NR-532: Healthcare Operational Planning and Management Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide
NR-532: Healthcare Operational Planning and Management Course Description
Contact Hours: Lecture – 48, Lab – 0, Clinical – 0
Semester Hours: Theory 3
In this course, the student focuses on synthesizing organizational and management theories in relation to strategic planning and management, changing care-delivery systems, human and financial resource management, decision making, professional practice, management information systems and meeting accreditation and legal standards.
Prerequisites Effective January 2024:
NR-581 or NR-581NP, NR-582 or NR-582NP, NR-583 or NR-583NP, NR-584 or NR-584NP, NR-585 or NR-585NP, NR-586 or NR-586NP, NR-531
Prerequisites: NR-500, NR-501, NR-504, NR-505, NR-506 or NR-544, NR-512, NR-531
NR-532: Healthcare Operational Planning and Management Course Syllabus
NR-532 Week 1 Discussion 1, Leadership and Management Theories
NR-532 Week 1 Discussion 2, Influences in Healthcare Organizations
NR 532 Week 2 Discussion 1, Patient Care Delivery Systems
NR-532 Week 2 Discussion 2, Role Management
NR-532 Week 3 Assignment, Strategic Planning Paper (2 Versions) NR532 Week 3 Discussion 1, Strategic Planning
NR-532 Week 3 Discussion 2, Evidence-Based Strategic Planning
NR-532 Week 4 Discussion 1, Licensure and Accreditation
NR-532 Week 4 Discussion 2, Patient Safety
NR-532 Week 5 Assignment, Legal / Regulatory Issue Paper (2 Versions) NR532 Week 5 Discussion 1, Human Resource Management
NR-532 Week 5 Discussion 2, Legal and Ethical Issues
NR-532 Week 6 Discussion 1, Information Management in Healthcare
NR-532 Week 6 Discussion 2, Meaningful Use of Technology
NR-532 Week 7 Assignment, Quality of Healthcare Paper NR532 Week 7 Discussion 1, Staffing
NR-532 Week 7 Discussion 2, Quality of Healthcare
NR-531 Week 8 Discussion 1, Quality of Healthcare Assignment
NR-531 Week 8 Discussion 2, Reflection
For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!
Syllabus Overview
| Course Number: | NR 532 |
| Course Title: | Healthcare Operational Planning and Management |
| Course Credits: | 3 credits |
| Prerequisite: | NR500, NR501, NR504, NR505, NR506, NR512 |
Course Description
This course focuses on synthesizing organizational and management theories in relation to strategic planning and management, changing care delivery systems, human and financial resource management, decision-making, professional practice, management information systems, and meeting accreditation and legal standards.
You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-533: Financial Management in Healthcare Organizations Course Assignments & Discussions.
Textbooks and Resources
Required Textbooks
The following books are required for this course:
Marquis, B.L. & Huston, C.J. (2015). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application (8th ed.).China: Wolters Kluwer Health.
Roussel, L. (2015). Management and leadership for nurse administrators (7th ed.). Boston: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Roussel, L. (2015). Management and leadership for nurse administrators (7th ed.). Boston: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
eBook Details
First Time Using VitalSource?
Step 1: View the VitalSource Video
Step 2: Register with VitalSource Bookshelf Online
- Click the cover or title of your eBook. A new window will open.
- Enter email address and password. Bookshelf Online will open.
Step 3: Access the Desktop and Mobile Versions
You must complete Step 2 prior to using the desktop or mobile versions.
Already Registered? 3 Ways to Access Your eBooks
Online
Access your eBook by clicking on the book cover or title in the syllabus page. Bookshelf Online will open.
Desktop
Download your eBooks and use them whether you’re connected to the Internet or not.
Mobile
Download the app and get your eBooks on your iPhone, iPad, or Android device.
Textbooks and Resources
Required Textbooks
The following books are required for this course:
Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (year of publication). Title of textbook in italics (X ed.). City, ST: Publisher.
Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.
The following book is required across all FNP courses:
American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
The following book is recommended across all FNP courses:
Goroll, A. H., & Mulley, A. G. (2014). Primary care medicine: Office evaluation and management of the adult patient (7th ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer.
Physical Books and Supplies
To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.
Program Outcomes
Program Outcomes of Chamberlain nursing programs can be found in the Program Descriptions section of your College Catalog. You can access your College Catalog at http://www.chamberlain.edu/msncatalog.
The MSN program outcomes are aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing publication, The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing (2011). Upon completion of the MSN degree program, the graduate will be able to:
- Practice safe, high-quality advanced nursing care based on concepts and knowledge from nursing and related disciplines.
- Construct processes for leading and promoting quality improvement and safety in advanced nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
- Use contemporary communication modalities effectively in advanced nursing roles.
- Evaluate the design, implementation and outcomes of strategies developed to meet healthcare needs.
- Develop a plan for lifelong personal and professional growth that integrates professional values regarding scholarship, service and global engagement.
- Apply legal, ethical and human-caring principles to situations in advanced nursing practice.
- Design patient-centered care models and delivery systems using the best available scientific evidence.
- Manage human, fiscal and physical resources to achieve and support individual and organizational goals.
- Compose a plan for systematic inquiry and dissemination of findings to support advanced nursing practice, patient-care innovation, and the nursing profession.
- Collaborate interprofessionally in research, education, practice, health policy and leadership to improve population health outcomes.
- Apply principles of informatics to manage data and information in order to support effective decision making.
Course Outcomes
Chamberlain College of Nursing courses are built to align course content with specific Course Outcomes (COs). The COs define the learning objectives that the student will be required to comprehend and demonstrate by course completion. The COs that will be covered in detail each week can be found in the Overview page in that particular week. Whenever possible, a reference will be made from a particular assignment or discussion back to the CO that it emphasizes.
Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to do the following.
- Evaluate organizational strategic plans (SP) in relation to the economic and quality outcomes of healthcare organizations and systems. (PO2 & PO4)
- Judge human resource theories and processes, including the implementation of professional practice models, in healthcare settings. (PO4 & PO7)
- Appraise the effects of strategies to reduce costs and improve quality of health. (PO2, PO4, & PO8)
- Organize legal and regulatory components of healthcare strategies. (PO6)
- Synthesize research findings in each content area. (PO9)
Course Schedule
| Week, COs, and Topics | Readings | Assignments |
| Week 1
CO 2 (PO4 & PO7) Introduction to Course and Healthcare Delivery Systems |
Marquis, B.L. & Huston, C.J. (2015). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application (8th ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer Health.
Roussel, L. (2015). Management and leadership for nurse administrators. (7th ed.). Boston: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Recommended Article Courtney-Pratt, H., Johnson, C., Cameron-Tucker, H., & Sanderson, S. (2012). Investigating the feasibility of promoting and sustaining delivery of cardiac rehabilitation in a rural community. Rural And Remote Health, 12:1838. |
Graded Discussions |
| Week 2
CO 2 (PO4 & PO7) Professional Practice Models |
Marquis, B.L. & Huston, C.J. (2015). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application (8th ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer Health.
Roussel, L. (2015). Management and leadership for nurse administrators. (7th ed.). Boston: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Recommended Articles Deshpande, A. (2013, August). Polyprofessionalism: A shift in healthcare delivery. British Journal of Healthcare Management, 19 (8), 370–3. |
Graded Discussions |
| Week 3
CO1 (PO2 & PO4) Strategic Planning as an Organizational Developmental Technique |
Marquis, B.L. & Huston, C.J. (2015). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application (8th ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer Health.
Roussel, L. (2015). Management and leadership for nurse administrators. (7th ed.). Boston: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Required Article Paschall, L. (2013, January). Implementing a strategic plan. Dental Assistant, 82 (1), 14–6. |
Strategic Planning Assignment
Graded Discussions |
| Week 4
CO 4 (PO6) License and Accreditation |
Marquis, B.L. & Huston, C.J. (2015). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application (8h ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer Health.
Roussel, L. (2015). Management and leadership for nurse administrators. (7th ed.). Boston: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Required Article Pulaski, G. (2013, July). Achieving regulatory goals through strategic planning. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 4 (2), 49–56. |
Graded Discussions |
| Week 5
CO 3 (PO2, PO 4, & PO8) Human Resource Issues in Healthcare |
Marquis, B.L. & Huston, C.J. (2015). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application (8h ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer Health.
Roussel, L. (2015). Management and leadership for nurse administrators. (7th ed.). Boston: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Recommended Article Mazzocato, P., Holden, R.J., Brommels, M., Aronsson, H., Bäckman, U., Elg, M., & Thor, J. (2012, February). How does lean work in emergency care? A case study of a lean-inspired intervention at the Astrid Lindgren Children’s hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. BMC Health Services Research, 12, pp. 28. |
Legal/Regulatory Issue Assignment
Note: Assignment automatically submitted to Turnitin (TII) through the CCN Dropbox
Graded Discussions |
| Week 6
CO 1 (PO2 & PO4) Management Information Systems Review |
Roussel, L. (2015). Management and leadership for nurse administrators. (7th ed.). Boston: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Required Article Grennan, M.J. Jr. (2013, Jul–Aug).Quality improvement and patient safety in the age of reform: Preconditions for success. Physician Executive, 39 (4), 28, 30, 32. Recommended Article Bostic, B. (2013, February). How healthcare CRM drives action and resolves issues. Medical Laboratory Observer, 45 (2), 24–6. |
Graded Discussions |
| Week 7
CO 1 (PO 2 & PO4) Healthcare Organization Throughput |
Marquis, B.L. & Huston, C.J. (2015). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing: Theory and application (8h ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer Health.
Roussel, L. (2015). Management and leadership for nurse administrators. (7th ed.). Boston: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Required Articles Platzke, S.M. & Andrabi, I.A. (2012, Aug). Focusing on white space to improve patient throughput. Healthcare Financial Management: Journal Of The Healthcare Financial Management Association, 66 (8), 102–6, 108. Mchugh, M., Van Dyke, K. J., Howell, E., Adams, F., Moss, D., & Yonek, J. (2013). Changes in Patient Flow Among Five Hospitals Participating in a Learning Collaborative. Journal For Healthcare Quality: Promoting Excellence In Healthcare, 35(1), 21-29. doi:10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00163.x |
Quality of Healthcare Assignment
Graded Discussions |
| Week 8
CO 1 (PO2 & PO4) Reflection |
Required Article
Welding, N.M. (2011, Jan–Feb). Creating a nursing residency: Decrease turnover and increase clinical competence. Medsurg Nursing: Official Journal Of The Academy Of Medical-Surgical Nurses. 20 (1), 37–40 |
Graded Discussions |
Quizzes, tests, and exams are scheduled throughout this course – see the Assignments pages in the weeks they are given for the time and date they will be available.
Late Assignment Policy
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.
In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.
This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.
Evaluation Methods
The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.
| Graded Item | Points | Weighting |
| Discussion (50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points Week 8) | 375 | 37.5% |
| Strategic Planning—Assignment (Week 3) | 200 | 20% |
| Legal/Regulatory Issue—Assignment (Week 5) Note: Assignment automatically submitted to Turnitin (TII) through the CCN Dropbox. | 200 | 20% |
| Quality of Healthcare—Assignment (Week 7) | 225 | 22.5% |
| Total | 1,000 | 100% |
No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.
All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.
| Letter Grade | Points | Percentage |
| A | 940–1,000 | 94% to 100% |
| A- | 920–939 | 92% to 93% |
| B+ | 890–919 | 89% to 91% |
| B | 860–889 | 86% to 88% |
| B- | 840–859 | 84% to 85% |
| C+ | 810–839 | 81% to 83% |
| C | 760–809 | 76% to 80% |
| F | 759 and below | 75% and below |
NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.
Participation for MSN
Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
Participation Guidelines
Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
Direct Quotes
Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.
Grading Rubric Guidelines
| Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Category | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Category | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
| Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. (5 points possible per graded thread) |
|
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. |
|
|
|
| Minus 1 Point | Minus 2 Point | Minus 3 Point | Minus 4 Point | Minus 5 Point | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 points lost | -5 points lost | ||||
| Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread |
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. | The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days | |||
| Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread |
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. | The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT. |
NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
Participation for MSN
There is Threaded Discussion Rubric document located in Course Resources.
Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
Participation Guidelines
Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. Posting twice on two different days meets the minimum requirement however for full credit, the student must post at least three substantive posts on three different days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
Direct Quotes
Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.
| Point Values | Exeptional
(100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance |
Exceeds
(88%) Very good or high level |
Meets
(80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
Needs Improvement
(38%) Poor or failing level of performance |
Developing
(0) Unsatisfactory level of performance |
| Performance | 10 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 0 |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. (5 points possible per graded thread)
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Minus 1 Point | Minus 2 Points | Minus 3 Points | Minus 4 Points | Minus 5 Points | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition |
|
|
|
|
|
| 0 Points Lost | -5 Points Lost | ||||
| Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread |
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. | The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days | |||
| Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread |
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. | The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT. |
NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
*Scholarly source: Per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments and threaded discussions. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Your textbook and lesson are not considered to be an outside scholarly source. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available data bases for a peer reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These web sites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site that you are unsure of. If the instructor determines that the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality, points will be deducted for not using scholarly sources. Current outside scholarly sources are required for the initial posting. This is defined to be 5 years or less. Instructor permission must be obtained if using a source that is older than 5 years.
Webliography Disclaimer
The purpose of the Webliography is to provide students with annotated bibliographies of world wide websites relevant to their courses. These websites are not meant to be all inclusive of what is available for each course’s subjects and have not been sanctioned as academically rigorous or scholarly by Chamberlain College of Nursing. Please exercise caution when using these websites for course assignments and references.
Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!
Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.
Expertise That Sets Us Apart
At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.
Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?
- Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
- Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
- Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
- Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
- Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
- Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.
Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?
Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!
Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey
Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.
Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!
