NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example AssignmentAssignment Brief: NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment

Course: NURS FPX 4020 Improving Quality of Care and Patient Safety

Assignment Title: Assessment 1: Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety

Overview:

This assignment focuses on improving quality and safety in healthcare, specifically addressing patient falls as a significant safety concern. Students will explore the risk factors associated with patient falls, look into practical solutions to mitigate this issue, understand the vital role of nurses in fall prevention, and identify key stakeholders for effective collaboration.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

The primary goals of this assignment are to:

  1. Analyze Patient Fall Risk Factors: Investigate and understand both internal and external factors contributing to the safety risk of patient falls. Utilize relevant literature and resources to gain insights into these risk elements.
  2. Explore Evidence-Based Solutions: Examine practical practices and solutions aimed at preventing patient falls. This includes assessing the effectiveness of interventions, such as minimizing psychoactive drug use, conducting gait and balance training, and providing vitamin D supplementation.
  3. Understand the Role of Nurses in Fall Prevention: Recognize and articulate the essential role of nurses in addressing patient falls. This involves assessing their involvement in fall risk assessment, patient education, and effective communication within the healthcare team.
  4. Identify Stakeholders for Collaboration: Identify and discuss stakeholders essential for collaborative efforts in fall prevention. Understand the importance of working together involving patients, doctors, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals.

The Student’s Role:

As a student undertaking this assignment, your role involves:

  • Research and Analysis: Conduct in-depth research to understand the complexities of patient fall risk factors and evidence-based solutions. Utilize academic journals, textbooks, and reputable sources to gather information.
  • Critical Thinking: Apply critical thinking skills to evaluate the effectiveness of evidence-based solutions. Consider the practicality of each intervention in real-world healthcare settings.
  • Nursing Perspective: Embrace the role of a nurse by exploring how they contribute to fall prevention. Analyze their responsibilities, including fall risk assessment, patient education, and communication, to comprehend the comprehensive nature of nursing involvement.
  • Stakeholder Identification: Identify and discuss key stakeholders involved in collaborative efforts for fall prevention. Emphasize the importance of effective communication and teamwork among healthcare professionals.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Assignment

For This Assessment, You Will Develop A 3-5 Page Paper That Examines A Safety Quality Issue In A Health Care Setting. You Will Analyze The Issue And Examine Potential Evidence-Based And Best-Practice Solutions From The Literature As Well As The Role

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Analyze the elements of a successful quality improvement initiative.    

Explain evidence-based and best-practice solutions to improve patient safety related to a specific patient safety risk and reduce costs.

Competency 2: Analyze factors that lead to patient safety risks.    

Explain factors leading to a specific patient safety risk.

Competency 4: Explain the nurse’s role in coordinating care to enhance quality and reduce costs.    

Explain how nurses can help coordinate care to increase patient safety and reduce costs.

Identify stakeholders with whom nurses would need to coordinate to drive quality and safety enhancements.

Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based strategies to communicate in a manner that supports safe and effective patient care.    

Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.

References

Allen, M. (2013). How many die from medical mistakes in U.S. hospitals? Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2013/09/20/224507654/how-many-die-from-medical-mistakes-in-u-s-hospitals.

Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J., & Donaldson, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Professional Context

As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for implementing quality improvement (QI) and patient safety measures in health care settings. Effective quality improvement measures result in systemic and organizational changes, ultimately leading to the development of a patient safety culture.

Scenario

Consider the hospital-acquired conditions that are not reimbursed under Medicare/Medicaid, some of which are specific safety issues such as infections, falls, medication errors, and other concerns that could have been prevented or alleviated with the use of evidence-based guidelines.

Choose a specific condition of interest and incorporate evidence-based strategies to support communication and ensure safe and effective care.

For this assessment, consider using one of the following approaches:

Expand on the scenario presented in Vila Health: Identifying Patient Safety Concerns and analyze a quality improvement (QI) initiative.

Analyze a current issue in clinical practice and identify a quality improvement (QI) initiative in the health care setting.

Instructions

The purpose of this assessment is to better understand the role of the baccalaureate-prepared nurse in enhancing quality improvement (QI) measures that address safety risk. This will be within the specific context of patient safety risks at a health care setting of your choice. You will do this by exploring the professional guidelines and best practices for improving and maintaining patient safety in health care settings from organizations such as QSEN and the IOM. Looking through the lens of these professional best practices to examine the current policies and procedures currently in place at your chosen organization and the impact on safety measures for patients, you will consider the role of the nurse in driving quality and safety improvements. You will identify stakeholders in QI improvement and safety measures as well as consider evidence-based strategies to enhance quality of care and promote safety in the context of your chosen health care setting.

Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so that you know what is needed for a distinguished score.

Explain factors leading to a specific patient-safety risk.

Explain evidence-based and best-practice solutions to improve patient safety related to a specific patient-safety risk and reduce costs.

Explain how nurses can help coordinate care to increase patient safety and reduce costs.

Identify stakeholders with whom nurses would coordinate to drive safety enhancements.

Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Additional Requirements

Length of submission: 3–5 pages, plus title and reference pages.

Number of references: Cite a minimum of 4 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment

Administration-related errors

Patient safety and the quality of care are paramount goals in healthcare, directly impacting treatment outcomes and patient satisfaction. Continuous quality improvement is integral to enhancing the overall efficiency of healthcare services. However, challenges persist in achieving quality enhancement, with a notable concern being medication errors, defined by the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention (NCCMERP, n.d) as “any preventable event that may cause or lead to inappropriate medication use or patient harm.” Medication errors (M.E.s) occurring during drug administration are often attributed to nurses. Although these errors can happen throughout the healthcare system, this paper specifically addresses the gravity of the issue within acute care settings.

Acute hospitals, providing short-term yet critical treatment services, such as emergency or intensive care, are prone to distractions and require quick decision-making. This setting increases the likelihood of medication administration errors (MAEs), posing a threat to patient safety. To address this, nurses need to implement effective strategies and solutions to minimize administration-related errors and improve care quality.

Overview of Medication Errors

Medication errors (M.E.s) constitute a significant healthcare issue, resulting in both minor and severe harm to patients. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA, 2019), there are over 100,000 reported presumed cases of M.E.s annually. Additionally, up to 9,000 people in the U.S. die each year due to these errors (Tariq et al., 2021). The associated costs are substantial, exceeding $40 billion per year in total care costs for patients affected by M.E.s (Tariq et al., 2021). Beyond financial implications, M.E.s contribute to perceptions of negligence, carelessness, or inexperience among healthcare staff, eroding trust in healthcare services.

Factors Leading to Medication Administration Errors

While medication errors (M.E.s) can occur at any stage of medication use, they are particularly prevalent during administration, accounting for up to 25% of drug administration instances (Koyama et al., 2020). Inattention and distraction are leading causes of MAEs, often resulting in errors such as administering the wrong drug, dose, or to the wrong patient. Nursing inattentiveness is linked to factors like high workload, multitasking, and increased patient flow (Bucknall et al., 2019). Distractions, common in healthcare facilities, especially in acute care settings, contribute to the most frequent administration-related M.E.s.

Competence or skill flaws, insufficient drug knowledge, misunderstandings related to abbreviations or poor handwriting, similar drug names, packaging, incorrect routes of administration, and non-compliance with recommendations and protocols further contribute to MAEs (Tariq et al., 2021). These factors elevate the risk of patient harm. However, the majority of these factors are preventable human errors that can be mitigated through the implementation of appropriate strategies.

Strategies to Improve Patient Safety

Improving patient safety and care quality necessitates a reduction in M.E. rates. Adherence to the “five-rights” rule, ensuring the right patient receives the right drug at the right time, dose, and route, is a fundamental strategy (Martyn et al., 2019). However, recent studies suggest the need for new frameworks, emphasizing the importance of managing workflow, avoiding interruptions, and implementing patient-centered strategies to contribute to safe and prompt medication administration (Martyn et al., 2019). The introduction of new teaching strategies, such as reflection and remediation educational models, can raise awareness of proper drug administration and reduce MAEs (McCabe & Ea, 2016). Computerizing and automating the medication preparation and administration process is another strategy endorsed by research, as it significantly reduces the occurrence of medication errors (Risør et al., 2018).

Nurse Roles

Nurses play a pivotal role in healthcare, particularly in acute care settings, where they are involved in various aspects, including medication prescribing, preparation, dispensing, and administration. Educated, experienced, and attentive nurses contribute to the prevention of medication errors through their high level of competence. Nurses are crucial in the medication use process, serving as the last line of defense to prevent MAEs by double-checking the correctness of medication, dose, patient, time, and route before administration.

Nurse Coordination with Stakeholders

Interdisciplinary collaboration is crucial to preventing medication administration errors. Nurses often require additional information from clinicians, physicians, pharmacists, or other nurses to ensure safe drug administration. Effective communication with patients is also essential, as missing patient information, failure to obtain medical and allergy histories, or not being aware of side effects can lead to MAEs. Nurses act as intermediaries, connecting healthcare professionals with patients, coordinating communication, and ensuring safe medication use.

Conclusion

Medication errors related to drug administration pose significant risks to patient safety, ranging from minor harm to potential fatality. While various factors contribute to these errors, they are preventable incidents requiring diligent efforts to explore and implement effective strategies. Reducing the rate of MAEs is crucial to providing patients with safe and quality care. The skills, knowledge, and attitudes of nursing staff are instrumental and should be maintained at a high level to ensure the prevention of medication errors.

References

Bucknall, T., Fossum, M., Hutchinson, A. M., Botti, M., Considine, J., Dunning, T., Hughes, L., Weir-Phyland, J., Digby, R. & Manias, E. (2019). Nurses’ decision‐making, practices and perceptions of patient involvement in medication administration in an acute hospital setting. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 75(6), 1316-1327. Web.

Food and Drug Administration (2019). Working to reduce medication errors. Web.

Koyama, A. K., Maddox, C. S., Li, L., Bucknall, T., & Westbrook, J. I. (2020). Effectiveness of double checking to reduce medication administration errors: a systematic review. BMJ Quality & Safety, 29(7), 595–603. Web.

Martyn, J., & Paliadelis, P. (2019). Nurses’ decision-making and the Five Rights of medication administration. Contemporary Nurse, 55(1), 116–126. Web.

McCabe, B., & Ea, E. (2016). Medication administration error reduction efforts in nursing homes: A systematic review and synthesis of quantitative evidence. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 62, 92-103. Web.

Risør, B. W., Lisby, M., Sørensen, J., & Bro, L. (2018). Two strategies for introducing barcoding of drug administration to an electronic medication administration record. Journal of Patient Safety, 14(4), 459-465. Web.

Tariq, R. A., Rai, A. B., Tai, Y. H., & Raouf, M. (2021). Medication administration errors in pediatrics: A systematic review. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 59, 25–33. Web.

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment Two

Introduction

Patient safety is a critical aspect of healthcare delivery, and medication administration errors (MAEs) pose a significant threat to patient well-being. This paper aims to explore the factors contributing to MAEs and present evidence-based strategies to enhance the quality of patient care while minimizing costs. By analyzing a specific incident involving a medication error and employing professional guidelines, this paper elucidates the role of baccalaureate-prepared nurses in coordinating care to drive safety enhancements.

Factors Leading to Patient Safety Risks

One illustrative incident involves Nurse Ella, who inadvertently administered rapid-acting insulin instead of long-acting insulin to a diabetic patient, Mr. Wallace. Several factors contribute to such medication errors:

Lack of Knowledge and Training: Inadequate knowledge about drug doses, interactions, and contraindications is a leading factor of medication administration errors. Research indicates that 78.7% of medication errors result from poor training of nurses (Hassen et al., 2022). Nurses possessing advanced pharmaceutical knowledge and subsequent training are less likely to make medication administration errors.

Communication Gap Between Healthcare Professionals: Insufficient communication and collaboration among healthcare staff contribute to medication errors. A study suggests a higher incidence of medication administration errors in settings with communication gaps (Ghasemi et al., 2022).

Prescribing Errors: Inaccurate prescriptions leading to incorrect dosages and inappropriate instructions are another significant factor. Incompletely written prescriptions contribute to 71% of prescription-related errors (White et al., 2019).

Stress, Burnout, and Mental Health Challenges: Elevated stress levels among nurses due to excessive workloads and long shifts contribute to psychological distress, burnout, and ultimately, medication errors. Burnout is linked to a fivefold increase in patient care and medication errors (White et al., 2019).

Evidence-Based Best Practices Solutions

To address these challenges, evidence-based and best practice solutions are crucial. Some effective strategies include:

QSEN Competencies: Implementation of Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) competencies in nursing education has been shown to improve nurses’ quality and safety education by up to 75% (Watanabe et al., 2021).

Medication Reconciliation: Implementing medication reconciliation procedures during care transitions, contrasting a patient’s present pharmaceutical regimen with prescribed medications, improves patient safety (Koprivnik et al., 2020).

Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE): Electronically submitting medicine orders through CPOE systems reduces the chance of adverse drug events and improves patient safety (Skalafouris et al., 2022).

Barcode Medication Administration (BCMA) Systems: Using BCMA systems for correct medication delivery enhances patient safety by preventing drug errors through patient identification and barcoded labels (Ye, 2023).

Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS): Offering suggestions based on research to healthcare practitioners at the point of care, CDSS can notify healthcare professionals about possible medication combinations, dosage mistakes, or allergies (Manias et al., 2020).

Value-Based Formulary Management: Choosing medicines based on clinical potency, cost-effectiveness, and safety helps maintain high healthcare quality while cutting expenditures related to pharmaceuticals (Weinmeyer et al., 2021).

Nurse-Led Coordination to Optimize Patient Safety

Effective coordination among healthcare professionals, especially nurses, plays a pivotal role in optimizing patient safety. In the case of medication administration errors, nurses can collaborate with various stakeholders:

Coordination with Physicians and Pharmacists: Clear communication between nurses and physicians regarding treatment regimens, along with collaborative efforts with pharmacists, can reduce prescription transcribing and filling errors (Koprivnik et al., 2020).

Collaboration with IT Personnel: Mutual collaboration with IT personnel for the effective utilization of technology tools ensures the proper functioning of systems like CPOE, BCMA, and CDSS to prevent MAEs (Ye, 2023).

Interdisciplinary Collaboration: A holistic care approach by working with interdisciplinary teams and adherence to regulatory requirements reduces the risk of errors, ensuring patient safety and cost-effectiveness (Alrabadi et al., 2021).

Nurses’ Coordination with Other Stakeholders

Nurses play a crucial role in collaborating with various stakeholders to improve medicine delivery and enhance patient safety:

Collaboration with Physicians and Pharmacists: Nurses collaborate with physicians and pharmacists to ensure accurate medication administration. Quality improvement teams and nursing staff can work together to evaluate challenges and implement suitable strategies (Manias et al., 2020).

Involvement of Patients and Families: Better adherence and patient satisfaction can be achieved by involving patients and their families actively in the medication administration process.

Involvement of Medication Safety Officers and Administrators: Organizational prioritization of patient safety through the involvement of medication safety officers and administrators is crucial. Professional associations offer tools for the continuous advancement of medical practices (Manias et al., 2020).

Conclusion

Medication administration errors pose a significant threat to patient safety and contribute to increased treatment costs. However, employing evidence-based best practices and fostering effective coordination among healthcare professionals, especially nurses, can significantly reduce the occurrence of MAEs. The integration of QSEN competencies, medication reconciliation, and advanced technological tools, along with interdisciplinary collaboration, creates a holistic approach to patient care, ensuring safety and cost-effectiveness.

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment Three

Quality improvement initiatives are widespread across health organizations, emphasizing patient safety and quality care. Patient safety remains a top priority for interdisciplinary teams, particularly as medication errors pose common and recurring threats to healthcare, contributing to increased patient harm and mortality (Alotaibi & Federico, 2017). Medication errors are preventable and can result from various factors such as communication gaps, disturbances during medication retrieval and administration, missing patient information, poor labeling, inadequate medication reconciliation, and lack of knowledge.

Factors Leading to Patient Safety Risks

Medication errors can occur at any time and place, often during prescription and drug monitoring. Resolving this issue necessitates collective responsibility, involving interdisciplinary collaboration. Evidence-based practices play a crucial role in raising awareness among healthcare professionals. While medication errors can happen in diverse settings, home environments pose risks, especially for children due to negligent drug storage. Adherence to the five rights of medication administration — ensuring the right drug, patient, dosage, time, and route — is critical in preventing errors. Factors contributing to negligence include increased workloads, fatigue, and insufficient pharmacologic knowledge.

Evidence-based Practices

High-quality care aligns with evidence-based research, emphasizing patient-centered care and proper communication among staff. Involving patients and caregivers in medication education and ensuring clear instructions can enhance care quality. Best practices to enhance patient safety encompass double-checking procedures, using name alerts, planning medication administration to avoid disruptions, and leveraging available technologies.

The Nurse’s Role in Coordinating Care

Nurses, integral to hospital quality improvement, engage in various roles, including patient care, data collection, and medication management. Medication errors pose financial burdens, and nurses play a vital role in coordinating care to alleviate these challenges. Coordination involves assessing the work environment, implementing safety technologies, educating patients, and exercising caution with high-alert medications. Nurses share knowledge, ensure seamless care transitions, and collaborate with interdisciplinary teams to develop personalized care plans, contributing to cost efficiency.

Stakeholder Coordination for Quality and Safety Enhancements

Effective coordination involves collaboration with stakeholders such as society, administrators, patients, families, researchers, technicians, nursing educators, and physicians. Patients and families actively contribute to quality patient safety by providing essential information and seeking clarification on medications.

Conclusion

Patient safety remains paramount, necessitating a focus on preventing medication errors. Factors contributing to these errors are diverse, emphasizing the need for strict adherence to the five rights of medication administration. Coordination by nurses, evidence-based practices, and stakeholder collaboration are essential elements in enhancing quality and safety in healthcare.

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment Four

Introduction

Ensuring patient safety and delivering quality care stand out as paramount challenges in healthcare, involving healthcare facilities, nurses, physicians, and various professionals. Suboptimal quality and compromised patient safety result in adverse outcomes such as morbidity, mortality, increased care costs, prolonged hospital stays, diminished patient and job satisfaction, among other issues. This paper aims to examine the patient safety issue of medication administration, analyze evidence-based practices, and scrutinize the coordination among nurses and stakeholders.

Patient-safety risk focusing on medication administration

Medication administration, a pivotal process predominantly managed by nurses, involves multiple stakeholders, including physicians, pharmacists, and informatics nurses. Errors at any stage of this process can lead to medication administration errors (MAEs) and subsequent adverse events. Research indicates varying rates of prescription, dispensing, and dosage errors, emphasizing the substantial contribution of human errors, particularly by nurses. Interferences during medication administration, whether from patients, families, or distractions, further elevate the risk of errors. Factors like nurse-to-patient ratio, poor communication, and inadequate training are additional contributors, with the potential consequences ranging from mortality and morbidity to adverse effects.

Evidence-based and best practice solutions

Implementing evidence-based practices (EBPs) is crucial to address medication administration challenges. Training and educating healthcare staff based on guidelines from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the Quality and Safety Education for Nurses (QSEN) is a primary EBP. This includes vigilant verification of medication with electronic health records (EHRs), allergy checks, pre-administration assessment, accurate dosage calculation, and the avoidance of workarounds and abbreviations. Another EBP involves the implementation of a physician order entry system with error reporting and communication capabilities, aiming to reduce prescription, dispensing, and administration errors. Technological interventions, such as bar-code-based medication administration and voice-tagged dosage calculation, prove effective in preventing errors. Strategies like using color-coded tabards and checklists, along with interprofessional collaboration, contribute to reducing interruptions and enhancing communication during medication administration.

Coordinated care among nurses to improve quality and patient safety

Nurses play a crucial role in coordinating care to address burnout and create supportive work environments. Collaborative efforts during medication administration, such as sharing responsibilities and supporting each other during interruptions, contribute to error reduction. Effective communication among nurses to identify patient allergies and educate colleagues about EHRs and technology usage enhances skills and knowledge. Nurse leaders manage resources and conflicts, ensuring a coordinated approach to resolve practice issues. Shared decision-making and coordinated care further contribute to efficient workflow and decreased medication errors.

Stakeholders and safety enhancement

Coordination among various stakeholders, including informatics nurses, pharmacists, physicians, therapists, nurse leaders, and patients, is essential for safety enhancement. Patients’ active involvement in treatment decisions and their contribution to health history and allergy information are critical. Informatics nurses play a vital role in data management, error reporting, and correction processes within EHRs. Physicians, pharmacists, and nurse leaders collaborate to prevent and correct medication errors, while therapists and specialists provide valuable insights into patient conditions. Effective communication and coordination among stakeholders help in resolving conflicts and ensuring patient safety.

References

Abukhader, I., & Abukhader, K. (2020). Effect of medication safety education program on intensive care nurses’ knowledge regarding medication errors. Journal Of Biosciences And Medicines, 08(06), 135-147.

Armstrong, G. (2019). QSEN safety competency: the key ingredient is just culture. The Journal Of Continuing Education In Nursing, 50(10), 444-447.

Bradley, C., Luder, H., Beck, A., Bowen, R., Heaton, P., & Kahn, R. et al. (2016). Pediatric asthma medication therapy management through community pharmacy and primary care collaboration. Journal Of The American Pharmacists Association, 56(4), 455-460.

Hammoudi, B., Ismaile, S., & Abu Yahya, O. (2017). Factors associated with medication administration errors and why nurses fail to report them. Scandinavian Journal Of Caring Sciences, 32(3), 1038-1046.

Huckels-Baumgart, S., Niederberger, M., Manser, T., Meier, C., & Meyer-Massetti, C. (2017). A combined intervention to reduce interruptions during medication preparation and double-checking: a pilot-study evaluating the impact of staff training and safety vests. Journal Of Nursing Management, 25(7), 539-548.

Korb-Savoldelli, V., Boussadi, A., Durieux, P., & Sabatier, B. (2018). Prevalence of computerized physician order entry systems–related medication prescription errors: A systematic review. International Journal Of Medical Informatics, 111, 112-122.

Manias, E. (2018). Effects of interdisciplinary collaboration in hospitals on medication errors: an integrative review. Expert Opinion On Drug Safety, 17(3), 259-275.

Montgomery, A., Azuero, A., Baernholdt, M., Loan, L., Miltner, R., & Qu, H. et al. (2020). Nurse burnout predicts self-reported medication administration errors in acute care hospitals. Journal For Healthcare Quality, Publish Ahead of Print.

Palese, A., Ferro, M., Pascolo, M., Dante, A., & Vecchiato, S. (2019). “I am administering medication—please do not interrupt me”: red tabards preventing interruptions as perceived by surgical patients. Journal Of Patient Safety, 15(1), 30-36.

Pop, M., & Finocchi, M. (2016). Medication errors: a case-based review. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 27(1), 5-11.

Tariq, R., Vashisht, V., Sinha, A., & Scherbak, y. (2021). Medication dispensing errors and prevention. Retrieved 17 March 2021, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519065/.

Thomas, L., Donohue-Porter, P., & Stein Fishbein, J. (2017). Impact of interruptions, distractions, and cognitive load on procedure failures and medication administration errors. Journal Of Nursing Care Quality, 32(4), 309-317.

Thompson, K., Swanson, K., Cox, D., Kirchner, R., Russell, J., & Wermers, R. et al. (2018). Implementation of bar-code medication administration to reduce patient harm. Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes, 2(4), 342-351.

Tsegaye, D., Alem, G., Tessema, Z., & Alebachew, W. (2020). Medication administration errors and associated factors among nurses. International Journal Of General Medicine, Volume 13, 1621-1632.

Verweij, L., Smeulers, M., Maaskant, J., & Vermeulen, H. (2016). Quiet please! drug round tabards: are they effective and accepted? A Mixed-Method Study. Journal Of Nursing Scholarship, 46(5), 340-348.

NURS FPX 4020 Assessment Enhancing Quality and Safety Example Assignment Five

Introduction

Patient safety is a major concern in healthcare, with patient falls being a significant safety issue. A fall is described as “an unplanned descent to the floor (or extension of the floor [e.g., trash can or other equipment]) with or without injury to the patient and with or without assistance” (Tucker et al., 2019, p. 113). Falls can lead to various injuries, including fractures, functional decline, traumatic brain injury, and nursing home placement, making them the “leading cause of accidental death in people over 65 years old” (Lasater et al., 2016, p. 545). In addition to the human cost, falls increase healthcare expenses due to the need to treat preventable injuries. Healthcare organizations are thus focused on falls prevention to enhance patient safety and reduce healthcare costs. This paper examines the risk factors of patient falls and evidence-based solutions. It also explores the role of nurses in falls prevention and identifies stakeholders with whom nurses should collaborate to address this safety concern.

Factors Leading to Patient-Safety Risk

Patient fall risk factors can be categorized as intrinsic and extrinsic. Intrinsic factors include patient characteristics such as age, sex, previous falls, balance impairment, gait, activities of daily living (ADL) disabilities, stroke, cognitive impairments, Parkinson’s disease, and incontinence (Kwan et al., 2016). The risk of falls increases with age, with those aged 65-74 years having a 32% probability and those over 80 years having a 37% probability (Kwan et al., 2016). Extrinsic factors related to the environment include home hazards, use of assistive devices, and inappropriate footwear (Morone et al., 2018; Kwan et al., 2016). The Morse scale assesses risk factors such as history of falls, secondary diagnosis, walk assistance, parenteral therapy, mental status, and gait to determine an individual’s risk of falls (Nadia & Permanasari, 2018).

Evidence-Based Solutions

Addressing patient falls begins with identifying at-risk patients and conducting a multifactorial fall risk assessment for older patients (Morone et al., 2018). Assessment should include factors like gait, balance, mental status, reflexes, and various functions (Morone et al., 2018). Analyzing the type of fall is crucial for selecting preventive strategies, categorizing falls as accidental, unanticipated physiological, anticipated physiological, or intentional (Morone et al., 2018). Evidence-based practices include minimizing psychoactive drug use, engaging in gait and balance training, and providing vitamin D supplementation (Morone et al., 2018). Managing conditions identified during risk assessment, such as visual impairment or a hazardous home environment, is also critical. Effective fall prevention involves interventions addressing both clinical assessment findings and individual risk assessment outcomes (Morone et al., 2018).

The Role of Nurses in Addressing Patient-Safety Risk

Nurses play a central role in addressing the safety issue of patient falls due to their extensive patient interaction and involvement in the care team (Nadia & Permanasari, 2018). Nurses contribute to fall risk assessment using tools like the Morse scale, inform patients about fall risks, and provide necessary assistance. Effective communication among nurses is vital for ensuring patient safety, as poor communication can jeopardize care coordination (Tucker et al., 2019).

Stakeholders

Collaboration with various stakeholders is essential for implementing evidence-based solutions for patient falls. Nurses should educate patients and families on fall risks and prevention strategies. Cooperation with doctors and pharmacists is crucial for adjusting medications and administering vitamin D. Nurses should also work with social workers and doctors to implement strategies like exercise programs, motivational interviewing, and environmental assessment. Effective communication among nurses is necessary for sharing information about safety issues and addressing them (Lasater et al., 2016; Tucker et al., 2019).

References

Kwan, E., Straus, S., & Holroyd-Leduc, J. (2016). Risk factors for falls in the elderly. In A. Huang & L. Mallet (Eds.), Medication-related falls in older people (pp. 91-101). Adis.

Lasater, K., Cotrell, V., McKenzie, G., Simonson, W., Morgove, M. W., Long, E. E., & Eckstrom, E. (2016). Collaborative falls prevention: Interprofessional team formation, implementation, and evaluation. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(12), 545-550.

Morone, G., Federici, A., Tramontano, M., Annicchiarico, R., & Salvia, A. (2018). Strategies to prevent falls. In G. Sandrini, V. Homberg, L. Saltuari, N. Smania, & A. Pedrocchi (Eds.), Advanced technologies for the rehabilitation of gait and balance disorders (pp. 149-158). Springer.

Nadia, P., & Permanasari, V. Y. (2018). Compliance of the nurse for fall risk assessment as a procedure of patient safety: A systematic review. KnE Life Sciences, 4(9), 207-219.

Tucker, S., Sheikholeslami, D., Farrington, M., Picone, D., Johnson, J., Matthews, G., Evans, R., Gould, R., Bohlken, D., Comried, L., Petrulevich, K., Perkhounkova, E., & Cullen, L. (2019). Patient, nurse, and organizational factors that influence evidence‐based fall prevention for hospitalized oncology patients: An exploratory study. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(2), 111-120.

Receive Academic Excellence with Our Professional Nursing Essay Writing Service

Are you struggling with challenging nursing assignments? Look no further! At ReliablePapers.com, we take pride in being the best nursing paper writing service that can save you time and elevate your academic performance. Our dedicated team of expert nursing essay writers is here to provide you with personalized and original nursing papers tailored to your unique requirements.

Why Choose Our Nursing Paper Writing Service?

  • Expertise Matters: Our pro writers specialize in nursing papers, ensuring that your essay is crafted with in-depth knowledge and understanding of nursing concepts.
  • Affordable Excellence: Worried about your budget? Our online nursing papers come at very affordable prices, making top-notch academic assistance accessible to all college students.
  • Customization Guaranteed: Tired of generic papers? Order a nursing custom paper from us, and our experts will write an original, customized essay to secure the best possible grades for you.

How to Order: Simple and Secure

Ready to experience academic success? Follow these easy steps:

  1. Click on our “Place Order” page.
  2. Fill in all the details for your paper.
  3. Proceed to checkout to complete the payment.

Once done, your order will be assigned to a suitable expert, taking the first step toward academic excellence.

Choose ReliablePapers.com – where excellence meets affordability! Save time for what matters most and let our professional essay writers elevate your academic journey.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient's Spiritual Needs Case Analysis ExampleAssignment Brief: PHI-413V Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

Overview:

The purpose of this assignment is to analyze a case study involving the postponement of medical intervention based on religious beliefs and to explore the ethical implications of such decisions. The case study revolves around the decisions made by a parent, Mike, for his son, James, considering spiritual beliefs and their impact on healthcare choices.

Understanding Assignment Objectives:

Decision-Making and Autonomy:
  • Analyze the crucial ethical principles of patient autonomy and decision-making.
  • Examine the challenges presented when dealing with minors and parental decisions.
  • Assess the ethical and legal responsibilities of healthcare professionals in cases where parental decisions may pose harm to the patient.
  • Evaluate the application of the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence in pediatric healthcare.
Christian View Regarding Health and Sickness:
  • Explore the influence of religious beliefs on healthcare practices and perceptions of sickness, health, and healing.
  • Examine the Christian perspective on illness, specifically viewing sickness as a test or punishment from God.
  • Analyze relevant biblical references that guide Christians on seeking medical treatment and the responsibility to care for the body as a temple.
  • Discuss the balance between faith, prayer, and medical interventions from a Christian standpoint.
Spiritual Assessment:
  • Understand the significance of conducting a spiritual needs assessment in the context of healthcare decisions.
  • Explore tools used for spiritual assessments, focusing on dimensions such as purpose, values, and self-identity.
  • Examine the role of healthcare professionals in addressing spiritual needs and directing patients to appropriate pastoral care.
  • Discuss the potential impact of a spiritual assessment on the alignment of medical decisions with religious beliefs.

The Student’s Role:

As a student, your role is to critically engage with the case study and address the outlined objectives. Provide in-depth analyses of the ethical considerations surrounding parental decisions, the Christian perspective on health and sickness, and the relevance of spiritual assessments in healthcare. Support your insights with references to ethical principles, biblical references, and scholarly literature.

Detailed Assessment Instructions for the PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Assignment

Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

Spirituality and religion are crucial factors in most people seeking medical care. Unfortunately, health care professionals might not consider religious beliefs and spiritual needs when they are dealing with complex medical decisions for their patients or their families. This paper analyzes a case involving parental postponement of a medically needed intervention based on religious beliefs in prayers and miracles…

In addition to the topic study materials, use the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about \”Case Study: Healing and Autonomy\” as the basis for your responses in this assignment.

Answer the following questions about a patient\’s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview.

In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient\’s autonomy? Explain your rationale.
In 400-500 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James\’s care?
In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care?
Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials. Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

BS in Health Sciences 1.2; BS Nursing (RN to BSN ) 5.2 Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.

Case Study: Healing and Autonomy

Mike and Joanne are the parents of James and Samuel, identical

twins born 8 years ago. James is currently suffering from acute glomerulonephritis, kidney failure. James was originally brought

into the hospital for complications associated with a strep throat infection. The spread of the A streptococcus infection led to the subsequent kidney failure. James’s condition was acute enough

to warrant immediate treatment. Usually cases of acute glomerulonephritis caused by strep infection tend to improve on their own or with an antibiotic. However,James also had elevated

blood pressure and enough fluid buildup that required temporary dialysis to relieve.The attending physician suggested immediate dialysis.After some time of discussion with Joanne, Mike informs the physician that they are going to forego the dialysis and place their faith in God. Mike and Joanne had been moved by a sermon their pastor had given a week ago, and also had witnessed a close

friend regain mobility when she was prayed over at a healing service after a serious stroke. They thought it more prudent to take James immediately to a faith healing service instead of putting James through multiple rounds of dialysis. Yet, Mike and Joanne

agreed to return to the hospital after the faith healing services later in the week, and in hopes that James would be healed by then.

Two days later the family returned and was forced to place James Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

on dialysis, as his condition had deteriorated. Mike felt perplexed and tormented by his decision to not treat James earlier.Had he not enough faith? Was God punishing him or James? To make matters

worse, James’s kidneys had deteriorated such that his dialysis was now not a temporary matter and was in need of a kidney transplant. Crushed and desperate, Mike and Joanne immediately offered to donate one of their own kidneys to James, but they were not compatible donors. Over the next few weeks, amidst daily rounds of dialysis, some of their close friends and church members also offered to donate a kidney to James.However, none of them were tissue matches James’s nephrologist called to schedule a private appointment with Mike and Joanne.James was stable, given the regular dialysis, but would require a kidney transplant within the year. Given the desperate situation, the nephrologist informed Mike and Joanne of a donor that was an ideal tissue match, but as of yet had not been considered—James’s brother Samuel. Mike vacillates and struggles to decide whether he should have his other son Samuel lose a kidney or perhaps wait for God to do a miracle this time around. Perhaps this is where the real testing of his faith will come in? Mike reasons, “This time around it is a matter of life and death. What could require greater faith than that?”

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example

Introduction

Spirituality and religion play pivotal roles in the healthcare decisions of individuals. However, healthcare professionals often overlook religious beliefs and spiritual needs when navigating complex medical scenarios. This paper delves into a case involving the deferment of a medically necessary intervention due to religious convictions about prayers and miracles.

Physician’s Role in Decision-Making

In the case of James, the physician should not have permitted Mike, the father, to persist in making decisions that seemed irrational and detrimental to James. While respecting parental autonomy is crucial, healthcare professionals bear a legal and ethical responsibility to intervene when a child’s well-being is jeopardized (Katz & Webb, 2016). In instances where a child faces the risk of disability or death due to parental decisions, professionals must report the situation to appropriate authorities and, if necessary, proceed with life-saving interventions.

Christian Perspective on Health and Sickness

From a Christian standpoint, perceptions of health and sickness are intertwined with faith. Some Christians may view good health as a reward for righteous living and illness as a consequence of sin or a test of faith. In the case of James, his father, Mike, grapples with feelings of inadequacy and questions whether the illness is a result of insufficient faith.

It is imperative for Christians to understand that seeking medical intervention aligns with biblical principles. In Matthew 9:12, Jesus emphasized the role of physicians, indicating that those who are sick need a physician. Medical care is not a lack of faith but a means through which God’s healing can manifest. Christians are encouraged to honor their bodies as temples of God and seek medical care responsibly (1 Corinthians 6:19-20).

Mike’s Dilemma and Christian Ethics

As a Christian, Mike should recognize that medical intervention is not a contradiction to trusting God. Allowing James to undergo necessary medical procedures does not negate the power of prayer but acknowledges that God may work through healthcare professionals. Honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence, Mike should consider the potential benefits of a kidney transplant for James. Beneficence entails promoting well-being, and in this case, a transplant can save James’s life without necessarily conflicting with spiritual beliefs.

Spiritual Needs Assessment

A spiritual needs assessment is instrumental in guiding the physician to assist Mike in determining suitable interventions for James and the family. Identifying spiritual and religious needs ensures that medical decisions are respectful and responsive to these beliefs. A comprehensive assessment involves supporting spiritual beliefs, organizing resources, and facilitating spiritual activities (Isaac et al., 2016).

Upon identifying the spiritual needs of James’s family, the physician can then decide whether to address these needs or involve spiritual and religious leaders in the care process. Referring individuals to appropriate pastoral care acknowledges the importance of spirituality in healthcare decision-making without placing the burden solely on medical professionals.

Conclusion

In conclusion, addressing a patient’s spiritual needs, especially within the context of religious beliefs, is essential for providing holistic and patient-centered care. While respecting autonomy is crucial, healthcare professionals must navigate complex situations, especially when a child’s well-being is at stake. Integrating spirituality into the care process through assessments and collaboration with spiritual leaders ensures a more comprehensive and respectful approach to healthcare decision-making.

References:

Isaac, K., Hay, J., & Lubetkin, E. (2016). Incorporating Spirituality in Primary Care. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(3), 1065-1077.

Katz, A., & Webb, S. (2016). Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics, 138(2), e20161485.

Part Two:

In 200-250 words, respond to the following:

In the context of the Christian worldview, the principles in this case are specified and weighted based on the core tenets of Christian ethics. Christians, when grappling with healthcare dilemmas, consider four key principles, recognizing the need for nuanced evaluation in each unique medical situation. In the presented case, the principle of beneficence carries significant weight. Despite James’s stable condition, the imminent threat to his life within a year without an organ transplant elevates the importance of saving his life. The Christian teaching underscores the sacredness of human life, imposing an obligation on Christians to preserve life. Both the parents and the healthcare practitioners share the responsibility of ensuring James’s survival, aligning with the principle of beneficence. Beyond mere survival, there exists a duty to enhance James’s life, a task guided by the same principle.

In 200-250 words, respond to the following:

Within the Christian worldview, achieving a balance among the four principles—Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy, and Justice—is a matter of discerning priorities aligned with Christian values. The sanctity of life, considered sacred in Christianity, forms the basis for balancing these principles. Christians navigate this delicate equilibrium by prioritizing the principle most aligned with preserving life. For instance, while autonomy allows freedom of choice, the paramount importance of beneficence may supersede in critical situations. In the case, parents exercised autonomy by seeking faith healing, potentially neglecting the beneficence owed to their son. The healthcare professional, guided by Christian ethics, might intervene, placing James on dialysis to avert harm.

Additionally, the Christian perspective emphasizes the role of justice and nonmaleficence. Clear communication with the parents, explaining that delaying treatment could exacerbate James’s condition and lead to dire consequences, incorporates these principles into the decision-making process. Ultimately, a Christian balance among the principles ensures a comprehensive approach, respecting autonomy but prioritizing beneficence, justice, and nonmaleficence in alignment with Christian teachings.

References:

Fried, A. L., & Fisher, C. B. (2018). Emerging ethical and legal issues in clinical child and adolescent psychology. In The Oxford Handbook of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology.

Hoehner, P. J. (2018). Practicing dignity: An introduction to Christian values and decision-making in health care. Biomedical ethics in the Christian narrative. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/phi413v/practicing-dignity-an-introduction-to-christianvalues-and-decision-making-in-health-care/v1.1/#/chapter/3

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example Two

Spiritual Needs Assessment

As healthcare professionals, engaging in conversations with patients about their spirituality becomes imperative. The beliefs, values, and morals of individuals shape their identity, influencing the approach of healthcare workers in providing care. Respecting patients’ beliefs, faith, and cultural backgrounds establishes trust and rapport, essential components of patient care. To deliver optimal care, healthcare professionals must understand the intricate connection between a patient’s belief system and the care plan. Confidence and openness to discussing various aspects of spirituality are crucial for effective patient care.

The author conducted an interview with a family member, D.K., who underwent treatment for an extended period, eventually diagnosed with Celiac Disease. This paper aims to create a spiritual assessment based on the interview, presenting a transcript and analyzing the interaction. Evaluation of the interview’s successes, areas for improvement, and identification of potential barriers between the interviewer and interviewee will be addressed. The focus of the interview is on D.K.’s experiences as a patient in a hospital setting.

Part I: The Interview

Inquiring about D.K.’s religious and spiritual beliefs, the interview revealed her 30-year commitment to Christianity and her reliance on faith during the hospitalization. The discussion highlighted the role of prayer and communion in supporting her spiritual well-being. When questioned about the influence of her beliefs on self-care decisions, D.K. expressed a heightened prayer focus and shared the significance of others praying for her. Additionally, privacy and respect for personal spiritual time emerged as crucial needs that healthcare professionals could address.

Part II: Analysis

The interviewee, an older Caucasian female and a devout Christian, faced a challenging diagnosis of Celiac Disease, impacting her culinary profession centered around gluten. The interview underscored the importance of spiritual care during hospitalization, emphasizing the need for healthcare professionals to respect and encourage moments of prayer and reflection. The author identified the potential value of conducting the interview while D.K. was still an inpatient.

No significant barriers were identified during the spiritual assessment, and the author stressed the importance of maintaining a commitment to spiritual care even amid busy schedules. Acknowledging the interconnectedness of spiritual and physical healing, the author emphasized the equal significance of addressing patients’ spiritual needs without delay.

References:

D.K. Personal Communication. November 2016.

Joint Commission. 2016. Medical Record – Spiritual Assessment. Retrieved from Joint Commission Spiritual Assessment. Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis.

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example Three

The principle of autonomy upholds a patient’s right to make informed medical decisions. However, in the context of this case within a Confucian society, where familial authority plays a significant role, the head of the family, Mike, is expected to make decisions for those under his care (Tai & Tsai, 2003). Despite the physician’s obligation to present all possible measures, the decision ultimately rests with James’s parents, even if it appears irrational from a medical standpoint. Mike, as a Christian family head, is entrusted with ensuring the well-being, both physical and spiritual, of his children. Thus, respecting patient autonomy is vital, trusting that Mike will act in his son’s best interest. James’s parents, albeit belatedly, opted for dialysis, a crucial step in stabilizing the child, allowing time for thoughtful consideration and consultation to determine the best course that benefits James without jeopardizing Samuel.

The physician may intervene in decision-making only if Mike is deemed incompetent or uncertain about the child’s best interests. In such cases, the physician should thoroughly explain all options and the chosen course of action, detailing the potential implications associated with the selected treatment method (Tai & Tsai, 2003).

Christians Views on Sickness and Health

Christianity acknowledges suffering, including sickness, pain, and disability, as integral to religious life (Porterfield, 2005). Viewing suffering as a path to redemption, Christians believe that healing is facilitated through unwavering faith in a higher power. Perspectives on sickness and healing vary among Christians, with some perceiving it as a consequence of sins, while others see it as a test of faith (Porterfield, 2005). In this case, Mike interpreted James’s illness as divine punishment, reflecting the diverse Christian perspectives. Seeking religious meaning and redemption during suffering is common among Christians, often manifesting through caregiving mirroring Jesus’ healing ministry.

Medical interventions, essential for Christians, do not signify a loss of faith; instead, they complement spirituality. Combining medicine with spirituality fosters positive expectations, alleviates stress, and enhances natural recovery processes, akin to the placebo effect (Porterfield, 2005). Various forms of medical interventions, including nutrition, exercise, and mental well-being, intertwine with Christian practices, promoting a holistic approach to health.

Mike, driven by the principles of nonmaleficence and benevolence, should act in James’s best interest. While prayer was attempted, the subsequent dialysis stabilized James, underscoring the importance of medical interventions. Embracing medical assistance aligns with Christian beliefs, acknowledging that God works through individuals, including healthcare professionals. To uphold his faith, Mike can prayerfully support the organ transplant, trusting in divine guidance.

Spiritual Assessment

Spiritual assessment in healthcare aids practitioners in addressing patients’ spiritual and emotional needs during challenging times. Utilizing Draper’s (2012) generic approach to spiritual assessment would be beneficial for Mike. This approach helps recognize and acknowledge spiritually based issues, identifying coping resources and facilitating informed decision-making. Questions should explore Mike’s spiritual beliefs, meaningful aspects of James’s life, and how these beliefs influence healthcare decisions.

Furthermore, the assessment tool can probe into Mike’s spiritual community, assessing its potential to provide emotional and spiritual support. Understanding these aspects enables the physician to tailor interventions that enhance spiritual well-being. Spiritual engagement contributes to improved quality of life, reduced stress symptoms, increased mindfulness, and enhanced coping mechanisms.

Conclusion

Christianity profoundly shapes perceptions of sickness, health, and seeking help from healthcare professionals. Both Christians and physicians play vital roles in maintaining patient autonomy, ensuring informed decision-making while respecting religious beliefs. Integrating medicine with spirituality provides a comprehensive approach to healthcare, acknowledging the interconnectedness of physical and spiritual well-being. The case emphasizes the importance of Christians accepting medical assistance when necessary, promoting a harmonious balance between faith and professional healthcare.

References

Craigie, F. C. (2010). Positive spirituality in health care: Nine practical approaches to pursuing wholeness for clinicians, patients, and health care organizations. Hillcrest Publishing Group.

Draper, P. (2012). An integrative review of spiritual assessment: implications for nursing management. Journal of Nursing Management, 20(8), 970-980.

Porterfield, A. (2005). Healing in the History of Christianity. Oxford University Press.

Tai, M. C. T., & Tsai, T. P. (2003). Who makes the decision? Patient’s autonomy vs. paternalism in a Confucian society. Croatian medical journal, 44(5), 558-561.

Zollfrank, A. A., Trevino, K. M., Cadge, W., Balboni, M. J., Thiel, M. M., Fitchett, G.… & Balboni, T. A. (2015). Teaching health care providers to provide spiritual care: a pilot study. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 18(5), 408-414.

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example Four

Introduction

Healthcare professionals strive to adhere to ethical principles, encompassing a patient’s beneficence, autonomy, nonmaleficence, and justice. However, the intricate nature of human body systems and diverse values often complicates strict adherence to these principles (Johnstone, 2019). Spiritual and religious beliefs, in particular, can significantly influence patients’ willingness to follow healthcare recommendations, potentially leading to adverse health outcomes. This case study highlights the imperative of addressing patients’ spiritual needs to ensure compliance with beneficence and nonmaleficence principles.

Patient Autonomy

The presented case underscores challenges related to patient autonomy. Decisions made by the parents, Mike and Joanne, create a dilemma for the physician in upholding beneficence and nonmaleficence principles. The parents’ choices result in a severe deterioration of their son’s health, prompting consideration of the child’s best interest over parental preferences. While tempting to override parental autonomy for the child’s benefit, disrespecting autonomy can lead to unintended consequences, including distrust in healthcare professionals and potential endangerment of the child (Ubel, Scherr, & Fagerlin, 2017).

Rather than infringing on parental autonomy, the physician should establish effective communication and rapport with the parents. Informing them about all options and consequences, the healthcare practitioner must act in the child’s best interest, emphasizing the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence as priorities (Lawrence, 2007). While being compassionate, the physician should be clear and sincere in presenting the preferred treatment, fostering collaboration with the parents.

Christian Perspective Regarding Sickness and Health

The Christian view on health and illness is nuanced, encompassing perspectives of punishment or trial. In this case, Mike perceives his son’s illness as a trial imposed by God, necessitating an active response. Viewing medical advances as gifts from God, Christians are encouraged to accept these instruments rather than reject divine wisdom (Johnstone, 2019). To align with beneficence and nonmaleficence principles, Mike should seek medical assistance, integrating faith with medical interventions. Trusting God and utilizing medical tools ensures the child’s well-being, demonstrating responsibility in cherishing God’s gifts.

Spiritual Assessment Benefits

Recognizing diverse patient needs, contemporary healthcare professionals advocate for spiritual assessments to facilitate holistic care. Various assessment instruments, including open-ended interviews, prove effective in identifying patients’ values and beliefs (Timmins & Caldeira, 2017). In this case, a spiritual assessment would provide insight into Mike’s values, enabling the physician to craft arguments supportive of recommended treatments. The assessment could involve consultation with other professionals and the hospital’s chaplain to guide the family effectively. By addressing spiritual needs, the physician could enhance relationships, fostering greater patient compliance and cooperation.

Conclusion

Mike faces challenging decisions that can impact his son’s life profoundly. Rooted in Christian faith, Mike can find strength by perceiving the trial as a call to action and appreciating divine wisdom. The physician, through a spiritual assessment, could tailor communication to align with Mike’s values, promoting collaboration. In navigating this delicate situation, Mike’s faith, integrated with medical interventions, can guide decisions that prioritize the child’s well-being.

References

Hubbard, R., & Greenblum, J. (2019). Parental decision making: The best interest principle, child autonomy, and reasonableness. HEC Forum, 31(3), 233-240.

Johnstone, M. J. (2019). Bioethics: A nursing perspective (7th ed.). Chatswood, NSW: Elsevier Health Sciences.

Lawrence, D. J. (2007). The four principles of biomedical ethics: A foundation for current bioethical debate. Journal of Chiropractic Humanities, 14, 34-40.

Timmins, F., & Caldeira, S. (2017). Assessing the spiritual needs of patients. Nursing Standard, 31(29), 47-53.

Ubel, P. A., Scherr, K. A., & Fagerlin, A. (2017). Empowerment failure: How shortcomings in physician communication unwittingly undermine patient autonomy. The American Journal of Bioethics, 17(11), 31-39.

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example Five

Introduction

Considering religion and spirituality is crucial in healthcare, acknowledging individual variations in religious, spiritual, and philosophical inclinations. Healthcare professionals, despite personal beliefs, must prioritize ethical decision-making for prompt medical attention (Lawrence, 2007). This case, exemplified by James, emphasizes the central role of healing in nursing, treating human life as invaluable and created in God’s image. The case delves into how a parent’s choices impact family dynamics in the context of a child’s health.

Question 1

Adhering to the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, which prioritize patient well-being, the doctor asserts that Mike’s judgments, deemed detrimental to James, must be addressed. Balancing therapy advantages with costs and risks aligns with beneficence, while non-maleficence prioritizes the patient’s welfare (Bavinck & Sutanto, 2019). Despite respecting patient autonomy, the physician may need to proceed with necessary treatments to avert harm, ensuring the patient’s access to medical care (Kabbur, 2013).

Sickness and Health

The Christian perspective views illness as an inevitable part of life, fostering fortitude, character, and hope through trials (Romans 5:3-4). Despite environmental sources of sickness, faith remains pivotal for healing, emphasizing trust in God’s promises (Hebrews 11:6). While illness is not desired, God’s presence brings comfort and hope to the afflicted (Mariottini, 2018).

Medical Intervention

Christians perceive medical assistance as a divine gift, emphasizing faith in the synergy of medical intervention and religious belief. Seeking timely medical attention is endorsed, acknowledging God’s provision of knowledge to physicians (Sirach, Chapter 38). Faith in medical intervention aligns with the belief in God’s healing gifts.

Recommendation Action for Mike

Mike’s decisions, influenced by a misunderstanding of Biblical narratives, may conflict with universal principles of good and evil. Advocating for a kidney transplant aligns with Christian values, considering it an act of love akin to Jesus’ example. Despite the difficulty, choosing a transplant for James, supported by Samuel, aligns with preserving life, emphasizing the potential for a healthy and normal life with one kidney.

Spiritual Needs Assessment

James’ physical pain and Mike’s spiritual distress necessitate a spiritual assessment. Recognizing the interplay of religious beliefs and health, a spiritual examination aids in understanding perspectives, fostering tailored solutions. The HOPE questions and Joint Commission’s Spiritual Assessment provide valuable insights, enhancing patient-doctor relationships and promoting better outcomes.

Conclusion

Religious beliefs significantly influence medical decisions, necessitating healthcare professionals’ training in spiritual needs assessment. Understanding and respecting patients’ religious views ensure compassionate and high-quality treatment. A proper spiritual examination fosters comprehension between healthcare providers and patients, contributing to improved outcomes.

References

Anandarajah, G. (2005). Doing a Culturally Sensitive Spiritual Assessment: Recognizing Spiritual Themes and Using the HOPE Questions. Virtual Mentor,7(5). doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2005.7.5.cprl1-0505

Bavinck, H., & Sutanto, N. G. (2019). Christian worldview. Wheaton, Illinois: Crossway.

Biblica Inc. (2011). Romans 5:3-4 New International Version. Retrieved from Bible Gateway

Kabbur, G. (2013). American Medical Association Journal of Ethics.

Lawrence DJ. (2007). The four principles of biomedical ethics: a foundation for current bioethical debate. Journal of Chiropractic Humanities, (14), 34–40. Retrieved from EBSCOhost

Mariottini, C. (2018, July 13). A Christian Perspective on Illness. Retrieved from Claude Mariottini

Shelly, J. A., & Miller, A. B. (2006). Called to care: A Christian worldview for nursing (2nd ed.).

PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Example Six

In today’s era, remarkable strides have been achieved in medical science. Despite these progressions, a considerable number still lean towards relying on spirituality and religion instead of conventional medical approaches. Conversely, medical professionals often overlook the spiritual requirements of patients, neglecting to guide them through intricate medical decisions. This paper seeks to scrutinize a case involving a paternal postponement of medical intervention rooted in a belief in miracles and prayers.

Decision-Making and Autonomy

An imperative facet of medical ethics is patient autonomy and the prerogative of decision-making. When dealing with minors, the principles of autonomy and decision-making frequently present a quandary. In the specified case, Mike’s decision, grounded in religious belief, was detrimental to James’s health, warranting intervention by the physician. While parental decisions hold significance in childcare, physicians working with minors are duty-bound to discuss all options, balancing “respecting children’s rights and liberties while protecting them from harm” (Strom-Gottfried, 2008). The ethical and legal responsibility of the physician was to intervene in the decision, preventing potential harm to James (Katz et al., 2016). The delayed intervention resulted in increased deterioration, necessitating permanent dialysis and a kidney transplant.

Medical health practitioners bear the responsibility of safeguarding minors at risk of medical neglect (Katz et al., 2016). Upon identifying potential harm due to parental decisions, the physician is legally and professionally obligated to report parents to relevant authorities. Continuing life-saving intervention, even against parental objections, aligns with the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence.

Christian View Regarding Health and Sickness

Long-standing religious beliefs have significantly influenced individual healthcare practices and perspectives on sickness, health, and healing. The notion that good health is a reward for virtuous deeds while sickness may be a form of divine punishment or a test of faith has persisted. In James’s case, Mike initially viewed the illness as a test from God, resorting to prayer for recovery. However, as uncertainties arose, questioning his faith, Mike pondered if this was divine punishment. Such reflections are common among the religious, attributing illness to a lack of devotion. This perspective on health and sickness can adversely influence healthcare choices, as evident in Mike’s inclination towards prayer over medical interventions.

Christianity, while acknowledging the importance of faith, encourages followers to seek medical treatment in times of illness. The scripture in Matthew 9:12 emphasizes the need for medical attention when one is unwell. This underlines the freedom of Christians to seek professional medical consultation, recognizing medical science as a divine gift for their well-being. Viewing the human body as a temple, Christians are obliged “to honor God with your bodies” (1 Corinthians 6:19-20). Hence, caring for the body through medical means aligns with Christian values.

As a Christian, Mike needs to ensure that his decisions uphold the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence. Trusting healthcare professionals as agents of God for treatment aligns with preserving life, combining prayer and medical intervention for the best outcome.

Spiritual Assessment

Conducting a spiritual needs assessment is instrumental in identifying the spiritual needs of patients and their families. It aids physicians in providing support aligned with religious beliefs, offering insights into conflicting beliefs affecting medical decisions (Isaac et al., 2016).

The spiritual assessment aims to address religious beliefs through tools exploring dimensions such as purpose, values, transcendental experiences, and self-identity (Monod et al., 2010). Physicians, while not providing spiritual guidance, can direct patients to appropriate pastoral care. Chaplains are better suited to inform patients about the risks of forgoing treatment and may effectively persuade patients on the importance of medical intervention.

References

Isaac, K., Hay, J., & Lubetkin, E. (2016). Incorporating Spirituality in Primary Care. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(3), 1065–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0190-2

Katz, A. L., Webb, S. A., & COMMITTEE ON BIOETHICS. (2016). Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice. Pediatrics, 138(2), e20161485. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-1485

Monod, S. M., Rochat, E., Büla, C. J., Jobin, G., Martin, E., & Spencer, B. (2010). The spiritual distress assessment tool: An instrument to assess spiritual distress in hospitalized elderly persons. BMC Geriatrics, 10(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-10-88

New International Version. (2011). Bible Gateway passage: Matthew 9 – New International Version. Bible Gateway. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%209&version=NIV

Rumun, A. J. (2014). INFLUENCE OF RELIGIOUS BELIEFS ON HEALTHCARE PRACTICE. 2(4), 12.

Strom-Gottfried, K. (2008). The Ethics of Practice with Minors: High Stakes, Hard Choices. Lyceum Books.

Boost Your Grades with Expert Nursing Paper Writing Services at ReliablePapers.com

Are you feeling overwhelmed by tough nursing paper topics? Look no further – at ReliablePapers.com, we take pride in being the best nursing paper writing service. If the examples provided on [PHI-413V Benchmark Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Examples] don’t suffice for your paper, entrust our expert nursing essay writers to craft a unique, customized nursing essay tailored to your requirements.

Worried about plagiarism? Our skilled professionals guarantee originality, ensuring you submit a paper that stands out and secures you the best grades. What’s more, our online nursing papers come at exceptionally affordable prices, making top-notch academic assistance accessible to every college student.

Why struggle with a complex topic, tight deadlines, or specific instructions when we’ve got your back? From writing your nursing assignments to providing valuable guides, ReliablePapers.com is your go-to destination. Ready to place an order? It’s a breeze! Click on our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, proceed to checkout, and your order will be assigned to a suitable expert.

Invest in your academic success by letting us perfect your nursing papers. Our experts deliver top-quality nursing essays tailored to your instructions, providing unparalleled assistance for every topic, deadline, and set of instructions. Seek the help of professional essay writers at ReliablePapers.com and save time for what truly matters.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company