PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Course Assignments & Discussions Study Guide
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Course Description
In this course, learners synthesize the impact of globalization on community health and the complexities of partnering with communities for development among resource-constrained populations. Learners review the history of international public health efforts and theories underpinning current global health initiatives. There is an emphasis on the role of faith and ministry-based organizations in global health advocacy and initiatives. Learners examine the challenges of building real collaboration across public, private, and local entities, and explore best practices for the integration of faith-based and professional public health principles to establish sustainable local development. Prerequisite: PUB-540.
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Course Discussions
Description
IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING WORD LIMIT REQUIREMENTS:
Please note that each and every assignment has its own word limit.
PLEASE ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS IN PARAGRAPHS AND MAKE IT COHESIVE AND TRY TO INCORPORATE THE READINGS BELOW
PLEASE add the links/sites below to the reference list if you use any of these readings and make sure everything is in proper APA format.
https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/quick-guide-on-refe…
Read Chapter 4 in For the Love of God: Principles and Practice of Compassion in Missions.
URL:
Read “The Stages of International (Global) Health: Histories of Successes or Successes of History?” by Birn, from Global Public Health (2009).
For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today!
URL:
Watch the “Introduction to PUB 655” video in the Participatory Community Development playlist, located in the Student Success Center. This video will explain the overall purpose and focus for this course. The course begins with a broad perspective and then concentrates specifically on engaging communities and vulnerable populations with a focus on Christian health missions.
URL:
Watch the “Defining Poverty” video in the Participatory Community Development playlist, located in the Student Success Center, in preparation for responding to the discussion question in this topic. The video provides an alternative definition of poverty based on relationships rather than only material need. This definition informs one’s approach to poverty and engaging lower-income communities.
URL:
Read “Towards a Common Definition of Global Health” by Koplan, Bond, Merson, Reddy, Rodriguez, Sewankambo, and Wasserheit, from The Lancet (2009).
URL:
https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pii=S0140-6736%2809%2960332-9
Read “Global Health Is Public Health” by Fried, Bentley, Buekens, Burke, Frenk, Klag, and Spencer, from The Lancet (2010).
URL:
http://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lancet/PIIS0140-6736(10)60203-6.pdf
Read “Poverty Is a Lie,” by Todd, from Mission Frontiers (2011).
URL:
https://www.missionfrontiers.org/pdfs/33-4-poverty-is-a-lie.pdf
Read “What Is Poverty?” located on The Chalmers Center website.
URL:
https://www.chalmers.org/our-work/redefining-poverty/what-is-poverty
Watch “Helping Without Hurting – Part 1: Reconsidering the Meaning of Poverty – LifeChurch.tv,” by Life.Church (2014), located on the YouTube website.
URL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a339VZRE3CM
Read “The History of Foreign Aid,” by Phillips (2013), located on the ReliefWeb website.
URL:
https://reliefweb.int/report/world/history-foreign-aid
Read “How AIDS Invented Global Health,” from New England Journal of Medicine (2013).
URL:
http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp1305297
Read “Global Health Players: Organizations Involved in International Health,” located on the Global Health Education website.
URL:
https://globalhealtheducation.org/56_nutrition_in_global_health/
Read “Donor Motives for Foreign Aid,” by Bandyopadhyay and Vermann, from Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review (2013).
URL:
https://files.stlouisfed.org/files/htdocs/publications/review/13/07/bandyopadhyay.pdf
MUST have at least three citations with the page numbers and three references in APA format and all questions clearly answered in paragraphs.(The List of References should not be older than 2017 and should not be included in the word count.) Include at least one scholarly reference and appropriate in-text citations and Address all points on the DQ. One point will be deducted for not addressing each item mentioned above. Remember that presenting someone else’s work as your own is plagiarism.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.
It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class
I am a stickler for good organization in everything. I do not want to have to dig for your answers. For instance, if an assignment asks you to provide three examples of something, I suggest that you number them 1-3 so I can find them easily. I also expect that when you submit something as a narrative, you pay attention to how you organize your thoughts: use paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences; and change paragraphs whenever you introduce a new idea. Also, if there are multiple parts to an assignment, use sub-heads within the paper to organize them.
To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for this assignments 1) look at the word/page limits 2) review and follow APA rules 3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and 4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.
REMEMBER IN APA FORMAT JOURNAL TITLES AND VOLUME NUMBERS ARE ITALICIZED.
References
American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on PHN-600 Foundations of Public Health Nursing Course Assignments & Discussions.
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Week 1 Discussion
DQ1
Defining international or global health is important and some consider global health synonymous with public health. Select one of the following two statements:
- Global health is public health requiring similar training and research methods.
- Global health is a separate discipline requiring specific training and research methods.
Identify at least two arguments that support the selected statement and provide sources to support those arguments. Identify and discuss one historical event that is important in how global health is understood today and how that event supports your argument. For one of your substantive responses, identify another classmate that selected the opposite statement and provide at least one point of agreement and one point of disagreement.
DQ 2
Poverty is central to health and development in low-income and middle-income countries. State your definition of poverty prior to studying public health. Based on this definition, what would be the focus of poverty alleviation solutions? Based on the relational and spiritual definition of poverty, discuss how the focus of solutions would change to include a holistic approach. Identify an example of a health program or solution that integrates a relational definition of poverty. Watch the video on “Defining Poverty” to help in responding to this discussion question.
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Week 2 Discussion
DQ1
Review the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, then evaluate the following statement by Katja Iversen, CEO of Women Deliver: “The SDGs are not a menu, they are a roadmap. We need to ask ourselves: Who can we do this with, and who does this affect?”
Discuss the difference between a roadmap and menu in reference to the SDGs and why a roadmap analogy makes more sense. In your response, reference at least two different goals between Goals 4 and 17 that are connected to health. Additionally, identify two key targets for reaching Goal 3 and why you think these are critical. Discuss two actions you could take to help make progress toward reaching the SDGs as a global society. Refer to the United Nations’ “The Lazy Person’s Guide to Saving the World” in the topic Resources.
DQ2
Visit “Global: Both Sexes, All Ages, 2016, DALYs” on the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation GBD Compare Data Visualization Hub website. Compare the primary causes of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) from countries in two different sociodemographic index levels or economic regions. Identify three social or political-economic differences that help explain the differences you observed. Discuss the utility of the disability-adjusted life year (DALY) measure as a composite measure of health. Why is the DALY helpful given the different categories of Communicable, Noncommunicable, and Injury when it comes to comparing mortality and morbidity?
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Week 3 Discussion
DQ1
Controlling infectious diseases is part of public health practice. Review approaches to prevention, control, and the obstacles that low-income and middle-income countries endure. Vaccines are a critical part of health, but health care systems are impacted by globalization. Some countries do not have surveillance systems in place that allow determining need. Provide an example of how globalization has impacted South America or sub-Saharan Africa. What three pieces of advice would you give the Minister of Health in countries of South America or sub-Saharan Africa when it comes to the integration of health care and public health (i.e., vaccines)?
DQ2
Macroeconomics of a country depicts the health of the population. There have been many outbreaks and pandemics of infectious diseases like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), H5N1 avian influenza, H1N1 swine influenza, Ebola, and COVID-19 or of noncommunicable diseases. How have these outbreaks or pandemics directly and indirectly affected national and global economies? Explain how national and international health care systems have handled the outbreak. How have they differed in their methods? In what ways have the economies and the health care systems impacted each other during these outbreaks? Provide at least three examples that depict the risk factors for disease.
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Week 4 Discussion
DQ1
Diseases that disproportionately affect the poor are typically prioritized by governments and donors. Some people believe that disorders such as depression are problems of the middle class and the affluent, or represent a “medicalization of misery,” and, therefore, do not deserve a share of scarce resources. What is the evidence linking poverty with mental disorders? How might poverty interact with mental health?
DQ2
Global health initiatives are often pivotal in the advancement of human rights. When addressing global public health issues, international organizations have a responsibility to develop policies and practices that support marginalized groups’ basic human rights. Policies that affect a woman’s reproductive and sexual health can be contradictory of the basic human right if it challenges the moral imperative of creating conditions that allow women to decide freely and responsibly on the number, spacing, and timing of their children or the ethical obligation to ensure equitable access to contraceptive options and safe reproductive service. This can become increasingly more of an issue when conditions arise that affect a woman and her unborn child, such as Zika virus.
Discuss your interpretation of the right to health. Explain how policies that affect a women’s sexual and reproductive health may be impacted by the introduction of a virus. Discuss the policies that countries impacted by Zika have developed around women’s sexual and reproductive health. Do any of these policies violate a woman’s right to health? Discuss if the global public health threat of Zika is severe enough to limit sexual and reproductive rights and freedoms. Conversely, is the threat of Zika-associated fetal anomalies sufficient to change existing restrictive laws and policies?
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Week 5 Discussion
DQ1
Availability, affordability, and safe and effective use are the main challenges to improving pharmaceutical access. In what ways have global health initiatives had positive and negative impacts on medicine access? Does this affect global health security? Why or why not?
DQ2
Trade has been an integral part of society since prehistoric times. It exists not only as a basis for the economy in a global market but ingrained in culture. However, trade can pose controversies in global health as health organizations try to balance sustainable community health strategies in economically and culturally diverse communities. Do you think that global health policies on trade are necessary to build community capacity and ultimately support the health of the community? Assess how a populations needs are met by discussing how trade can positively impact a community’s health. Provide two examples of goods or services as support. In contrast, discuss how trade can negatively impact a community’s health, providing support using two examples of goods or services.
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Week 6 Discussion
DQ1
Discuss three of the nine Sphere Core Humanitarian Standards. Identify the one that you think is most often neglected in the case of natural disasters or humanitarian emergencies such as natural disasters, violence, war and vulnerable human settlements. Discuss characteristics of humanitarian emergencies in your response. Share a real example of how these standards were (or were not) applied in a recent humanitarian crisis.
DQ2
As the number of international migrants grows globally, the need for access to public health services continues to rise. This dilemma is causing a complex humanitarian issue to become a reality for many countries. Review the World Health Organization’s draft global action plan “Promoting the Health of Refugees and Migrants.” Discuss the roles and responsibilities of international organizations in providing health support for refugees and migrants. Compare these to the roles and responsibilities of governmental agencies. Why would a country benefit from being a member of an international organization when dealing with humanitarian crises? What role should the faith-based community fulfill when supporting the needs of the migrant community?
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Week 7 Discussion
DQ1
Using the proximate determinants framework, discuss the relative impacts of one of the following reproductive health issues: contraception, breastfeeding, abortion, sexual activity and infecundity on total fertility rates in Latin America versus Africa from both a family-centered and systems-based perspective. What are the policy implications of these findings? Provide a real-world example of this issue and explain how the policy impacts the low-income population. Similarly, explain why Japan, which has a relatively low contraceptive prevalence rate, has such a low total fertility rate.
DQ2
The Ministry of Health of a lower-income country has decided to institute a national nutrition surveillance system to monitor the country’s most pressing child and maternal nutrition problems. The surveillance system should incorporate the micronutrient deficiencies that affect the population, and account for people at different life stages, socioeconomic, and geographic groups’ vulnerabilities to individual nutrient deficiencies. As a health professional working for the ministry, provide your professional summary for a selected lower middle income country, of the nutritional problems, target groups, approaches to assessment, options for routine contact in the community, and types of agencies to organize into a surveillance system to guide the ministry. Discuss ways in which single-micronutrient deficiency prevention strategies might be combined, integrated, or coordinated to achieve cost-effective control. Describe the roles of general rations, supplementary feeding programs, and therapeutic feeding programs in maintaining population nutrition.
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Week 8 Discussion
DQ1
Think about the need for shelter, food, potable water, sanitation, health care, and other service provisions as a country endures a complex emergency (war, civil conflict, and political violence). What is the role of international, national, nongovernmental organizations, military, and other humanitarian actors in humanitarian aid, relief, and response? Why are commercial interests a conflict and can compromise public health? Provide an example of a complex emergency and lesson learned that has emerged in the last 10 years.
DQ2
After viewing “Poverty Inc” located in the topic Resources, discuss how responding to complex emergencies impacts one of the servant leadership principles. As a servant leader, explain the balance between capacity-building and supporting the local community. Reflecting on your responsibilities as a public health partner, how is your professional role impacted by the limitations of humanitarian aid? Discuss the line between helping and hurting the community.
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Course Assignments
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Week 2 Assignment
Description
PUB-655 Evaluating a Global Health Issue Week 2 Assignment
The Global Burden of Disease study is conducted by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation and published in the Lancet journal. It captures and analyzes data on many major causes of mortality and morbidity from almost every country. The study allows researchers and practices to compare countries and also help individual countries prioritize major health issues and risk factors with available resources. Review the background of the study by exploring the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation website as well as the various GBD reports found in the Lancet journal. Create a PowerPoint presentation (five to seven slides, not including your title or references slide) that addresses one of the top five causes of mortality and morbidity from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD). Select the health issue based on a specific country of interest and include the following in your presentation:
- Evidence and statistics supporting it as a major health issue, such as the Disability Adjusted Life Years or other measures of mortality and morbidity. Indicate which country you selected.
- Four major risk factors related to the health issue.
- Potential gaps or limitations in the data.
- Three social or economic opportunities to control or reduce the prevalence of this issue (reference the connection to the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals).
- Points of interest regarding this leading cause of mortality and morbidity related to the country you selected.
For the presentation, use Loom to create a video. Refer to the topic Resources for additional guidance on recording your presentation with Loom. To submit your video, you can either upload the video directly, embed your video into a Word document, or put the link to your video in a Word document and submit the document.
Refer to the resource, “Creating Effective PowerPoint Presentations,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/quick-guide-on-refe…
Read Chapter 11 in For the Love of God: Principles and Practice of Compassion in Missions.
URL:
Explore the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) page of the United Nations website. Study all 17 goals in preparation for a discussion question in this topic.
URL:
http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/
Explore the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation website.
URL:
Explore the Data Repository on the Global Health Observatory (GHO) page of the World Health Organization (WHO) website.
URL:
http://www.who.int/gho/database/en/
Explore the Health Data Tools and Statistics page of the Partners in Information Access for the Public Health Workforce website.
URL:
https://phpartners.org/health_stats.html
Explore the Global Burden of Disease page, located on The Lancet website.
URL:
Read “The Lazy Person’s Guide to Saving the World,” located on the United Nations website.
URL:
http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/takeaction/
Watch “Chris Murray and the Global Burden of Disease,” by Gates (2015), located on the YouTube website.
URL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_kfOygmfxA
Watch “Causes of Death: Global Burden of Disease Study 2015,” by The Lancet TV (2016), located on the YouTube website.
URL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ERvFgjBHizo
Watch “What Does a $100 Million Public Health Data Revolution Look Like?” by TEDMED (2013), located on the YouTube website.
URL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mususV-jMFk
Watch “The State of Global Health,” by Global Health With Greg Martin (2013), located on the YouTube website.
URL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n4mz5r6KiYo
Watch, “The DALY Show, Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALY),” by Kahn (Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies) (2014), located on the YouTube website.
URL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Exce4gy7aOk
Explore “Global: Both Sexes, All Ages, 2016, DALYs, ” located on the GBD Compare/Viz Hub page of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation website.
URL:
https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/
References
American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
PUB-655 Evaluating a Global Health Issue Week 2 Assignment Rubric
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| PUB-655 | PUB-655-O500 | Evaluating a Global Health Issue | 80.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Criteria | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Evidence and Statistics Supporting a Major Health Issue | 10.0% | Evidence and statistics supporting a major health issue are not present. | Evidence and statistics supporting a major health issue indicate less than satisfactory search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Evidence and statistics supporting a major health issue indicate adequate search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Evidence and statistics supporting a major health issue indicate sufficient clarity of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Evidence and statistics supporting a major health issue indicate outstanding clarity. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Four Major Risk Factors Related to the Health Issue | 10.0% | Major risk factors related to the health issue are not present. | At least one major risk factor related to the health issue is addressed. | At least two major risk factors related to the health issue are addressed. | At least three major risk factors related to the health issue are addressed with supporting details. | Four major risk factors related to the health issue are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Potential Gaps or Limitations in the Data | 10.0% | Potential gaps or limitations in the data are not present. | Potential gaps or limitations in the data indicate less than satisfactory search of the literature. | Potential gaps or limitations in the data indicate adequate search of the literature. | Potential gaps or limitations in the data indicate sufficient depth of content in the topic. | Potential gaps or limitations in the data indicate outstanding depth. | |||
| Three Social or Economic Opportunities to Control or Reduce the Prevalence of the Health Issue | 10.0% | Three social or economic opportunities to control or reduce the prevalence of this health issue are not present. | At least one social or economic opportunities to control or reduce the prevalence of this health issue indicates less than satisfactory search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | At least two social or economic opportunities to control or reduce the prevalence of this health issue indicate adequate search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | At least three social or economic opportunities to control or reduce the prevalence of this health issue indicate sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | At least three social or economic opportunities to control or reduce the prevalence of this health issue indicate outstanding clarity. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Points of Interest Regarding the Health Issue Related to the Selected Country | 10.0% | Points of interest regarding the health issue related to the selected country are not present. | Points of interest regarding the health issue related to the selected country are not well communicated in the assignment; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Points of interest regarding the health issue related to the selected country are communicated in the assignment; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Points of interest regarding the health issue related to the selected country are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Points of interest regarding the health issue related to the selected country evidenced outstanding clarity and are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Presentation of Content | 20.0% | The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. | The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. | The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other. | The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. | The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. | |||
| Layout | 10.0% | The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. | The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. | The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. | The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. | The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. | |||
| Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) | 10.0% | Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. | Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. | Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. | The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. | The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. | |||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. | Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. | Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. | |||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | |||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Week 3 Assignment
Description
PUB-655 Benchmark – Integrating Health Care and Public Health Systems Week 3 Assignment
When considering public health and health care systems and the services they provide, it is important to think about how these systems and services are integrated. Systems thinking tools are helpful to consider the various links, feedback loops, and decision points within a system to identify opportunities for improvement and increase efficiency.
For this assignment, select a low- or middle-income country of interest and assess its health system. In a 1,000-1,250-word paper, address the following:
- Describe the major components of the health system.
- Discuss core services the health system provides and who manages them(government, private sector, a mix of both, etc.).
- Discuss who is responsible for paying for those services or who funds the provided services.
- Apply a systems thinking tool, such as a causal diagram or process map, to identify opportunities for how gaps in public health services can be bridged through a strong health system.
- Conclude by considering how the convergence of communicable and noncommunicable diseases can be addressed more effectively through an integrated health system in the selected country.
General Requirements
You are required to cite at least SIX sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the discussion question criteria and public health content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required.
While APA style is required, solid academic writing is expected as well, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
PLEASE make sure APA citation and permalink for articles are complete and correct.
Y
PLEASE add the links/sites below to the reference list if you use any of these readings and make sure everything is in proper APA format.
https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/quick-guide-on-refe…
Read “The Health Impacts of Globalisation: A Conceptual Framework,” by Huynen, Martens, and Hilderink, from Globalization and Health (2005).
URL:
Read “Participant Guidelines: Systems Tools for Complex Health Systems: A Guide to Creating a Causal Loop Diagrams,” by de Pinho (Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health) (2015), located on the World Health Organization (WHO) website.
URL:
http://www.who.int/alliance-hpsr/resources/publications/CLD_Course_Participant_Manual.pdf
Read “Guide: How to Process Map,” by the Agency for Clinical Innovation (2015).
URL:
https://www.aci.health.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/279088/Guide_on_How_to_Process_Map.pdf
Read “Building From Common Foundations: The World Health Organization and Faith-Based Organizations in Primary Healthcare,” by Bandy et al. (2008), located on the World Health Organization website.
URL:
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43884/1/9789241596626_eng.pdf
Read “Globalization of Health Care: Designing, Developing, and Implementing a Just World Class Health System in a Frontier Market,” by Waruingi et al., from Journal of Global Health Care Systems (2013).
URL:
Read “The Global Health System: Actors, Norms, and Expectations in Transition,” by Szlezak et al., from PLOS Medicine (2010).
URL:
http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000183&type=printable
Read “Assessing the Health Impact of Transnational Corporations: Its Importance and a Framework,” by Baum et al., from Globalization and
Health (2016).
URL:
Read “Framing International Trade and Chronic Disease,” by Labonte, Mohindra, and Lencucha, from Globalization and Health (2011).
URL:
Read “Declaration of Alma-Ata,” by the International Conference on Primary Health Care (1978), located on the World Health Organization (WHO) website.
URL:
http://www.who.int/publications/almaata_declaration_en.pdf
Read “A View of Health Care Around the World,” by Wallace, from Annals for Family Medicine (2013).
URL:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3596027/pdf/0110084.pdf
Read “Health Care Systems in Low- and Middle-Income Countries,” by Mills, from New England Journal of Medicine (2014).
URL:
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMra1110897
Read “The WHO Health Systems Framework,” located on the World Health Organization (WHO) website.
URL:
http://www.wpro.who.int/health_services/health_systems_framework/en/
Read “Five Capitalist Democracies and How They Do It,” by Frontline (2008), located on the PBS website.
URL:
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/sickaroundtheworld/countries/
Explore the Management Sciences For Health website.
URL:
MUST have at least 5 citations with the page numbers and 5 references in APA format.(The List of References should not be older than 2016 and should not be included in the word count.) Include at least one scholarly reference and appropriate in-text citations and Address all points on the DQ. One point will be deducted for not addressing each item mentioned above. Remember that presenting someone else’s work as your own is plagiarism.
Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources.
It is important that you cover all the topics identified in the assignment. Covering the topic does not mean mentioning the topic BUT presenting an explanation from the context of ethics and the readings for this class
I am a stickler for good organization in everything. I do not want to have to dig for your answers. For instance, if an assignment asks you to provide three examples of something, I suggest that you number them 1-3 so I can find them easily. I also expect that when you submit something as a narrative, you pay attention to how you organize your thoughts: use paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences; and change paragraphs whenever you introduce a new idea. Also, if there are multiple parts to an assignment, use sub-heads within the paper to organize them.
To get maximum points you need to follow the requirements listed for this assignments 1) look at the word/page limits 2) review and follow APA rules 3) create subheadings to identify the key sections you are presenting and 4) Free from typographical and sentence construction errors.
REMEMBER IN APA FORMAT JOURNAL TITLES AND VOLUME NUMBERS ARE ITALICIZED.
References
American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
PUB-655 Benchmark – Integrating Health Care and Public Health Systems Week 3 Assignment Rubric
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| PUB-655 | PUB-655-O500 | Benchmark – Integrating Health Care and Public Health Systems | 150.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 70.0% | ||||||||
| Major Components of the Health System | 10.0% | Major components of the health system are not present. | Major components of the health system indicate less than satisfactory search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Major components of the health system indicate adequate search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Major components of the health system indicate sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Major components of the health system indicate outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Core Services Provided and Who Manages Them | 10.0% | Core services provided and who manages them are not present. | Core services provided and who manages them indicate less than satisfactory search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Core services provided and who manages them indicate adequate search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Core services provided and who manages them indicate sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Core services provided and who manages them indicate outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Payment and Funding of Services | 10.0% | Payment and funding of services are not present. | Payment and funding of services indicate less than satisfactory search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Payment and funding of services indicate adequate search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Payment and funding of services indicate sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Payment and funding of services indicate outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Application of a Systems Thinking Tool (C: 3.6) | 20.0% | Application of a systems thinking tool is not present. | Application of a systems thinking tool is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Application of a systems thinking tool is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Application of a systems thinking tool related to the topic is analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Application of a systems thinking tool indicates outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Integrated Health System Addressing Convergence of Communicable and Noncommunicable Diseases | 20.0% | Integrated health system addressing convergence of communicable and noncommunicable diseases is not present. | Integrated health system addressing convergence of communicable and noncommunicable diseases indicates less than satisfactory search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Integrated health system addressing convergence of communicable and noncommunicable diseases indicates adequate search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Integrated health system addressing convergence of communicable and noncommunicable diseases indicates sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Integrated health system addressing convergence of communicable and noncommunicable diseases indicates outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% | ||||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |||
| Format | 10.0% | ||||||||
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | |||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Week 5 Assignment
Description
PUB-655 Benchmark – Participatory Learning and Action Tools Week 5 Assignment
Participatory learning and action (PLA) tools are used to engage communities in a process of shared decision making around their strengths and assets. Action steps are often identified by the group to make social, economic, or environmental changes in their community. Select and practice one of the following participatory learning and action tools:
- Community asset map
- Holistic worldview analysis
- Appreciative inquiry interview
- Problem tree analysis (also called diagramming)
- Photovoice
Guides on how to facilitate the tools are described in the community
engagement and PLA resources in the Topic Materials. Identify an individual or
group of individuals with whom you are currently working as part of your job,
service, volunteerism, or family. Review the selected tool and become familiar
with the process and purpose of the tool prior to facilitating it with your
selected individual or group.
In a 1,000-1,250-word essay, discuss the following:
- What tool did you select and why did you select it instead of the other options?
- What cultural insight did you learn based on the individual or group you selected? Include a brief description of the individual or group you engaged for this
assignment. - What challenges did you identify in facilitating the tool?
- Discuss how the participants responded to the tool regarding their participation and shared decision making. Consider how PLA tools are focused on building the
capacity of people versus projects or programs. - A Health in All Policies approach, which include economic and environmental
factors, is important in addressing the interconnectedness of health factors to
support holistic transformation. Discuss how this community engagement approach through such a tool is useful for assessing a Health in All Policies approach. In addition, consider how this approach is effective in reducing health
disparities by addressing economic and environmental issues through community
mobilization and assets. Review the website and introductory report on “Health
in All Policies,” by the American Public Health Association (APHA), and “What
You Need to Know About Health in All Policies,” by the World Health
Organization (WHO), located in the Topic Materials for additional insight.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. PLEASE add the links/sites below to the reference list if you use any of these readings and make sure everything is in proper APA format.
https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/quick-guide-on-refe…
Read Chapter 5 in For the Love of God: Principles and Practice of Compassion in Missions.
URL:
Read “Connecting Communities and Complexity: A Case Study in Creating the Conditions for Transformational Change,” by Durie and Wyatt, from Critical Public Health (2013).
URL:
Read “Cultural Humility: Measuring Openness to Culturally Diverse Clients,” by Hook, Davis, Owen, Worthington, and Utsey, from Journal of Counseling Psychology (2013).
URL:
Read “Reflections on Cultural Humility,” by Waters and Asbill, from American Psychological Association CYF News (2013).
URL:
http://www.apa.org/pi/families/resources/newsletter/2013/08/cultural-humility.aspx
Read “Tyranny/Transformation: Power and Paradox in Participatory Development,” by Christens and Speer, from Forum: Qualitative Social Research (2006).
URL:
http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/91/189
Read “A Basic Guide to ABCD Community Organizing,” by McKnight, located on the DePaul University website.
URL:
Read “Wholistic Worldview Analysis: Understanding Community Realities,” by Jayakaran (2007), located on the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) website.
URL:
http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G02908.pdf
Read “Participatory Analysis for Community Action (PACA) Training Manual,” from the Peace Corps Information Collection and Exchange, Publication No. M0053(2007), located on the Peace Corps website.
URL:
http://files.peacecorps.gov/multimedia/pdf/library/PACA-2007.pdf
Read “Empowering Communities: Participation Techniques for Community-Based Programme Development: Volume 2: Participant’s Handbook,” by De Negri, Thomas, Ilinigumugabo, Muvandi, and Lewis(1998), located on the Participatory Methods website.
URL:
Read “Generic Processes of Appreciative Inquiry,” located on The Center for Appreciative Inquiry website.
URL:
Watch “Appreciative Inquiry,” by Townsin (2013), located on the YouTube website.
URL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QzW22wwh1J4
Read “Ten Seed Technique,” by Jayakaran, located on the Dr. Ravi Jayakaran website.
URL:
http://ravijayakaran.com/home.htm
Read “Toolkit,” from the Asset-Based Community Development Institute, located on the DePaul University website.
URL:
https://resources.depaul.edu/abcd-institute/resources/Pages/tool-kit.aspx
Read “Open Questions,” by Goetzman, located on the Global Learning Partners, Inc. website.
URL:
https://online.nph.net/media/documents/TeachtheWord/open-questions.pdf
Read “Section 20: Implementing Photovoice in Your Community,” in Chapter 3 of the Community Tool Box website.
URL:
Read the Health in All Policies page of the American Public Health Association website, and download and read the PDF, “An Introduction to Health in All Policies: A Guide for State and Local Governments.”
URL:
https://www.apha.org/topics-and-issues/health-in-all-policies
Read “What You Need to Know About Health in All Policies,” located on the World Health Organization (WHO) website.
URL:
http://www.who.int/social_determinants/publications/health-policies-manual/key-messages-en.pdf
Explore the Best Practices in Global Health Missions website.
URL:
Explore the Global CHE Network website.
URL:
PUB-655 Benchmark – Participatory Learning and Action Tools Week 5 Assignment Rubric
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| PUB-655 | PUB-655-O500 | Benchmark – Participatory Learning and Action Tools | 200.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 70.0% | ||||||||
| Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) Tool Selected and Rationale | 10.0% | Participatory learning and action (PLA) tool and rationale are not present. | Participatory learning and action (PLA) tool and rationale indicate less than satisfactory search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Participatory learning and action (PLA) tool and rationale indicate adequate search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Participatory learning and action (PLA) tool and rationale indicate sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Participatory learning and action (PLA) tool and rationale indicate outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Participants Described and Cultural Insight Provided | 15.0% | Participants described and cultural insight are not present. | Participants described and cultural insight indicate less than satisfactory reflection. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Participants described and cultural insight indicate adequate reflection. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Participants described and cultural insight indicate sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Participants described and cultural insight indicate outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Challenges in Facilitation of the Tool | 15.0% | Challenges in facilitation of the tool are not present. | Challenges in facilitation of the tool are not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Challenges in facilitation of the tool are communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Challenges in facilitation of the tool are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Challenges in facilitation of the tool evidenced outstanding depth and are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Effectiveness of PLA Tool Related to Shared Decision Making and Building Capacity | 15.0% | Effectiveness of PLA tool related to shared decision making and building capacity is not present. | Effectiveness of PLA tool related to shared decision making and building capacity indicates less than satisfactory reflection. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Effectiveness of PLA tool related to shared decision making and building capacity indicates adequate reflection. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Effectiveness of PLA tool related to shared decision making and building capacity indicates sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Effectiveness of PLA tool related to shared decision making and building capacity indicates outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Health in All Policies (C:1.2) | 15.0% | Health in All Policies is not present. | Health in All Policies indicates less than satisfactory reflection. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Health in All Policies indicates adequate reflection. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Health in All Policies indicates sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Health in All Policies indicates outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% | ||||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |||
| Format | 10.0% | ||||||||
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | |||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Week 7 Assignment
Description
PUB-655 Benchmark – Faith-Based Organization Case Study Week 7 Assignment
A faith-based organization (FBO) is an organization that has a faith or religious component as its foundation and motivation for its work. The purpose of this assignment is to assess a faith-based organization and understand how it is unique. Faith-based organizations play an important role in global health given their holistic approach to serving the whole person and community, especially among vulnerable groups. Identify an example of a faith-based global health organization or ministry. Research the institution by reviewing annual reports, websites, papers, program documents, or conducting in-person or phone interviews. The organization should be at least 5 years old, work in multiple countries, and have an explicit faith-based foundation. Write a 1,000-1,250-word case study on the selected organization in which you assess the following aspects of the organization:
Mission
Assess how the mission of the organization aligns with its strategies and work.
- How does the mission of the organization match its strategies and activities in
serving vulnerable or low-income populations? - How does the organization integrate faith into its public health activities and
programs? Comment on how the organization balances its mission to share its
faith with its goal to improve health. - Are the values of the organization unique compared to other global health organizations?
Populations
Assess the populations served by the organization or ministry.
- How does the organization or ministry identify a population or individuals to
serve? - Does the organization have specific eligibility criteria?
Funding Mechanism
Assess the funding mechanism of the organization.
- What are the primary sources of support for the organization?
- Do the local populations being served by the organization help support the
organization (time, talents, or treasure)?
Partnerships
Assess the partnerships of the organization within public health to develop innovative and appropriate public health models.
- How does the organization work or partner with other organizations, churches, or groups in the communities where the organization works?
- Does the organization partner with governmental public health agencies?
- How could the organization improve the effectiveness of its “aid” and support in the communities within which it works?
General Requirements
You are required to cite at least SIX sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the discussion question criteria and public health content.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is not required.
While APA style is required, solid academic writing is expected as well, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
PLEASE make sure APA citation and permalink for articles are complete and correct.
PLEASE add the links/sites below to the reference list if you use any of these readings and make sure everything is in proper APA format.
https://apastyle.apa.org/learn/quick-guide-on-refe…
Read Chapters 3 and 10 in For the Love of God: Principles and Practice of Compassion in Missions.
URL:
Read “Evaluating the Strength of Faith: Potential Comparative Advantages of Faith-Based Organizations Providing Health Services in Sub-Saharan Africa,” by Lipsky from Public Administration and Development (2011).
URL:
Read “Measuring the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of Young Children in Resource-Limited Settings: A Review of the Existing Measures,” by Paltzer, Barker, and Witt, from Quality of Life Journal (2013).
URL:
Read “On Understanding Orphan Statistics,” located on the Christian Alliance for Orphans website.
URL:
Read “The Malawi Development Assessment Tool (MDAT): The Creation, Validation, and Reliability of a Tool to Assess Child Development in Rural African Settings,” by Gladstone, Lancaster, Umar, Nyirenda, Kayira, ven den Broek, and Smyth, from PLOS Medicine (2010).
URL:
http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1000273
Read “Every Child Alive: The Urgent Need to End Newborn Deaths,” by Devine and Taylor (2018), located on the UNICEF website.
URL:
Review the website for the Journal of Global Health (JoGH) collection covering maternal, neonatal and child health, Engaging Communities for Improving Mothers’ and Children’s Health: Reviewing the Evidence of Effectiveness in Resource-Constrained Settings, edited by Perry(2017). Download and read the following selection: “Comprehensive Review of the Evidence Regarding the Effectiveness of Community Based Primary Health Care in Improving Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health: 6. Strategies Used by Effective Projects” by Perry et al.
URL:
http://jogh.org/community-based-PHC.htm
Explore the Millions Saved page of the Center for Global Development website.
URL:
http://millionssaved.cgdev.org/
Explore the Christian Connections for International Health (CCIH) website.
URL:
Explore the Early Child Development page of the World Health Organization (WHO) website.
URL:
http://www.who.int/topics/early-child-development/en/
Explore the UNICEF website.
URL:
1 attachments
PUB-655 Benchmark – Faith-Based Organization Case Study Week 7 Assignment Rubric
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| PUB-655 | PUB-655-O500 | Benchmark – Faith-Based Organization Case Study | 250.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 70.0% | ||||||||
| Alignment Between the Mission and Strategies of the Organization (1.3) | 20.0% | Alignment between the mission and strategies of the organization is not present. | Alignment between the mission and strategies of the organization indicates less than satisfactory search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Alignment between the mission and strategies of the organization indicates adequate search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Alignment between the mission and strategies of the organization indicates sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Alignment between the mission and strategies of the organization indicates outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Populations Served by the Organization or Ministry | 15.0% | Populations served by the organization or ministry are not present. | Populations served by the organization or ministry indicate less than satisfactory search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Populations served by the organization or ministry indicate adequate search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Populations served by the organization or ministry indicate sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Populations served by the organization or ministry indicate outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Funding Mechanism of the Organization | 15.0% | Funding mechanism of the organization is not present. | Funding mechanism of the organization indicates less than satisfactory search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Funding mechanism of the organization indicates adequate search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Funding mechanism of the organization indicates sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Funding mechanism of the organization indicates outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Partnerships of the Organization Within Public Health to Develop Innovative and Appropriate Public Health Models (1.5) | 20.0% | Partnerships of the organization within public health to develop innovative and appropriate public health models are not present. | Partnerships of the organization within public health to develop innovative and appropriate public health models indicate less than satisfactory search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Partnerships of the organization within public health to develop innovative and appropriate public health models indicate adequate search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Partnerships of the organization within public health to develop innovative and appropriate public health models indicate sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Partnerships of the organization within public health to develop innovative and appropriate public health models indicate outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% | ||||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |||
| Format | 10.0% | ||||||||
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | |||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
PUB-655 International Perspectives in Community Health Week 8 Assignment
Question Description
PUB-655 Reflection on Systems-Based Approach Balanced With Personal Connection
PUB-655 Final Reflection: Systems Thinking With Small Changes Week 8 Assignment
A systems thinking approach is necessary when leading a public health initiative in a culturally and economically diverse community. On the other side, it is important to not ignore the individual aspects of health. Given the influence of political or economic systems, reflect on how focusing on broad social, political, and economic factors might blind us to the interpersonal aspects of health and the small individual impacts that can change a person’s world. In a 500-word reflection, comment on how a systems-based approach helps bridge gaps in providing necessary public health services but needs to be balanced with a personal holistic approach to transform communities. View the “Start Small, Change the World: Lori DiPrete Brown at TEDxUWMadison” video on YouTube to provide additional perspective.
Read Chapter 13 in For the Love of God: Principles and Practice of Compassion in Missions.
URL:
Read “Understanding Global Health and Development Partnerships: Perspectives From African and Global Health System Professionals,” by Barnes, Brown, and Harman, from Social Science and Medicine (2016).
URL:
Watch the “Partnership Development” video in the Participatory Community Development playlist, located in the Student Success Center. The video highlights important characteristics when building effective and sustainable relationships within a cross-cultural context and with faith-based entities, including the local church.
URL:
Read “Working Together For Global Health Goals: The United States Agency for International Development and Faith-Based Organizations,” by Powell, from Christian Journal for Global Health (2014).
URL:
http://journal.cjgh.org/index.php/cjgh/article/view/36/125
Read “Partnerships for Development: Perspectives From Global Health,” by the United Nations System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda (2013), located on the United Nations website.
URL:
http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/untaskteam_undf/thinkpieces/25_thinkpiece_health.pdf
Read “What Makes a Global Health Partnership Succeed?” by Saldinger (2014), from the Devex website.
URL:
https://www.devex.com/news/what-makes-a-global-health-partnership-succeed-84858
Watch “Start Small, Change the World: Lori DiPrete Brown at TEDxUWMadison,” by TEDx Talks (2014), located on the YouTube website.
URL:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HE9SypCzXU
Read “The 7 Standards,” located on the Standards of Excellence in Short-Term Mission website.
URL:
http://www.soe.org/explore/the-7-standards/
References
American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
PUB-655 Final Reflection: Systems Thinking With Small Changes Week 8 Assignment
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| PUB-655 | PUB-655-O500 | Final Reflection: Systems Thinking With Small Changes | 80.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) | Satisfactory (79.00%) | Good (87.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 70.0% | ||||||||
| Reflection on Systems-Based Approach Balanced With Personal Connection | 70.0% | Reflection on systems-based approach balanced with personal connection is not provided. | Reflection on systems-based approach balanced with personal connection indicates less than satisfactory search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is not communicated in the essay; the most important areas related to the topic are not addressed. | Reflection on systems-based approach balanced with personal connection indicates adequate search of the literature. Understanding of the topic is communicated in the essay; some of the most important areas related to the topic are addressed. | Reflection on systems-based approach balanced with personal connection indicates sufficient depth of content in the topic. The most important issues related to the topic are analyzed and addressed with supporting details. | Reflection on systems-based approach balanced with personal connection indicates outstanding depth. The most important issues and other related subtopics are addressed with supporting details. | |||
| Organization and Effectiveness | 20.0% | ||||||||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |||
| Format | 10.0% | ||||||||
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | |||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | |||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!
Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.
Expertise That Sets Us Apart
At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.
Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?
- Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
- Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
- Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
- Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
- Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
- Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.
Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?
Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!
Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey
Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.
Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!
