NURS 6052/5052 EB006 Disseminating Evidenced Based Practice Changes Example

, ,

NURS 6052/5052 EB006 Disseminating Evidenced Based Practice Changes Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB006 Disseminating Evidenced Based Practice Changes ExampleEB006 Disseminating Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Changes Assignment

NURS 6052/5052 EB006 Disseminating Evidence Based Practice Changes Assignment Brief

Assignment Instructions Overview:

In this assignment, students will create a 10- to 13-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation to analyze effective strategies for disseminating evidence-based practice (EBP) changes within their healthcare organization. This task emphasizes clear communication of EBP changes, tailored dissemination strategies, and addresses potential challenges to ensure successful adoption. The submission must be named following the format “EB006_presentation_firstinitial_lastname” and should meet all criteria provided in the rubric. The completed presentation will be uploaded through the Assessment tab, with an option to use Turnitin Draft Check to confirm originality.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

This assignment aims to develop students’ skills in identifying and communicating effective dissemination strategies for EBP changes. Students will analyze various strategies to share EBP changes with healthcare colleagues and stakeholders, enhancing their understanding of how to advocate for and implement best practices. The task focuses on not only selecting appropriate dissemination strategies but also critically evaluating their effectiveness and feasibility in a real-world organizational context.

The Student’s Role:

Students will take on the role of a clinical professional aiming to implement an EBP change within their healthcare organization. They will select a clinical issue of interest relevant to their setting, propose an evidence-based practice change, and design a strategic plan to communicate this change effectively to their team. As part of this role, students will identify barriers to dissemination, critically analyze dissemination strategies, and develop solutions to overcome these obstacles.

Competencies Measured:

This assessment evaluates key competencies in disseminating EBP changes within healthcare settings. These include the ability to:

  • Identify and communicate clinical issues that are conducive to evidence-based improvements.
  • Design strategic dissemination plans to promote EBP adoption.
  • Critically evaluate and select effective communication strategies for sharing EBP changes.
  • Identify and propose solutions to barriers to EBP dissemination.
  • Engage in reflective practices that support ongoing professional development, making this task an essential component of the course’s Portfolio Assessment and the Capstone course.

You can also read other assignment examples for the NURS 5052 – Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice Course below:

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice Discussion Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB002 Identifying Research Methodologies Evidence-Based Project Assignment Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB003 Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Evidence-Based Project Assignment Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB004 Critical Appraisal Evaluation Summary and Synthesis of Evidence Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB005 Evidence Based Decision Making Presentation Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB006 Disseminating Evidenced Based Practice Changes Example

Slide 1: Title Slide

Title: Disseminating Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Changes: Reducing Hospital Readmissions for Heart Failure Patients

Subtitle: [Your Course Name and Code]

Your Name:

Date:

Narration:

“Hello, everyone. Today, I will be presenting a dissemination strategy to implement an evidence-based practice change to address the high rate of hospital readmissions for heart failure patients. This EBP change focuses on improving discharge education to support self-management and reduce preventable readmissions.”

Slide 2: Introduction to EBP and Its Importance in Healthcare

Content:

  • Overview of EBP as a cornerstone in improving healthcare quality and patient outcomes (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).
  • Importance of EBP dissemination in translating research into practice effectively (Dang & Dearholt, 2017).

Narration:

“Evidence-based practice is essential in healthcare because it combines clinical expertise, research evidence, and patient preferences to enhance patient care outcomes. Effective dissemination ensures that research-backed interventions, like improved discharge education, are adopted widely, leading to high-quality, standardized care.”

Slide 3: Clinical Issue of Interest

Title: Clinical Issue: High Readmission Rates for Heart Failure Patients

Content:

  • Heart failure is a leading cause of hospital readmissions, with nearly 25% of patients readmitted within 30 days (Benjamin et al., 2019).
  • Impact of high readmissions on healthcare costs and patient quality of life (CDC, 2022).

Narration:

“The clinical issue of interest is the high readmission rate among heart failure patients. Studies show that nearly 25% of these patients are readmitted within 30 days. Readmissions significantly burden healthcare costs and expose patients to additional health risks. This issue is highly conducive to evidence-based change, as effective discharge education can empower patients to manage their conditions better.”

Slide 4: Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

Title: Recommended EBP Change: Discharge Education Program

Content:

  • Discharge education program covering medication management, diet, symptom monitoring, and follow-up care (Naylor et al., 2017).
  • Evidence showing a 30% reduction in readmissions with improved discharge education (Koelling et al., 2017).

Narration:

“I recommend implementing a structured discharge education program for heart failure patients, addressing key areas such as medication management, diet and fluid restrictions, symptom monitoring, and the importance of follow-up care. Studies indicate that well-structured discharge education can reduce readmission rates by up to 30%, as patients gain the knowledge and skills needed to manage their health effectively.”

Slide 5: Strategy 1 – Organizational Meetings

Title: Dissemination Strategy 1: Organizational Meetings

Content:

  • Led by senior leaders, these meetings emphasize the importance of the EBP change (Melnyk et al., 2017).
  • Allows for open dialogue, enabling staff to ask questions and voice concerns.

Narration:

“The first recommended dissemination strategy is conducting organizational meetings led by senior leaders. These meetings serve as a platform to communicate the importance of the EBP change. They also provide an opportunity for staff to ask questions, ensuring everyone understands the change and feels involved in the implementation process.”

Slide 6: Strategy 2 – Peer-to-Peer Training Workshops

Title: Dissemination Strategy 2: Peer-to-Peer Training Workshops

Content:

  • Interactive workshops led by experienced nurses to train colleagues on discharge education methods.
  • Encourages collaboration, enhancing the retention of new practices (Dang & Dearholt, 2017).

Narration:

“Peer-to-peer training workshops are the second recommended strategy. These workshops are interactive sessions where experienced nurses train their colleagues on delivering effective discharge education. This method promotes collaboration and improves retention of the new practices, as staff feel more engaged and confident in applying the changes.”

Slide 7: Less Preferred Strategy – Email Communication

Title: Less Preferred Strategy: Email Communication

Content:

  • Often ignored or skimmed, leading to low engagement (Shah et al., 2020).
  • Does not provide an interactive platform for discussion.

Narration:

“One of the less recommended strategies is disseminating the information through email communication. Although it is quick and easy, emails are often ignored or only briefly read, which can lead to a lack of understanding and engagement. Additionally, emails do not allow for the interactive discussion needed for complex EBP changes.”

Slide 8: Less Preferred Strategy – Intranet Posts

Title: Less Preferred Strategy: Intranet Posts

Content:

  • Limited reach, as many staff members do not regularly check the intranet (AHA, 2021).
  • Does not foster engagement or discussion.

Narration:

“Posting information on the intranet is another less effective dissemination strategy, as many staff members do not consistently check the intranet for updates. Without interactive engagement, this method may fail to communicate the change’s significance and the practical steps needed for successful implementation.”

Slide 9: Potential Barriers to Preferred Strategies

Title: Barriers to Dissemination

Content:

  • Time Constraints: Staff may not have time to attend meetings or workshops (Naylor et al., 2017).
  • Resource Limitations: Limited funding for additional training resources (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).

Narration:

“While organizational meetings and peer-to-peer workshops are effective, they come with challenges. Time constraints prevent staff from attending due to their workload, and resource limitations might hinder access to necessary training materials and facilitators.”

Slide 10: Overcoming Time Constraints

Title: Overcoming Barrier 1: Time Constraints

Content:

  • Offer flexible scheduling or recorded sessions for staff on different shifts.
  • Encourage cross-departmental collaboration to streamline meeting times.

Narration:

“To overcome time constraints, meetings and workshops could be offered at multiple times to accommodate various shifts. Additionally, recording sessions allows staff to access training on their own schedule, making it more feasible for everyone to participate.”

Slide 11: Overcoming Resource Limitations

Title: Overcoming Barrier 2: Resource Limitations

Content:

  • Secure leadership support by presenting data on the cost-effectiveness of the program.
  • Seek grants or budget reallocations to support the training program.

Narration:

“Resource limitations can be addressed by presenting the financial benefits of reducing readmissions to hospital leadership. Additionally, grants and budget reallocation options can provide funding for necessary resources, ensuring effective dissemination and training.”

Slide 12: Expected Outcomes and Impact

Title: Anticipated Outcomes of EBP Change

Content:

  • Reduced readmissions for heart failure patients by 20-30% (Koelling et al., 2017).
  • Improved patient satisfaction and empowerment through education (Shah et al., 2020).

Narration:

“The anticipated outcomes of implementing this discharge education program include a 20-30% reduction in heart failure readmissions, as shown in multiple studies. Additionally, patients will feel more empowered and satisfied with their care as they gain a better understanding of managing their condition.”

Slide 13: Conclusion

Title: Conclusion

Content:

  • Recap of the importance of EBP dissemination in improving patient outcomes.
  • Call to action for organization-wide support in adopting the discharge education program.

Narration:

“In conclusion, effective dissemination of this EBP change is essential for reducing readmission rates and enhancing patient outcomes. By using targeted strategies, we can ensure that all staff are well-prepared to implement these changes, ultimately leading to better care for our patients. Thank you for your attention, and I encourage everyone to support this program’s adoption.”

Slide 14: References

Title: References

American Heart Association. (2021). Managing heart failure. Retrieved from https://www.heart.org/

Benjamin, E. J., Muntner, P., et al. (2019). Heart disease and stroke statistics—2019 update. Circulation, 139(10), e56-e528.

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS 6052/5052 EB006 Disseminating Evidenced Based Practice Changes Assignment

Description

Overview

For this Performance Task Assessment, you will create a narrated PowerPoint presentation in which you analyze dissemination strategies to best communicate evidence-based practice changes to your organization.

Submission Length: A 10- to 13-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation.

Your response to this Assessment should:

  • Reflect the criteria provided in the rubric.
  • Adhere to the required assignment length.

This Assessment requires submission of one (1) file, a narrated PowerPoint presentation. Save your file as EB006_presentation_firstinitial_lastname (for example, EB006_presentation_J_Smith).

You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu.

Note: For students in Nursing Education, Executive Nursing, or Nursing Informatics, this Assessment is a Portfolio Assessment in your program. You will have one Portfolio Assessment in each of your courses. You will need to save these Assessments for inclusion in your portfolio that you will submit in your Capstone course.

Instructions

Access the following to complete this Assessment:

To complete this Assessment:

  • Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change.
    Identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of an evidence-based change. (Note: You are required to focus on the same clinical issue of interest in the competencies EB002–EB006.)
  • Create a 10- to 13-slide (total for all topics) narrated PowerPoint presentation in which you address the following:
  • Explain the clinical issue of interest that is most conducive to an evidence-based practice change in your healthcare organization. (1–2 slides)
  • Describe the evidence-based practice change that you would recommend implementing to address the clinical issue of interest that you selected. Be specific and provide examples. (2–3 slides)
  • Compare at least two dissemination strategies that you might recommend to communicate evidence-based practice changes to your organization, and explain why. (2 slides)
  • Compare at least two dissemination strategies that you would be least inclined to recommend to communicate evidence-based practice changes to your organization, and explain why. (2 slides)
  • Identify at least two barriers that you might encounter when using the dissemination strategies that you are most inclined to use. (1 slide)
  • Explain how you might overcome the barriers that you identified. Be specific and provide examples. (2–3 slides

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

/by

NURS 6052/5052 EB005 Evidence Based Decision Making Presentation Example

, ,

NURS 6052/5052 EB005 Evidence Based Decision Making Presentation Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB005 Evidence-Based Decision-Making Presentation ExampleEB005 Evidence-Based Decision-Making Presentation Assignment

NURS 6052/5052 EB005 Evidence Based Decision Making Presentation Assignment Brief

Assignment Instructions Overview:

This assignment requires creating a narrated PowerPoint presentation (8–14 slides) recommending and supporting an evidence-based practice change for your healthcare organization. The aim is to propose a well-supported, research-based modification to improve patient care, based on systematic evidence and tailored to the organization’s specific needs and culture. Your PowerPoint should be formatted and cited according to APA guidelines and will include both a description of the organization and the development and proposal of an evidence-based intervention. Save and submit the file as EB005_presentation_firstinitial_lastname (e.g., EB005_presentation_J_Smith). Review the rubric before submission, as it guides both content and presentation standards.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

This assignment emphasizes understanding and applying evidence-based practice (EBP) in a healthcare setting. The goal is to analyze a clinical issue, develop an intervention based on systematic evidence, and present a plan for implementing this change effectively. By using evidence and EBP approaches, you’ll demonstrate the ability to connect clinical challenges with actionable solutions that improve patient outcomes and align with organizational goals.

The Student’s Role:

As a nursing student and healthcare practitioner, your role involves critically evaluating a clinical issue, conducting a systematic review of relevant literature, and designing a feasible EBP proposal. This process includes developing a clear PICOT question to guide your research, analyzing peer-reviewed studies, and proposing an evidence-backed practice change. You are also responsible for planning knowledge transfer, ensuring that the proposed change can be adopted effectively within the organization, and identifying measurable outcomes for evaluating the intervention’s impact.

Competencies Measured:

This task assesses several key competencies in evidence-based decision-making, including:

  • Critical Thinking and Analysis: Identifying relevant clinical issues and synthesizing research to form an evidence-based solution.
  • Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Application: Developing a PICOT question, conducting systematic literature searches, and integrating findings into a feasible intervention plan.
  • Knowledge Dissemination and Implementation: Crafting a structured plan for transferring knowledge and implementing changes within a healthcare organization.
  • Outcome Measurement and Evaluation: Defining measurable objectives for assessing the effectiveness of the proposed change and demonstrating understanding of evaluation methods.
  • Professional Presentation Skills: Conveying ideas and evidence in a clear, organized PowerPoint format that adheres to APA standards and supports engagement and understanding among healthcare colleagues.

You can also read other assignment examples for the NURS 5052 – Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice Course below:

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice Discussion Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB002 Identifying Research Methodologies Evidence-Based Project Assignment Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB003 Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Evidence-Based Project Assignment Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB004 Critical Appraisal Evaluation Summary and Synthesis of Evidence Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB006 Disseminating Evidenced Based Practice Changes Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB005 Evidence Based Decision Making Presentation Example

Title Slide

Title: Evidence-Based Practice Change Proposal

Your Name

Degree Program, Walden University

NURS 6052/5052 EB005: Evidence-Based Decision Making

Instructor Name

Month Day, Year

Slide 1-2: Introduction to Healthcare Organization

Title: Overview of Healthcare Organization

Slide Content:

Our healthcare organization is a mid-sized, urban hospital serving a diverse patient population, primarily adults with complex, chronic conditions. The organizational culture emphasizes patient-centered care and values continuous improvement, though it is sometimes challenged by limited resources and high patient turnover.

Our facility demonstrates readiness for change but faces common barriers, including workload demands, resistance to new protocols, and the need for thorough training. The organization encourages staff participation in quality improvement initiatives, which supports an environment conducive to evidence-based changes.

Slide 3-5: Problem Description and Opportunity for Change

Title: Identifying the Problem and Need for Change

Slide Content:

Clinical Issue: The problem identified for evidence-based change is the high rate of post-surgical infections among adult patients. In the past year, the infection rate for post-operative patients has increased by approximately 15%, creating significant challenges in patient recovery times, healthcare costs, and overall patient satisfaction.

Scope and Impact: This issue affects over 200 patients annually, leading to extended hospital stays and increased readmissions. The issue’s scope impacts patients, families, healthcare providers, and the organization, which bears the financial burden of infection-related readmissions and lengthier hospital stays.

Stakeholders: Key stakeholders include surgeons, nursing staff, infection control teams, and the administrative staff responsible for funding and policy adjustments. Each of these groups plays a role in implementing and adhering to infection control protocols and postoperative care standards.

Risks of Change Implementation: Potential risks include staff resistance due to increased workload or workflow changes and the upfront costs associated with implementing new protocols and purchasing infection control resources. However, benefits such as improved patient outcomes and decreased costs related to readmissions justify these temporary challenges (Johnson & Smith, 2021).

Slide 6-8: Evidence-Based Practice Proposal

Title: Proposed Evidence-Based Change and Literature Support

Slide Content:

Proposed Change: Implement a pre-surgical education program focused on infection prevention, combined with an enhanced postoperative infection monitoring system. Research indicates that patient education and systematic monitoring can reduce infection rates by empowering patients with knowledge and improving early detection of infection (Bennett et al., 2022).

PICOT Question: In adult surgical patients (P), does implementing a pre-surgical education program (I) compared to standard care (C) reduce postoperative infection rates (O) over a six-month period (T)?

Literature Review:

  1. Smith et al. (2020) conducted a systematic review of infection prevention programs in hospital settings. Findings indicated that preoperative education significantly reduced postoperative infections, highlighting the value of patient knowledge in infection prevention.
  2. Jones and Carter (2021) reviewed studies on monitoring systems for early detection of surgical site infections, showing that postoperative monitoring reduces severe infections by promoting timely intervention.
  3. Brown et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis on the effectiveness of structured patient education, finding a 20% reduction in infections among patients who received preoperative and postoperative education.
  4. Green and White (2023) evaluated combined approaches, suggesting that a dual strategy of education and monitoring yielded the highest reduction in postoperative infections.

Decision-Making Approach: This approach aligns with the hospital’s values and is feasible given existing staff resources and infection control protocols. Evidence-based decision-making prioritizes strategies that address high-impact issues, aiming to reduce infection rates and promote optimal patient outcomes.

Slide 9-10: Knowledge Transfer Plan

Title: Knowledge Transfer and Implementation

Slide Content:

Knowledge Creation: This change was developed based on existing research indicating the benefits of patient education and monitoring for infection control. The PICOT framework guided our selection of relevant evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Dissemination Strategies: The plan includes weekly interdisciplinary meetings to review protocols, scheduled in-service sessions for nursing and surgical teams, and readily accessible digital resources outlining the new procedures. Stakeholder engagement will involve patient representatives, encouraging feedback and continuous improvement.

Adoption and Implementation: The hospital’s infection control committee will spearhead the implementation. Training sessions will ensure consistent understanding across departments, while a checklist for infection prevention will be integrated into the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system for streamlined monitoring (Jones & Lee, 2023).

Slide 11-12: Measurable Outcomes and Evaluation

Title: Expected Outcomes and Evaluation Metrics

Slide Content: Measurable Outcomes: Anticipated outcomes include:

  1. Reduction in Infection Rates: A target reduction of at least 10% in post-surgical infection rates within six months.
  2. Improved Patient Satisfaction: Increased satisfaction scores related to postoperative care, measured through surveys.
  3. Reduced Readmission Rates: Aiming for a 5% decrease in infection-related readmissions by the end of the implementation period.

Evaluation Methods: Evaluation will involve regular data analysis of infection rates, readmission frequencies, and patient satisfaction surveys. Monthly reviews of infection data will be conducted, and feedback from staff and patients will help identify areas for further improvement (Carter et al., 2022).

Slide 13-14: References

References:

Bennett, L., Thompson, A., & Clark, J. (2022). Patient education and postoperative infection rates: A review of evidence. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 43(5), 1040-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iche.2022.04.003

Brown, M. P., Davis, R., & Taylor, E. (2022). Meta-analysis of preoperative patient education on infection prevention. Journal of Surgical Outcomes, 12(2), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSO.0000000000000874

Carter, S. L., Jackson, H., & Miller, D. (2022). Evaluation of infection monitoring systems in post-surgical care. American Journal of Nursing Research, 40(3), 123-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajn.2022.01.002

Green, R., & White, D. (2023). The combined approach to infection prevention in surgical patients: A systematic review. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 37(6), 834-843. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciad123

Johnson, P., & Smith, K. (2021). Risk factors and barriers in implementing infection control protocols. Healthcare Management Review, 16(4), 210-220. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000783

Jones, H., & Lee, P. (2023). Role of interdisciplinary teams in infection prevention: A focus on surgical units. Journal of Hospital Administration, 30(1), 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/jha/had015

Smith, A., & Carter, N. (2020). Effectiveness of infection prevention programs in surgical settings. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(8), 745-753. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15012

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS 6052/5052 EB005 Evidence Based Decision Making Presentation Assignment

Description

EB005: Evidence-Based Decision Making

Overview

For this Performance Task Assessment, you will create a narrated PowerPoint presentation recommending and supporting an evidence-based practice change for your current healthcare organization.

Submission Length: An 8- to 14-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation.

Your response to this Assessment should:

  • Reflect the criteria provided in the rubric.
  • Adhere to the required assignment length.

This Assessment requires submission of one (1) file, a narrated PowerPoint presentation. Save your file as EB005_presentation_firstinitial_lastname (for example, EB005_presentation_J_Smith).

Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the Assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.

Instructions

To complete this Assessment:

  • Reflect on your current healthcare organization and think about potential opportunities for evidence-based change.

(You may have completed the next three points in previous competencies.)

  • Identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of an evidence-based change. (Note: You are required to focus on the same clinical issue of interest in the competencies EB002–EB006.)
  • Develop a PICOT question to address this issue.
  • Using the keywords from the PICOT question, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level.

Create a PowerPoint presentation by addressing the following in 8–14 slides (total for all topics)

  • Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change. (You may opt to keep various elements of this anonymous, such as your company name.) (1–2 slides)
  • Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general. (2–3 slides)
  • Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an evidence-based practice approach to decision making. Note: You may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered. (3–5 slides)
  • Be sure to include a description of the PICOT question that you developed for your search, and which databases you consulted.
  • Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation. (1–2 slides)
  • Describe the measurable outcomes that you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change. (1–2 slides)
  • Be sure to provide APA citations for the supporting evidence-based, peer-reviewed articles that you selected to support your thinking.

 Template to Use:

 Presentation Title

Your Name

Program Name or Degree Name, Walden University

COURSE XXX: Title of Course

Instructor Name

Month XX, 202X

  • Go to the “Home” tab at the top and click the “New Slide” or “Layout” button to

access different formatting for your slides.

  • Choose formatting that presents your information in the most logical way.
  • Use consistent, grammatically parallel format for bulleted lists (for example, on this slide, each element begins with an imperative verb).
  • You can also consult APA’s suggestions on formatting lists.
  • End bullet points consistently, either with or without a period.
  • Keep font of text consistent.
  • Be sure headings are consistent in their spacing, placement, size, etc.
  • Consider using the slide after the title slide to summarize your presentation’s points

(like an abstract for a paper).

 Your slides can also contain entire paragraphs, like this one does. In both paragraphs and bulleted lists in your presentation, citation rules apply just as they do in papers: when using or referencing another author’s ideas, you must cite that source. When incorporating a citation in a slide, do so just as you would in a traditional paper: According to Jones (2020), presentations are not very different from papers.

  • According to Smith and Cat (2020), you should make your presentation great, not just good.

 

Use APA style rules to format any tables and figures in your presentation:

Figure 1

Title Reflecting Figure Information

Note. Any needed general

notes on figure. From

“Utilizing Bar Graphs,” by A. Jones, 2020, Journal of Handy Graphs, 76(2), p. 3 (https://doi.org/10.123.45/ abc). Reprinted with permission.

  • Remember to adhere to any assignment guidelines regarding presentation format. This template contains suggestions only.
  • Keep in mind that there is no such thing as an “APA standard PowerPoint.” Review

our presentation tips for more information!

  • Visit the Academic Skills Center for more tips on how to use PowerPoint or visit

Microsoft’s PowerPoint help and learning website.

  • Always include a reference list at the end of your presentation, just like you would in a paper. Reference list entries take the same format they would in a paper, including a hanging indent. Visit the Common Reference List Examples page for the correct APA format. Here are a few examples:

Jones, P. (2020). This great book. Publisher.

Smith, W., & Cat, D. (2020). How to make a good presentation great. Presentations

Quarterly, 45(4), 56-59. https://doi.org/10.123.45/abc

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

/by

NURS 6052/5052 EB004 Critical Appraisal Evaluation Summary and Synthesis of Evidence Example

, ,

NURS 6052/5052 EB004 Critical Appraisal Evaluation Summary and Synthesis of Evidence Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB004 Critical Appraisal, Evaluation/Summary, and Synthesis of Evidence ExampleEB004 Critical Appraisal, Evaluation/Summary, and Synthesis of Evidence Assignment

NURS 6052/5052 EB004 Critical Appraisal Evaluation Summary and Synthesis of Evidence Assignment Brief

Assignment Instructions Overview:

This assignment focuses on critically appraising peer-reviewed evidence to support evidence-based best practices within a clinical setting. Through careful review, evaluation, and synthesis of multiple research studies, students will assess the strength of research findings relevant to a clinical issue of choice. By developing a focused clinical inquiry question, conducting database searches, and appraising selected studies, students will gain experience in systematically evaluating evidence quality and relevance.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

The core objective of this assignment is to enable students to critically assess existing research for evidence-based practices that can improve clinical outcomes. Students will use the critical appraisal process to evaluate research quality, applicability, and strength of recommendations. This includes understanding how to form a clinical inquiry using a PICOT question, identifying and using reliable research databases, and applying evidence from systematic reviews or high-quality studies to inform practice recommendations.

The Student’s Role:

In this assignment, students act as critical appraisers of research, rigorously analyzing studies to determine their value and application in clinical practice. This involves using the Critical Appraisal Worksheet to assess selected articles and make evidence-based practice recommendations that are justified with scholarly citations. This role also requires students to synthesize information across studies, discerning the overall relevance, potential impact, and feasibility of implementing the best practices derived from the research.

Competencies Measured:

This assignment assesses key competencies in evidence-based practice (EBP) application, critical thinking, and information synthesis. The competencies evaluated include the ability to:

  • Formulate a PICOT question to guide clinical inquiries.
  • Conduct thorough literature searches in reputable databases.
  • Apply critical appraisal skills to assess study design, evidence level, and applicability of findings.
  • Make informed, research-backed recommendations that align with best practices in patient care.
  • Adhere to APA guidelines in summarizing and citing research findings.

Performance Task Components:

Part 1: Critical Appraisal of Research

  • Formulate a clinical inquiry based on a PICOT question.
  • Search at least four peer-reviewed, systematic-level articles on the clinical question.
  • Complete the Critical Appraisal Worksheet, analyzing study quality, evidence level, methods, sample size, major findings, and outcomes.

Part 2: Evidence-Based Best Practices

  • Based on the critical appraisal, identify and explain a best practice that emerges as effective and supported by research.
  • Justify the recommended best practice in a narrative using APA-cited sources.
  • Submit an evaluation table for the selected studies, providing a concise yet detailed overview of each article’s methodology, key findings, and overall relevance to practice.

You can also read other assignment examples for the NURS 5052 – Essentials of Evidence-Based Practice Course below:

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Quadruple Aim and Evidence-Based Practice Assignment Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB001 Where in the World Is Evidence-Based Practice Discussion Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB002 Identifying Research Methodologies Evidence-Based Project Assignment Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB003 Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews Evidence-Based Project Assignment Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB005 Evidence-Based Decision-Making Presentation Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB006 Disseminating Evidenced Based Practice Changes Example

NURS 6052/5052 EB004 Critical Appraisal Evaluation Summary and Synthesis of Evidence Example

Evaluation Table for Evidence-Based Practice Project

Full APA formatted citation of selected article

Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
Citation Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stilwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Evidence-based practice, step by step: A critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III. American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000388264.49427.f9 Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stilwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Evidence-based practice, step by step: A critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I. American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.c6 Buccheri, R., & Sharifi, C. (2017). Critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines for evidence-based practice. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 23(6), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078390317719326 Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stilwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Evidence-based practice, step by step: A critical appraisal of the evidence: Part II: Digging deeper–Examining the “keeper” studies. American Journal of Nursing, 110(9), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000387953.42912.6a

 

Evidence Level (I, II, or III)

 

Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
Evidence Level II III III III

 

Conceptual Framework

Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
Description The study builds upon the prior two parts of the series, focusing on evaluating the impact of Rapid Response Teams (RRTs) on ICU admissions and cardiac arrests. The conceptual framework integrates best practices in rapid response interventions in healthcare, assessing outcome improvements in hospital settings (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010). This article examines the role of RRTs and their effect on patient outcomes, using a conceptual framework that addresses the practical aspects of rapid intervention for patient safety in clinical settings. The study explores ICU admissions and cardiac arrests due to varying RRT implementations (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010). The article lacks a specific conceptual framework; rather, it serves as a guide to critical appraisal tools, intended to educate healthcare providers on choosing tools that best meet their needs for evidence-based practice and improve the reliability of clinical decisions (Buccheri & Sharifi, 2017). This article continues the series, focusing on developing appraisal skills to determine study quality, and using a hypothetical framework centered on a clinical PICOT question examining ICU admissions and cardiac arrests as influenced by RRTs (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010).

 

Design/Method

 

Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
Description The study design follows a quasi-experimental format, comparing hospitals with RRTs and those without them. Data collection included a synthesis of existing studies, using inclusion criteria focused on studies with clear ICU admission and cardiac arrest data. Exclusion criteria eliminated non-relevant or low-quality studies. The research methodology emphasizes appraising the reliability of data through an evidence synthesis table, categorizing studies by evidence level to conclude RRT effectiveness (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010). This is a narrative review that integrates data from multiple hospitals to explore the efficacy of RRTs. Researchers used inclusion criteria that included studies from credible databases (PubMed, CINAHL), excluding articles lacking statistical rigor or clear outcomes relevant to ICU admissions or cardiac arrest. The design ensures a comprehensive examination of available evidence on RRTs (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010). The authors conducted a systematic review, aiming to compile and discuss the most relevant critical appraisal tools for evidence-based practice. Articles were selected based on inclusion criteria specifying credible, validated appraisal tools. The paper provides examples of tool applications in practice, with a design intended to assist clinicians in effective evidence assessment (Buccheri & Sharifi, 2017). A quasi-experimental design, this article follows a hypothetical case study method, where a staff nurse scenario is used to demonstrate the steps in evaluating RRT effectiveness on ICU admissions. Inclusion and exclusion criteria focused on studies with relevant PICOT questions and similar clinical settings, providing a model for applying evidence appraisal skills in practice (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010).

 

Sample/Setting

 

Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
Description Sampled studies varied in hospital size (218-662 beds), covering teaching, acute care, community, and public hospitals. Hospital bed numbers ranged from 218-662 in a variety of settings, including teaching and public hospitals. Included 150 nurses from diverse settings. Focused on providing accessible tools for EBP (Buccheri & Sharifi, 2017). Used a hypothetical nurse scenario involving hospitals with teaching, community, and public settings to contextualize findings.

 

Major Variables Studied

Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
Variables Independent: RRTs Dependent: ICU admissions and cardiac arrests Independent: RRTs Dependent: ICU admissions and cardiac arrests Independent: Critical appraisal tools Dependent: Evidence quality Independent: RRTs Dependent: ICU admissions and cardiac arrests

 

Measurement

Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
Description Statistical analysis of ICU admissions and cardiac arrest rates, with P-values for significant results (p < 0.05). Studies were categorized by design. The research team separated studies into levels of evidence, focusing on p-values and confidence intervals for rigorous statistical analysis. Nine critical appraisal tools and eight reporting guidelines are assessed and summarized. This qualitative analysis highlighted tool usability and reporting accuracy (Buccheri & Sharifi, 2017). Researchers evaluated the validity of each selected study using reliability metrics and bias assessments, dividing studies by design to assess ICU admission reduction and RRT impact (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010).

 

Data Analysis Statistical or Qualitative Findings

Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
Findings Data indicated significant reductions in ICU admissions with RRT implementation (p < 0.05), suggesting positive outcomes in patient safety (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010). The synthesis of studies revealed consistent evidence supporting RRTs’ efficacy in reducing ICU admissions and cardiac arrests when properly implemented (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010). Describes patterns among critical appraisal tools, helping clinicians select appropriate tools to enhance reliability in EBP (Buccheri & Sharifi, 2017). Validity assessments across studies indicated that improved RRTs correlated with a decrease in ICU admissions and improved patient safety (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010).

 

Findings and Recommendations

Article #1             Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
Summary Recommends the inclusion of RRTs in healthcare settings for improved patient outcomes. RRTs should be standard practice in reducing ICU admissions and improving response to emergencies (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010). Suggests that healthcare systems consider RRTs a mandatory part of patient safety protocols to prevent ICU admissions and cardiac arrest (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010). Recommends healthcare providers utilize critical appraisal tools to improve evidence quality, enhancing EBP reliability and patient outcomes (Buccheri & Sharifi, 2017). Advises clinical practitioners to regularly apply critical appraisal techniques to ensure high-quality, evidence-based decisions, especially in emergency response planning (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010).

 

Part 2: Evidence-Based Best Practices

Recommended Best Practice: Implementation of Rapid Response Teams (RRTs) to Improve Patient Outcomes

Based on the critical appraisal of the selected articles, a clear best practice recommendation that emerges is the implementation of Rapid Response Teams (RRTs) in hospital settings. Evidence from these studies highlights that RRTs play a significant role in reducing unplanned ICU admissions and cardiac arrest occurrences among hospitalized patients by facilitating early intervention for deteriorating patients. By identifying and managing clinical deterioration early, RRTs have been shown to improve patient outcomes, reduce morbidity, and potentially lower mortality rates in acute care settings.

Justification for the Best Practice Recommendation

The research reviewed emphasizes the impact of RRTs on patient safety and outcomes. For instance, Fineout-Overholt et al. (2010a) discuss how RRTs contribute to the timely assessment and intervention in cases of clinical instability. This approach allows healthcare teams to act proactively, preventing the need for more intensive interventions like ICU admissions and reducing the likelihood of adverse events such as cardiac arrest. Additionally, the evidence suggests that RRTs may alleviate some of the workload on ICU staff, as fewer patients require transfer to intensive care when early intervention is provided (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010b).

The studies reviewed also describe the composition and operation of RRTs, typically involving experienced clinicians like ICU nurses and respiratory therapists who can quickly respond to patients showing signs of clinical deterioration (Fineout-Overholt et al., 2010c). This multidisciplinary approach facilitates comprehensive assessments and interventions that can be lifesaving. The systemic review by Buccheri and Sharifi (2017) supports the use of RRTs as part of a broader evidence-based practice (EBP) strategy, emphasizing their role in enhancing patient outcomes through improved clinical decision-making and rapid response protocols.

Challenges and Considerations for Implementation

While the benefits of RRTs are evident, some limitations and challenges exist. Implementing RRTs requires appropriate resource allocation, training, and a supportive hospital culture that values rapid response as part of patient-centered care. Additionally, as Fineout-Overholt et al. (2010a) highlight, effective RRT implementation relies on healthcare providers’ adherence to evidence-based protocols and consistent communication across teams to recognize and manage clinical changes. Hospitals must ensure that RRT staff are well-trained and that the roles of each team member are clearly defined to maximize response efficiency and effectiveness.

Conclusion

In essence, implementing RRTs in hospitals is a highly recommended evidence-based practice that has been shown to improve patient outcomes by reducing ICU admissions and preventing adverse events like cardiac arrests. This best practice aligns with the broader goal of providing high-quality, evidence-based care that prioritizes patient safety and proactive health management. By incorporating RRTs as a standard intervention in hospital settings, healthcare providers can ensure more effective responses to patient deterioration, ultimately enhancing the quality of care.

References

Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stilwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010a). Evidence-based practice, step by step: A critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III. American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000388264.49427.f9

Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B. M., Stilwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010b). Evidence-based practice, step by step: A critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I. American Journal of Nursing, 110(9), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000388264.49427.f9

Buccheri, R., & Sharifi, C. (2017). Critical appraisal tools and reporting guidelines for evidence-based practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(6), 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12258

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS 6052/5052 EB004 Critical Appraisal Evaluation Summary and Synthesis of Evidence Assignment

Description

Overview

For this Performance Task Assessment, you will critically appraise peer-reviewed articles related to a clinical question or interest and based on the critical appraisal of the articles, recommend a best practice that emerges from the research.

Your response to this Assessment should:

  • Reflect the criteria provided in the rubric.
  • Adhere to the required assignment length.

This Assessment requires submission of two (2) documents, a completed Critical Appraisal Worksheet and an evidenced-based practice recommendation response. Save your files as EB004_appraisal_firstinitial_lastname (for example, EB004_appraisal_J_Smith) and EB004_EBP_firstinitial_lastname (for example, EB004_EBP_J_Smith).

You may submit a draft of your assignment to the Turnitin Draft Check area to check for authenticity. When you are ready to upload your completed Assessment, use the Assessment tab on the top navigation menu.

Instructions

Access the following to complete this Assessment:

Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the Assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively.

Important Information on Interpreting the Assessment Rubric (click to expand)

Achievement vs. Mastery of the Competency

  • Mastery of this Competency means that 80% or more of the rows have been assessed as Exceeds Expectations and no rows have been assessed as Does Not Meet Expectations.
  • Achievement of this Competency means that all rows are assessed at Meets Expectations or above (but lower than the 80% threshold required for Mastery).

Assessment of Individual Rubric Rows

In order to achieve Meets Expectations for a particular row of the rubric, you must have adequately completed all criteria in that row. This means that you have addressed all required elements to the required level of quantity and/or quality.

In order to achieve Exceeds Expectations for a particular row of the rubric, you must have adequately completed all criteria in the row, and in addition, your response must reflect a depth and breadth of knowledge and expertise. Examples of this include—but are not limited to—the following:

  • You provide additional, specific, and/or particularly relevant examples to illustrate points made.
  • You seamlessly incorporate your original thoughts and diverse, credible, and relevant academic sources, when applicable, to express your viewpoint or develop a persuasive argument.
  • You demonstrate a deeper understanding of the subject that draws from discipline-specific knowledge and theory and incorporates the viewpoints of a diverse set of business and management thought leaders.
  • You draw additional connections between multiple, complex topics to support your explanations.
  • You are able to apply your knowledge in unique, creative, and/or innovative ways.
  • You thoroughly break down concepts into simpler parts and use your understanding of business to make connections.
  • Your analysis is insightful and original.
  • You design processes, products, and/or solutions that are creative, high-quality, and innovative.
  • You consider diverse perspectives and relevant social, ethical, and business-related issues when proposing new ideas or formulating judgments.

Rubric

Important Note: As a student taking this Competency, you agree that you may be required to submit your Assessment for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted Assessment materials will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such materials. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Usage Policy posted on the Turnitin.com site.

Click each of the items below to complete this assessment

Part 1: Critical Appraisal of Research

  • Identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. (Note: You are required to focus on the same clinical issue of interest in the competencies EB002–EB006.)
  • Develop a PICOT question to address this clinical issue of interest.
  • Using the keywords from the PICOT question, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level.
  • Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected by completing the Critical Appraisal Worksheet.
    • Be sure to include an evaluation table.

Part 2: Evidence-Based Best Practices

Based on your appraisal, recommend a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. In a 1- to 2-page narrative, address the following:

  • Explain the best practice that emerged, justifying your proposal with APA citations for the evidenced-based research that you reviewed.
  • Evaluation Table Use this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research
Full APA formatted citation of selected article. Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4
Evidence Level * (I, II, or III)
Conceptual Framework Describe the theoretical basis for the study (If there is not one mentioned in the article, say that here).**
Design/Method Describe the design and how the study was carried out (In detail, including inclusion/exclusion criteria).
Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients, attrition rate, etc.
Major Variables Studied List and define dependent and independent variables
Measurement Identify primary statistics used to answer clinical questions (You need to list the actual tests done).
Data Analysis Statistical or Qualitative findings (You need to enter the actual numbers determined by the statistical tests or qualitative data).
Findings and Recommendations General findings and recommendations of the research
Appraisal and Study Quality Describe the general worth of this research to practice. What are the strengths and limitations of study? What are the risks associated with implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research? What is the feasibility of use in your practice?
Key findings
Outcomes
General Notes/Comments
  • *These levels are from the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice: Evidence Level and Quality Guide · Level I Experimental, randomized controlled trial (RCT), systematic review RTCs with or without meta-analysis · Level II Quasi-experimental studies, systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies, or quasi-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis · Level III Nonexperimental, systematic review of RCTs, quasi-experimental with/without meta-analysis, qualitative, qualitative systematic review with/without meta-synthesis · Level IV Respected authorities’ opinions, nationally recognized expert committee/consensus panel reports based on scientific evidence · Level V Literature reviews, quality improvement, program evaluation, financial evaluation, case reports, nationally recognized expert(s) opinion based on experiential evidence **Note on Conceptual Framework · The following information is from Walden academic guides which helps explain conceptual frameworks and the reasons they are used in research. Here is the link https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/conceptualframework · Researchers create theoretical and conceptual frameworks that include a philosophical and methodological model to help design their work. A formal theory provides context for the outcome of the events conducted in the research. The data collection and analysis are also based on the theoretical and conceptual framework. · As stated by Grant and Osanloo (2014), “Without a theoretical framework, the structure and vision for a study is unclear, much like a house that cannot be constructed without a blueprint. By contrast, a research plan that contains a theoretical framework allows the dissertation study to be strong and structured with an organized flow from one chapter to the next.” · Theoretical and conceptual frameworks provide evidence of academic standards and procedure. They also offer an explanation of why the study is pertinent and how the researcher expects to fill the gap in the literature. · Literature does not always clearly delineate between a theoretical or conceptual framework. With that being said, there are slight differences between the two.
    References The Johns Hopkins Hospital/Johns Hopkins University (n.d.). Johns Hopkins nursing dvidence-based practice: appendix C: evidence level and quality guide. Retrieved October 23, 2019 from https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/evidence-based-practice/_docs/appendix_c_evidence_level_quality_guide.pdf Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, Selecting, and Integrating a Theoretical Framework in Dissertation Research: Creating the Blueprint for Your” House”. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 4(2), 12-26. Walden University Academic Guides (n.d.). Conceptual & theoretical frameworks overview. Retrieved October 23, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/conceptualframework

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

/by