals. Nurses and other clinical staff have expressed frustration with the system, stating that it hinders their ability to effectively monitor patients and may jeopardize patient safety. Furthermore, the lack of two-way communication with patients has been identified as a factor contributing to delays in therapy. Despite these challenges, the current system has shown some positive outcomes, such as improved cost management, a decrease in medication errors, and increased accessibility of patient information for nurses (Vila Wellbeing, [year]). Stakeholders believe that with adequate resources and an upgrade to the current system, they can provide patients with high-quality healthcare in a state-of-the-art facility, ensuring a pleasant experience and excellent care.

Survey and Characterize the Dangers

Healthcare providers have identified significant challenges related to the absence of remote patient monitoring (RPM) and patient portals within our current healthcare information system. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, Vila Wellbeing relied on efficient doorstep assessments to gauge patient severity levels. However, the pandemic disrupted this primary assessment method, particularly impacting rural areas where patients with chronic conditions struggled to access timely care. Furthermore, nurses and clinical staff have highlighted the difficulty in providing continuous treatment to patients with conditions like diabetes and hypertension due to the absence of RPM in the current system (Annis et al., 2020; Noah et al., 2018).

Characterize Data Framework Client Best Practice

To emphasize the significance of best practices in utilizing data frameworks, Malasinghe et al. (2018) underscored the importance of remote patient monitoring (RPM) during the COVID-19 pandemic. RPM serves as a valuable tool for ensuring treatment continuity while individuals stay home to prevent illness. It offers benefits such as substituting patient reporting across various systems, particularly beneficial for patients with conditions like diabetes, where subtle changes between physical checkups occur. Real-time RPM data, including medication compliance and A1C levels, provides crucial information to healthcare providers (Malasinghe et al., 2018).

Additionally, Chu et al. (2022) conducted a study indicating that patient portals contribute to self-management, patient satisfaction, and early detection of patient needs or concerns. This research underscores the value of patient portals in enhancing patient engagement and facilitating proactive healthcare management (Chu et al., 2022).

Innovation Usefulness

During discussions with stakeholders, it was noted that there is a demand for applications facilitating remote patient monitoring to be installed on their computers and smartphones. Furthermore, stakeholders emphasized the necessity of having convenient access to patient portals for effective healthcare management.

Work Process and Correspondence

Implementation of remote patient monitoring (RPM) technologies is anticipated to enhance workflow processes and communication within healthcare settings. Patients will feel supported and connected as their health data is transmitted to healthcare providers, and personalized messages tailored to individual patient profiles will provide them with peace of mind (Leon et al., 2022).

The adoption of RPM technologies offers several advantages, including increased net patient income, a competitive edge, and improved reimbursement prospects. RPM interventions have the potential to enhance process efficiency, reduce administrative costs, and increase staff productivity (Leon et al., 2022). Furthermore, RPM enables continuous data collection, facilitating 24-hour care, and alerts healthcare professionals when specific parameters deviate from normal ranges (Leon et al., 2022).

Information Capture

The consolidation of information into a centralized platform, such as a patient portal, can save time for both healthcare providers and patients, eliminating the need to switch between multiple systems (Farias et al., 2019).

Practice and Outcomes

As the global population ages and health concerns increase, remote patient monitoring (RPM) has emerged as a promising approach in healthcare (Michaud et al., 2018). Traditionally, patient monitoring was confined to hospital rooms. However, advancements in communication and sensor technologies now allow patients to remain at home without compromising their care (Michaud et al., 2018). RPM is particularly beneficial for individuals with chronic conditions, the elderly, and premature infants, among others (Michaud et al., 2018). Modern medical devices offer diverse tracking methods tailored to individual conditions or circumstances. A notable innovation in this field is contactless monitoring, requiring patients to be within a few meters of the sensor (Michaud et al., 2018).

Conclusion

The needs assessment meeting with stakeholders has provided valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities present within Vila Wellbeing’s healthcare information system. Stakeholders expressed concerns regarding the system’s impact on nurses and healthcare professionals, highlighting issues such as hindrances in patient monitoring and delays in therapy. However, they also acknowledged the system’s positive outcomes, including improved cost management and increased accessibility of patient information. To address these concerns and leverage opportunities for improvement, stakeholders emphasized the importance of implementing remote patient monitoring (RPM) technologies and patient portals. RPM was identified as a promising approach to enhance workflow processes, improve communication, and ensure continuous patient care, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the consolidation of information into centralized platforms like patient portals was seen as a practical solution to save time and streamline processes for healthcare providers and patients alike. Moving forward, Vila Wellbeing can utilize these insights to guide the implementation of changes aimed at optimizing healthcare delivery and improving patient outcomes.

References

Annis, A. M., Sparrow, A., Stedman, M., & Walsh, C. (2020). The effects of COVID-19 on emergency medical services. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 35(3), 237–239.

Chu, Y., Zhang, Z., Du, L., Wang, Q., & Zhang, H. (2022). Impact of patient portals on patient empowerment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(2), e33750.

Farias, A., Simmons, M., Singh, G., Crocetti, S., Bina, R., Wile, C., & Yu, H. (2019). An integrated approach to mobile health systems user authentication. IEEE Access, 7, 23025–23034.

Leon, A. M., Maia, S., Catarino, J., & Barretto, A. (2022). Telemedicine and telemonitoring of chronic diseases: Interdisciplinary responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Medical Systems, 46(2), 18.

Malasinghe, L., Ramzan, N., Dahal, K., & Hill, K. (2018). Remote patient monitoring: A comprehensive study. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 9(2), 491–506.

Michaud, T. L., Siahpush, M., Schwab, R. J., Eiland, L. A., DeVany, M., Hansen, G., Slachetka, T. S., Boilesen, E., Tak, H. J., Wilson, F. A., Wang, H., Pagán, J. A., & Su, D. (2018). Remote Patient Monitoring and clinical outcomes for postdischarge patients with type 2 diabetes. Population Health Management, 21(5), 387–394.

Noah, B., Keller, M. S., Mosadeghi, S., Stein, L., Johl, S., Delshad, S., Tashjian, C., Lew, D., & Kwan, J. T. (2018). Impact of remote patient monitoring on clinical outcomes: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. NPJ Digital Medicine, 1(1), 20172.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 6416 Needs Assessment Meeting with Stakeholders Paper Assignment

Description

Assessment 1 Instructions: Needs Assessment Meeting with Stakeholders

Introduction

Note: Each assessment in this course builds on the work you completed in the previous assessment. Therefore, you must complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

As a nursing informatics specialist, you have been asked to arrange and lead a needs assessment meeting for stakeholders around an organizational information system change. Completing an assessment with the stakeholders will help you to gain a clear understanding of end-user needs, how the system currently functions, and what enhanced functionality should be achieved with an information system change. Ultimately, you are implementing the system change to enhance the interprofessional team’s ability to positively affect care delivery outcomes.

Note: Complete the assessments in this course in the order in which they are presented.

Preparation

For the assessments in this course, imagine you are working on an organizational information system change project as a nursing informatics specialist project manager.

For this assessment, you have reached the stage in your information systems change where you will bring stakeholders together to collaborate on a needs assessment. An important skill for informatics professionals is being able to understand the viewpoints of stakeholders and leverage that understanding to create buy-in.

For this assessment, you will be creating a video summary of findings from a needs assessment meeting. You can base your summary on your personal experiences being in a needs assessment meeting, or you can imagine one that is relevant to your personal practice and an information systems change you would like to see happen. 

If you are imagining the needs assessment meeting, assume that each stakeholder group would elect one team member to attend the meeting. This would mean that there be a minimum of five participants in your meeting. Try to keep in mind these various points of view as you plan and create your meeting summary.

To prepare to complete this assessment, think through the following items before you begin to record your video:

Define at least four groups of stakeholders. These might include:
Administration.

• The end-users of the system that input information into particular elements of the system.
• The most critical interprofessional team members that need to access and read that information; in other words, individuals who could be part of an informatics support team for the system.
• How is the system currently functioning?
• How would the stakeholders like it to function?
• What are the risks that the current system poses to patient safety?
• What are the best evidence-based practices with use of this type of information system?
• What software and hardware functionality do the stakeholders want?
• How might this information system change enhance workflow and communication?
• How will data capture improve with implementation of this system?
• What are the current effects from the system’s use on health care delivery outcomes?
  Will a change enhance outcomes?

Instructions

Your assessment submission will be a Kaltura video debrief of your hypothetical needs assessment meeting. The time limit for your video is 7 minutes.

During the meeting, you would pose the questions listed in Part 2 as a means to conduct the needs assessment collaboratively.

Organize your video using the following outline.

Part 1: Introduction

Create an introduction to explain your role and an overview of the project, including the scope. Include a brief timeline to complete the project and a vision statement for the future outlining what the organization wants to achieve with this information system change.

Part 2: Questions and Explanation

The questions you would have asked during the needs assessment meeting can be grouped as outlined below. For each category, report the hypothetical findings and outcomes. Distinguished performers will also comment on the importance of finding answers to these questions.

Assess the current situation and desired state of the information system:

• What do the stakeholders see as issues with the current information system?
• What is working well with the current information system?
• What can stakeholders envision as the best solution if they had all resources?

Assess and define the risks:

• What do the stakeholders see as patient safety risks or other risks (such as ethical, legal, or practical) with the current system?

Define information system user best practice:

• What are the best evidence-based practices with use of this type of information system?

Technology functionality:

• What software and hardware functionality do the stakeholders want to have?

Workflow and communication:

• How might an information system change enhance workflow and communication?

Data capture:

• How might data capture improve with implementation of a new system?

Practice and outcomes:

• How could a change affect current practice for the better by enhancing patient outcomes?

Part 3: Conclusion

Summarize the highlights of the meeting as a takeaway for the stakeholders. Be sure to state the connection between the project scope, potential direction, and the organizational vision for the stakeholders as a means to guide the project forward. Comment on change management principles that could be relevant in mitigating resistance as the project proceeds.

PART 4: SCHOLARLY REFERENCE LIST

The scholarly sources that you used to support your ideas must be included in a reference list. Submit your APA formatted reference list as a separate document.

Boost Your Grades with ReliablePapers.com – Your Expert Nursing Paper Writing Service!

Are you struggling with nursing research papers or assignments? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we’re your trusted nursing writing service, committed to delivering customized and original nursing papers for top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions? Our skilled nursing essay writers are here to help. From crafting custom nursing research papers to assisting with nursing assignments, we ensure top grades for your academic success.

Timely Support for Your Coursework, Top Grade Assured

With years of experience helping nursing students with coursework, we efficiently handle orders even with tight deadlines. Our expert nursing writers create outstanding papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions.

Why Choose Nursing Paper Writing Services at ReliablePapers.com?

• Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
• Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
• Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized essays for your academic success.
• Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Our skilled writers at ReliablePapers.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your research paper stands out. Trust us for your academic success – our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seek help to submit research on time and ensure exceptional performance in your nursing papers. Trust ReliablePapers.com for your academic success! Order your nursing essays today, save time, and secure the grades you deserve.

 Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements, and let our experts deliver your work ASAP. Place Your Order Now.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!