A collection of students’ favorite writing guides, how-tos, and hacks that will help them improve their writing skills and knowledge and make sure they excel in school

NR-501:  Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

NR-501:  Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Assignments & Discussions Study GuideNR-501: Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Description

In this course, the student examines multiple theories from nursing and relevant fields. The student critiques the components of the theories and explores the value and contributions of the theories to nursing, advanced nursing, and evidence-based practice.

Prerequisite: NR-500NP or NR-500

NOTE: NP-designated course for Nurse Practitioner track students only.

NR-501: Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Syllabus

NR-501 Week 1 Discussion: Theory in Nursing

NR-501 Week 1 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 2 Assignment: Reflective Essay Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

NR-501 Week 2 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 2 Discussion: Ways of Knowing_ (2 Versions)

NR-501 Week 3 Assignment: Concept Analysis Paper

NR-501 Week 3 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 3 Discussion: Steps of Concept Analysis (2Versions)

NR-501 Week 4 Discussion: Nursing Theory

NR-501 Week 4 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 5 Assignment: Application of Theory paper

NR-501 Week 5 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 5 Discussion: Culture and Caring Theories

NR-501 Week 6 Discussion: Literature Review

NR-501 Week 6 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 7 Assignment: Theoretical Framework Supporting Evidence-based Practice PowerPoint

NR-501 Week 7 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 7 Discussion: Nursing Theory Applied to Evidence Based Practice

NR-501 Week 8 Reflection on Learning (Dual Version)

NR-501 Week 8 Discussion Course Reflection & Future Application

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

NR-501: Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course: A Comprehensive Guide

Our NR-501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Study Guide is here to help you succeed in this challenging course. You will learn the theoretical basis of advanced nursing practice in this course. Learn the foundational concepts of advanced nursing practice by delving into a variety of theoretical and conceptual frameworks.

NR 501 Week 1 Discussion: Reflection On Learning, Reading (Bundle)

NR-501 Discussions in Week 1 will center on thinking critically about the material covered in the readings. You may use this introspection to better understand and implement the course’s major ideas and theories.

NR 501 Week 3 Assignment: Concept Analysis (2 Versions)

In NR-501 Week 3, you’ll do a concept analysis, which is a deep dive into clarifying and expanding upon a single nursing idea. The capacity to assess and comprehend the theoretical foundation of advanced nursing practice is strengthened by this task.

NR 501 Week 5 Assignment: Annotated Bibliography (2 Versions)

A critical review of the literature on a specific issue in advanced nursing practice is the focus of NR-501 Week 5’s annotated bibliography project. While delving into theoretical frameworks and evidence-based practice, this project will help you hone your research and information literacy abilities.

NR 501 Week 7 Assignment: Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-based Practice: PowerPoint Presentation (2 Versions)

In NR-501 Week 7, you’ll concentrate on creating a theory to back up your evidence-based methods. To complete this task, you will develop a PowerPoint presentation that bridges the gap between theory and evidence-based practice.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-503: Population Health, Epidemiology and Statistical Principles Course Assignments & Discussions.

NR 501 Reflections on Learning Week 1 – 8

Engage in self-reflection throughout the course to solidify your grasp of the theoretical underpinnings of advanced nursing practice. To better incorporate theory into clinical practice, ponder on the following questions.

You will learn the theoretical underpinnings of advanced nursing practice by completing the assignments, contributing to conversations, and engaging in reflective activities. You will be better able to deliver optimal treatment to patients as a result of the information you have gained.

In conclusion, NR-501, Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice, is a foundational course that provides the theoretical background and practical skills need for advanced nursing. You will investigate theoretical ideas and their practical implications via classwork, class discussions, and personal introspection. Take advantage of this chance to learn more and improve your skills so you can give better treatment based on sound principles.

FAQs

NR 501 Week 7 Assignment: Theoretical Framework to Support Evidence-based Practice: PowerPoint Presentation (2 Versions)

Purpose

Nurse practitioners actively engage in the process of translating nursing knowledge into practice, thereby establishing evidence-based approaches within the discipline. Throughout this process, a theoretical framework provides a meaningful context to guide and support evidence-based practice. The purpose of this assignment is to identify a theory or model which can … as a framework for a future evidence-based project during your nurse practitioner education.

NR-501 Week 1 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Submission

What were the most important concepts you learned in week 1? Why are these concepts important? How will they prepare you for your future role as a nurse practitioner? In what ways do you feel prepared for your new role? In what ways do you feel unprepared?

NR 501 Week 2 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Submission

Explore an area of interest through patterns of knowing (CO 1)

Analyze the benefits of reflection for shaping and understanding theory. (CO 2)

Differentiate between the received and perceived schools of scientific thought. (CO 2)4.Examine different patterns of knowing in nursing. (CO 2)5.Examine the components of the nursing metaparadigm.

NR-501 Week 3 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Submission

Write 1-2 paragraphs reflecting on your understanding of concept analysis. Provide one specific example of how you achieved the weekly objectives.

What knowledge do you still need to demonstrate competency in the weekly concepts?

What skills do you need to continue developing to apply these concepts?

NR-501 Week 4 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Submission

Provide one specific example of how you achieved the weekly objectives. What concepts, theories, models, tools, techniques, and resources in this week did you find most valuable? What issues had you not considered before?

NR-501 Week 5 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Submission

As you contemplate your future NP practice, how do you view your role in using theory in practice? Which of the theories “spoke” to you? What are some barriers you see to implementing theory in practice?

NR-501: Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course: Master Instruction Worksheet

NR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice

 

Definition:  A Master Level Instructor creates an authentic learning environment that both challenges and supports students as they work to understand and apply complex concepts to real life.  The best instructor helps their students learn in ways that make “a sustained, substantial, and positive influence on how students think, act, and feel.”

Responsibilities:

               Course SME:   Develop assignments that challenge and support students as they seek their goal of becoming a nurse educator

               Course Faculty:  Create a learning environment in which the students feel supported and challenged. 

Expectation Operationalize by Chamberlain Care Principle TEACH VALUES CNE Competency Socratic/Lateral Thinking Examples
1.  Creates a natural critical learning environment (Facilitation; Active Learning)

·        Assigns challenging tasks that help students to rethink their assumptions, develop authentic ideas, and examine their mental models of reality.

·        Works collaboratively with faculty and peers to provide opportunities to try, fail, and receive feedback in advance of and separate from any summative judgment of their effort.

Threaded discussion questions are crafted to require students to reflect upon the application of nursing theory to selected topics.

For example:

·        Provide a brief argument for importance of nursing theory in the profession

·        Faculty provide detailed formative feedback regarding correct use of scholarly references and APA errors within postings and assignments.  Faculty use “track changes” or “review notes” to provide direct feedback regarding errors.

Care for Students

 

Community

Heart

 

Facilitates Learning

 

Facilitates Learner Development and Socialization

 

Use assessment and evaluation strategies

 

Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role

 

Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community

Socratic Questions:

Example for Week 1, TD #1:

·        If you held a position within a healthcare agency that was being eliminated, how could you use a specific nursing theory to save the position?

·        How would you respond to the following statement:  “nursing theory is of no use at the patient’s bedside, it is used only by academics?”

Lateral Thinking Questions:

If you had to evaluate your use of nursing theory at this point in your career, what score would you give yourself?

 

 2.  Gets students’ attention and keeps it (Active Learning; Content Management)

a.      Incorporates active learning strategies that are responsive to students’ needs and learning style.

b.       Provides relevant content for students through application to real life concepts.

All written assignments require application of nursing theory to a practice area.

Assignment Three requires students to identify a practice concern and suggest how nursing theory may be used to resolve this concern.

Care for Students

 

 

Accountability

Community

Heart

 

Facilitate Learning

 

Facilitate Learner Development and Socialization

 

Use assessment and evaluation strategies

 

Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role

 

Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community

Socratic Questions:

Examples for Week 6 or 7:

Within your future practice specialty, how would you use a selected nursing theory to support a change project?

 

Lateral Thinking Questions:

A professional peer from a different practice focus is having problems with patient safety, using a selected nursing theory, what advice would you provide to help resolve the concern?

3.       Starts with the student rather than the discipline (Facilitation)

  1. Challenges faulty learning models and creates new ones that are effective within a collaborative environment. 
Many students enter NR 501 with limited information regarding nursing theory.  Therefore, the course begins with general information regarding concepts and metaparadigms before progressing to application within diverse practice setting.  This allows students to gain knowledge and understanding prior to application. Care for Students

 

Community

Heart

 

Facilitates Learning

 

Facilitate Learner Development and Socialization

 

Use assessment and evaluation strategies

 

Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role

 

Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community

Socratic Questions:

Examples for Week 2, TD #1:

The metaparadigms of the nursing profession are agreed upon, but yet may overlap with other professional disciplines.  How is the focus of each metaparadigm within the nursing profession different from the focus of other healthcare professions?  Use the same healthcare profession for each of the metaparadigms.

Lateral Thinking Questions:

Identify the most negative comment you have heard regarding nursing theory and then craft a rebuttal to the comment.

 

4.      Gets commitment from students (Content Management)

  1. Ensures equal commitment of both faculty and students to class, coursework, and learning.  Explains how each specific rule, regulation, or assignment is supported by the learning objectives of the course.

 

Specific information regarding assignment guidelines is provided in detailed.  Students’ questions within Q & A thread are responded to by faculty in a timely manner and with details. 

With the Summer B 2015 term, the course lead is scheduling webinars reviewing each required assignment allowing students another media to achieve information regarding assignments.

Within all assignments and threaded discussion, links to course outcomes are identified.

Care for Students

 

Community

Heart

 

Facilitates Learning

Facilitate Learner Development and Socialization

Use assessment and evaluation strategies

Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role

Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community

Socratic Questions:

Examples for Week 4, TD #1:

If you did not have a nursing theory to guide your professional practice what would you use?  How would your practice be holistic?

Lateral Thinking Questions:

The nursing profession is extremely diverse in its practice.  How many nursing theories at the practice level of theory development would it take to completely reflect the profession?  What would be the advantages and disadvantages to have numerous practice level theories?

How would a specific grand nursing theory be useful in global nursing?

 

5.      Helps students learn outside of class (Integration)

  1. Develops course activities that promote learning outside of class.
  2. Promotes curiosity to expand application of learning.
Students are required to provide current references to support information within threaded discussions and assignments.  This fosters database searching outside of the class. 

Within threaded discussions and Assignment One: Importance of Theory, students are to provide examples from “real life” professional nursing. 

Care for Students

 

Community

Heart

 

Facilitates Learning

Facilitate Learner Development and Socialization

Use assessment and evaluation strategies

Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role

Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community

Socratic Questions:

Examples for Week 7, TD #2:

Some of the authors of selected nursing theories have died.  What methods would you suggest in order to continue the work to apply the theory?  Is this theory still relevant in today’s nursing/healthcare environment and should it die with the author?

What challenges did you face in finding current, primary references for your assignments or threaded discussions?

Lateral Thinking Questions:

Have you ever attended a conference where an acknowledged nurse theorist personally presented?  What was your impression of the theorist?

 

If you had the opportunity to ask two questions of any nursing theorist (living or deceased), what would be the questions, and why would you ask that question?

6.      Engages students in disciplinary thinking

(Relevance)

a.      Guides students to professional education with journals and texts from the profession

Students are guided toward the use of primary scholarly references by not allowing textbook to be used in 2 of 3 assignments.

Feedback is provided individually if a student uses a non-scholarly reference (NR 501 is the second course in the MSN curriculum so students are unclear regarding references to be used).

By purposefully requiring students to apply nursing theory to specific practice areas (education, leadership, practice, research, etc.) information from a variety of professional journals is determined.

Care for Students

 

Accountability

 

Community

Heart

 

Facilitates Learning

Facilitate Learner Development and Socialization

Use assessment and evaluation strategies

 

Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role

Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community

Use assessment and evaluation strategies

Pursue systematic self-evaluation and improvement in the academic nurse educator role

Function effectively within the organizational environment and the academic community

Socratic Questions:

Example for Week 3:

To prepare for the concept analysis, how did you select the concept you presented?  What interested you about the concept?

 

 

Lateral Thinking Questions:

Example for Week 7, TD #2:

Comparing a research-based reference that identified a nursing theory to a research-based reference that did use a nursing theory, what were the similarities and differences?

Example for Week 8:

Within your future specialty area, which nursing theory is commonly used?  If none, which nursing theory do you believe would be most useful to foster the quality of the specialty area?

 

7.      Creates diverse learning experiences (Relevance)

 a. Integrates instructional strategies that promote lifelong learning.

b. Uses evaluation methods that support strategic learning.

Learning experiences within NR 501 include:

·        Interactives within lessons to engage students and provide application of information

·        Threaded discussions include application of nursing theory to selected enrollment focus (i.e. education, leadership, practice, informatics, health policy) for use post-graduation.

·        Evaluation occurs by direct input by faculty within written assignments using track changes or review notes.  Rubrics are provided as a summary of formative feedback.

Care for Students

 

Accountability

Community

Heart

 

Facilitates Learning Socratic Questions:

How would a selected nursing theory foster your achievement of your future career goals in your specialty area?

 

Lateral Thinking Questions:

How would you evaluate your current use of nursing theory?  What do you anticipate your use of nursing theory will be 5 years after completing your MSN degree? 

 

 

 

Chamberlain Care TEACH Values  CNE Competencies
Care for Self

  • Are you standing in your strengths

 

Care for Colleagues

  • The democracy of truth

 

Care for Students

  • Create extraordinary moments for students
Teamwork

We put the team first, appreciate diverse points of view, assume positive intent, collaborate and communicate openly.

Energy

We move quickly, learn from mistakes, build positive spirit and always look for a better way

Accountability

We take ownership and initiative, demonstrate courage as we speak up, and act with integrity in all we do.

Community

We operate with a shared sense of responsibility and purpose, and enrich colleagues, students and the broader community we serve.

Heart

               We serve students and each other with passion, respect and care.

1.    Facilitate learning

2.    Facilitate learner development and socialization

3.   Use assessment and evaluation strategies

4.    Participate in curriculum design and evaluation of program outcomes

5.  Pursue Systematic Self-Evaluation and Improvement in the Academic Nurse Educator Role

6.    Function as a change agent and leader

7.    Engage in the scholarship of teaching

8.  Function Effectively within the Organizational Environment and the Academic Community.

 

NR-501:  Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Assignments & Discussions

NR-501 Week 1 Discussion

Nursing Theory

For many? Students enrolled in NR501, this is an initial nursing course? Theory.? So, let’s have a debate.? Is nursing theory important to the? Nursing profession? In particular, is it important for nurse practitioners? Does theory inform nurse practitioner practice??

If you believe it is important, explain why it is? useful.? f you do not believe it is useful, explain why nursing theory. Is not necessary to the profession?

NR-501 Week 2 Discussion

Ways of Knowing

Nursing knowledge is classified in various ways, one of which is Carper’s Patterns of Knowing (Carper, 1978). Carper’s framework offers a lens through which the nurse can reflect upon insights acquired through empirical, ethical, personal, and aesthetic knowledge (Carper, 1978).

Through intentional reflection using Carper’s Patterns of Knowing, nurses can process experiential learning and knowledge acquired through practice NR-501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Discussion Essays.

This assignment aims to reflect upon a specific practice situation and better understand the professional knowledge and insights obtained through that experience.

Criteria for Content

Think of a surprising or challenging practice situation in which you felt underprepared, unprepared, or uncomfortable.

Select an important nursing issue/topic inherent to the identified situation.

Briefly? explain the situation

Identify the nursing issue inherent in the identified situation

Use Carper’s Patterns of Knowing to analyze the situation as a method of refection. In your discussion, address ONE of the following Patterns of Knowing:

  • What do you think was the underlying reason for the situation? (Esthetics)
  • What were your thoughts and feeling in the situation? (Personal)
  • What was one personal belief that impacted your actions? (Ethics)
  • What evidence in nursing literature supports the nursing importance of the identified issue? (Empirical)

What new insights did you gain through this reflective practice opportunity? How will this apply to your practice as a nurse practitioner? Be sure to use scholarly literature to support your position.

NR-501 Week 3 Discussion Steps of Concept Analysis

At the end of Week 3, your concept analysis is due. This discussion provides an opportunity to start this assignment. Select a nursing concept supported by a nursing theory, and address the following components included in a concept analysis:?

  • Definition of concept and discussion of the concept in the nurse practitioner role?
  • Identification of three attributes of the concept?
  • Description of one antecedent and one consequence of the concept?
  • Identification of two empirical referents?
  • A brief explanation of theoretical applications of the concept (How is the concept relevant to a nursing theory?)?

This information does not have to be comprehensive but provides a foundation for the upcoming assignment. Be sure to include scholarly references.

NR-501 Week 4 Discussion Nursing Theory

Identify your specialty area of NP practice. Select a nursing, borrowed, or interdisciplinary theory provided in the lesson plan or one of your findings. Address the following:

  • Origin
  • Meaning and scope
  • Logical adequacy
  • Usefulness and simplicity
  • Generalizability
  • Testability

Finally, provide an example of of how the theory could be used to improve or evaluate the practice quality in your specific setting. What rationale can you provide that validates the theory as applied to the role of the nurse practitioner?

NR-501 Week 5 Discussion

Culture and Caring Theories

Which of the culture and caring theories most resonates with you for your practice as an NP? How does the theory integrate the nursing paradigm?? What parts of the theory do you identify with? How does the theory help to meet CLAS standards to advance health equity?

NR-501 Week 6 Discussion Literature Review

Locate a scholarly journal article that uses either a health behavior theory or the Praxis Theory of Suffering as the basis for evidence-based research. Choose an article DIFFERENT than those provided in the weekly readings.

Summarize the research presented. How was the theory used? How do the research findings either support or refute the use of the theory in practice? How could you use the research in your practice as an NP?

NR-501 Week 8 Discussion

In Week 7, you posted your Kaltura presentation to the Week 8 discussion area. This week, you will view and comment on peer presentations. For full credit, view and comment on at least TWO peer presentations by Saturday at 11:59 PM MT.

Your post should be substantive and professional and include at least one scholarly resource.

NR501 Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice References

Carper, B.A. (1978). Fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. Retrieved 8 September 2019 from

https://www.google.co.ke/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8871/eb88fb06168bb31e20e9c54e57920e575a47.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwje0JrqscHkAhVClFwKHYXzAgsQFjAQegQICRAB&usg=AOvVaw0CEuuz-eqnIwVMqcmUI55E

Haswell, N. (2019). The four ethical principles and their application in aesthetic practice. Journal of Aesthetic Nursing, 8(4), 177-179. Doi: 10.12968/joan.2019.8.4.177

Schmidt, L.A., Nelson, D. & Godfrey, L. (2003). A clinical ladder program based on Carper’s fundamental patterns of knowing in nursing. JONA, 33(3), 146-152. Doi: 10.1097/00005110-200303000-00005

Quaglietti, S., Blum, L. & Ellis, V. (2004). The role of the adult nurse practitioner in palliative care. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing, 6(4), 209-214. Doi: 10.1097/00129191-200410000-00009

NR-501:  Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 1 Discussion DQ 1 Importance of Theory in Nursing NEW 

For many students enrolled in NR 501, this is an initial course for nursing theory. So, let’s have a debate!!! Is nursing theory important to the nursing profession? If you believe that it is important, explain why it is useful. If you do not believe that it is useful, explain why nursing theory is not necessary to the profession? Be sure to provide an example that demonstrates your opinion and a scholarly reference (not using the required textbook or lesson) which supports your opinion.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 2 Discussion DQ 1 Significance of Nursing Concepts within the Profession NEW​

This discussion considers the metaparadigm of nursing and the four concepts of the nursing profession—person, environment, health and nursing profession. Select a practice area of the nursing profession (i.e. education, executive, informatics, healthcare policy, and advanced clinical practice) and apply EACH of the four concepts to the selected area. Be sure to apply EACH of the four concepts and include an example that demonstrates the application to the practice area. Don’t forget to support your initial posting with scholarly references.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 2 Importance of Theory Paper Assignment – Environmental Theory and Florence Nightingale NEW

Importance of Theory: Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to a) identify a nursing theory, b) analyze the importance of the selected theory to the nursing profession, c) summarize key concepts and relationships among the concepts of the selected nursing theory, d) present views of the selected theory on areas of specialization, and e) communicate ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

  • (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
  • (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
  • (CO#4) Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4, 7)

Due Date

Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 2

Total Points Possible: 100

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

This assignment focuses on the importance of nursing theory within the profession. Selecting one nursing theory (non-nursing theories are not allowed), the nursing theory will be presented by identifying the key concepts present within the theory. The selected nursing theory will then be applied to ONE of the following professional nursing practice areas:

  • Education (e.g. undergraduate, staff development, etc.)
  • Leadership (e.g. nurse executive, manager, leader, etc.)
  • Informatics (e.g. data management, etc.)
  • Healthcare policy (e.g. application to local, state, national, or global healthcare concerns, etc.)

Nurse practitioner

Criteria for Content

  1. Introduction:

The introduction requires the following information.

Statements about nursing theory in general

Identification of the ONE nursing theory (non-nursing theories are not allowed) selected by the student to be used within this assignment. The specific selected nursing theory may be from any of the three categories of nursing theory (i.e. grand, middle-range, or practice), but must be a specific nursing theory (i.e. Orem, Roy, Benner, etc.); a category may not be used.
Identification of the sections of the paper.

References from nursing literature are required.

  1. Importance of Nursing Theory:

This section requires the following information.

Present an analysis of the importance of nursing theory, in general, to the nursing profession. Each of the following questions are to be answered.

Why should the study of nursing theory be included in a master’s program?

How is nursing theory useful to the nursing profession?

How can nursing theory be used to separate the nursing profession from other healthcare professions?

What would be ONE concern regarding the use of nursing theory within the profession?
References from nursing literature are required.

  1. Summary of Selected Nursing Theory:

This section requires the following information.

Present the name and author of the selected nursing theory (bibliographic and historical information about the theory or theorist is NOT included). Identify when the nursing theory was initially published and the latest edition of the selected nursing theory.

Provide a summary of the key concepts contained within the selected nursing theory.

Provide a detailed description of how this nursing theory addresses each of the metaparadigms/ concepts (person, health, environment, and nursing profession) associated with nursing.

Identify why this nursing theory selected and its potential use within the student’s selected Master’s track (i.e. education, leadership, informatics, healthcare policy, or nurse practitioner)

References from nursing literature are required.

  1. Application of Specific Nursing Theory to Selected Professional Nursing Practice area:

This section includes the following elements:

Present a discussion of how the selected nursing theory definesand explains one of the following professional nursing practice areas:

  • Education (e.g. undergraduate, staff development, etc.)
  • Leadership (e.g. nurse executive, manager, leader, etc.)
  • Informatics (e.g. data 
    management, etc.)
  • Healthcare policy (e.g. application to local, state, national, or global healthcare concerns, etc.)

Nurse practitioner

Present 2 (two) examples illustrating the above information. Professional examples come from a student’s own practice experiences or from the scholarly literature. If the example is from the student’s experience, identify this as the source by using the first person in describing the example.

Keep each example succinct (about 1 – 3 paragraphs).

References from nursing literature are required.

  1. Conclusion:

This section includes the following elements:

Summarizes presented information regarding theory in general and its use within the nursing profession

Summarizes the selected nursing theory.

 Presents self-reflection regarding what was learned from writing this assignment.

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 2 Importance of Theory Paper Assignment – Application of Pender’s Health Promotion Model NEW

Importance of Theory: Guidelines with Scoring Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to a) identify a nursing theory, b) analyze the importance of the selected theory to the nursing profession, c) summarize key concepts and relationships among the concepts of the selected nursing theory, d) present views of the selected theory on areas of specialization, and e) communicate ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

  • (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
  • (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
  • (CO#4) Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4, 7)

Due Date

Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 2

Total Points Possible: 100

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

This assignment focuses on the importance of nursing theory within the profession. Selecting one nursing theory (non-nursing theories are not allowed), the nursing theory will be presented by identifying the key concepts present within the theory. The selected nursing theory will then be applied to ONE of the following professional nursing practice areas:

  • Education (e.g. undergraduate, staff development, etc.)
  • Leadership (e.g. nurse executive, manager, leader, etc.)
  • Informatics (e.g. data management, etc.)
  • Healthcare policy (e.g. application to local, state, national, or global healthcare concerns, etc.)

Nurse practitioner

Criteria for Content

  1. Introduction:

The introduction requires the following information.

Statements about nursing theory in general

Identification of the ONE nursing theory (non-nursing theories are not allowed) selected by the student to be used within this assignment. The specific selected nursing theory may be from any of the three categories of nursing theory (i.e. grand, middle-range, or practice), but must be a specific nursing theory (i.e. Orem, Roy, Benner, etc.); a category may not be used.
Identification of the sections of the paper.

References from nursing literature are required.

  1. Importance of Nursing Theory:

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 3 Discussion DQ 1 Steps of Concept Analysis NEW

Select a nursing concept (be sure to use a nursing theory) and then provide a response to each one of the steps included in a concept analysis regarding your selected concept. This information does not have to be comprehensive but provides a foundation to the upcoming assignment. Be sure to include a scholarly reference.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Paper Assignment – Health Promotion Behavior Concept NEW

NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

Purpose

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete a concept analysis of a concept found in a nursing theory using an identified process. The assignment fosters analytical thinking related to the selected concept as well as application within the profession.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

  • (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
  • (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
  • (CO#4) Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4. 7)

Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 4

Total Points Possible: 250 Points

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of ONE concept found in a nursing theory. The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application within the model and alternative cases. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.

Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis.

Criteria for Content

  1. Introduction

The introduction substantively presents all following 4 (four) elements:

  • Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development,
  • Identifies the selected nursing concept,
  • Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained, and
  • Names the sections of the paper.
  1. Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept

This section includes:

  • Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required), and
  • Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory is substantively presented.
  • A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
  1. Literature review

This section requires:

  • A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six)scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
  • Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
  • Support from nursing literature is required.

Please Note: Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review.

  1. Defining attributes

For this section:

  • A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.
  • A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
  • Explanation: An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept. For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.
  1. Antecedent and Consequence

This section requires the identification of:

  • 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept, and
  • 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
  • A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
  • Explanation: An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event. In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept.
  • A consequence follows or is the result of an event. In this situation a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.
  1. Empirical Referents

This section requires the identification of:

2 (two) empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
Explanation: An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept.

  1. Model Cases

 1 model caseis created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

  • Definition,
  • All identified attributes,
  • Antecedent,
  • Consequence, and
  • Empirical referent or Measurement
  • Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the crea

CHAMBERLAIN COLLEGE OF NURSING NR 501 Week 4 Concept Analysis Paper Assignment – Self Care Concept NEW

NR501 Concept Analysis Guidelines and Rubric

Purpose

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete a concept analysis of a concept found in a nursing theory using an identified process. The assignment fosters analytical thinking related to the selected concept as well as application within the profession.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:

  • (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
  • (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
    (CO#4)
  • Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4. 7)

Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 4

Total Points Possible: 250 Points

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

This assignment presents a modified method for conducting a concept analysis of ONE concept found in a nursing theory. The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing theory. The selected concept is identified and then the elements of the analysis process are applied in order to synthesize knowledge for application within the model and alternative cases. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used. The paper concludes with a synthesis of the student’s new knowledge about the concept. The scholarly literature is incorporated throughout the analysis.

Only the elements identified in this assignment should be used for this concept analysis.

Criteria for Content

  1. Introduction

The introduction substantively presents all following 4 (four) elements:

  • Identifies the role of concept analysis within theory development,
  • Identifies the selected nursingconcept,
  • Identifies the nursing theory from which the selected concept was obtained, and
  • Names the sections of the paper.
  1. Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept

This section includes:

  • Defines/explains the concept using scholarly literature (a dictionary maybe used for this section ONLY, and additional scholarly nursing references are required), and
  • Information about the concept as discussed by the theorist from the selected nursing theory is substantively presented.
  • A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
  1. Literature review

This section requires:

  • A substantive discussion of at least 6 (six) scholarly nursing literature sources on the selected concept.
    Themes, ideas, and/or facts about the concept found in the reviewed sources are presented in an organized fashion.
  • Support from nursing literature is required.

Please Note: Primary research articles about the selected nursing concept are the most useful resource for the literature review.

  1. Defining attributes

For this section:

  • A minimum of THREE (3) attributes are required.
  • A substantive discussion of this section with support from nursing literature is required.
  • Explanation: An attribute identifies characteristics of a concept. For this situation, the characteristics of the selected nursing concept are identified and discussed.
  1. Antecedent and Consequence

This section requires the identification of:

  • 1 antecedent of the selected nursing concept, and
  • 1 consequence of the selected nursing concept.
  • A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.
  • Explanation: An antecedent is an identifiable occurrence that precedes an event. In this situation, an antecedent precedes a selected nursing concept.
  • A consequence follows or is the result of an event. In this situation a consequence follows or is the result of the selected nursing concept.
  1. Empirical Referents

This section requires the identification of:

2 (two)empirical referents of the selected nursing concept.

A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

Explanation: An empirical referent is an objective ways to measure or determine the presence of the selected nursing concept.

  1. Model Cases

1 model case is created by the student and discussed substantively by demonstrating within the case each of the following areas:

  • Definition,
  • All identified attributes,
  • Antecedent,
  • Consequence, and
  • Empirical referent or Measurement
  • Information from selected nursing theory is applied to the created model case.

A substantive discussion of the element with support from nursing literature is required.

Explanation: A model case is an example of the hypothetical individual who demonstrates all of the attributes, antecedents, consequences, and referents noted previously in this assignment.

  1. Alternative Cases

This section requires:

The identification of 2(two) alternative cases correctly created and presented. The two required alternative cases are:

Borderline (absence of one or two of previously identified attributes of the selected nursing concept.

Contrary (demonstrates the complete opposite of selected nursing concept)

Applies information from selected nursing theory.

Explanation: Alternative cases represent the opposite of the model case.

For this assignment, two alternative cases are required.

These are:

  • Borderline case which is a created case where one or two of the previously identified attributes are missing.
  • Contrary case which is a created case that demonstrate the complete opposite of the selected nursing concept.
  1. Conclusion

This section requires:

Summarization of key information regarding:

  • Selected nursing concept,
  • Selected nursing theory, and
  • Application of concept analysis findings to advanced nursing practice.

The concluding statements include self-reflection on the new knowledge gained about applying nursing theory to a professional issue or concern.

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

  1. The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least 8, but no more than 10 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.
  2. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
  3. The source of the concept for this assignment must be a published nursing theory. Non-nursing theories may NOT be used.
  4. A minimum of 6 (six) scholarly references must be used. Required textbooks for this course, and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment. A dictionary maybe used as a reference for the section titled “Definition/Explanation of the selected nursing concept”, but it is NOT counted as one of the 6 required scholarly nursing references. For additional assistance regarding scholarly nursing references, please see “What is a scholarly source” located in the Course Resources tab. Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.

References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them.

  1. Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited and referenced correctly.
  2. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.
  3. PLEASE note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.
    Possible Concepts: The following concepts are not required; students may select one of these concepts or find another concept. Each selected concept must be associated with a nursing theory; the use of non-nursing theories is NOT allowed. If you have any questions regarding your concept or the nursing theory, please consult with your faculty member for assistance.
  • Behavioral system
  • Boundary lines
  • Caring
  • Empowerment
  • Homeostasis
  • Noise
  • Open system
  • Palliative care
  • Resources
  • Self-care
  • Adaptation
  • Comfort
  • Compassion
  • Engagement
  • Leadership
  • Meaningfulness
  • Modeling
  • Pain
  • Pattern
  • Transaction

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 4 Discussion DQ 1 Connection Between Theory and Practice NEW

Connection Between Theory and Practice 

Hello Class,

Our Course Objectives (CO) for this week and corresponding MSN Program Objective (PO) are:

Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO #1)

Examine instances where theory is used to guide the development of new knowledge and implementation of evidence-based practice. (PO #6).

Grand theories are more abstract or general in nature and middle-range theories that are more specific in nature. What relationship(s) do you find between grand nursing theories and clinical practice? Provide one example that uses a specific grand theory to support your views.

I look forward to reading your examples!

For this week’s discussion, please answer this question:
What relationship(s) do you find between grand nursing theories and application to clinical practice? Provide one example that uses a specific grand range theory to support your views.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 5 Discussion DQ 1 Borrowed Theories NEW

Borrowed Theories 

Greetings Class,

Moving right along into week 5: This week our discussion addresses the following PO:

Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO #1)

Key Concepts:
Scope of borrowed theories and their application to the nursing profession

Categories commonly used to organize nursing theories and how a theory fits into the category

This is our question: Nursing makes use of theories from other disciplines (aka., borrowed theories). How does using borrowed theory support the development of nursing theory?

Looking forward to our discussion!

For this discussion, please answer this question:

Nursing makes use of theories from other disciplines (a.k.a., borrowed theories). How does using borrowed theory support the development of nursing theory?

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 5 Discussion DQ 2 Borrowed Theories Guiding Practice NEW

Borrowed Theories Guiding Practice

Greetings Class, This is your topic for TD2 and we will be meeting the following PO:

Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, 
comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO #1)

Key Concepts:

Scope of borrowed theories and their application to the nursing profession.

Categories commonly used to organize nursing theories and how a theory fits into the category.

Choose a borrowed theory and apply its framework to an advanced nursing issue (i.e., hositlity in the workplace, instituting bedside reporting, and shared leadership).

See you in the threads!

Please answer this question:

Choose a borrowed theory and apply its framework to an advanced nursing issue (i.e., hostility in the workplace, instituting bedside reporting, and shared leadership).

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 6 Application of Theory Paper Assignment – Nursing Theory Virginia Henderson Needs Theory NEW

Application of Nursing Theory Guidelines

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to use nursing theory as a way to resolve a problem or issue occurring within nursing leadership, nursing education, nursing informatics, health policy, or advance clinical practice.

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, a student will demonstrate the ability to:

  • (CO#1) Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to their components, relationships among the components, logic of the propositions, comprehensiveness, and utility to advanced nursing. (PO1)
  • (CO#3) Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO3, 7, 10)
  • (CO#4) Demonstrate logical and creative thinking in the analysis and application of a theory to nursing practice. (PO4, 7)

Due Date: Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week 6

Total Points Possible: 275

Requirements

Description of the Assignment:

One nursing theory will be presented as a framework to resolve a problem occurring within one of the professional areas of leadership, education, informatics, healthcare policy or advance clinical practice. The same nursing theory selected in Assignment One may be used to resolve the identified problem.
A specific nursing theory must be used. No non-nursing theories are permitted. A category of nursing theory (grand, middle range, practice) may not be used—only a specific, published nursing theory is to be selected and applied to the issue or concern important to the profession of nursing as documented in the nursing literature.

Please note: Do not rely on .com sites to identify the nursing theory as they do not provide accurate information in all cases.

Content

  1. Introduction:

The introduction for this paper includes:

A nursing theory is required; non-nursing theories may not be used.

General statements on the idea of nursing theory being applied to solve problems/issues in nursing practice. You do not need to go into the specialty area of practice in-depth as this will be covered in another section of the paper.

A one-paragraph summary of the selected specific nursing theory is required.

Information identifying the sections of this assignment.

References from nursing literature are required.

  1. Description of Issue or Concern:

The selected issue or concern must be clearly identified as being significant to the professional area of either leadership, education, informatics, healthcare policy or advance clinical practice. The issue or concern must be presented comprehensively, but concisely by answering each of the following questions.

What is the specific issue or concern being presented?

Why should the nursing profession care about this issue or concern?

What does the nursing literature have to say about this issue or concern including its frequency of occurrence?

Who are the stakeholders or the people affected by the issue or concern?

References from nursing literature are required.

  1. Application of Selected Nursing Theory to Issue or Concern:

This section of the assignment focuses on using the selected nursing theory to resolve the described issue or concern. Required information includes:

Restating the selected nursing theory to be used

Identification of one strategy useful in resolving the identified issue or concern.

The strategy should be presented in depth with the following information being required:

  • A specific description of how the selected nursing theory can help to resolve the issue or concern
  • A specific and detailed description of the strategy to be used
  • A specific and detailed description of how the strategy can be implemented
  • A specific and detailed description of one suggestion for future

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization NEW

Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization 

Hi Everyone,

Our discussion this week is aimed at addressing these POs:

Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice. (PO # 2)

Propose strategies for use of relevant theories that nurse leaders can employ in selected healthcare or educational organizations, considering legal and ethical principles. (POs #2, 6)

Key Concept

Role of grand and middle-range nursing theories applied to health care organizations

Communicate the analysis of and proposed strategies for the use of a theory in nursing practice.

(PO #3)

Key Concept

Grand or middle-range theory applied to a specific area of nursing leadership practice

Recommend strategies for the use of theory as the basis for actions of advanced nursing practice in leadership and education. (PO #5)

Key Concepts

Relationship between leadership and management and theory

Role of theory in developing and applying leadership and management concepts

Discuss how a specific middle-range nursing theory has been or could be applied by nurse leaders or nurse managers to effectively deal with an administrative issue (i.e., staffing, use of supplies, staff performance issues). Include an example from the literature or your own experience to illustrate your points. 

I look forward to your responses.

For this discussion, please answer this question:

Discuss how a specific middle-range nursing theory has been or could be applied by nurse leaders or nurse managers to effectively deal with an administrative issue (i.e., staffing, use of supplies, staff performance issues). Include an example from the literature or your own experience to illustrate your points.

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 6 Discussion Impact of Nursing Theory Upon Healthcare Organization NEW

Discuss how a specific middle-range nursing theory has been or could be applied by nurse leaders or nurse managers to effectively deal with an administrative issue (i.e., staffing, use of supplies, staff performance issues). Include an example from the literature or your own experience to illustrate your points. 

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 7 Discussion DQ 1 NEW

In NR 500, you developed a PICOT question. Select a nursing theory that you find useful in nursing practice. Discuss each of the following selected elements of the PICOT format by applying your selected nursing theory to the element. Be sure to include a scholarly reference.

  • Population/ Patient Problem: Consider how your selected nursing theory may guide you in selecting the population and/or patient problem
  • Intervention: Does your selected nursing theory identify a possible intervention? If not, how is your selected intervention consistent with your selected nursing theory?
  • Comparison: What other methods or studies can one compare this intervention with?
  • Outcome: How would the outcome of your PICOT study contribute to your selected nursing theory? Would it add new information? Would it confirm some part of the theory?

Chamberlain College Of Nursing NR 501 Week 8 Discussion DQ 1 Course Reflection and Future Application NEW

Throughout the discussions occurring within NR 501, a common element has been application of theory. In this our last discussion regarding theory, it is time to focus on you and your capstone experience (yes, it is never too early consider this major project!). While it is too early to identify your project, let’s consider on your future practice area as this is the setting your project will occur in.

Based upon your self-reflection and use of nursing theory within the discussions and assignments, select ONE nursing theory that you prefer and answer the following questions:

  1. Why do you prefer the nursing theory you selected?
  2. How can this theory be used in your current practice area (education, executive, advanced clinical practice, informatics, or healthcare policy)?
  3. How can this theory be used in your future practice area (education, executive advanced clinical practice, informatics or healthcare policy)?

CHAMBERLIAN COLLEGE OF NURSING NR 501 Week 5 Application of Theory Assignment

The Application of Theory assignment is due Sunday 11:59pm MT at the end of Week 5. Please use your textbooks listed below to complete the assignment this week. The guidelines and rubric for this assignment are also listed below and in Course Resources.

Groenwald, S. L. (Ed.). (2018). Designing and creating a culture of care for students and faculty: The Chamberlain University College of Nursing Model. Washington, DC: National League for Nursing.

McCance, T. McCormack, B., & Dewing, J. (2011). An exploration of person-centeredness in practice. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 16(2). doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol16No02Man01

Purpose

Within the profession of nursing, multiple theories, models, and conceptual frameworks have been created to serve as a foundation for practice. The purpose of this assignment is to appraise the value of the model in serving as a theoretical framework and apply the model to your selected area of future professional nursing practice (your MSN track). For this assignment, you will select one of the following nursing models to address within the paper: the Patient-Centred Nursing (PCN) Framework or the Chamberlain Care Model.

Course Outcomes

Through this assessment, the student will meet the following Course Outcomes:

Apply nursing theory as a framework to guide the translation of knowledge and implementation of evidence-based practice in future professional settings. (CO #2)

Analyze theories from nursing and relevant fields with respect to the components, relationships among the components, and application to advanced nursing practice. (CO#4)

Total Points Possible

This assessment is worth 175 points.

Due Date

Submit your file(s) by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.

Requirements

Criteria for Content

Select one of the two models presented in the week five lesson (either the Person-Centred Nursing Framework, or the Chamberlain Care Model).

In a three- to four-page scholarly paper, address the following:

Provide a succinct overview of the model you have selected and discuss how the selected model addresses the four concepts within the nursing metaparadigm (person, health, nursing, environment).

Discuss how the selected model qualifies as a theoretical framework within the profession of nursing, and its use within the profession.

Describe how the chosen model can be applied in the future APN role (education, executive, family nurse practitioner, healthcare policy, or nursing informatics).

Preparing the paper

Submission Requirements

Application: Use Microsoft Word 2013™ to create the written assessment.

Length: The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) is at least three and no more than four pages in length.

A minimum of four (4) scholarly literature sources must be used.

Submission: Submit your file to the Canvas course site by the due date/time indicated.

Best Practices in Preparing the Project

The following are best practices in preparing this project.

Review directions thoroughly.

Follow submission requirements.

Make sure all elements on the grading rubric are included.

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.

Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

Ideas and information that come from scholarly literature must be cited and referenced correctly.

A minimum of four (4) scholarly literature references must be used.

Abide by CCN academic integrity policy.

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

NR-500: Foundational Concepts and Applications Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

NR-500: Foundational Concepts and Applications Course Assignments & Discussions Study GuideNR-500: Foundational Concepts and Applications Course Description

This nursing course introduces the graduate student to the conceptual foundations and skills essential for the master’s-prepared nurse. A framework for professional nursing practice, the scholarly communication of ideas, the use of critical inquiry and information dissemination, and the professional development of the master’s-prepared nurse will be explored. Prerequisite: None

NR-500: Foundational Concepts and Applications Complete Course Week 1 – 8

NR-500NP Week 1 Assignment: New Student Orientation (NSO)

NR-500NP Week 1 Discussion: The Value of a Master’s-Prepared Nurse

NR-500NP Week 1 Reflection On learning

NR-500NP Week 1 Reading

NR-500NP Week 2 Assignment: Roles in Advanced Practice Nursing (2 Versions)

NR-500NP Week 2 Reflection On learning

NR-500NP Week 2 Reading

NR-500NP Week 3 Discussion: Person-Centred Care (With Replies)

NR-500NP Week 3 Scavenger Hunt Quiz

NR-500NP Week 3 Reflection On learning

NR-500NP Week 3 Reading

NR-500NP Week 4 Assignment: APN Professional Development Plan Paper

NR-500NP Week 4 Reflection On learning

NR-500NP Week 4 Reading

NR-500NP Week 5 Discussion: Systems Theory and Practice Issues (3 Versions)

NR-500NP Week 5 Reflection On learning

NR-500NP Week 5 Reading

NR-500NP Week 6 Assignment: Area of Interest PowerPoint Presentation – Depression in Teenagers

NR-500NP Week 6 Assignment: Area of Interest PowerPoint Presentation – Breast Cancer Education Among Ethnicities

NR-500NP Week 6 Assignment: Area of Interest PowerPoint Presentation – Early Assessment for Depression in Adolescents

NR-500NP Week 6 Assignment: Area of Interest PowerPoint Presentation – Obesity

NR-500NP Week 6 Assignment: Area of Interest PowerPoint Presentation – Opioid Crises

NR-500NP Week 6 Assignment: Area of Interest PowerPoint Presentation – Breast Cancer Education

NR-500NP Week 6 Reflection On learning

NR-500NP Week 6 Reading

NR-500NP Week 7 Discussion: Incivility and Healthful Environments (With Replies)

NR- 500NP Week 7 Reflection On learning

NR-500NP Week 7 Reading

NR-500NP Week 8 Discussion: What Did You Learn

NR-500NP Week 8 Reflection

NR-500NP Week 8 Assignment: Reflection On Learning Weeks 1-8

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

NR-500: Foundational Concepts and Applications Course Syllabus Overview

Course Number: NR500
Course Title: Foundational Concepts and Applications
Course Credits: 3 credits
Prerequisite:

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Optional Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

National League for Nursing. (2012). Outcomes and competencies for graduates of practical/vocational, diploma, baccalaureate, master’s practice doctorate, and research doctorate programs in nursing. New York, NY: National League for Nursing.

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-501:  Theoretical Basis for Advanced Nursing Practice Course Assignments & Discussions.

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

Textbooks and Resources

Required Textbooks

The following books are required for this course:

Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (year of publication). Title of textbook in italics (X ed.). City, ST: Publisher.

Information regarding supplementary material, software, etc.

The following book is required across all FNP courses:

American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

The following book is recommended across all FNP courses:

Goroll, A. H., & Mulley, A. G. (2014). Primary care medicine: Office evaluation and management of the adult patient (7th ed.). China: Wolters Kluwer.

 

Physical Books and Supplies

To obtain all your books and supplies, visit the online Chamberlain bookstore at https://bookstore.chamberlain.edu/.

Program Outcomes

Program Outcomes of Chamberlain nursing programs can be found in the Program Descriptions section of your College Catalog. You can access your College Catalog at http://www.chamberlain.edu/msncatalog.

The MSN program outcomes are aligned with the American Association of Colleges of Nursing publication, The Essentials of Master’s Education in Nursing (2011). Upon completion of the MSN degree program, the graduate will be able to:

  1. Practice safe, high-quality advanced nursing care based on concepts and knowledge from nursing and related disciplines.
  2. Construct processes for leading and promoting quality improvement and safety in advanced nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
  3. Use contemporary communication modalities effectively in advanced nursing roles.
  4. Evaluate the design, implementation and outcomes of strategies developed to meet healthcare needs.
  5. Develop a plan for lifelong personal and professional growth that integrates professional values regarding scholarship, service and global engagement.
  6. Apply legal, ethical and human-caring principles to situations in advanced nursing practice.
  7. Design patient-centered care models and delivery systems using the best available scientific evidence.
  8. Manage human, fiscal and physical resources to achieve and support individual and organizational goals.
  1. 9.Compose a plan for systematic inquiry and dissemination of findings to support advanced nursing practice, patient-care innovation, and the nursing profession.
  1. Collaborate interprofessionally in research, education, practice, health policy and leadership to improve population health outcomes.
  2. Apply principles of informatics to manage data and information in order to support effective decision making.

Course Outcomes

Chamberlain College of Nursing courses are built to align course content with specific Course Outcomes (COs). The COs define the learning objectives that the student will be required to comprehend and demonstrate by course completion. The COs that will be covered in detail each week can be found in the Overview page in that particular week. Whenever possible, a reference will be made from a particular assignment or discussion back to the CO that it emphasizes.

Upon completion of this course, the student will be able to do the following.

  1. Examine roles and competencies of master’s-prepared nurses essential to performing as leaders and advocates of holistic, safe, and quality care. (POs 1, 2, 3, and 10)
  2. Apply concepts of person-centered care to nursing practice situations. (POs 1, 6, and 7)
  3. Analyze essential skills needed to lead within the context of complex systems. (POs 1, 2, 3, 8, and 11)
  4. Explore the process of scholarship engagement to improve health and healthcare outcomes in various settings. (POs 4, 5, and 9)

Course Schedule

 

Week, COs, and Topics Readings Assignments
Week 1

COs 1 and 3

Master’s- Prepared Nurse Competencies

Textbook:

National League for Nursing. (2012). Outcomes and competencies for graduates of practical/vocational, diploma, baccalaureate, master’s practice doctorate, and research doctorate rograms in nursing. New York, NY : National League for Nursing. Read pages: 1–31, 39–40, 60–69.

Articles/Websites:

American Associations of Colleges of Nursing. (2011). The essentials of master’s education in nursing. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/MastersEssentials11.pdf Link

Chamberlain College of Nursing. (2016). Chamberlain college of nursing masters of science in nursing conceptual framework. Retrieved from https://www.chamberlain.edu/docs/default-source/academics-admissions/catalog.pdf Link

Cotterill-Walker, S. M. (2012). Where is the evidence that master’s level nursing education makes a difference to patient care? A literature review. Nurse Education Today, 32(1), 57–64. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.02.001 Link to article

Institute of Medicine. (2010, October). The future of nursing. Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: Author. Link

National League for Nursing. (2016). Competencies for graduates of nursing programs. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/professional-development-programs/competencies-for-nursing-education/nln-competencies-for-graduates-of-nursing-programs Link

Discussion Topic

The value of a master’s- prepared nurse (graded)

New Student Orientation (NSO)

Student Success Strategies (SSS) Module

Week 2

COs 1 and 2

Caring in Nursing

Adams, L. Y. (2016). The conundrum of caring in nursing. International Journal of Caring Sciences9(1), 1–8.

Chamberlain College of Nursing. (2016). Mission, philosophy, program outcomes. Retrieved from https://www.chamberlain.edu/docs/default-source/academics-admissions/catalog.pdf Link

Drahošová, L., & Jarošová, D. (2016). Concept caring in nursing. Central European Journal of Nursing & Midwifery7(2), 453–461. doi:10.15452/CEJNM.2016.07.0014

Manley, K., Hills, V., & Marriot, S. (2011). Person-centered care: Principle of nursing practice D. Nursing Standard, 25(31), 35–7.

McCormack, B., Borg, M., Cardiff, S., Dewing, J., Jacobs, G., Janes, N., . . . Wilson, V. (2015). Person-centeredness – the ‘state’ of the art. International Practice Development Journal, 5. Retrieved from http://www.fons.org/Resources/Documents/Journal/Vol5Suppl/IPDJ_05(suppl)_01.pdf Link

Papathanasiou, I., Sklavou, M., & Kourkouta, L. (2013). Holistic nursing care: Theories and perspectives. American Journal of Nursing Science, 2(1), 1–5. doi:10.11648/j.ajns.20130201.11

Discussion Topic

Caring Concepts in Nursing

Graded Assignment (10%)

Artistic Expression of Caring Concept

Week 3

COs 1 and 2

Self-Knowledge

 

 

American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2011). The essentials of master’s education in nursing. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/MastersEssentials11.pdf

Kools, S., Chimwaza, A., & Macha, S. (2015). Cultural humility and working with marginalized populations in developing countries. Global Health Promotion, 22(1), 52–59. doi:10.1177/1757975914528728

Rasheed, S. P. (2015). Self-awareness as a therapeutic tool for nurse/client relationship. International Journal of Caring Sciences8(1), 211.

Stone, J., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2011). Non-conscious bias in medical decision making: what can be done to reduce it? Medical Education45(8), 768–776. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04026.x

Optional Viewing:

Bassett, M. (2015). Why your doctor should care about social justice [TED Talks]. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/mary_bassett_why_your_doctor_should_care_about_social_justice Link

Modern family clip: “I’m from Denver”. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/7324122 Link

Roberts, D. (2015). The problem with race-based medicine [TED Talks]. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/dorothy_roberts_the_problem_with_race_based_medicine Link

Discussion Topic

Knowing Self

Graded Assignment

(7.5%)

Addressing Bias

Week 4

COs 1 and 3

Leadership: Establishing Relationships – Influencing Change

 

Canadian College of Health Leaders (2010). Key points to leadership growth. A checklist for leaders. Retrieved from http://leadscanada.net/uploaded/web/Resources/key_points/KEYPOINTS_2016_EN.pdf

Kumar, S., Adhish, V., & Chauhan, A. (2014). Managing self for leadership. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 39(3), 138– 142. doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.137148

Scully, N. J. (2015). Leadership in nursing: The importance of recognizing inherent values and attributes to secure a positive future for the profession. Collegian, 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2014.09.004

Weaver, B., Lindsay, B., & Gitelman, B. (2012). Communication technology and social media: Opportunities and implications for healthcare systems. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 17(3), 3.

Optional Viewing

Cuddy, A. (2012). Your body language shapes who you are (TED Talks). Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ks-_Mh1QhMc Link

 

Discussion Topic

Leadership: Establishing Relationships and Influencing Change

Week 5

COs 1, 3, and 4

Scholarship and Evidence-Based Practice: A Process for Change

Conard, P. L., & Pape, T. (2014). Roles and responsibilities of the nursing scholar. Pediatric Nursing40(2), 87–90. Link

John Hopkins Medicine. (n.d.). John Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model. Retrieved from http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/evidence-based-practice/jhn_ebp.html Link

Limoges, J., Acorn, S., & Osborne, M. (2015). The scholarship of application: Recognizing and promoting nurses’ contribution to knowledge development. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 46(2), 77– 82. doi:10.3928/00220124-20151217-02 Link

Melnyk, B. M., Fineout-Overholt, E., Gallagher-Ford, L., & Stillwell, S. B. (2011). Sustaining evidence-based practice through organizational policies and an innovative model. American Journal of Nursing, 111(9), 57–60. Link

Stevens, K. R. (2013). The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing18(2), 1. doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04 Link

 

Discussion Topic

Evidence-Based Practice

Graded Assignment (15%)

Area of Interest PowerPoint Presentation

Week 6

CO 3

Systems: Structure and Function

Lis, G. A., Hanson, P., Burgermeister, D., & Banfield, B. (2014). Transforming graduate nursing education in the context of complex adaptive systems: Implications for master’s and DNP curricula. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30(6), 456 – 462. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2014.05.003

University of Victoria. (2012). Complexity Science in Brief. Retrieved from http://www.uvic.ca/research/groups/cphfri/assets/docs/Complexity_Science_in_Brief.pdf

Discussion Topic

Systems: Structure and Function

Graded Assignment (10%)

Complete Second Life Scavenger Hunt

Week 7

COs 1, 2, and 3

Healthful Work Environments

American Nurses Association (2015). Incivility, bullying, and workplace violence [Position Statement]. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/PosStat-Endorsed-ANA-Incivility-Bullying-Violence.pdf

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013). Workplace violence prevention for nurses. Retrieved from http://wwwn.cdc.gov/wpvhc/Course.aspx/Slide/Unit1_5

Lachman, V. D. (2015). Ethical issues in the disruptive behaviors of incivility, bullying, and horizontal/lateral violence. Urologic Nursing35(1), 39–42.

McNamara, S. A. (2012). Incivility in nursing: Unsafe nurse, unsafe patients. AORN Journal95(4), 535–540. doi:10.1016/j.aorn.2012.01.020

Morris, K. (2012). Lateral violence in the workplace: Fact or fiction? Ohio Nurses Review87(1), 6–7.

Stanton, C. (2015). Action needed to stop lateral violence in the perioperative setting. AORN Journal101(5), 7–9. doi:10.1016/S0001-2092(15)00320-8

Enhancement Resources:

American Nurses Association (2016). Incivility, bullying, and workplace violence. Retrieved from http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/WorkplaceSafety/Healthy-Nurse/bullyingworkplaceviolence

American Nurses Association (2016). Downloadable graphics: Preventing bullying and civility best practices. Retrieved from http://www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/WorkplaceSafety/Healthy-Nurse/bullyingworkplaceviolence/Preventing-Bullying-and-Civility-Best-Practices.html

America Nurses Association (2016). Healthy nurse, healthy nation. Retrieved from http://nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/WorkplaceSafety/Healthy-Nurse

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013). Workplace violence prevention for nurses. Retrieved from http://wwwn.cdc.gov/wpvhc/Course.aspx/Slide/Unit1_5

Discussion Topic

Healthful Environments

Graded Assignment (20%)

Cultivating Healthful Environments

Week 8

CO s 1–4

Synthesis of Course Concepts

No reading Discussion Topic

Synthesis of Course Concepts

 

 

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.

Evaluation Methods

No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.

Letter Grade Points Percentage
A   940–1,000 94% to 100%
A-  920–939 92% to 93%
B+ 890–919 89% to 91%
B   860–889 86% to 88%
B-  840–859 84% to 85%
C+ 810–839 81% to 83%
C   760–809 76% to 80%
F   759 and below 75% and below

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.

Graded Item Points Weighting
Discussion

(Weeks 1–7: 50 points each week; Week 8: 25 points)

375 37.5%
Assessment: Artistic Expression of Caring Concept

(Due Week 2)

100

 

10%
Assessment: Addressing Bias

(Due Week 3)

75 7.5%
Assessment: Area of Interest PowerPoint Presentation

(Due Week 5)

150 15%
Assessment: Complete Second Life Scavenger Hunt

(Due Week 6)

100 10%
Assessment: Cultivating Healthful Environments

(Due Week 7)

200 20%
Total 1,000 100%

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Participation for MSN

   The Threaded Discussion Grading Grid and Rubric document can be found in Course Resources.

Participation Guidelines

Due Date: First initial posting to the required threaded discussion topic is due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Peer and instructor responses are due by Sunday 11:59 pm MT. All posts for week 8 are due by the close of class on Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the threaded discussions.

Total Points Possible: Varies with course, please see specific course syllabus. These guidelines are for a required threaded discussion worth 50 points. Please note that week 8 will be worth only 25 points.

Requirements:

Description of the Assignment

  1. Initial posting: This is defined to be the initial post in which the student responds to the required threaded discussion topic. The first posting by a student within the required discussion area is considered to be the initial posting and will be evaluated using the rubric criteria. Scholarship in communication is expected. Required scholarly source(s) provide specific information that thoroughly address the required topic. For the initial posting, one scholarly source must be presented. The scholarly source must be an outside source. The student may use the required course textbook (s), assigned readings and lesson information in the initial post; however, these are not considered outside scholarly sources.

The initial posting must occur before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Initial postings must be at a minimum of 300 words. References do not apply toward word count. ONLY in Week 8, the initial posting must be a minimum of 200 words with a scholarly reference. It remains due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT

  1. Peer responses: As part of the threaded discussion requirements, the student must provide a substantive response to a peer. Substantive responses pose new ideas, ask questions, and/or generally add to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive way.

The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting and instructor response (see below). This peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. This response does not require a scholarly reference unless information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, then APA guidelines apply. Peer responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.

  1. Instructor response: The student must respond to an instructor’s follow-up questions. The instructor’s question may be directed to the student or may be a question directed to another student in the section. The response must be comprehensive and scholarly in nature. Instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.

The response to the instructor must occur on a day different from the initial post and a day different from the peer response. Responses to the instructor must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

  1. For week 8 only:Students are expected to post a peer response or an instructor post but are not required to do both. These posts must be a minimum of 100 words. References do not apply toward word count. The peer or instructor response must be on a different day than the initial post and must occur before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT due to the shorter week.

Posting Requirements:

  1. The initial posting must be provided before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
  2. The initial posting must have at least one scholarly outside source that is cited within the posting and referenced. Required course textbooks, assigned readings and lesson information are not considered to be outside scholarly sources.
  3. Initial posting must be a minimum of 300 words; peer responses and instructor responses a minimum 150 words.
  4. The peer responses and instructor responses must be provided before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
  5. All postings are substantive and relate to the graded threaded discussion topic.
  6. Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is accepted.
  7. Postings must occur on 3 separate days.
  8. For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT

Criteria for Content

  • Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
  • Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
  • Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
  • Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
  • Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
  • Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
  • For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

  1. Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
  2. When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab.
  3. Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
  4. Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.

Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 

Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points

 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
 

Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
 16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
   10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
Interactive Dialogue

Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
  • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
  8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

The following was present:

  • 0-3 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
The following was present:

  • 4-6 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
The following was present:

  • 7-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 10- 12 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
 

The following was present:

  • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

AND/OR

  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
The following was present:

  • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
  0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
Participation

Requirements

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
  0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

 

Grading Rubric Guidelines Week 8 ONLY

Performance Category  100% or highest level of performance

100%

Very good or high level of performance

88%

Acceptable level of performance

81%

Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

Deficient level of performance

56%

Failing level of performance

55% or less

         8 Points         7 Points       6 Points           5 Points          4 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

  • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
  • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
  • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
  • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
          8 Points        7 Points       6 Points          5 Points             4 Points       0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.

Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.

Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
  • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

  • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
  • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.

Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.

Interactive Dialogue

For Week 8 only:

Initial post should be a minimum of 200 words (references do not count toward word count)

The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each (references do not count toward word count)

Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words.
  • The peer or instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 3 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words.
  • The peer or instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
Demonstrated 2 of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words.
  • The peer or instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

  • Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words.
  • The peer or instructor responses must be a minimum of 100 words each.
  • Responses are substantive
  • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
       4 Points 3 Points        2 Points       0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.  

The following was present:

  • 0-4 errors in APA format

AND

  • Responses have 0-4 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND

  • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic, and facilitates communication.

 

The following was present:

  • 5-9 errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have 5-9 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

AND/OR

  • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand
 

The following was present:

  • 10- 13 errors in APA format

AND/OR

  • Responses have 10-13 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand
 

The following was present:

  • 14 to greater errors in APA format.

AND/OR

  • Responses have more than 14 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

AND/OR

  • Writing style does not facilitate communication
           0 Points   5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements For Week 8 ONLY:

Demonstrated the following:

  • Initial, and peer or faculty postings were made on 2 separate days
Failed to demonstrate the following:

  • Initial, and peer or faculty postings were made on 2 separate days
      0 Points Lost      5 Points Lost
 Requirements For Week 8 ONLY:

Demonstrated all of the following:

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

A minimum of one peer or one instructor response is to be posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT

 

Demonstrates one or less of the following.

  • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
  • A minimum of one peer or one instructor response is to be posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

NOTE: To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 pm MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 pm MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 pm MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

*Scholarly source: Per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments and threaded discussions. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Your textbook and lesson are not considered to be an outside scholarly source. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available data bases for a peer reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These web sites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site that you are unsure of. If the instructor determines that the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality, points will be deducted for not using scholarly sources. Current outside scholarly sources are required for the initial posting. This is defined to be 5 years or less. Instructor permission must be obtained if using a source that is older than 5 years.

Webliography Disclaimer

The purpose of the Webliography is to provide students with annotated bibliographies of world wide websites relevant to their courses. These websites are not meant to be all inclusive of what is available for each course’s subjects and have not been sanctioned as academically rigorous or scholarly by Chamberlain College of Nursing. Please exercise caution when using these websites for course assignments and references.

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company

PHI-413V Ethical and Spiritual Decision Making in Health Care Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide

PHI-413V Ethical and Spiritual Decision Making in Health Care Course Assignments & Discussions Study GuidePHI-413V Ethical and Spiritual Decision Making in Health Care Course Description

This course introduces a Christian foundation for spiritual assessment and care with specific emphasis on biomedical ethical principles and ethical decision-making within health care. Students practice assessment and propose holistic interventions that take into account the dignity of the human person. These assessments and interventions contribute to the physical and spiritual well-being of individuals across the life span and the health-illness continuum.

PHI-413V – Ethical and Spiritual Decision Making in Health Care Course Syllabus

Version 12.2

Ethical and Spiritual Decision Making in Health Care

 

Course Code                        Type                                    Duration                         Credit Hours

PHI-413V v:12   Credit Based      35 Days         3.0        .2

Pre-Requisites

None

Co-Requisites

None

PHI-413V

REQUIRED COURSE MATERIALS

Textbooks

Electronic Resources

A Brief Guide to Philosophical Writing

Read “A Brief Guide to Philosophical Writing.” These resources will help guide your writing process for philosophical writing.

ANA Code of Ethics

Refer to the ANA (American Nurses’ Association) Code of Ethics on the VCU website (2020).

https://www.vcuhealth.org/explore-vcu-health/for-health-professionals/nursing/about-nursing-at-vcu/ana-code-of-ethics (https://www.vcuhealth.org/explore-vcu-health/for-health-professionals/nursing/about-nursing-at-vcu/ana-code-of-ethics)

College of Nursing and Health Care Professions Undergraduate Field Experience Manual

Review the “Bachelor of Science in Nursing (RN to BSN)” section, found in the College of Nursing and Health Care Professions Undergraduate Field Experience Manual (2018-2019), located in the Student Success Center.

For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today and get the most reliable research paper help!

Ethical Positions Statement

Read Grand Canyon University’s “Ethical Positions Statement” on the GCU website.https://www.gcu.edu/why-gcu/christian-identity-and-mission (https://www.gcu.edu/why-gcu/christian-identity-and-mission)

Faith and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care Professions

View both “Faith and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care Professions” video messages to RN to BSN students from Dr. Lisa Smith and Dr.Maria Quimba, from the College of Nursing and Health Care Professions.https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=7285A42D-1FDE-E811-844B-005056BD1ABC(https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=7285A42D-1FDE-E811-844B-005056BD1ABC)

GCU Doctrinal Statement

Read Grand Canyon University’s “GCU Doctrinal Statement” on the GCU website.https://www.gcu.edu/why-gcu/christian-identity-and-mission (https://www.gcu.edu/why-gcu/christian-identity-and-mission)

LopesWrite

Refer to the LopesWrite webpage for guidance regarding assignments requiring submission to LopesWrite.https://support.gcu.edu/hc/en-us/articles/201277380-LopesWrite (https://support.gcu.edu/hc/en-us/articles/201277380-LopesWrite)

Philosophical Writing

View the “Philosophical Writing” video to help inform your philosophical writing assignments throughout the course.https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=30E68DF7-0AA5-E611-8627-005056A072B6(https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=30E68DF7-0AA5-E611-8627-005056A072B6)

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Grand Canyon University (Ed.). (2022). Practicing dignity: An introduction to Christian values and decision-making in health care (2nd ed.).

Statement on the Integration of Faith and Work

Read the “Statement on the Integration of Faith and Work” from Grand Canyon University’s One Foundationhttps://www.gcu.edu/sites/default/files/media/Documents/Statement-IFLW.pdf (https://www.gcu.edu/sites/default/files/media/Documents/Statement-IFLW.pdf)

The Bible

This course requires the use of a Bible. Students should use one of the following versions: the English Standard Version (ESV), the New International Version (NIV), or the New American Standard Bible (NASB). Each of these versions is available in print and also for free atBibleGateway.com.

Students might also find it helpful to choose a study Bible such as the NIV Life Application Study Bible or the ESV Study Bible in order to take advantage of additional information.

The Nuremberg Code

Refer to “The Nuremberg Code” found on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services website.https://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/nuremberg.pdf (https://history.nih.gov/research/downloads/nuremberg.pdf)

WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects

Refer to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki for this course.https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/(https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/)

You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on NR-500: Foundational Concepts and Applications Course Assignments & Discussions.

INSTRUCTOR ONLY MATERIALS

PHI-413V Course Guide

The course guide contains content and instructional information designed to assist faculty in the effective presentation of course materials.

PHI-413V Course Revision History

PHI-413V Discussion Questions

This document contains all utilized discussion questions.

TOPICS, OBJECTIVES, AND COURSE CONTENT

Topic 1: Foundational Issues in Christian Spirituality and Ethics

Objectives:

  1. 1.1: Explain the nature of spirituality and ethics according to the Christian worldview.
  2. 1.2: Explain the limitations of science as it relates to ethics.
  3. 1.3: Explain the current philosophical challenges to a Christian understanding of ethics in health care.

Topic Materials

Textbooks

Electronic Resources

10 Things You Should Know About Scientism

Read “10 Things You Should Know About Scientism,” by Moreland, on the Crossway website (2018).https://www.crossway.org/articles/10-things-you-should-know-about-scientism/ (https://www.crossway.org/articles/10-things-you-should-know-about-scientism/)

Faith and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care Professions

View both “Faith and Spiritual Decision-Making in Health Care Professions” video messages to RN to BSN students from Dr. Lisa Smith andDr. Maria Quimba, from the College of Nursing and Health Care Professions.

https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=7285A42D-1FDE-E811-844B-005056BD1ABC(https://www.gcumedia.com/lms-resources/student-success-center/?mediaElement=7285A42D-1FDE-E811-844B-005056BD1ABC)

Literary Styles in the Bible

View “Literary Styles in the Bible” on the Bible Project website (2018).https://thebibleproject.com/videos/literary-styles-bible/ (https://thebibleproject.com/videos/literary-styles-bible/)

Optional – Topic 1: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 1: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 1 from Practicing Dignity.

The Story of the Bible

View “The Story of the Bible” on the Bible Project website (2018).

https://thebibleproject.com/videos/the-story-of-the-bible/ (https://thebibleproject.com/videos/the-story-of-the-bible/)

What Is Scientism?

Read “What Is Scientism?” by Burnett, on the American Association for the Advancement of Science website (2018).

https://www.aaas.org/programs/dialogue-science-ethics-and-religion/what-scientism (https://www.aaas.org/programs/dialogue-science-ethics-and-religion/what-scientism)

What Is the Bible?

View “What Is the Bible?” on the Bible Project website (2018).

https://thebibleproject.com/videos/what-is-bible/ (https://thebibleproject.com/videos/what-is-bible/)

Assignments:

Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

Based on the required topic Resources, write a reflection about worldview and respond to following:

  1. In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodernrelativism within health care.
  2. In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.
  3. In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview:
  4. What is ultimate reality?
  5. What is the nature of the universe?
  6. What is a human being?
  7. What is knowledge?
  8. What is your basis of ethics?
  9. What is the purpose of your existence?

Remember to support your reflection with the topic Resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Discussion Questions:

Topic 1 DQ 2

What aspects of the topic readings do you find the most interesting? What is your view of the analysis of disease and healing in the readings? Explain.

Topic 1 DQ 1

What would spirituality be according to your own worldview? How do you believe that your conception of spirituality would influence theway in which you care for patients?

Participation:

Week 1 Participation: 20.0 points

Topic 2: God, Humanity, and Human Dignity

Objectives:

2.1: Explain the Christian view of the nature of human persons.

2.2: Compare the Christian view of intrinsic human value and dignity in contrast to secular views of personhood.

2.3: Evaluate how the concept of intrinsic human dignity is applied in the process of ethical decision-making.

Topic Materials

Textbooks

Electronic Resources

Optional – Joni and Friends

For additional information, the Joni and Friends website is recommended:

https://www.joniandfriends.org/ (https://www.joniandfriends.org/)

Optional – Topic 2: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 2: Optional Study Resources” that are recommended.

Philosophy – Ethics: Moral Status

View the video “Philosophy – Ethics: Moral Status,” by Jeff Sebo, from Wireless Philosophy. https://youtu.be/smuhAjyRbw0 (https://youtu.be/smuhAjyRbw0)

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 2 from Practicing Dignity.

The Image of God, Bioethics, and Persons with Profound Intellectual Disabilities

Read the attached article, “The Image of God, Bioethics, and Persons With Profound Intellectual Disabilities,” by Devan Stahl and John F.Kilner, from The Journal of the Christian Institute on Disability. ©2017 Joni and Friends, Agoura Hills, CA. Used with permission.

Assignments:

Case Study on Moral Status

Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and the required topic Resources, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:

  1. What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related tothe intrinsic human value and dignity?
  2. Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What fromthe case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?
  3. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?
  4. What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Discussion Questions:

Topic 2 DQ 2

According to your worldview, what value does a human person have? How does your position affect your stance on controversial bioethical issues, such as abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research?

Topic 2 DQ 1

What is the Christian concept of the imago Dei? How might it be important to health care, and why is it relevant?

Participation:

Week 2 Participation: 20.0 points

Topic 3: Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative

Objectives:

  1. 3.1: Describe the four principles and four boxes approach to biomedical ethics.
  2. 3.2: Describe how the four principles and four boxes approach would be applied according to the Christian worldview.

Topic Materials

Textbooks

Electronic Resources

Incorporating Spirituality into Patient Care

Read “Incorporating Spirituality into Patient Care,” by Orr, from American Medical Association Journal of Ethics (2015). https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/incorporating-spirituality-patient-care/2015-05 (https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/incorporating-spirituality-patient-care/2015-05)

New Testament Overview

View the online video, “New Testament Overview,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2018). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0BrP8bqj0c&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0BrP8bqj0c&feature=youtu.be)

Optional – Topic 3: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 3: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 3 from Practicing Dignity.

Read Scripture: TaNaK/Old Testament

View the online video, “Read Scripture: TaNaK/Old Testament,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2018). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALsluAKBZ-c&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALsluAKBZ-c&feature=youtu.be)

Sacrifice and Atonement

Explore “Sacrifice and Atonement” webpage and watch the video, on the Bible Project website (2018). https://thebibleproject.com/explore/sacrifice-atonement/ (https://thebibleproject.com/explore/sacrifice-atonement/)

The Messiah

Explore “The Messiah” webpage and watch the video on the Bible Project website (2018). https://thebibleproject.com/explore/the-messiah/ (https://thebibleproject.com/explore/the-messiah/)

Understanding Health and Healing

View the “Understanding Health and Healing” media piece.https://www.gcumedia.com/tncc/whole-person-care/understanding/ (https://www.gcumedia.com/tncc/whole-person-care/understanding/)

Word Study: Khata/Sin

View the online video, “Word Study: Khata/Sin,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2018). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNOZ7ocLD74&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aNOZ7ocLD74&feature=youtu.be)

Word Study: Shalom/Peace

View the online video, “Word Study: Shalom/Peace,” from the Bible Project, located on the YouTube website (2017). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLYORLZOaZE&feature=youtu.be (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLYORLZOaZE&feature=youtu.be)

Assignments:

Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative

This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically analyze a case. Organizing the data in this way will help you apply the four principles and four boxes approach.

Based on the “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and other required topic Resources, you will complete the “Applying the Four Principles: Case Study” document that includes the following:

Part 1: Chart

This chart will formalize the four principles and four boxes approach and the four-boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.

Part 2: Evaluation

This part includes questions, to be answered in a total of 500 words, that describe how principalism would be applied according to the Christian worldview.

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Discussion Questions:

Topic 3 DQ 2

What do the four parts of the Christian biblical narrative (i.e., creation, fall, redemption, and restoration) say about the nature of God and of reality in relation to the reality of sickness and disease? From where would one find comfort and hope in the light of illness according to this narrative? Explain in detail each part of the narrative above and analyze the implications.

Topic 3 DQ 1

The four principles, especially in the context of bioethics in the United States, has often been critiqued for raising the principle of autonomy to the highest place, such that it trumps all other principles or values. How would you rank the importance of each of the four principles? How do you believe they would be ordered in the context of the Christian biblical narrative? Refer to the topic Resources in your response.

Participation:

Week 3 Participation: 20.0 points

Topic 4: Death, Dying, and Grief

Objectives:

  1. 4.1: Explain the meaning and significance of death in light of the Christian narrative and the hope of resurrection.
  2. 4.2: Analyze end of life issues.

Topic Materials

Textbooks

Electronic Resources

Euthanasia

Read “Euthanasia,” by Wells, Frey, and Cataldo, from Gale Encyclopedia of Nursing and Allied Health (2013).https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/galegnaah/euthanasia/0?institutionId=5865(https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/galegnaah/euthanasia/0?institutionId=5865)

Optional – Topic 4: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 4: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 4 from Practicing Dignity.

Assignments:

Case Study on Death and Dying

The practice of health care providers at all levels brings you into contact with people from a variety of faiths. This calls for knowledge and understanding of a diversity of faith expressions; for the purpose of this course, the focus will be on the Christian worldview.

Based on “Case Study: End of Life Decisions,” the Christian worldview, and the worldview questions presented in the required topic Resources you will complete an ethical analysis of George’s situation and his decision from the perspective of the Christian worldview.

Provide a 1,500-2,000-word ethical analysis while answering the following questions:

  1. How would George interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative, with an emphasis on the fallenness of the world?
  2. How would George interpret his suffering in light of the Christian narrative, with an emphasis on the hope of resurrection?
  3. As George contemplates life with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), how would the Christian worldview inform his view about the value of his life as a person?
  4. What sorts of values and considerations would the Christian worldview focus on in deliberating about whether or not George should opt for euthanasia?
  5. Given the above, what options would be morally justified in the Christian worldview for George and why?
  6. Based on your worldview, what decision would you make if you were in George’s situation?

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Discussion Questions:

Topic 4 DQ 2

Reflect on the analysis of the sin of suicide and, thus, euthanasia from the topic readings. Do you agree? Why or why not? Refer to the lecture and topic readings in your response.

Topic 4 DQ 1

How often do you engage with or witness death in your work? How has this experience or the lack of it shaped your view of death? Has it gotten easier or harder for you to accept the fact of death? As you explain, include your clinical specialty.

Participation:

Week 4 Participation: 20.0 points

Topic 5: Intervention and Ethical Decision-Making

Objectives:

  1. 5.1: Analyze a health care situation with an ethical dilemma for an individual patient and his or her caregivers.
  2. 5.2: Utilize ethical theories, principles, and a decision-making framework to propose a resolution to ethical dilemmas faced by individual clients and their caregivers.

Topic Materials

Textbooks

Electronic Resources

Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients

Read ” Assessing the Spiritual Needs of Patients” by Timmins and Caldeira, from Nursing Standard (2017). https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/1877957457?accountid=7374(https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/1877957457?accountid=7374)

Doing a Culturally Sensitive Spiritual Assessment: Recognizing Spiritual Themes and Using the HOPE Questions

Read “Doing a Culturally Sensitive Spiritual Assessment: Recognizing Spiritual Themes and Using the HOPE Questions,” by Anandarajah,from AMA Journal of Ethics (2005).

https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/doing-culturally-sensitive-spiritual-assessment-recognizing-spiritual-themes-and-using-hope/2005-05 (https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/doing-culturally-sensitive-spiritual-assessment-recognizing-spiritual-themes-and-using-hope/2005-05)

End of Life and Sanctity of Life, Commentary 1

Read “End of Life and Sanctity of Life,, Commentary 1,” by Reichman, from American Medical Association Journal of Ethics, formerly Virtual Mentor (2005).

http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2005/05/ccas2-0505.html (http://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/2005/05/ccas2-0505.html)

GCU Technical Support – Field Experience Site Information Form

Refer to the “Field Experience Site Information Form” page in the GCU Technical Support Help Center for further instructions from GCU Technical Support on how to complete the “Field Experience Site Information Form” assignment. You will be submitting your chosen mentor, site information, and information regarding your chosen experience through this form in order to start the process of being cleared for your practice experience.

NOTE: Completion of the form works best on a non-mobile device. Please make sure your pop-up blockers are turned off.

https://support.gcu.edu/hc/en-us/articles/360000596207 (https://support.gcu.edu/hc/en-us/articles/360000596207)

Optional – Topic 5: Optional Resources

For additional information, see the “Topic 5: Optional Resources” that are recommended.

Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision-Making in Health Care

Read Chapters 5 from Practicing Dignity.

Assignments:

Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis

In addition to the topic Resources, use the chart you completed and questions you answered in the Topic 3 about “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” as the basis for your responses in this assignment.

Answer the following questions about a patient’s spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview.

  1. In 200-250 words, respond to the following: Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James, or would that mean a disrespect of a patient’s autonomy? Explain your rationale.
  2. In 400-500 words, respond to the following: How ought the Christian think about sickness and health? How should a Christian think about medical intervention? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James in relation to what is truly honoring the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence in James’s care?
  3. In 200-250 words, respond to the following: How would a spiritual needs assessment help the physician assist Mike determine appropriate interventions for James and for his family or others involved in his care?

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

BS in Health Sciences 1.2; BS Nursing (RN to BSN ) 5.2

Assess for the spiritual needs and provide appropriate interventions for individuals, families, and groups.

Field Experience Site Information Form

In preparation for your clinical practice experience, you will need to access the “Field Experience Site Information Form” from your student portal. You will be submitting your chosen mentor, site information, and information regarding your chosen experience through this form in order to start the process of being cleared for your practice experience. You can find information on the mentor and site requirements by viewing the “Guidelines for Undergraduate Field Experiences” located in the College of Nursing and Health Care Professions resource page in the Student Success Center.

For this assignment, complete the required “Field Experience Site Information Form” via your student portal. Once you log into your Student Portal, go to My Apps/Edocs/Click here to access all documents pending an e-signature. If you have any questions concerning this form, or if you are unable to view it in your student portal, contact your assigned field experience counselor for assistance.

NOTE: Completion of the form works best on a non-mobile device. Please make sure your pop-up blockers are turned off.

Once you have completed the site information form, a confirmation receipt will be sent to your my.gcu.edu email. Upload and submit your confirmation receipt in this assignment.

For further instructions, refer to “GCU Technical Support – Field Experience Site Information Form” in your topic Resources.

For students in the Bachelor of Science in Health Science: Professional Development and Advanced Patient Care, submit a Word document that states, “I am in the Bachelor of Science in Health Science: Professional Development and Advanced Patient Care program, which does not require field experience.”

For students enrolled concurrently with their community college, submit a Word document that states, “I am in the Concurrent Enrollment Program, which does not require field experience until admitted to the full degree program. Therefore, I am exempt from this requirement at this time.”

Discussion Questions:

Topic 5 DQ 1

What is your definition of spiritual care? How does it differ or accord with the description given in the topic readings? Explain.

Topic 5 DQ 2

When it comes to facilitating spiritual care for patients with worldviews different from your own, what are your strengths and weaknesses? If you were the patient, who would have the final say in terms of ethical decision-making and intervention in the event of a difficult situation?

Participation:

Week 5 Participation: 20.0 points

Gradebook

Assignment Topic Due Non Trad Points
Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory Topic 1 100
Case Study on Moral Status Topic 2 200
Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative Topic 3 150
Case Study on Death and Dying Topic 4 200
Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis Topic 5 200
Field Experience Site Information Form Topic 5 0
Discussion Questions Topics 1-5 50
Participation Topics 1-5 100
Total 1000

Grade Scale

Final Grade Column

Letter Grade GPA Value Minimum (%) Maximum (%)
A 4.0 93.0 100.0
A- 3.7 90.0 92.99
B+ 3.3 87.0 89.99
B 3.0 83.0 86.99
B- 2.7 80.0 82.99
C+ 2.3 77.0 79.99
C 2.0 70.0 76.99
D 1.0 60.0 69.99
F 0.0 0.02 59.99
I 0.0 0.0 0.01

Grade Categories

Assignments (%) Points Percentile
Case Study on Moral Status 200.0
Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative  

150.0

 

Case Study on Death and Dying 200.0
Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis 200.0
Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory 100.0

 

Discussion Question (%) Points Percentile
Topic 3 DQ 2 5.0
Topic 3 DQ 1 5.0
Topic 1 DQ 2 5.0
Topic 5 DQ 1 5.0
Topic 1 DQ 1 5.0
Topic 4 DQ 1 5.0
Topic 2 DQ 1 5.0
Topic 4 DQ 2 5.0
Topic 5 DQ 2 5.0
Topic 2 DQ 2 5.0

 

Participation (%) Points Percentile
Week 3 Participation 20.0

 

Participation (%) Points Percentile
Week 1 Participation 20.0

 

Participation (%) Points Percentile
Week 4 Participation 20.0

 

Participation (%) Points Percentile
Week 5 Participation 20.0

 

Participation (%) Points Percentile
Week 2 Participation 20.0

Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!

Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.

Expertise That Sets Us Apart

At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.

Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?

  • Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
  • Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
  • Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
  • Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
  • Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
  • Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.

Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?

Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!

Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey

Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or get professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.

Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!

paper writing company