NRNP 6635 Discussion The Psychiatric Evaluation

,

NRNP 6635 Discussion the Psychiatric Evaluation and Evidence-Based Rating Scales

NRNP 6635 Discussion the Psychiatric Evaluation and Evidence-Based Rating Scales

NRNP 6635 is a graduate-level nursing course that focuses on the advanced practice of psychiatric-mental health nursing. The course is designed to prepare nurse practitioners to assess, diagnose, and treat individuals with psychiatric disorders across their lifespans.

One of the key topics covered in NRNP 6635 is psychiatric evaluation, which involves the systematic collection and analysis of information about a patient’s mental health status. Psychiatric evaluation typically includes a comprehensive clinical interview, a review of medical and psychiatric history, and the use of standardized assessment tools to measure symptoms and functioning.

Assessment tools are a critical component of psychiatric evaluation, as they provide standardized and objective measures of symptoms and functioning that can guide diagnosis and treatment planning. NRNP 6635 covers a variety of assessment tools, including self-report measures, clinician-administered measures, and performance-based measures.

Throughout NRNP 6635 course, students are taught to critically evaluate the psychometric properties of assessment tools, including their reliability, validity, sensitivity, and specificity. They also learn to integrate assessment results with other clinical information, such as patient history, presenting symptoms, and context, to make accurate diagnoses and treatment plans. This enables students to select the most appropriate assessment tool for a given clinical situation and to interpret assessment results accurately.

In addition to these assessment tools, NRNP 6635 covers other evidence-based rating scales and measurement instruments that are commonly used in psychiatric evaluation, such as the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia.

Overall, NRNP 6635 provides students with a comprehensive understanding of psychiatric evaluation and assessment tools, which is essential for effective and evidence-based psychiatric-mental health practice.

Examples of Common Assessment/Rating Tools covered in NRNP 6635

Some commonly used rating scales include the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Delirium Rating Scale, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).

Check out another task that our nursing assignment writing experts have assisted another student on Asthma Exacerbation Gabriel Martinez shadow health Objective Data

The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS)

The Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS) is appropriate to use with clients during the psychiatric interview when assessing for major depressive disorder (MDD) or evaluating the severity of depressive symptoms. It is a brief self-report instrument that covers all of the clinical domains used in making a diagnosis of MDD based on DSM-IV-TR criteria, making it a useful tool for identifying and tracking depressive symptoms in clinical practice.

Using the QIDS during the psychiatric interview can be helpful to a nurse practitioner’s psychiatric assessment in several ways. Firstly, it can provide a standardized measure of depressive symptoms that can be used to monitor treatment response and track symptom changes over time. Secondly, it can help to identify specific areas of impairment or dysfunction associated with depressive symptoms, such as changes in sleep or appetite, which can guide treatment planning. Finally, it can aid in making a diagnosis of MDD by providing a standardized measure of symptom severity that can be compared to established diagnostic criteria.

There is evidence to support the use of the QIDS in clinical practice. A study by Trivedi et al. (2004) compared the QIDS to other commonly used depression rating scales and found that it demonstrated good reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Another study by Fava et al. (2004) found that the QIDS was sensitive to differences in depressive symptom severity and was able to differentiate between remission, response, and non-response to treatment. Additionally, the QIDS has been shown to be a valid measure of depressive symptoms in various populations, including individuals with co-occurring substance use disorders and older adults (Rush et al., 2000; Sheehan et al., 2010).

Overall, the QIDS is a useful tool for assessing depressive symptoms in clinical practice, and its psychometric properties have been demonstrated in several studies. Using the QIDS during the psychiatric interview can help nurse practitioners to make accurate diagnoses, monitor treatment responses, and tailor treatment plans to specific areas of dysfunction associated with depressive symptoms.

The Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE)

The Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) is appropriate to use with clients during the psychiatric interview when assessing for cognitive impairment, particularly in older adults. It is a brief, standardized test that assesses various domains of cognitive function, such as orientation, memory, attention, and language.

Using the MMSE during the psychiatric interview can be helpful to a nurse practitioner’s psychiatric assessment in several ways. Firstly, it can identify the presence and severity of cognitive impairment, which can inform diagnostic and treatment decisions. Secondly, it can help to identify specific areas of cognitive dysfunction, such as memory or language deficits, that may be associated with underlying conditions such as dementia or delirium. Finally, it can help to monitor cognitive function over time, allowing for early detection of changes that may require intervention.

There is evidence to support the use of the MMSE in clinical practice. A systematic review by Folstein et al. (2010) found that the MMSE had good sensitivity and specificity for detecting cognitive impairment and was able to differentiate between normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. Another study by Pinto et al. (2019) found that the MMSE was effective in detecting cognitive impairment in older adults with depression, highlighting the importance of assessing cognitive function in this population.

Overall, the MMSE is a useful tool for assessing cognitive function in clinical practice, particularly in older adults. Its psychometric properties have been demonstrated in several studies, and it can inform diagnostic and treatment decisions, identify specific areas of cognitive dysfunction, and monitor cognitive function over time.

The Delirium Rating Scale

The Delirium Rating Scale (DRS) is a standardized tool used to assess the severity of delirium, a common and serious neuropsychiatric syndrome that is often underrecognized in clinical settings. The DRS assesses various domains of delirium, such as attention, orientation, memory, and language, and provides a total score that reflects the overall severity of delirium.

The DRS is appropriate to use with clients during the psychiatric interview when assessing for delirium or suspected delirium, particularly in older adults or those with comorbid medical conditions. It can be helpful to a nurse practitioner’s psychiatric assessment in several ways. Firstly, it can assist in identifying the presence and severity of delirium, which can inform diagnostic and treatment decisions. Secondly, it can help to monitor the course of delirium over time, allowing for early detection of changes that may require intervention. Finally, it can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for delirium.

There is evidence to support the use of the DRS in clinical practice. A systematic review by Adamis et al. (2018) found that the DRS had good psychometric properties and was able to reliably identify and measure the severity of delirium in both clinical and research settings. Another study by Inouye et al. (2014) found that the DRS was effective in identifying delirium in hospitalized older adults and that its use was associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced healthcare costs.

Overall, the DRS is a useful tool for assessing the severity of delirium in clinical practice, particularly in older adults or those with comorbid medical conditions. Its psychometric properties have been demonstrated in several studies, and it can assist in diagnostic and treatment decisions, monitor the course of delirium over time, and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions.

The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)

The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) is a commonly used rating scale in psychiatric evaluation that assesses the severity of symptoms in patients with mental illness.

When screening physical health in psychiatric evaluation, it is important to ask questions related to the patient’s medical history, current medications, allergies, and any recent surgeries or hospitalizations. Additionally, assessing a patient’s well-being or ill-being is important for the Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurse (PMHN).

The PMHN should ask questions related to the patient’s sleep patterns, appetite changes, energy levels, and overall mood. It is also important to assess any suicidal ideation or self-harm behaviors. By asking these questions and conducting a thorough physical examination, the PMHN can identify any underlying medical conditions that may be contributing to the patient’s mental health symptoms and provide appropriate treatment.

Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Electronic Medical Records (EMRs), Personal Health Records (PHRs), Medical Practice Management Software (MPM), and many other healthcare data components collectively have the potential to improve the quality of care by providing information critical for patient life.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recently announced the “All of Us” initiative that aims to collect one million or more patients’ data such as EHR, including medical imaging, socio-behavioral, and environmental data over the next few years. This initiative can provide relevant solutions for improving public health by collecting big data relating to past, present, or future physical/mental health.

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) is a clinician-based questionnaire that measures the severity of anxiety symptoms. The HAM-A consists of 14 items designed to assess the severity of a patient’s anxiety. Each item contains a number of symptoms, and each group of symptoms is rated on a scale of zero to four, with four being the most severe. All of these scores are used to compute an overarching score that challenges the original version of the scale over time.

When screening physical health in psychiatric evaluation, assessing a patient’s well-being or ill-being is important for the PMHN. The HAM-A can be used as part of this assessment to measure the severity of anxiety symptoms. Respondents indicate how they currently feel, and responses are rated on a 4-point Likert scale and range from 0 to 3. The HAM-A is one of many recommended measures for anxiety disorders.

The PMHN should ask questions related to the patient’s sleep patterns, appetite changes, energy levels, and overall mood. It is also important to assess any suicidal ideation or self-harm behaviors. Furthermore, when using HAM-A rating scale in psychiatric evaluation, the clinician should ask questions related to the patient’s level of anxiety and its impact on their daily life.

The HAM-A questionnaire includes items such as anxious mood, tension, fears, insomnia, somatic complaints related to anxiety, and others. By asking these questions and conducting a thorough physical examination along with HAM-A assessment tool, the PMHN can identify any underlying medical conditions that may be contributing to the patient’s mental health symptoms and provide appropriate treatment.

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is a medical scale used for measuring the symptom severity of patients with schizophrenia. It is considered the “gold standard” for measuring how well treatment is working. The PANSS test takes about 30 to 40 minutes and consists of two parts. In the first section, the practitioner will ask about the patient’s medical history and symptoms. In the second part, the practitioner may ask questions that try to find out how severe the patient’s symptoms are.

When assessing a patient’s physical health, doctors may use other tests in addition to PANSS. For example, doctors may use the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia to check for symptoms of depression that could affect daily life or might even lead to thoughts of suicide. Doctors may also use Clinical Global Impression-Schizophrenia (CGI-SCH), which has been adapted from the more general Clinical Global Impression score used to diagnose other psychiatric illnesses.

The PANSS questionnaire includes items such as delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thinking, and anxiety/depression symptoms among others. By asking these questions and conducting a thorough physical examination along with PANSS assessment tool, the PMHN can identify any underlying medical conditions that may be contributing to the patient’s mental health symptoms and provide appropriate treatment.

Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)

The Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) is a rating scale used to measure the severity of manic symptoms in patients with bipolar disorder. The scale has 11 items and is based on the patient’s subjective report of their clinical condition over the previous 48 hours. Some of the questions that may be asked when screening physical health in psychiatric evaluation include:

  1. Are you experiencing any physical symptoms such as headaches, stomachaches, or fatigue?
  2. Have you experienced any changes in appetite or weight?
  3. Are you currently taking any medications or supplements?
  4. Have you had any recent illnesses or injuries?
  5. Do you have a history of chronic medical conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, or heart disease?

Furthermore, when using YMRS rating scale in psychiatric evaluation, the clinician should ask questions related to manic symptoms such as elevated mood and grandiosity. The YMRS questionnaire includes items such as elevated mood, and increased motor activity/energy level among others.

In addition to this, the mental status examination should include general awareness and responsiveness of the patient along with descriptions of their behavioral and cognitive functioning. It includes descriptions of the patient’s orientation (knowing current date and location), intelligence, memory, judgment and thought process along with their behavior and mood assessment.

By asking these questions and conducting a thorough physical examination along with YMRS assessment tool based on the patient’s subjective report of his or her clinical condition over the previous 48 hours, the PMHN can identify any underlying medical conditions that may be contributing to the patient’s mental health symptoms and provide appropriate treatment.

Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS)

The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a commonly used tool for assessing depression severity. It consists of 10 items that evaluate mood, feelings of guilt or worthlessness, suicidal ideation, sleep disturbances, appetite changes, concentration difficulties, and energy levels over the past week.

The MADRS is a self-reported questionnaire that can be used to monitor depression severity. It has two categories: severity of illness and degree of change. The assessment tool is adapted from the original Prodromal Questionnaire, which is a 92-item self-report tool.

The MADRS stratifies the severity of depressive episodes in adults and should only be used in adults aged 18 years or older. It rates based on a clinical interview with the patient, and clinical judgment should be used to determine whether the rating lies on the defined scale steps (0, 2, 4, 6 points) or between them (1, 3, 5 points).

When using the MADRS to screen physical health in psychiatric evaluation, some questions that can be asked include:

  • Have you lost interest in activities that you previously enjoyed?
  • Do you feel sad or depressed most of the time?
  • Have you experienced changes in your appetite or weight?
  • Do you have trouble sleeping or sleeping too much?
  • Do you feel tired or lack energy most of the time?
  • Have you experienced feelings of worthlessness or guilt?
  • Have you had difficulty concentrating or making decisions?

These questions can help assess a patient’s mental state and provide insight into their overall well-being.

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) is a self-administered tool used to assess depression. It is a brief questionnaire that incorporates DSM-IV depression criteria with other leading major depressive symptoms. The PHQ-9 consists of nine questions that ask about the frequency of symptoms experienced over the last two weeks. The questions are related to mood, sleep, appetite, energy, and concentration.

When screening physical health in psychiatric evaluation, it is important to assess a patient’s well-being or ill-being. The PHQ-9 can be used as a screening tool for depression in primary care settings. It can also be used by mental health professionals as part of their treatment plan with patients. The PHQ-9 can be administered in print form or digital versions and is available in over 30 languages.

The PHQ-9 has been validated as a reliable and valid tool for assessing depression. Studies have shown that PHQ-9 scores >10 had a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 88% for Major Depressive Disorder. The final question on the PHQ-9 asks about thoughts of hurting oneself or being better off dead. This question counts if given any score other than zero, regardless of the duration of the symptom, and is a criterion for Major Depressive Disorder.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7)

The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) is a seven-item self-report anxiety questionnaire designed to assess the patient’s health status during the previous two weeks. It is commonly used as a measure of general anxiety symptoms across various settings and populations.

The GAD-7 can identify probable cases of a generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and assess symptom severity. It has strong criterion validity for identifying possible cases of GAD. The degree to which the test measures what it claims to be measuring is known as construct validity, and Löwe et al. (2008) substantiated the one-dimensional structure of the GAD-7 and its factorial invariance for gender and age.

When using the GAD-7, patients are asked about how often they have been bothered by feeling nervous, anxious or on edge; not being able to stop or control worrying; worrying too much about different things; trouble relaxing; being so restless that it’s hard to sit still; becoming easily annoyed or irritable; and feeling afraid as if something awful might happen. Each item has four response options ranging from “not at all” to “nearly every day,” with scores ranging from 0 to 21. A score of 10 or greater indicates clinically significant anxiety symptoms.

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a widely used psychometric test for measuring the severity of depression. It consists of 21 multiple-choice self-report inventory questions that relate to symptoms of depression such as hopelessness, irritability, guilt, feelings of being punished, and physical symptoms such as fatigue, weight loss, and sleep disturbance. The BDI can be easily adapted in most clinical conditions for detecting major depression and recommending an appropriate intervention.

The BDI is designed as a screening device rather than a diagnostic tool. When scoring the test, a value of 0 to 3 is assigned for each answer. The total score is then compared to a key to determine the severity of depression. The standard cut-off scores range from 0-63 with higher scores indicating more severe depression.

Questions to ask when screening physical health in psychiatric evaluation

When conducting a psychiatric evaluation, screening physical health is crucial for the effective diagnosis and treatment of patients. Poor physical health can lead to an increased risk of developing mental health problems, while poor mental health can negatively impact physical health. By asking the right questions, PMHNPs can better understand their patients’ mental and physical health, leading to more effective diagnosis and treatment. Asking questions about well-being or ill-being allows the PMHNP to assess the patient’s quality of life, feelings of anxiety, distress, motivation, and energy. Additionally, questions about safety should be included to ensure the patient’s safety and well-being.

Below, we will examine the questions to ask when screening physical health in psychiatric evaluation and assessing a patient’s well-being or ill-being.

Screening Physical Health:

The PMHNP should screen the patient’s physical health by asking questions about their health concerns, sleeping habits, appetite, and eating habits. This is important because poor physical health can lead to an increased risk of developing mental health problems, and poor mental health can negatively impact physical health. Furthermore, some physical diseases are linked to psychotropic treatment. Thus, it is essential to ask questions such as “What health concerns do you have?” “How are your sleeping habits over the past 4 weeks?” “Have you noticed any changes, difficulty sleeping?” “How would you describe your current appetite?” and “Have your eating habits altered in any way?”

Assessing Well-being or Ill-being:

The PMHNP should also ask questions about the patient’s well-being or ill-being. This will allow them to assess the patient’s quality of life, feelings of anxiety, distress, motivation, and energy. Sample questions could include “Have you had little pleasure or interest in the activities you usually enjoy over the past few months?” and “Have you been concerned by low feelings, stress, sadness, and nervousness?”

Ensuring Safety:

As safety is a priority for the provider, questions about suicide, self-harm, homicide, domestic violence, and abuse must be included in the interview. Inquiring about any previous suicide attempts, self-harm, or thoughts of harming themselves or others is essential. If necessary, the provider should take steps to ensure the patient’s safety and involve other healthcare professionals in the patient’s care plan.

Relationships and Belonging:

Finally, the PMHNP should ask questions about the patient’s relationships and sense of belonging. This will allow them to understand the patient’s feelings and beliefs about their society and environment, to know if they feel accepted, supported, and possess meaningful relationships. Possible questions that can be asked include “Do you have friends, family, or otherwise?” “How do you feel about others around you?” and “Tell me about how you have been feeling about your relationships recently.”

Importance of screening physical health in psychiatric evaluation

When conducting a psychiatric evaluation, it is essential to screen the patient’s physical health as it is the first step in diagnosis and treatment. The interconnectedness of physical and mental health is well-established. Poor physical health can lead to an increased risk of developing mental health problems, while poor mental health can negatively impact physical health, increasing the risk of some conditions. In addition, some physical diseases are linked to psychotropic treatment. Consequently, individuals with serious mental illness experience a heightened rate of preventable and treatable physical illnesses and comorbidities such as obesity, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes.

To screen physical health effectively, clinicians should ask the patient questions about their general health concerns. For example, what health concerns do they have, and have they noticed any changes in their health status? Additionally, it is essential to inquire about the patient’s sleeping habits over the past four weeks, including any changes or difficulty sleeping. Changes in appetite and eating habits should also be assessed, as this may indicate physical health issues.

In addition to asking these questions, the use of evidence-based rating scales in psychiatric evaluation can help clinicians to assess the patient’s mental health status and guide treatment decisions. Rating scales provide standardized measurements of symptom severity and can assist in identifying treatment targets and tracking the patient’s progress over time.

It is important to note that rating scales should be used in conjunction with clinical evaluation and an individualized treatment plan. They are not a substitute for a comprehensive assessment of the patient’s mental health status and should be used as a tool to aid in diagnosis and treatment decisions.

Get Expert Writers to Work on Your NRNP 6635 Assignment Paper from ReliablePapers.com

You can be sure that a seasoned professional with a background in nursing will write your paper when you order from ReliablePapers.com.

Hiring a professional nursing writer to assist you in creating your NRNP 6635 assignment paper can help you in many ways.

When you hire a professional writer, it’s much easier to get high-quality content that has been well researched and written in a clear and concise way.

If you’re a nursing student in need of nursing essay help, you can rest assured that the experts at ReliablePapers.com will provide you with top-notch service at a price you can afford.

Whether you need help starting from scratch or revising a previously written paper, nursing term paper writers are here to help.

Nursing students who need a reliable writing service can get help with their assignments from the nursing custom paper writers at our company.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

/by

Assignment: Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders

,

Assignment: Assessing and Diagnosing Patients with Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders

Assignment: Assessing and Diagnosing Patients with Substance Related and Addictive Disorders

As an advanced practice nurse, it is important to know how to assess and diagnose patients with substance-related and addictive disorders. To prepare for the assignment, you should review the learning resources provided and become familiar with the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation template. You should also identify a video case study to use for the assignment, view the assigned video case, and review the additional data provided in the “Case History Reports” document. You should consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient and what interview questions would be needed to ask the patient. Finally, you should identify at least three possible differential diagnoses for the patient.

Steps to Consider in Writing the Assignment: Assessing and Diagnosing Patients with Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders

To begin, review the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation template provided below and familiarize yourself with the criteria for diagnosing substance-related and addictive disorders as outlined in the DSM-5. Select a video case study from the choices provided and review the patient’s case history report, paying attention to any cultural or contextual factors that may be relevant to the assessment and diagnosis process.

Next, consider what questions you would need to ask the patient during an interview to gather the necessary information for a comprehensive psychiatric evaluation. Take note of the patient’s chief complaint, symptomatology, and the duration and severity of their symptoms, as well as how their symptoms are impacting their daily functioning.

Based on your assessment, formulate at least three possible differential diagnoses, listed in order of priority, and provide supporting evidence for each diagnosis. Compare the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain how you ruled out each diagnosis to arrive at your primary diagnosis. Be sure to include pertinent positives and negatives that support your diagnosis, taking into consideration any cultural, social, or economic factors that may be relevant.

Finally, in your reflection notes, consider how you would approach the session differently if given the opportunity and discuss any legal or ethical considerations related to the patient’s treatment. Consider how you might incorporate health promotion and disease prevention strategies into your treatment plan, taking into account the patient’s age, ethnicity, and other risk factors.

Check out another post by our nursing paper writing experts aimed at assisting students on Evolving Roles of Nurse Educators in Diverse Environments.

Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template

Patient Information:

Name: ___________ Date of Birth: ___________ Date of Evaluation: ___________

Identifying Data:

The patient is a _____-year-old (gender) (ethnicity) individual who presents with (chief complaint) and reports a history of (relevant medical and psychiatric history).

Reason for Referral:

The patient was referred for evaluation due to (reason for referral).

Subjective:

The patient reports experiencing (symptoms) for (duration). The symptoms have impacted the patient’s functioning in (specific areas of life).

Mental Status Examination:

Appearance:

Behavior:

Speech:

Mood:

Affect:

Thought Process:

Thought Content:

Perception:

Cognition:

Insight:

Judgment:

Assessment:

Based on the patient’s history and mental status examination, the following differential diagnoses are considered:

  1. (Differential Diagnosis 1) – (Supporting Evidence)
  2. (Differential Diagnosis 2) – (Supporting Evidence)
  3. (Differential Diagnosis 3) – (Supporting Evidence)

After considering the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, (Differential Diagnosis #) can be ruled out because (reason). The critical-thinking process led to the primary diagnosis of (Primary Diagnosis).

Pertinent Positives:

Pertinent Negatives:

Plan:

The following plan is recommended for the patient:

  • (Interventions)
  • (Referrals)
  • (Follow-up)

Reflection:

If I could conduct the session over, I would (reflection). In terms of legal/ethical considerations, (discussion). In terms of health promotion and disease prevention, (discussion).

Assignment: Assessing and Diagnosing Patients with Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders Example One

Patient Name: John Doe

Age: 32

Gender: Male

Date of Evaluation: 03/13/2023

Identifying Information

The patient is a 32-year-old male who was brought in for evaluation by his wife due to his recent drug use and erratic behavior. He is currently unemployed and lives with his wife and two children.

Chief Complaint

The patient’s chief complaint is “I can’t stop using drugs.”

History of Present Illness

The patient reports that he has been using heroin for the past year, and he has been experiencing intense cravings and withdrawal symptoms when he tries to quit. He reports that he uses the drug to alleviate anxiety and depression symptoms. He also reports that he has been experiencing decreased energy, sleep disturbances, and appetite changes.

Mental Status Examination

The patient was cooperative and communicative during the evaluation. His mood was depressed, and his affect was constricted. His thought processes were tangential, and he had difficulty with concentration and memory. He denied suicidal or homicidal ideation.

Diagnostic Impressions

  1. Substance Use Disorder
  2. Major Depressive Disorder
  3. Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Assessment

The patient’s substance use disorder is the primary diagnosis. The DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorders include the presence of impaired control, social impairment, risky use, and pharmacological criteria. The patient meets the criteria for severe opioid use disorder based on his intense cravings and withdrawal symptoms. He also meets the criteria for major depressive disorder due to his depressed mood, decreased energy, sleep disturbances, and appetite changes. Finally, he meets the criteria for generalized anxiety disorder based on his report of anxiety symptoms.

Differential Diagnosis

  1. Substance-induced mood disorder
  2. Bipolar disorder
  3. Adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood

The differential diagnoses were considered based on the patient’s depressive symptoms, but the DSM-5 criteria for each diagnosis were ruled out based on the patient’s history and current symptoms.

Critical-Thinking Process

The primary diagnosis of substance use disorder was selected based on the DSM-5 criteria and the patient’s history of heroin use, intense cravings, and withdrawal symptoms. The secondary diagnoses of major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder were also made based on the patient’s reported symptoms.

Reflection Notes

If I could conduct the session over, I would spend more time discussing the patient’s social history and family dynamics to better understand his support system and potential sources of stress. Legal/ethical considerations include obtaining informed consent and ensuring patient confidentiality. Health promotion and disease prevention should take into account the patient’s age, gender, and cultural background. The patient’s past medical history and socioeconomic factors should also be considered when developing a treatment plan.

Assignment: Assessing and Diagnosing Patients with Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders Example Two

Patient Information

Name: Briana Jackson

Age: 27

Gender: Male

Ethnicity: African American

Date of Evaluation: 03/13/2023

Chief Complaint

“I feel like I can’t go a day without using cocaine. It’s really affecting my life, and I’m starting to worry about my health.”

History of present illness (HPI)

Briana Jackson is a 27-year-old African American male who presents with concerns about cocaine use. He reports that he has been using cocaine regularly for the past two years, with increasing frequency over the past six months. He reports using cocaine daily, and has attempted to cut back or stop using in the past, but has been unsuccessful. He reports feeling like he needs cocaine to function, and that his cocaine use has impacted his work, relationships, and overall functioning. He reports no significant past medical history and no other current medical concerns.

Mental Status Examination

Appearance: Briana is a well-groomed African American male, who appears alert and oriented.

Speech: Briana’s speech is clear and coherent, with no evidence of slurring or difficulty with articulation.

Mood/Affect: Briana’s mood is anxious, and his affect is dysphoric.

Thought Content: Briana reports feeling like he needs cocaine to function, and expresses concern about the impact of his cocaine use on his life.

Thought Process: Briana’s thought process is organized and goal-directed, with no evidence of tangential thinking or loose associations.

Perception: No evidence of perceptual disturbances.

Cognition: Briana is alert and oriented to person, place, and time. He reports no difficulty with memory or concentration.

Differential Diagnosis

  1. Cocaine use disorder
  2. Generalized anxiety disorder
  3. Major depressive disorder

To arrive at the primary diagnosis of cocaine use disorder, I considered several factors. Briana meets the DSM-5 criteria for cocaine use disorder, including a pattern of use that has persisted for more than 12 months, unsuccessful attempts to cut down or stop using, and impairment in social, occupational, and/or other areas of functioning. Additionally, Briana reports feeling like he needs cocaine to function, which is consistent with the diagnosis of a substance use disorder. Briana also reports anxious and dysphoric mood, which could suggest co-occurring anxiety or depressive disorders. However, these symptoms could also be secondary to the effects of cocaine use. While Briana meets the diagnostic criteria for both generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder, these diagnoses are less likely given the context of his symptoms and the evidence of cocaine use disorder.

Reflection Notes

If I could conduct the session over, I would make sure to spend more time exploring the impact of Briana’s cocaine use on his relationships, work, and overall functioning. Additionally, I would try to better understand his motivation for seeking treatment at this time, and explore potential barriers to treatment engagement. In terms of legal/ethical considerations, I would make sure to discuss the risks and benefits of treatment options, including the use of medication-assisted treatment for cocaine use disorder. I would also consider factors such as Briana’s cultural background and socioeconomic status in developing a treatment plan that is appropriate for him. Finally, I would emphasize the importance of ongoing monitoring and support to prevent relapse and promote long-term recovery.

Assignment: Assessing and Diagnosing Patients with Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders Example Three

Patient Name: John Smith

Age: 42

Gender: Male

Date of Evaluation: 03/13/2023

SUBJECTIVE:

The patient, John Smith, presents with a chief complaint of feeling anxious and depressed for the past few months. He reports feeling “down” and “hopeless” most of the time and has trouble sleeping. He admits to using cocaine and alcohol frequently to cope with his symptoms. He reports experiencing tremors and sweating when he tries to stop using substances. John reports that his symptoms have been interfering with his work and relationships, causing significant distress.

OBJECTIVE:

During the evaluation, John appeared anxious and restless, fidgeting in his seat and avoiding eye contact. He had dilated pupils and slight tremors in his hands. His speech was rapid and pressured, and he exhibited psychomotor agitation.

ASSESSMENT:

Mental Status Examination Results:

  • Appearance and behavior: The patient appeared anxious and restless, exhibiting psychomotor agitation.
  • Mood and affect: The patient’s mood was depressed and hopeless, and his affect was constricted.
  • Thought process: The patient’s thought process was rapid and pressured.
  • Thought content: The patient expressed feelings of hopelessness and despair.
  • Perception: No evidence of perceptual disturbances.
  • Cognition: The patient’s cognitive functioning appeared to be intact, with no evidence of memory impairment or disorientation.
  • Insight and judgment: The patient had limited insight into his condition and was reluctant to engage in treatment.

Differential Diagnosis:

  1. Cocaine Use Disorder: The patient exhibits the following symptoms that meet the criteria for Cocaine Use Disorder according to DSM-5: tolerance, withdrawal, and use of the substance in larger amounts or for a longer period than intended. The patient has been using cocaine frequently to cope with his symptoms, which has resulted in functional impairment.
  2. Alcohol Use Disorder: The patient exhibits the following symptoms that meet the criteria for Alcohol Use Disorder according to DSM-5: tolerance, withdrawal, and use of the substance in larger amounts or for a longer period than intended. The patient reports using alcohol frequently to cope with his symptoms, which has resulted in functional impairment.
  3. Major Depressive Disorder: The patient exhibits the following symptoms that meet the criteria for Major Depressive Disorder according to DSM-5: depressed mood, anhedonia, insomnia, feelings of worthlessness or guilt, and thoughts of death or suicide.

Critical Thinking Process:

Based on the patient’s history, symptoms, and observations during the evaluation, the primary diagnosis for John is Cocaine Use Disorder. While he also exhibits symptoms of Alcohol Use Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder, his cocaine use appears to be the primary driver of his functional impairment and overall distress. The patient reports experiencing withdrawal symptoms, including tremors and sweating, when he tries to stop using cocaine. Additionally, his physical examination revealed dilated pupils and slight tremors, which are consistent with cocaine use.

Reflected Notes:

If I could conduct the session over, I would spend more time exploring the patient’s social support system and possible underlying stressors. It is also important to address any legal or ethical considerations related to the patient’s substance use, such as driving under the influence or workplace policies. Health promotion and disease prevention strategies should also be discussed, including harm reduction techniques and referral to substance use treatment programs. Finally, cultural and socioeconomic factors should be considered when developing a treatment plan that is tailored to the patient’s unique needs and circumstances.

Assignment: Assessing and Diagnosing Patients with Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders Example Four

Patient Information:

Name: Bob

Age: 34

Sex: Male

Occupation: Unemployed

Education: High School

Marital Status: Single

Ethnicity: African American

Chief Complaint:

Bob complains of difficulty controlling his alcohol consumption.

HPI:

Bob reports that he started drinking heavily in college but was able to keep it under control until recently. He now drinks every day and cannot control the amount he consumes. He reports experiencing tremors in his hands and sweating when he does not drink.

Past Psychiatric History:

Bob reports a history of depression and anxiety for which he was prescribed medication but stopped taking it due to side effects.

Medication Trials and Current Medications:

Bob reports taking no current medications.

Psychotherapy or Previous Psychiatric Diagnosis:

Bob reports receiving a diagnosis of depression and anxiety in the past but has not received any psychotherapy.

Pertinent Substance Use, Family Psychiatric/Substance Use, Social, and Medical History:

Bob reports a family history of alcoholism. He also reports experiencing financial difficulties and losing his job due to his drinking.

Allergies:

Bob reports no known allergies.

ROS:

Bob reports no significant changes in his weight, appetite, or sleep patterns.

Mental Status Exam:

Bob presents as a disheveled and unkempt individual. He appears agitated and restless, frequently shifting in his seat. His speech is slurred, and he has difficulty focusing on the questions asked. He reports experiencing auditory hallucinations.

Assessment:

Based on Bob’s history and mental status exam, the following differential diagnoses are possible:

  1. Alcohol use disorder
  2. Major depressive disorder with psychotic features
  3. Schizophrenia

Alcohol use disorder is the highest priority diagnosis. The DSM-5 criteria for alcohol use disorder include a problematic pattern of alcohol use leading to clinically significant impairment or distress, such as drinking more than intended or being unable to stop or cut down on drinking. Bob meets these criteria, as he reports difficulty controlling his alcohol consumption and experiencing withdrawal symptoms when he attempts to stop.

Major depressive disorder with psychotic features is another possible diagnosis, as Bob reports a history of depression and currently experiences auditory hallucinations. However, his symptoms are more consistent with alcohol use disorder.

Schizophrenia is a less likely diagnosis, as Bob does not report a history of psychotic symptoms outside of his alcohol use.

The critical-thinking process that led to the primary diagnosis of alcohol use disorder was based on Bob’s history of heavy drinking, withdrawal symptoms, and difficulty controlling his alcohol consumption, which all meet the DSM-5 criteria for alcohol use disorder.

Reflection Notes:

If I could conduct the session over, I would focus more on exploring Bob’s feelings and motivations for drinking to gain a better understanding of his behavior. I would also address his auditory hallucinations and explore the possibility of comorbid psychiatric disorders. Legal and ethical considerations include ensuring informed consent and confidentiality, as well as addressing any potential risks associated with Bob’s heavy drinking, such as impaired judgment and increased risk of accidents. Health promotion and disease prevention would include addressing the long-term health consequences of alcohol use disorder and providing resources for quitting drinking. Factors such as Bob’s age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic background may also impact his treatment plan and should be taken into consideration.

Get Expert Writers to Work on Your Assignment: Assessing and Diagnosing Patients with Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders Paper

Professional nursing paper writers at reliablepapers.com can help students with their nursing assignments about evaluating and diagnosing patients with substance-related and addictive disorders.

Our paper writing company has expert writers who can apply concepts, theories, and principles related to patient interviewing, diagnostic reasoning, and recording patient information. They can also formulate differential diagnoses of psychiatric disorders based on the DSM-5 criteria.

All of our customers are always happy with our nursing paper writing services because we meet all of their needs.

ReliablePapers.com promises high-quality content, 100% originality, complete privacy, and on-time delivery of orders at a price that is easy on the wallet.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

/by

NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Hematological and Immune System Disorders Assignment Example

, ,

NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Hematological and Immune System Disorders Assignment Example

NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Hematological and Immune System Disorders Assignment ExampleNRNP 6540 Week 8 Assignment; Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Hematological and Immune

NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Hematological and Immune System Disorders Assignment Brief

Assignment Instructions Overview:

In this assignment, students will complete a Focused SOAP Note, using the provided template, for a patient case study involving a hematological or immune disorder. The SOAP Note should include a comprehensive assessment and differential diagnosis based on subjective and objective findings, which students will gather and interpret. This assignment emphasizes evidence-based practice by requiring students to draw on current clinical guidelines and peer-reviewed research to support their diagnoses and treatment plans. Students are also expected to incorporate holistic considerations for patient care, such as health promotion, education, and family or caregiver support.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

The main objective of this assignment is for students to demonstrate their competency in clinical assessment, diagnosis, and treatment planning for hematological and immune system disorders. This includes developing skills in data collection (through subjective and objective means), identifying critical symptoms, analyzing potential differential diagnoses, and creating comprehensive care plans. Students will integrate evidence-based guidelines, address relevant patient factors, and consider any special requirements in the treatment of hematological disorders, such as patient education and disease prevention.

The Student’s Role:

Students will act as primary care providers (PCPs) within the scope of this assignment. They will gather subjective and objective data from the case, analyze this information, and document findings within a SOAP Note. As PCPs, students are responsible for formulating differential diagnoses, planning treatment, coordinating care with specialists if needed, and providing patient education. They must apply critical thinking to differentiate among diagnoses, select appropriate diagnostic tests, and construct a treatment plan that incorporates all elements of patient care. The assignment also requires the student to reflect on the case, noting insights or lessons learned through the diagnostic and treatment process.

Competencies Measured:

This assignment measures core competencies in clinical judgment, diagnostic reasoning, and treatment planning. Specific competencies include:

  • Gathering and evaluating patient history and clinical data to formulate an accurate assessment.
  • Analyzing and prioritizing differential diagnoses based on clinical findings.
  • Utilizing evidence-based practices to support diagnostic and treatment decisions.
  • Demonstrating proficiency in creating a holistic treatment plan, which includes health promotion, disease prevention, and patient education.
  • Collaborating with healthcare providers to ensure integrated, patient-centered care.
  • Reflecting on clinical decisions to enhance ongoing learning and application in future clinical practice.

You can also read these assignment examples for the NRNP 6540 – Advanced Practice Care of Older Adults Course:

NRNP 6540 Assessment of Older Adults Evaluation Plan Discussion Example

NRNP 6540 Psychosocial Disorders Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Dementia Delirium and Depression Assignment Example

NRNP 6540 Assessing Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Disorders Assignment Example

NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Abdominal Urological and Gynecological Disorders Assignment Example

NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Hematological and Immune System Disorders Assignment Example

Focused SOAP Note Template for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

Subjective:

Chief Complaint (CC): Mrs. Derrick, a 78-year-old female, presents with complaints of severe fatigue, intermittent fever, night sweats, a significant unintentional weight loss (15 pounds over six months), bleeding gums, purple patches on her skin, and shortness of breath. She also reports intensified bone and joint pain, which is distinct from her chronic arthritis pain.

History of Present Illness (HPI): The patient notes an overall decline in energy and reports feeling increasingly lethargic over recent months. The associated symptoms—fever, night sweats, and weight loss—were initially mild but have intensified recently. She describes unusual bleeding from her gums during brushing and purple, bruise-like patches on her skin. She reports a distinct deep pain in her bones and joints, which she believes is more intense and different from her usual osteoarthritis pain.

Past Medical History (PMH):

  • Hypertension
  • Osteoarthritis, primarily in the left hip
  • Occasional gastric reflux

Medication List:

  • Omeprazole 20 mg PO daily
  • Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg PO daily
  • Acetaminophen 325 mg, 2 tablets every 6 hours PRN for hip pain

Allergies: No known drug allergies (NKDA).

 

Family and Social History: Mrs. Derrick lives with her son, daughter-in-law, and grandson. Her previous employment included 15 years at a dry-cleaning shop, where she was exposed to chemicals such as benzene, known to be a risk factor for leukemia. She has Medicare and a supplemental plan and is financially stable with her family support.

Review of Systems (ROS):

  • General: Significant weight loss, fatigue, fever, night sweats.
  • Skin: Purple patches noted on extremities.
  • Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, Throat (HEENT): Reports bleeding gums with brushing.
  • Respiratory: Shortness of breath.
  • Musculoskeletal: Joint and bone pain, distinct from her usual arthritis symptoms.

Objective:

  • Vital Signs: Pending; assess for fever, blood pressure stability, and oxygen saturation.
  • Physical Examination:
    • Lymphatic: Enlarged lymph nodes palpated.
    • Abdomen: Notable swelling and discomfort; assess for hepatosplenomegaly (potentially a sign of ALL).
    • Respiratory: Observe for signs of respiratory distress or hypoxemia.
    • Skin: Purple patches observed, likely petechiae or ecchymoses.
  • Additional Data to Collect:
    • Detailed Work Exposure History: Further details on chemical exposure, specifically duration and concentration of benzene exposure, which can contribute to hematological malignancies.
    • Objective Tests:
      • Complete Blood Count (CBC) with differential: to assess for leukopenia, anemia, or thrombocytopenia.
      • Peripheral Blood Smear: to identify blast cells, typical in ALL.
      • Bone Marrow Biopsy: to confirm leukemic cells presence and subtype the ALL.
      • Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP): to evaluate liver and kidney function, important for chemotherapy planning and identifying systemic impact.

Assessment:

  • Differential Diagnoses:
      • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): High on differential due to classic symptoms of fatigue, fever, night sweats, weight loss, bleeding gums, and bone pain. The exposure to benzene also elevates her risk.
      • Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Considered due to the age factor and the slow progression nature of CLL; however, rapid symptom progression and the presence of purplish patches are more consistent with ALL.
      • Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS): Could be considered, especially in older adults with anemia and leukopenia. However, symptoms such as night sweats and lymphadenopathy are less typical in MDS than in ALL.
  • Rationale: The combination of her symptoms, rapid progression, and exposure to benzene strongly indicates ALL. Differential diagnoses were ruled out based on symptom progression and the presence of blast cells, which is more indicative of ALL.

Plan:

Diagnostics and Tests:

    • CBC with Differential: Assess for blast cells, anemia, and thrombocytopenia.
    • Peripheral Blood Smear and Bone Marrow Biopsy: Essential to confirm ALL diagnosis and determine subtype.
    • Flow Cytometry: To classify leukemia cells and guide treatment.
    • CMP: Baseline liver and renal function assessment to support treatment planning.

Referral and Consultations:

    • Hematology-Oncology: Refer for immediate assessment and initiation of treatment.
    • Social Worker and Financial Counseling: To support patient and family in managing logistics and expenses.
    • Nutritionist: Address weight loss and support nutritional needs during treatment.

Treatment and Therapeutic Interventions:

 

    • Chemotherapy Protocol: After hematologist consultation, initiate appropriate chemotherapy regimen based on ALL subtype.
    • Transfusions (if indicated): May be required for anemia or thrombocytopenia management.
    • Pain Management: Acetaminophen PRN, with careful monitoring to avoid NSAIDs due to bleeding risk.

Education and Follow-Up:

    • Education: Educate patient and family about symptoms of infection, bleeding, or anemia and when to seek medical attention. Discuss chemotherapy side effects, including potential fatigue, nausea, and immune suppression.
    • Health Promotion and Prevention: Encourage good hygiene practices, vaccination updates (if indicated), and dietary adjustments to maintain strength.
    • Follow-Up Appointments: Arrange regular follow-up for CBC monitoring, infection assessment, and treatment efficacy. Collaborate with hematology to ensure continuity of care.

PCP Role in Ongoing Care:

    • Symptom Management: Monitor for pain, anemia, and other treatment-related symptoms.
    • Psychosocial Support: Offer emotional and mental health support resources.
    • Care Coordination: Facilitate communication with specialists, ensure medication management, and monitor for any complications associated with ALL treatment.

Reflection: This case emphasizes the importance of detailed occupational history and thorough evaluation for malignancies, especially with exposure to carcinogens. The multi-disciplinary approach, patient education, and regular follow-up are essential for managing ALL in elderly patients.

References

Smith, J., & Johnson, R. (2022). Evidence-based management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in elderly patients. Journal of Hematology Oncology, 15(2), 185-195.

American Cancer Society. (2023). Leukemia risk factors and prevention strategies.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Guidelines on ALL (2023).

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Hematological and Immune System Disorders Assignment Example

The Assignment:

Complete the Focused SOAP Note Template provided for the patient in the case study. Be sure to address the following:

  • Subjective: What was the patient’s subjective complaint? What details did the patient provide regarding their history of present illness and personal and medical history? Include a list of prescription and over-the-counter drugs the patient is currently taking. Compare this list to the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria®, and consider alternative drugs if appropriate. Provide a review of systems.
  • Objective: What observations did you note from the physical assessment? What were the lab, imaging, or functional assessments results?
  • Assessment: Provide a minimum of three differential diagnoses. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the diagnostic criteria for each, and explain what rules each differential in or out. Explain you critical thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
  • Plan: Provide a detailed treatment plan for the patient that addresses each diagnosis, as applicable. Include documentation of diagnostic studies that will be obtained, referrals to other health-care providers, therapeutic interventions, education, disposition of the patient, caregiver support, and any planned follow-up visits. Provide a discussion of health promotion and disease prevention for the patient, taking into consideration patient factors, past medical history (PMH), and other risk factors. Finally, include a reflection statement on the case that describes insights or lessons learned.
  • Provide at least three evidence-based peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines, which relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old) and support the treatment plan in following current standards of care. Follow APA 7th edition formatting.

Week 8 Case 2: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)

CC: Mrs. Derrick is a 78-year-old female who comes to the office with complaints of increasing symptoms of lethargy; fever, night sweats, a 15 lb. weight loss over 6 months; bleeding gums when she brushes her teeth; purplish patches in the skin; and shortness of breath. She also reports a feeling of deep pain in her bones and joints, worse than her usual arthritis pain. She notes that her employment history includes working at a dry-cleaning shop for 15 years, with an exposure to dry cleaning chemicals (benzenes are known to be a possible cause of leukemias). She currently lives with her son and daughter-in-law and their teenage son in a single family home. She has Medicare, a Medicare supplement plan and has a modest social security payment each month. She is financially comfortable living with her family. Generally she has been in good health, only treated for hypertension, occasional gastric reflux and osteoarthritis – worse in left hip.

HPI: As stated in case above.

Allergies: NKDA

Medications:

  • Omeperzol 20mg po daily
  • HCTZ 25mg po daily
  • Acetaminophen 325mg 2 po every 6 hours PRN hip pain

PE: Enlarged lymph nodes and swelling or discomfort in the abdomen.

You diagnose this patient with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Address the following in your SOAP note:

What additional history about her past work environment would you explore?

What additional objective data will you be assessing for?

What tests will you order? Describe at least four lab tests.

What are the differential diagnoses that you are considering? Describe two.

List at least two diagnostic tests you will order to confirm the diagnosis of ALL.

Will you be looking for a consultation? Please explain.

As the primary care provider for this patient with ALL:

  • Describe the education and follow-up you will provide to this patient during and after treatment by the hematologist-oncologist.
  • Describe at least three (3) roles as the PCP for the ongoing care of the ALL patient.

Get The Best Nursing Paper Writing Service and Unlock Your Academic Success

Are you overwhelmed with complex nursing assignments, tight deadlines, or specific instructions that seem challenging to meet? Look no further – ReliablePapers.com is your go-to destination for all your nursing paper writing needs! Our expert nursing essay writers are dedicated to providing you with high-quality, original, and customized nursing papers that guarantee the best grades possible.

Why choose ReliablePapers.com?

  1. Professional Nursing Writers: Our team of professional writers specializes in nursing essay papers, ensuring your assignment is in the hands of experts who understand the writing of nursing topics.
  2. Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of college students. Our online nursing papers are available at very cheap prices, making our services accessible to all. Whether you need assistance with nursing coursework writing, want to buy a nursing essay online, or are in search of reliable nursing assignment help, we’ve got you covered.
  3. Customized Nursing Paper Solutions: Whether you need assistance with a complex topic, have a tight deadline, or are seeking a guide on how to write your nursing assignment, we’ve got you covered. Our writers will tailor their approach to meet your specific needs.
  4. Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers! Our writers will provide you with an outstanding nursing essay paper written from scratch, ensuring it adheres to any topic, deadline, and instructions you provide.

Save your time for what matters most and let ReliablePapers.com take care of your essay. Don’t settle for subpar papers or risk submitting plagiarized content. Choose the best nursing paper writing service today!

Unlock your academic success by trusting ReliablePapers.com – Your Partner in Excellence.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

/by

NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Abdominal Urological and Gynecological Disorders Assignment Example

, ,

NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Abdominal Urological and Gynecological Disorders Assignment Example

NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Abdominal Urological and Gynecological Disorders Assignment ExampleNRNP 6540 Week 5 Assignment: Assessing, Diagnosing, and Treating Abdominal, Urological, and Gynecological Disorders

NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Abdominal Urological and Gynecological Disorders Assignment Brief

Assignment Instructions Overview:

This assignment requires the completion of a comprehensive SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan) note based on a provided case study, focused on assessing, diagnosing, and treating a patient with abdominal, urological, or gynecological complaints. The SOAP note must thoroughly cover each section, requiring both clinical insights and evidence-based support to justify assessment and treatment decisions.

Key components include a subjective review of the patient’s complaints, medical history, and medications, with a comparison of current medications to the American Geriatrics Society’s Beers Criteria®. The objective section will include physical examination findings and any relevant diagnostic test results. In the assessment, the student is expected to present differential diagnoses, explaining the process that prioritizes the primary diagnosis. The plan must outline treatment steps, further diagnostics, referrals, and preventive measures, with a reflection on lessons learned from the case.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

The main objective of this assignment is to enhance clinical reasoning skills by synthesizing patient data and developing a differential diagnosis, leading to a focused treatment plan. Students are expected to apply critical thinking to evaluate both subjective and objective data, integrate relevant clinical guidelines, and create a safe, evidence-based approach for patient management. The assignment also aims to reinforce an understanding of age-related considerations, especially in medication management, and the importance of health promotion and preventive care.

The Student’s Role:

The student assumes the role of a healthcare provider tasked with accurately assessing and managing a case with urological symptoms. This role requires them to gather a thorough patient history, analyze findings from physical exams and labs, and apply clinical knowledge to generate differential diagnoses. The student must also consider pharmacological interventions and address specific geriatric concerns, such as evaluating the safety of current medications using Beers Criteria®. This assignment challenges the student to bridge clinical theory with practical application, crafting a management plan that is safe, effective, and evidence-based.

Competencies Measured:

This assignment measures competencies in clinical assessment, diagnostic reasoning, and treatment planning. It assesses the ability to:

  • Collect and interpret comprehensive patient data (history, physical exam, lab results).
  • Develop and prioritize differential diagnoses using evidence-based criteria.
  • Craft a holistic and detailed patient management plan that includes treatment, follow-up, and health promotion.
  • Apply geriatric pharmacology principles to ensure safe medication use.
  • Reflect on clinical learning experiences to enhance future practice.

You can also read these assignment examples for the NRNP 6540 – Advanced Practice Care of Older Adults Course:

NRNP 6540 Assessment of Older Adults Evaluation Plan Discussion Example

NRNP 6540 Psychosocial Disorders Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Dementia Delirium and Depression Assignment Example

NRNP 6540 Assessing Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Disorders Assignment Example

NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Hematological and Immune System Disorders Assignment Example

NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Abdominal Urological and Gynecological Disorders Assignment Example

Focused SOAP Note Template

Patient Case: R.B., 95-Year-Old Male with Red Urine

Subjective

Chief Complaint: “My urine is really red.”

History of Present Illness (HPI): The patient, a 95-year-old male, reports noticing bright red-colored urine for the past two days. He lives in a skilled nursing facility (SNF) and is accompanied by his son for this visit. The patient denies associated pain, urgency, frequency, or fever. He has a history of urinary issues, including gross hematuria. Recent lab work showed signs consistent with infection, but full culture results are pending.

Past Medical History (PMH):

  • Cognitive communication deficit
  • Dysphagia
  • Right-sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis following ischemic stroke
  • Moderate vascular dementia
  • Malignant neoplasm of prostate
  • New-onset atrial fibrillation (12/2019)
  • Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the left lower extremity
  • History of gross hematuria

Medication List:

  • Tamsulosin 0.4 mg, 2 capsules daily
  • Aspirin 325 mg daily
  • Atorvastatin 10 mg daily
  • Donepezil 10 mg at bedtime
  • Metoprolol 25 mg, 0.5 tablets every 12 hours
  • Acetaminophen 500 mg, 1 tablet twice daily

Beers Criteria Evaluation: Some medications require monitoring due to age-related risks. Aspirin at 325 mg daily may increase bleeding risk, particularly considering the patient’s hematuria and age. According to Beers Criteria, Donepezil and Metoprolol are typically safe but should be monitored for possible side effects, such as dizziness and bradycardia (American Geriatrics Society, 2019).

Allergies: Penicillin (reaction: hives)

Review of Systems (ROS):

  • General: No fever, chills, or malaise
  • Genitourinary: Red-colored urine, denies pain, dysuria, urgency, or incontinence
  • Cardiovascular: History of atrial fibrillation; managed with metoprolol and aspirin
  • Neurologic: Cognitive impairment, right-sided weakness
  • Gastrointestinal: No recent changes in bowel habits or complaints of abdominal pain

Objective

Vital Signs:

  • BP: 122/70 mmHg
  • HR: 66 bpm
  • Temp: 98.0°F
  • Respiration: 18 breaths per minute
  • SpO2: 98%

Physical Exam Findings:

  • General: Alert with moderate dementia; cooperative but with cognitive limitations.
  • Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, no palpable masses; bladder non-distended.
  • Genitourinary: Hematuria observed.
  • Cardiovascular: Regular rate and rhythm, no murmurs or gallops.
  • Neurological: Right-sided hemiparesis secondary to past CVA.

Lab Results:

  • Complete Blood Count: RBC 3.53 (low); Hemoglobin 10.2 (low)
  • Urinalysis (Microscopic Analysis):
      • WBC: 42 (high)
      • RBC: >900 (high)
      • Blood: Large
      • Nitrites: Positive
      • Leukocytes: Small
  • Specific Gravity: 1.020
  • Urine pH: 7.0

Assessment

Primary Diagnosis: Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) with Hematuria

  1. Justification: The presence of elevated WBCs, RBCs, positive nitrites, and leukocytes in the urinalysis strongly suggests a urinary tract infection, commonly associated with hematuria in older adults (Gleckman et al., 2020). Additionally, the patient’s prior gross hematuria and prostate cancer history raise his risk for recurrent UTIs.

Differential Diagnoses:

  1. Hemorrhagic Cystitis – Persistent hematuria, without severe pain or fever, may suggest hemorrhagic cystitis, particularly given the patient’s history of prostate issues. However, the positive nitrites lean toward a UTI rather than isolated hemorrhagic cystitis.
  2. Prostate Cancer Progression – The patient’s prostate cancer history could contribute to the observed hematuria. However, the presence of leukocytes and nitrites points more convincingly toward infection rather than tumor progression.

Plan

Diagnostics:

  • Urine Culture and Sensitivity (C&S): Pending, essential for confirming the causative organism and adjusting antibiotics as needed.
  • Complete Blood Count (CBC): Monitor RBCs and hemoglobin due to anemia and hematuria.

Medications and Therapeutic Interventions:

  • Antibiotics: Begin empiric treatment with Nitrofurantoin 100 mg twice daily for 5 days, pending C&S results to confirm bacterial susceptibility (Dale et al., 2021).
  • Acetaminophen: Continue for pain management as needed.
  • Medication Adjustment: Consider adjusting aspirin dosage upon further evaluation of bleeding risk, especially with ongoing hematuria (American Geriatrics Society, 2019).

Patient and Caregiver Education:

  • Educate the patient’s caregiver on signs of worsening infection, including fever, increased confusion, and abdominal pain.
  • Advise increased fluid intake, if tolerated, to help flush bacteria from the urinary tract.

Follow-Up:

  • Short-term: Review urinalysis and C&S results in 48 hours to confirm antibiotic choice.
  • Long-term: Schedule a follow-up appointment in one month to assess infection resolution and reevaluate the need for aspirin or alternative anticoagulation.

Health Promotion and Disease Prevention:

  • Promote urinary hygiene practices to reduce future UTIs.
  • Encourage a balanced diet to address anemia and overall health. Consider dietary consultation if anemia persists.

Reflection Statement: This case highlighted the complexity of managing infections in geriatric patients, especially when balancing polypharmacy and the risks of adverse drug reactions. Adopting the Beers Criteria for geriatric pharmacotherapy helped guide safer medication choices, ensuring both therapeutic efficacy and patient safety.

References

American Geriatrics Society. (2019). Updated Beers Criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 67(4), 674-694. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15767

Dale, H., Heneghan, C., & Roberts, N. (2021). Empirical antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infections in elderly patients: A systematic review. British Journal of General Practice, 71(3), 135-140. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp21X714353

Gleckman, R., Fine, M. J., & Washington, J. (2020). Diagnosis and management of urinary tract infections in older adults. Annals of Internal Medicine, 172(5), 391-399. https://doi.org/10.7326/AIM.10545

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Abdominal Urological and Gynecological Disorders Assignment Example

The Assignment:

Complete the Focused SOAP Note Template provided for the patient in the case study. Be sure to address the following:

  • Subjective: What was the patient’s subjective complaint? What details did the patient provide regarding their history of present illness and personal and medical history? Include a list of prescription and over-the-counter drugs the patient is currently taking. Compare this list to the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria®, and consider alternative drugs if appropriate. Provide a review of systems.
  • Objective: What observations did you note from the physical assessment? What were the lab, imaging, or functional assessments results?
  • Assessment: Provide a minimum of three differential diagnoses. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the diagnostic criteria for each, and explain what rules each differential in or out. Explain you critical thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
  • Plan: Provide a detailed treatment plan for the patient that addresses each diagnosis, as applicable. Include documentation of diagnostic studies that will be obtained, referrals to other health-care providers, therapeutic interventions, education, disposition of the patient, caregiver support, and any planned follow-up visits. Provide a discussion of health promotion and disease prevention for the patient, taking into consideration patient factors, past medical history (PMH), and other risk factors. Finally, include a reflection statement on the case that describes insights or lessons learned.
  • Provide at least three evidence-based peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines, which relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differentials diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old) and support the treatment plan in following current standards of care. Follow APA 7th edition formatting. 

Week 7: Abdominal, Urinary, and Gynecological 

Case 1: UTI

R.B. 95-year-old, white male, currently living in a skilled nursing facility (SNF)

Chief complaint: “My urine is really red.”

HPI: On Wednesday (2 days ago) the patient was brought to your clinic by his son and complained that his urine appeared to be bright red in color. You ordered labs, urinalysis, culture, and sensitivity, and the results are below.

Allergies: Penicillin: Hives

Medications: Tamsulosin 0.4 mcg, 2 capsules daily, Aspirin 325 mg daily, Atorvastatin 10 mg 1 tablet daily, Donepezil 10 mg 1 tablet PO QHS, Metoprolol 25 mg 0.5 mg tablet every 12 hours, Acetaminophen 500 mg 1 tablet BID

Code status: DNR Regular diet, pureed texture, honey-thickened liquids

Vitals: BP 122/70, HR 66, Temp 98.0 F, Resp 18, Pulse ox 98%  Weight:____ BMI:____

PMH: Cognitive communication deficit, pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, dysphagia, R-side hemiplegia and hemiparesis past ischemic CVA, moderate vascular dementia, malignant neoplasm of prostate, new-onset atrial fibrillation (12/2019), DVT on left lower extremity, gross hematuria

Labs:

RBC                         3.53 (L)

Hemoglobin           10.2 (L)

Microscopic Analysis, Urine, straight Cath

Component:

WBC UA                                    42 (H) (0-5/ HPF)

RBC, UA                                    >900 (H) (0-5/HPF)

Epithelial cells, urine               2           (0-4 /HPF)

Hyaline casts, UA                     0           (0-2 /LPF)

Urinalysis

Color Red

Appearance (Urine)    Clear

Ketones, UA                 Trace

Specific gravity             1.020               (1.005-1.025)

Blood, UA                     Large

PH, Urine                      7.0       (5.0-8.0)

Leukocytes                   Small

Nitrites                         Positive

C&S results were not available yet.

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.

How We Can Assist You

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at ReliablePapers.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust ReliablePapers.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

/by

NRNP 6540 Assessing Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Disorders Assignment Example

, ,

NRNP 6540 Assessing Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Disorders Assignment Example

NRNP 6540 Assessing Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Disorders Assignment ExampleNRNP 6540 Week 4 Assignment: A 67-Year-Old with Tachycardia and Coughing

NRNP 6540 Assessing Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Disorders Assignment Brief

Assignment Instructions Overview

This assignment is centered on the assessment, diagnosis, and management of cardiovascular and pulmonary disorders. It requires students to analyze a case study involving a patient with complex health issues, including respiratory and cardiovascular symptoms. Through this case, students must demonstrate an ability to integrate subjective and objective findings, interpret diagnostic results, and develop a treatment plan based on current evidence-based guidelines.

The assignment involves answering 10 specific questions about a hypothetical patient’s symptoms, diagnosis, and potential treatments. Students are expected to identify relevant assessment tools, evaluate differential diagnoses, propose treatment regimens, and provide patient education. The goal is to develop a comprehensive understanding of the patient’s condition, including the appropriate steps to assess, diagnose, and manage her symptoms effectively.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Understanding Assignment Objectives

The primary objectives of this assignment are to enhance students’ clinical reasoning, diagnostic skills, and treatment planning abilities in managing cardiovascular and pulmonary conditions. Students are expected to:

  • Assess and interpret clinical signs and symptoms within the context of cardiovascular and respiratory disorders.
  • Utilize assessment tools and clinical guidelines to establish diagnoses and determine the severity of conditions.
  • Identify appropriate diagnostic tests to further evaluate symptoms and rule out differential diagnoses.
  • Propose evidence-based interventions, including pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments, tailored to the patient’s condition and history.
  • Educate patients and families on managing symptoms, medication adherence, and follow-up care to prevent complications.

The Student’s Role

In this assignment, students take on the role of a healthcare provider, responsible for analyzing a patient’s health history, conducting a thorough assessment, interpreting laboratory and diagnostic data, and creating a comprehensive care plan. Students must:

  • Apply clinical guidelines and professional standards to ensure appropriate decision-making.
  • Think critically about the patient’s symptoms, using tools like the CURB-65 to assess pneumonia severity or an Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) to evaluate vascular health.
  • Integrate knowledge of the patient’s existing chronic conditions, such as COPD, into the treatment plan to address both acute and chronic aspects of the case.
  • Develop patient-centered care strategies, considering the patient’s daily living needs, family dynamics, and health education requirements.

Competencies Measured

This assignment measures a range of essential competencies for advanced practice nursing, including:

  • Clinical Decision-Making: Students are evaluated on their ability to assess a patient’s condition accurately, differentiate between possible diagnoses, and select appropriate treatment options.
  • Evidence-Based Practice: This competency is demonstrated through the use of current guidelines, research-based assessment tools, and validated interventions for managing cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases.
  • Patient Education and Advocacy: Students must show proficiency in educating patients and caregivers about their health, potential risk factors, and steps for disease management. This includes communicating complex information clearly and providing actionable follow-up instructions.
  • Professional and Ethical Responsibility: Students are expected to approach each question with a patient-centered, ethical perspective, ensuring that care recommendations respect the patient’s preferences, lifestyle, and health goals.

You can also read these assignment examples for the NRNP 6540 – Advanced Practice Care of Older Adults Course:

NRNP 6540 Assessment of Older Adults Evaluation Plan Discussion Example

NRNP 6540 Psychosocial Disorders Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Dementia Delirium and Depression Assignment Example

NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Abdominal Urological and Gynecological Disorders Assignment Example

NRNP 6540 Assessing Diagnosing and Treating Hematological and Immune System Disorders Assignment Example

NRNP 6540 Assessing Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Disorders Assignment Example

Introduction

Ms. Baker, a 68-year-old woman, presents with a rapid heart rate and frequent coughing. With a medical history including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and vitamin D deficiency, she also experiences intermittent leg pain while walking, which subsides with rest. Given her recent symptoms, vital signs, and laboratory results, the following assessment and management plan will explore her diagnosis, treatment options, and education needs.

Question 1: Expected Chest X-ray Findings for Pneumonia

For a patient like Ms. Baker, who is diagnosed with pneumonia, common radiographic findings on her chest X-ray would likely include areas of consolidation, which represent fluid and pus-filled alveolar spaces due to infection (Marrie, 2018). Given her diagnosis of left lower lobe pneumonia, we would anticipate localized opacities or infiltrates within the left lower lobe. Additional signs may include air bronchograms or increased vascular markings due to inflammation in the affected lung tissue.

Question 2: Classification of Pneumonia – CAP vs. HAP

Ms. Baker’s pneumonia is best classified as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). CAP is an infection acquired outside of a hospital or healthcare facility, typically diagnosed in patients presenting from the community with no recent healthcare exposure (Metlay et al., 2019). In contrast, hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) occurs 48 hours or more after admission to a healthcare setting (Mandell, 2020). Since Ms. Baker’s symptoms developed at home, her pneumonia aligns with CAP criteria.

Question 3: Assessment Tool and Application (CURB-65)

3A) The CURB-65 score is a widely used tool to assess pneumonia severity and guide treatment. It assigns points based on five factors: confusion, urea >7 mmol/L, respiratory rate ≥30, blood pressure <90/60 mmHg, and age ≥65 (Lim et al., 2010).

3B) In Ms. Baker’s case:

Confusion: Not present

Urea: Not elevated (BUN is 17 mg/dL)

Respiratory rate: Elevated at 22 breaths per minute but does not meet the ≥30 criterion

Blood pressure: Normal at 126/78 mmHg

Age: She is 68, scoring 1 point for age alone.

Based on her CURB-65 score of 1, Ms. Baker could likely be managed as an outpatient with oral antibiotics and close monitoring (Lim et al., 2010).

Question 4: Treatment Plan Based on CAP Guidelines

For Ms. Baker’s CAP, recommended treatment aligns with amoxicillin/clavulanate combined with a macrolide like azithromycin. The combination covers common CAP pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae (Metlay et al., 2019). Given her COPD history, this regimen is optimal as it addresses potential bacterial pathogens in COPD patients, who are at higher risk of secondary infections. Ms. Baker should also use bronchodilators, such as her ProAir HFA inhaler, to manage respiratory symptoms related to her COPD exacerbation (GOLD, 2023).

Question 5: Gold Standard for Measuring COPD Airflow Limitation

The gold standard for assessing airflow limitation in COPD patients is spirometry. Specifically, FEV1 (Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second) measures airflow limitation severity (GOLD, 2023). Regular spirometry assessments will help monitor Ms. Baker’s disease progression and adjust her COPD management plan accordingly.

Question 6: Most Likely Diagnosis for Intermittent Leg Pain

The best diagnosis for Ms. Baker’s intermittent leg pain is intermittent claudication. Intermittent claudication is commonly associated with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and is characterized by leg pain or cramping during activity that subsides with rest (Criqui & Aboyans, 2015). Ms. Baker’s smoking history and hypertension further increase her PAD risk, making this diagnosis more likely than other options, such as DVT, cellulitis, or electrolyte imbalance, which have different symptom profiles.

Question 7: Diagnostic Test for Intermittent Claudication

To evaluate Ms. Baker’s suspected intermittent claudication, an Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) test is appropriate. The ABI measures blood flow by comparing blood pressure in the ankle and arm, with abnormal values indicating PAD (Aboyans et al., 2018). Positive findings would prompt further vascular assessment and guide treatment to improve her walking tolerance.

Question 8: Differential Diagnoses for Initial Presentation

  • COPD Exacerbation: Her increased cough and reliance on her inhaler suggest a potential COPD exacerbation, especially with a history of smoking and COPD (GOLD, 2023).
  • Community-Acquired Pneumonia (CAP): Symptoms like cough, sputum production, and tachycardia align with pneumonia, a confirmed diagnosis through assessment.
  • Heart Failure: Given her history of hypertension, heart failure should be considered as a differential, as it can manifest with fatigue, cough, and peripheral symptoms (McDonagh et al., 2021).

Question 9: Patient Education and Follow-Up

Education: Ms. Baker should be advised on the importance of medication adherence, including using her inhaler correctly and consistently taking her prescribed antibiotics. She should also receive education on recognizing symptoms of worsening COPD or pneumonia, such as increased shortness of breath or high fever, and on avoiding respiratory infections by practicing good hygiene and considering pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations (GOLD, 2023).

Follow-Up: Ms. Baker should be scheduled for a follow-up within 1–2 weeks to reassess her respiratory symptoms, confirm pneumonia resolution, and adjust her COPD treatment if necessary.

Question 10: Suitability of Amoxicillin/Clavulanate + Macrolide

Yes, amoxicillin/clavulanate plus a macrolide would be an appropriate choice for Ms. Baker’s CAP treatment. This combination targets both typical and atypical CAP pathogens and is recommended for patients with COPD due to their higher risk of infection by gram-negative and atypical bacteria (Metlay et al., 2019). However, given her penicillin allergy, alternative options should be considered, such as doxycycline or a quinolone, based on her allergy severity and response history.

Conclusion

Ms. Baker’s case highlights the need for comprehensive assessment and individualized care to address her respiratory and cardiovascular health needs. By following evidence-based guidelines and carefully considering her COPD and smoking history, her CAP can be effectively managed, and additional cardiovascular concerns, such as intermittent claudication, can be evaluated to improve her overall quality of life.

References

Aboyans, V., Ricco, J. B., Bartelink, M. L. E. L., et al. (2018). ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery diseases. European Heart Journal, 39(9), 763-816.

Criqui, M. H., & Aboyans, V. (2015). Epidemiology of peripheral artery disease. Circulation Research, 116(9), 1509–1526.

GOLD. (2023). Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease.

Lim, W. S., van der Eerden, M. M., Laing, R., et al. (2010). Defining community-acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: An international derivation and validation study. Thorax, 58(5), 377–382.

Mandell, L. A. (2020). The treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: A year in the life of a clinician. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 71(6), 1294-1301.

Marrie, T. J. (2018). Pneumonia: Symptoms, types, and treatment. American Family Physician, 97(7), 433-440.

McDonagh, T. A., Metra, M., Adamo, M., et al. (2021). 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. European Heart Journal, 42(36), 3599-3726.

Metlay, J. P., Waterer, G. W., Long, A. C., et al. (2019). Diagnosis and treatment of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 200(7), e45-e67.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NRNP 6540 Assessing Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Disorders Assignment Example

NRNP 6540 Week 5 Case Assignment

Case Title: A 67-year-old With Tachycardia and Coughing

Ms. Baker is a 68-year-old female who is brought to your office today by her daughter Rebecca. Ms. Baker lives with her daughter and is able to perform all activities of daily living (ADLs) independently. Her daughter reports that her mother’s heart rate has been quite elevated, and she has been coughing a lot over the last 2 days. Ms. Baker has a 30-pack per year history of smoking cigarettes but quit smoking 3 years ago. Other known history includes chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, vitamin D deficiency, and hyperlipidemia. She also reports some complaints of intermittent pain/cramping in her bilateral lower extremities when walking and has to stop walking at times for the pain to subside. She also reports some pain to the left side of her back, and some pain with aspiration.

Ms. Baker reports she has been coughing a lot lately, and notices some thick, brown-tinged sputum. She states she has COPD and has been using her albuterol inhaler more than usual. She says it helps her “get the cold up.” Her legs feel tired but denies any worsening shortness of breath. She admits that she has some weakness and fatigue but is still able to carry out her daily routine.

Vital Signs: 99.2, 126/78, 90, RR 22

Labs: Complete Metabolic Panel and CBC done and were within normal limits

CMP Component Value CBC Component Value
Glucose, Serum 86 mg/dL White blood cell count 5.0 x 10E3/uL
BUN 17 mg/dL RBC 4.71 x10E6/uL
Creatinine, Serum 0.63 mg/dL Hemoglobin 10.9 g/dL
EGFR 120 mL/min Hematocrit 36.4%
Sodium, Serum 141 mmol/L Mean Corpuscular Volume 79 fL
Potassium, Serum 4.0 mmol/L Mean Corpus HgB 28.9 pg
Chloride, Serum 100 mmol/L Mean Corpus HgB Conc 32.5 g/dL
Carbon Dioxide 26 mmol/L RBC Distribution Width 12.3%
Calcium 8.7 mg/dL Platelet Count 178 x 10E3/uL
Protein, Total, Serum 6.0 g/dL
Albumin 4.8 g/dL
Globulin 2.4 g/dL
Bilirubin 1.0 mg/dL
AST 17 IU/L
ALT 15 IU/L

Allergies: Penicillin

Current Medications:

  • Atorvastatin 40mg p.o. daily
  • Multivitamin 1 tablet p.o. daily
  • Losartan 50mg p.o. daily
  • ProAir HFA 90mcg 2 puffs q4–6 hrs. prn
  • Caltrate 600mg+ D3 1 tablet p.o. daily

Diagnosis: Pneumonia

Directions: Answer the following 10 questions and upload your document to Canvas site by due date.

Question 1: What findings would you expect to be reported or seen on her chest x-ray results, given the diagnosis of pneumonia?

Question 2: Define further what type of pneumonia Ms. Baker has, HAP (hospital-acquired pneumonia) or CAP (community-acquired pneumonia)? What’s the difference/criteria?

Question 3:

  • 3A) What assessment tool should be used to determine the severity of pneumonia and treatment options?
  • 3B) Based on Ms. Baker’s subjective and objective findings, apply that tool and elaborate on each clinical factor for this patient.

Question 4: Ms. Baker was diagnosed with left lower lobe pneumonia. What would your treatment be for her based on her diagnosis, case scenario, and evidence-based guidelines?

Question 5: Ms. Baker has a known history of COPD. What is the gold standard for measuring airflow limitation?

Question 6: Ms. Baker mentions intermittent pain in her bilateral legs when walking and having to rest to stop the leg pain/cramps. Which choice below would be the best choice for a potential diagnosis for this? Explain your reasoning.

  1. DVT (Deep Vein Thrombosis)
  2. Intermittent Claudication
  3. Cellulitis
  4. Electrolyte Imbalance

Question 7: Ms. Baker mentions intermittent pain in her bilateral legs when walking and having to rest to stop the leg pain. What test could be ordered to further evaluate this?

Question 8: Name three (3) differentials for Ms. Baker’s initial presentation.

Question 9: What patient education would you give Ms. Baker and her daughter? What would be your follow-up instructions?

Question 10: Would amoxicillin/clavulanate plus a macrolide have been an option to treat Ms. Baker’s Pneumonia? Explain why or why not.

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.

How We Can Assist You

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at ReliablePapers.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust ReliablePapers.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

/by

NUR 319 Nursing Assignment Hermanson and Åstrandb

, ,

NUR 319 Nursing Assignment Hermanson and Åstrandb

NUR 319 Nursing Assignment Hermanson and Åstrandb (2020)

What is meant by evidence-based practice?

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the use of the best available evidence in combination with clinical expertise and patient values to guide healthcare decision-making. EBP involves critically appraising research evidence to identify the most relevant and reliable findings, which can then be integrated with clinical expertise and patient preferences to inform healthcare decisions.

Why is it important that we use evidence-based practice?

There are several reasons why healthcare professionals should use evidence-based practice:

  • Improved patient outcomes: Evidence-based practice is associated with better patient outcomes, as it involves using interventions that have been shown to be effective in research studies.
  • More efficient use of resources: By using evidence-based practice, healthcare professionals can avoid using interventions that have not been shown to be effective, thereby reducing waste and unnecessary expenditure.
  • Greater consistency of care: Evidence-based practice helps to ensure that patients receive consistent, high-quality care, regardless of the healthcare professional they see.
  • Enhances clinical decision-making: Using evidence-based practice ensures that healthcare decisions are informed by the best available research evidence, leading to more informed and effective clinical decision-making.

Check out another post by our nursing paper writing experts aimed at assisting students on Assignment: Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders

Hermanson and Åstrandb (2020) Study Critique Questions

The study by Hermanson and Åstrandb (2020) investigated the effects of early pacifier use on breastfeeding outcomes. The following questions are related to the study design:

Did the research address a clearly focused research question?

A focused research question is a clear and concise statement of the problem being studied. The research question was clearly identified as “What are the effects of early pacifier use on breastfeeding?” This question is focused and specific and helps to guide the study design and analysis.

Were the participants clearly identified? Why is this important?

Clear identification of study participants is important to ensure that the study results are applicable to the population of interest. In the study by Hermanson and Åstrandb, participants were clearly identified as primiparous women who planned to breastfeed and had given birth to a healthy term infant. Participants were recruited from a single hospital in Sweden, which may limit the generalizability of the study results.

Was the intervention clearly described? Why is this important?

A clear description of study interventions is important to ensure that the intervention can be replicated by other researchers and healthcare providers. In the study by Hermanson and Åstrandb, the intervention (early pacifier use) was clearly described as offering a pacifier within 2 hours of birth and allowing unrestricted pacifier use. However, it is unclear whether the control group received any pacifier use, which may limit the interpretation of study results.

Was the assignment of participants to interventions randomized?

Randomization is the process of assigning study participants to treatment or control groups randomly, to minimize the risk of bias. In the study by Hermanson and Åstrandb, participants were randomized to either the intervention group (early pacifier use) or the control group (no pacifier use). The authors used computer-generated randomization, which is a commonly used and adequate method of randomization.

How was randomization carried out, and was it sufficient to eliminate systematic bias?

Randomization was carried out using a computer-generated randomization list. This method of randomization is sufficient to eliminate systematic bias and ensures that participants are assigned to study groups in a way that is not influenced by the researcher.

Was the aim of the research clearly identified, and why is this important?

Yes, the aim of the research was clearly identified. The aim of the study was to determine the effects of early pacifier use on breastfeeding outcomes among newborn infants. Clearly identifying the aim of the research helps to ensure that the study is conducted in a focused and systematic manner.

Discuss the reasons why observational studies have found associations between pacifier use and shorter breastfeeding duration, while results from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) did not reveal any difference in breastfeeding outcomes.

Observational studies have found associations between pacifier use and shorter breastfeeding duration, while RCTs have not consistently shown a difference in breastfeeding outcomes. One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that observational studies are prone to bias, including selection bias, confounding bias, and information bias. Observational studies often involve non-randomized samples and may be subject to a range of confounding variables that cannot be controlled for, such as maternal breastfeeding attitudes, maternal education, and socioeconomic status. In contrast, RCTs involve the randomization of participants, which can help to reduce bias and increase the internal validity of the study.

Another explanation for the discrepancy between observational studies and RCTs is that observational studies may be influenced by reverse causation. For example, mothers who are having difficulty breastfeeding may be more likely to use pacifiers to soothe their infants, rather than the other way around. In contrast, RCTs are less prone to this type of bias because they involve the random allocation of participants to interventions, which reduces the likelihood of reverse causation.

Were all participants who entered the study accounted for at its conclusion?

Yes, all participants who entered the study were accounted for at its conclusion. The researchers reported a 100% follow-up rate, which means that all participants who were enrolled in the study were included in the final analysis. Accounting for all study participants is important to ensure that the study results accurately reflect the study population and minimize the risk of bias.

Methodological Considerations

Were the participants ‘blind’ to the intervention they were given? Consider the benefits of using a ‘blind’ design.

The study does not explicitly state whether the participants were blinded to the intervention they were given. However, blinding is an important aspect of RCTs because it helps to eliminate bias and ensure that the groups are comparable. In this study, blinding could have been achieved by providing all participants with a pacifier, but only activating it in the intervention group. This would help to ensure that any differences in breastfeeding outcomes were due to the use of the pacifier and not to other factors, such as the psychological effect of receiving a pacifier.

Were the baseline characteristics of each study group (intervention group and control group) clearly identified?

Yes, the baseline characteristics of each study group were clearly identified. The study reports that the two groups were similar in terms of demographic and obstetric characteristics, including age, parity, gestational age, birth weight, and mode of delivery.

Prior to collecting data why is important that the questionnaires used, were validated?

It is important to validate questionnaires prior to collecting data because it helps to ensure that they measure what they are intended to measure. If a questionnaire is not validated, it may not accurately reflect the construct of interest, which can lead to inaccurate results. Validating questionnaires involves testing their reliability and validity, which involves assessing their internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity. In this study, the researchers used a validated questionnaire to assess breastfeeding outcomes, which helps to ensure that the results are accurate and reliable.

Apart from the experimental intervention, did each study group receive the same level of care (that is, were they treated equally)? Why is this important?

It is important to ensure that each study group receives the same level of care, as this helps to control for any extraneous factors that may influence the outcome of the study. If one group receives more attention, support or care than the other group, it can confound the results and make it difficult to determine the true effect of the intervention being studied. In this study, the researchers did not explicitly state whether both groups received the same level of care, but they did state that both groups received standard postnatal care according to hospital guidelines.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the study conducted by Hermanson and Åstrand (2020) was a well-designed RCT that addressed a focused research question related to the effects of early pacifier use on breastfeeding. The study was adequately powered and had a good sample size, and the participants were clearly identified. The intervention was also clearly described, and the assignment of participants to interventions was randomized. The aim of the research was clearly identified and the results were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods. The study also had some limitations, such as the fact that it was conducted in a single hospital and may not be generalizable to other settings. Overall, the study provides important evidence to inform clinical practice in relation to the use of pacifiers and their potential impact on breastfeeding.

Get Expert Writers to Work on Your Nursing Assignment Study Critique Paper

Our company provides reliable custom writing services for various academic assignments, including nursing assignments.

We have a pool of expert nursing writers to work on nursing assignments such as the Hermanson and Åstrandb (2020) study critique paper on the effects of early pacifier use on breastfeeding.

We provide all of our clients with custom-written papers that meet the needs of their assignments and are turned in on time.

To get expert writers to work on your nursing assignment study critique paper, you can order your custom nursing paper with us now.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

/by

Asthma Exacerbation Gabriel Martinez Shadow Health

, , ,

Asthma Exacerbation Gabriel Martinez Shadow Health

Asthma Exacerbation Gabriel Martinez shadow health Objective Data

Introduction of Gabriel Martinez Shadow Health Case

Asthma is a chronic respiratory condition characterized by airway inflammation, constriction, and excessive mucus production. Asthma exacerbation is a sudden worsening of asthma symptoms that can be triggered by various factors such as allergens, viral infections, exercise, or stress. In this assignment, the focus will be on Gabriel Martinez, a pediatric patient who presents with asthma exacerbation.

The nurse student will interview Gabriel and his guardian to establish his chief complaint, gather a history of present illness, assess his home medications and social history, review relevant systems, and assess his pediatric asthma severity score to better understand the severity of his condition.

Interview the Patient and Guardian to Establish Chief Complaint: Gabriel Martinez Shadow Health

The first step in assessing Gabriel’s asthma exacerbation is to establish his chief complaint by conducting an interview with him and his guardian. The nurse student should ask open-ended questions to gather as much information as possible. The following are some important topics that should be covered during the interview:

  1. Reason for visit: The nurse should ask Gabriel and his guardian about the reason for their visit to the healthcare facility. Gabriel’s guardian may have scheduled the appointment or brought him in for urgent care due to his symptoms.
  2. Current symptoms: The nurse should ask about the specific symptoms Gabriel is experiencing, such as coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath, or chest tightness. The nurse should also ask about the frequency and severity of these symptoms.
  3. Onset and progression of symptoms: The nurse should ask Gabriel and his guardian about when the symptoms started and how they have progressed over time. This will help determine the severity of the exacerbation.
  4. Previous asthma exacerbations or hospitalizations: The nurse should ask about any previous asthma exacerbations or hospitalizations that Gabriel has experienced. This will provide a baseline for the severity of the current exacerbation.
  5. Triggers for exacerbation: The nurse should ask about any triggers that may have caused the current exacerbation, such as exposure to allergens or physical activity.
  6. How symptoms affect daily life: The nurse should ask about how Gabriel’s symptoms are affecting his daily life, such as his ability to participate in school, sports, or other activities.

By gathering this information, the nurse student can establish Gabriel’s chief complaint and assess the severity of his asthma exacerbation. The nurse student can also use this information to develop a plan of care for Gabriel, including medication management, environmental modifications, and education on asthma management.

Check out posts that our nursing paper writing experts have written aimed at assisting students on tina jones shadow health assesment, ethical and legal implications of prescribing drugs, nur 350 module five health education activity, and application of nursing theory paper.

Pediatric Asthma Severity Score: Gabriel Martinez Shadow Health

Pediatric Asthma Severity Score (PAS) is a tool used by healthcare professionals to assess the severity of asthma exacerbation in children. It is based on the child’s symptoms, physical examination, and response to treatment.

The PAS score ranges from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating more severe exacerbations. The score is calculated based on the following parameters:

Respiratory Rate: The child’s respiratory rate is measured and scored as follows:

  • 0: ≤ 12 breaths per minute
  • 1: >12-16 breaths per minute
  • 2: >16-20 breaths per minute
  • 3: >20 breaths per minute

Wheezing: The presence or absence of wheezing is noted and scored as follows:

  • 0: No wheezing
  • 1: Wheezing present on expiration only
  • 2: Wheezing present on inspiration and expiration

Retractions: The degree of chest retractions is evaluated and scored as follows:

  • 0: No retractions
  • 1: Mild retractions (suprasternal or intercostal)
  • 2: Moderate retractions (suprasternal, intercostal, and subcostal)
  • 3: Severe retractions (suprasternal, intercostal, subcostal, and sternal)

Oxygen Saturation: The child’s oxygen saturation level is measured and scored as follows:

  • 0: >94%
  • 1: 91-94%
  • 2: <91%

Based on these parameters, the nurse can calculate the PAS score and assess the severity of the child’s asthma exacerbation. A score of 0-3 indicates mild exacerbation, 4-7 indicates moderate exacerbation and 8-12 indicates severe exacerbation.

The PAS score is a useful tool for healthcare professionals to monitor the child’s response to treatment and adjust the treatment plan accordingly. A higher score may require more aggressive treatment, such as oxygen therapy, bronchodilators, or systemic corticosteroids, while a lower score may indicate that the child’s symptoms are under control and may not require additional interventions.

It is important to note that the PAS score is just one part of the overall assessment of the child’s condition and should be used in conjunction with other clinical indicators and the child’s medical history.

Chief Complaint (Patient):

The chief complaint is the primary reason for the patient seeking medical attention. In the case of Gabriel Martinez, who is experiencing an asthma exacerbation, his chief complaint may include shortness of breath, chest tightness, wheezing, coughing, and difficulty breathing. Gabriel or his guardian may describe feeling like he is “wheezing more than usual” or that he is “having trouble catching his breath.”

To fully understand the nature and severity of Gabriel’s chief complaint, you can ask further questions to gather more information. For example, you can ask about the timing of the symptoms (i.e. when they started, how long they have been going on), any triggers that may have led to the exacerbation (i.e. exposure to allergens or irritants), and any previous episodes of asthma exacerbation or hospitalizations. You can also ask about any recent changes in medications or other factors that may have contributed to the exacerbation.

It’s important to listen carefully to the patient or their guardian to get a clear understanding of their chief complaint and any accompanying symptoms. By gathering this information, you can determine the appropriate course of action and provide effective treatment and management of the patient’s asthma exacerbation.

History of Present Illness (Patient):

The history of present illness (HPI) is a detailed account of the patient’s current symptoms and the progression of their illness. In the case of Gabriel Martinez, his HPI may include a description of his asthma symptoms, such as the frequency, duration, and severity of his episodes, as well as any recent changes in symptoms.

When taking Gabriel’s HPI, it’s important to ask questions to gather as much information as possible. Some relevant questions to ask may include:

  • When did you first start experiencing these symptoms?
  • Have your symptoms gotten worse over time or stayed the same?
  • Do you have any triggers that seem to make your symptoms worse?
  • Have you been taking your asthma medications as prescribed?
  • Have you experienced any other respiratory symptoms, such as coughing or wheezing?
  • Have you had any recent asthma exacerbations that required medical attention or hospitalization?

In addition to gathering information on the current symptoms, it’s important to ask about any relevant medical history, such as previous hospitalizations or surgeries, allergies, and chronic medical conditions. This information can help guide treatment decisions and ensure that any potential risk factors are taken into consideration.

By taking a thorough history of the present illness, healthcare providers can gain a better understanding of the patient’s condition and provide appropriate treatment and management.

Home Medications (Patient):

The home medications part of the patient’s medical history involves gathering information on any medications the patient is currently taking to manage their asthma or other health conditions. For Gabriel Martinez, this may include medications such as inhaled bronchodilators, corticosteroids, and leukotriene modifiers.

When gathering information on home medications, it’s important to ask about the name of the medication, the dose, and the frequency of administration. It’s also important to ask how long the patient has been taking the medication, if they have experienced any side effects, and if they have noticed any improvement in their symptoms since starting the medication.

In addition to prescription medications, it’s important to ask about any over-the-counter medications, herbal supplements, or other treatments the patient may be taking. This information can help healthcare providers identify potential drug interactions or other risks associated with the patient’s current medication regimen.

It’s important to stress the importance of adhering to medication regimens, especially for chronic conditions such as asthma. Patients should be advised to take their medications as prescribed and to keep a record of when they take each medication to avoid missing doses. They should also be instructed on proper medication administration techniques, such as using a spacer device with their inhaler.

By gathering information on the patient’s home medications, healthcare providers can ensure that they are providing appropriate treatment and management for the patient’s condition, and identify any potential medication-related issues that may need to be addressed.

Social History (Patient):

The social history part of the patient’s medical history involves gathering information on the patient’s lifestyle and habits that may have an impact on their health. For Gabriel Martinez, this may include factors such as his living environment, occupational exposure, and any lifestyle habits that may contribute to his asthma symptoms.

When gathering social history information, healthcare providers may ask questions about:

  • Living environment: Does the patient live in a home with pets, smokers, or mold? Is there adequate ventilation in the home?
  • Occupational exposures: Does the patient work in an environment with exposure to dust, chemicals, or other irritants that may trigger asthma symptoms?
  • Lifestyle habits: Does the patient smoke or use other tobacco products? Do they engage in physical activity or exercise regularly? Do they follow a healthy diet?
  • Social support: Does the patient have a support system in place to help manage their asthma? Do they have access to transportation to attend medical appointments?

It’s important to note that social history information can have a significant impact on the patient’s health and well-being. For example, exposure to secondhand smoke or occupational irritants may exacerbate asthma symptoms, while engaging in regular physical activity and following a healthy diet may help to improve overall lung function and reduce symptoms.

By gathering information on the patient’s social history, healthcare providers can develop a comprehensive treatment plan that takes into account any environmental or lifestyle factors that may be contributing to the patient’s condition. They can also provide counseling and resources to help the patient make positive changes that may improve their overall health and quality of life.

Review of Relevant Systems (Patient):

The review of relevant systems (ROS) is a structured approach used to gather information about the patient’s overall health and to identify any additional symptoms or conditions that may be related to their chief complaint. This part of the patient’s medical history involves gathering information on various body systems and their related symptoms.

For Gabriel Martinez, a review of relevant systems may involve asking questions about:

  • Respiratory system: In addition to asthma symptoms, does the patient experience cough, shortness of breath, wheezing, or chest pain?
  • Cardiovascular system: Does the patient experience any chest pain or discomfort, palpitations, or shortness of breath with exertion?
  • Gastrointestinal system: Does the patient experience any nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or abdominal pain?
  • Neurological system: Does the patient experience any headaches, dizziness, or weakness?
  • Musculoskeletal system: Does the patient experience any joint pain or stiffness, muscle weakness, or difficulty with mobility?
  • Skin and hair: Does the patient have any rashes, lesions, or changes in skin color or texture?

By gathering information on the patient’s review of relevant systems, healthcare providers can identify any additional symptoms or conditions that may be related to the patient’s chief complaint. This can help to guide further diagnostic testing or treatment planning.

It’s important to note that a thorough review of relevant systems should be conducted for every patient, regardless of their chief complaint. This can help to identify any underlying health conditions or concerns that may require further evaluation or management.

History of Present Illness (Guardian):

The history of present illness (HPI) by Gabriel’s guardian is an important aspect of the patient assessment that can provide valuable information about Gabriel’s current asthma exacerbation. Here are some key questions to ask during the HPI assessment:

Onset:

  • When did Gabriel’s asthma symptoms begin to worsen?
  • Were there any identifiable triggers that led to the onset of Gabriel’s symptoms?

Symptoms:

  • What symptoms is Gabriel experiencing, such as shortness of breath, wheezing, coughing, or chest tightness?

Are Gabriel’s symptoms constant or intermittent?

Duration:

  • How long has Gabriel’s current episode of asthma symptoms been going on?
  • Has Gabriel experienced similar symptoms in the past, and if so, how long did they last?

Severity:

  • How severe are Gabriel’s current symptoms on a scale of 1-10?

Have Gabriel’s symptoms been severe enough to require emergency medical treatment or hospitalization in the past?

Response to treatment:

  • What treatments have been used to manage Gabriel’s symptoms, and how effective have they been?
  • Have any changes been made to Gabriel’s medication regimen or asthma management plan in response to his current symptoms?

Triggers:

  • Are there any triggers that seem to exacerbate the patient’s symptoms? These may include exposure to allergens, irritants, changes in weather, or some exercises or physical activities.

It is important to ask these questions to better understand the nature and severity of Gabriel’s asthma exacerbation, as well as any potential triggers or underlying factors that may be contributing to his symptoms. This information can be used to guide further diagnostic testing or treatment planning, as well as to provide education and resources to help the patient and their family manage their symptoms more effectively.

Home Medications (Guardian):

Home medications are an important aspect of the patient assessment that can provide valuable information about Gabriel’s current asthma management plan. Here are some key questions to ask during the home medications assessment:

Asthma medications:

  • Is Gabriel currently taking any medications to manage his asthma symptoms, such as rescue inhalers, long-acting bronchodilators, or inhaled corticosteroids?
  • How often is Gabriel taking his medications and are they providing effective symptom relief?

Other medications:

  • Is Gabriel taking any other medications or supplements that may be affecting his asthma, such as over-the-counter pain medications or herbal remedies?

Adherence:

  • Does Gabriel consistently take his medications as prescribed, or have there been any issues with adherence?
  • Are there any barriers to medication adherence that Gabriel’s guardian has identified, such as difficulty remembering to take medications or concerns about side effects?

It is important to ask these questions to ensure that Gabriel is receiving appropriate medication management for his asthma and to identify any potential issues with adherence or effectiveness of his current medication regimen. Knowing about Gabriel’s current medication regimen can help his healthcare providers determine whether his asthma is well-controlled and whether any changes need to be made to his treatment plan. For example, if his asthma symptoms are not well-controlled with his current medication regimen, his healthcare providers may consider adjusting the dosage or adding another medication to better manage his symptoms. Additionally, it can help guide the development of an asthma management plan that includes appropriate medication use and monitoring.

Past Medical History (Guardian):

Past medical history is an important component of the patient assessment that can help identify any previous medical conditions or treatments that may be contributing to Gabriel’s current asthma exacerbation. Here are some key questions to ask during the past medical history assessment:

Medical conditions:

  • Has Gabriel’s guardian been diagnosed with any medical conditions, such as heart disease, diabetes, or high blood pressure?
  • Has Gabriel’s guardian been hospitalized or had any surgeries in the past?

Allergies:

  • Does Gabriel’s guardian have any known allergies, such as food allergies or allergies to medications?

Medications:

  • Is Gabriel’s guardian currently taking any medications or supplements?
  • Has Gabriel’s guardian taken any medications in the past that may have had an impact on his respiratory system, such as antibiotics or medications for other conditions?

Immunizations:

  • Is Gabriel’s guardian up-to-date on all recommended immunizations?

It is important to ask these questions to identify any potential underlying health problems or complications that may be contributing to Gabriel’s asthma exacerbation. Additionally, it can help identify any medications or treatments that may need to be adjusted or changed to better manage his asthma symptoms. Knowing about Gabriel’s past medical history can help his healthcare providers understand the severity and chronicity of his asthma, as well as identify any potential risk factors or complications that may impact his treatment. For example, Gabriel’s history of hospitalization for asthma exacerbation indicates that he may be at higher risk for severe asthma attacks and may require more aggressive treatment to prevent future exacerbations. Similarly, his peanut allergy is a potential trigger for asthma exacerbation, and his healthcare providers may need to take this into consideration when developing his treatment plan.

Social History (Guardian):

Social history is an important aspect of the patient assessment that can provide valuable information about Gabriel’s home environment and lifestyle, which may be contributing to his asthma exacerbation. Here are some key questions to ask during the social history assessment:

Occupation:

  • Does Gabriel’s guardian work in a job that involves exposure to any potential respiratory irritants, such as dust, fumes, or chemicals?

Housing:

  • Does Gabriel live in a home with pets or have exposure to secondhand smoke?
  • Is Gabriel’s home in an area with high levels of air pollution or other environmental triggers that may exacerbate asthma symptoms?

Diet and exercise:

  • Does Gabriel eat a healthy diet that includes plenty of fruits, vegetables, and lean protein?
  • Does Gabriel participate in regular physical activity and exercise?

Substance use:

  • Does anyone in the household smoke or use tobacco products?
  • Does Gabriel’s guardian drink alcohol or use recreational drugs?

Mental health:

  • Does Gabriel’s guardian have a history of depression, anxiety, or other mental health conditions that may be affecting his ability to manage Gabriel’s asthma?

It is important to ask these questions to identify any potential environmental or lifestyle factors that may be contributing to Gabriel’s asthma exacerbation. This information can help guide the development of an asthma management plan that addresses both medical and non-medical factors that may be impacting Gabriel’s health.

Family Medical History (Guardian):

Family medical history is an important component of the patient assessment that can help identify any genetic or familial risk factors that may be contributing to Gabriel’s asthma exacerbation. Here are some key questions to ask during the family medical history assessment:

Respiratory conditions:

  • Has anyone in Gabriel’s immediate family, such as his parents or siblings, been diagnosed with asthma, allergies, or other respiratory conditions?
  • Has anyone in the family been hospitalized or had any complications related to asthma?

Cardiovascular conditions:

  • Has anyone in the family been diagnosed with heart disease, high blood pressure, or stroke?

Endocrine conditions:

  • Has anyone in the family been diagnosed with diabetes, thyroid disease, or other endocrine disorders?

Gastrointestinal conditions:

  • Has anyone in the family been diagnosed with Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, or other gastrointestinal conditions?

Neurological conditions:

  • Has anyone in the family been diagnosed with epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, or Alzheimer’s disease?

Cancer:

  • Has anyone in the family been diagnosed with any type of cancer?

It is important to ask these questions to determine any potential genetic or familial risk factors that may increase the likelihood of Gabriel developing asthma or other related conditions. Additionally, it can help identify any potential environmental factors or triggers that may be contributing to his asthma exacerbation. Additionally, knowing about Gabriel’s family medical history can help his healthcare providers assess his risk for certain medical conditions and tailor his treatment plan accordingly.

Review of Relevant Systems (Guardian):

A comprehensive review of the patient’s body systems to identify any symptoms related to the chief complaint, as reported by the guardian.

Here are some key questions to ask during the assessment:

Respiratory system:

  • Have you noticed any coughing, wheezing, or shortness of breath in Gabriel recently?
  • Has Gabriel had any difficulty breathing during exercise or at rest?
  • Has Gabriel been using his inhaler or nebulizer more frequently than usual?

Cardiovascular system:

  • Has Gabriel complained of chest pain or discomfort?
  • Have you noticed any rapid or irregular heartbeats in Gabriel?

Gastrointestinal system:

  • Has Gabriel had any nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea?
  • Have you noticed any changes in Gabriel’s appetite or weight?

Urinary system:

  • Has Gabriel had any difficulty or pain during urination?
  • Has Gabriel had any changes in his urinary habits or frequency?

Musculoskeletal system:

  • Has Gabriel complained of any joint pain or stiffness?
  • Has Gabriel had any difficulty with mobility or range of motion?

Integumentary system:

  • Has Gabriel had any rashes, hives, or skin lesions?
  • Have you noticed any changes in Gabriel’s skin color or texture?

Neurological system:

  • Has Gabriel had any headaches, dizziness, or seizures?
  • Have you noticed any changes in Gabriel’s behavior or cognitive function?

Endocrine system:

  • Has Gabriel had any excessive thirst or urination?
  • Has Gabriel had any changes in his growth or development?

It is important to ask these questions to identify any potential underlying health problems or complications that may be contributing to Gabriel’s asthma exacerbation.

Get Expert Help to Write Your Gabriel Martinez Shadow Health Paper for You

The idea of getting expert help to write your Gabriel Martinez Shadow Health paper is the best solution to ensure you produce a top-notch paper.

Contrary to the view of some professors, seeking expert help to write a paper when you need it is the best decision you can make to ensure you get the grades you desire and don’t delay your graduation time.

With the help of our nursing assignment experts, nursing students can get the best nursing papers on time and at prices, they can afford.

We understand that nursing students often have a lot of training to attend, which leaves them with limited time to write their assignments. Our nursing coursework help experts have the knowledge and skills to handle these kinds of assignments and take some of your stress and worry away.

Our nursing paper writing services assist students in writing term papers, dissertations, case studies, and other types of nursing assignment writing.

All of the papers that our experts write are properly proofread and have a high level of grammar. We also offer unlimited revisions in case the student isn’t happy or needs more information.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

/by

NRS 429VN VARK Analysis Paper Assignment Example

, ,

NRS-429VN VARK Analysis Paper Assignment Example

NRS 429VN VARK Analysis Paper Assignment ExampleNRS 429VN VARK Analysis Paper Assignment Brief

Assignment Overview:

The NRS 429VN VARK Analysis Paper aims to help nursing students explore and understand their learning styles using the Visual, Aural, Read/Write, Kinesthetic (VARK) questionnaire. The assignment requires students to analyze their VARK results, compare their learning styles with others, and think about how this awareness influences their ideas about teaching and learning in a healthcare context.

Assignment Objectives:

  • Identify Learning Style: Use the VARK questionnaire to find out your preferred learning style.
  • Analyze Learning Strategies: Compare your current preferred learning strategies with the strategies for your learning style.
  • Reflect on Educational Impact: Think about how individual learning styles affect the understanding and performance of educational activities.
  • Explore Teaching and Learning: Talk about why educators need to figure out individual learning styles when working with learners.
  • Health Promotion Focus: Explore why understanding learning styles is crucial in health promotion, and discuss how learning styles affect the possibility for behavioral change.
  • Provide Evidence: Cite at least 4 peer-reviewed or scholarly sources published within the last 5 years to support your analysis.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

This assignment aims to increase your awareness of personal learning styles and their implications for teaching and learning in healthcare settings. By figuring out your preferred learning strategies, you will gain insights into how you process information effectively. The analysis should not only talk about your learning style but also explore its relevance in nursing education and health promotion.

The Student’s Role:

  • Complete VARK Questionnaire: Access and complete “The VARK Questionnaire” available on the VARK website (https://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/).
  • Analyze Results: Review your questionnaire scores and explore the corresponding link to understand your learning preference.
  • Compare Learning Styles: Compare your preferred learning strategies with visual, aural, read/write, kinesthetic, and multimodal styles identified on the VARK Results page.
  • Reflect on Educational Impact: Think about how your learning style influences your ability to understand and perform educational activities. Reflect on personal experiences and preferences.
  • Discuss Teaching and Learning: Talk about why educators need to figure out individual learning styles in healthcare education. Explore how diverse teaching approaches can cater to different learning preferences.
  • Explore Health Promotion: Investigate the importance of understanding learning styles in health promotion. Discuss how accommodating diverse learning styles can enhance the potential for behavioral change in health-related interventions.

Detailed Assessment Description of the VARK Analysis Paper Assignment

Learning styles represent the different approaches to learning based on preferences, weaknesses, and strengths. For learners to best achieve the desired educational outcome, learning styles must be considered when creating a plan. Complete “The VARK Questionnaire,” located on the VARK website (­ https://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/ ), and then complete the following:

  1. Click “OK” to receive your questionnaire scores.
  2. Once you have determined your preferred learning style, review the corresponding link to view your learning preference.
  3. Review the other learning styles: visual, aural, read/write, kinesthetic, and multimodal (listed on the VARK Questionnaire Results page).
  4. Compare your current preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
  5. Examine how awareness of learning styles has influenced your perceptions of teaching and learning.

In a paper (900-words), summarize your analysis of this exercise and discuss the overall value of learning styles. Include the following:

  1. Provide a summary of your learning style according the VARK questionnaire.
  2. Describe your preferred learning strategies. Compare your current preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
  3. Describe how individual learning styles affect the degree to which a learner can understand or perform educational activities. Discuss the importance of an educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners.
  4. Discuss why understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion is important to achieving the desired outcome. How do learning styles ultimately affect the possibility for a behavioral change? How would different learning styles be accommodated in health promotion?

Cite to at least 4 peer‐reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria.

Prepare this assignment according to APA guidelines.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite, so no plagiarism.

 

Course Code Class Code
NRS-429VN NRS-429VN-O505 VARK Analysis Paper 100.0
Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (75.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (89.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
Content 80.0%
Personal Learning Styles According to VARK Questionnaire 20.0% Personal learning style content is missing. Personal learning style presented is not reflective of VARK questionnaire. Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified, but summary is incomplete. Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and basic summary is provided. Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described. Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described in detail. Summary offers examples that display personal insight or reflection.
Preferred Learning Strategies 20.0% Personal learning strategy content is missing. Personal learning strategy is partially described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is incomplete. Personal learning strategy is summarized. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is generally described. Personal learning strategy is described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is presented. Personal learning strategy is clearly described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is detailed. Overall discussion demonstrates insight into preferred learning strategies and how these support preferred learning styles.
Learning Styles (Effect on educational performance and importance of identifying learning styles for learners as an educator) 20.0% Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is not presented. Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is partially presented. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is unclear. There are inaccuracies. Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is generally discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is generally established. There are minor inaccuracies. More rationale or evidence is needed for support. Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is established. Some rationale or evidence is needed for support. Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is thoroughly discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is clearly established. Strong rationale and evidence support discussion.
Learning Styles and Health Promotion (learning styles and importance to achieving desired outcome for learners, learning styles and effect on behavioral change, accommodation of different learning styles in health promotion) 20.0% Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion, the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes, and the accommodation of different learning styles is not discussed. Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is partially presented; a correlation has not been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is incomplete. There are inaccuracies. Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is generally presented; a general correlation has been established. More rationale or evidence is needed to fully establish correlation. Accommodation of different learning styles is summarized. Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is discussed; a correlation has been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is discussed. Some detail or minor support is needed. Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is discussed in detail. A strong correlation has been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is discussed. The narrative demonstrates insight into the importance of learning styles to health promotion and behavioral outcomes.
Organization and Effectiveness 15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format 5.0%
Paper Format  (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 2.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 3.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%

NRS-429VN VARK Analysis Paper Assignment Example

Introduction

Learning styles play a crucial role in the educational journey of individuals, influencing how they process information and acquire knowledge (Almigbal, 2015). The Visual, Aural, Read/Write, Kinesthetic (VARK) questionnaire, designed by Neil Fleming, is a valuable tool that helps individuals identify their preferred learning styles. This paper explores the VARK analysis of a nurse, highlighting the significance of understanding learning styles in the context of health promotion and nursing education.

Summary of VARK Analysis

Upon completing the VARK questionnaire, I identified myself as a multimodal learner with a strong emphasis on read/write and kinesthetic modalities. Multimodal learners, as described by Fleming, are individuals who benefit from a combination of two or more learning styles (Bhagat et al., 2015). In my case, the preference for read/write and kinesthetic modalities is particularly evident in my approach to learning, both in theory and practical applications.

The highest scores in kinesthetics align with my hands-on learning preference, especially in clinical settings. For instance, I excel in tasks like catheter insertions by combining hands-on experience with visual aids, dictionaries, and handouts. Additionally, when preparing for exams, I find written materials and textbooks to be essential, showcasing my reliance on the read/write modality.

Preferred Learning Strategies

As a kinesthetic learner, I thrive on acquiring knowledge through practice and real-world exposure. The incorporation of all senses—smell, touch, sight, hearing, and taste—enhances my understanding of information. Activities such as working in a hospital laboratory, participating in field trips, listening to real-life scenario lectures, and hands-on experiences contribute significantly to my learning process. Visual elements, such as graphs and color-coded information, also capture my attention and aid in content retention (Prithishkumar & Michael, 2014).

Comparison of Learning Styles

While my preferred learning style is primarily kinesthetic, the analysis revealed high scores in all four modalities, demonstrating flexibility in adapting to various learning situations. Surprisingly, the visual modality did not rank at the top, highlighting the unique interplay between visual and kinesthetic preferences. Recognizing the utility of different modalities allows for a more holistic learning experience.

Improving Learning Behavior

Upon reflection, certain modifications are necessary to enhance my learning capabilities. These adjustments include incorporating more visual elements such as books and diagrams. Additionally, utilizing a tape recorder to articulate ideas and explain concepts to others can reinforce my understanding. Recognizing the importance of learning styles and implementing diverse strategies will contribute to improved study habits, academic performance, and overall satisfaction in both work and studies (Laxman et al., 2014).

Impact on Teaching and Learning

Educators play a pivotal role in shaping the learning experiences of students. Understanding the diverse learning styles of individuals is crucial for tailoring teaching approaches to meet the needs of learners effectively. For instance, students with multimodal preferences, like myself, benefit from a variety of instructional methods that encompass visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic elements. Research suggests that educators who align their teaching styles with students’ preferred learning styles achieve better outcomes (Laxman et al., 2014).

Importance in Health Promotion

In the context of health promotion, awareness of individual learning styles becomes paramount. Different individuals engage with health-related information in varied ways, and tailoring educational strategies to accommodate diverse learning styles enhances the effectiveness of health promotion initiatives. Understanding learning styles is directly linked to the potential for behavioral change. By catering to individuals’ preferred modalities, health educators can create interventions that resonate with the target audience, increasing the likelihood of positive behavioral outcomes (Bhagat et al., 2015).

Conclusion

The VARK analysis has provided valuable insights into my learning preferences and strategies. As a nurse, recognizing and embracing a multimodal approach, with a focus on read/write and kinesthetic modalities, will contribute to a more effective educational experience. The incorporation of diverse learning styles in nursing education and health promotion efforts is essential for addressing the unique needs of individuals. By acknowledging and accommodating different learning styles, educators and healthcare professionals can foster a positive and impactful learning environment.

References

Almigbal, T. H. (2015). Relationship between the learning style preferences of medical students and academic achievement. Saudi medical journal, 36(3), 349.

Bhagat, A., Vyas, R., & Singh, T. (2015). Students awareness of learning styles and their perceptions to a mixed method approach for learning. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, 5(Suppl 1), S58.

Prithishkumar, I. J., & Michael, S. A. (2014). Understanding your student: using the VARK model. Journal of postgraduate medicine, 60(2), 183.

Laxman, K., Sandip, S., & Sarun, K. (2014). Exploration of preferred learning styles in medical education using VARK modal. Russian Open Medical Journal, 3(3).

NRS-429VN VARK Analysis Paper Assignment Example Two

Learning Style Summary According to the VARK Questionnaire

Human beings are perpetual learners, embarking on the journey of acquiring knowledge from birth until their last breath. Recognizing that everyone possesses distinct learning styles, it becomes imperative for each individual to discover the approach that suits them best (Husmann & O’Loughlin, 2019). The Visual, Aural, Read/Write, and Kinesthetic (VARK) questionnaire, devised by Neil Fleming in 1987, serves as a tool to identify individual learning styles. With sixteen questions, this assessment categorizes individuals into five strategies, offering valuable insights into their preferred modes of learning. This paper aims to delve into the VARK questionnaire scores for a nurse, comparing their learning style with others and contemplating necessary changes for improved learning behavior.

Preferred Learning Strategies

Learning styles encompass the modes individuals employ to collect, interpret, process, and reflect on educational materials. These preferences, rooted in natural inclinations, are crucial for educators to consider when delivering information. Effective teaching involves incorporating activities that stimulate visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic learning modalities, catering to diverse student preferences. The analysis of my VARK scores reveals a multimodal learning style with a blend of read/write and kinesthetic preferences. Being flexible in delivering information, especially through hands-on approaches, aligns with my intended nursing practices.

Impact on Educational Activities

Individual learning styles significantly influence the understanding and execution of educational activities. As a kinesthetic learner with the highest score in this modality, I excel in activities that involve hands-on experiences. Clinical rotations, such as catheter insertions, become more manageable through overlapping visual aids, dictionaries, handouts, and practical engagement. The preference for reading textbooks and written materials for exams aligns with my kinesthetic learning style. Retaining information is enhanced through real-life exposure, utilizing all senses to grasp knowledge. Understanding how different modalities contribute to memory retention shapes effective learning practices.

Importance in Health Promotion

Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion is paramount for achieving desired outcomes. Learning styles play a crucial role in behavioral change, impacting how individuals absorb and apply health-related information. In health promotion interventions, accommodating diverse learning styles becomes essential for enhancing the possibility of behavioral change. Educators and health professionals must recognize and tailor their approaches to align with individuals’ learning preferences, ensuring effective communication and engagement.

In conclusion, the VARK questionnaire provides valuable insights into preferred learning styles. For nurses and healthcare professionals, understanding one’s learning style is crucial for effective education and practice. Embracing diverse learning modalities contributes to enhanced study habits, education, and overall satisfaction in both work and studies.

References:

Husmann, P. R., & O’Loughlin, V. D. (2019). Another nail in the coffin for learning styles? Disparities among undergraduate anatomy students’ study strategies, class performance, and reported VARK learning styles. Anatomical sciences education, 12(1), 6-19.

Idrizi, E., & Filiposka, S. (2018). VARK learning styles and online education: Case Study. Learning, 5-6.

Khongpit, V., Sintanakul, K., & Nomphonkrang, T. (2018). The VARK learning style of the university student in computer course. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 102-106.

Mozaffari, H. R., Janatolmakan, M., Sharifi, R., Ghandinejad, F., Andayeshgar, B., & Khatony, A. (2020). The relationship between the VARK learning styles and academic achievement in Dental Students. Advances in medical education and practice, 11, 15.

NRS-429VN VARK Analysis Paper Assignment Example Three

Preferred Learning Strategy

According to my VARK assessment, my favored learning strategy is the multimodal approach, encompassing aural (listening) and kinesthetic (doing) methods. In this assessment, I scored 10 in aural and 9 in kinesthetic learning, highlighting a strong inclination towards these two strategies.

In my aural learning preference, I thrive on absorbing ideas through discussions, emphasizing concepts with a variety of voices. I find clarity in explaining what I learn through verbal communication. I often read my notes aloud, aiding my understanding of concepts. Additionally, discussing and explaining notes to a peer with similar aural preferences enhances my retention, as I tend to remember information better through hearing and speaking.

Embracing the kinesthetic learning strategy, I discover that I excel when engaged in practical activities. Physical involvement in creating and designing concepts resonates with my learning style. Real-world experiences, such as visiting sites and collaborating with community members, are vital to my understanding. As a nurse, I prefer learning about immunization processes in a clinical setting, allowing me to observe and participate actively in the procedures. These preferences align seamlessly with the strategies outlined for kinesthetic learners on the VARK website (VARK, 2020).

This multimodal learning approach, combining aural and kinesthetic strategies, allows me to leverage diverse methods for a comprehensive and effective learning experience.

Individual Learning Styles and Educational Activities

Individual learning styles significantly impact the understanding of educational activities. As a kinesthetic and aural learner, my understanding is heightened when I observe and engage in real-world applications. For example, as a nurse, witnessing immunization procedures in a clinical setting enhances my comprehension.

Educators must identify students’ learning styles to tailor lesson materials accordingly. Aligning the teaching approach with students’ preferences fosters effective learning. For instance, using aural methods for read/write learners may lead to challenges. Considering learning styles enhances collaboration and cooperation in the classroom, preventing frustration and maintaining focus.

Understanding learning styles in health promotion is pivotal for achieving desired outcomes. Tailoring health education to participants’ preferred styles ensures better understanding and accurate implementation. For a diabetic patient with a read/write preference, providing written instructions for insulin injection may be more effective than a demonstration.

This understanding also promotes collaboration and adherence from patients, crucial for positive health outcomes. Adapting teaching styles to patients’ preferences fosters a deeper understanding of health concepts, increasing the likelihood of behavioral change. For instance, if a patient with a kinesthetic preference encounters a clinician using the same style, they are more likely to adjust their practices for improved health.

Individual Learning Styles and Their Impact on Educational Activities

Individual learning styles play a crucial role in shaping the understanding of educational activities, as they influence how learners absorb and process information. In my case, I identify with the kinesthetic and aural styles. The kinesthetic style involves using my senses, particularly sight, to learn, as seen in my preference for observing real-world activities like immunizations in clinical settings. This hands-on approach enhances my retention of knowledge.

Educators bear the responsibility of recognizing students’ learning styles, a task essential for tailoring learning materials to align with these preferences (Bastable, 2019). For instance, if students favor the read/write style, educators should provide written materials and encourage note-taking to facilitate their understanding. Failure to align teaching methods with students’ learning styles, such as using aural approaches for those inclined towards read/write styles, may hinder comprehension and render lessons less effective.

Considering learners’ styles is pivotal for promoting collaboration and cooperation in the classroom (Bastable, 2019). Mismatched teaching methods can lead to frustration, resulting in distractions and a lack of focus among students. This mismatch might manifest as students engaging in off-topic conversations instead of concentrating on the lesson. To cultivate collaboration and cooperation, educators should adopt teaching styles that resonate with students’ familiar and preferred learning approaches, thereby boosting overall classroom engagement.

Understanding and accommodating diverse learning styles contribute significantly to creating an effective and inclusive learning environment.

Learning Styles and Their Impact on Health Promotion

Understanding learning styles in health promotion is pivotal for achieving successful outcomes. Tailoring health education to align with participants’ learning styles enhances comprehension and the accurate implementation of health concepts. During health promotion sessions, educators should assess participants’ learning styles to customize information delivery. For example, when instructing a diabetic patient on insulin injection, considering their learning style is crucial. If the patient prefers the read/write style, providing written instructions might be more effective than a hands-on demonstration.

Furthermore, awareness of learning styles in health promotion encourages collaboration and adherence from patients, crucial for positive health outcomes (Sharma & Branscum, 2020). When clinicians align their communication with patients’ preferred styles, it fosters trust and cooperation. For instance, if a patient prefers the aural learning style, clinicians should verbalize prescription details rather than relying solely on written instructions. This personalized approach promotes patient engagement, understanding, and, ultimately, adherence to health interventions.

Learning styles significantly impact the potential for behavioral change by facilitating a deeper understanding of concepts. When patients encounter educators who match their learning style, it enhances comprehension and motivates behavioral adjustments. For instance, a patient with a kinesthetic learning preference, when guided by a clinical educator using a hands-on approach, is more likely to understand and implement health recommendations effectively.

Reference

Bastable, S. (2019). Health Professional as Educator. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Sharma, M., & Branscum, P. (2020). Foundations of Mental Health Promotion. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

VARK. (2020). VARK – A Guide to Learning Styles. Retrieved from https://vark-learn.com.

Your Academic Solution: ReliablePapers.com – The Go-To for Nursing Essays

Feeling overwhelmed with nursing assignments? No need to stress – ReliablePapers.com is here to help! As a top-notch nursing paper writing service, we understand that certain topics can be tough, and deadlines can be tight. Our team of professional nursing essay writers is ready to create customized and original papers just for you, ensuring you not only save time but also achieve excellent grades.

If the samples on the [NRS-429VN – VARK Analysis Paper Assignment Examples] page don’t quite match what you need, our experts can craft a unique custom nursing essay to fit your requirements. Say goodbye to the worry of submitting a plagiarized paper – trust our writers for authenticity and quality.

What makes us stand out?

Our online nursing papers are not only high-quality but also affordable for all college students. Whether you’re dealing with a complex topic, facing a tight deadline, or seeking guidance on nursing assignments, ReliablePapers.com has got you covered.

Ready to succeed academically?

Placing your order is simple! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide details for your paper, proceed to checkout, and let our experts handle the rest. Take the first step towards securing the grades you deserve with ReliablePapers.com. Trust us to provide original papers tailored to your instructions and save time for what matters most!

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

/by

NUR 350 Module Five Health Education Activity

, ,

NUR 350 Module Five Health Education Activity

NUR 350 Module Five Health Education Activity

The activity involves choosing a vulnerable population, assessing their needs, and planning, implementing, and evaluating a health education activity to address those needs.

You will need to review available data and demographics for your local area to choose a population to assess and diagnose their need. Then, you will plan, implement, and evaluate a health education activity that addresses their need.

Here is some general guidance on how to approach this health education activity based on the instructions and guidelines you have been provided by your instructor.

Health Education Activity Process Step: Assessment

In this section, you should summarize your assessment of the vulnerable elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh related to pressure ulcers. Consider factors such as demographics, health status, access to healthcare, and social support. Gather data from reliable sources such as government health reports, local health departments, and healthcare providers.

Health Education Activity Process Step: Diagnosis

Based on your assessment, identify the health needs of the chosen vulnerable population. A NANDA community nursing diagnosis related to pressure ulcers in the elderly population could be a “Risk for impaired skin integrity related to immobility, sensory deficit, and/or incontinence.” Support your diagnosis with evidence from your assessment.

Health Education Activity Process Step: Plan

Outline your plan for implementing a health education activity that will meet the needs of your chosen vulnerable population. Identify two SMART goals that your activity will achieve. For example, a SMART goal could be to increase knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention by 50% among elderly residents of Mary Manning Walsh within three months. Describe your plans to evaluate the achievement of these goals.

Health Education Activity Process Step: Implementation

Explain the process for implementing your health education activity. Describe what you did and how you did it. Provide details such as the type of activity, location, materials, and audience. Consider how you adapted your approach to meet the specific needs of the vulnerable elderly population.

Health Education Activity Process Step: Evaluation

Evaluate the success of your health education activity based on feedback from the audience. Describe how you collected feedback and what it revealed about the effectiveness of your activity. Did you achieve your SMART goals? Support your evaluation with evidence from your assessment and feedback.

Health Education Activity Process Step: Reflection

Reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of your approach to the health education activity. Consider what you would do differently in the future to improve health education opportunities for vulnerable populations. Identify areas where you excelled and areas where you could improve.

Health Education Activity Process Step: Log of Hours

Ensure that you have completed eight hours of clinical practice experience related to your health education activity. Fill out the log accurately and include all activities related to preparing for, implementing, and evaluating your health education activity.

Remember to follow the provided guidelines and rubric for this health education activity and complete all sections of the Health Education Activity Planner and Log worksheet. Good luck with your project!

We have also provided some written examples to guide you in writing your NUR 350 module five health education activity.

Check out another post by our paper writing experts aimed at assisting students on NUR 319 Nursing Assignment

NUR 350 Module Five Health Education Activity Example One

Process Step: Assessment

The vulnerable population chosen for this health education activity is the elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh. According to the demographic data available, the elderly population is increasing in this area, with an estimated 15% of the population being over the age of 65. Furthermore, a review of patient records revealed that pressure ulcers are a significant problem among this population. It was noted that most of these patients had limited mobility and required assistance with their daily activities. The majority of these patients also had chronic conditions, such as diabetes and heart disease, which increases the risk of developing pressure ulcers.

Process Step: Diagnosis

The NANDA community nursing diagnosis identified for this population is “Risk for impaired skin integrity related to immobility and chronic illness.” Evidence from patient records indicates that this population is at high risk for developing pressure ulcers due to their limited mobility and chronic conditions.

Process Step: Plan

The plan for implementing a health education activity for this vulnerable population includes two SMART goals:

  • Increase knowledge and awareness of pressure ulcers and their prevention among the elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh by 50% within six months.
  • Decrease the incidence of pressure ulcers among the elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh by 25% within six months.

To achieve these goals, the health education activity will include a presentation on the causes, prevention, and treatment of pressure ulcers. The presentation will be tailored to the elderly population and will include practical tips for preventing pressure ulcers, such as repositioning frequently and maintaining good nutrition. The effectiveness of the presentation will be evaluated through pre and post-surveys, and the incidence of pressure ulcers will be tracked through patient records.

Process Step: Implementation

The health education activity was implemented through a 30-minute presentation to the elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh. The presentation covered the causes and prevention of pressure ulcers, as well as practical tips for preventing them. Attendees were engaged through the use of visual aids and were encouraged to ask questions. The presentation was well-received, and attendees reported feeling more knowledgeable about pressure ulcers and their prevention.

Process Step: Evaluation

The success of the health education activity was evaluated based on feedback from the audience and the incidence of pressure ulcers among the population. Pre and post-surveys revealed a 60% increase in knowledge and awareness of pressure ulcers and their prevention. The incidence of pressure ulcers decreased by 30% within six months of the presentation. These results indicate that the SMART goals were achieved, and the health education activity was successful in reducing the incidence of pressure ulcers among the vulnerable population.

Process Step: Reflection

Looking back on the steps completed so far, it is evident that the approach taken was effective in achieving the goals of the health education activity. However, it is also clear that more time could have been spent tailoring the presentation to the specific needs of the audience. In future health education opportunities, more emphasis will be placed on customizing the presentation to meet the unique needs of the population. Additionally, more attention will be given to tracking the long-term impact of the presentation on the incidence of pressure ulcers among the population.

Process Step: Log of Hours

Preparing for the health education activity took approximately 4 hours, which included reviewing patient records and demographic data and developing the presentation. Implementing the health education activity took approximately 2 hours, which included delivering the presentation and collecting feedback from the audience. Evaluating the success of the health education activity took approximately 2 hours, which included analyzing survey results and tracking the incidence of pressure ulcers among the population. Overall, 8 hours were spent on this health education activity.

NUR 350 Module Five Health Education Activity Example Two

Process Step: Assessment

For this health education activity, the vulnerable population chosen is elderly individuals who reside at Mary Manning Walsh nursing home. A review of available data and demographics in the local area indicates that the elderly population is at risk of developing pressure ulcers due to their age, reduced mobility, and decreased skin integrity. Pressure ulcers are a common problem among the elderly population in nursing homes, and this can result in significant pain, discomfort, and increased healthcare costs. A review of the medical records of the patients at Mary Manning Walsh nursing home indicated that pressure ulcers are a significant health problem that requires urgent attention.

Process Step: Diagnosis

The health needs of the vulnerable elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh nursing home are pressure ulcer prevention and management. The NANDA community nursing diagnosis that will guide the health education activity is “Risk for impaired skin integrity related to immobility and reduced tissue perfusion as evidenced by the presence of pressure ulcers.” The evidence supporting this diagnosis is the high prevalence of pressure ulcers among the elderly population in nursing homes, as well as the risk factors associated with this condition.

Process Step: Plan

The plan for implementing a health education activity that will meet the needs of the vulnerable elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh nursing home includes the following SMART goals:

  • By the end of the health education activity, 80% of the elderly residents at Mary Manning Walsh nursing home will be able to identify at least three risk factors associated with pressure ulcers.
  • By the end of the health education activity, 70% of the elderly residents at Mary Manning Walsh nursing home will be able to demonstrate at least one self-care technique to prevent pressure ulcers.

To evaluate the achievement of these goals, a pre-and post-education survey will be conducted. The survey will assess the residents’ knowledge of pressure ulcers and their risk factors and self-care techniques before and after the health education activity.

Process Step: Implementation

The implementation process for the health education activity involved collaboration with the nursing staff at Mary Manning Walsh nursing home to identify the residents who would benefit from the education. The education session was conducted in the residents’ common area, and a PowerPoint presentation was used to educate them on the risk factors associated with pressure ulcers and self-care techniques to prevent them. The residents were also provided with handouts summarizing the key points of the education session.

Process Step: Evaluation

The success of the health education activity was evaluated based on feedback from the residents and the results of the pre-and post-education survey. The residents reported that the education session was informative, and they appreciated the opportunity to learn about pressure ulcer prevention. The pre-and post-education survey results showed a significant increase in the residents’ knowledge of pressure ulcer risk factors and self-care techniques, with 85% of residents being able to identify at least three risk factors and 75% being able to demonstrate at least one self-care technique. Therefore, the SMART goals were achieved.

Process Step: Reflection

Looking back at all the steps completed so far, I think the strengths of my approach were a collaboration with the nursing staff, the use of a PowerPoint presentation, and the pre-and post-education survey to evaluate the success of the activity. However, the weakness was that the education session was conducted in the residents’ common area, which may have led to distractions and reduced engagement. In future health education opportunities, I will ensure that the education sessions are conducted in a quieter environment to maximize resident engagement.

Process Step: Log of Hours

I spent eight hours preparing for, implementing, and evaluating the health education activity. The time was spent on research, collaboration with the nursing staff, development of the PowerPoint presentation and handouts, conducting the education session, and data collection for the pre-and post-education survey.

NUR 350 Module Five Health Education Activity Example Three

Process Step: Assessment

The vulnerable elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh is at risk for pressure ulcers due to factors such as immobility, sensory deficits, and incontinence. The majority of residents are over the age of 65 and have multiple chronic health conditions, including diabetes, heart disease, and dementia. Access to healthcare is limited, as many residents have mobility issues and rely on staff for transportation to appointments. Social support is also limited, as many residents do not have family or friends nearby and may feel isolated. Data from local health departments and healthcare providers indicate that pressure ulcers are a common issue among this population.

Process Step: Diagnosis

The health needs of the vulnerable elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh include preventing pressure ulcers and improving skin integrity. A NANDA community nursing diagnosis related to pressure ulcers in the elderly population could be a “Risk for impaired skin integrity related to immobility, sensory deficit, and/or incontinence.” This diagnosis is supported by evidence from the assessment, which identified the risk factors for pressure ulcers among this population.

Process Step: Plan

The plan for implementing a health education activity for the vulnerable elderly population at Mary Manning Walsh includes developing a presentation on pressure ulcer prevention and skin integrity. The two SMART goals for this activity are:

  • Increase knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention by 50% among elderly residents of Mary Manning Walsh within three months
  • Improve skin integrity by reducing the incidence of pressure ulcers by 20% within six months

Plans to evaluate the achievement of these goals include administering pre- and post-education surveys to assess knowledge and track the incidence of pressure ulcers over time.

Process Step: Implementation

The health education activity was implemented by developing a PowerPoint presentation on pressure ulcer prevention and skin integrity. The presentation was given to groups of residents at Mary Manning Walsh, as well as staff members who work closely with the vulnerable elderly population. The presentation included information on the causes of pressure ulcers, risk factors, prevention strategies, and how to maintain skin integrity. Handouts and posters were provided to reinforce the information presented. The presentation was adapted to meet the specific needs of the vulnerable elderly population, with larger font sizes and simplified language.

Process Step: Evaluation

The success of the health education activity was evaluated based on feedback from the audience. The pre-and post-education surveys showed a 60% increase in knowledge about pressure ulcer prevention among residents and staff members who attended the presentation. The incidence of pressure ulcers decreased by 15% within six months, which was close to the target goal of 20%. Overall, the SMART goals were achieved, indicating that the health education activity was successful in meeting the needs of the vulnerable elderly population.

Process Step: Reflection

The strengths of this approach to the health education activity include tailoring the presentation to meet the specific needs of the vulnerable elderly population, providing handouts and posters to reinforce the information presented, and tracking the incidence of pressure ulcers over time to evaluate the effectiveness of the activity. The weaknesses include limited access to healthcare and social support, which may have impacted the success of the activity. In the future, more emphasis could be placed on engaging family members and volunteers to provide social support and help with healthcare needs. The activity could also be expanded to include other health topics relevant to the vulnerable elderly population.

Process Step: Log of Hours

Date | Activity | Hours

  • 02/10/2023 | Research and planning for health education activity | 2 hours
  • 02/15/2023 | Developing PowerPoint presentation and handouts | 3 hours
  • 02/18/2023 | Giving presentation to residents and staff members | 2 hours
  • 02/20/2023 | Evaluating pre- and post-education surveys | 1 hour
  • 02/25/2023 | Tracking incidence of pressure ulcers | 1 hour

Get Expert Writers to Work on Your NUR 350 Module Five Health Education Activity

ReliablePapers.com has hired nursing paper writers with a wealth of experience to write high-quality papers. These papers are written by nursing assignment help writers who are experts in nursing education.

Getting help from professional writers to write your health education activity can be beneficial in many ways.

Professional writers have more knowledge and experience, so they can give you high-quality content that is well-researched and written in a clear and concise way.

Nursing students can be sure that ReliablePapers.com will help them with their essays in the best way possible, on time, and at a price, they can afford.

You can get nursing term paper writing assistance with writing your papers from scratch or rewriting an existing paper.

If you require a reliable writing service, our experienced nursing paper writers are always available to assist you with any nursing coursework help.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

/by

NURS 6053 IO003 Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies Example

, ,

NURS 6053 IO003 Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies Example

NURS 6053 IO003 Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies Example

NURS 6053 Week 6 Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies

NURS 6053 IO003 Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies Assignment Brief

Assignment Instructions Overview:

In this assignment, students will develop a personal leadership philosophy by reflecting on core values, strengths, and areas for improvement. The purpose is to cultivate self-awareness in leadership and understand the influence of personal traits on leading effectively. Students are asked to consider key scholarly insights on leadership behaviors that promote healthy work environments, relate these findings to their own traits, and outline strategies for personal development in their leadership journey.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

This assignment aims to enhance self-reflection in leadership, helping students identify and articulate their unique leadership philosophies. By engaging with scholarly resources, students will gain insights into essential leadership behaviors that contribute to constructive, healthy workplace dynamics. Moreover, students will examine their CliftonStrengths Assessment results to better understand how their strengths and potential growth areas can be harnessed for leadership success.

The Student’s Role:

Students are expected to reflect on their own leadership qualities, values, and strengths as identified through the CliftonStrengths Assessment. They will be required to relate these strengths to scholarly resources and articulate a personal mission or vision statement. Additionally, students will need to select two key behaviors they wish to develop further and create a specific, actionable plan for enhancing these areas. By completing this assignment, students will foster an understanding of how self-awareness and continuous improvement can inform and enrich their approach to leadership.

Competencies Measured:

This assignment assesses the following competencies:

  • Self-Awareness in Leadership: Understanding and articulating one’s core values, mission, and vision.
  • Strength Identification and Utilization: Leveraging the CliftonStrengths Assessment results to identify leadership strengths and areas for improvement.
  • Development Planning: Creating an actionable plan for professional and personal growth in leadership, incorporating reflection and evidence-based strategies.
  • Effective Communication of Personal Philosophy: Synthesizing insights into a cohesive, well-supported personal leadership philosophy that reflects scholarly findings and personal reflections.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS 6053 – Interprofessional Organizational and Systems Leadership Course:

NURS 6053 IO001 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Example

NURS 6053 IO001 Healthcare Environment Review of Current Healthcare Issues Discussion Assignment Example

NURS 6053 IO002 Professionalism Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Assignment Example

NURS 6053 IO002 Developing Organizational Policies and Practices Example

NURS 6053 IO004 Workplace Environment Assessment Assignment Example

NURS 6053 IO005 Change Implementation and Management Plan Assignment Example

NURS 6053 IO003 Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies Example

Introduction

Effective leadership in healthcare requires more than technical skills—it demands a deep alignment with one’s core values, a clear vision, and an understanding of personal strengths and areas for growth. Leaders who act based on a personal leadership philosophy tend to inspire trust, foster resilience, and create positive, productive environments for both staff and patients (Marshall & Broome, 2017). This paper presents a personal leadership philosophy shaped by values, an individualized mission, and insights from the Clifton Strengths Assessment. Additionally, it explores specific behaviors for development and a structured plan for personal and professional growth.

Core Values

Core values are the guiding principles that shape how a leader behaves, makes decisions, and interacts with others. According to Shanafelt and Noseworthy (2017), values are central to fostering healthy work environments, especially in high-stakes settings like healthcare. My core values are integrity, empathy, and accountability. These principles anchor my leadership philosophy and inspire me to prioritize ethical behavior, compassionate care, and personal responsibility.

  • Integrity: Integrity involves maintaining ethical standards, honesty, and transparency, even in challenging situations. As a healthcare leader, I believe integrity is essential for building trust within a team and with patients. This value encourages clear communication and ensures that decision-making aligns with ethical standards (Marshall & Broome, 2017).
  • Empathy: Empathy allows leaders to understand and connect with their team members’ feelings and perspectives, promoting emotional support and cohesion. In healthcare, empathy enhances patient care and team morale (Rath, 2007). Empathetic leadership also encourages open communication and trust, which are essential for high-performing teams.
  • Accountability: Accountability is essential for effective leadership and drives responsibility in decision-making and patient care. Leaders who prioritize accountability foster environments where team members feel empowered to take ownership of their roles and outcomes (Marshall & Broome, 2017). This value motivates me to continually evaluate my actions and decisions to improve as a leader.

Personal Mission/Vision Statement

My vision as a leader is to create an inclusive, supportive work environment that encourages personal growth, teamwork, and excellence in patient care. My mission is to lead with empathy, foster open communication, and inspire my team to deliver compassionate, high-quality care. This mission reflects my commitment to developing a workplace where everyone feels valued, empowered, and motivated to achieve their full potential.

Check out another post by our nursing paper writing experts aimed at assisting students on tina jones shadow health assesment and gabriel martinez shadow health objective data.

Analysis of CliftonStrengths Assessment

The CliftonStrengths Assessment highlighted my top strengths as Learner, Activator, Intellection, Individualization, and Achiever. Each strength reflects a unique aspect of my leadership style and contributes to my ability to lead effectively in a healthcare setting.

  • Learner: As a Learner, I am passionate about acquiring knowledge and skills, which enhances my adaptability and ability to address new challenges. In healthcare, where continuous learning is vital, this strength motivates me to stay informed about the latest evidence-based practices (Rath, 2007).
  • Activator: Activators turn ideas into action, a strength that drives my proactive approach to problem-solving. This trait helps me implement changes efficiently and motivates others to take action in high-stakes situations (Rath, 2007).
  • Intellection: This strength reflects my inclination towards introspective and intellectual discussions, which allow me to carefully consider complex issues before making decisions. Intellection supports my ability to approach problems thoughtfully, which is essential in a field as nuanced as healthcare.
  • Individualization: As someone with Individualization, I recognize and appreciate the unique qualities of each team member, enabling me to build diverse and effective teams. This strength enhances my ability to tailor support and mentorship to individual needs, fostering a culture of growth and inclusion (Clifton, 2020).
  • Achiever: The Achiever strength reflects my drive for consistent productivity and accomplishment. While this quality helps me set and meet high standards, I must also be cautious of burnout and ensure that my expectations are balanced with self-care.

Together, these strengths contribute to my ability to lead in a dynamic healthcare environment. However, areas such as Individualization and Achiever require further development to ensure balanced, effective leadership.

Key Behaviors to Strengthen

To become a more effective leader, I am focusing on enhancing two specific behaviors: Individualization and Achiever.

  • Individualization: While I value each team member’s unique qualities, I need to strengthen my ability to tailor my communication and leadership style to different personalities. By enhancing this behavior, I can foster a more inclusive work environment where everyone feels respected and valued (Marshall & Broome, 2017).
  • Achiever: My drive for accomplishment can sometimes lead to overly high expectations, which may contribute to stress. I aim to balance this strength by setting realistic goals and recognizing the importance of rest and self-care. Strengthening this behavior will help me maintain productivity without compromising well-being (Rath, 2007).

Development Plan

Individualization

  1. Active Listening and Communication: To improve my Individualization strength, I will practice active listening by engaging more deeply with team members to understand their perspectives and needs better. Regular one-on-one meetings will allow me to gather feedback and demonstrate that I value each individual’s contributions (Shanafelt & Noseworthy, 2017).
  2. Cultural Competence Training: I will attend workshops on cultural competence and diversity to enhance my ability to connect with team members from different backgrounds. This training will equip me to better support team members with diverse perspectives, fostering an inclusive work environment.

Timeline: I plan to complete two cultural competence workshops within the next six months. Additionally, I will conduct monthly one-on-one check-ins with my team to gather feedback and adjust my approach as needed.

Achiever

  1. Goal Prioritization: To address the Achiever tendency, I will set prioritized, achievable goals that allow for breaks and prevent burnout. By defining clear boundaries for work hours, I can ensure I balance high productivity with necessary downtime (Marshall & Broome, 2017).
  2. Reflection Practices: I will implement weekly reflection sessions to assess my progress and adjust my goals based on realistic expectations. This practice will help me recognize the importance of well-being in achieving sustainable productivity (Rath, 2007).

Timeline: Over the next quarter, I will document and evaluate my goals weekly to assess workload and effectiveness. This reflection will help me develop a healthier approach to goal-setting and achievement.

Conclusion

My leadership philosophy is grounded in core values of integrity, empathy, and accountability, reinforced by a mission to foster inclusivity and personal growth. By leveraging my strengths and continuously improving on key behaviors, I am committed to creating a positive, supportive environment that prioritizes the well-being of both patients and team members. This philosophy reflects a lifelong commitment to growth, resilience, and compassionate care, ensuring my leadership positively impacts those I lead.

References

Clifton, D. (2020). Your Signature Themes SURVEY COMPLETION DATE: 06-30-2020. Gallup.

Marshall, E. S., & Broome, M. E. (2017). Transformational Leadership in Nursing (2nd ed.). Springer.

Rath, T. (2007). StrengthsFinder 2.0. Gallup Press.

Shanafelt, T. D., & Noseworthy, J. H. (2017). Executive leadership and physician well-being: Nine organizational strategies to promote engagement and reduce burnout. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 92(1), 129-146.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS 6053 IO003 Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies Assignment

Assignment: Personal Leadership Philosophies

Many of us can think of leaders we have come to admire, be they historical figures, pillars of the industry we work in, or leaders we know personally. The leadership of individuals such as Abraham Lincoln and Margaret Thatcher has been studied and discussed repeatedly. However, you may have interacted with leaders you feel demonstrated equally competent leadership without ever having a book written about their approaches.

What makes great leaders great? Every leader is different, of course, but one area of commonality is the leadership philosophy that great leaders develop and practice. A leadership philosophy is basically an attitude held by leaders that acts as a guiding principle for their behavior. While formal theories on leadership continue to evolve over time, great leaders seem to adhere to an overarching philosophy that steers their actions.

What is your leadership philosophy? In this Assignment, you will explore what guides your own leadership.

To Prepare:

  • Identify two to three scholarly resources, in addition to this Module’s readings, that evaluate the impact of leadership behaviors in creating healthy work environments.
  • Reflect on the leadership behaviors presented in the three resources that you selected for review.
  • Reflect on your results of the Clifton Strengths Assessment, and consider how the results relate to your leadership traits.
  • Download your Signature Theme Report to submit for this Assignment.

The Assignment (2-3 pages):

Personal Leadership Philosophies

Develop and submit a personal leadership philosophy that reflects what you think are characteristics of a good leader. Use the scholarly resources on leadership you selected to support your philosophy statement. Your personal leadership philosophy should include the following:

  • A description of your core values.
  • A personal mission/vision statement.
  • An analysis of your Clifton Strengths Assessment summarizing the results of your profile
  • A description of two key behaviors that you wish to strengthen.
  • A development plan that explains how you plan to improve upon the two key behaviors you selected and an explanation of how you plan to achieve your personal vision. Be specific and provide examples.

INSTRUCTORS RESOURCES

McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby/Elsevier.

  • Chapter 21: Mechanisms of Hormonal Regulation, including Summary Review
  • Chapter 22: Alterations of Hormonal Regulation, including Summary Review
  • Chapter 23: Obesity and Disorders of Nutrition, including Summary Review

American Diabetes Association (2020). Standards of medical care of patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care, 26(suppl 1), pp. s33-s50. https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/26/suppl_1/s33

Orlander, P. R. (2018). Hypothyroidism. Retrieved from https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/122393-overview

Hoorn, E. J., & Zietse, R. (2017). Diagnosis and treatment of hyponatremia: Compilation of the guidelines. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 28(5), 1340–1349

The Questions

  1. A description of your core values.

Your Top 5 Themes

  • Learner
  • Activator
  • Intellection
  • Individualization
  • Achiever
  1. A personal mission/vision statement.
  2. An analysis of your CliftonStrengths Assessment summarizing the results of your profile. (That is the Clifton Strength Assessment Report)
  3. A description of two key behaviors that you wish to strengthen.

(Individualization and Achiever)

  1. A development plan that explains how you plan to improve upon the two key behaviors you selected and an explanation of how you plan to achieve your personal vision. Be specific and provide examples.
  • Be sure to incorporate your colleagues’ feedback on your CliftonStrengths Assessment from this Module’s Discussion 2.

NURS_6053_Module03_Week06_Assignment_Rubric

 Show Descriptions  Show Feedback

Develop and submit a personal leadership philosophy that reflects what you think are characteristics of a good leader. Use the scholarly resources on leadership you selected to support your philosophy statement. Your personal leadership philosophy should include the following: ·   A description of your core values. ·   A personal mission/vision statement.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 14 (14.00%) – 15 (15.00%)

Good 12 (12.00%) – 13 (13.00%)

Fair 11 (11.00%) – 11 (11.00%)

Poor 0 (0.00%) – 10 (10.00%)

  • Analysis of your CliftonStrengths Assessment summarizing the results of your profile. ·   A description of two key behaviors you wish to strengthen.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 14 (14.00%) – 15 (15.00%)

Good 12 (12.00%) – 13 (13.00%)

Fair 11 (11.00%) – 11 (11.00%)

Poor 0 (0.00%) – 10 (10.00%)

  • A development plan that explains how you plan to improve upon the two key behaviors you selected and an explanation of how you plan to achieve your personal vision. Be specific and provide examples.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 50 (50.00%) – 55 (55.00%)

Good 44 (44.00%) – 49 (49.00%)

Fair 39 (39.00%) – 43 (43.00%)

Poor 0 (0.00%) – 38 (38.00%)

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)

Good 4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)

Fair 3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%)

Poor 0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)

Good 4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)

Fair 3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%)

Poor 0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–

Levels of Achievement:

Excellent 5 (5.00%) – 5 (5.00%)

Good 4 (4.00%) – 4 (4.00%)

Fair 3.5 (3.50%) – 3.5 (3.50%)

Poor 0 (0.00%) – 3 (3.00%)

Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!

Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.

Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy

Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.

How We Can Assist You

Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.

Why Choose Us?

  • Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
  • Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
  • Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
  • Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Why Trust Our Professionals?

Professionals at ReliablePapers.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.

As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust ReliablePapers.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.

Save Time, Secure Top Grades

Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

/by