Archive for category: Blog

HCI-670 User Interface Design for Informatics Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

HCI-670 User Interface Design for Informatics Course Description

In this course, learners apply principles of human factors engineering to the design of optimal user interfaces that improve clinical processes. Learners examine clinical decision support and clinical workflow analysis, modeling, reducing data entry errors, and usability testing in efforts to improve the experience of end users while prioritizing patient safety and the delivery of quality health care.

HCI 670 (User Interface Design for Informatics) Complete Course Syllabus— Topic 1 till 8 — Assignments & Discussion Questions

• HCI 670 Topic 1 Assignment Human Factors Engineering Paper
• HCI 670 Topic 1 Discussion Question 1
• HCI 670 Topic 1 Discussion Question 2
• HCI 670 Topic 2 Assignment Clinical Decision Support
• HCI 670 Topic 2 Discussion Question 1
• HCI 670 Topic 2 Discussion Question 2
• HCI 670 Topic 3 Assignment Needs Assessment Case Study
• HCI 670 Topic 3 Discussion Question 1
• HCI 670 Topic 3 Discussion Question 2
• HCI 670 Topic 4 Assignment: Designing Electronic Forms
• HCI 670 Topic 4 Discussion Question 1
• HCI 670 Topic 4 Discussion Question 2
• HCI 670 Topic 5 Assignment: Benchmark — Create a Workflow
• HCI 670 Topic 5 Discussion Question 1
• HCI 670 Topic 5 Discussion Question 2
• HCI 670 Topic 6 Assignment Benchmark — User Testing Script
• HCI 670 Topic 6 Discussion Question 1
• HCI 670 Topic 6 Discussion Question 2
• HCI 670 Topic 7 Assignment Workflow Training
• HCI 670 Topic 7 Discussion Question 1
• HCI 670 Topic 7 Discussion Question 2
• HCI 670 Topic 8 Assignment Benchmark — Internal Presentation
• HCI 670 Topic 8 Discussion Question 1

HCI-670 User Interface Design for Informatics Course Assignments & Discussions

HCI-670 User Interface Design for Informatics Course Discussions

HCI 670 Topic 1 DQ 1: 

Describe the benefits of a clinical workflow and explain how an EHR-related workflow applies to informatics.

HCI 670 Topic 1 DQ 2: 

What are the possible solutions to prevent data entry error? How does this relate to overall integrity of the database and the analytic process?

HCI 670 Topic 2 DQ 1: 

Provide an example of an EHR-based clinical decision support tool from a workplace experience or current online resource. Describe the impact of decision support tool on the quality of patient care.

HCI 670 Topic 2 DQ 2: 

Discuss design principles used to facilitate heuristics in a clinical decision support process. Provide a workplace example and offer suggestions to improve the clinical decision support? Provide a rationale for why you made those suggestions.

HCI 670 Topic 3 DQ 1: 

Define “need assessment” and explain the various types of need assessments. Provide a workplace example of an improvement opportunity and identify the methods of needs assessment that could be used in this situation.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today!

HCI 670 Topic 3 DQ 2: 

Patient safety is a major concern for the health care industry. Refer to the topic resources to discuss how this concern may be addressed during the EHR needs assessment.

HCI 670 Topic 4 DQ 1: 

Consider the concept of data governance. Discuss the important strategies required for a data governance program.

HCI 670 Topic 4 DQ 2: 

Discuss how you would use data to develop information, knowledge and wisdom in workplace.

HCI 670 Topic 5 DQ 1: 

What are the benefits of a workflow analysis? What are some of the questions that need to be addressed when doing a workflow analysis?

HCI 670 Topic 5 DQ 2: 

Provide an example of something that was implemented and went poorly because workflow analysis was not done. Describe why it failed and what happened as a result.

HCI 670 Topic 6 DQ 1: 

Explain at least two different types of user testing, their importance and provide an example.

HCI 670 Topic 6 DQ 2: 

Refer to the assigned reading, “Exploratory Testing vs Scripted Testing — A Quick Guide,” to discuss in which step of the user testing process the most crucial bugs are identified.

HCI 670 Topic 7 DQ 1: 

Describe your principles of adult learning and their application to end user training. Provide an example of a training you have attended and how adult learning principles were utilized.

HCI 670 Topic 7 DQ 2: 

Discuss how organizational culture impacts the success of system implementation. Identify strategic change initiative success factors and discuss how these factors impact successful system implementation.

HCI 670 Topic 8 DQ 1: 

Changing health information systems can have a direct impact on the quality of patient care. Discuss initiatives that can enhance patient care quality during advanced stages of EHR adaption. Refer to the topic resources for help answering this question.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on PUB-540 Principles of Epidemiology Course Assignments & Discussions.

HCI-670 User Interface Design for Informatics Course Assignments

HCI 670 Topic 1 Assignment — Human Factors Engineering Paper

Assignment

Human Factors Engineering Paper

The purpose of this assignment is to explain the principles of design usability and analyze the impact of human factors on electronic applications for health care systems.

Write a 750-1,000-word paper on the usability of health informatics applications. Include the following:

1. Describe an example of an electronic health record (EHR) application used in a health care setting.
2. Describe the key elements of design usability for that application.
3. Analyze and describe how human factors or heuristic principles affect the electronic EHR in the chosen application.
4. Recommend an improvement to the chosen electronic application.
5. Provide a rationale for the suggested improvement based on knowledge of design usability.

Support your findings with a minimum of two scholarly resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

Rubric

 

 

 

HCI 670 Topic 2 Assignment — Clinical Decision Support

Assignment

Clinical Decision Support

Clinical decision support is about using the right trigger, to the right person, with the right instructions, with the intent to ensure that the person is making the right decision.

The purpose of this assignment is to describe the different types of clinical decision support and determine the outcomes of applied clinical decision support.

Using the topic resources and your own research, write a 500-750-word paper addressing the following:

1. What are the different types of clinical decision support?
2. Describe at least three different types of clinical decision support that could be used in a health care setting or provide a personal workplace example.
3. Using the examples, you have provided (above), identify the triggers that would initiate the criteria for clinical decision support.
4. Using the same examples, outline the who, what, when, and how instructions of a clinical decision support enhancement.
5. Describe the outcomes of the clinical decision support application.

Cite at least two scholarly resources in your response.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

Rubric

 

HCI 670 Topic 3 Assignment — Needs Assessment Case Study

Description

The purpose of this assignment is to identify and analyze the needs of an EHR in a clinical setting in order to determine a potential solution to an EHR problem.

Read the “Integrated Case Study”, “Oncology North: Navigator Intake Paper Form” and “Oncology South: Oncology Navigator Intake Form” resources prior to beginning the assignment and use the information in the resource to write a 750-1,000 word paper that provides answers to the following questions:

1. What are the problems identified in the EHR?
2. What are the gaps resulting from the identified problems?
3. What are some opportunities to expand or develop the capabilities of the EHR?
4. What developments could be made to the clinical workflow setting?
5. What is a potential solution to the identified EHR problem?

Cite at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed resources in your analysis.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Integrated Case Study

Overview:

Throughout this course, you will use this case study to demonstrate knowledge of the following course content:

• Clinical decision support
• Assessing user needs
• Analyzing and documenting workflow
• Designing and customizing fields, forms, and templates
• User testing
• Evaluation metrics
• Designing user documentation and training

In a series of assignments, you will use this case study to integrate user interface design (including usability/human factor principles) into a design document, analyze and develop workflows, evaluate users’ needs (including their involvement in user testing), develop evaluation metrics, and design enduser training materials.

The case study, which will be used throughout the course, will focus on various components of the course topics. It focuses specifically on the unique needs of oncology patients and the healthcare needs of oncology navigators and prior authorization/financial coordinators.

The Case:

Universal Health is a large not-for-profit health care system with 12 hospitals in threestates and two large oncology programs in Arizona. One of the oncology programs is affiliated with Academic Hospital and the other with a larger national oncology healthcare system. Although both oncology locations are part of Universal Health, there are significant differences in how each of thelocations operates due to a recent merger/acquisition of the Academic Hospital oncology program (Oncology South) and the affiliation of the other oncology program (Oncology North) with a national oncology health care system. To compound these operational issues, Oncology North had been part of Universal Health for 8 years, so its Electronic Health Record (EHR) wasChrystal, which was the EHR platform for Universal Health and became the model used to convert Oncology South off itsEHR to align with the rest of the organization. Management of oncology patients is quite complex and there was significant concern from Oncology South aboutthe EHR conversion, as well as changes that would affectitsoperating model. Previously,both oncology programs worked relatively independently with IT to create custom solutions, but now would need to work together to create a standardized oncology solution for Universal Health.

If a merger/acquisition of a large academic hospital and its oncology program wasnot complex enough, adding the conversion of an EHR certainly made the situation more difficult. Also compounding the issue, Oncology North—although it had been on the EHR Chrystal for almost 8 years—had significant issues with the current build and felt that there were several gaps related to functionality for oncology clinicians to service itsunique population. Since Universal Health was in the process of converting the EHR at Academic Hospital and Oncology program, the EHR vendor, Chrystal, was actively involving itsalignment specialiststo assist in the conversion. One of the keyfirst steps of the Chrystal alignment specialists was to do a gap analysis and prioritization of EHR functionality for oncology as well as throughout Universal Health.

The gap analysis done by Chrystal found that the oncology build for Universal Health overall did not align to itsrecommendation for oncology specialties in several areas within the EHR. As a result, a focused team (including a project manager,nursing informatics, Universal Health IT resources, Chrystal oncology alignment specialists, and Chrystal oncology IT experts) was created to systematically address the recommendations from the Chrystal oncology gap analysis. Although there were recommendations globally related to Universal Health’s overall EHR build, there were some specific recommendations related to the build of the oncology platform within Chrystal. Some of the initial focus was related to concerns related to prior authorization/financial gaps and the functionally/workflow of all the oncology providers/clinicians,but also the oncology navigators whoreally didnot have any oncology functionality within Chrystal.

Servicing an oncology population is a significant part of the patient demographics of anylarge health care organization.Oncology patients have unique needs due to the frequency of their visits and the length of their treatments and follow-up, which can last a lifetime. A cancer diagnosis is life changing and can cause great emotional, physical, and financial stress. Oncology navigators exist to assess and assist patients and their families during their cancer treatment and hopefully into remission/survivorship. Unfortunately, cancer treatment can be costly, and dealing with insurance companies for prior authorization is an unfortunate reality in the current health care system. For health care providers, there is great financial responsibility in providing cancer treatment, so obtaining authorization from insurance companies and ensuring that patients are aware of their own financial responsibility areessential for both the patient and the organization.

After a patient receives a cancer diagnosis, the next step is usually a referral to an oncology specialist/program like Oncology North or Oncology South. That referral can come from a patient calling an oncology specialist/program directly or from the diagnosing physician contactingan oncology specialist/program. Oncology South and Oncology North both have dedicated intake referral specialists who work directly with patients, families,and referring physicians to get patients scheduled with anoncology specialist basedon their diagnosis. Before the patient sees the oncology specialist for the first time, many documents need to be sent to the prior authorization team for review to ensure that the appropriate prior authorization is obtained from the insurance company, as well as making sure that the patient will be seen by the most appropriate oncology specialist for the specifically diagnosed cancer. These documents vary from pathology reports, diagnostic results, and referring physician notes that can be sent to the prior authorization specialist at different times for different patients. It is essential to have a standard workflow and expectation of standard documentation in a certain place in the EHR, so that everyone involved in the initial authorization and clinical care knows what steps have been takenand what actions arepending. While these financial steps are occurring behind the scenes and are important details that need to be secured before a patient’s first appointment, it is worth noting that at this juncture patients have just received some of the worst news in their life and they just want to get treatment as soon as possible.

Oncology navigators are nurses that specialize in assisting patients navigate their cancer journey from diagnosis through treatment and into survivorship. After the first contact with the oncology intake specialists, oncology navigators are the next foundational step in the patient’s journey towards treatment and recovery. After the initial documentation is completed by the intake specialist who provides some basic information, including name of person calling, contact information, referral sources, provider information, and diagnosis information,such astype of cancer.  Based upon the type of cancer on the intake documentation, an oncology navigator who specializes in that cancer type is notified of the new patient and contacts the patient to initiate acustom navigation plan based upon assessment of needs. The oncology navigator role is an extremely important part of the oncology team. However, oncology navigatorswere identified as being significantly underdeveloped within Universal Health EHR based upon Chrystal’s gap analysis, so there needed to be focused attention on this group within the organization.

As a result, a dedicated team needed to be formed to include individuals from nursing informatics from Universal Health, Chrystal oncology alignment and IT specialists, Chrystal IT staff, and oncology navigators from both Oncology North and Oncology South. This team would be responsible documenting workflow, assessing enduser needs, and submitting a final design recommendation (including training materials) to the Universal Health IT build team. The completion deadline for the design document is 8 weeks.

Assessing current state and understanding end user needs must be one of the first goals of this dedicated team. Two days were dedicated for onsite observations of oncology navigators at Oncology South and Oncology North, during which it was discovered from the observations that even though the oncology navigators at both locations performedthe same role, they had some significant differences that needed to be overcome to be able to collaborate and create a single oncology navigator solution. The grid below outlines some of the differences.

Operations Differences	Oncology South	Oncology North
Initial Contact With Patient	Phone interview within 3 days	Initial physician clinic visit
Patient Oversight	All oncology patients	Only oncology patients that have identified needs
Documentation	Paper form: See document: Nav Assessment 2018	Paper form: See document: Oncology North

Although each location has operational differences, they alsohave several similarities in how they used some of the tools in the EHR, as well as their need for data and the ability to track/trend the outcomes of their patients. One key request was to make it easier for all oncology clinicians to be able to see their documentation within Chrystal. These foundational similarities aligned to what Chrystal oncology specialists had implemented at other institutions, having already created an Oncology Navigator Recommended Design Document that could be used at UniversalHealth. The table below provides some similarities between Oncology North and Oncology South.

Operations Similarities	Oncology North and Oncology South
Position	Navigator/Coordinator RN
Data Request	Wanted discrete data for reports
Electronic Documentation	Used same two electronic methods to chart: Electronic forms shared by all types of navigators (e.g., ortho, pulmonary) Free-text note also shared by same navigators above
Electronic Documentation	Wanted it to be easier to find specific oncology navigator documentation

Healthcare is all about data.In addition to using EHR for recording documentation, it is used to extract data to evaluate outcomes. Data in the EHR can come from discrete data from ICD10/ICD9 used by providers/coders, SNOMED, IMO codes used clinicians, but also directly from forms and flowsheets from discrete data fields. Understanding the unique data requirements of the oncology navigators, as well the initial prior authorization team, is foundational to creating the appropriate discrete fields or using existing data fields like ICD10 to help sort and organize data.

HCI 670 Topic 3 Assignment — Needs Assessment Case Study Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HCI-670	HCI-670-O500	Needs Assessment Case Study	75.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)	3: Satisfactory (79.00%)	4: Good (87.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Identified Problems	10.0%	A description of the identified problem is not present.	A description of the identified problem is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of the identified problem is included but lacks supporting details.	A description of the identified problem is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of the identified problem in the EHR is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Gaps	15.0%	A description of the gaps resulting from the identified problem is not present.	A description of the gaps resulting from the identified problem is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of the gaps resulting from the identified problem is included but lacks supporting details.	A description of the gaps resulting from the identified problem is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of the gaps resulting from the identified problem is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Opportunities	15.0%	An explanation of the opportunities to expand or develop the capabilities of the EHR is not present.	An explanation of the opportunities to expand or develop the capabilities of the EHR is incomplete or incorrect.	An explanation of the opportunities to expand or develop the capabilities of the EHR is included but lacks supporting details.	An explanation of the opportunities to expand or develop the capabilities of the EHR is complete and includes supporting details.	An explanation of the opportunities to expand or develop the capabilities of the EHR is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Developments to Clinical Workflow	15.0%	A description of the developments could be made to the clinical workflow setting is not present.	A description of the developments could be made to the clinical workflow setting is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of the developments could be made to the clinical workflow setting is included but lacks supporting details.	A description of the developments could be made to the clinical workflow setting is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of the developments could be made to the clinical workflow setting is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Potential Solution	15.0%	A description of the potential solution to the identified EHR problem is not present.	A description of the potential solution to the identified EHR problem is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of the potential solution to the identified EHR problem is included but lacks supporting details.	A description of the potential solution to the identified EHR problem is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of the potential solution to the identified EHR problem is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

 

HCI 670 Topic 4 Assignment — Digital Electronic Forms

Assignment

Designing Electronic Forms

The purpose of this assignment is to design a clinical form to be used for oncology RN navigators.

Read the “Integrated Case Study” resource and review the “Oncology North: Navigator Intake Paper Form” and “Oncology South: Oncology Navigator Intake Form” prior to beginning the assignment.

Based upon the case study and two intake forms, use an Excel spreadsheet or Word document to design a custom form that merges the paper documents and converts them to an electronic form. Be sure to include the different custom fields and topics necessary for navigating the form.

Along with your form, include a 250-word rationale in which you:

1. Describe the heuristic principles used to design the clinical form.
2. Explain how the documentation aids the oncology RN navigator in providing quality patient care.
3. Explain the rationale of the design.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

HCI 670 Topic 4 Assignment — Digital Electronic Forms Rubric

HCI 670 Topic 5 Assignment Benchmark — Create a Workflow

Description

The purpose of this assignment is to analyze a clinical workflow and apply process modeling techniques to solve an EMR problem.

Read the “Integrated Case Study” resource and review the “Oncology North: Navigator Intake Paper Form” and “Oncology South: Oncology Navigator Intake Form” prior to beginning the assignment. In addition, refer to the instructor feedback you received on the Topic 3 assignment.

Part 1: Analyze a Current State

Analyze the “Oncology North: Navigator Intake Paper Form” and “Oncology South: Oncology Navigator Intake Form” to identify opportunities for process improvement as they relate to informatics. Consider ways to optimize electronic documentation and reduce the number of steps.

Part 2: Create a Future State Workflow

Using an Excel spreadsheet or Word document, create a future state workflow that solves the identified improvement opportunities from your analysis with a minimum of six steps and a clearly defined start and stop. The workflow must display the accurate symbols used to indicate certain actions.

Part 3: Rationale

In addition, support the future state workflow with a 500-word rationale that provides the following:

1. Identify the users of the workflow.
2. Describe the identified opportunities for process improvement and how the future state workflow addresses these opportunities.
3. Describe how the future state workflow optimizes electronic documentation and reduces the number of steps.
4. Explain the effects of the future state workflow on patient care.
5. Explain how the future state workflow will change based on user needs.
6. Discuss how to develop an improvement plan to enhance the future state workflow.

Include three to five scholarly resources to support your findings.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Make sure to divide each point in a paragraph format. First paragraph needs to be an intro and include a thesis statement, Last paragraph needs to be a concluding statement.

para1: Intro; para2: Rationale: Users, Process Improvement, Opportunities to Improve (C2.3, C6.7); para3: Rationale: Optimizes Documentation and Reduction of Steps; para4: Rationale: Effects on Patient Care; para5: Rationale: Changes Based on Needs; para6: Research; para7: conclusion.

For the resources, make sure they are academic based. Each source must include either a doi or url.

HCI 670 Topic 5 Assignment Benchmark — Create a Workflow Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HCI-670	HCI-670-O500	Benchmark – Create a Workflow	110.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)	3: Satisfactory (79.00%)	4: Good (87.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Criteria	100.0%
Workflow	20.0%	Workflow is not present.	The workflow is incomplete or incorrect about solving the identified problem and does not include at least six steps, a clearly defined start and stop, and accurate symbols.	The workflow lacks supporting details about solving the identified problem and may not include at least six steps, a clearly defined start and stop, and accurate symbols.	The workflow is complete and includes supporting details about solving the identified problem and includes at least six steps, a clearly defined start and stop, and accurate symbols.	The workflow is extremely thorough in solving the identified problem and includes at least six steps, a clearly defined start and stop, and accurate symbols.
Rationale: Users, Process Improvement, Opportunities to Improve (C2.3, C6.7)	10.0%	Rationale is not present.	Rationale includes an ineffective analysis of the clinical workflow by identifying the users and opportunities for process improvement. Rationale poorly explains how the workflow addresses these opportunities and improves the use of information and clinical decision making.	Rationale includes a vague analysis of the clinical workflow by identifying the users and opportunities for process improvement. Rationale minimally explains how the workflow addresses these opportunities and improves the use of information and clinical decision making.	Rationale includes a detailed analysis of the clinical workflow by identifying the users and opportunities for process improvement. Rationale directly explains how the workflow addresses these opportunities and improves the use of information and clinical decision making.	Rationale includes a comprehensive analysis of the clinical workflow by identifying the users and opportunities for process improvement. Rationale thoroughly explains how the workflow addresses these opportunities and improves the use of information and clinical decision making.
Rationale: Optimizes Documentation and Reduction of Steps	10.0%	Rationale is not present.	Rationale incorrectly describes how the future state workflow optimizes electronic documentation and reduces the number of steps.	Rationale unclearly describes how the future state workflow optimizes electronic documentation and reduces the number of steps.	Rationale effectively describes how the future state workflow optimizes electronic documentation and reduces the number of steps.	Rationale innovatively describes how the future state workflow optimizes electronic documentation and reduces the number of steps.
Rationale: Effects on Patient Care	10.0%	Rationale is not present.	Rationale inaccurately explains the effects of the future state workflow on patient care.	Rationale weakly explains the effects of the future state workflow on patient care.	Rationale aptly explains the effects of the future state workflow on patient care.	Rationale insightfully explains the effects of the future state workflow on patient care.
Rationale: Changes Based on Needs	10.0%	Rationale is not present.	Rationale inadequately explains how the future state workflow will change based on user needs and how the improvement plan will be developed.	Rationale ambiguously explains how the future state workflow will change based on user needs and how the improvement plan will be developed.	Rationale reasonably explains how the future state workflow will change based on user needs and how the improvement plan will be developed.	Rationale proficiently explains how the future state workflow will change based on user needs and how the improvement plan will be developed.
Research	5.0%	No outside sources were used to support the assignment.	Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.	Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness.	Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.	Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive and address all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Visual Appeal	5.0%	There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is evident.	Color is garish and/or typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited.	Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout.	Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.	Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.
Technical Skill	5.0%	Execution does not meet the criteria outlined.	Execution is sloppy and unprofessional.	Execution needs improvement.	Execution is of good quality.	Execution is flawless. Demonstrates an in-depth, high-level of understanding.
Aesthetic Quality	5.0%	Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose of presentation is low quality.	Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present.	Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear.	Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message.	Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident.
Appropriateness	5.0%	There is no evidence that the student has selected an effective tool, technique, or paradigm to achieve the goal as defined in the project or course guideline. Materials (photo, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) are missing.	Student selection of a tool, technique, or paradigm does not relate to the project or course goal. Student selects materials (photos, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) that are not appropriate for the audience and the situation and are inadequately developed.	Student selects a tool, technique, or paradigm that achieves a basic representation as defined in the project or course guideline. Student selects materials (photos, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) that are appropriate for the audience and the situation but some of the development of the material is inadequate.	Student selects an effective tool, technique, or paradigm to achieve the desired goal as defined in the project or course guideline. Student selects materials (photos, sound files, video clips, apparel, illustrations, etc.) that are appropriate for the audience and the situation.	Student shows a deep understanding of the audience and the situation by selecting material that enhances understanding. Student creates tools, techniques, or paradigms that effectively achieve the desired goal.
Originality	5.0%	The work is an extensive collection and rehash of the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people. There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness.	The work is a minimal collection or rehash of the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people. There is no evidence of new thought.	The product shows evidence of originality. While based on the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people, the work does offer some new insights.	The product shows evidence of originality and inventiveness. While based somewhat on the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights.	The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and sound research.
Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

HCI 670 Topic 6 Assignment Benchmark — User Testing Script

Description

The purpose of this assignment is to apply user testing to the created workflow for the identified case study need.

Read the “Integrated Case Study” resource prior to beginning the assignment. In addition, refer to the instructor feedback you received on the Topic 5 assignment.

Write a 750-1,000 word test script that answers the following questions:

1. Who would be part of the user testing?
2. What are the elements to test?
3. What are the steps used to perform acceptance testing, integration testing of new systems, and testing of system enhancements?
4. Are there any rules involved?
5. What is the action/outcome expected?
6. What would the action plan be if testing does not work?

Cite at least two scholarly resources in your response.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

HCI 670 Topic 6 Assignment Benchmark — User Testing Script Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HCI-670	HCI-670-O500	Benchmark – User Testing Script	115.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)	3: Satisfactory (79.00%)	4: Good (87.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	100.0%
User	10.0%	A description of who is part of the user testing is not present.	A description of who is part of the user testing is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of who is part of the user testing is included but lacks supporting details.	A description of who is part of the user testing is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of who is part of the user testing is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Elements to Test	10.0%	A description of the elements to test is not present.	A description of the elements to test is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of the elements to test is included but lacks supporting details.	A description of the elements to test is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of the elements to test is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Testing Steps (C2.6, C6.10)	10.0%	An explanation of the steps to be taken to perform acceptance testing, integration testing of new systems, and testing of system enhancements is not present.	An explanation of the steps to be taken to perform acceptance testing, integration testing of new systems, and testing of system enhancements is incomplete or incorrect.	An explanation of the steps to be taken to perform acceptance testing, integration testing of new systems, and testing of system enhancements is included but lacks supporting details.	An explanation of the steps to be taken to perform acceptance testing, integration testing of new systems, and testing of system enhancements is complete and includes supporting details.	An explanation of the steps to be taken to perform acceptance testing, integration testing of new systems, and testing of system enhancements is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Rules	10.0%	A description of the rules used in the user testing is not present.	A description of the rules used in the user testing is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of the rules used in the user testing is included but lacks supporting details.	A description of the rules used in the user testing is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of the rules used in the user testing is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Action or Outcome	10.0%	An explanation of the action or outcome expected from the user testing is not present.	An explanation of the action or outcome expected from the user testing is incomplete or incorrect.	An explanation of the action or outcome expected from the user testing is included but lacks supporting details.	An explanation of the action or outcome expected from the user testing is complete and includes supporting details.	An explanation of the action or outcome expected from the user testing is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Action Plan	20.0%	An explanation of the action plan to be put in place if the user testing does not work is not present.	An explanation of the action plan to be put in place if the user testing does not work is incomplete or incorrect.	An explanation of the action plan to be put in place if the user testing does not work is included but lacks supporting details.	An explanation of the action plan to be put in place if the user testing does not work is complete and includes supporting details.	An explanation of the action plan to be put in place if the user testing does not work is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

HCI 670 Topic 7 Assignment — Workflow Training

Description

The purpose of this assignment is to create materials to educate and train staff on the future state workflow created in Topic 5. Refer to your instructor’s feedback on that assignment for successful completion of this assignment.

Create an 8-10 slide PowerPoint presentation that could be used for leading a professional development for your staff on the future state workflow process.

Include a title slide, reference slide, and presenter’s notes.

Be sure to include the following:

1. Objectives
2. Purpose of the workflow
3. Steps to creating the workflow
4. Purpose/Problem the workflow solves
5. Key changes or improvements
6. Who is impacted and why

Include three to five scholarly resources to support your findings.

Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

HCI 670 Topic 7 Assignment — Workflow Training Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HCI-670	HCI-670-O500	Workflow Training	85.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)	3: Satisfactory (79.00%)	4: Good (87.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	100.0%
Objectives	5.0%	An explanation of the objectives of the presentation and workflow is not present.	An explanation of the objectives of the presentation and workflow is incomplete or incorrect.	An explanation of the objectives of the presentation and workflow is included but lacks supporting details.	An explanation of the objectives of the presentation and workflow is complete and includes supporting details.	An explanation of the objectives of the presentation and workflow is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Purpose	5.0%	An explanation of the purpose of the workflow is not present.	An explanation of the purpose of the workflow is incomplete or incorrect.	An explanation of the purpose of the workflow is included but lacks supporting details.	An explanation of the purpose of the workflow is complete and includes supporting details.	An explanation of the purpose of the workflow is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Steps	5.0%	An explanation of the steps taken to create the workflow is not present.	An explanation of the steps taken to create the workflow is incomplete or incorrect.	An explanation of the steps taken to create the workflow is included but lacks supporting details.	An explanation of the steps taken to create the workflow is complete and includes supporting details.	An explanation of the steps taken to create the workflow is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Problem	10.0%	A description of problem the workflow solves is not present.	A description of problem the workflow solves is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of problem the workflow solves is included but lacks supporting details.	A description of problem the workflow solves is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of problem the workflow solves is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Key Changes	10.0%	A description of the key changes or improvements is not present.	A description of the key changes or improvements is incomplete or incorrect.	A description of the key changes or improvements is included but lacks supporting details.	A description of the key changes or improvements is complete and includes supporting details.	A description of the key changes or improvements is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Impact	5.0%	An explanation of who is impacted by the workflow and why is not present.	An explanation of who is impacted by the workflow and why is incomplete or incorrect.	An explanation of who is impacted by the workflow and why is included but lacks supporting details.	An explanation of who is impacted by the workflow and why is complete and includes supporting details.	An explanation of who is impacted by the workflow and why is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Presentation of Content	30.0%	The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.	The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.	The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.	The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.	The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Layout	10.0%	The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.	The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.	The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.	The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.	The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)	10.0%	Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.	Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.	Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.	The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.	The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.	Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.	Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

HCI 670 Topic 8 Assignment Benchmark — Internal Presentation

Assignment

Benchmark – Internal Presentation

The purpose of this assignment is to present the steps taken to identify and solve an EHR problem. This PowerPoint presentation is designed for executive leadership and explains the work done to solve the identified problem in the case study.

Create a 10-15 slide PowerPoint presentation overviewing the informatics solution to the identified problems in the “Integrated Case Study” resource. Include the following information:

1. Describe the gap/need identified.
2. Describe the electronic form created to assist the oncology RN navigator
3. Describe the future state workflow created to meet the needs of the EHR.
4. Explain how principles of human factor engineering and user interface were integrated into the design and implementation of the informatics solution.
5. Outline the evaluation measures for the informatics solution.
6. Describe the process for evaluating the success of the informatics solution.

Include cover slide, reference slide, and presenter’s notes.

Include three to five credible resources to support your findings.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

HCI 670 Topic 8 Assignment Benchmark — Internal Presentation Rubric

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

• Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
• Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
• Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
• Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
• Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
• Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

HCI-655 Electronic Health Records Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

HCI-655 Electronic Health Records Course Description

This course prepares learners to evaluate, implement, and optimize electronic health record (EHR) technology to support the management and use of clinical data. Learners examine the architecture of EHRs and analyze the challenges of their design and use, including system integration requirements, distributed user bases, storage of complex data, high security requirements, and the diverse information needs of various end users. Learners also apply project management techniques to the planning and implementation of EHRs. Prerequisite: HIM-650.

HCI-655 Electronic Health Records Course All Assignments & Discussions

HCI 655 Week 1 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

Describe the EHR adoption rate trends in the past 10 years. What have been the driving forces behind EHR adoption? What are some potential barriers to EHR adoption?

HCI 655 Week 1 Discussion 2 | Grand Canyon University

Describe the benefits of an EHR compared to a paper-based system. Have you had any personal experience with EHRs? If so, explain how they were beneficial or counterproductive.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on HCI-660 Health Data Analytics Course Assignments & Discussions.

HCI 655 Week 1 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

Week 1 Exploring EHRs

The purpose of this assignment is to become familiar with components of EHRs.

In a 500-750 word essay, describe the components of EHRs. 

Include the following:

1. Define EHR.
2. Describe information found in an EHR.
3. Describe the core functions of an EHR.
4. Explain how an EHR varies by clinical setting.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

HCI 655 Topic 1 Assignment: VLab MEDITECH Expanse Getting Started & Acute Activities (Patient Care Services and Physician Care Manager)

Assessment Description

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 1 Assignment: VLab MEDITECH Expanse Getting Started & Acute Activities (Patient Care Services and Physician Care Manager) Description: The purpose of this assignment is to access patient electronic health records (EHRs) using the MEDITECH EHR application. Complete the VLab activities and quizzes for this topic. When opening the VLab activity, note that some of the activities are gated, meaning you must complete the previous activities first.

Grading for this assignment will be credit/no credit. To receive credit, learners must achieve a minimum VLab score of 80% on the quizzes. Learners are allowed unlimited attempts to attain the required score.

After completing the quizzes for these activities, click the “Print to PDF” button to download and save the scoresheets to your computer. Upload the scoresheets to the assignment dropbox.

here are the login credentials:

Website:  https://www.ahima.org

Usrernamen: ***********************************************************  23Desmoto$

Website: https://newconnect.mheducation.com

Usrernamen: ************************************************** 23Desmoto$

HCI 655 Week 2 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

What is the role of EHR interfaces? Explain how EHR technology platforms address information being shared through EHR interfaces.

HCI 655 Week 2 Discussion 2 | Grand Canyon University

Describe the differences between cloud-based and client-server architectures. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each model? 

What is the general difference in cost between the two models, and should cost be a factor in considering which is best?

HCI 655 Week 2 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 2 Assessment: EHR Technology Platforms

Week 2 EHR Technology Platforms

HCI 655 Topic 2 Assessment: EHR Technology Platforms

The purpose of this assignment is to research and become familiar with EHR technology platforms.

In a 750-1,000 word essay, research and explain various EHR technology platforms. 

Include the following:

1. Select and describe two different technology platforms used in leading EHR systems.
2. Contrast the benefits and challenges for the EHR technology platforms you selected. Include at least two benefits and two challenges for each platform.
3. Explain why each technology platform you selected was developed.
4. Identify which current EHR systems use the technology platforms you selected.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today!

HCI 655 Week 3 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

Describe the different data entry methods used by clinicians. Which methods are the most efficient and why are some approaches favored over others by clinicians? How is information stored and retrieved in the EHR?

HCI 655 Week 3 Discussion 2 | Grand canyon University

What are the benefits associated with reconciliation of health care data? 

What are the challenges associated with reconciliation of health care data? 

HCI 655 Week 3 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 Topic 3 Assessment: Health Care Systems Interoperability

Week 3 Health Care Systems Interoperability

Description

The purpose of this assignment is to develop an awareness of challenges associated with interoperability.

In a 1,000-1,250 word essay, analyze the current state of interoperability. Include the following:

1. Describe the importance of data integrity in health care.
2. Explain barriers to interoperability and health information exchange.
3. Identify at least five key challenges of data storage and maintaining data integrity.
4. Propose one solution to each challenge you have researched.
5. Describe at least five standards recognized by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC-HIT) that are applicable to interoperability.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

HCI 655 Week 4 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

Explain CMS quality-based reporting requirements. How does the EHR support the capture and reporting of data to registries that are used to determine quality-based performance?

HCI 655 Week 4 Discussion 2 | Grand Canyon University

Explain how the CMS Promoting Interoperability program and its security requirements impact EHR design and use. Explain the role of encryption in storing secured data. Explain the importance of making ethical decisions to comply with security requirements when using EHR systems. How could aspects of a Christian worldview help inform ethical decision making in this situation?

HCI 655 Week 4 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 Topic 4 Assessment: VLab – MEDITECH Expanse (Ambulatory Activities – Office Staff Home Screen and Clinical Chart Review)

The purpose of this assignment is to navigate through the MEDITECH Expanse Ambulatory Office Staff functions and to examine the workflow and development of the patient’s record and how clinical staff interacts with the patient’s record.

Instructions

I have attached the vendor evaluation matrix that you will use in your final report. You will list the name of the fictional hospital or ambulatory clinic at the top followed by the vendors that you be evaluating. You will need to list your requirements on the left side of the matrix. It comes pre-populated with some requirements which you can use, but you only need to list your top 10-15 requirements. Then weigh each vendor on the requirements with a scale of 1-5 with 5 being the highest rating. Then total up the scores and you can use this as part of your decision making process for your recommendation.

One more thing for you for the final project

Please go to https://klasresearch.com/ and request a free account. This site can help you in the evaluation of your vendors. This site is known to be the leader in reviews for acute and ambulatory vendors. Please log on and see the different vendors and modules that they offer and how they rate compared to others.

From the syllabus:

Special Project Report (40%)

Use chapter 7 as your guide. You can also listen to the week 2 course chat where I cover this in detail.

Follow the steps in page 146 from the book. Tell the story as a narrative. Who are you? Whats your role? What health system hired you.

Listen to the week 2 course chat for additonal details and examples I shared from my past experiences. To access go to blackboard/chat/menu(top left)/ then the date – may have to select recordings in a range on the top right and enter january 1 of this year – then select week 2

Students are required to submit a not less than seven-page research project at the end of the semester. The topic is that you are an information technology consultant and have been hired to evaluate the vendor information system alternatives and select a new healthcare information system for a hospital, clinical department or other provider entity. You will prepare a consulting report on analyzing current systems and providing needs analysis. You will evaluate potential vendors and provide a recommendation for a new system.

A special project is required as follows:

Consider that you are an information technology consultant. You have been hired to evaluate the vendor information system alternatives and select a new healthcare information system for a hospital, clinical department or other provider entity. You will prepare a consulting report that includes the following:

1. Situation Analysis. Describe the “real” or hypothetical work environment, provider objectives and current information systems configuration as well as any unmet needs or issues. What current clinical systems does the hospital or ambulatory clinic have? What are their pain points with the current setup?
2. Functional Requirements. List or otherwise characterize the key functional requirements to be met by a new or upgraded health information system.
3. Evaluate Vendor Alternatives. Describe and evaluate two to four vendor alternatives. Indicate pros, cons for each alternative. You must evaluate real vendors ex. Epic, Allscripts, Meditech
4. Provisional Recommendation. Given the information available to you, what are you recommending to your client? Options may include upgrading the current system or implementing a new enterprise-wide clinical system. Be specific and indicate your rationales for your recommendation.
5. A table comparing features of the vendor alternatives
6. A graphic representation depicting the workflow of one department in your fictional hospital.

*Define the process that you will be taking to make a decision. For example, you as the project manager with be forming a steering committee, have vendor demonstration days etc. Use the steps defined in Chapter 7 as your guide.

Students are encouraged to come forward with their own project ideas and then secure approval. Otherwise, I will work with you to “brainstorm” alternatives.

Much or most of the information required for this assignment should be available from the Web. However, you may also wish to obtain product information through your own or another organization. You may also interview one or more individuals with relevant experience and expertise.

Your consultant’s report should be written as a single-spaced business-type report, about ten pages in length. The report will have:

• No less than seven pages narrative, including all the subsections indicated above

HCI 655 Topic 4 Assessment: VLab – MEDITECH Expanse (Ambulatory Activities – Office Staff Home Screen and Clinical Chart Review) Vendor Evaluation Matrix

	Hospital/ Ambulatory Site Name
	Vendor Evaluation Matrix
Instructions: Score each vendor on a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) on each of your prioritized items. Total up your ratings for each vendor to help make your comparisons. Write the names of the vendors you are comparing in the watermark space provided in vendor columns.  Use the blank rows at the end of the worksheet to ask your own questions.
Functionality/Usability	Epic	Cerner	Meditech	Allscripts
Charting
tele visit	5	4	4	4.5
Does the system offer a variety of data entry options, e.g., dictation, voice recognition, structured notes, etc.?
Can I make subsequent edits and addendums to clinical documentation?
Does the system alert me about unfinished portions of the clinical documentation and can I bypass it if necessary?
Can I access other such clinical information as previous labs, progress notes, etc. from a patient’s “electronic chart” while charting?
Does the system allow me to multi-task, e.g., create task, order lab, etc. while charting?
Does the system allow me to forward patient information to staff, other physicians, etc. via e-mail, electronic faxing, messaging, etc.?
Does the system ensure that only authorized clinicians can sign clinical documentation?
Prescriptions
Can I complete a prescription within a few clicks?	5	4	5	4
Can I look up medication information and is this information valuable?
How extensive (and how sensitive) is the system’s interactions checking capability, e.g., drug-drug, drug-allergy, drug-food?
How accurate is the system in identifying drug-condition warnings, e.g., pregnancy?
Can I refill a medication within a few clicks? Can previous sigs be viewed from the refill screen?
Can the system handle multiple drug formularies?
Can the system send prescriptions electronically to pharmacies in my local market?
Lab and Results Management
Can I complete a lab order within a few clicks?
Can the system send lab orders electronically to laboratories, hospitals, etc. in my local market?
Can I pull up and review lab results within a few clicks?
Can the system receive lab results electronically from laboratories, hospitals, etc. in my local market?
Does the system notify me of abnormal lab results and provide normal ranges?
Can the system show me trending of results over time?
Can I create and/or customize “off-the-shelf” order sets?
Decision Support
Does the system utilize clinical information from all parts of the chart to provide decision support?
Does the system alert me when patient data indicates intervention is recommended?
Can I access medical literature, clinical guidelines, etc.?
Disease and Population Management
Assuming good data entry for all patients, can I query the system and identify patients that have a particular condition, are on a certain medication, etc.?
Does the system track patients for follow-up and send out reminders?
Can I create ad-hoc reports or am I limited to ones provided off-the-shelf? Can I customize these reports?
Does reporting module handle “and/or” queries together?
Health Record Management
Can I look up a patient by a number of different criteria, e.g., name, MRN, SSN, etc.?
Does the system provide a summary view of a patient’s health status?
Does the system handle other such clinical documents as x-rays, reports, etc.?
Does the system allow me to maintain patient lists, e.g., problems, allergies, medications, etc.?
Can I organize patient information within the system in a similar way to my paper charts?
Clinical Tasking & Messaging
Can I access and manage various tasks, e.g., sign progress notes, review labs, etc. within a few clicks?
Can I task or message someone else in the practice and do it with a few clicks?
Does system alert me of overdue tasks and urgent lab results?
How disruptive are the alerts, are they customizable and can they be overridden?
Can I manage tasks and messages from a computer other than my own?
Financial considerations
Roughly how much could the system cost my clinic?
Can you offer an Application Service Provider (ASP) option, purchase option, or monthly subscription option?
Roughly how much do the software licenses cost?
About how much will on-going maintenance and upgrades cost?
How often will a support person(s) be available once the system goes “LIVE” in case of any system difficulty?
How are the licenses issued? Concurrent user versus per practitioner?
TOTAL SCORE

HCI 655 Week 4 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 Topic 4 Assessment: EHR Privacy and Security

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 4 Assessment: EHR Privacy and Security

Description

The purpose of this assignment is to understand how legislation has driven EHR design and use.

Prepare a PowerPoint presentation (10 to 15 slides) reflecting on the legislation that has affected the privacy and security of EHRs. Each slide should include speaker notes. Address the following.

1. How did the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and Computer-Based Patient Record Institute (CPRI) lead the way in the conceptualization of EHRs?
2. Describe the HITECH Act and how it has impacted EHR design and use.
3. Explain at least two benefits and challenges of the HITECH Act  
4. Describe Promoting Interoperability (formerly called Meaningful Use) as outlined in the HITECH Act.
5. Describe at least five different types of security measures and include the components of each security measure.

https://www.healthit.gov/topic/privacy-security-an…

https://www.pewtrusts.org/-/media/assets/2018/08/healthit_safe_use_of_ehrs_report.pdf

https://compliancy-group.com/what-is-the-hitech-ac…

HCI 655 Week 5 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 5 Discussion Question 1 Description: Discuss various health care settings and their unique needs relating to EHRs. Explain the importance of matching organizational needs to the EHR vendor.

HCI 655 Week 5 Discussion 2 | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 5 Discussion Question 2 Description: What types of clinical content are typically provided by vendors? What approaches do vendors and health care systems take towards developing and customizing clinical content within their EHRs?

HCI 655 Week 5 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 Topic 5 Assessment: Organizational Needs

Description

The purpose of this assignment is to become familiar with how organizational needs influence the selection of EHRs.

In a 500-750 word essay, reflect on how an organization’s needs are supported by an EHR vendor.

Choose a health care setting and a related organization. Identify the specific needs that influence the selection of an EHR for that organization. Include the following:

1. Describe the organizational needs for the organization you selected.
2. Explain how EHR vendors can support the organization by considering its organizational needs.
3. Explain how organizational needs are used to establish user specifications.
4. Describe the types of clinical content offered by EHR vendors.
5. Explain the importance of pre-authored clinical content provided by EHR vendors.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 5 Assessment: Organizational Needs Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HCI-655	HCI-655-O501	Organizational Needs	60.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)	3: Satisfactory (79.00%)	4: Good (87.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Organizational Needs	20.0%	A description of organizational needs is not present.	A description of organizational needs is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	A description of organizational needs is present.	A description of organizational needs is present and well developed.	A description of organizational needs is present and thorough.
EHR Vendor Support	15.0%	An explanation of EHR vendor support is not present.	An explanation of EHR vendor support is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	An explanation of EHR vendor support is present.	An explanation of EHR vendor support is present and well developed.	An explanation of EHR vendor support is present and thorough.
User Specifications	15.0%	An explanation of how organizational needs are used to establish user specifications is not present.	An explanation of how organizational needs are used to establish user specifications is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	An explanation of how organizational needs are used to establish user specifications is present.	An explanation of how organizational needs are used to establish user specifications is present and well developed.	An explanation of how organizational needs are used to establish user specifications is present and thorough.
Clinical Content	10.0%	A description of the types of clinical content offered by EHR vendors is not present.	A description of the types of clinical content offered by EHR vendors is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	A description of the types of clinical content offered by EHR vendors is present.	A description of the types of clinical content offered by EHR vendors is present and well developed.	A description of the types of clinical content offered by EHR vendors is present and thorough.
Pre-Authored Clinical Content	10.0%	An explanation of the importance of pre-authored clinical content provided by EHR vendors is not present.	An explanation of the importance of pre-authored clinical content provided by EHR vendors is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	An explanation of the importance of pre-authored clinical content provided by EHR vendors is present.	An explanation of the importance of pre-authored clinical content provided by EHR vendors is present and well developed.	An explanation of the importance of pre-authored clinical content provided by EHR vendors is present and thorough.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

HCI 655 Week 6 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 6 Discussion Question 1 Description: Describe the importance of mapping existing workflows and workflows planned for future projects. How does EHR functionality impact workflows? Give an example of why it is important for an EHR to be compatible with clinical workflows.

HCI 655 Week 6 Discussion 2 | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 6 Discussion Question 2 Description: What are the key workflow elements for a hospital admission? What are the key workflow elements for an inpatient encounter? What are the key workflow elements for an outpatient encounter? Discuss how a workflow impacts a patient’s experience in various health care settings.

HCI 655 Week 6 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 Topic 6 Assessment: Mapping a Workflow

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 6 Assessment: Mapping a Workflow

Description

The purpose of this assignment is to map a complete workflow for a clinical process.

Choose from the following list to create a visual workflow chart that includes five or more steps. Create the workflow using Microsoft Word. As you create your clinical process workflow, explain how the EHR supports each step in the process.

1. Hospital admission
2. Hospital discharge
3. Outpatient clinic visit
4. Ordering testing and reporting diagnostic imaging
5. Ordering and delivery of pharmaceuticals to the patient
6. Ordering and completing a dialysis or chemotherapy visit

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 6 Assessment: Mapping a Workflow Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HCI-655	HCI-655-O501	Mapping a Workflow	80.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)	3: Satisfactory (79.00%)	4: Good (87.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Criteria	100.0%
Workflow	20.0%	A complete workflow is not present.	A workflow is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	A complete workflow is present.	A complete workflow is present and well developed.	A complete workflow is present and thorough.
EHR Support	20.0%	An explanation of how an EHR supports each step in the workflow process is not present.	An explanation of how an EHR supports each step in the workflow process is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	An explanation of how an EHR supports each step in the workflow process is present.	An explanation of how an EHR supports each step in the workflow process is present and well developed.	An explanation of how an EHR supports each step in the workflow process is present and thorough.
Steps	20.0%	Five or more steps are not present.	Five or more steps are present, but they lack detail or are incomplete.	Five or more steps are present.	Five or more steps are present and well developed.	Five or more steps are present and thorough.
Visual Appeal	10.0%	There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is evident.	Color is garish or typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited.	Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout.	Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and consistently.	Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and consistently.
Aesthetic Quality	10.0%	Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose of presentation is low quality.	Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present.	Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear.	Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message.	Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)	10.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	10.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

HCI 655 Week 7 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 7 Discussion Question 1 Description: What are the steps involved in EHR vendor selection? What is the most common rationale for changing EHR vendor platforms? Describe the difference between an RFI and RFP.

HCI 655 Week 7 Discussion 2 | Grand Canyon University

question 2: Describe three challenges associated with migration of data from one EHR product to another. List several risks of poor planning in the data migration process.

HCI 655 Week 7 Discussion 3 | Grand Canyon University

Question 3: Evaluate computer and information technologies to determine applicability to health care practice, education, administration, and research.

HCI 655 Week 7 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 7 Assessment: Benchmark – RFI for EHR Vendor

Description:

The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate an EHR vendor by analyzing key criteria that would be used to develop a request for information (RFI). You will choose an acute care or ambulatory setting and an EHR vendor to determine if the EHR vendor meets the needs of the setting.

In a 1,000-1,250 word essay, describe the considerations that need to be addressed during the EHR vendor evaluation process using the key criteria below. Evaluate your selected EHR vendor based on the research you have done on the key criteria. Include the following:

1. Describe the organization, services provided, and the need for a new system.
2. Explain the RFI process and the significance of a vendor evaluation and rating scale.
3. Describe the health care information system architecture, functionality, and applicability to health care practice (include research, administrative reporting, security, and certification).
4. Provide examples of how the EHR supports care coordination, interoperability, and electronic quality measures.
5. Explain the vendor implementation support and stakeholder education process.
6. A summary of the findings and whether or not to recommend the chosen health care setting and EHR vendor, based on applicability to health care practice, education, administration, and research

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MS Health Informatics

1.2: Evaluate computer and information technologies to determine applicability to health care practice, education, administration, and research.

MSN Health Informatics

6.2: Evaluate computer and information technologies to determine applicability to health care practice, education, administration, and research.

07:16

This is the assignment

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 7 Assessment: Benchmark – RFI for EHR Vendor Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HCI-655	HCI-655-O501	Benchmark – RFI for EHR Vendor	120.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)	3: Satisfactory (79.00%)	4: Good (87.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Criteria	100.0%
Organization, Services Provided, and Need for New System	10.0%	The description of the organization, services provided, and need for new system is not present.	The description of the organization, services provided, and need for new system is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The description of the organization, services provided, and need for new system is present.	The description of the organization, services provided, and need for new system is detailed.	The description of the organization, services provided, and need for new system is thorough.
RFI Process and Significance of Vendor Evaluation and Rating Scale	10.0%	The description of the significance of the vendor evaluation and rating scale is not present.	The description of the significance of the vendor evaluation and rating scale is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The description of the significance of the vendor evaluation and rating scale is present.	The description of the significance of the vendor evaluation and rating scale is detailed.	The description of the significance of the vendor evaluation and rating scale is thorough.
Health Care Information System Architecture, Functionality, and Applicability to Health Care Practice (includes research, administrative reporting, security, and certification).	15.0%	The description of the health care information system, architecture, functionality, and applicability to health care practice is not present.	The description of the health care information system, architecture, functionality, and applicability to health care practice is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The description of the health care information system, architecture, functionality, and applicability to health care practice is present.	The description of the health care information system, architecture, functionality, and applicability to health care practice is detailed.	The description of the health care information system, architecture, functionality, and applicability to health care practice is thorough.
Care Coordination, Interoperability, and Electronic Quality Measures	10.0%	The explanation of how EHR supports care coordination, interoperability, and electronic quality measures is not present.	The explanation of how EHR supports care coordination, interoperability, and electronic quality measures is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The explanation of how EHR supports care coordination, interoperability, and electronic quality measures is present.	The explanation of how EHR supports care coordination, interoperability, and electronic quality measures is detailed.	The explanation of how EHR supports care coordination, interoperability, and electronic quality measures is thorough.
Vendor Implementation Support and Stakeholder Education Process	10.0%	The description of the vendor implementation support and stakeholder education process is not present.	The description of the vendor implementation support and stakeholder education process is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The description of the vendor implementation support and stakeholder education process is present.	The description of the vendor implementation support and stakeholder education process is detailed.	The description of the vendor implementation support and stakeholder education process is thorough.
Summary of Findings and Recommendation of Chosen Health Care Setting and EHR Vendor Based on Applicability to Health Care Practice, Education, Administration, and Research (C1.2, 6.2)	15.0%	A summary of findings and recommendation of chosen health care setting and EHR vendor based on applicability to health care practice, education, and research are not present.	A summary of findings and recommendation of chosen health care setting and EHR vendor based on applicability to health care practice, education, and research is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	A summary of findings and recommendation of chosen health care setting and EHR vendor based on applicability to health care practice, education, and research is present.	A summary of findings and recommendation of chosen health care setting and EHR vendor based on applicability to health care practice, education, and research is detailed.	The summary of findings recommendation of chosen health care setting and EHR vendor based on applicability to health care practice, education, and research is well developed.
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

HCI 655 Week 8 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 8 Discussion Question 1 Description: What is the step-by-step process for implementing an EHR? What are the most typical challenges faced by health care systems when implementing EHRs?

HCI 655 Week 8 Discussion 2 | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 8 Discussion Question 2 Description: What is the role of project management techniques in the implementation of EHRs? Why is project management so important for a successful EHR implementation? What is the role and value of acceptance testing during the EHR implementation process?

HCI 655 Week 8 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 Topic 8 Assessment: Implementation Plan Outline

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to become familiar with the EHR implementation process by creating an implementation plan outline.

Develop an implementation plan outline for an enterprise health care system. In your outline, include a description of the following elements and how you would address them in an EHR implementation plan.

• Impacted health care settings within the enterprise health care system
• Challenges of implementing EHRs
• Project management methodology and tools used
• Health care system organizational structure
• Needs for interoperability and interfaces between information systems
• Education and training requirements
• User acceptance testing considerations

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

• Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
• Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
• Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
• Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
• Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
• Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

HQS-620 Project Management in Health Care Course Assignments & Examples Study Guide

HQS-620 Project Management in Health Care Course Description

This course examines the models and approaches of project management in health care settings. Learners demonstrate understanding of the project management process and its application to health care quality and safety initiatives. Learners gain skills to identify various stakeholders and roles, set goals and expectations, plan stakeholder engagement, and identify ways to mitigate obstacles in health care project management. Prerequisite: HQS-610.

HQS-620 Project Management in Health Care Course Discussions

Discussions Topic 1

HQS 620 Topic 1 DQ 1

Describe why project management is needed and explain the correlation between the nursing process and project management. Explain the value of establishing a framework for a project and provide an example in which a project management framework aided in the implementation of a new process

HQS 620 Topic 1 DQ 2

Review Figure 2.1 “The Five Steps of the Nursing Process” and Figure 2.2 “The Five Phases of Project Management” in Chapter 2 of the textbook. As you reflect on the five steps of the nursing process, describe how that process aligns with the concept of project management. Provide specific examples of the similarities between elements of Figure 2.1 and 2.2.

Discussions Topic 2

HQS 620 Topic 2 DQ 1

Describe three significant skills that are essential to have in the role as project manager. How do those skills align with the skills needed in the nursing profession? Provide a specific example to support your answer. Discuss one to two effective strategies to promote a high reliability organization.

HQS 620 Topic 2 DQ 2

As the project manager it is important to understand team dynamics. Describe how you would apply your leadership skills to move team members from the “storming” to “norming” stage of team development.

Discussions Topic 3

HQS 620 Topic 3 DQ 1

Describe the value of creating a statement of work (SOW) and project charter. What elements of these documents will be valuable in project management? Provide a specific example to support your answer.

HQS 620 Topic 3 DQ 2

How do key stakeholders and project team members differ and how are they the same? As the project manager, how do you ensure that the individuals that perform the work have a voice in the project development? Sources are below, can use sources 5 years old, no source from .com websites are allowed.

Each question gets one source Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse Sipes, C. (2019). Project management for the advanced practice nurse (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company. ISBN-13: 9780826161956 https://project-management.com/How-to-Write-the-Project-statement-of-work-sow/

Discussions Topic 4

HQS 620 Topic 4 DQ 1

Describe the relationship between project deliverables, goals, and outcomes.  How are each important and what makes each different? Provide an example of each to support your position.

HQS 620 Topic 4 DQ 2

Assessment Description

How does a “shared mental model” or visual tool assist in the completion of a project? What elements are important to include in such a visual and why?

Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse

Sipes, C. (2019). Project management for the advanced practice nurse (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company. ISBN-13: 9780826161956 

Discussions Topic 5

HQS 620 Topic 5 DQ 1

Assessment Description

The formula to calculate the communication channels is: n x (n – 1) / 2. N is the number of team members. Use the formula to determine the number of communication channels for a team of five members. Based on your calculation, what are the possible number of communication channels on the project team? Do you agree or disagree with the calculation? Should all stakeholders (even those not on the team) be included? Explain your rationale.

HQS 620 Topic 5 DQ 2

Identify three workplace environmental factors (i.e., organizational culture, staffing issues, regulatory requirements, etc.) and explain how they might adversely influence project communication.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today!

HQS-620 Project Management in Health Care Course Assignments

HQS 620 Grand Canyon University Week 2 Role of a Project Manager Case Study

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to determine the role of a project manager for a given case study. Use the “AHRQ Case Studies – Case Studies of Quality Improvement Initiatives” from the AHRQ website located in the Topic 2 topic Resources to complete this assignment. The case studies located in Chapter 8 of the textbook provide additional support for this assignment.

Select and read a case study from “AHRQ Case Studies – Case Studies of Quality Improvement Initiatives”. Once you have read the case study, in a 500-700-word paper, address the following:

1. Describe the problem outlined in the case study.
2. Discuss the project goals.
3. Describe the role of the project manager addressing the following:
4. Planning
5. Organizing
6. Budgeting
7. Monitoring progress
8. Managing reports and documentation
9. Health care quality and safety initiatives

Prepare this role of a project manager assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on HIM-615 Health Care Information Systems and Technology Course Assignments & Examples.

Resources

What Is a Project Manager? The Lead Role for Project Success

Read “What Is a Project Manager? The Lead Role for Project Success,” by Alexander (2019), located on the CIO website.

https://www.cio.com/article/3224865/what-is-a-project-manager-the-lead-role-for-project-success.html#tk.cio_rs

Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse

Read the “PM Roles and Responsibilities” section of Chapter 3 and Chapter 8 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice N

… Read More

View Resource

AHRQ Case Studies – Case Studies of Quality Improvement Initiatives

Explore the case studies on the AHRQ website in preparation for the Topic 2 assignment.

https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/quality-improvement/reports-and-case-studies/Case-Study_QI-Initiatives.html

Understanding the Complexity of Project Team Member Selection Through Agent-Based Modeling

Read “Understanding the Complexity of Project Team Member Selection Through Agent-Based Modeling,” by Hsu, Weng, Cui, and Rand, f

… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.or

Case Study – Role of a Project Manager – Rubric

Collapse All

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HQS-620	HQS-620-O500	Case Study – Role of a Project Manager	80.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%)	3: Satisfactory (88.00%)
Content	100.0%
Problem Outlined in Case Study	7.0%	A description of the problem outlined in the case study is not present or is inaccurate.	A description of the problem outlined in the case study is present but lacks details or is incomplete.	A description of the problem outlined in the case study is present.
Discussion of Project Goals	9.0%	A discussion of the project goals is not present or is inaccurate.	A discussion of the project goals is present but lacks details or is incomplete.	A discussion of the project goals is present.
Role of Project Manager in Planning	9.0%	A description of the project managers role in planning is not present or is inappropriate.	A description of the project managers role in planning is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	A description of the project managers role in planning is present.
Role of Project Manager in Organizing	9.0%	A description of the project managers role in organizing is not present or is inappropriate.	A description of the project managers role in organizing is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	A description of the project managers role in organizing is present.
Role of Project Manager in Budgeting	9.0%	A description of the project managers role in budgeting is not present or is inappropriate.	A description of the project managers role in budgeting is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	A description of the project managers role in budgeting is present.
Role of Project Manager in Monitoring Progress	9.0%	A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is not present or is inappropriate.	A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is present.
Role of Project Manager in Managing Reports and Documentation	9.0%	A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is not present or is inappropriate.	A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is present.
Role of Project Manager in Health Care Quality and Safety Intiatives	9.0%	A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives is not present or is inappropriate.	A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives is present.
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

 

Case Studies of Quality Improvement Initiatives

Over a five-year period the CAHPS RAND Team prepared a series of case studies of quality improvement initiatives undertaken by health plans and health care organizations. The studies provide practical examples of efforts to improve performance on various aspects of patients’ experience of health care as measured by the CAHPS surveys.

Each case study presents a short overview of the steps an organization took in its quality improvement initiative, followed by a more detailed description of specific actions involved in each step. The contents cover:

• Performance issues the organization identified from its CAHPS survey data.
• The strategy and action plan developed to improve its performance in the relevant areas.
• Its experiences in implementing its action plan.
• Resulting effects on its subsequent CAHPS survey results.

Improving Customer Service and Access in a Surgical Practice

This case study (PDF, 998 KB) describes a surgical practice’s successful implementation of a six-step plan to improve customer service and access for its patients. Published by RAND, August 2011.

Improving Hospital Inpatient Nursing Care

This case study (PDF, 604 KB) describes a large acute care hospital’s successful implementation of a six-step plan to improve the emotional support provided to inpatients by the registered nurses and the rest of the nursing staff. Published by RAND, April 2010.

Improving Performance for Health Plan Customer Service

This case study (PDF, 1.2 MB) focuses on the successful quality improvement methods employed by a health plan to improve customer service for its members. Published by RAND, August 2007. Review a summary of this report (PDF, 1.2 MB).

HQS 620 Grand Canyon Week 3 Project Charter Assignment: Des Moines Medical Center Diabetes Clinic Questions

The purpose of this assignment is to create a project charter with a work breakdown structure. Select one case study in Chapter 8 of the textbook from the following options: Case Study: Nurse Manager or Case Study: Informatics Nurse Specialist (INS).  The case study you select in this topic will be used throughout the course to complete the assignments in Topics 3-7.

Review Figure 3.2 “Project Charter Content” from Chapter 3 in the textbook. Use this as a model to complete the “Project Charter Template”. You will complete the template as if you are the project manager. The project charter will serve as a statement of work for the case study you selected in Chapter 8 of the textbook.

This assignment requires one or two scholarly resources.

Prepare Part 2 of the template according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. 

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Case study from chapter 8

Case Study: Clinical Nurse Specialist

Cindy J. has just graduated from the master’s program with her CNS and is now preparing to set up her diabetes clinic in the Des Moines Medical Center. She will be working with a peer, Kathy, who has 7 years’ experience in independent practice in the clinic but now has asked Cindy to join her practice. Cindy is hesitant, telling Kathy she knows nothing about setting up and running a clinic and she has managed a group only of her own patients.

Kathy tells her not to worry, that she has management experience as a PM, which she gained while in another practice with someone who had a lot of project management experience, and that she will help her using project management tools she also used in the past. Cindy also keeps the course text she used in her practicum that has examples of project management tools to use with examples of how to use each of them.

Kathy tells Cindy that first she will need to put together a plan for how she wants the clinic to run and suggests that she use a Gantt chart (Chapter 4, Planning: Project Management—Phase 2), which will define the days, who will be on what days for all of the clinic employees, and all of the different tasks that will be needed in the clinic. Later, after she has completed the chart and assigned different tasks, she will formalize content from the chart into a weekly schedule, which will be used permanently after the clinic is set up.

Next she will need to develop a scope document (Chapter 3, De-sign/Initiation: Project Management—Phase 1), which will define exactly what they will do and not do in the clinic, and a charter (Chapter 3, De-sign/Initiation: Project Management—Phase 1) for the clinic, which will define the mission, levels of authority, and other key stakeholders.

She will also need to develop a risk management plan (Chapter 4, Planning: Project Management—Phase 2), which will outline how risks will be managed and Chapter 8 Case Studies: Applying Project Management Concepts and Tools 199strategies for mitigating risks, and a responsibility matrix (Chapter 4, Planning: Project Management—Phase 2), which will outline owners of the different responsibilities in the clinic.

Kathy tells Cindy that she will manage the budget for now until Cindy gets up to speed and then show her how to set up and manage the budget (Chapter 4, Planning: Project Management—Phase 2). Kathy has already set up a communication plan but asks Cindy to review and revise it now that the clinic is growing (Chapter 5, Implementation/Execution—Phase 3).

Cindy will need to set up status meetings after first determining how often they will be needed at the format that should be used (Chapter 5, Implementation/Execution—Phase 3), also to determine how they will monitor and control all that is happening in the new clinic (Chapter 6, Monitoring and Controlling: Project Management—Phase 4). She will also need to start thinking about the project closing process (Chapter 7, Closing the Project—Phase 5).

Source:

Figure 3.2 reference – project charter content— this is only reference. Don’t need to fill this out!!

## will be an attached document. Would not upload here.

Other documents will be uploaded separately.

Project Charter Template

Part 1: A project charter is an essential element in the design phase of project management. The project charter serves as a framework and outlines key details of the project. Ultimately, the project charter will give authority to the project manager once key stakeholders and leadership sign off. Complete the template below based on the running case study in the Course Materials.

 

Project Title:
Project Start Date:                     Projected Finish Date:
Project Manager:(include name and e-mail)
Background/Need/Justification:
Project Objective(s):
Applicable Industry Standards:
Budget Information:
Deliverables:
Risks and/or Potential Issues:
Project Timeline:
Key milestones	Team Member Responsible	Planned Target Date	Actual Date
Project Team: Roles and Responsibilities:
Position	Position	Position	Position
Approval/Review Committee:
Name and Signature	Role	Position	Contact Information

 

Part 2: In 500-750 words, address the following:

1. Summarize the steps involved in initiating and designing a project in a health care setting.
2. Describe the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation. What is unique about this relative to health care quality and safety?
3. Explain how authority gradients influenceteamwork and patient safety in a health care setting.
4. Research and describe two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities in a health care setting.
5. Describe one benefit and one challenge for each researchedstrategy.

References

This assignment requires one or two scholarly resources. Cite these references below.

Rubric HQS 620 Project Charter Assignment – Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HQS-620	HQS-620-O500	Project Charter Template	100.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%)	3: Satisfactory (88.00%)	4: Good (92.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	100.0%
Project Charter Template	25.0%	The Project Charter Template is not complete or is incorrect.	The Project Charter Template is complete but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The Project Charter Template is present.	The Project Charter Template is present and includes relevant details.	The Project Charter Template is present and includes substantial relevant details.
Summary	9.0%	A summary of the steps involved in initiating and designing a project is not present or is inappropriate.	A summary of the steps involved in initiating and designing a project is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	A summary of the steps involved in initiating and designing a project is present.	A summary of the steps involved in initiating and designing a project is present and detailed.	A summary of the steps involved in initiating and designing a project is present and thorough.
Influence of Authority Gradients on Team Selection and Formulation	9.0%	An explanation of the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation is not present.	An explanation of the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	An explanation of the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation is present.	An explanation of the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation is present and detailed.	An explanation of the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation is present and thorough.
Influence of Authority Gradients on Teamwork and Patient Safety	9.0%	An explanation of how authority gradients influence teamwork and patient safety is not present.	An explanation of how authority gradients influence teamwork and patient safety is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	An explanation of how authority gradients influence teamwork and patient safety is present.	An explanation of how authority gradients influence teamwork and patient safety is present and detailed.	An explanation of how authority gradients influence teamwork and patient safety is present and thorough.
Identifying and Managing Overlap	9.0%	A description of two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities is not present.	A description of two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	A description of two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities is present.	A description of two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities is present and detailed.	A description of two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities is present and thorough.
Benefits and Challenges of Strategies	9.0%	One benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy is not present or is incomplete.	One benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	One benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy is present.	One benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy is present and detailed.	One benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy is present and thorough.
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

Grand Canyon University HQS-620 Building a Project Schedule Assignment Week 4

Assessment Description

The purpose of this HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule assignment is to create a Gantt chart to outline the tasks and schedule for the case study you selected in the Class Resources. Recall that you created a project charter as the Topic 3 assignment. Review the feedback you received from your instructor for that assignment.

Part 1: Use the feedback from the Topic 3 assignment to create a HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Gantt chart showing the tasks and the time in which tasks should be completed for the project.To complete this assignment, access the Simple Gantt Chart located on the Microsoft Office website at: https://templates.office.com/en-us/simple-gantt-chart-tm16400962

Part 2: Create a 250-500-word HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule summary addressing the following:

1. What is the value of a work breakdown structure?
2. What is the importance of monitoring critical success factors?

Submit both the HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Gantt chart and the summary to the dropbox.

Prepare the Part 2 summary according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Resources

Collapse All

A Visual Management Tool for Program Planning, Project Management and Evaluation in Paediatric Health Care

Read “A Visual Management Tool for Program Planning, Project Management and Evaluation in Paediatric Health Care,” by Glegg, Ryce

… Read More

https://www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0149718918300120

Project Management: Case Studies

Read “Project Planning” in Project Management: Case Studies.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat01182a&AN=gcu.317842&site=eds-live&scope=site

Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse

Read Chapter 4 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.

View Resource

The Art of Project Planning

Read “The Art of Project Planning,” by Stolovitsky, from Genius Inside (2014).

https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/white-papers/art-of-project-planning.pdf

What Is a Gantt Chart?

Read “What Is a Gantt Chart” located on the Association for Project Management website (2019).

https://www.apm.org.uk/resources/find-a-resource/gantt-chart/

Step by Step Guide to Implement Quality Improvement

Read “Step by Step Guide to Implement Quality Improvement,” from the Center for Public Health Quality (CPHQ), located on the Asso

… Read More

HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Rubric

Collapse All

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HQS-620	HQS-620-O500	Building a Project Schedule	100.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%)	3: Satisfactory (88.00%)	4: Good (92.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	100.0%
Gantt Chart Alignment of Tasks	25.0%	A Gantt Chart is not present.	A Gantt Chart is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	A Gantt Chart is present.	A Gantt Chart is present and somewhat aligns with the tasks on the Project Charter.	A Gantt Chart is present and thoroughly aligns with the tasks on the Project Charter.
Gantt Chart Alignment of Deadlines	25.0%	Deadlines on the Gantt Chart are not present.	Deadlines on the Gantt Chart are present, but lack details or are incomplete.	Deadlines on the Gantt Chart are present.	Deadlines on the Gantt Chart are present and somewhat align to the deadlines on the Project Charter.	Deadlines on the Gantt Chart are present and thoroughly align to the deadlines on the Project Charter.
Presentation	11.0%	The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements.	The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements.	The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements.	The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements.	The submission is presented effectively and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts.
Synthesis	12.0%	Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical and/or verifiable.	Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical.	Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects but does not adequately form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at times is confusing.	Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified.	Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified.
Value of a Work Breakdown Structure	11.0%	An explanation of the value of a work breakdown structure is not present.	An explanation of the value of a work breakdown structure is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.	An explanation of the value of a work breakdown structure is present.	An explanation of the value of a work breakdown structure is present and detailed.	An explanation of the value of a work breakdown structure is present and thorough.
Critical Success Factors	11.0%	An explanation of the importance of monitoring critical success factors is not present.	An explanation of the importance of monitoring critical success factors is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete.	An explanation of the importance of monitoring critical success factors is present.	An explanation of the importance of monitoring critical success factors is present and detailed.	An explanation of the importance of monitoring critical success factors is present and thorough.
Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.	Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.	Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
Total Weightage	100%

 

Create a Project Schedule in this worksheet

Create a Project Schedule in this worksheet. Enter title of this project in cell B1. Information about how to use this worksheet, including instructions for screen readers and the author of this workbook is in the About worksheet. Continue navigating down column A to hear further instructions.	PROJECT TITLE
Enter Company Name in cell B2.	Company Name
Enter the name of the Project Lead in cell B3. Enter the Project Start date in cell E3. Pooject Start: label is in cell C3.	Project Lead	Project Start:		Wed, 7/10/2024
The Display Week in cell E4  represents the starting week to display in the project schedule in cell I4. The project start date is considered Week 1. To change the display week, simply enter a new week number in cell E4. The starting date for each week, starting with the display week from cell E4, starts in cell I4 and is auto calculated. There are 8 weeks represented in this view from cell I4 through cell BF4. You should not modify these cells. Display Week: label is in cell C4.		Display Week:		1
Cells I5 through BL5 contain the day number for the week represented in the cell block above each date cell and are auto calculated. You should not modify these cells. Today’s date is outlined in Red (hex #AD3815) from today’s date in row 5 through the entire date column to the end of the project schedule.
This row contains headers for the project schedule that follows below them. Navigate from B6 through BL 6 to hear the content. The first letter of each day of the week for the date above that heading, starts in cell I6 and continues through cell BL6. All project timeline charting is auto generated based on the start and end dates entered, using conditional formats. Do not modify content in cells within columns after column I starting with cell I7.	TASK	ASSIGNED TO	PROGRESS	START	END
Cell B8 contains the Phase 1 sample title. Enter a new Title in cell B8. Enter a name to assign the phase to, if it applies for your project, in cell C8. Enter Progress for the entire phase, if it applies for your project, in cell D8. Enter the start and end dates for the entire phase, if it applies for your project, in cells E8 and F8. The Gantt chart will automatically fill in the appropriate dates and shade according to the progress entered. To delete the phase and work only from tasks, simply delete this row.	Phase 1 Title
Cell B9 contains the sample task “Task 1.” Enter a new task name in cell B9. Enter a person to assign the task to in cell C9. Enter progres of the task in cell D9. A progress bar appears in the cell and is shaded according to the number in the cell. For example, 50 percent progress would shade half of the cell. Enter task start date in cell E9. Enter task end date in cell F9. A status bar shaded for the dates entered appears in blocks starting from cell I9 through BL9.	Task 1	Name	50%	7/10/24	7/13/24
Rows 10 through 13 repeat the pattern from row 9. Repeat the instructions from cell A9 for all task rows in this worksheet. Overwrite any sample data. A sample of another phase starts in cell A14. Continue entering tasks in cells A10 through A13 or go to cell A14 to learn more.	Task 2		60%	7/13/24	7/15/24
	Task 3		50%	7/15/24	7/19/24
	Task 4		25%	7/19/24	7/24/24
	Task 5			7/14/24	7/16/24
The cell at right contains the Phase 2 sample title. You can create a new phase at any time within column B. This project schedule does not require phases. To remove the phase, simply delete the row. To create a new phase block in this row, enter a new Title in cell at right. To continue adding tasks to the phase above, enter a new row above this one and fill in the task data as in cell A9’s instruction. Update the Phase details in cell at right based on cell A8’s instruction. Continue navigating down column A cells to learn more. If you haven’t added any new rows in this worksheet, you will find 2 additional sample phase blocks have been created for you in cells B20 and B26. Otherwise, navigate through column A cells to find the additional blocks. Repeat the instructions from cells A8 and A9 whenever you need to.	Phase 2 Title
	Task 1		50%	7/15/24	7/19/24
	Task 2		50%	7/17/24	7/22/24
	Task 3			7/22/24	7/25/24
	Task 4			7/22/24	7/24/24
	Task 5			7/22/24	7/25/24
Sample phase title block	Phase 3 Title
	Task 1			7/25/24	7/30/24
	Task 2			7/31/24	8/4/24
	Task 3			8/5/24	8/10/24
	Task 4			8/11/24	8/15/24
	Task 5			8/5/24	8/9/24
Sample phase title block	Phase 4 Title
	Task 1			date	date
	Task 2			date	date
	Task 3			date	date
	Task 4			date	date
	Task 5			date	date
This is an empty row
This row marks the end of the Project Schedule. DO NOT enter anything in this row. Insert new rows ABOVE this one to continue building out your Project Schedule.	Insert new rows ABOVE this one

Grand Canyon University HQS 620 Communication Plan Assignment Week 5

Assessment Description

The purpose of this HQS 620 Communication Plan assignment is to create a communication plan for stakeholders. This communication plan is in relation to the case study you selected in the Class Resources.

Complete the “Plan Template” located in the topic Resources folder.

This Communication Plan assignment requires two or three scholarly resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this HQS 620 Communication Plan assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Prepare Part 2 of the template according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this HQS 620 Communication Plan assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Resources

Collapse All

What Drives Continuous Improvement Project Success in Healthcare?

Read “What Drives Continuous Improvement Project Success in Healthcare?” by Stelson, Hille, Eseonu, and Doolen, from Internat

… Read More

https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2016-0035/full/pdf?title=what-drives-continuous-improvement-project-success-in-healthcare

Plan Template

Utilize the ” Plan Template” to complete the topic assignment.

HQS-620-RS-PlanTemplate.docx

Project Change Stakeholder

Read “Project Change Stakeholder ,” by Butt, Naaranoja, and Savolainen, from International Jour

… Read More

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786316300850

Health Information Privacy

Explore the “Health Information Privacy” section on the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services website.

Project Management for Project Managers Based on the PMBOK

Read “Project Management for Project Managers Based on the PMBOK,” by Jainendrakumar, from PM World Journal

… Read More

https://pmworldlibrary.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/pmwj38-Sep2015-Jainendrakumar-project-communication-management-advisory.pdf

Email in Project Management: A Bane or a Blessing?

Read “Email in Project Management: A Bane or a Blessing?” by Smit, Bond-Barnard, Steyn, and Fabris-Rotelli, from

… Read More

https://search-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/1928615026?accountid=7374

Effective Management: A Key to Stakeholder Relationship Management in Project-Based Organizations

Read “Effective Management: A Key to Stakeholder Relationship Management in Project-Based Organizations,” by Rajhan

… Read More

Communication Plan Template

Part 1: Communication among stakeholders is a crucial aspect of successful project management. Complete the template below to plan out the details of communicating throughout the project.

 

Description (What type of communication needs to take place, i.e., team meeting?)	Stakeholders Involved (Who should be included in the development of this communication?)	Frequency (How often will the communication occur?)	Stakeholder’s Preferred Method of Communication (Meeting, newsletter, etc.)	Audience (Who is the recipient of the communication?)	Project Member (Who is responsible for the communication?)
Interpersonal communication	Project manager and business partner	Two times per week	Meeting	Project managers	Project manager
Team meeting	Team members, business partner, and project manager	Three times in two weeks	Video conferencing	Project members	Project manager
Small group communication	Project team members and executives	Four times in three weeks	E-mails	Project members	Project manager
Team meeting	Resource managers, executives, and team members	Five times a month	Meeting	Project members	Project manager
Team meeting	Team members and investors	Four times a month	Meeting	Project members	Project manager
Interpersonal communication	Project managers, business partners, and executives	Three times after two weeks	Telephone conversation	Project managers	Project manager
Team meeting	Team members, project managers, and business partners	Two times a week	Meeting	Project members	Project manager

HQS 620 Communication Plan – Rubric

Collapse All

Management Plan Template

30 points

Criteria Description

Management Plan Template

1. 5: Excellent

30 points

HQS-620 Management Plan Template is present and thorough. It includes substantial relevant details.

1. 4: Good

27.6 points

Management Plan Template is present and includes relevant details.

1. 3: Satisfactory

26.4 points

Management Plan Template is present.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

24 points

Management Plan Template is present but is incomplete or incorrect.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

HQS-620 Communication Management Plan Template is not present.

Cycle

20 points

Criteria Description

Cycle

1. 5: Excellent

20 points

A description and analysis of the elements in the communication cycle is present and thorough.

1. 4: Good

18.4 points

A description and analysis of the elements in the communication cycle is present and detailed.

1. 3: Satisfactory

17.6 points

A description and analysis of the elements in the communication cycle is present.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

16 points

A description and analysis of the elements in the communication cycle is present but lack details or are incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description and analysis of the elements in the communication cycle is not present.

strategies

20 points

Criteria Description

strategies

1. 5: Excellent

20 points

A description of three communication strategies and how they can improve communication to support team functioning while meeting the preferences of stakeholders is present and through.

1. 4: Good

18.4 points

A description of three communication strategies and how they can improve communication to support team functioning while meeting the preferences of stakeholders is present and detailed.

1. 3: Satisfactory

17.6 points

A description of three communication strategies and how they can improve communication to support team functioning while meeting the preferences of stakeholders is present.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

16 points

A description of three communication strategies and how they can improve communication to support team functioning while meeting the preferences of stakeholders is present but is incomplete or incorrect.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of three communication strategies and how they can improve communication to support team functioning while meeting the preferences of stakeholders is not present.

HQS 620 Communication Plan Thesis Development and Purpose

7 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

1. 5: Excellent

7 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

1. 4: Good

6.44 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

1. 3: Satisfactory

6.16 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5.6 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

HQS 620 Communication Plan Argument Logic and Construction

8 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

1. 5: Excellent

8 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

1. 4: Good

7.36 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

1. 3: Satisfactory

7.04 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

6.4 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

HQS 620 Communication Plan Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

HQS 620 Communication Plan Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

1. 5: Excellent

5 points

All format elements are correct.

1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

HQS 620 Communication Plan Documentation of Sources

5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

HQS 620 Grand Canyon University Week 6 Implementation Checklist Template Assignment

Assessment Description

The purpose of this HQS 620 Project Management Implementation Checklist assignment is to outline an implementation strategy for the goals in the previous phases of project management for the case study you selected in the course materials. I’m assuming from the work u submitted last week. 

Use the “Implementation Checklist Template” located in the topic Resources folder to complete this assignment.

Prepare Part 2 of the template according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this Project Management Implementation Checklist assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Project Management Implementation Checklist Template

Part 1: An implementation checklist can keep a project on track by outlining specific activities, which stakeholder is responsible, and by planning a due date. Fill in the implementation checklist below for the case study.

Step	Activity	Stakeholder Responsibility	Due Date

 

Part 2: In 250-500 words, address the following:

1. Explain the importance of an implementation checklist.
2. Explain the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management.

Project Management Implementation Checklist – Rubric

Collapse All

Implementation Checklist Template

30 points

Criteria Description

Implementation Checklist Template

1. 5: Excellent

30 points

Implementation Checklist Template is present and thorough. It includes substantial relevant details.

1. 4: Good

27.6 points

Implementation Checklist Template is present and includes relevant details.

1. 3: Satisfactory

26.4 points

Implementation Checklist Template is present.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

24 points

Implementation Checklist Template is present but is incomplete or incorrect.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Implementation Checklist Template is not present.

Importance of Project Management Implementation Checklist Checklist

20 points

Criteria Description

Importance of Implementation Checklist

1. 5: Excellent

20 points

An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present and thorough.

1. 4: Good

18.4 points

An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present and detailed.

1. 3: Satisfactory

17.6 points

An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

16 points

An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present but is incomplete or incorrect.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is not present.

Addressing Change Management

20 points

Criteria Description

Addressing Change Management

1. 5: Excellent

20 points

An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present and thorough.

1. 4: Good

18.4 points

An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present and detailed.

1. 3: Satisfactory

17.6 points

An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

16 points

An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present but is incomplete or incorrect.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is not present.

Project Management Implementation Checklist Thesis Development and Purpose

7 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

1. 5: Excellent

7 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

1. 4: Good

6.44 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

1. 3: Satisfactory

6.16 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5.6 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

8 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

1. 5: Excellent

8 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

1. 4: Good

7.36 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

1. 3: Satisfactory

7.04 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

6.4 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Project Management Implementation Checklist Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Project Management Implementation Checklist Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

1. 5: Excellent

5 points

All format elements are correct.

1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Project Management Implementation Checklist Resources

Collapse All

Implementation Checklist Template

Utilize the “Implementation Checklist Template” to complete the topic assignment.

HQS-620-RS-ImplementationChecklist.docx

Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse

Review Chapter 4 and Read Chapter 5 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.

View Resource

Quality Management Systems Implementation Compared With Organizational Maturity in Hospital

Read “Quality Management Systems Implementation Compared With Organizational Maturity in Hospital,” by Moradi, Jafari, Maleki, Na

Grand Canyon University HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Week 7

Assessment Description

The purpose of this HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment is to use a Fishbone Diagram to complete a root cause analysis. Identify a problem in your practice environment and utilize the “Fishbone Analysis Diagram Template” to work through the problem to the root cause. Refer to “Problem-Solving Your Fishbone Into a Wishbone,” located in the topic Resources to complete this assignment.

While APA style is not required for Part 1, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Prepare Part 2 of the template according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

You are required to submit this HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Resources

Collapse All

Problem-Solving Your Fishbone Into a Wishbone

Read “Problem-Solving Your Fishbone Into a Wishbone,” located on the Vanguard s website (2018) for successful completion of the assignment/

Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse

Read Chapter 6 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.

View Resource

Fishbone Analysis Diagram Template

Utilize the “Fishbone Analysis Diagram Template” to complete the topic assignment.

HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment – Rubric

Collapse All

Fishbone Diagram

40 points

Criteria Description

Fishbone Diagram

1. 5: Excellent

40 points

The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is present and includes substantial relevant details.

1. 4: Good

36.8 points

The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is present and includes relevant details.

1. 3: Satisfactory

35.2 points

The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is present.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

32 points

The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is complete but lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The Fishbone Analysis Diagram Assignment is not complete or is incorrect.

Progress Tracking in Project Management

15 points

Criteria Description

Progress Tracking in Project Management

1. 5: Excellent

15 points

A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present and thorough.

1. 4: Good

13.8 points

A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present and detailed.

1. 3: Satisfactory

13.2 points

A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present back lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is not present.

Implementing Project Adjustments

15 points

Criteria Description

Implementing Project Adjustments

1. 5: Excellent

15 points

A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present and thorough.

1. 4: Good

13.8 points

A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present and detailed.

1. 3: Satisfactory

13.2 points

A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present back lacks detail or is incomplete.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is not present.

HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Thesis Development and Purpose

7 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

1. 5: Excellent

7 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

1. 4: Good

6.44 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

1. 3: Satisfactory

6.16 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

5.6 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Argument Logic and Construction

8 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

1. 5: Excellent

8 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

1. 4: Good

7.36 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

1. 3: Satisfactory

7.04 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

6.4 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

1. 5: Excellent

5 points

All format elements are correct.

1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

1. 5: Excellent

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

1. 4: Good

4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

1. 3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

1. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

HQS-620 Project Management Methodologies Assignment

Assessment Description

The goal of this assignment is to compare and contrast different project management methodologies that can be used in health care project management. Conduct your own research to compare and contrast the methodologies of Lean/Six Sigma, Waterfall, PSDA, and Agile. Choose another project management methodology of your choice.

To finish the assignment, use the HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies template.

This assignment necessitates the use of two to three scholarly resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and source documentation should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the Student Success Center’s APA Style Guide.

You are required to submit this HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Attachments

Resources

Collapse All

9 of the Most Popular Project Management Methodologies Made Simple

Read “9 of the Most Popular Project Management Methodologies Made Simple,” by Aston, located on the Digital Project Manager website

Hybrid Project Management Has Role in Health Care Today

Read “Hybrid Project Management Has Role in Health Care Today,” by Hakim, from Physician Leadership Journal (2019).

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.579714743&site=eds-live&scope=site

HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies: Case Studies

Read “Project Management Methodologies” in Project Management: Case Studies.

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat01182a&AN=gcu.317842&site=eds-live&scope=site

How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project

Read “How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project,” by Silver et al., from American Society of Nephrology (2016).

https://cjasn.asnjournals.org/content/clinjasn/11/5/893.full.pdf

Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse

Read Chapters 1 and 2 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.

View Resource

A Health Care Project Management Office’s Strategies for Continual Change and Continuous Improvement

Read “A Health Care Project Management Office’s Strategies for Continual Change and Continuous Improvement,” by Tremblay Aubry, R

… Read More

HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00126450-201801000-00002&D=ovft&PDF=y

Top Project Management Methodologies 2019

View “Top Project Management Methodologies 2019,” from KnowledgeHut, located on YouTube.

Project Management for Healthcare

Read the “Safety” and “Regulatory” sections of Chapter 2 in “Project Management for Healthcare,” by Shirley (2011

… Read More

https://lopes.idm.oclc.or

HQS-620 Project Management Methodologies Template

Directions: Research information about the project management methodologies listed below to complete the table. In addition, conduct your own research on other project management methodologies and include this in the table below. The assignment requires a minimum of two or three scholarly resources. A resource may be used more than once in the last column of the template.

HQS-620 Project Management Methodologies Template

Directions: Research information about the project management methodologies listed below to complete the table. In addition, conduct your own research on other project management methodologies and include this in the table below. The assignment requires a minimum of two or three scholarly resources. A resource may be used more than once in the last column of the template.

Project Management Methodology	Description	Pros	Cons	Example of when this methodology would be appropriate	Scholarly Resource
Lean/Six Sigma
Waterfall
PDSA
Agile
Choose an additional project management methodology here

 

HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies Rubric

Collapse All

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HQS-620	HQS-620-O500	Project Management Methodologies	80.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%)	3: Satisfactory (88.00%)	4: Good (92.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	100.0%
Lean/Six Sigma	18.0%	The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are not present.	The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present but lack details or are incomplete.	The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present.	The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present and detailed.	The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present and thorough.
Waterfall	18.0%	The required elements for Waterfall are not present.	The required elements for Waterfall are present but lack details or are incomplete.	The required elements for Waterfall are present.	The required elements for Waterfall are present and detailed.	The required elements for Waterfall are present and thorough.
PDSA	18.0%	The required elements for PDSA are not present.	The required elements for PDSA are present but lack details or are incomplete.	The required elements for PDSA are present.	The required elements for PDSA are present and detailed.	The required elements for PDSA are present and thorough.
Agile	18.0%	The required elements for Agile are not present.	The required elements for Agile are present but lack details or are incomplete.	The required elements for Agile are present.	The required elements for Agile are present and detailed.	The required elements for Agile are present and thorough.
Additional Project Management Methodology	18.0%	The required elements for the selected methodology are not present.	The required elements for the selected methodology are present but lack details or are incomplete.	The required elements for the selected methodology are present.	The required elements for the selected methodology are present and detailed.	The required elements for the selected methodology are present and thorough.
Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

• Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
• Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
• Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
• Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
• Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
• Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!