HCI-655 Electronic Health Records Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

HCI-655 Electronic Health Records Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

HCI-655 Electronic Health Records Course Description

This course prepares learners to evaluate, implement, and optimize electronic health record (EHR) technology to support the management and use of clinical data. Learners examine the architecture of EHRs and analyze the challenges of their design and use, including system integration requirements, distributed user bases, storage of complex data, high security requirements, and the diverse information needs of various end users. Learners also apply project management techniques to the planning and implementation of EHRs. Prerequisite: HIM-650.

HCI-655 Electronic Health Records Course All Assignments & Discussions

HCI 655 Week 1 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

Describe the EHR adoption rate trends in the past 10 years. What have been the driving forces behind EHR adoption? What are some potential barriers to EHR adoption?

HCI 655 Week 1 Discussion 2 | Grand Canyon University

Describe the benefits of an EHR compared to a paper-based system. Have you had any personal experience with EHRs? If so, explain how they were beneficial or counterproductive.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on HCI-660 Health Data Analytics Course Assignments & Discussions.

HCI 655 Week 1 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

Week 1 Exploring EHRs

The purpose of this assignment is to become familiar with components of EHRs.

In a 500-750 word essay, describe the components of EHRs. 

Include the following:

1. Define EHR.
2. Describe information found in an EHR.
3. Describe the core functions of an EHR.
4. Explain how an EHR varies by clinical setting.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

HCI 655 Topic 1 Assignment: VLab MEDITECH Expanse Getting Started & Acute Activities (Patient Care Services and Physician Care Manager)

Assessment Description

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 1 Assignment: VLab MEDITECH Expanse Getting Started & Acute Activities (Patient Care Services and Physician Care Manager) Description: The purpose of this assignment is to access patient electronic health records (EHRs) using the MEDITECH EHR application. Complete the VLab activities and quizzes for this topic. When opening the VLab activity, note that some of the activities are gated, meaning you must complete the previous activities first.

Grading for this assignment will be credit/no credit. To receive credit, learners must achieve a minimum VLab score of 80% on the quizzes. Learners are allowed unlimited attempts to attain the required score.

After completing the quizzes for these activities, click the “Print to PDF” button to download and save the scoresheets to your computer. Upload the scoresheets to the assignment dropbox.

here are the login credentials:

Website:  https://www.ahima.org

Usrernamen: ***********************************************************  23Desmoto$

Website: https://newconnect.mheducation.com

Usrernamen: ************************************************** 23Desmoto$

HCI 655 Week 2 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

What is the role of EHR interfaces? Explain how EHR technology platforms address information being shared through EHR interfaces.

HCI 655 Week 2 Discussion 2 | Grand Canyon University

Describe the differences between cloud-based and client-server architectures. What are the advantages and disadvantages of each model? 

What is the general difference in cost between the two models, and should cost be a factor in considering which is best?

HCI 655 Week 2 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 2 Assessment: EHR Technology Platforms

Week 2 EHR Technology Platforms

HCI 655 Topic 2 Assessment: EHR Technology Platforms

The purpose of this assignment is to research and become familiar with EHR technology platforms.

In a 750-1,000 word essay, research and explain various EHR technology platforms. 

Include the following:

1. Select and describe two different technology platforms used in leading EHR systems.
2. Contrast the benefits and challenges for the EHR technology platforms you selected. Include at least two benefits and two challenges for each platform.
3. Explain why each technology platform you selected was developed.
4. Identify which current EHR systems use the technology platforms you selected.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today!

HCI 655 Week 3 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

Describe the different data entry methods used by clinicians. Which methods are the most efficient and why are some approaches favored over others by clinicians? How is information stored and retrieved in the EHR?

HCI 655 Week 3 Discussion 2 | Grand canyon University

What are the benefits associated with reconciliation of health care data? 

What are the challenges associated with reconciliation of health care data? 

HCI 655 Week 3 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 Topic 3 Assessment: Health Care Systems Interoperability

Week 3 Health Care Systems Interoperability

Description

The purpose of this assignment is to develop an awareness of challenges associated with interoperability.

In a 1,000-1,250 word essay, analyze the current state of interoperability. Include the following:

1. Describe the importance of data integrity in health care.
2. Explain barriers to interoperability and health information exchange.
3. Identify at least five key challenges of data storage and maintaining data integrity.
4. Propose one solution to each challenge you have researched.
5. Describe at least five standards recognized by the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC-HIT) that are applicable to interoperability.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

HCI 655 Week 4 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

Explain CMS quality-based reporting requirements. How does the EHR support the capture and reporting of data to registries that are used to determine quality-based performance?

HCI 655 Week 4 Discussion 2 | Grand Canyon University

Explain how the CMS Promoting Interoperability program and its security requirements impact EHR design and use. Explain the role of encryption in storing secured data. Explain the importance of making ethical decisions to comply with security requirements when using EHR systems. How could aspects of a Christian worldview help inform ethical decision making in this situation?

HCI 655 Week 4 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 Topic 4 Assessment: VLab – MEDITECH Expanse (Ambulatory Activities – Office Staff Home Screen and Clinical Chart Review)

The purpose of this assignment is to navigate through the MEDITECH Expanse Ambulatory Office Staff functions and to examine the workflow and development of the patient’s record and how clinical staff interacts with the patient’s record.

Instructions

I have attached the vendor evaluation matrix that you will use in your final report. You will list the name of the fictional hospital or ambulatory clinic at the top followed by the vendors that you be evaluating. You will need to list your requirements on the left side of the matrix. It comes pre-populated with some requirements which you can use, but you only need to list your top 10-15 requirements. Then weigh each vendor on the requirements with a scale of 1-5 with 5 being the highest rating. Then total up the scores and you can use this as part of your decision making process for your recommendation.

One more thing for you for the final project

Please go to https://klasresearch.com/ and request a free account. This site can help you in the evaluation of your vendors. This site is known to be the leader in reviews for acute and ambulatory vendors. Please log on and see the different vendors and modules that they offer and how they rate compared to others.

From the syllabus:

Special Project Report (40%)

Use chapter 7 as your guide. You can also listen to the week 2 course chat where I cover this in detail.

Follow the steps in page 146 from the book. Tell the story as a narrative. Who are you? Whats your role? What health system hired you.

Listen to the week 2 course chat for additonal details and examples I shared from my past experiences. To access go to blackboard/chat/menu(top left)/ then the date – may have to select recordings in a range on the top right and enter january 1 of this year – then select week 2

Students are required to submit a not less than seven-page research project at the end of the semester. The topic is that you are an information technology consultant and have been hired to evaluate the vendor information system alternatives and select a new healthcare information system for a hospital, clinical department or other provider entity. You will prepare a consulting report on analyzing current systems and providing needs analysis. You will evaluate potential vendors and provide a recommendation for a new system.

A special project is required as follows:

Consider that you are an information technology consultant. You have been hired to evaluate the vendor information system alternatives and select a new healthcare information system for a hospital, clinical department or other provider entity. You will prepare a consulting report that includes the following:

1. Situation Analysis. Describe the “real” or hypothetical work environment, provider objectives and current information systems configuration as well as any unmet needs or issues. What current clinical systems does the hospital or ambulatory clinic have? What are their pain points with the current setup?
2. Functional Requirements. List or otherwise characterize the key functional requirements to be met by a new or upgraded health information system.
3. Evaluate Vendor Alternatives. Describe and evaluate two to four vendor alternatives. Indicate pros, cons for each alternative. You must evaluate real vendors ex. Epic, Allscripts, Meditech
4. Provisional Recommendation. Given the information available to you, what are you recommending to your client? Options may include upgrading the current system or implementing a new enterprise-wide clinical system. Be specific and indicate your rationales for your recommendation.
5. A table comparing features of the vendor alternatives
6. A graphic representation depicting the workflow of one department in your fictional hospital.

*Define the process that you will be taking to make a decision. For example, you as the project manager with be forming a steering committee, have vendor demonstration days etc. Use the steps defined in Chapter 7 as your guide.

Students are encouraged to come forward with their own project ideas and then secure approval. Otherwise, I will work with you to “brainstorm” alternatives.

Much or most of the information required for this assignment should be available from the Web. However, you may also wish to obtain product information through your own or another organization. You may also interview one or more individuals with relevant experience and expertise.

Your consultant’s report should be written as a single-spaced business-type report, about ten pages in length. The report will have:

• No less than seven pages narrative, including all the subsections indicated above

HCI 655 Topic 4 Assessment: VLab – MEDITECH Expanse (Ambulatory Activities – Office Staff Home Screen and Clinical Chart Review) Vendor Evaluation Matrix

	Hospital/ Ambulatory Site Name
	Vendor Evaluation Matrix
Instructions: Score each vendor on a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) on each of your prioritized items. Total up your ratings for each vendor to help make your comparisons. Write the names of the vendors you are comparing in the watermark space provided in vendor columns.  Use the blank rows at the end of the worksheet to ask your own questions.
Functionality/Usability	Epic	Cerner	Meditech	Allscripts
Charting
tele visit	5	4	4	4.5
Does the system offer a variety of data entry options, e.g., dictation, voice recognition, structured notes, etc.?
Can I make subsequent edits and addendums to clinical documentation?
Does the system alert me about unfinished portions of the clinical documentation and can I bypass it if necessary?
Can I access other such clinical information as previous labs, progress notes, etc. from a patient’s “electronic chart” while charting?
Does the system allow me to multi-task, e.g., create task, order lab, etc. while charting?
Does the system allow me to forward patient information to staff, other physicians, etc. via e-mail, electronic faxing, messaging, etc.?
Does the system ensure that only authorized clinicians can sign clinical documentation?
Prescriptions
Can I complete a prescription within a few clicks?	5	4	5	4
Can I look up medication information and is this information valuable?
How extensive (and how sensitive) is the system’s interactions checking capability, e.g., drug-drug, drug-allergy, drug-food?
How accurate is the system in identifying drug-condition warnings, e.g., pregnancy?
Can I refill a medication within a few clicks? Can previous sigs be viewed from the refill screen?
Can the system handle multiple drug formularies?
Can the system send prescriptions electronically to pharmacies in my local market?
Lab and Results Management
Can I complete a lab order within a few clicks?
Can the system send lab orders electronically to laboratories, hospitals, etc. in my local market?
Can I pull up and review lab results within a few clicks?
Can the system receive lab results electronically from laboratories, hospitals, etc. in my local market?
Does the system notify me of abnormal lab results and provide normal ranges?
Can the system show me trending of results over time?
Can I create and/or customize “off-the-shelf” order sets?
Decision Support
Does the system utilize clinical information from all parts of the chart to provide decision support?
Does the system alert me when patient data indicates intervention is recommended?
Can I access medical literature, clinical guidelines, etc.?
Disease and Population Management
Assuming good data entry for all patients, can I query the system and identify patients that have a particular condition, are on a certain medication, etc.?
Does the system track patients for follow-up and send out reminders?
Can I create ad-hoc reports or am I limited to ones provided off-the-shelf? Can I customize these reports?
Does reporting module handle “and/or” queries together?
Health Record Management
Can I look up a patient by a number of different criteria, e.g., name, MRN, SSN, etc.?
Does the system provide a summary view of a patient’s health status?
Does the system handle other such clinical documents as x-rays, reports, etc.?
Does the system allow me to maintain patient lists, e.g., problems, allergies, medications, etc.?
Can I organize patient information within the system in a similar way to my paper charts?
Clinical Tasking & Messaging
Can I access and manage various tasks, e.g., sign progress notes, review labs, etc. within a few clicks?
Can I task or message someone else in the practice and do it with a few clicks?
Does system alert me of overdue tasks and urgent lab results?
How disruptive are the alerts, are they customizable and can they be overridden?
Can I manage tasks and messages from a computer other than my own?
Financial considerations
Roughly how much could the system cost my clinic?
Can you offer an Application Service Provider (ASP) option, purchase option, or monthly subscription option?
Roughly how much do the software licenses cost?
About how much will on-going maintenance and upgrades cost?
How often will a support person(s) be available once the system goes “LIVE” in case of any system difficulty?
How are the licenses issued? Concurrent user versus per practitioner?
TOTAL SCORE

HCI 655 Week 4 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 Topic 4 Assessment: EHR Privacy and Security

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 4 Assessment: EHR Privacy and Security

Description

The purpose of this assignment is to understand how legislation has driven EHR design and use.

Prepare a PowerPoint presentation (10 to 15 slides) reflecting on the legislation that has affected the privacy and security of EHRs. Each slide should include speaker notes. Address the following.

1. How did the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and Computer-Based Patient Record Institute (CPRI) lead the way in the conceptualization of EHRs?
2. Describe the HITECH Act and how it has impacted EHR design and use.
3. Explain at least two benefits and challenges of the HITECH Act  
4. Describe Promoting Interoperability (formerly called Meaningful Use) as outlined in the HITECH Act.
5. Describe at least five different types of security measures and include the components of each security measure.

https://www.healthit.gov/topic/privacy-security-an…

https://www.pewtrusts.org/-/media/assets/2018/08/healthit_safe_use_of_ehrs_report.pdf

https://compliancy-group.com/what-is-the-hitech-ac…

HCI 655 Week 5 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 5 Discussion Question 1 Description: Discuss various health care settings and their unique needs relating to EHRs. Explain the importance of matching organizational needs to the EHR vendor.

HCI 655 Week 5 Discussion 2 | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 5 Discussion Question 2 Description: What types of clinical content are typically provided by vendors? What approaches do vendors and health care systems take towards developing and customizing clinical content within their EHRs?

HCI 655 Week 5 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 Topic 5 Assessment: Organizational Needs

Description

The purpose of this assignment is to become familiar with how organizational needs influence the selection of EHRs.

In a 500-750 word essay, reflect on how an organization’s needs are supported by an EHR vendor.

Choose a health care setting and a related organization. Identify the specific needs that influence the selection of an EHR for that organization. Include the following:

1. Describe the organizational needs for the organization you selected.
2. Explain how EHR vendors can support the organization by considering its organizational needs.
3. Explain how organizational needs are used to establish user specifications.
4. Describe the types of clinical content offered by EHR vendors.
5. Explain the importance of pre-authored clinical content provided by EHR vendors.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 5 Assessment: Organizational Needs Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HCI-655	HCI-655-O501	Organizational Needs	60.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)	3: Satisfactory (79.00%)	4: Good (87.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Organizational Needs	20.0%	A description of organizational needs is not present.	A description of organizational needs is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	A description of organizational needs is present.	A description of organizational needs is present and well developed.	A description of organizational needs is present and thorough.
EHR Vendor Support	15.0%	An explanation of EHR vendor support is not present.	An explanation of EHR vendor support is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	An explanation of EHR vendor support is present.	An explanation of EHR vendor support is present and well developed.	An explanation of EHR vendor support is present and thorough.
User Specifications	15.0%	An explanation of how organizational needs are used to establish user specifications is not present.	An explanation of how organizational needs are used to establish user specifications is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	An explanation of how organizational needs are used to establish user specifications is present.	An explanation of how organizational needs are used to establish user specifications is present and well developed.	An explanation of how organizational needs are used to establish user specifications is present and thorough.
Clinical Content	10.0%	A description of the types of clinical content offered by EHR vendors is not present.	A description of the types of clinical content offered by EHR vendors is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	A description of the types of clinical content offered by EHR vendors is present.	A description of the types of clinical content offered by EHR vendors is present and well developed.	A description of the types of clinical content offered by EHR vendors is present and thorough.
Pre-Authored Clinical Content	10.0%	An explanation of the importance of pre-authored clinical content provided by EHR vendors is not present.	An explanation of the importance of pre-authored clinical content provided by EHR vendors is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	An explanation of the importance of pre-authored clinical content provided by EHR vendors is present.	An explanation of the importance of pre-authored clinical content provided by EHR vendors is present and well developed.	An explanation of the importance of pre-authored clinical content provided by EHR vendors is present and thorough.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

HCI 655 Week 6 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 6 Discussion Question 1 Description: Describe the importance of mapping existing workflows and workflows planned for future projects. How does EHR functionality impact workflows? Give an example of why it is important for an EHR to be compatible with clinical workflows.

HCI 655 Week 6 Discussion 2 | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 6 Discussion Question 2 Description: What are the key workflow elements for a hospital admission? What are the key workflow elements for an inpatient encounter? What are the key workflow elements for an outpatient encounter? Discuss how a workflow impacts a patient’s experience in various health care settings.

HCI 655 Week 6 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 Topic 6 Assessment: Mapping a Workflow

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 6 Assessment: Mapping a Workflow

Description

The purpose of this assignment is to map a complete workflow for a clinical process.

Choose from the following list to create a visual workflow chart that includes five or more steps. Create the workflow using Microsoft Word. As you create your clinical process workflow, explain how the EHR supports each step in the process.

1. Hospital admission
2. Hospital discharge
3. Outpatient clinic visit
4. Ordering testing and reporting diagnostic imaging
5. Ordering and delivery of pharmaceuticals to the patient
6. Ordering and completing a dialysis or chemotherapy visit

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 6 Assessment: Mapping a Workflow Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HCI-655	HCI-655-O501	Mapping a Workflow	80.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)	3: Satisfactory (79.00%)	4: Good (87.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Criteria	100.0%
Workflow	20.0%	A complete workflow is not present.	A workflow is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	A complete workflow is present.	A complete workflow is present and well developed.	A complete workflow is present and thorough.
EHR Support	20.0%	An explanation of how an EHR supports each step in the workflow process is not present.	An explanation of how an EHR supports each step in the workflow process is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	An explanation of how an EHR supports each step in the workflow process is present.	An explanation of how an EHR supports each step in the workflow process is present and well developed.	An explanation of how an EHR supports each step in the workflow process is present and thorough.
Steps	20.0%	Five or more steps are not present.	Five or more steps are present, but they lack detail or are incomplete.	Five or more steps are present.	Five or more steps are present and well developed.	Five or more steps are present and thorough.
Visual Appeal	10.0%	There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is evident.	Color is garish or typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited.	Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout.	Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and consistently.	Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and consistently.
Aesthetic Quality	10.0%	Design is cluttered. Materials detract from the content or the purpose of presentation is low quality.	Design detracts from purpose. Text and visuals are too simplistic, cluttered, and busy. Little or no creativity or inventiveness is present.	Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Materials add to, not detract from the presentation. Materials used were quality products and easy to see or hear.	Design is appropriate and integrates a variety of objects, charts, and graphs to amplify the message.	Design is clean. Skillful handling of text and visuals creates a distinctive and effective presentation. Overall, effective and functional audio, text, or visuals are evident.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)	10.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	10.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

HCI 655 Week 7 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 7 Discussion Question 1 Description: What are the steps involved in EHR vendor selection? What is the most common rationale for changing EHR vendor platforms? Describe the difference between an RFI and RFP.

HCI 655 Week 7 Discussion 2 | Grand Canyon University

question 2: Describe three challenges associated with migration of data from one EHR product to another. List several risks of poor planning in the data migration process.

HCI 655 Week 7 Discussion 3 | Grand Canyon University

Question 3: Evaluate computer and information technologies to determine applicability to health care practice, education, administration, and research.

HCI 655 Week 7 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 7 Assessment: Benchmark – RFI for EHR Vendor

Description:

The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate an EHR vendor by analyzing key criteria that would be used to develop a request for information (RFI). You will choose an acute care or ambulatory setting and an EHR vendor to determine if the EHR vendor meets the needs of the setting.

In a 1,000-1,250 word essay, describe the considerations that need to be addressed during the EHR vendor evaluation process using the key criteria below. Evaluate your selected EHR vendor based on the research you have done on the key criteria. Include the following:

1. Describe the organization, services provided, and the need for a new system.
2. Explain the RFI process and the significance of a vendor evaluation and rating scale.
3. Describe the health care information system architecture, functionality, and applicability to health care practice (include research, administrative reporting, security, and certification).
4. Provide examples of how the EHR supports care coordination, interoperability, and electronic quality measures.
5. Explain the vendor implementation support and stakeholder education process.
6. A summary of the findings and whether or not to recommend the chosen health care setting and EHR vendor, based on applicability to health care practice, education, administration, and research

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MS Health Informatics

1.2: Evaluate computer and information technologies to determine applicability to health care practice, education, administration, and research.

MSN Health Informatics

6.2: Evaluate computer and information technologies to determine applicability to health care practice, education, administration, and research.

07:16

This is the assignment

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 7 Assessment: Benchmark – RFI for EHR Vendor Rubric

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
HCI-655	HCI-655-O501	Benchmark – RFI for EHR Vendor	120.0
Criteria	Percentage	1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	2: Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%)	3: Satisfactory (79.00%)	4: Good (87.00%)	5: Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Criteria	100.0%
Organization, Services Provided, and Need for New System	10.0%	The description of the organization, services provided, and need for new system is not present.	The description of the organization, services provided, and need for new system is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The description of the organization, services provided, and need for new system is present.	The description of the organization, services provided, and need for new system is detailed.	The description of the organization, services provided, and need for new system is thorough.
RFI Process and Significance of Vendor Evaluation and Rating Scale	10.0%	The description of the significance of the vendor evaluation and rating scale is not present.	The description of the significance of the vendor evaluation and rating scale is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The description of the significance of the vendor evaluation and rating scale is present.	The description of the significance of the vendor evaluation and rating scale is detailed.	The description of the significance of the vendor evaluation and rating scale is thorough.
Health Care Information System Architecture, Functionality, and Applicability to Health Care Practice (includes research, administrative reporting, security, and certification).	15.0%	The description of the health care information system, architecture, functionality, and applicability to health care practice is not present.	The description of the health care information system, architecture, functionality, and applicability to health care practice is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The description of the health care information system, architecture, functionality, and applicability to health care practice is present.	The description of the health care information system, architecture, functionality, and applicability to health care practice is detailed.	The description of the health care information system, architecture, functionality, and applicability to health care practice is thorough.
Care Coordination, Interoperability, and Electronic Quality Measures	10.0%	The explanation of how EHR supports care coordination, interoperability, and electronic quality measures is not present.	The explanation of how EHR supports care coordination, interoperability, and electronic quality measures is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The explanation of how EHR supports care coordination, interoperability, and electronic quality measures is present.	The explanation of how EHR supports care coordination, interoperability, and electronic quality measures is detailed.	The explanation of how EHR supports care coordination, interoperability, and electronic quality measures is thorough.
Vendor Implementation Support and Stakeholder Education Process	10.0%	The description of the vendor implementation support and stakeholder education process is not present.	The description of the vendor implementation support and stakeholder education process is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	The description of the vendor implementation support and stakeholder education process is present.	The description of the vendor implementation support and stakeholder education process is detailed.	The description of the vendor implementation support and stakeholder education process is thorough.
Summary of Findings and Recommendation of Chosen Health Care Setting and EHR Vendor Based on Applicability to Health Care Practice, Education, Administration, and Research (C1.2, 6.2)	15.0%	A summary of findings and recommendation of chosen health care setting and EHR vendor based on applicability to health care practice, education, and research are not present.	A summary of findings and recommendation of chosen health care setting and EHR vendor based on applicability to health care practice, education, and research is present but lacks detail or is incomplete.	A summary of findings and recommendation of chosen health care setting and EHR vendor based on applicability to health care practice, education, and research is present.	A summary of findings and recommendation of chosen health care setting and EHR vendor based on applicability to health care practice, education, and research is detailed.	The summary of findings recommendation of chosen health care setting and EHR vendor based on applicability to health care practice, education, and research is well developed.
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

HCI 655 Week 8 Discussion 1 | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 8 Discussion Question 1 Description: What is the step-by-step process for implementing an EHR? What are the most typical challenges faced by health care systems when implementing EHRs?

HCI 655 Week 8 Discussion 2 | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 (Electronic Health Records) Topic 8 Discussion Question 2 Description: What is the role of project management techniques in the implementation of EHRs? Why is project management so important for a successful EHR implementation? What is the role and value of acceptance testing during the EHR implementation process?

HCI 655 Week 8 Assignment | Grand Canyon University

HCI 655 Topic 8 Assessment: Implementation Plan Outline

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment is to become familiar with the EHR implementation process by creating an implementation plan outline.

Develop an implementation plan outline for an enterprise health care system. In your outline, include a description of the following elements and how you would address them in an EHR implementation plan.

• Impacted health care settings within the enterprise health care system
• Challenges of implementing EHRs
• Project management methodology and tools used
• Health care system organizational structure
• Needs for interoperability and interfaces between information systems
• Education and training requirements
• User acceptance testing considerations

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

• Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
• Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
• Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
• Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
• Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
• Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!