DNP 835 Topic 1 DQ 1 PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety Reflection Example

DNP 835 Topic 1 DQ 1 PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety Reflection ExampleAssignment Brief: DNP 835 Topic 1 DQ 1 PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety Reflection Assignment

Assignment Overview:

In this assignment, you will engage in a reflective analysis of the discussions in DNP 835 Topic 1, specifically focusing on Patient Safety (PS) 101: Introduction to Patient Safety. The objective is to critically evaluate and respond to key concepts and insights shared by peers in the context of patient safety practices and initiatives.

Assignment Objectives:

  • Reflect on Patient Safety Discussions: Your main task is to think about the discussions that happened in DNP 835 Topic 1, particularly those related to patient safety. Consider various perspectives, insights, and experiences shared by your peers and evaluate their implications for healthcare practices.
  • Incorporate Assigned Readings: Include relevant information from the assigned readings, including references to the Joint Commission’s key elements, Lawati et al.’s systematic review, and the study by Storesund et al. on the impact of checklists in surgery.
  • Analyze Leadership Commitment: Evaluate the commitment of healthcare leadership to patient safety, as discussed in the posts. Assess the outlined strategies and principles for fostering a culture of safety within healthcare organizations.
  • Explore Surgical Safety Checklists: Look into the effectiveness of surgical safety checklists, drawing insights from the discussions on the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist and the Surgical Patient Safety System (SURPASS) checklists. Consider how these tools contribute to preventing complications and improving patient outcomes.
  • Evaluate Nursing Errors: Think about the challenges and factors contributing to nursing errors, as highlighted in the posts. Analyze the implications of these errors for patient safety and explore potential strategies to address them.
  • Apply Patient Safety Concepts: Consider real-life examples shared by peers, such as the case of a doctor administering the wrong blood due to onboarding processes. Discuss how the principles of patient safety can be applied to mitigate such errors and improve overall healthcare processes.

The Student’s Role:

As a student, your role is to actively engage with the content discussed in DNP 835 Topic 1. Participate in the reflective process, bringing in your insights and experiences related to patient safety. Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the assigned readings and apply the concepts to the context of patient safety in healthcare settings. Your reflections should go beyond summarization and aim to provide thoughtful analyses, considering the broader implications for healthcare delivery and patient outcomes.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the DNP 835 Topic 1 DQ 1 PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety Reflection Assignment

DNP 835 Topic 1 DQ 1 Reflecting on the “IHI Module PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety,” summarize why it is essential to improve patient safety

Topic 1 DQ 1

Reflecting on the “IHI Module PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety,” summarize why it is essential to improve patient safety. Use one of the articles from this week’s topic Resources and describe the framework or theory that was used to improve the patient outcome. What outcome measures were identified and how did they align with the improvement project? Explain how the authors learned from the error or unintended events to ensure patient safety. Provide supporting evidence.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.

As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.

It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

 

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

DNP 835 Topic 1 DQ 1 PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety Reflection Example

Reflection on IHI Module PS 101: Introduction to Patient Safety:

Improving patient safety is a critical aspect of healthcare, and the IHI Module PS 101 sheds light on the key elements, including leadership, policies, transparency, validation, and just culture, necessary for fostering a safety culture. The relevance of patient safety is emphasized through its impact on the quality of care. Safety culture, as defined by Lee et al. (2019), is shaped by individual and group values, attitudes, perceptions, competencies, and behavior patterns, determining an organization’s commitment to health and safety management.

Nurses, as frontline healthcare workers, play a pivotal role in promoting patient safety. Nursing knowledge, derived from nursing theories, is a valuable asset for delivering patient-centered care and improving outcomes (Ortiz, 2021). The importance of proper assessment and adherence to guidelines is highlighted by Haley and Fritz (2019), emphasizing the need to treat the resident and not the urine in long-term care settings.

Leadership commitment to a safety culture is crucial, as highlighted in the Joint Commission’s key elements. This commitment involves communication of support, modeling expected behavior, creating a code of conduct, fostering an environment for reporting errors without fear of punishment, and promoting collaboration across disciplines (Joint Commission, 2019).

The focus on patient safety extends to perioperative care, where the use of checklists, such as the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist and the Surgical Patient Safety System checklists, has a significant impact. The study by Storesund et al. (2020) demonstrates the effectiveness of these checklists in reducing adverse events, unplanned repeat surgeries, and rehospitalization rates.

The implementation of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist globally resulted in a noteworthy reduction in complications and mortality rates (Haugen et al., 2019). The emphasis on protocol adherence and the checklist’s comprehensive nature contribute to improved patient safety outcomes.

Patient safety is not without challenges, and errors, particularly in nursing, are prevalent. Factors contributing to nursing errors include heavy workload, inadequate knowledge, and suboptimal working environments (Mohsenpour et al., 2017). It is crucial to address these challenges systematically and collaboratively to enhance patient safety.

Reflecting on personal experiences, the need for effective onboarding processes and systematic approaches to addressing errors is evident. Ordering unnecessary labs, as discussed by Haley and Fritz (2019), highlights the importance of empowering nurses with clinical judgment skills to avoid overuse of medical resources.

References:

Haley, T., & Fritz, S. (2019). Treat the resident, not the urine: Using patient safety to reduce urinary tract infections and overuse of urine culture in long term care. American Journal of Infection Control, 47(6), S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.04.148

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). Improving Health and Health Care Worldwide | IHI – Institute for Healthcare Improvement. https://my.ihi.org/

Joint Commission. Comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals (CAMH). Oakbrook Terrace (IL): Joint Commission Resources; 2019.

Lee, S. E., Scott, L. D., Dahinten, V. S., Vincent, C., Lopez, K. D., & Park, C. G. (2019). Safety culture, patient safety, and quality of care outcomes: a literature review. Western journal of nursing research, 41(2), 279-304.

Mohsenpour M, Hosseini M, Abbaszadeh A, et al. Iranian paediatric nurses experience of nursing error: a content analysis. HK J Paediatr (New Series) 2017; 22: 97–102.

Ortiz, M. R. (2021). Best practices in patient-centered care: Nursing theory reflections. Nursing Science Quarterly, 34(3). https://doi-org/10.1177/08943184211010432

Storesund, A., Haugen, A. S., Flaatten, H., Nortvedt, M. W., Eide, G. E., Boermeester, M. A., Sevdalis, N., Tveiten, Ø., Mahesparan, R., Hjallen, B. M., Fevang, J. M., Størksen, C. H., Thornhill, H. F., Sjøen, G. H., Kolseth, S. M., Haaverstad, R., Sandli, O. K., & Søfteland, E. (2020). Clinical efficacy of Combined Surgical Patient Safety System and the World Health Organization’s checklists in surgery. JAMA Surgery, 155(7), 562. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0989

Haugen, A. S., Sevdalis, N., & Søfteland, E. (2019). Impact of the world health organization surgical safety checklist on patient safety. Anesthesiology, 131(2), 420-425.

Unread

Thank you for your insightful post. I concur with your statements regarding the critical importance of prioritizing patient safety. Particularly noteworthy is the assertion, “Due to the complexity of the healthcare system about patient care, practicing patient safety is vital to preventing errors and harm when caring for the patient. Nurses contribute to and promote patient safety practices.” In alignment with the Joint Commission’s key elements, the leadership of my organization has dedicated itself to fostering a safety culture. This commitment involves holding themselves and others accountable for the following:

  • Communicating leadership support for a culture of safety.
  • Modeling expected behavior within a safety culture.
  • Developing and enforcing a code of conduct that defines appropriate behavior supporting a safety culture and unacceptable behavior that can undermine it.
  • Creating an environment where people can speak up about errors without fear of punishment; utilizing this information to identify system flaws contributing to mistakes.
  • Applying a fair and consistent approach to evaluate the actions of staff involved in patient safety incidents.
  • Supporting event reporting of near misses, unsafe conditions, and adverse events.
  • Identifying and addressing organizational barriers to event reporting.
  • Cultivating an organization-wide willingness to examine system weaknesses and using findings to improve care delivery.
  • Promoting collaboration across ranks and disciplines to seek solutions to identified safety problems.
  • Periodically assessing an organization’s safety culture to track changes and improvements.

(Joint Commission, 2019)

Jan 9, 2023, 6:30 PM

Unread

Patient safety is the practice of preventing mistakes in medical care. It is essential to the quality of treatment that patients receive because even minor errors can negatively affect their general well-being. Patient safety requires a dedication to ongoing development and an emphasis on reducing risks and averting potential harm (Lawati et al., 2018). Patient safety is crucial because it protects patients from injury and raises the standard of care in general. Patients are more likely to experience better health outcomes when they receive safe care. As a result, it is crucial for healthcare professionals to put patient safety first and strive tirelessly to increase the security of the treatment they deliver. This essay describes the use of checklists in the perioperative care pathway to improve surgery patients’ safety and outcomes.

According to Storesund et al. (2020), the study aimed to determine the impact of the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist (WHO SSC) and the Surgical Patient Safety System (SURPASS) checklists on patient treatment results such as illness, death, and hospitalization length. The research design involved introducing the pre- and post-operative SURPASS checklists to the intraoperative surgical safety checklist in surgery departments at a tertiary hospital in Norway using a nonrandomized clinical trial approach. The primary purpose of these checklists was to improve patient outcomes by consistently following key safety steps throughout the perioperative care pathway.

My focus is to assess the incidence of complications during hospitalization, unplanned repeat surgeries, unplanned return visits within thirty days of being discharged, and death within thirty days. These outcomes were chosen because they are all indicators of patient safety and have the potential to have a significant impact on patient outcomes. The study aimed to improve patient outcomes overall by lowering the occurrence of complications, reoperations, and readmissions, as well as improving survival rates.

This study used the length of hospital stay (LOS) as a secondary outcome measure. While LOS is not directly related to patient safety, it can be an important indicator of the perioperative care pathway’s efficiency and effectiveness. The study aimed to improve the overall efficiency of the perioperative care pathway by lowering the LOS, which could lead to cost savings and improved patient satisfaction (Storesund et al., 2020). The identified outcome measures were generally aligned with the improvement project, as they were chosen to assess the impact of the checklists on key indicators of patient safety and efficiency in the perioperative care pathway.

The joint application of the two checklists was linked to decreased adverse events while in the hospital, unplanned repeat surgeries, and rehospitalization rates. According to Storesund et al. (2020), this finding raises the possibility that using these checklists could help identify and prevent mistakes or unintended events in the perioperative care pathway, improving patient outcomes.

References

Lawati, M. H., Dennis, S., Short, S. D., & Abdulhadi, N. N. (2018). Patient safety and safety culture in primary health care: A systematic review. BMC Family Practice, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-018-0793-7

Storesund, A., Haugen, A. S., Flaatten, H., Nortvedt, M. W., Eide, G. E., Boermeester, M. A., Sevdalis, N., Tveiten, Ø., Mahesparan, R., Hjallen, B. M., Fevang, J. M., Størksen, C. H., Thornhill, H. F., Sjøen, G. H., Kolseth, S. M., Haaverstad, R., Sandli, O. K., & Søfteland, E. (2020). Clinical efficacy of Combined Surgical Patient Safety System and the World Health Organization’s checklists in surgery. JAMA Surgery, 155(7), 562. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0989

Jan 10, 2023, 7:12 PM

Unread

Hi Lydia, thanks for your post and for discussing the surgical checklist for patient safety. Serious complications and sometimes loss of life have resulted from surgical errors. The introduction of a surgical checklist helped alleviate the complications previously experienced. The most common surgical complications are related to surgical techniques, infections, and postoperative bleeding. A record of 48.6 to 60.7% reduction in equipment errors was achieved with the use of a preoperative checklist. Implementation and practice of good teamwork, communication, and consistency of care are essential in achieving improved patient safety.

The use of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist was noted to reduce complications from 11.0 to 7.0%, with a mortality drop from 1.5 to 0.8% in a global setting of eight hospitals in eight countries (Haugen et al., 2019). In another scenario, the WHO checklist was reported to have resulted in a reduction of surgical complications from 19.9 to 12.4% in the intervention group, and the concurrent length of stay was reduced by 0.8 days. As with any procedure, it is essential to implement and adhere to the protocol in its entirety to achieve the desired outcomes.

Reference

Haugen, A. S., Sevdalis, N., & Søfteland, E. (2019). Impact of the world health organization surgical safety checklist on patient safety. Anesthesiology, 131(2), 420-425.

Jan 11, 2023, 11:28 PM

Unread

Patient safety is a major concern in the healthcare system, and medical errors are the most significant threats in this regard. Generally, mistakes occur when one’s choice leads to negative or less desirable outcomes and in fact, the term “error” means to astray. The most frequent nursing students’ errors are related to hand hygiene and personal protection. In addition, the lack of enough skills and appropriate equipment are prevalent causes of nursing students’ errors.

Authorities in this field should attend to these errors in nursing education, clinical practice, and nursing studies in order to promote this profession in all of these three dimensions. Nurses play a crucial role in providing health care; however, the results of a study showed that 20% of nurses make at least one mistake during their working time. The factors leading to committing errors include heavy workload, a large number of patients, unstable patient status, nurses’ lack of adequate knowledge, improper working environment, and lack of support from and cooperation with experienced staff.

References

Mohsenpour M, Hosseini M, Abbaszadeh A, et al. Iranian paediatric nurses experience of nursing error: a content analysis. HK J Paediatr (New Series) 2017; 22: 97–102.

Jan 9, 2023, 4:45 PM

Unread

I am unsure which stories touched me more, as I can see myself in every situation. For example, the doctor that accidentally administered the wrong blood due to inadequate onboarding processes could have easily avoided the mistake had he been familiar with the hospital’s procedures (Institute for Healthcare Improvement, n.d.). As many patients, including myself, have fallen victim to medical errors, we must begin to review the process (Institute for Healthcare Improvement, n.d.). Unfortunately, I am not optimistic when it comes to the nursing population, as it is likely that some will find it better to gloat about a colleague’s errors rather than focus on fixing the situation. However, the IHI curriculum pilot example shows that this process is ineffective in increasing patient safety but adds to the takeaways from the IHI lesson. The lesson examples that addressing errors systematically is the best approach (Institute for Healthcare Improvement, n.d.).

However, the assignment asks us to review the posted articles and provide a synopsis relevant to the topic; in this aspect, we know that ordering unnecessary labs increases costs (Haley & Fritz, 2019). In this case, simply empowering the nurses to assess and clinical judgment skills to assess residents for Urinary Tract Infections showed promise in reducing the orders for urine cultures (Haley & Fritz, 2019).

References

Haley, T., & Fritz, S. (2019). Treat the resident, not the urine: Using patient safety to reduce urinary tract infections and overuse of urine culture in long term care. American Journal of Infection Control, 47(6), S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.04.148

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). Improving Health and Health Care Worldwide | IHI – Institute for Healthcare Improvement. https://my.ihi.org/

Achieve Academic Success with ReliablePapers.com: Your Trusted Nursing Paper Partner

Are you facing the challenge of crafting a top-notch nursing essay? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we pride ourselves on being the premier nursing paper writing service, dedicated to ensuring your academic success. Our expert nursing essay writers are ready to assist you in creating a unique, customized nursing essay that guarantees top-notch grades.

Why choose us?

  1. Originality Guaranteed: Tired of generic papers? Our professionals can help you compose an entirely original and custom nursing paper, steering clear of plagiarism pitfalls.
  2. Affordability for All: We understand the budget constraints of college students. Our online nursing papers come at exceptionally low prices, ensuring accessibility without compromising quality.
  3. Expert Nursing Writers at Your Service: Let our seasoned writers perfect your paper, irrespective of the complexity, tight deadlines, or specific instructions. We’re your one-stop solution for all nursing assignment needs.

How to Order:

Placing your order is a breeze. Just visit our “Place Order” page, fill in the details for your paper, and proceed to checkout. Once done, your order will be promptly assigned to a suitable expert, setting you on the path to academic excellence.

Don’t wait until the last minute! Fill in your requirements now and let our experts deliver your work promptly.

Trust ReliablePapers.com – Your Partner in Nursing Academic Excellence! Save time for what matters most.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example AssignmentAssignment Brief: NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment

Course: NURS FPX 4020 Improving Quality of Care and Patient Safety

Assignment Title: Assessment 1: Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety

Overview:

This assignment focuses on improving quality and safety in healthcare, specifically addressing patient falls as a significant safety concern. Students will explore the risk factors associated with patient falls, look into practical solutions to mitigate this issue, understand the vital role of nurses in fall prevention, and identify key stakeholders for effective collaboration.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

The primary goals of this assignment are to:

  1. Analyze Patient Fall Risk Factors: Investigate and understand both internal and external factors contributing to the safety risk of patient falls. Utilize relevant literature and resources to gain insights into these risk elements.
  2. Explore Evidence-Based Solutions: Examine practical practices and solutions aimed at preventing patient falls. This includes assessing the effectiveness of interventions, such as minimizing psychoactive drug use, conducting gait and balance training, and providing vitamin D supplementation.
  3. Understand the Role of Nurses in Fall Prevention: Recognize and articulate the essential role of nurses in addressing patient falls. This involves assessing their involvement in fall risk assessment, patient education, and effective communication within the healthcare team.
  4. Identify Stakeholders for Collaboration: Identify and discuss stakeholders essential for collaborative efforts in fall prevention. Understand the importance of working together involving patients, doctors, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals.

The Student’s Role:

As a student undertaking this assignment, your role involves:

  • Research and Analysis: Conduct in-depth research to understand the complexities of patient fall risk factors and evidence-based solutions. Utilize academic journals, textbooks, and reputable sources to gather information.
  • Critical Thinking: Apply critical thinking skills to evaluate the effectiveness of evidence-based solutions. Consider the practicality of each intervention in real-world healthcare settings.
  • Nursing Perspective: Embrace the role of a nurse by exploring how they contribute to fall prevention. Analyze their responsibilities, including fall risk assessment, patient education, and communication, to comprehend the comprehensive nature of nursing involvement.
  • Stakeholder Identification: Identify and discuss key stakeholders involved in collaborative efforts for fall prevention. Emphasize the importance of effective communication and teamwork among healthcare professionals.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Assignment

For This Assessment, You Will Develop A 3-5 Page Paper That Examines A Safety Quality Issue In A Health Care Setting. You Will Analyze The Issue And Examine Potential Evidence-Based And Best-Practice Solutions From The Literature As Well As The Role

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.    

Explain evidence-based and best-practice solutions to improve patient safety related to a specific patient safety risk and reduce costs.

Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.    

Explain factors leading to a specific patient safety risk.

Competency 4: Explain the nurse’s role in coordinating care to enhance quality and reduce costs.    

Explain how nurses can help coordinate care to increase patient safety and reduce costs.

Identify stakeholders with whom nurses would need to coordinate to drive quality and safety enhancements.

Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.    

Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.

References

Allen, M. (2013). How many die from medical mistakes in U.S. hospitals? Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/09/20/224507654/how-many-die-from-medical-mistakes-in-u-s-hospitals.

Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J., & Donaldson, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Professional Context

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for implementing quality improvement (QI) and patient safety measures in health care settings. Effective quality improvement measures result in systemic and organizational changes, ultimately leading to the development of a patient safety culture.

Scenario

Consider the hospital-acquired conditions that are not reimbursed under Medicare/Medicaid, some of which are specific safety issues such as infections, falls, medication errors, and other concerns that could have been prevented or alleviated with the use of evidence-based guidelines.

Choose a specific condition of interest and incorporate evidence-based strategies to support communication and ensure safe and effective care.

For this assessment, consider using one of the following approaches:

Expand on the scenario presented in Vila Health: Identifying Patient Safety Concerns and analyze a quality improvement (QI) initiative.

Analyze a current issue in clinical practice and identify a quality improvement (QI) initiative in the health care setting.

Instructions

The purpose of this assessment is to better understand the role of the baccalaureate-prepared nurse in enhancing quality improvement (QI) measures that address safety risk. This will be within the specific context of patient safety risks at a health care setting of your choice. You will do this by exploring the professional guidelines and best practices for improving and maintaining patient safety in health care settings from organizations such as QSEN and the IOM. Looking through the lens of these professional best practices to examine the current policies and procedures currently in place at your chosen organization and the impact on safety measures for patients, you will consider the role of the nurse in driving quality and safety improvements. You will identify stakeholders in QI improvement and safety measures as well as consider evidence-based strategies to enhance quality of care and promote safety in the context of your chosen health care setting.

Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so that you know what is needed for a distinguished score.

Explain factors leading to a specific patient-safety risk.

Explain evidence-based and best-practice solutions to improve patient safety related to a specific patient-safety risk and reduce costs.

Explain how nurses can help coordinate care to increase patient safety and reduce costs.

Identify stakeholders with whom nurses would coordinate to drive safety enhancements.

Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

Length of submission: 3–5 pages, plus title and reference pages.

Number of references: Cite a minimum of 4 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment

Administration-related errors

Patient safety and the quality of care are paramount goals in healthcare, directly impacting treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction. Continuous quality improvement is integral to enhancing the overall efficiency of healthcare services. However, challenges persist in achieving quality enhancement, with a notable concern being medication errors, defined by the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCCMERP, n.d) as “any preventable event that may cause or lead to inappropriate medication use or patient harm.” Medication errors (M.E.s) occurring during drug administration are often attributed to nurses. Although these errors can happen throughout the healthcare system, this paper specifically addresses the gravity of the issue within acute care settings.

Acute hospitals, providing short-term yet critical treatment services, such as emergency or intensive care, are prone to distractions and require quick decision-making. This setting increases the likelihood of medication administration errors (MAEs), posing a threat to patient safety. To address this, nurses need to implement effective strategies and solutions to minimize administration-related errors and improve care quality.

Overview of Medication Errors

Medication errors (M.E.s) constitute a significant healthcare issue, resulting in both minor and severe harm to patients. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA, 2019), there are over 100,000 reported presumed cases of M.E.s annually. Additionally, up to 9,000 people in the U.S. die each year due to these errors (Tariq et al., 2021). The associated costs are substantial, exceeding $40 billion per year in total care costs for patients affected by M.E.s (Tariq et al., 2021). Beyond financial implications, M.E.s contribute to perceptions of negligence, carelessness, or inexperience among healthcare staff, eroding trust in healthcare services.

Factors Leading to Medication Administration Errors

While medication errors (M.E.s) can occur at any stage of medication use, they are particularly prevalent during administration, accounting for up to 25% of drug administration instances (Koyama et al., 2020). Inattention and distraction are leading causes of MAEs, often resulting in errors such as administering the wrong drug, dose, or to the wrong patient. Nursing inattentiveness is linked to factors like high workload, multitasking, and increased patient flow (Bucknall et al., 2019). Distractions, common in healthcare facilities, especially in acute care settings, contribute to the most frequent administration-related M.E.s.

Competence or skill flaws, insufficient drug knowledge, misunderstandings related to abbreviations or poor handwriting, similar drug names, packaging, incorrect routes of administration, and non-compliance with recommendations and protocols further contribute to MAEs (Tariq et al., 2021). These factors elevate the risk of patient harm. However, the majority of these factors are preventable human errors that can be mitigated through the implementation of appropriate strategies.

Strategies to Improve Patient Safety

Improving patient safety and care quality necessitates a reduction in M.E. rates. Adherence to the “five-rights” rule, ensuring the right patient receives the right drug at the right time, dose, and route, is a fundamental strategy (Martyn et al., 2019). However, recent studies suggest the need for new frameworks, emphasizing the importance of managing workflow, avoiding interruptions, and implementing patient-centered strategies to contribute to safe and prompt medication administration (Martyn et al., 2019). The introduction of new teaching strategies, such as reflection and remediation educational models, can raise awareness of proper drug administration and reduce MAEs (McCabe & Ea, 2016). Computerizing and automating the medication preparation and administration process is another strategy endorsed by research, as it significantly reduces the occurrence of medication errors (Risør et al., 2018).

Nurse Roles

Nurses play a pivotal role in healthcare, particularly in acute care settings, where they are involved in various aspects, including medication prescribing, preparation, dispensing, and administration. Educated, experienced, and attentive nurses contribute to the prevention of medication errors through their high level of competence. Nurses are crucial in the medication use process, serving as the last line of defense to prevent MAEs by double-checking the correctness of medication, dose, patient, time, and route before administration.

Nurse Coordination with Stakeholders

Interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial to preventing medication administration errors. Nurses often require additional information from clinicians, physicians, pharmacists, or other nurses to ensure safe drug administration. Effective communication with patients is also essential, as missing patient information, failure to obtain medical and allergy histories, or not being aware of side effects can lead to MAEs. Nurses act as intermediaries, connecting healthcare professionals with patients, coordinating communication, and ensuring safe medication use.

Conclusion

Medication errors related to drug administration pose significant risks to patient safety, ranging from minor harm to potential fatality. While various factors contribute to these errors, they are preventable incidents requiring diligent efforts to explore and implement effective strategies. Reducing the rate of MAEs is crucial to providing patients with safe and quality care. The skills, knowledge, and attitudes of nursing staff are instrumental and should be maintained at a high level to ensure the prevention of medication errors.

References

Bucknall, T., Fossum, M., Hutchinson, A. M., Botti, M., Considine, J., Dunning, T., Hughes, L., Weir-Phyland, J., Digby, R. & Manias, E. (2019). Nurses’ decision‐making, practices and perceptions of patient involvement in medication administration in an acute hospital setting. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(6), 1316-1327. Web.

Food and Drug Administration (2019). Working to reduce medication errors. Web.

Koyama, A. K., Maddox, C. S., Li, L., Bucknall, T., & Westbrook, J. I. (2020). Effectiveness of double checking to reduce medication administration errors: a systematic review. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29(7), 595–603. Web.

Martyn, J., & Paliadelis, P. (2019). Nurses’ decision-making and the Five Rights of medication administration. Contemporary Nurse, 55(1), 116–126. Web.

McCabe, B., & Ea, E. (2016). Medication administration error reduction efforts in nursing homes: A systematic review and synthesis of quantitative evidence. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 62, 92-103. Web.

Risør, B. W., Lisby, M., Sørensen, J., & Bro, L. (2018). Two strategies for introducing barcoding of drug administration to an electronic medication administration record. Journal of Patient Safety, 14(4), 459-465. Web.

Tariq, R. A., Rai, A. B., Tai, Y. H., & Raouf, M. (2021). Medication administration errors in pediatrics: A systematic review. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 59, 25–33. Web.

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment Two

Introduction

Patient safety is a critical aspect of healthcare delivery, and medication administration errors (MAEs) pose a significant threat to patient well-being. This paper aims to explore the factors contributing to MAEs and present evidence-based strategies to enhance the quality of patient care while minimizing costs. By analyzing a specific incident involving a medication error and employing professional guidelines, this paper elucidates the role of baccalaureate-prepared nurses in coordinating care to drive safety enhancements.

Factors Leading to Patient Safety Risks

One illustrative incident involves Nurse Ella, who inadvertently administered rapid-acting insulin instead of long-acting insulin to a diabetic patient, Mr. Wallace. Several factors contribute to such medication errors:

Lack of Knowledge and Training: Inadequate knowledge about drug doses, interactions, and contraindications is a leading factor of medication administration errors. Research indicates that 78.7% of medication errors result from poor training of nurses (Hassen et al., 2022). Nurses possessing advanced pharmaceutical knowledge and subsequent training are less likely to make medication administration errors.

Communication Gap Between Healthcare Professionals: Insufficient communication and collaboration among healthcare staff contribute to medication errors. A study suggests a higher incidence of medication administration errors in settings with communication gaps (Ghasemi et al., 2022).

Prescribing Errors: Inaccurate prescriptions leading to incorrect dosages and inappropriate instructions are another significant factor. Incompletely written prescriptions contribute to 71% of prescription-related errors (White et al., 2019).

Stress, Burnout, and Mental Health Challenges: Elevated stress levels among nurses due to excessive workloads and long shifts contribute to psychological distress, burnout, and ultimately, medication errors. Burnout is linked to a fivefold increase in patient care and medication errors (White et al., 2019).

Evidence-Based Best Practices Solutions

To address these challenges, evidence-based and best practice solutions are crucial. Some effective strategies include:

QSEN Competencies: Implementation of Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) competencies in nursing education has been shown to improve nurses’ quality and safety education by up to 75% (Watanabe et al., 2021).

Medication Reconciliation: Implementing medication reconciliation procedures during care transitions, contrasting a patient’s present pharmaceutical regimen with prescribed medications, improves patient safety (Koprivnik et al., 2020).

Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE): Electronically submitting medicine orders through CPOE systems reduces the chance of adverse drug events and improves patient safety (Skalafouris et al., 2022).

Barcode Medication Administration (BCMA) Systems: Using BCMA systems for correct medication delivery enhances patient safety by preventing drug errors through patient identification and barcoded labels (Ye, 2023).

Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS): Offering suggestions based on research to healthcare practitioners at the point of care, CDSS can notify healthcare professionals about possible medication combinations, dosage mistakes, or allergies (Manias et al., 2020).

Value-Based Formulary Management: Choosing medicines based on clinical potency, cost-effectiveness, and safety helps maintain high healthcare quality while cutting expenditures related to pharmaceuticals (Weinmeyer et al., 2021).

Nurse-Led Coordination to Optimize Patient Safety

Effective coordination among healthcare professionals, especially nurses, plays a pivotal role in optimizing patient safety. In the case of medication administration errors, nurses can collaborate with various stakeholders:

Coordination with Physicians and Pharmacists: Clear communication between nurses and physicians regarding treatment regimens, along with collaborative efforts with pharmacists, can reduce prescription transcribing and filling errors (Koprivnik et al., 2020).

Collaboration with IT Personnel: Mutual collaboration with IT personnel for the effective utilization of technology tools ensures the proper functioning of systems like CPOE, BCMA, and CDSS to prevent MAEs (Ye, 2023).

Interdisciplinary Collaboration: A holistic care approach by working with interdisciplinary teams and adherence to regulatory requirements reduces the risk of errors, ensuring patient safety and cost-effectiveness (Alrabadi et al., 2021).

Nurses’ Coordination with Other Stakeholders

Nurses play a crucial role in collaborating with various stakeholders to improve medicine delivery and enhance patient safety:

Collaboration with Physicians and Pharmacists: Nurses collaborate with physicians and pharmacists to ensure accurate medication administration. Quality improvement teams and nursing staff can work together to evaluate challenges and implement suitable strategies (Manias et al., 2020).

Involvement of Patients and Families: Better adherence and patient satisfaction can be achieved by involving patients and their families actively in the medication administration process.

Involvement of Medication Safety Officers and Administrators: Organizational prioritization of patient safety through the involvement of medication safety officers and administrators is crucial. Professional associations offer tools for the continuous advancement of medical practices (Manias et al., 2020).

Conclusion

Medication administration errors pose a significant threat to patient safety and contribute to increased treatment costs. However, employing evidence-based best practices and fostering effective coordination among healthcare professionals, especially nurses, can significantly reduce the occurrence of MAEs. The integration of QSEN competencies, medication reconciliation, and advanced technological tools, along with interdisciplinary collaboration, creates a holistic approach to patient care, ensuring safety and cost-effectiveness.

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment Three

Quality improvement initiatives are widespread across health organizations, emphasizing patient safety and quality care. Patient safety remains a top priority for interdisciplinary teams, particularly as medication errors pose common and recurring threats to healthcare, contributing to increased patient harm and mortality (Alotaibi & Federico, 2017). Medication errors are preventable and can result from various factors such as communication gaps, disturbances during medication retrieval and administration, missing patient information, poor labeling, inadequate medication reconciliation, and lack of knowledge.

Factors Leading to Patient Safety Risks

Medication errors can occur at any time and place, often during prescription and drug monitoring. Resolving this issue necessitates collective responsibility, involving interdisciplinary collaboration. Evidence-based practices play a crucial role in raising awareness among healthcare professionals. While medication errors can happen in diverse settings, home environments pose risks, especially for children due to negligent drug storage. Adherence to the five rights of medication administration — ensuring the right drug, patient, dosage, time, and route — is critical in preventing errors. Factors contributing to negligence include increased workloads, fatigue, and insufficient pharmacologic knowledge.

Evidence-based Practices

High-quality care aligns with evidence-based research, emphasizing patient-centered care and proper communication among staff. Involving patients and caregivers in medication education and ensuring clear instructions can enhance care quality. Best practices to enhance patient safety encompass double-checking procedures, using name alerts, planning medication administration to avoid disruptions, and leveraging available technologies.

The Nurse’s Role in Coordinating Care

Nurses, integral to hospital quality improvement, engage in various roles, including patient care, data collection, and medication management. Medication errors pose financial burdens, and nurses play a vital role in coordinating care to alleviate these challenges. Coordination involves assessing the work environment, implementing safety technologies, educating patients, and exercising caution with high-alert medications. Nurses share knowledge, ensure seamless care transitions, and collaborate with interdisciplinary teams to develop personalized care plans, contributing to cost efficiency.

Stakeholder Coordination for Quality and Safety Enhancements

Effective coordination involves collaboration with stakeholders such as society, administrators, patients, families, researchers, technicians, nursing educators, and physicians. Patients and families actively contribute to quality patient safety by providing essential information and seeking clarification on medications.

Conclusion

Patient safety remains paramount, necessitating a focus on preventing medication errors. Factors contributing to these errors are diverse, emphasizing the need for strict adherence to the five rights of medication administration. Coordination by nurses, evidence-based practices, and stakeholder collaboration are essential elements in enhancing quality and safety in healthcare.

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment Four

Introduction

Ensuring patient safety and delivering quality care stand out as paramount challenges in healthcare, involving healthcare facilities, nurses, physicians, and various professionals. Suboptimal quality and compromised patient safety result in adverse outcomes such as morbidity, mortality, increased care costs, prolonged hospital stays, diminished patient and job satisfaction, among other issues. This paper aims to examine the patient safety issue of medication administration, analyze evidence-based practices, and scrutinize the coordination among nurses and stakeholders.

Patient-safety risk focusing on medication administration

Medication administration, a pivotal process predominantly managed by nurses, involves multiple stakeholders, including physicians, pharmacists, and informatics nurses. Errors at any stage of this process can lead to medication administration errors (MAEs) and subsequent adverse events. Research indicates varying rates of prescription, dispensing, and dosage errors, emphasizing the substantial contribution of human errors, particularly by nurses. Interferences during medication administration, whether from patients, families, or distractions, further elevate the risk of errors. Factors like nurse-to-patient ratio, poor communication, and inadequate training are additional contributors, with the potential consequences ranging from mortality and morbidity to adverse effects.

Evidence-based and best practice solutions

Implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs) is crucial to address medication administration challenges. Training and educating healthcare staff based on guidelines from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) is a primary EBP. This includes vigilant verification of medication with electronic health records (EHRs), allergy checks, pre-administration assessment, accurate dosage calculation, and the avoidance of workarounds and abbreviations. Another EBP involves the implementation of a physician order entry system with error reporting and communication capabilities, aiming to reduce prescription, dispensing, and administration errors. Technological interventions, such as bar-code-based medication administration and voice-tagged dosage calculation, prove effective in preventing errors. Strategies like using color-coded tabards and checklists, along with interprofessional collaboration, contribute to reducing interruptions and enhancing communication during medication administration.

Coordinated care among nurses to improve quality and patient safety

Nurses play a crucial role in coordinating care to address burnout and create supportive work environments. Collaborative efforts during medication administration, such as sharing responsibilities and supporting each other during interruptions, contribute to error reduction. Effective communication among nurses to identify patient allergies and educate colleagues about EHRs and technology usage enhances skills and knowledge. Nurse leaders manage resources and conflicts, ensuring a coordinated approach to resolve practice issues. Shared decision-making and coordinated care further contribute to efficient workflow and decreased medication errors.

Stakeholders and safety enhancement

Coordination among various stakeholders, including informatics nurses, pharmacists, physicians, therapists, nurse leaders, and patients, is essential for safety enhancement. Patients’ active involvement in treatment decisions and their contribution to health history and allergy information are critical. Informatics nurses play a vital role in data management, error reporting, and correction processes within EHRs. Physicians, pharmacists, and nurse leaders collaborate to prevent and correct medication errors, while therapists and specialists provide valuable insights into patient conditions. Effective communication and coordination among stakeholders help in resolving conflicts and ensuring patient safety.

References

Abukhader, I., & Abukhader, K. (2020). Effect of medication safety education program on intensive care nurses’ knowledge regarding medication errors. Journal Of Biosciences And Medicines, 08(06), 135-147.

Armstrong, G. (2019). QSEN safety competency: the key ingredient is just culture. The Journal Of Continuing Education In Nursing, 50(10), 444-447.

Bradley, C., Luder, H., Beck, A., Bowen, R., Heaton, P., & Kahn, R. et al. (2016). Pediatric asthma medication therapy management through community pharmacy and primary care collaboration. Journal Of The American Pharmacists Association, 56(4), 455-460.

Hammoudi, B., Ismaile, S., & Abu Yahya, O. (2017). Factors associated with medication administration errors and why nurses fail to report them. Scandinavian Journal Of Caring Sciences, 32(3), 1038-1046.

Huckels-Baumgart, S., Niederberger, M., Manser, T., Meier, C., & Meyer-Massetti, C. (2017). A combined intervention to reduce interruptions during medication preparation and double-checking: a pilot-study evaluating the impact of staff training and safety vests. Journal Of Nursing Management, 25(7), 539-548.

Korb-Savoldelli, V., Boussadi, A., Durieux, P., & Sabatier, B. (2018). Prevalence of computerized physician order entry systems–related medication prescription errors: A systematic review. International Journal Of Medical Informatics, 111, 112-122.

Manias, E. (2018). Effects of interdisciplinary collaboration in hospitals on medication errors: an integrative review. Expert Opinion On Drug Safety, 17(3), 259-275.

Montgomery, A., Azuero, A., Baernholdt, M., Loan, L., Miltner, R., & Qu, H. et al. (2020). Nurse burnout predicts self-reported medication administration errors in acute care hospitals. Journal For Healthcare Quality, Publish Ahead of Print.

Palese, A., Ferro, M., Pascolo, M., Dante, A., & Vecchiato, S. (2019). “I am administering medication—please do not interrupt me”: red tabards preventing interruptions as perceived by surgical patients. Journal Of Patient Safety, 15(1), 30-36.

Pop, M., & Finocchi, M. (2016). Medication errors: a case-based review. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 27(1), 5-11.

Tariq, R., Vashisht, V., Sinha, A., & Scherbak, y. (2021). Medication dispensing errors and prevention. Retrieved 17 March 2021, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519065/.

Thomas, L., Donohue-Porter, P., & Stein Fishbein, J. (2017). Impact of interruptions, distractions, and cognitive load on procedure failures and medication administration errors. Journal Of Nursing Care Quality, 32(4), 309-317.

Thompson, K., Swanson, K., Cox, D., Kirchner, R., Russell, J., & Wermers, R. et al. (2018). Implementation of bar-code medication administration to reduce patient harm. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes, 2(4), 342-351.

Tsegaye, D., Alem, G., Tessema, Z., & Alebachew, W. (2020). Medication administration errors and associated factors among nurses. International Journal Of General Medicine, Volume 13, 1621-1632.

Verweij, L., Smeulers, M., Maaskant, J., & Vermeulen, H. (2016). Quiet please! drug round tabards: are they effective and accepted? A Mixed-Method Study. Journal Of Nursing Scholarship, 46(5), 340-348.

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment Five

Introduction

Patient safety is a major concern in healthcare, with patient falls being a significant safety issue. A fall is described as “an unplanned descent to the floor (or extension of the floor [e.g., trash can or other equipment]) with or without injury to the patient and with or without assistance” (Tucker et al., 2019, p. 113). Falls can lead to various injuries, including fractures, functional decline, traumatic brain injury, and nursing home placement, making them the “leading cause of accidental death in people over 65 years old” (Lasater et al., 2016, p. 545). In addition to the human cost, falls increase healthcare expenses due to the need to treat preventable injuries. Healthcare organizations are thus focused on falls prevention to enhance patient safety and reduce healthcare costs. This paper examines the risk factors of patient falls and evidence-based solutions. It also explores the role of nurses in falls prevention and identifies stakeholders with whom nurses should collaborate to address this safety concern.

Factors Leading to Patient-Safety Risk

Patient fall risk factors can be categorized as intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic factors include patient characteristics such as age, sex, previous falls, balance impairment, gait, activities of daily living (ADL) disabilities, stroke, cognitive impairments, Parkinson’s disease, and incontinence (Kwan et al., 2016). The risk of falls increases with age, with those aged 65-74 years having a 32% probability and those over 80 years having a 37% probability (Kwan et al., 2016). Extrinsic factors related to the environment include home hazards, use of assistive devices, and inappropriate footwear (Morone et al., 2018; Kwan et al., 2016). The Morse scale assesses risk factors such as history of falls, secondary diagnosis, walk assistance, parenteral therapy, mental status, and gait to determine an individual’s risk of falls (Nadia & Permanasari, 2018).

Evidence-Based Solutions

Addressing patient falls begins with identifying at-risk patients and conducting a multifactorial fall risk assessment for older patients (Morone et al., 2018). Assessment should include factors like gait, balance, mental status, reflexes, and various functions (Morone et al., 2018). Analyzing the type of fall is crucial for selecting preventive strategies, categorizing falls as accidental, unanticipated physiological, anticipated physiological, or intentional (Morone et al., 2018). Evidence-based practices include minimizing psychoactive drug use, engaging in gait and balance training, and providing vitamin D supplementation (Morone et al., 2018). Managing conditions identified during risk assessment, such as visual impairment or a hazardous home environment, is also critical. Effective fall prevention involves interventions addressing both clinical assessment findings and individual risk assessment outcomes (Morone et al., 2018).

The Role of Nurses in Addressing Patient-Safety Risk

Nurses play a central role in addressing the safety issue of patient falls due to their extensive patient interaction and involvement in the care team (Nadia & Permanasari, 2018). Nurses contribute to fall risk assessment using tools like the Morse scale, inform patients about fall risks, and provide necessary assistance. Effective communication among nurses is vital for ensuring patient safety, as poor communication can jeopardize care coordination (Tucker et al., 2019).

Stakeholders

Collaboration with various stakeholders is essential for implementing evidence-based solutions for patient falls. Nurses should educate patients and families on fall risks and prevention strategies. Cooperation with doctors and pharmacists is crucial for adjusting medications and administering vitamin D. Nurses should also work with social workers and doctors to implement strategies like exercise programs, motivational interviewing, and environmental assessment. Effective communication among nurses is necessary for sharing information about safety issues and addressing them (Lasater et al., 2016; Tucker et al., 2019).

References

Kwan, E., Straus, S., & Holroyd-Leduc, J. (2016). Risk factors for falls in the elderly. In A. Huang & L. Mallet (Eds.), Medication-related falls in older people (pp. 91-101). Adis.

Lasater, K., Cotrell, V., McKenzie, G., Simonson, W., Morgove, M. W., Long, E. E., & Eckstrom, E. (2016). Collaborative falls prevention: Interprofessional team formation, implementation, and evaluation. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(12), 545-550.

Morone, G., Federici, A., Tramontano, M., Annicchiarico, R., & Salvia, A. (2018). Strategies to prevent falls. In G. Sandrini, V. Homberg, L. Saltuari, N. Smania, & A. Pedrocchi (Eds.), Advanced technologies for the rehabilitation of gait and balance disorders (pp. 149-158). Springer.

Nadia, P., & Permanasari, V. Y. (2018). Compliance of the nurse for fall risk assessment as a procedure of patient safety: A systematic review. KnE Life Sciences, 4(9), 207-219.

Tucker, S., Sheikholeslami, D., Farrington, M., Picone, D., Johnson, J., Matthews, G., Evans, R., Gould, R., Bohlken, D., Comried, L., Petrulevich, K., Perkhounkova, E., & Cullen, L. (2019). Patient, nurse, and organizational factors that influence evidence‐based fall prevention for hospitalized oncology patients: An exploratory study. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(2), 111-120.

Receive Academic Excellence with Our Professional Nursing Essay Writing Service

Are you struggling with challenging nursing assignments? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we take pride in being the best nursing paper writing service that can save you time and elevate your academic performance. Our dedicated team of expert nursing essay writers is here to provide you with personalized and original nursing papers tailored to your unique requirements.

Why Choose Our Nursing Paper Writing Service?

  • Expertise Matters: Our pro writers specialize in nursing papers, ensuring that your essay is crafted with in-depth knowledge and understanding of nursing concepts.
  • Affordable Excellence: Worried about your budget? Our online nursing papers come at very affordable prices, making top-notch academic assistance accessible to all college students.
  • Customization Guaranteed: Tired of generic papers? Order a nursing custom paper from us, and our experts will write an original, customized essay to secure the best possible grades for you.

How to Order: Simple and Secure

Ready to experience academic success? Follow these easy steps:

  1. Click on our “Place Order” page.
  2. Fill in all the details for your paper.
  3. Proceed to checkout to complete the payment.

Once done, your order will be assigned to a suitable expert, taking the first step toward academic excellence.

Choose ReliablePapers.com – where excellence meets affordability! Save time for what matters most and let our professional essay writers elevate your academic journey.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient's Spiritual Needs Case Analysis ExampleAssignment Brief: PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

Overview:

The purpose of this assignment is to analyze a case study involving the postponement of medical intervention based on religious beliefs and to explore the ethical implications of such decisions. The case study revolves around the decisions made by a parent, Mike, for his son, James, considering spiritual beliefs and their impact on healthcare choices.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

Decision-Making and Autonomy:
  • Analyze the crucial ethical principles of patient autonomy and decision-making.
  • Examine the challenges presented when dealing with minors and parental decisions.
  • Assess the ethical and legal responsibilities of healthcare professionals in cases where parental decisions may pose harm to the patient.
  • Evaluate the application of the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence in pediatric healthcare.
Christian View Regarding Health and Sickness:
  • Explore the influence of religious beliefs on healthcare practices and perceptions of sickness, health, and healing.
  • Examine the Christian perspective on illness, specifically viewing sickness as a test or punishment from God.
  • Analyze relevant biblical references that guide Christians on seeking medical treatment and the responsibility to care for the body as a temple.
  • Discuss the balance between faith, prayer, and medical interventions from a Christian standpoint.
Spiritual Assessment:
  • Understand the significance of conducting a spiritual needs assessment in the context of healthcare decisions.
  • Explore tools used for spiritual assessments, focusing on dimensions such as purpose, values, and self-identity.
  • Examine the role of healthcare professionals in addressing spiritual needs and directing patients to appropriate pastoral care.
  • Discuss the potential impact of a spiritual assessment on the alignment of medical decisions with religious beliefs.

The Student’s Role:

As a student, your role is to critically engage with the case study and address the outlined objectives. Provide in-depth analyses of the ethical considerations surrounding parental decisions, the Christian perspective on health and sickness, and the relevance of spiritual assessments in healthcare. Support your insights with references to ethical principles, biblical references, and scholarly literature.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Assignment

Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

Spirituality and religion are crucial factors in most people seeking medical care. Unfortunately, health care professionals might not consider religious beliefs and spiritual needs when they are dealing with complex medical decisions for their patients or their families. This paper analyzes a case involving parental postponement of a medically needed intervention based on religious beliefs in prayers and miracles…

In addition to the topic study materials, use the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about \”Case Study: Healing and Autonomy\” as the basis for your responses in this assignment.

Answer the following questions about a patient\’s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview.

In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient\’s autonomy? Explain your rationale.
In 400-500 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James\’s care?
In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care?
Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials. Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

BS in Health Sciences 1.2; BS Nursing (RN to BSN ) 5.2 Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.

Case Study: Healing and Autonomy

Mike and Joanne are the parents of James and Samuel, identical

twins born 8 years ago. James is currently suffering from acute glomerulonephritis, kidney failure. James was originally brought

into the hospital for complications associated with a strep throat infection. The spread of the A streptococcus infection led to the subsequent kidney failure. James’s condition was acute enough

to warrant immediate treatment. Usually cases of acute glomerulonephritis caused by strep infection tend to improve on their own or with an antibiotic. However,James also had elevated

blood pressure and enough fluid buildup that required temporary dialysis to relieve.The attending physician suggested immediate dialysis.After some time of discussion with Joanne, Mike informs the physician that they are going to forego the dialysis and place their faith in God. Mike and Joanne had been moved by a sermon their pastor had given a week ago, and also had witnessed a close

friend regain mobility when she was prayed over at a healing service after a serious stroke. They thought it more prudent to take James immediately to a faith healing service instead of putting James through multiple rounds of dialysis. Yet, Mike and Joanne

agreed to return to the hospital after the faith healing services later in the week, and in hopes that James would be healed by then.

Two days later the family returned and was forced to place James Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

on dialysis, as his condition had deteriorated. Mike felt perplexed and tormented by his decision to not treat James earlier.Had he not enough faith? Was God punishing him or James? To make matters

worse, James’s kidneys had deteriorated such that his dialysis was now not a temporary matter and was in need of a kidney transplant. Crushed and desperate, Mike and Joanne immediately offered to donate one of their own kidneys to James, but they were not compatible donors. Over the next few weeks, amidst daily rounds of dialysis, some of their close friends and church members also offered to donate a kidney to James.However, none of them were tissue matches James’s nephrologist called to schedule a private appointment with Mike and Joanne.James was stable, given the regular dialysis, but would require a kidney transplant within the year. Given the desperate situation, the nephrologist informed Mike and Joanne of a donor that was an ideal tissue match, but as of yet had not been considered—James’s brother Samuel. Mike vacillates and struggles to decide whether he should have his other son Samuel lose a kidney or perhaps wait for God to do a miracle this time around. Perhaps this is where the real testing of his faith will come in? Mike reasons, “This time around it is a matter of life and death. What could require greater faith than that?”

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example

Introduction

Spirituality and religion play pivotal roles in the healthcare decisions of individuals. However, healthcare professionals often overlook religious beliefs and spiritual needs when navigating complex medical scenarios. This paper delves into a case involving the deferment of a medically necessary intervention due to religious convictions about prayers and miracles.

Physician’s Role in Decision-Making

In the case of James, the physician should not have permitted Mike, the father, to persist in making decisions that seemed irrational and detrimental to James. While respecting parental autonomy is crucial, healthcare professionals bear a legal and ethical responsibility to intervene when a child’s well-being is jeopardized (Katz & Webb, 2016). In instances where a child faces the risk of disability or death due to parental decisions, professionals must report the situation to appropriate authorities and, if necessary, proceed with life-saving interventions.

Christian Perspective on Health and Sickness

From a Christian standpoint, perceptions of health and sickness are intertwined with faith. Some Christians may view good health as a reward for righteous living and illness as a consequence of sin or a test of faith. In the case of James, his father, Mike, grapples with feelings of inadequacy and questions whether the illness is a result of insufficient faith.

It is imperative for Christians to understand that seeking medical intervention aligns with biblical principles. In Matthew 9:12, Jesus emphasized the role of physicians, indicating that those who are sick need a physician. Medical care is not a lack of faith but a means through which God’s healing can manifest. Christians are encouraged to honor their bodies as temples of God and seek medical care responsibly (1 Corinthians 6:19-20).

Mike’s Dilemma and Christian Ethics

As a Christian, Mike should recognize that medical intervention is not a contradiction to trusting God. Allowing James to undergo necessary medical procedures does not negate the power of prayer but acknowledges that God may work through healthcare professionals. Honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, Mike should consider the potential benefits of a kidney transplant for James. Beneficence entails promoting well-being, and in this case, a transplant can save James’s life without necessarily conflicting with spiritual beliefs.

Spiritual Needs Assessment

A spiritual needs assessment is instrumental in guiding the physician to assist Mike in determining suitable interventions for James and the family. Identifying spiritual and religious needs ensures that medical decisions are respectful and responsive to these beliefs. A comprehensive assessment involves supporting spiritual beliefs, organizing resources, and facilitating spiritual activities (Isaac et al., 2016).

Upon identifying the spiritual needs of James’s family, the physician can then decide whether to address these needs or involve spiritual and religious leaders in the care process. Referring individuals to appropriate pastoral care acknowledges the importance of spirituality in healthcare decision-making without placing the burden solely on medical professionals.

Conclusion

In conclusion, addressing a patient’s spiritual needs, especially within the context of religious beliefs, is essential for providing holistic and patient-centered care. While respecting autonomy is crucial, healthcare professionals must navigate complex situations, especially when a child’s well-being is at stake. Integrating spirituality into the care process through assessments and collaboration with spiritual leaders ensures a more comprehensive and respectful approach to healthcare decision-making.

References:

Isaac, K., Hay, J., & Lubetkin, E. (2016). Incorporating Spirituality in Primary Care. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(3), 1065-1077.

Katz, A., & Webb, S. (2016). Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics, 138(2), e20161485.

Part Two:

In 200-250 words, respond to the following:

In the context of the Christian worldview, the principles in this case are specified and weighted based on the core tenets of Christian ethics. Christians, when grappling with healthcare dilemmas, consider four key principles, recognizing the need for nuanced evaluation in each unique medical situation. In the presented case, the principle of beneficence carries significant weight. Despite James’s stable condition, the imminent threat to his life within a year without an organ transplant elevates the importance of saving his life. The Christian teaching underscores the sacredness of human life, imposing an obligation on Christians to preserve life. Both the parents and the healthcare practitioners share the responsibility of ensuring James’s survival, aligning with the principle of beneficence. Beyond mere survival, there exists a duty to enhance James’s life, a task guided by the same principle.

In 200-250 words, respond to the following:

Within the Christian worldview, achieving a balance among the four principles—Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice—is a matter of discerning priorities aligned with Christian values. The sanctity of life, considered sacred in Christianity, forms the basis for balancing these principles. Christians navigate this delicate equilibrium by prioritizing the principle most aligned with preserving life. For instance, while autonomy allows freedom of choice, the paramount importance of beneficence may supersede in critical situations. In the case, parents exercised autonomy by seeking faith healing, potentially neglecting the beneficence owed to their son. The healthcare professional, guided by Christian ethics, might intervene, placing James on dialysis to avert harm.

Additionally, the Christian perspective emphasizes the role of justice and nonmaleficence. Clear communication with the parents, explaining that delaying treatment could exacerbate James’s condition and lead to dire consequences, incorporates these principles into the decision-making process. Ultimately, a Christian balance among the principles ensures a comprehensive approach, respecting autonomy but prioritizing beneficence, justice, and nonmaleficence in alignment with Christian teachings.

References:

Fried, A. L., & Fisher, C. B. (2018). Emerging ethical and legal issues in clinical child and adolescent psychology. In The Oxford Handbook of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology.

Hoehner, P. J. (2018). Practicing dignity: An introduction to Christian values and decision-making in health care. Biomedical ethics in the Christian narrative. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/phi413v/practicing-dignity-an-introduction-to-christianvalues-and-decision-making-in-health-care/v1.1/#/chapter/3

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example Two

Spiritual Needs Assessment

As healthcare professionals, engaging in conversations with patients about their spirituality becomes imperative. The beliefs, values, and morals of individuals shape their identity, influencing the approach of healthcare workers in providing care. Respecting patients’ beliefs, faith, and cultural backgrounds establishes trust and rapport, essential components of patient care. To deliver optimal care, healthcare professionals must understand the intricate connection between a patient’s belief system and the care plan. Confidence and openness to discussing various aspects of spirituality are crucial for effective patient care.

The author conducted an interview with a family member, D.K., who underwent treatment for an extended period, eventually diagnosed with Celiac Disease. This paper aims to create a spiritual assessment based on the interview, presenting a transcript and analyzing the interaction. Evaluation of the interview’s successes, areas for improvement, and identification of potential barriers between the interviewer and interviewee will be addressed. The focus of the interview is on D.K.’s experiences as a patient in a hospital setting.

Part I: The Interview

Inquiring about D.K.’s religious and spiritual beliefs, the interview revealed her 30-year commitment to Christianity and her reliance on faith during the hospitalization. The discussion highlighted the role of prayer and communion in supporting her spiritual well-being. When questioned about the influence of her beliefs on self-care decisions, D.K. expressed a heightened prayer focus and shared the significance of others praying for her. Additionally, privacy and respect for personal spiritual time emerged as crucial needs that healthcare professionals could address.

Part II: Analysis

The interviewee, an older Caucasian female and a devout Christian, faced a challenging diagnosis of Celiac Disease, impacting her culinary profession centered around gluten. The interview underscored the importance of spiritual care during hospitalization, emphasizing the need for healthcare professionals to respect and encourage moments of prayer and reflection. The author identified the potential value of conducting the interview while D.K. was still an inpatient.

No significant barriers were identified during the spiritual assessment, and the author stressed the importance of maintaining a commitment to spiritual care even amid busy schedules. Acknowledging the interconnectedness of spiritual and physical healing, the author emphasized the equal significance of addressing patients’ spiritual needs without delay.

References:

D.K. Personal Communication. November 2016.

Joint Commission. 2016. Medical Record – Spiritual Assessment. Retrieved from Joint Commission Spiritual Assessment. Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis.

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example Three

The principle of autonomy upholds a patient’s right to make informed medical decisions. However, in the context of this case within a Confucian society, where familial authority plays a significant role, the head of the family, Mike, is expected to make decisions for those under his care (Tai & Tsai, 2003). Despite the physician’s obligation to present all possible measures, the decision ultimately rests with James’s parents, even if it appears irrational from a medical standpoint. Mike, as a Christian family head, is entrusted with ensuring the well-being, both physical and spiritual, of his children. Thus, respecting patient autonomy is vital, trusting that Mike will act in his son’s best interest. James’s parents, albeit belatedly, opted for dialysis, a crucial step in stabilizing the child, allowing time for thoughtful consideration and consultation to determine the best course that benefits James without jeopardizing Samuel.

The physician may intervene in decision-making only if Mike is deemed incompetent or uncertain about the child’s best interests. In such cases, the physician should thoroughly explain all options and the chosen course of action, detailing the potential implications associated with the selected treatment method (Tai & Tsai, 2003).

Christians Views on Sickness and Health

Christianity acknowledges suffering, including sickness, pain, and disability, as integral to religious life (Porterfield, 2005). Viewing suffering as a path to redemption, Christians believe that healing is facilitated through unwavering faith in a higher power. Perspectives on sickness and healing vary among Christians, with some perceiving it as a consequence of sins, while others see it as a test of faith (Porterfield, 2005). In this case, Mike interpreted James’s illness as divine punishment, reflecting the diverse Christian perspectives. Seeking religious meaning and redemption during suffering is common among Christians, often manifesting through caregiving mirroring Jesus’ healing ministry.

Medical interventions, essential for Christians, do not signify a loss of faith; instead, they complement spirituality. Combining medicine with spirituality fosters positive expectations, alleviates stress, and enhances natural recovery processes, akin to the placebo effect (Porterfield, 2005). Various forms of medical interventions, including nutrition, exercise, and mental well-being, intertwine with Christian practices, promoting a holistic approach to health.

Mike, driven by the principles of nonmaleficence and benevolence, should act in James’s best interest. While prayer was attempted, the subsequent dialysis stabilized James, underscoring the importance of medical interventions. Embracing medical assistance aligns with Christian beliefs, acknowledging that God works through individuals, including healthcare professionals. To uphold his faith, Mike can prayerfully support the organ transplant, trusting in divine guidance.

Spiritual Assessment

Spiritual assessment in healthcare aids practitioners in addressing patients’ spiritual and emotional needs during challenging times. Utilizing Draper’s (2012) generic approach to spiritual assessment would be beneficial for Mike. This approach helps recognize and acknowledge spiritually based issues, identifying coping resources and facilitating informed decision-making. Questions should explore Mike’s spiritual beliefs, meaningful aspects of James’s life, and how these beliefs influence healthcare decisions.

Furthermore, the assessment tool can probe into Mike’s spiritual community, assessing its potential to provide emotional and spiritual support. Understanding these aspects enables the physician to tailor interventions that enhance spiritual well-being. Spiritual engagement contributes to improved quality of life, reduced stress symptoms, increased mindfulness, and enhanced coping mechanisms.

Conclusion

Christianity profoundly shapes perceptions of sickness, health, and seeking help from healthcare professionals. Both Christians and physicians play vital roles in maintaining patient autonomy, ensuring informed decision-making while respecting religious beliefs. Integrating medicine with spirituality provides a comprehensive approach to healthcare, acknowledging the interconnectedness of physical and spiritual well-being. The case emphasizes the importance of Christians accepting medical assistance when necessary, promoting a harmonious balance between faith and professional healthcare.

References

Craigie, F. C. (2010). Positive spirituality in health care: Nine practical approaches to pursuing wholeness for clinicians, patients, and health care organizations. Hillcrest Publishing Group.

Draper, P. (2012). An integrative review of spiritual assessment: implications for nursing management. Journal of Nursing Management, 20(8), 970-980.

Porterfield, A. (2005). Healing in the History of Christianity. Oxford University Press.

Tai, M. C. T., & Tsai, T. P. (2003). Who makes the decision? Patient’s autonomy vs. paternalism in a Confucian society. Croatian medical journal, 44(5), 558-561.

Zollfrank, A. A., Trevino, K. M., Cadge, W., Balboni, M. J., Thiel, M. M., Fitchett, G.… & Balboni, T. A. (2015). Teaching health care providers to provide spiritual care: a pilot study. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 18(5), 408-414.

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example Four

Introduction

Healthcare professionals strive to adhere to ethical principles, encompassing a patient’s beneficence, autonomy, nonmaleficence, and justice. However, the intricate nature of human body systems and diverse values often complicates strict adherence to these principles (Johnstone, 2019). Spiritual and religious beliefs, in particular, can significantly influence patients’ willingness to follow healthcare recommendations, potentially leading to adverse health outcomes. This case study highlights the imperative of addressing patients’ spiritual needs to ensure compliance with beneficence and nonmaleficence principles.

Patient Autonomy

The presented case underscores challenges related to patient autonomy. Decisions made by the parents, Mike and Joanne, create a dilemma for the physician in upholding beneficence and nonmaleficence principles. The parents’ choices result in a severe deterioration of their son’s health, prompting consideration of the child’s best interest over parental preferences. While tempting to override parental autonomy for the child’s benefit, disrespecting autonomy can lead to unintended consequences, including distrust in healthcare professionals and potential endangerment of the child (Ubel, Scherr, & Fagerlin, 2017).

Rather than infringing on parental autonomy, the physician should establish effective communication and rapport with the parents. Informing them about all options and consequences, the healthcare practitioner must act in the child’s best interest, emphasizing the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence as priorities (Lawrence, 2007). While being compassionate, the physician should be clear and sincere in presenting the preferred treatment, fostering collaboration with the parents.

Christian Perspective Regarding Sickness and Health

The Christian view on health and illness is nuanced, encompassing perspectives of punishment or trial. In this case, Mike perceives his son’s illness as a trial imposed by God, necessitating an active response. Viewing medical advances as gifts from God, Christians are encouraged to accept these instruments rather than reject divine wisdom (Johnstone, 2019). To align with beneficence and nonmaleficence principles, Mike should seek medical assistance, integrating faith with medical interventions. Trusting God and utilizing medical tools ensures the child’s well-being, demonstrating responsibility in cherishing God’s gifts.

Spiritual Assessment Benefits

Recognizing diverse patient needs, contemporary healthcare professionals advocate for spiritual assessments to facilitate holistic care. Various assessment instruments, including open-ended interviews, prove effective in identifying patients’ values and beliefs (Timmins & Caldeira, 2017). In this case, a spiritual assessment would provide insight into Mike’s values, enabling the physician to craft arguments supportive of recommended treatments. The assessment could involve consultation with other professionals and the hospital’s chaplain to guide the family effectively. By addressing spiritual needs, the physician could enhance relationships, fostering greater patient compliance and cooperation.

Conclusion

Mike faces challenging decisions that can impact his son’s life profoundly. Rooted in Christian faith, Mike can find strength by perceiving the trial as a call to action and appreciating divine wisdom. The physician, through a spiritual assessment, could tailor communication to align with Mike’s values, promoting collaboration. In navigating this delicate situation, Mike’s faith, integrated with medical interventions, can guide decisions that prioritize the child’s well-being.

References

Hubbard, R., & Greenblum, J. (2019). Parental decision making: The best interest principle, child autonomy, and reasonableness. HEC Forum, 31(3), 233-240.

Johnstone, M. J. (2019). Bioethics: A nursing perspective (7th ed.). Chatswood, NSW: Elsevier Health Sciences.

Lawrence, D. J. (2007). The four principles of biomedical ethics: A foundation for current bioethical debate. Journal of Chiropractic Humanities, 14, 34-40.

Timmins, F., & Caldeira, S. (2017). Assessing the spiritual needs of patients. Nursing Standard, 31(29), 47-53.

Ubel, P. A., Scherr, K. A., & Fagerlin, A. (2017). Empowerment failure: How shortcomings in physician communication unwittingly undermine patient autonomy. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(11), 31-39.

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example Five

Introduction

Considering religion and spirituality is crucial in healthcare, acknowledging individual variations in religious, spiritual, and philosophical inclinations. Healthcare professionals, despite personal beliefs, must prioritize ethical decision-making for prompt medical attention (Lawrence, 2007). This case, exemplified by James, emphasizes the central role of healing in nursing, treating human life as invaluable and created in God’s image. The case delves into how a parent’s choices impact family dynamics in the context of a child’s health.

Question 1

Adhering to the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, which prioritize patient well-being, the doctor asserts that Mike’s judgments, deemed detrimental to James, must be addressed. Balancing therapy advantages with costs and risks aligns with beneficence, while non-maleficence prioritizes the patient’s welfare (Bavinck & Sutanto, 2019). Despite respecting patient autonomy, the physician may need to proceed with necessary treatments to avert harm, ensuring the patient’s access to medical care (Kabbur, 2013).

Sickness and Health

The Christian perspective views illness as an inevitable part of life, fostering fortitude, character, and hope through trials (Romans 5:3-4). Despite environmental sources of sickness, faith remains pivotal for healing, emphasizing trust in God’s promises (Hebrews 11:6). While illness is not desired, God’s presence brings comfort and hope to the afflicted (Mariottini, 2018).

Medical Intervention

Christians perceive medical assistance as a divine gift, emphasizing faith in the synergy of medical intervention and religious belief. Seeking timely medical attention is endorsed, acknowledging God’s provision of knowledge to physicians (Sirach, Chapter 38). Faith in medical intervention aligns with the belief in God’s healing gifts.

Recommendation Action for Mike

Mike’s decisions, influenced by a misunderstanding of Biblical narratives, may conflict with universal principles of good and evil. Advocating for a kidney transplant aligns with Christian values, considering it an act of love akin to Jesus’ example. Despite the difficulty, choosing a transplant for James, supported by Samuel, aligns with preserving life, emphasizing the potential for a healthy and normal life with one kidney.

Spiritual Needs Assessment

James’ physical pain and Mike’s spiritual distress necessitate a spiritual assessment. Recognizing the interplay of religious beliefs and health, a spiritual examination aids in understanding perspectives, fostering tailored solutions. The HOPE questions and Joint Commission’s Spiritual Assessment provide valuable insights, enhancing patient-doctor relationships and promoting better outcomes.

Conclusion

Religious beliefs significantly influence medical decisions, necessitating healthcare professionals’ training in spiritual needs assessment. Understanding and respecting patients’ religious views ensure compassionate and high-quality treatment. A proper spiritual examination fosters comprehension between healthcare providers and patients, contributing to improved outcomes.

References

Anandarajah, G. (2005). Doing a Culturally Sensitive Spiritual Assessment: Recognizing Spiritual Themes and Using the HOPE Questions. Virtual Mentor,7(5). doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.cprl1-0505

Bavinck, H., & Sutanto, N. G. (2019). Christian worldview. Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway.

Biblica Inc. (2011). Romans 5:3-4 New International Version. Retrieved from Bible Gateway

Kabbur, G. (2013). American Medical Association Journal of Ethics.

Lawrence DJ. (2007). The four principles of biomedical ethics: a foundation for current bioethical debate. Journal of Chiropractic Humanities, (14), 34–40. Retrieved from EBSCOhost

Mariottini, C. (2018, July 13). A Christian Perspective on Illness. Retrieved from Claude Mariottini

Shelly, J. A., & Miller, A. B. (2006). Called to care: A Christian worldview for nursing (2nd ed.).

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example Six

In today’s era, remarkable strides have been achieved in medical science. Despite these progressions, a considerable number still lean towards relying on spirituality and religion instead of conventional medical approaches. Conversely, medical professionals often overlook the spiritual requirements of patients, neglecting to guide them through intricate medical decisions. This paper seeks to scrutinize a case involving a paternal postponement of medical intervention rooted in a belief in miracles and prayers.

Decision-Making and Autonomy

An imperative facet of medical ethics is patient autonomy and the prerogative of decision-making. When dealing with minors, the principles of autonomy and decision-making frequently present a quandary. In the specified case, Mike’s decision, grounded in religious belief, was detrimental to James’s health, warranting intervention by the physician. While parental decisions hold significance in childcare, physicians working with minors are duty-bound to discuss all options, balancing “respecting children’s rights and liberties while protecting them from harm” (Strom-Gottfried, 2008). The ethical and legal responsibility of the physician was to intervene in the decision, preventing potential harm to James (Katz et al., 2016). The delayed intervention resulted in increased deterioration, necessitating permanent dialysis and a kidney transplant.

Medical health practitioners bear the responsibility of safeguarding minors at risk of medical neglect (Katz et al., 2016). Upon identifying potential harm due to parental decisions, the physician is legally and professionally obligated to report parents to relevant authorities. Continuing life-saving intervention, even against parental objections, aligns with the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence.

Christian View Regarding Health and Sickness

Long-standing religious beliefs have significantly influenced individual healthcare practices and perspectives on sickness, health, and healing. The notion that good health is a reward for virtuous deeds while sickness may be a form of divine punishment or a test of faith has persisted. In James’s case, Mike initially viewed the illness as a test from God, resorting to prayer for recovery. However, as uncertainties arose, questioning his faith, Mike pondered if this was divine punishment. Such reflections are common among the religious, attributing illness to a lack of devotion. This perspective on health and sickness can adversely influence healthcare choices, as evident in Mike’s inclination towards prayer over medical interventions.

Christianity, while acknowledging the importance of faith, encourages followers to seek medical treatment in times of illness. The scripture in Matthew 9:12 emphasizes the need for medical attention when one is unwell. This underlines the freedom of Christians to seek professional medical consultation, recognizing medical science as a divine gift for their well-being. Viewing the human body as a temple, Christians are obliged “to honor God with your bodies” (1 Corinthians 6:19-20). Hence, caring for the body through medical means aligns with Christian values.

As a Christian, Mike needs to ensure that his decisions uphold the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence. Trusting healthcare professionals as agents of God for treatment aligns with preserving life, combining prayer and medical intervention for the best outcome.

Spiritual Assessment

Conducting a spiritual needs assessment is instrumental in identifying the spiritual needs of patients and their families. It aids physicians in providing support aligned with religious beliefs, offering insights into conflicting beliefs affecting medical decisions (Isaac et al., 2016).

The spiritual assessment aims to address religious beliefs through tools exploring dimensions such as purpose, values, transcendental experiences, and self-identity (Monod et al., 2010). Physicians, while not providing spiritual guidance, can direct patients to appropriate pastoral care. Chaplains are better suited to inform patients about the risks of forgoing treatment and may effectively persuade patients on the importance of medical intervention.

References

Isaac, K., Hay, J., & Lubetkin, E. (2016). Incorporating Spirituality in Primary Care. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(3), 1065–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0190-2

Katz, A. L., Webb, S. A., & COMMITTEE ON BIOETHICS. (2016). Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics, 138(2), e20161485. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1485

Monod, S. M., Rochat, E., Büla, C. J., Jobin, G., Martin, E., & Spencer, B. (2010). The spiritual distress assessment tool: An instrument to assess spiritual distress in hospitalized elderly persons. BMC Geriatrics, 10(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-10-88

New International Version. (2011). Bible Gateway passage: Matthew 9 – New International Version. Bible Gateway. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%209&version=NIV

Rumun, A. J. (2014). INFLUENCE OF RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON HEALTHCARE PRACTICE. 2(4), 12.

Strom-Gottfried, K. (2008). The Ethics of Practice with Minors: High Stakes, Hard Choices. Lyceum Books.

Boost Your Grades with Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services at ReliablePapers.com

Are you feeling overwhelmed by tough nursing paper topics? Look no further – at ReliablePapers.com, we take pride in being the best nursing paper writing service. If the examples provided on [PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Examples] don’t suffice for your paper, entrust our expert nursing essay writers to craft a unique, customized nursing essay tailored to your requirements.

Worried about plagiarism? Our skilled professionals guarantee originality, ensuring you submit a paper that stands out and secures you the best grades. What’s more, our online nursing papers come at exceptionally affordable prices, making top-notch academic assistance accessible to every college student.

Why struggle with a complex topic, tight deadlines, or specific instructions when we’ve got your back? From writing your nursing assignments to providing valuable guides, ReliablePapers.com is your go-to destination. Ready to place an order? It’s a breeze! Click on our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Invest in your academic success by letting us perfect your nursing papers. Our experts deliver top-quality nursing essays tailored to your instructions, providing unparalleled assistance for every topic, deadline, and set of instructions. Seek the help of professional essay writers at ReliablePapers.com and save time for what truly matters.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Assignment Example

NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Assignment Example

NURS FPX 4010 Assessment 2: Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Assignment Brief: NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Course: NURS FPX 4010 Leading People, Processes, and Organizations in Interprofessional Practice

Assignment Title: Assessment 2: Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Assignment Overview:

This assignment aims to enhance students’ understanding of healthcare challenges, particularly understaffing, through an interview with a nurse manager, and to explore interdisciplinary solutions using change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches. By looking into real-world scenarios and theoretical frameworks, students will gain insights into the complexities of healthcare management and develop critical thinking skills.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

This assignment is designed to:

  1. Enhance your interviewing skills and ability to extract relevant information from a healthcare professional.
  2. Develop critical thinking regarding the identified healthcare challenge (understaffing) and its multifaceted impact.
  3. Apply theoretical frameworks, specifically Kurt Lewin’s change model and democratic leadership, to propose interdisciplinary solutions.
  4. Explore collaboration approaches that contribute to effective interdisciplinary teams in healthcare settings.

The Student’s Role:

As a student, your role involves:

  • Planning and executing a semi-structured interview with a nurse manager, ensuring thoughtful and relevant questions.
  • Analyzing the identified healthcare challenge, emphasizing interdisciplinary aspects.
  • Applying change theories and leadership concepts to propose viable solutions.
  • Engaging in critical thinking to explore collaboration approaches that contribute to the overall effectiveness of interdisciplinary healthcare teams.

NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Assignment Example

Interview Summary

I conducted an interview with a registered nurse working in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a local hospital. The nurse, a female in her late twenties, has accumulated five years of experience in the mentioned hospital. Her responsibilities include administering medications, evaluating vital signs, performing diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and monitoring medical equipment.

The nurse highlighted a critical issue in the hospital’s safety culture, emphasizing its inadequacies. Despite existing safety protocols, medical errors are prevalent, and there is a pervasive culture of concealing mistakes rather than reporting them. Recent management changes triggered an investigation into medical errors, but the results are pending.

The nurse attributed the prevalence of medical errors to a lack of collaboration. While interdisciplinary teams exist, there is a tendency for blame-shifting between physicians and nurses. The nurse acknowledges the potential benefits of interdisciplinary teamwork but notes issues such as a lack of trust, physicians’ dominance, and inadequate nurse participation in decision-making.

Issue Identification

The identified issue is the deficient safety culture in the hospital, leading to a high incidence of medical errors. The lack of a collaborative environment exacerbates the problem, hindering effective communication and cooperation among healthcare professionals. An interdisciplinary approach is essential to address these challenges, fostering a culture of safety and improving collaboration.

Change Theories for an Interdisciplinary Solution

To address the issue, the Five As Behavior Change Model can be applied. This model involves assessing the situation, advising on the benefits of change, agreeing on specific goals, assisting in overcoming barriers, and arranging a comprehensive plan. The interdisciplinary team, following this model, would assess current behaviors and beliefs related to safety, advise on the benefits of a safety culture, agree on specific safety goals, assist in overcoming barriers, and arrange a comprehensive plan for implementation.

This model has demonstrated effectiveness in various settings and is supported by the study conducted by Lopez-Jeng and Eberth (2019). Their research, published in a peer-reviewed journal, provides a current and credible foundation for implementing the Five As Behavior Change Model.

Leadership Strategies for an Interdisciplinary Solution

Transformational leadership is identified as the most suitable strategy to address the safety culture issue. Healthcare professionals need support, encouragement, and guidance rather than a punitive approach. Transformational leaders inspire and motivate teams toward a shared vision, promoting collaboration and fostering a positive work environment.

Research by Kagan, Porat, and Barnoy (2019) supports the effectiveness of transformational leadership in shaping the quality and safety culture in hospitals. Published in a peer-reviewed journal, this study provides credible insights into the impact of leadership strategies on patient satisfaction and safety culture.

Collaboration Approaches for Interdisciplinary Teams

For effective collaboration within interdisciplinary teams, a transformational leadership approach is recommended. Each team should have a leader who acknowledges the need for change and values input from all members. Additionally, involving patients in the creation of a safety culture, as suggested by Kagan et al. (2019), can enhance the interdisciplinary approach.

The hospital’s prior research on medical errors provides an opportunity to evaluate the current safety culture based on the perspectives of healthcare professionals, administrators, and patients. This approach helps identify weaknesses and barriers to establishing a robust safety culture.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the interview with the ICU nurse highlighted a critical issue in the hospital’s safety culture, leading to a high incidence of medical errors. An interdisciplinary approach, guided by the Five As Behavior Change Model and supported by transformational leadership, is recommended to address the identified issue. Collaboration within interdisciplinary teams, incorporating the perspectives of healthcare professionals and patients, is crucial for the successful implementation of a safety culture. This foundation will inform the development of a comprehensive plan in the subsequent phases of the project.

References

Kagan, I., Porat, N., & Barnoy, S. (2019). The quality and safety culture in general hospitals: Patients’, physicians’, and nurses’ evaluation of its effect on patient satisfaction. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 31(4), 261-268.

Lopez-Jeng, C., & Eberth, S. D. (2019). Improving hospital safety culture for falls prevention through interdisciplinary health education. Health Promotion Practice.

Tetuan, T., Ohm, R., Kinzie, L., McMaster, S., Moffitt, B., & Mosier, M. (2017). Does systems thinking improve the perception of safety culture and patient safety? Journal of Nursing Regulation, 8(2), 31-39.

NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Assignment Example Two

Summary

The interviewee for Assessment Two is an Advanced Certified Oncology Nurse Practitioner at a major cancer center. Due to the prevailing COVID-19 situation, the interview was conducted telephonically, utilizing a set of questions provided for the assessment as a basic guide. The interview, conducted in a semi-structured manner, was recorded. The cancer center comprises various disciplines, including surgical, radiation, and medical oncologists, pain management specialists, social workers, psychologists, nurse practitioners, and discipline-specific nursing staff. Notably, the cancer center recently transitioned from an independent medical oncology practice to becoming part of the Christian Care Health System, signifying a significant cultural shift. The nurse practitioner’s primary responsibilities include coordinating between disciplines, writing referrals and orders, managing chemotherapy, pain management, education, and follow-up calls.

A pertinent issue highlighted by the nurse practitioner is the encroachment of disciplines beyond their defined scope of practice, leading to interference in the responsibilities of other disciplines. This issue is exacerbated by a perceived lack of strong motivational leadership to aid the oncology practice in adapting to its new role within the larger corporation. Additionally, while the organization emphasizes teamwork, true interprofessional collaboration is limited, and a silo mentality prevails. The interviewee’s attempt to contribute to a collaborative team was met with resistance, reflecting a need for effective leadership and a shift in organizational culture.

Issue Identification

The primary issue identified during the interview is the infringement of one discipline into the scope of practice of another, resulting in a disruption of patient care. Examples include the medical oncology group managing a patient’s pain until it is deemed uncontrolled, at which point the patient is referred to the pain management group. Challenges arise when patients experience uncontrolled pain and communicate this to their medical oncologist, raising questions about the appropriate course of action. The multidisciplinary approach is deemed suitable for addressing this issue, with evidence supporting interprofessional practice for improved patient care, safety, and prevention of medical errors (Bosch & Mansel, 2015).

Change Theory

Change theory, as applied to the organization, involves understanding the existing culture, beliefs, and values that influence the organization’s openness to change. Kurt Lewin’s Field Theory is considered relevant in this context, offering a framework for analyzing group behavior and environmental factors. The goal is to identify and modify forces that hinder or promote change. The application of Lewin’s theory is crucial for targeting the cultural shift needed within the organization, encouraging collaboration as the norm.

Leadership Strategy

Effective leadership is identified as a crucial component for driving organizational change and fostering interprofessional collaboration. The transformational leadership style, characterized by charisma, inspiration, effective communication, and empowerment, is deemed suitable for the current situation. The existing leadership is perceived as weak, lacking communication and transparency. A transformational leader is seen as instrumental in guiding the cancer center toward an interdisciplinary approach.

Collaborative Approach

The literature emphasizes a collaborative approach centered on putting the patient first. This patient-centric focus serves as an equalizer, aligning individual team members’ interests with patient interests. Active and respectful communication is highlighted as a tool for building interprofessional collaboration, emphasizing the importance of a common language and standardized communication methods. Interprofessional rounding is suggested as a beneficial practice to prevent disciplines from infringing on each other’s practices and gain insights into preventing future issues.

Conclusion

In conclusion, change theory, leadership, and collaborative practice are identified as essential tools for improving healthcare. Change theory provides a mechanism for understanding and altering organizational culture, but effective leadership is required to drive and motivate the workforce toward interdisciplinary practice. Patient-centric collaboration and open communication are proposed as fundamental principles for fostering a collaborative approach. The integration of these tools can lead to a positive shift in organizational culture, promoting true interprofessional collaboration for enhanced patient care and safety.

References

Batras, D., Duff, C., & Smith, B. J. (2015). Organizational change theory: Implications for health promotion practice. Health Promotion International, 31(2), 231-241.

Bergstedt, K., & Wei, H. (2020). Leadership strategies to promote frontline nursing staff engagement. Nursing Management, 48-53.

Bosch, B., & Mansel, H. (2015). Interprofessional collaboration in healthcare: Lessons to be learned from competitive sports. CPJRPC, 176-179.

Hussain, S. T., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. H. (2016). Kurt Lewin’s change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3, 125-127.

Tomasik, J., & Flemming, C. (2015). Lessons from the field: Promising interprofessional collaboration practices. Retrieved from www.rwjf.org/en/library/research/2015/03/lessons-from-the-field.html

NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Assignment Example Three

Summary of the Interview

The interview followed a semi-structured approach to gain insights from a nursing colleague regarding her organization, its past and current challenges, her role and responsibilities, the effectiveness of interventions, impacts on diverse populations, the role of nurse leaders, leadership strategies, and interdisciplinary collaboration within the organization (McIntosh & Morse, 2015). The colleague works in a profit-based acute healthcare facility with 75 beds, utilizing advanced technologies such as automated EHRs, patient monitoring systems, telemedicine, error reporting software, and data analytics for nursing informatics to enhance care quality. As an ICU nurse, her duties encompass monitoring, recording patient data, ordering diagnostics tests, coordinating with healthcare professionals, administering medication, treating wounds, and educating patients and families.

The interview, conducted in a flexible style, allowed the interviewee ample opportunity to express perspectives. Open-ended questions were utilized to delve deeper into healthcare issues, with a focus on statistics and benchmarks to gauge issue severity. Past challenges such as resistance to implementing technology were addressed through nurse training, transformational leadership, and the hiring of specialized nurses.

Identified Issue from the Interview

While various issues require interdisciplinary collaboration, the significant concern is medication errors, demanding a collaborative approach involving nurses, physicians, lab technicians, pharmacists, informatics nurses, and pain management nurses (Srinivasamurthy et al., 2021). Collaboration is essential due to the involvement of multiple healthcare professionals, making it challenging to detect errors and identify root causes. Delays in patient care due to communication gaps can threaten patient safety. A blame culture further complicates the issue, involving different stakeholders and potentially compromising patient care (Tena et al., 2018).

Analysis of Potential Change Theories

Lewin’s change theory, with stages of unfreezing, moving, and refreezing, is deemed suitable for addressing the issue. While driving forces include quality of care and patient safety, resistance forces center around a blame culture. This theory facilitates unfreezing the current process, implementing change, and refreezing to establish the change, fostering collaboration and shared decision-making (Smith & Gullett, 2019). Rogers’ theory, with stages of awareness, interest, evaluation, implementation, and adoption, complements Lewin’s model, focusing on motivating professionals to adopt change and evaluating outcomes (Smith & Gullett, 2019). Spradley’s eight-step change theory emphasizes evaluation and stabilization, supporting change implementation through collaborative efforts.

Leadership Strategies

To address potential resistance, transformational and servant leadership styles are recommended, involving strategies like group discussions, understanding stakeholders’ perspectives, motivation, action plans for collaboration, support provision, fostering an inclusive work environment, root-cause analysis to reduce blame culture, and establishing direct communication channels. Sharing the workload during medication administration through effective staffing and scheduling can further enhance collaboration (Jember et al., 2018).

Collaborative Approaches from the Literature

Various collaborative models have been proposed in the literature. Manias (2018) suggests a multimodal interdisciplinary collaboration model, encompassing communication tools, logs, collaborative medication review, adherence to protocols, direct involvement of pharmacists, and collaborative conferences and workshops. Tena et al. (2018) propose root-cause analysis with a safety checklist to identify discrepancies in patient information. Jember et al. (2018) and Srinivasamurthy et al. (2021) highlight the positive impact of a medication error system integrated with computerized physician entry, involving all stakeholders to reduce medication errors.

References

Ahrq.gov. (2020). How do you measure fall rates and fall prevention practices? [URL].

Hunitie, M. (2016). A cross-sectional study of the impact of transformational leadership on integrative conflict management. Asian Social Science, 12(5), 47. [DOI]

Jember, A., Hailu, M., Messele, A., Demeke, T., & Hassen, M. (2018). Proportion of medication error reporting and associated factors among nurses: a cross-sectional study. BMC Nursing, 17(1). [DOI]

Manias, E. (2018). Effects of interdisciplinary collaboration in hospitals on medication errors: an integrative review. Expert Opinion On Drug Safety, 17(3), 259-275. [DOI]

McIntosh, M., & Morse, J. (2015). Situating and constructing diversity in semi-structured interviews. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 2, 233339361559767. [DOI]

Smith, M., & Gullett, D. (2019). Nursing theories and nursing practice (5th ed.). F A Davis.

Srinivasamurthy, S., Ashokkumar, R., Kodidela, S., Howard, S., Samer, C., & Chakradhara Rao, U. (2021). Impact of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) on the incidence of chemotherapy-related medication errors: a systematic review. European Journal Of Clinical Pharmacology. [DOI]

Tena, R., League, S., & Brennan, J. (2018). Preventing wrong site, wrong procedure, wrong patient errors. Nursing Made Incredibly Easy!, 16(3), 10-13. [DOI]

Weller, S., Vickers, B., Bernard, H., Blackburn, A., Borgatti, S., Gravlee, C., & Johnson, J. (2018). Open-ended interview questions and saturation. PLOS ONE, 13(6), e0198606. [DOI]

NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Assignment Example Four

Interview Summary

I conducted a telephonic interview with Mr. Kelly (pseudonym), the nurse manager at Sanford Medical Center, Bismarck. The facility, comprising a team of specialists, emphasizes healthcare excellence through a combination of compassionate patient care, expertise, and advanced technology. Mr. Kelly oversees financial and human resources, maintains care standards and quality, ensures staff and patient satisfaction, and fosters a safe environment. In the interview, I posed the following questions:

  1. What is the main challenge facing your organization?
  2. How does this problem affect the ability to complete your duties?
  3. How have you or your organization tried to address this problem?
  4. Does your organization have a culture of collaboration?

Mr. Kelly acknowledged understaffing, particularly in the nursing department, as the primary challenge. Shortages in the emergency department compromise patient care quality, leading to nurses working extended hours. The resultant stress contributes to physical, mental, and emotional health issues among nurses, affecting patient satisfaction. Sanford Medical Center addresses understaffing by retaining nurses through a supportive work environment, flexible staffing schedules, and initiatives to prevent burnout. The organization also emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration, exemplified by a situation where teamwork proved effective during a patient influx.

Issue Identification

The issue of understaffing necessitates discussions on teamwork and interdisciplinary communication to enhance nursing unit efficiency, patient safety, and care quality (Hensel et al., 2017). Teamwork skills improvement and interdisciplinary communication integration from psychology, management, and social studies can address this challenge (Tuaminen et al., 2016).

Change Theories for Interdisciplinary Solution

Kurt Lewin’s three-step model offers an interdisciplinary solution to understaffing. The model involves unfreezing, moving, and refreezing. Nursing education serves as a solution, with awareness creation, sustained efforts for change, and post-implementation evaluations (Sutherland, 2013).

Leadership Strategies for Interdisciplinary Solution

Democratic leadership, involving participative decision-making, fosters collaboration in addressing understaffing. This approach encourages engagement, values collaboration, and leverages individual strengths and talents (Smith et al., 2018).

Collaboration Approaches for Interdisciplinary Teams

Creating trusting communication, implementing team-building activities, and recognizing achievements contribute to efficient interdisciplinary teams (Tappen, 2016). Open-plan offices, team-building workshops, and recognition initiatives foster collaboration and positive interaction among nursing staff.

References

Hensel, K. O., van den Bruck, R., Klare, I., Heldmann, M., Ghebremedhin, B., & Jenke, A. C. (2017). Nursing staff fluctuation and pathogenic burden in the NICU-effective outbreak management and the underestimated relevance of non-resistant strains. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1-7.

Tuominen, O. A., Lundgren-Laine, H., Kauppila, W., Hupli, M., & Salanterä, S. (2016). A real-time Excel-based scheduling solution for nursing staff reallocation. Nursing Management, 23(6).

Morley, L., & Cashell, A. (2017). Collaboration in health care. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 48(2), 207-216.

Tappen, R. M. (2016). They know me here: Patients’ perspectives on their nursing home experiences. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 21(1).

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 4010 Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Assignment

Assessment 2 Instructions: Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification

Top of Form

Bottom of Form

  • PRINT
  • For this assessment, you will create a 2-4 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach, and review best practices and evidence to address the issue.

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, your participation and leadership in interdisciplinary teams will be vital to the health outcomes for your patients and organization. One way to approach designing an improvement project is to use the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement describes it thus:

The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is shorthand for testing a change in the real work setting—by planning it, trying it, observing the results, and acting on what is learned. This is the scientific method adapted for action-oriented learning…Essentially, the PDSA cycle helps you test out change ideas on a smaller scale before evaluating the results and making adjustments before potentially launching into a somewhat larger scale project (n.d.).   

You might also recognize that the PDSA cycle resembles the nursing process. The benefit of gaining experience with this model of project design is that it provides nurses with an opportunity to ideate and lead improvements. For this assessment, you will not be implementing all of the PDSA cycle. Instead, you are being asked to interview a health care professional of your choice to determine what kind of interdisciplinary problem he or she is experiencing or has experienced in the workplace. This interview, in Assessment 2, will inform the research that you will conduct to propose a plan for interdisciplinary collaboration in Assessment 3.

It would be an excellent choice to complete the PDSA Cycle activity prior to developing the report. The activity consists of four questions that create the opportunity to check your understanding of best-practices related to each stage of the PDSA cycle. The information gained from completing this formative will promote your success with the Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification report. This will take just a few minutes of your time and is not graded.

Reference

Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). How to improve. Retrieved from https://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx

Demonstration of Proficiency

    • Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
  • Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
  • Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
  • Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
    • Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
  • Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
    • Describe change theories and a leadership strategy that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
  • Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
    • Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Professional Context

This assessment will introduce the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model to create change in an organization. By interviewing a colleague of your choice, you will begin gathering information about an interprofessional collaboration problem that your colleague is experiencing or has experienced. You will identify a change theory and leadership strategies to help solve this problem.

Scenario

This assessment is the first of three related assessments in which you will gather interview information (Assessment 2);  design a proposal for interdisciplinary problem-solving, (Assessment 3); and report on how an interdisciplinary improvement plan could be implemented in a place of practice (Assessment 4). At the end of the course, your interviewee will have a proposal plan based on the PDSA cycle that he or she could present to stakeholders to address an interdisciplinary problem in the workplace.

For this assessment, you will need to interview a health care professional such as a fellow learner, nursing colleague, administrator, business partner, or another appropriate person who could provide you with sufficient information regarding an organizational problem that he or she is experiencing or has experienced, or an area where they are seeking improvements. Consult the Interview Guide [DOCX] for an outline of how to prepare and the types of information you will need to complete this project successfully.

Remember: this is just the first in a series of three assessments.

Instructions

For this assessment, you will report on the information that you collected in your interview, analyzing the interview data and identifying a past or current issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary approach. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently being used. You will discuss the interview strategy that you used to collect information. Your interview strategy should be supported by citations from the literature. Additionally, you will start laying the foundation for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal (Assessment 3) by researching potential change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to issue you have identified. Please be certain to review the scoring guide to confirm specific required elements of this assessment. Note that there are differences between basic, proficient and distinguished scores.

When submitting your plan, use the Interview and Issue Identification Template [DOCX], which will help you to stay organized and concise. As you complete the template, make sure you use APA format for in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that are informing your plan, as well as for the reference list at the end.

Additionally, be sure to address the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

  • Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
  • Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
  • Describe potential change theories and a leadership strategies that could inform an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
  • Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could facilitate establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
  • Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, and using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

  • Length of submission: Use the provided template. Most submissions will be 2 to 4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old. 
  • APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.

Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.

 

Interview and Interdisciplinary Issue Identification Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization. Does not summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization. Discusses an interview, but the focus of the interview, the issues addressed, or the specifics of health care organizational context are unclear or missing. Summarizes an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization. Summarizes an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization. Notes strategies employed in the interview to ensure that sufficient information was gathered.
Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate. Does not identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate. Identifies an issue with an unclear connection to the interview or for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach seems inappropriate. Identifies an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate. Identifies an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate, providing one or more specific reasons to justify this approach.
Describe potential change theories and a leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Does not describe potential change theories and a leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Identifies change theories and leadership strategies that are unclear, incomplete, or irrelevant to developing an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Describes potential change theories and leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Describes potential change theories and a leadership strategies that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue. Notes which sources seem most credible or relevant to the specific organizational issue.
Describe collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue. Does not describe collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue. Identifies collaborative approaches from the literature but the relevance to establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue is unclear or insufficiently explained. Describes collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue. Describes collaborative approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue. Notes which sources seem most credible or relevant to the specific organizational issue.
Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style. Does not communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style. Communicates inconsistently, using writing that is unclear, illogically organized, and/or containing numerous errors in grammar or APA style. Communicates with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style. Communicates with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style with no errors.

Achieve Academic Success with Our Expert Nursing Essay Writers at ReliablePapers.com!

Are you feeling overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Do tight deadlines and specific instructions make the essay writing process seem impossible? Look no further – ReliablePapers.com is here to save you time and secure the grades you deserve! As the best nursing paper writing service company, we offer unparalleled expertise and professionalism.

Our expert nursing essay writers specialize in writing custom nursing papers for students, ensuring that your assignment is not just good but exceptional. If the provided samples are insufficient for your paper or you wish for a unique and customized nursing essay, our professionals are ready to assist. Say goodbye to plagiarized papers, as our writers guarantee original content tailored to your instructions.

Worried about the cost? Our online nursing papers are available at incredibly affordable prices, catering to all college students. Whether you need assistance with a complex topic, have a tight deadline, or seek a guide for your nursing assignments, ReliablePapers.com has got you covered.

Ready to take the first step toward academic success? Click on our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Seek the help of professional essay writers from ReliablePapers.com, and save time for what matters most. Your journey to outstanding academic achievements begins with us!

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS FPX 4040 Assessment Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators

NURS FPX 4040 Assessment Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators

Capella NURS FPX 4040 Assessment 4: Informatics and Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicators

Assignment Brief: NURS FPX 4040 Assessment Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators

Course: NURS FPX 4040 Managing Health Information and Technology

Assignment Title: Assessment Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators

Assignment Overview:

This assignment aims to deepen your understanding of informatics and its role in Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators (NSQIs). Focusing on the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) framework, you will explore the significance of nursing-sensitive indicators, their impact on patient outcomes, and the integration of informatics to enhance nursing care.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

This assignment aims to enhance your comprehension of nursing-sensitive quality indicators, emphasizing the role of informatics in optimizing patient care outcomes. You will explore theoretical frameworks, legal considerations, and the practical application of technology in healthcare settings.

The Student’s Role:

As a student, your role is to engage critically with the NDNQI framework, select a specific nursing-sensitive quality indicator, and analyze its implications for patient care and organizational performance. Investigate the challenges faced by nurses and the potential benefits of informatics in addressing these challenges. Additionally, explore the legal and ethical responsibilities associated with accurate data reporting.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 4040 Assessment Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators Assignment

Prepare an 4-5 page paper on the importance of nursing-sensitive quality indicators.

As you begin to prepare this assessment you are encouraged to complete the Conabedian Quality Assessment Framework activity. Quality healthcare delivery requires systematic action. Completion of this will help you succeed with the assessment as you consider how the triad of structure (such as the hospital, clinic, provider qualifications/organizational characteristics) and process (such as the delivery/coordination/education/protocols/practice style or standard of care) may be modified to achieve quality outcomes.

The American Nursing Association (ANA) established the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI®) in 1998 to track and report on quality indicators heavily influenced by nursing action.

 

NDNQI® was established as a standardized approach to evaluating nursing performance in relation to patient outcomes. It provides a database and quality measurement program to track clinical performance and to compare nursing quality measures against other hospital data at the national, regional, and state levels. Nursing-sensitive quality indicators help establish evidence-based practice guidelines in the inpatient and outpatient settings to enhance quality care outcomes and initiate quality improvement educational programs, outreach, and protocol development.

The quality indicators the NDNQI® monitors are organized into three categories: structure, process, and outcome. Theorist Avedis Donabedian first identified these categories. Donabedian’s theory of quality health care focused on the links between quality outcomes and the structures and processes of care (Grove, Gray, Jay, Jay, & Burns, 2015).

Nurses must be knowledgeable about the indicators their workplaces monitor. Some nurses deliver direct patient care that leads to a monitored outcome. Other nurses may be involved in data collection and analysis. In addition, monitoring organizations, including managed care entities, exist to gather data from individual organizations to analyze overall industry quality. All of these roles are important to advance quality and safety outcomes.

The focus of Assessment 4 is on how informatics supports the monitoring of nursing-sensitive quality indicator data. You will develop an 8–10 minute audio (or video) training module to orient new nurses in a workplace to a single nursing-sensitive quality indicator critical to the organization. Your recording will address how data are collected and disseminated across the organization along with the nurses’ role in supporting accurate reporting and high-quality results.

Reference

Grove, S. K., Gray, J. R., Jay, G.W., Jay, H. M., & Burns, N. (2015). Understanding nursing research: Building an evidence-based practice (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

Competency 1: Describe nurses’ and the interdisciplinary team’s role in informatics with a focus on electronic health information and patient care technology to support decision making.

Describe the interdisciplinary team’s role in collecting and reporting quality indicator data to enhance patient safety, patient care outcomes, and organizational performance reports.

Competency 3: Evaluate the impact of patient care technologies on desired outcomes.

Explain how a health care organization uses nursing-sensitive quality indicators to enhance patient safety, patient care outcomes, and organizational performance reports.

Competency 4: Recommend the use of a technology to enhance quality and safety standards for patients.

Justify how a nursing-sensitive quality indicator establishes evidence-based practice guidelines for nurses to follow when using patient care technologies to enhance patient safety, satisfaction, and outcomes.

Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication to facilitate use of health information and patient care technologies.

Deliver a professional and effective audio tutorial on a selected quality indicator that engages new nurses and motivates them to accurately report quality data in a timely fashion.

Follow APA style and formatting guidelines for citations and references.

Preparation

This assessment requires you to prepare a 4-5 page paper on the importance of nursing-sensitive quality indicators. To successfully prepare for your assessment, you will need to complete the following preparatory activities:

Select a single nursing-sensitive quality indicator that you see as important to a selected type of health care system.

Conduct independent research on the most current information about the selected nursing-sensitive quality indicator.

Interview a professional colleague or contact who is familiar with quality monitoring and how technology can help to collect and report quality indicator data. You do not need to submit the transcript of your conversation, but do integrate what you learned from the interview into the audio tutorial. Consider these questions for your interview:

What is your experience with collecting data and entering it into a database?

What challenges have you experienced?

How does your organization share with the nursing staff and other members of the health care system the quality improvement monitoring results?

What role do bedside nurses and other frontline staff have in entering the data? For example, do staff members enter the information into an electronic medical record for extraction? Or do they enter it into another system? How effective is this process

Instructions

For this assessment, imagine you are a member of a Quality Improvement Council at any type of health care system, whether acute, ambulatory, home health, managed care, et cetera. Your Council has identified that newly hired nurses would benefit from comprehensive training on the importance of nursing-sensitive quality indicators. The Council would like the training to address how this information is collected and disseminated across the organization. It would also like the training to describe the role nurses have in accurate reporting and high-quality results.

The Council indicates a recording is preferable to a written fact sheet due to the popularity of audio blogs. In this way, new hires can listen to the tutorial on their own time using their phone or other device.

As a result of this need, you offer to create an audio tutorial orienting new hires to these topics. You know that you will need a script to guide your audio recording. You also plan to incorporate into your script the insights you learned from conducting an interview with an authority on quality monitoring and the use of technology to collect and report quality indicator data.

You determine that you will cover the following topics in your audio tutorial script:

Introduction: Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicator

What is the NDNQI®?

What are nursing-sensitive quality indicators?

Which particular quality indicator did you select to address in your tutorial?

Why is this quality indicator important to monitor?

Be sure to address the impact of this indicator on quality of care and patient safety.

Why do new nurses need to be familiar with this particular quality indicator when providing patient care?

Collection and Distribution of Quality Indicator Data

According to your interview and other resources, how does your organization collect data on this quality indicator?

How does the organization disseminate aggregate data?

What role do nurses play in supporting accurate reporting and high-quality results?

As an example, consider the importance of accurately entering data regarding nursing interventions.

Additional Requirements

References: Cite a minimum of three scholarly and/or authoritative sources.

APA: Submit along with the recording a separate Reference page that follows APA style and formatting guidelines. For an APA refresher, consult the APA Style and Formatpage on Campus.

NURS FPX 4040 Assessment Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators Example

Introduction

Welcome to this comprehensive tutorial on Nursing Informatics and Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicators. I’m [Your Name], and in this session, we’ll explore why nursing-sensitive quality indicators are crucial, focusing on patient safety, quality care outcomes, and the essential role of health informatics. Let’s dig into the dynamic relationship between healthcare structures, processes, and outcomes, emphasizing the importance of evidence-based practice and technology in nursing.

Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicators: A Foundation for Quality Care

Nursing-sensitive quality indicators, as defined by the American Nursing Association (ANA), are crucial measures reflecting the quality of organizational structures, processes, and outcomes in nursing care. These indicators play a vital role in enhancing patient safety and satisfaction while influencing organizational performance. For our tutorial, we will spotlight the nursing-sensitive quality indicator of patient falls.

Importance of Patient Falls as a Quality Indicator

Patient falls are a significant quality indicator due to their impact on patient safety and healthcare outcomes. According to the ANA, patient falls can lead to severe consequences, including extended hospitalization, physical injuries, and, in severe cases, fatalities. The rates of patient falls serve as a barometer for assessing the effectiveness of nursing practices and the overall safety of healthcare environments.

Collection and Distribution of Quality Indicator Data

Data Collection Through Health Information Systems

To monitor and improve patient safety practices, robust data collection mechanisms are crucial. Health information systems, including Electronic Health Records (EHRs), are instrumental in gathering and managing data related to nursing-sensitive quality indicators. During an interview with a senior information system executive, insights were gained into the role of technology in data collection and reporting.

Challenges and Opportunities in Data Collection

While health information systems provide a streamlined approach to data collection, challenges such as unrepresentative samples, lower response rates, and limited follow-up data persist. Our interviewee emphasized the need for continuous improvement in data collection tools, citing the benefits of web-based systems in accessing diverse populations and reducing costs.

Nurse’s Role in Accurate Reporting

Nurses play a pivotal role in supporting accurate reporting and achieving high-quality results. The accuracy of data, especially regarding nursing interventions, is crucial for informed decision-making. Integrating data into electronic medical records and other systems requires precision, and frontline staff’s effectiveness in this process contributes significantly to the reliability of quality indicator data.

Nursing Informatics: Empowering the Interdisciplinary Team

Nursing informatics encompasses the application of information technology in patient care, education, and organizational management. Let’s explore how nursing informatics empowers the interdisciplinary team:

Role of Nursing Informatics in Patient Care

Nursing informatics facilitates efficient data documentation, supports interdisciplinary collaboration, and enhances communication across different healthcare settings. Through electronic systems, nurses can collect, analyze, and report data, contributing to evidence-based decision-making in patient care.

Impact of Patient Care Technologies

Health information systems, including Electronic Health Records, have demonstrated transformative effects on patient care outcomes. Studies show that these systems reduce human errors, improve clinical outcomes, and enhance interdisciplinary coordination. The standardization of documentation procedures in EHRs contributes to positive patient outcomes, reducing information omissions and improving handover processes.

Technology for Quality and Safety: Electronic Health Records

Electronic Health Records (EHRs) are integral to enhancing quality and safety standards for patients. The adoption of EHRs has become widespread, with 96% of U.S. hospitals implementing these systems. The benefits of EHRs include increased organizational productivity, reduced documentation time, and improved access to complete and accurate patient information.

Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines

Nursing-sensitive quality indicators, such as patient falls, serve as a foundation for evidence-based practice guidelines. The systematic collection and analysis of data through EHRs enable organizations to identify areas for improvement. By implementing evidence-based guidelines derived from quality indicators, healthcare leaders can develop targeted interventions to prevent patient falls and enhance overall patient safety.

Conclusion

In conclusion, nursing-sensitive quality indicators are invaluable tools for measuring and improving organizational structures, processes, and outcomes in healthcare. Our focus on patient falls as a quality indicator highlights its significance in assessing patient safety and the effectiveness of nursing practices. Leveraging health informatics, particularly through EHRs, enhances the collection, analysis, and dissemination of quality indicator data, contributing to evidence-based practice and improved patient care outcomes.

Thank you for joining this tutorial on Nursing Informatics and Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicators. As healthcare professionals, your commitment to understanding and applying these concepts is essential for ensuring the delivery of high-quality and safe patient care.

References

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality – AHRQ (2019, September 7). Falls. Retrieved from https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer/falls.

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality – AHRQ (2013). 5. How do you measure fall rates and fall prevention practices? Retrieved from https://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/hospital/fallpxtoolkit/fallpxtk5.html.

Alotaibi, Y., and Federico, F. (2017). The Impact of Health Information Technology on Patient Safety. Saudi Medical Journal, 38(12), 1173–1180. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.12.20631.

Dellinger, A. (2017). Older Adult Falls: Effective Approaches to Prevention. Current Trauma Reports, 3(2), 118–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40719-017-0087-x.

Health IT. (2019). Improved Diagnostics and Patient Outcomes. Retrieved from https://www.healthit.gov/topic/health-it-and-health-information-exchange-basics/improved-diagnostics-patient-outcomes#footnote-1.

NURS FPX 4040 Assessment Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators Example Two

Hello everyone, I’m Rebecca, and I’m excited to welcome you to the RWJBarnabas Health nursing team. In this tutorial, I’ll help you understand how our facility uses Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators (NSQIs). NSQIs measure and assess the quality of nursing care, capturing elements influenced by nursing interventions. These indicators act as measures of effectiveness and outcomes, aiding in identifying areas for improved patient care.

Importantly, NSQIs, like pressure ulcers and patient satisfaction, help healthcare organizations spot areas of concern and implement targeted interventions to enhance patient care. They also inform evidence-based practice and evaluate the effectiveness of nursing interventions. Analyzing NSQI data reveals patterns, trends, and relationships, advancing nursing knowledge and best practices.

Now, let’s have a look at the National Database of Nursing-Sensitive Quality Indicators (NDNQI).

NDNQI, developed by Press Ganey and the American Nurses Association (ANA), is a comprehensive database collecting data on various nursing-sensitive indicators. It enables facilities to benchmark performance, track progress, and classify information into structure, process, and outcome indicators for standardized assessment.

Here’s how our nursing staff uses NDNQI ratios and an acuity system for staffing. The charge nurse assesses patient complexity using an acuity system, adjusting staffing levels accordingly. NDNQI includes nurse-to-patient ratios, monitored regularly to ensure adherence to guidelines. If ratios indicate inadequate staffing, adjustments are made for effective and safe patient care.

For instance, our facility addresses the increase in pressure ulcers among certain patient groups. Pressure ulcers impact care quality, Medicare reimbursement, and patient satisfaction. They also pose a financial burden on hospitals. Nurses actively engage in prevention through monthly training programs, staff meetings, and reporting data in Press Ganey surveys, contributing to NDNQI.

The interdisciplinary team, including nurses, plays a crucial role in data collection. Using tools like the Braden Scale, they assess patient risk factors, documenting in EHRs for reporting to NDNQI. This data informs quality improvement initiatives, resource allocation, and staff education, promoting a culture of safety.

As nurses, your role is vital. Using the Braden Scale, you assess, document, and report pressure ulcer data. This data drives quality improvement, resource allocation decisions, and staff education, contributing to positive patient outcomes.

Your actions impact healthcare on a broader scale. The data you provide supports research, informs evidence-based practice, and aids in protocols and guideline development. It also influences Medicare reimbursements, helping the facility thrive in the evolving healthcare landscape.

In conclusion, your role in NDNQI contributes to enhanced nursing practice, patient outcomes, and the future of healthcare. Welcome to the organization, and thank you for your dedication to making a difference in patients’ lives.

References:

Afaneh, T., Abu-Moghli, F., & Ahmad, M. (2021). Nursing-sensitive indicators: A concept analysis. Nursing Management, 28(3), 28–33.

Madaris, S. (2023, January 12). Your comprehensive guide to the Press Ganey National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI).

Padula, W. V., & Delarmente, B. A. (2019). The national cost of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in the United States. International Wound Journal, 16(3), 634–640.

Paulsen R. A. (2018). Taking nurse staffing research to the unit level. Nursing Management, 49(7), 42–48.

Smith, S., Snyder, A., McMahon, L. F., Jr, Petersen, L., & Meddings, J. (2018). Success in hospital-acquired pressure ulcer prevention: A tale in two data sets. Health Affairs, 37(11), 1787–1796.

NURS FPX 4040 Assessment Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators Example Three

Introduction

Ensuring high-quality care and patient safety is a fundamental goal for healthcare providers, with a focus on nursing staff and hospital administration. The American Nurses Association (ANA) addressed this by establishing the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI). This database reports unit-level performance data regularly to assist medical facilities in evaluating their nursing care delivery. This paper explores the significance of a specific nursing-sensitive quality indicator (NSI), Nosocomial Infections, in relation to patient safety, care outcomes, and organizational performance. It also examines the role of nurses in supporting accurate reporting and high-quality results, along with the collection and dissemination of nursing-sensitive quality indicator data across healthcare organizations.

Nursing Quality Indicators

NDNQI primarily focuses on collecting and assessing process, structure, and outcome indicators related to healthcare to enable nursing leadership and staff to review their performance regarding patient outcomes. Process indicators involve techniques of nursing interventions and patient assessment, such as nursing job satisfaction or Pediatric Pain Assessment, Intervention, Reassessment (AIR) Cycle. Structural indicators include nursing staff supply and their education, skill, and certification levels. Outcome indicators represent patient results sensitive to nursing care, such as falls and pressure ulcers. This paper specifically examines the nosocomial infections rate as it reflects medical quality and patient safety in hospitals.

Nosocomial Infection Indicator

Nosocomial infections, or Healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs), pose a significant global public health problem due to their impact on mortality and morbidity among hospitalized patients. In the USA alone, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports approximately 1.7 million cases of Healthcare-Acquired infections, resulting in over 98,000 deaths annually. Patients with surgical-associated infections spend an additional average of 6.5 days in the hospital. The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has further emphasized the critical importance of this issue for patient outcomes and safety.

Resilience to antibiotics is a concerning aspect, with about 50 percent of surgical-associated infections, especially Staphylococcus aureus and gram-negative bacilli, being antibiotic-resistant. Various types of HCAIs include Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI), Surgical Site Infection (SSI), Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI), and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP). Nursing staff, at the forefront of patient care, directly contribute to reducing infection transmission by following essential prevention procedures like hand hygiene, surface sanitation, sterilization, and using protective equipment.

Data Collection on the Quality Indicator

To address human factor-related errors, healthcare personnel need advanced technology support, such as the Health Information System (HIS). HIS is a documentation tool designed to manage, collect, store, and transmit healthcare data, including the patient’s electronic medical record (EMR) and Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS). EMR replaces traditional paper-based methods, providing accurate patient history, test results, and treatment information. CDSS offers health-related information, clinical guidelines, and diagnostic support, promoting decision-making.

HIS contributes to accuracy in documentation by aggregating information from different sources, selecting required tests for diagnosis, and facilitating clinical workflow. Despite challenges such as usability, interoperability, and scalability, HIS significantly improves staff expertise and computer literacy. It aids in monitoring and obtaining information about nosocomial infections, allowing healthcare organizations to develop a comprehensive picture of potential problem areas and provide excellent service.

Nurse’s Role in Supporting Accurate Reporting and High-Quality Results

An interdisciplinary team, including nurses, physicians, pediatricians, and clinical pharmacists, is crucial for the accurate collection and reporting of NSIs. Nurses play a key role in reporting adverse reactions to medications, changes in patients’ conditions, and entering relevant data into electronic medical records. Other stakeholders, such as office staff, managers, patients, and their families, are also responsible for providing correct information.

In conclusion, this paper emphasizes the importance of collecting and reporting data on nursing-sensitive quality indicators, focusing on Nosocomial Infections. HCAIs have significant implications for patient safety and outcomes, and the Health Information System serves as a vital tool in this context. Nurses, as part of interdisciplinary teams, contribute to accurate reporting, ensuring high-quality results and promoting patient safety.

References

Haque, M., Sartelli, M., McKimm, J., & Bakar, M. A. (2018). Health care-associated infections–an overview. Infection and Drug Resistance, 11, 2321-2333.

Healthcare-Acquired Infections (HAIs). (n.d.). PatientCareLink.

Infection prevention and control (n.d.). WHO.

Oliver, M. (2019). Communication devices and electronic aids to activities of daily living (5th ed.). In Atlas of Orthoses and Assistive Devices (pp. 403-417). Elsevier.

Sutton, R. T., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D. C., Sadowski, D. C., Fedorak, R. N., & Kroeker, K. I. (2020). An overview of clinical decision support systems: Benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3(1), 1-10.

NURS FPX 4040 Assessment Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators Example Four

At Community Hospital, our dedication to continuously assess and enhance patient care is unwavering. We are fortunate to contribute to the Nebraska Hospital Association (NHA), a state organization that collects and analyzes nursing data. Collaborating with other agencies, the NHA strives to develop effective processes for hospital nurses, fostering improvements in patient care. The NHA’s mission is to assist Nebraska hospitals in becoming leaders in the quality of care and safety they provide to patients. Currently, 61 Nebraska hospitals have pledged to lead in healthcare best practices, ensuring the quality and safety of every patient, as per information from Nebraskahospitals.org.

The NHA sends us annual quality surveys, crucial for gathering necessary data. Once obtained, the NHA provides facility-specific reports containing statistics and data. This information empowers us to implement processes that enhance the quality of care, patient safety, and staff performance. For instance, human resources utilizes these reports to assess staff retention, patient satisfaction, and other areas. Subsequently, appropriate departments receive these reports, initiating the development of plans to enhance patient care quality and safety. The data, collected from nurses actively engaged in their work, aids in retaining skilled nurses and ensuring the delivery of quality care.

One notable outcome of these efforts is the increase in patient satisfaction scores in various departments, including outpatient infusion, inpatient services, and the emergency department. Additionally, the focus on reducing 30-day readmission rates, which incur penalties for hospitals, has proven beneficial. Hospitals face reimbursement reductions for readmissions within 30 days, impacting both financials and the quality of care. Nurses, through their research and data analysis, have identified causes of readmissions, emphasizing their crucial role in patient safety.

Nurses, as key contributors, are responsible for collecting and reporting data to the NHA, playing an essential role in the interdisciplinary team. The data collected contributes significantly to improving patient safety and the overall patient experience. The simplicity of survey data entry ensures all team members can easily participate. Community Hospital’s quality team oversees data related to readmission rates, length of stay, incident reports, catheters, infections, and more.

Nurses at Community Hospital are entrusted with providing quality care based on best practices, thorough documentation, patient education, and identifying areas for further education. The impact of their work and data collection is substantial, potentially reducing readmissions and contributing to patients’ longer, healthier lives at home.

The data submitted for surveys provides valuable insights into patient care, influencing interventions and significantly impacting patient outcomes. The hospital’s quality improvement team utilizes this data to create and implement plans that enhance patient outcomes and safety. The team communicates updates to the NHA, outlining their plans for the collected data.

Through the CMS Value-Based Purchasing Program, acute care facilities receive incentive money for higher performance quality measures and improvements in quality and safety. Nurses’ efforts contribute to increased reimbursement and financial benefits for the facility, demonstrating the direct impact of their care.

In conclusion, our collaboration with the NHA offers a unique opportunity to positively influence nursing practices and enhance patient care and safety across the state. Nurses are urged to ensure complete and accurate documentation and timely completion of surveys. Nurse managers are committed to supporting nurses in these efforts, focusing on quality improvement and sharing data received. Every team member plays a crucial role in elevating the quality of patient care and safety, and their contributions are highly valued.

References:

CMS.gov – https://cms.gov

Nebraska Hospital Association – https://nha.org

Upadhyay, S., Stevenson, A., & Smith, D. (2019). Readmission rates and their impact on hospital financial performance. https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

NURS FPX 4040 Assessment Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators Example Five

Greetings esteemed members, I am Julian Nkem, and it is a pleasure to welcome some of the brightest minds in this field to contribute to our patients’ well-being. Today, I am excited to discuss our advancements in the healthcare system and how we are leveraging the Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators (NDNQI) approach to enhance the quality of care at Vila Health Hospital.

The NDNQI, introduced in 1998 by the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators, serves to track and report quality indicators influencing nurses’ performance in healthcare organizations (Merkley, 2018).

NDQI and Nursing Quality Indicators

At Vila Health Hospital, we utilize the NDNQI framework to assess hospital performance, comparing nursing actions against relevant data. This data aids in establishing evidence-based practice guidelines, enhancing both inpatient and outpatient strategies. Today’s presentation is part of our ongoing efforts to improve nursing care through educational and outreach programs.

Quality indicators under the NDNQI encompass structure, processes, and outcomes. Avedis Donabedian initially integrated these elements into the NDNQI framework. The four types of nursing-sensitive quality indicators include nurse-focused outcomes, patient-focused outcomes, organizational-focused indicators, and nursing-focused interventions and processes.

Chosen Indicator and Its Importance

Addressing the growing issue of medical errors causing stress and fatigue among nurses (Kieft, 2018), our focus is on Outcome Indicators related to the quantity and quality of nursing care. This choice aims to establish a link between nursing outcomes and organizational processes, emphasizing the need for nurses to be informed about these indicators.

Role of Nurses in Accurate Data Reporting

Nurses, integral to accurate data reporting, spend vital time on documentation and reporting. The Data Protection Act of 1988 emphasizes their responsibility to ensure patient safety through accurate record-keeping. Nurses play a crucial role in the legal, ethical, and professional duty of storing patient records accurately in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system, preventing misunderstandings, and promoting quality care.

Importance of the Indicator

Leveraging technology, such as Electronic Health Records (EHR), enhances nurses’ ability to handle daily tasks efficiently, ensuring error-free work and improved patient care outcomes (Gao, 2018). This nursing-sensitive quality indicator is essential for promoting evidence-based practices at Vila Health Hospital.

Why Nurses Need to Be Aware of This Indicator

Clinical documentation using IT systems, as suggested by Merkley (2018), aids in effective patient information presentation and medication accounting. It significantly contributes to the chosen nursing-sensitive quality indicator, impacting both the quantity and quality of nursing care at our hospital.

Collection and Distribution of Quality Indicator Data

The interview with Dr. Raymond Dallas, in charge of our ICU and psychiatric ward, emphasizes the importance of data collection speed. Nurses play a vital role in collecting and reporting data for NDNQI, ensuring accurate and timely entry through online surveys. Data is then analyzed and entered into the system to improve nursing care in our hospital.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Vila Health Hospital’s adoption of IT informatics positively impacts the quality of nursing care and patient safety. The chosen nursing-sensitive quality indicator, “nursing quality of care outcomes using IT informatics,” highlights the significance of accurate data entry by nurses to drive improvements in quality.

References:

Alharbi, J., Jackson, D., & Usher, K. (2020). Compassion fatigue in critical care nurses and its impact on nurse-sensitive indicators in Saudi Arabian hospitals. Australian Critical Care, 33(6), 553-559.

Gao, J. L., Liu, X. M., Che, W. F., & Xin, X. (2018). Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for haemodialysis using Delphi method. Journal of clinical nursing, 27(21-22), 3920-3930.

Kieft, R. A. M. M., Stalpers, D., Jansen, A. P. M., Francke, A. L., & Delnoij, D. M. J. (2018). The methodological quality of nurse-sensitive indicators in Dutch hospitals: A descriptive exploratory research study. Health Policy, 122(7), 755-764.

Merkley, J., Amaral, N., Sinno, M., Jivraj, T., Mundle, W., & Jeffs, L. (2018). Developing a Nursing Scorecard Using the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators®: A Canadian Hospital’s Experience. Nursing Leadership (Toronto, Ont.), 31(4), 82-91.

Myers, H., Pugh, J. D., & Twigg, D. E. (2018). Identifying nurse-sensitive indicators for stand-alone high acuity areas: A systematic review. Collegian, 25(4), 447-456.

Start, R., Matlock, A. M., Brown, D., Aronow, H., & Soban, L. (2018). Realizing momentum and synergy: Benchmarking meaningful ambulatory care nurse-sensitive indicators. Nursing Economics, 36(5), 246-251.

Thomas-Hawkins, C., Latham, C. E., & Hain, D. J. (2017). Emphasizing the Value of Nephrology Nursing Through Nursing-Sensitive Indicators: A Call for Action. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 44(4).

Achieve Academic Success with ReliablePapers.com – Your Trusted Nursing Paper Partner!

Are you grappling with challenging nursing research topics and looming deadlines? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we pride ourselves on being the best in the business, offering top-notch nursing paper writing services that cater to your unique needs.

Don’t let tough subjects overwhelm you; our dedicated team of expert nursing essay writers is here to provide tailored solutions. If the provided samples on [NURS FPX 4040 Assessment Informatics and Nursing Sensitive Quality Indicators Examples] aren’t sufficient, our professionals can craft an original, customized nursing paper that guarantees you the grades you desire.

Worried about plagiarism? With us, that’s a thing of the past. Our writers ensure that each essay is crafted from scratch, following your specific instructions. At surprisingly affordable prices, our online nursing papers cater to the budget constraints of every college student. We’re not just a writing service; we’re your go-to partner for academic success.

Ready to take the first step? Placing an order is a breeze! Click on our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and let our experts take it from there. Trust us to make your nursing papers perfect, freeing up your time for what matters most.

Embrace excellence with ReliablePapers.com – where your academic success begins.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NHS FPX 4000 Applying Ethical Principles Capella Essay Example

NHS FPX 4000 Applying Ethical Principles Capella Essay Example

NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 1: Applying Ethical Principles

Assignment Brief: NHS FPX 4000 Applying Ethical Principles Capella Essay

Course: NHS FPX 4000 Developing a Health Care Perspective

Assignment Title: Assessment 1: Applying Ethical Principles

Assignment Objectives:

The primary objective of this assignment is to evaluate the application of ethical principles in healthcare decision-making. Students are tasked with analyzing a case study involving ethical dilemmas, utilizing the ethical decision-making model, and demonstrating effective communication approaches. The focus is on understanding and resolving ethical challenges by applying key ethical principles in healthcare.

Overview of the Case Study:

The case study involves Dr. Angela Kerr, a pediatrician, and the parents of a 5-day-old baby, Ana. The parents, Jenna and Chris Smith, refuse to vaccinate Ana based on their beliefs associating vaccines with autism. Dr. Kerr faces an ethical dilemma as she navigates the tension between respecting parental autonomy and advocating for the well-being of the child and the community through vaccination.

Breakdown of the Assignment Instructions:

  • Analysis of Ethical Issues: Evaluate the ethical issues presented in the case study, considering the principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Discuss the conflicts between parental autonomy and public health concerns.
  • Ethical Decision-Making Model: Apply the ethical decision-making model, comprising moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior, to analyze Dr. Kerr’s actions. Assess how Dr. Kerr navigates the ethical dilemma and maintains a balance between respecting autonomy and promoting beneficence.
  • Effectiveness of Communication Approach: Examine Dr. Kerr’s communication approach. Evaluate the effectiveness of her communication in addressing the concerns of the parents and conveying the importance of vaccination. Discuss how communication contributes to ethical decision-making.
  • Resolving the Ethical Dilemma: Propose strategies for resolving the ethical dilemma presented in the case study. Consider additional sources and approaches Dr. Kerr could use to reinforce the importance of vaccination and address parental concerns while respecting autonomy.
  • The Student’s Role: Assume the role of a healthcare ethics analyst tasked with providing insights and recommendations to Dr. Kerr. Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of ethical principles and their practical application in healthcare scenarios.
  • Conclusion: Summarize the key findings and recommendations based on the analysis. Emphasize the significance of applying ethical principles in healthcare decision-making and resolving ethical dilemmas effectively.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NHS FPX 4000 Assignment: Applying Ethical Principles Capella Essay

Assessment 1 Instructions: Applying Ethical Principles Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles. Describe the issues and a possible solution in a 3-5-page paper. Introduction Whether you are a nurse, a public health professional, a health care administrator, or in another role in the health care field, you must base your decisions on a set of ethical principles and values. Your decisions must be fair, equitable, and defensible. Each discipline has established a professional code of ethics to guide ethical behavior. In this assessment, you will practice working through an ethical dilemma as described in a case study. Your practice will help you develop a method for formulating ethical decisions. Demonstration of Proficiency By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria: • Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of health care. • Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case. • Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care. • Summarize the facts in a case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it. • Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study. • Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study. • Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study. • Competency 4: Write for a specific audience, in appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards. • Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. • Write following APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references. Instructions Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. For this assessment, develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. In your assessment: 1. Access the Ethical Case Studies media piece to review the case studies you may use for this assessment. • Select the case most closely related to your area of interest and use it to complete the assessment. ▪ Note: The case study may not supply all of the information you need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any assumptions or speculations you make. • Include the selected case study in your reference list, using proper APA Style and Format. 2. Summarize the facts in a case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it. • Identify which case study you selected and briefly summarize the facts surrounding it. Identify the problem or issue that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge. • Identify who is involved or affected by the ethical problem or issue. • Access the Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece and use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) to analyze the ethical issues. ▪ Apply the three components outlined in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media. • Analyze the factors that contributed to the ethical problem or issue identified in the case study. ▪ Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed. 3. Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case. • In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation. The How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? library guide will help you locate appropriate references. (https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/peerreview) ▪ Cite and apply key principles from the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the ethical problem or issue. ▪ Review the Think Critically About Source Quality resource. • Assess the credibility of the information source. • Assess the relevance of the information source. 4. Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study. • Describe how the health care professional in the case study communicated with others. • Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively. • Explain which communication approaches should be used and which ones should be avoided. • Describe the consequences of using effective and non-effective communication approaches. 5. Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study. • Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or issue presented in the case study. • Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case. • Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care professionals. 6. Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study. • Describe the proposed solution. • Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization. • Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration. 7. Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. • Apply the principles of effective composition. • Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics. 8. Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references. • Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards. • Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.

NHS FPX 4000 Assignment: Applying Ethical Principles Capella Essay Example

Healthcare professionals often find themselves entangled in ethical dilemmas that demand careful consideration of ethical principles. In the case study “Incident 10: To vaccinate or not,” the Smith family, parents of a five-day-old newborn named Ana, expressed their decision to abstain from vaccinating their child due to perceived risks. Dr. Angela Kerr, the pediatrician, faced the ethical dilemma of balancing parental autonomy with the well-being of the child. This essay explores the ethical issues, analyzes the case using the Ethical Decision-Making Model, assesses communication effectiveness, and proposes a solution grounded in ethical principles.

Case Study Overview

The case study, “Incident 10: To vaccinate or not” (Capella, 2022), scrutinizes the decision-making process of the Smith family regarding their five-day-old newborn, Ana. Ana was born without complications in a community hospital, and her parents, Jenna and Chris Smith, expressed their intention to raise her naturally. This included exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months, preparing organic baby food, and abstaining from vaccinating Ana. Despite Dr. Kerr, the pediatrician, explaining the importance of vaccination, addressing myths, and providing information on safety, the Smiths remained firm in their decision, posing an ethical dilemma for Dr. Kerr.

Case Analysis Using Ethical Decision-Making Model

  • Moral Awareness: Moral awareness involves recognizing the presence of an ethical dilemma. In this case, the dilemma revolves around the Smiths’ decision not to vaccinate Ana. Dr. Kerr identifies the potential risks associated with their choice.
  • Moral Judgment: Dr. Kerr employs moral judgment by presenting facts and evidence to the Smiths. She highlights the benefits of vaccination, debunking myths and addressing concerns about autism. This step is crucial for informed decision-making.
  • Ethical Behavior: Dr. Kerr exhibits ethical behavior by respecting the autonomy of the Smiths while fulfilling her duty to advocate for Ana’s health. She provides reliable information, ensuring transparency and fostering shared decision-making.

Communication Effectiveness:

Dr. Kerr’s communication approach is characterized by active listening and informative dialogue. She acknowledges the Smiths’ concerns, discusses the benefits of vaccination, and introduces the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. While her communication is clear and non-judgmental, the Smiths remain firm in their decision.

Proposed Solution Applying Ethical Principles:

  1. Autonomy: Respecting the principle of autonomy, Dr. Kerr should acknowledge the Smiths’ right to make decisions for Ana. She can express understanding and validate their concerns, fostering a collaborative decision-making process.
  2. Beneficence: Considering beneficence, Dr. Kerr should continue providing information on the benefits of vaccination. Emphasizing the positive impact on Ana’s health and the community aligns with the principle of acting in the patient’s best interest.
  3. Non-Maleficence: To adhere to non-maleficence, Dr. Kerr must ensure that Ana is not intentionally harmed. By emphasizing the safety of vaccines and debunking misinformation, she safeguards Ana’s well-being.
  4. Justice: Justice demands fairness and equality. Dr. Kerr should underscore the role vaccination plays in protecting vulnerable individuals, contributing to community health. This aligns with the principle of justice in healthcare distribution.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the case study highlights the ethical dilemma surrounding parental decision-making on vaccination. Dr. Kerr’s approach incorporates ethical principles, emphasizing autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. The proposed solution encourages ongoing dialogue, education, and collaboration to address the Smiths’ concerns while safeguarding Ana’s health. Health care professionals must navigate such ethical challenges with sensitivity, effective communication, and a commitment to ethical principles.

References

Baumgaertner, B., Carlisle, J. E., Justwan, F. (2018). The influence of political ideology and trust on willingness to vaccinate. PLOS ONE, 13(1), e0191728. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191728

Capella University (2022). Incident 10: To vaccinate or not? https://media.capella.edu/CourseMedia/nhs4000element18655/wrapper.asp

Cole, J., Teegala, Y. (March 15, 2022). Motivational interviewing and vaccine acceptance in children: The MOTIVE study. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.01.058

NHS FPX 4000 Assignment: Applying Ethical Principles Capella Essay Example Two

Applying Ethical Principles

At some point in life, individuals encounter ethical dilemmas that challenge their moral principles or code of ethics. Healthcare professionals face ethical issues across diverse settings, and to fulfill their responsibilities, they can rely on the four basic ethical principles: autonomy, beneficence, maleficence, and justice (Vermont Ethics Network, 2011).

Case Study Overview

In response to an Ethical Case Study report at Capella University, Corey Davidson is appointed as the Emergency Department (ED) director at Crosby Community Hospital. Despite having a strong reputation, concerns about Corey’s age and declining health affecting his medical performance arise. Margaret Truman, the Director of Nursing, discusses Corey’s worries, highlighting his non-compliance with evidence-based protocols. Corey is now faced with an ethical dilemma: whether to revoke Dr. Lacy’s ED privileges or respect the clinical judgment of the community’s experienced physician.

Analysis of Ethical Issues

The primary issue in Corey’s ethical dilemma is Dr. Lacy’s resistance to adapting to new hospital rules and refusal to follow evidence-based protocols, potentially harming patient outcomes. Dr. Lacy’s practices, such as prescribing Lasix without a definitive diagnosis, raise concerns about patient safety and effective treatment.

Using the Ethical Decision-making Model

The ethical decision-making paradigm involves three phases: moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior (Capella, 2018a). Corey becomes ethically aware of Dr. Lacy’s performance issues when Margaret brings them to his attention. Corey’s moral judgment is clear when faced with the possibility of revoking Dr. Lacy’s ED credentials, guiding his subsequent ethical actions.

Effectiveness of Communication and Approach

Open communication is crucial, and Corey’s availability for staff communication allows him to be informed about hospital concerns. However, closed-loop communication and clarification could improve the situation. Miscommunication arises as Corey doesn’t question Dr. Lacy’s awareness of new rules, affecting the overall understanding of the issue.

Resolving the Ethical Dilemma by Applying Ethical Principles

Corey’s ethical dilemma can be addressed by considering the principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and fairness. Beneficence and nonmaleficence guide Corey’s duty to act in the patient’s best interest, and Dr. Lacy’s non-compliance may warrant revocation of ED privileges. Consultation with Dr. Lacy and exploring alternative diagnostic methods, like POCUS, can enhance communication and collaboration.

Conclusion

The ethical decision-making model, influenced by the four ethical principles, aids healthcare professionals like Corey in navigating ethical dilemmas. In this case, Corey’s dilemma regarding Dr. Lacy’s performance is resolved through a comprehensive approach that considers autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and fairness.

References

American Medical Association. (2001). AMA principles of medical ethics. Retrieved from AMA Principles of Medical Ethics

Capella University (2018a). Ethical Decision-Making Model. Retrieved from Capella University Website: NHS-FP4000 course room.

Capella University (2018b). Old School or Out of Touch? Ethical Case Studies. Retrieved from Capella University Website: NHS-FP4000 course room.

Long, B., Koyfman, A., & Chin, E. J. (2018). Misconceptions in acute heart failure diagnosis and Management in the Emergency Department. The American journal of emergency medicine, 36(9), 1666-1673.

Vermont Ethics Network. (2021). Medical Ethics / Health Care Ethics. Vermont Ethics Network

NHS FPX 4000 Assignment: Applying Ethical Principles Capella Essay Example Three

In healthcare settings, ethical challenges frequently arise, creating a pivotal moment for healthcare professionals and patients where decision-making becomes intricate. To guide medical practitioners in navigating ethical scenarios, four ethical standards were established—autonomy, emphasizing each individual’s right to make their own choices; beneficence, dedicated to prioritizing the patient’s best interests; non-maleficence, focusing on healthcare professionals’ responsibility to protect patients from harm; and justice, promoting fairness and equality for all individuals. These principles serve as a framework for addressing ethical dilemmas in the healthcare environment (Levitt, 2014). While they may not always offer definitive solutions, these principles assist healthcare workers in making the most informed clinical judgments and decisions possible amid challenging situations.

Overview of the Case Study

The case study titled “To Vaccinate, or Not” presents a scenario involving two parents, Jenna and Chris, who opt not to vaccinate their 5-day-old child, Ana. Their preference is to nurture their daughter naturally, encompassing exclusive breastfeeding for the initial six months, utilizing organic baby food, and refraining from immunization. Their decision is informed by researched information associating vaccines with autism, leading them to believe that the potential risks outweigh the benefits of vaccination for their daughter. In contrast, Ana’s pediatrician, Dr. Kerr, counters this information, strongly advocating for Ana to receive full vaccination. Dr. Kerr underscores the significant reduction in fatal infections achieved through vaccinations and highlights the role of vaccines in eradicating diseases like measles in the United States. She also elaborates on the regular updates maintained by government databases such as the Vaccination Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), funded by the CDC and FDA, which track vaccine safety data. Additionally, Dr. Kerr emphasizes the importance of vaccinations in protecting children who cannot receive them due to medical reasons. Despite Dr. Kerr’s evidence-based explanations, the Smiths persist in their decision, creating an ethical dilemma for the pediatrician.

Analysis of Ethical Issues in the Case Study

Dr. Kerr faces a significant ethical challenge as the Smiths decline to vaccinate Ana, potentially jeopardizing her health. As a healthcare provider, Dr. Kerr is required to possess extensive knowledge and confidence in advocating for the undeniable benefits and safety of immunizations on behalf of Ana (De St. Maurice & Edwards, 2016). Upon hearing the Smiths’ reasons and the comprehensive research that led to their decision, Dr. Kerr finds herself compelled to advocate for the health of her patient by providing education to the parents. This situation gives rise to an ethical dilemma centered around the principles of autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence.

Autonomy, the concept that individuals have the right to make decisions for themselves, is a foundational principle. However, in this specific scenario involving a baby like Ana, the responsibility for decision-making lies with her parents. Beneficence reflects the physician’s commitment to act in the patient’s best interest, upholding various moral principles to prevent harm. Simultaneously, non-maleficence underscores the physician’s obligation to refrain from causing harm to others. In this case, Dr. Kerr unequivocally believes that vaccinating Ana is the optimal decision, as the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the associated risks. This ethical dilemma emerges from the clash between the parents’ autonomy in decision-making and Dr. Kerr’s commitment to beneficence and non-maleficence in safeguarding Ana’s well-being.

Ethical Decision-Making Model to Analyze the Case Study

The Ethical Decision-Making Model involves three integral components: moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior. Of these, moral awareness, signifying the identification and acknowledgment of ethical considerations, stands out as the most crucial element. Dr. Kerr’s moral awareness is palpable in this case, evident when she openly acknowledges her disagreement with Ana’s parents’ decision not to immunize her. The sensitivity to one’s values and morality plays a pivotal role in shaping moral understanding.

Moral judgment, the process of deciding between right and wrong, is influenced by individual differences, cognitive biases, and organizational culture. Dr. Kerr’s righteous judgment is evident as she provides Ana’s parents with accurate and well-informed information, aiming to assist them in making an informed decision. This reflects her commitment to navigating the ethical complexities surrounding vaccination decisions.

Finally, ethical behavior encompasses taking the appropriate actions to address the identified issues. Dr. Kerr’s ethical behavior is manifest in her recommendation to Ana’s parents that the child be vaccinated because it is in her best interest. In this way, Dr. Kerr translates her moral awareness and judgment into ethical actions, aligning with her duty to advocate for the well-being of her patient.

Effectiveness of Communication Approaches in the Case Study

The effectiveness of communication approaches in the case study is notable in Dr. Kerr’s conscientious efforts to engage with Ana’s parents. Her communication strategies are characterized by attentiveness, non-judgmental demeanor, and a commitment to understanding the parents’ perspectives. Dr. Kerr’s ability to listen sensitively to their reasoning fosters an open and respectful dialogue, creating an environment conducive to effective communication.

Maintaining a non-judgmental attitude is identified as a crucial element in the communication process. Dr. Kerr’s approach reflects this principle, ensuring that Ana’s parents feel comfortable expressing their thoughts and preferences without the fear of being judged. This open-mindedness contributes to building trust, a fundamental component in delivering high-quality patient care.

Recognizing the importance of parental consent in the decision-making process, Dr. Kerr employs informative data to convey facts about the effectiveness of immunization. Specifically, she addresses the parents’ concerns about a perceived link between vaccines and autism, debunking this notion with evidence-based information. Dr. Kerr’s responses are grounded in research findings, such as the lack of evidence supporting thimerosal’s role in causing autism.

Overall, Dr. Kerr’s communication approach is characterized by respect for parental opinions and decisions. By combining attentiveness, non-judgmental communication, and evidence-based information, she strives to encourage Ana’s parents to reconsider their beliefs while respecting their autonomy in the decision-making process.

Resolving the Ethical Dilemma by Applying Ethical Principles

In resolving the ethical dilemma presented in this case study, Dr. Kerr grapples with considerations related to autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Although Ana is her patient, being under the age of 18 means that her parents hold the authority to make decisions regarding her health. Dr. Kerr demonstrates respect for autonomy by actively listening to Ana’s parents and refraining from pressuring them to vaccinate her. However, she also upholds the principle of beneficence by advocating for Ana’s health and recommending immunization as a beneficial course of action.

Furthermore, Dr. Kerr exhibits non-maleficence by imparting information to Ana’s parents about the positive aspects of vaccination, emphasizing that immunization is the healthiest choice for their child. To enhance the effectiveness of her communication, it may be advantageous to provide Ana’s parents with additional resourceful data regarding the benefits of immunizations and dispelling any misconceptions, such as the alleged link to autism. Dr. Kerr’s suggestion to use credible sources aligns with evidence-based practices, potentially influencing the parents’ perspectives and motivating them to reconsider their decision.

In conclusion, this case underscores the critical role of ethical concepts in guiding healthcare workers to make sound clinical judgments and decisions in challenging situations. Dr. Kerr’s approach reflects a commitment to ethical principles and a consideration of the well-being of the patient, highlighting the importance of navigating such dilemmas with respect, informed communication, and a focus on promoting health.

References

De St. Maurice, A., & Edwards, K. (2016). Vaccine Hesitancy in Children—A Call for Action. Children, 3(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/children3020007

Esernio-Jenssen, D., & Offit, P. (2020). Don’t hesitate–vaccinate! Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 13(3), 337-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-020-00324-y

Levitt, D. (2014). Ethical Decision-Making in a Caring Environment: The Four Principles and LEADS. Healthcare Management Forum, 27(2), 105–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcmf.2014.03.013

NHS FPX 4000 Application of Ethical Principles: Capella Essay Example Four

Applying Ethical Principles

In a healthcare setting, ethical decision-making principles are crucial to navigate diverse situations. The primary ethical principles in healthcare encompass justice, autonomy, nonmaleficence, and beneficence (Jill Day et al., 2018). Autonomy involves informed consent, sharing accurate information, and maintaining confidentiality. These principles serve as a framework for guiding health practitioners in ethical decision-making across various scenarios, including assisting patients in making informed decisions about their health.

Overview of the Case Study

L. Straight, the director of Hopewell Hospital, is considering reducing Dr. Cutrite’s privileges due to his deteriorating physical and mental state owing to age. Despite the decline in Dr. Cutrite’s capabilities, Straight, influenced by his political standing, continues to recommend him for various procedures. A significant incident arises when a plastic syringe needle protector is left in a patient’s belly after surgery, leading to an ethical dilemma. The operating room supervisor reports the issue without expressing concern, and the surgical team, including Dr. Cutrite, downplays the mistake. Straight plans to recall the patient without disclosing the truth, adding an unethical dimension to the situation (Capella, 2022).

Analysis of Ethical Issues

This case unfolds multiple ethical dilemmas within healthcare. Firstly, Straight fails to fulfill his role by not reducing Dr. Cutrite’s responsibilities, disregarding the doctor’s declining physical and mental condition. Secondly, the surgical team’s response to the mistake, especially Dr. Cutrite’s directive against taking action and Straight’s intention to conceal the error from the patient, raises ethical concerns. Leaving a plastic syringe protector in a patient’s body is a serious mistake with potential health risks, and the lack of urgency and transparency in addressing it is unethical. Dr. Cutrite’s use of influence to dissuade action further compounds the ethical issues.

Applying the Ethical Decision-Making Model

The ethical decision-making model consists of three components: moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior. Straight demonstrates moral awareness by recognizing the ethical dilemma and considering recalling the patient. However, his judgment is flawed as his intention is to conceal the details, resulting in unethical behavior. In contrast, the health practitioners, including Dr. Cutrite and the supervisor, lack moral awareness, and their judgment leads to a course of action that neglects ethical considerations.

Effectiveness of Communication Approaches

Effective communication is pivotal in healthcare to ensure quality outcomes (Buljac-Samardzic et al., 2020). In this case, communication breakdowns contribute to ethical lapses. The failure to report the mistake in a timely manner, the nonchalant reporting by the supervisor, and the lack of reprimand for Dr. Cutrite’s actions all indicate ineffective communication. Timely and accurate information sharing, coupled with a focus on patient safety, could have averted the potential harm caused by the oversight.

Solution

Resolving ethical concerns within healthcare requires adherence to principles such as justice, autonomy, nonmaleficence, and beneficence. Beneficence dictates acting in the best interest of patients, while nonmaleficence prohibits causing harm. In this case, failure to adhere to these principles resulted in harm to the patient. The ethical dilemma involves autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. The practitioners’ intention to hide the truth and Dr. Cutrite’s influence on clinical decisions placed the patient at risk. Adhering to these principles would guide the practitioners toward ethical behavior, ensuring patient well-being.

Conclusion

Patient health should be the paramount concern in healthcare, guided by the application of ethical principles. These principles offer a framework for health practitioners to make ethically sound decisions. In the presented case study, Straight faces the decision of recalling the patient and informing them of the mistake, as well as demoting Dr. Cutrite—both actions aligning with ethical behavior. The resolution to such cases lies in promoting principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, and autonomy to address ethical dilemmas effectively.

References

Buljac-Samardzic, M., Doekhie, K. D., & van Wijngaarden, J. D. (2020). Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade. Human resources for health, 18(1), 1-42.

Capella. (2022). Ethical Case Studies. Retrieved from https://media.capella.edu/CourseMedia/nhs4000element18655/wrapper.asp

Capella.edu. (2022). Ethical Decision-Making Model. Retrieved from https://media.capella.edu/CourseMedia/nhs4000element18816/wrapper.asp

Jill Day, B. G. S., LDA, R., CDA, C., & Sarah Stream, B. A. (2018). Ethics in the Dental Office: Autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice should guide your decisions. Dental Assistant, 87(4), 8-9.

Spoljar, D., Curkovic, M., Gastmans, C., Gordijn, B., Vrkic, D., Jozepovic, A., … & Borovecki, A. (2020). Ethical content of expert recommendations for end-of-life decision-making in intensive care units: A systematic review. Journal of critical care, 58, 10-19.

Achieve Academic Excellence with ReliablePapers.com – Your Trusted Nursing Paper Writing Service

Are you struggling with challenging nursing topics or facing tight deadlines for your assignments? Look no further – at ReliablePapers.com, we take pride in being the best nursing paper writing service that caters to all your academic needs. Our team of expert nursing essay writers is here to save your time and elevate your grades.

If the provided samples on [NHS FPX 4000 Applying Ethical Principles Capella Essay Examples] are not sufficient for your paper, our professionals can craft a unique, customized nursing essay tailored to your specific instructions. Say goodbye to the stress of submitting plagiarized papers; trust us to deliver original and flawless content that guarantees you the grades you deserve.

Worried about the cost? Our online nursing papers come at incredibly affordable prices, making academic assistance accessible to every college student. Whether you need help with coursework writing, want to buy an essay online safely, or seek nursing assignment help, we’ve got you covered.

Ready to take the first step toward academic success? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, and proceed to checkout. Once you complete the payment, your order will be assigned to a suitable expert. Our writers are ready to provide outstanding nursing essay papers, written from scratch, on any topic, within any deadline, and following any instructions.

Save time for what matters most and let ReliablePapers.com be your partner in achieving academic excellence. Seek professional nursing essay writers from us today!

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS4221 FADE Performance Improvement Model Example

NURS4221 FADE Performance Improvement Model ExampleAssignment Brief: NURS4221 FADE Performance Improvement Model Example

Overview:

This assignment aims to apply the FADE Quality Improvement Model to address a generic practice problem in a healthcare setting. The focus is on understanding, implementing, and assessing the effectiveness of the FADE model in enhancing overall healthcare performance.

Assignment Objectives:

  • Apply the FADE Quality Improvement Model to a generic healthcare practice problem.
  • Analyze each phase of the FADE model and its application in resolving the identified issue.
  • Collaborate with relevant stakeholders in the healthcare setting to gather information and implement FADE strategies.
  • Assess the outcomes of the implemented FADE model, considering its impact on healthcare processes and overall patient satisfaction.
  • Communicate the findings and recommendations in a structured essay format.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

The primary goal is to understand and apply the FADE Quality Improvement Model, a systematic approach designed to enhance performance and patient satisfaction in healthcare settings. The specific practice problem is intentionally left broad, allowing students to apply the FADE model to a variety of scenarios, from workflow inefficiencies to communication challenges.

The Student’s Role:

As a student, your role is to:

  1. Select and thoroughly understand a generic practice problem within a healthcare setting.
  2. Explore and comprehend the FADE Quality Improvement Model, focusing on its four phases: Focus, Analyze, Develop, and Execute.
  3. Collaborate with relevant individuals in the healthcare setting, such as healthcare professionals and administrators, to gather information about the existing challenges and potential solutions.
  4. Apply the FADE model systematically to develop and implement action plans to address the identified practice problem.
  5. Evaluate the effectiveness of the implemented FADE strategies, considering both quantitative and qualitative data related to healthcare processes and overall stakeholder satisfaction.
  6. Communicate your findings, insights, and recommendations in a well-structured essay, adhering to the provided guidelines and ensuring clarity in conveying the application of the FADE model.

Assignment Structure:

Introduction:
  • Briefly introduce the FADE Quality Improvement Model.
  • Clearly state the chosen generic practice problem within a healthcare setting.
  • Provide a thesis statement outlining the application of the FADE model to address the generic issue.
Literature Review:
  • Explore the principles and concepts of the FADE model.
  • Review scholarly sources discussing the FADE model in healthcare.
  • Highlight the relevance of the FADE model in addressing performance issues in various healthcare scenarios.
FADE Model Application:
  • Break down each phase of the FADE model: Focus, Analyze, Develop, and Execute.
  • Apply these phases to the identified generic practice problem, detailing specific actions and strategies within each phase.
Results and Discussion:
  • Present the outcomes of implementing the FADE model, focusing on improvements in the chosen healthcare scenario.
  • Discuss any challenges faced during the implementation and potential solutions.
Conclusions and Recommendations:
  • Summarize the research problem, procedures, and results within the context of the FADE model.
  • Emphasize the relationship between findings and literature review, focusing on FADE principles.
  • Provide recommendations for future research and ongoing improvements using the FADE model.
References:
  • Compile a comprehensive reference list following the specified citation style.

Ensure that your essay is well-organized, logically structured, and effectively communicates your understanding and application of the FADE Quality Improvement Model in addressing the chosen generic practice problem within the healthcare setting.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS4221 FADE Performance Improvement Model Application Paper

Choose a Quality Improvement Model from Chapter 5 in the Spath (2018) textbook, and apply this model to your practice problem. Please do not choose Lean or Six Sigma as your quality model unless you have an expert in these quality models in your organization to guide you through the process.

PDSA (p.124).

RCI (p.127).

FOCUS PDCA (p.128).

FADE (p.129).

Post a Discussion entry describing the model that you selected and how each step of the model will be used to develop the plan for the Practice Experience Project. Continue to collaborate with the selected individuals in your practice environment as needed in the development of the Practice Experience Project, and share this information with your group.

NURS4221 FADE Performance Improvement Model Example

Ensuring timely and efficient healthcare delivery is crucial, especially when it comes to administering medications. Drug rounds play a vital role in nursing practice, directly impacting patient care and satisfaction. Unfortunately, delays in this essential task are common, particularly during the 1700 hours round, coinciding with the end of visiting hours and potential distractions. Leveraging the FADE Performance Improvement Model, it is possible to address this challenge, streamline drug rounds, and improve the overall patient experience.

The FADE model has four essential phases: Focus, Analyze, Develop, and Execute that provides a structured framework for quality improvement. In the Focus phase, the specific problem is identified—delayed drug rounds, especially during the 1700 hours timeframe. Observations, nurse logs, and data analysis help discern potential challenges, like increased patient calls and nurse workload. The importance of timely drug administration, as highlighted by Miller et al. (2020), underscores the critical nature of addressing consistent delays during the 1700 hours round (Smith & Johnson, 2019).

Transitioning to the Analyze phase, a deeper exploration involves root cause analysis to unveil the fundamental reasons behind the delays. Patient calls are identified as contributing factors, but deeper issues like workflow inefficiencies and inadequate nurse resource allocation also emerge (Jones et al., 2021). This understanding aligns with the recommendations of Brown & White (2018), emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach to tackle delays in medication administration.

With a clear understanding of the root causes, the progression to the Develop phase ensues, where actionable solutions are formulated. Addressing patient calls may involve stricter enforcement of visiting hours by hospital security, coupled with improved communication strategies to manage family expectations (Williams et al., 2019; Anderson & Davis, 2020). Additionally, delegating non-critical tasks to registered nurses during the 1700 hours round is considered to alleviate the workload (Smith et al., 2022).

The Execute phase brings the plan to life, with interventions piloted in specific wards or during designated shifts. Data on drug round completion times, staff feedback, and patient satisfaction are crucial for assessing the effectiveness of the strategies. Continuous evaluation and adaptation are deemed essential for optimizing the implemented solutions and ensuring long-term success.

In the pilot phase, initial findings indicate a noticeable improvement in drug round completion times, supported by positive staff feedback and enhanced patient satisfaction scores (Johnson & Brown, 2021). Ongoing evaluation and adjustments are crucial to optimize the interventions and ensure sustained improvements over time.

The results of this initiative are analyzed in the final section, highlighting the impact on drug round timeliness, staff workload, and patient satisfaction. Challenges encountered during execution, such as resistance to stricter visiting hours, will be addressed through ongoing communication and collaboration with stakeholders (Brown et al., 2023). The scalability of these interventions to other units or settings will be explored, considering the unique dynamics of each healthcare environment (Smith & Anderson, 2021).

The FADE model, with its systematic analysis, targeted interventions, and emphasis on continuous improvement, provides a powerful tool for addressing complex challenges within healthcare. Applying it to the specific issue of delayed drug rounds aims to streamline medication administration and foster a culture of quality improvement. The 1700 hours challenge, though formidable, can be transformed into a catalyst for enhanced patient care and a more efficient healthcare system.

Conclusions and Recommendations

In conclusion, the application of the FADE model to address delayed drug rounds has proven effective in improving overall healthcare efficiency. Continuous monitoring and adaptation of interventions are vital for sustaining positive outcomes. Recommendations include ongoing collaboration with stakeholders, regular staff training on communication strategies, and periodic reviews to ensure the continued success of the implemented solutions (Jones & Williams, 2022). The FADE model’s systematic approach offers a replicable framework for addressing similar challenges in other healthcare units and settings, providing a pathway for continuous improvement in patient care.

References

Anderson, A., & Davis, R. (2020). Effective Communication Strategies in Healthcare. Journal of Nursing Communication, 12(3), 45-57.

Brown, E., & White, L. (2018). Addressing Medication Administration Delays: A Comprehensive Approach. Journal of Nursing Excellence, 5(2), 78-91.

Brown, J., Smith, M., & Johnson, P. (2023). Overcoming Challenges in Medication Rounds: Lessons Learned. Journal of Healthcare Improvement, 8(1), 112-125.

Johnson, R., & Brown, A. (2021). Evaluation of Interventions to Improve Drug Round Efficiency. Journal of Patient Safety & Quality Improvement, 6(2), 87-98.

Smith, R., Anderson, J., & Davis, S. (2022). Delegating Tasks to Improve Drug Round Efficiency. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 7(1), 55-68.

Achieve Academic Success with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Service

Are you facing challenges tackling tough nursing topics? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we pride ourselves on being the best nursing paper writing service company that can save you time and guarantee the grades you deserve. Our expert nursing essay writers are here to provide you with a unique, customized nursing essay tailored to your specific instructions.

If the sample on [NURS4221 FADE Performance Improvement Model Example] isn’t sufficient for your paper, trust our professionals to craft an original and plagiarism-free nursing paper. We understand the importance of delivering quality content, and our affordable online nursing papers cater to the budget constraints of college students.

Whether you’re dealing with a complex research topic related to nursing, a tight deadline, or specific instructions, our pro writers are here to cover you. From nursing assignment help to coursework writing assistance, our team is dedicated to ensuring your academic success. Ready to place your order? Simply visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, and proceed to checkout for a seamless experience.

Don’t compromise on quality – let our experts help you secure the grades you deserve.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS 6053 IO001 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Example

NURS 6053 IO001 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue AssignmentNURS 6053 IO001 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Assignment

NURS 6053 IO001 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Assignment Brief

Course: NURS 6053 – Interprofessional Organizational and Systems Leadership

Assignment Title: NURS 6053 IO001 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Assignment

Assignment Instructions Overview

In this assignment, you will undertake an analysis of a significant healthcare issue, focusing on how national trends impact organizational leadership practices. This assignment will involve a detailed examination of a selected healthcare stressor and its implications within your work setting. The objective is to understand the broader context of healthcare issues and propose actionable strategies based on scholarly research and practical insights.

Understanding Assignment Objectives

The primary objective of this assignment is to develop a comprehensive understanding of a national healthcare issue or stressor and its specific impact on your organization. This includes:

  • Analyzing the Issue: Identify and describe a relevant healthcare issue or stressor, providing detailed context and data to illustrate its significance.
  • Reviewing Literature: Summarize and synthesize findings from scholarly articles that address strategies to manage the identified issue.
  • Proposing Solutions: Suggest evidence-based strategies that could be implemented in your organization, discussing potential positive and negative outcomes.

The Student’s Role

As a student, your role is to act as an analyst and advisor to your organization’s leadership team. You are expected to:

  • Conduct thorough research on the selected healthcare issue or stressor.
  • Gather and analyze relevant organizational data to illustrate the impact of the issue.
  • Critically evaluate scholarly resources to identify effective strategies used by other organizations.
  • Develop a well-structured white paper that presents your findings and recommendations in a clear and concise manner.

Competencies Measured

This assignment is designed to measure several key competencies:

  • Critical Thinking and Analysis: Evaluate complex healthcare issues and stressors using data and scholarly research.
  • Research Skills: Identify, review, and synthesize relevant scholarly articles and organizational data.
  • Communication: Effectively communicate your findings and recommendations to a leadership audience.
  • Problem-Solving: Propose actionable strategies that address organizational challenges related to national healthcare trends.
  • Leadership Insight: Understand the implications of healthcare trends on leadership practices and organizational performance.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS 6053 – Interprofessional Organizational and Systems Leadership Course:

NURS 6053 IO001 Healthcare Environment Review of Current Healthcare Issues Discussion Assignment Example

NURS 6053 IO002 Professionalism Organizational Policies and Practices to Support Healthcare Issues Assignment Example

NURS 6053 IO001 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Example

Introduction

The healthcare landscape in the United States is fraught with complex challenges. One of the most pressing issues is nurse burnout, which significantly impacts the healthcare system’s ability to deliver high-quality care. This paper analyzes nurse burnout, its effects on our organization, and strategies employed by other organizations to mitigate this issue. It also explores potential strategies for our organization to address nurse burnout effectively.

Description of Nurse Burnout and Its Impact on the Organization

Nurse burnout is characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a reduced sense of personal accomplishment, leading to decreased job performance and increased turnover rates. According to data from our organization, there has been a noticeable increase in absenteeism and turnover rates among nurses over the past two years, correlating with an increase in patient complaints about care quality.

Quantitatively, our turnover rate for nurses has increased by 15% in the last year, leading to significant recruitment and training costs. Additionally, our patient satisfaction scores have dropped by 10%, and we have seen a 20% increase in medication errors, which are often attributed to overworked and stressed nursing staff.

Review of Articles Addressing Nurse Burnout

Article Summaries

Kelly, L., Gee, P. M., & Butler, R. J. (2021). The article “Impact of nurse burnout on organizational and patient outcomes” explores how nurse burnout negatively affects patient care quality, increases healthcare costs, and reduces nurse retention rates. The authors highlight interventions such as mindfulness training, adequate staffing, and supportive leadership as effective strategies to combat burnout.

Dolan, E. D., et al. (2022). In “Strategies to reduce nurse burnout: Evidence from healthcare organizations,” the authors analyze various organizational strategies to reduce burnout. These strategies include implementing flexible work schedules, promoting a positive work environment, and offering professional development opportunities. The study found that these interventions significantly reduced burnout rates and improved job satisfaction among nurses.

Addressing Nurse Burnout in Other Organizations

Other healthcare organizations have successfully implemented change strategies to address nurse burnout. For instance, some hospitals have introduced mindfulness and stress management programs, resulting in a 25% reduction in burnout rates and a 15% improvement in job satisfaction. Additionally, organizations that have increased nurse-to-patient ratios and provided better managerial support have reported lower turnover rates and improved patient care outcomes.

Strategies to Address Organizational Impact of Nurse Burnout

Strategy 1: Mindfulness Training and Stress Management Programs

Mindfulness training and stress management programs help nurses manage stress and improve their emotional resilience. Implementing such programs in our organization can provide nurses with tools to cope with job-related stress, potentially reducing burnout rates. For example, a mindfulness program can be integrated into the existing wellness initiatives, offering regular sessions and resources for stress management.

Strategy 2: Improving Nurse-to-Patient Ratios

Increasing the nurse-to-patient ratio can significantly reduce workload and burnout. By hiring additional staff or redistributing workloads, our organization can ensure that nurses are not overwhelmed, allowing them to provide better patient care and reduce errors. This strategy, however, requires a substantial investment in recruitment and training.

Strategy 3: Enhancing Supportive Leadership

Supportive leadership involves creating a positive work environment where nurses feel valued and supported. Training for managers on recognizing signs of burnout and providing emotional and professional support can foster a healthier workplace culture. Regular check-ins and open communication channels can help identify issues early and provide necessary interventions.

Potential Positive and Negative Impacts

Implementing these strategies can lead to several positive outcomes, such as improved job satisfaction, reduced turnover rates, and better patient care quality. For instance, mindfulness training has been shown to improve focus and reduce stress, leading to fewer errors and higher job satisfaction. However, these initiatives also come with potential challenges. Increasing the nurse-to-patient ratio requires financial resources, and there might be resistance to change among staff.

Conclusion

Nurse burnout is a significant issue that impacts both organizational performance and patient outcomes. By learning from successful strategies implemented by other organizations, such as mindfulness training, improving nurse-to-patient ratios, and enhancing supportive leadership, our organization can address this issue effectively. These strategies can lead to a healthier work environment, improved job satisfaction, and better patient care, aligning with the broader goals of the Quadruple Aim in healthcare.

References

Dolan, E. D., et al. (2022). Strategies to reduce nurse burnout: Evidence from healthcare organizations. Journal of Nursing Management, 30(2), 145-157.

Kelly, L., Gee, P. M., & Butler, R. J. (2021). Impact of nurse burnout on organizational and patient outcomes. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 35(3), 301-316.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS 6050/6053: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Assignment

  • IO001 Healthcare Environment
    • Analyze the impact of national healthcare trends on organizational leadership practice.

Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

The Quadruple Aim provides broad categories of goals to pursue to maintain and improve healthcare. Within each goal are many issues that, if addressed successfully, may have a positive impact on outcomes. For example, healthcare leaders are being tasked to shift from an emphasis on disease management often provided in an acute care setting to health promotion and disease prevention delivered in primary care settings. Efforts in this area can have significant positive impacts by reducing the need for primarNURS 6050/6053 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Example

y healthcare and by reducing the stress on the healthcare system.

Changes in the industry only serve to stress what has always been true; namely, that the healthcare field has always faced significant challenges, and that goals to improve healthcare will always involve multiple stakeholders. This should not seem surprising given the circumstances. Indeed, when a growing population needs care, there are factors involved such as the demands of providing that care and the rising costs associated with healthcare. Generally, it is not surprising that the field of healthcare is an

 industry facing multifaceted issues that evolve over time.

In this module’s Discussion, you reviewed some healthcare issues/stressors and selected one for further review. For this Assignment, you will consider in more detail the healthcare issue/stressor you selected. You will also review research that addresses the issue/stressor and write a white paper to your organization’s leadership that addresses the issue/stressor you selected.

To Prepare:

  • Review the national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the Resources and reflect on the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for study.
  • Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post for the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected. Quadruple Aim Nurse Burnout Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue
  • Identify and review two additional scholarly resources (not included in the Resources for this module) that focus on change strategies implemented by healthcare organizations to address your selected national healthcare issue/stressor.

The Assignment (3-4 Pages):

Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

Develop a 3- to 4-page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing your selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following:

  • Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).
  • Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources on the national healthcare issue/stressor. Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.
  • Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. Explain how they may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.

Looking Ahead

The paper you develop in Module 1 will be revisited and revised in Module 2. Review the Assignment instructions for Module 2 to prepare for your revised paper.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_6053_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Develop a 3- to 4-page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing the selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following: ·   Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization). 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization. The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization. The response includes accurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization that is vague or inaccurate. The response includes vague or inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. The response includes vague and inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected, or is missing.

·   Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources, on the national healthcare issue/stressor and explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations. 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

A complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided. The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources that fully support the summary provided. The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

An accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2 or 3 course-specific resources that may support the summary provided. The response explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

A vague or inaccurate summary of outside resources reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided. The response explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations that is vague or inaccurate.

0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

A vague and inaccurate summary of no outside resources reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided, or is missing. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the summary provided.

·   Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected and explain how they may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples. 27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

A complete, detailed, and accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided. The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively, with specific and accurate examples.

24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

An accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided. The response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively. May include some specific examples.

21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

A vague or inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided. The response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively that is vague or inaccurate. May include some vague or inaccurate examples.

0 (0%) – 20 (20%)

A vague and inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided, or is missing. The response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Does not include any examples.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6053_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

Exit

Access Academic Success with Our Expert Nursing Essay Writers!

Are nursing assignments causing you stress? Do you find it challenging to craft a perfect [NURS 6053 IO001 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Assignment]? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we take pride in being the best nursing paper writing service company dedicated to elevating your academic journey.

Our team of pro writers specializes in nursing essays, offering a helping hand to those facing tough nursing topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions. If the provided samples on [NURS 6050/6053 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue Examples] don’t suffice, let our experts craft a unique, customized nursing essay tailored to your instructions. Say goodbye to plagiarism and secure the grades you deserve with our original and affordable online nursing papers.

Why choose us? Our nursing papers are not only high-quality but also budget-friendly, ensuring accessibility for all college students. We guarantee an outstanding essay written from scratch, meeting any topic, deadline, or specific requirements.

Ready to experience academic success? Click on our “Place Order” page, provide your paper details, and proceed to checkout. Let ReliablePapers.com be your go-to source for top-notch nursing papers.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS FPX 4050 Final Care Coordination Plan Assignment Example

NURS FPX 4050 Final Care Coordination Plan Assignment ExampleAssignment Brief: NURS FPX 4050 Final Care Coordination Plan

Assignment Overview:

The NURS FPX 4050 Final Care Coordination Plan assignment tasks students with formulating a detailed care coordination plan for a patient. This assessment explores patient-centered care, ethical dimensions, collaboration with community resources, and adherence to healthcare policies.

Assignment Objectives:

Students are tasked with assuming the role of a healthcare professional to craft a comprehensive care coordination plan. Objectives include developing a holistic plan, integrating ethical considerations, collaborating with community resources, understanding health policies, and ensuring patient satisfaction while aligning with broader health goals.

The Student’s Role:

The student assumes the role of a healthcare professional entrusted with crafting a care coordination plan. Drawing on knowledge about effective care, ethical considerations, and healthcare policies, the student will develop a comprehensive and practical plan.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 4050 Final Care Coordination Plan Assignment

  • For this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1 using best practices found in the literature.

Introduction

NOTE: You are required to complete this assessment after Assessment 1 is successfully completed.

Care coordination is the process of providing a smooth and seamless transition of care as part of the health continuum. Nurses must be aware of community resources, ethical considerations, policy issues, cultural norms, safety, and the physiological needs of patients. Nurses play a key role in providing the necessary knowledge and communication to ensure seamless transitions of care. They draw upon evidence-based practices to promote health and disease prevention to create a safe environment conducive to improving and maintaining the health of individuals, families, or aggregates within a community. When provided with a plan and the resources to achieve and maintain optimal health, patients benefit from a safe environment conducive to healing and a better quality of life.

This assessment provides an opportunity to research the literature and apply evidence to support what communication, teaching, and learning best practices are needed for a hypothetical patient with a selected health care problem.

You are encouraged to complete the Vila Health: Cultural Competence activity prior to completing this assessment. Completing course activities before submitting your first attempt has been shown to make the difference between basic and proficient assessment.

Preparation

In this assessment, you will evaluate the preliminary care coordination plan you developed in Assessment 1 using best practices found in the literature.

To prepare for your assessment, you will research the literature on your selected healthcare problem. You will describe the priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family members. You will identify changes to the plan based upon EBP and discuss how the plan includes elements of Healthy People 2030.

Note: Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your plan to Smarthinking Tutoring for feedback, before you submit the final version for this assessment. If you plan on using this free service, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24-48 hours for receiving feedback.

Instructions

Note: You are required to complete Assessment 1 before this assessment.

For this assessment:

  • Build on the preliminary plan, developed in Assessment 1, to complete a comprehensive care coordination plan.

Document Format and Length

Build on the preliminary plan document you created in Assessment 1. Your final plan should be a scholarly APA-formatted paper, 6 pages in length, not including title page and reference list.

Supporting Evidence

Support your care coordination plan with peer-reviewed articles, course study resources, and Healthy People 2030 resources. Cite at least three credible sources.

Grading Requirements

The requirements, outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the Final Care Coordination Plan Scoring Guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.

  • Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem.
  1. Address three health care issues.
  2. Design an intervention for each health issue.
  3. Identify three community resources for each health intervention.

. Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.

  1. Consider the practical effects of specific decisions.
  2. Include the ethical questions that generate uncertainty about the decisions you have made.

. Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.

  1. Cite specific health policy provisions.

. Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice.

  1. Clearly explain the need for changes to the plan.

. Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

  1. Use the literature on evaluation as guide to compare learning session content with best practices.
  2. Align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

. Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

. Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Additional Requirements

Before submitting your assessment, proofread your final care coordination plan to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your plan.

Portfolio Prompt: Save your presentation to your ePortfolio. Submissions to the ePortfolio will be part of your final Capstone course.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

. Competency 1: Adapt care based on patient-centered and person-focused factors.

  1. Design patient-centered health interventions and timelines for a selected health care problem.

. Competency 2: Collaborate with patients and family to achieve desired outcomes.

  1. Describe priorities that a care coordinator would establish when discussing the plan with a patient and family member, making changes based upon evidence-based practice.

. Competency 3: Create a satisfying patient experience.

  1. Use the literature on evaluation as a guide to compare learning session content with best practices, including how to align teaching sessions to the Healthy People 2030 document.

. Competency 4: Defend decisions based on the code of ethics for nursing.

  1. Consider ethical decisions in designing patient-centered health interventions.

. Competency 5: Explain how health care policies affect patient-centered care.

  1. Identify relevant health policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care.

. Competency 6: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead patient-centered care.

  1. Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
  2. Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

Resources: Managing Chronic Illnesses

  • Read through the following resources to identify the role of care coordination in managing chronic illnesses. Pay close attention to similarities between your community and the patient population.
  • Improving Chronic Illness Care. (n.d.). Care coordination: Reducing care fragmentation. http://www.improvingchroniccare.org/index.php?p=Care_Coordination s=326
  • Improving Chronic Illness Care. (n.d.). Reducing care fragmentation: A toolkit for coordinating care [PDF]. http://www.improvingchroniccare.org/

Resources: Additional Resources for Further Exploration

  • You may use the following optional resource to further explore topics related to the competencies. Consider how health care scientists assess and evaluate a diverse cultural setting and the impact on needed health care.
  • Quinn, M., Robinson, C., Forman, J., Krein, S. L., & Rosland, A. M. (2017). Survey instruments to assess patient experiences with access and coordination across health care settings: Available and needed measures. Med Care, 55(Supplement 7 1), S84-S91. http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5509356

NURS FPX 4050 Final Care Coordination Plan Example Assignment

In the initial care coordination plan, stroke was identified as a significant healthcare concern, aiming to devise interventions and establish coordinated care for patients affected by or recovering from strokes, considering the high mortality rate of 5.5 million associated with strokes (Donkor, 2018). The final care coordination plan is designed to create patient-centered healthcare interventions with specific timelines, incorporating evidence from literature for three major health issues: stroke, heart disease, and diabetes in adults.

Stroke and Intervention Design

Stroke, a leading cause of global mortality, has profound effects on the quality of life, impairing speech, mobility, and daily activities, with a risk of recurrence (Mejia et al., 2017). Healthy People 2030 recognizes stroke as an outcome of poor cardiovascular health (Health.gov, 2019), emphasizing the need to address cardiovascular conditions as a secondary key health issue. The coordinated intervention for strokes includes a multimodal approach, considering factors such as patient conditions, cultural aspects, type of stroke, and underlying causes.

The intervention comprises promoting a healthy lifestyle through improved diet and cardiovascular activities, implementing endovascular interventions, conducting neurological workups, and prioritizing urgent carotid interventions within 48 hours for moderate to severe strokes. Education and training for nurses to diagnose and apply suitable interventions, including percutaneous vascular interventions or intravenous thrombolytic treatments, are crucial. The plan incorporates stroke management interventions like the use of antiplatelet and statins and emphasizes the importance of psychosocial, social, and cultural support for successful recovery (Merriman et al., 2019).

Timeline and Resources

The implementation of the plan spans three months, allowing the first month for training and education of nurses and resource provision. Essential community resources include local support associations for stroke survivors, community health workers, and online support through the Internet Stroke Center (Stroke Support Association, 2021).

Cardiovascular Disease and Interventions

Selected due to its high mortality rate and its potential to lead to strokes, cardiovascular disease is a critical focus of the care coordination plan. To prevent and manage cardiovascular disease, the plan integrates diet and lifestyle-based interventions, therapeutic and clinical interventions, and emphasizes interprofessional collaboration to provide patient-centered care.

Diet and lifestyle-based interventions include culture-sensitive nutrition plans, moderate to high-intensity workouts, balanced diets, physician counseling, and BMI tracking. Therapeutic interventions involve stress management, cell-based therapies, stem cell therapies, nanomedicines, meditation, psychological well-being, and lifestyle choices based on individualized plans developed by healthcare professionals (Brandhorst & Longo, 2019).

Timeline and Resources

The implementation of the cardiovascular disease care plan takes three months, involving the creation of dietary plans and the promotion of a healthy lifestyle. A subsequent three to six-month evaluation period will assess the effectiveness of the integrated solutions. Community resources include the American Heart Association, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s “Eat for a Healthy Heart” initiative, and local nutritional clubs.

Diabetes and Interventions

Considering the increasing prevalence of diabetes globally, the care coordination plan addresses preventive and management interventions for diabetes, emphasizing its link to cardiovascular conditions. Healthy People 2030 recommends intensive lifestyle interventions with a focus on nutrition and self-management.

The intervention involves patient education, promoting a healthy lifestyle in the community, and implementing culture-based, patient-centered, and socioeconomic-based interventions to reduce obesity and diabetes. The plan collaborates with professionals from diverse fields, including nurses, physicians, nutritionists, to provide comprehensive diabetes self-management education (DSME), covering medication management, self-monitoring, diet, exercise, and appropriate healthcare utilization (Carpenter et al., 2019).

Timeline and Resources

The implementation of the diabetes care plan spans two months, with the first month dedicated to patient education and the promotion of a healthy lifestyle. The subsequent phase involves creating and implementing culture-based, patient-centered, and socioeconomic-based interventions. Community resources include the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, local health and nutrition services, and medical clinics.

Ethical Decisions in Designing Patient-Centered Health Interventions

The design and implementation of a final care coordination plan for treating, preventing, and managing health conditions present ethical challenges. Conflicts may arise due to differing patient preferences, evidence availability, and patient well-being. For instance, conflicts in stroke treatment options, the suitability of high-intensity workouts for certain patients, and cultural considerations in diabetes treatment pose ethical decision-making challenges. Addressing these requires an ethical decision-making process grounded in patient-centered, culture-based, high-quality, and affordable care, aligning with ethical principles of respect for persons, nonmaleficence or beneficence, and justice (DeCamp et al., 2017; Lulé et al., 2019).

Identifying Relevant Health Policy Implications for Coordination and Continuum of Care

Healthcare policies and acts play a crucial role in shaping coordinated care plans and the continuum of care. Key policy recommendations identified by the AHRQ, such as population identification, identity protection, service delivery, healthcare access, and cost of care, directly influence the care coordination plan (AHRQ, 2021). Policies like HIPAA ensure patient identity protection, while the Affordable Care Act (ACA) guides recommendations for identified diseases, Medicaid, treatment plans, and cost-effective care. Additionally, policies related to billing management and self-management, as well as telemedicine and telehealth policies, impact patient access to online community resources and organizational service provision while adhering to privacy regulations (Khullar & Chokshi, 2018; Bescos & Westerteicher, 2018).

Priorities for a Care Coordinator

When discussing the care coordination plan, the care coordinator prioritizes patient well-being, quality of care, and safety, aligning with evidence-based practice (Quinn et al., 2017; AHRQ, 2019). Consideration of medical history, cultural factors, and patient wishes or consent are essential aspects. Additionally, cost of care, patient and family education, and empowerment are prioritized to collaborate effectively with patients, families, and healthcare professionals. The urgency for change is highlighted, emphasizing the potential consequences of failing to prevent, treat, and manage health issues, including mortality and morbidity (Zhao et al., 2018).

Evaluating Best Practices and Healthy People 2030

The literature review underscores the interconnectedness of stroke, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes, emphasizing the need for effective interventions. Evidence-based practices, such as carotid interventions within 48 hours for stroke, are identified as solutions (Morris et al., 2017). Patient-centered care, advocated by Healthy People 2030, emphasizes the adoption of new evidence-based interventions to enhance treatment recovery (Health.gov, 2019). Best practices for stroke involve a combination of interventions addressing psychosocial, social, and cultural aspects, stressing the importance of stress management, carotid interventions, percutaneous vascular interventions, and appropriate medication management (Lindekleiv et al., 2018).

Similarly, cardiovascular disease and diabetes are addressed through nutrition, therapeutic, and clinical interventions, coupled with education and community support. While Healthy People 2030 recognizes these aspects, there is a need for revisions to include telehealth services and culture-based care comprehensively (Health.gov, 2019). Integrating these elements into the 2030 vision will enhance the effectiveness and inclusivity of proposed healthcare interventions.

References:

AHRQ. (2019). Care coordination. Ahrq.gov. Retrieved 20 July 2021, from https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/care/coordination.html.

AHRQ. (2021). Care management: implications for medical practice, health policy, and health services research. Ahrq.gov. Retrieved 20 July 2021, from https://www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/care/coordination/mgmt.html.

Baatiema, L., de‐Graft Aikins, A., Sarfo, F. S., Abimbola, S., Ganle, J. K., & Somerset, S. (2020). Improving the quality of care for people who had a stroke in a low‐/middle‐income country: A qualitative analysis of health‐care professionals’ perspectives. Health Expectations, 23(2), 450–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13027

Bescos, C., & Westerteicher, C. (2018). Act programme: Breaking the barriers for care coordination and telehealth. International Journal Of Integrated Care, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.1229

Brandhorst, S., & Longo, V. (2019). Dietary restrictions and nutrition in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Circulation Research, 124(6), 952-965. https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.118.313352

Carpenter, R., DiChiacchio, T., & Barker, K. (2019). Interventions for self-management of type 2 diabetes: An integrative review. International Journal Of Nursing Sciences, 6(1), 70-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.12.002

CDC. (2021). Heart disease facts. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 20 July 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/facts.htm#:~:text=Heart%20Disease%20in%20the%20United%20States&text=One%20person%20dies%20every%2036,United%20States%20from%20cardiovascular%20disease.&text=About%20655%2C000%20Americans%20die%20from,1%20in%20every%204%20deaths.

CDC. (2021). National diabetes statistics report, 2020 | CDC. Cdc.gov. Retrieved 20 July 2021, from https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/index.html.

de Jesus, J., Kahan, S., & Eckel, R. (2016). Nutrition interventions for cardiovascular disease. Medical Clinics Of North America, 100(6), 1251-1264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcna.2016.06.007

DeCamp, M., Pomerantz, D., Cotts, K., Dzeng, E., Farber, N., & Lehmann, L. et al. (2017). Ethical issues in the design and implementation of population health programs. Journal Of General Internal Medicine, 33(3), 370-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4234-4

Donkor, E. S. (2018). Stroke in the 21st century: a snapshot of the burden, epidemiology, and quality of life. Stroke Research and Treatment, 2018, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3238165

Glazier, R., Bajcar, J., Kennie, N., & Willson, K. (2016). A systematic review of interventions to improve diabetes care in socially disadvantaged populations. Diabetes Care, 29(7), 1675-1688. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc05-1942

Health.gov. (2018). Improve cardiovascular health in adults. Health.gov. Retrieved 20 July 2021, from https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/heart-disease-and-stroke/improve-cardiovascular-health-adults-hds-01.

Health.gov. (2019). Heart disease and stroke – healthy people 2030 | health.gov. Health.gov. Retrieved 25 July 2021, from https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/heart-disease-and-stroke.

Health.gov. (2020). Diabetes management: intensive lifestyle interventions for patients with type 2 diabetes – Healthy People 2030 | health.gov. Health.gov. Retrieved 20 July 2021, from https://health.gov/healthypeople/tools-action/browse-evidence-based-resources/diabetes-management-intensive-lifestyle-interventions-patients-type-2-diabetes.

Holt, R. (2020). Healthcare compliance and barriers to the implementation of healthcare IT initiatives across the continuum of care. Journal Of Health Care Financ. Retrieved 25 July 2021, from.

Khaki, A. S., & Tadi, P. (2021). Cerebrovascular disease [Statpearls]. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430927/

Khullar, D., & Chokshi, D. (2018). Can better care coordination lower health care costs?. JAMA Network Open, 1(7), e184295. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4295

Lepard, M., Joseph, A., Agne, A., & Cherrington, A. (2017). Diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes living in rural areas: a systematic literature review. Current Diabetes Reports, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-015-0608-3

Lindekleiv, H., Berge, E., Bruins Slot, K., & Wardlaw, J. (2018). Percutaneous vascular interventions versus intravenous thrombolytic treatment for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009292.pub2

Lulé, D., Kübler, A., & Ludolph, A. (2019). Ethical principles in patient-centered medical care to support quality of life in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Frontiers In Neurology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00259

Ma, C., Avenell, A., Bolland, M., Hudson, J., Stewart, F., & Robertson, C. et al. (2017). Effects of weight loss interventions for adults who are obese on mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, j4849. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4849

Mathews, E., Thomas, E., Absetz, P., D’Esposito, F., Aziz, Z., & Balachandran, S. et al. (2017). Cultural adaptation of a peer-led lifestyle intervention program for diabetes prevention in India: the Kerala diabetes prevention program (K-DPP). BMC Public Health, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4986-0

Maulik, N. (2013). Cardiovascular diseases: nutritional and therapeutic interventions (1st ed.). CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.

Mejia, A., Leijten, P., Lachman, J., & Parra-Cardona, J. (2017). Different strokes for different folks? contrasting approaches to cultural adaptation of parenting interventions. Prevention Science, 18(6), 630-639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0671-2

Merriman, N., Sexton, E., McCabe, G., Walsh, M., Rohde, D., & Gorman, A. et al. (2019). Addressing cognitive impairment following stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomised controlled studies of psychological interventions. BMJ Open, 9(2), e024429. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024429

Morris, D., Ayabe, K., Inoue, T., Sakai, N., Bulbulia, R., Halliday, A., & Goto, S. (2017). Evidence-based carotid interventions for stroke prevention: state-of-the-art review. Journal Of Atherosclerosis And Thrombosis, 24(4), 373-387. https://doi.org/10.5551/jat.38745

Quinn, M., Robinson, C., Forman, J., Krein, S., & Rosland, A. (2017). Survey instruments to assess patient experiences with access and coordination across health care settings. Medical Care, 55(Suppl 1), S84-S91. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0000000000000730

Rafnsson, S., & Fowkes, G. (2020). Positive and negative well-being of older adults with symptomatic peripheral artery disease: A population-based investigation. JRSM Cardiovascular Disease, 9, 204800402096171. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048004020961717

Stroke Support Association. (2021). Community resources for survivors of stroke – stroke support association. Stroke Support Association. Retrieved 20 July 2021, from https://strokesupportassoc.org/community-resources-for-survivors-of-stroke-2/.

Wafa, H., Wolfe, C., Bhalla, A., & Wang, Y. (2020). Long-term trends in death and dependence after ischaemic strokes: A retrospective cohort study using the South London Stroke Register (SLSR). PLOS Medicine, 17(3), e1003048. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003048

Zhao, D., Liu, J., Wang, M., Zhang, X., & Zhou, M. (2018). Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in China: current features and implications. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 16(4), 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-018-0119-4

NURS FPX 4050 Final Care Coordination Plan Assignment Example Two

Effective healthcare systems rely heavily on care coordination, ensuring a smooth transition between different aspects of patient care. The Care Coordination Plan, particularly for individuals with lifestyle diseases, enhances the care coordination process, emphasizing collaboration with community resources to achieve optimal results (Salz & Baxi, 2016). This plan must adhere strictly to federal regulations and ethical guidelines. Building upon the groundwork laid in Assessment 1, this Final Care Coordination Plan addresses stroke patients’ unique needs, considering underlying health issues identified during assessments.

Stroke, a major global cause of mortality and disability, affects both developed and developing countries. In the United States alone, nearly 800,000 people suffer from strokes annually, with 80% preventable through screening and managing risk factors (George et al., 2017). As stroke often coexists with other health issues, the Final Care Coordination Plan addresses the broader health spectrum discovered during assessments.

Patient-Centered Interventions play a pivotal role in stroke care. Shifting from a hospital-centered approach to a patient-centered one places the individual and their family at the core, improving self-management and treatment outcomes (American Stoke Association, 2021). In this case, the patient diagnosed with stroke faces additional challenges, including depression, paranoia, diabetes, anxiety, insomnia, and advisability. Patient-centered care coordination becomes essential for tailored, effective treatment.

Considering the patient’s specific conditions, the plan delves into two primary concerns: cardiovascular complications and depression. Given that more than 70% of stroke patients are diagnosed with diabetes, a leading risk factor, the plan emphasizes healthy behaviors to prevent cardiovascular issues (George et al., 2017; Navi & Iadecola, 2018). Addressing depression, often exacerbated by the stigma associated with stroke, involves patient-focused strategies to shift focus, establish routines, and develop self-management skills (Lappin et al., 2017).

Community Resources are integral to patient-centered care coordination. Collaborating with organizations like the Million Hearts Initiative, National Stroke Association, and American Stroke Association ensures comprehensive support for stroke survivors and their families, aligning with the care coordination plan (National Stroke Association, 2020). These resources provide preventive advice, support networks, and helplines for a holistic approach to stroke care.

Ethics is a cornerstone in patient-centered health interventions, guided by principles like beneficence, fairness, autonomy, and non-maleficence. Adhering to ethical standards, as outlined by the American Nurses Association (ANA) Code of Ethics, is crucial for healthcare professionals involved in the care coordination process.

Health Policy Implications for Care Continuum and Coordination are evident in government policies like the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and Medicaid. These policies, by increasing healthcare access and coverage, have heightened the importance of care coordination efforts. The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program, a part of the ACA, emphasizes reducing readmission rates, aligning with care coordination goals.

Care Coordination Plan Patient Satisfaction and Healthy People 2030 are key indicators of success. Patient satisfaction ensures the plan’s effectiveness, while Healthy People 2030 guides stroke care coordination by setting objectives for national stroke prevention and treatment.

In conclusion, this Final Care Coordination Plan addresses the multifaceted needs of stroke patients. Ethical considerations, collaboration with community resources, and alignment with health policies contribute to the plan’s effectiveness. Patient-centered interventions and a focus on cardiovascular health, mental well-being, and community resources ensure a comprehensive approach, ultimately improving stroke care outcomes.

References

American Stroke Association. (2021). About stroke. https://www.stroke.org/en/help-and-support

George, M. G., Fischer, L., Koroshetz, W., Bushnell, C., Frankel, M., Foltz, J., & Thorpe, P. G. (2017). CDC grand rounds: public health strategies to prevent and treat strokes. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report, 66(18), 479.

Lappin, J. M., Darke, S., & Farrell, M. (2017). Stroke and methamphetamine use in young adults: a review. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 88(12), 1079-1091.

Navi, B. B., & Iadecola, C. (2018). Ischemic stroke in cancer patients: a review of an underappreciated pathology. Annals of neurology, 83(5), 873-883.

National Stroke Association. (2020). Retrieved from https://www.stroke.org/en/healthy-living/lifestyle-risk-factors/

Salz, T., & Baxi, S. (2016). Moving survivorship care plans forward: focus on care coordination. Cancer medicine, 5(7), 1717-1722.

NURS FPX 4050 Final Care Coordination Plan Assignment Example Three

The participant involved in the care coordination plan session is a 65-year-old woman residing in Houston, Texas. Her existing self-management practices bring attention to three significant health concerns: high blood pressure, type II diabetes, and obesity. Chronic hypertension, prevalent among older adults, poses risks such as cardiovascular disease, cognitive decline, and diminished autonomy. Effectively managing hypertension requires adherence to prescribed medications, self-assessment with blood pressure monitors, and lifestyle adjustments tailored to individual assessments, such as moderating caffeine and alcohol intake, quitting smoking, or incorporating age-appropriate exercise.

Type II diabetes, another health concern for the participant, demands careful self-management to avoid complications like neuropathy and vascular damage. Patient education on blood glucose measurement, diabetes literacy improvement through counseling, and adherence to diabetes diet guidelines emerge as effective practices. Research indicates that structured diabetes self-management education contributes to reduced hemoglobin A1c levels and fewer complications, fostering healthier eating habits and lowering mental health risks.

The participant’s weight issue compounds her quality of life, affecting mobility, independence, and cardiovascular health. Weight loss programs, encompassing diets, exercise, or pharmaceutical therapy, show promise in enhancing glycemic control in overweight and obese individuals with type II diabetes. The integration of weight loss programs with counseling by diabetes educators demonstrates improved mental health outcomes compared to standard diabetic diet education.

Patient Needs and Care-Affecting Factors

The participant, recognizing her current health needs, seeks to maintain overall health, enhance eating choices, and optimize self-monitoring practices. The goals emphasize education and awareness, ensuring the effectiveness and safety of her weight loss program for diabetics. Uncertainties may prompt the reevaluation of priorities during ongoing collaboration.

To tailor care to the participant’s unique needs, factors such as chronic health conditions, senior citizenship, autonomy, family support, and cultural preferences must be considered. As a Hispanic woman, her food preferences rooted in her native culture necessitate culturally competent nutritional education that aligns with the traditional Mexican diet.

Community Resources: Educational Services

Diabetes education program covering self-management, dietary choices, medication use, and physical activity (Medical Clinic of Houston, 1701 Sunset Blvd, Houston, TX 77005, (713) 520-4774).

Classes on healthy nutrition for various age groups, including older adults (Houston Food Bank, 535 Portwall St., Houston, TX 77029, (713) 223-3700).

Online resources for hypertension education and the Check.Change.Control program for self-monitoring (American Heart Association, 7272 Greenville Ave. Dallas, TX 75231, 1-800-242-8721).

References:

Benetos, A., Petrovic, M., & Strandberg, T. (2019). Hypertension management in older and frail older patients. Circulation Research, 124(7), 1045-1060.

Holland-Carter, L., Tuerk, P. W., Wadden, T. A., Fujioka, K. N., Becker, L. E., Miller-Kovach, K.,… Kushner, R. F. (2017). Impact on psychosocial outcomes of a nationally available weight management program tailored for individuals with type 2 diabetes: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, 31(5), 891-897.

Powers, M. A., Bardsley, J., Cypress, M., Duker, P., Funnell, M. M., Fischl, A. H.,… Vivian, E. (2017). Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: A joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. The Diabetes Educator, 43(1), 40-53

NURS FPX 4050 Final Care Coordination Plan Assignment Example Four

The Care Coordination plan is a critical step for the prompt recovery of patients and ensuring the delivery of appropriate treatment at the right time. It encompasses all planned activities to provide high-quality care and treatment to patients, fostering a secure and effective environment where patients can trust their healthcare providers and receive efficient services. Nurses and healthcare staff must be vigilant and proactive to handle diverse circumstances. The primary goal is to create a patient-centered treatment plan that prioritizes the patient’s needs, ensuring effective communication at the right time with the right individuals for optimal patient care. Nursing staff should possess knowledge of medical and ethical practices to formulate and negotiate effective plans for patients (Izumi, et al., 2018). Proper guidance and instructions from healthcare advisors instill positivity and motivation in patients.

Patient-centered Health Interventions & Timelines for Selected Healthcare Problem:

Patient-centered care coordination focuses on addressing individual patient needs, aiming to provide the best possible treatment with improved clinical outcomes. This approach has gained popularity in healthcare as it facilitates personalized care and enhances patient satisfaction. Villa Health Hospital is dedicated to effectively managing Gestational Diabetes patients through patient-centered care coordination. The patient-centered treatment plan emphasizes patient well-being and involves coordination among patients, healthcare workers, and families to utilize available resources for patient support, education, and quality care (Otero, et al., 2015).

A care coordination plan is a devised methodology for delivering enhanced, efficient, safe, and quality healthcare services, supporting patients in managing their health and well-being, particularly important for diabetic patients who need to focus on health, diet, and physical activity. The patient-centered health care plan aims to promote diabetes self-management through systematic improvements in primary care quality and delivery. This involves scheduled appointments, mini-group health consultations, and a Self-Management program. The “self-management goal cycle” guides individuals in developing clear, achievable goals, recorded in the medical chart and available to the entire patient care team. This ensures continuous review of patient goals during interactions, resulting in a consistent healthcare continuum (Langford et al., 2007).

In the subsequent step, a detailed evaluation is conducted concerning the patient’s diet and daily routine, analyzing previous routines and their effectiveness. Based on this information, the healthcare team helps the patient develop meaningful objectives. Quarterly or monthly follow-up visits and telephone appointments with the healthcare team assess patient improvement based on the plan. This procedure gradually becomes a standard part of primary care visits, easily integrated with clinical treatment.

Another intervention involves patient education, implementing various strategies to control diabetes. Knowledge about illnesses and their therapeutic techniques is crucial for effective disease management. Disseminating information about diseases to nursing and healthcare professionals can be an effective intervention for reducing blood pressure.

Developing a health promotion plan for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in a nursing care home involves setting care objectives, monitoring pharmaceutical and sugar levels, and detailing insulin administration. While treatment plans are tailored to individuals, certain common strategies can be applied. Physicians and therapists should plan appropriate medication and physical activities to mitigate the risk of T2DM. Psychologists can assist in stress reduction through sessions and therapies, and dietitians can design suitable diet plans for both mothers and children to lower the risk of uncontrolled sugar levels and obesity.

1st intervention: Self-management education and support from healthcare professionals. Continuous support from healthcare personnel is crucial for guiding patients in dealing with T2DM. Efficient use of available resources, including community seminars, counseling sessions, and workshops, can provide necessary education and promote self-care. Physicians should devise home care plans and prescribe medications for a prompt recovery. Healthcare workers must ensure the utilization of preventive care services, organizing random checkups, and management programs (Zhao, 2022).

2nd intervention: Blood sugar monitoring regime. Care plans should include a segment on blood sugar testing, specifying the type of glucose monitor used and the target blood sugar level before meals. This section also addresses how blood sugar tests will be performed and which body part is suitable for testing, such as fingers, thighs, calves, or arms (Li & Hao, 2019).

3rd intervention: Insulin therapy management. The insulin therapy section outlines the insulin administration tools, including needles, insulin pen fills, or insulin syphons. It also covers the insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio, enabling users to measure the appropriate insulin dose, along with a timetable for self-administration of insulin (Lauver et al., 2019).

4th intervention: Family support during the treatment schedule. Recognizing the significant impact of family on disease care, providing diabetes education to the individual with T2DM may be limited in its influence. Family-based approaches to chronic illness care consider the family’s environment, addressing intellectual, social, and psychological needs. Involving families in learning programs can encourage diabetic patients, establish functional family practices, and promote diabetic self-management (Tomaselli et al., 2020).

Ethical Decisions in Designing Patient-Centered Healthcare Interventions

Patient-centered care is a commendable approach that prioritizes individualized treatment, considering the patient’s personality, lifestyle, and relationships along with their physical illness. However, ethical considerations arise in the implementation of this approach, including concerns about breaching privacy, potential biases in patients’ narratives, the development of personal relationships, and shared decision-making that could lead to negative outcomes.

Implementing a patient-centered care plan is considered ethical and efficient, placing the patient at the center of decision-making. Healthcare workers must handle patients’ personal information with utmost care and professionalism. The emphasis is on treating patients equally and involving them in decisions about their treatment while respecting their privacy and needs.

Ethical decision-making in patient-centered care involves questioning the legality of decisions, working with dedication and professionalism, and understanding the patient to provide appropriate guidance. Some critical ethical questions to address include whether the decision is in the best interest of the patient, whether it is legal, whether it fulfills ethical requirements, and whether the patient’s privacy is secured.

Patient-centered intervention, while crucial, necessitates addressing ethical issues. Ethical dilemmas may arise when the patient’s and practitioner’s views differ regarding treatment goals. Respecting autonomy and dignity may sometimes conflict with acting in the patient’s best interest.

Villa Health Hospital strives to provide patient-centered care for gestational diabetes patients while considering ethical perspectives. Autonomy, cultural values, personal choices, and the freedom to reject therapy are essential aspects of patient-centered healthcare.

The ethical concept of human prosperity, as proposed by Aristotle, emphasizes viewing patients as human beings rather than merely as patients. Nurses play a vital role in considering the cultural values and traditions of patients, embracing emotional intelligence, and adhering to ethical judgments to enhance the quality of care coordination.

Reducing ethical issues in healthcare organizations involves improving patient coordination and participation in treatments. Nurses can enhance their emotional intelligence, recognize prejudices, and adopt ethical practices to foster better relations with the environment and contribute to organizational progress. Overall, patient-centered models are viewed as more appreciable, ethical, and courteous in healthcare settings.

Policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care

The implementation of a patient-centered care (PCC) approach requires careful consideration of policies to ensure effective delivery and continuity of care. Policymakers play a crucial role in shaping the healthcare system to support and encourage patient-centered care. Here are some policy implications for the coordination and continuum of care in the context of gestational diabetes patients at Villa Health hospital:

Performance Requirements for Patient-Centered Care:

  • Policymakers should establish precise performance requirements that healthcare service providers must meet to deliver patient-centered care effectively.
  • Focus on concerted and integrated efforts to develop patient-centered care, acknowledging that it involves more than just infrastructural and technical advancements.

Strategic Plan for Patient-Centered Care:

  • Develop a strategic plan to encourage the acquisition and maintenance of skills related to patient-centered care by healthcare workers.
  • Urge healthcare organizations to adopt a patient-centered approach, emphasizing self-management assistance and shared decision-making.

Quality Care and Compassion:

  • Policies should emphasize the provision of quality care by nursing staff with utmost compassion and compatibility.

Privacy Protection:

  • Ensure policies that protect the privacy and personal information of patients while providing the right treatment after understanding their concerns.

Healing Relationship and Technical Care:

  • Policies should encourage healthcare staff to establish healing relationships with patients, ensuring enhanced technical care and interpersonal relationships.

Meaningful Use of Health Information Technology (HIT):

  • Encourage the meaningful use of Health Information Technology provided by the federal government to benefit patients.

Inter-Professional Coordination:

  • Policies should emphasize proper coordination among the inter-professional team to provide patient-centered care.

Individualized Care Strategies:

  • Encourage nursing staff to plan individualized and personalized care strategies for each patient, treating them as unique entities.

Public Awareness Programs:

  • Policies should mandate the organization of health seminars and workshops to enhance public awareness, promoting proactive healthcare.

These policies not only contribute to the betterment of patients but also enhance the overall performance and reputation of healthcare organizations. Furthermore, they can serve as a foundation for proposing new technologies and improved treatment strategies in the future.

Additionally, government initiatives, such as those implemented by the Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Programs, play a role in shaping healthcare policies. For instance, scoring systems that impose monetary penalties for high readmission rates incentivize hospitals to provide better and more effective clinical care during stays. Legislative approaches, like approving the use of e-cigarettes to control tobacco, and financial support provided by the Affordable Care Act for chronic case programs and medicinal options, contribute to a comprehensive healthcare framework.

The regulation of environmental standards and support for innovative research also reflects a commitment to overall health, demonstrating a recognition that healthcare extends beyond direct medical care to include environmental factors. The supervision of tobacco industry restrictions and clean air campaigns by regulatory bodies like the United States Food and Drug Administration further emphasizes the importance of a holistic approach to healthcare.

Priorities for Discussion in Healthcare Planning

It is imperative for healthcare professionals to operate in a collaborative and coordinated manner to ensure positive outcomes. The foremost priority of nursing and healthcare staff is delivering effective and high-quality care to patients. The healthcare field necessitates continual dedication and professionalism to navigate unforeseen challenges. A well-coordinated care plan is essential to prevent adverse events, mistreatment, incorrect prescriptions, unnecessary readmissions, excessive screening, and prolonged hospital stays. Such a plan not only reduces hospital expenditures but also safeguards the hospital’s reputation. Healthcare advisors should exercise caution when communicating with patients and their families, following evidence-based priorities as per national standards:

  • Prioritize the patient’s needs and preferences in treatment and communication.
  • Enhance treatment strategies to meet ethical and medical standards.
  • Maintain composure, take responsibility, and handle patients professionally.
  • Avoid arguments and acknowledge inexperience or lack of practice instead of conveying incorrect information.
  • Establish a connection with patients, seeking to understand their challenges.
  • Clearly communicate treatment plans or changes based on available evidence-based practices.

Care coordinators play a crucial role in discussing treatment plans with patients and fostering trust by providing patient-centered care.

Comparison of Teaching Session Content with Best Practices

The Healthy People 2030 initiative, a governmental public health framework from 2020, proves instrumental in guiding healthcare professionals in effectively addressing challenges posed by Gestational diabetes. This initiative encompasses a comprehensive framework outlining the issues related to gestational diabetes and effective strategies to overcome them. Aimed at ensuring the well-being of the population and promoting a healthier lifestyle, the initiative serves as a valuable guide for nursing staff to acquire new strategies and enhance their knowledge for effective patient treatment. The initiative aligns with goals of promoting public health and preventing diseases.

The data gathered from Healthy People 2030 has significantly aided nursing and healthcare staff at Villa Health Hospital in formulating improved strategies for dealing with gestational diabetes patients. This initiative enables the identification of criteria for treating mothers with gestational diabetes, addressing symptoms like high blood pressure, breathing difficulties, cardiovascular diseases, depression, and anxiety. Solutions include increased physical activities, regular monitoring of sugar levels, timely medication, and a proper diet plan. Consequently, the nursing staff’s abilities and skills are enhanced, contributing to the creation of a more collaborative and effective healthcare environment.

References

Brandi, K., & Fuentes, L. (2020). The history of tiered-effectiveness contraceptive counseling and the importance of patient-centered family planning care. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 222(4S), S873–S877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1271

Epstein, R. M., Fiscella, K., Lesser, C. S., & Stange, K. C. (2010). Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care. Health affairs, 29(8), 1489-1495.

Izumi, S., Barfield, P. A., Basin, B., Mood, L., Neunzert, C., Tadesse, R., Bradley, K. J., & Tanner, C. A. (2018). Care coordination: Identifying and connecting the most appropriate care to the patients. Research in Nursing & Health, 41(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21843

Langford, A. T., Sawyer, D. R., Gioimo, S., Brownson, C. A., & O’Toole, M. L. (2007). Patient-Centered. The Diabetes Educator, 33(S6), 139S-144S.

Lauver, D. R., Ward, S. E., Heidrich, S. M., Keller, M. L., Bowers, B. J., Brennan, P. F., … & Wells, T. J. (2019). Patient‐centered interventions. Research in nursing & health, 25(4), 246-255.

Martinez, N. G., Niznik, C. M., & Yee, L. M. (2017). Optimizing postpartum care for the patient with gestational diabetes mellitus. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 217(3), 314-321.

Moore, L., Britten, N., Lydahl, D., Naldemirci, Ö. Elam, M., & Wolf, A. (2017). Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of person-centred care in different healthcare contexts. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 31(4), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12376

Otero, C., Luna, D., Marcelo, A., Househ, M., Mandirola, H., Curioso, W., Pazos, P., & Villalba, C. (2015). Why patient-centered care coordination is important in developing countries? Contribution of the IMIA health informatics for development working group. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 10(1), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.15265/IY-2015-013

Plows, J., Stanley, J., Baker, P., Reynolds, C., & Vickers, M. (2018). The Pathophysiology of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(11), 3342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19113342

Poitras, M. E., Maltais, M. E., Bestard-Denommé, L., Stewart, M., & Fortin, M. (2018). What are the effective elements in patient-centered and multimorbidity care? A scoping review. BMC health services research, 18(1), 1-9.

Ritchie, N. D., Sauder, K. A., Kaufmann, P. G., & Perreault, L. (2021). Patient-centered goal-setting in the National Diabetes Prevention Program: a pilot study. Diabetes Care, 44(11), 2464-2469.  https://doi.org/10.2337/figshare.14994912

Santana, M. J., Manalili, K., Jolley, R. J., Zelinsky, S., Quan, H., & Lu, M. (2018). How to practice person-centred care: A conceptual framework. Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, 21(2), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12640

Teitelbaum, J., McGowan, A. K., Richmond, T. S., Kleinman, D. V., Pronk, N., Ochiai, E., Blakey, C., & Brewer, K. H. (2021). Law and Policy as Tools in Healthy People 2030. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice: JPHMP, 27(6), S265–S273. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001358

Tomaselli, G., Buttigieg, S. C., Rosano, A., Cassar, M., & Grima, G. (2020). Person-centered care from a relational ethics perspective for the delivery of high quality and safe healthcare: a scoping review. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 44. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00044

Get to Enjoy Academic Success with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writers

Are you struggling with challenging nursing topics and tight deadlines? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we take pride in being the best nursing paper writing service. If the examples provided on [NURS FPX 4050 Final Care Coordination Plan Assignment Examples] aren’t sufficient for your paper, trust our expert nursing essay writers to deliver a unique and customized nursing essay that guarantees you top grades.

Worried about plagiarism? Our skilled writers craft original and personalized nursing papers, ensuring your work stands out. We offer online nursing papers at affordable prices, making quality assistance accessible to all college students. Whether you need help with coursework, essays, or any nursing assignment, our professional writers have got you covered.

Ready to elevate your academic performance? Placing an order is easy! Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert. Take the first step toward academic success by entrusting us to perfect your nursing papers and secure the grades you deserve.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Example

NURS 6052 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Module01 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Brief

Course: NURS 5052 – Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice

Assignment Title: NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Module01 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment

Assignment Overview:

In this assignment, you will explore the interconnectedness of the Quadruple Aim in healthcare and Evidence-Based Practice (EBP). The Quadruple Aim, an extension of the Triple Aim, emphasizes four key goals: improving patient experience, enhancing population health, reducing healthcare costs, and promoting healthcare team well-being. EBP, on the other hand, is a systematic approach that integrates the best available evidence into healthcare decision-making. Your task is to analyze how EBP contributes to achieving the Quadruple Aim and understand its impact on patient care, population health, cost management, and healthcare provider well-being.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

The primary objectives of this assignment are to:

  • Explore the Relationship: Investigate the connection between the Quadruple Aim and EBP. Understand how EBP can serve as a strategic tool to achieve the goals outlined in the Quadruple Aim.
  • Analyze Impact on Patient Experience: Examine the role of EBP in enhancing patient experience. Provide examples and evidence supporting the idea that EBP positively influences the first goal of the Quadruple Aim.
  • Evaluate Contribution to Population Health: Assess how EBP aligns with evidence-based public health and explore how it directly impacts population health. Provide insights into how EBP can be a driver for success in achieving the second goal of the Quadruple Aim.
  • Investigate Cost Implications: Analyze the impact of EBP on healthcare costs. Evaluate the Return on Investment (ROI) of EBP and discuss how it can contribute to the cost-related goal of the Quadruple Aim.
  • Examine Healthcare Team Well-being: Explore how EBP empowers healthcare professionals and its role in mitigating burnout and stress. Discuss strategies within EBP that contribute to achieving the fourth goal of the Quadruple Aim.

The Student’s Role:

As a student, your role is to critically engage with the literature and scholarly articles related to the Quadruple Aim and EBP. Analyze the information to draw connections between the two concepts and support your arguments with evidence. You are encouraged to provide real-world examples and practical applications to illustrate the impact of EBP on each dimension of the Quadruple Aim. Additionally, consider potential challenges and barriers to implementing EBP in healthcare settings and propose strategies to overcome them.

Ensure that your analysis is thorough, well-organized, and supported by reputable sources. Utilize the provided references, and supplement them with additional scholarly articles and research to strengthen your arguments. This assignment aims to deepen your understanding of the practical implications of EBP in achieving the Quadruple Aim in healthcare.

You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS 5052 – Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice Course:

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Module01 Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice Discussion Assignment Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB002 Module02 Identifying Research Methodologies Evidence-Based Project Assignment Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB003 Module03 Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Evidence-Based Project Assignment Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Example

In the pursuit of optimal healthcare performance, organizations have evolved from the traditional Triple Aim—focused on improved population health, enhanced patient experience, and lower healthcare costs—to the more comprehensive Quadruple Aim. The Quadruple Aim introduces a crucial fourth dimension: the improvement of the work life of healthcare providers. Evidence-based practice (EBP) emerges as a strategic tool in this evolving landscape, guiding healthcare decisions based on the integration of clinical expertise, the best available research evidence, patient values, and best practices. This analysis explores the intricate connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim, specifically addressing their impact on patient experience, population health, costs, and the work-life of healthcare providers.

Patient Experience

Patient experience is a cornerstone of quality healthcare, emphasizing the need for personalized, patient-centric care that minimizes errors and enhances overall satisfaction. EBP plays a pivotal role in improving patient experience by aligning clinical decisions with the latest research findings. For instance, the implementation of evidence-based strategies, such as hourly rounding and effective communication protocols, has been shown to significantly elevate patient satisfaction (Skaggs et al., 2018). EBP encourages healthcare providers to tailor interventions based on scientific evidence, fostering a proactive role for patients in their treatment plans and increasing overall engagement.

Population Health

Improving population health involves addressing the diverse needs of communities, understanding prevalent conditions, and promoting equitable distribution of resources. EBP provides a systematic approach to achieving these goals by empowering healthcare professionals to utilize research effectively. By identifying prevailing health issues, such as obesity, through evidence-based methodologies, healthcare organizations can implement targeted interventions to enhance population health (Lhachimi, Bala, & Vanagas, 2016). EBP not only offers access to high-quality information but also serves as a catalyst for successful quality improvement programs.

Costs

The rising cost of healthcare is a global concern, and organizations strive to provide quality services while maintaining financial viability. EBP contributes to cost reduction by eliminating unnecessary medical procedures and enhancing the efficiency of care delivery. Implementation of evidence-based recommendations has demonstrated substantial decreases in adverse events and healthcare costs, with simultaneous improvements in patient satisfaction (Walewska-Zielecka et al., 2021). While initial investments in modern healthcare technologies may increase capital costs, the long-term impact includes reduced treatment costs and enhanced quality of care.

Work-Life of Healthcare Providers

A positive work environment is essential for healthcare providers to deliver optimal care. EBP practices promote inter-professional collaboration, patient-provider engagement, and overall staff well-being. The implementation of EBP is associated with reduced burnout, increased job satisfaction, and enhanced productivity among healthcare providers (Kim et al., 2016). The integration of electronic health records, facilitated by EBP, has streamlined administrative tasks, replacing tedious paperwork and contributing to a more conducive work environment.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the synergy between EBP and the Quadruple Aim is evident in their collective impact on patient experience, population health, costs, and the work-life of healthcare providers. EBP serves as the guiding force that aligns organizational decisions with the latest scientific evidence, promoting a culture of continuous improvement and patient-centered care. As healthcare organizations navigate the complexities of the modern healthcare landscape, the strategic integration of EBP emerges as a fundamental approach to achieving the Quadruple Aim. By enhancing the quality of care, promoting efficient resource utilization, and fostering a supportive work environment, EBP becomes the cornerstone of healthcare excellence in the pursuit of the Quadruple Aim.

References

Skaggs, M. K. D., Daniels, J. F., Hodge, A. J., & DeCamp, V. L. (2018). Using the Evidence-Based Practice Service Nursing Bundle to Increase Patient Satisfaction. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 44(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2017.10.011

Lhachimi, S. K., Bala, M. M., & Vanagas, G. (2016). Evidence-Based Public Health. BioMed Research International, 2016, 5681409. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5681409

Walewska-Zielecka, B., Religioni, U., Soszyński, P., & Wojtkowski, K. (2021). Evidence-Based Care Reduces Unnecessary Medical Procedures and Healthcare Costs in the Outpatient Setting. Value in Health Regional Issues, 25, 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2020.07.577

Kim, S. C., Stichler, J. F., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A., & Davidson, J. E. (2016). Predictors of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation, Job Satisfaction, and Group Cohesion Among Regional Fellowship Program Participants. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(5), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12171

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Example Two

Introduction

The amalgamation of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) and the Quadruple Aim in healthcare signifies a transformative approach to decision-making, policy formulation, and the delivery of patient-centered care. EBP, rooted in scientific evidence and shaped by patient preferences and clinician expertise, aligns seamlessly with the Quadruple Aim’s pursuit of improving patient experience, population health, reducing costs, and enhancing the work-life of healthcare providers. This analysis explores the profound relation between EBP and the Quadruple Aim, shedding light on how EBP influences the four key elements of this transformative framework.

Evidence-Based Practice

EBP, a cornerstone of contemporary healthcare, is driven by the imperative to provide high-quality and safe healthcare services. With its roots in well-designed scientific studies, EBP integrates patient values and clinician expertise, fostering a holistic approach to decision-making (Crabtree et al., 2016). The interprofessional model embraced by EBP promotes shared decision-making, highlighting the collaboration among healthcare providers and the active involvement of patients in their care plans.

The Quadruple Aim

The Quadruple Aim expands the traditional Triple Aim by introducing the crucial fourth dimension—improving the work-life of healthcare providers. This addition recognizes the essential role of a productive and satisfied healthcare workforce in achieving overall healthcare excellence (Bodenheimer & Sinsky, 2014). The Quadruple Aim’s goals encompass enhancing patient experience, improving population health, reducing healthcare costs, and fostering a positive work environment for healthcare providers.

Influence of EBP on the Quadruple Aim Elements

Patient Experience

EBP’s impact on patient experience is profound, emphasizing the translation of research findings into clinical practice. Through efficient literature searching and evidence evaluation, healthcare providers can tailor care plans based on individual patient needs, leading to improved quality and safety of healthcare services (Jacobs et al., 2018). The integration of EBP in clinical problem-solving contributes directly to enhancing the overall patient experience.

Population Health

EBP serves as a linchpin for promoting population health by educating communities on health determinants, treatment benefits and limitations, and cultural practices. The equitable distribution of resources is facilitated by identifying and addressing prevailing health issues within specific populations (Sakallaris et al., 2016). EBP’s emphasis on individual patient needs ensures that healthcare interventions are tailored to diverse population segments, fostering efficiency in health promotion strategies.

Costs

While the upfront costs of implementing EBP, such as adopting modern technologies, may initially increase capital costs, the long-term impact is cost reduction. EBP contributes to the elimination of unnecessary medical procedures, enhancing the efficiency and quality of care. The adoption of evidence-based recommendations has been associated with decreased adverse events, lower healthcare costs, and improved patient satisfaction (Crabtree et al., 2016; Walewska-Zielecka et al., 2021).

Work-Life of Healthcare Providers

A positive work environment is vital for healthcare providers, and EBP practices contribute significantly to fostering such an environment. Interprofessional collaboration, patient-provider engagement, and shared decision-making promoted by EBP reduce burnout, increase job satisfaction, and enhance staff productivity (William Jackson Epperson Md et al., 2016). The integration of evidence-based processes, such as electronic health records, streamlines administrative tasks, creating a conducive atmosphere for healthcare providers.

Conclusion

In the symbiotic relationship between EBP and the Quadruple Aim, healthcare organizations find a transformative path toward excellence. The influence of EBP on patient experience, population health, costs, and the work-life of healthcare providers underscores its pivotal role in achieving the Quadruple Aim. As healthcare continues to evolve, the strategic integration of EBP emerges as a linchpin for organizations aspiring to enhance quality, efficiency, and overall healthcare outcomes.

References

Bodenheimer, T., & Sinsky, C. (2014). From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. The Annals of Family Medicine, 12(6), 573-576.

Crabtree, E., Brennan, E., Davis, A., & Coyle, A. (2016). Improving Patient Care Through Nursing Engagement in Evidence-Based Practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(2), 172-175.

Jacobs, B., McGovern, J., Heinmiller, J., & Drenkard, K. (2018). Engaging employees in well-being: moving from the triple aim to the quadruple aim. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 231-245.

Sakallaris, B. R., Miller, W. L., Saper, R., Jo Kreitzer, M., & Jonas, W. (2016). Meeting the challenge of a more person-centered future for US healthcare. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 5(1), 51-60.

William Jackson Epperson Md, M. B. A., Facmpe, S. F. C., & Wilhoit, G. (2016). Provider burnout and patient engagement: the quadruple and quintuple aims. The Journal of Medical Practice Management: MPM, 31(6), 359.

Walewska-Zielecka, B., Religioni, U., Soszyński, P., & Wojtkowski, K. (2021). Evidence-Based Care Reduces Unnecessary Medical Procedures and Healthcare Costs in the Outpatient Setting. Value in Health Regional Issues, 25, 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vhri.2020.07.577.

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Example Three

Introduction

The evolution of healthcare has witnessed the integration of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) as a cornerstone for informed decision-making and improved patient care. As healthcare strives to achieve the Quadruple Aim—enhancing patient experience, improving population health, reducing costs, and nurturing the work life of healthcare providers—the connection between EBP and these aims becomes increasingly apparent. This analysis explores how EBP serves as a catalyst in reaching the Quadruple Aim, addressing each of the four measures.

Patient Experience

Patient experience flourishes when informed decisions and patient-centered care converge. EBP, exemplified by practices like bedside shift reports, not only promotes transparency in communication but actively involves patients in their care (Dorvil, 2018). This patient engagement enhances the overall experience, fostering a sense of empowerment and satisfaction. The implementation of EBP strategies, rooted in research evidence, elevates the quality of care, aligning seamlessly with the Quadruple Aim’s patient-centric focus.

Population Health

In the pursuit of improving population health, EBP emerges as a guiding light. Evidence-Based Public Health (EBPH) practices, grounded in data-driven decision-making and intervention evidence, empower healthcare systems to address population risk factors and disease burden (Allen et al., 2018). The systematic use of evidence in public health planning and interventions becomes instrumental in achieving the Quadruple Aim’s goal of enhancing overall community health.

Costs

The financial landscape of healthcare is intricately tied to the effectiveness and efficiency of care. EBP interventions, notably those targeting healthcare-associated infections and inappropriate care, directly contribute to cost reduction (Lavenberg et al., 2019). The integration of best available evidence into decision-making not only strengthens the safety and quality of care but optimizes the value of care delivered. EBP, thus, becomes a strategic tool in aligning with the Quadruple Aim’s imperative of cost-effectiveness.

Work-Life of Healthcare Providers

A satisfied and engaged healthcare workforce is pivotal to achieving the Quadruple Aim. EBP interventions, such as communication skills training, psychiatric interventions, and mindfulness practices, emerge as evidence-based strategies to combat burnout and enhance the well-being of healthcare providers (Aryankhesal et al., 2019). By recognizing and addressing burnout, organizations create an environment conducive to productivity and job satisfaction, contributing to the Quadruple Aim’s fourth element.

Conclusion

The connection between Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim is symbiotic, each reinforcing the other in the pursuit of healthcare excellence. EBP, with its emphasis on informed decision-making, quality care, and workforce well-being, acts as a linchpin in realizing the Quadruple Aim. As healthcare organizations embrace this synergy, the trajectory towards patient-centered, cost-effective, and provider-supportive care is illuminated, heralding a new era of healthcare excellence.

References

Allen, P., Jacob, R. R., Lakshman, M., Best, L. A., Bass, K., & Brownson, R. C. (2018). Lessons Learned in Promoting Evidence-Based Public Health: Perspectives from Managers in State Public Health Departments. Journal of Community Health, 43(4), 856-863.

Aryankhesal, A., Mohammadibakhsh, R., Hamidi, Y., Alidoost, S., Bahzadifar, M., Sohrabi, R., … & Farhadi, Z. (2019). Interventions on reducing burnout in physicians and nurses: A systematic review. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 33, 77.

Dorvil, B. (2018). The secrets to successful nurse bedside shift report implementation and sustainability. Nursing Management, 49(6), 20-25.

Lavenberg, J. G., Cacchione, P. Z., Jayakumar, K. L., Leas, B. F., Mitchell, M. D., Mull, N. K., & Umscheid, C. A. (2019). Impact of a Hospital Evidence-Based Practice Center (EPC) on Nursing policy and Practice. Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing, 16(1), 4-11.

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Example Four

The Quadruple Aim has recently gained prominence, underscoring the significance of the healthcare system and its workforce. The primary objective is to enhance job satisfaction among healthcare employees. Despite the widespread acceptance of evidence-based practice (EBP), its implementation has been inconsistent. This essay looaks at the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim, scrutinizing whether the link is direct or indirect.

The Quadruple Aim prioritizes acknowledging the healthcare system’s efforts in population health, enhancing patient experience, and lowering healthcare service costs. It addresses the dissatisfaction among healthcare workers due to workplace challenges like incivility, work overload, neglect, and disrespect (Sikka et al., 2015). While EBP may not directly address these issues, some connections emerge, primarily because the Quadruple Aim closely ties the healthcare system to all aspects of the Triple Aim.

Addressing the first Quadruple Aim point, patient experience, EBP significantly contributes. Although EBP’s goal is to enhance healthcare service quality and patient outcomes, Kim et al. (2016) find no direct correlation between EBP implementation and improved patient outcomes. However, Crabtree et al. (2016) argue that EBP implementation increases nurses’ confidence, enhancing their ability to search literature and evaluate evidence. While these skills may not directly impact patient experience, they signify professional development, ultimately elevating healthcare service quality.

In terms of the second key point, population health, EBP positively influences healthcare service quality by mitigating excessive workforce turnover. Sikka et al. (2015) highlight alarming statistics – 60% of physicians contemplate leaving practice, and at least 70% know a colleague who left due to poor morale. EBP’s widespread implementation could address turnover, alleviating the incivility issue. Enhanced communication and relationships in working groups fostered by EBP would prevent workplace incivility, potentially retaining more employees and attracting more people to healthcare services.

These arguments extend to healthcare service costs. Resolving turnover problems through EBP could decrease healthcare service costs (Kim et al., 2016). Although evidence for a direct correlation between job satisfaction and EBP use is lacking, a connection exists between job satisfaction and the confidence gained from EBP implementation.

In conclusion, EBP’s use in the Triple Aim approach may be described as indirect. However, in the Quadruple Aim approach, it is directly linked to the healthcare system, significantly influencing other aspects. While EBP primarily targets patient safety and healthcare system improvement, its widespread implementation could address workforce turnover issues. This, in turn, would benefit the overall healthcare system and population health.

References

Crabtree, E., Brennan, E., Davis, A., & Coyle, A. (2016). Improving patient care through nursing engagement in evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(2), 172–175.

Kim, S. C., Stichler, J. F., Ecoff, L., Brown, C. E., Gallo, A.-M., & Davidson, J. E. (2016). Predictors of evidence-based practice implementation, job satisfaction, and group cohesion among regional fellowship program participants. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 13(5), 340–348.

Sikka, R., Morath, J. M., & Leape, L. (2015). The Quadruple Aim: Care, health, cost and meaning in work. BMJ Quality & Safety, 24, 608–610.

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Example Five

The Triple Aim aimed to enhance healthcare organizations by improving patient care quality, population health, and reducing costs, but it overlooked the well-being of healthcare workers. The Quadruple Aim added the improvement of the work-life of healthcare workers to address this gap. Evidence-based practices (EBP) play a significant role in the Quadruple Aim, enhancing efficiency and effectiveness by incorporating scientifically tested methodologies (Lavenberg et al., 2019).

EBP impacts patient experience by emphasizing practices like proper hand hygiene and equipment changes to prevent hospital-acquired infections. Updated treatment protocols through EBP contribute to positive patient outcomes and reduce medical errors, especially with interprofessional collaboration (IPC), which involves patients in their management, enhancing their experiences (Reeves et al., 2017).

In population health, EBP allows public health workers to promote best practices, such as targeted vaccinations, efficiently using scarce resources to prevent diseases. Adequate resources and time are crucial for optimal EBP utilization in population health (Lhachimi et al., 2016).

EBP influences the cost of care by providing estimations and analyses that guide crucial actions, eliminating redundant laboratory tests, and promoting cost-effective use. Practices like interprofessional collaboration empower clinicians, boosting morale and job satisfaction. However, successful implementation requires training healthcare professionals in EBP, and there is a need to expedite the development of evidence-based practices to reduce the time between research and implementation (Eaton et al., 2017).

In conclusion, evidence-based practices contribute to achieving the Quadruple Aim by improving patient care, healthcare worker satisfaction, reducing costs, and promoting population health. However, barriers need addressing to facilitate the effective implementation of evidence-based practices.

References

Lavenberg, J. G., Cacchione, P. Z., Jayakumar, K. L., Leas, B. F., Mitchell, M. D., Mull, N. K., & Umscheid, C. A. (2019). Impact of a Hospital Evidence-Based Practice Center (EPC) on Nursing policy and Practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(1), 4-11.

Reeves, S., Pelone, F., Harrison, R., Goldman, J., & Zwarenstein, M. (2017). Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(6), CD000072.

Lhachimi, S. K., Nusselder, W. J., Smit, H. A., Baili, P., Bennett, K., Fernandez, E., … & Mackenbach, J. P. (2016). Potential health gains and health losses in eleven EU countries attainable through feasible prevalences of the life-style related risk factors alcohol, BMI, and smoking: a quantitative health impact assessment. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 734.

Eaton, S. L., Day, L. E., & Hutchinson, M. (2017). Evidence-based practice in nursing education: Assisting future nurses to facilitate evidence-based practice among students. Nurse Education in Practice, 22, 39-44.

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Example Six

Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) and the Quadruple Aim play crucial roles in enhancing healthcare equality, improving patient outcomes, reducing hospital costs, and enhancing the work life of clinicians (Malnyk, Gallagher-Ford, & Fineout-Overholt, 2016). EBP is an approach that utilizes the best evidence to inform nursing practice, aiming to achieve optimal patient outcomes (Melnyk & Fine-Overhold, 2018). The Quadruple Aim focuses on improving patient care experience, population health, reducing healthcare costs, and enhancing the well-being of healthcare workers (Sikka, Morath, & Leape, 2015). Both EBP and the Quadruple Aim are interdependent, with the successful implementation of one requiring the support of the other.

EBP significantly contributes to the achievement of the Quadruple Aim across its four measures: patient experience, population health, cost, and the work life of healthcare providers. Patient experience is positively impacted by incorporating EBP into care delivery, such as implementing evidence-based practices like hourly rounding, which is proven to enhance patient satisfaction (Lavenberg et al., 2019).

Population health benefits from EBP by addressing population characteristics, needs, values, and preferences. EBP supports the development of accessible tools and interventions to improve population health, particularly in managing prevalent comorbidities like heart failure, diabetes, and obesity (Jacobs et al., 2012). Efficient utilization of EBP in population health promotes cost-effective practices by reducing hospitalizations, tests, and doctor visits, thus aligning with the cost measure of the Quadruple Aim (Lhachimi et al., 2016).

EBP contributes to cost reduction by providing estimations and analyses guiding cost-effective care. It eliminates redundant laboratory tests, allowing for optimal resource utilization. Additionally, EBP, including interprofessional collaboration, empowers clinicians, leading to higher job satisfaction and morale, ultimately impacting healthcare costs positively (Eaton et al., 2017).

The fourth goal of the Quadruple Aim, the work life of healthcare providers, is foundational for achieving the other three aims. Burnout and stress among healthcare providers can negatively impact patient outcomes. EBP interventions, such as workload reduction and stress management, enhance the work life of healthcare providers, resulting in improved patient care (Bodenheimer & Sinsky, 2014).

In conclusion, the successful implementation of the Quadruple Aim requires prioritizing EBP in healthcare organizations. Achieving the fourth aim is integral to realizing the other three goals, emphasizing the importance of a healthy and engaged healthcare workforce (Sikka et al., 2015).

References

Bodenheimer, T., & Sinsky, C., (2014). From triple to quadruple aim: Care of the patient requires care of the provider. Annual Family Medicine, 12(6), 573-576. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1713

Eaton, S. L., Day, L. E., & Hutchinson, M. (2017). Evidence-based practice in nursing education: Assisting future nurses to facilitate evidence-based practice among students. Nurse Education in Practice, 22, 39-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.11.001

Jacobs, J. A., Jones, E., Gabella, B. A., Springs, B., & Brownson, R. C. (2012). Tools for implementing an evidence-based approach in public health practice. Preventing Chronic Disease, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd9.110324

Lavenberg, J. G., Cacchione, P. Z., Jayakumar, K. L., Leas, B. F., Mitchell, M. D., Mull, N. K., & Umscheid, C. A. (2019). Impact of a hospital evidence-based center on nursing policy and practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12346

Malnyk, B. M., Gallagher-Ford, L., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2016). Improving healthcare quality, patient outcomes, and costs with evidence-based practice. Reflections on Nursing Leadership, 43(3), 1-8. Retrieved from

Melnyk, B. M., & Fine-Overhold, E. (2018). Making the case for evidence-based practice and cultivating a spirit of inquiry. In B. M. Melnyk & E. Fine-Overhold (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed., p. 7-32). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

Sikka, R., Morath, J. M., & Leape, L. (2015). The quadruple aim: Care, health, cost, and meaning in work. BMJ Quality & Safety, 24(), 608-610. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004160

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Example Seven

The Quadruple Aim, an extension of the Triple Aim, was developed by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement to enhance healthcare delivery efficiency. Comprising reducing costs, improving population health and patient experience, and healthcare team well-being, it is closely intertwined with evidence-based practice (EBP) as a strategy for achieving its goals (Arnetz et al., 2020).

EBP significantly influences the first goal of the Quadruple Aim, improving patient experience. It serves as the foundation for quality patient care, incorporating validated research evidence, clinical expertise, and patient preferences. EBP ensures nurses are updated on the latest research and medical protocols, allowing for informed decision-making and increased patient involvement in care plans, ultimately enhancing the patient experience (Kim et al., 2019).

The second goal, improving population health, is directly impacted by EBP. EBP aligns with evidence-based public health, facilitating informed decisions based on researched methods and data collection tools. This approach improves the quality of services provided to the population, optimizes the use of public health resources, and enhances prevention programs and policies (Brownson et al., 2018).

Addressing the third goal, EBP influences cost in healthcare by analyzing its Return on Investment (ROI). Although initial implementation may incur expenses, the long-term benefits, such as optimized drug use leading to cost reduction and improved patient outcomes, outweigh the initial costs. EBP’s focus on cost-effective care and reducing hospital visits contributes to achieving the Quadruple Aim’s cost-related goal (Walewska-Zielecka et al., 2021).

The fourth goal, healthcare team well-being, is an area where EBP plays a crucial role. EBP empowers healthcare professionals, mitigating stress, burnout, and depression. Empowered professionals lead to increased job satisfaction, better performance, and improved patient outcomes. EBP includes strategies like flexible schedules and participation in health and wellness programs, fostering a positive work environment (Chen et al., 2021; Armstrong, 2019).

In conclusion, EBP is integral to achieving the Quadruple Aim. It enhances patient experience, improves population health, optimizes healthcare costs, and positively impacts the well-being of healthcare providers. Prioritizing EBP is essential for a holistic and successful approach to healthcare delivery.

References

Arnetz, B. B., Goetz, C. M., Arnetz, J. E., Sudan, S., VanSchagen, J., Piersma, K., & Reyelts, F. (2020). Enhancing healthcare efficiency to achieve the quadruple aim: An exploratory study. BMC Research Notes, 13(1), 362.

Brownson, R. C., Fielding, J. E., & Green, L. W. (2018). Building capacity for evidence-based public health: Reconciling the pulls of practice and the push of research. Annual Review of Public Health, 39(1), 27-53.

Chen, M., Ran, B., Gao, X., Yu, G., Wang, J., & Jagannathan, J. (2021). Evaluation of occupational stress management for improving performance and productivity at workplaces by monitoring the health, well-being of workers. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(2), 101713.

Kim, J. S., Gu, M. O., & Chang, H. (2019). Effects of an evidence-based practice education program using multifaceted interventions: A quasi-experimental study with undergraduate nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 71.

Walewska-Zielecka, B., Religioni, U., Soszyński, P., & Wojtkowski, K. (2021). Evidence-based care reduces unnecessary medical procedures and healthcare costs in the outpatient setting. Value in Health Regional Issues, 25(2), 23-28.

Cullen, L., & Hanrahan, K. (2018). Evidence-based practice and the bottom line: An issue of cost. Healthcare Financial Management Association.

Armstrong, G. (2019). Quality and Safety Education for Nurses teamwork and collaboration competency: Empowering nurses. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 50(6), 252-255.

Detailed Assessment Description of the NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment

Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim

Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim

Healthcare organizations continually seek to optimize healthcare performance. For years, this approach was a three-pronged one known as the Triple Aim, with efforts focused on improved population health, enhanced patient experience, and lower healthcare costs.

More recently, this approach has evolved to a Quadruple Aim by including a focus on improving the work life of healthcare providers. Each of these measures are impacted by decisions made at the organizational level, and organizations have increasingly turned to EBP to inform and justify these decisions.

To Prepare:

  • Read the articles by Sikka, Morath, & Leape (2015); Crabtree, Brennan, Davis, & Coyle (2016); and Kim et al. (2016) provided in the Resources.
  • Reflect on how EBP might impact (or not impact) the Quadruple Aim in healthcare.
  • Consider the impact that EBP may have on factors impacting these quadruple aim elements, such as preventable medical errors or healthcare delivery.

To Complete:

Write a brief analysis (no longer than 2 pages) of the connection between EBP and the Quadruple Aim NURS 5052/NURS 6052/NURS 6052N/NRSE 6052C/NURS 6052C/NURS 5052C/NURS 6052A/NRSE 6052A: Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice.

Your analysis should address how EBP might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:

  • Patient experience
  • Population health
  • Costs
  • Work life of healthcare providers

By Day 7 of Week 1

Submit your anaylsis.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 1 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 1 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Unlock Your Academic Success with ReliablePapers.com – Your Trusted Nursing Essay Partner!

Are you feeling overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics and looming deadlines? Don’t stress! At ReliablePapers.com, we pride ourselves on being the best nursing paper writing service, offering expert assistance to ensure your academic success. Our [NURS 6052 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Examples] showcase the caliber of our work, but when you need a customized nursing essay, our seasoned writers are here for you.

Why choose us? Our professionals craft original and tailored nursing papers, meeting your unique instructions and ensuring you receive the best grades. Worried about plagiarism? Our experts guarantee 100% originality, leaving you with a paper that stands out.

We offer affordable online nursing papers designed for every college student’s budget. Don’t compromise on quality; let us make your nursing papers perfect. Click through to our “Place Order” page – it’s easy! Provide your paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Let ReliablePapers.com save you time, deliver top-notch nursing papers, and guide you toward academic excellence. Trust our reliable and experienced writers – your path to success starts here!

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company