Archive for category: Writing Guides

NR-501:  Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

NR-501: Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Description

In this course, the student examines multiple theories from nursing and relevant fields. The student critiques the components of the theories and explores the value and contributions of the theories to nursing, advanced nursing, and evidence-based practice.

Prerequisite: NR-500NP or NR-500

NOTE: NP-designated course for Nurse Practitioner track students only.

NR-501: Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Syllabus

NR-501 Week 1 Discussion: Theory in Nursing

NR-501 Week 1 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 2 Assignment: Reflective Essay Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

NR-501 Week 2 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 2 Discussion: Ways of Knowing_ (2 Versions)

NR-501 Week 3 Assignment: Concept Analysis Paper

NR-501 Week 3 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 3 Discussion: Steps of Concept Analysis (2Versions)

NR-501 Week 4 Discussion: Nursing Theory

NR-501 Week 4 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 5 Assignment: Application of Theory paper

NR-501 Week 5 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 5 Discussion: Culture and Caring Theories

NR-501 Week 6 Discussion: Literature Review

NR-501 Week 6 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 7 Assignment: Theoretical Framework Supporting Evidence-based Practice PowerPoint

NR-501 Week 7 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 7 Discussion: Nursing Theory Applied to Evidence Based Practice

NR-501 Week 8 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 8 Discussion Course Reflection & Future Application

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

NR-501: Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course: A Comprehensive Guide

Our NR-501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Study Guide is here to help you succeed in this challenging course. You will learn the theoretical basis of advanced nursing practice in this course. Learn the foundational concepts of advanced nursing practice by delving into a variety of theoretical and conceptual frameworks.

NR 501 Week 1 Discussion: Reflection On Learning, Reading (Bundle)

NR-501 Discussions in Week 1 will center on thinking critically about the material covered in the readings. You may use this introspection to better understand and implement the course’s major ideas and theories.

NR 501 Week 3 Assignment: Concept Analysis (2 Versions)

In NR-501 Week 3, you’ll do a concept analysis, which is a deep dive into clarifying and expanding upon a single nursing idea. The capacity to assess and comprehend the theoretical foundation of advanced nursing practice is strengthened by this task.

NR 501 Week 5 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography (2 Versions)

A critical review of the literature on a specific issue in advanced nursing practice is the focus of NR-501 Week 5’s annotated bibliography project. While delving into theoretical frameworks and evidence-based practice, this project will help you hone your research and information literacy abilities.

NR 501 Week 7 Assignment: Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-based Practice: PowerPoint Presentation (2 Versions)

In NR-501 Week 7, you’ll concentrate on creating a theory to back up your evidence-based methods. To complete this task, you will develop a PowerPoint presentation that bridges the gap between theory and evidence-based practice.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-503: Population Health, Epidemiology and Statistical Principles Course Assignments & Discussions.

NR 501 Reflections on Learning Week 1 – 8

Engage in self-reflection throughout the course to solidify your grasp of the theoretical underpinnings of advanced nursing practice. To better incorporate theory into clinical practice, ponder on the following questions.

You will learn the theoretical underpinnings of advanced nursing practice by completing the assignments, contributing to conversations, and engaging in reflective activities. You will be better able to deliver optimal treatment to patients as a result of the information you have gained.

In conclusion, NR-501, Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice, is a foundational course that provides the theoretical background and practical skills need for advanced nursing. You will investigate theoretical ideas and their practical implications via classwork, class discussions, and personal introspection. Take advantage of this chance to learn more and improve your skills so you can give better treatment based on sound principles.

FAQs

NR 501 Week 7 Assignment: Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-based Practice: PowerPoint Presentation (2 Versions)

Purpose

Nurse practitioners actively engage in the process of translating nursing knowledge into practice, thereby establishing evidence-based approaches within the discipline. Throughout this process, a theoretical framework provides a meaningful context to guide and support evidence-based practice. The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can … as a framework for a future evidence-based project during your nurse practitioner education.

NR-501 Week 1 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Submission

What were the most important concepts you learned in week 1? Why are these concepts important? How will they prepare you for your future role as a nurse practitioner? In what ways do you feel prepared for your new role? In what ways do you feel unprepared?

NR 501 Week 2 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Submission

Explore an area of interest through patterns of knowing (CO 1)

Analyze the benefits of reflection for shaping and understanding theory. (CO 2)

Differentiate between the received and perceived schools of scientific thought. (CO 2)4.Examine different patterns of knowing in nursing. (CO 2)5.Examine the components of the nursing metaparadigm.

NR-501 Week 3 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Submission

Write 1-2 paragraphs reflecting on your understanding of concept analysis. Provide one specific example of how you achieved the weekly objectives.

What knowledge do you still need to demonstrate competency in the weekly concepts?

What skills do you need to continue developing to apply these concepts?

NR-501 Week 4 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Submission

Provide one specific example of how you achieved the weekly objectives. What concepts, theories, models, tools, techniques, and resources in this week did you find most valuable? What issues had you not considered before?

NR-501 Week 5 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Submission

As you contemplate your future NP practice, how do you view your role in using theory in practice? Which of the theories “spoke” to you? What are some barriers you see to implementing theory in practice?

NR-501: Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course: Master Instruction Worksheet

NR501

Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice

 

Definition:  A Master Level Instructor creates an authentic learning environment that both challenges and supports students as they work to understand and apply complex concepts to real life.  The best instructor helps their students learn in ways that make “a sustained, substantial, and positive influence on how students think, act, and feel.”

Responsibilities:

               Course SME:   Develop assignments that challenge and support students as they seek their goal of becoming a nurse educator

               Course Faculty:  Create a learning environment in which the students feel supported and challenged. 

Expectation	Operationalize by	Chamberlain Care Principle	TEACH VALUES	CNE Competency	Socratic/Lateral Thinking Examples
1.  Creates a natural critical learning environment (Facilitation; Active Learning) ·        Assigns challenging tasks that help students to rethink their assumptions, develop authentic ideas, and examine their mental models of reality. ·        Works collaboratively with faculty and peers to provide opportunities to try, fail, and receive feedback in advance of and separate from any summative judgment of their effort.	Threaded discussion questions are crafted to require students to reflect upon the application of nursing theory to selected topics. For example: ·        Provide a brief argument for importance of nursing theory in the profession ·        Faculty provide detailed formative feedback regarding correct use of scholarly references and APA errors within postings and assignments.  Faculty use “track changes” or “review notes” to provide direct feedback regarding errors.	Care for Students	Community Heart	Facilitates Learning   Facilitates Learner Development and Socialization   Use assessment and evaluation strategies   Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role   Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community	Socratic Questions: Example for Week 1, TD #1: ·        If you held a position within a healthcare agency that was being eliminated, how could you use a specific nursing theory to save the position? ·        How would you respond to the following statement:  “nursing theory is of no use at the patient’s bedside, it is used only by academics?” Lateral Thinking Questions: If you had to evaluate your use of nursing theory at this point in your career, what score would you give yourself?
2.  Gets students’ attention and keeps it (Active Learning; Content Management) a.      Incorporates active learning strategies that are responsive to students’ needs and learning style. b.       Provides relevant content for students through application to real life concepts.	All written assignments require application of nursing theory to a practice area. Assignment Three requires students to identify a practice concern and suggest how nursing theory may be used to resolve this concern.	Care for Students	Accountability Community Heart	Facilitate Learning   Facilitate Learner Development and Socialization   Use assessment and evaluation strategies   Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role   Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community	Socratic Questions: Examples for Week 6 or 7: Within your future practice specialty, how would you use a selected nursing theory to support a change project?   Lateral Thinking Questions: A professional peer from a different practice focus is having problems with patient safety, using a selected nursing theory, what advice would you provide to help resolve the concern?
3.       Starts with the student rather than the discipline (Facilitation) Challenges faulty learning models and creates new ones that are effective within a collaborative environment.	Many students enter NR 501 with limited information regarding nursing theory.  Therefore, the course begins with general information regarding concepts and metaparadigms before progressing to application within diverse practice setting.  This allows students to gain knowledge and understanding prior to application.	Care for Students	Community Heart	Facilitates Learning   Facilitate Learner Development and Socialization   Use assessment and evaluation strategies   Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role   Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community	Socratic Questions: Examples for Week 2, TD #1: The metaparadigms of the nursing profession are agreed upon, but yet may overlap with other professional disciplines.  How is the focus of each metaparadigm within the nursing profession different from the focus of other healthcare professions?  Use the same healthcare profession for each of the metaparadigms. Lateral Thinking Questions: Identify the most negative comment you have heard regarding nursing theory and then craft a rebuttal to the comment.
4.      Gets commitment from students (Content Management) Ensures equal commitment of both faculty and students to class, coursework, and learning.  Explains how each specific rule, regulation, or assignment is supported by the learning objectives of the course.	Specific information regarding assignment guidelines is provided in detailed.  Students’ questions within Q & A thread are responded to by faculty in a timely manner and with details.  With the Summer B 2015 term, the course lead is scheduling webinars reviewing each required assignment allowing students another media to achieve information regarding assignments. Within all assignments and threaded discussion, links to course outcomes are identified.	Care for Students	Community Heart	Facilitates Learning Facilitate Learner Development and Socialization Use assessment and evaluation strategies Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community	Socratic Questions: Examples for Week 4, TD #1: If you did not have a nursing theory to guide your professional practice what would you use?  How would your practice be holistic? Lateral Thinking Questions: The nursing profession is extremely diverse in its practice.  How many nursing theories at the practice level of theory development would it take to completely reflect the profession?  What would be the advantages and disadvantages to have numerous practice level theories? How would a specific grand nursing theory be useful in global nursing?
5.      Helps students learn outside of class (Integration) Develops course activities that promote learning outside of class. Promotes curiosity to expand application of learning.	Students are required to provide current references to support information within threaded discussions and assignments.  This fosters database searching outside of the class.  Within threaded discussions and Assignment One: Importance of Theory, students are to provide examples from “real life” professional nursing.	Care for Students	Community Heart	Facilitates Learning Facilitate Learner Development and Socialization Use assessment and evaluation strategies Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community	Socratic Questions: Examples for Week 7, TD #2: Some of the authors of selected nursing theories have died.  What methods would you suggest in order to continue the work to apply the theory?  Is this theory still relevant in today’s nursing/healthcare environment and should it die with the author? What challenges did you face in finding current, primary references for your assignments or threaded discussions? Lateral Thinking Questions: Have you ever attended a conference where an acknowledged nurse theorist personally presented?  What was your impression of the theorist?   If you had the opportunity to ask two questions of any nursing theorist (living or deceased), what would be the questions, and why would you ask that question?
6.      Engages students in disciplinary thinking (Relevance) a.      Guides students to professional education with journals and texts from the profession	Students are guided toward the use of primary scholarly references by not allowing textbook to be used in 2 of 3 assignments. Feedback is provided individually if a student uses a non-scholarly reference (NR 501 is the second course in the MSN curriculum so students are unclear regarding references to be used). By purposefully requiring students to apply nursing theory to specific practice areas (education, leadership, practice, research, etc.) information from a variety of professional journals is determined.	Care for Students	Accountability   Community Heart	Facilitates Learning Facilitate Learner Development and Socialization Use assessment and evaluation strategies   Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community Use assessment and evaluation strategies Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community	Socratic Questions: Example for Week 3: To prepare for the concept analysis, how did you select the concept you presented?  What interested you about the concept?     Lateral Thinking Questions: Example for Week 7, TD #2: Comparing a research-based reference that identified a nursing theory to a research-based reference that did use a nursing theory, what were the similarities and differences? Example for Week 8: Within your future specialty area, which nursing theory is commonly used?  If none, which nursing theory do you believe would be most useful to foster the quality of the specialty area?
7.      Creates diverse learning experiences (Relevance)  a. Integrates instructional strategies that promote lifelong learning. b. Uses evaluation methods that support strategic learning.	Learning experiences within NR 501 include: ·        Interactives within lessons to engage students and provide application of information ·        Threaded discussions include application of nursing theory to selected enrollment focus (i.e. education, leadership, practice, informatics, health policy) for use post-graduation. ·        Evaluation occurs by direct input by faculty within written assignments using track changes or review notes.  Rubrics are provided as a summary of formative feedback.	Care for Students	Accountability Community Heart	Facilitates Learning	Socratic Questions: How would a selected nursing theory foster your achievement of your future career goals in your specialty area?   Lateral Thinking Questions: How would you evaluate your current use of nursing theory?  What do you anticipate your use of nursing theory will be 5 years after completing your MSN degree?

 

 

Chamberlain Care	TEACH Values	CNE Competencies
Care for Self Are you standing in your strengths   Care for Colleagues The democracy of truth   Care for Students Create extraordinary moments for students	Teamwork We put the team first, appreciate diverse points of view, assume positive intent, collaborate and communicate openly. Energy We move quickly, learn from mistakes, build positive spirit and always look for a better way Accountability We take ownership and initiative, demonstrate courage as we speak up, and act with integrity in all we do. Community We operate with a shared sense of responsibility and purpose, and enrich colleagues, students and the broader community we serve. Heart                We serve students and each other with passion, respect and care.	1.    Facilitate learning 2.    Facilitate learner development and socialization 3.   Use assessment and evaluation strategies 4.    Participate in curriculum design and evaluation of program outcomes 5.  Pursue Systematic Self-Evaluation and Improvement in the Academic Nurse Educator Role 6.    Function as a change agent and leader 7.    Engage in the scholarship of teaching 8.  Function Effectively within the Organizational Environment and the Academic Community.

NR-501:  Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Assignments & Discussions

NR-501 Week 1 Discussion

Nursing Theory

For many? Students enrolled in NR501, this is an initial nursing course? Theory.? So, let’s have a debate.? Is nursing theory important to the? Nursing profession? In particular, is it important for nurse practitioners? Does theory inform nurse practitioner practice??

If you believe it is important, explain why it is? useful.? f you do not believe it is useful, explain why nursing theory. Is not necessary to the profession?

NR-501 Week 2 Discussion

Ways of Knowing

Nursing knowledge is classified in various ways, one of which is Carper’s Patterns of Knowing (Carper, 1978). Carper’s framework offers a lens through which the nurse can reflect upon insights acquired through empirical, ethical, personal, and aesthetic knowledge (Carper, 1978).

Through intentional reflection using Carper’s Patterns of Knowing, nurses can process experiential learning and knowledge acquired through practice NR-501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Discussion Essays.

This assignment aims to reflect upon a specific practice situation and better understand the professional knowledge and insights obtained through that experience.

Criteria for Content

Think of a surprising or challenging practice situation in which you felt underprepared, unprepared, or uncomfortable.

Select an important nursing issue/topic inherent to the identified situation.

Briefly? explain the situation

Identify the nursing issue inherent in the identified situation

Use Carper’s Patterns of Knowing to analyze the situation as a method of refection. In your discussion, address ONE of the following Patterns of Knowing:

• What do you think was the underlying reason for the situation? (Esthetics)
• What were your thoughts and feeling in the situation? (Personal)
• What was one personal belief that impacted your actions? (Ethics)
• What evidence in nursing literature supports the nursing importance of the identified issue? (Empirical)

What new insights did you gain through this reflective practice opportunity? How will this apply to your practice as a nurse practitioner? Be sure to use scholarly literature to support your position.

NR-501 Week 3 Discussion Steps of Concept Analysis

At the end of Week 3, your concept analysis is due. This discussion provides an opportunity to start this assignment. Select a nursing concept supported by a nursing theory, and address the following components included in a concept analysis:?

• Definition of concept and discussion of the concept in the nurse practitioner role?
• Identification of three attributes of the concept?
• Description of one antecedent and one consequence of the concept?
• Identification of two empirical referents?
• A brief explanation of theoretical applications of the concept (How is the concept relevant to a nursing theory?)?

This information does not have to be comprehensive but provides a foundation for the upcoming assignment. Be sure to include scholarly references.

NR-501 Week 4 Discussion Nursing Theory

Identify your specialty area of NP practice. Select a nursing, borrowed, or interdisciplinary theory provided in the lesson plan or one of your findings. Address the following:

• Origin
• Meaning and scope
• Logical adequacy
• Usefulness and simplicity
• Generalizability
• Testability

Finally, provide an example of of how the theory could be used to improve or evaluate the practice quality in your specific setting. What rationale can you provide that validates the theory as applied to the role of the nurse practitioner?

NR-501 Week 5 Discussion

Culture and Caring Theories

Which of the culture and caring theories most resonates with you for your practice as an NP? How does the theory integrate the nursing paradigm?? What parts of the theory do you identify with? How does the theory help to meet CLAS standards to advance health equity?

NR-501 Week 6 Discussion Literature Review

Locate a scholarly journal article that uses either a health behavior theory or the Praxis Theory of Suffering as the basis for evidence-based research. Choose an article DIFFERENT than those provided in the weekly readings.

Summarize the research presented. How was the theory used? How do the research findings either support or refute the use of the theory in practice? How could you use the research in your practice as an NP?

NR-501 Week 8 Discussion

In Week 7, you posted your Kaltura presentation to the Week 8 discussion area. This week, you will view and comment on peer presentations. For full credit, view and comment on at least TWO peer presentations by Saturday at 11:59 PM MT.

Your post should be substantive and professional and include at least one scholarly resource.

NR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice References

Carper, B.A. (1978). Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Retrieved 8 September 2019 from

https://www.google.co.ke/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8871/eb88fb06168bb31e20e9c54e57920e575a47.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwje0JrqscHkAhVClFwKHYXzAgsQFjAQegQICRAB&usg=AOvVaw0CEuuz-eqnIwVMqcmUI55E

Haswell, N. (2019). The four ethical principles and their application in aesthetic practice. Journal of Aesthetic Nursing, 8(4), 177-179. Doi: 10.12968/joan.2019.8.4.177

Schmidt, L.A., Nelson, D. & Godfrey, L. (2003). A clinical ladder program based on Carper’s fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. JONA, 33(3), 146-152. Doi: 10.1097/00005110-200303000-00005

Quaglietti, S., Blum, L. & Ellis, V. (2004). The role of the adult nurse practitioner in palliative care. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing, 6(4), 209-214. Doi: 10.1097/00129191-200410000-00009

NR-501:  Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 1 Discussion DQ 1 Importance of Theory in Nursing NEW 

For many students enrolled in NR 501, this is an initial course for nursing theory. So, let’s have a debate!!! Is nursing theory important to the nursing profession? If you believe that it is important, explain why it is useful. If you do not believe that it is useful, explain why nursing theory is not necessary to the profession? Be sure to provide an example that demonstrates your opinion and a scholarly reference (not using the required textbook or lesson) which supports your opinion.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 2 Discussion DQ 1 Significance of Nursing Concepts within the Profession NEW​

This discussion considers the metaparadigm of nursing and the four concepts of the nursing profession—person, environment, health and nursing profession. Select a practice area of the nursing profession (i.e. education, executive, informatics, healthcare policy, and advanced clinical practice) and apply EACH of the four concepts to the selected area. Be sure to apply EACH of the four concepts and include an example that demonstrates the application to the practice area. Don’t forget to support your initial posting with scholarly references.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 2 Importance of Theory Paper Assignment – Environmental Theory and Florence Nightingale NEW

Importance of Theory: Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to a) identify a nursing theory, b) analyze the importance of the selected theory to the nursing profession, c) summarize key concepts and relationships among the concepts of the selected nursing theory, d) present views of the selected theory on areas of specialization, and e) communicate ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

• (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
• (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
• (CO#4) Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4, 7)

Due Date

Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 2

Total Points Possible: 100

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

This assignment focuses on the importance of nursing theory within the profession. Selecting one nursing theory (non-nursing theories are not allowed), the nursing theory will be presented by identifying the key concepts present within the theory. The selected nursing theory will then be applied to ONE of the following professional nursing practice areas:

• Education (e.g. undergraduate, staff development, etc.)
• Leadership (e.g. nurse executive, manager, leader, etc.)
• Informatics (e.g. data management, etc.)
• Healthcare policy (e.g. application to local, state, national, or global healthcare concerns, etc.)

Nurse practitioner

Criteria for Content

1. Introduction:

The introduction requires the following information.

Statements about nursing theory in general

Identification of the ONE nursing theory (non-nursing theories are not allowed) selected by the student to be used within this assignment. The specific selected nursing theory may be from any of the three categories of nursing theory (i.e. grand, middle-range, or practice), but must be a specific nursing theory (i.e. Orem, Roy, Benner, etc.); a category may not be used.
Identification of the sections of the paper.

References from nursing literature are required.

2. Importance of Nursing Theory:

This section requires the following information.

Present an analysis of the importance of nursing theory, in general, to the nursing profession. Each of the following questions are to be answered.

Why should the study of nursing theory be included in a master’s program?

How is nursing theory useful to the nursing profession?

How can nursing theory be used to separate the nursing profession from other healthcare professions?

What would be ONE concern regarding the use of nursing theory within the profession?
References from nursing literature are required.

3. Summary of Selected Nursing Theory:

This section requires the following information.

Present the name and author of the selected nursing theory (bibliographic and historical information about the theory or theorist is NOT included). Identify when the nursing theory was initially published and the latest edition of the selected nursing theory.

Provide a summary of the key concepts contained within the selected nursing theory.

Provide a detailed description of how this nursing theory addresses each of the metaparadigms/ concepts (person, health, environment, and nursing profession) associated with nursing.

Identify why this nursing theory selected and its potential use within the student’s selected Master’s track (i.e. education, leadership, informatics, healthcare policy, or nurse practitioner)

References from nursing literature are required.

4. Application of Specific Nursing Theory to Selected Professional Nursing Practice area:

This section includes the following elements:

Present a discussion of how the selected nursing theory definesand explains one of the following professional nursing practice areas:

• Education (e.g. undergraduate, staff development, etc.)
• Leadership (e.g. nurse executive, manager, leader, etc.)
• Informatics (e.g. data 
  management, etc.)
• Healthcare policy (e.g. application to local, state, national, or global healthcare concerns, etc.)

Nurse practitioner

Present 2 (two) examples illustrating the above information. Professional examples come from a student’s own practice experiences or from the scholarly literature. If the example is from the student’s experience, identify this as the source by using the first person in describing the example.

Keep each example succinct (about 1 – 3 paragraphs).

References from nursing literature are required.

5. Conclusion:

This section includes the following elements:

Summarizes presented information regarding theory in general and its use within the nursing profession

Summarizes the selected nursing theory.

 Presents self-reflection regarding what was learned from writing this assignment.

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 2 Importance of Theory Paper Assignment – Application of Pender’s Health Promotion Model NEW

Importance of Theory: Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to a) identify a nursing theory, b) analyze the importance of the selected theory to the nursing profession, c) summarize key concepts and relationships among the concepts of the selected nursing theory, d) present views of the selected theory on areas of specialization, and e) communicate ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

• (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
• (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
• (CO#4) Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4, 7)

Due Date

Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 2

Total Points Possible: 100

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

This assignment focuses on the importance of nursing theory within the profession. Selecting one nursing theory (non-nursing theories are not allowed), the nursing theory will be presented by identifying the key concepts present within the theory. The selected nursing theory will then be applied to ONE of the following professional nursing practice areas:

• Education (e.g. undergraduate, staff development, etc.)
• Leadership (e.g. nurse executive, manager, leader, etc.)
• Informatics (e.g. data management, etc.)
• Healthcare policy (e.g. application to local, state, national, or global healthcare concerns, etc.)

Nurse practitioner

Criteria for Content

1. Introduction:

The introduction requires the following information.

Statements about nursing theory in general

Identification of the ONE nursing theory (non-nursing theories are not allowed) selected by the student to be used within this assignment. The specific selected nursing theory may be from any of the three categories of nursing theory (i.e. grand, middle-range, or practice), but must be a specific nursing theory (i.e. Orem, Roy, Benner, etc.); a category may not be used.
Identification of the sections of the paper.

References from nursing literature are required.

2. Importance of Nursing Theory:

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis NEW

Select a nursing concept (be sure to use a nursing theory) and then provide a response to each one of the steps included in a concept analysis regarding your selected concept. This information does not have to be comprehensive but provides a foundation to the upcoming assignment. Be sure to include a scholarly reference.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Paper Assignment – Health Promotion Behavior Concept NEW

NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

Purpose

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete a concept analysis of a concept found in a nursing theory using an identified process. The assignment fosters analytical thinking related to the selected concept as well as application within the profession.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

• (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
• (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
• (CO#4) Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4. 7)

Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 4

Total Points Possible: 250 Points

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of ONE concept found in a nursing theory. The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application within the model and alternative cases. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.

Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis.

Criteria for Content

1. Introduction

The introduction substantively presents all following 4 (four) elements:

• Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development,
• Identifies the selected nursing concept,
• Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained, and
• Names the sections of the paper.

2. Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept

This section includes:

• Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required), and
• Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory is substantively presented.
• A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.

3. Literature review

This section requires:

• A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six)scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
• Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
• Support from nursing literature is required.

Please Note: Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review.

4. Defining attributes

For this section:

• A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.
• A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
• Explanation: An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept. For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.

5. Antecedent and Consequence

This section requires the identification of:

• 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept, and
• 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
• A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
• Explanation: An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event. In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept.
• A consequence follows or is the result of an event. In this situation a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.

6. Empirical Referents

This section requires the identification of:

2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Explanation: An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept.

7. Model Cases

 1 model caseis created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

• Definition,
• All identified attributes,
• Antecedent,
• Consequence, and
• Empirical referent or Measurement
• Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the crea

CHAMBERLAIN COLLEGE OF NURSING NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Paper Assignment – Self Care Concept NEW

NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

Purpose

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete a concept analysis of a concept found in a nursing theory using an identified process. The assignment fosters analytical thinking related to the selected concept as well as application within the profession.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

• (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
• (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
  (CO#4)
• Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4. 7)

Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 4

Total Points Possible: 250 Points

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of ONE concept found in a nursing theory. The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application within the model and alternative cases. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.

Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis.

Criteria for Content

1. Introduction

The introduction substantively presents all following 4 (four) elements:

• Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development,
• Identifies the selected nursingconcept,
• Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained, and
• Names the sections of the paper.

2. Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept

This section includes:

• Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required), and
• Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory is substantively presented.
• A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.

3. Literature review

This section requires:

• A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
  Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
• Support from nursing literature is required.

Please Note: Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review.

4. Defining attributes

For this section:

• A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.
• A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
• Explanation: An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept. For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.

5. Antecedent and Consequence

This section requires the identification of:

• 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept, and
• 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
• A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
• Explanation: An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event. In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept.
• A consequence follows or is the result of an event. In this situation a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.

6. Empirical Referents

This section requires the identification of:

2 (two)empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

Explanation: An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept.

7. Model Cases

1 model case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

• Definition,
• All identified attributes,
• Antecedent,
• Consequence, and
• Empirical referent or Measurement
• Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the created model case.

A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

Explanation: A model case is an example of the hypothetical individual who demonstrates all of the attributes, antecedents, consequences, and referents noted previously in this assignment.

8. Alternative Cases

This section requires:

The identification of 2(two) alternative cases correctly created and presented. The two required alternative cases are:

Borderline (absence of one or two of previously identified attributes of the selected nursing concept.

Contrary (demonstrates the complete opposite of selected nursing concept)

Applies information from selected nursing theory.

Explanation: Alternative cases represent the opposite of the model case.

For this assignment, two alternative cases are required.

These are:

• Borderline case which is a created case where one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.
• Contrary case which is a created case that demonstrate the complete opposite of the selected nursing concept.

9. Conclusion

This section requires:

Summarization of key information regarding:

• Selected nursing concept,
• Selected nursing theory, and
• Application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained about applying nursing theory to a professional issue or concern.

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

1. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least 8, but no more than 10 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.
2. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
3. The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing theory. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used.
4. A minimum of 6 (six) scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. A dictionary maybe used as a reference for the section titled “Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept”, but it is NOT counted as one of the 6 required scholarly nursing references. For additional assistance regarding scholarly nursing references, please see “What is a scholarly source” located in the Course Resources tab. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

5. Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.
6. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
7. PLEASE note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.
   Possible Concepts: The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept. Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing theories is NOT allowed. If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance.

• Behavioral system
• Boundary lines
• Caring
• Empowerment
• Homeostasis
• Noise
• Open system
• Palliative care
• Resources
• Self-care
• Adaptation
• Comfort
• Compassion
• Engagement
• Leadership
• Meaningfulness
• Modeling
• Pain
• Pattern
• Transaction

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 4 Discussion DQ 1 Connection Between Theory and Practice NEW

Connection Between Theory and Practice 

Hello Class,

Our Course Objectives (CO) for this week and corresponding MSN Program Objective (PO) are:

Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO #1)

Examine instances where theory is used to guide the development of new knowledge and implementation of evidence-based practice. (PO #6).

Grand theories are more abstract or general in nature and middle-range theories that are more specific in nature. What relationship(s) do you find between grand nursing theories and clinical practice? Provide one example that uses a specific grand theory to support your views.

I look forward to reading your examples!

For this week’s discussion, please answer this question:
What relationship(s) do you find between grand nursing theories and application to clinical practice? Provide one example that uses a specific grand range theory to support your views.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 5 Discussion DQ 1 Borrowed Theories NEW

Borrowed Theories 

Greetings Class,

Moving right along into week 5: This week our discussion addresses the following PO:

Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO #1)

Key Concepts:
Scope of borrowed theories and their application to the nursing profession

Categories commonly used to organize nursing theories and how a theory fits into the category

This is our question: Nursing makes use of theories from other disciplines (aka., borrowed theories). How does using borrowed theory support the development of nursing theory?

Looking forward to our discussion!

For this discussion, please answer this question:

Nursing makes use of theories from other disciplines (a.k.a., borrowed theories). How does using borrowed theory support the development of nursing theory?

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 5 Discussion DQ 2 Borrowed Theories Guiding Practice NEW

Borrowed Theories Guiding Practice

Greetings Class, This is your topic for TD2 and we will be meeting the following PO:

Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, 
comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO #1)

Key Concepts:

Scope of borrowed theories and their application to the nursing profession.

Categories commonly used to organize nursing theories and how a theory fits into the category.

Choose a borrowed theory and apply its framework to an advanced nursing issue (i.e., hositlity in the workplace, instituting bedside reporting, and shared leadership).

See you in the threads!

Please answer this question:

Choose a borrowed theory and apply its framework to an advanced nursing issue (i.e., hostility in the workplace, instituting bedside reporting, and shared leadership).

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 6 Application of Theory Paper Assignment – Nursing Theory Virginia Henderson Needs Theory NEW

Application of Nursing Theory Guidelines

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to use nursing theory as a way to resolve a problem or issue occurring within nursing leadership, nursing education, nursing informatics, health policy, or advance clinical practice.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, a student will demonstrate the ability to:

• (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
• (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
• (CO#4) Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4, 7)

Due Date: Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 6

Total Points Possible: 275

Requirements

Description of the Assignment:

One nursing theory will be presented as a framework to resolve a problem occurring within one of the professional areas of leadership, education, informatics, healthcare policy or advance clinical practice. The same nursing theory selected in Assignment One may be used to resolve the identified problem.
A specific nursing theory must be used. No non-nursing theories are permitted. A category of nursing theory (grand, middle range, practice) may not be used—only a specific, published nursing theory is to be selected and applied to the issue or concern important to the profession of nursing as documented in the nursing literature.

Please note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.

Content

1. Introduction:

The introduction for this paper includes:

A nursing theory is required; non-nursing theories may not be used.

General statements on the idea of nursing theory being applied to solve problems/issues in nursing practice. You do not need to go into the specialty area of practice in-depth as this will be covered in another section of the paper.

A one-paragraph summary of the selected specific nursing theory is required.

Information identifying the sections of this assignment.

References from nursing literature are required.

2. Description of Issue or Concern:

The selected issue or concern must be clearly identified as being significant to the professional area of either leadership, education, informatics, healthcare policy or advance clinical practice. The issue or concern must be presented comprehensively, but concisely by answering each of the following questions.

What is the specific issue or concern being presented?

Why should the nursing profession care about this issue or concern?

What does the nursing literature have to say about this issue or concern including its frequency of occurrence?

Who are the stakeholders or the people affected by the issue or concern?

References from nursing literature are required.

3. Application of Selected Nursing Theory to Issue or Concern:

This section of the assignment focuses on using the selected nursing theory to resolve the described issue or concern. Required information includes:

Restating the selected nursing theory to be used

Identification of one strategy useful in resolving the identified issue or concern.

The strategy should be presented in depth with the following information being required:

• A specific description of how the selected nursing theory can help to resolve the issue or concern
• A specific and detailed description of the strategy to be used
• A specific and detailed description of how the strategy can be implemented
• A specific and detailed description of one suggestion for future

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization NEW

Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization 

Hi Everyone,

Our discussion this week is aimed at addressing these POs:

Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO # 2)

Propose strategies for use of relevant theories that nurse leaders can employ in selected healthcare or educational organizations, considering legal and ethical principles. (POs #2, 6)

Key Concept

Role of grand and middle-range nursing theories applied to health care organizations

Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice.

(PO #3)

Key Concept

Grand or middle-range theory applied to a specific area of nursing leadership practice

Recommend strategies for the use of theory as the basis for actions of advanced nursing practice in leadership and education. (PO #5)

Key Concepts

Relationship between leadership and management and theory

Role of theory in developing and applying leadership and management concepts

Discuss how a specific middle-range nursing theory has been or could be applied by nurse leaders or nurse managers to effectively deal with an administrative issue (i.e., staffing, use of supplies, staff performance issues). Include an example from the literature or your own experience to illustrate your points. 

I look forward to your responses.

For this discussion, please answer this question:

Discuss how a specific middle-range nursing theory has been or could be applied by nurse leaders or nurse managers to effectively deal with an administrative issue (i.e., staffing, use of supplies, staff performance issues). Include an example from the literature or your own experience to illustrate your points.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization NEW

Discuss how a specific middle-range nursing theory has been or could be applied by nurse leaders or nurse managers to effectively deal with an administrative issue (i.e., staffing, use of supplies, staff performance issues). Include an example from the literature or your own experience to illustrate your points. 

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 7 Discussion DQ 1 NEW

In NR 500, you developed a PICOT question. Select a nursing theory that you find useful in nursing practice. Discuss each of the following selected elements of the PICOT format by applying your selected nursing theory to the element. Be sure to include a scholarly reference.

• Population/ Patient Problem: Consider how your selected nursing theory may guide you in selecting the population and/or patient problem
• Intervention: Does your selected nursing theory identify a possible intervention? If not, how is your selected intervention consistent with your selected nursing theory?
• Comparison: What other methods or studies can one compare this intervention with?
• Outcome: How would the outcome of your PICOT study contribute to your selected nursing theory? Would it add new information? Would it confirm some part of the theory?

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 8 Discussion DQ 1 Course Reflection and Future Application NEW

Throughout the discussions occurring within NR 501, a common element has been application of theory. In this our last discussion regarding theory, it is time to focus on you and your capstone experience (yes, it is never too early consider this major project!). While it is too early to identify your project, let’s consider on your future practice area as this is the setting your project will occur in.

Based upon your self-reflection and use of nursing theory within the discussions and assignments, select ONE nursing theory that you prefer and answer the following questions:

1. Why do you prefer the nursing theory you selected?
2. How can this theory be used in your current practice area (education, executive, advanced clinical practice, informatics, or healthcare policy)?
3. How can this theory be used in your future practice area (education, executive advanced clinical practice, informatics or healthcare policy)?

CHAMBERLIAN COLLEGE OF NURSING NR 501 Week 5 Application of Theory Assignment

The Application of Theory assignment is due Sunday 11:59pm MT at the end of Week 5. Please use your textbooks listed below to complete the assignment this week. The guidelines and rubric for this assignment are also listed below and in Course Resources.

Groenwald, S. L. (Ed.). (2018). Designing and creating a culture of care for students and faculty: The Chamberlain University College of Nursing Model. Washington, DC: National League for Nursing.

McCance, T. McCormack, B., & Dewing, J. (2011). An exploration of person-centeredness in practice. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 16(2). doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol16No02Man01

Purpose

Within the profession of nursing, multiple theories, models, and conceptual frameworks have been created to serve as a foundation for practice. The purpose of this assignment is to appraise the value of the model in serving as a theoretical framework and apply the model to your selected area of future professional nursing practice (your MSN track). For this assignment, you will select one of the following nursing models to address within the paper: the Patient-Centred Nursing (PCN) Framework or the Chamberlain Care Model.

Course Outcomes

Through this assessment, the student will meet the following Course Outcomes:

Apply nursing theory as a framework to guide the translation of knowledge and implementation of evidence-based practice in future professional settings. (CO #2)

Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationships among the components, and application to advanced nursing practice. (CO#4)

Total Points Possible

This assessment is worth 175 points.

Due Date

Submit your file(s) by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.

Requirements

Criteria for Content

Select one of the two models presented in the week five lesson (either the Person-Centred Nursing Framework, or the Chamberlain Care Model).

In a three- to four-page scholarly paper, address the following:

Provide a succinct overview of the model you have selected and discuss how the selected model addresses the four concepts within the nursing metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment).

Discuss how the selected model qualifies as a theoretical framework within the profession of nursing, and its use within the profession.

Describe how the chosen model can be applied in the future APN role (education, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics).

Preparing the paper

Submission Requirements

Application: Use Microsoft Word 2013™ to create the written assessment.

Length: The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) is at least three and no more than four pages in length.

A minimum of four (4) scholarly literature sources must be used.

Submission: Submit your file to the Canvas course site by the due date/time indicated.

Best Practices in Preparing the Project

The following are best practices in preparing this project.

Review directions thoroughly.

Follow submission requirements.

Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.

Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.

A minimum of four (4) scholarly literature references must be used.

Abide by CCN academic integrity policy.

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

• Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
• Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
• Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
• Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
• Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
• Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

PHI-413V Ethical and Spiritual Decision Making in Health Care Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

PHI-413V Ethical and Spiritual Decision Making in Health Care Course Description

This course introduces a Christian foundation for spiritual assessment and care with specific emphasis on biomedical ethical principles and ethical decision-making within health care. Students practice assessment and propose holistic interventions that take into account the dignity of the human person. These assessments and interventions contribute to the physical and spiritual well-being of individuals across the life span and the health-illness continuum.

PHI-413V – Ethical and Spiritual Decision Making in Health Care Course Syllabus

Version 12.2

Ethical and Spiritual Decision Making in Health Care

Course Code                        Type                                    Duration                         Credit Hours PHI-413V v:12   Credit Based      35 Days         3.0        .2

Pre-Requisites

None

Co-Requisites

None

PHI-413V

REQUIRED COURSE MATERIALS

Textbooks

Electronic Resources

A Brief Guide to Philosophical Writing

Read “A Brief Guide to Philosophical Writing.” These resources will help guide your writing process for philosophical writing.

ANA Code of Ethics

Refer to the ANA (American Nurses’ Association) Code of Ethics on the VCU website (2020).

https://www.vcuhealth.org/explore-vcu-health/for-health-professionals/nursing/about-nursing-at-vcu/ana-code-of-ethics (https://www.vcuhealth.org/explore-vcu-health/for-health-professionals/nursing/about-nursing-at-vcu/ana-code-of-ethics)

College of Nursing and Health Care Professions Undergraduate Field Experience Manual

Review the “Bachelor of Science in Nursing (RN to BSN)” section, found in the College of Nursing and Health Care Professions Undergraduate Field Experience Manual (2018-2019), located in the Student Success Center.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Ethical Positions Statement

Read Grand Canyon University’s “Ethical Positions Statement” on the GCU website.https://www.gcu.edu/why-gcu/christian-identity-and-mission (https://www.gcu.edu/why-gcu/christian-identity-and-mission)

Faith and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care Professions

View both “Faith and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care Professions” video messages to RN to BSN students from Dr. Lisa Smith and Dr.Maria Quimba, from the College of Nursing and Health Care Professions.https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=7285A42D-1FDE-E811-844B-005056BD1ABC(https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=7285A42D-1FDE-E811-844B-005056BD1ABC)

GCU Doctrinal Statement

Read Grand Canyon University’s “GCU Doctrinal Statement” on the GCU website.https://www.gcu.edu/why-gcu/christian-identity-and-mission (https://www.gcu.edu/why-gcu/christian-identity-and-mission)

LopesWrite

Refer to the LopesWrite webpage for guidance regarding assignments requiring submission to LopesWrite.https://support.gcu.edu/hc/en-us/articles/201277380-LopesWrite (https://support.gcu.edu/hc/en-us/articles/201277380-LopesWrite)

Philosophical Writing

View the “Philosophical Writing” video to help inform your philosophical writing assignments throughout the course.https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=30E68DF7-0AA5-E611-8627-005056A072B6(https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=30E68DF7-0AA5-E611-8627-005056A072B6)

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Grand Canyon University (Ed.). (2022). Practicing dignity: An introduction to Christian values and decision-making in health care (2nd ed.).

Statement on the Integration of Faith and Work

Read the “Statement on the Integration of Faith and Work” from Grand Canyon University’s One Foundationhttps://www.gcu.edu/sites/default/files/media/Documents/Statement-IFLW.pdf (https://www.gcu.edu/sites/default/files/media/Documents/Statement-IFLW.pdf)

The Bible

This course requires the use of a Bible. Students should use one of the following versions: the English Standard Version (ESV), the New International Version (NIV), or the New American Standard Bible (NASB). Each of these versions is available in print and also for free atBibleGateway.com.

Students might also find it helpful to choose a study Bible such as the NIV Life Application Study Bible or the ESV Study Bible in order to take advantage of additional information.

The Nuremberg Code

Refer to “The Nuremberg Code” found on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services website.https://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/nuremberg.pdf (https://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/nuremberg.pdf)

WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects

Refer to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki for this course.https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/(https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/)

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-500: Foundational Concepts and Applications Course Assignments & Discussions.

INSTRUCTOR ONLY MATERIALS

PHI-413V Course Guide

The course guide contains content and instructional information designed to assist faculty in the effective presentation of course materials.

PHI-413V Course Revision History

PHI-413V Discussion Questions

This document contains all utilized discussion questions.

TOPICS, OBJECTIVES, AND COURSE CONTENT

Topic 1: Foundational Issues in Christian Spirituality and Ethics

Objectives:

1. 1.1: Explain the nature of spirituality and ethics according to the Christian worldview.
2. 1.2: Explain the limitations of science as it relates to ethics.
3. 1.3: Explain the current philosophical challenges to a Christian understanding of ethics in health care.

Topic Materials

Textbooks

Electronic Resources

10 Things You Should Know About Scientism

Read “10 Things You Should Know About Scientism,” by Moreland, on the Crossway website (2018).https://www.crossway.org/articles/10-things-you-should-know-about-scientism/ (https://www.crossway.org/articles/10-things-you-should-know-about-scientism/)

Faith and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care Professions

View both “Faith and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care Professions” video messages to RN to BSN students from Dr. Lisa Smith andDr. Maria Quimba, from the College of Nursing and Health Care Professions.

https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=7285A42D-1FDE-E811-844B-005056BD1ABC(https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=7285A42D-1FDE-E811-844B-005056BD1ABC)

Literary Styles in the Bible

View “Literary Styles in the Bible” on the Bible Project website (2018).https://thebibleproject.com/videos/literary-styles-bible/ (https://thebibleproject.com/videos/literary-styles-bible/)

Optional – Topic 1: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 1: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 1 from Practicing Dignity.

The Story of the Bible

View “The Story of the Bible” on the Bible Project website (2018).

https://thebibleproject.com/videos/the-story-of-the-bible/ (https://thebibleproject.com/videos/the-story-of-the-bible/)

What Is Scientism?

Read “What Is Scientism?” by Burnett, on the American Association for the Advancement of Science website (2018).

https://www.aaas.org/programs/dialogue-science-ethics-and-religion/what-scientism (https://www.aaas.org/programs/dialogue-science-ethics-and-religion/what-scientism)

What Is the Bible?

View “What Is the Bible?” on the Bible Project website (2018).

https://thebibleproject.com/videos/what-is-bible/ (https://thebibleproject.com/videos/what-is-bible/)

Assignments:

Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

Based on the required topic Resources, write a reflection about worldview and respond to following:

1. In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodernrelativism within health care.
2. In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.
3. In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview:
4. What is ultimate reality?
5. What is the nature of the universe?
6. What is a human being?
7. What is knowledge?
8. What is your basis of ethics?
9. What is the purpose of your existence?

Remember to support your reflection with the topic Resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Discussion Questions:

Topic 1 DQ 2

What aspects of the topic readings do you find the most interesting? What is your view of the analysis of disease and healing in the readings? Explain.

Topic 1 DQ 1

What would spirituality be according to your own worldview? How do you believe that your conception of spirituality would influence theway in which you care for patients?

Participation:

Week 1 Participation: 20.0 points

Topic 2: God, Humanity, and Human Dignity

Objectives:

2.1: Explain the Christian view of the nature of human persons.

2.2: Compare the Christian view of intrinsic human value and dignity in contrast to secular views of personhood.

2.3: Evaluate how the concept of intrinsic human dignity is applied in the process of ethical decision-making.

Topic Materials

Textbooks

Electronic Resources

Optional – Joni and Friends

For additional information, the Joni and Friends website is recommended:

https://www.joniandfriends.org/ (https://www.joniandfriends.org/)

Optional – Topic 2: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 2: Optional Study Resources” that are recommended.

Philosophy – Ethics: Moral Status

View the video “Philosophy – Ethics: Moral Status,” by Jeff Sebo, from Wireless Philosophy. https://youtu.be/smuhAjyRbw0 (https://youtu.be/smuhAjyRbw0)

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 2 from Practicing Dignity.

The Image of God, Bioethics, and Persons with Profound Intellectual Disabilities

Read the attached article, “The Image of God, Bioethics, and Persons With Profound Intellectual Disabilities,” by Devan Stahl and John F.Kilner, from The Journal of the Christian Institute on Disability. ©2017 Joni and Friends, Agoura Hills, CA. Used with permission.

Assignments:

Case Study on Moral Status

Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and the required topic Resources, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:

1. What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related tothe intrinsic human value and dignity?
2. Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What fromthe case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?
3. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?
4. What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Discussion Questions:

Topic 2 DQ 2

According to your worldview, what value does a human person have? How does your position affect your stance on controversial bioethical issues, such as abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research?

Topic 2 DQ 1

What is the Christian concept of the imago Dei? How might it be important to health care, and why is it relevant?

Participation:

Week 2 Participation: 20.0 points

Topic 3: Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative

Objectives:

1. 3.1: Describe the four principles and four boxes approach to biomedical ethics.
2. 3.2: Describe how the four principles and four boxes approach would be applied according to the Christian worldview.

Topic Materials

Textbooks

Electronic Resources

Incorporating Spirituality into Patient Care

Read “Incorporating Spirituality into Patient Care,” by Orr, from American Medical Association Journal of Ethics (2015). https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/incorporating-spirituality-patient-care/2015-05 (https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/incorporating-spirituality-patient-care/2015-05)

New Testament Overview

View the online video, “New Testament Overview,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2018). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0BrP8bqj0c&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0BrP8bqj0c&feature=youtu.be)

Optional – Topic 3: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 3: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 3 from Practicing Dignity.

Read Scripture: TaNaK/Old Testament

View the online video, “Read Scripture: TaNaK/Old Testament,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2018). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALsluAKBZ-c&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALsluAKBZ-c&feature=youtu.be)

Sacrifice and Atonement

Explore “Sacrifice and Atonement” webpage and watch the video, on the Bible Project website (2018). https://thebibleproject.com/explore/sacrifice-atonement/ (https://thebibleproject.com/explore/sacrifice-atonement/)

The Messiah

Explore “The Messiah” webpage and watch the video on the Bible Project website (2018). https://thebibleproject.com/explore/the-messiah/ (https://thebibleproject.com/explore/the-messiah/)

Understanding Health and Healing

View the “Understanding Health and Healing” media piece.https://www.gcumedia.com/tncc/whole-person-care/understanding/ (https://www.gcumedia.com/tncc/whole-person-care/understanding/)

Word Study: Khata/Sin

View the online video, “Word Study: Khata/Sin,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2018). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNOZ7ocLD74&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNOZ7ocLD74&feature=youtu.be)

Word Study: Shalom/Peace

View the online video, “Word Study: Shalom/Peace,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2017). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLYORLZOaZE&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLYORLZOaZE&feature=youtu.be)

Assignments:

Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative

This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically analyze a case. Organizing the data in this way will help you apply the four principles and four boxes approach.

Based on the “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and other required topic Resources, you will complete the “Applying the Four Principles: Case Study” document that includes the following:

Part 1: Chart

This chart will formalize the four principles and four boxes approach and the four-boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.

Part 2: Evaluation

This part includes questions, to be answered in a total of 500 words, that describe how principalism would be applied according to the Christian worldview.

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Discussion Questions:

Topic 3 DQ 2

What do the four parts of the Christian biblical narrative (i.e., creation, fall, redemption, and restoration) say about the nature of God and of reality in relation to the reality of sickness and disease? From where would one find comfort and hope in the light of illness according to this narrative? Explain in detail each part of the narrative above and analyze the implications.

Topic 3 DQ 1

The four principles, especially in the context of bioethics in the United States, has often been critiqued for raising the principle of autonomy to the highest place, such that it trumps all other principles or values. How would you rank the importance of each of the four principles? How do you believe they would be ordered in the context of the Christian biblical narrative? Refer to the topic Resources in your response.

Participation:

Week 3 Participation: 20.0 points

Topic 4: Death, Dying, and Grief

Objectives:

1. 4.1: Explain the meaning and significance of death in light of the Christian narrative and the hope of resurrection.
2. 4.2: Analyze end of life issues.

Topic Materials

Textbooks

Electronic Resources

Euthanasia

Read “Euthanasia,” by Wells, Frey, and Cataldo, from Gale Encyclopedia of Nursing and Allied Health (2013).https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/galegnaah/euthanasia/0?institutionId=5865(https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/galegnaah/euthanasia/0?institutionId=5865)

Optional – Topic 4: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 4: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 4 from Practicing Dignity.

Assignments:

Case Study on Death and Dying

The practice of health care providers at all levels brings you into contact with people from a variety of faiths. This calls for knowledge and understanding of a diversity of faith expressions; for the purpose of this course, the focus will be on the Christian worldview.

Based on “Case Study: End of Life Decisions,” the Christian worldview, and the worldview questions presented in the required topic Resources you will complete an ethical analysis of George’s situation and his decision from the perspective of the Christian worldview.

Provide a 1,500-2,000-word ethical analysis while answering the following questions:

1. How would George interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative, with an emphasis on the fallenness of the world?
2. How would George interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative, with an emphasis on the hope of resurrection?
3. As George contemplates life with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), how would the Christian worldview inform his view about the value of his life as a person?
4. What sorts of values and considerations would the Christian worldview focus on in deliberating about whether or not George should opt for euthanasia?
5. Given the above, what options would be morally justified in the Christian worldview for George and why?
6. Based on your worldview, what decision would you make if you were in George’s situation?

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Discussion Questions:

Topic 4 DQ 2

Reflect on the analysis of the sin of suicide and, thus, euthanasia from the topic readings. Do you agree? Why or why not? Refer to the lecture and topic readings in your response.

Topic 4 DQ 1

How often do you engage with or witness death in your work? How has this experience or the lack of it shaped your view of death? Has it gotten easier or harder for you to accept the fact of death? As you explain, include your clinical specialty.

Participation:

Week 4 Participation: 20.0 points

Topic 5: Intervention and Ethical Decision-Making

Objectives:

1. 5.1: Analyze a health care situation with an ethical dilemma for an individual patient and his or her caregivers.
2. 5.2: Utilize ethical theories, principles, and a decision-making framework to propose a resolution to ethical dilemmas faced by individual clients and their caregivers.

Topic Materials

Textbooks

Electronic Resources

Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients

Read ” Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients” by Timmins and Caldeira, from Nursing Standard (2017). https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/1877957457?accountid=7374(https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/1877957457?accountid=7374)

Doing a Culturally Sensitive Spiritual Assessment: Recognizing Spiritual Themes and Using the HOPE Questions

Read “Doing a Culturally Sensitive Spiritual Assessment: Recognizing Spiritual Themes and Using the HOPE Questions,” by Anandarajah,from AMA Journal of Ethics (2005).

https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/doing-culturally-sensitive-spiritual-assessment-recognizing-spiritual-themes-and-using-hope/2005-05 (https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/doing-culturally-sensitive-spiritual-assessment-recognizing-spiritual-themes-and-using-hope/2005-05)

End of Life and Sanctity of Life, Commentary 1

Read “End of Life and Sanctity of Life,, Commentary 1,” by Reichman, from American Medical Association Journal of Ethics, formerly Virtual Mentor (2005).

http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2005/05/ccas2-0505.html (http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2005/05/ccas2-0505.html)

GCU Technical Support – Field Experience Site Information Form

Refer to the “Field Experience Site Information Form” page in the GCU Technical Support Help Center for further instructions from GCU Technical Support on how to complete the “Field Experience Site Information Form” assignment. You will be submitting your chosen mentor, site information, and information regarding your chosen experience through this form in order to start the process of being cleared for your practice experience.

NOTE: Completion of the form works best on a non-mobile device. Please make sure your pop-up blockers are turned off.

https://support.gcu.edu/hc/en-us/articles/360000596207 (https://support.gcu.edu/hc/en-us/articles/360000596207)

Optional – Topic 5: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 5: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 5 from Practicing Dignity.

Assignments:

Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

In addition to the topic Resources, use the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” as the basis for your responses in this assignment.

Answer the following questions about a patient’s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview.

1. In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient’s autonomy? Explain your rationale.
2. In 400-500 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James’s care?
3. In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care?

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

BS in Health Sciences 1.2; BS Nursing (RN to BSN ) 5.2

Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.

Field Experience Site Information Form

In preparation for your clinical practice experience, you will need to access the “Field Experience Site Information Form” from your student portal. You will be submitting your chosen mentor, site information, and information regarding your chosen experience through this form in order to start the process of being cleared for your practice experience. You can find information on the mentor and site requirements by viewing the “Guidelines for Undergraduate Field Experiences” located in the College of Nursing and Health Care Professions resource page in the Student Success Center.

For this assignment, complete the required “Field Experience Site Information Form” via your student portal. Once you log into your Student Portal, go to My Apps/Edocs/Click here to access all documents pending an e-signature. If you have any questions concerning this form, or if you are unable to view it in your student portal, contact your assigned field experience counselor for assistance.

NOTE: Completion of the form works best on a non-mobile device. Please make sure your pop-up blockers are turned off.

Once you have completed the site information form, a confirmation receipt will be sent to your my.gcu.edu email. Upload and submit your confirmation receipt in this assignment.

For further instructions, refer to “GCU Technical Support – Field Experience Site Information Form” in your topic Resources.

For students in the Bachelor of Science in Health Science: Professional Development and Advanced Patient Care, submit a Word document that states, “I am in the Bachelor of Science in Health Science: Professional Development and Advanced Patient Care program, which does not require field experience.”

For students enrolled concurrently with their community college, submit a Word document that states, “I am in the Concurrent Enrollment Program, which does not require field experience until admitted to the full degree program. Therefore, I am exempt from this requirement at this time.”

Discussion Questions:

Topic 5 DQ 1

What is your definition of spiritual care? How does it differ or accord with the description given in the topic readings? Explain.

Topic 5 DQ 2

When it comes to facilitating spiritual care for patients with worldviews different from your own, what are your strengths and weaknesses? If you were the patient, who would have the final say in terms of ethical decision-making and intervention in the event of a difficult situation?

Participation:

Week 5 Participation: 20.0 points

Gradebook

Assignment	Topic Due	Non Trad Points
Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory	Topic 1	100
Case Study on Moral Status	Topic 2	200
Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative	Topic 3	150
Case Study on Death and Dying	Topic 4	200
Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis	Topic 5	200
Field Experience Site Information Form	Topic 5	0
Discussion Questions	Topics 1-5	50
Participation	Topics 1-5	100
Total		1000

Grade Scale

Final Grade Column

Letter Grade	GPA Value	Minimum (%)	Maximum (%)
A	4.0	93.0	100.0
A-	3.7	90.0	92.99
B+	3.3	87.0	89.99
B	3.0	83.0	86.99
B-	2.7	80.0	82.99
C+	2.3	77.0	79.99
C	2.0	70.0	76.99
D	1.0	60.0	69.99
F	0.0	0.02	59.99
I	0.0	0.0	0.01

Grade Categories

Assignments (%)	Points	Percentile
Case Study on Moral Status	200.0	—
Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative	150.0	—
Case Study on Death and Dying	200.0	—
Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis	200.0	—
Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory	100.0	—

 

Discussion Question (%)	Points	Percentile
Topic 3 DQ 2	5.0	—
Topic 3 DQ 1	5.0	—
Topic 1 DQ 2	5.0	—
Topic 5 DQ 1	5.0	—
Topic 1 DQ 1	5.0	—
Topic 4 DQ 1	5.0	—
Topic 2 DQ 1	5.0	—
Topic 4 DQ 2	5.0	—
Topic 5 DQ 2	5.0	—
Topic 2 DQ 2	5.0	—

 

Participation (%)	Points	Percentile
Week 3 Participation	20.0	—

 

Participation (%)	Points	Percentile
Week 1 Participation	20.0	—

 

Participation (%)	Points	Percentile
Week 4 Participation	20.0	—

 

Participation (%)	Points	Percentile
Week 5 Participation	20.0	—

 

Participation (%)	Points	Percentile
Week 2 Participation	20.0	—

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

• Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
• Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
• Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
• Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
• Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
• Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

HRM-635 Acquiring, Developing, and Leveraging Human Capital Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

HRM-635 Acquiring, Developing, and Leveraging Human Capital Course Description

The effective strategic management of human capital is the differentiator of every successful organization. This course examines talent management, workforce diversity, succession planning, employee development and motivation, and performance matrix. This course addresses human resource competencies identified by the Society of Human Resource Management (SHRM). Using the strong strategic human resource acumen provided by this course, students will be well-prepared for positions as senior human resources specialists or as general managers.

Class Introductions

Students will make a post familiarizing themselves with peers. They will also identify potential exciting or challenging aspects of the course.

HRM-635 Acquiring, Developing, and Leveraging Human Capital Course Assignments & Discussions Syllabus

Description

HRM635 Topic 2 Discussion 1, Online Recruitment Method

HRM-635 Topic-2 Discussion 2, Reliability and Validity

HRM 635 Week 2 Assignment, Benchmark – Acquiring Employees

HRM635 Topic 3 Discussion 1, Interview Questions

HRM635 Topic 3 Discussion 2, Recruiting and Organization Culture

HRM 635 Week 3 Assignment, Interview Selection Process

HRM-635 Topic 4 Discussion 1, HR Discussion

HRM635 Topic 4 Discussion 2, Formal and Informal Orientation Processes in My Organization

HRM-635 Topic 5 Discussion 1, Engaging Environment

HRM635 Topic 5 Discussion 2, Supporting Employee Development

HRM635 Week 5 Assignment, Training and Development

HRM635 Topic 6 Discussion 1, Appraisals Process to Identify Potential Improvements

HRM-635 Topic 6 Discussion 2, Performance Management System

HRM-635 Week 6 CLC Assignment, Performance Appraisal at Telespazio

HRM635 Topic 7 Discussion 1, Compensation in the Workplace

HRM-635 Topic 7 Discussion 2, Legally Required Benefits

HRM635 Week 7 Assignment, Employee Reward System

HRM635 Topic 8 Discussion 1, HRM Discussion

HRM635 Topic-8 Discussion 2, Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action

HRM-635 Week 8 Assignment, Synopsis on Human Resource Management

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

HRM-635 Acquiring, Developing, and Leveraging Human Capital Course Discussions

Topic 1: The Role of HR in Developing HR-Mindedness

Topic 1 DQ 1

The assignment will conduct research on the community for SHRM. It will first identify the firm’s role and relevance in guiding HR professionals. Further, it will explain the role of SHRM in helping HR officials complete their tasks efficiently and effectively.

Topic 1 DQ 2

Students will reflect on their firm’s HRM status. Then, they will identify elements of an HRM perspective related to the firm’s employees. Again, it will identify elements that enhance strategic HRM while focusing on the whole firm. Lastly, it will describe how the student’s firm accepts HR as a strategic partner.

Topic 2: Job Analysis, Job Descriptions, And Job Competencies

Topic 2 DQ 1

The assessment will identify the firm’s specific websites, procedures, and processes to attract new employees online. Students will also discuss the challenges and benefits of social media when looking for a job opening. They will also identify the drawbacks of using social media to hire new talent and how they can be reduced.

Topic 2 DQ 2

Students will assume they were rejected in a job hire. Then, they will discuss the validity and reliability of the selection and recruitment practices used. In addition, they will explain the relevance of the two factors when choosing an effective hiring method. Finally, they will evaluate the validity and reliability of their firm’s selection and hiring process.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on LDR-615 Organizational Development and Change Course Assignments & Discussions.

Topic 3: Recruitment, Selection, And Talent Management

Topic 3 DQ 1

The paper will identify one standard interview question for a specific job position. It will also discuss the rationale behind question development and expected response suggestions.

Topic 3 DQ 2

The assignment will identify pre-employment selection techniques that can be utilized to ascertain if a candidate fits with the company culture. It will also identify the message relayed to candidates in the hiring process of a firm. Lastly, it will clarify how HR officials can eliminate bias in pre-employment assessments.

Topic 4: Training and Development

Topic 4 DQ 1

The students will analyze the firm’s needs, identify skill gaps, and provide resources to support training goals. Then, they will suggest an appropriate training program for their firm. Later, they will explain how the training program aligns with worker’s needs and the firm’s goals. Lastly, they will explain how they determine the effectiveness of a training program.

Topic 4 DQ 2

Students will identify the informal or formal onboarding processes in their firm. They will also identify factors that make the onboarding process effective. Finally, they will suggest implementing changes to make the firm’s onboarding process effective.

Topic 5: Employment Retention and Engagement

Topic 5 DQ 1

The paper will explain the relevance of fostering employee engagement in a firm. It will also provide experiences that can help foster a culture of engagement. Then, it will share a strategy to promote an engaging environment for the firm.

Topic 5 DQ 2

The assessment will explain how the firm’s leadership can support employees seeking to advance their careers within the firm. It will also give an example and explain how the approach could aid employee retention.

Topic 6: Performance Management and Appraisal

Topic 6 DQ 1

The paper will identify the most helpful job analysis component that can aid in developing a performance appraisal tool. It will also identify the most difficult part of the performance management procedure.

Topic 6 DQ 2

In this paper, students will explain the purpose of a performance appraisal tool in aligning with a firm’s strategic goals. They will also discuss the relationship between a performance management procedure and employee growth and development.

Topic 7: Compensation and Benefits Incentives

Topic 7 DQ 1

The paper will identify and explain two elements of the total compensation package that foster a firm’s competitiveness and entice and retain workers.

Topic 7 DQ 2

The assignment will define legally required benefits and their purpose. It will also explain if any of the benefits can be waived. Lastly, it will give an example while adding another benefit that should be included.

Topic 8: Employment Law and Employee Relations

Topic 8 DQ 1

The paper will describe how the Christian worldview affects HR personnel’s job duties and roles. It will also identify ethical and legal responsibilities that Christian employees have in promoting employee beliefs. Further, it will give an example of factors that influence good employee treatment in the workplace.

Topic 8 DQ 2

The paper will ascertain the relevance of various initiatives today. The initiatives include affirmative action, equal employment opportunity, ban the Box, the Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act, and the Family Medical Leave Act. Finally, it will choose the two initiatives mentioned above and provide a detailed explanation and supporting information.

HRM-635 Acquiring, Developing, and Leveraging Human Capital Course Assignments

Topic 1: The Role of HR in Developing HR-Mindedness

Topic 2: Job Analysis, Job Descriptions, and Job Competencies

HRM-635 Benchmark – Acquiring Employees Week 2 Assignment

Description

During this course, you will develop materials that support the human resource process from acquiring, developing, and leveraging on employee strengths. This project is broken into four separate assignments due in Topics 2, 3, 5, and 7. While you are only required to submit each assignment in its respective topic, you will submit a reflection assignment that provides a brief overview of the learning outcomes from your assignment feedback.

In this assignment, you are conducting a needs assessment and developing two job descriptions for your current organization or a preapproved organization that you have access to interact with, in order to complete this assignment. If you are not currently in an organization, please inform your instructor of the organization you will use to complete this project. They must approve your selection prior to beginning your assignment and you must have the ability to observe employees and functions within that organization.

Needs Assessment

Observe and assess the state of your current organization, or another pre-selected organization. A needs assessment is necessary to identify areas for potential growth, both at the employee and organizational level. If you are not in a position to look holistically at your organization, you can focus on a department or team within the organization. Use the “Needs Assessment Matrix” resource to complete your needs assessment. You are required to analyze required functions, department or employment needs, jobs or tasks, and current trainings in order to complete your matrix and prepare for the next part of this assignment.

Job Descriptions

Once your needs assessment is complete, you are required to select an existing position in your organization and develop a one-page detailed job description for that position that is informed by the findings of the need’s assessment. It is recommended that you take the time to conduct a job analysis and observe current employees in the selected positions to accurately depict the knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics that must be incorporated into the job description. If you are unable to observe, do your best to accurately depict the specific functions of the job. Incorporate any new job roles you feel should be added to the position based on your findings. Make sure the job description is based on the needs and available resources of the organization, and that it adheres to all applicable labor laws.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

HRM-635 Benchmark – Acquiring Employees Assignment: Needs Assessment Matrix

Definition: A needs assessment is the process organizations use to determine if training is necessary for its employees.

Note: This template serves as a guide to complete the needs assessment of your current or selected organization. You are allowed to manipulate the categories to obtain the information you require in order to complete the assignment.

Department	Required Functions	Department or Employee Needs	Jobs or Tasks	Current Trainings

 

HRM-635 Benchmark – Acquiring Employees Assignment Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HRM-635	HRM-635-O500	Benchmark – Acquiring Employees	130.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)	Satisfactory (79.00%)	Good (87.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Needs Assessment (MSL: 2.2) (MPA: 2.3)	35.0%	A needs assessment is not included.	A needs assessment is included, but it is incomplete or lacks detail.	A needs assessment is included and the matrix is complete, but the needs assessment minimally addresses areas for potential growth.	A detailed needs assessment is included and the matrix is thorough and complete. The needs assessment addresses areas for potential growth and includes at least one example from each area analyzed.	A comprehensive needs assessment is included and the matrix is well developed. The needs assessment addresses areas for potential growth and includes multiple examples from each area analyzed.
Job Descriptions	35.0%	Two job descriptions are not included.	One or two job descriptions are included, but they are incomplete or lack detail.	Two job descriptions are included. A job analysis is conducted to determine necessary knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics to incorporate in the job descriptions.	Two job descriptions are included and provide details of corporate research conducted during analysis. A thorough job analysis is conducted to determine necessary knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics to incorporate in the job descriptions.	Two job descriptions are included and provide details of corporate research conducted during analysis. A thorough job analysis is conducted to determine necessary knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics to incorporate in the job descriptions. The job descriptions are clear and well developed to appeal to potential candidates.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format  (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

Topic 3: Recruitment, Selection, and Talent Management

HRM-635 Interview Selection Process Week 3 Assignment

The paper will develop an interview strategy that students deem fit for hiring a diverse pool of qualified candidates in their firm. It should be a 750-1000 word essay that details the hiring process.

Description

Once you have a clear understanding of what your organization needs, it is time to consider the interview process. This assignment is a continuation of the acquiring, developing, and leveraging employee process you have already been working on during this course. The interview process is an important step in hiring the right person for your organization. For this assignment, develop an interview strategy you would consider using to interview and select the right candidate for your organization. You are required to use the job descriptions you developed in the previous assignment. As you are developing your interview strategy, think about testing options that would benefit the interview process. The following must be included in your interview strategy (750-1,000 words):

1. A detailed description of the time, place, format, interview type, and employees involved in the actual interview process.
2. At least one testing option to be included in the selection process. Explain why this testing option is best suited for the selection process.
3. A minimum of four situational and four behavioral interview questions that you would use to interview for both jobs. (Reminder: Use both of the job descriptions from your previous assignment.)

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

HRM-635 Interview Selection Process Week 3 Assignment Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HRM-635	HRM-635-O500	Selection Process	125.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)	Satisfactory (79.00%)	Good (87.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Detailed Description of Interview Process	25.0%	There is no detailed description for the interview process.	A detailed description for the interview process is included, but is incomplete or lacks details.	A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description minimally addresses the requirements according to the assignment.	A detailed description for the interview process is included. The description addresses the requirements according to the assignment with detail and research based on observation conducted.	A thorough description for the interview process is included. The description accurately addresses the requirements for the entire interview process, incorporating research based on observations conducted.
Testing Options	20.0%	There are no testing options included in the interview process.	Testing options are included, but are incomplete or lack details.	One testing option is included in the interview process. There is a minimal explanation for selecting the testing option for the interview process.	Multiple testing options are included in the interview process. There is a detailed explanation for selecting the testing options for the interview process.	Multiple testing options are included with a detailed justification for using them during the interview process. There is a detailed explanation for selecting the testing options for the interview process based on observations conducted in the organization.
Interview Questions	25.0%	There are no behavioral or situational questions for the interview process.	The interview process includes both behavioral and situational questions, but they are incomplete or lack details.	The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions.	The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The questions relate to the job descriptions developed in previous assignments.	The interview process includes four behavioral and four situational questions. The questions are well developed and there is a clear connection to the job descriptions developed in previous assignments.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.	Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity.  There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions.  Techniques of argumentation are evident.   There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	5.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Research Citations	5.0%
Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes,  and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	No reference page is included. No citations are used.	Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.	Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.	Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.	In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

Topic 4: Training and Development

Topic 5: Employment Retention and Engagement

HRM-635 Benchmark – Training and Development Week 5 Assignment

Training and development prompts a change within an organization. The goal of training is to identify areas for improvement and develop materials and opportunities to educate employees in order to support growth.

The assessment will develop a small training exercise presented using PPT.

Description

For this assignment, you are required to develop a small training exercise. Review your needs assessment and previous observations conducted on your work environment to help identify one area for improvement that would benefit a part of your organization. This training exercise does not need to be implemented, but should include at least one deliverable that you could use during the training exercise. As you are reviewing your organization, consider employee engagement, systems, procedures, communication, and the culture within the organization. These are suggestions for possible areas that could benefit from a training exercise. The training must include the following:

1. What goal is the organization trying to accomplish?
2. What processes or procedures will change after the training?
3. Describe the strategies or actions involved in the training exercise to meet established goals. What is the expected performance or applications after the training? How will the strategies drive successful business results and improve employee performance?
4. How will the organization provide support to the employees receiving training? To new employees? Does this support consider strengths and weaknesses within the organization?

You are required to develop a written description (1,000 words) including one visual for your training exercise. Be sure to take time to analyze your work surroundings and identify a need for further training and development.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

HRM-635 Benchmark – Training and Development Week 5 Assignment Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HRM-635	HRM-635-O500	Benchmark Assignment – Training and Development	180.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)	Satisfactory (79.00%)	Good (87.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Goal for the Training	10.0%	The training does not include a goal for the organization.	The training includes a goal for the organization, but it is incomplete or lacks details.	The training includes a goal for the organization.	The training includes a detailed goal for the organization and provides reasoning based on observations conducted.	The training includes a detailed goal for the organization and provides thorough research conducted during observations.
Processes and Procedures Implemented After Training	20.0%	The training does not describe new processes and procedures to be implemented.	The training includes new processes and procedures to be implemented, but they are incomplete or lack details.	The training includes new processes and procedures to be implemented after the training.	The training includes detailed processes and procedures to be implemented after the training with an explanation about the changes that will occur.	The training includes detailed processes and procedures to be implemented after the training with an explanation about the changes that will occur. The student addresses the strengths and weaknesses of employees and how to build on employee assets.
Strategies in the Training to Meet Goals and Drive Successful Business Results (MBA SHRM: 5.2)	25.0%	The training does not include strategies to meet organizational goals and drive successful business results.	The training includes strategies to meet organizational goals and drive successful business results, but they are incomplete or lack details.	The training includes strategies to meet organizational goals and drive successful business results.	The training includes detailed strategies to meet organizational goals and drive successful business results. There is an explanation for using the strategies to improve employee performance.	The training includes detailed strategies to meet organizational goals and drive successful business results. There is an explanation for using the strategies to improve employee performance and a connection between organizational goals and the training and development provided.
Visual for Training Exercise	15.0%	The training does not include a visual representation.	The training includes a visual representation, but it is incomplete or lacks details.	The training includes a visual representation.	The training includes a detailed visual representation that supports the training exercise for the organization.	The training includes a detailed visual representation that supports the training exercise for the organization. The visual is well developed and clearly prepares employees for the training.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Thesis Development and Purpose	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format  (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

Topic 6: Performance Management and Appraisal

Performance Appraisals: Aligning Strategic Goals To People Development

The assignment will require students to act as consultants, evaluate the existing performance management, and propose changes. The paper should be 1000-1250 words.

HRM-635 CLC – Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development – Case Study Week 6 Assignment

Description

This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.

Read the Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development case study located in Topic resources.

Read the Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development case study (located in Topic resources) discussing the assessment of employees within the Telespazio organization.

In 1,000-1,250 words, explain how the organization uses the appraisal assessments to identify employee roles, the current appraisal systems, performance ratings, and Telespazio’s practices for performing appraisal interviews. Decide what changes or strategies could be implemented to current performance appraisal practices. Consider a new performance appraisal tool that would benefit this highly matrixed, global company and an effective method for conducting a performance appraisal interview. Describe the benefits of using both the proposed appraisal tool and appraisal interview during the performance evaluation process. Suggest a minimum of two recommendations to Telespazio leadership which would meet the performance appraisal expectations of fair and realistic criterion, and professional development and motivation of the employees.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite or Turnitin.

Resources:

Read Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development, by Profili, Sammarra, Innocenti, and Gabrielli, from Harvard Business School Press (2013).

HRM-635 CLC – Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development – Case Study Week 6 Assignment Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HRM-635	HRM-635-O501	CLC – Performance Appraisal at Telespazio: Aligning Strategic Goals to People Development – Case Study	80.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)	Satisfactory (79.00%)	Good (87.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Current Appraisal Methods	20.0%	The description does not include the current appraisal method.	The description includes the current appraisal method, but it is incomplete or lacks details.	The description includes the current appraisal method and briefly identifies roles and performance ratings of employees.	The description includes a detailed current appraisal method and identifies roles and performance ratings of employees with at least one example of current practices.	The description includes a comprehensive appraisal method to include all required elements within the assignment with at least one example of current practices.
Changes or Strategies for Telespazio	25.0%	The description does not include changes or strategies for the company.	The description includes some changes or strategies for the company, but they are incomplete or lack details.	The description includes changes or strategies for Telespazio to implement for its performance appraisal practices.	The description includes detailed changes or strategies for Telespazio to implement for its performance appraisal practices and includes at least one example of the change.	The description includes detailed changes or strategies for Telespazio to implement for its performance appraisal practices and includes at least one example of the change.
Appraisal Tool and Appraisal Interview	25.0%	The description does not include appraisal tools or an appraisal interview method.	The description includes either the appraisal tool or the appraisal interview method, but it is incomplete or lacks details.	The description includes mention of both an appraisal tool and an appraisal interview method to include in the performance appraisal practices of the organization.	The description includes detailed suggestions for both an appraisal tool and an appraisal interview method to include in the performance appraisal practices of the organization.	The description includes thorough suggestions for both an appraisal tool and an appraisal interview method to include in the performance appraisal practices of the organization. In addition, the description addresses the benefit of using the appraisal tool and interview method as a part of the performance appraisal practice.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format  (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

Topic 7: Compensation and Benefits Incentives

Leveraging Human Capital

Students should develop a proposal discussing a plan to motivate workers, rewards and incentives, and performance indicators.

HRM-635 Leveraging Human Capital Week 7 Assignment

Description

Leveraging Human Capital

Throughout this course, you analyzed your current work environment to identify their acquiring, developing, and training practices. Employees are the biggest asset and contribute to the culture and overall performance of the organization. The final part of this project requires you to determine how to leverage on the human capital within your organization. Use the research you have complied throughout this course to determine how to appropriately develop and motivate your employees.

Develop a final written proposal (1,250-1,500 words), discussing performance indicators, rewards and incentives, and a plan for motivating employees. Your proposal must include the following:

1. An evaluation of the current employee status. Describe tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall performance on the job.
2. Develop strategies to encourage employees. How will you reward them for their performance and support them during difficulty?
3. Describe strategies to leverage on employee assets. How will you identify their strengths and use them to better the performance and skills of individual employees?
4. Describe a vision for the overall culture you aspire to develop in your organization.
5. How will you integrate rewards and incentives to remain competitive in your market and appeal to your employees?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Resources:

Read “Designing and Measuring Human Capital Key Performance Indicators: The Balanced Scorecard Approach,” by Verma, from TATA Consultancy Services.

http://research-innovation.tcs.com/platform-solutions/related-insights/Pages/Designing-Measuring-Human-Capital-Key-Performance-Indicators.aspx

Read “Creating a Smart Compensation Package,” by Massad, located on the Entrepreneur website.

http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/77934

Read “Basic Strategic Pay Policies,” by Joyner, located on the Houston Chronicle website.

http://smallbusiness.chron.com/basic-strategic-pay-policies-35634.html

INSTRUCTIONS FOR STUDENT: Use this to help make sure you covered all the required content, structure, and mechanical expectations.

Content (Student should structure the paper into sections in BOLD below.)

Section 1- Introduction (←Use this header): what the memo is going to be about; it mentions the upcoming sections.

Section 2- Job Performance & Evaluation (←Use this header): An evaluation of the current employee status. Describe tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall performance on the job.

Section 3- Reward & Encouragement Strategies (← Use this header): Develop strategies to encourage employees. How will you reward them for their performance and support them during difficulty?

Section 4- Levering on Employee Strengths (←Use this header): Describe strategies to leverage on employee assets. How will you identify their strengths and use them to better the performance and skills of individual employees?

Section 5- Culture Within the Organization (←Use this header): Describe a vision for the overall culture you aspire to develop in your organization.

Tip: Check out this link https://new.edu/resources/visual-elements-of-organizational-culture

Section 6- Rewards & Incentive to Remain Competitive (← Use this header): How will you integrate rewards and incentives to remain competitive in your market and appeal to your employees?

Section 7- References (←Use this header): has at least 5 peer-reviewed/scholarly references from the databases within the library. The references are also integrated within the paper.

Organization / Development

The 7 required sections are organized separately in sequence as listed in the Content section.

The memo is at least 1250 words in length (excluding references and headers) size 12 Times New Roman font with double spacing text.

Each section is labeled with the header prescribed above.

Mechanics

Formatting or layout and graphics are pleasing to the eye (font, colors, spacing).

Rules of grammar, word usage, punctuation, capitalization, and spelling are followed.

Sentences are complete, clear, varied, and concise with proper syntax.

Used size 12 Times New Roman font for main body text and References.

Used double spacing between sentences and in References section.

HRM-635 Leveraging Human Capital Week 7 Assignment Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
		Leveraging Human Capital	125.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less than Satisfactory (74.00%)	Satisfactory (79.00%)	Good (87.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Job Performance Evaluation	15.0%	The written proposal does not include a job performance evaluation.	A job performance is included, but is incomplete or lacks details.	A job performance is included and minimally describes the tasks and performance of employees.	A job performance is included and clearly describes the tasks and performance of employees. There are examples of performance indicators based on observation conducted.	A job performance is well developed and clearly describes the tasks and performance of employees. There are detailed examples of tasks and performance indicators based on observation conducted and how they relate to job performance outcomes.
Reward and Encouragement Strategies	20.0%	The written proposal does not include rewards, incentives, encouragement, or competitive package strategies.	Rewards, incentives, encouragement, and competitive package strategies are included, but are incomplete or lack details.	There is some description of rewards, incentives, and competitive package strategies that support employee performance.	There is a detailed description of rewards, incentives, and competitive package strategies that support employee performance. There are examples of these elements observed within the current organization.	There is a well-developed description of rewards, incentives, and competitive package strategies that support employee performance. There are detailed examples of these elements observed within the current organization and rewards provided for job performance outcomes.
Leveraging on Employee Strengths	20.0%	The written proposal does not include leveraging on human capital.	The written proposal includes a description of leveraging on employee strengths, but the description is incomplete or lacks details.	There is some description of leveraging on employee strengths to improve performance.	There is a detailed description of leveraging on employee strengths to improve performance. There are examples of current practices to leverage on employee strengths observed within the organization.	There is a well-developed description of leveraging on employee strengths to improve performance. There are detailed examples of current practices to leverage on employee strengths observed within the organization and how skills and performance support outcomes.
Culture Within the Organization	15.0%	The written proposal does not include a description of the culture within the organization.	The written proposal includes a description of the culture within the organization, but is incomplete or lacks details.	There is some description of the culture within the organization.	There is a detailed description of the culture within the organization. There are examples included based on the observations conducted within the organization.	There is a well-developed description of the culture within the organization. There are detailed examples included based on the observations conducted within the organization and how the culture contributes to performance outcomes.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing  (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format  (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

HRM-635 Employee Reward System Week 7 Assignment

Description

Throughout this course, you have analyzed your current work environment to identify the acquiring, developing, and training practices. Employees are the biggest asset and contribute to the culture and overall performance of the organization. This project requires you to determine how to leverage the human capital within your organization. Use the research you have complied throughout this course to determine how to appropriately develop and motivate your employees.

Develop a written proposal (1,000-1,250 words), discussing performance indicators, rewards and incentives, and a plan for motivating employees. Your proposal must include the following:

• Describe tasks and performance indicators that contribute to the overall employee performance on the job.
• How will you identify an employee’s strengths and skills to leverage their performance?
• Develop strategies to improve employee performance. How will you provide employees with rewards and incentives for performance improvement?
• How will you integrate rewards and incentives to remain competitive in the marketplace and recruit and retain the employees?
• Describe a vision for the overall culture you aspire to develop in your organization, relative to the employees being the biggest asset.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. 

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. 

Topic 8: Employment Law and Employee Relations

Benchmark – Organizational And Personal HR Development Plan

In this assignment, students will capture the key findings learned and suggestions to the firm’s leadership team. The paper will be presented in 10-12 slides and follow APA writing guidelines. Students are also advised to refer to the assignment rubric in case they are stuck.

Description

Benchmark Assignment – Organizational and Personal HR Development Plan

Throughout this course, you have had the opportunity to understand the important role human resources has as a strategic business partner and to reflect on the role of HR within your respective organizations. For this presentation, you will be capturing the key findings learned in this course, including making recommendations to your company leadership team.

Create a 10-12 slide PowerPoint presentation, then record your narrated presentation using a screen recording tool such as Loom, Vimeo, or Screencast-O-Matic. Once recorded, place the link to your recorded presentation on the cover slide of your PowerPoint. Submit your PowerPoint presentation with your embedded link.

Your presentation should include the following:

• Develop a synopsis of your outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within your organization. Examine the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used.
• Based on the immediate hiring and training needs within the company, how can the company focus on the employees’ current strengths (knowledge, skills, abilities, and experiences) to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes?
• Propose plans for developing and integrating the positions of HR specialist or generalist, HR leadership, HR consultant, or HR of One within the organization.
• What recommendations would you make to the leadership of your company relative to making sound decisions when acquiring, developing, and leveraging resources (i.e., human talent, technology, knowledge management) to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with employment practices?
• Based on the knowledge gained in this course, how will you apply what has been learned into your organization? As a human resource professional, describe the elements of your personal development plan within the field of HR.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

HRM-635 Synopsis on Human Resource Management Week 8 Assignment

Description

For this assignment, review the feedback you received from your instructor on each submission developed during this course. Develop a synopsis of your outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within your organization. You are not required to submit each assignment again, but you are required to evaluate your assignment, the feedback you received, and develop a synopsis of your take-away from the process. Integrate any plans for preparing for a position as an HR specialist or manager within an organization.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

Rubric

Collapse All RubricCollapse All

collapse Synopsis of Outcomes assessment

Synopsis of Outcomes

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Synopsis of Outcomes

5. Excellent

7.5 points

There is a comprehensive synopsis of the outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within the organization. There is a clear examination of the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used.

4. Good

6.53 points

Synopsis of outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within the organization has adequate detail. There is a clear examination of the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Synopsis of outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within the organization has minimal detail. There is a simple examination of the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.55 points

Synopsis of outcomes for acquiring, developing, training, and leveraging on human capital within the organization lacks details. There is a vague examination of the pros and cons to the current systems or processes being used.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Synopsis of outcomes is not included.

collapse Employee’s Current Strengths (B) assessment

Employee’s Current Strengths (B)

15 points

Criteria Description

Employee’s Current Strengths (C 2.2)

5. Excellent

15 points

There is a detailed explanation of how the company can focus on the employee’s current strengths to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes.

4. Good

13.05 points

There is a minimally detailed explanation of how the company can focus on the employee’s current strengths to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes.

3. Satisfactory

11.85 points

There is a thorough explanation of how the company can focus on the employee’s current strengths to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes.

2. Less than Satisfactory

11.1 points

There is a vague explanation of how the company can focus on the employee’s current strengths to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

There is no explanation of how the company can focus on the employee’s current strengths to leverage diversity to improve performance outcomes.

collapse Proposed Plans assessment

Proposed Plans

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Proposed Plans

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions are detailed and thorough.

4. Good

6.53 points

Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions are complete and comprehensible.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions are somewhat comprehensible.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.55 points

Proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions are incomplete or incomprehensive.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

There is no mention of proposed plans for developing and integrating the different HR positions.

collapse Recommendations to the Leadership (B) assessment

Recommendations to the Leadership (B)

15 points

Criteria Description

Recommendations to the Leadership (C. 2.3)

5. Excellent

15 points

The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with employment practices are substantial.

4. Good

13.05 points

The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with employment practices are relevant.

3. Satisfactory

11.85 points

The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with employment practices are overly simplistic.

2. Less than Satisfactory

11.1 points

The recommendations for the leadership of the company relative to making sound decisions to meet organizational needs while staying legally compliant with employment practices are irrelevant.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

There is no mention of recommendations for the leadership team.

collapse Application of Knowledge Gained assessment

Application of Knowledge Gained

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Application of Knowledge Gained

5. Excellent

7.5 points

The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the organization is clear and insightful.

4. Good

6.53 points

The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the organization is detailed and descriptive.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the organization is ambiguous.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.55 points

The discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the organization is insufficient.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

There is no discussion of how the knowledge gained from this course will be applied in the organization.

collapse Professionalism assessment

Professionalism

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Professionalism

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Appearance and manner exhibit appropriate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment totally free of distraction.

4. Good

6.53 points

Appearance and manner exhibit adequate professionalism within the video. The video is taken within an environment relatively free of distraction.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Appearance or manner within the video are lacking some degree of professionalism; or the video includes some distraction in the environment or background.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.55 points

Appearance or manner within the video is unprofessional; or the video is taken within a distracting environment or background.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Not addressed.

collapse Presentation of Content assessment

Presentation of Content

45 points

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent

45 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good

39.15 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Presentation includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Satisfactory

35.55 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less than Satisfactory

33.3 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Presentation includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Presentation includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

collapse Layout assessment

Layout

15 points

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent

15 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good

13.05 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

3. Satisfactory

11.85 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

2. Less than Satisfactory

11.1 points

The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

collapse Language Use and Audience Awareness assessment

Language Use and Audience Awareness

15 points

Criteria Description

Includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.

5. Excellent

15 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

4. Good

13.05 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

3. Satisfactory

11.85 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less than Satisfactory

11.1 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

collapse Mechanics of Writing assessment

Mechanics of Writing

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

6.53 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.55 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

collapse Documentation of Sources assessment

Documentation of Sources

7.5 points

Criteria Description

Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc. as appropriate to assignment and style.

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

6.53 points

Sources are documented as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Sources are documented as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.55 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

• Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
• Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
• Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
• Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
• Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
• Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!