HQS-620 Project Management in Health Care Course Assignments & Examples Study Guide
HQS-620 Project Management in Health Care Course Description
This course examines the models and approaches of project management in health care settings. Learners demonstrate understanding of the project management process and its application to health care quality and safety initiatives. Learners gain skills to identify various stakeholders and roles, set goals and expectations, plan stakeholder engagement, and identify ways to mitigate obstacles in health care project management. Prerequisite: HQS-610.
HQS-620 Project Management in Health Care Course Discussions
Discussions Topic 1
HQS 620 Topic 1 DQ 1
Describe why project management is needed and explain the correlation between the nursing process and project management. Explain the value of establishing a framework for a project and provide an example in which a project management framework aided in the implementation of a new process
HQS 620 Topic 1 DQ 2
Review Figure 2.1 “The Five Steps of the Nursing Process” and Figure 2.2 “The Five Phases of Project Management” in Chapter 2 of the textbook. As you reflect on the five steps of the nursing process, describe how that process aligns with the concept of project management. Provide specific examples of the similarities between elements of Figure 2.1 and 2.2.
Discussions Topic 2
HQS 620 Topic 2 DQ 1
Describe three significant skills that are essential to have in the role as project manager. How do those skills align with the skills needed in the nursing profession? Provide a specific example to support your answer. Discuss one to two effective strategies to promote a high reliability organization.
HQS 620 Topic 2 DQ 2
As the project manager it is important to understand team dynamics. Describe how you would apply your leadership skills to move team members from the “storming” to “norming” stage of team development.
Discussions Topic 3
HQS 620 Topic 3 DQ 1
Describe the value of creating a statement of work (SOW) and project charter. What elements of these documents will be valuable in project management? Provide a specific example to support your answer.
HQS 620 Topic 3 DQ 2
How do key stakeholders and project team members differ and how are they the same? As the project manager, how do you ensure that the individuals that perform the work have a voice in the project development? Sources are below, can use sources 5 years old, no source from .com websites are allowed.
Each question gets one source Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse Sipes, C. (2019). Project management for the advanced practice nurse (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company. ISBN-13: 9780826161956 https://project-management.com/How-to-Write-the-Project-statement-of-work-sow/
Discussions Topic 4
HQS 620 Topic 4 DQ 1
Describe the relationship between project deliverables, goals, and outcomes. How are each important and what makes each different? Provide an example of each to support your position.
HQS 620 Topic 4 DQ 2
Assessment Description
How does a “shared mental model” or visual tool assist in the completion of a project? What elements are important to include in such a visual and why?
Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse
Sipes, C. (2019). Project management for the advanced practice nurse (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company. ISBN-13: 9780826161956
Discussions Topic 5
HQS 620 Topic 5 DQ 1
Assessment Description
The formula to calculate the communication channels is: n x (n – 1) / 2. N is the number of team members. Use the formula to determine the number of communication channels for a team of five members. Based on your calculation, what are the possible number of communication channels on the project team? Do you agree or disagree with the calculation? Should all stakeholders (even those not on the team) be included? Explain your rationale.
HQS 620 Topic 5 DQ 2
Identify three workplace environmental factors (i.e., organizational culture, staffing issues, regulatory requirements, etc.) and explain how they might adversely influence project communication.
For top-quality coursework writing help and assignment writing services, trust Reliable Papers. Our expert team delivers 100% original human-written work tailored to your needs. Contact us via phone, WhatsApp, or live chat for assistance today!
HQS-620 Project Management in Health Care Course Assignments
HQS 620 Grand Canyon University Week 2 Role of a Project Manager Case Study
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to determine the role of a project manager for a given case study. Use the “AHRQ Case Studies – Case Studies of Quality Improvement Initiatives” from the AHRQ website located in the Topic 2 topic Resources to complete this assignment. The case studies located in Chapter 8 of the textbook provide additional support for this assignment.
Select and read a case study from “AHRQ Case Studies – Case Studies of Quality Improvement Initiatives”. Once you have read the case study, in a 500-700-word paper, address the following:
- Describe the problem outlined in the case study.
- Discuss the project goals.
- Describe the role of the project manager addressing the following:
- Planning
- Organizing
- Budgeting
- Monitoring progress
- Managing reports and documentation
- Health care quality and safety initiatives
Prepare this role of a project manager assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
You can also read another study guide on nursing assignments for students from another post on HIM-615 Health Care Information Systems and Technology Course Assignments & Examples.
Resources
What Is a Project Manager? The Lead Role for Project Success
Read “What Is a Project Manager? The Lead Role for Project Success,” by Alexander (2019), located on the CIO website.
https://www.cio.com/article/3224865/what-is-a-project-manager-the-lead-role-for-project-success.html#tk.cio_rs
Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse
Read the “PM Roles and Responsibilities” section of Chapter 3 and Chapter 8 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice N
… Read More
View Resource
AHRQ Case Studies – Case Studies of Quality Improvement Initiatives
Explore the case studies on the AHRQ website in preparation for the Topic 2 assignment.
https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/quality-improvement/reports-and-case-studies/Case-Study_QI-Initiatives.html
Understanding the Complexity of Project Team Member Selection Through Agent-Based Modeling
Read “Understanding the Complexity of Project Team Member Selection Through Agent-Based Modeling,” by Hsu, Weng, Cui, and Rand, f
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.or
Case Study – Role of a Project Manager – Rubric
Collapse All
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | |
| HQS-620 | HQS-620-O500 | Case Study – Role of a Project Manager | 80.0 | |
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | 2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) | 3: Satisfactory (88.00%) |
| Content | 100.0% | |||
| Problem Outlined in Case Study | 7.0% | A description of the problem outlined in the case study is not present or is inaccurate. | A description of the problem outlined in the case study is present but lacks details or is incomplete. | A description of the problem outlined in the case study is present. |
| Discussion of Project Goals | 9.0% | A discussion of the project goals is not present or is inaccurate. | A discussion of the project goals is present but lacks details or is incomplete. | A discussion of the project goals is present. |
| Role of Project Manager in Planning | 9.0% | A description of the project managers role in planning is not present or is inappropriate. | A description of the project managers role in planning is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | A description of the project managers role in planning is present. |
| Role of Project Manager in Organizing | 9.0% | A description of the project managers role in organizing is not present or is inappropriate. | A description of the project managers role in organizing is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | A description of the project managers role in organizing is present. |
| Role of Project Manager in Budgeting | 9.0% | A description of the project managers role in budgeting is not present or is inappropriate. | A description of the project managers role in budgeting is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | A description of the project managers role in budgeting is present. |
| Role of Project Manager in Monitoring Progress | 9.0% | A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is not present or is inappropriate. | A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | A description of the project managers role in monitoring progress is present. |
| Role of Project Manager in Managing Reports and Documentation | 9.0% | A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is not present or is inappropriate. | A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | A description of the project managers role in managing reports and documentation is present. |
| Role of Project Manager in Health Care Quality and Safety Intiatives | 9.0% | A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives is not present or is inappropriate. | A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | A description of the project managers role in health care quality and safety initiatives is present. |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
| Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
Case Studies of Quality Improvement Initiatives
Over a five-year period the CAHPS RAND Team prepared a series of case studies of quality improvement initiatives undertaken by health plans and health care organizations. The studies provide practical examples of efforts to improve performance on various aspects of patients’ experience of health care as measured by the CAHPS surveys.
Each case study presents a short overview of the steps an organization took in its quality improvement initiative, followed by a more detailed description of specific actions involved in each step. The contents cover:
- Performance issues the organization identified from its CAHPS survey data.
- The strategy and action plan developed to improve its performance in the relevant areas.
- Its experiences in implementing its action plan.
- Resulting effects on its subsequent CAHPS survey results.
Improving Customer Service and Access in a Surgical Practice
This case study (PDF, 998 KB) describes a surgical practice’s successful implementation of a six-step plan to improve customer service and access for its patients. Published by RAND, August 2011.
Improving Hospital Inpatient Nursing Care
This case study (PDF, 604 KB) describes a large acute care hospital’s successful implementation of a six-step plan to improve the emotional support provided to inpatients by the registered nurses and the rest of the nursing staff. Published by RAND, April 2010.
Improving Performance for Health Plan Customer Service
This case study (PDF, 1.2 MB) focuses on the successful quality improvement methods employed by a health plan to improve customer service for its members. Published by RAND, August 2007. Review a summary of this report (PDF, 1.2 MB).
HQS 620 Grand Canyon Week 3 Project Charter Assignment: Des Moines Medical Center Diabetes Clinic Questions
The purpose of this assignment is to create a project charter with a work breakdown structure. Select one case study in Chapter 8 of the textbook from the following options: Case Study: Nurse Manager or Case Study: Informatics Nurse Specialist (INS). The case study you select in this topic will be used throughout the course to complete the assignments in Topics 3-7.
Review Figure 3.2 “Project Charter Content” from Chapter 3 in the textbook. Use this as a model to complete the “Project Charter Template”. You will complete the template as if you are the project manager. The project charter will serve as a statement of work for the case study you selected in Chapter 8 of the textbook.
This assignment requires one or two scholarly resources.
Prepare Part 2 of the template according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Case study from chapter 8
Case Study: Clinical Nurse Specialist
Cindy J. has just graduated from the master’s program with her CNS and is now preparing to set up her diabetes clinic in the Des Moines Medical Center. She will be working with a peer, Kathy, who has 7 years’ experience in independent practice in the clinic but now has asked Cindy to join her practice. Cindy is hesitant, telling Kathy she knows nothing about setting up and running a clinic and she has managed a group only of her own patients.
Kathy tells her not to worry, that she has management experience as a PM, which she gained while in another practice with someone who had a lot of project management experience, and that she will help her using project management tools she also used in the past. Cindy also keeps the course text she used in her practicum that has examples of project management tools to use with examples of how to use each of them.
Kathy tells Cindy that first she will need to put together a plan for how she wants the clinic to run and suggests that she use a Gantt chart (Chapter 4, Planning: Project Management—Phase 2), which will define the days, who will be on what days for all of the clinic employees, and all of the different tasks that will be needed in the clinic. Later, after she has completed the chart and assigned different tasks, she will formalize content from the chart into a weekly schedule, which will be used permanently after the clinic is set up.
Next she will need to develop a scope document (Chapter 3, De-sign/Initiation: Project Management—Phase 1), which will define exactly what they will do and not do in the clinic, and a charter (Chapter 3, De-sign/Initiation: Project Management—Phase 1) for the clinic, which will define the mission, levels of authority, and other key stakeholders.
She will also need to develop a risk management plan (Chapter 4, Planning: Project Management—Phase 2), which will outline how risks will be managed and Chapter 8 Case Studies: Applying Project Management Concepts and Tools 199strategies for mitigating risks, and a responsibility matrix (Chapter 4, Planning: Project Management—Phase 2), which will outline owners of the different responsibilities in the clinic.
Kathy tells Cindy that she will manage the budget for now until Cindy gets up to speed and then show her how to set up and manage the budget (Chapter 4, Planning: Project Management—Phase 2). Kathy has already set up a communication plan but asks Cindy to review and revise it now that the clinic is growing (Chapter 5, Implementation/Execution—Phase 3).
Cindy will need to set up status meetings after first determining how often they will be needed at the format that should be used (Chapter 5, Implementation/Execution—Phase 3), also to determine how they will monitor and control all that is happening in the new clinic (Chapter 6, Monitoring and Controlling: Project Management—Phase 4). She will also need to start thinking about the project closing process (Chapter 7, Closing the Project—Phase 5).
Source:
Figure 3.2 reference – project charter content— this is only reference. Don’t need to fill this out!!
## will be an attached document. Would not upload here.
Other documents will be uploaded separately.
Project Charter Template
Part 1: A project charter is an essential element in the design phase of project management. The project charter serves as a framework and outlines key details of the project. Ultimately, the project charter will give authority to the project manager once key stakeholders and leadership sign off. Complete the template below based on the running case study in the Course Materials.
| Project Title: | |||
| Project Start Date: Projected Finish Date: | |||
| Project Manager:(include name and e-mail)
|
|||
| Background/Need/Justification:
|
|||
| Project Objective(s):
|
|||
| Applicable Industry Standards:
|
|||
| Budget Information:
|
|||
| Deliverables:
|
|||
| Risks and/or Potential Issues:
|
|||
| Project Timeline: | |||
| Key milestones | Team Member Responsible | Planned Target Date | Actual Date |
| Project Team: Roles and Responsibilities: | |||
| Position | Position | Position | Position |
| Approval/Review Committee: | |||
| Name and Signature | Role | Position | Contact Information |
Part 2: In 500-750 words, address the following:
- Summarize the steps involved in initiating and designing a project in a health care setting.
- Describe the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation. What is unique about this relative to health care quality and safety?
- Explain how authority gradients influenceteamwork and patient safety in a health care setting.
- Research and describe two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities in a health care setting.
- Describe one benefit and one challenge for each researchedstrategy.
References
This assignment requires one or two scholarly resources. Cite these references below.
Rubric HQS 620 Project Charter Assignment – Rubric
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| HQS-620 | HQS-620-O500 | Project Charter Template | 100.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | 2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) | 3: Satisfactory (88.00%) | 4: Good (92.00%) | 5: Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Project Charter Template | 25.0% | The Project Charter Template is not complete or is incorrect. | The Project Charter Template is complete but lacks detail or is incomplete. | The Project Charter Template is present. | The Project Charter Template is present and includes relevant details. | The Project Charter Template is present and includes substantial relevant details. | |||
| Summary | 9.0% | A summary of the steps involved in initiating and designing a project is not present or is inappropriate. | A summary of the steps involved in initiating and designing a project is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | A summary of the steps involved in initiating and designing a project is present. | A summary of the steps involved in initiating and designing a project is present and detailed. | A summary of the steps involved in initiating and designing a project is present and thorough. | |||
| Influence of Authority Gradients on Team Selection and Formulation | 9.0% | An explanation of the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation is not present. | An explanation of the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | An explanation of the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation is present. | An explanation of the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation is present and detailed. | An explanation of the influence of authority gradients on team selection and formulation is present and thorough. | |||
| Influence of Authority Gradients on Teamwork and Patient Safety | 9.0% | An explanation of how authority gradients influence teamwork and patient safety is not present. | An explanation of how authority gradients influence teamwork and patient safety is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | An explanation of how authority gradients influence teamwork and patient safety is present. | An explanation of how authority gradients influence teamwork and patient safety is present and detailed. | An explanation of how authority gradients influence teamwork and patient safety is present and thorough. | |||
| Identifying and Managing Overlap | 9.0% | A description of two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities is not present. | A description of two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | A description of two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities is present. | A description of two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities is present and detailed. | A description of two strategies for identifying and managing overlap in team member roles and accountabilities is present and thorough. | |||
| Benefits and Challenges of Strategies | 9.0% | One benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy is not present or is incomplete. | One benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | One benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy is present. | One benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy is present and detailed. | One benefit and one challenge for each researched strategy is present and thorough. | |||
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 7.0% | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. | Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | |||
| Argument Logic and Construction | 8.0% | Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. | Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. | Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. | Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. | Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | |||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |||
| Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 5.0% | Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | |||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Grand Canyon University HQS-620 Building a Project Schedule Assignment Week 4
Assessment Description
The purpose of this HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule assignment is to create a Gantt chart to outline the tasks and schedule for the case study you selected in the Class Resources. Recall that you created a project charter as the Topic 3 assignment. Review the feedback you received from your instructor for that assignment.
Part 1: Use the feedback from the Topic 3 assignment to create a HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Gantt chart showing the tasks and the time in which tasks should be completed for the project.To complete this assignment, access the Simple Gantt Chart located on the Microsoft Office website at: https://templates.office.com/en-us/simple-gantt-chart-tm16400962
Part 2: Create a 250-500-word HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule summary addressing the following:
- What is the value of a work breakdown structure?
- What is the importance of monitoring critical success factors?
Submit both the HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Gantt chart and the summary to the dropbox.
Prepare the Part 2 summary according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
You are required to submit this HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Resources
Collapse All
A Visual Management Tool for Program Planning, Project Management and Evaluation in Paediatric Health Care
Read “A Visual Management Tool for Program Planning, Project Management and Evaluation in Paediatric Health Care,” by Glegg, Ryce
… Read More
https://www-sciencedirect-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/science/article/pii/S0149718918300120
Project Management: Case Studies
Read “Project Planning” in Project Management: Case Studies.
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat01182a&AN=gcu.317842&site=eds-live&scope=site
Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse
Read Chapter 4 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.
View Resource
The Art of Project Planning
Read “The Art of Project Planning,” by Stolovitsky, from Genius Inside (2014).
https://www.projectsmart.co.uk/white-papers/art-of-project-planning.pdf
What Is a Gantt Chart?
Read “What Is a Gantt Chart” located on the Association for Project Management website (2019).
https://www.apm.org.uk/resources/find-a-resource/gantt-chart/
Step by Step Guide to Implement Quality Improvement
Read “Step by Step Guide to Implement Quality Improvement,” from the Center for Public Health Quality (CPHQ), located on the Asso
… Read More
HQS 620 Building a Project Schedule Rubric
Collapse All
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| HQS-620 | HQS-620-O500 | Building a Project Schedule | 100.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | 2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) | 3: Satisfactory (88.00%) | 4: Good (92.00%) | 5: Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Gantt Chart Alignment of Tasks | 25.0% | A Gantt Chart is not present. | A Gantt Chart is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. | A Gantt Chart is present. | A Gantt Chart is present and somewhat aligns with the tasks on the Project Charter. | A Gantt Chart is present and thoroughly aligns with the tasks on the Project Charter. | |||
| Gantt Chart Alignment of Deadlines | 25.0% | Deadlines on the Gantt Chart are not present. | Deadlines on the Gantt Chart are present, but lack details or are incomplete. | Deadlines on the Gantt Chart are present. | Deadlines on the Gantt Chart are present and somewhat align to the deadlines on the Project Charter. | Deadlines on the Gantt Chart are present and thoroughly align to the deadlines on the Project Charter. | |||
| Presentation | 11.0% | The submission is incoherent, contains major inconsistencies, is not presented effectively, or is missing a substantial amount of the required elements. | The submission is ineffective, contains multiple inconsistencies, or is missing a few of the required elements. | The submission contains minor inconsistencies that are not overly distracting. Presentation contains a majority of the required elements. | The submission is presented effectively and contains all of the required elements. | The submission is presented effectively and all of the required elements creatively contribute to the presentation of the concepts. | |||
| Synthesis | 12.0% | Synthesis does not successfully integrate ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. The combination of elements is not logical and/or verifiable. | Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects inadequately. The combination of elements is not logical. | Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects but does not adequately form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements at times is confusing. | Synthesis integrates ideas, images, or objects to form a cohesive whole. Combination of elements is logical and justified. | Synthesis is unique. Synthesis shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together. The combination of elements is verified. | |||
| Value of a Work Breakdown Structure | 11.0% | An explanation of the value of a work breakdown structure is not present. | An explanation of the value of a work breakdown structure is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete. | An explanation of the value of a work breakdown structure is present. | An explanation of the value of a work breakdown structure is present and detailed. | An explanation of the value of a work breakdown structure is present and thorough. | |||
| Critical Success Factors | 11.0% | An explanation of the importance of monitoring critical success factors is not present. | An explanation of the importance of monitoring critical success factors is present, but lacks detail or is incomplete. | An explanation of the importance of monitoring critical success factors is present. | An explanation of the importance of monitoring critical success factors is present and detailed. | An explanation of the importance of monitoring critical success factors is present and thorough. | |||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. | Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. | Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. | |||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Create a Project Schedule in this worksheet
| Create a Project Schedule in this worksheet. Enter title of this project in cell B1. Information about how to use this worksheet, including instructions for screen readers and the author of this workbook is in the About worksheet. Continue navigating down column A to hear further instructions. |
PROJECT TITLE | |||||
| Enter Company Name in cell B2. | Company Name | |||||
| Enter the name of the Project Lead in cell B3. Enter the Project Start date in cell E3. Pooject Start: label is in cell C3. | Project Lead | Project Start: | Wed, 7/10/2024 | |||
| The Display Week in cell E4 represents the starting week to display in the project schedule in cell I4. The project start date is considered Week 1. To change the display week, simply enter a new week number in cell E4. The starting date for each week, starting with the display week from cell E4, starts in cell I4 and is auto calculated. There are 8 weeks represented in this view from cell I4 through cell BF4. You should not modify these cells. Display Week: label is in cell C4. |
Display Week: | 1 | ||||
| Cells I5 through BL5 contain the day number for the week represented in the cell block above each date cell and are auto calculated. You should not modify these cells. Today’s date is outlined in Red (hex #AD3815) from today’s date in row 5 through the entire date column to the end of the project schedule. |
||||||
| This row contains headers for the project schedule that follows below them. Navigate from B6 through BL 6 to hear the content. The first letter of each day of the week for the date above that heading, starts in cell I6 and continues through cell BL6. All project timeline charting is auto generated based on the start and end dates entered, using conditional formats. Do not modify content in cells within columns after column I starting with cell I7. |
TASK | ASSIGNED TO |
PROGRESS | START | END | |
| Cell B8 contains the Phase 1 sample title. Enter a new Title in cell B8. Enter a name to assign the phase to, if it applies for your project, in cell C8. Enter Progress for the entire phase, if it applies for your project, in cell D8. Enter the start and end dates for the entire phase, if it applies for your project, in cells E8 and F8. The Gantt chart will automatically fill in the appropriate dates and shade according to the progress entered. To delete the phase and work only from tasks, simply delete this row. |
Phase 1 Title | |||||
| Cell B9 contains the sample task “Task 1.” Enter a new task name in cell B9. Enter a person to assign the task to in cell C9. Enter progres of the task in cell D9. A progress bar appears in the cell and is shaded according to the number in the cell. For example, 50 percent progress would shade half of the cell. Enter task start date in cell E9. Enter task end date in cell F9. A status bar shaded for the dates entered appears in blocks starting from cell I9 through BL9. |
Task 1 | Name | 50% | 7/10/24 | 7/13/24 | |
| Rows 10 through 13 repeat the pattern from row 9. Repeat the instructions from cell A9 for all task rows in this worksheet. Overwrite any sample data. A sample of another phase starts in cell A14. Continue entering tasks in cells A10 through A13 or go to cell A14 to learn more. |
Task 2 | 60% | 7/13/24 | 7/15/24 | ||
| Task 3 | 50% | 7/15/24 | 7/19/24 | |||
| Task 4 | 25% | 7/19/24 | 7/24/24 | |||
| Task 5 | 7/14/24 | 7/16/24 | ||||
| The cell at right contains the Phase 2 sample title. You can create a new phase at any time within column B. This project schedule does not require phases. To remove the phase, simply delete the row. To create a new phase block in this row, enter a new Title in cell at right. To continue adding tasks to the phase above, enter a new row above this one and fill in the task data as in cell A9’s instruction. Update the Phase details in cell at right based on cell A8’s instruction. Continue navigating down column A cells to learn more. If you haven’t added any new rows in this worksheet, you will find 2 additional sample phase blocks have been created for you in cells B20 and B26. Otherwise, navigate through column A cells to find the additional blocks. Repeat the instructions from cells A8 and A9 whenever you need to. |
Phase 2 Title | |||||
| Task 1 | 50% | 7/15/24 | 7/19/24 | |||
| Task 2 | 50% | 7/17/24 | 7/22/24 | |||
| Task 3 | 7/22/24 | 7/25/24 | ||||
| Task 4 | 7/22/24 | 7/24/24 | ||||
| Task 5 | 7/22/24 | 7/25/24 | ||||
| Sample phase title block | Phase 3 Title | |||||
| Task 1 | 7/25/24 | 7/30/24 | ||||
| Task 2 | 7/31/24 | 8/4/24 | ||||
| Task 3 | 8/5/24 | 8/10/24 | ||||
| Task 4 | 8/11/24 | 8/15/24 | ||||
| Task 5 | 8/5/24 | 8/9/24 | ||||
| Sample phase title block | Phase 4 Title | |||||
| Task 1 | date | date | ||||
| Task 2 | date | date | ||||
| Task 3 | date | date | ||||
| Task 4 | date | date | ||||
| Task 5 | date | date | ||||
| This is an empty row | ||||||
| This row marks the end of the Project Schedule. DO NOT enter anything in this row. Insert new rows ABOVE this one to continue building out your Project Schedule. |
Insert new rows ABOVE this one | |||||
Grand Canyon University HQS 620 Communication Plan Assignment Week 5
Assessment Description
The purpose of this HQS 620 Communication Plan assignment is to create a communication plan for stakeholders. This communication plan is in relation to the case study you selected in the Class Resources.
Complete the “Plan Template” located in the topic Resources folder.
This Communication Plan assignment requires two or three scholarly resources.
While APA style is not required for the body of this HQS 620 Communication Plan assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
Prepare Part 2 of the template according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
You are required to submit this HQS 620 Communication Plan assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Resources
Collapse All
What Drives Continuous Improvement Project Success in Healthcare?
Read “What Drives Continuous Improvement Project Success in Healthcare?” by Stelson, Hille, Eseonu, and Doolen, from Internat
… Read More
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2016-0035/full/pdf?title=what-drives-continuous-improvement-project-success-in-healthcare
Plan Template
Utilize the ” Plan Template” to complete the topic assignment.
HQS-620-RS-PlanTemplate.docx
Project Change Stakeholder
Read “Project Change Stakeholder ,” by Butt, Naaranoja, and Savolainen, from International Jour
… Read More
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786316300850
Health Information Privacy
Explore the “Health Information Privacy” section on the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services website.
Project Management for Project Managers Based on the PMBOK
Read “Project Management for Project Managers Based on the PMBOK,” by Jainendrakumar, from PM World Journal
… Read More
https://pmworldlibrary.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/pmwj38-Sep2015-Jainendrakumar-project-communication-management-advisory.pdf
Email in Project Management: A Bane or a Blessing?
Read “Email in Project Management: A Bane or a Blessing?” by Smit, Bond-Barnard, Steyn, and Fabris-Rotelli, from
… Read More
https://search-proquest-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/docview/1928615026?accountid=7374
Effective Management: A Key to Stakeholder Relationship Management in Project-Based Organizations
Read “Effective Management: A Key to Stakeholder Relationship Management in Project-Based Organizations,” by Rajhan
… Read More
Communication Plan Template
Part 1: Communication among stakeholders is a crucial aspect of successful project management. Complete the template below to plan out the details of communicating throughout the project.
| Description
(What type of communication needs to take place, i.e., team meeting?) |
Stakeholders Involved
(Who should be included in the development of this communication?) |
Frequency
(How often will the communication occur?) |
Stakeholder’s Preferred Method of Communication
(Meeting, newsletter, etc.) |
Audience
(Who is the recipient of the communication?) |
Project Member
(Who is responsible for the communication?) |
| Interpersonal communication | Project manager and business partner |
Two times per week |
Meeting | Project managers | Project manager |
| Team meeting | Team members, business partner, and project manager |
Three times in two weeks |
Video conferencing | Project members | Project manager |
| Small group communication | Project team members and executives |
Four times in three weeks |
E-mails | Project members | Project manager |
| Team meeting | Resource managers, executives, and team members | Five times a month | Meeting | Project members | Project manager |
| Team meeting | Team members and investors | Four times a month | Meeting | Project members | Project manager |
| Interpersonal communication | Project managers, business partners, and executives | Three times after two weeks | Telephone conversation | Project managers | Project manager |
| Team meeting | Team members, project managers, and business partners | Two times a week | Meeting | Project members | Project manager |
HQS 620 Communication Plan – Rubric
Collapse All
Management Plan Template
30 points
Criteria Description
Management Plan Template
- 5: Excellent
30 points
HQS-620 Management Plan Template is present and thorough. It includes substantial relevant details.
- 4: Good
27.6 points
Management Plan Template is present and includes relevant details.
- 3: Satisfactory
26.4 points
Management Plan Template is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
24 points
Management Plan Template is present but is incomplete or incorrect.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
HQS-620 Communication Management Plan Template is not present.
Cycle
20 points
Criteria Description
Cycle
- 5: Excellent
20 points
A description and analysis of the elements in the communication cycle is present and thorough.
- 4: Good
18.4 points
A description and analysis of the elements in the communication cycle is present and detailed.
- 3: Satisfactory
17.6 points
A description and analysis of the elements in the communication cycle is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
16 points
A description and analysis of the elements in the communication cycle is present but lack details or are incomplete.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description and analysis of the elements in the communication cycle is not present.
strategies
20 points
Criteria Description
strategies
- 5: Excellent
20 points
A description of three communication strategies and how they can improve communication to support team functioning while meeting the preferences of stakeholders is present and through.
- 4: Good
18.4 points
A description of three communication strategies and how they can improve communication to support team functioning while meeting the preferences of stakeholders is present and detailed.
- 3: Satisfactory
17.6 points
A description of three communication strategies and how they can improve communication to support team functioning while meeting the preferences of stakeholders is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
16 points
A description of three communication strategies and how they can improve communication to support team functioning while meeting the preferences of stakeholders is present but is incomplete or incorrect.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of three communication strategies and how they can improve communication to support team functioning while meeting the preferences of stakeholders is not present.
HQS 620 Communication Plan Thesis Development and Purpose
7 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
- 5: Excellent
7 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
- 4: Good
6.44 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
- 3: Satisfactory
6.16 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.6 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
HQS 620 Communication Plan Argument Logic and Construction
8 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
- 5: Excellent
8 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
- 4: Good
7.36 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
- 3: Satisfactory
7.04 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.4 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
HQS 620 Communication Plan Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
HQS 620 Communication Plan Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
All format elements are correct.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
HQS 620 Communication Plan Documentation of Sources
5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
HQS 620 Grand Canyon University Week 6 Implementation Checklist Template Assignment
Assessment Description
The purpose of this HQS 620 Project Management Implementation Checklist assignment is to outline an implementation strategy for the goals in the previous phases of project management for the case study you selected in the course materials. I’m assuming from the work u submitted last week.
Use the “Implementation Checklist Template” located in the topic Resources folder to complete this assignment.
Prepare Part 2 of the template according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
You are required to submit this Project Management Implementation Checklist assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Project Management Implementation Checklist Template
Part 1: An implementation checklist can keep a project on track by outlining specific activities, which stakeholder is responsible, and by planning a due date. Fill in the implementation checklist below for the case study.
| Step | Activity | Stakeholder Responsibility | Due Date |
Part 2: In 250-500 words, address the following:
- Explain the importance of an implementation checklist.
- Explain the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management.
Project Management Implementation Checklist – Rubric
Collapse All
Implementation Checklist Template
30 points
Criteria Description
Implementation Checklist Template
- 5: Excellent
30 points
Implementation Checklist Template is present and thorough. It includes substantial relevant details.
- 4: Good
27.6 points
Implementation Checklist Template is present and includes relevant details.
- 3: Satisfactory
26.4 points
Implementation Checklist Template is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
24 points
Implementation Checklist Template is present but is incomplete or incorrect.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Implementation Checklist Template is not present.
Importance of Project Management Implementation Checklist Checklist
20 points
Criteria Description
Importance of Implementation Checklist
- 5: Excellent
20 points
An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present and thorough.
- 4: Good
18.4 points
An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present and detailed.
- 3: Satisfactory
17.6 points
An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
16 points
An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is present but is incomplete or incorrect.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
An explanation of the importance of an implementation checklist is not present.
Addressing Change Management
20 points
Criteria Description
Addressing Change Management
- 5: Excellent
20 points
An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present and thorough.
- 4: Good
18.4 points
An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present and detailed.
- 3: Satisfactory
17.6 points
An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
16 points
An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is present but is incomplete or incorrect.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
An explanation of the importance of addressing change management in the implementation phase of project management is not present.
Project Management Implementation Checklist Thesis Development and Purpose
7 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
- 5: Excellent
7 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
- 4: Good
6.44 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
- 3: Satisfactory
6.16 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.6 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
8 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
- 5: Excellent
8 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
- 4: Good
7.36 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
- 3: Satisfactory
7.04 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.4 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Project Management Implementation Checklist Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Project Management Implementation Checklist Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
All format elements are correct.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Project Management Implementation Checklist Resources
Collapse All
Implementation Checklist Template
Utilize the “Implementation Checklist Template” to complete the topic assignment.
HQS-620-RS-ImplementationChecklist.docx
Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse
Review Chapter 4 and Read Chapter 5 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.
View Resource
Quality Management Systems Implementation Compared With Organizational Maturity in Hospital
Read “Quality Management Systems Implementation Compared With Organizational Maturity in Hospital,” by Moradi, Jafari, Maleki, Na
Grand Canyon University HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Week 7
Assessment Description
The purpose of this HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment is to use a Fishbone Diagram to complete a root cause analysis. Identify a problem in your practice environment and utilize the “Fishbone Analysis Diagram Template” to work through the problem to the root cause. Refer to “Problem-Solving Your Fishbone Into a Wishbone,” located in the topic Resources to complete this assignment.
While APA style is not required for Part 1, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
Prepare Part 2 of the template according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
You are required to submit this HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Resources
Collapse All
Problem-Solving Your Fishbone Into a Wishbone
Read “Problem-Solving Your Fishbone Into a Wishbone,” located on the Vanguard s website (2018) for successful completion of the assignment/
Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse
Read Chapter 6 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.
View Resource
Fishbone Analysis Diagram Template
Utilize the “Fishbone Analysis Diagram Template” to complete the topic assignment.
HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment – Rubric
Collapse All
Fishbone Diagram
40 points
Criteria Description
Fishbone Diagram
- 5: Excellent
40 points
The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is present and includes substantial relevant details.
- 4: Good
36.8 points
The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is present and includes relevant details.
- 3: Satisfactory
35.2 points
The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
32 points
The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is complete but lacks detail or is incomplete.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The Fishbone Analysis Diagram Assignment is not complete or is incorrect.
Progress Tracking in Project Management
15 points
Criteria Description
Progress Tracking in Project Management
- 5: Excellent
15 points
A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present and thorough.
- 4: Good
13.8 points
A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present and detailed.
- 3: Satisfactory
13.2 points
A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
12 points
A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present back lacks detail or is incomplete.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is not present.
Implementing Project Adjustments
15 points
Criteria Description
Implementing Project Adjustments
- 5: Excellent
15 points
A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present and thorough.
- 4: Good
13.8 points
A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present and detailed.
- 3: Satisfactory
13.2 points
A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
12 points
A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present back lacks detail or is incomplete.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is not present.
HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Thesis Development and Purpose
7 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
- 5: Excellent
7 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
- 4: Good
6.44 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
- 3: Satisfactory
6.16 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.6 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Argument Logic and Construction
8 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
- 5: Excellent
8 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
- 4: Good
7.36 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
- 3: Satisfactory
7.04 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.4 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
All format elements are correct.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
HQS-620 Project Management Methodologies Assignment
Assessment Description
The goal of this assignment is to compare and contrast different project management methodologies that can be used in health care project management. Conduct your own research to compare and contrast the methodologies of Lean/Six Sigma, Waterfall, PSDA, and Agile. Choose another project management methodology of your choice.
To finish the assignment, use the HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies template.
This assignment necessitates the use of two to three scholarly resources.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and source documentation should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the Student Success Center’s APA Style Guide.
You are required to submit this HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Attachments
Resources
Collapse All
9 of the Most Popular Project Management Methodologies Made Simple
Read “9 of the Most Popular Project Management Methodologies Made Simple,” by Aston, located on the Digital Project Manager website
Hybrid Project Management Has Role in Health Care Today
Read “Hybrid Project Management Has Role in Health Care Today,” by Hakim, from Physician Leadership Journal (2019).
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.579714743&site=eds-live&scope=site
HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies: Case Studies
Read “Project Management Methodologies” in Project Management: Case Studies.
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cat01182a&AN=gcu.317842&site=eds-live&scope=site
How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project
Read “How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project,” by Silver et al., from American Society of Nephrology (2016).
https://cjasn.asnjournals.org/content/clinjasn/11/5/893.full.pdf
Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse
Read Chapters 1 and 2 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.
View Resource
A Health Care Project Management Office’s Strategies for Continual Change and Continuous Improvement
Read “A Health Care Project Management Office’s Strategies for Continual Change and Continuous Improvement,” by Tremblay Aubry, R
… Read More
HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies
https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00126450-201801000-00002&D=ovft&PDF=y
Top Project Management Methodologies 2019
View “Top Project Management Methodologies 2019,” from KnowledgeHut, located on YouTube.
Project Management for Healthcare
Read the “Safety” and “Regulatory” sections of Chapter 2 in “Project Management for Healthcare,” by Shirley (2011
… Read More
https://lopes.idm.oclc.or
HQS-620 Project Management Methodologies Template
Directions: Research information about the project management methodologies listed below to complete the table. In addition, conduct your own research on other project management methodologies and include this in the table below. The assignment requires a minimum of two or three scholarly resources. A resource may be used more than once in the last column of the template.
HQS-620 Project Management Methodologies Template
Directions: Research information about the project management methodologies listed below to complete the table. In addition, conduct your own research on other project management methodologies and include this in the table below. The assignment requires a minimum of two or three scholarly resources. A resource may be used more than once in the last column of the template.
| Project Management Methodology | Description | Pros | Cons | Example of when this methodology would be appropriate | Scholarly Resource |
| Lean/Six Sigma
|
|||||
| Waterfall
|
|||||
| PDSA
|
|||||
| Agile
|
|||||
| Choose an additional project management methodology here |
HQS 620 Project Management Methodologies Rubric
Collapse All
| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points | ||||||
| HQS-620 | HQS-620-O500 | Project Management Methodologies | 80.0 | ||||||
| Criteria | Percentage | 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | 2: Less Than Satisfactory (80.00%) | 3: Satisfactory (88.00%) | 4: Good (92.00%) | 5: Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 100.0% | ||||||||
| Lean/Six Sigma | 18.0% | The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are not present. | The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present but lack details or are incomplete. | The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present. | The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present and detailed. | The required elements for Lean/Six Sigma are present and thorough. | |||
| Waterfall | 18.0% | The required elements for Waterfall are not present. | The required elements for Waterfall are present but lack details or are incomplete. | The required elements for Waterfall are present. | The required elements for Waterfall are present and detailed. | The required elements for Waterfall are present and thorough. | |||
| PDSA | 18.0% | The required elements for PDSA are not present. | The required elements for PDSA are present but lack details or are incomplete. | The required elements for PDSA are present. | The required elements for PDSA are present and detailed. | The required elements for PDSA are present and thorough. | |||
| Agile | 18.0% | The required elements for Agile are not present. | The required elements for Agile are present but lack details or are incomplete. | The required elements for Agile are present. | The required elements for Agile are present and detailed. | The required elements for Agile are present and thorough. | |||
| Additional Project Management Methodology | 18.0% | The required elements for the selected methodology are not present. | The required elements for the selected methodology are present but lack details or are incomplete. | The required elements for the selected methodology are present. | The required elements for the selected methodology are present and detailed. | The required elements for the selected methodology are present and thorough. | |||
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 5.0% | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |||
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 5.0% | Sources are not documented. | Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. | Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | |||
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Make Your Nursing Academic Journey Truly Fulfilling with Our Expert Nursing Assignment Writing Help!
Feeling overwhelmed by the demands of your nursing essays and assignments? Don’t let stress derail your academic success. ReliablePapers.com is your partner in navigating the challenges of nursing studies. Our reliable nursing paper writing services are tailored to lighten your assignment load and ensure your journey in nursing education is not just manageable, but truly fulfilling.
Expertise That Sets Us Apart
At ReliablePapers.com, we understand the unique struggles faced by nursing students. That’s why we’ve assembled a team of seasoned nursing writers who are not only experts in their field but also passionate about helping students succeed. Our writers bring years of academic writing experience and a deep understanding of nursing topics, ensuring that your papers are meticulously crafted to meet the highest standards.
Why Choose ReliablePapers.com for Your Nursing Essays?
- Experienced Nursing Writers: Our team comprises experienced nursing professionals who are dedicated to delivering top-quality nursing papers tailored to your requirements.
- Direct Communication: You’ll have direct communication with your assigned writer, allowing for seamless collaboration and transparency throughout the writing process.
- Affordable Prices: We understand the financial constraints of students, which is why we offer competitive prices starting at just $10 per page.
- Guaranteed Originality: Plagiarism is a strict no-no at ReliablePapers.com. We guarantee 100% original, custom-made papers that reflect your unique voice and understanding.
- Timely Support: With our fast turnaround times and dedicated support team, you can rest assured that your papers will be delivered on time, every time.
- Hassle-Free Ordering: Ordering a custom nursing paper from ReliablePapers.com is quick and easy. Simply provide your details, and our experts will take care of the rest.
Why Struggle When Help Is Just a Click Away?
Don’t let nursing assignments overwhelm you. With ReliablePapers.com’s nursing writing help services, you can reclaim your time, achieve top grades, and stay ahead of the curve. Order your custom nursing paper today and unlock your full potential with ReliablePapers.com!
Don’t Let Stress Define Your Nursing Academic Journey
Place your order with ReliablePapers.com today and experience the difference firsthand. Whether you need to buy nursing research papers, get cheap nursing papers, or professional nursing coursework help, we’ve got you covered. Trust us with your nursing assignments, and let us help you succeed in your nursing studies.
Hire an Expert Paper Writer on Any Subject, Any Topic, Any Deadline! Submit your paper instructions by placing your order here to get started!
