NURS 6052/5052 EB002 Identifying Research Methodologies Evidence-Based Project Assignment Example
NURS 6052/5052 EB002 Module02 Identifying Research Methodologies Evidence-Based Project Assignment
NURS 6052/5052 EB002 Identifying Research Methodologies Evidence-Based Project Assignment Brief
Course: NURS 5052 – Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice
Assignment Title: NURS 6052/5052 EB002 Module02 Identifying Research Methodologies Evidence-Based Project Assignment
Assignment Overview
In this assignment, you will engage in a clinical inquiry to explore the difference between common practice and best practice within healthcare settings. By critically analyzing peer-reviewed research articles, you will identify clinical areas of interest and investigate research methodologies employed to maintain or improve clinical practices.
Understanding Assignment Objectives
The primary objective of this assignment is to develop your skills in identifying and critically analyzing research methodologies used in clinical inquiry. You will select a specific clinical issue of interest and explore relevant peer-reviewed articles to understand the aims, methodologies, and strengths of the research conducted.
The Student’s Role
As a student undertaking this assignment, your role is to:
- Identify a clinical issue of interest within the healthcare context.
- Conduct a comprehensive search using appropriate keywords in Walden Library databases to locate relevant peer-reviewed research articles.
- Reflect on the selection process and analyze the methodologies employed in the identified research articles.
- Utilize the Matrix Worksheet template to document and critically evaluate each selected article’s research methodology.
Competencies Measured
This assignment assesses the following competencies:
- Ability to formulate clinical questions for inquiry.
- Capacity to conduct effective literature searches in academic databases.
- Skill in critically analyzing research methodologies employed in peer-reviewed articles.
- Understanding of the importance of evidence-based practice in healthcare decision-making.
You Can Also Check Other Related Assessments for the NURS 5052 – Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice Course:
NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Module01 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Example
NURS 6052/5052 EB004 Critical Appraisal Evaluation Summary and Synthesis of Evidence Example
NURS 6052/5052 EB005 Evidence-Based Decision-Making Presentation Example
NURS 6052/5052 EB006 Disseminating Evidenced Based Practice Changes Example
NURS 6052/5052 EB002 Identifying Research Methodologies Evidence-Based Project Assignment Example
Identifying Research Methodologies in Clinical Inquiry
Clinical issues significantly impact the quality of care, health providers’ well-being, patient safety, and service delivery. Workplace incivility, characterized by disrespect and discourteous actions among employees, is prevalent in nursing practice and can profoundly affect confidence, interprofessional collaboration, teamwork, and productivity if left unchecked. Moreover, it adversely affects psychological well-being, leading to anxiety, burnout, and high job turnover rates. Effective management of nursing incivility is crucial to enhancing and promoting quality care and patient safety. The following matrix worksheet presents four research articles addressing nursing incivility in the workplace.
Full Citation of Selected Articles
| Article #1 | Article #2 | Article #3 | Article #4 |
| Kile, D., Eaton, M., DeValpine, M., & Gilbert, R. (2018). The effectiveness of education and cognitive rehearsal in managing nurse‐to‐nurse incivility: A pilot study. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(3), 543-552. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12709 | Asghari, E., Abdollahzadeh, F., Ebrahimi, H., Rahmani, A., & Vahidi, M. (2017). How to prevent workplace incivility?: Nurses’ perspective. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 22(2), 157-163. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.205966 | Armstrong, N. (2018). Management of nursing workplace incivility in the health care settings: A systematic review. Workplace Health & Safety, 66(8), 403-410. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165079918771106 | Razzi, C. C., & Bianchi, A. L. (2019). Incivility in nursing: Implementing a quality improvement program utilizing cognitive rehearsal training. Nursing Forum, 54(4), 526-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12366 |
Why Chosen & Relation to Clinical Issue
Article #1: This article was chosen for its comprehensive approach to enhancing awareness and utilizing educational programs to reduce nurse-to-nurse incivility. It underscores the importance of cognitive rehearsal techniques in managing and coping with incivility, supporting employees’ mental preparedness to address workplace stressors.
Article #2: Selected due to its focus on the detrimental effects of workplace incivility on healthcare workers’ health and patient care, providing insights into preventive strategies from nurses’ perspectives.
Article #3: This article aims to control workplace incivility by proposing practical interventions and evidence-based strategies, emphasizing the negative impact of incivility on nurses’ emotional well-being and patient safety.
Article #4: Chosen for its approach of implementing a quality improvement program through cognitive rehearsal training, aiming to promote a healthy workplace and enhance job satisfaction and commitment among nurses.
Aims of Research
Article #1: To raise awareness among nurses and reduce the impact of incivility by implementing cognitive rehearsal techniques.
Article #2: To prevent workplace incivility in healthcare settings from the perspective of nurses.
Article #3: To effectively control workplace incivility through proposed interventions.
Article #4: To educate nurses on identifying and managing incivility through cognitive rehearsal training.
Research Methodologies Used
Article #1: Mixed methods approach combining qualitative and quantitative methods, utilizing surveys before and after cognitive rehearsal training to assess effectiveness.
Article #2: Qualitative methods using semi-structured interviews and purposive sampling to explore nurses’ perspectives on incivility prevention.
Article #3: Quantitative research methodology conducting a systematic review of studies on workplace incivility.
Article #4: Quantitative research utilizing the nursing incivility scale (NIS) to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive rehearsal educational modules.
Strengths of Research Methodologies
Article #1: Mixed methods provide comprehensive insights by addressing qualitative and quantitative aspects simultaneously, enhancing understanding and data validity.
Article #2: Qualitative methods allow in-depth exploration of incivility issues, providing nuanced insights into nurses’ experiences.
Article #3: Systematic reviews offer a robust synthesis of existing evidence, providing reliable information for clinical decision-making.
Article #4: Quantitative methods maintain objectivity and accuracy in data collection, ensuring reliability and validity of results.
In conclusion, these articles contribute valuable perspectives and interventions to address workplace incivility among nurses. Their methodologies, whether mixed, qualitative, or systematic, offer distinct strengths in understanding, preventing, and managing incivility. By synthesizing these findings, evidence-based practices can be developed to reduce incivility, promote a positive work environment, and enhance patient care.
References
Abdollahzadeh, F., Asghari, E., Ebrahimi, H., Rahmani, A., & Vahidi, M. (2017). How to prevent workplace incivility?: Nurses’ perspective. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 22(2), 157-163.
Armstrong, N. (2018). Management of nursing workplace incivility in the health care settings: A systematic review. Workplace Health & Safety, 66(8), 403-410.
Kile, D., Eaton, M., deValpine, M., & Gilbert, R. (2019). The effectiveness of education and cognitive rehearsal in managing nurse‐to‐nurse incivility: A pilot study. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(3), 543-552.
Razzi, C. C., & Bianchi, A. L. (2019, October). Incivility in nursing: Implementing a quality improvement program utilizing cognitive rehearsal training. Nursing Forum, 54(4), 526-536.
Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS 6052/5052 EB002 Identifying Research Methodologies Evidence-Based Project Assignment
Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies
Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?
When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.
Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.
Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?
In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.
To Prepare:
- Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.
- Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
- Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
- Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.
Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies
After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:
- The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
- A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
- A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
- A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
- NURS 5052/NURS 6052/NURS 6052N/NRSE 6052C/NURS 6052C/NURS 5052C/NURS 6052A/NRSE 6052A: Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice
- A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
By Day 7 of Week 3
Submit your Evidence-Based Project.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 3 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 3 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
- Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 5 days to provide you with quality feedback.
Learning Resources
Note: To access this module’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
- Chapter 2, “Asking Compelling Clinical Questions” (pp. 33–54)
- Chapter 21, “Generating Evidence Through Quantitative and Qualitative Research” (pp. 607–653)
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Hoare, Z., & Hoe, J. (2013). Understanding quantitative research: Part 2. Nursing Standard, 27(18), 48–55. doi:10.7748/ns2013.01.27.18.48.c9488
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Hoe, J., & Hoare, Z. (2012). Understanding quantitative research: Part 1. Nursing Standard, 27(15), 52–57. doi:10.7748/ns2012.12.27.15.52.c9485
Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
Walden University Library. (n.d.-a). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
Walden University Library. (n.d.-b). Evaluating resources: Primary & secondary sources. Retrieved January 22, 2020, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/sources
Walden University Library. (n.d.-f). Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: Boolean terms. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/boolean
Walden University Library. (n.d.-g). Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: Introduction to keyword searching. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/searching-basics
Walden University Library. (n.d.-i). Quick Answers: What are filtered and unfiltered resources in nursing? Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/73299
Document: Matrix Worksheet Template (Word Document)
Required Media
Centers for Research Quality. (2015a, August 13). Overview of qualitative research methods [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/IsAUNs-IoSQ
Centers for Research Quality. (2015b, August 13). Overview of quantitative research methods [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/cwU8as9ZNlA
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Review of research: Anatomy of a research study [Mutlimedia file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Schulich Library McGill. (2017, June 6). Types of reviews [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/5Rv9z7Mp4kg
Give Your Grades a Boost with Our Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services!
Are you overwhelmed by challenging nursing topics? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we’re proud to be your go-to nursing writing service. Our team of skilled nursing essay writers is dedicated to delivering customized and original nursing papers that ensure top-notch grades.
Writing Nursing Assignments Made Easy
Whether you’re dealing with complex topics, tight deadlines, or specific instructions, we’ve got your back. From crafting a custom nursing research paper to assisting with your nursing assignments, our professionals are here to lend a helping hand.
How We Can Assist You
Our pro nursing writers create outstanding nursing essay papers from scratch, addressing any topic, meeting any deadline, and following your specific instructions. At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the importance of your academic success.
Why Choose Us?
- Affordable Prices: Our online nursing papers are priced affordably, ensuring accessibility for all college students.
- Expert Writers: Let our skilled writers make your paper perfect, providing the expertise needed for exceptional results.
- Originality Guaranteed: Say goodbye to plagiarized papers. Our nursing experts craft original and customized nursing essays for your academic success.
- Easy Ordering Process: Ready to place your order? It’s hassle-free! Visit our “Place Order” page, provide paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.
Why Trust Our Professionals?
Professionals at ReliablePapers.com are updated with the latest nursing trends, ensuring your nursing research paper stands out. Our skilled writers offer the best nursing writing services, meeting your desires and ensuring timely submissions.
As a nursing student, balancing assignments and class participation can be overwhelming. Seeking help enables you to submit research on time and ensures exceptional performance in your nursing research papers and assignments. Trust ReliablePapers.com for your academic success! Our online nursing essays are unmatched both in quality and affordability.
Save Time, Secure Top Grades
Ready to save time and secure the grades you deserve? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and trust us to make your nursing papers perfect. Don’t wait until the last minute; fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work ASAP.
Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!
