NR-511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care Practicum Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

NR-511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care Practicum Course Assignments & Discussions Study GuideNR-511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care Practicum Course Description

Contact Hours: Lecture – 6, Lab – 25, Clinical – 0

Semester Hours: Theory .4, Clinical 2.6

This course will provide students with the fundamental knowledge needed to formulate a differential diagnosis of individuals within the primary care setting, along with an introduction to critical diagnostic skills to cultivate evidence-based behaviors. An emphasis will be placed on processing client information in a logical, progressive manner and formulating differential diagnoses for individuals across the lifespan. The course will include 125 hours of supervised clinical practicum in primary care.

Prerequisites Effective January 2024:

NR-581 or NR-581NP, NR-582 or NR-582NP, NR-583 or NR-583NP, NR-584 or NR-584NP, NR-585 or NR-585NP, NR-586 or NR-586NP, NR-507, NR-509, NR-565, NR-566

Prerequisite: NR-500NP, NR-501NP, NR-503, NR-505NP, NR-506NP, NR-507, NR-509, NR-599, NR-565, NR-566

NR-511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care Practicum Course Syllabus

NR 511 Week 1 Assignment: Clinical Readiness Exam

NR 511 Week 1 Study Guide

NR 511 Week 2 Reading: Chapter 11 Review – Abdominal Problems

NR-511 Week 3 Case Study Discussion: Part One

NR 511 Week 3 Case Study Discussion: Part Two

NR-511 Week 4 Midterm Exam (Study Guide Week 1, 2 and 3)

NR 511 Week 4 Midterm Exam (5 Versions / 250 Questions & Answers)

NR-511 Week 5 Assignment: SNAPPS PowerPoint Background (Guide)

NR 511 Week 5 Assignment: SNAPPS Presentation Template

NR-511 Week 6 Case Study Discussion: Part One

NR 511 Week 6 Case Study Discussion: Part One

NR-511 Week 7 Assignment: Clinical Practice Guideline Peer Review Discussion

NR 511 Week 8 Assignment: Reflection

NR-511 Week 8 Final Exam Study Guide (Questions & Answers)

NR 511 Week 8 Final Exam (100 Questions & Answers)

NR 511 Power Point Transcript: Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

NR-511 Completed Learning Agreement Week 1 & Week 8

NR 511 eELOGS Frequently Asked Questions

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Syllabus Overview

Course Number: NR511
Course Title: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care
Course Credits: 3 credits (Theory 0.5; Clinical 2.5)
Prerequisite: NR508, NR509

Course Description

This course will provide students with content regarding formulating differential diagnoses of individuals within the primary care setting, along with an introduction to critical diagnostic skills to cultivate evidence-based behaviors. An emphasis will be placed on processing client information in a logical, progressive manner and formulating differential diagnoses for individuals across the lifespan. The course will include 125 hours of supervised clinical practicum in primary care.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (year of publication). Title of textbook in italics (X ed.). City, ST: Publisher.

Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-512: Fundamentals of Nursing Informatics Course Assignments & Discussions.

Optional Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Book Title

Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Access E-Book

Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E., Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015). Primary care: The art and science of advanced practice nursing (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com

 

Access E-Book

Ferri, F. F. (2016). Ferri’s clinical advisor 2017:  5 books in 1. Elsevier – Health Services

 

Access E-Book

Jarvis, C. (2016). Physical examination & health assessment (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com

 

The following book is required across all FNP courses:

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

The following book is recommended across all FNP courses:

Goroll, A. H., & Mulley, A. G. (2014). Primary care medicine: Office evaluation and management of the adult patient (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com

 

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

eBook Details

First Time Using VitalSource?

Step 1: View the VitalSource Video

Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online

  1. Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
  2. Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.

Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions

You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.

Already Registered?   3 Ways to Access Your eBooks

Online

Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.

Desktop

Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.

Mobile

Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.

Program Outcomes

Program Outcomes of Chamberlain nursing programs can be found in the Program Descriptions section of your College Catalog. You can access your College Catalog at http://www.chamberlain.edu/msncatalog.

The MSN program outcomes are aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing publication, The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing (2011). Upon completion of the MSN degree program, the graduate will be able to:

  1. Practice safe, high-quality advanced nursing care based on concepts and knowledge from nursing and related disciplines.
  2. Construct processes for leading and promoting quality improvement and safety in advanced nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
  3. Use contemporary communication modalities effectively in advanced nursing roles.
  4. Evaluate the design, implementation and outcomes of strategies developed to meet healthcare needs.
  5. Develop a plan for lifelong personal and professional growth that integrates professional values regarding scholarship, service and global engagement.
  6. Apply legal, ethical and human-caring principles to situations in advanced nursing practice.
  7. Design patient-centered care models and delivery systems using the best available scientific evidence.
  8. Manage human, fiscal and physical resources to achieve and support individual and organizational goals.
  9. Compose a plan for systematic inquiry and dissemination of findings to support advanced nursing practice, patient-care innovation, and the nursing profession.
  10. Collaborate interprofessionally in research, education, practice, health policy and leadership to improve population health outcomes.
  11. Apply principles of informatics to manage data and information in order to support effective decision making.

Course Outcomes

Chamberlain College of Nursing courses are built to align course content with specific Course Outcomes (COs). The COs define the learning objectives that the student will be required to comprehend and demonstrate by course completion. The COs that will be covered in detail each week can be found in the Overview page in that particular week. Whenever possible, a reference will be made from a particular assignment or discussion back to the CO that it emphasizes.

Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to do the following.

  1. Demonstrate diagnostic reasoning that will assist in health promotion and illness management of common health problems in primary care through case study presentation. (PO 1)
  2. Plan for healthcare delivery in an evidence-based manner to support high-quality and cost-effective care and decision-making. (PO 1, 9, 11)
  3. Formulate differential diagnoses based on the subjective and objective patient data obtained from the case study. (PO 1, 3)
  4. Create weekly S-O-A-P documentation on a clinical patient, demonstrating increased mastery each week. (PO 1, 3)
  5. Create a plan of care which integrates pharmacological, complementary, and non-pharmacological therapies for management of common health problems. (PO 1)
  6. Utilize established standards and guidelines for management of common pediatric, gynecology, internal medicine, and behavioral conditions in primary care. (1, 11)
  7. Engage in sequential application of selected advanced skills/procedures. (PO 1)
  8. Demonstrate advanced skills/procedures for quality outcomes pertinent to patient care. (PO 1, 2)
  9. Perform selected advanced skills/procedures appropriate to student competence and provider scope of practice. (1)
  10. Conduct a systematic and accurate assessment of a client’s total health status, utilizing appropriate interviewing and data collection techniques.  (PO 1, 2, 5, 11)
  11. Reflect on personal and professional growth toward achieving competence as a family nurse practitioner. (PO 5, 7)

Course Schedule

 

Week, CO, and Topics Readings Assignments
Week 1
CO 3, 6, 8
Primary Care in the 21st Century, Caring and the Art of Diagnosis and Treatment
Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E., Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015). Primary care: The art and science of advanced practice nursing (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 1: Primary Care in the  Twenty-First Century: A Circle of Caring
  • Chapter 4: The Art of Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Chapter 8: Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat Problems
Attestation Statement Completion (required to begin course)

Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs with SOAP note

APEA myQBank Weekly Practice Questions (required but not graded)

Case Study Discussions

Week 2
CO 4, 6, 9, 10,
Evidence-Based Practice, Neurological Problems, and Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat Problems
Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E., Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015). Primary care: The art and science of advanced practice nursing (4th ed.).Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 5: Evidence-Based Care
  • Chapter 6: Neurologic Problems
Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs with SOAP note

APEA myQBank Weekly Practice Questions (required but not graded)

Case Study Discussions

Week 3
CO 4, 5, 7, 8, 9
Health Promotion, Skin Problems, and Respiratory Problems
Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E., Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015). Primary care: The art and science of advanced practice nursing (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 3: Health Promotion
  • Chapter 7: Skin Problems
  • Chapter 9: Respiratory Problems
Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs with SOAP note

APEA myQBank Weekly Practice Questions (required but not graded)

Case Study Discussions

Week 4
CO 2, 5, 7, 8, 9
Diagnostic Testing, Cardiovascular Problems, Abdominal Problems, Renal Problems
Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E., Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015). Primary care: The art and science of advanced practice nursing (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 10: Cardiovascular Problems
  • Chapter 11: Abdominal Problems
  • Chapter 12: Renal Problems
Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs with SOAP note

APEA myQBank Weekly Practice Questions (required but not graded)

Midterm Clinical Performance Evaluation in eLogs (required)

Case Study Discussion

Week 5
CO 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Men’s Health Problems, Women’s Health Problems, Musculoskeletal Problems
Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E., Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015). Primary care: The art and science of advanced practice nursing (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 13: Men’s Health Problems
  • Chapter 14: Women’s Health Problems
  • Chapter 15: Musculoskeletal Problems
Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs

APEA myQBank Weekly Practice Questions (required but not graded)

Case Study Discussions

Week 6
CO 2, 5, 7, 8, 9
Complex Diagnosis, Endocrine and Metabolic Problems, Hematologic and Immune Problems, and Emergency Problems
Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E., Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015). Primary care: The art and science of advanced practice nursing (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com 

  • Chapter 16: Endocrine and Metabolic Problems
  • Chapter 17: Hematologic and Immune Problems
  • Chapter 19: Emergency Problems
Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs (required but not graded)

APEA myQBank Weekly Practice Questions (required but not graded)

Case Study Discussions

Week 7
CO 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9
Laboratory tests, Psychological Problems, Palliative Care and Practical Psychotherapy
Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E., Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015). Primary care: The art and science of advanced practice nursing (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 18: Psychosocial Problems
  • Chapter 20: Palliative Care
  • Chapter 23: The 15-Minute Hour: A Short-Term Approach to Psychotherapy in Primary Care
Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs (required but not graded)

APEA myQBank Weekly Practice Questions (required but not graded)

Case Study Discussions

Week 8
CO 11
Ethical and Legal Issues, the Business of Advanced Practice, Putting Caring into Practice: Caring for Self
Dunphy, L. M., Winland-Brown, J. E., Porter, B. O., & Thomas, D. J. (2015). Primary care: The art and science of advanced practice nursing (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com 

  • Chapter 21: Ethical and Legal Issues of a Caring-Based Practice
  • Chapter 22: The Business of Advanced Practice
  • Chapter 24: Putting Caring Into Practice: Caring for Self
Clinical Encounter Log in eLogs (graded)

Clinical Performance Evaluation (graded)

Reflection (graded)

 

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.

Evaluation Methods

The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.

Graded Item Points Weighting
Clinical Course Attestation

(due before Week 1 content will be available)

N/A N/A
APEA myQBank Weekly Practice Questions

(required but not graded- Weeks 1-7)

 N/A N/A
Case Study Discussions (100 points, Weeks 1–7) 700 70%
Clinical Hours/Patient Encounter Validation

(Due Week 4- required to progress to Week 5)

N/A N/A
Reflection
(due Week 8)
50 5%
Clinical Encounter Log

(due Weeks 1–8)

SOAP notes in eLogs

(due Weeks 1-4)

Clinical Performance Evaluation

(Week 8)

Final clinical performance evaluation pass, documentation of 125 hours*, and completed SOAP notes = 250 points    

Fail or unsatisfactory on clinical performance evaluation, less than 125 hours documented*, and/or SOAP notes not submitted=0 points.

*A maximum of fifteen (15) alternative hours is allowed in each FNP clinical course. The alternative hours can only be documented in the three (3) approved categories (1. Lab review 2. Telephone management 3. Prescription refills).

250 25%
Total 1,000 100%

A passing grade, or S, must be achieved on the clinical performance evaluation. If this is achieved and the 125 clinical hours are documented, the 250 points will be added to the remainder of the course points to calculate the final course grade. If the student does not achieve a passing grade (fail) for the clinical performance evaluation, then the final course grade assigned will be F.

No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.

Letter Grade Points Percentage
A   940–1,000 94% to 100%
A-  920–939 92% to 93%
B+ 890–919 89% to 91%
B   860–889 86% to 88%
B-  840–859 84% to 85%
C+ 810–839 81% to 83%
C   760–809 76% to 80%
F   759 and below 75% and below

NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Participation for MSN

Participation Guidelines

The weekly case study discussion is worth up to 100 points. Students are expected to participate a minimum of four times (once in Part One by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in Part Two by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. MT, provide a written summary in SOAP format to the Dropbox by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, and one post to a student peer as required in the interactive dialogue criterion). The student must provide answers to the graded case study questions from Part One, post a treatment plan for Part Two and provide a written summation of their case in SOAP format to the Dropbox for Part Three. The written summation must be submitted in a Word document and the following file naming convention be used: Last name.week#.SOAP For example: if your last name is Smith then your Week 1 SOAP note would be saved as Smith.Week1.SOAP

Grading Rubric

Criteria Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

Satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvements

Poor or failing  level of performance

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

 Total Points Possible= 100
  30 Points  26 Points   24 Points   11 Points   0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Post contributes unique perspectives/insights applicable to the results from the physical exam and diagnosis (es).

Part One: Initial post includes at least three (3) appropriate differential diagnoses with rationale and answers all questions presented in the case. Demonstrates course knowledge/assigned readings by: linking questions and tests/interventions to diagnoses,linking diseases by identifying symptoms and patient information.

Parts Two and Three: Primary and secondary diagnoses and treatment plan supported with rationale from the literature. Differential diagnoses are eliminated.

All five (5) parts of the treatment plan are thorough, specific and evidence-based.

 

Post contributes unique perspectives or insights, but may lack some applicability to presented case study patients.

Part One: Initial post includes at least two (2) appropriate differential diagnoses with rationale and answers most of the questions presented in the case. One to two (1-2) elements of specificity identified in course expectations not met

Parts Two and Three: Confirmed diagnosis (es) and treatment plan partially applicable and evidence-based for each case study patient.

 

 

Post has limited perspective, insights and/or applicability to presented case study patients.

Part One: Initial post does not address each patient or does not include at least two (2) differential diagnoses for each patient. Some evidence-based rationale may be missing. Does not answer questions presented in the case. Two (2) or more elements of specificity from course expectations not met.

Parts Two and Three: Confirmed diagnosis and treatment plan are not applicable to specific case study or some sections may not be evidence-based.

 

 

Post perspectives are not consistent with current practice. Three (3) or more elements from course expectations missing from parts two and/or three, differential diagnoses not eliminated from Part Two and/or Three.

 

Post offers no insight or application to the case study presentation.

 

  30 Points   26 Points 24 Points   11 Points  0 Points
Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Initial discussion posts in Parts One, Two and SOAP note are supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full references are provided.

 

Initial discussion posts for Parts One, Two, and SOAP note are partially supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years.

 

In-text citations and full references are provided.

Evidence-based reference( s) used but may not fully support the treatment plan.

Initial discussion posts for Parts One, Two, and SOAP note are partially supported by evidence.

Sources may not be scholarly in nature or may be older than 5 years.

In-text citations and/or full references may be incomplete or missing.

Citations to non-scholarly websites given as rationale to support differential diagnoses and/or treatment plan.

 

 

Discussion posts contain no evidence-based practice reference or citation.

 

*Students should note that factitious sources, sources that are clearly not read by the student and used, or sources that have incorrect dates will result in an automatic zero (0) for this section for the week.

    10 Points   9 Points   8 Points   4 Points   0 Points
Organization Discussion posts and SOAP notes presents case study findings in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence. Each problem-based learning case study patient is presented individually in all discussion posts and SOAP notes.

 

Part One: Discussion questions addressed individually for each patient.

 

 

Discussion posts and SOAP notes are relevant to the topic but may be unclear or difficult to follow in places.

 

Part One: Discussion questions may not be addressed individually for each patient.

Part Two or SOAP note contains all elements but may not be written following SOAP note format.

 

Discussion posts and SOAP notes not fully relevant to the topic. May be unclear or difficult to follow in places.

 

Part Two and SOAP note do not contain all components and/or may be missing data.

Discussion post presents case findings and plan or intervention that are sometimes unclear to follow and may not always be relevant to topic. Discussion post is not relevant to case study.

 

  26 Points 23 Points   21 Points   10 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Presents case study findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a peer including evidence from appropriate sources, and all direct faculty questions posted in Parts One and Two.

 

 

 

Presents case study findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a peer. Does include evidence from appropriate sources.

 

Responds to some direct faculty questions posted in Parts One and Two. 

 

Responds to a student peer and faculty questions but the posts adds limited content or insights to the discussion.

 

Does include evidence from appropriate sources.

 

Responds to a student peer and/or faculty, but the nature of the response is not substantive.

 

Does not include evidence from any sources.

 

Does not respond to a topic-related peer post and/or does not respond to faculty questions posted by Sunday.

 

    4 Points   3 Points   2 Points   1 Points   0  Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors. Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Post contains greater than ten errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.
  0 Points Deducted Points Deducted for Late or Missing Posts
Participation

Enters first post to part one by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; First post to part two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday; and submits written summation by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. Written submission (SOAP notes) will NOT be accepted after Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Enters first post to Part One by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; first post to Part Two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday; and enters peer response/faculty responses and written summation (SOAP) by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

 

Ten percent (10%) per day for each late discussion post.

*See Calculating Late Posting Penalty Document

Written submissions including SOAPs will not be accepted after Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due.

33 points deducted per part if Part One, Part Two or SOAP note is/are not submitted by Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due.

Webliography Disclaimer

The purpose of the Webliography is to provide students with annotated bibliographies of world wide websites relevant to their courses. These websites are not meant to be all inclusive of what is available for each course’s subjects and have not been sanctioned as academically rigorous or scholarly by Chamberlain College of Nursing. Please exercise caution when using these websites for course assignments and references.

Professional Portfolio

Select assignments from courses across the FNP program will be compiled as artifacts within a Professional Portfolio to demonstrate your professional growth and expertise. Your final portfolio, which will be submitted in the final course NR661, will be assessed against the learning outcomes of the program. The Professional Portfolio will include the following:

  • Reflections from Week 8 for all FNP courses
  • Five exemplar case studies (student selects top five)
  • eLogs portfolio
  • Curriculum vitae
  • Professional development plan paper from NR510

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NR-510: Leadership and Role of the APN Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

NR-510: Leadership and Role of the APN Course Assignments & Discussions Study GuideNR-510: Leadership and Role of the APN Course Description

Contact Hours: Lecture – 48, Lab – 0, Clinical – 0

Semester Hours: Theory 3

This course introduces students to the role development of today’s advanced practice nurse (APN) leader in society and healthcare organization systems from the perspective of primary and acute care. Students will explore, analyze, apply and evaluate diverse aspects of ethical and legal decision-making standards specific to APN scope of practice. Topics include the standards and regulations governing the practice of APNs in diverse settings. The course emphasizes strategies and processes that foster implementation of visionary leadership, diffusion of innovation and change within an organization. It also defines social, political, legal, legislative, regulatory and organizational factors that influence healthcare. Principles of leadership are emphasized including ethics, negotiation, motivating others, acting as an advocate, problem-solving, managing diversity, interprofessional collaboration and multi-agency partnerships, quality improvement and safety and organizational behavior.

Prerequisites: NR-500, NR-501, NR-506, NR-512

NR-510: Leadership and Role of the APN Course Syllabus

NR 510 Week 1 Recorded Presentation: Introduction and NP Practice

NR 510 Week 1 Assignment: Practicum Process

NR 510 Week 2 Discussion: Advanced Practice Nursing

NR 510 Week 3 Case Study: Organizational Behavior & Business Influences & Advanced Practice Nursing

NR 510 Week 4 Case Study: Organizational Change and Ethical-Legal Influences in Advanced Practice Nursing

NR 510 Week 5 Discussion: Conflict at the Office

NR 510 Week 6 Assignment: APN Professional Development Plan Paper

NR 510 Week 7 Assignment: Recorded LACE Presentation

NR 510 Week 7 Assignment: Recorded LACE PowerPoint: Slide Notes

NR 510 Week 8 Reflection on Achievement of Outcomes

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Course Tour Transcript

Welcome to NR510: Leadership and Role of the Advanced Practice Nurse.

We are Dr. Elizabeth M. Romeo and Dr. Sandra Deering, the course leaders for NR510, and we would like to take you on a short tour!

In this course, we will focus on the role development of today’s advanced practice nurse leader in society and healthcare organization systems, from the perspective of primary and acute care. We will also examine healthcare leadership principles, interprofessional collaboration, and innovations that improve quality and patient safety.

Please refer to your course syllabus for a complete list of the course outcomes. The syllabus also includes the course schedule that shows you at a glance your weekly readings and when graded assignments are due.

You may ask: Where do I find information on my graded assignments? The guidelines and grading rubrics are located under the Course Resources tab where they may be downloaded. In this course, you will be asked to develop an application paper on the state of advanced practice, prepare a professional business plan, write your resume, and reflect on what you have learned from the course.

The threaded discussions in this course are designed to help you apply your readings to meet the course outcomes. Remember that discussion is required and graded. The threaded discussion grading rubric may be found in the syllabus and in the Course Resources tab. When posting, explain how your required readings and the scholarly resources you find relate to the topics. Use appropriate grammar, spelling, punctuation, and syntax in your posts and papers. Cite your references using current APA format.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-511: Differential Diagnosis and Primary Care Practicum Course Assignments & Discussions.

The course lessons complement the readings, help you fill information gaps, and synthesize what you are learning. For example, the Week 2 lesson presents information about nurse practitioner core competencies that identify requisite behaviors that the nurse practitioner graduate should possess. The lessons contain interactive learning experiences. For example, the Week 6 lesson contains a visually interesting presentation of the four aspects of the “LACE” consensus model.

So that you can focus on reading and writing synthesis, in this course, there are no quizzes or midterm exam requirements.

A formal course project is not required in this course although selected assignments from the course should be saved for your professional portfolio. Please refer to your course syllabus for further information about the professional portfolio.

In summary, this course introduces you to the foundational skills necessary for today’s advanced practice nurse leader, so let’s get started on our course journey!

Syllabus Overview

Course Number: NR510
Course Title: Leadership and Role of the Advanced Practice Nurse
Course Credits: 3 credits (3, 0)
Prerequisite: NR500

Course Description

This course introduces students to the role development of today’s advanced practice nurse (APN) leader in society and healthcare organization systems from the perspective of primary and acute care. Students will explore, analyze, apply, and evaluate diverse aspects of ethical and legal decision-making standards specific to APN scope of practice. Topics include the standards and regulations governing the practice of APNs in diverse settings. The course emphasizes strategies and processes that foster implementation of visionary leadership, diffusion of innovation, and change within an organization. It also defines social, political, legal, legislative, regulatory, and organizational factors that influence healthcare. Principles of leadership are emphasized including ethics, negotiation, motivating others, acting as an advocate, problem-solving, managing diversity, interprofessional collaboration and multi-agency partnerships, quality improvement and safety, and organizational behavior.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (year of publication). Title of textbook in italics (X ed.). City, ST: Publisher.

Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Optional Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Book Title

Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

eBook Details

First Time Using VitalSource?

Step 1: View the VitalSource Video

Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online

  1. Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
  2. Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.

Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions

You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.

Already Registered?   3 Ways to Access Your eBooks

Online

Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.

Desktop

Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.

Mobile

Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Access E-Book

Buppert, C. (2015). Nurse practitioner’s business practice & legal guide (5th ed.).Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

 

Access E-Book

DeNisco, S.M., & Barker, A. M. (2015). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

 

Access E-Book

Codina, M. (2013). Family Nurse Practitioner Certification Intensive Review (2nd ed.). Springer Publishing Company.

 

Access E-Book

Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2015). Quantum leadership: Building better partnerships for sustainable health (4th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

 

The following book is required across all FNP courses:

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

The following book is recommended across all FNP courses:

Access E-Book

Goroll, A. H., & Mulley, A. G. (2014). Primary care medicine: Office evaluation and management of the adult patient (7th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

 

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

eBook Details

First Time Using VitalSource?

Step 1: View the VitalSource Video

Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online

  1. Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
  2. Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.

Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions

You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.

Already Registered?   3 Ways to Access Your eBooks

Online

Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.

Desktop

Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.

Mobile

Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.

Program Outcomes

Program Outcomes of Chamberlain nursing programs can be found in the Program Descriptions section of your College Catalog. You can access your College Catalog at http://www.chamberlain.edu/msncatalog.

The MSN program outcomes are aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing publication, The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing (2011). Upon completion of the MSN degree program, the graduate will be able to:

  1. Practice safe, high-quality advanced nursing care based on concepts and knowledge from nursing and related disciplines.
  2. Construct processes for leading and promoting quality improvement and safety in advanced nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
  3. Use contemporary communication modalities effectively in advanced nursing roles.
  4. Evaluate the design, implementation and outcomes of strategies developed to meet healthcare needs.
  5. Develop a plan for lifelong personal and professional growth that integrates professional values regarding scholarship, service and global engagement.
  6. Apply legal, ethical and human-caring principles to situations in advanced nursing practice.
  7. Design patient-centered care models and delivery systems using the best available scientific evidence.
  8. Manage human, fiscal and physical resources to achieve and support individual and organizational goals.
  9. Compose a plan for systematic inquiry and dissemination of findings to support advanced nursing practice, patient-care innovation, and the nursing profession.
  10. Collaborate interprofessionally in research, education, practice, health policy and leadership to improve population health outcomes.
  11. Apply principles of informatics to manage data and information in order to support effective decision making.

Course Outcomes

Chamberlain College of Nursing courses are built to align course content with specific Course Outcomes (COs). The COs define the learning objectives that the student will be required to comprehend and demonstrate by course completion. The COs that will be covered in detail each week can be found in the Overview page in that particular week. Whenever possible, a reference will be made from a particular assignment or discussion back to the CO that it emphasizes.

Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to do the following.

  1. Synthesize knowledge and concepts from advanced practice nursing with supporting disciplines as a foundation for APN/specialty nurse practitioner practice that is culturally competent and population-specific (PO #1).
  2. Integrate interprofessional collaboration and innovative communication to support and promote the teaching-coaching function of advanced practice nursing (PO #3).
  3. Assimilate primary care competencies into APN/specialty nurse practitioner practice that exemplify professional values, scholarship, service, and culturally competent global awareness and support ongoing professional and personal development (PO #5).
  4. Plan for healthcare delivery system negotiation and management of human and physical resources in a fiscally responsible manner to support high-quality and cost-effective care and decision-making (PO #8).
  5. Contribute to the body of advanced practice nursing knowledge through participation in systematic inquiry, utilization of evidence-based practice, and dissemination of findings to support high-quality care and healthcare innovation (PO #9).
  6. Detail the development of advanced practice nursing roles from a historical perspective including the impact of advanced practice nursing on the healthcare delivery system from the perspectiv of selected current reports (i.e., LACE, IOM, etc.) (PO #5).
  7. Critically analyze legislative and regulatory issues including independent practice and restraint of trade, and business and legal requirements for the four advanced practice nursing roles of CNS, CNP, CNM, and CRNA (PO #1 and 9).
  8. Examine the contribution of various interprofessional collaboration resources including the role dimension of consultant for advanced practice nursing (PO #3).
  9. Evaluate strategies for contract negotiation, CV/resume writing, credentialing, national board certification, hospital privileges, and reimbursement (PO #8).
  10. Develop visionary leadership skills that combine best evidence with nursing expertise to support quality improvement, safety, and change across healthcare organizations and systems (PO #1, 3, 8, and 9).
  11. Differentiate leadership strategies that strengthen interprofessional collaboration and incorporate an ethic of care, values, and ethical principles into the role of the nurse leader across healthcare organizations and systems (PO #2, 4, 5, 6, and 7).
  12. Reflect on personal and professional growth toward achieving competence as a family nurse practitioner. (PO 5, 10)

Course Schedule

Week, CO, and Topics Readings Assignments
Week 1
CO 1, 6 and 7
Historical Development of the Advanced Practice Nursing Role, Systematic Inquiry, and Evidence-Based Practice (EBP)
DeNisco, S.M., & Barker, A. M. (2015). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Part I—Professional Roles for the Advanced Practice Nurse
  • Part IV—Theoretical Foundations, Research, and Evidence-Based Practice

Buppert, C. (2015). Nurse practitioner’s business practice & legal guide (5th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 1—What is a Nurse Practitioner?
Case Study
Week 2
CO 1, 6, and 7
Complexity Theory and Skills, Understandings, and Integrative Abilities of the APN and Specialty Nurse Practitioner Practice
DeNisco, S.M., & Barker, A. M. (2015). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Part II—Healthcare Delivery and Health Policy for Advanced Practice: Core Knowledge 

Buppert, C. (2015). Nurse practitioner’s business practice & legal guide (5th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 12—Lawmaking and Health Policy

Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2015). Quantum leadership: Building better partnerships for sustainable health (4th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 2—Ten Complexity Principles for Leaders for Thriving in the Quantum Age
  • Chapter 7—Leading Constant Movement: Managing Crisis and Change
Case Study
Week 3
CO 1, 6, 7, and 9
Organizational Behavior and Business Influences on APN and Specialty Nurse Practitioner Practice
Buppert, C. (2015). Nurse practitioner’s business practice & legal guide (5th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 5—Prescribing
  • Chapter 6—Hospital Privileges
  • Chapter 7—Negligence and Malpractice
  • Chapter 8—Risk Management
  • Chapter 9—Reimbursement for Nurse Practitioner Services
  • Chapter 10—The Employed Nurse Practitioner

Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2015). Quantum leadership: Building better partnerships for sustainable health (4th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 8—Living Leadership: Vulnerability, Risk Taking, and Stretching
  • Chapter 11—Toxic Organizations and People: The Leader as Transformer
Case Study
Week 4
CO 6, 7, 8, 9 10, and 11 
Organizational Change and Ethical-Legal Influences on APN and Specialty Nurse Practitioner Practice
DeNisco, S.M., & Barker, A. M. (2015). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Part V—The Role of Race, Culture, Ethics, and Advocacy in Advanced Practice of Nursing

Buppert, C. (2015). Nurse practitioner’s business practice & legal guide (5th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 2—Legal Scope of Nurse Practitioner Practice
  • Chapter 3—State Regulation of Nurse Practitioner Practice
  • Chapter 4—Federal Regulation of the Nurse Practitioner Profession
  • Chapter 16—Resolving Ethical Dilemmas

Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2015). Quantum leadership: Building better partnerships for sustainable health (4th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 1—A New Vessel for Leadership: Changing the Health Landscape in an Age of Reform
  • Chapter 3—Evidentiary Leadership: An Expanded Lens to Determine Healthcare Value
Case Study
Week 5
CO 4, 5, and 8
Organizational Leadership and Management Skills for Quality of Care and Patient Safety Considerations in APN and Specialty Nurse Practitioner Practice
DeNisco, S.M., & Barker, A. M. (2015). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https:bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Part III—Quality, Safety, and  Information Systems for Advanced Practice

Buppert, C. (2015). Nurse practitioner’s business practice & legal guide (5th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 14—Standards of Care for Nurse Practitioner Practice
  • Chapter 15—Measuring Nurse Practitioner Performance

Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2015). Quantum leadership: Building better partnerships for sustainable health (4th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 9—Healing Brokenness: Error as Opportunity 
  • Chapter 14—Renewing the Spirit of Leadership: Becoming a Living Leader 
Case Study
Week 6
CO 2, 3, 6, and 9
Sociopolitical Aspects of Healthcare Organizations, Innovations and Systems, and APN Issues Involving Licensure – Accreditation – Certification – Education for the LACE Consensus Model
Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2015). Quantum leadership: Building better partnerships for sustainable health (4th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 4—Innovation as a Way of Life: Leading Through the White Water of Change
  • Chapter 5—Innovation Leadership

Yoder-Wise, P. (2010). LACE: The consensus model and implications beyond advanced practice. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing41(7),  291.

Case Study
Week 7
COs 2, 3, and 7
Conflict Resolution Strategies to Overcome Barriers to APN Independent Practice and Restraint of Trade
Buppert, C. (2015). Nurse practitioner’s business practice & legal guide (5th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 11—Practice Ownership: Legal Business Considerations for the Nurse Practitioner Owner

DeNisco, S. M., & Barker, A. M. (2015). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession (3rd.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 30—Role Transition:Strategies for Success  in the Marketplace

Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2015). Quantum leadership: Building better partnerships for sustainable health (4th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 6—Leadership and Normative Conflict: Managing the Diversity of a Multifocal Workplace
  • Chapter 10—The Fully Engaged Leader: Integrated Capacity for Success
APN Professional Development Plan

Case Study

Week 8
CO 4, 5, 8, 11 and 12
APN Consulting Resources and Partnership Innovations for the Future
Buppert, C. (2015). Nurse practitioner’s business practice & legal guide (5th ed.).Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 13—Promoting the Profession to the Public
  • Chapter 17—Strategies for NPs

DeNisco, S. M., & Barker, A. M. (2015). Advanced practice nursing: Essential knowledge for the profession (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 6- Interprofessional Collaboration for Improving Patient and Population Health

Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2015). Quantum leadership: Building better partnerships for sustainable health (4th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 12—Coaching for Unending Change: Transforming the Membership Community 
  • Chapter 13—The Leader’s Courage to be Willing: Building a Context for Hope 
Reflection

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.

Evaluation Methods

No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.

Letter Grade Points Percentage
A   940–1,000 94% to 100%
A-  920–939 92% to 93%
B+ 890–919 89% to 91%
B   860–889 86% to 88%
B-  840–859 84% to 85%
C+ 810–839 81% to 83%
C   760–809 76% to 80%
F   759 and below 75% and below

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.

Graded Item Points Weighting
Case Study (Weeks 1–7)
100 points each week
700 70%
APN Professional Development Plan (Week 7) 200 20%
Reflection (Week 8) 100 10%
Total 1,000 100%

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Participation for MSN

Participation Guidelines

The weekly case study discussion is worth up to 100 points. Students are expected to participate a minimum of four times (once in part one by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in part two by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in part three by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, and one post to a student peer as required in the interactive dialogue criterion).

Grading Rubric 

Criteria Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

Satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvements

Poor or failing  level of performance

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

 Total Points Possible= 100
  30 Points  26 Points 24 Points  11 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three which contribute unique perspectives and insights, and are applicable to the discussion/case presentation.

 

Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three which contribute unique perspectives and insights, but may be lacking some applicability to the discussion/case presentation.

 

Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three but some responses have limited perspectives and insights, and have limited application to discussion/case presentation, or only two of the three posts have been fully answered.

 

Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three but posts are not consistent with current practice, or only one post has been fully answered.

 

Student does not fully answer discussion questions in all of the parts, or responses offer neither insight, nor application to discussion/case presentation.

 

  30 Points  26 Points 24 Points  11 Points  0 Points
Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) All three discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided.

 

All three discussion posts are from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided.

However, evidence-based, peer reviewed journal articles that are cited may not fully support the discussion in any one area.

Two of the three discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided. Only one of the discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) scholarly in nature, 2) published within the last 5 years, and; 3) in-text citations and full references are provided. Discussion posts One, Two, and Three contain No evidence- based practice references or citations.

*Students should note that factitious sources, sources that are clearly not read by the student and used, or sources that have incorrect dates will result in an automatic ZERO for this section for the week.

    10 Points 9 Points 8 Points  4 Points  0 Points
Organization Discussion posts One, Two, and Three present case study findings in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence. Discussion posts One, Two, and Three present case study findings which are sometimes unclear to follow.

 

Discussion posts present case findings in a logical and understandable method but One of the discussion parts contain a significant error.

 

Discussion posts are sometimes unclear to follow and/or there are significant errors in Two discussion parts.

 

Discussion posts are Not presented in a logical, understandable sequence and/or there are significant errors in ALL THREE discussion parts.
    26 Points 23 Points 21 Points 10 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Presents case study findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a peer including evidence from appropriate sources, and all direct faculty questions posted in parts one, two and three.

A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.

 

 

Presents case study findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a peer. Does include evidence from appropriate sources.

Responds to some direct faculty questions posted in parts one, two and three.

A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.

 

Responds to a student peer and/or faculty questions but the posts adds limited content or insights to the discussion.

Does include evidence from appropriate sources

 

Responds to a student peer and/or faculty, but the nature of the response is not substantial.

Does not include evidence from any resources.

 

Does not respond to a topic-related peer post and/or does not respond to faculty questions by Sunday.
  4 Points 3 Points 2 Points 1 Point

 

0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors. Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Post contains greater than ten errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.
  0 Points Deducted  10% deduction per day for late discussion post

  

33 points deducted per omitted/late discussion part
Participation

Enters first post to Part One by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; first post to Part Two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday; and posts Part Three and peer response by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Enters first post to Part One by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; first post to Part Two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday; and posts Part Three and peer response by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. Ten percent (10%) per day for each late discussion post.

.

*See Calculating Late Posting Penalty Document in Course Resources

 

 

 

Written submissions will not be accepted after Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due.

33 points deducted per part if Part 1 is not posted by Friday 11:59 p.m., Part 2 or 3 is/are not submitted by Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due.

* Refer to “What is a Scholarly Source” and “Reference Guide for FNP Case Studies” in the “Course Resources” section

** Part Three discussion CLOSES at Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT-deductions will apply once discussion has closed.

Webliography Disclaimer

The purpose of the Webliography is to provide students with annotated bibliographies of world wide websites relevant to their courses. These websites are not meant to be all inclusive of what is available for each course’s subjects and have not been sanctioned as academically rigorous or scholarly by Chamberlain College of Nursing. Please exercise caution when using these websites for course assignments and references.

Professional Portfolio

Select assignments from courses across the FNP program will be compiled as artifacts within a Professional Portfolio to demonstrate your professional growth and expertise. Your final portfolio, which will be submitted in the final course NR661, will be assessed against the learning outcomes of the program. The Professional Portfolio will include the following:

  • Reflections from Week 8 for all FNP courses
  • Five exemplar case studies (student selects top five)
  • eLogs portfolio
  • Curriculum vitae
  • Professional development plan paper from NR510

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NR-509: Advanced Physical Assessment Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

NR-509: Advanced Physical Assessment Course Assignments & Discussions Study GuideNR-509: Advanced Physical Assessment Course Description

Contact Hours: Lecture – 40, Lab – 25, Clinical – 0

Semester Hours: Theory 2.5, Lab Hours .5

This course expands the knowledge of health assessment principles specific to the role of the APN. The student will develop assessment

techniques related to history and physical examination of clients across the lifespan, including psychiatric-mental health and related supportive assessment. Student will explore, analyze, apply and evaluate these principles in the classroom setting. This course includes approximately 25 hours of lab practicing physical assessment skills using both a virtual and on-ground learning environment. A remote hands-on physical examination check off will also occur in the course. The student will submit a video recording to complete this assignment. Additionally, an immersion skills lab will occur in this course. This requires the student to visit the on-ground Chamberlain designated site offering the immersion lab. The entire immersion is approximately 11 hours of lab time. If any portion of the immersion is missed, the total practice time in the course must still be at least 25 hours. The student is responsible for completing and certifying at least 25 hours practicing physical assessment skills in the course. The remote physical examination check-off and the immersion lab are graded as pass/fail and are not factored into the course GPA. Students must pass each of these in order to pass the course and progress in the program. If either are failed the course grade will revert to a failing grade (F).

Prerequisites Effective January 2024:

NR-581 or NR-581NP, NR-582 or NR-582NP, NR-583 or NR-583NP, NR-584 or NR-584NP, NR-585 or NR-585NP, NR-586 or NR-586NP, NR-507, NR-565, NR-566, NR-567, NR-568, NR-546

Prerequisites: NR-500NP or NR-500, NR-501NP or NR-501, NR-503, NR-505NP or NR-505, NR-506NP, NR-507, NR-565, NR-567, NR-599

Prerequisites (students enrolled prior to May 2019): NR-500, NR-501, NR-503, NR-505, NR-506, NR-507, NR-508, NR-510, NR-512

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

NR-509: Advanced Physical Assessment Course Syllabus

NR 509 Week 1 Discussion: Social Determinants of Health: Economic Stability

NR-509 Week 1 Discussion: Social Determinants of Health: Education Access and Quality

NR 509 Week 1 Weekly Group Study

NR 509 Week 2 iHuman Virtual Patient Encounter Practice Case and Self-Assessment

NR-509 Week 2 iHuman Reflection – Collection

NR 509 Week 2 iHuman SOAP Note Template – Marvin F. Webster

NR-509 Week 2 Weekly Group Study

NR 509 Week 2 Quiz

NR 509 Week 3 Assignment: iHuman Virtual Patient Encounter – HEENT Assessment

  • iHuman Case and Reflection – Amanda a Wheaton
  • iHuman Case and Reflection – Jenna a James
  • iHuman SOAP Note Template – Amanda a Wheaton

NR-509 Week 3 Weekly Group Study

NR 509 Week 3 Quiz

NR 509 Week 4 Discussion: Client Challenges – Collection

NR-509 Week 4 Weekly Group Study

NR 509 Week 4 Midterm Review

NR-509 Week 4 Midterm Review/Rationales

NR 509 Week 4 Midterm Exam – Real Exam

NR 509 Week 5 Assignment: iHuman Virtual Patient Encounter – Abdominal Assessment

  • iHuman Case and Reflection – Jose Gonzalez
  • iHuman Case and Reflection – Dorothy Jones

NR-509 Week 5 Weekly Group Study

NR 509 Week 5 Quiz

NR 509 Week 6 Assignment: iHuman Virtual Patient Encounter – Neurologic Assessment

  • iHuman Case and Reflection – Carlotta A Russe
  • iHuman Case and Reflection – Jessica A Walbertz
  • iHuman SOAP Note – Carlotta A Russe

NR-509 Week 6 Weekly Group Study

NR 509 Week 6 Quiz

NR 509 Week 7 Assignment: Physical Examination Video Evaluation – Collection

NR-509 Week 7 Assignment: Immersion Skills Lab

NR 509 Week 7 Weekly Group Study

NR-509 Week 7 Quiz

NR 509 Week 8 Assignment: ePortfolio

NR-509 Week 8 Assignment: Reflection

NR 509 Week 8 Weekly Group Study

NR-509 Week 8 Final Exam

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-510: Leadership and Role of the APN Course Assignments & Discussions.

Syllabus Overview

Course Number: NR509
Course Title: Advanced Physical Assessment
Course Credits: 3 credits (2.5 theory, 0.5 lab)
Prerequisite: NR503, NR507

Course Description

This course expands the knowledge of health assessment principles specific to the role of the APN. The student will develop assessment techniques related to history and physical examination of clients across the lifespan, including psychiatric-mental health and related supportive assessments. Students will explore, analyze, apply, and evaluate these principles in the classroom setting.

This course includes 25 hours of lab.  A Health Assessment Performance Evaluation will occur in the laboratory setting (11 hours) requiring the student to visit the Chamberlain campus offering this evaluation. The student is responsible for completing 14 hours of practice prior to the Health Assessment Performance Evaluation.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (year of publication). Title of textbook in italics (X ed.). City, ST: Publisher.

Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Optional Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Book Title

Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

eBook Details

First Time Using VitalSource?

Step 1: View the VitalSource Video

Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online

  1. Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
  2. Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.

Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions

You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.

Already Registered?   3 Ways to Access Your eBooks

Online

Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.

Desktop

Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.

Mobile

Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Access E-Book

Jarvis, C. (2016). Physical examination & health assessment (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

 

Access E-Book

Swartz, M. H. (2014). Textbook of physical diagnosis: History and examination (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

 

The following book is required across all FNP courses:

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

The following book is recommended across all FNP courses:

Goroll, A. H., & Mulley, A. G. (2014). Primary care medicine: Office evaluation and management of the adult patient (7th ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer.

 

Hollier, A. (2009). Pharm in a flash. Advanced Practice Education Associates.

 

Hollier, A. (2016). Clinical guidelines in primary care (2nd ed.). Advanced Practice Education Associates.

Textbook is required for final FNP certification preparation

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

eBook Details

First Time Using VitalSource?

Step 1: View the VitalSource Video

Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online

  1. Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
  2. Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.

Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions

You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.

Already Registered?   3 Ways to Access Your eBooks

Online

Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.

Desktop

Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.

Mobile

Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.

Program Outcomes

Program Outcomes of Chamberlain nursing programs can be found in the Program Descriptions section of your College Catalog. You can access your College Catalog at http://www.chamberlain.edu/msncatalog.

The MSN program outcomes are aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing publication, The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing (2011). Upon completion of the MSN degree program, the graduate will be able to:

  1. Practice safe, high-quality advanced nursing care based on concepts and knowledge from nursing and related disciplines.
  2. Construct processes for leading and promoting quality improvement and safety in advanced nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
  3. Use contemporary communication modalities effectively in advanced nursing roles.
  4. Evaluate the design, implementation and outcomes of strategies developed to meet healthcare needs.
  5. Develop a plan for lifelong personal and professional growth that integrates professional values regarding scholarship, service and global engagement.
  6. Apply legal, ethical and human-caring principles to situations in advanced nursing practice.
  7. Design patient-centered care models and delivery systems using the best available scientific evidence.
  8. Manage human, fiscal and physical resources to achieve and support individual and organizational goals.
  9. Compose a plan for systematic inquiry and dissemination of findings to support advanced nursing practice, patient-care innovation, and the nursing profession.
  10. Collaborate interprofessionally in research, education, practice, health policy and leadership to improve population health outcomes.
  11. Apply principles of informatics to manage data and information in order to support effective decision making.

Course Outcomes

Chamberlain College of Nursing courses are built to align course content with specific Course Outcomes (COs). The COs define the learning objectives that the student will be required to comprehend and demonstrate by course completion. The COs that will be covered in detail each week can be found in the Overview page in that particular week. Whenever possible, a reference will be made from a particular assignment or discussion back to the CO that it emphasizes.

Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to do the following.

  1. Synthesize knowledge and concepts from advanced practice nursing with supporting disciplines as a foundation for specialty nurse practitioner practice that is culturally competent and population-specific. (PO 9, 10)
  2. Incorporate relationship-based caring and ethical-legal principles within the nursing metaparadigm to benefit a culturally diverse society and advanced practice nursing. (PO 6)
  3. Demonstrate knowledge required to perform a focused health history and examination for developmental, gender-related, age-specific, and special populations. (PO 1, 5)
  4. Complete a comprehensive health history and examination for developmental, gender-related, age-specific, and special populations. (PO 1, 5)
  5. Conduct an effective interview using good communication skills and appropriate interviewing techniques, including comprehensive pharmacologic and psychiatric-mental health assessment. (PO 1, 3)
  6. Differentiate normal from abnormal findings. (PO 1, 4)
  7. Document findings of the history and physical examination in a logical, organized sequence using appropriate nursing/medical terminology. (PO 1, 3, 4)
  8. Adapt history and physical examination to the needs of the patient, i.e., pediatric versus geriatric patient. (PO 1, 4, 7)
  9. Identify appropriate diagnostic tests with appropriate consultation and/or referral. (PO 1, 8)
  10. Distinguish elements of bifocal versus emergent assessment techniques. (PO 1, 9)
  11. Reflect on personal and professional growth toward achieving competence as a family nurse practitioner. (PO 5, 10)

Course Schedule

Week, CO, and Topics Readings Assignments
Week 1
CO 1, 10
Overview of Advanced Physical Assessment
Jarvis, C. (2016). Physical examination & health assessment (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 1: Evidence–Based Assessment
  • Chapter 3: The Interview
  • Chapter 4: The Complete Health History
  • Chapter 8: Assessment Techniques and Safety in the Clinical Setting
  • Chapter 9: General Survey, Measurement, Vital Signs
  • Chapter 10: Pain Assessment: The Fifth Vital Sign
  • Chapter 27: The Complete Health Assessment: Adult

Swartz, M. H. (2014). Textbook of physical diagnosis: History and examination (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 1: The Interviewer’s Questions
  • Chapter 2: The Patient’s Responses
  • Chapter 4: The Physical Examination
Discussion
Week 2
CO 2, 5
Assessment of HEENT, Integument, and Abdomen
Jarvis, C. (2016). Physical examination & health assessment (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 12: Skin, Hair, and Nails
  • Chapter 13: Head, Face, and Neck, including Regional Lymphatics
  • Chapter 14: Eyes
  • Chapter 15: Ears
  • Chapter 16: Nose, Mouth, and Throat
  • Chapter 21: Abdomen

Swartz, M. H. (2014). Textbook of physical diagnosis: History and examination (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 5: The Skin
  • Chapter 6: The Head and Neck
  • Chapter 7: The Eye
  • Chapter 8 The Ear and Nose
  • Chapter 9: The Oral Cavity and Pharynx
  • Chapter 14: The Abdomen
Discussion

APEA QBank Practice Questions (required, but not graded)

Week 3
CO 3, 6, 8
Assessment of the Neurovascular, Musculoskeletal, and Cardiopulmonary Systems
Jarvis, C. (2016). Physical examination & health assessment (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 18: Thorax and Lungs
  • Chapter 19: Heart and Neck Vessels
  • Chapter 20: Peripheral Vascular System and Lymphatic System
  • Chapter 22: Musculoskeletal System
  • Chapter 23: Neurologic System

Swartz, M. H. (2014). Textbook of physical diagnosis: History and examination (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 10: The Chest
  • Chapter 11: The Heart
  • Chapter 12: The Peripheral Vascular System
  • Chapter 17: The Musculoskeletal System
  • Chapter 18: The Nervous System
Discussion

APEA QBank Practice Questions

Week 4
CO 3, 6, 8
Assessment of Men’s Health
Jarvis, C. (2016). Physical examination & health assessment (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 24: Male Genitourinary System
  • Chapter 25: Anus, Rectum, and Prostate

Swartz, M. H. (2014). Textbook of physical diagnosis: History and examination (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 15: Male Genitalia and Hernias
Discussion

APEA QBank Practice Questions

Week 5
CO 3, 6, 8
Assessment of the Women’s Health
Jarvis, C. (2016). Physical examination & health assessment (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 17: Breasts and Regional Lymphatics
  • Chapter 26: Female Genitourinary System
  • Chapter 30: The Pregnant Woman

Swartz, M. H. (2014). Textbook of physical diagnosis: History and examination (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 13: The Breast
  • Chapter 16: Female Genitalia
  • Chapter 20: The Pregnant Patient
Discussion

APEA QBank Practice Questions

Week 6
CO 1, 5
Completion of the 3P Exam and Reflection
Review readings on areas necessary for successful completion of the 3P exam 3P Exam (graded)

APEA QBank Practice Questions

Reflection

Week 7
CO 2, 5
Overview of Advanced Supportive Assessments
Jarvis, C. (2016). Physical examination & health assessment (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 2: Cultural Competence
  • Chapter 5: Mental Status Assessment
  • Chapter 6: Substance Use Assessment
  • Chapter 7: Domestic and Family Violence Assessment
  • Chapter 11: Nutritional Assessment

Swartz, M. H. (2014). Textbook of physical diagnosis: History and examination (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 3: Putting the History Together
  • Chapter 27: Caring for Patients in a Culturally Diverse Society
  • Chapter 28: Understanding Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • Chapter 29: Assessment of Nutritional Status
Practice Hours Certification

Completion of Immersion Program

Week 8
CO 4, 7, 9, 11
Special Populations
Jarvis, C. (2016). Physical examination & health assessment (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 29: Bedside Assessment and Electronic Health Recording
  • Chapter 31: Functional Assessment of the Older Adult

Swartz, M. H. (2014). Textbook of physical diagnosis: History and examination (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 21: The Pediatric Patient
  • Chapter 22: The Geriatric Patient
  • Chapter 23: The Acutely Ill or Injured Patient
Reflection

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.

Evaluation Methods

The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.

Students that are not able to attend the scheduled weekend immersion for their section of NR509 will be granted an Incomplete.  The next weekend immersion offered must be attended and successfully passed in order for the Incomplete to be changed to a letter grade.   Students with an Incomplete that do not attend and successfully pass the next offered weekend immersion will have the Incomplete changed to an F. 

Graded Item Points Weighting
Discussion

(Weeks 1–5)
120 points each week

600 60%
Advanced Practice Education Associates (APEA) QBank Practice Questions (required, but not graded Weeks 2–6) N/A N/A
APEA 3P Exam (Week 6) 120 12%
Practice Hours Verification

(Week 7)

30 3%
Immersion Completion

Successful completion = 250 points

Unsuccessful completion = 0 points

(due end of Week 7)

250 25%
Reflection

(required, but not graded

Week 6 and 8)

N/A N/A
Total 1,000 100%

No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.

Letter Grade Points Percentage
A   940–1,000 94% to 100%
A-  920–939 92% to 93%
B+ 890–919 89% to 91%
B   860–889 86% to 88%
B-  840–859 84% to 85%
C+ 810–839 81% to 83%
C   760–809 76% to 80%
F   759 and below 75% and below

NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Participation for MSN

Participation Guidelines

The weekly case study discussion is worth up to 120 points. Students are expected to participate a minimum of two times (once in part one by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. MT and responds to peer/instructor posts by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT).

Grading Rubric 

Criteria Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

Satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvements

Poor or failing  level of performance

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

 Total Points Possible= 120
  35 Points  31 Points 28 Points  13 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Post contributes unique perspectives or insights consistent with current standards of practice applicable to the results from the case study.

 

Post contributes unique perspectives or insights, but may be lacking some applicability to the case presentation.

 

Post has limited perspectives or insights and limited application to case presentation.

 

Post perspectives are not consistent with current practice.

 

Post offers no insight or application to the case study presentation.

 

  35 Points  31 Points 28 Points  13 Points  0 Points
Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Discussion posts are supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full references are provided.

 

Discussion posts partially supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years.
In-text citations and full references are provided.
Evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited but may not fully support the main post.
Discussion posts partially supported by evidence.
Sources may not be scholarly in nature or may be older than 5 years.
In-text citations and/or full references may be incomplete or missing.
Citations to non-scholarly websites given as rationale to support differential diagnoses and/or treatment plan.

No evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited.

Discussion posts contain no evidence-based practice reference or citation.

*Students should note that factitious sources, sources that are clearly not read by the student and used, or sources that have incorrect dates will result in an automatic ZERO for this section for the week.

    10 Points 9 Points 8 Points  4 Points  0 Points
Organization Post presents case study findings (SOAP note) in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence; clearly relevant to topic. Post presents case study findings that are sometimes unclear and difficult to follow.

 

Presents information in a logical and understandable method but the information has limited relevance to the discussion.

 

Post presents case findings that are sometimes unclear to follow and may not always be relevant to topic.

 

Post is not relevant to discussion question.
    35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Presents findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a student peer and respond to all faculty questions posted by Sunday.

A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.

Does include evidence from appropriate sources.

 

Responds to a student peer and all faculty questions, but the posts to either add limited content or insights to the discussion.

 

Does include evidence from appropriate sources.

 

Responds to a student peer and all faculty questions but one or both of the responses does not contain evidence from appropriate sources.

 

 

 

Responds to a student peer, but does not respond to all faculty questions by Sunday (there may be some instructor question responses, but not all questions were answered in the discussion).

 

OR

Responds to all or some faculty questions, but does not respond to a student peer.

 

 

Does not respond to a topic-related peer post and/or does not respond to faculty questions posted by Sunday.
    5 Points  4 Points    3 Points    2 Points  

 

0 Points 
Grammar, Syntax, APA APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors. Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Post contains greater than ten errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.
  0 Points Deducted Late or Omitted Deductions per Discussion Part
Participation

Enters first post to thread by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; responds to peer/instructor posts by 11:59 MT on Sunday.

Enters first post to thread by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; responds to peer/instructor posts by 11:59 MT on Sunday. 85 points deducted if Part 1 is not submitted by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the week it is due.

Ten percent (10%) per day for each late discussion post.

*See Calculating Late Posting Penalty Document

Written submissions of Part One and Two will not be accepted after Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due.

Webliography Disclaimer

The purpose of the Webliography is to provide students with annotated bibliographies of world wide websites relevant to their courses. These websites are not meant to be all inclusive of what is available for each course’s subjects and have not been sanctioned as academically rigorous or scholarly by Chamberlain College of Nursing. Please exercise caution when using these websites for course assignments and references.

Professional Portfolio

Select assignments from courses across the FNP program will be compiled as artifacts within a Professional Portfolio to demonstrate your professional growth and expertise. Your final portfolio, which will be submitted in the final course NR661, will be assessed against the learning outcomes of the program. The Professional Portfolio will include the following:

  • Reflections from Week 8 for all FNP courses
  • Five exemplar case studies (student selects top five)
  • eLogs portfolio
  • Curriculum vitae
  • Professional development plan paper from NR510

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NR-508: Advanced Pharmacology Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

NR-508: Advanced Pharmacology Course Assignments & Discussions Study GuideNR-508: Advanced Pharmacology Course Description

Contact Hours: Lecture – 48, Lab – 0, Clinical – 0

Semester Hours: Theory 3

In this course, the student focuses on pharmacology and therapeutics used in the treatment of selected health conditions commonly encountered by the advanced practice nurse in the primary care setting. Emphasis is placed on the decision making process utilized to safely and effectively prescribe and monitor pharmacotherapeutics for the treatment of acute and chronic diseases appropriate to the patient situation.

Prerequisites: NR-500, NR-501, NR-503, NR-505, NR-506, NR-507, NR-510, NR-512

NR-508: Advanced Pharmacology Course Syllabus

NR 508 Entire Coursework Weeks 1 – 8

NR 508 Course Material Week 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7

NR 508 RX Writing Assignments Weeks 2, 3, 7

Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider: TestBank Solutions

NR 508 Discussion Topic Week 1, Case Study Discussion Week 2, 3, 5

NR 508 Weekly Quizzes Week 1 – 7 (Summer 2020)

NR 508 Week 1 Bundle: Homework, Discussion, Quiz Collection

NR 508 Week 1 Quiz (100% Correct | Collection 2020)

NR 508 Week 1 Discussion: Legal and Professional Issues in Prescribing (3 Versions)

NR 508 Week 1 Homework – The Practicum Team and the FNP Practicum Process

Pharmacotherapeutics For Advanced Practice Nurse Prescribers: 4th Edition – TestBank

NR 508 Week 2 Bundle: Assignment, Discussion, Quiz Collection

NR 508 Week 2 Case Study Discussion: Original Post, Responses 75 Pages (Multiple Versions)

NR 508 Week 2 Quiz (100% Correct | Collection 2020)

NR 508 Week 2 RX Writing Assignment: Celexa (citalopram) 20mgday tablet

NR 508 Week 2 RX Writing Assignment: Escitalopram 10 mg (Dual Variants)

NR 508 Week 2 RX Writing Assignment: Resources plus Assignment Samples

NR 508 Week 3 Bundle: Assignment, Case Study Discussion, Quiz Collection

NR 508 Week 3 RX Writing Assignment: Prednisone 10 mg

NR 508 Week 3 RX Writing Assignment: Metoprolol 50mg

NR 508 Week 3 Case Study Discussion: Case of Mr. Russell: 69 Page Responses (Multiple Versions)

NR 508 Week 3 Quiz (100% Correct | Collection 2020)

NR 508 Week 4 Mid-term Exam (Collection)

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm Possible Questions-Answers

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm Possible Questions plus Study Guide

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm Filled Outline + Chart (2 Versions)

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm Review Questions/Outline (Spring 2020)

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm Exam Study Guide: Filled (3 Versions)

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm Exam Material

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm Exam (Package)

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm: Version 3 (Retired)

NR 508 Week 5 Bundle: Case Study Discussion, Quiz Collection

NR 508 Week 5 Quiz (100% Correct | Collection 2020)

NR 508 Week 5 Case Study Discussion: Case of Maria

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Assignment Using Kaltura

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds PowerPoint Presentation: Osteoarthritis (15 Slide)

NR 508 Week 6 Test Your Knowledge (Summer 2020)

NR 508 Test Your Knowledge (Summer 2020)

NR 508 Week 6 Quiz (100% Correct | Collection 2020)

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation, Quiz Collection

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation+Week 7 Discussion Based on Presentation

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation: Anticoagulants for Outpatient Treatment of Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (13 Slides)

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment: Migraine Headache (15 Slide)

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds PowerPoint Presentation: Depression in Primary Care (15 Slide)

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds PowerPoint Presentation: Asthma (15 Slide)

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation: Allergic Rhinits (15 Slide)

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment: Headache (15 Slides)

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment: Diabetes Type 2 (15 Slides)

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment: Sinusitis (15 Slides)

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation: Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds: Hypertension Presentation (15 Slide)

NR 508 Weeks 6, 7 Grand Rounds Topics Overview

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds PowerPoint Presentation: Parkinson’s Disease (Study Material)

NR 508 Weeks 6 plus Week 7 Grand Rounds: Cystitis and Pyelonephritis (Fall 2019)

NR 508 Week 7 RX Writing Assignment Metoprolol tartrate 50 mg

NR 508 Week 7 RX Writing Assignment Prednisone 10 mg

NR 508 Week 7 Quiz (100% Correct | Collection 2020)

NR 508 Week 7 Grand Rounds: Original Post & Responses to PPP (3 Versions)

NR 508 Week 7 Grand Rounds: Discussion/3 Responses to Peer’s PowerPoint

NR 508 Week 7 Review Questions with Answers

NR 508 Week 7 Bundle: Assignment, Quiz Collection

NR 508 Week 8 Final Exam Summary

NR 508 Week 8 Final Exam (Practice Q and A with Rationale)

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm: Version 2 (Retired)

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm: Version 1 (Retired)

TestBank: NR 508 Midterm plus Final Exam Preparation

NR 508 Midterm plus Final Exam: Multiple Versions (Retired)

TestBank: NR 508 Final Exam Preparation

NR 508 Final Exam (Retired)

NR 508 Week 8 Final Exam (Retired)

Pharmacotherapeutics For Advanced Practice Nurse Prescribers: TestBank Solutions for Midterm NR 508

NR 508 Week 8 Final Exam Study Guide: 3 Versions

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Syllabus Overview

Course Number: NR508
Course Title: Advanced Pharmacology
Course Credits: 3 credits
Prerequisite: NR503, NR507

Course Description

This course expands knowledge of pharmacological principles specific to the role of the APN. The student will explore, analyze, apply, and evaluate commonly used drugs for the treatment of chronic diseases and self-limiting acute conditions and apply critical appraisal skills in determining best evidence for prescriptive intervention.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-509: Advanced Physical Assessment Course Assignments & Discussions.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (year of publication). Title of textbook in italics (X ed.). City, ST: Publisher.

Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Optional Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Book Title

Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

eBook Details

First Time Using VitalSource?

Step 1: View the VitalSource Video

Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online

  1. Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
  2. Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.

Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions

You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.

Already Registered?   3 Ways to Access Your eBooks

Online

Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.

Desktop

Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.

Mobile

Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Access E-Book

Edmunds, M. W., & Mayhew, M. S. (2013). Pharmacology for the primary care provider (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

 

The following book is required across all FNP courses:

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

The following book is recommended across all FNP courses:

Access E-Book

Goroll, A. H., & Mulley, A. G. (2014). Primary care medicine: Office evaluation and management of the adult patient (7th ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer.

 

eBook Details

First Time Using VitalSource?

Step 1: View the VitalSource Video

Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online

  1. Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
  2. Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.

Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions

You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.

Already Registered?   3 Ways to Access Your eBooks

Online

Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.

Desktop

Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.

Mobile

Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.

Program Outcomes

Program Outcomes of Chamberlain nursing programs can be found in the Program Descriptions section of your College Catalog. You can access your College Catalog at http://www.chamberlain.edu/msncatalog.

The MSN program outcomes are aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing publication, The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing (2011). Upon completion of the MSN degree program, the graduate will be able to:

  1. Practice safe, high-quality advanced nursing care based on concepts and knowledge from nursing and related disciplines.
  2. Construct processes for leading and promoting quality improvement and safety in advanced nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
  3. Use contemporary communication modalities effectively in advanced nursing roles.
  4. Evaluate the design, implementation and outcomes of strategies developed to meet healthcare needs.
  5. Develop a plan for lifelong personal and professional growth that integrates professional values regarding scholarship, service and global engagement.
  6. Apply legal, ethical and human-caring principles to situations in advanced nursing practice.
  7. Design patient-centered care models and delivery systems using the best available scientific evidence.
  8. Manage human, fiscal and physical resources to achieve and support individual and organizational goals.
  9. Compose a plan for systematic inquiry and dissemination of findings to support advanced nursing practice, patient-care innovation, and the nursing profession.
  10. Collaborate interprofessionally in research, education, practice, health policy and leadership to improve population health outcomes.
  11. Apply principles of informatics to manage data and information in order to support effective decision making.

NR-508: Advanced Pharmacology Course: A Comprehensive Guide

NR 508 Entire Coursework Weeks 1 – 8:

Your knowledge of advanced pharmacological principles will be strengthened through the completion of the NR 508 coursework, which is spread out over a period of eight weeks and covers a diverse variety of pharmacology concepts and themes.

NR 508 Course Material Week 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7:

You will have the opportunity to investigate the foundational ideas of pharmacology by actively engaging with course materials that are unique to each week’s topic of emphasis.

NR 508 RX Writing Assignments Weeks 2, 3, 7:

You will have the opportunity to put your knowledge and skills to use in properly prescribing drugs through the use of these NR 508 tasks. You will go through a variety of scenarios, and you will learn to create prescriptions that are appropriate.

NR 508 Pharmacology for the Primary Care Provider: TestBank Solutions:

This useful resource provides you with test bank solutions to assist you in practicing for pharmacology examinations and preparing for them, ensuring that you have an excellent grasp of the essential ideas.

NR 508 Discussion Topic Week 1, Case Study Discussion Week 2, 3, 5:

You will participate in conversations on a variety of pharmaceutical subjects as well as evaluate and NR 508 discuss case studies to increase your ability to think critically. Engaging in discussions is an essential component of the course.

NR 508 Weekly Quizzes Week 1 – 7 (Summer 2020):

You’ll be able to gauge how well you’re doing in the class by taking regular quizzes that test your knowledge of the material covered in each week’s lesson.

NR 508 Week 1 Bundle: Homework, Discussion, Quiz Collection:

The first week of the course is comprised of a variety of activities, including as homework assignments, group discussions, and NR 508 quizzes, all of which are intended to lay a solid foundation in pharmacology.

NR 508 Week 1 Quiz (100% Correct | Collection 2020):

You will be able to put your knowledge to the test and solidify your comprehension by accessing a variety of quizzes that have been developed especially for Week 1.

NR 508 Week 1 Discussion: Legal and Professional Issues in Prescribing (3 Versions):

Participate in a conversation that is centered on the NR 508 legal and professional sides of prescribing drugs, and explore the ethical issues and laws that are in place.

NR 508 Week 1 Homework – The Practicum Team and the FNP Practicum Process:

Finish the material that has been provided to you, which focuses on gaining a grasp of the practicum team as well as the process that is involved in the Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) practicum.

NR 508 Pharmacotherapeutics For Advanced Practice Nurse Prescribers: 4th Edition – TestBank:

You will be able to NR 508 practice and strengthen your understanding of pharmacotherapeutic concepts with the help of the test bank that is provided by this beneficial resource. The test bank was designed to be carefully matched with the textbook.

NR 508 Week 2 Bundle: Assignment, Discussion, Quiz Collection:

Your comprehension of pharmacological principles will be tested throughout NR 508 Week 2 with a series of topic-specific exercises, group discussions, and exams.

NR 508 Week 2 Case Study Discussion:

Original Post, NR 508 Responses 75 Pages (Multiple Versions): Participate in an in-depth discussion of a NR 508 case study, during which you and your fellow students will examine and discuss the situation that has been presented to you, investigating various points of view and potential courses of treatment.

NR 508 Week 2 Quiz (100% Correct | Collection 2020):

You will be able to evaluate how well you grasp the material by accessing a set of quizzes that have been prepared just for NR 508 Week 2.

NR 508 Week 2 RX Writing Assignment:

NR 508 Celexa (citalopram) 20mg/day tablet: Through the completion of this assignment, you will have the opportunity to practice your skills in writing prescriptions for Celexa, a medication that is frequently prescribed.

NR 508 Week 2 RX Writing Assignment:

Escitalopram 10 mg (Dual Variants): Your skills in writing prescriptions will be further improved by completing this NR 508 assignment, which examines the various forms in which an escitalopram prescription might be written.

NR 508 Week 2 RX Writing Assignment:

Resources in addition to Example Assignments: In this section, you will have the opportunity to gain access to extra resources as well as examples of assignments that will help you improve your RX writing skills.

NR 508 Week 3 Bundle:

NR 508 Discussion of the Case Study, Homework, and the Collection of NR 508 Quizzes: In the third week of the course, you will participate in a variety of learning activities, such as case study discussions, quizzes, and assignments, to broaden your understanding of pharmacology.

NR 508 Week 3 RX Writing Assignment: Prednisone 10 mg:

You will get the opportunity to practice writing prescriptions for prednisone 10 milligrams through this assignment, which focuses on how to write those prescriptions.

NR 508 Week 3 RX Writing Assignment: Metoprolol 50mg:

Finishing this NR 508 assignment, which focuses on creating a prescription for Metoprolol 50 milligrams, will help you improve your skills in writing prescriptions.

NR 508 Week 3 Case Study Discussion: Case of Mr. Russell:

69 Page Responses (Multiple Versions): Participate in an in-depth conversation about a case study with Mr. Russell, during which you will assess his condition, suggest possible courses of therapy, and engage in conversation with your fellow students in order to acquire new points of view.

NR 508 Week 3 Quiz (100% Correct | Collection 2020):

By completing the questions that correlate to the topics that were discussed in NR 508 Week 3, you can evaluate how well you comprehend the material that was presented.

NR 508 Week 4 Mid-term Exam (Collection):

You will get access to a collection of NR 508 practise exams to help you prepare for the midterm exam. These assessments will allow you to evaluate your level of preparedness and determine the topics on which you will need further study time.

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm Possible Questions-Answers:

Acquainting yourself with potential exam questions and the solutions to those questions will allow you to practise and improve your overall performance on the test.

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm Possible Questions plus Study Guide:

Get access to a study guide as well as practise questions that have been created to assist you in efficiently preparing for the midterm test.

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm Filled Outline + Chart (2 Versions):

Before the midterm exam, you should make use of these completed outlines and charts to help you organise your knowledge and review important ideas.

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm Review Questions/Outline (Spring 2020):

To help you better your understanding and be ready for the midterm exam, we have given you with some review questions as well as an overview.

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm Exam Study Guide: Filled (3 Versions):

You will be able to more easily review the important ideas and topics that will be on the midterm exam with the assistance of our study guide, which is packed with useful content.

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm Exam Material:

You will need to thoroughly prepare for the NR 508 midterm exam, thus it is important that you have access to important study tools and resources.

NR 508 Week 4 Midterm Exam (Package):

Get access to a complete bundle that contains materials that have been created with the express purpose of assisting you in doing well on the midterm exam.

NR 508 Week 5 Bundle: Case Study Discussion, Quiz Collection:

In the NR 508 fifth week of the course, you will participate in a variety of activities, such as discussions based on case studies and quizzes, to help you solidify your knowledge of pharmacological principles.

NR 508 Week 5 Quiz (100% Correct | Collection 2020):

By taking the questions that are offered, you will be able to evaluate how well you comprehend the material that was presented in NR 508 Week 5.

NR 508 Week 5 Case Study Discussion: Case of Maria:

Participate in a thought-provoking conversation on the case study centred on Maria’s medical condition, the available treatment choices, and the nursing interventions.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Assignment Using Kaltura:

You will participate in a dynamic and interesting grand rounds assignment utilising Kaltura, during which you will present a subject that is associated with pharmacology.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds PowerPoint Presentation: Osteoarthritis (15 Slide):

As part of the homework for grand rounds, you have to put together a comprehensive PowerPoint presentation on osteoarthritis.

NR 508 Week 6 Test Your Knowledge (Summer 2020):

Examine your understanding of pharmacology by participating in the activity titled “Test Your Knowledge,” which was developed especially for NR 508 Week 6 of the course.

NR 508 Test Your Knowledge (Summer 2020):

Through the use of this in-depth knowledge assessment, you will be tested on your mastery of pharmacology topics.

NR 508 Week 6 Quiz (100% Correct | Collection 2020):

By completing the questions that correspond to the topics discussed in NR 508 Week 6, you can evaluate how well you understand the material that was presented during that week.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation, Quiz Collection: Participate in a grand rounds presentation and use the associated tests to evaluate how well you understand the information that is being delivered to you.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation+Week 7 Discussion Based on Presentation:

You will give your presentation for the grand rounds assignment, and then you will take part in a discussion that is based on the presentation. This will allow for additional investigation of the issue.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation:

Anticoagulants for the Outpatient Treatment of Patients with Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (13 Slides): Anticoagulants for Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation Prepare a comprehensive presentation for the grand rounds on the use of anticoagulants for the treatment of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who are receiving care outside of the hospital.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment: Migraine Headache (15 Slide):

As part of your homework for grand rounds, you will need to create a comprehensive PowerPoint presentation on the subject of migraine headaches.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds PowerPoint Presentation: Depression in Primary Care (15 Slide):

As part of your project for grand rounds, you will need to develop a comprehensive NR 508 PowerPoint presentation that centers on the subject of depression in primary care.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds PowerPoint Presentation: Asthma (15 Slide):

As part of the project for grand rounds, you will need to put up an educational PowerPoint presentation on the subject of asthma.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation: Allergic Rhinitis (15 Slide):

Create a comprehensive presentation for grand rounds on the subject of allergic rhinitis, including all aspects of the condition including its genesis, diagnosis, and therapy.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment: Headache (15 Slides):

As part of the homework for grand rounds, you will need to put together a comprehensive PowerPoint presentation on the subject of headaches.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment: Diabetes Type 2 (15 Slides):

As part of your project for grand rounds, you are to develop an interesting PowerPoint presentation that focuses on diabetes NR 508 type 2.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment: Sinusitis (15 Slides):

Create a comprehensive PowerPoint presentation on the topic of sinusitis, including sections on its pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and treatment options.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation: Urinary Tract Infection (UTI):

Give a comprehensive presentation on urinary tract infections at the grand rounds, focusing on their causes as well as diagnosis and treatment options.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds Presentation Assignment:

You can enhance your knowledge of pharmaceutical subjects by attending a variety of grand rounds presentations and completing the associated homework.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds: Hypertension Presentation (15 Slide):

As part of your project for grand rounds, you will need to put together an in-depth PowerPoint presentation on hypertension.

NR 508 Weeks 6, 7 Grand Rounds Topics Overview:

You will get a full comprehension of the issue by getting an overview of the grand rounds themes that were covered in NR 508 Weeks 6 and 7.

NR 508 Week 6 Grand Rounds PowerPoint Presentation: Parkinson’s Disease (Study Material):

You should look at some study materials that are centered on Parkinson’s illness to assist you in getting ready for the grand rounds NR 508 assignment.

NR 508 Weeks 6 plus Week 7 Grand Rounds: Cystitis and Pyelonephritis (Fall 2019):

By attending the presentations during grand rounds, you will have the opportunity to learn important information on the causes of cystitis and pyelonephritis as well as the methods used to diagnose and treat them.

NR 508 Week 7 RX Writing Assignment: Metoprolol tartrate 50 mg:

By completing this assignment, which focuses on creating a prescription for Metoprolol tartrate 50 mg, you will be able to improve your skills in writing prescriptions.

NR 508 Week 7 Case Study Discussion: Case of Mrs. Adams:

Take part in a roundtable discussion on an interactive case study focusing around the medical condition of Mrs. Adams, the available treatment choices, and the nursing interventions.

NR 508 Week 7 Quiz (100% Correct | Collection 2020):

By taking the quizzes that are offered, you will be able to evaluate how well you comprehend the material that was presented in NR 508 Week 7.

NR 508 Week 8 Final Exam (Collection):

You will have access to a selection of sample exams in order to help you prepare for the NR 508 final exam. These exams will allow you to evaluate your level of preparedness and determine which topics require additional study.

NR 508 Week 8 Final Exam Study Guide:

Get access to a detailed study guide that explains important concepts and subjects that need to be reviewed for the final test.

NR 508 Week 8 Final Exam Possible Questions plus Study Guide:

Acquainting oneself with potential test questions and the solutions to those questions can facilitate successful practice and preparation on your part.

NR 508 Week 8 Final Exam Filled Outline + Chart (2 Versions):

Before the final test, you should make use of these completed outlines and charts to arrange the information you have learned and to review the key topics.

NR 508 Week 8 Final Exam Review Questions/Outline (Spring 2020):

To help you better your understanding and be ready for the final test, we have given you with some review questions as well as an overview.

NR 508 Week 8 Final Exam Study Guide: Filled (3 Versions):

You will be able to more easily review the important themes and concepts that will be on the final exam with the assistance of this thorough NR 508 study guide, which is packed with useful content.

Pharmacology for Advanced Practice Nurses: Test Bank:

Obtain extra practice questions and assessment tools from a pharmacology test bank.

Remember, our online class help service provides comprehensive support throughout the NR 508 Advanced Pharmacology course. Coursework, assignments, conversations, quizzes, test preparation, and more are our specialties. We can help with your specific demands.

FAQs

Question: When prescribing acyclovir, patients should be educated regarding the:

Answer: When prescribing acyclovir, inform patients:

Acyclovir is used for herpes simplex, shingles, and genital herpes, thus patients should know why.

Acyclovir dosage, frequency, and duration should be explained to patients. Emphasize the significance of finishing the prescribed medicine.

Acyclovir may cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, dizziness, and rash. They should report severe or persistent side effects to their doctor.

Drug interactions: Patients should tell their doctor about any medications, including over-the-counter and herbal supplements, to avoid acyclovir interactions.

Precautions and contraindications: Patients should be notified of any acyclovir-related precautions or contraindications, including as allergies or medical conditions that may necessitate dose modifications or strict monitoring.

Follow-up: Patients should appreciate the importance of follow-up meetings or consultations to assess treatment efficacy and address any issues or problems that may arise during therapy.

Healthcare practitioners must educate patients about the medicine, its purpose, and how to use it safely and effectively.

Question: To prevent further development of antibacterial resistance, it is important that fluoroquinolones are reserved for the treatment of:

Answer: Fluoroquinolones should only be used for serious infections when other treatments fail to avoid antimicrobial resistance. Broad-spectrum fluoroquinolones kill many bacteria. However, overuse or misuse can lead to resistant germs, making these medications less effective.

Therefore, fluoroquinolones should be used sparingly to treat severe bacterial infections such pneumonia, complex urinary tract infections, or certain bacterial strains that are sensitive. Healthcare professionals can reduce antibacterial resistance and preserve antibiotic efficacy by using them only in these conditions. s

Question: Pharmaceutical promotion may affect prescribing. To address the impact of pharmaceutical promotion, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) has made the following recommendations:

Answer: The Institute of Medicine (IOM), now the National Academy of Medicine, has advised on how pharmaceutical promotion affects prescribing. Some suggestions:

Pharmaceutical corporations should declare all financial relationships and conflicts of interest with healthcare professionals and institutions. Transparency ensures impartial prescription.

Independent, evidence-based, industry-free continuing education for healthcare professionals is needed. This helps doctors stay current on research and treatment standards without pharmaceutical marketing.

Healthcare organizations and professional societies should create standards for pharmaceutical company-healthcare professional contacts. These standards can help ensure ethical, scientific, and suitable interactions.

Monitoring and enforcement: Regulatory bodies should have the power and resources to monitor and enforce pharmaceutical promotion restrictions. This includes checking promotional materials, verifying claims, and taking action against dishonest or misleading activities.

These principles enhance evidence-based prescribing, limit pharmaceutical advertising, and protect the prescribing process.

Question: Nicholas has been diagnosed with type A influenza. Appropriate prescribing of oseltamivir (Tamiflu) would include:

Answer: Appropriate prescribing of oseltamivir (Tamiflu) for a patient diagnosed with type A influenza may include the following considerations:

Timely initiation: Oseltamivir works best when begun within 48 hours of symptoms. Early drug prescription can reduce symptom severity and duration.

Dosage and duration: Age, weight, and symptom intensity determine oseltamivir dosage and duration. Follow prescribed guidelines and modify dosage as needed.

Patient education: Patients should be told to finish their oseltamivir treatment even if their symptoms improve. This maximizes efficacy and decreases antiviral resistance.

Monitoring adverse effects: Patients should be advised that oseltamivir may cause nausea, vomiting, headache, and occasionally allergic reactions. They should notify their doctor of any serious adverse effects.

Contagion prevention: Patients should be instructed to cover their mouth and nose while coughing or sneezing, wash their hands often, and avoid close contact with others to prevent the spread of influenza.

Oseltamivir for influenza should be prescribed based on the patient’s characteristics and the latest health authority treatment guidelines.

Question: Pharmacokinetic factors that affect prescribing include:

Answer: Pharmacokinetic considerations can influence prescribing:

Absorption: Drug absorption depends on the route of administration (oral, intravenous), drug formulation, patient’s gastrointestinal health, and concurrent food or medication ingestion. These factors affect medication bioavailability and efficacy.

Distribution: Drug distribution depends on physicochemical qualities and patient parameters such body composition, organ function, and disease. Drug distribution depends on protein binding, tissue penetration, and blood-brain barrier permeability.

Metabolism: The body converts medications into active or inactive metabolites through metabolism. Liver enzymes metabolize drugs. Genetic differences in these enzymes and drug interactions affect metabolism, effectiveness, and toxicity.

Elimination: Drugs are eliminated by renal excretion, liver metabolism, or other means. Drug elimination is affected by kidney and liver function, requiring dose modifications or alternate treatments.

These pharmacokinetic parameters assist healthcare providers prescribe appropriately and customize patient treatment regimens.

Question: An example of a first-dose reaction that may occur includes:

Answer: Allergic or hypersensitive reactions are possible first-dose reactions. The initial dose of a drug might cause mild to severe reactions. Symptoms include rash, itching, swelling, trouble breathing, disorientation, and anaphylaxis.

First-dose effects vary with drug. Healthcare providers must be alert and manage such reactions. For severe first-dose responses, antihistamines or epinephrine should be given.

Question: Monitoring for patients who are on long-term antifungal therapy with ketoconazole includes:

Answer: Long-term ketoconazole therapy monitoring may include:

Liver function tests: Long-term ketoconazole use may cause hepatotoxicity. To detect liver damage or dysfunction, monitor ALT, AST, and bilirubin levels regularly.

Ketoconazole side effects should be evaluated. This may involve monitoring for gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain), skin reactions, hormone changes (e.g., decreased testosterone, increased estrogen), and drug interactions with other drugs.

Drug interactions: Ketoconazole may interact with cytochrome P450-metabolized drugs. Drug interactions must be monitored to avoid side effects or reduced efficacy of other treatments.

Therapeutic response: Antifungal therapy should be monitored. It entails examining fungal infection resolution, symptom improvement, or reduction in aberrant laboratory findings (e.g., fungal cultures, microscopy, or other relevant diagnostic tests).

Close monitoring helps discover problems and manage long-term ketoconazole antifungal medication.

Question: Nicole is a 16-year-old female who is taking minocycline for acne. She comes to the clinic complaining of a headache. What would be the plan of care?

Answer: When Nicole, a minocycline-treated acne sufferer, complains of a headache, the treatment plan may include:

Assess headache severity and characteristics: Collect headache duration, intensity, location, and symptoms. This aids diagnosis and management.

Assess causes: Medications can cause headaches. Minocycline can cause headaches. However, tension headaches, migraines, sinusitis, and associated reasons should also be investigated.

Drug history: Assess minocycline dose, duration, and adherence. Nicole may relate the headache with minocycline if she recently started taking it or changed the dosage.

If minocycline causes the headache, try other acne treatments. The healthcare professional might discuss with Nicole the pros and cons of switching acne drugs.

Provide symptomatic relief: If the headache is minor and treatable, the doctor may recommend rest, relaxation, or cool or warm compresses. If safe for Nicole’s age and health, over-the-counter painkillers may be considered.

Monitor and follow-up: If the headache persists or worsens, it may be important to reassess, consider further investigations, or consult a neurologist.

The patient’s needs and circumstances should determine the plan of care, which should include headache evaluation and control while treating acne with minocycline.

Question: Precautions that should be taken when prescribing controlled substances include:

Answer: Prescribe restricted substances safely, legally, and responsibly. Some precautions:

Appropriate indication: Only medically necessary controlled medications should be prescribed. The doctor should evaluate the patient’s condition before prescribing a controlled substance.

Controlled substance prescribing requires accurate and complete documentation. This involves maintaining correct medical records, documenting the justification for prescribing, recording dose instructions, monitoring the patient’s reaction to therapy, and documenting any controlled substance prescription talks or agreements.

Prescription monitoring programs: Healthcare professionals should use PDMPs to access controlled substance prescription histories. Healthcare practitioners can analyze controlled substance prescription information in PDMPs to identify misuse, diversion, or abuse.

Patient education and informed consent: Healthcare practitioners should tell patients about restricted substance dangers and benefits, side effects, correct usage, and the need of following dosage instructions. Patients should be told about dependence, tolerance, and withdrawal symptoms before consenting.

Controlled drug patients need regular monitoring. This includes analyzing the medication’s efficacy, the patient’s reaction to treatment, adverse effects, and misuse, as well as periodically revisiting the controlled substance’s requirement.

Collaboration and consultation: When prescribing prohibited medications for complex situations or high-risk patients, doctors should consult with pain management or addiction specialists. Consultation can improve patient care and lessen controlled substance hazards.

Prescribers must follow laws, regulations, and professional recommendations to protect patients and prevent misuse and diversion.

Question: Clinical judgment in prescribing includes:

Answer: Clinical judgment in prescribing is the healthcare provider’s capacity to make informed pharmaceutical therapy decisions based on clinical competence, patient knowledge, evidence, and patient considerations. Prescription clinical judgment includes:

Assessing the patient’s condition: Doctors employ clinical judgment to evaluate the patient’s medical history, present symptoms, physical examination findings, and pertinent test results. This helps determine the underlying ailment, treatment goals, and pharmaceutical therapy advantages and hazards.

Selecting the right medication: After assessing the patient, doctors determine the best medication(s). The mechanism of action, effectiveness, safety profile, potential drug interactions, and patient-specific features (e.g., age, comorbidities, allergies) are considered.

Individualizing the treatment plan requires clinical judgment. Adjusting dosage, exploring other methods of administration, addressing any contraindications or precautions, and considering patient preferences and adherence may be necessary.

Monitoring and follow-up: Doctors decide on drug therapy patients’ monitoring settings and follow-up schedules. This includes monitoring therapy response, side effects, dosage modifications, and patient adherence.

Continuous assessment and adjustment: Clinical judgment prescribes pharmacological therapy based on patient response. Healthcare providers must analyze therapy outcomes, reassess the patient’s health, and make necessary drug modifications. This may involve changing dosage, drugs, or eliminating inefficient or dangerous therapies.

Healthcare practitioners must use clinical experience, evidence, and patient-specific information to make informed prescribing decisions. It improves patient outcomes and pharmaceutical safety.

Course Outcomes

Chamberlain College of Nursing courses are built to align course content with specific Course Outcomes (COs). The COs define the learning objectives that the student will be required to comprehend and demonstrate by course completion. The COs that will be covered in detail each week can be found in the Overview page in that particular week. Whenever possible, a reference will be made from a particular assignment or discussion back to the CO that it emphasizes.

Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to do the following.

  1. Evaluate the APN role for independent and interprofessional collaborative management of pharmacological agents in prescribing and monitoring pharmacologic therapies in patients across the lifespan. (PO 1)
  2. Differentiate evidence-based practice guidelines in management of therapeutic agents for selected system problems. (PO 1)
  3. Analyze major pharmacological groups including pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and indications for use, in the management of patients in primary care and with special populations such as infants, children, pregnant and lactating women, and older adults. (PO 1, 4)
  4. Distinguish internal and external environment factors affecting drug action, reaction, efficacy, and interaction. (PO 1)
  5. Identify appropriate drug therapy and drug product selection for treatment of specific health problems in the primary care setting while taking into consideration cost-effectiveness, side effects, monitoring, contraindications, interactions, and efficacy. (PO 1, 4)
  6. Reflect on personal and professional growth toward achieving competence as a family nurse practitioner. (PO 5, 10)

Course Schedule

Week, COs, and Topics Readings Assignments
Week 1

CO 1, 2, 3, 4

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Art of Pharmacotherapeutics, Reproductive System Medications and Drug-OTC-Herbal Interactions

Edmunds, M. W. & Mayhew, M. S. (2013). Pharmacology for the primary care provider. (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 1: Prescriptive Authority and Role Implementation: Tradition versus Change
  • Chapter 2: Historical Review of Prescriptive Authority: The Role of Nurses (NPs, CNMs, CRNAs, and CNSs) and Physicians Assistants
  • Chapter 3: Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Principles
  • Chapter 7: Over-the-Counter Medications
  • Chapter 8: Complementary and Alternative Therapies
  • Chapter 9: Establishing the Therapeutic Relationship
  • Chapter 10: Practical Tips on Writing Prescriptions
  • Chapter 11: Evidence-Based Decision Making and Treatment Guidelines
  • Chapter 12: Design and Implementation of Patient Education
  • Chapter 54: Contraceptives
  • Chapter 55: Hormone Replacement Therapy
  • Chapter 56: Drugs for Breast Cancer
  • Chapter 71: Weight Management
Case Study Discussion

Quiz

Week 2

CO 5

Metabolic Syndrome I and II/Diabetes-Co-Morbidities,  Hypertension, and Hyperlipidemia

Edmunds, M. W. & Mayhew, M. S. (2013). Pharmacology for the primary care provider. (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 17: Hypertension and Miscellaneous Antihypertensive Medications
  • Chapter 18: Coronary Artery Disease and Antianginal Medications
  • Chapter 21: Calcium Channel Blockers
  • Chapter 24: Antihyperlipidemic Agents
  • Chapter 52: Thyroid Medications
  • Chapter 53: Diabetes Mellitus Agents
Case Study Discussion

Quiz

Week 3

CO 5

Cardiovascular Disease: Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation, and Gastrointestinal Disorders

Edmunds, M. W. & Mayhew, M. S. (2013). Pharmacology for the primary care provider. (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 19: Heart Failure and Digoxin
  • Chapter 20: B-Blockers
  • Chapter 22: ACE Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers
  • Chapter 23: Antiarrhythmic Agents
  • Chapter 25: Agents That Act on Blood
  • Chapter 26: Antacids and the Management of GERD
  • Chapter 27: Histamine-Blockers and Proton Pump Inhibitors
  • Chapter 28: Laxatives
  • Chapter 29: Antidiarrheals
  • Chapter 30: Antiemetics
  • Chapter 31: Medications for Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Other Gastrointestinal Problems
  • Chapter 32: Diuretics
Case Study Discussion

Quiz

Week 4

CO 1, 3, 4, 5

Depression (anti-depressants), Anti-anxiety, and Psychopharmacology

Edmunds, M. W. & Mayhew, M. S. (2013). Pharmacology for the primary care provider. (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 41: Medications for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Chapter 42: Medications for Dementia
  • Chapter 45: Antiepileptics
  • Chapter 46: Antiparkinson Agents
  • Chapter 47: Antidepressants
  • Chapter 48: Antianxiety and Antiinsomnia Agents
  • Chapter 49: Antipsychotics
  • Chapter 50: Substance Abuse
  • Chapter 72: Smoking Cessation
Midterm exam
Week 5

CO 1, 3

Anti-infectives

Edmunds, M. W. & Mayhew, M. S. (2013). Pharmacology for the primary care provider. (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 33: Male Genitourinary Agents
  • Chapter 34: Agents for Urinary Incontinence and Urinary Analgesia
  • Chapter 57: Principles for Prescribing Anti-infectives
  • Chapter 58: Treatment for Specific Infections and Miscellaneous Antibodies
  • Chapter 59: Penicillins
  • Chapter 60: Cephalosporins
  • Chapter 61: Tetracyclines
  • Chapter 62: Macrolides
  • Chapter 63: Fluoroquinolones
  • Chapter 64: Aminoglycosides
  • Chapter 65: Sulfonamides
  • Chapter 66: Antitubercular Agents
  • Chapter 67: Antifungals
  • Chapter 68: Antiretroviral Medications
  • Chapter 69: Antiviral and Antiprotozoal Agents
Case Study Discussion

Quiz

Week 6

CO 3

Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesics

(Gout and Acetaminophen Toxicity)

Edmunds, M. W. & Mayhew, M. S. (2013). Pharmacology for the primary care provider. (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 35: Acetaminophen
  • Chapter 36: Aspirin and Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Medications
  • Chapter 37: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Medications and Immune Modulators
  • Chapter 38: Gout Medications
  • Chapter 39: Osteoporosis Treatment
  • Chapter 40: Muscle Relaxants
  • Chapter 43: Analgesia and Pain Management
  • Chapter 44: Migraine Medications
Case Study Discussion

Quiz

Week 7

CO 3

Pulmonary/Respiratory Agents: Asthma, and Drug Mechanisms

Edmunds, M. W. & Mayhew, M. S. (2013). Pharmacology for the primary care provider. (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 13: Dermatologic Agents
  • Chapter 14: Eye, Ear, Throat, and Mouth
  • Chapter 15: Upper Respiratory Agents
  • Chapter 16: Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Medications
  • Chapter 51: Glucocorticosteroids
Reflection

Quiz

Week 8

CO 6

Unrelated Topics in Pharmacology

Edmunds, M. W. & Mayhew, M. S. (2013). Pharmacology for the primary care provider . (4th ed.). Retrieved from http://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 4: Special Populations: Geriatrics
  • Chapter 5: Special Populations: Pediatrics
  • Chapter 6: Special Populations: Pregnant and Nursing Women
  • Chapter 70:The Immune System and Immunizations
  • Chapter 73: Vitamins and Minerals
Final exam

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.

Evaluation Methods

The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.

Graded Item Points Weighting
Discussion (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 6) 135 points each week 675 67.5%
Midterm Exam (Week 4) 120 12%
Reflection (Week 7) 55 5.5%
Final Exam (Week 8) 150 15%
Total 1,000 100%

No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.

Letter Grade Points Percentage
A   940–1,000 94% to 100%
A-  920–939 92% to 93%
B+ 890–919 89% to 91%
B   860–889 86% to 88%
B-  840–859 84% to 85%
C+ 810–839 81% to 83%
C   760–809 76% to 80%
F   759 and below 75% and below

NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Participation for MSN

Participation Guidelines

The weekly case study discussion is worth up to 135 points. Students are expected to participate a minimum of four times (once in Part One by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in Part Two by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in Part Three by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, and one post to a student peer as required in the interactive dialogue criterion).

Grading Rubric

Criteria Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

Satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvements

Poor or failing  level of performance

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

 Total Points Possible= 135
 40 Points  35 Points 32 Points   15 Points   0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three which contribute unique perspectives and insights, and are applicable to the discussion/case presentation.

 

Student fully answers  discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three which contribute unique perspectives and insights, but may be lacking some applicability to the discussion/case presentation.

 

Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three but some responses have limited perspectives and insights, and have limited application to discussion/case presentation, or only two of the three posts have been fully answered.

 

Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three but posts are not consistent with current practice, or only one post has been fully answered.

 

Student does not fully answer discussion questions in all of the parts or responses offer neither insight,nor application to discussion/case presentation.

 

  40 Points    35 Points 32 Points   15 Points  0 Points
Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) All three discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided.

 

All three discussion posts are from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided.

 

However, evidence-based, peer reviewed journal articles that are cited may not fully support the discussion in any one area.

Two of the three discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided. Only one of the discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) scholarly in nature, 2) published within the last 5 years, and; 3) in-text citations and full references are provided. Discussion posts One, Two, and Three contain no evidence- based practice references or citations.

 

*Students should note that factitious sources, sources that are clearly not read by the student and used, or sources that have incorrect dates will result in an automatic ZERO for this section for the week.

    10 Points 9 Points 8 Points   4 Points   0 Points
Organization Discussion posts One, Two, and Three present case study findings in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence.

 

Discussion posts One, Two, and Three present case study findings which are sometimes unclear to follow.

 

Discussion posts present case findings in a logical and understandable method but one of the discussion parts contain a significant error. Discussion posts are sometimes unclear to follow and/or there are significant errors in two discussion parts.

 

Discussion posts are not presented in a logical, understandable sequence and/or there are significant errors in ALL THREE discussion parts.

 

    40 Points   35 Points   32 Points 15 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Presents case study findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a peer including evidence from appropriate sources, and all direct faculty questions posted in parts one, two and three.

 

A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.

 

Presents case study findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a peer. Does include evidence from appropriate sources.

 

Responds to some direct faculty questions posted in parts one, two and three.

 

 

A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.

  Responds to a student peer and/or faculty questions but the posts adds limited content or insights to the discussion.

 

Does include evidence from appropriate sources

 

Responds to a student peer and/or faculty, but the nature of the response is not substantial.

 

Does not include evidence from any resources.

 

Does not respond to a topic-related peer post and/or does not respond to faculty questions by Sunday.

 

  5 Points   4 Points   3 Points   2 Points   0 Points  
Grammar, Syntax, APA APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors.

 

Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

 

Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

 

Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

 

Post contains greater than ten errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.

 

  0 Points Deducted   10% Deduction per Day for Late Discussion Post   33 Points Deducted per Omitted/Late Discussion Part
Participation Enters first post to Part One by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; first post to Part Two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday; and posts Part Three and peer response by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. 

 

Ten percent (10%) per day for each late discussion post.

*See Calculating Late Posting Penalty Document

 

 

Written submissions will not be accepted after Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due.

Thirty three (33) points deducted per part if Part 1, Part 2 or 3 is/are not submitted by Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due

 

* Refer to “What is a Scholarly Source” and “Reference Guide for FNP Case Studies” in the “Course Resources” section

** Part Three discussion CLOSES at Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT deductions will apply once discussion has closed.

Webliography Disclaimer

The purpose of the Webliography is to provide students with annotated bibliographies of world wide websites relevant to their courses. These websites are not meant to be all inclusive of what is available for each course’s subjects and have not been sanctioned as academically rigorous or scholarly by Chamberlain College of Nursing. Please exercise caution when using these websites for course assignments and references.

Professional Portfolio

Select assignments from courses across the FNP program will be compiled as artifacts within a Professional Portfolio to demonstrate your professional growth and expertise. Your final portfolio, which will be submitted in the final course NR661, will be assessed against the learning outcomes of the program. The Professional Portfolio will include the following:

  • Reflections from Week 8 for all FNP courses
  • Five exemplar case studies (student selects top five)
  • eLogs portfolio
  • Curriculum vitae
  • Professional development plan paper from NR510

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NR-507: Advanced Pathophysiology Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

NR-507: Advanced Pathophysiology Course Assignments & Discussions Study GuideNR 507 Advanced Pathophysiology Course Description

Contact Hours: Lecture – 48, Lab – 0, Clinical – 0

Semester Hours: Theory 3

In this course, the student encounters advanced content in pathophysiology and human physiologic responses across the lifespan. The student explores, analyzes, applies and evaluates the normal and abnormal human responses to selected pathophysiologic mechanisms and conditions.

Prerequisites Effective January 2024:

NR-581 or NR-581NP, NR-582 or NR-582NP, NR-583 or NR-583NP, NR-584 or NR-584NP, NR-585 or NR-585NP, NR-586 or NR-586NP

Prerequisites: NR-500NP or NR-500, NR-501NP or NR-501, NR-503, NR-505NP or NR-505, NR-506NP, NR-599

Prerequisites (students enrolled prior to May 2019): NR-500, NR-501, NR-503, NR-505, NR-506, NR-510, NR-512

NR 507 Advanced Pathophysiology Course Syllabus

NR 507 Coursework Weeks 1 – 8

NR 507 Course Assignments Week 1 – 8

NR 507 Case Study Assignments Week 1, 3, and 6

NR 507 Discussions Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7

NR 507 Week 1 Assignments, Case Study, Introduction, Edapt Content, Readings

NR 507 Week 1 Case Study: Allergic Rhinitis

NR 507 Week 2 Assignments, Discussion, Edapt Content, Readings

NR 507 Week 2 Assignments: Cardiovascular Disorders plus Hematological Disorders

NR 507 Week 2 Discussion: Heart Failure

NR 507 Week 3 Assignment, Case Study, Open Forum, Readings

NR 507 Week 3 Assignment: Alterations in Pulmonary Function

NR 507 Week 3 Case Study: Pulmonary

NR 507 Week 4 Midterm Exam

NR 507 Week 5 Assignments, Discussion, Readings

NR 507 Week 5 Discussion: Diverticulitis

NR 507 Week 6 Assignments

NR 507 Week 6 Assignment: Case Study

NR 507 Week 7 Discussion: Alzheimer’s Disease

NR 507 Week 7 Assignment, Discussion, Readings

NR 507 Week 8 Final Exam

NR 507 Week 4 Midterm Exam

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Syllabus Overview

Course Number: NR507
Course Title: Advanced Pathophysiology
Course Credits: 3 credits
Prerequisite: NR503

Course Description

This course will provide students with advanced content in pathophysiology and human physiologic responses. The student will explore, analyze, apply, and evaluate the normal and abnormal human responses to selected pathophysiologic mechanisms and conditions.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (year of publication). Title of textbook in italics (X ed.). City, ST: Publisher.

Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-508: Advanced Pharmacology Course Assignments & Discussions.

Optional Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Book Title

Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

eBook Details

First Time Using VitalSource?

Step 1: View the VitalSource Video

Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online

  1. Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
  2. Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.

Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions

You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.

Already Registered?   3 Ways to Access Your eBooks

Online

Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.

Desktop

Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.

Mobile

Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Access E-Book

McCance, K. L., Huether, S. E., Brashers, V. L., & Rote, N. S. (2013). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

 

Access E-Book

McCance, K. L., Huether, S. E., Brashers, V. L., & Rote, N. S. (2013). Study guide for pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

 

The following book is required across all FNP courses:

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

The following book is recommended across all FNP courses:

Access E-Book

Goroll, A. H., & Mulley, A. G. (2014). Primary care medicine: Office evaluation and management of the adult patient (7th ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer.

 

eBook Details

First Time Using VitalSource?

Step 1: View the VitalSource Video

Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online

  1. Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
  2. Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.

Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions

You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.

Already Registered?   3 Ways to Access Your eBooks

Online

Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.

Desktop

Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.

Mobile

Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.

Program Outcomes

Program Outcomes of Chamberlain nursing programs can be found in the Program Descriptions section of your College Catalog. You can access your College Catalog at http://www.chamberlain.edu/msncatalog.

The MSN program outcomes are aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing publication, The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing (2011). Upon completion of the MSN degree program, the graduate will be able to:

  1. Practice safe, high-quality advanced nursing care based on concepts and knowledge from nursing and related disciplines.
  2. Construct processes for leading and promoting quality improvement and safety in advanced nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
  3. Use contemporary communication modalities effectively in advanced nursing roles.
  4. Evaluate the design, implementation and outcomes of strategies developed to meet healthcare needs.
  5. Develop a plan for lifelong personal and professional growth that integrates professional values regarding scholarship, service and global engagement.
  6. Apply legal, ethical and human-caring principles to situations in advanced nursing practice.
  7. Design patient-centered care models and delivery systems using the best available scientific evidence.
  8. Manage human, fiscal and physical resources to achieve and support individual and organizational goals.
  9. Compose a plan for systematic inquiry and dissemination of findings to support advanced nursing practice, patient-care innovation, and the nursing profession.
  10. Collaborate interprofessionally in research, education, practice, health policy and leadership to improve population health outcomes.
  11. Apply principles of informatics to manage data and information in order to support effective decision making.

NR-507: Advanced Pathophysiology: A Comprehensive Guide

NR 507 Coursework Weeks 1 – 8:

The coursework for NR 507 Advanced Pathophysiology covers a wide variety of topics, giving you the opportunity to build an in-depth understanding of advanced pathophysiological ideas.

NR 507 Course Assignments Week 1 – 8:

You will have projects due at various times throughout the week as a part of your education. Your knowledge of the topic as well as your ability to apply it will be tested with these assignments.

NR 507 Case Study Assignments Week 1, 3, and 6:

NR 507 Case studies provide you the chance to apply what you’ve learned about pathophysiology to situations that actually occur in the real world. You will examine and assess particular situations that pertain to allergic rhinitis, pulmonary function, and other pertinent subjects.

NR 507 Discussions Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7:

Participating in discussions gives you the opportunity to communicate with your contemporaries and exchange ideas on a variety of pathophysiological subjects. Your knowledge of the topic will likely improve as a result of participating in these discussions.

NR 507 Week 1 Assignments, Case Study, Introduction, Edapt Content, Readings:

During the first week of the class, you will be given an overview of the material that will be covered, as well as an introduction to the required readings, as well as the first of your NR 507 assignments and a case study centered on allergic rhinitis.

NR 507 Week 2 Assignments, Discussion, Edapt Content, Readings:

The second week of the course covers cardiovascular and hematological illnesses. Heart failure is explicitly addressed in both the assignments and the conversations that take place during this week.

NR 507 Week 3 Assignment, Case Study, Open Forum, Readings:

Changes in pulmonary function are the primary topic of discussion during NR 507 Week 3 of the study. You will investigate a case study that focuses on disorders affecting the lungs (pulmonary conditions).

NR 507 Week 4 Midterm Exam Solutions plus Study Guide:

The NR 507midterm exam will be given during NR 507week 4, and it will assess your knowledge and comprehension of the material that has been presented up to this point. There are study guides and answers available for you to use so that you can become ready.

NR 507 Week 5 Assignments, Discussion, Readings:

During NR 507 Week 5, the topic of diverticulitis is front and center, since both the assignments and the discussions are centered around it.

NR 507 Week 6 Assignments:

In NR 507 week 6, you will have extra assignments to complete, all of which are designed to further hone your comprehension of advanced pathophysiology.

NR 507 Week 7 Discussion:

NR 507 Alzheimer’s Disease: During the seventh week of the course, you will participate in a conversation about Alzheimer’s disease and investigate the pathophysiological features of the condition.

NR 507 Week 7 Assignment, Discussion, Readings:

The readings and assignments for NR 507 Week 7 are intended to supplement the conversation that was held about Alzheimer’s illness.

NR 507 Week 8 Final Exam:

The final test for NR 507 will serve as the capstone of your educational experience. To perform exceptionally well on this in-depth test, thoroughly prepare utilizing the study guide that has been provided.

NR 507 Week 4 Midterm Exam:

Note that there are older versions of the Week 4 midterm exam that have been abandoned, and it is possible that these older versions may not apply to the present course.

Our team of experts is well-versed in NR-507: Advanced Pathophysiology Course Assignments & Discussions :

Able to offer complete support for each of the categories above, and with the necessary skills. You can count on us to provide first-rate assistance with any aspect of your online course, whether it be homework, case studies, class discussions, or studying for exams. Don’t hesitate to ask for help if you want to get ahead in NR-507: Advanced Pathophysiology Course Assignments & Discussions.

FAQs

Question: The coronary ostia are located in the:

The ascending aorta walls above the aortic valve include the coronary ostia. Right and left coronary ostia are common. These openings allow aortic blood to enter the coronary arteries, which oxygenate the heart muscle.

Question: Which manifestations of Vaso occlusive crisis are associated with sickle cell disease (SCD) in infants?

Vaso occlusive crises can cause acute discomfort, fever, hand and foot swelling, irritability, fussiness, and decreased appetite in sickle cell disease (SCD) newborns. Jaundice, priapism, and acute chest syndrome (chest discomfort, cough, and difficulty breathing) may also occur.

Question: Decreased lung compliance means that the lungs are demonstrating which characteristic?

Decreased lung compliance means stiffness or reduced lung expansion. It reduces lung capacity. Pulmonary fibrosis, pneumonia, and lung fluid accumulation can cause this.

Question: What is the life span of an erythrocyte (in days)?

Erythrocytes, or red blood cells, live 120 days. Red blood cells carry oxygen from the lungs to tissues and eliminate carbon dioxide. The spleen and liver remove old red blood cells after 120 days, and bone marrow produces new ones.

Question: Infants are most susceptible to significant losses in total body water because of an infant’s:

Due to their bigger body surface area, higher metabolic rate, and immature kidney function, infants lose more total body water. Their higher metabolic rate requires more water, and their immature kidneys cannot concentrate urine and preserve water. Infants are especially susceptible to dehydration since they have more body fluids.

Question: Causes of hyperkalemia include:

Hyperkalemia is high blood potassium. Acute kidney injury or chronic kidney disease, potassium-sparing diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, adrenal gland disorders like Addison’s disease, tissue trauma or burns, acidosis, and excessive potassium intake can cause hyperkalemia.

Question: Erythrocyte life span of less than 120 days, ineffective bone marrow response to erythropoietin, and altered iron metabolism describe the pathophysiologic characteristics of which type of anemia?

Hemolytic anemias are associated with erythrocyte lifespans of less than 120 days, poor bone marrow response to erythropoietin, and abnormal iron metabolism. Hemolytic anemias cause premature red blood cell breakdown and anemia. Hemolytic anemias include autoimmune, inherited, and sickle cell.

Question: The lung is innervated by the parasympathetic nervous system via which nerve?

The vagus nerve (tenth cranial nerve or pneumogastric nerve) controls lung parasympathetic innervation. The vagus nerve regulates bronchoconstriction, mucus secretion, and airway smooth muscle tone through parasympathetic fibers.

Question: When an individual aspirates food particles, where would the nurse expect to hear decreased or absent breath sounds?

The nurse expects to hear fewer or no breath sounds in the afflicted lung when food particles are aspirated. Food particles can block airways and limit sound transmission. The nurse may also notice coughing, wheezing, or increased breathing effort.

Question: Which T-lymphocyte phenotype is the key determinant of childhood asthma?

Th2-lymphocytes are important in pediatric asthma. Th2 lymphocytes release inflammatory cytokines such IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13, which cause airway inflammation, mucus formation, and eosinophil recruitment. Immune responses cause asthma’s bronchoconstriction and airway hyperresponsiveness.

Question: What is the final stage of the infectious process?

Resolution or convalescence ends the infectious process. The immune system destroys or controls the infectious pathogen in this stage. The person recovers when the infection symptoms fade. Infection type and intensity determine convalescence length.

Course Outcomes

Chamberlain College of Nursing courses are built to align course content with specific Course Outcomes (COs). The COs define the learning objectives that the student will be required to comprehend and demonstrate by course completion. The COs that will be covered in detail each week can be found in the Overview page in that particular week. Whenever possible, a reference will be made from a particular assignment or discussion back to the CO that it emphasizes.

Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to do the following.

  1. Analyze pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)
  2. Differentiate the epidemiology, etiology, developmental considerations, pathogenesis, and clinical and laboratory manifestations of specific disease processes. (PO 1)
  3. Examine the way in which homeostatic, adaptive, and compensatory physiological mechanisms can be supported and/or altered through specific therapeutic interventions. (PO 1, 7)
  4. Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)
  5. Describe outcomes of disruptive or alterations in specific physiologic processes. (PO 1)
  6. Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)
  7. Explore age-specific and developmental alterations in physiologic and disease states. (PO 1, 4)
  8. Reflect on personal and professional growth toward achieving competence as a family nurse practitioner. (PO 5, 10)

Course Schedule

Week, COs, and Topics Readings Assignments
Week 1

CO 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Altered Immune System and Altered Inflammatory Response

McCance, K. L., Huether, S. E., Brashers, V. L., & Rote, N. S. (2013). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

  • Chapter 8: Adaptive Immunity
  • Chapter 9: Alterations in Immunity and Inflammation
  • Chapter 10: Infection
  • Chapter 11: Stress and Disease
  • Chapter 12: Cancer Biology
  • Chapter 13: Cancer Epidemiology
Case Sudy

Quiz (required, but not graded)

Week 2

CO 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Respiratory Disorders and Alterations in Acid/Base Balance, Fluid and Electrolytes

McCance, K. L., Huether, S. E., Brashers, V. L., & Rote, N. S. (2013). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

  • Chapter 3: The Cellular Environment: Fluids and Electrolytes, Acids and Bases
  • Chapter 34: Structure and Function of the Pulmonary System
  • Chapter 35: Alterations in Pulmonary Functions
  • Chapter 36: Alterations in Pulmonary Function in Children
Case Study

Quiz (required, but not graded)

Week 3

CO 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Cardiovascular, Cellular, and Hematologic Disorders

McCance, K. L., Huether, S. E., Brashers, V. L., & Rote, N. S. (2013). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

  • Chapter 26: Sexually Transmitted Infections
  • Chapter 27: Structure and Function of the Hematologic System
  • Chapter 28: Alterations in Erythrocyte Function
  • Chapter 29: Alterations of Leukocyte, Lymphoid, and Hemostatic Function
  • Chapter 30: Alterations in Hematologic Function in Children
  • Chapter 31: Structure and Function of the Cardiovascular and Lymphatic System
  • Chapter 32: Alterations of Cardiovascular Function
  • Chapter 33: Alterations of Cardiovascular Function in Children
Case Study

Quiz (required, but not graded)

Week 4

CO 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Alterations in Renal Function

McCance, K. L., Huether, S. E., Brashers, V. L., & Rote, N. S. (2013). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

  • Chapter 37: Structure and Function of the Renal and Urologic Systems
  • Chapter 38: Alterations of Renal and Urinary Tract Function
  • Chapter 39: Alterations of Renal and Urinary Tract Function in Children
Midterm (graded)
Week 5

CO 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Hormonal Regulation

McCance, K. L., Huether, S. E., Brashers, V. L., & Rote, N. S. (2013). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

  • Chapter 21: Mechanisms of Hormonal Regulation
  • Chapter 22: Alterations of Hormonal Regulation
  • Chapter 40: Structure and Function of the Digestive System
  • Chapter 41: Alterations of Digestive Function
  • Chapter 42: Alterations of Digestive Function in Children
Case Study

Quiz (required, but not graded)

Week 6

CO 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Musculoskeletal Disorders

McCance, K. L., Huether, S. E., Brashers, V. L., & Rote, N. S. (2013). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

  • Chapter 43: Structure and Function of the Musculoskeletal System
  • Chapter 44: Alterations of Musculoskeletal Function
  • Chapter 45: Alterations of Musculoskeletal Function in Children
  • Chapter 46: Structure, Function and Disorders of the Integument
  • Chapter 47: Alterations of the Integument in Children
Case Study

Quiz (required, but not graded)

Week 7

CO 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Behavioral, Neurologic, and Digestive System

McCance, K. L., Huether, S. E., Brashers, V. L., & Rote, N. S. (2013). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

  • Chapter 16: Pain, Temperature Regulation, Sleep and Sensory Function
  • Chapter 17: Alterations in Cognitive Systems, Cerebral Hemodynamics, and Motor Function
  • Chapter 18: Disorders of the Central and Peripheral Nervous Systems and the Neuromuscular Junction
  • Chapter 19: Neurobiology of Schizophrenia, Mood Disorders, and Anxiety Disorders
  • Chapter 20: Alterations of Neurologic Function in Children
Reflection (graded)

Quiz (required, but not graded)

Week 8

CO 8

Genomes, Genetic Alterations, and Reproductive Disorders

McCance, K. L., Huether, S. E., Brashers, V. L., & Rote, N. S. (2013). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (7th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

  • Chapter 4: Genes and Genetic Diseases
  • Chapter 5: Genes, Environment, and Common Diseases
  • Chapter 23: Structure and Function of the Reproductive Systems
  • Chapter 24: Alterations of the Female Reproductive System
  • Chapter 25: Alterations of the Male Reproductive System
Final Comprehensive Exam (graded)

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.

Evaluation Methods

The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.

Graded Item Points Weighting
Case Study Discussion (Weeks 1, 2, 3, 5, 6) 135 points each week 675 67.5%
Midterm Exam (Week 4) 120 12%
Reflection (Week 7) 55 5.5%
Final Exam (Week 8) 150 15%
Total 1,000 100%

No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.

Letter Grade Points Percentage
A   940–1,000 94% to 100%
A-  920–939 92% to 93%
B+ 890–919 89% to 91%
B   860–889 86% to 88%
B-  840–859 84% to 85%
C+ 810–839 81% to 83%
C   760–809 76% to 80%
F   759 and below 75% and below

NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Participation for MSN

Participation Guidelines

The weekly case study discussion is worth up to 135 points. Students are expected to participate a minimum of four times (once in Part One by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in Part Two by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in Part Three by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, and one post to a student peer as required in the interactive dialogue criterion).

Grading Rubric

Criteria Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

Satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvements

Poor or failing  level of performance

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

 Total Points Possible= 135
 40 Points  35 Points 32 Points   15 Points   0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three which contribute unique perspectives and insights, and are applicable to the discussion/case presentation.

 

Student fully answers  discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three which contribute unique perspectives and insights, but may be lacking some applicability to the discussion/case presentation.

 

Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three but some responses have limited perspectives and insights, and have limited application to discussion/case presentation, or only two of the three posts have been fully answered.

 

Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three but posts are not consistent with current practice, or only one post has been fully answered.

 

Student does not fully answer discussion questions in all of the parts or responses offer neither insight,nor application to discussion/case presentation.

 

  40 Points    35 Points 32 Points   15 Points  0 Points
Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) All three discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided.

 

All three discussion posts are from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided.

 

However, evidence-based, peer reviewed journal articles that are cited may not fully support the discussion in any one area.

Two of the three discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided. Only one of the discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) scholarly in nature, 2) published within the last 5 years, and; 3) in-text citations and full references are provided. Discussion posts One, Two, and Three contain no evidence- based practice references or citations.

 

*Students should note that factitious sources, sources that are clearly not read by the student and used, or sources that have incorrect dates will result in an automatic ZERO for this section for the week.

    10 Points 9 Points 8 Points   4 Points   0 Points
Organization Discussion posts One, Two, and Three present case study findings in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence.

 

Discussion posts One, Two, and Three present case study findings which are sometimes unclear to follow.

 

Discussion posts present case findings in a logical and understandable method but one of the discussion parts contain a significant error. Discussion posts are sometimes unclear to follow and/or there are significant errors in two discussion parts.

 

Discussion posts are not presented in a logical, understandable sequence and/or there are significant errors in ALL THREE discussion parts.

 

    40 Points   35 Points   32 Points 15 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Presents case study findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a peer including evidence from appropriate sources, and all direct faculty questions posted in parts one, two and three.

 

A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.

 

Presents case study findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a peer. Does include evidence from appropriate sources.

 

Responds to some direct faculty questions posted in parts one, two and three.

 

 

A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.

  Responds to a student peer and/or faculty questions but the posts adds limited content or insights to the discussion.

 

Does include evidence from appropriate sources

 

Responds to a student peer and/or faculty, but the nature of the response is not substantial.

 

Does not include evidence from any resources.

 

Does not respond to a topic-related peer post and/or does not respond to faculty questions by Sunday.

 

  5 Points   4 Points   3 Points   2 Points   0 Points  
Grammar, Syntax, APA APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors.

 

Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

 

Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

 

Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.

 

Post contains greater than ten errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.

 

  0 Points Deducted   10% Deduction per Day for Late Discussion Post   33 Points Deducted per Omitted/Late Discussion Part
Participation Enters first post to Part One by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; first post to Part Two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday; and posts Part Three and peer response by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. 

 

Ten percent (10%) per day for each late discussion post.

*See Calculating Late Posting Penalty Document

 

 

Written submissions will not be accepted after Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due.

Thirty three (33) points deducted per part if Part 1, Part 2 or 3 is/are not submitted by Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due

 

* Refer to “What is a Scholarly Source” and “Reference Guide for FNP Case Studies” in the “Course Resources” section

** Part Three discussion CLOSES at Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT deductions will apply once discussion has closed.

Webliography Disclaimer

The purpose of the Webliography is to provide students with annotated bibliographies of world wide websites relevant to their courses. These websites are not meant to be all inclusive of what is available for each course’s subjects and have not been sanctioned as academically rigorous or scholarly by Chamberlain College of Nursing. Please exercise caution when using these websites for course assignments and references.

Professional Portfolio

Select assignments from courses across the FNP program will be compiled as artifacts within a Professional Portfolio to demonstrate your professional growth and expertise. Your final portfolio, which will be submitted in the final course NR661, will be assessed against the learning outcomes of the program. The Professional Portfolio will include the following:

  • Reflections from Week 8 for all FNP courses
  • Five exemplar case studies (student selects top five)
  • eLogs portfolio
  • Curriculum vitae
  • Professional development plan paper from NR510

NR-507: Advanced Pathophysiology Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

Week 1: Altered Immune System and Altered Inflammatory Response

– Discussion Part One

This week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes (COs).

1 Analyze pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

2 Differentiate the epidemiology, etiology, developmental considerations, pathogenesis, and clinical and laboratory manifestations of specific disease processes. (PO 1)

3 Examine the way in which homeostatic, adaptive, and compensatory physiological mechanisms can be supported and/or altered through specific therapeutic interventions. (PO 1, 7)

6 Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

5 Describe outcomes of disruptive or alterations in specific physiologic processes. (PO 1)

6 Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

7 Explore age-specific and developmental alterations in physiologic

and disease states. (PO 1, 4)

Discussion

Discussion Part One (graded)

John is a 19-year-old college football player who presents with sneezing, itchy eyes, and nasal congestion that worsens at night. He states that he has a history of asthma, eczema and allergies

to pollen. There is also one other person on the football team that has similar symptoms. His vitals are BP 110/70, P 84, R 18, T 100 F. Write a differential of at least five (5) possible items from the most likely to less likely. For each disease include information about the epidemiology, pathophysiology and briefly argue why this disease fits the presentation and why it might not fit the presentation.

Week 1: Altered Immune System and Altered Inflammatory Response – Discussion

Part Two

A patient has been admitted into the emergency room that was in the passenger side of a car that collided with another car head on. The patient is pale, barely conscious and has a weak and thready pulse. An IV is started. The vitals are BP 80/50, P 140, T 96.0 and R 26. As the team fights to keep the patient alive they have to remove the spleen. Blood is given but it has been mistyped. A transfusion reaction occurs. Describe the type of hypersensitivity reaction that has occurred and discuss the molecular pathophysiology of the specific type of hypersensitive reaction you have chosen.

In the event that this patient survived the car accident and the transfusion reaction which organs are most likely to be damaged and why?

Week 1: Altered Immune System and Altered Inflammatory

Response – Discussion Part Three

This week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes (COs).

1 Analyze pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

2 Differentiate the epidemiology, etiology, developmental considerations, pathogenesis, and clinical and laboratory manifestations of specific disease processes. (PO 1)

3 Examine the way in which homeostatic, adaptive, and compensatory physiological mechanisms can be supported and/or altered through specific therapeutic interventions. (PO 1,

4 Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states.(PO 1)

5 Describe outcomes of disruptive or alterations in specific physiologic processes. (PO 1)

6 Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

7 Explore age-specific and developmental alterations in physiologic and disease states. (PO 1, 4)

Discussion

A 44-year-old patient presents with lump in the chest of approximately 2 cm in diameter. There is a slight dimple over the location of the lump and when the lump is manipulated it seems to be attached to the surrounding tissue. A lumpectomy is performed and the mass is sent to pathology. The pathology report comes back and the mass is confirmed to be an estrogen receptor negative, a progesterone receptor negative and a her2/neu receptor positive breast cancer.

What are some of the risk factors for breast cancer?

What tumor suppressor genes are associated with breast cancer?

What tumor oncogenes are associated with breast cancer?

Compare and contrast tumor suppressor genes from oncogenes?

Week2

Week 2: Respiratory Disorders and Alterations in Acid/Base Balance,

Fluid and Electrolytes – Discussion Part One

This week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes (COs).

Analyze pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

Differentiate the epidemiology, etiology, developmental considerations, pathogenesis, and clinical and laboratory manifestations of specific disease processes. (PO 1)

Examine the way in which homeostatic, adaptive, and compensatory physiological mechanisms can be supported and/or altered through specific therapeutic interventions. (PO 1, 7)

Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states. (PO1)

Describe outcomes of disruptive or alterations in specific physiologic processes. (PO 1)

Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states. (PO1)

Explore age-specific and developmental alterations in physiologic and disease states. (PO 1, 4)

Discussion Part One (graded)

A five-month-old Caucasian female is brought into the clinic as the parent complain that she has been having ongoing foul-smelling , greasy diarrhea. She seems to be small for her age and a

bit sickly but, her parent’s state that she has a huge appetite. Upon examination you find that

the patient is wheezing and you observe her coughing.

Write a differential diagnosis of at least five (5) disorders and explain why each might be

a possibility and any potential weaknesses of each differential.

Why is it that the later in age this disease manifest itself, the less severe the disease is?

What tests would you run to clarify your differential and potentially come to a definitive

diagnosis?

If the same child was African in ancestry would this change your initial differential? Why

or why not?

Week 2: Respiratory Disorders and Alterations in Acid/Base Balance, Fluid and Electrolytes – Discussion Part Two

This week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes (COs). NR507 Advanced Pathophysiology – Full Course (all essay discussions+ midterm and final exam)

1 Analyze pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

2 Differentiate the epidemiology, etiology, developmental considerations, pathogenesis, and clinical and laboratory manifestations of specific disease processes. (PO 1)

3 Examine the way in which homeostatic, adaptive, and compensatory physiological mechanisms can be supported and/or altered through specific therapeutic interventions. (PO 1, 7)

4 Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

5 Describe outcomes of disruptive or alterations in specific physiologic processes. (PO 1)

6 Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

7 Explore age-specific and developmental alterations in physiologic and disease states. (PO 1, 4)

Tammy is a 33-year-old who presents for evaluation of a cough. She reports that about 3 weeks ago she developed a “really bad cold” with rhinorrhea. The cold seemed to go away but then she developed a profound, deep, mucus-producing cough. Now, there is no rhinorrhea or rhinitis—the primary problem is the cough. She develops these coughing fits that are prolonged, very deep, and productive of a lot of green sputum. She hasn’t had any fever but does have a scratchy throat. Tammy has tried over-the-counter cough medicines but has not had much relief. The cough keeps her awake at night and sometimes gets so bad that she gags and dry heaves.

Write a differential of at least five (5) possible diagnosis’s and explain how each may be a possible answer to the clinical presentation above.

Remember, to list the differential in the order of most likely to less likely.

Based upon what you have at the top of the differential how would you treat this patient?

Suppose now, the patient has a fever of 100.4 and complains of foul smelling mucous and breath. Indeed, she complains of producing cups of mucous some days. She has some trouble breathing on moderate exertion but this is only a minor complaint to her. How does this change your differential and why?

Week 2: Respiratory Disorders and Alterations in Acid/Base Balance,

Fluid and Electrolytes – Discussion Part Three

This week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes (COs).

Analyze pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

Differentiate the epidemiology, etiology, developmental considerations, pathogenesis, and clinical and laboratory manifestations of specific disease processes. (PO 1)

Examine the way in which homeostatic, adaptive, and compensatory physiological mechanisms can be supported and/or altered through specific therapeutic interventions. (PO 1, 7)

Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states.

Describe outcomes of disruptive or alterations in specific physiologic processes. (PO 1)

Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states. (PO

Explore age-specific and developmental alterations in physiologic and disease states. (PO 1, 4)

A nursing student comes into your office because they are struggling with the concept of pulmonary function. They know you as an experienced FNP and so they are comfortable asking if you could clarify the terms residual volume (RV), functional reserve capacity (FRC), total lung capacity (TLC) inspiratory reserve volume (IRV), and expiratory reserve volume (ERV).

Give her a definition of each?

List three (3) disorders that can alter the residual volume and explain how they do so?

Week 3: Cardiovascular, Cellular, and Hematologic Disorders – Discussion

Week 3

Part One

This week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes (COs).

1 Analyze pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

2 Differentiate the epidemiology, etiology, developmental considerations, pathogenesis, and clinical and laboratory manifestations of specific disease processes. (PO 1).

3 Examine the way in which homeostatic, adaptive, and compensatory physiological mechanisms can be supported and/or altered through specific therapeutic interventions. (PO 1, 7)

4 Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

5 Describe outcomes of disruptive or alterations in specific physiologic processes. (PO 1)

6 Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

7 Explore age-specific and developmental alterations in physiologic and disease states

A 17-year-old African American from the inner city complains of severe chest and abdominal pain. Upon examination the attending physician performs and EKG, chest x-ray, and an abdominal and chest clinical examination and finds nothing. Assuming, she is drug seeking he sends her home. She comes back to the ER 4 hours later and now you see the patient. She explains that she was running track this past afternoon at school and that despite being very hot (100 F) she pushed on. Afterwards, she starts feeling extensive pain in her chest and abdomen. She has jaundiced eyes, her blood pressure is 98/50, pulse is 112, T = 99.9 F, R = 28. The pain seems out of proportion to the physical findings.

What is your list of differential diagnoses in this case and explain how each of these fits with the case patient as described above. Be sure to list at least four (4) pertinent differential diagnoses. Indicate which of these you would select as the most likely diagnosis and explain why.

Now, as she is in the ER she begins to exhibit stroke like features. ? Does this change your differential? How do you treat this patient now? Are they any preventative actions that could have been taken?

Week 3: Cardiovascular, Cellular, and Hematologic Disorders –

Discussion Part Two

This week’s graded topics relate to the following Course Outcomes (COs).

1 Analyze pathophysiologic mechanisms associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

2 Differentiate the epidemiology, etiology, developmental considerations, pathogenesis, and clinical and laboratory manifestations of specific disease processes. (PO 1)

3 Examine the way in which homeostatic, adaptive, and compensatory physiological mechanisms can be supported and/or altered through specific therapeutic interventions. (PO 1, 7)

4 Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

5 Describe outcomes of disruptive or alterations in specific physiologic processes. (PO 1)

6 Distinguish risk factors associated with selected disease states. (PO 1)

7 Explore age-specific and developmental alterations in physiologic and disease states. (PO 1, 4)

Jesse is a 57-year-old male who presents with gradual onset of dyspnea on exertion and fatigue. He also complains of frequent dyspepsia with nausea and occasional epigastric pain. He states that at night he has trouble breathing especially while lying on his back. This is relieved by him sitting up. His vitals are 180/110, P = 88, T = 98.0 C, R = 20.

Write a differential in this case and explain how each item in your differential fits and how it might not fit.

What tests would you order? What immediate treatment would you consider giving this patient and what treatment when he went home? Assume your first differential is definitive.

Now, he comes back to your clinic 3 months later and both his ankles are slightly swollen. What possible explanations are there for this observation?

Week 3: Cardiovascular, Cellular, and Hematologic Disorders –

Discussion Part Three

A new patient is brought into the office for their annual evaluation. The child is a 6-year-old and appears a bit small for their age but not so small that any alarm bells are set off. The vitals are: P = 116, R = 22, T = 98.6 F, BP = 110/50. (The normal vitals in a 6-year-old are P = 75 – 120, R = 16 – 22, T = 98.6 , BP = (85-115)/(48-64). Examination of the lungs is normal, HEENT is normal, as is the abdominal exam. The heart however, seems laterally displaced and there appears to be only a continuous murmur which can be described as crescendo/decrescendo systolic murmur that extends into diastole. Because, you were trained at Chamberlain College of Nursing you immediately know that this is probably a patent ductus arteriosus.

Week 5

Week 5: Alterations in Endocrine Function – Discussion Part One

Week 5: Discussion Part One

Ms. Blake is an older adult with diabetes and has been too ill to get out of bed for 2 days. She has had a severe cough and has been unable to eat or drink during this time. She has a history of Type I diabetes. On admission her laboratory values show:

Sodium (Na+) 156 mEq/L
Potassium (K+) 4.0 mEq/L
Chloride (Cl–) 115 mEq/L
Arterial blood gases (ABGs) pH- 7.30; Pco2-40; Po2-70; HCO3-20
Normal values
Sodium (Na+) 136-146 mEq/L
Potassium (K+) 3.5-5.1 mEq/L
Chloride (Cl–) 98-106 mEq/L
Arterial blood gases (ABGs) pH- 7.35-7.45

Pco2- 35-45 mmHg

Po2-80-100 mmHg

HCO3–22-28 mEq/L

  • List three (3) reasons on why she may have become bed ridden?
  • Based on these reasons what tests would you order?
  • Describe the molecular mechanism of the development of ketoacidosis.

Week 5: Discussion Part Two

13 13 unread replies. 39 39 replies.

A three-month-old baby boy comes into your clinic with the main complaint that he frequently vomits after eating. He often has a swollen upper belly after feeding and acts fussy all the time. The vomiting has become more frequent this past week and he is beginning to lose weight. NR507 Advanced Pathophysiology – Full Course (all essay discussions+ midterm and final exam)

  • Write three (3) differential diagnoses at this time?
  • Is there any genetic component to the top of your differentials?
  • What tests would you order?

Week 5: Discussion Part Three

27 27 unread replies. 38 38 replies.

Write a one (1) paragraph case study of your own for a patient with Ulcerative Colitis?

Week 6

Week 6: Discussion Part One

19 19 unread replies. 38 38 replies.

You are contacted by an attorney representing a client who has been charged with child abuse and whom faces loss of her child and 15 years in prison. The record indicated that the child was 4 years old and presented to the ER room with a broken arm and a broken leg. There also appeared to be multiple previous fractures. Now, you examine the child and find blue sclera, a sunken chest wall, severe scoliosis, and you observe a triangular face and prominent forehead. You confirm that there have been multiple previous fractures by evaluating the previous X-rays. This is a genetic disorder.

  • What is the most likely genetic disease that this presents and why?
  • What is the molecular basis of this disease?
  • Before, calling the police what should the initial clinician have done?

Week 6: Discussion Part Two

22 22 unread replies. 37 37 replies.

Johnny is a 5-year-old Asian boy who is brought to a family practice office with a “runny” nose that started about 1 week ago but has not resolved. He has been blowing his nose quite frequently and “sores” have developed around his nose. His mother states, “The sores started as ‘big blisters’ that rupture; sometimes, a scab forms with a crust that looks like “dried maple syrup” but continues to seep and drain.” She is worried because the lesions are now also on his forearm. Johnny’s past medical and family histories are normal. He has been febrile but is otherwise asymptomatic. The physical examination was unremarkable except for moderate, purulent rhinorrhea and 0.5- to 1-cm diameter weeping lesions around the nose and mouth and on the radial surface of the right forearm. There is no regional lymphadenopathy.

  • Write a differential of at least three (3) possible diagnoses and explain how each may be a possible answer to the clinical presentation above. Remember, to list the differential in the order of most likely to less likely.
  • Based upon what you have at the top of the differentials how would you treat this patient?
  • When would you allow the student back to school? Elaborate on your reasoning?

Week 6: Discussion Part Three

27 27 unread replies. 32 32 replies.

Keisha, a 13-year-old female, has come into your urgent care center. She has red conjunctiva, a cough and a fever of about 104 F, She also has a rash on her face a possibly the beginning of a rash on her arms. About 10 days ago she was around another student who had similar symptoms.

  • Write three (3) differential diagnoses?
  • What are some of the complications of this disease, assume that the top of your differential is the definitive?
  • Assume that the second item you place on your differential is the definitive diagnosis. What are some complications of that disease?

Week 7: Reflection

17 17 unread replies. 56 56 replies.

Reflect back over the past eight weeks and describe how the achievement of the course outcomes in this course have prepared you to meet the MSN program outcome #, MSN Essential VIII, and Nurse Practitioner Core Competencies # 1 Scientific Foundation Competencies

Program Outcome #4: Evaluate the design, implementation, and outcomes of strategies developed to meet healthcare needs (MSN Essentials III, IV, VIII).
MSN Essential VIII: Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving Health

  • Recognizes that the master’s-prepared nurse applies and integrates broad, organizational, client-centered, and culturally appropriate concepts in the planning, delivery, management, and evaluation of evidence-based clinical prevention and population care and services to individuals, families, and aggregates/identified populations.

Nurse Practitioner Core Competencies # 1 Scientific Foundation Competencies

  1. Critically analyzes data and evidence for improving advanced nursing practice.
  2. Integrates knowledge from the humanities and sciences within the context of nursing science.
  3. Translates research and other forms of knowledge to improve practice processes and outcomes.
  4. Develops new practice approaches based on the integration of research, theory, and practice knowledge.

Midverm

Question 1

2 / 2 pts

Examination of the throat in a child demonstrating signs and symptoms of acute epiglottitis may contribute to which life-threatening complication?

Retropharyngeal abscess

Laryngospasms

Rupturing of the tonsils

Gagging induced aspiration

Question 2

2 / 2 pts

Causes of hyperkalemia include:

Hyperparathyroidism and malnutrition

Vomiting and diarrhea

Renal failure and Addison disease

Hyperaldosteronism and Cushing disease

Question 3

2 / 2 pts

What is the life span of an erythrocyte (in days)?

20 to 30

60 to 90

100 to 120

200 to 240

Question 4

2 / 2 pts

Which substance has been shown to increase the risk of cancer when used in combination with tobacco smoking?

Alcohol

Steroids

Antihistamines

Antidepressants

Question 5

0 / 2 pts

Which hepatitis virus is known to be sexually transmitted?

A

B

C

D

Question 6

2 / 2 pts

What is the purpose of the spirometry measurement?

To evaluate the cause of hypoxia

To measure the volume and flow rate during forced expiration

To measures the gas diffusion rate at the alveolocapillary membrane

To determine pH and oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations

Question 7

2 / 2 pts

What is the direct action of atrial natriuretic hormone?

Sodium retention

Sodium excretion

Water retention

Water excretion

Question 8

2 / 2 pts

What is the most important negative inotropic agent?

Norepinephrine

Epinephrine

Acetylcholine

Dopamine

Question 9

2 / 2 pts

What is the primary cause of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) of the newborn?

Immature immune system

Small alveoli

Surfactant deficiency

Anemia

Question 10

2 / 2 pts

An individual is more susceptible to infections of mucous membranes when he or she has a seriously low level of which immunoglobulin antibody?

IgG

IgM

IgA

IgE

Question 11

2 / 2 pts

Low plasma albumin causes edema as a result of a reduction in which pressure?

Capillary hydrostatic

Interstitial hydrostatic

Plasma oncotic

Interstitial oncotic

Question 12

2 / 2 pts

Erythrocyte life span of less than 120 days, ineffective bone marrow response to erythropoietin, and altered iron metabolism describe the pathophysiologic characteristics of which type of anemia?

Aplastic

Sideroblastic

Anemia of chronic disease

Iron deficiency

Question 13

2 / 2 pts

An infant’s hemoglobin must fall below ___ g/dl before signs of pallor, tachycardia, and systolic murmurs occur.

11

9

7

5

Question 14

2 / 2 pts

What part of the kidney controls renal blood flow, glomerular filtration, and renin secretion?

Macula densa

Visceral epithelium

Juxtaglomerular apparatus (JGA)

Filtration slits

Question 15

2 / 2 pts

The lung is innervated by the parasympathetic nervous system via which nerve?

Vagus

Phrenic

Brachial

Pectoral

Question 16

2 / 2 pts

Which statement best describes a Schilling test?

Administration of radioactive cobalamin and the measurement of its excretion in the urine to test for vitamin B12 deficiency

Measurement of antigen-antibody immune complexes in the blood to test for hemolytic anemia

Measurement of serum ferritin and total iron-binding capacity in the blood to test for iron deficiency anemia

Administration of folate and measurement in 2 hours of its level in a blood sample to test for folic acid deficiency anemia.

Question 17

2 / 2 pts

Which disorder results in decreased erythrocytes and platelets with changes in leukocytes and has clinical manifestations of pallor, fatigue, petechiae, purpura, bleeding, and fever?

Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP)

Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL)

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL)

Iron deficiency anemia (IDA)

Question 18

2 / 2 pts

Which compensatory mechanism is spontaneously used by children diagnosed with tetralogy of Fallot to relieve hypoxic spells?

Lying on their left side

Performing the Valsalva maneuver

Squatting

Hyperventilating

Question 19

2 / 2 pts

Which hormone is required for water to be reabsorbed in the distal tubule and collecting duct?

Antidiuretic hormone

Aldosterone

Cortisol

Adrenocorticotropin hormone

Question 20

2 / 2 pts

What is the fundamental physiologic manifestation of anemia?

Hypotension

Hyperesthesia

Hypoxia

Ischemia

Question 21

2 / 2 pts

Continuous increases in left ventricular filing pressures result in which disorder?

Mitral regurgitation

Mitral stenosis

Pulmonary edema

Jugular vein distention

Question 22

2 / 2 pts

Which T-lymphocyte phenotype is the key determinant of childhood asthma?

Cluster of differentiation (CD) 4 T-helper Th1 lymphocytes

CD4 T-helper Th2 lymphocytes

CD8 cytotoxic T lymphocytes

Memory T lymphocytes

Question 23

2 / 2 pts

Innervation of the bladder and internal urethral sphincter is supplied by which nerves?

Peripheral nerves

Parasympathetic fibers

Sympathetic nervous system

Tenth thoracic nerve roots

Question 24

2 / 2 pts

Which of the following is classified as a megaloblastic anemia?

Iron deficiency

Pernicious

Sideroblastic

Hemolytic

Question 25

2 / 2 pts

When an individual aspirates food particles, where would the nurse expect to hear decreased or absent breath sounds?

Left lung

Right lung

Trachea

Carina

Question 26

0 / 2 pts

The most common site of metastasis for a patient diagnosed with prostate cancer is which location?

Bones

Brain

Bladder

Kidney

Question 27

2 / 2 pts

Perceived stress elicits an emotional, anticipatory response that begins where?

Prefrontal cortex

Anterior pituitary

Limbic system

Hypothalamus

Question 28

2 / 2 pts

Which manifestations of vasoocclusive crisis are associated with sickle cell disease (SCD) in infants?

Atelectasis and pneumonia

Edema of the hands and feet

Stasis ulcers of the hands, ankles, and feet

Splenomegaly and hepatomegaly

Question 29

2 / 2 pts

Which cytokines initiate the production of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH)?

IL–1 and IL-6

IL-2 and TNF-?

IFN and IL-12

TNF-ß and IL-4

Question 30

2 / 2 pts

The generation of clonal diversity occurs primarily during which phase of life?

Fetal

Neonatal

Infancy

Puberty

Question 31

2 / 2 pts

Where in the respiratory tract do the majority of foreign objects aspirated by children finally lodge?

Trachea

Left lung

Bronchus

Bronchioles

Question 32

2 / 2 pts

Which immunoglobulin (Ig) is present in childhood asthma?

IgM

IgG

IgE

IgA

Question 33

2 / 2 pts

Between which months of age does sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) most often occur?

0 and 1

2 and 4

5 and 6

6 and 7

Question 34

2 / 2 pts

Which complex (wave) represents the sum of all ventricular muscle cell depolarizations?

PRS

QRS

QT interval

P

Question 35

2 / 2 pts

When a patient has small, vesicular lesions that last between 10 and 20 days, which sexually transmitted infection is suspected?

Genital herpes

Chancroid

Syphilis

Chlamydia

Question 36

2 / 2 pts

What is the chief predisposing factor for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) of the newborn?

Low birth weight

Alcohol consumption during pregnancy

Premature birth

Smoking during pregnancy

Question 37

2 / 2 pts

Which statement concerning exotoxins is true?

Exotoxins are contained in cell walls of gram-negative bacteria.

Exotoxins are released during the lysis of bacteria.

Exotoxins are able to initiate the complement and coagulation cascades.

Exotoxins are released during bacterial growth.

Question 38

2 / 2 pts

Deficiencies in which element can produce depression of both B- and T-cell function?

Iron

Zinc

Iodine

Magnesium

Question 39

0 / 2 pts

The function of the foramen ovale in a fetus allows what to occur?

Right-to-left blood shunting

Left-to-right blood shunting

Blood flow from the umbilical cord

Blood flow to the lungs

Question 40

2 / 2 pts

Decreased lung compliance means that the lungs are demonstrating which characteristic?

Difficult deflation

Easy inflation

Stiffness

Inability to diffuse oxygen

Question 41

2 / 2 pts

60 to 70

40 to 60

30 to 40

10 to 20

Question 42

2 / 2 pts

Which statement concerning benign tumors is true?

The resulting pain is severe.

Benign tumors are not encapsulated.

Benign tumors are fast growing.

The cells are well-differentiated.

Question 43

2 / 2 pts

How much urine accumulates in the bladder before the mechanoreceptors sense bladder fullness?

75 to 100 ml

100 to 150 ml

250 to 300 ml

350 to 400 ml

Question 44

2 / 2 pts

How high does the plasma glucose have to be before the threshold for glucose is achieved?

126 mg/dl

150 mg/dl

180 mg/dl

200 mg/dl

Question 45

0 / 2 pts

Apoptosis is a(an):

Normal mechanism for cells to self-destruct when growth is excessive

Antigrowth signal activated by the tumor-suppressor gene Rb

Mutation of cell growth stimulated by the TP53 gene

Transformation of cells from dysplasia to anaplasia

Question 46

0 / 2 pts

What is the role of collagen in the clotting process?

Initiates the clotting cascade.

Activates platelets.

Stimulates fibrin.

Deactivates fibrinogen.

Question 47

0 / 2 pts

Infants are most susceptible to significant losses in total body water because of an infant’s:

High body surface–to–body size ratio

Slow metabolic rate

Kidneys are not mature enough to counter fluid losses

Inability to communicate adequately when he or she is thirsty

Question 48

0 / 2 pts

What is the action of urodilatin?

Urodilatin causes vasoconstriction of afferent arterioles.

It causes vasodilation of the efferent arterioles.

Urodilatin inhibits antidiuretic hormone secretion.

It inhibits salt and water reabsorption.

Question 49

0 / 2 pts

Which cardiac chamber has the thinnest wall and why?

The right and left atria; they are low-pressure chambers that serve as storage units and conduits for blood.

The right and left atria; they are not directly involved in the preload, contractility, or afterload of the heart.

The left ventricle; the mean pressure of blood coming into this ventricle is from the lung, which has a low pressure.

The right ventricle; it pumps blood into the pulmonary capillaries, which have a lower pressure compared with the systemic circulation.

Question 50

0 / 2 pts

Research supports the premise that exercise has a probable impact on reducing the risk of which cancer?

Liver

Endometrial

Stomach

Colon

Question 51

0 / 2 pts

What is the trigone?

A smooth muscle that comprises the orifice of the ureter

The inner mucosal lining of the kidneys

A smooth triangular area between the openings of the two ureters and the urethra

One of the three divisions of the loop of Henle

Question 52

2 / 2 pts

What is the most abundant class of plasma protein?

Globulin

Albumin

Clotting factors

Complement proteins

Question 53

2 / 2 pts

The glomerular filtration rate is directly related to which factor?

Perfusion pressure in the glomerular capillaries

Diffusion rate in the renal cortex

Diffusion rate in the renal medulla

Glomerular active transport

Question 54

0 / 2 pts

Which cells have phagocytic properties similar to monocytes and contract like smooth muscles cells, thereby influencing the glomerular filtration rate?

Principle cells

Podocin cells

Mesangial cells

Intercalated cells

Question 55

0 / 2 pts

Why is nasal congestion a serious threat to young infants?

Infants are obligatory nose breathers.

Their noses are small in diameter.

Infants become dehydrated when mouth breathing.

Their epiglottis is proportionally greater than the epiglottis of an adult’s.

Question 56

2 / 2 pts

The risk for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) decreases for premature infants when they are born between how many weeks of gestation?

16 and 20

20 and 24

24 and 30

30 and 36

Question 57

2 / 2 pts

What is the ratio of coronary capillaries to cardiac muscle cells?

1:1 (one capillary per one muscle cell)

1:2 (one capillary per two muscle cells)

1:4 (one capillary per four muscle cells)

1:10 (one capillary per ten muscle cells)

Question 58

2 / 2 pts

A person with type O blood is considered to be the universal blood donor because type O blood contains which of the following?

No antigens

No antibodies

Both A and B antigens

Both A and B antibodies

Question 59

2 / 2 pts

The drug heparin acts in hemostasis by which processes?

Inhibiting thrombin and antithrombin III (AT-III)

Preventing the conversion of prothrombin to thrombin

Shortening the fibrin strands to retract the blood clot

Degrading the fibrin within blood clots

Question 60

2 / 2 pts

What effects do exercise and body position have on renal blood flow?

Exercise and body position activate renal parasympathetic neurons and cause mild vasoconstriction.

They activate renal sympathetic neurons and cause mild vasoconstriction.

Both activate renal parasympathetic neurons and cause mild vasodilation.

They activate renal sympathetic neurons and cause mild vasodilation.

Final exam 

 

Question 1

2 / 2 pts

What is the major virus involved in the development of cervical cancer?

Herpes simplex virus type 6

Herpes simplex virus type 2

Human papillomavirus

Human immunodeficiency virus

Question 2

2 / 2 pts

Which statement accurately describes childhood asthma?

An obstructive airway disease characterized by reversible airflow obstruction, bronchial hyperreactivity, and inflammation

A pulmonary disease characterized by severe hypoxemia, decreased pulmonary compliance, and diffuse densities on chest x-ray imaging

A pulmonary disorder involving an abnormal expression of a protein, producing viscous mucus that lines the airways, pancreas, sweat ducts, and vas deferens

An obstructive airway disease characterized by atelectasis and increased pulmonary resistance as a result of a surfactant deficiency

Question 3

0 / 2 pts

The ability of the pathogen to invade and multiply in the host is referred to as:

Infectivity

Toxigenicity

Pathogenicity

Virulence

Question 4

2 / 2 pts

Obesity creates a greater risk for dehydration in people because:

Adipose cells contain little water because fat is water repelling.

The metabolic rate of obese adults is slower than the rate of lean adults.

The rate of urine output of obese adults is higher than the rate of output of lean adults.

The thirst receptors of the hypothalamus do not function effectively.

Question 5

2 / 2 pts

Continued therapy of pernicious anemia (PA) generally lasts how long?

6 to 8 weeks

8 to 12 months

Until the iron level is normal

The rest of one’s life

Question 6

2 / 2 pts

Which statement best describes cystic fibrosis?

Obstructive airway disease characterized by reversible airflow obstruction, bronchial hyperreactivity, and inflammation

Respiratory disease characterized by severe hypoxemia, decreased pulmonary compliance, and diffuse densities on chest x-ray imaging

Pulmonary disorder involving an abnormal expression of a protein-producing viscous mucus that obstructs the airways, pancreas, sweat ducts, and vas deferens

Pulmonary disorder characterized by atelectasis and increased pulmonary resistance as a result of a surfactant deficiency

Question 7

2 / 2 pts

What pulmonary defense mechanism propels a mucous blanket that entraps particles moving toward the oropharynx?

Nasal turbinates

Alveolar macrophages

Cilia

Irritant receptors on the nares

Question 8

2 / 2 pts

As stated in the Frank-Starling law, a direct relationship exists between the _____ of the blood in the heart at the end of diastole and the _____ of contraction during the next systole.

Pressure; force

Volume; strength

Viscosity; force

Viscosity; strength

Question 9

2 / 2 pts

The tonic neck reflex observed in a newborn should no longer be obtainable by:

2 years

1 year

10 months

5 months

Question 10

2 / 2 pts

Carcinoma refers to abnormal cell proliferation originating from which tissue origin?

Blood vessels

Epithelial cells

Connective tissue

Glandular tissue

Question 11

2 / 2 pts

Which of the following describes how the body compensates for anemia?

Increasing rate and depth of breathing

Decreasing capillary vasoconstriction

Hemoglobin holding more firmly onto oxygen

Kidneys releasing more erythropoietin

Question 12

2 / 2 pts

What term is used to describe a hernial protrusion of a saclike cyst that contains meninges, spinal fluid, and a portion of the spinal cord through a defect in a posterior arch of a vertebra?

Encephalocele

Meningocele

Spina bifida occulta

Myelomeningocele

Question 13

2 / 2 pts

Chvostek and Trousseau signs indicate which electrolyte imbalance?

Hypokalemia

Hyperkalemia

Hypocalcemia

Hypercalcemia

Question 14

2 / 2 pts

After sexual transmission of HIV, a person can be infected yet seronegative for how many months?

1 to 2

6 to 14

18 to 20

24 to 36

Question 15

2 / 2 pts

Which hormone prompts increased anxiety, vigilance, and arousal during a stress response?

Norepinephrine

Epinephrine

Cortisol

Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)

Question 16

2 / 2 pts

Which blood cells are the chief phagocytes involved in the early inflammation process?

Neutrophils

Monocytes

Eosinophils

Erythrocytes

Question 17

2 / 2 pts

Where are alveolar macrophages found?

Skin

Breasts

Gastrointestinal tract

Lungs

Question 18

2 / 2 pts

Which normal physiologic change occurs in the aging pulmonary system?

Decreased flow resistance

Fewer alveoli

Stiffening of the chest wall

Improved elastic recoil

Question 19

0 / 2 pts

An infant diagnosed with a small patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) would likely exhibit which symptom?

Intermittent murmur

Lack of symptoms

Need for surgical repair

Triad of congenital defects

Question 20

2 / 2 pts

Hemophilia B is caused by a deficiency of which clotting factor?

V

VIII

IX

X

Question 21

2 / 2 pts

A hypersensitivity reaction that produces an allergic response is called:

Hemolytic shock

Anaphylaxis

Necrotizing vasculitis

Systemic erythematosus

Question 22

2 / 2 pts

Which statement is true regarding pain and cancer?

Pain is primarily a result of pressure caused by the tumor.

Pain indicates the metastasis of a cancer.

Pain is usually the initial symptom of cancer.

Pain is generally associated with late-stage cancer.

Question 23

2 / 2 pts

What is the anomaly in which the soft bony component of the skull and much of the brain is missing?

Anencephaly

Myelodysplasia

Cranial meningocele

Hydrocephaly

Question 24

0 / 2 pts

At birth, which statement is true?

Systemic resistance and pulmonary resistance fall.

Gas exchange shifts from the placenta to the lung.

Systemic resistance falls and pulmonary resistance rises.

Systemic resistance and pulmonary resistance rise.

Question 25

2 / 2 pts

What is the most commonly reported symptom of cancer treatment?

Nausea

Fatigue

Hair loss

Weight loss

Question 26

0 / 2 pts

The common property among the three types of medications used to treat depression is that they:

Increase neurotransmitter levels within the synapse.

Increase neurotransmitter levels in the presynapse.

Decrease neurotransmitter levels in the postsynapse.

Decrease neurotransmitter levels within the synapse.

Question 27

0 / 2 pts

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NR-506: Health Care Policy and Leadership Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

NR-506: Health Care Policy and Leadership Course Assignments & Discussions Study GuideNR-506: Health Care Policy and Leadership Course Description

Contact Hours: Lecture – 48, Lab – 0, Clinical – 0

Semester Hours: Theory 3

Students explore healthcare policy and advanced practice leadership as it impacts nursing, consumers and systems from institutional to global spheres. Students, as advocates, propose healthcare policies that reflect person-centered care and population health needs. The development, analysis and consequence of healthcare policies, leadership models and ethical and legal decision-making are examined within the context of social, ethical and regulatory issues.

Prerequisites: NR-500NP or NR-500, NR-501NP or NR-501, or NR-512, NR-599.

NOTE: NP-designated course for Nurse Practitioner track students only.

NR-506: Health Care Policy and Leadership Course Syllabus

NR-506 Week 1 Assignment, Identification of Healthcare Policy (Privacy in Public for Nursing Mothers)

NR-506 Week 1 Assignment, Identification of Healthcare Policy (Styrofoam)

NR-506 Week 1 Discussion, The Four Spheres of Political Action in Nursing

NR-506 Week 2 Assignment, Identification of Healthcare Policy Concern (Poverty and its effects on Healthcare)

NR-506 Week 2 Assignment, Identification of Healthcare Policy Concern (Sex Education)

NR-506 Week 2 Assignment, Identification of Healthcare Policy Concern (Old Age Care)

NR-506 Week 2 Assignment, Identification of Healthcare Policy Concern (Obesity)

NR-506 Week 2 Discussion, Policy Priority Selection (Two Responses)

NR-506 Week 3 Discussion, Effective Coalition Leadership

NR-506 Week 4 Assignment, Preparation of Presentation for Elected Official (Sex Education)

NR-506 Week 4 Assignment, Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official (Elderly Care)

NR-506 Week 4 Assignment, Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official (Privacy for Breastfeeding Mothers in Public)

NR-506 Week 4 Assignment, Preparation of Presentation to Elected official (Styrofoam)

NR-506 Week 4 Assignment, Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official (Poverty)

NR-506 Week 4 Discussion, Challenges in Lobbying Strategies

NR-506 Week 5 Discussion, Drivers for High Performance Healthcare (03 Responses)

NR-506 Week 6 Discussion, Using the Media (02 Responses)

NR-506 Week 7 Assignment, Summary of Healthcare Concern Presentation (Poverty)

NR-506 Week 7 Assignment, Summary of Healthcare Concern Presentation (School Nutrition)

NR-506 Week 7 Assignment, Summary of Healthcare Concern Presentation (Sex Education)

NR-506 Week 7 Assignment, Summary of Healthcare Concern Presentation (Banning Styrofoam)

NR-506 Week 7 Discussion, RN as Healthcare Policy Leader

NR-506 Week 8 Discussion, Global Policy Reform

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Syllabus Overview

Course Number: NR506
Course Title: Healthcare Policy
Course Credits: 3 credits
Prerequisite: None

Course Description

In this course, the student will explore topics related to healthcare policy, including the processes involved in the development of healthcare policy and the analysis of the components and consequences of policies currently impacting nursing, consumers, and the healthcare system. The forces responsible for current healthcare policies will be examined, including historical, ethical, and political factors. Current policy-related controversies and challenges to healthcare policies are also examined. Students investigate and propose strategies that nurses employ to impact policy development at institutional, local, national, and international levels.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Access E-Book

Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

 

Access E-Book

Teitelbaum, J. & Wilensky, S. (2017 ). Essentials of health policy and law (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com

 

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Optional Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

eBook Details

First Time Using VitalSource?

Step 1: View the VitalSource Video

Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online

  1. Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
  2. Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.

Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions

You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.

Already Registered?   3 Ways to Access Your eBooks

Online

Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.

Desktop

Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.

Mobile

Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

.

 

The following book is required across all FNP courses:

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

The following book is recommended across all FNP courses:

Goroll, A. H., & Mulley, A. G. (2014). Primary care medicine: Office evaluation and management of the adult patient (7th ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-507: Advanced Pathophysiology Course Assignments & Discussions.

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

Program Outcomes

Program Outcomes of Chamberlain nursing programs can be found in the Program Descriptions section of your College Catalog. You can access your College Catalog at http://www.chamberlain.edu/msncatalog.

The MSN program outcomes are aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing publication, The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing (2011). Upon completion of the MSN degree program, the graduate will be able to:

  1. Practice safe, high-quality advanced nursing care based on concepts and knowledge from nursing and related disciplines.
  2. Construct processes for leading and promoting quality improvement and safety in advanced nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
  3. Use contemporary communication modalities effectively in advanced nursing roles.
  4. Evaluate the design, implementation and outcomes of strategies developed to meet healthcare needs.
  5. Develop a plan for lifelong personal and professional growth that integrates professional values regarding scholarship, service and global engagement.
  6. Apply legal, ethical and human-caring principles to situations in advanced nursing practice.
  7. Design patient-centered care models and delivery systems using the best available scientific evidence.
  8. Manage human, fiscal and physical resources to achieve and support individual and organizational goals.
  9. Compose a plan for systematic inquiry and dissemination of findings to support advanced nursing practice, patient-care innovation, and the nursing profession.
  10. Collaborate interprofessionally in research, education, practice, health policy and leadership to improve population health outcomes.
  11. Apply principles of informatics to manage data and information in order to support effective decision making.

NR-506: Health Care Policy and Leadership Course: A Comprehensive Guide

  1. NR 506 Week 7 Discussion: APNs as Healthcare Policy Leaders

This week, we’ll talk about how NR 506Advanced Practice Nurses (APNs) may be influential policymakers in the healthcare system. Learn how they impacted the making of health policy and its execution.

  1. NR 506 Week 8 Reflection on Achievement of Outcomes

Take some time to think on everything you’ve learned and accomplished in NR 506 so far. Reflect on the means through which the course objectives have been met and their relevance to your professional development.

  1. NR 506 Week 6 Discussion: Scope of Practice and Patient’s Healthcare Accessibility

Explore how the boundaries of a doctor’s or nurse’s practice affect patients’ ability to get the treatment they need. Consider how various policy options could affect patient outcomes.

  1. NR 506 Week 5 Discussion: Ethical and Legal Implications

Investigate the moral and legal questions that healthcare policy raise. NR 506Discuss in depth the challenges of reconciling individual patient needs with public health goals.

  1. NR 506 Week 4 Assignment: Health Policy Analysis Presentation

As part of this task, you will evaluate a specific health policy in depth. Showcase your research and proposed changes to the policy.

  1. NR 506 Week 3 Assignment: Quality Healthcare: Measuring NP Performance

Gain insight into how NR 506Nurse Practitioners (NPs) are evaluated on the quality of care they provide. Analyze the procedures and instruments currently utilized for evaluating students.

  1. NR 506 Week 2 Assignment plus Graded Discussion Topic

Finish your report on the effects of organizational shifts and ethical/legal considerations on NR 506APRN practice. Participate in a peer-reviewed conversation and exchange ideas.

  1. NR 506 Week 1 Discussion: Barriers to Practice

Determine the challenges faced by advanced practice nurses and suggest possible solutions. Create and share creative content while also NR 506 discussing it with other users.

  1. NR 506 Discussion Questions Week 1 – 8

Get involved in weekly discussion questions that foster critical thinking on various healthcare policy topics.

  1. NR 506 Course Assignments Week 3, 4, 7, & 8

To further your learning, explore the collection of assignments for NR 506weeks 3, 4, 7, and 8.

  1. NR 506 Entire Course Week 1 – 8

For a thorough understanding of health care policy, access the whole course material from NR 506 weeks 1 to 8.

  1. NR 506 Week 7 Assignment plus Discussion

Discuss policy issues and the School Health Based Clinic (SHBC) in both the NR 506 week 7 assignment and associated discussions.

  1. NR 506 Week 7 Assignment: Policy Concern Presentation – School Health Based Clinic (SHBC)

Create a policy-focused presentation on the NR 506 school-based health clinic and give it.

  1. NR 506 Week 4 Assignment: Health Policy Analysis Presentation

Conduct in-depth research on health policy and provide an engaging presentation to back up your results.

  1. NR 506 Week 2 Discussion:

NR 506 Case Study on Organizational Change and Legal and Ethical Influences in Advanced Practice Nursing Through case studies, take part in stimulating conversations on organizational change and the ethical-legal effects on advanced practice nursing. Enroll in NR 506 Health Care Policy (Updated 2023) to learn everything there is to know about the creation, analysis, and effects of healthcare policy on advanced nursing practice. To explore through particular themes and take part in insightful conversations and projects, use the available subheadings.

FAQs

Question: The FNP knows that during an abdominal assessment, deep palpation is used to determine

Answer: Deep palpation detects deeper lumps or organ enlargement during an abdominal evaluation. It lets the FNP evaluate organ size, shape, and consistency and find anomalies or soreness that light palpation may miss. Deep palpation evaluates the liver, spleen, kidneys, and bladder with gentle but strong pressure.

Question: The FNP is assessing the abdomen of an aging adult. Which of these statements regarding an aging adult and abdominal assessment is true?

Answer Changes in elderly adults can affect abdominal assessment. The abdomen may relax due to decreased abdominal muscular tone. Palpating abdominal tumors or anomalies is difficult due to abdominal muscular relaxation. Aging adults may have less fat cushioning, making abdominal organs more visible and palpable. The FNP must consider these age-related changes while assessing an aging adult’s abdomen.

Course Outcomes

Chamberlain College of Nursing courses are built to align course content with specific Course Outcomes (COs). The COs define the learning objectives that the student will be required to comprehend and demonstrate by course completion. The COs that will be covered in detail each week can be found in the Overview page in that particular week. Whenever possible, a reference will be made from a particular assignment or discussion back to the CO that it emphasizes.

Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to do the following.

  1. Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and healthcare. (PO 9, 10)
  2. Employ strategies to affect the development, implementation, and consequences of policies at the institutional, local, national, and international levels. (PO 4, 8, 10)
  3. Communicate with policy-makers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the healthcare system. (PO 2, 3, 10)
  4. Analyze the historical, ethical, and political contexts of healthcare policy and the consequences of policy implementation. (PO 6, 10)
  5. Advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that influence healthcare and its consumers and nurses and their nursing practice. (PO 2, 10)
  6. Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 7, 10)

Course Schedule

Week, COs, and Topics Readings Assignments
Week 1

CO 1 & 4

Policymaking, Healthcare and Professional Nursing

Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 1: Frameworks for Action in Policy and Politics
  • Chapter 2: A Historical Perspective on Policy, Politics and Nursing
  • Chapter 3: Advocacy in Nursing and Health Care
  • Chapter 6: A Primer on Political Philosophy 
  • Chapter 15: Health Policy, Politics, and Professional Ethics

Gambardella, L.C. (2011). Nursing and politics: Strange bedfellows or compatible partners in practice? Building a passion for political action. Nursing News, 35(2), 13. link to article

Nault, D.S. (2012). Nurses and public policy. The Michigan Nurse, 85(1), 13-20. link to article

Homework (not graded, but required)

  • Complete the Planning Your Visit Worksheet 1 (Formulating a Healthcare Policy Worksheet 1)
  • Listen to the narrative assignment located at the end of the lesson

Graded Discussion Topics

Week 2

CO 2

Policy Making Process: How Nurses Can Make an Impact

Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from https://bookshelf.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 4: Learning the Ropes of Policy and Politics
  • Chapter 7: The Policy Process
  • Chapter 9: Political Analysis and Strategies 
  • Chapter 80: TAKING ACTION: The Nightingales Take on Big Tobacco

Teitelbaum, J. & Wilensky, S. (2017 ). Essentials of health policy and law (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 1: Understanding the Role and Conceptualizing Health Policy and Law
  • Chapter 2: Policy and the Policymaking Process

Mebane, F. & Blendon, R. (2001). Political strategy 101: How to make health policy and influence political people. Journal of Child Neurology, 16(7), 513-519. link to article

Homework (not graded, but required)

  • Begin work on the Your Policy-Priority Assignment (graded) that is due by Week 3.
  • Begin work on the Planning Your Visit Worksheet 2 (ungraded) that is due by Week 3.
  • Listen to the assignment located at the end of the lesson.

Graded Discussion Topics

Week 3

CO 5, 6

Determining Healthcare Policy Priorities

Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 10: Communication and Conflict Management in Health Policy
  • Chapter 13: Using Research to Advance Health and Social Policies for Children
  • Chapter 51: TAKING ACTION: Influencing Policy Through an Appointment to the San Francisco Health Commission
  • Chapter 69: TAKING ACTION: A Nurse Practitioner’s Activist Efforts in Nevada
  • Chapter 72: Interest Groups in Health Care Policy and Politics
  • Chapter 73: Current Issues in Nursing Associations
  • Chapter 75: Coalitions: A Powerful Political Strategy
  • Chapter 76: TAKING ACTION: The Nursing Community Builds a Unified Voice
  • Chapter 90: TAKING ACTION: Reefer Madness: The Clash of Science, Politics, and Medical Marijuana

Teitelbaum, J. & Wilensky, S. (2017 ). Essentials of health policy and law (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 14: The Art of Structuring and Writing a Health Policy Analysis

Goodman, T. (2014). The future of nursing: An opportunity for advocacy. AORN Journal99(6), 668-671 doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2014.03.004
link to article

Nannini, A. & Crocker, S. (2010). Translating evidence from systematic reviews for policy makers. Journal of Gerontological Nursing36(6), 22-26. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20100504-02. link to ariticle

Your Policy-Priority Issue (This assignment must be submitted to Turnitin)

Homework (not graded, but required)

  • Planning Your Visit Worksheet 2
  • Listen to the assignment located at the end of the lesson.

Graded Discussion Topics

Week 4

CO 2, 3

Overview of Legislation and Regulation: Communication and Lobbying Process

Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com 

  • Chapter 40: Contemporary Issues in Government
  • Chapter 42: Is There a Nurse in the House? The Nurses in the U.S. Congress
  • Chapter 43: An Overview of Legislation and Regulation
  • Chapter 44: Lobbying Policymakers: Individual and Collective Strategies
  • Chapter 45: TAKING ACTION: An Insider’s View of Lobbying United States Congress
  • Chapter 46: The American Voter and the Electoral Process
  • Chapter 55: TAKING ACTION: Nurse, Educator, and Legislator: My Journey to the Delaware Senate

Laxalt, N. (2009). Can you hear me now? Guidelines for effective communication with legislators. Nevada Information18(1), 10. link to article

Stewart, M. & Deaton, L. (2014). United our voices can make a difference. Pelican News70(3), 6. link to article

Homework (not graded, but required)

  • Begin work on the Policymaker Visit Worksheet 3 (ungraded) due Week 5.
  • Listen to the assignment located at the end of the lesson.

Graded Discussion Topics

Week 5

CO 2, 4, 5

Healthcare Policy in the United States: Influencing the Process at Every Level

Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com 

  • Chapter 16: The Changing United States Health Care System
  • Chapter 17: A Primer on Health Economics of Nursing and Health Policy
  • Chapter 18: Financing Health Care in the United States
  • Chapter 34: Filling the Gaps: Retail Health care Clinics and Nurse-Managed Health Centers
  • Chapter 41: How Government Works: What You Need to Know to Influence the Process

Teitelbaum, J. & Wilensky, S. (2017 ). Essentials of health policy and law (3rd ed.). Retrieved from https:online.vitalsource.com

  • Chapter 4: Overview of the United States Healthcare System
  • Chapter 5: Public Health Institutions and Systems

Blumenthal, D., Abrams, M., Nuzum, R. (2015). The Affordable Care Act at 5 Years. The New England Journal of Medicine, 372, 2451-2458. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr1503614. link to article

Buerhaus, P. I. (2010). Healthcare payment reform: Implications for nurses. Nursing Economics28(1), 49–54. link to article

Gardenier, D. (2012). Can clinical nurse practitioners be involved in policy making? The Journal for Nurse Practitioners, 8(3), 198-199. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2012.01.008 link to article

Hughes, A. (n.d). The challenge of contributing to policy making in primary care: the gendered experiences and strategies of nurses. Sociology Of Health & Illness32(7), 977-992. link to article

Strech, S. & Wyatt, D. (2013). Partnering to lead change: Nurses’ role in the redesign of healthcare, AORN98(3), 260-266. link to article

Planning your Visit:

Planning Your Visit (Part A)

Planning Your Visit-Public Talk Video (Part B)

Homework (not graded, but required)

  • Policymaker Visit Worksheet 3
  • Listen to the assignment located at the end of the lesson.

Graded Discussion Topics

Week 6

CO 2, 4, 5

Professional Development and Social Media in Healthcare Policy

Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com 

  • Chapter 14: Using the Power of Media to Influence Health Policy and Politics
  • Chapter 57: TAKING ACTION:  Nurse Leaders on the Board Room 
  • Chapter 63: The Contemporary Work Environment of Nursing
  • Chapter 66: The Politics of Advanced Practice Nursing

Gardner, D. (2014). Dismantle or improve ObamaCare? Nurses must take action. Nursing Economics, 32(6), 323-326. link to article

Homework (not graded, but required)

  • Continue working on the Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation.
  • Listen to the assignment located at the end of the lesson.

Graded Discussion Topics

Week 7

CO 2

Leadership and Contemporary Nursing Strategies in Promoting Healthcare Policy

Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com 

  • Chapter 74: Professional Nursing Associations: Operationalizing Nursing Values
  • Chapter 77: TAKING ACTION: The Nursing Kitchen Cabinet: Policy and Politics in Action
  • Chapter 79: TAKING ACTION: Campaign for Action
  • Chapter 81: Where Policy Hits the pavement: Contemporary Issues in Communities
  • Chapter 82: An Introduction to Community Activism
  • Chapter 85: TAKING ACTION: From Sewage Problems to the Statehouse: Serving Communities

Auerbach, J. 2015. Creating a diversified portfolio of population health measures within payment and healthcare reform. American Journal of Public Health, 105(3) : 427-431. link to article

Doody O. and Doody, C. (2012). Transformational leadership in nursing practice, British Journal of Nursing, 21(20): 1212-1218. link to article

Freudenberg, N. & Tusi, E. (2014). Evidence, power, and policy change in community-based participatory research. American Journal of Public Health104(1), 11-14 doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301471. link to article

HealthForum. (2015). Population health: a look at the strategy and impact of consumerism. Hospital & Health Networks, 9(89): 47-57. link to article

Butterfield, P. 2002 (yes I know it is old but this is a classic) Upstream reflections on environmental health: an abbreviated history and framework for action. Advanced Nursing Science, 25(1) 32-49. link to article

Laderman, M. & Whittington, J. (2015). Assessing community health needs. Healthcare Executive, SEPT/OCT: 70-73. link to article

Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation

Homework (not graded, but required)

  • Be ready to post your Pollicymaker Visit Electronic Presentation to the threaded discussion board in Week 8.
  • Listen to the assignment located at the end of the lesson.

Graded Discussion Topics

Week 8

CO 5

Advocacy in the International Community

Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (Eds). (2016). Policy & politics in nursing and healthcare (7th ed.). Retrieved from http://online.vitalsource.com 

  • Chapter 87: Human Trafficking: The Need for Nursing Advocacy
  • Chapter 91: International Health and Nursing Policy and Politics Today: A Snapshot
  • Chapter 92: Infectious Disease: A Global Perspective

Kohl, H.W., Craig, C. L., Lambert, E.V., Inoue, S., Alkandari, J.R., Leetonngin, G.,
Kahlmeier, K. (2012). The pandemic of physical inactivity: Global action for public health. The Lancet 380(9838) 294-305. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60898-8. link to article

Farrer, L., Marinetti, C., Cavaco, Y., Costongs, C. (2015). Advocacy for health equity: A synthesis review. The Milbank Quarterly 93(2) 392-437. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.121122-4. link to article

McMichael, A.J., Globalization, climate change, and human health. (2013). New England Journal of Medicine, 368, 1335-1343. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1109341. link to article

Meetoo, D. (2013). The setting of healthcare priorities through public engagement. British Journal of Nursing22(7), 372-376. link to article

Graded Discussion Topic

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.

Evaluation Methods

The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.

Graded Item Points Weighting
Discussion
(50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points, Week 8)
375 37.5%
Your Policy-Priority Issue
(due Week 3)
175 17.5%
Planning Your Visit Part A
(due Week 5)
100 10%
Planning Your Visit – Public Talk Video Part B
(due Week 5)
75 7.5%
Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation
(due Week 7)
275 27.5%
Total 1,000 100%

No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.

Letter Grade Points Percentage
A   940–1,000 94% to 100%
A-  920–939 92% to 93%
B+ 890–919 89% to 91%
B   860–889 86% to 88%
B-  840–859 84% to 85%
C+ 810–839 81% to 83%
C   760–809 76% to 80%
F   759 and below 75% and below

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Participation for MSN

    The Threaded Discussion Grading Grid and Rubric document can be found in Course Resources.

 Participation Guidelines

Due Date: First initial posting to the required threaded discussion topic is due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Peer and instructor responses are due by Sunday 11:59 pm MT. All posts for week 8 are due by the close of class on Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the threaded discussions.

Total Points Possible: Varies with course, please see specific course syllabus. These guidelines are for a required threaded discussion worth 50 points. Please note that week 8 will be worth only 25 points.

Requirements:

Description of the Assignment

  1. Initial posting: This is defined to be the initial post in which the student responds to the required threaded discussion topic. The first posting by a student within the required discussion area is considered to be the initial posting and will be evaluated using the rubric criteria. Scholarship in communication is expected. Required scholarly source(s) provide specific information that thoroughly address the required topic. For the initial posting, one scholarly source must be presented. The scholarly source must be an outside source. The student may use the required course textbook (s), assigned readings and lesson information in the initial post; however, these are not considered outside scholarly sources.

The initial posting must occur before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Initial postings must be at a minimum of 300 words. References do not apply toward word count. ONLY in Week 8, the initial posting must be a minimum of 200 words with a scholarly reference. It remains due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT

  1. Peer responses: As part of the threaded discussion requirements, the student must provide a substantive response to a peer. Substantive responses pose new ideas, ask questions, and/or generally add to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive way.

The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting and instructor response (see below). This peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. This response does not require a scholarly reference unless information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, then APA guidelines apply. Peer responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.

  1. Instructor response: The student must respond to an instructor’s follow-up questions. The instructor’s question may be directed to the student or may be a question directed to another student in the section. The response must be comprehensive and scholarly in nature. Instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.

The response to the instructor must occur on a day different from the initial post and a day different from the peer response. Responses to the instructor must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

  1. For week 8 only:Students are expected to post a peer response or an instructor post but are not required to do both. These posts must be a minimum of 100 words. References do not apply toward word count. The peer or instructor response must be on a different day than the initial post and must occur before Wednesday, 11:50 pm MT due to the shorter week.

Posting Requirements:

  1. The initial posting must be provided before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
  2. The initial posting must have at least one scholarly outside source that is cited within the posting and referenced. Required course textbooks, assigned readings and lesson information are not considered to be outside scholarly sources.
  3. Initial posting must be a minimum of 300 words; peer responses and instructor responses a minimum 150 words.
  4. The peer responses and instructor responses must be provided before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
  5. All postings are substantive and relate to the graded threaded discussion topic.
  6. Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is accepted.
  7. Postings must occur on 3 separate days.
  8. For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT

Criteria for Content

  • Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
  • Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
  • Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
  • Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
  • Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
  • Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
  • For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

  1. Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
  2. When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab.
  3. Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
  4. Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.

Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points

 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

 

Grading Rubric Guidelines Week 8 ONLY

Performance Category  100% or highest level of performance

100%

Very good or high level of performance

88%

Acceptable level of performance

81%

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

Deficient level of performance

56%

Failing level of performance

55% or less

         8 Points         7 Points       6 Points           5 Points          4 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
          8 Points        7 Points       6 Points          5 Points             4 Points       0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.

Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.

Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.

Interactive Dialogue

For Week 8 only:

Initial post should be a minimum of 200 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words.
  • The peer or instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words.
  • The peer or instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words.
  • The peer or instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words.
  • The peer or instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
       4 Points 3 Points        2 Points       0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.  

The following was present:

  • 0-4 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-4 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic, and facilitates communication.

 

The following was present:

  • 5-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 5-9 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand
 

The following was present:

  • 10- 13 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 10-13 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand
 

The following was present:

  • 14 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 14 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
           0 Points   5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements For Week 8 ONLY:

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, and peer or faculty postings were made on 2 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, and peer or faculty postings were made on 2 separate days
      0 Points Lost      5 Points Lost
 Requirements For Week 8 ONLY:

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer or one instructor response is to be posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT

 

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
  • A minimum of one peer or one instructor response is to be posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 pm MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 pm MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 pm MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

*Scholarly source: Per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments and threaded discussions. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Your textbook and lesson are not considered to be an outside scholarly source. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available data bases for a peer reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These web sites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site that you are unsure of. If the instructor determines that the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality, points will be deducted for not using scholarly sources. Current outside scholarly sources are required for the initial posting. This is defined to be 5 years or less. Instructor permission must be obtained if using a source that is older than 5 years.

Participation for MSN

Participation Guidelines

The weekly case study discussion is worth up to 100 points. Students are expected to participate a minimum of four times (once in part one by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in part two by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in part three by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, and one post to a student peer as required in the interactive dialogue criterion).

Grading Rubric

Criteria A

Outstanding or highest level of performance

B

Very good or high level of performance 

C

Competent or satisfactory level of performance

F

Poor or failing unsatisfactory level of performance

 Total Points Possible= 100
 25 Points  20 Points  15 Points  0 Points
 Application of Course Knowledge Post contributes unique perspectives or insights consistent with current standards of practice applicable to the results from the case study. Post contributes unique perspectives or insights, but may be lacking some applicability to the case presentation.  Post has limited perspectives or insights and limited application to case presentation.  Post perspectives are not consistent with current practice.
 25 Points  20 Points  15 Points  0 Points
Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Discussion posts are supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full references are provided. Discussion posts partially supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years.

In-text citations and full references are provided.

Evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited but may not fully support the discussion.

Discussion posts partially supported by evidence.

Sources may not be scholarly in nature or may be older than 5 years.

In-text citations and/or full references may be incomplete or missing.

Citations to non-scholarly websites given as rationale to support differential diagnoses and/or treatment plan. No evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited.
   25 Points 20 Points  15 Points  0 Points
Organization Post presents case study findings in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence; clearly relevant to topic. Post presents case study findings and plan or intervention that is sometimes unclear to follow, though relevant to topic. Post presents case findings and plan or intervention that are sometimes unclear to follow and may not always be relevant to topic. Post is not relevant to discussion question.
  25 Points 20 Points 15 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Presents findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a student peer and respond to all faculty questions posted by Thursday. A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate. Presents findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a student peer. Responds to some faculty questions posted by Thursday. Responds to a student peer and/or faculty, but the nature of the response is not substantive. Does not respond to a topic-related peer post. Does not respond to faculty questions posted by Thursday.
  0 Points Deducted 8 Points Deducted 9 Points Deducted 10 Points Deducted
Grammar, Syntax, APA

(Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing)

APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to three errors. Four to six errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation noted Seven to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are noted Post contains greater than nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
  0 Points Deducted – 5 Points per Discussion Part
Participation

Enters first post to part one by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; First post to part two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday. *5 points deducted per discussion part if this criteria is not met.

Enters first post to part one by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; first post to part two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday; and submits written summation by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. *5 points deducted per discussion part if this criteria is not met.

Webliography Disclaimer

The purpose of the Webliography is to provide students with annotated bibliographies of world wide websites relevant to their courses. These websites are not meant to be all inclusive of what is available for each course’s subjects and have not been sanctioned as academically rigorous or scholarly by Chamberlain College of Nursing. Please exercise caution when using these websites for course assignments and references.

NR-506: Health Care Policy and Leadership Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 1 Discussion The Four Spheres of Political Action in Nursing NEW

The Four Spheres of Political Action in Nursing Please discuss the four spheres of political action in nursing. 

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 2 Discussion Policy Priority Selection NEW

Policy-Priority SelectionIdentify your selected healthcare policy priority and discuss the rationale for your selection. Describe the model of policy making that you feel would be best applied to your policy issue and the rationale for selecting this modePolicy-Priority

 Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership NEW

Effective Coalition Leadership. Describe the various elements necessary for effective leadership within a coalition. How does this apply to your professional practice or life?

 Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 3 Your Policy Priority Issue ( Bicycle Helmet Policy ) NEW

Your Policy Priority Issue Guidelines and Grading RubricPurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to: a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your planning a policymaker call b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your healthcare policy issue and the policymaking process, and c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:(CO#1) Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and health care. (PO 9, 10)(CO#3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2, 3, 10)(CO#4) Analyze the historical, ethical, and political contexts of healthcare policy and the consequences of policy implementation. (PO 6, 10)(CO#6) Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO4, 7, 10)Due DateSunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3Total Points:175 pointsRequirementsAssignment Criteria for Presentation:1. Provide an introduction to your healthcare policy-priorityissue and the title or name of your legislator.2. Articulate key points under each of the Formulating a Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet #1 sections.3. Provide a critique of empirical evidence that supports your chosen healthcare policy-priority issue and analysis.4. Demonstrate the importance and impact of the chosen healthcare policy-priority issue to nursing.5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content.6. The paper will be a minimum of 4 pages and a maximum offive pages in length,in APA format 6th edition,excluding the title and reference page.Preparing the PaperAfter completing Formulating a Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet #1, address all areas on the worksheet in the body of a scholarly paper. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references published within the past 5 years.Category Points % DescriptionIntroduction and Conclusion 35 20 Introduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy- priority issue and the title or name of your designated legislator.Concluding statements summarizing content.Key Points 40 23 Identification of all key points of your healthcare policy-priority issue (review sections of Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet) are clearly analyzed and fully articulated.Empirical Evidence 40 23 Provide a critique of empirical evidence thatsupports your chosen healthcare policy issue and analysis.Impact and Importance to Nursing 35 20 Demonstrate the importance and impact of the chosen healthcare policy issue to nursing.APA Format 10 6 Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format.Writing Quality 15 8 Rules of grammar, word usage, sentence, and paragraph format and punctuation.Total 175 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.Grading RubricAssignment Criteria Exceptional(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds(88%)Very good or high level of performance Meets(80%)Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement(38%)Poor or failing level of performance Developing(0)Unsatisfactory level of performanceContentPossible Points = 150 PointsIntroduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue. Concluding statements summarizing content are present.35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 PointsIntroduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue and the title or name of your designated legislator. Concluding statements summarizing content are present, clear, and well written.Introduction introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue and the name or title of your designated legislator. Concluding statements summarizing content are present. Minor clarity or detail issues.Introduction and conclusion are included; could include more details such as a specific healthcare policy-priority issue that a legislator could act upon or the name or title of the legislator; clarity or improvement of format.Lacking introduction or conclusion.No attempt made at introduction or conclusion.Identification of all key points of your healthcare policy-priority issue are clearly analyzed and fully articulated.40 Points 35 Points 32 Points 15 Points 0 PointsKey points are well described, and analysis is fully articulated.Key points are described with some lack of clarity, and/or analysis is lacking detail or clarity.Key points are not well described, and/or analysis is lacking detail or clarity.Key points or analysis is missing.Key points and analysis is missing.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy-priority issue is clearly critiqued.40 Points 35 Points 32 Points 15 Points 0 PointsEmpirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is clearly critiqued in a comprehensive and accurate manner.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is critiqued but lacking clarity or not substantive.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is noted but not critiqued.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy priority issue is lacking.No attempt made at providing empirical evidence.Your healthcare policy- priority issue clearly demonstrates the impact and or importance of your issue to nursing or the intended impact to patient outcomes.35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 PointsImpact to patient outcomes or nursing practice is thoroughly discussed.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has rare inaccuracy.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice lacks occasional important elements or specificity.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has multiple instances of inaccuracies.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has multiple instances of inaccuracies and is vague.Content Subtotal_____of 150 pointsFormat Possible Points = 25 PointsAPA Format: Text, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format 6thedition.10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 PointsPaper is free from APA errors throughout.There are 1-2 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 3-4 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 5 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 6 or more APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s)Writing Quality: Paper is appropriate in length. References include a minimum of 5 scholarly references excluding the course text. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 PointsPaper is appropriate in length. References include more than the minimum number of scholarly references, excluding the course text. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.Paper is short/long in length and/or contains a minimum of scholarly references excluding course text, or references utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with1-2 exceptions.Paper is short/long in length and contains only 1 scholarly reference. Additional references are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with 3-4 exceptions.Paper is short/long two or more pages in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 5 errors.Paper is short/long two or more pages in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 6 or more errors.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 5 Discussion Drivers of High Performance Healthcare Systems NEW

Drivers of High Performance Healthcare SystemsSelect two drivers (for example quality, cost, and access) of high performance healthcare systems and apply it to your current work situation. The application could demonstrate the presence of the driver in a positive manner or it could acknowledge the presence of a concern.Levels of Government Involved in Healthcare Policy MakingReview the assigned article for this Week, Buerhaus, P. I. (2010). Healthcare payment reform: Implications for nurses. Nursing Economics, 28(1), 49–54.An emerging political issue is to change the way healthcare providers are compensated to control healthcare spending. Nurses are the largest group of healthcare providers and can make the greatest impact on the healthcare system. Compare and contrast two advantages versus the disadvantages of the policy to disentangle nursing costs from the patient room charges and/or organization charges. How can this policy affect your policy priority? Is there evidence?

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 5 Planning Your Visit (Part A) NEW

Planning Your Visit(Part A)Guidelines and Grading RubricPurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify communication strategies that support an effective policy making-presentation/visit(CO #2);(b) deliver a message andmake recommendations (CO #2,3), and (c) communicate ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner. (CO#3)Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:(CO #2) Employ strategies to affect the development, implementation, and consequences of policies at the institutional, local, national, and international levels. (PO 4, 8, 10)(CO #3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2,3,10)(CO #4) Analyze the historical, ethical, and political contexts of health care policy and the consequences of policy implementation. (PO 6, 10)(CO #5) Advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that influence health care and its consumers and nurses and their nursing practice. (PO2,10)Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5Total Points: 100pointsRequirementsAssignment Criteria for Presentation1. Introduce your chosen policy issue, the current status, and an overview of your plan for a legislative visit.2. Articulate key communication strategies involved in your approach to the legislator including plan, message, and recommendations; see Worksheet 2 and again, the focus is on evidence-based communication techniques for effective healthcare policy visit to the legislator.3. Provide an analysis of empirical evidence of effective communication strategies and techniques to support an effective visit and follow-up to the legislator.4. Provide specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing.5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content.6. Paper will be 2-3 pages, excluding title and reference pages, and in APA format 6thedition.7. Five non-text book references are required as minimum.Preparing the PaperFollowing completion of Planning Your Visit Ungraded Worksheet 2, target communication strategies that support an effective policymaking visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic references or current references (published within the past 5 years) that support your policy plan, the message, recommendations, and follow-up.Category Points % DescriptionIntroduction and Conclusion 10 10 Introductionbriefly identifies your healthcare policy-priority issue, the policy itself and legislator with a plan for the policymaker visit/presentation. Concluding statements summarize content.Empirical Evidence 50 50 Empirical evidence identifies effective communication strategies and techniqueswith follow-up supporting your visit to the legislator.Specific Examples 20 20 Provide specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing.APA Format 10 10 Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format 6thedition.Writing Quality 10 10 Rules of grammar, word usage, sentence and paragraph format, and punctuation are followed. Paper length appropriate.Total 100 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.Grading RubricAssignment Criteria Exceptional(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds(88%)Very good or high level of performance Meets(80%)Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement(38%)Poor or failing level of performance Developing(0)Unsatisfactory level of performanceContentPossible Points = 100 PointsIntroduction and Conclusion 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 PointsIntroduction briefly identifiesyour healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself, and legislator with a plan for the policymaker visit/presentation.Concluding statements summarizing content have no inaccuracy.Introduction of your healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself, and legislatorwith a plan for policymaker visit/presentation has rare inaccuracy.Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.Introduction of your healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself, and legislator with a plan for policymaker visit/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity.Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.Introduction of your healthcare/policy-priority issue, policy itself and legislator with a plan for a policymaker visit/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is lacking content.Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or lacks content.No attempt at introduction or conclusion.Empirical Evidence 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsEmpirical evidence ofeffective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator is clearly articulated.Empirical evidence ofeffective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator has a few inaccuracies.Empirical evidence ofeffective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator has multiple instances of inaccuracies or lacks detail/articulation.Empirical evidence of effective communication strategies and techniques with follow-up supporting your healthcare policy-priority visit to the legislator is missing.No attempt at providing Empirical evidence.Specific Examples 20 Points 18 Points 16 Points 8 Points 0 PointsProvides specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentationto nursing and has no inaccuracy and is clearly articulated.Provides specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing and lacks occasional important elements or specificity and/or lacks clarity.Provides specific examples of the impact and/or importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing and has multiple instances of inaccuracies and/or lacks clarity.No specific examples of the impact OR importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing.No specific examples of the impact AND importance of a successful visit/presentation to nursing.Content Subtotal_____of80 pointsFormat Possible Points = 20 PointsAPA Format: 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 PointsText, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format.There are 1–2 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s).There are 3–4 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s).There are 5 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s).There are 6 or more APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s).Writing Quality.10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 PointsPaper is appropriate in length. References include the minimum of five (5) scholarly references,excluding the course text.Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.Paper is short or long in length and/or contains fewer than 5 but more than 1 scholarly reference, excluding course text, or references utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with1–2 exceptions.Paper is short or long in length and contains only 1 scholarly reference. Additional references are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with 3–4 exceptions.Paper is two or more pages short or long in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 5 errors Paper is two or more pages short or long in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 6 or more errors.Format Subtotal_____of 20 pointsTotal Points_____of 100 points

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 6 Discussion Using the Media NEW

Using the MediaGiven the power of the media, discuss how you would use an opinion editorial, a personal interview, websites, texting, Facebook, Twitter, and/or blogs to influence public opinion relative to your policy priority. What issues about media and electronic social networking do you need to consider? Why?

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 7 Discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader NEW

RN as Healthcare Policy LeaderAs a health policy professional leader, communicating with lay audiences is an important skill in promoting the health of the community for master prepared registered nurses. Develop a concise position statement reflecting the research findings and recommendations by experts as they relate to workplace support for breast feeding mothers, medical marijuana services in the community, genetic testing or applications of stem cell research, transgender care, abortion, end-of-life care, or a community service administered by Family Nurse Practitioners (if you pick this one be specific about the type of community service the FNP would work in or manage).Population Based CareFind an article that describes holistic care of a client with a chronic illness. As a leader in healthcare policy, what additional healthcare policy changes would you advocate for to improve the health of this population?

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 7 Policymaker Electronic Presentation NEW

Policymaker Electronic PresentationGuidelines and Grading RubricPurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your policymaker visit (CO #3); (b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process (CO #6); and (c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner (CO #3).Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:(CO#1) Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and health care. (PO 9, 10)(CO#3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2,3, 10)(CO#6) Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 7 10)Due Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7Total Points:275 pointsRequirementsAssignment Criteria for Presentation1. Describe your visit/presentation, including any PowerPoint presentation materials that you utilizedduring your policymaker visit. Limit these slides to five slides in this project (of the 15 total slides). This includes any handouts that you left with the policymaker.2. Discuss the response of the policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).3. Reflect on the process, follow-up plans, insights gained about the issue and process, and support with evidence.4. Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content.6. Develop a 15-slide PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes in APA format, not including title and reference slides. Write speaker notes sufficient enough to enable someone to take over or give the presentation other than you.Preparing the PresentationAfter completing Policymaker Visit Ungraded Worksheet 3, develop an electronic presentation to describe, analyze, and reflect upon your policymaking visit. Include 5 slides from thePowerPoint presentation that you would have used during an actual policymaker visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references within the past 5 years that specifically support insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process.Category Points % DescriptionVisit Description 50 18 Clearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes no more than 5 slides from actual presentation)Policymaker Response 50 18 Slides and speaker notes discuss responses of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).Reflections on Process 50 18 Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up, and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.Future Opportunities 50 18 Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting/presentation and their importance to nursing.Conclusions 45 16 Concluding statements summarize content.APA format 15 6 Slides, speaker notes, and references are completely consistent with APA format.Presentation/Writing 15 6 Slide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone.Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.Total 275 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.Grading RubricAssignment Criteria Exceptional(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds(88%)Very good or high level of performance Meets(80%)Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement(38%)Poor or failing level of performance Developing(0)Unsatisfactory level of performanceContentPossible Points = 245 PointsVisit Description 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsClearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes actual presentation) Description of visit/presentation has rare inaccuracy.Description of visit/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity.Description of visit/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is not addressed Does not identify, define or describe the healthcare policy..Policymaker Response 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsSlides and speaker notes discuss response of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s) and is clearly articulated.Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has rare inaccuracy.Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response occasionally inaccurate or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has multiple inaccuracies or lacks sufficient level of detail.Slides and speaker notes do not discuss the policymaker response.Reflections on Process 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsReflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up,and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.Reflection on process, supportive evidence, follow-up, and insights gained has rare inaccuracy within slides and speaker notes.Occasionally inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.Reflection on process, evidence, follow-up, and insights is inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks sufficient detail.There is no reflection on process.Future Opportunities 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsClearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.Describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing with need for further detail or clarity.Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting but no mention of importance to nursing.Minimal description of possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and no Discussion of importance to nursing.Does not describe possible future opportunities or their importance to nursing.Conclusion 45 Points 40 Points 36 Points 0 PointsConcluding statements summarize content in a clear and articulated manner.Concluding statements summarizing content have rare inaccuracy or lack of minor details/clarity.Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or little detail.No conclusion.Content Subtotal _____of 245 pointsFormatPossible Points = 30 PointsAPA format 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 PointsSlides, speaker notes, and references are completely are free from APA errors throughout.There are 2-3 APA format errors.There are 4-6 APA format errors.There are 6-7 APA format errors.Eight or more errors in APA, grammar, spelling and syntax and/or citations are missingPresentation/Writing 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 PointsSlide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.Presentations slides are professional in appearance and tone with rare exceptions.Slides are+1 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with rare repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack minor detail or clarity.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone with occasional areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+2 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with occasional repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack detail or clarity.Most presentation slides are not professional in appearance and tone with numerous areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+3 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content withmultiple repetitions of slides or lack significant detail.Presentation includes numerous crowded slides and has no flow.Format Subtotal _____of 30 pointsTotal Points _____of 275 points

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 7 Policymaker Electronic Presentation (Vaccination Rates for Children in Ingham County, Michigan) NEW

Policymaker Electronic PresentationGuidelines and Grading RubricPurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your policymaker visit (CO #3); (b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process (CO #6); and (c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner (CO #3).Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:(CO#1) Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and health care. (PO 9, 10)(CO#3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2,3, 10)(CO#6) Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 7 10)Due Date:Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7Total Points:275 pointsRequirementsAssignment Criteria for Presentation1. Describe your visit/presentation, including any PowerPoint presentation materials that you utilizedduring your policymaker visit. Limit these slides to five slides in this project (of the 15 total slides). This includes any handouts that you left with the policymaker.2. Discuss the response of the policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).3. Reflect on the process, follow-up plans, insights gained about the issue and process, and support with evidence.4. Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content.6. Develop a 15-slide PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes in APA format, not including title and reference slides. Write speaker notes sufficient enough to enable someone to take over or give the presentation other than you.Preparing the PresentationAfter completing Policymaker Visit Ungraded Worksheet 3, develop an electronic presentation to describe, analyze, and reflect upon your policymaking visit. Include 5 slides from thePowerPoint presentation that you would have used during an actual policymaker visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references within the past 5 years that specifically support insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process.Category Points % DescriptionVisit Description 50 18 Clearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes no more than 5 slides from actual presentation)Policymaker Response 50 18 Slides and speaker notes discuss responses of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).Reflections on Process 50 18 Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up, and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.Future Opportunities 50 18 Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting/presentation and their importance to nursing.Conclusions 45 16 Concluding statements summarize content.APA format 15 6 Slides, speaker notes, and references are completely consistent with APA format.Presentation/Writing 15 6 Slide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone.Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.Total 275 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.Grading RubricAssignment Criteria Exceptional(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds(88%)Very good or high level of performance Meets(80%)Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement(38%)Poor or failing level of performance Developing(0)Unsatisfactory level of performanceContentPossible Points = 245 PointsVisit Description 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsClearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes actual presentation) Description of visit/presentation has rare inaccuracy.Description of visit/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity.Description of visit/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is not addressed Does not identify, define or describe the healthcare policy..Policymaker Response 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsSlides and speaker notes discuss response of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s) and is clearly articulated.Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has rare inaccuracy.Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response occasionally inaccurate or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has multiple inaccuracies or lacks sufficient level of detail.Slides and speaker notes do not discuss the policymaker response.Reflections on Process 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsReflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up,and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.Reflection on process, supportive evidence, follow-up, and insights gained has rare inaccuracy within slides and speaker notes.Occasionally inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.Reflection on process, evidence, follow-up, and insights is inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks sufficient detail.There is no reflection on process.Future Opportunities 50 Points 44 Points 40 Points 19 Points 0 PointsClearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.Describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing with need for further detail or clarity.Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting but no mention of importance to nursing.Minimal description of possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and no Discussion of importance to nursing.Does not describe possible future opportunities or their importance to nursing.Conclusion 45 Points 40 Points 36 Points 0 PointsConcluding statements summarize content in a clear and articulated manner.Concluding statements summarizing content have rare inaccuracy or lack of minor details/clarity.Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or little detail.No conclusion.Content Subtotal _____of 245 pointsFormatPossible Points = 30 PointsAPA format 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 PointsSlides, speaker notes, and references are completely are free from APA errors throughout.There are 2-3 APA format errors.There are 4-6 APA format errors.There are 6-7 APA format errors.Eight or more errors in APA, grammar, spelling and syntax and/or citations are missingPresentation/Writing 15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 PointsSlide and speaker notes content are accurate.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.Presentations slides are professional in appearance and tone with rare exceptions.Slides are+1 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with rare repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack minor detail or clarity.Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone with occasional areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+2 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content with occasional repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack detail or clarity.Most presentation slides are not professional in appearance and tone with numerous areas needing improvements in style.Slides are+3 of required number.Speaker notes contain presentation content withmultiple repetitions of slides or lack significant detail.Presentation includes numerous crowded slides and has no flow.Format Subtotal _____of 30 pointsTotal Points _____of 275 points

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 506 Week 8 Discussion Global Policy Reform NEW

Global Policy ReformReflect on the concepts and practices you have learned in NR 506 on healthcare systems, politics, and health policy. Read the article that is linked below and share insights as how to make informed decisions on nursing practice and patient outcomes on a global basis. In addition, state how you will apply what you have learned in this course to your upcoming practicum experience. Note: it is welcome but not necessary to post your own references this Week in your Discussion responses. Enjoy the reading and simply reflect with us.Read the.proquest.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu/docview/1029876233?accountid=147674″>articleby Kohl, H.W., Craig, C. L., Lambert, E.V., Inoue, S., Alkandari, J.R., Leetonngin, G., Kahlmeier, K. (2012), a systems approach to dealing with the global issue of physical inactivity is discussed.Your Policy Priority Issue Guidelines and Grading RubricPurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to: a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your planning a policymaker call b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your healthcare policy issue and the policymaking process, and c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.Course OutcomesThis assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:(CO#1) Analyze application of theories to the development of policies that affect nursing and health care. (PO 9, 10)(CO#3) Communicate with policymakers to advocate for effective policies that affect nurses and nursing, consumers, or the health care system. (PO 2, 3, 10)(CO#4) Analyze the historical, ethical, and political contexts of healthcare policy and the consequences of policy implementation. (PO 6, 10)(CO#6) Investigate the interrelationship between policy decisions and evidence-based practice. (PO4, 7, 10)Due DateSunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3Total Points:175 pointsRequirementsAssignment Criteria for Presentation:1. Provide an introduction to your healthcare policy-priorityissue and the title or name of your legislator.2. Articulate key points under each of the Formulating a Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet #1 sections.3. Provide a critique of empirical evidence that supports your chosen healthcare policy-priority issue and analysis.4. Demonstrate the importance and impact of the chosen healthcare policy-priority issue to nursing.5. Provide concluding statements summarizingthe content.6. The paper will be a minimum of 4 pages and a maximum offive pages in length,in APA format 6th edition,excluding the title and reference page.Preparing the PaperAfter completing Formulating a Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet #1, address all areas on the worksheet in the body of a scholarly paper. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references published within the past 5 years.Category Points % DescriptionIntroduction and Conclusion 35 20 Introduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy- priority issue and the title or name of your designated legislator.Concluding statements summarizing content.Key Points 40 23 Identification of all key points of your healthcare policy-priority issue (review sections of Healthcare Policy Ungraded Worksheet) are clearly analyzed and fully articulated.Empirical Evidence 40 23 Provide a critique of empirical evidence thatsupports your chosen healthcare policy issue and analysis.Impact and Importance to Nursing 35 20 Demonstrate the importance and impact of the chosen healthcare policy issue to nursing.APA Format 10 6 Text, title page, and references are consistent with APA format.Writing Quality 15 8 Rules of grammar, word usage, sentence, and paragraph format and punctuation.Total 175 100 A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.Grading RubricAssignment Criteria Exceptional(100%)Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds(88%)Very good or high level of performance Meets(80%)Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement(38%)Poor or failing level of performance Developing(0)Unsatisfactory level of performanceContentPossible Points = 150 PointsIntroduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue. Concluding statements summarizing content are present.35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 PointsIntroduction clearly introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue and the title or name of your designated legislator. Concluding statements summarizing content are present, clear, and well written.Introduction introduces your healthcare policy-priority issue and the name or title of your designated legislator. Concluding statements summarizing content are present. Minor clarity or detail issues.Introduction and conclusion are included; could include more details such as a specific healthcare policy-priority issue that a legislator could act upon or the name or title of the legislator; clarity or improvement of format.Lacking introduction or conclusion.No attempt made at introduction or conclusion.Identification of all key points of your healthcare policy-priority issue are clearly analyzed and fully articulated.40 Points 35 Points 32 Points 15 Points 0 PointsKey points are well described, and analysis is fully articulated.Key points are described with some lack of clarity, and/or analysis is lacking detail or clarity.Key points are not well described, and/or analysis is lacking detail or clarity.Key points or analysis is missing.Key points and analysis is missing.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy-priority issue is clearly critiqued.40 Points 35 Points 32 Points 15 Points 0 PointsEmpirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is clearly critiqued in a comprehensive and accurate manner.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is critiqued but lacking clarity or not substantive.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy- priority issue is noted but not critiqued.Empirical evidence supporting your healthcare policy priority issue is lacking.No attempt made at providing empirical evidence.Your healthcare policy- priority issue clearly demonstrates the impact and or importance of your issue to nursing or the intended impact to patient outcomes.35 Points 31 Points 28 Points 13 Points 0 PointsImpact to patient outcomes or nursing practice is thoroughly discussed.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has rare inaccuracy.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice lacks occasional important elements or specificity.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has multiple instances of inaccuracies.Impact to patient outcomes or nursing practice has multiple instances of inaccuracies and is vague.Content Subtotal_____of 150 pointsFormat Possible Points = 25 PointsAPA Format: Text, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format 6thedition.10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 PointsPaper is free from APA errors throughout.There are 1-2 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 3-4 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 5 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s) There are 6 or more APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s)Writing Quality: Paper is appropriate in length. References include a minimum of 5 scholarly references excluding the course text. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.15 Points 13 Points 12 Points 6 Points 0 PointsPaper is appropriate in length. References include more than the minimum number of scholarly references, excluding the course text. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.Paper is short/long in length and/or contains a minimum of scholarly references excluding course text, or references utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with1-2 exceptions.Paper is short/long in length and contains only 1 scholarly reference. Additional references are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with 3-4 exceptions.Paper is short/long two or more pages in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 5 errors.Paper is short/long two or more pages in length and does not contain scholarly references. References utilized are not scholarly. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 6 or more errors.

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NR-505: Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

NR-505: Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Course Assignments & Discussions Study GuideNR-505: Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Course Description

Contact Hours: Lecture – 48, Lab – 0, Clinical – 0

Semester Hours: Theory 3

This course provides an evidence-based practice with research in order to foster scholarship and holistic, person-centered care in diverse healthcare settings. Content related to research methodologies, problem identification, critique of findings and literature and application to evidence-based practice is presented. Students will be provided an opportunity to practice learned principles through the development of an evidence-based project that focuses on quality improvement or safety.

Prerequisites: NR-500, NR-501, NR-504 or NR-510, NR-506 or NR-544, NR-512

NR-505: Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Course Syllabus

NR-505 Week 1 Discussion: Area of Interest in NP

NR-505 Week 1 Assignment: Reflection on Learning

NR-505 Week 2 Assignment: PICOT Question Worksheet

NR-505 Week 2 Discussion: Collaboration Café

NR-505 Week 2 Assignment: Reflection on Learning

NR-505 Week 3 Discussion: Collaboration Cafe

NR-505 Week 3 Assignment: Reflection on Learning

NR-505 Week 4 Discussion: Collaboration Café

NR-505 Week 4 Assignment: Reflection on Learning

NR-505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Summary Assignment

NR-505NP Week 5 Assignment: Reflection on Learning

NR-505 Week 6 Assignment: CITI Training

NR-505 Week 6 Discussion: Original Post, Resposes

NR-505 Week 6 Assignment: Reflection on Learning

NR-505 Week 7 Assignment: Recommendation for an Evidence-Based Practice Change PowerPoint Presenation

NR-505 Week 7 Assignment: Reflection on Learning

NR-505 Week 8 Discussion: Peer Review (With Response)

NR-505 Week 8 Assignment: Reflection on Learning Week 1-8

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Syllabus Overview

Course Number: NR505
Course Title: Advanced Research Methods: Evidence-Based Practice
Course Credits: 3 credit hours
Prerequisite: NR500, NR501, NR504, NR506, NR512

Course Description

This course provides an integration of evidence-based practice with research in order to foster scholarship and holistic, person-centered care in diverse healthcare settings. Content related to research methodologies, problem identification, critique of findings and literature, and application to evidence-based practice is presented. Students will be provided an opportunity to practice learned principles through the development of an evidence-based project that focuses on quality improvement or safety.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-506: Health Care Policy and Leadership Course Assignments & Discussions.

Optional Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2018). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

.

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

eBook Details

You must purchase your books through the bookstore before the eBook links above will function.

First Time Using VitalSource?

Step 1: View the VitalSource Video

Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online

  1. Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
  2. Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.

Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions

You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.

Already Registered?   3 Ways to Access Your eBooks

Online

Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.

Desktop

Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.

Mobile

Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (year of publication). Title of textbook in italics (X ed.). City, ST: Publisher.

Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.

The following book is required across all FNP courses:

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

The following book is recommended across all FNP courses:

Goroll, A. H., & Mulley, A. G. (2014). Primary care medicine: Office evaluation and management of the adult patient (7th ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer.

 

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

eBook Details

You must purchase your books through the bookstore before the eBook links above will function.

First Time Using VitalSource?

Step 1: View the VitalSource Video

Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online

  1. Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
  2. Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.

Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions

You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.

Already Registered?   3 Ways to Access Your eBooks

Online

Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.

Desktop

Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.

Mobile

Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.

Program Outcomes

Program Outcomes of Chamberlain nursing programs can be found in the Program Descriptions section of your College Catalog. You can access your College Catalog at http://www.chamberlain.edu/msncatalog.

The MSN program outcomes are aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing publication, The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing (2011). Upon completion of the MSN degree program, the graduate will be able to:

  1. Practice safe, high-quality advanced nursing care based on concepts and knowledge from nursing and related disciplines.
  2. Construct processes for leading and promoting quality improvement and safety in advanced nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
  3. Use contemporary communication modalities effectively in advanced nursing roles.
  4. Evaluate the design, implementation and outcomes of strategies developed to meet healthcare needs.
  5. Develop a plan for lifelong personal and professional growth that integrates professional values regarding scholarship, service and global engagement.
  6. Apply legal, ethical and human-caring principles to situations in advanced nursing practice.
  7. Design patient-centered care models and delivery systems using the best available scientific evidence.
  8. Manage human, fiscal and physical resources to achieve and support individual and organizational goals.
  9. Compose a plan for systematic inquiry and dissemination of findings to support advanced nursing practice, patient-care innovation, and the nursing profession.
  10. Collaborate interprofessionally in research, education, practice, health policy and leadership to improve population health outcomes.
  11. Apply principles of informatics to manage data and information in order to support effective decision making.

NR-505: Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Course: A Comprehensive Guide

NR 505 Week 1 Discussion: Area of Interest in NP (2 Versions)

During NR 505 Week 1, you will have opportunities to explore topics pertinent to your chosen subspecialty of NP. Conversations like these are great for exchanging ideas and getting feedback from others as you brainstorm new areas of inquiry.

NR 505 Week 2 Assignment, Discussion, Reflection (Bundle)

NR 505 a deeper understanding of research methods and evidence-based practices while encouraging critical thinking and self-awareness.

NR 505 Week 2 PICOT Worksheet Assignment

The NR 505 PICOT worksheet is due at the end of Week 2. This activity guides you through the process of formulating a clear research question by isolating its constituent parts (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and timeframe).

NR 505 Week 3 Discussion: Quantitative Research – Collaboration Cafe (2 Versions)

In NR 505 Week 3, you will take part in a collaborative cafe to talk about methods for conducting quantitative research. Participate in discussions with your contemporaries on the topic of quantitative research methodologies and their uses in nursing practice.

NR 505 Week 4 Discussion plus Reflection on Learning

Learning is reinforced and new insights into research methods and evidence-based practices are gained duringNR 505 week 4’s conversations and reflections.

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment, Discussion, Reflection on Learning (Bundle)

In NR 505 Week 5, you’ll be working on projects, talking to classmates, and thinking deeply about what you’ve learned. Your understanding of cutting-edge research techniques and evidence-based practice will grow with the help of these practice problems.

NR 505 Week 5 Assignment: Research Summary Table Worksheet (2 Versions)

The study summary table will be your focus during NR 505 Week 5. Research study summaries and analyses are required to determine important findings and their relevance to nursing practice.

NR 505 Week 6 Discussion: Collaboration Cafe

Cafes for collaborative discussion of research and evidence-based practice resume this week NR 505 (Week 6).

NR 505 Week 7 Assignment, Discussion, Reflection on Learning (Bundle)

Advanced research methodologies and evidence-based practices are the focus of the week seven assignments, conversations, and NR 505 reflection exercises.

NR 505 Week 7 Assignment: Evidence-based Practice Change PowerPoint Presentation (3 Versions)

In NR 505 Week 7, you’ll develop a PowerPoint presentation advocating for a change in practice supported by evidence. Your ability to effectively incorporate research findings into nursing practice recommendations is highlighted in this presentation.

NR 505 Week 8 Collaboration Cafe, Peer Review Discussion, Reflections on Learning Week 1-8

The NR 505 final week of this course will consist of a collaborative cafe, peer review talks, and introspective thinking about what you’ve learned.

NR 505 Week 8 Discussion: Peer Review (With Response)

Peer review talks, which round off NR 505 Week 8, give you the chance to give constructive criticism on your colleagues’ work and get important feedback on your own assignments.

NR 505 Complete Course Week 1 – 8

This thorough course covers every facet of cutting-edge research techniques and evidence-based practice. You will develop a comprehensive understanding of how research influences nursing practice via interesting assignments, reflections, and introductory discussions.

NR 505 Course Assignments Week 2, 5 and 7 (Bundle)

The course tasks for NR 505 Weeks 2, 5, and 7 are meant to test your capacity for investigation and critical thought. These packages give you the chance to explore numerous research areas and improve your capacity to use evidence-based techniques in clinical work.

NR 505 Reflections on Learning Week 1 – 8

The course tasks for NR 505 Weeks 2, 5, and 7 are meant to test your capacity for investigation and critical thought. These packages give you the chance to explore numerous research areas and improve your capacity to use evidence-based techniques in clinical work.

NR 505 Discussion Questions Week 1 – 8

Explore the supplied discussion questions with your peers in order to have stimulating conversations. These NR 505 discussions foster critical thinking, teamwork, and the investigation of many viewpoints on research and evidence-based practice.

NR 505 Advanced Research Methods:

Start your journey in NR 505 Advanced Research Methods: Evidence-Based Practise and gain the knowledge and abilities required to evaluate research critically and apply evidence-based practises in your nursing profession.

FAQs

Question: The FNP knows that during an abdominal assessment, deep palpation is used to determine

Answer: Deep palpation detects deeper lumps or organ enlargement during an abdominal evaluation. It lets the FNP evaluate organ size, shape, and consistency and find anomalies or soreness that light palpation may miss. Deep palpation evaluates the liver, spleen, kidneys, and bladder with gentle but strong pressure.

Question: The FNP is assessing the abdomen of an aging adult. Which of these statements regarding an aging adult and abdominal assessment is true?

Answer:

Changes in elderly adults can affect abdominal assessment. The abdomen may relax due to decreased abdominal muscular tone. Palpating abdominal tumors or anomalies is difficult due to abdominal muscular relaxation. Aging adults may have less fat cushioning, making abdominal organs more visible and palpable. The FNP must consider these age-related changes while assessing an aging adult’s abdomen.

Question: During examination, the FNP finds that a patient has excessive dryness of the skin. The best term to describe this condition is

Answer:

Xerosis is skin dryness. Environmental variables (low humidity, dry air), hot water, harsh soaps and detergents, and medical problems (eczema, psoriasis) can cause xerosis. It causes itching, flaking, and tight skin.

Question: A FNP notices that a patient has ascites, which indicates the presence of

Answer:

Ascites is fluid collection in the peritoneal cavity between the abdominal organs and the abdominal wall. Liver illness, especially cirrhosis, causes it. Heart failure, kidney problems, cancer, and infections can cause ascites. Ascites indicates a disorder that requires additional assessment and management.

Course Outcomes

Chamberlain College of Nursing courses are built to align course content with specific Course Outcomes (COs). The COs define the learning objectives that the student will be required to comprehend and demonstrate by course completion. The COs that will be covered in detail each week can be found in the Overview page in that particular week. Whenever possible, a reference will be made from a particular assignment or discussion back to the CO that it emphasizes.

Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to do the following.

  1. Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO 1, 2, 7, 9)
  2. Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 7, 9, 11)
  3. Demonstrate professional and personal growth through a spirit of inquiry, scholarship, and service in diverse healthcare settings. (PO5)
  4. Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 2, 6, 9)
  5. Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic nursing care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 2, 4, 7, 9, 10)

Course Schedule

Week, COs, and Topics Readings Assignments
Week 1

COs 1, 2, and 3

Evidence-Based Practice + Research = Extraordinary Person-Centered Care

Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2018). Essentials of nursing research: Apprising evidence for nursing practice (9 th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

  • Chapter 1: Intoduction to Nursing Research in an Evidence-Based Practice Environment
  • Chapter 2: Fundamentals of Evidence-Based Nursing Practice
  • Chapter 3: Key Concepts and Steps in Quantitative and Qualitative Research
Graded Discussion
Week 2

CO 4

Framing the Question and Locating Evidence

Polit, D. & Beck, C. (2018). Essentials of nursing research: Apprising evidence for nursing practice (9 th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

  • Chapter 6: Research Problems, Research Questions, and Hypotheses
  • Chapter 7: Finding and Reviewing Research Evidence in the Literature
  • Chapter 8: Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks
Refinement of Nursing Issue Into Research Assignment

Graded Discussion

Week 3

CO 4

Developing New Evidence: Quantitative

Polit, D., & Beck, C. (2018). Essentials of nursing research: Apprising evidence for nursing practice (9 th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

  • Chapter 9: Quantitative Research Design
  • Chapter 10: Sampling and Data Collection in Quantitative Studies (pp. 161–167; stop with “Data Collection in Quantitative Research”)
NIH Certification Assignment

Graded Discussion

Week 4

CO 4

Developing New Evidence: Qualitative

Polit, D. & Beck, C. (2018). Essentials of nursing research: Apprising evidence for nursing practice (9 th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

  • Chapter 11: Qualitative Designs and Approaches
  • Chapter 12: Sampling and Data Collection in Qualitative Studies (pp. 198–203; stop with “Data Collection in Qualitative Studies”)
  • Chapter 13: Mixed Methods and Other Special Types of Research
Research Design and Sampling Assignment

Graded Discussion

Week 5

CO 4

Producing Evidence

Polit, D. & Beck, C. (2018). Essentials of nursing research: Apprising evidence for nursing practice (9 th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

  • Chapter 10: Sampling and Data Collection in Quantitative Studies (pp.167–182)
  • Chapter 12: Sampling and Data Collection in Qualitative Studies (pp. 203–211)
  • Chapter 14: Statistical Analysis of Quantitative Data (pp. 227–247; stop with “Multivariate Statistical Analysis”)
  • Chapter 16: Analysis of Qualitative Data (pp. 277–293)
Methodology and Analysis Assignment

Graded Discussion

Week 6

COs 4 and 5

Consider the Evidence: What Is Known and Is It Useful?

Polit, D. & Beck, C. (2018). Essentials of nursing research: Apprising evidence for nursing practice (9 th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

  • Chapter 4: Reading and Critiquing Research Articles
  • Chapter 15: Interpretation and Clinical Significance in Quantitative Research
  • Chapter 17: Trustworthiness and Integrity in Qualitative Research
Considering Evidence Assignment

Graded Discussion

Week 7

COs 1 and 2

Translating Evidence Into Practice

Lockwood, C., Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z. (2014). Translating evidence into policy and practice. Nursing Clinics North America49, 555–566. doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2014.08.010  Link

Schaffer, M., Sandau, K., & Diedrick, L. (2012). Evidence-based practice models for organizational change: Overview and practical applications. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(5), 1,197–1,208. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06122.x  Link

Optional Reading and Viewing

Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Website: Link

Kitson, A. L., & Harvey, G. (2016). Methods to succeed in effective knowledge translation in clinical practice. Journal Of Nursing Scholarship: An Official Publication Of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society Of Nursing / Sigma Theta Tau48(3), 294–302. doi:10.1111/jnu.12206 Link

Melnyk, B. M. (2012). Achieving a high-reliability organization through implementation of the ARCC model for systemwide sustainability of evidence-based practice. Nursing Administration Quarterly36(2), 127–135. doi:10.1097/naq.0b013e318249fb6a Link

Professional Presentation of Project

Graded Discussion

Week 8

COs 2 and 3

Synthesis and Next Steps

Newhouse, R. (2007). Creating infrastructure supportive of evidence-based nursing practice: Leadership strategies. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 4(1), 21–29. Link Graded Discussion

 Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.

Evaluation Methods

No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.

Letter Grade Points Percentage
A   940–1,000 94% to 100%
A-  920–939 92% to 93%
B+ 890–919 89% to 91%
B   860–889 86% to 88%
B-  840–859 84% to 85%
C+ 810–839 81% to 83%
C   760–809 76% to 80%
F   759 and below 75% and below

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.

Points Weighting
Discussions
(50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points, Week 8)
375 37.5%
Refinement of Nursing Issue Into Research Assignment
(due Week 2)
180 18%
NIH Certification Assignment
(due Week 3)
85 8.5%
Research Design and Sampling Assignment
(due Week 4)
80 8%
Methodology and Analysis Assignment
(due Week 5)
80 8%
Considering Evidence Assignment
(due Week 6)
100 10%
Professional Presentation of Project
(due Week 7)
100 10%
Total 1,000 100%

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Participation for MSN

   The Discussion Grading Grid and Rubric document can be found in Course Resources.

Participation Guidelines

Due Date: The initial posting to the required discussion topic is due by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. Peer and instructor responses are due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All posts for Week 8 are due by the close of class on Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the discussions.

Total Points Possible: This varies by course, so please see the specific course Syllabus. These guidelines are for a required discussion worth 50 points. Please note that Week 8 will be worth only 25 points.

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

  1. Initial posting: This is defined to be the initial post in which the student responds to the required discussion topic. The first posting by a student within the required discussion area is considered to be the initial posting and will be evaluated using the rubric criteria. Scholarship in communication is expected. Required scholarly sources provide specific information that thoroughly address the required topic. For the initial posting, one scholarly source must be presented. The scholarly source must be an outside source. The student may use the required course textbook(s), assigned readings, and lesson information in the initial post, but these are not considered outside scholarly sources.

The initial posting must occur before Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. Initial postings must be at a minimum of 300 words. References do not apply toward word count. In Week 8 only, the initial posting must be a minimum of 200 words with a scholarly reference. It remains due by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT

  1. Peer responses: As part of the discussion requirements, the student must provide a substantive response to a peer. Substantive responses pose new ideas, ask questions, and/or generally add to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive way.

The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting and instructor response (see below). This peer response must occur before Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT. This response does not require a scholarly reference unless information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, in which case APA guidelines apply. Peer responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.

  1. Instructor response: The student must respond to an instructor’s follow-up questions. The instructor’s question may be directed to the student or may be a question directed to another student in the section. The response must be comprehensive and scholarly in nature. Instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.

The response to the instructor must occur on a day different from the initial post and a day different from the peer response. Responses to the instructor must occur before Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT.

  1. For Week 8 only:Students are expected to post a peer response or an instructor post but are not required to do both. These posts must be a minimum of 100 words. References do not apply toward word count. The peer or instructor response must be on a different day from the initial post and must occur before Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT due to the shorter week.

Posting Requirements

  1. The initial posting must be provided before Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT.
  2. The initial posting must have at least one scholarly outside source that is cited within the posting and referenced. Required course textbooks, assigned readings, and lesson information are not considered to be outside scholarly sources.
  3. The initial posting must be a minimum of 300 words; peer responses and instructor responses must be a minimum 150 words.
  4. The peer responses and instructor responses must be provided before Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT.
  5. All postings are substantive and relate to the graded threaded discussion topic.
  6. Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is accepted.
  7. Postings must occur on 3 separate days.
  8. For week 8 only: The required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required: one initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. The initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on 2 separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT

Criteria for Content

  • Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
  • Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
  • Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded discussion topic by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
  • Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA formatting, and syntax are required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual (6th edition). Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
  • Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response, and one instructor response (for a total of three posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
  • Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. MT.
  • For Week 8 only: The required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required: one initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on 2 separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT.

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

  1. The instructor reserves the right to submit any discussion posting to Turnitin in order to verify the originality.
  2. When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What Is a Scholarly Source” located in Course Resources.
  3. Websites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the website. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points may be deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent, such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarly value is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
  4. Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes, even if they are just a few words, because your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.

Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

Very good or high level of performance

88%

Acceptable level of performance

81%

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

Deficient level of performance

56%

Failing level of performance

55% or less

 Total Points Possible = 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required discussion topic(s)
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission), and reliable for the required topic*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required discussion topic(s)
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission), and reliable for the required topic*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required discussion topic(s)
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission), and reliable for the required topic*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required discussion topic(s)
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission), and reliable for the required topic*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge, and information from scholarly resources to the required topic
  • Applies facts, principles, or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience
  • Application of information  comprehensive and specific to the required topic
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge, and information from scholarly resources to the required topic
  • Applies facts, principles, or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience
  • Application of information  comprehensive and specific to the required topic
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge, and information from scholarly resources to the required topic
  • Applies facts, principles, or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience
  • Application of information  comprehensive and specific to the required topic
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge, and information from scholarly resources to the required topic
  • Applies facts, principles, or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience
  • Application of information  comprehensive and specific to the required topic
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post a minimum of 300 words
  • Peer and instructor responses a minimum of 150 words each
  • Responses  substantive
  • Responses  related to the topic of discussion
Demonstrated three of the following:

  • Initial post a minimum of 300 words
  • Peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses  substantive
  • Responses  related to the topic of discussion
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing

The source of information is the APA Manual (6th edition)

Error is defined to be a unique APA error; same type of error is only counted as one error

The following was present:

  • Zero to three errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses with 0–3 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication
The following was present:

  • Four to six errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses with 4–5 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style somewhat focused on topic
The following was present:

  • Seven to nine errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses with 6–7 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style slightly focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand
 

The following was present:

  • Ten to twelve errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses with 8–9 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand
 

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings made on 3 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial posting to graded  discussion topic posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

 

Grading Rubric Guidelines Week 8 ONLY

Performance Category  100% or highest level of performance

100%

Very good or high level of performance

88%

Acceptable level of performance

81%

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

Deficient level of performance

56%

Failing level of performance

55% or less

         8 Points         7 Points       6 Points           5 Points          4 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required discussion topic(s)
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission), and reliable for the required topic*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required discussion topic(s)
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission), and reliable for the required topic*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required discussion topic(s)
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission), and reliable for the required topic*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required discussion topic(s)
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission), and reliable for the required topic*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
          8 Points        7 Points       6 Points          5 Points             4 Points       0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge, and information from scholarly resources to the required topic
  • Applies facts, principles, or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge, and information from scholarly resources to the required topic
  • Applies facts, principles, or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge, and information from scholarly resources to the required topic
  • Applies facts, principles, or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge, and information from scholarly resources to the required topic
  • Applies facts, principles, or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.

Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.

Interactive Dialogue

For Week 8 only:

Initial post a minimum of 200 words (references do not count toward word count)

Peer and instructor responses a minimum of 100 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses substantive and related to the topic

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post a minimum of 200 words
  • Peer or instructor responses a minimum of 100 words each
  • Responses substantive
  • Responses related to the topic of discussion
Demonstrated three of the following:

  • Initial post be a minimum of 200 words
  • Peer or instructor responses a minimum of 100 words each
  • Responses substantive
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words.
  • The peer or instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words.
  • The peer or instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
       4 Points 3 Points        2 Points       0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax, and APA style of writing

Source of information is the APA Manual (6th edition)

Error is defined to be a unique APA error; same type of error is only counted as one error 

The following was present:

  • Zero to four errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses with 0–4 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style  generally clear, focused on topic, and facilitates communication

 

The following was present:

  • Five to nine errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses with 5–9 grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand
 

The following was present:

  • Ten to thirteen errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 10–13 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand
 

The following was present:

  • 14 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 14 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
           0 Points   5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements For Week 8 only:

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial and peer or faculty postings made on 2 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, and peer or faculty postings were made on 2 separate days
      0 Points Lost      5 Points Lost
 Requirements For Week 8 only:

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial posting to the graded discussion topic posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

Minimum of one peer or one instructor response to be posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT

 

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
  • A minimum of one peer or one instructor response is to be posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

*Scholarly source: Per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments and discussions. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Your textbook and lesson are not considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the discussions, reputable Internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ending in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly, because anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association has a .com site with a high level of scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site that you are unsure of. If the instructor determines that the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality, points will be deducted for not using scholarly sources. Current outside scholarly sources are required for the initial posting. This is defined to be 5 years or less. Instructor permission must be obtained if using a source that is older than 5 years.

Webliography Disclaimer

The purpose of the Webliography is to provide students with annotated bibliographies of world wide websites relevant to their courses. These websites are not meant to be all inclusive of what is available for each course’s subjects and have not been sanctioned as academically rigorous or scholarly by Chamberlain College of Nursing. Please exercise caution when using these websites for course assignments and references.

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NR-504:  Leadership and Nursing Practice Role Development Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

NR-504:  Leadership and Nursing Practice: Role Development Course Assignments & Discussions Study GuideNR-504 Leadership and Nursing Practice Role Development Course Description

Contact Hours: Lecture – 48, Lab – 0, Clinical – 0

Semester Hours: Theory 3

This course applies leadership principles to the role of the MSN-prepared nurse across a variety of practice settings. Leadership-specific knowledge, skills and attitudes to assure safe, high quality care within a person-centered practice environment are integrated. The role of the MSN-prepared nurse to lead change and facilitate outcome achievement is emphasized.

Prerequisite: NR-500, NR-501, NR-506 or NR-544, NR-512

NR-504: Leadership and Nursing Practice Role Development Course Syllabus

Syllabus Overview

NR-504 Week 8 Discussion: Synthesis and Reflection of Learning (2 Versions)

NR-504 Week 6 Discussion: Collaboration Cafe

NR-504 Week 5 Assignment plus Discussion (Bundle)

NR-504 Week 4 Discussion: Leading Others: Implications of Personal Leadership Style

NR-504 Week 3 Discussion: Leading and Caring for Oneself

NR-504 Week 2 Discussion: Peer Engagement Forum (2 Versions)

NR-504 Week 1 Discussion: Leadership; Theory Application to Advanced Nursing Practice

NR-504 Course Assignments Week 3, 5 and 7

NR-504 Course Discussions: Altogether Week 1 – 8

NR-504 Discussion Questions-Answers Week 1 – 8

NR-504 Entire Course Week 1 – 8

NR-504 Week 7 Discussion: Collaboration Cafe

NR-504 Week 5 Discussion: Collaboration Cafe

NR-504 Week 5 Assignment: Leading a Culture of Excellence Paper Part I: Concept Map, Part II: Written Paper

NR-504 Peer Engagement Forum Week 2, 5, 6 and 7

NR-504 Week 7 Assignment: Leadership Style and Change Advocacy Statement Part II: Written Summary

NR-504 Week 7 Assignment, Discussion (Bundle)

NR-504 Week 4 Assignment: Engaging Others with Leadership

NR-504 Week 2 Assignment: Role of Ethics within Leadership

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Course Number: NR504
Course Title: Leadership Within Healthcare Professions
Course Credits: 3 credits
Prerequisite: MSN students: NR500

MPH students: MPH500

Course Description

With an interdisciplinary viewpoint, the student will explore personal and strategic leadership components for diverse healthcare settings. The course emphasizes leadership concepts including communication, ethics, negotiation, advocacy, and work environment. Information related to living leadership within teams, systems, communities, and professional organizations are discussed. With the use of active learning, students will be able to practice problem-solving and change techniques in selected leadership scenarios.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-505: Advanced Research Methods Evidence-Based Practice Course Assignments & Discussions.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Dickson, G. & Tholl, B. (2014). Bringing leadership to life in health: LEADS in a caring environment. London: Springer.

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Optional Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Access E-Book

Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2015). Quantum leadership: Building better partnerships for sustainable health (4th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

eBook Details

First Time Using VitalSource?

Step 1: View the VitalSource Video

Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online

  1. Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
  2. Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.

Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions

You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.

Already Registered?   3 Ways to Access Your eBooks

Online

Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.

Desktop

Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.

Mobile

Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Author, A.A., & Author, B.B. (year of publication). Title of textbook in italics (X ed.). City, ST: Publisher.

Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.

The following book is required across all FNP courses:

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

The following book is recommended across all FNP courses:

Goroll, A.H., & Mulley, A.G. (2014). Primary care medicine: Office evaluation and management of the adult patient (7th ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer.

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

Program Outcomes

Program Outcomes of Chamberlain nursing programs can be found in the Program Descriptions section of your College Catalog. You can access your College Catalog at http://www.chamberlain.edu/msncatalog.

The MSN program outcomes are aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing publication, The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing (2011). Upon completion of the MSN degree program, the graduate will be able to:

  1. Practice safe, high-quality advanced nursing care based on concepts and knowledge from nursing and related disciplines.
  2. Construct processes for leading and promoting quality improvement and safety in advanced nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
  3. Use contemporary communication modalities effectively in advanced nursing roles.
  4. Evaluate the design, implementation and outcomes of strategies developed to meet healthcare needs.
  5. Develop a plan for lifelong personal and professional growth that integrates professional values regarding scholarship, service and global engagement.
  6. Apply legal, ethical and human-caring principles to situations in advanced nursing practice.
  7. Design patient-centered care models and delivery systems using the best available scientific evidence.
  8. Manage human, fiscal and physical resources to achieve and support individual and organizational goals.
  9. Compose a plan for systematic inquiry and dissemination of findings to support advanced nursing practice, patient-care innovation, and the nursing profession.
  10. Collaborate interprofessionally in research, education, practice, health policy and leadership to improve population health outcomes.
  11. Apply principles of informatics to manage data and information in order to support effective decision making.

MPH Program Outcomes

The MPH program outcomes are aligned with the Council for Education of Public Health (CEPH) accreditation criteria (2011) and the Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health (ASPPH) publication, a Master of Public Health Degree for the 21st Century (2014).

At the completion of the Chamberlain MPH program, the graduate will be able to

  1. Articulate the history and philosophy of the professional discipline of public health relative to its core values, concepts, functions, and leadership roles.
  2. Utilize quantitative methods and epidemiologic tools to assess, monitor, and review the health status of populations and their related determinants of health and illness.
  3. Apply evidence-based reasoning and health informatics approaches to the process of program planning, development, budgeting, management, and evaluation in public health organizations and public health interventions to improve community health outcomes.
  4. Specify approaches for assessing, preventing, and controlling environmental hazards that pose risks to human health and safety.
  5. Apply theoretical constructs of social change, health behavior, and social justice in planning public health interventions.
  6. Develop public health programs and strategies responsive to the diverse cultural values and traditions of the communities being served.
  7. Practice systems thinking techniques and problem solving to understand and respond to the dynamic interactions among sectors, organizations and public health professionals in improving public health.
  8. Demonstrate leadership abilities as effective collaborators and coordinators within and across organizations and as members of interdisciplinary and interprofessional teams.
  9. Communicate public health messages to a variety of audiences using targeted written, mass media and electronic communication, and social marketing.
  10. Apply the ethical, legal, economic, political, and regulatory dimensions of healthcare and public health policy to developing, evaluating, and advocating for public health policies.

Course Outcomes

Chamberlain College of Nursing courses are built to align course content with specific Course Outcomes (COs). The COs define the learning objectives that the student will be required to comprehend and demonstrate by course completion. The COs that will be covered in detail each week can be found in the Overview page in that particular week. Whenever possible, a reference will be made from a particular assignment or discussion back to the CO that it emphasizes.

Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to do the following.

  1. Analyze leadership qualities that facilitate collaboration and cooperation at the individual, team, community, and organizational levels within diverse healthcare settings to foster human health. (MPH PO 1, MSN PO 1, 7)
  2. Analyze goal-directed leadership actions that foster positive healthcare outcomes and effective processes at individual, community, and global healthcare settings. (MPH PO 7, MSN PO 2)
  3. Develop personal and strategic communication modalities that foster negotiation, advocacy, and positive work environments within diverse healthcare settings. (MPH PO 9, MSN PO 3)
  4. Incorporate evidenced-based reasoning and a questioning attitude to influence a culture of sustainable innovation and change to strengthen current and future healthcare organizations. (MPH PO 3, MSN PO 4)
  5. Incorporate ongoing leadership character development, values and ethical principles into a living leader role that collaborates with and engages individuals, teams, agencies, and organizations locally as well as globally. (MPH PO 8, MSN PO 5)
  6. Analyze techniques that foster goal-directed decision-making that foster priority setting, innovation, and dynamic interactions within diverse healthcare settings. (MPH PO 6, MSN PO 6, 8)

NR-504: Leadership and Nursing Practice: Role Development Course: A Comprehensive Guide

NR 504 Week 8 Discussion:

In this section NR 504 Week 8 Discussion, you will have the chance to synthesize what you’ve learned and reflect on your education thus far. Have deep conversations in which you investigate other points of view.

NR 504 Week 6 Discussion:

Leadership in the nursing profession relies heavily on collaboration. During the sixth week of NR 504 Week 8 Discussion: Collaboration Cafe is a meeting place for nurses to collaborate and share ideas.

NR 504 Week 5

Work Added On Assignment and discussion are combined into one convenient package called “NR 504 Week 5 Discussion.” Research the idea of “leading a culture of excellence” in depth, and then show what you’ve learned by composing a concept map and an essay.

NR 504 Week 3 Discussion:

Self-care is the foundation of effective leadership. NR 504 Topics for the NR 504 Third Week The need of self-care for nursing leaders is highlighted in Leading and Caring for Oneself. NR 504 Discuss ways to keep yourself healthy and happy, and compare notes on what works for you.

NR 504 Week 2 Discussion:

Peer interaction is a useful learning opportunity. NR 504 Discussion from NR 504 Week 2: The Peer Engagement Forum provides a venue for deep conversations with your peers. Develop a strong network while sharing your knowledge and absorbing that of others.

NR 504 Week 1 Discussion:

In advanced nursing practice, leadership theories are crucial. The NR 504 first week’s discussion in NR 504 on Leadership: NR 504 Theory Application to Advanced Nursing Practice examines how leadership theories are used in the nursing profession. Participate in discussions and evaluate their applicability to your practice.

NR 504 Course Assignments Week 3, 5, and 7

NR 504 Course Assignments provide a set of tasks intended to improve your knowledge and leadership abilities. Each task focuses on a different facet of leadership and offers chances for introspection and personal development.

NR 504 Course Discussions:

From NR 504 Course Discussions Weeks 1 through 8, you’ll have lively group conversations with your classmates about a wide range of issues connected to leadership and nursing practice. Learn more by hearing other people’s viewpoints and discussing what you’ve learned.

NR 504 Discussion Questions-Answers

Each NR 504 Discussion week’s worth of material includes a set of questions designed to promote in-depth thought and lively discussion. If you want to impress people with your expertise and have interesting conversations, try your hand at these questions.

NR 504 Entire Course

All of the NR 504 course material is covered in NR 504 Weeks 1 through 8, providing a thorough education. Get involved with the course content, the assignments, the conversations, and the growth of your leadership abilities.

NR 504 Week 7 Discussion

Successful leaders understand the importance of teamwork. The Seventh Week of NR 504: The goal of the NR 504 Collaboration Cafe is to highlight the value of working together to accomplish goals. NR 504 Discuss, compare notes, and look for ways to improve your teamwork.

NR 504 Week 5 Discussion:

In this session of NR 504 Week 5 Collaboration Cafe, you will discuss the importance of teamwork in nursing administration. Take part in group conversations, exchange suggestions for improvement, and gain insight from the experiences of others.

NR 504 Week 5 Assignment:

Fostering a World-Class Work Environment Part I of the NR 504 Week 5 Paper: Concept Map The Written Paper is a deep dive into the topic of creating an excellent culture of leadership. Create a concept map and research paper that demonstrates your knowledge and ability to lead others.

NR 504 Week 2 Assignment:

The ability to lead ethically is essential. NR 504 Week 2 Ethical Considerations in the Workplace (NR 504 Week 2) Ethical issues in nursing administration are given special attention in leadership. Examine leadership scenarios through the lens of ethics, both theoretical and practical.

NR 504 Leadership and Nursing Practice:

If you want to learn how to lead others and have a deeper grasp of nursing practice, enroll in NR 504: Leadership and Nursing Practice: Role Development. Participate actively in class discussions and in-class activities; this will be an educational experience that will change your life.

FAQs

NR 504 Week 3 Assignment: Reflective Essay

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to promote introspective reflection related to leadership competencies which positively influence others and cultivate healthful working relationships. Students will reflect upon personal strengths and opportunities for enhancement with respect to leadership competencies, and implications of leadership competency in the selected are of MSN specialty practice.

Requirements

Based upon readings and learning activities within the class lessons, reflect upon specific leadership-related competencies which you possess and leadership competencies where there is an opportunity for enhancement. Identify two specific areas of strength, and two areas for improvement. How will those competencies impact future practice as a MSN-prepared nurse in your specialty area?

NR 504 Week 5 Assignment: Leading a Culture of Excellence Paper Part I: Concept Map, Part II: Written Paper

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to consider the value of a culture of excellence and leadership strategies which support a culture of excellence within the student’s selected MSN track. Students will identify organizational characteristics which support a culture of excellence. In addition, students will identify an existing organizational mission, vision, and values and create an original concept map to portray the interrelationships between each element. The extent to which the organizational mission, vision, and values reflect a culture of excellence will … examined. Leadership strategies which promote a culture of excellence and support the Chamberlain Care Model will be applied.

NR 504 Week 7 Assignment: Leadership Style and Change Advocacy Statement Part II: Written Summary

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to synthesize insights gained through learning activities and personal reflection in order to create a personal leadership style and change advocacy statement. Students will record a video of themselves presenting their individual leadership style and change advocacy statement. Students will conclude by noting how the selected leadership style can facilitate the change process. A concise summary paper is included.

Course Schedule

Week, Course Outcomes, and Topics Readings Assignments
Week 1

CO 1

General Leadership

Dickson, G., & Tholl, B. (2014). Bringing leadership to life in health: LEADS in a caring environment. London: Springer.

  • Chapter 1: LEADS – A New Perspective on Leadership in Health
  • Chapter 4: Learning LEADS – A Lifelong Journey

Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2015). Quantum leadership: Building better partnerships for sustainable health (4th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

  • Chapter 1: A New Vessel for Leadership: Changing the Health Landscape in an Age of Reform

Delmatoff, J., & Lazarus, I. (2014). The most effective leadership style for the new landscape of healthcare. Journal of Healthcare Management59(4), 245-249. link to article

Graded Discussion
Week 2

COs 1 and 5

Personal Leadership Development

Arya, D. (2014). So, you must be a leader-everyone is! Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management. 9(2), 8–12. link to article

Dickson, G., & Tholl, B. (2014). Bringing leadership to life in health: LEADS in a caring environment. London: Springer.

  • Chapter 2: The LEADS in a Caring Environment Capabilities Framework: The Source Code for Health Leadership
  • Chapter 3: Learning LEADS: A Lifelong Journey

Pater, R. (2013). The art of creative, high-performance leadership. Professional Safety, 58(9), 37-39. link to article

Pater, R. (2014). Overcoming the top 10 leadership mistakes. Professional Safety59(6), 30-32. link to article

Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2015). Quantum leadership: Building better partnerships for sustainable health (4th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

  • Chapter 2: Ten Complexity Principles for Leaders for Thriving in the Quantum Age

Westcott, R. (2014). Leadership challenges. The Journal for Quality & Participation, 37(1), 8-12, 32. link to article

Role of Ethics Within Leadership 

Graded Discussions

Week 3

COs 1 and 5

Personal Leadership Skills

Delmatoff, J. & Lazarus, I. (2014). The most effective leadership style for the new landscape of healthcare.     Journal of Healthcare Management59(4), 245-249. link to article

Dickson, G., & Tholl, B. (2014). Bringing leadership to life in health: LEADS in a caring environment. London: Springer.

  • Chapter 5: The LEADS in a Caring Environment Framework: Lead Self

Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2015). Quantum leadership: Building better partnerships for sustainable health (4th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

  • Chapter 8: Living Leadership: Vulnerability, Risk Taking, and Stretching  

Quiros, E. (2014). Leading people through change. Strategic Finance, 95(11), 15-16. link to article

Roop, M. (2014). Leading from behind. Strategic Finance, 96(6), 17-18, 63. link to article

Graded Discussions
Week 4

COs 1, 5, and 6

Leadership at the Team Level

Dickson, G., & Tholl, B. (2014). Bringing leadership to life in health: LEADS in a caring environment. London: Springer.

  • Chapter 6: The LEADS in a Caring Environment Framework: Engage Others

Kumar, S., Deshmukh, V. & Adhish, S. (2014). Building and leading teams. Indian Journal of Community Medicine39(4), 208-213. link to article

Porter-O’Grady, T., & Malloch, K. (2015). Quantum leadership: Building better partnerships for sustainable health (4th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

  • Chapter 6: Leadership and Normative Conflict: Managing the Diversity of a Multifocal Workplace
  • Chapter 10: The Fully Engaged Leader: Integrated Capacity for Success 

Shetach, A. (2012). Conflict leadership: Navigating toward effective and efficient team outcomes. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 35(2), 25-30. link to article

Orientation to Second Life (required but not graded)

Engaging Others with Leadership 

Graded Discussions

Week 5

COs 2 and 3

Leadership at the Agency Level – Meso System

Porter-O’Grady, T. & Malloch, K. (2015). Quantum leadership: Building better partnerships for sustainable health (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishing.

  • Chapter 9: Healing Brokenness: Error as Opportunity

Article Readings:

Barach, P. & Johnson, J.K. (2006). Understanding the complexity of redesigning care around the clinical microsystem. Quality Safety Health Care, (Suppl 1), 10-16.

         Link to article

Pranzer, R.J., Gitomer, R.S., Greene, W.H., Reagan Webster, P., Landry, K.R., & Riccobono, C.A. (2013). Increasing demands for quality measurement. JAMA, 310(18), 1971-1979. Link to article

Singer, S., Rivard, P. Hayes, J., Shokeen, P., Gaba, D., & Rosen, A. (2013). Improving patient care through leadership engagement with frontline staff: A department of Veterans Affairs Case Study. The Joint Commission, 398, 349-360. Link to article

Optional Readings:

McInnes, E., Middleton, S., Gardner, G., Haines, M., Haertsch, M., Paul, C,. & Castaldi, P. (2012). A qualitative study of stakeholder views of the conditions for and outcomes of successful clinical networks. BMC Health Services Research, 1472(12), 1-12. Link to article

Parsons, M. L. & Cornett, P. A. (2011). Sustaining the pivotal organizational outcome: Magnet recognition. Journal of Nursing Management, 19, 277-286. Link to article

Graded Discussion
Week 6

COs 2 and 5

Transformation and Change – Meso System

Porter-O’Grady, T. & Malloch, K. (2015). Quantum leadership: Building better partnerships for sustainable health (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishing.

  • Chapter 1: A New Vessel for Leadership: Changing the Health Landscape in an Age of Reform
  • Chapter 2: Ten Complexity Principles for Leaders Thriving in the Quantum Age
  • Chapter 12: Coaching for Unending Change: Transforming the Membership Community

Optional Readings:

Pascale, R. & Sternin, J. (2005). Your company’s change agents. Harvard Business Review, 74-81. Link to article

Wolf, G. & Greenhouse, P. (2007). Blueprint for design: Creating models that direct change. Journal of Nursing Administration JONA, 37(9), 381-386. Link to article

Meso Level Leadership: Care Clinic Improvement Project

Graded Discussion

Week 7

COs 3 and 5

Leadership at the Professional Level

Kegler, M., Rigler, J., & Honeycutt, S. (2010). How does community context influence coalitions in the formation stage? A multiple case study based on the community coalition action theory. Public Health, 10(90), 1-11. Link to article

Nargiso, J., Friend, K., Egan, C., Florin, P., Stevenson, J., Amodei, B., & Barovier, L. (2013). Coalitional capacities and environmental strategies to prevent underage drinking. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 222-231. Link to article

Walsh, L., Craddock, H., Gulley, K., Strauss-Riggs, K., & Schor, K. W. (2015). Building health care system capacity: Training health care professionals in disaster preparedness health care coalitions. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, 30(2), 123-130. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X14001460  Link to article

Wells, R. & Alexander, J. (2008). What motivates people to participate more in community-based coalitions? American Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 94-104. Link to article

Williams, E. M., Terrell, J., Anderson, J., & Tumiel-Berhalter, L. (2016). A Case Study of Community Involvement Influence on Policy Decisions: Victories of a Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership. International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health, 13(5), doi:10.3390/ijerph13050515 Link to article

Optional Readings:

Kegler, M. & Swan, D. (2012). Advancing coalition theory: The effect of coalition factors on community capacity mediated by member engagement. Health Education Research, 27(4), 572-584. Link to article

The Professional Coalition/ Organization  Project 

Graded Discussion

Week 8

COs 1 and 6

Leadership at the Community Level

There are no assigned readings. Graded Discussion

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.

Evaluation Methods

The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.

Graded Item Points Weighting
Discussions

(Weeks 1-7) 50 points each week

(Week 8) 25 points

375 37.5%
 

Role of Ethics Within Leadership

(due Week 2)

100 10%
Engaging Others with Leadership

(due Week 4)

200 20%
Meso Level Leadership: Care Clinic Improvement

Project

(due Week 6)

200 20%
The Professional Coalition/Organization
PowerPoint Project
(due Week 7)
125 12.5%
Total 1000 100%

No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.

Letter Grade Points Percentage
A   940–1,000 94% to 100%
A-  920–939 92% to 93%
B+ 890–919 89% to 91%
B   860–889 86% to 88%
B-  840–859 84% to 85%
C+ 810–839 81% to 83%
C   760–809 76% to 80%
F   759 and below 75% and below

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Participation for MSN

   The Threaded Discussion Grading Grid and Rubric document can be found in Course Resources.

Participation Guidelines

Due Date: First initial posting to the required threaded discussion topic is due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Peer and instructor responses are due by Sunday 11:59 pm MT. All posts for week 8 are due by the close of class on Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the threaded discussions.

Total Points Possible: Varies with course, please see specific course syllabus. These guidelines are for a required threaded discussion worth 50 points. Please note that week 8 will be worth only 25 points.

Requirements:

Description of the Assignment

  1. Initial posting: This is defined to be the initial post in which the student responds to the required threaded discussion topic. The first posting by a student within the required discussion area is considered to be the initial posting and will be evaluated using the rubric criteria. Scholarship in communication is expected. Required scholarly source(s) provide specific information that thoroughly address the required topic. For the initial posting, one scholarly source must be presented. The scholarly source must be an outside source. The student may use the required course textbook (s), assigned readings and lesson information in the initial post; however, these are not considered outside scholarly sources.

The initial posting must occur before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Initial postings must be at a minimum of 300 words. References do not apply toward word count. ONLY in Week 8, the initial posting must be a minimum of 200 words with a scholarly reference. It remains due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT

  1. Peer responses: As part of the threaded discussion requirements, the student must provide a substantive response to a peer. Substantive responses pose new ideas, ask questions, and/or generally add to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive way.

The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting and instructor response (see below). This peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. This response does not require a scholarly reference unless information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, then APA guidelines apply. Peer responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.

  1. Instructor response: The student must respond to an instructor’s follow-up questions. The instructor’s question may be directed to the student or may be a question directed to another student in the section. The response must be comprehensive and scholarly in nature. Instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.

The response to the instructor must occur on a day different from the initial post and a day different from the peer response. Responses to the instructor must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

  1. For week 8 only:Students are expected to post a peer response or an instructor post but are not required to do both. These posts must be a minimum of 100 words. References do not apply toward word count. The peer or instructor response must be on a different day than the initial post and must occur before Wednesday, 11:50 pm MT due to the shorter week.

Posting Requirements:

  1. The initial posting must be provided before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
  2. The initial posting must have at least one scholarly outside source that is cited within the posting and referenced. Required course textbooks, assigned readings and lesson information are not considered to be outside scholarly sources.
  3. Initial posting must be a minimum of 300 words; peer responses and instructor responses a minimum 150 words.
  4. The peer responses and instructor responses must be provided before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
  5. All postings are substantive and relate to the graded threaded discussion topic.
  6. Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is accepted.
  7. Postings must occur on 3 separate days.
  8. For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT

Criteria for Content

  • Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
  • Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
  • Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
  • Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
  • Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
  • Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
  • For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

  1. Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
  2. When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab.
  3. Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
  4. Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.

Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points

 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

 

Grading Rubric Guidelines Week 8 ONLY

Performance Category  100% or highest level of performance

100%

Very good or high level of performance

88%

Acceptable level of performance

81%

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

Deficient level of performance

56%

Failing level of performance

55% or less

         8 Points         7 Points       6 Points           5 Points          4 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
          8 Points        7 Points       6 Points          5 Points             4 Points       0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.

Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.

Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.

Interactive Dialogue

For Week 8 only:

Initial post should be a minimum of 200 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words.
  • The peer or instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words.
  • The peer or instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words.
  • The peer or instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words.
  • The peer or instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
       4 Points 3 Points        2 Points       0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.  

The following was present:

  • 0-4 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-4 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic, and facilitates communication.

 

The following was present:

  • 5-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 5-9 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand
 

The following was present:

  • 10- 13 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 10-13 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand
 

The following was present:

  • 14 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 14 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
           0 Points   5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements For Week 8 ONLY:

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, and peer or faculty postings were made on 2 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, and peer or faculty postings were made on 2 separate days
      0 Points Lost      5 Points Lost
 Requirements For Week 8 ONLY:

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer or one instructor response is to be posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT

 

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
  • A minimum of one peer or one instructor response is to be posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 pm MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 pm MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 pm MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

*Scholarly source: Per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments and threaded discussions. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Your textbook and lesson are not considered to be an outside scholarly source. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available data bases for a peer reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These web sites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site that you are unsure of. If the instructor determines that the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality, points will be deducted for not using scholarly sources. Current outside scholarly sources are required for the initial posting. This is defined to be 5 years or less. Instructor permission must be obtained if using a source that is older than 5 years.

Participation for MSN

Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10 point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Grading Rubric

Criteria A

Outstanding or highest level of performance

B

Very good or high level of performance 

C

Competent or satisfactory level of performance

F

Poor or failing unsatisfactory level of performance

 Total Points Possible= 100
 25 Points  20 Points   15 Points   0 Points
 Application of Course Knowledge Post contributes unique perspectives or insights consistent with current standards of practice applicable to the results from the case study. Post contributes unique perspectives or insights, but may be lacking some applicability to the case presentation.  Post has limited perspectives or insights and limited application to case presentation.  Post perspectives are not consistent with current practice.
  25 Points   20 Points   15 Points  0 Points
Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Discussion posts are supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years. In-text citations and full references are provided. Discussion posts partially supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years.

In-text citations and full references are provided.

Evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited but may not fully support the discussion.

Discussion posts partially supported by evidence.

Sources may not be scholarly in nature or may be older than 5 years.

In-text citations and/or full references may be incomplete or missing.

Citations to non-scholarly websites given as rationale to support differential diagnoses and/or treatment plan. No evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited.
   25 Points 20 Points  15 Points   0 Points
Organization Post presents case study findings in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence; clearly relevant to topic. Post presents case study findings and plan or intervention that is sometimes unclear to follow, though relevant to topic. Post presents case findings and plan or intervention that are sometimes unclear to follow and may not always be relevant to topic. Post is not relevant to discussion question.
  25 Points 20 Points 15 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Presents findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a student peer and respond to all faculty questions posted by Friday. A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate. Presents findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a student peer. Responds to some faculty questions posted by Friday. Responds to a student peer and/or faculty, but the nature of the response is not substantive. Does not respond to a topic-related peer post. Does not respond to faculty questions posted by Friday.
  0 Points Deducted 8 Points Deducted 7 Points Deducted 10 Points Deducted
Grammar, Syntax, APA

(Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing)

APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to three errors. Four to six errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation noted Seven to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are noted Post contains greater than nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation.
  0 Points Deducted – 5 Points per Discussion Part
Participation Enters first post to part one by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday; First post to part two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Friday. *5 points deducted per discussion part if this criteria is not met. Enters first post to part one by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday; first post to part two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Friday; and submits written summation by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. *5 points deducted per discussion part if this criteria is not met.

Discussion posts partially supported by evidence from appropriate sources published within the last 5 years.

In-text citations and full references are provided.

Evidence-based, peer reviewed journal article cited but may not fully support the discussion.

Webliography Disclaimer

The purpose of the Webliography is to provide students with annotated bibliographies of world wide websites relevant to their courses. These websites are not meant to be all inclusive of what is available for each course’s subjects and have not been sanctioned as academically rigorous or scholarly by Chamberlain College of Nursing. Please exercise caution when using these websites for course assignments and references.

Professional Portfolio

Select assignments from courses across the FNP program will be compiled as artifacts within a Professional Portfolio to demonstrate your professional growth and expertise. Your final portfolio, which will be submitted in the final course NR661, will be assessed against the learning outcomes of the program. The Professional Portfolio will include the following:

  • Reflections from Week 8 for all FNP courses
  • Five exemplar case studies (student selects top five)
  • eLogs portfolio
  • Curriculum vitae
  • Professional development plan paper from NR510

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NR-503: Population Health, Epidemiology and Statistical Principles Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

NR-503: Population Health, Epidemiology and Statistical Principles Course Assignments & Discussions Study GuideNR-503 Population Health, Epidemiology and Statistical Principles Course Description

Contact Hours: Lecture – 48, Lab – 0, Clinical – 0

Semester Hours: Theory 3

This course introduces students to advanced practice competencies utilized by advanced practice nurses. These competencies include the utilization of epidemiological and statistical principles to serve as a basis for the assessment, development and implementation of evidence-based interventions for populations. Additional concepts focus on utilizing epidemiology to identify, predict and intervene for risk factors that impact populations.

Prerequisites: NR-500NP or NR-500, NR-501NP or NR-501, NR-505NP or NR-505, NR-506NP, NR-599

NR-503: Population Health, Epidemiology and Statistical Principles Course Syllabus

Syllabus Overview

NR-503 Week 1 Discussion: Exercise and Discussion Questions from Curley Text Book

NR-503 Week 2 Assignment: Healthy People 2020 Impact Paper (3 Versions)

NR-503 Week 2 Discussion: Epidemiological Methods

NR-503 Week 3 Discussion: Epidemiological Methods and Measurements

NR-503 Week 4 MIDTERM (Actual Exam + Study Material)

NR-503 Week 4 Discussion: Open Forum Discussion

NR-503 Week 5 Assignment: Infectious Disease Paper (7 Versions)

NR-503 Week 5 Discussion: Open Forum Discussion

NR-503 Week 6 Assignment: Epidemiological Analysis: Chronic Health Problem (All 5 Topics)

NR-503 Week 6 Discussion: Open Forum Discussion

NR-503 Week 7 Reflection : Reflection on Achievement of Outcomes Concept Map

NR-503 Week 7 Discussion: Global and Environmental Health

NR-503 Week 8 Discussion: Health Policy and Ethics

NR-503 Week 8 FINAL EXAM (Study Guide / Exam / Notes Material)

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Course Number: NR503
Course Title: Population Health, Epidemiology, & Statistical Principles
Course Credits: 3 credits
Prerequisite: NR505

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (year of publication). Title of textbook in italics (X ed.). City, ST: Publisher.

Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Optional Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Book Title

Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

eBook Details

First Time Using VitalSource?

Step 1: View the VitalSource Video

Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online

  1. Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
  2. Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.

Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions

You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-504:  Leadership and Nursing Practice: Role Development Course Assignments & Discussions.

Already Registered?   3 Ways to Access Your eBooks

Online

Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.

Desktop

Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.

Mobile

Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Access E-Book

Gordis, L. (2014). Epidemiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders

 

The following book is required across all FNP courses:

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

The following book is recommended across all FNP courses:

Access E-Book

Goroll, A. H., & Mulley, A. G. (2014). Primary care medicine: Office evaluation and management of the adult patient (7th ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer.

 

eBook Details

First Time Using VitalSource?

Step 1: View the VitalSource Video

Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online

  1. Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
  2. Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.

Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions

You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.

Already Registered?   3 Ways to Access Your eBooks

Online

Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.

Desktop

Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.

Mobile

Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.

Program Outcomes

Program Outcomes of Chamberlain nursing programs can be found in the Program Descriptions section of your College Catalog. You can access your College Catalog at http://www.chamberlain.edu/msncatalog.

The MSN program outcomes are aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing publication, The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing (2011). Upon completion of the MSN degree program, the graduate will be able to:

  1. Practice safe, high-quality advanced nursing care based on concepts and knowledge from nursing and related disciplines.
  2. Construct processes for leading and promoting quality improvement and safety in advanced nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
  3. Use contemporary communication modalities effectively in advanced nursing roles.
  4. Evaluate the design, implementation and outcomes of strategies developed to meet healthcare needs.
  5. Develop a plan for lifelong personal and professional growth that integrates professional values regarding scholarship, service and global engagement.
  6. Apply legal, ethical and human-caring principles to situations in advanced nursing practice.
  7. Design patient-centered care models and delivery systems using the best available scientific evidence.
  8. Manage human, fiscal and physical resources to achieve and support individual and organizational goals.
  9. Compose a plan for systematic inquiry and dissemination of findings to support advanced nursing practice, patient-care innovation, and the nursing profession.
  10. Collaborate interprofessionally in research, education, practice, health policy and leadership to improve population health outcomes.
  11. Apply principles of informatics to manage data and information in order to support effective decision making.

Course Outcomes

Chamberlain College of Nursing courses are built to align course content with specific Course Outcomes (COs). The COs define the learning objectives that the student will be required to comprehend and demonstrate by course completion. The COs that will be covered in detail each week can be found in the Overview page in that particular week. Whenever possible, a reference will be made from a particular assignment or discussion back to the CO that it emphasizes.

Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to do the following.

  1. Define key terms in epidemiology, community health, and population-based research. (PO 1, 4)
  2. Compare study designs used for obtaining population health information from surveillance, observation, community, and control trial based research. (PO 1, 4)
  3. Identify appropriate outcome measures and study designs applicable to epidemiological subfields such as infectious disease, chronic disease, environmental exposures, reproductive health, and genetics. (PO 1, 4, 7)
  4. Apply commonly used measures of health risk. (PO 1)
  5. Examine current ethical/legal issues in epidemiology. (PO 6)
  6. Identify important sources of epidemiological data. (PO 4)
  7. Evaluate a public health problem in terms of magnitude, person, time, and place. (PO 1, 4)
  8. Reflect on personal and professional growth toward achieving competence as a family nurse practitioner. (PO 5, 10)

Course Schedule

Week, CO, and Topics Readings Assignments
Week 1

CO 1, 6

Epidemiology and Disease

Gordis, L. (2014).  Epidemiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders

  • Chapter 1: Introduction
  • Chapter 2: Dynamics of Disease Transmission
  • Chapter 3: The Occurrence of Disease: I. Disease Surveillance and Measures of Morbidity.
  • Chapter 4: The Occurrence of Disease: II. Mortality and Other Measures of Disease Impact.

Websites to visit and investigate this week (please see the course webliography for URL):

  • National Notifiable Disease Surveillance System
  • Healthy People 2020
  • Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report homepage (MMWR)
Key Concepts Worksheet (graded)

Case Study Discussion

Week 2

CO 1, 2, 3

Descriptive Epidemiology, Screening, Prevention, and the Importance of the Randomized Control Trial

Gordis, L. (2014). Epidemiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders

  • Chapter 5: Assessing the Validity and Reliability of Diagnostic Screening Tests
  • Chapter 6: The Natural History of Disease: Ways of Expressing Prognosis
  • Chapter 7: Assessing Preventive and Therapeutic Measures: Randomized Trials
  • Chapter 8: Randomized Trials: Some Further Issues

To better understand sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value look up this article via the internet:

Parikh, B., Mathai, A., Parikh, S., Sekbar, C., & Thomas, R. (2008). Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values. Indian Journal of Opthamology, 56(1), 45-50

Case Study Discussion
Week 3

CO 2, 3, & 4

Estimating Risk, Chronic Disease, and Cohort Design

Gordis, L. (2014).  Epidemiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders

  • Chapter 9: Cohort Studies
  • Chapter 11: Estimating Risk, is There an Association?
  • Chapter 12: More on Risk: Estimating the Potential for Prevention

To understand more on risk check out:

The Cochrane Collaboration Comparing Two Groups

Relative Risk Worksheet (graded)

Case Study Discussion

Week 4

CO 2, 3, & 6

Case Control, Comparing Research Designs, and Causation of Disease

Gordis, L. (2014).  Epidemiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders

  • Chapter 10: Case Control Studies
  • Chapter 13: A Pause for Review: Comparing Cohort and Case-Control Studies
  • Chapter 14: From Association to Causation: Driving Inferences from Epidemiological Studies
Case Study Discussion
Week 5

CO 3, 5, 6

Subfields of Epidemiology

Website exploration:

CDC Surveillance Resource Center – http://www.cdc.gov/surveillancepractice/

CDC Sexually Transmitted Diseases – http://www.cdc.gov/sTD/stats/default.htm

Floud, S., Blangiardo, M., Clark, C., Hoogh, K., Babisch, W., Houthuijs, D., & … Hansell, A. L. (2013). Exposure to aircraft and road traffic noise and associations with heart disease and stroke in six European countries: a cross-sectional study. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 12(1), 1-23. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-12-89

Hai-Ying, L., Skjetne, E., & Kobernus, M. (2013). Mobile phone tracking: in support of modelling traffic-related air pollution contribution to individual exposure and its implications for public health impact assessment. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 12(1), 1-26. doi:10.1186/1476-069X-12-93

Hulme, P. (2010). Cultural considerations in evidence-based practice. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 21, 271–280.

Srinivasan, S., O’Fallon, L. R., & Dearry, A. (2003). Creating healthy communities, healthy homes, healthy people: Initiating a research agenda on the built environment and public health. American Journal of Public Health, 93(9), 1146–1150.

Case Study Discussion
Week 6

CO 2, 3, 6, 7

Epidemiology, the Bigger Picture

Gordis, L. (2014).  Epidemiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders

  • Chapter 16: Identifying Genetic and Environmental Factors in Disease Causation 

Halsey Lea, D., Skirton, H. Read, C. Y., & Williams, J. K. (2011). Implications for educating the next generation of nurses on genetics and genomics in the 21st century. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 43(1), 3–12.

Jenkins, J., Grady, P. A., & Collins, F. S. (2005). Nurses and the genomic revolution. Journal of Nursing Scholarship37(2), 98–101.

Zaccai, J. H. (2004). How to assess epidemiological studies.  Postgraduate Medical Journal, 80, 140-147 doi:10.1136/pgmj.2003.012633.  Retrieved from http://pmj.bmj.com/content/80/941/140.full

Evaluation of an Epidemiological Disease or Problem Assignment (graded)

Case Study Discussion

Week 7

CO 1, 4, 6

Health Services and Health Screening

Gordis, L. (2014).  Epidemiology (5th ed). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders

  • Chapter 17: Using Epidemiology to Evaluate Health Service 
  • Chapter 18: The Epidemiological Approach to Evaluating Screening Programs

Chassin, M. R., Loeb, J. M., Schmaltz, S., & Wachter, R. M. (2010). Accountability measures – Using measurement to promote quality improvement. New England Journal of Medicine, 363(7), 683-688.

FNP Practicum Process (required but not graded)

Case Study Discussion

Week 8

CO 5

Health Policy and Ethics

Gordis, L. (2014).  Epidemiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders

  • Chapter 19: Epidemiology and Public Policy
  • Chapter 20: Ethical and Professional Issues in Epidemiology
Reflection (required, but not graded)

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.

Evaluation Methods

The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.

Graded Item Points Weighting
Case Study Discussion (100 points/week; Weeks 1–7) 700 70%
Key Concepts Worksheet (Week 1) 50 5%
Relative Risk Calculation Worksheet (Week 3) 50 5%
Evaluation of Epidemiological Problem Paper (Week 6) 200 20%
FNP Practicum Process (Week 7- required but not graded) N/A N/A
Total 1,000 100%

No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.

Letter Grade Points Percentage
A   940–1,000 94% to 100%
A-  920–939 92% to 93%
B+ 890–919 89% to 91%
B   860–889 86% to 88%
B-  840–859 84% to 85%
C+ 810–839 81% to 83%
C   760–809 76% to 80%
F   759 and below 75% and below

NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Participation for MSN

Participation Guidelines

The weekly case study discussion is worth up to 100 points. Students are expected to participate a minimum of four times (once in part one by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in part two by Thursday, 11:59 p.m. MT, once in part three by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, and one post to a student peer as required in the interactive dialogue criterion).

Grading Rubric 

Criteria Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

Satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvements

Poor or failing  level of performance

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

 Total Points Possible= 100
  30 Points  26 Points 24 Points  11 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three which contribute unique perspectives and insights, and are applicable to the discussion/case presentation.

 

Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three which contribute unique perspectives and insights, but may be lacking some applicability to the discussion/case presentation.

 

Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three but some responses have limited perspectives and insights, and have limited application to discussion/case presentation, or only two of the three posts have been fully answered.

 

Student fully answers discussion questions in Parts One, Two, and Three but posts are not consistent with current practice, or only one post has been fully answered.

 

Student does not fully answer discussion questions in all of the parts, or responses offer neither insight, nor application to discussion/case presentation.

 

  30 Points  26 Points 24 Points  11 Points  0 Points
Support from Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) All three discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided.

 

All three discussion posts are from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided.

However, evidence-based, peer reviewed journal articles that are cited may not fully support the discussion in any one area.

Two of the three discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) evidence- based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) published within the last 5 years *, and; 4) in-text citations and full references are provided. Only one of the discussion posts are supported from appropriate sources which are: 1) scholarly in nature, 2) published within the last 5 years, and; 3) in-text citations and full references are provided. Discussion posts One, Two, and Three contain No evidence- based practice references or citations.

*Students should note that factitious sources, sources that are clearly not read by the student and used, or sources that have incorrect dates will result in an automatic ZERO for this section for the week.

    10 Points 9 Points 8 Points  4 Points  0 Points
Organization Discussion posts One, Two, and Three present case study findings in a logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence. Discussion posts One, Two, and Three present case study findings which are sometimes unclear to follow.

 

Discussion posts present case findings in a logical and understandable method but One of the discussion parts contain a significant error.

 

Discussion posts are sometimes unclear to follow and/or there are significant errors in Two discussion parts.

 

Discussion posts are Not presented in a logical, understandable sequence and/or there are significant errors in ALL THREE discussion parts.
    26 Points 23 Points 21 Points 10 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Presents case study findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a peer including evidence from appropriate sources, and all direct faculty questions posted in parts one, two and three.

A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.

 

 

Presents case study findings and responds substantively to at least one topic-related post of a peer. Does include evidence from appropriate sources.

Responds to some direct faculty questions posted in parts one, two and three.

A substantive post adds content or insights to the discussion and is supported by references and citations as appropriate.

 

Responds to a student peer and/or faculty questions but the posts adds limited content or insights to the discussion.

Does include evidence from appropriate sources

 

Responds to a student peer and/or faculty, but the nature of the response is not substantial.

Does not include evidence from any resources.

 

Does not respond to a topic-related peer post and/or does not respond to faculty questions by Sunday.
  4 Points 3 Points 2 Points 1 Point

 

0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors. Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted. Post contains greater than ten errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.
  0 Points Deducted  10% deduction per day for late discussion post

  

33 points deducted per omitted/late discussion part
Participation

Enters first post to Part One by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; first post to Part Two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday; and posts Part Three and peer response by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Enters first post to Part One by 11:59 p.m. MT on Tuesday; first post to Part Two by 11:59 p.m. MT on Thursday; and posts Part Three and peer response by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT. Ten percent (10%) per day for each late discussion post.

.

*See Calculating Late Posting Penalty Document in Course Resources

 

 

 

Written submissions will not be accepted after Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due.

33 points deducted per part if Part 1 is not posted by Friday 11:59 p.m., Part 2 or 3 is/are not submitted by Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT of the week they are due.

* Refer to “What is a Scholarly Source” and “Reference Guide for FNP Case Studies” in the “Course Resources” section

** Part Three discussion CLOSES at Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT-deductions will apply once discussion has closed.

Webliography Disclaimer

The purpose of the Webliography is to provide students with annotated bibliographies of world wide websites relevant to their courses. These websites are not meant to be all inclusive of what is available for each course’s subjects and have not been sanctioned as academically rigorous or scholarly by Chamberlain College of Nursing. Please exercise caution when using these websites for course assignments and references.

Professional Portfolio

Select assignments from courses across the FNP program will be compiled as artifacts within a Professional Portfolio to demonstrate your professional growth and expertise. Your final portfolio, which will be submitted in the final course NR661, will be assessed against the learning outcomes of the program. The Professional Portfolio will include the following:

  • Reflections from Week 8 for all FNP courses
  • Five exemplar case studies (student selects top five)
  • eLogs portfolio
  • Curriculum vitae
  • Professional development plan paper from NR510

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NR-501:  Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

NR-501:  Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Assignments & Discussions Study GuideNR-501: Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Description

In this course, the student examines multiple theories from nursing and relevant fields. The student critiques the components of the theories and explores the value and contributions of the theories to nursing, advanced nursing, and evidence-based practice.

Prerequisite: NR-500NP or NR-500

NOTE: NP-designated course for Nurse Practitioner track students only.

NR-501: Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Syllabus

NR-501 Week 1 Discussion: Theory in Nursing

NR-501 Week 1 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 2 Assignment: Reflective Essay Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

NR-501 Week 2 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 2 Discussion: Ways of Knowing_ (2 Versions)

NR-501 Week 3 Assignment: Concept Analysis Paper

NR-501 Week 3 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 3 Discussion: Steps of Concept Analysis (2Versions)

NR-501 Week 4 Discussion: Nursing Theory

NR-501 Week 4 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 5 Assignment: Application of Theory paper

NR-501 Week 5 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 5 Discussion: Culture and Caring Theories

NR-501 Week 6 Discussion: Literature Review

NR-501 Week 6 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 7 Assignment: Theoretical Framework Supporting Evidence-based Practice PowerPoint

NR-501 Week 7 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 7 Discussion: Nursing Theory Applied to Evidence Based Practice

NR-501 Week 8 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 8 Discussion Course Reflection & Future Application

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

NR-501: Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course: A Comprehensive Guide

Our NR-501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Study Guide is here to help you succeed in this challenging course. You will learn the theoretical basis of advanced nursing practice in this course. Learn the foundational concepts of advanced nursing practice by delving into a variety of theoretical and conceptual frameworks.

NR 501 Week 1 Discussion: Reflection On Learning, Reading (Bundle)

NR-501 Discussions in Week 1 will center on thinking critically about the material covered in the readings. You may use this introspection to better understand and implement the course’s major ideas and theories.

NR 501 Week 3 Assignment: Concept Analysis (2 Versions)

In NR-501 Week 3, you’ll do a concept analysis, which is a deep dive into clarifying and expanding upon a single nursing idea. The capacity to assess and comprehend the theoretical foundation of advanced nursing practice is strengthened by this task.

NR 501 Week 5 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography (2 Versions)

A critical review of the literature on a specific issue in advanced nursing practice is the focus of NR-501 Week 5’s annotated bibliography project. While delving into theoretical frameworks and evidence-based practice, this project will help you hone your research and information literacy abilities.

NR 501 Week 7 Assignment: Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-based Practice: PowerPoint Presentation (2 Versions)

In NR-501 Week 7, you’ll concentrate on creating a theory to back up your evidence-based methods. To complete this task, you will develop a PowerPoint presentation that bridges the gap between theory and evidence-based practice.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-503: Population Health, Epidemiology and Statistical Principles Course Assignments & Discussions.

NR 501 Reflections on Learning Week 1 – 8

Engage in self-reflection throughout the course to solidify your grasp of the theoretical underpinnings of advanced nursing practice. To better incorporate theory into clinical practice, ponder on the following questions.

You will learn the theoretical underpinnings of advanced nursing practice by completing the assignments, contributing to conversations, and engaging in reflective activities. You will be better able to deliver optimal treatment to patients as a result of the information you have gained.

In conclusion, NR-501, Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice, is a foundational course that provides the theoretical background and practical skills need for advanced nursing. You will investigate theoretical ideas and their practical implications via classwork, class discussions, and personal introspection. Take advantage of this chance to learn more and improve your skills so you can give better treatment based on sound principles.

FAQs

NR 501 Week 7 Assignment: Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-based Practice: PowerPoint Presentation (2 Versions)

Purpose

Nurse practitioners actively engage in the process of translating nursing knowledge into practice, thereby establishing evidence-based approaches within the discipline. Throughout this process, a theoretical framework provides a meaningful context to guide and support evidence-based practice. The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can … as a framework for a future evidence-based project during your nurse practitioner education.

NR-501 Week 1 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Submission

What were the most important concepts you learned in week 1? Why are these concepts important? How will they prepare you for your future role as a nurse practitioner? In what ways do you feel prepared for your new role? In what ways do you feel unprepared?

NR 501 Week 2 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Submission

Explore an area of interest through patterns of knowing (CO 1)

Analyze the benefits of reflection for shaping and understanding theory. (CO 2)

Differentiate between the received and perceived schools of scientific thought. (CO 2)4.Examine different patterns of knowing in nursing. (CO 2)5.Examine the components of the nursing metaparadigm.

NR-501 Week 3 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Submission

Write 1-2 paragraphs reflecting on your understanding of concept analysis. Provide one specific example of how you achieved the weekly objectives.

What knowledge do you still need to demonstrate competency in the weekly concepts?

What skills do you need to continue developing to apply these concepts?

NR-501 Week 4 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Submission

Provide one specific example of how you achieved the weekly objectives. What concepts, theories, models, tools, techniques, and resources in this week did you find most valuable? What issues had you not considered before?

NR-501 Week 5 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Submission

As you contemplate your future NP practice, how do you view your role in using theory in practice? Which of the theories “spoke” to you? What are some barriers you see to implementing theory in practice?

NR-501: Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course: Master Instruction Worksheet

NR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice

 

Definition:  A Master Level Instructor creates an authentic learning environment that both challenges and supports students as they work to understand and apply complex concepts to real life.  The best instructor helps their students learn in ways that make “a sustained, substantial, and positive influence on how students think, act, and feel.”

Responsibilities:

               Course SME:   Develop assignments that challenge and support students as they seek their goal of becoming a nurse educator

               Course Faculty:  Create a learning environment in which the students feel supported and challenged. 

Expectation Operationalize by Chamberlain Care Principle TEACH VALUES CNE Competency Socratic/Lateral Thinking Examples
1.  Creates a natural critical learning environment (Facilitation; Active Learning)

·        Assigns challenging tasks that help students to rethink their assumptions, develop authentic ideas, and examine their mental models of reality.

·        Works collaboratively with faculty and peers to provide opportunities to try, fail, and receive feedback in advance of and separate from any summative judgment of their effort.

Threaded discussion questions are crafted to require students to reflect upon the application of nursing theory to selected topics.

For example:

·        Provide a brief argument for importance of nursing theory in the profession

·        Faculty provide detailed formative feedback regarding correct use of scholarly references and APA errors within postings and assignments.  Faculty use “track changes” or “review notes” to provide direct feedback regarding errors.

Care for Students

 

Community

Heart

 

Facilitates Learning

 

Facilitates Learner Development and Socialization

 

Use assessment and evaluation strategies

 

Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role

 

Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community

Socratic Questions:

Example for Week 1, TD #1:

·        If you held a position within a healthcare agency that was being eliminated, how could you use a specific nursing theory to save the position?

·        How would you respond to the following statement:  “nursing theory is of no use at the patient’s bedside, it is used only by academics?”

Lateral Thinking Questions:

If you had to evaluate your use of nursing theory at this point in your career, what score would you give yourself?

 

 2.  Gets students’ attention and keeps it (Active Learning; Content Management)

a.      Incorporates active learning strategies that are responsive to students’ needs and learning style.

b.       Provides relevant content for students through application to real life concepts.

All written assignments require application of nursing theory to a practice area.

Assignment Three requires students to identify a practice concern and suggest how nursing theory may be used to resolve this concern.

Care for Students

 

 

Accountability

Community

Heart

 

Facilitate Learning

 

Facilitate Learner Development and Socialization

 

Use assessment and evaluation strategies

 

Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role

 

Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community

Socratic Questions:

Examples for Week 6 or 7:

Within your future practice specialty, how would you use a selected nursing theory to support a change project?

 

Lateral Thinking Questions:

A professional peer from a different practice focus is having problems with patient safety, using a selected nursing theory, what advice would you provide to help resolve the concern?

3.       Starts with the student rather than the discipline (Facilitation)

  1. Challenges faulty learning models and creates new ones that are effective within a collaborative environment. 
Many students enter NR 501 with limited information regarding nursing theory.  Therefore, the course begins with general information regarding concepts and metaparadigms before progressing to application within diverse practice setting.  This allows students to gain knowledge and understanding prior to application. Care for Students

 

Community

Heart

 

Facilitates Learning

 

Facilitate Learner Development and Socialization

 

Use assessment and evaluation strategies

 

Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role

 

Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community

Socratic Questions:

Examples for Week 2, TD #1:

The metaparadigms of the nursing profession are agreed upon, but yet may overlap with other professional disciplines.  How is the focus of each metaparadigm within the nursing profession different from the focus of other healthcare professions?  Use the same healthcare profession for each of the metaparadigms.

Lateral Thinking Questions:

Identify the most negative comment you have heard regarding nursing theory and then craft a rebuttal to the comment.

 

4.      Gets commitment from students (Content Management)

  1. Ensures equal commitment of both faculty and students to class, coursework, and learning.  Explains how each specific rule, regulation, or assignment is supported by the learning objectives of the course.

 

Specific information regarding assignment guidelines is provided in detailed.  Students’ questions within Q & A thread are responded to by faculty in a timely manner and with details. 

With the Summer B 2015 term, the course lead is scheduling webinars reviewing each required assignment allowing students another media to achieve information regarding assignments.

Within all assignments and threaded discussion, links to course outcomes are identified.

Care for Students

 

Community

Heart

 

Facilitates Learning

Facilitate Learner Development and Socialization

Use assessment and evaluation strategies

Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role

Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community

Socratic Questions:

Examples for Week 4, TD #1:

If you did not have a nursing theory to guide your professional practice what would you use?  How would your practice be holistic?

Lateral Thinking Questions:

The nursing profession is extremely diverse in its practice.  How many nursing theories at the practice level of theory development would it take to completely reflect the profession?  What would be the advantages and disadvantages to have numerous practice level theories?

How would a specific grand nursing theory be useful in global nursing?

 

5.      Helps students learn outside of class (Integration)

  1. Develops course activities that promote learning outside of class.
  2. Promotes curiosity to expand application of learning.
Students are required to provide current references to support information within threaded discussions and assignments.  This fosters database searching outside of the class. 

Within threaded discussions and Assignment One: Importance of Theory, students are to provide examples from “real life” professional nursing. 

Care for Students

 

Community

Heart

 

Facilitates Learning

Facilitate Learner Development and Socialization

Use assessment and evaluation strategies

Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role

Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community

Socratic Questions:

Examples for Week 7, TD #2:

Some of the authors of selected nursing theories have died.  What methods would you suggest in order to continue the work to apply the theory?  Is this theory still relevant in today’s nursing/healthcare environment and should it die with the author?

What challenges did you face in finding current, primary references for your assignments or threaded discussions?

Lateral Thinking Questions:

Have you ever attended a conference where an acknowledged nurse theorist personally presented?  What was your impression of the theorist?

 

If you had the opportunity to ask two questions of any nursing theorist (living or deceased), what would be the questions, and why would you ask that question?

6.      Engages students in disciplinary thinking

(Relevance)

a.      Guides students to professional education with journals and texts from the profession

Students are guided toward the use of primary scholarly references by not allowing textbook to be used in 2 of 3 assignments.

Feedback is provided individually if a student uses a non-scholarly reference (NR 501 is the second course in the MSN curriculum so students are unclear regarding references to be used).

By purposefully requiring students to apply nursing theory to specific practice areas (education, leadership, practice, research, etc.) information from a variety of professional journals is determined.

Care for Students

 

Accountability

 

Community

Heart

 

Facilitates Learning

Facilitate Learner Development and Socialization

Use assessment and evaluation strategies

 

Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role

Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community

Use assessment and evaluation strategies

Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role

Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community

Socratic Questions:

Example for Week 3:

To prepare for the concept analysis, how did you select the concept you presented?  What interested you about the concept?

 

 

Lateral Thinking Questions:

Example for Week 7, TD #2:

Comparing a research-based reference that identified a nursing theory to a research-based reference that did use a nursing theory, what were the similarities and differences?

Example for Week 8:

Within your future specialty area, which nursing theory is commonly used?  If none, which nursing theory do you believe would be most useful to foster the quality of the specialty area?

 

7.      Creates diverse learning experiences (Relevance)

 a. Integrates instructional strategies that promote lifelong learning.

b. Uses evaluation methods that support strategic learning.

Learning experiences within NR 501 include:

·        Interactives within lessons to engage students and provide application of information

·        Threaded discussions include application of nursing theory to selected enrollment focus (i.e. education, leadership, practice, informatics, health policy) for use post-graduation.

·        Evaluation occurs by direct input by faculty within written assignments using track changes or review notes.  Rubrics are provided as a summary of formative feedback.

Care for Students

 

Accountability

Community

Heart

 

Facilitates Learning Socratic Questions:

How would a selected nursing theory foster your achievement of your future career goals in your specialty area?

 

Lateral Thinking Questions:

How would you evaluate your current use of nursing theory?  What do you anticipate your use of nursing theory will be 5 years after completing your MSN degree? 

 

 

 

Chamberlain Care TEACH Values  CNE Competencies
Care for Self

  • Are you standing in your strengths

 

Care for Colleagues

  • The democracy of truth

 

Care for Students

  • Create extraordinary moments for students
Teamwork

We put the team first, appreciate diverse points of view, assume positive intent, collaborate and communicate openly.

Energy

We move quickly, learn from mistakes, build positive spirit and always look for a better way

Accountability

We take ownership and initiative, demonstrate courage as we speak up, and act with integrity in all we do.

Community

We operate with a shared sense of responsibility and purpose, and enrich colleagues, students and the broader community we serve.

Heart

               We serve students and each other with passion, respect and care.

1.    Facilitate learning

2.    Facilitate learner development and socialization

3.   Use assessment and evaluation strategies

4.    Participate in curriculum design and evaluation of program outcomes

5.  Pursue Systematic Self-Evaluation and Improvement in the Academic Nurse Educator Role

6.    Function as a change agent and leader

7.    Engage in the scholarship of teaching

8.  Function Effectively within the Organizational Environment and the Academic Community.

 

NR-501:  Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Assignments & Discussions

NR-501 Week 1 Discussion

Nursing Theory

For many? Students enrolled in NR501, this is an initial nursing course? Theory.? So, let’s have a debate.? Is nursing theory important to the? Nursing profession? In particular, is it important for nurse practitioners? Does theory inform nurse practitioner practice??

If you believe it is important, explain why it is? useful.? f you do not believe it is useful, explain why nursing theory. Is not necessary to the profession?

NR-501 Week 2 Discussion

Ways of Knowing

Nursing knowledge is classified in various ways, one of which is Carper’s Patterns of Knowing (Carper, 1978). Carper’s framework offers a lens through which the nurse can reflect upon insights acquired through empirical, ethical, personal, and aesthetic knowledge (Carper, 1978).

Through intentional reflection using Carper’s Patterns of Knowing, nurses can process experiential learning and knowledge acquired through practice NR-501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Discussion Essays.

This assignment aims to reflect upon a specific practice situation and better understand the professional knowledge and insights obtained through that experience.

Criteria for Content

Think of a surprising or challenging practice situation in which you felt underprepared, unprepared, or uncomfortable.

Select an important nursing issue/topic inherent to the identified situation.

Briefly? explain the situation

Identify the nursing issue inherent in the identified situation

Use Carper’s Patterns of Knowing to analyze the situation as a method of refection. In your discussion, address ONE of the following Patterns of Knowing:

  • What do you think was the underlying reason for the situation? (Esthetics)
  • What were your thoughts and feeling in the situation? (Personal)
  • What was one personal belief that impacted your actions? (Ethics)
  • What evidence in nursing literature supports the nursing importance of the identified issue? (Empirical)

What new insights did you gain through this reflective practice opportunity? How will this apply to your practice as a nurse practitioner? Be sure to use scholarly literature to support your position.

NR-501 Week 3 Discussion Steps of Concept Analysis

At the end of Week 3, your concept analysis is due. This discussion provides an opportunity to start this assignment. Select a nursing concept supported by a nursing theory, and address the following components included in a concept analysis:?

  • Definition of concept and discussion of the concept in the nurse practitioner role?
  • Identification of three attributes of the concept?
  • Description of one antecedent and one consequence of the concept?
  • Identification of two empirical referents?
  • A brief explanation of theoretical applications of the concept (How is the concept relevant to a nursing theory?)?

This information does not have to be comprehensive but provides a foundation for the upcoming assignment. Be sure to include scholarly references.

NR-501 Week 4 Discussion Nursing Theory

Identify your specialty area of NP practice. Select a nursing, borrowed, or interdisciplinary theory provided in the lesson plan or one of your findings. Address the following:

  • Origin
  • Meaning and scope
  • Logical adequacy
  • Usefulness and simplicity
  • Generalizability
  • Testability

Finally, provide an example of of how the theory could be used to improve or evaluate the practice quality in your specific setting. What rationale can you provide that validates the theory as applied to the role of the nurse practitioner?

NR-501 Week 5 Discussion

Culture and Caring Theories

Which of the culture and caring theories most resonates with you for your practice as an NP? How does the theory integrate the nursing paradigm?? What parts of the theory do you identify with? How does the theory help to meet CLAS standards to advance health equity?

NR-501 Week 6 Discussion Literature Review

Locate a scholarly journal article that uses either a health behavior theory or the Praxis Theory of Suffering as the basis for evidence-based research. Choose an article DIFFERENT than those provided in the weekly readings.

Summarize the research presented. How was the theory used? How do the research findings either support or refute the use of the theory in practice? How could you use the research in your practice as an NP?

NR-501 Week 8 Discussion

In Week 7, you posted your Kaltura presentation to the Week 8 discussion area. This week, you will view and comment on peer presentations. For full credit, view and comment on at least TWO peer presentations by Saturday at 11:59 PM MT.

Your post should be substantive and professional and include at least one scholarly resource.

NR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice References

Carper, B.A. (1978). Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Retrieved 8 September 2019 from

https://www.google.co.ke/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8871/eb88fb06168bb31e20e9c54e57920e575a47.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwje0JrqscHkAhVClFwKHYXzAgsQFjAQegQICRAB&usg=AOvVaw0CEuuz-eqnIwVMqcmUI55E

Haswell, N. (2019). The four ethical principles and their application in aesthetic practice. Journal of Aesthetic Nursing, 8(4), 177-179. Doi: 10.12968/joan.2019.8.4.177

Schmidt, L.A., Nelson, D. & Godfrey, L. (2003). A clinical ladder program based on Carper’s fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. JONA, 33(3), 146-152. Doi: 10.1097/00005110-200303000-00005

Quaglietti, S., Blum, L. & Ellis, V. (2004). The role of the adult nurse practitioner in palliative care. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing, 6(4), 209-214. Doi: 10.1097/00129191-200410000-00009

NR-501:  Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 1 Discussion DQ 1 Importance of Theory in Nursing NEW 

For many students enrolled in NR 501, this is an initial course for nursing theory. So, let’s have a debate!!! Is nursing theory important to the nursing profession? If you believe that it is important, explain why it is useful. If you do not believe that it is useful, explain why nursing theory is not necessary to the profession? Be sure to provide an example that demonstrates your opinion and a scholarly reference (not using the required textbook or lesson) which supports your opinion.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 2 Discussion DQ 1 Significance of Nursing Concepts within the Profession NEW​

This discussion considers the metaparadigm of nursing and the four concepts of the nursing profession—person, environment, health and nursing profession. Select a practice area of the nursing profession (i.e. education, executive, informatics, healthcare policy, and advanced clinical practice) and apply EACH of the four concepts to the selected area. Be sure to apply EACH of the four concepts and include an example that demonstrates the application to the practice area. Don’t forget to support your initial posting with scholarly references.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 2 Importance of Theory Paper Assignment – Environmental Theory and Florence Nightingale NEW

Importance of Theory: Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to a) identify a nursing theory, b) analyze the importance of the selected theory to the nursing profession, c) summarize key concepts and relationships among the concepts of the selected nursing theory, d) present views of the selected theory on areas of specialization, and e) communicate ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

  • (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
  • (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
  • (CO#4) Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4, 7)

Due Date

Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 2

Total Points Possible: 100

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

This assignment focuses on the importance of nursing theory within the profession. Selecting one nursing theory (non-nursing theories are not allowed), the nursing theory will be presented by identifying the key concepts present within the theory. The selected nursing theory will then be applied to ONE of the following professional nursing practice areas:

  • Education (e.g. undergraduate, staff development, etc.)
  • Leadership (e.g. nurse executive, manager, leader, etc.)
  • Informatics (e.g. data management, etc.)
  • Healthcare policy (e.g. application to local, state, national, or global healthcare concerns, etc.)

Nurse practitioner

Criteria for Content

  1. Introduction:

The introduction requires the following information.

Statements about nursing theory in general

Identification of the ONE nursing theory (non-nursing theories are not allowed) selected by the student to be used within this assignment. The specific selected nursing theory may be from any of the three categories of nursing theory (i.e. grand, middle-range, or practice), but must be a specific nursing theory (i.e. Orem, Roy, Benner, etc.); a category may not be used.
Identification of the sections of the paper.

References from nursing literature are required.

  1. Importance of Nursing Theory:

This section requires the following information.

Present an analysis of the importance of nursing theory, in general, to the nursing profession. Each of the following questions are to be answered.

Why should the study of nursing theory be included in a master’s program?

How is nursing theory useful to the nursing profession?

How can nursing theory be used to separate the nursing profession from other healthcare professions?

What would be ONE concern regarding the use of nursing theory within the profession?
References from nursing literature are required.

  1. Summary of Selected Nursing Theory:

This section requires the following information.

Present the name and author of the selected nursing theory (bibliographic and historical information about the theory or theorist is NOT included). Identify when the nursing theory was initially published and the latest edition of the selected nursing theory.

Provide a summary of the key concepts contained within the selected nursing theory.

Provide a detailed description of how this nursing theory addresses each of the metaparadigms/ concepts (person, health, environment, and nursing profession) associated with nursing.

Identify why this nursing theory selected and its potential use within the student’s selected Master’s track (i.e. education, leadership, informatics, healthcare policy, or nurse practitioner)

References from nursing literature are required.

  1. Application of Specific Nursing Theory to Selected Professional Nursing Practice area:

This section includes the following elements:

Present a discussion of how the selected nursing theory definesand explains one of the following professional nursing practice areas:

  • Education (e.g. undergraduate, staff development, etc.)
  • Leadership (e.g. nurse executive, manager, leader, etc.)
  • Informatics (e.g. data 
    management, etc.)
  • Healthcare policy (e.g. application to local, state, national, or global healthcare concerns, etc.)

Nurse practitioner

Present 2 (two) examples illustrating the above information. Professional examples come from a student’s own practice experiences or from the scholarly literature. If the example is from the student’s experience, identify this as the source by using the first person in describing the example.

Keep each example succinct (about 1 – 3 paragraphs).

References from nursing literature are required.

  1. Conclusion:

This section includes the following elements:

Summarizes presented information regarding theory in general and its use within the nursing profession

Summarizes the selected nursing theory.

 Presents self-reflection regarding what was learned from writing this assignment.

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 2 Importance of Theory Paper Assignment – Application of Pender’s Health Promotion Model NEW

Importance of Theory: Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to a) identify a nursing theory, b) analyze the importance of the selected theory to the nursing profession, c) summarize key concepts and relationships among the concepts of the selected nursing theory, d) present views of the selected theory on areas of specialization, and e) communicate ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

  • (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
  • (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
  • (CO#4) Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4, 7)

Due Date

Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 2

Total Points Possible: 100

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

This assignment focuses on the importance of nursing theory within the profession. Selecting one nursing theory (non-nursing theories are not allowed), the nursing theory will be presented by identifying the key concepts present within the theory. The selected nursing theory will then be applied to ONE of the following professional nursing practice areas:

  • Education (e.g. undergraduate, staff development, etc.)
  • Leadership (e.g. nurse executive, manager, leader, etc.)
  • Informatics (e.g. data management, etc.)
  • Healthcare policy (e.g. application to local, state, national, or global healthcare concerns, etc.)

Nurse practitioner

Criteria for Content

  1. Introduction:

The introduction requires the following information.

Statements about nursing theory in general

Identification of the ONE nursing theory (non-nursing theories are not allowed) selected by the student to be used within this assignment. The specific selected nursing theory may be from any of the three categories of nursing theory (i.e. grand, middle-range, or practice), but must be a specific nursing theory (i.e. Orem, Roy, Benner, etc.); a category may not be used.
Identification of the sections of the paper.

References from nursing literature are required.

  1. Importance of Nursing Theory:

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis NEW

Select a nursing concept (be sure to use a nursing theory) and then provide a response to each one of the steps included in a concept analysis regarding your selected concept. This information does not have to be comprehensive but provides a foundation to the upcoming assignment. Be sure to include a scholarly reference.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Paper Assignment – Health Promotion Behavior Concept NEW

NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

Purpose

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete a concept analysis of a concept found in a nursing theory using an identified process. The assignment fosters analytical thinking related to the selected concept as well as application within the profession.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

  • (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
  • (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
  • (CO#4) Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4. 7)

Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 4

Total Points Possible: 250 Points

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of ONE concept found in a nursing theory. The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application within the model and alternative cases. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.

Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis.

Criteria for Content

  1. Introduction

The introduction substantively presents all following 4 (four) elements:

  • Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development,
  • Identifies the selected nursing concept,
  • Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained, and
  • Names the sections of the paper.
  1. Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept

This section includes:

  • Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required), and
  • Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory is substantively presented.
  • A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
  1. Literature review

This section requires:

  • A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six)scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
  • Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
  • Support from nursing literature is required.

Please Note: Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review.

  1. Defining attributes

For this section:

  • A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.
  • A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
  • Explanation: An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept. For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.
  1. Antecedent and Consequence

This section requires the identification of:

  • 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept, and
  • 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
  • A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
  • Explanation: An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event. In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept.
  • A consequence follows or is the result of an event. In this situation a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.
  1. Empirical Referents

This section requires the identification of:

2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Explanation: An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept.

  1. Model Cases

 1 model caseis created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

  • Definition,
  • All identified attributes,
  • Antecedent,
  • Consequence, and
  • Empirical referent or Measurement
  • Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the crea

CHAMBERLAIN COLLEGE OF NURSING NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Paper Assignment – Self Care Concept NEW

NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

Purpose

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete a concept analysis of a concept found in a nursing theory using an identified process. The assignment fosters analytical thinking related to the selected concept as well as application within the profession.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

  • (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
  • (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
    (CO#4)
  • Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4. 7)

Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 4

Total Points Possible: 250 Points

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of ONE concept found in a nursing theory. The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application within the model and alternative cases. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.

Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis.

Criteria for Content

  1. Introduction

The introduction substantively presents all following 4 (four) elements:

  • Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development,
  • Identifies the selected nursingconcept,
  • Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained, and
  • Names the sections of the paper.
  1. Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept

This section includes:

  • Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required), and
  • Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory is substantively presented.
  • A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
  1. Literature review

This section requires:

  • A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
    Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
  • Support from nursing literature is required.

Please Note: Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review.

  1. Defining attributes

For this section:

  • A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.
  • A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
  • Explanation: An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept. For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.
  1. Antecedent and Consequence

This section requires the identification of:

  • 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept, and
  • 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
  • A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
  • Explanation: An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event. In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept.
  • A consequence follows or is the result of an event. In this situation a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.
  1. Empirical Referents

This section requires the identification of:

2 (two)empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

Explanation: An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept.

  1. Model Cases

1 model case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

  • Definition,
  • All identified attributes,
  • Antecedent,
  • Consequence, and
  • Empirical referent or Measurement
  • Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the created model case.

A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

Explanation: A model case is an example of the hypothetical individual who demonstrates all of the attributes, antecedents, consequences, and referents noted previously in this assignment.

  1. Alternative Cases

This section requires:

The identification of 2(two) alternative cases correctly created and presented. The two required alternative cases are:

Borderline (absence of one or two of previously identified attributes of the selected nursing concept.

Contrary (demonstrates the complete opposite of selected nursing concept)

Applies information from selected nursing theory.

Explanation: Alternative cases represent the opposite of the model case.

For this assignment, two alternative cases are required.

These are:

  • Borderline case which is a created case where one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.
  • Contrary case which is a created case that demonstrate the complete opposite of the selected nursing concept.
  1. Conclusion

This section requires:

Summarization of key information regarding:

  • Selected nursing concept,
  • Selected nursing theory, and
  • Application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained about applying nursing theory to a professional issue or concern.

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

  1. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least 8, but no more than 10 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.
  2. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
  3. The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing theory. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used.
  4. A minimum of 6 (six) scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. A dictionary maybe used as a reference for the section titled “Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept”, but it is NOT counted as one of the 6 required scholarly nursing references. For additional assistance regarding scholarly nursing references, please see “What is a scholarly source” located in the Course Resources tab. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

  1. Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.
  2. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
  3. PLEASE note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.
    Possible Concepts: The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept. Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing theories is NOT allowed. If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance.
  • Behavioral system
  • Boundary lines
  • Caring
  • Empowerment
  • Homeostasis
  • Noise
  • Open system
  • Palliative care
  • Resources
  • Self-care
  • Adaptation
  • Comfort
  • Compassion
  • Engagement
  • Leadership
  • Meaningfulness
  • Modeling
  • Pain
  • Pattern
  • Transaction

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 4 Discussion DQ 1 Connection Between Theory and Practice NEW

Connection Between Theory and Practice 

Hello Class,

Our Course Objectives (CO) for this week and corresponding MSN Program Objective (PO) are:

Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO #1)

Examine instances where theory is used to guide the development of new knowledge and implementation of evidence-based practice. (PO #6).

Grand theories are more abstract or general in nature and middle-range theories that are more specific in nature. What relationship(s) do you find between grand nursing theories and clinical practice? Provide one example that uses a specific grand theory to support your views.

I look forward to reading your examples!

For this week’s discussion, please answer this question:
What relationship(s) do you find between grand nursing theories and application to clinical practice? Provide one example that uses a specific grand range theory to support your views.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 5 Discussion DQ 1 Borrowed Theories NEW

Borrowed Theories 

Greetings Class,

Moving right along into week 5: This week our discussion addresses the following PO:

Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO #1)

Key Concepts:
Scope of borrowed theories and their application to the nursing profession

Categories commonly used to organize nursing theories and how a theory fits into the category

This is our question: Nursing makes use of theories from other disciplines (aka., borrowed theories). How does using borrowed theory support the development of nursing theory?

Looking forward to our discussion!

For this discussion, please answer this question:

Nursing makes use of theories from other disciplines (a.k.a., borrowed theories). How does using borrowed theory support the development of nursing theory?

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 5 Discussion DQ 2 Borrowed Theories Guiding Practice NEW

Borrowed Theories Guiding Practice

Greetings Class, This is your topic for TD2 and we will be meeting the following PO:

Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, 
comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO #1)

Key Concepts:

Scope of borrowed theories and their application to the nursing profession.

Categories commonly used to organize nursing theories and how a theory fits into the category.

Choose a borrowed theory and apply its framework to an advanced nursing issue (i.e., hositlity in the workplace, instituting bedside reporting, and shared leadership).

See you in the threads!

Please answer this question:

Choose a borrowed theory and apply its framework to an advanced nursing issue (i.e., hostility in the workplace, instituting bedside reporting, and shared leadership).

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 6 Application of Theory Paper Assignment – Nursing Theory Virginia Henderson Needs Theory NEW

Application of Nursing Theory Guidelines

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to use nursing theory as a way to resolve a problem or issue occurring within nursing leadership, nursing education, nursing informatics, health policy, or advance clinical practice.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, a student will demonstrate the ability to:

  • (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
  • (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
  • (CO#4) Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4, 7)

Due Date: Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 6

Total Points Possible: 275

Requirements

Description of the Assignment:

One nursing theory will be presented as a framework to resolve a problem occurring within one of the professional areas of leadership, education, informatics, healthcare policy or advance clinical practice. The same nursing theory selected in Assignment One may be used to resolve the identified problem.
A specific nursing theory must be used. No non-nursing theories are permitted. A category of nursing theory (grand, middle range, practice) may not be used—only a specific, published nursing theory is to be selected and applied to the issue or concern important to the profession of nursing as documented in the nursing literature.

Please note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.

Content

  1. Introduction:

The introduction for this paper includes:

A nursing theory is required; non-nursing theories may not be used.

General statements on the idea of nursing theory being applied to solve problems/issues in nursing practice. You do not need to go into the specialty area of practice in-depth as this will be covered in another section of the paper.

A one-paragraph summary of the selected specific nursing theory is required.

Information identifying the sections of this assignment.

References from nursing literature are required.

  1. Description of Issue or Concern:

The selected issue or concern must be clearly identified as being significant to the professional area of either leadership, education, informatics, healthcare policy or advance clinical practice. The issue or concern must be presented comprehensively, but concisely by answering each of the following questions.

What is the specific issue or concern being presented?

Why should the nursing profession care about this issue or concern?

What does the nursing literature have to say about this issue or concern including its frequency of occurrence?

Who are the stakeholders or the people affected by the issue or concern?

References from nursing literature are required.

  1. Application of Selected Nursing Theory to Issue or Concern:

This section of the assignment focuses on using the selected nursing theory to resolve the described issue or concern. Required information includes:

Restating the selected nursing theory to be used

Identification of one strategy useful in resolving the identified issue or concern.

The strategy should be presented in depth with the following information being required:

  • A specific description of how the selected nursing theory can help to resolve the issue or concern
  • A specific and detailed description of the strategy to be used
  • A specific and detailed description of how the strategy can be implemented
  • A specific and detailed description of one suggestion for future

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization NEW

Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization 

Hi Everyone,

Our discussion this week is aimed at addressing these POs:

Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO # 2)

Propose strategies for use of relevant theories that nurse leaders can employ in selected healthcare or educational organizations, considering legal and ethical principles. (POs #2, 6)

Key Concept

Role of grand and middle-range nursing theories applied to health care organizations

Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice.

(PO #3)

Key Concept

Grand or middle-range theory applied to a specific area of nursing leadership practice

Recommend strategies for the use of theory as the basis for actions of advanced nursing practice in leadership and education. (PO #5)

Key Concepts

Relationship between leadership and management and theory

Role of theory in developing and applying leadership and management concepts

Discuss how a specific middle-range nursing theory has been or could be applied by nurse leaders or nurse managers to effectively deal with an administrative issue (i.e., staffing, use of supplies, staff performance issues). Include an example from the literature or your own experience to illustrate your points. 

I look forward to your responses.

For this discussion, please answer this question:

Discuss how a specific middle-range nursing theory has been or could be applied by nurse leaders or nurse managers to effectively deal with an administrative issue (i.e., staffing, use of supplies, staff performance issues). Include an example from the literature or your own experience to illustrate your points.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization NEW

Discuss how a specific middle-range nursing theory has been or could be applied by nurse leaders or nurse managers to effectively deal with an administrative issue (i.e., staffing, use of supplies, staff performance issues). Include an example from the literature or your own experience to illustrate your points. 

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 7 Discussion DQ 1 NEW

In NR 500, you developed a PICOT question. Select a nursing theory that you find useful in nursing practice. Discuss each of the following selected elements of the PICOT format by applying your selected nursing theory to the element. Be sure to include a scholarly reference.

  • Population/ Patient Problem: Consider how your selected nursing theory may guide you in selecting the population and/or patient problem
  • Intervention: Does your selected nursing theory identify a possible intervention? If not, how is your selected intervention consistent with your selected nursing theory?
  • Comparison: What other methods or studies can one compare this intervention with?
  • Outcome: How would the outcome of your PICOT study contribute to your selected nursing theory? Would it add new information? Would it confirm some part of the theory?

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 8 Discussion DQ 1 Course Reflection and Future Application NEW

Throughout the discussions occurring within NR 501, a common element has been application of theory. In this our last discussion regarding theory, it is time to focus on you and your capstone experience (yes, it is never too early consider this major project!). While it is too early to identify your project, let’s consider on your future practice area as this is the setting your project will occur in.

Based upon your self-reflection and use of nursing theory within the discussions and assignments, select ONE nursing theory that you prefer and answer the following questions:

  1. Why do you prefer the nursing theory you selected?
  2. How can this theory be used in your current practice area (education, executive, advanced clinical practice, informatics, or healthcare policy)?
  3. How can this theory be used in your future practice area (education, executive advanced clinical practice, informatics or healthcare policy)?

CHAMBERLIAN COLLEGE OF NURSING NR 501 Week 5 Application of Theory Assignment

The Application of Theory assignment is due Sunday 11:59pm MT at the end of Week 5. Please use your textbooks listed below to complete the assignment this week. The guidelines and rubric for this assignment are also listed below and in Course Resources.

Groenwald, S. L. (Ed.). (2018). Designing and creating a culture of care for students and faculty: The Chamberlain University College of Nursing Model. Washington, DC: National League for Nursing.

McCance, T. McCormack, B., & Dewing, J. (2011). An exploration of person-centeredness in practice. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 16(2). doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol16No02Man01

Purpose

Within the profession of nursing, multiple theories, models, and conceptual frameworks have been created to serve as a foundation for practice. The purpose of this assignment is to appraise the value of the model in serving as a theoretical framework and apply the model to your selected area of future professional nursing practice (your MSN track). For this assignment, you will select one of the following nursing models to address within the paper: the Patient-Centred Nursing (PCN) Framework or the Chamberlain Care Model.

Course Outcomes

Through this assessment, the student will meet the following Course Outcomes:

Apply nursing theory as a framework to guide the translation of knowledge and implementation of evidence-based practice in future professional settings. (CO #2)

Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationships among the components, and application to advanced nursing practice. (CO#4)

Total Points Possible

This assessment is worth 175 points.

Due Date

Submit your file(s) by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.

Requirements

Criteria for Content

Select one of the two models presented in the week five lesson (either the Person-Centred Nursing Framework, or the Chamberlain Care Model).

In a three- to four-page scholarly paper, address the following:

Provide a succinct overview of the model you have selected and discuss how the selected model addresses the four concepts within the nursing metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment).

Discuss how the selected model qualifies as a theoretical framework within the profession of nursing, and its use within the profession.

Describe how the chosen model can be applied in the future APN role (education, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics).

Preparing the paper

Submission Requirements

Application: Use Microsoft Word 2013™ to create the written assessment.

Length: The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) is at least three and no more than four pages in length.

A minimum of four (4) scholarly literature sources must be used.

Submission: Submit your file to the Canvas course site by the due date/time indicated.

Best Practices in Preparing the Project

The following are best practices in preparing this project.

Review directions thoroughly.

Follow submission requirements.

Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.

Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.

A minimum of four (4) scholarly literature references must be used.

Abide by CCN academic integrity policy.

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company