NHS FPX 4000 Applying Ethical Principles Capella Essay Example
NHS FPX 4000 Assessment 1: Applying Ethical Principles
Assignment Brief: NHS FPX 4000 Applying Ethical Principles Capella Essay
Course: NHS FPX 4000 Developing a Health Care Perspective
Assignment Title: Assessment 1: Applying Ethical Principles
Assignment Objectives:
The primary objective of this assignment is to evaluate the application of ethical principles in healthcare decision-making. Students are tasked with analyzing a case study involving ethical dilemmas, utilizing the ethical decision-making model, and demonstrating effective communication approaches. The focus is on understanding and resolving ethical challenges by applying key ethical principles in healthcare.
Overview of the Case Study:
The case study involves Dr. Angela Kerr, a pediatrician, and the parents of a 5-day-old baby, Ana. The parents, Jenna and Chris Smith, refuse to vaccinate Ana based on their beliefs associating vaccines with autism. Dr. Kerr faces an ethical dilemma as she navigates the tension between respecting parental autonomy and advocating for the well-being of the child and the community through vaccination.
Breakdown of the Assignment Instructions:
- Analysis of Ethical Issues: Evaluate the ethical issues presented in the case study, considering the principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. Discuss the conflicts between parental autonomy and public health concerns.
- Ethical Decision-Making Model: Apply the ethical decision-making model, comprising moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior, to analyze Dr. Kerr’s actions. Assess how Dr. Kerr navigates the ethical dilemma and maintains a balance between respecting autonomy and promoting beneficence.
- Effectiveness of Communication Approach: Examine Dr. Kerr’s communication approach. Evaluate the effectiveness of her communication in addressing the concerns of the parents and conveying the importance of vaccination. Discuss how communication contributes to ethical decision-making.
- Resolving the Ethical Dilemma: Propose strategies for resolving the ethical dilemma presented in the case study. Consider additional sources and approaches Dr. Kerr could use to reinforce the importance of vaccination and address parental concerns while respecting autonomy.
- The Student’s Role: Assume the role of a healthcare ethics analyst tasked with providing insights and recommendations to Dr. Kerr. Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of ethical principles and their practical application in healthcare scenarios.
- Conclusion: Summarize the key findings and recommendations based on the analysis. Emphasize the significance of applying ethical principles in healthcare decision-making and resolving ethical dilemmas effectively.
Detailed Assessment Instructions for the NHS FPX 4000 Assignment: Applying Ethical Principles Capella Essay
Assessment 1 Instructions: Applying Ethical Principles Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles. Describe the issues and a possible solution in a 3-5-page paper. Introduction Whether you are a nurse, a public health professional, a health care administrator, or in another role in the health care field, you must base your decisions on a set of ethical principles and values. Your decisions must be fair, equitable, and defensible. Each discipline has established a professional code of ethics to guide ethical behavior. In this assessment, you will practice working through an ethical dilemma as described in a case study. Your practice will help you develop a method for formulating ethical decisions. Demonstration of Proficiency By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria: • Competency 1: Apply information literacy and library research skills to obtain scholarly information in the field of health care. • Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case. • Competency 3: Apply ethical principles and academic standards to the study of health care. • Summarize the facts in a case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it. • Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study. • Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study. • Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study. • Competency 4: Write for a specific audience, in appropriate tone and style, in accordance with Capella’s writing standards. • Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. • Write following APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references. Instructions Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. At a minimum, be sure to address each point. In addition, you are encouraged to review the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. For this assessment, develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. In your assessment: 1. Access the Ethical Case Studies media piece to review the case studies you may use for this assessment. • Select the case most closely related to your area of interest and use it to complete the assessment. ▪ Note: The case study may not supply all of the information you need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any assumptions or speculations you make. • Include the selected case study in your reference list, using proper APA Style and Format. 2. Summarize the facts in a case study and use the three components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it. • Identify which case study you selected and briefly summarize the facts surrounding it. Identify the problem or issue that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge. • Identify who is involved or affected by the ethical problem or issue. • Access the Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece and use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) to analyze the ethical issues. ▪ Apply the three components outlined in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media. • Analyze the factors that contributed to the ethical problem or issue identified in the case study. ▪ Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed. 3. Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case. • In addition to the readings provided, use the Capella library to locate at least one academic peer-reviewed journal article relevant to the problem or issue that you can use to support your analysis of the situation. The How Do I Find Peer-Reviewed Articles? library guide will help you locate appropriate references. (https://capellauniversity.libguides.com/peerreview) ▪ Cite and apply key principles from the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the ethical problem or issue. ▪ Review the Think Critically About Source Quality resource. • Assess the credibility of the information source. • Assess the relevance of the information source. 4. Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study. • Describe how the health care professional in the case study communicated with others. • Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively. • Explain which communication approaches should be used and which ones should be avoided. • Describe the consequences of using effective and non-effective communication approaches. 5. Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study. • Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or issue presented in the case study. • Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case. • Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care professionals. 6. Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to an ethical problem or issue described in a case study. • Describe the proposed solution. • Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization. • Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration. 7. Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. • Apply the principles of effective composition. • Determine the proper application of the rules of grammar and mechanics. 8. Write using APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references. • Determine the proper application of APA formatting requirements and scholarly writing standards. • Integrate information from outside sources into academic writing by appropriately quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing, following APA style.
NHS FPX 4000 Assignment: Applying Ethical Principles Capella Essay Example
Healthcare professionals often find themselves entangled in ethical dilemmas that demand careful consideration of ethical principles. In the case study “Incident 10: To vaccinate or not,” the Smith family, parents of a five-day-old newborn named Ana, expressed their decision to abstain from vaccinating their child due to perceived risks. Dr. Angela Kerr, the pediatrician, faced the ethical dilemma of balancing parental autonomy with the well-being of the child. This essay explores the ethical issues, analyzes the case using the Ethical Decision-Making Model, assesses communication effectiveness, and proposes a solution grounded in ethical principles.
Case Study Overview
The case study, “Incident 10: To vaccinate or not” (Capella, 2022), scrutinizes the decision-making process of the Smith family regarding their five-day-old newborn, Ana. Ana was born without complications in a community hospital, and her parents, Jenna and Chris Smith, expressed their intention to raise her naturally. This included exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months, preparing organic baby food, and abstaining from vaccinating Ana. Despite Dr. Kerr, the pediatrician, explaining the importance of vaccination, addressing myths, and providing information on safety, the Smiths remained firm in their decision, posing an ethical dilemma for Dr. Kerr.
Case Analysis Using Ethical Decision-Making Model
- Moral Awareness: Moral awareness involves recognizing the presence of an ethical dilemma. In this case, the dilemma revolves around the Smiths’ decision not to vaccinate Ana. Dr. Kerr identifies the potential risks associated with their choice.
- Moral Judgment: Dr. Kerr employs moral judgment by presenting facts and evidence to the Smiths. She highlights the benefits of vaccination, debunking myths and addressing concerns about autism. This step is crucial for informed decision-making.
- Ethical Behavior: Dr. Kerr exhibits ethical behavior by respecting the autonomy of the Smiths while fulfilling her duty to advocate for Ana’s health. She provides reliable information, ensuring transparency and fostering shared decision-making.
Communication Effectiveness:
Dr. Kerr’s communication approach is characterized by active listening and informative dialogue. She acknowledges the Smiths’ concerns, discusses the benefits of vaccination, and introduces the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. While her communication is clear and non-judgmental, the Smiths remain firm in their decision.
Proposed Solution Applying Ethical Principles:
- Autonomy: Respecting the principle of autonomy, Dr. Kerr should acknowledge the Smiths’ right to make decisions for Ana. She can express understanding and validate their concerns, fostering a collaborative decision-making process.
- Beneficence: Considering beneficence, Dr. Kerr should continue providing information on the benefits of vaccination. Emphasizing the positive impact on Ana’s health and the community aligns with the principle of acting in the patient’s best interest.
- Non-Maleficence: To adhere to non-maleficence, Dr. Kerr must ensure that Ana is not intentionally harmed. By emphasizing the safety of vaccines and debunking misinformation, she safeguards Ana’s well-being.
- Justice: Justice demands fairness and equality. Dr. Kerr should underscore the role vaccination plays in protecting vulnerable individuals, contributing to community health. This aligns with the principle of justice in healthcare distribution.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, the case study highlights the ethical dilemma surrounding parental decision-making on vaccination. Dr. Kerr’s approach incorporates ethical principles, emphasizing autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice. The proposed solution encourages ongoing dialogue, education, and collaboration to address the Smiths’ concerns while safeguarding Ana’s health. Health care professionals must navigate such ethical challenges with sensitivity, effective communication, and a commitment to ethical principles.
References
Baumgaertner, B., Carlisle, J. E., Justwan, F. (2018). The influence of political ideology and trust on willingness to vaccinate. PLOS ONE, 13(1), e0191728. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191728
Capella University (2022). Incident 10: To vaccinate or not? https://media.capella.edu/CourseMedia/nhs4000element18655/wrapper.asp
Cole, J., Teegala, Y. (March 15, 2022). Motivational interviewing and vaccine acceptance in children: The MOTIVE study. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.01.058
NHS FPX 4000 Assignment: Applying Ethical Principles Capella Essay Example Two
Applying Ethical Principles
At some point in life, individuals encounter ethical dilemmas that challenge their moral principles or code of ethics. Healthcare professionals face ethical issues across diverse settings, and to fulfill their responsibilities, they can rely on the four basic ethical principles: autonomy, beneficence, maleficence, and justice (Vermont Ethics Network, 2011).
Case Study Overview
In response to an Ethical Case Study report at Capella University, Corey Davidson is appointed as the Emergency Department (ED) director at Crosby Community Hospital. Despite having a strong reputation, concerns about Corey’s age and declining health affecting his medical performance arise. Margaret Truman, the Director of Nursing, discusses Corey’s worries, highlighting his non-compliance with evidence-based protocols. Corey is now faced with an ethical dilemma: whether to revoke Dr. Lacy’s ED privileges or respect the clinical judgment of the community’s experienced physician.
Analysis of Ethical Issues
The primary issue in Corey’s ethical dilemma is Dr. Lacy’s resistance to adapting to new hospital rules and refusal to follow evidence-based protocols, potentially harming patient outcomes. Dr. Lacy’s practices, such as prescribing Lasix without a definitive diagnosis, raise concerns about patient safety and effective treatment.
Using the Ethical Decision-making Model
The ethical decision-making paradigm involves three phases: moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior (Capella, 2018a). Corey becomes ethically aware of Dr. Lacy’s performance issues when Margaret brings them to his attention. Corey’s moral judgment is clear when faced with the possibility of revoking Dr. Lacy’s ED credentials, guiding his subsequent ethical actions.
Effectiveness of Communication and Approach
Open communication is crucial, and Corey’s availability for staff communication allows him to be informed about hospital concerns. However, closed-loop communication and clarification could improve the situation. Miscommunication arises as Corey doesn’t question Dr. Lacy’s awareness of new rules, affecting the overall understanding of the issue.
Resolving the Ethical Dilemma by Applying Ethical Principles
Corey’s ethical dilemma can be addressed by considering the principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and fairness. Beneficence and nonmaleficence guide Corey’s duty to act in the patient’s best interest, and Dr. Lacy’s non-compliance may warrant revocation of ED privileges. Consultation with Dr. Lacy and exploring alternative diagnostic methods, like POCUS, can enhance communication and collaboration.
Conclusion
The ethical decision-making model, influenced by the four ethical principles, aids healthcare professionals like Corey in navigating ethical dilemmas. In this case, Corey’s dilemma regarding Dr. Lacy’s performance is resolved through a comprehensive approach that considers autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and fairness.
References
American Medical Association. (2001). AMA principles of medical ethics. Retrieved from AMA Principles of Medical Ethics
Capella University (2018a). Ethical Decision-Making Model. Retrieved from Capella University Website: NHS-FP4000 course room.
Capella University (2018b). Old School or Out of Touch? Ethical Case Studies. Retrieved from Capella University Website: NHS-FP4000 course room.
Long, B., Koyfman, A., & Chin, E. J. (2018). Misconceptions in acute heart failure diagnosis and Management in the Emergency Department. The American journal of emergency medicine, 36(9), 1666-1673.
Vermont Ethics Network. (2021). Medical Ethics / Health Care Ethics. Vermont Ethics Network
NHS FPX 4000 Assignment: Applying Ethical Principles Capella Essay Example Three
In healthcare settings, ethical challenges frequently arise, creating a pivotal moment for healthcare professionals and patients where decision-making becomes intricate. To guide medical practitioners in navigating ethical scenarios, four ethical standards were established—autonomy, emphasizing each individual’s right to make their own choices; beneficence, dedicated to prioritizing the patient’s best interests; non-maleficence, focusing on healthcare professionals’ responsibility to protect patients from harm; and justice, promoting fairness and equality for all individuals. These principles serve as a framework for addressing ethical dilemmas in the healthcare environment (Levitt, 2014). While they may not always offer definitive solutions, these principles assist healthcare workers in making the most informed clinical judgments and decisions possible amid challenging situations.
Overview of the Case Study
The case study titled “To Vaccinate, or Not” presents a scenario involving two parents, Jenna and Chris, who opt not to vaccinate their 5-day-old child, Ana. Their preference is to nurture their daughter naturally, encompassing exclusive breastfeeding for the initial six months, utilizing organic baby food, and refraining from immunization. Their decision is informed by researched information associating vaccines with autism, leading them to believe that the potential risks outweigh the benefits of vaccination for their daughter. In contrast, Ana’s pediatrician, Dr. Kerr, counters this information, strongly advocating for Ana to receive full vaccination. Dr. Kerr underscores the significant reduction in fatal infections achieved through vaccinations and highlights the role of vaccines in eradicating diseases like measles in the United States. She also elaborates on the regular updates maintained by government databases such as the Vaccination Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), funded by the CDC and FDA, which track vaccine safety data. Additionally, Dr. Kerr emphasizes the importance of vaccinations in protecting children who cannot receive them due to medical reasons. Despite Dr. Kerr’s evidence-based explanations, the Smiths persist in their decision, creating an ethical dilemma for the pediatrician.
Analysis of Ethical Issues in the Case Study
Dr. Kerr faces a significant ethical challenge as the Smiths decline to vaccinate Ana, potentially jeopardizing her health. As a healthcare provider, Dr. Kerr is required to possess extensive knowledge and confidence in advocating for the undeniable benefits and safety of immunizations on behalf of Ana (De St. Maurice & Edwards, 2016). Upon hearing the Smiths’ reasons and the comprehensive research that led to their decision, Dr. Kerr finds herself compelled to advocate for the health of her patient by providing education to the parents. This situation gives rise to an ethical dilemma centered around the principles of autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence.
Autonomy, the concept that individuals have the right to make decisions for themselves, is a foundational principle. However, in this specific scenario involving a baby like Ana, the responsibility for decision-making lies with her parents. Beneficence reflects the physician’s commitment to act in the patient’s best interest, upholding various moral principles to prevent harm. Simultaneously, non-maleficence underscores the physician’s obligation to refrain from causing harm to others. In this case, Dr. Kerr unequivocally believes that vaccinating Ana is the optimal decision, as the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the associated risks. This ethical dilemma emerges from the clash between the parents’ autonomy in decision-making and Dr. Kerr’s commitment to beneficence and non-maleficence in safeguarding Ana’s well-being.
Ethical Decision-Making Model to Analyze the Case Study
The Ethical Decision-Making Model involves three integral components: moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior. Of these, moral awareness, signifying the identification and acknowledgment of ethical considerations, stands out as the most crucial element. Dr. Kerr’s moral awareness is palpable in this case, evident when she openly acknowledges her disagreement with Ana’s parents’ decision not to immunize her. The sensitivity to one’s values and morality plays a pivotal role in shaping moral understanding.
Moral judgment, the process of deciding between right and wrong, is influenced by individual differences, cognitive biases, and organizational culture. Dr. Kerr’s righteous judgment is evident as she provides Ana’s parents with accurate and well-informed information, aiming to assist them in making an informed decision. This reflects her commitment to navigating the ethical complexities surrounding vaccination decisions.
Finally, ethical behavior encompasses taking the appropriate actions to address the identified issues. Dr. Kerr’s ethical behavior is manifest in her recommendation to Ana’s parents that the child be vaccinated because it is in her best interest. In this way, Dr. Kerr translates her moral awareness and judgment into ethical actions, aligning with her duty to advocate for the well-being of her patient.
Effectiveness of Communication Approaches in the Case Study
The effectiveness of communication approaches in the case study is notable in Dr. Kerr’s conscientious efforts to engage with Ana’s parents. Her communication strategies are characterized by attentiveness, non-judgmental demeanor, and a commitment to understanding the parents’ perspectives. Dr. Kerr’s ability to listen sensitively to their reasoning fosters an open and respectful dialogue, creating an environment conducive to effective communication.
Maintaining a non-judgmental attitude is identified as a crucial element in the communication process. Dr. Kerr’s approach reflects this principle, ensuring that Ana’s parents feel comfortable expressing their thoughts and preferences without the fear of being judged. This open-mindedness contributes to building trust, a fundamental component in delivering high-quality patient care.
Recognizing the importance of parental consent in the decision-making process, Dr. Kerr employs informative data to convey facts about the effectiveness of immunization. Specifically, she addresses the parents’ concerns about a perceived link between vaccines and autism, debunking this notion with evidence-based information. Dr. Kerr’s responses are grounded in research findings, such as the lack of evidence supporting thimerosal’s role in causing autism.
Overall, Dr. Kerr’s communication approach is characterized by respect for parental opinions and decisions. By combining attentiveness, non-judgmental communication, and evidence-based information, she strives to encourage Ana’s parents to reconsider their beliefs while respecting their autonomy in the decision-making process.
Resolving the Ethical Dilemma by Applying Ethical Principles
In resolving the ethical dilemma presented in this case study, Dr. Kerr grapples with considerations related to autonomy, beneficence, and non-maleficence. Although Ana is her patient, being under the age of 18 means that her parents hold the authority to make decisions regarding her health. Dr. Kerr demonstrates respect for autonomy by actively listening to Ana’s parents and refraining from pressuring them to vaccinate her. However, she also upholds the principle of beneficence by advocating for Ana’s health and recommending immunization as a beneficial course of action.
Furthermore, Dr. Kerr exhibits non-maleficence by imparting information to Ana’s parents about the positive aspects of vaccination, emphasizing that immunization is the healthiest choice for their child. To enhance the effectiveness of her communication, it may be advantageous to provide Ana’s parents with additional resourceful data regarding the benefits of immunizations and dispelling any misconceptions, such as the alleged link to autism. Dr. Kerr’s suggestion to use credible sources aligns with evidence-based practices, potentially influencing the parents’ perspectives and motivating them to reconsider their decision.
In conclusion, this case underscores the critical role of ethical concepts in guiding healthcare workers to make sound clinical judgments and decisions in challenging situations. Dr. Kerr’s approach reflects a commitment to ethical principles and a consideration of the well-being of the patient, highlighting the importance of navigating such dilemmas with respect, informed communication, and a focus on promoting health.
References
De St. Maurice, A., & Edwards, K. (2016). Vaccine Hesitancy in Children—A Call for Action. Children, 3(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/children3020007
Esernio-Jenssen, D., & Offit, P. (2020). Don’t hesitate–vaccinate! Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 13(3), 337-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-020-00324-y
Levitt, D. (2014). Ethical Decision-Making in a Caring Environment: The Four Principles and LEADS. Healthcare Management Forum, 27(2), 105–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcmf.2014.03.013
NHS FPX 4000 Application of Ethical Principles: Capella Essay Example Four
Applying Ethical Principles
In a healthcare setting, ethical decision-making principles are crucial to navigate diverse situations. The primary ethical principles in healthcare encompass justice, autonomy, nonmaleficence, and beneficence (Jill Day et al., 2018). Autonomy involves informed consent, sharing accurate information, and maintaining confidentiality. These principles serve as a framework for guiding health practitioners in ethical decision-making across various scenarios, including assisting patients in making informed decisions about their health.
Overview of the Case Study
L. Straight, the director of Hopewell Hospital, is considering reducing Dr. Cutrite’s privileges due to his deteriorating physical and mental state owing to age. Despite the decline in Dr. Cutrite’s capabilities, Straight, influenced by his political standing, continues to recommend him for various procedures. A significant incident arises when a plastic syringe needle protector is left in a patient’s belly after surgery, leading to an ethical dilemma. The operating room supervisor reports the issue without expressing concern, and the surgical team, including Dr. Cutrite, downplays the mistake. Straight plans to recall the patient without disclosing the truth, adding an unethical dimension to the situation (Capella, 2022).
Analysis of Ethical Issues
This case unfolds multiple ethical dilemmas within healthcare. Firstly, Straight fails to fulfill his role by not reducing Dr. Cutrite’s responsibilities, disregarding the doctor’s declining physical and mental condition. Secondly, the surgical team’s response to the mistake, especially Dr. Cutrite’s directive against taking action and Straight’s intention to conceal the error from the patient, raises ethical concerns. Leaving a plastic syringe protector in a patient’s body is a serious mistake with potential health risks, and the lack of urgency and transparency in addressing it is unethical. Dr. Cutrite’s use of influence to dissuade action further compounds the ethical issues.
Applying the Ethical Decision-Making Model
The ethical decision-making model consists of three components: moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior. Straight demonstrates moral awareness by recognizing the ethical dilemma and considering recalling the patient. However, his judgment is flawed as his intention is to conceal the details, resulting in unethical behavior. In contrast, the health practitioners, including Dr. Cutrite and the supervisor, lack moral awareness, and their judgment leads to a course of action that neglects ethical considerations.
Effectiveness of Communication Approaches
Effective communication is pivotal in healthcare to ensure quality outcomes (Buljac-Samardzic et al., 2020). In this case, communication breakdowns contribute to ethical lapses. The failure to report the mistake in a timely manner, the nonchalant reporting by the supervisor, and the lack of reprimand for Dr. Cutrite’s actions all indicate ineffective communication. Timely and accurate information sharing, coupled with a focus on patient safety, could have averted the potential harm caused by the oversight.
Solution
Resolving ethical concerns within healthcare requires adherence to principles such as justice, autonomy, nonmaleficence, and beneficence. Beneficence dictates acting in the best interest of patients, while nonmaleficence prohibits causing harm. In this case, failure to adhere to these principles resulted in harm to the patient. The ethical dilemma involves autonomy, beneficence, and nonmaleficence. The practitioners’ intention to hide the truth and Dr. Cutrite’s influence on clinical decisions placed the patient at risk. Adhering to these principles would guide the practitioners toward ethical behavior, ensuring patient well-being.
Conclusion
Patient health should be the paramount concern in healthcare, guided by the application of ethical principles. These principles offer a framework for health practitioners to make ethically sound decisions. In the presented case study, Straight faces the decision of recalling the patient and informing them of the mistake, as well as demoting Dr. Cutrite—both actions aligning with ethical behavior. The resolution to such cases lies in promoting principles of beneficence, nonmaleficence, and autonomy to address ethical dilemmas effectively.
References
Buljac-Samardzic, M., Doekhie, K. D., & van Wijngaarden, J. D. (2020). Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade. Human resources for health, 18(1), 1-42.
Capella. (2022). Ethical Case Studies. Retrieved from https://media.capella.edu/CourseMedia/nhs4000element18655/wrapper.asp
Capella.edu. (2022). Ethical Decision-Making Model. Retrieved from https://media.capella.edu/CourseMedia/nhs4000element18816/wrapper.asp
Jill Day, B. G. S., LDA, R., CDA, C., & Sarah Stream, B. A. (2018). Ethics in the Dental Office: Autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice should guide your decisions. Dental Assistant, 87(4), 8-9.
Spoljar, D., Curkovic, M., Gastmans, C., Gordijn, B., Vrkic, D., Jozepovic, A., … & Borovecki, A. (2020). Ethical content of expert recommendations for end-of-life decision-making in intensive care units: A systematic review. Journal of critical care, 58, 10-19.
Achieve Academic Excellence with ReliablePapers.com – Your Trusted Nursing Paper Writing Service
Are you struggling with challenging nursing topics or facing tight deadlines for your assignments? Look no further – at ReliablePapers.com, we take pride in being the best nursing paper writing service that caters to all your academic needs. Our team of expert nursing essay writers is here to save your time and elevate your grades.
If the provided samples on [NHS FPX 4000 Applying Ethical Principles Capella Essay Examples] are not sufficient for your paper, our professionals can craft a unique, customized nursing essay tailored to your specific instructions. Say goodbye to the stress of submitting plagiarized papers; trust us to deliver original and flawless content that guarantees you the grades you deserve.
Worried about the cost? Our online nursing papers come at incredibly affordable prices, making academic assistance accessible to every college student. Whether you need help with coursework writing, want to buy an essay online safely, or seek nursing assignment help, we’ve got you covered.
Ready to take the first step toward academic success? Visit our “Place Order” page, fill in your paper details, and proceed to checkout. Once you complete the payment, your order will be assigned to a suitable expert. Our writers are ready to provide outstanding nursing essay papers, written from scratch, on any topic, within any deadline, and following any instructions.
Save time for what matters most and let ReliablePapers.com be your partner in achieving academic excellence. Seek professional nursing essay writers from us today!
Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!
